Clearly not. The whole point of building a botnet like this is that each member of it only has to send very small amounts of traffic to avoid any detection.
Enough to know that try to filter at the target of attacks is practically useless and is why I am asking if there is any way that I do not know yet to solve the problem at the other end of the connection.
Exactly. Especially when these IoT bothets are in the hundreds of thousands of devices. The amount of traffic per device is less than what is used simply streaming from Netflix.
I run it at less than its native res, so it's not as sharp as it could be. Lower resolution would be better for me, and I'm far from being the only one in that position.
Why wouldn't you just run the monitor at a higher DPI? DPI scaling is old hat at this point.
Nope just not an idiot. Tesla specifically lists what their system provides as a feature set and it has never once listed "ability to exceed speed limit" as a feature.
Where in the itemized bill of sale did any of these owners have it listed "Ability for autopilot to exceed speed limits"? I'm doubting that was listed anywhere on the sale contract. So, no, they did not buy that specific features. They bought an autopilot system as a whole.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, the "DDoS" was people flooding their store to buy things. Valve still seems to not have learned any lessons from past winter sales.
I know very well, thank you.
Clearly not. The whole point of building a botnet like this is that each member of it only has to send very small amounts of traffic to avoid any detection.
Enough to know that try to filter at the target of attacks is practically useless and is why I am asking if there is any way that I do not know yet to solve the problem at the other end of the connection.
So again, do you not understand how a DDoS works?
And to avoid another dumb response from you
Ask a dumb question...
Exactly. Especially when these IoT bothets are in the hundreds of thousands of devices. The amount of traffic per device is less than what is used simply streaming from Netflix.
Do you not know how a DDoS works?
Should rename these from IoT devices to Internet of DDoS devices.
This is a third-party library. Why would you need to update all of PHP?
What do you have to hide? Post your real name and stop hiding behind a psuedonym.
Because your legal name is "Nogrial"?
No, they run OxygenOS.
I run it at less than its native res, so it's not as sharp as it could be. Lower resolution would be better for me, and I'm far from being the only one in that position.
Why wouldn't you just run the monitor at a higher DPI? DPI scaling is old hat at this point.
The couple hundred milliamps of a current draw from the backlight is nothing compared to the CPU and the display.
From a moral standpoint, I don't think people should be forced to watch things they don't want.
Then simply avoid the movie if you're such an uptight Puritan.
Yeah, that's exactly what the last part of the submission already says. Way to be insightful there, brah.
Nope just not an idiot. Tesla specifically lists what their system provides as a feature set and it has never once listed "ability to exceed speed limit" as a feature.
https://www.tesla.com/autopilo...
Where in the itemized bill of sale did any of these owners have it listed "Ability for autopilot to exceed speed limits"? I'm doubting that was listed anywhere on the sale contract. So, no, they did not buy that specific features. They bought an autopilot system as a whole.
It has nothing to do with it. Idiots like the GP just think they are being clever by saying it.
Then why would the issue have continued with batteries from a completely different manufacturer?
What exactly would Germany gain from lying about this? Sounds like you're just unable to admit you fell for a lie.
Of course it is. The claim of the GGP is silly.
Yes. If it's not largely automated then they have an incompetent sysadmin team.
This isn't cutting out the middleman. It's just replacing the current middleman with Amazon as the middleman.
But then contrary to the claim that isn't eliminating a middleman. It's simply changing who the middleman is.
It would also eliminate the need for a third-party broker, which typically charges a commission of about 15% for doing the middleman work.
So Amazon is doing all of this for free? If not, how are they not also just another third-party broker that charges a commission?
It's a easy way to bilk VCs of money.
It's legal because industry-cocksucker Ajit Pai will be the head of the FCC soon.