I see you've used the same account 5 times in a row. That's the first time I've seen you do that. Is this the account you dedicate to 'your mum' comments?
It's quite clear that getting a tattoo on your face/neck is shouting something about your personality to anyone who looks at you. Getting a tattoo on you chest/butt/somewhere else not so obvious may indicate that you have a wild side, but you have the discretion to put it away when it's not appropriate. A lack of discretion is something that may be of interest to a jury.
I never really understood those comments. Your mum right back at you.
Interesting, your brother said that he was from Wisconsin, yet you use the British spelling of mum.
If only your comment history wasn't full of telling people that they are pathetic and/or cowering, I could take a look at what you've said before and try to work out who you really are...
Someone else will probably beat me to this short bout of pedanticism questioning how micro and nano are applied in this situation (micro-ton?) and highlighting the fact that there are three orders of magnitude separating the micro and nano scale.
Congratulations sir, for falling hook, line and sinker for the terrorists mind games. Mr. Bin Laden is very happy that people like you populate the planet, to ensure excellent return on his investments, even almost a decade since the last time he did anything.
It's hard to defend freedom because you always find yourself defending scoundrels, as these are the first people whose freedoms get taken away.
I've butchered that quote terribly. The point is, slapping a bunch of DCMA charges on this guy sets some dangerous precedents that can be used against the rest of us. Punish him for what he did wrong, trafficking the stolen goods, but leave it at that. Jailbreaking the phones isn't a crime in itself, so he shouldn't be charged for it.
Your honour, my only crime was pulling the trigger of this gun, I had no intention that it would begin the chain of events that lead to the death of my ex-wife.
Slashdot Mirror
I see you've used the same account 5 times in a row. That's the first time I've seen you do that. Is this the account you dedicate to 'your mum' comments?
You know you could just make that;
cower some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
Your sig and not have to type it every time.
I'm afraid that Brits have landed in Wisconsin, apparently in secret, trying to win back the US in the war of independence mark 2.
Or that you're the most persistent troll that I've ever met.
I had a vision of a panda dung statue (a statue of a panda, made out of panda dung) setting up a stall to sell those little potted bamboo plants.
It's quite clear that getting a tattoo on your face/neck is shouting something about your personality to anyone who looks at you. Getting a tattoo on you chest/butt/somewhere else not so obvious may indicate that you have a wild side, but you have the discretion to put it away when it's not appropriate. A lack of discretion is something that may be of interest to a jury.
Oh, don't get me started on those.
I bow down before your pedantry.
I never really understood those comments. Your mum right back at you.
Interesting, your brother said that he was from Wisconsin, yet you use the British spelling of mum.
If only your comment history wasn't full of telling people that they are pathetic and/or cowering, I could take a look at what you've said before and try to work out who you really are...
Someone else will probably beat me to this short bout of pedanticism questioning how micro and nano are applied in this situation (micro-ton?) and highlighting the fact that there are three orders of magnitude separating the micro and nano scale.
STFU n00b! lol
Well, I guess I am arguing with some guy who lives on the other side of the country over the internet. That is pretty pathetic...
Darkness, imprisoning me
All I see is absolute horror
I cannot live
I cannot die
Trapped between worlds
Body my holding cell
What exactly did this guy do to you that you're trolling forums in his name and posting his address on the internet?
So, just out of curiosity... what's your address?
Pipped by one minute. That's gotta sting.
Oh, I see. I thought this guy was jailbreaking the phones with his cock. What was he using then?
So you're telling me this isn't all about the Digital Century Method of Aerobics?
Thanks for sorting that out.
Congratulations sir, for falling hook, line and sinker for the terrorists mind games. Mr. Bin Laden is very happy that people like you populate the planet, to ensure excellent return on his investments, even almost a decade since the last time he did anything.
But it's still a carbon-based life-form right?
(Not that I'm trying to diminish this, I think it's awesome. Just trying to get my facts straight.)
I can see a bunch of naked protesters between aluminum panels trying to power lightbulbs now.
That. Would. Be. AWESOME!
How does that quote go?
It's hard to defend freedom because you always find yourself defending scoundrels, as these are the first people whose freedoms get taken away.
I've butchered that quote terribly. The point is, slapping a bunch of DCMA charges on this guy sets some dangerous precedents that can be used against the rest of us. Punish him for what he did wrong, trafficking the stolen goods, but leave it at that. Jailbreaking the phones isn't a crime in itself, so he shouldn't be charged for it.
Your honour, my only crime was pulling the trigger of this gun, I had no intention that it would begin the chain of events that lead to the death of my ex-wife.
+1 for the classy Star Trek reference directly following the low-brow Simpsons reference.
*golf clap*
Your problem is that you're trying to apply logic to and idealogical group. That's never going to work.