As the summary says the printer remembers the region of the first cartridge used. Printers are packaged with different cartridges for a region and then shipped to that region.
Journals are there to filter out the bad science. If they don't check the credentials and conflicts of reviewers they are not doing their jobs. It is not an all or nothing situation. Journals should be blamed for not checking reviewers. Researchers should be blamed for bad research. Employers should be blamed for allowing bad research. The blame is shared.
Editors' primary responsibility is to know who the appropriate reviewers are.
So the editor must know the credentials and area of work of every possible reviewer in the world. That seems to be a tall order.
If the editor simply follows my suggestions, nothing has been done to ensure the reviewer is an expert in the field.
That is the problem. The editor should check the credentials of the suggested reviewers and filter them for expertise and conflict. A good editor would also add at least one reviewer not on the list.
Using 250 gallons of reclaimed water instead of 250 gallons of potable water is definitely worth it. You are seeing it because there is probably a ban on watering lawns with city water. Lets keep potable water for it's intended use and use reclaimed water where we can.
How do you know those trucks are hauling water and not fuel for farm equipment? Maybe it is liquid fertilizer. My father had a tank in the back of his truck to re-fuel his D-7 Caterpillar.
They are different plastic. The balls are probably made from ABS. The issue with water bottles is the BPA which softens the plastic. There is no BPA in the shade balls. There are some plastic water bottles that are accepted because they are BPA free.
One example is Joe Muller & Sons farm in Yolo County, which grows tomatoes, peppers and sunflowers. The farm runs a buried drip irrigation system on 650 acres in the Woodland area. Tom Muller, a partner in the business, said the farm has documented water savings as great as 40 percent. This cuts costs because it means the farm has to buy less water or pump less groundwater from its own wells.
employee or white hat or grey hat comes to you with an exploit.
Too bad that is not what happened. The following is a much closer description.
A recent hire who has yet to start work publishes an implementation of an exploit so that anyone can use it
Here are the differences. 1. He had yet to start work 2. He let the exploit out to the general public before informing his soon to be employer. I believe that it would have been a different story had he just reported the exploit to Google rather than publishing it.
oh, the guy wrote an app instead of coming to you immediately? gee, how horrible
That is the difference between a white hat and a black hat. It shows poor judgement, need for recognition and the propensity to do similar stupid things in the future.
Lets look a a similar situation. Say you boss is walking around a conference with is fly open. Which of the following do you do? 1. Ignore it and hope he realizes. 2. Talk to him and discretely mention the issue. 3. Stand in the middle of the room and shout out the fact that your boss has his fly down. This guy chose option 3 which shows how little judgement and tact he truly had.
oh, all complicated software has exploits? true. so you're really eager to plug those holes any way you can, right? you're really glad someone found one for you, right? prove it, by rewarding those who find the holes
There is a right way and a wrong way to do thing and this guy chose the wrong way.
How many of counterclaim notices have been filed? Use the system against the claimants. File a counterclaim and the content must be put back if a suit is not filed in court.
Crying about take down notices without filing counterclaims is just stupid. A take down notice is not the end of the story.
The real story here is the crab-pot mentality. If I'm making 100k, and my cubicle neighbour goes from 35k to 70k, that doesn't have any impact on me whatsoever*. Why complain?
Say you make $70K/yr in a job that required a university degree and ten years experience and have worked for the company for five years. Your work week is usually 60 hours and you often work weekends to get projects complete. Say a new guy is hired in the mail room. He is a high school dropout works 9-5 seven days a week and never works weekend. What would you think if he also made $70K/yr?
It does impact you financially as well. Every company has a budget for wages. When some wages go up others are held down. The extra money being paid to the mail room guy is not being paid to you. You could be making $80K/yr but the company does not have the budget to do it.
Steve Jobs had two main feelings/opinions; 1. Steve Jobs always has the right answer. 2. Apple employees and customers exist for the sole purpose of making Steve Jobs lots of cash.
I am not sure that absolutely equal pay for everyone is exactly right although I do think that people who quit over having someone else make as much as them is pretty petty and entitled.
Say you are a college graduate who has worked for the company for 5 years, including the startup where you barely made a living wage, work ten hour days (often weekends) and have little time off. What if a high school dropout who just got hired in the mail room working 8 hour days 5 days a week makes the same as you? I know I would be pissed.
Like I said, clear the area before jamming the signal. As for the 10 to 15 feet range, if you do that it can not be set up near people defeating part of it's purpose.
The bomb is going to be defused or go off. I would rather have it go off when I had control of the situation rather than when the bomber wanted it to.
Slashdot Mirror
As the summary says the printer remembers the region of the first cartridge used. Printers are packaged with different cartridges for a region and then shipped to that region.
They call themselves "Journal of Mathematics Research"
You are right but I found a journal that has a publishing fee.
d) The authors revise paper and pay publication fee (300USD).
Here is a list of math journals and their submission price. It is a bit old but I doubt they are all free now.
Journals are there to filter out the bad science. If they don't check the credentials and conflicts of reviewers they are not doing their jobs. It is not an all or nothing situation. Journals should be blamed for not checking reviewers. Researchers should be blamed for bad research. Employers should be blamed for allowing bad research. The blame is shared.
Editors' primary responsibility is to know who the appropriate reviewers are.
So the editor must know the credentials and area of work of every possible reviewer in the world. That seems to be a tall order.
If the editor simply follows my suggestions, nothing has been done to ensure the reviewer is an expert in the field.
That is the problem. The editor should check the credentials of the suggested reviewers and filter them for expertise and conflict. A good editor would also add at least one reviewer not on the list.
I see people pumping the water onto their lawns.
Using 250 gallons of reclaimed water instead of 250 gallons of potable water is definitely worth it. You are seeing it because there is probably a ban on watering lawns with city water. Lets keep potable water for it's intended use and use reclaimed water where we can.
They were not common last year.
Last year they used potable city water.
How do you know those trucks are hauling water and not fuel for farm equipment? Maybe it is liquid fertilizer. My father had a tank in the back of his truck to re-fuel his D-7 Caterpillar.
They are different plastic. The balls are probably made from ABS. The issue with water bottles is the BPA which softens the plastic. There is no BPA in the shade balls. There are some plastic water bottles that are accepted because they are BPA free.
Not quite.
One example is Joe Muller & Sons farm in Yolo County, which grows tomatoes, peppers and sunflowers. The farm runs a buried drip irrigation system on 650 acres in the Woodland area. Tom Muller, a partner in the business, said the farm has documented water savings as great as 40 percent. This cuts costs because it means the farm has to buy less water or pump less groundwater from its own wells.
Woodland is in the Central Valley.
employee or white hat or grey hat comes to you with an exploit.
Too bad that is not what happened. The following is a much closer description.
A recent hire who has yet to start work publishes an implementation of an exploit so that anyone can use it
Here are the differences.
1. He had yet to start work
2. He let the exploit out to the general public before informing his soon to be employer.
I believe that it would have been a different story had he just reported the exploit to Google rather than publishing it.
oh, the guy wrote an app instead of coming to you immediately? gee, how horrible
That is the difference between a white hat and a black hat. It shows poor judgement, need for recognition and the propensity to do similar stupid things in the future.
Lets look a a similar situation. Say you boss is walking around a conference with is fly open. Which of the following do you do?
1. Ignore it and hope he realizes.
2. Talk to him and discretely mention the issue.
3. Stand in the middle of the room and shout out the fact that your boss has his fly down.
This guy chose option 3 which shows how little judgement and tact he truly had.
oh, all complicated software has exploits? true. so you're really eager to plug those holes any way you can, right? you're really glad someone found one for you, right? prove it, by rewarding those who find the holes
There is a right way and a wrong way to do thing and this guy chose the wrong way.
I think I have seen this somewhere before. Editors, lol.
The sequence "lympics" is so commonly used in words.
How many of counterclaim notices have been filed? Use the system against the claimants. File a counterclaim and the content must be put back if a suit is not filed in court.
Crying about take down notices without filing counterclaims is just stupid. A take down notice is not the end of the story.
References please. Google brings things up when counter claims are filed. Otherwise they loose their protection from suits.
Isn't it standard to post losses for 2-3 years before you become profitable.
Uber has been in operation since 2010. Therefore they have had 5 years to post a profit.
As soon as they automate driving...
So Uber is good for at least 20 years. ;)
The real story here is the crab-pot mentality. If I'm making 100k, and my cubicle neighbour goes from 35k to 70k, that doesn't have any impact on me whatsoever*. Why complain?
Say you make $70K/yr in a job that required a university degree and ten years experience and have worked for the company for five years. Your work week is usually 60 hours and you often work weekends to get projects complete. Say a new guy is hired in the mail room. He is a high school dropout works 9-5 seven days a week and never works weekend. What would you think if he also made $70K/yr?
It does impact you financially as well. Every company has a budget for wages. When some wages go up others are held down. The extra money being paid to the mail room guy is not being paid to you. You could be making $80K/yr but the company does not have the budget to do it.
Steve Jobs had two main feelings/opinions;
1. Steve Jobs always has the right answer.
2. Apple employees and customers exist for the sole purpose of making Steve Jobs lots of cash.
I am not sure that absolutely equal pay for everyone is exactly right although I do think that people who quit over having someone else make as much as them is pretty petty and entitled.
Say you are a college graduate who has worked for the company for 5 years, including the startup where you barely made a living wage, work ten hour days (often weekends) and have little time off. What if a high school dropout who just got hired in the mail room working 8 hour days 5 days a week makes the same as you? I know I would be pissed.
Almost, there are some extra pay/bonuses for certain things.
This is called the honeymoon phase. After dealing with idiots for a few years everyone changes.
Nowhere in the summary or article does it use tthe word "creeping". It says "creepy" in the context of producing a sensation of uneasiness or fear.
Like I said, clear the area before jamming the signal. As for the 10 to 15 feet range, if you do that it can not be set up near people defeating part of it's purpose.
The bomb is going to be defused or go off. I would rather have it go off when I had control of the situation rather than when the bomber wanted it to.
Considering you went back to lower case letters I call BS. We both know that is yelling on the internet.