Yeah, but RIAA will hook you up with the best drugs and hookers, and lawyers to get you out of jail. These are the expenditures that can't be itemized..
You see, this phone system consists of a multibillion-dollar matrix of space age technology that is so sophisticated even we can't handle it. But that's your problem, isn't it? So, the next time you complain about your phone service, why don't you try using two Dixie cups with a string? We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Apple.
But we give it too much power to allow that. A much more fundamental change is needed. Until then, long term liability is probably the only alternative. It should never cost the victim anything at all. All costs should be laid on the leaker. And "Trust no one" with your info still applies.
So all of their private conversations are suddenly public record because they get paid with tax dollars?
No they are subject to public scrutiny if their private conversations become a basis for public legislation. I have a right to take away your professional (as opposed to personal) privacy if I am to be subject to any law based on your work.
The question mark is there to show us they acceding to China's wish that they not reveal "state secrets". They have stated as much. I never said they're trying to hide it. All I'm saying is that they are untrustworthy for the user, and their software is suspicious. They filter (and possibly misdirect) what you're searching for, and they try to track your every move. It's easy to block, but they are making the effort. And the fanboi-ism is also as extreme as with Apple. I hope that somebody with the resources is performing an in depth investigation.
...it was glaringly obvious that Matt was just doing it for the paycheck.
You honestly believe that he's one of those people who thinks there's never enough? If anything, I would think that now, more than ever, he's doing it for fun.
Slashdot Mirror
It makes for very delicate, frail, some times dangerous products. Stone age equipment running on renewables is much more robust on the long term.
Don't believe for a second they don't know that
Yeah, but RIAA will hook you up with the best drugs and hookers, and lawyers to get you out of jail. These are the expenditures that can't be itemized..
Your proposal is acceptable.
So we can expect a Microsoft bankruptcy at any moment then?
To Paraphrase:
You see, this phone system consists of a multibillion-dollar matrix of space age technology that is so sophisticated even we can't handle it. But that's your problem, isn't it? So, the next time you complain about your phone service, why don't you try using two Dixie cups with a string? We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Apple.
Their POV is that of the consumer (hence the name), not the designers or engineers. The trade rags are there to cover that angle.
I have yet to see them sensationalize anything. But my mind is open to any links that show otherwise. Feel free...
They could launch them from the factory and have them parachute down to the cape. They are reusable, right?
There are some who think culling the population a bit is beneficial to mankind..
...only 5-6 channels left per city...
You're making me all nostalgic...
But we give it too much power to allow that. A much more fundamental change is needed. Until then, long term liability is probably the only alternative. It should never cost the victim anything at all. All costs should be laid on the leaker. And "Trust no one" with your info still applies.
Coalition soldiers then walk in without a fight.
Until the Taliban truck in a bunch of Playboy bunnies, weed, and Twinkies
I expect something like this
It's called Slashdot. It has actually been running for several years now.
So all of their private conversations are suddenly public record because they get paid with tax dollars?
No they are subject to public scrutiny if their private conversations become a basis for public legislation. I have a right to take away your professional (as opposed to personal) privacy if I am to be subject to any law based on your work.
Marconi didn't invent FM radio.
Somebody planted the seeds of unrest...
Making an unwise assumption you are :-)
The question mark is there to show us they acceding to China's wish that they not reveal "state secrets". They have stated as much. I never said they're trying to hide it. All I'm saying is that they are untrustworthy for the user, and their software is suspicious. They filter (and possibly misdirect) what you're searching for, and they try to track your every move. It's easy to block, but they are making the effort. And the fanboi-ism is also as extreme as with Apple. I hope that somebody with the resources is performing an in depth investigation.
FM radio itself didn't fail. But the creator was victimized by piracy.
...it was glaringly obvious that Matt was just doing it for the paycheck.
You honestly believe that he's one of those people who thinks there's never enough? If anything, I would think that now, more than ever, he's doing it for fun.
You cannot acquire any rights through censorship. Any and all regulation of speech is censorship.
Linky?
controversial hate speech laws = censorship
copyright = censorship
And in direct violation of the 1st Amendment
You are wrong.
In this case it is.