I'd rather trust the highway engineers who actually know what they're doing when setting these limits and dropping down if conditions necessitate. So, yeah, still applies to freeways.
No, because (somewhat ironically) its illegal to pay Americans that little.
The lawsuits says that workers were "brought-in", and were mostly H1-B holders. H1-B holders need to be paid market salary.
If it's anything like the way Intel does things in Hillsboro, yeah, that's not happening. They just lied to INS to get H1B visas and are paying 'em less than a Taco Bell manager makes.
How about American cricket fans? Cricket Ticket costs more, by itself, than I pay for gas, car insurance, electricity and water combined. And required an insane tv subscription as a prerequisite.
Hulu wasn't bad when it was possible to adblock that for 3 minutes of silence and didn't charge. Or you can pitch 'em $10/mo and get it commercial free. Their current model's the worst of both worlds.
You do realize that places like Tulsa, Oklahoma already get like, 35 channels over the air, even if you have a relatively shitty antenna setup and are stuck using an indoor antenna in a basement apartment at the bottom of a hill, right? And that's like, basically, the big three and the rest are specialty channels that are easily on par in terms of watchability with early to mid 1990s basic cable.
Go to my dad's place in Los Angeles with the same antenna setup and you're looking at 70 channels. Get the antenna up on the chimney and it's more like 135. For free.
Well, this should be interesting. TiVo's who ended up taking over TV Guide, Dish and Rovio, ultimately replacing TV Guide as the company with it's name at the top of the building at what was formerly known as TV Guide Plaza in Tulsa's San Souci neighborhood.
Hell, I'll go so far as to say it's not worth it compared to fucking with the antenna or watching what hits Youtube Red (which I already have as part of Google Play Music subscription I use the hell out of at work) unless I can TiVo it. I don't want timeshifting to be at their mercy.
I think that kind of thing is precisely the opposite of what we need. People who say that it's your civic duty or that it is patriotic to vote are wrong. I think that if you don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues, then the responsible thing to do is to not vote at all.
Sounds like there's some common ground. But I think that if you don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues and don't vote, or don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues and do vote, then you're actively working against your own country.
Perhaps if you'd do a better deal, it wouldn't have been cheaper for Microsoft to start from scratch than to work with you or some other AV manufacture.
The funny thing is if security in Windows wasn't designed to be shit from the start, Kaspersky wouldn't even have a market segment.
Joke's on them. I adblock the shit out of everything (want to feed me ads? Pay for my and my employer's internet connections), and thanks to being the victim of student loan fraud dropping my credit from 800 to an unrecoverable (short of paying for some other asshole's college) 450, I pay cash on the spot for everything, lowest cost, and generally grey-market.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Windows
Mobile community when IDC confirmed that Windows Mobile market share
has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent
of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey
which plainly states that Windows Mobile has lost more market share,
this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Windows
Mobile is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by
failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking
test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Windows Mobile's future. The
hand writing is on the wall: Windows Mobile faces a bleak future. In
fact there won't be any future at all for Windows Mobile because
Windows Mobile is dying. Things are looking very bad for Windows
Mobile. As many of us are already aware, Windows Mobile continues to
lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
WinCE is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core
developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD
developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the
point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: WinCE is dying.
All major surveys show that Windows Mobile has steadily declined in
market share. Windows Mobile is very sick and its long term survival
prospects are very dim. If Windows Mobile is to survive at all it will
be among OS dilettante dabblers. Windows Mobile continues to
decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Windows Mobile
from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes,
Windows Mobile is dead.
Slashdot Mirror
If you think reality is "the left" when it's really "the center," you might need to get out of your conservative safe space and return to reality.
I'd rather trust the highway engineers who actually know what they're doing when setting these limits and dropping down if conditions necessitate. So, yeah, still applies to freeways.
No, because (somewhat ironically) its illegal to pay Americans that little.
The lawsuits says that workers were "brought-in", and were mostly H1-B holders. H1-B holders need to be paid market salary.
If it's anything like the way Intel does things in Hillsboro, yeah, that's not happening. They just lied to INS to get H1B visas and are paying 'em less than a Taco Bell manager makes.
No idea. I use OpenStreetMap instead.
Like the Will Smith version of I, Robot
I haven't seen an update to Slashcode in recent history...
How about American cricket fans? Cricket Ticket costs more, by itself, than I pay for gas, car insurance, electricity and water combined. And required an insane tv subscription as a prerequisite.
Hulu wasn't bad when it was possible to adblock that for 3 minutes of silence and didn't charge. Or you can pitch 'em $10/mo and get it commercial free. Their current model's the worst of both worlds.
You do realize that places like Tulsa, Oklahoma already get like, 35 channels over the air, even if you have a relatively shitty antenna setup and are stuck using an indoor antenna in a basement apartment at the bottom of a hill, right? And that's like, basically, the big three and the rest are specialty channels that are easily on par in terms of watchability with early to mid 1990s basic cable. Go to my dad's place in Los Angeles with the same antenna setup and you're looking at 70 channels. Get the antenna up on the chimney and it's more like 135. For free.
Well, this should be interesting. TiVo's who ended up taking over TV Guide, Dish and Rovio, ultimately replacing TV Guide as the company with it's name at the top of the building at what was formerly known as TV Guide Plaza in Tulsa's San Souci neighborhood.
Hell, I'll go so far as to say it's not worth it compared to fucking with the antenna or watching what hits Youtube Red (which I already have as part of Google Play Music subscription I use the hell out of at work) unless I can TiVo it. I don't want timeshifting to be at their mercy.
has a liberal bias.
...now say it in Donald Trump's voice.
I think that kind of thing is precisely the opposite of what we need. People who say that it's your civic duty or that it is patriotic to vote are wrong. I think that if you don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues, then the responsible thing to do is to not vote at all.
Sounds like there's some common ground. But I think that if you don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues and don't vote, or don't take the time to educate yourself about the candidates and the issues and do vote, then you're actively working against your own country.
A business model!
Perhaps if you'd do a better deal, it wouldn't have been cheaper for Microsoft to start from scratch than to work with you or some other AV manufacture.
The funny thing is if security in Windows wasn't designed to be shit from the start, Kaspersky wouldn't even have a market segment.
Closed source and closed development? Did we forget about Chromium, which is in Debian?
Joke's on them. I adblock the shit out of everything (want to feed me ads? Pay for my and my employer's internet connections), and thanks to being the victim of student loan fraud dropping my credit from 800 to an unrecoverable (short of paying for some other asshole's college) 450, I pay cash on the spot for everything, lowest cost, and generally grey-market.
If you don't want Microsoft spying on you and you're a Windows user, you've already lost the game.
Or not, but it doesn't matter, since the desktop really isn't as relevant as it used to be.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Windows Mobile community when IDC confirmed that Windows Mobile market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Windows Mobile has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Windows Mobile is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Windows Mobile's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Windows Mobile faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Windows Mobile because Windows Mobile is dying. Things are looking very bad for Windows Mobile. As many of us are already aware, Windows Mobile continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
WinCE is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: WinCE is dying.
All major surveys show that Windows Mobile has steadily declined in market share. Windows Mobile is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Windows Mobile is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. Windows Mobile continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Windows Mobile from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Windows Mobile is dead.
Fact: Windows Mobile is dying
...the fastest way to provide the same level of security is to just get rid of the checkpoint.
They would have owned up to it by now then.
We have nobody to blame except ourselves.
Get a TiVo. TiVo lets you filter out those channels using the same feature you use to let TiVo know whether or not you get certain channels.