Mile? What's a mile? You use metric prefixes like "Giga" and slap "mile" in the same phrase. It's so non-sequitur. What about our international readers?
0? Huh? Just because the poster was Anonymous Coward? That so sucks. Anyway, I'm always registered and I never get above a score of 1. Let's see if this gets labeled OT as well.
Your post was great. I love satire. It did NOT deserve a score of 0. Does/. score posts with a perl script that generates a random number from -1 to 5? It sure seems that way sometimes.
Is this really going to solve anything? Symbolically, it may bring attention to DDos attacks, and it may tell the world that IRCnet thinks they're wrong, but this stunt is about as productive as a hunger strike. Nothing is really accomplished here.
No good. If you read the article, you'd know that evens up to 400,000,000,000,000 have already been tested. I think that's reason enough to conclude that brute force will not produce a counterexample. No matter your computing power, it would take an infinite amount of time to check for aleph null numbers. Seems like a formal proof is the correct method instead.
Slashdot Mirror
Kind of like the metric system.
they destroy YOU remotely!
"IE and Konqueror don't both to check the issuer of this intermediate cert making SSL in both browsers something of a joke."
What you say?!
This code sucks like you wouldn't believe.
this?
FSCK u, @$$4013!
Damn. /c0d3 sux0rs. Try it in php. I refreshed and refreshed and refreshed, so why did there appear to be no replies?
Does the M17 installer seg fault like the M16 one did?
So I guess Microsoft CAN innovate something.
Mile? What's a mile? You use metric prefixes like "Giga" and slap "mile" in the same phrase. It's so non-sequitur. What about our international readers?
0? Huh? Just because the poster was Anonymous Coward? That so sucks. Anyway, I'm always registered and I never get above a score of 1. Let's see if this gets labeled OT as well.
Your post was great. I love satire. It did NOT deserve a score of 0. Does /. score posts with a perl script that generates a random number from -1 to 5? It sure seems that way sometimes.
Is this really going to solve anything? Symbolically, it may bring attention to DDos attacks, and it may tell the world that IRCnet thinks they're wrong, but this stunt is about as productive as a hunger strike. Nothing is really accomplished here.
When else are prayers mentioned other than in the context of religion?
>>I'm sure all of us will keep him in our prayers. Not ALL of us. I'm not a theist, and I don't pray.
No good. If you read the article, you'd know that evens up to 400,000,000,000,000 have already been tested. I think that's reason enough to conclude that brute force will not produce a counterexample. No matter your computing power, it would take an infinite amount of time to check for aleph null numbers. Seems like a formal proof is the correct method instead.