It fairly benchmarks the current Vivante device against an iPhone4s, against which it loses, but the article points out the design is modular and has plenty of scope for performance improvements and scaling.
It does appear as though the rest of the journalism is a little on the lazy side though
I have an original HTC Desire and have taken it apart and put it back together. It's fairly easy to repair. I've not had the same luck with Samsung S2s which I think need someone more professional than I to fix them
Ah so it is okay if it is only an automated drone doing the dirty deed:)
Law in this area is a balancing act. If it is just for the purpose of serving relevant adverts to put before your eyeballs, on terms which you have accepted in using the service, then yes. If it is for tracking your movements and activity before hunting you down and killing you, then no (or at least not without a warrant)
chances are it gets 8 miles to the gallon, thus you get a top speed of 202 mph for three minutes before the next refill... even though that refill might be in another county.
About 17mpg (US), 21mpg (proper gallons)- this is the previous version. Better than a number of US SUVs.....
...this is not addressed through the basics of contract law.
When a wireless router broadcasts a SSID on an unencrypted wireless network, it is effectively an invitation to use that network. So your computer asks that router for an IP address, and lo and behold the router gives you an IP address. By making a request for an IP Address and the router giving you one, it has effectively given you permission to join the network.
All this is different on a secure network, since you either have to have the key or pick the lock (even a simple lock like WEP). Picking the lock to use a service without authorisation can easily be seen as an offence.
So what has Google done that is radically different from walking around looking for an open connection so you can send an email? (Apart from scale that is).
I'm sure defacing websites may be some sort of crime, but terrorism? Terrorism seems to have suffered from mission creep. Defacing websites may be highly annoying, but probably ought to qualify as a semi-legitimate form of protest.
If the software is GPL, you're perfectly free to modify and use it privately - it's only when you distribute the software that you have an obligation to also distribute the source code. BSD and similar licenses have no restrictions whatsoever, so you can use them how you like.
AFAIK, you retain copyright on the delta changes from the original software too.
It fairly benchmarks the current Vivante device against an iPhone4s, against which it loses, but the article points out the design is modular and has plenty of scope for performance improvements and scaling.
It does appear as though the rest of the journalism is a little on the lazy side though
...a bigger(?) version of GCHQ in England....
what is Blade Runner
The European Court of Human Rights has 47 member countries, not just the members of the EU. For example, it includes Russia and Turkey as members.
Skynet comments
After the Revolution and Bonaparte, the monarchy was restored
Louis XVIII (1815-1824)
Charles X (1824-1830)
Louis Philippe (1830-1848) (deposed)
Napoleon III (1848-1870) was President then Emperor IIRC
I have an original HTC Desire and have taken it apart and put it back together. It's fairly easy to repair. I've not had the same luck with Samsung S2s which I think need someone more professional than I to fix them
That Apple is a more vulnerable brand in the long run than Coca Cola.
Ah so it is okay if it is only an automated drone doing the dirty deed :)
Law in this area is a balancing act. If it is just for the purpose of serving relevant adverts to put before your eyeballs, on terms which you have accepted in using the service, then yes. If it is for tracking your movements and activity before hunting you down and killing you, then no (or at least not without a warrant)
...she was(is?) the ringmaster for the Apple Samsung patent battle.
Personally if I wanted a decent tech judgement I'd move heaven and earth to end up before Judge Alsup (Oracle v Android)
Taking Liberties with Privacy Officer
All they talk about is branes......
Riddick-ulous idea if I say so myself
chances are it gets 8 miles to the gallon, thus you get a top speed of 202 mph for three minutes before the next refill... even though that refill might be in another county.
About 17mpg (US), 21mpg (proper gallons)- this is the previous version. Better than a number of US SUVs.....
My wife isn't impressed when I share my Python skills with others.
...this is not addressed through the basics of contract law.
When a wireless router broadcasts a SSID on an unencrypted wireless network, it is effectively an invitation to use that network.
So your computer asks that router for an IP address, and lo and behold the router gives you an IP address. By making a request for an IP Address and the router giving you one, it has effectively given you permission to join the network.
All this is different on a secure network, since you either have to have the key or pick the lock (even a simple lock like WEP). Picking the lock to use a service without authorisation can easily be seen as an offence.
So what has Google done that is radically different from walking around looking for an open connection so you can send an email? (Apart from scale that is).
the autopilot [/airplane]
He's a very naughty boy!
I'm sure defacing websites may be some sort of crime, but terrorism? Terrorism seems to have suffered from mission creep. Defacing websites may be highly annoying, but probably ought to qualify as a semi-legitimate form of protest.
Erm, ok then Lara. Or is it, "Dr. Jones"?
Thank you for dragging me into a dungeon of fanfic.
Thank you for adding dungeons into the fanfic mix....
I think the US should send thousands of troops to 'Nam to ensure freedom and liberty. It worked last time, didn't it.... :-P
Syriasly
I couldn't fuck a gorilla!
The software used to be highly rated but fell in popularity over the years.
That seems to be the usual point at which software companies turn into trolls.
... so you'd stop getting involved in all the crazy Middle East shit
If the software is GPL, you're perfectly free to modify and use it privately - it's only when you distribute the software that you have an obligation to also distribute the source code. BSD and similar licenses have no restrictions whatsoever, so you can use them how you like.
AFAIK, you retain copyright on the delta changes from the original software too.