I think a better question would be "how many devices are capable of running the Java runtime environment?" I am assuming this is more of a philosophical question like, "Is God dead?" or "is kindness dead in this world?" As the department suggests, it may also be resting. Be sure to feed and water your Java regularly, and check it for ticks.
Reality is: AI lets cowardly judges shift responsibility to the technology sector allowing good ol' racist data to be used by arresting officers because technology is the future. Such wow!
Even then this thing is probably just "doing its best". Think about it this way, if you think it's better to have this installed in a critical meeting room than not for reasons of security, and that is exactly what will happen, people will come prepared. Such systems don't know if you're lying, they look at the physiological changes and historical patterns in response to your actions. Okay, let's say if somebody asks you is your name Steve, and it says so on your ID, you might reason, "I don't know? What if I'm named Ron who is in a hospital in a coma for 40 years." Boom, system just showed patterns of hesitation and creative thinking, clearly this person is lying and his name is not John. Peoplr will come prepared and genuinely panick when they have 4 of a kind aces because some maniac called 4Aces hacked their credit cards, maxed them out, insurance didn't cover it all and now they are scared. The machine will grin and go all in, "He's bluffing, he's scared." Aw fuck.
You make the assumption that we understand what we are doing. What are you going to do when some super virus mutates and only people with Toxoplasma gondii parasite in their brains survive it? Clearly all parasites are bad, why? Because it's right there in their names, "parasites". The conversation always comes to changing eye or hair color when talking about gene editing (you read those stories right? I know me too) but do you realize how profound a change that is even to simply change someone into a blonde from a brunette? You're talking about a baby who is the product of millions of years of fighting to see which genes even survive to get their protein and at the end of the battle you're just going to Dumbledore the victor? Hell there might be that single moment where this one person just digs green eyes, but because of your editing they never fall for each other and that one meiosis which would have created the first ebola immune baby never comes to be. Not to mention the psychological effects. While we have something called surgical addiction, you want to allow gene editing on humans? How long until a baby is killed because the parents thought it didn't turn out the way they wanted and they wanted a new one to edit properly this time and they blame the doctor? Fine you say, lets just focus on itemizing the pros and cons, okay. Some of the cons include 7 billion unedited humans. Accidents beyond our current understanding, (read whoops, sorry about the tumor) people must live with much like accidently getting their babies penis entirely chopped off during circumcision, but with a whole new fuck up vector. A whole new level of discrimination (see GATTACA). You know why the future is the future? Because it's full of unknowns. How many FDA approved medications turned out it actually killed you? It was the best they could do at the time remember?
This is a race to the bottom. Much like the weaknesses found in SHA-1, SHA-256 is likely also going to suffer collisions. By mathematics alone, this is only a matter of time. People keep saying things like, "Yea, but that time is thousands and thousands of years." That is not true, with something like 50 quintillion hashes calculated per second, that is actually more like a 100 years, and that number is getting shorter by the day. After analyzing those collisions it's likely that a pattern will be found, much like there was for SHA-1 and MD-5 (https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/), at which point... BitCoin is dead. Their protocol allows for a hash with the size of 256 bits. Even if that's Ethereum which uses KECCAK-256 I believe, same problem, only a matter of time. Now, given that hashing, philosophically suffers from collisions by the pigeon hole principal, why in the world would you ever base something like currency to operate on it is beyond me.
The good thing about a paper is that it stays that way once you print it. If the news screwed up, you physically need to throw away the old one, and buy a new one. If we had no printed media, I don't think we would have heard of anything Snowden released.
Are we finally admiting that we are doing this globally and that every person born in the Internet enabled world has no privacy? I mean everybody already knows this but are countries owning up to how screwed every person is going forward because our lives can be played with like Sims characters? China was never pretending, they said smoking cigarettes in prohibited areas gives you -100 points and helping an old lady cross the street is +100 points. U.S. chased Snowden off to Russia and just sort of beat everyone talking about him to shut the fuck up. But is this it? Now that we realize policy is the only solution, we are going to stop playing with everyone unable to purchase their privacy? Boy that would be wonderful news. Evil loses in global politics where money is everything.
I mean how did we get by when either promoted or recommended videos weren't all you were shown? People just saw new videos and/or sort by views? lol That's the only way YouTube is tolerable for me still. I filter for today, and search different letters of the alphabet to find new videos. Sometimes "of" or "the" works pretty well too. Otherwise you can only access videos YouTube locks you down to. It's free anyways, what are we complaining about?
Either these people don't know how to run a bank, or these are nation level actors. You can't digitally order all the money away in a normal bank system. This just sounds like a high level excuse to get away with robbery, and make some news. Hackers, that's hip, people will buy that right? Banks use quantum key encryption for each large transfer, and those are limited by physical distance, and separated physically from regular networks. Then there are actual people whose job it is to watch transactions, transfer you to security if let's say your IP changes erratically. If somebody makes a purchase in a different state, banks will put a hold on all activity. Banks watch their customers like hawks. I can understand attacking ATMs, they actually have cash in them, but this sounds like a whole lot of hooey. Then again maybe I'm reading the article wrong, what does "Pakistani banks was stolen" mean anyway? Someone stole the entire bank building Robin Hood Men in Tights style?
Sorry bro, I'm Trump broke. I got $10 in the bank but I look like I am rich. The service will be missed. Many Flash animations will hold your memory alive as they all get converted to mp4s.
Wow, it's like they're charging him hard enough for people to forget calling SWAT can be a death sentence in the U.S.A. There are videos on YouTube you can watch where just by the video you can tell if it's U.S.A. or not by how many people are slammed into the ground. It's like a Mongolian army of horsemen on call, they will burn your village down. That last one was the most interesting to me, because like a double-blind study neither the SWAT nor the victim knew what was going on yet he died anyways. The real question isn't how hard to hit this man to make an example of him, but rather why calling the officials is a death sentence.
I have 165 elephants, and if I need to take them up to the roof I still have to make 2 trips. I'm going to hold off until the technology gets up to the 200 elephant range.
I think the opposite could be a business here in the West. Open a start-up where customers can purchase the opportunity to tell someone else's boss that the person has quit their job. The start-up (call it Peaz, or iQuit?) could get a percentage of the transaction. (Ads: Wanna tell someone's boss to take a hike, she ain't coming back? Visit our website!)
Slashdot Mirror
The cash was just tired, it needed some rest.
Just use bear metaphors.
I think a better question would be "how many devices are capable of running the Java runtime environment?" I am assuming this is more of a philosophical question like, "Is God dead?" or "is kindness dead in this world?" As the department suggests, it may also be resting. Be sure to feed and water your Java regularly, and check it for ticks.
Reality is: AI lets cowardly judges shift responsibility to the technology sector allowing good ol' racist data to be used by arresting officers because technology is the future. Such wow!
Even then this thing is probably just "doing its best". Think about it this way, if you think it's better to have this installed in a critical meeting room than not for reasons of security, and that is exactly what will happen, people will come prepared. Such systems don't know if you're lying, they look at the physiological changes and historical patterns in response to your actions. Okay, let's say if somebody asks you is your name Steve, and it says so on your ID, you might reason, "I don't know? What if I'm named Ron who is in a hospital in a coma for 40 years." Boom, system just showed patterns of hesitation and creative thinking, clearly this person is lying and his name is not John. Peoplr will come prepared and genuinely panick when they have 4 of a kind aces because some maniac called 4Aces hacked their credit cards, maxed them out, insurance didn't cover it all and now they are scared. The machine will grin and go all in, "He's bluffing, he's scared." Aw fuck.
Oh look! Another lie detector.
You make the assumption that we understand what we are doing. What are you going to do when some super virus mutates and only people with Toxoplasma gondii parasite in their brains survive it? Clearly all parasites are bad, why? Because it's right there in their names, "parasites". The conversation always comes to changing eye or hair color when talking about gene editing (you read those stories right? I know me too) but do you realize how profound a change that is even to simply change someone into a blonde from a brunette? You're talking about a baby who is the product of millions of years of fighting to see which genes even survive to get their protein and at the end of the battle you're just going to Dumbledore the victor? Hell there might be that single moment where this one person just digs green eyes, but because of your editing they never fall for each other and that one meiosis which would have created the first ebola immune baby never comes to be. Not to mention the psychological effects. While we have something called surgical addiction, you want to allow gene editing on humans? How long until a baby is killed because the parents thought it didn't turn out the way they wanted and they wanted a new one to edit properly this time and they blame the doctor? Fine you say, lets just focus on itemizing the pros and cons, okay. Some of the cons include 7 billion unedited humans. Accidents beyond our current understanding, (read whoops, sorry about the tumor) people must live with much like accidently getting their babies penis entirely chopped off during circumcision, but with a whole new fuck up vector. A whole new level of discrimination (see GATTACA). You know why the future is the future? Because it's full of unknowns. How many FDA approved medications turned out it actually killed you? It was the best they could do at the time remember?
Approaches Netflix, puts his hand on its head... It's afraid .... turns around ... IT'S AFRAID!
This is a race to the bottom. Much like the weaknesses found in SHA-1, SHA-256 is likely also going to suffer collisions. By mathematics alone, this is only a matter of time. People keep saying things like, "Yea, but that time is thousands and thousands of years." That is not true, with something like 50 quintillion hashes calculated per second, that is actually more like a 100 years, and that number is getting shorter by the day. After analyzing those collisions it's likely that a pattern will be found, much like there was for SHA-1 and MD-5 (https://www.mscs.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/), at which point ... BitCoin is dead. Their protocol allows for a hash with the size of 256 bits. Even if that's Ethereum which uses KECCAK-256 I believe, same problem, only a matter of time. Now, given that hashing, philosophically suffers from collisions by the pigeon hole principal, why in the world would you ever base something like currency to operate on it is beyond me.
It butchered my image. Ended up looking like if you just select the background with magic wand and press delete.
The good thing about a paper is that it stays that way once you print it. If the news screwed up, you physically need to throw away the old one, and buy a new one. If we had no printed media, I don't think we would have heard of anything Snowden released.
Banning Fortnite? For once I'm not mad at China.
This has been first reported nearly a decade ago, I'm not sure what's "news" about it today.
In America the government talks to your car.
pulls down blinds "We're closed, go home! No more quantum!"
Are we finally admiting that we are doing this globally and that every person born in the Internet enabled world has no privacy? I mean everybody already knows this but are countries owning up to how screwed every person is going forward because our lives can be played with like Sims characters? China was never pretending, they said smoking cigarettes in prohibited areas gives you -100 points and helping an old lady cross the street is +100 points. U.S. chased Snowden off to Russia and just sort of beat everyone talking about him to shut the fuck up. But is this it? Now that we realize policy is the only solution, we are going to stop playing with everyone unable to purchase their privacy? Boy that would be wonderful news. Evil loses in global politics where money is everything.
I mean how did we get by when either promoted or recommended videos weren't all you were shown? People just saw new videos and/or sort by views? lol That's the only way YouTube is tolerable for me still. I filter for today, and search different letters of the alphabet to find new videos. Sometimes "of" or "the" works pretty well too. Otherwise you can only access videos YouTube locks you down to. It's free anyways, what are we complaining about?
Either these people don't know how to run a bank, or these are nation level actors. You can't digitally order all the money away in a normal bank system. This just sounds like a high level excuse to get away with robbery, and make some news. Hackers, that's hip, people will buy that right? Banks use quantum key encryption for each large transfer, and those are limited by physical distance, and separated physically from regular networks. Then there are actual people whose job it is to watch transactions, transfer you to security if let's say your IP changes erratically. If somebody makes a purchase in a different state, banks will put a hold on all activity. Banks watch their customers like hawks. I can understand attacking ATMs, they actually have cash in them, but this sounds like a whole lot of hooey. Then again maybe I'm reading the article wrong, what does "Pakistani banks was stolen" mean anyway? Someone stole the entire bank building Robin Hood Men in Tights style?
Sorry bro, I'm Trump broke. I got $10 in the bank but I look like I am rich. The service will be missed. Many Flash animations will hold your memory alive as they all get converted to mp4s.
Yea? Who better than kids to create instruments of murder and mayhem, that's the ticket.
Wow, it's like they're charging him hard enough for people to forget calling SWAT can be a death sentence in the U.S.A. There are videos on YouTube you can watch where just by the video you can tell if it's U.S.A. or not by how many people are slammed into the ground. It's like a Mongolian army of horsemen on call, they will burn your village down. That last one was the most interesting to me, because like a double-blind study neither the SWAT nor the victim knew what was going on yet he died anyways. The real question isn't how hard to hit this man to make an example of him, but rather why calling the officials is a death sentence.
I have 165 elephants, and if I need to take them up to the roof I still have to make 2 trips. I'm going to hold off until the technology gets up to the 200 elephant range.
Hmmmm... is a smart phone considered a substance?
I think the opposite could be a business here in the West. Open a start-up where customers can purchase the opportunity to tell someone else's boss that the person has quit their job. The start-up (call it Peaz, or iQuit?) could get a percentage of the transaction. (Ads: Wanna tell someone's boss to take a hike, she ain't coming back? Visit our website!)
Yea but the same study also says it is good for your heart. First time I ever heard of alcohol causing cancer. Nutrition science must be fun.