Um, using biofuels is entirely on topic when talking about Carbon capture, so I am not sure where you get that s/he was offtopic from. I would say that more you went entirely off topic by bringing something to the discussion that came from left field.
You do realize that you comment works both ways, don't you?
Face it, you are as deplorable as Hillary, nobody with any sense of decency would stand by this piece of garbage.
After all, publically calling the women your husband raped whores really shows how for feminism one is. Also, with how careless she was with classified information, and official records (which are used for FOIA), do you really trust her to keep the launch codes secret or actually care about Top Secret information?
Which is exactly why cellulose is better than coal. You really should reread that, as it says nothing about coal, but about cellulose fuels.
If the Carbon was pulled out of the atmosphere less than a million years ago (as in the freaking plants grew, then we converted them to fuels), than it is Carbon neutral. This is a fact. You are the only one bringing up coal and the carbonaceous period, which is clearly outside of the less than a million years ago figure that HornWumpus is typing about.
That comment was in response to your comment that cellulose to fuel wouldn't work. HornWumpus never actually said anything about coal, but about cellulose to fuel, which is an option to power cars, not coal power plants. If gasoline is replaced by biofuels, it removes a large source of Carbon going into the atmosphere.
Which says nothing about coal, but says that cellulose to fuel would allow useful work to be done with the extra plant matter that is now instead allowed to decompose.
This is the assertion you made. I am pointing out that this is not an accurate statement. Global warming may have contributed some, but it was not the cause. The cause was a normal atmospheric phenomenon of hurricanes that has happened for longer than man has been around.
In the revolutionary war, many of the cannon and most of the rifles were privately owned. The military of the day actually had worse guns than the militias.
The intent according to the most recent second amendment case that came before the supreme court was that private citizens should not be restricted from owning any arm used by the military. I am not sure how they made the jump from that to that it was ok to restrict automatic firearms and short barreled shotguns, but that was the way it was put in the majority decision.
Also, no, the second amendment does not give the right just for the militia, it gives the right to all men (I am assuming human, but wouldn't be surprised if it was only males), with the reason being to be able to form a militia on need.
Perhaps you should learn to read before you go calling bull on others.
For the ability to climb mountains, I bought hiking boots.
This does not mean that I only use my hiking boots for climbing mountains, it means that is one reason I bought hiking boots.
Perhaps before quoting amendment numbers, it might do to look up the amendment you are referring to.
You say fourth, but it appears you might be railing against the fifth. The fourth amendment covers illegal search and seizure. The fifth covers locking people up without due process. Now, the government has done exactly nothing to destroy the fourth, except to people who can't read English sentences.
The actual court order did not compel Apple to do anything for free, and offered one possible way for them to do it, but also left Apple open to suggest another method. It asked Apple to do an estimate of how much they wanted to be paid, and the way they wanted to do it, to be approved by the FBI.
I see nothing that goes against the fourth or fifth here.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
For the Fifth in fact, it doesn't even apply, the guy is dead.
Are you trying to claim that the FBI failed to get a warrant to access a deceased person's iPhone? After all, the only thing that has to be achieved to search people's papers and property is a warrant.
You mean like the BS you wrote that made no sense whatsoever? I just tried to figure out what the hell you were talking about.
Hurricanes have been happening for millions of years, no Global Warming did not cause the Haiti deaths, a plain old hurricane and poor people who don't live in proper housing caused the tragedy.
You just don't get it. Apple made Palm Pilots with Cell phones built in, they copied their predecessor. The reason you have to keep repeating yourself is because you are wrong. Just because you willfully ignore all that came before your precious Apple, doesn't make it not exist.
Global warming didn't cause any tragedy, being poor did. Haiti and the Dominican Republic share an island, but you don't hear about the DR being washed out to sea, that is because they build with concrete there, so there isn't much that can be damaged by one of these storms.
For FiOS, the difference is $10, but I can't speak for Comcast. That was for me to move 75/75 to a business line ($90/mo already, $100/mo as commercial).
So, what exactly do you see that is the same? I see the generic phone icon...and that is about it. Everything else that is not dictated by purpose looks entirely different. Sorry, but the location of the speaker grill is kind of a universal for phones, and rounded corners are still a normal thing.
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
Care to "correct the narrative" some more? Or are you calling James Comey a liar?
In much of the US, people have to still drive when there is snow on the ground. Many places don't even shut down for snow. If your car refuses to go, you will need another car to get to work.
As to hurricanes, people need to drive in them too, but usually that is emergency services, or idiots, so it is less true than snow.
See, the key thing you are missing is that flagship =/= all phones. There will always be ways to get what you want. You are comparing all phones that a manufacturer makes to 2 or 3 of their phones. Samsung makes much more than the S7 and Note 7.
Why would they suddenly reduce their selection to kill off a port that is very popular? You seem to be equating the Apple way with every other company, when it is rather obtuse to do so. No, Apple doesn't lead the industry, they are routinely 1-2 years behind the rest of the industry. Removing the analog port is a money grab and nothing else. You can keep denying it all you like, but it doesn't change the facts around it.
Did you even bother to read TFA? This is all Wild Ass Speculation (tm), not actual fact, or even an announcement. You are taking rumor as fact, nothing says that Samsung will sell 0 phones in 5 years with a headphone port, and in fact that would be absurd to expect to happen.
Slashdot Mirror
FOIA = required by law
publishing tax returns = political tradition that could lead to identity theft
If you disagree, I propose that you post a link to your tax returns here.
though Chicago might be more of a gamble, but still
Do you mean Detroit or Baltimore?
I would much rather see something like HyperLink built with the money,
Hyperloop possibly?
If your employer is paying a portion of your medical insurance, you aren't under Obamacare.
Obamacare is personally paid insurance, not employer paid insurance.
Um, using biofuels is entirely on topic when talking about Carbon capture, so I am not sure where you get that s/he was offtopic from. I would say that more you went entirely off topic by bringing something to the discussion that came from left field.
What makes you think I am voting for Trump? Perhaps you should rethink your position that there are only two choices.
Not that I like defending Obama or anything, but you do realize he is reading a book there, those aren't his own personal words.
You do realize that you comment works both ways, don't you?
Face it, you are as deplorable as Hillary, nobody with any sense of decency would stand by this piece of garbage.
After all, publically calling the women your husband raped whores really shows how for feminism one is. Also, with how careless she was with classified information, and official records (which are used for FOIA), do you really trust her to keep the launch codes secret or actually care about Top Secret information?
Which is exactly why cellulose is better than coal. You really should reread that, as it says nothing about coal, but about cellulose fuels.
If the Carbon was pulled out of the atmosphere less than a million years ago (as in the freaking plants grew, then we converted them to fuels), than it is Carbon neutral. This is a fact. You are the only one bringing up coal and the carbonaceous period, which is clearly outside of the less than a million years ago figure that HornWumpus is typing about.
That comment was in response to your comment that cellulose to fuel wouldn't work. HornWumpus never actually said anything about coal, but about cellulose to fuel, which is an option to power cars, not coal power plants. If gasoline is replaced by biofuels, it removes a large source of Carbon going into the atmosphere.
This is the first comment in the string:
https://hardware.slashdot.org/...
Which says nothing about coal, but says that cellulose to fuel would allow useful work to be done with the extra plant matter that is now instead allowed to decompose.
(which caused this tragedy)
This is the assertion you made. I am pointing out that this is not an accurate statement. Global warming may have contributed some, but it was not the cause. The cause was a normal atmospheric phenomenon of hurricanes that has happened for longer than man has been around.
Are you sure about that?
In the revolutionary war, many of the cannon and most of the rifles were privately owned. The military of the day actually had worse guns than the militias.
The intent according to the most recent second amendment case that came before the supreme court was that private citizens should not be restricted from owning any arm used by the military. I am not sure how they made the jump from that to that it was ok to restrict automatic firearms and short barreled shotguns, but that was the way it was put in the majority decision.
I have a hint for you, the militia consists of every man between 17 and 45.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Also, no, the second amendment does not give the right just for the militia, it gives the right to all men (I am assuming human, but wouldn't be surprised if it was only males), with the reason being to be able to form a militia on need.
Perhaps you should learn to read before you go calling bull on others.
For the ability to climb mountains, I bought hiking boots.
This does not mean that I only use my hiking boots for climbing mountains, it means that is one reason I bought hiking boots.
Perhaps before quoting amendment numbers, it might do to look up the amendment you are referring to.
You say fourth, but it appears you might be railing against the fifth. The fourth amendment covers illegal search and seizure. The fifth covers locking people up without due process. Now, the government has done exactly nothing to destroy the fourth, except to people who can't read English sentences.
https://assets.documentcloud.o...
The actual court order did not compel Apple to do anything for free, and offered one possible way for them to do it, but also left Apple open to suggest another method. It asked Apple to do an estimate of how much they wanted to be paid, and the way they wanted to do it, to be approved by the FBI.
I see nothing that goes against the fourth or fifth here.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,[a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
For the Fifth in fact, it doesn't even apply, the guy is dead.
Are you trying to claim that the FBI failed to get a warrant to access a deceased person's iPhone? After all, the only thing that has to be achieved to search people's papers and property is a warrant.
What exact civil liberty is being given up here?
You mean like the BS you wrote that made no sense whatsoever? I just tried to figure out what the hell you were talking about.
Hurricanes have been happening for millions of years, no Global Warming did not cause the Haiti deaths, a plain old hurricane and poor people who don't live in proper housing caused the tragedy.
So, Apple copied the Palm Pilots?
You just don't get it. Apple made Palm Pilots with Cell phones built in, they copied their predecessor. The reason you have to keep repeating yourself is because you are wrong. Just because you willfully ignore all that came before your precious Apple, doesn't make it not exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Oh wait, someone else beat Apple to the Palm Pilot with a cell phone:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So I guess you can point right at that and say, Apple copied it.
You are a vegan musical composition of global warming?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Global warming didn't cause any tragedy, being poor did. Haiti and the Dominican Republic share an island, but you don't hear about the DR being washed out to sea, that is because they build with concrete there, so there isn't much that can be damaged by one of these storms.
For FiOS, the difference is $10, but I can't speak for Comcast. That was for me to move 75/75 to a business line ($90/mo already, $100/mo as commercial).
That is true of every smartphone in existence. So what that means is that Apple copied my Nexus phone, so they are more guilty of copying.
They look nothing alike, you are just too pro Apple to even see the differences.
So, what exactly do you see that is the same? I see the generic phone icon...and that is about it. Everything else that is not dictated by purpose looks entirely different. Sorry, but the location of the speaker grill is kind of a universal for phones, and rounded corners are still a normal thing.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press...
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
Care to "correct the narrative" some more? Or are you calling James Comey a liar?
In much of the US, people have to still drive when there is snow on the ground. Many places don't even shut down for snow. If your car refuses to go, you will need another car to get to work.
As to hurricanes, people need to drive in them too, but usually that is emergency services, or idiots, so it is less true than snow.
Sure you can.
http://accessories.dell.com/sn...
http://accessories.dell.com/sn...
http://accessories.dell.com/sn...
See, the key thing you are missing is that flagship =/= all phones. There will always be ways to get what you want. You are comparing all phones that a manufacturer makes to 2 or 3 of their phones. Samsung makes much more than the S7 and Note 7.
http://www.samsung.com/us/mobi...
Why would they suddenly reduce their selection to kill off a port that is very popular? You seem to be equating the Apple way with every other company, when it is rather obtuse to do so. No, Apple doesn't lead the industry, they are routinely 1-2 years behind the rest of the industry. Removing the analog port is a money grab and nothing else. You can keep denying it all you like, but it doesn't change the facts around it.
Did you even bother to read TFA? This is all Wild Ass Speculation (tm), not actual fact, or even an announcement. You are taking rumor as fact, nothing says that Samsung will sell 0 phones in 5 years with a headphone port, and in fact that would be absurd to expect to happen.