Sure it's possible that it has an effect. Effect size is still kinda important since the Japan Tsunami caused a significant and abrupt change in the Earths wobble. However, until someone can adequately explain our enhanced rainfall that started in 2010 that is clearly caused by enhanced evaporation in 2010 I'm in the Global Warming is dubious camp. Heck I suspect I can see that Japanese Tsunami in the Evaporation data, but the sample size is just too small to be sure. If it's global warming why doesn't the evaporation change significantly before 2010? If Global Warming Causes the evaporation to remain flat by increasing the humidity then why does it move after 2010 in a very disturbing way. It's easy to see it's caused by the last solar cycle, but then why didn't the other cycles have the same effect? It's easy enough to find out why by doing some searching on some disturbing differences in cycle 24, but you can't get past the Bad Astronomer comparing counter Global Warming evidence to holocaust deniers.
One of the many claims that Global Warming has made is that Evaporation Rate has increased increasing the amount or humidity, and thus increasing the amount of rain. However, the precipitation data from the same dataset that has an radical increase in precip started in last 2010. Now just think about what you said.
Evaporation slows down when the humidity is higher.
The data shows that evaporation from 1950 to 2010 hasn't slowed down or speed up. It's stayed relatively constant. From your own logic and the data it's easy to conclude that no global warming exists from 1950 to 2010.
I've analyzed the data enough that just about any question you can come up with to poke a hole in it can easily be answered.
What's the point? I have convening proof that the Global Warming claims are wrong. I've provided source code, and detailed analysis. All that happens is the Global Warming advocates call me the equivalent of a Holocaust denier. Just go download the Global Historical Climatology Network dataset. Pull out the Evaporation Rate data for yourself. Then calculate the change in evaporation rate for all the stations that have data over the last 30 years or from 1950 to present if you're game. You won't find any meaningful increase or decrease from 1950 to 2010. Unless you want to change the claim that Global Warming Started around October 2010 then global warming doesn't exist as it's been claimed.
It's still very much constitutional for a judge to issue a warrant to search my home given probable cause. Now if Apple hasn't made their walled garden, and done just about everything they could to stop people from jail breaking phone then I'd agree with you. But the way Apple has behaved in regards to their phone they try to play the game of Land Lord, and in that case this is no different than a land lord being issued a warrant to have the home searched of a murder suspect. Now if you're going to insist that it's "unconstitutional" you're going to need to quote chapter and verse with a given argument. Otherwise it's the same old "unconstitutional" claim whenever something is done that one side or the other doesn't like. It's unconstitutional to propose a constitutional amendment to the 14th amendment. It's unconstitutional for any law you don't like, and that's all this argument has ever been.
In the case of Google all they have to do is do a pin code reset, and their in. I have a hard time believing that Apple would make it so their device is so easy to loose all your important data. I can put my belongings in a secure bank, but if the government has a court order it'll be opened up to them. What makes Apple so special?
Sorry, but performant isn't in the Webster online dictionary, and even Chrome thinks it's a misspelled word. Googles Ngram views also shows that up until the last few decades it's a rarely used word. However, in the books the Ngram viewer references it's not being used to indicate performance in at least one case in 1812. Heck even the usage in the 70's and 80's seems to be referencing it as an actor in something, and having nothing to do with performance or efficiency as this article want it to be.
Look at the comparison. I'm willing to bet a large amount of their audience happen to be watching cartoon, or anime. When your color pallet is reduced you don't need to save the entire thing in 32bit color to get the same exact quality. Some will be shaved, and others wont be shaved that much.
If you think the report has such bad things to day about Managed Languages it really depends on how you read it. Java ends up looking like it's just under PHP, but if you look at the Critical Flaws portion it's actually much better than C++. Heck, Javascript is the best overall, but it's easy to see why Javascript is so pervasive that it needs a fairly solid sandbox, or everyone's hit with the exploit. Which is why Java exploits are so bad it doesn't matter that Java has fewer critical exploits when the Java plugin ends up with the exploit everyone with it installed gets hit.
Any of the Critic reviews were false reviews of the PC version, and we've known that for a while now. The only versions of the game that were released early to the critics were PS4, and XBox One. Many of the reviews disclosed that early in their reviews, and most of them released what version they were reviewing. By reading the reviews you can tell by reading the negative reviews. Console user reviews have more positive then negative, and the PC has more negative than positive. Heck even one of the PS4 negative user reviews cites "-poor optimalization on a pc " as the reason for the negative review. The XBox One has a stutter issue that Probably should have been fixed before release, but by and large the major issues are a poor PC release that you should have understood before. As for the critics they very rarely consider giving different scores for different systems for the same game. They only have time to review one version. Most rational PC gamers understand that the platform is buggy and a head ack for a large sample of games, and that there is only a short period of time where the consoles are at their End of Life that the PC wins hands down because the consoles are holding back development by their static specs. Only the new, nieve, and master race PC gamers are upset because they thought the days of PC buggyness was over.
Your implying that they haven't upgrade? You can't honestly not remember when 256k was the bee's knees, can you? Back in the ADSL days it maxed out at 1 meg up, and 10 megs down if you where lucky, and very few areas had enough fiber and t1's to support everyone at those speeds. Now with VDSL2 it can go somewhere from 50 to 200 megs as its cap depending on the version. The providers still should only sell what they have the ability to provide if they're smart so we're a ways off from maxing it out, but the simple view of the history shows that yes they have been upgrading for quite a while now. Now maybe they didn't spend the money to get you personally up to 1 gigabit, but that's hardly not spending the money. And maybe they could have spent the money better, but in reality if it was that easy to just toss money at it to get everyone 1 gigabit then Google fiber would have launched everyone, and not just in the select few areas that it was financially possible to do.
If your players have no fear of punishment, or rejection if they decide to do unethical things they they are doing it wrong. Murdering the black smith for his weapons is basically asking the DM to write you a ticket to abusive DM land.
There is still sufficient problems. Take the Bird Flu back when we were in panic mode. Just because you concocted a disease that's lethal doesn't mean that it's easily transmittable. So in the process of trying to make an Air Born Ebola you end up infecting yourself long before you make it an easily transmissible version. Sure you could be a slow moving disease bomb, but if the infection rate is like how the Bird Flu was when you practically had to get bird feces on your hands then put it in your mouth cross infection becomes unlikely. Even regular Ebola wouldn't spread very well here. In Africa it spreads so easily mostly due to some archaic barrial rights where all the women prepare the body. Here we're so paranoid about corpses that only a special medial technical gets to extract the fluid embalm, and all in a very sanitary way.
I get how nasty this bomb looks, but for the life of me I can't think of how to get the explosive into this impossible to disarm assembly without having it explode. With all the traps even on the screws I don't see how it could be put together, and then armed. It probably requires some very specific way to put it together without having it explode.
Cutting open the case to get to the wires would have cause the aluminum foil to complete the circuit. The only option was the cut open the case and the wires simultaneously. To do that required a shaped charge. This is the only detonator that the FBI has come accost that couldn't even be disarmed by its creator for a reason. The ransom was just for the switch code to disable the tilt switch so they could move it to a safe place to explode.
A large volume of Liquid Nitrogen might do the trick. I think the biggest problem with that would be the contraction of the metal before the explosive became stable might have caused the aluminum foil to complete the circuit and explode.
No he's saying that he can make claims about the n=1 when he's only about claims about the n=99,999. That 1 single untreated survivor is still more likely random change, and completely meaningless.
Sorry, but N=1 is statistically meaningless even in your example. Could be explained away as nothing more than random change. Drawing any significant conclusion on N less than 30 is utter nonsense, and should be discarded and defecated on like the N=12 AntiVax studies. Heck I'll still have doubt on any study with less than 100 and you'll have me believing unless proven otherwise with N above 1000.
$2.42 for a single meal that lasts up to a year. Sounds like it's market is survivalist hipsters planning for the end of the world. I'll stick to a pound of split peas or lentils. Heck if I'm going full on Apocalypse survivalist I'll just take the discount and buy in bulk getting them at far less than a dollar per pound. They last 4 to 5 years so much better as a survival meal. With O2 absorbers they're supposed to last forever. I could even stock up on freeze dried veggies and make a better meal.Why would I buy this 'Soylent' in light of better alternatives?
The cheap cable may have had signalling noise on the line in some way. Improper shielding right next to an electric cable will do that. However, until the noise reaches a level that the error handling can't compensate you shouldn't notice it at all. The odds of you consistently passing Ethernet frames that pass the checksum so you'll hear the noise is unimaginable unless deliberately setup to do so. It's a simple checksum fail - resend frame. It'll cut down on your bandwidth with re-transmissions, but not on the quality. The fact that people don't hear the quality difference on WiFi is all the proof you need. The day my Ethernet line has more errors than my WiFi signal is the day I replace the cable.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure it's possible that it has an effect. Effect size is still kinda important since the Japan Tsunami caused a significant and abrupt change in the Earths wobble. However, until someone can adequately explain our enhanced rainfall that started in 2010 that is clearly caused by enhanced evaporation in 2010 I'm in the Global Warming is dubious camp. Heck I suspect I can see that Japanese Tsunami in the Evaporation data, but the sample size is just too small to be sure. If it's global warming why doesn't the evaporation change significantly before 2010? If Global Warming Causes the evaporation to remain flat by increasing the humidity then why does it move after 2010 in a very disturbing way. It's easy to see it's caused by the last solar cycle, but then why didn't the other cycles have the same effect? It's easy enough to find out why by doing some searching on some disturbing differences in cycle 24, but you can't get past the Bad Astronomer comparing counter Global Warming evidence to holocaust deniers.
Evaporation slows down when the humidity is higher.
The data shows that evaporation from 1950 to 2010 hasn't slowed down or speed up. It's stayed relatively constant. From your own logic and the data it's easy to conclude that no global warming exists from 1950 to 2010.
I've analyzed the data enough that just about any question you can come up with to poke a hole in it can easily be answered.
Yea there is. It's called RayDavisItis, and symptoms including having socially unacceptable results.
Link to which the GHCN data from NOAA, or the source code and analysis that you can easily do for yourself.
What's the point? I have convening proof that the Global Warming claims are wrong. I've provided source code, and detailed analysis. All that happens is the Global Warming advocates call me the equivalent of a Holocaust denier. Just go download the Global Historical Climatology Network dataset. Pull out the Evaporation Rate data for yourself. Then calculate the change in evaporation rate for all the stations that have data over the last 30 years or from 1950 to present if you're game. You won't find any meaningful increase or decrease from 1950 to 2010. Unless you want to change the claim that Global Warming Started around October 2010 then global warming doesn't exist as it's been claimed.
It's still very much constitutional for a judge to issue a warrant to search my home given probable cause. Now if Apple hasn't made their walled garden, and done just about everything they could to stop people from jail breaking phone then I'd agree with you. But the way Apple has behaved in regards to their phone they try to play the game of Land Lord, and in that case this is no different than a land lord being issued a warrant to have the home searched of a murder suspect. Now if you're going to insist that it's "unconstitutional" you're going to need to quote chapter and verse with a given argument. Otherwise it's the same old "unconstitutional" claim whenever something is done that one side or the other doesn't like. It's unconstitutional to propose a constitutional amendment to the 14th amendment. It's unconstitutional for any law you don't like, and that's all this argument has ever been.
In the case of Google all they have to do is do a pin code reset, and their in. I have a hard time believing that Apple would make it so their device is so easy to loose all your important data. I can put my belongings in a secure bank, but if the government has a court order it'll be opened up to them. What makes Apple so special?
Sorry, but performant isn't in the Webster online dictionary, and even Chrome thinks it's a misspelled word. Googles Ngram views also shows that up until the last few decades it's a rarely used word. However, in the books the Ngram viewer references it's not being used to indicate performance in at least one case in 1812. Heck even the usage in the 70's and 80's seems to be referencing it as an actor in something, and having nothing to do with performance or efficiency as this article want it to be.
Look at the comparison. I'm willing to bet a large amount of their audience happen to be watching cartoon, or anime. When your color pallet is reduced you don't need to save the entire thing in 32bit color to get the same exact quality. Some will be shaved, and others wont be shaved that much.
If you think the report has such bad things to day about Managed Languages it really depends on how you read it. Java ends up looking like it's just under PHP, but if you look at the Critical Flaws portion it's actually much better than C++. Heck, Javascript is the best overall, but it's easy to see why Javascript is so pervasive that it needs a fairly solid sandbox, or everyone's hit with the exploit. Which is why Java exploits are so bad it doesn't matter that Java has fewer critical exploits when the Java plugin ends up with the exploit everyone with it installed gets hit.
Any of the Critic reviews were false reviews of the PC version, and we've known that for a while now. The only versions of the game that were released early to the critics were PS4, and XBox One. Many of the reviews disclosed that early in their reviews, and most of them released what version they were reviewing. By reading the reviews you can tell by reading the negative reviews. Console user reviews have more positive then negative, and the PC has more negative than positive. Heck even one of the PS4 negative user reviews cites "-poor optimalization on a pc " as the reason for the negative review. The XBox One has a stutter issue that Probably should have been fixed before release, but by and large the major issues are a poor PC release that you should have understood before. As for the critics they very rarely consider giving different scores for different systems for the same game. They only have time to review one version. Most rational PC gamers understand that the platform is buggy and a head ack for a large sample of games, and that there is only a short period of time where the consoles are at their End of Life that the PC wins hands down because the consoles are holding back development by their static specs. Only the new, nieve, and master race PC gamers are upset because they thought the days of PC buggyness was over.
Your implying that they haven't upgrade? You can't honestly not remember when 256k was the bee's knees, can you? Back in the ADSL days it maxed out at 1 meg up, and 10 megs down if you where lucky, and very few areas had enough fiber and t1's to support everyone at those speeds. Now with VDSL2 it can go somewhere from 50 to 200 megs as its cap depending on the version. The providers still should only sell what they have the ability to provide if they're smart so we're a ways off from maxing it out, but the simple view of the history shows that yes they have been upgrading for quite a while now. Now maybe they didn't spend the money to get you personally up to 1 gigabit, but that's hardly not spending the money. And maybe they could have spent the money better, but in reality if it was that easy to just toss money at it to get everyone 1 gigabit then Google fiber would have launched everyone, and not just in the select few areas that it was financially possible to do.
If your players have no fear of punishment, or rejection if they decide to do unethical things they they are doing it wrong. Murdering the black smith for his weapons is basically asking the DM to write you a ticket to abusive DM land.
Just let it build up over an hour and define a leap day light savings time where to don't move out clocks back an hour.
There is still sufficient problems. Take the Bird Flu back when we were in panic mode. Just because you concocted a disease that's lethal doesn't mean that it's easily transmittable. So in the process of trying to make an Air Born Ebola you end up infecting yourself long before you make it an easily transmissible version. Sure you could be a slow moving disease bomb, but if the infection rate is like how the Bird Flu was when you practically had to get bird feces on your hands then put it in your mouth cross infection becomes unlikely. Even regular Ebola wouldn't spread very well here. In Africa it spreads so easily mostly due to some archaic barrial rights where all the women prepare the body. Here we're so paranoid about corpses that only a special medial technical gets to extract the fluid embalm, and all in a very sanitary way.
I get how nasty this bomb looks, but for the life of me I can't think of how to get the explosive into this impossible to disarm assembly without having it explode. With all the traps even on the screws I don't see how it could be put together, and then armed. It probably requires some very specific way to put it together without having it explode.
Cutting open the case to get to the wires would have cause the aluminum foil to complete the circuit. The only option was the cut open the case and the wires simultaneously. To do that required a shaped charge. This is the only detonator that the FBI has come accost that couldn't even be disarmed by its creator for a reason. The ransom was just for the switch code to disable the tilt switch so they could move it to a safe place to explode.
A large volume of Liquid Nitrogen might do the trick. I think the biggest problem with that would be the contraction of the metal before the explosive became stable might have caused the aluminum foil to complete the circuit and explode.
They tried that with a shaped charge of C4, but the few sticks of dynamite he put in it for just in case they tried that caused the TNT to explode.
Does the 14 years a resident require the last 14 years of citizenship to reside in the US, or can it be any 14 years of your life?
No he's saying that he can make claims about the n=1 when he's only about claims about the n=99,999. That 1 single untreated survivor is still more likely random change, and completely meaningless.
Sorry, but N=1 is statistically meaningless even in your example. Could be explained away as nothing more than random change. Drawing any significant conclusion on N less than 30 is utter nonsense, and should be discarded and defecated on like the N=12 AntiVax studies. Heck I'll still have doubt on any study with less than 100 and you'll have me believing unless proven otherwise with N above 1000.
It's also likely that their ranking is higher because people are searching for those candidates more. A simple case of reverse causation.
$2.42 for a single meal that lasts up to a year. Sounds like it's market is survivalist hipsters planning for the end of the world. I'll stick to a pound of split peas or lentils. Heck if I'm going full on Apocalypse survivalist I'll just take the discount and buy in bulk getting them at far less than a dollar per pound. They last 4 to 5 years so much better as a survival meal. With O2 absorbers they're supposed to last forever. I could even stock up on freeze dried veggies and make a better meal.Why would I buy this 'Soylent' in light of better alternatives?
The cheap cable may have had signalling noise on the line in some way. Improper shielding right next to an electric cable will do that. However, until the noise reaches a level that the error handling can't compensate you shouldn't notice it at all. The odds of you consistently passing Ethernet frames that pass the checksum so you'll hear the noise is unimaginable unless deliberately setup to do so. It's a simple checksum fail - resend frame. It'll cut down on your bandwidth with re-transmissions, but not on the quality. The fact that people don't hear the quality difference on WiFi is all the proof you need. The day my Ethernet line has more errors than my WiFi signal is the day I replace the cable.