You can say it about whatever phone you like, and you are wrong. Do you really think that with the high percentage of Windows users in the market people would have trouble using a Windows OS on a phone? Usability isn't that big of a deal. Many of the phones were touchscreen and/or keyboarded. I had a flip with a numeric keypad and never had issues using it. Palm was also incredibly useful, and BlackBerry was the high water line of usability for years before iPhone (or Android) ever came around.
Except perhaps those aliens wouldn't have the NIMBYs we have to deal with and would have shifted over to nuclear fission, and possibly even nuclear fusion.
Um, the networks all advertised it for data when the data portion of 3G was released, they knew it would get used, they failed to upgrade. Stop making excuses. AT&T was actually much worse at it than Verizon, somewhat due to the technology differences, but AT&T still failed at upgrading.
Are you really that confused? There were tons of very usable smart phones well before the iPhone was considered for designing. You may be drinking the coolade, but you are wrong. Windows Mobile, Palm, BlackBerry, and many others were quite usable and worked wonderfully. Having to use iPhones for work, I would even say they are quite a bit less useful than the old WinMo phones, with WinMo, you could run any software you wanted. Want a tether app, sure no problem.
Whois the IP address and report them to their ISP. We had someone hack one of our servers before (service account with default password...someone else, not I) and started running a dictionary attack from it, we were notified by our ISP, and we cleaned it up, then started notifying the ISPs of the source of our attack. That is the smart thing to do, but not all ISPs will even do anything about it.
CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 502(c) "COMPREHENSIVE COMPUTER DATA ACCESS AND FRAUD ACT" (1) Knowingly accesses and without permission alters, damages, deletes, destroys, or otherwise uses any data, computer, computer system, or computer network in order to either (A) devise or execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, deceive, or extort, or (B) wrongfully control or obtain money, property, or data.
Nope
(2) Knowingly accesses and without permission takes, copies, or makes use of any data from a computer, computer system, or computer network, or takes or copies any supporting documentation, whether existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(3) Knowingly and without permission uses or causes to be used computer services.
Nope
(4) Knowingly accesses and without permission adds, alters, damages, deletes, or destroys any data, computer software, or computer programs which reside or exist internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(5) Knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer, computer system, or computer network.
Authorized user? Who is authorized, who authorizes. Wouldn't giving out the password to numerous people in the room not authorized to have it break this part?
(6) Knowingly and without permission provides or assists in providing a means of accessing a computer, computer system, or computer network in violation of this section.
He would have broken this clause had he provided the passwords over the phone with people in attendance who did not belong having the password, as they tried to force him to do.
(7) Knowingly and without permission accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(8) Knowingly introduces any computer contaminant into any computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(9) Knowingly and without permission uses the Internet domain name of another individual, corporation, or entity in connection with the sending of one or more electronic mail messages, and thereby damages or causes damage to a computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
Ok, what did he break again? Nowhere in there does it say he is required to provide passwords to systems at an office he has already been let go from. If they didn't get the passwords before firing him, tough shit.
Um, Macs are PCs...as PC stands for Personal Computer, as opposed to Mainframe Computers. I have always wondered about the logic of calling it PC vs Mac, when both are PCs...
There were some reports of higher than normal radioactivity as far away as Maine, it was reported that they thought this was from a radioactive release from Fukushima. Apparently, this could have been from the large Radon release instead.
Except it was quite well detailed in the SF password policy that his boss was not entitled to the password, and surely the HR director on the other end of the phone, as well as the police officers they called are not privy to the password.
So, if this is your rationale behind being a left wing supporter, how you you align that with the left's support of the media corporations? Left or right, they are both in support of corporations, just different ones.
Agreed, this patent actually makes sense when you consider that it is a manufactured dog toy, not a stick. Now the method of swinging on a swing pantent is blatantly stupid however, and would serve as a much better example of abuse of the system.
I misunderstood the term meta-stable and later figured out the error. Not being a nuclear isotope specialist, I am not clear though on the actual dangers of the 99 isotope vs the 99m isotope, and I have to say, the Wikipedia article doesn't really go into the dangers. Please enlighten me on why this isotope is so dangerous.
Slashdot Mirror
Already been corrected, but I think you are thinking of Snow Crash, not Neuromancer.
You can say it about whatever phone you like, and you are wrong. Do you really think that with the high percentage of Windows users in the market people would have trouble using a Windows OS on a phone? Usability isn't that big of a deal. Many of the phones were touchscreen and/or keyboarded. I had a flip with a numeric keypad and never had issues using it. Palm was also incredibly useful, and BlackBerry was the high water line of usability for years before iPhone (or Android) ever came around.
Except perhaps those aliens wouldn't have the NIMBYs we have to deal with and would have shifted over to nuclear fission, and possibly even nuclear fusion.
Um, the networks all advertised it for data when the data portion of 3G was released, they knew it would get used, they failed to upgrade. Stop making excuses. AT&T was actually much worse at it than Verizon, somewhat due to the technology differences, but AT&T still failed at upgrading.
Are you really that confused? There were tons of very usable smart phones well before the iPhone was considered for designing. You may be drinking the coolade, but you are wrong. Windows Mobile, Palm, BlackBerry, and many others were quite usable and worked wonderfully. Having to use iPhones for work, I would even say they are quite a bit less useful than the old WinMo phones, with WinMo, you could run any software you wanted. Want a tether app, sure no problem.
Hook it to their fingers? For more fun, do it to different hands.
I much prefer our 440v 3 phase for a nice boom.
Whois the IP address and report them to their ISP. We had someone hack one of our servers before (service account with default password...someone else, not I) and started running a dictionary attack from it, we were notified by our ISP, and we cleaned it up, then started notifying the ISPs of the source of our attack. That is the smart thing to do, but not all ISPs will even do anything about it.
CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 502(c)
"COMPREHENSIVE COMPUTER DATA ACCESS AND FRAUD ACT"
(1) Knowingly accesses and without permission alters, damages,
deletes, destroys, or otherwise uses any data, computer, computer
system, or computer network in order to either (A) devise or execute
any scheme or artifice to defraud, deceive, or extort, or (B)
wrongfully control or obtain money, property, or data.
Nope
(2) Knowingly accesses and without permission takes, copies, or
makes use of any data from a computer, computer system, or computer
network, or takes or copies any supporting documentation, whether
existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer
system, or computer network.
Nope
(3) Knowingly and without permission uses or causes to be used
computer services.
Nope
(4) Knowingly accesses and without permission adds, alters,
damages, deletes, or destroys any data, computer software, or
computer programs which reside or exist internal or external to a
computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(5) Knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the
disruption of computer services or denies or causes the denial of
computer services to an authorized user of a computer, computer
system, or computer network.
Authorized user? Who is authorized, who authorizes. Wouldn't giving out the password to numerous people in the room not authorized to have it break this part?
(6) Knowingly and without permission provides or assists in
providing a means of accessing a computer, computer system, or
computer network in violation of this section.
He would have broken this clause had he provided the passwords over the phone with people in attendance who did not belong having the password, as they tried to force him to do.
(7) Knowingly and without permission accesses or causes to be
accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(8) Knowingly introduces any computer contaminant into any
computer, computer system, or computer network.
Nope
(9) Knowingly and without permission uses the Internet domain name
of another individual, corporation, or entity in connection with the
sending of one or more electronic mail messages, and thereby damages
or causes damage to a computer, computer system, or computer
network.
Nope
Ok, what did he break again? Nowhere in there does it say he is required to provide passwords to systems at an office he has already been let go from. If they didn't get the passwords before firing him, tough shit.
Um, Macs are PCs...as PC stands for Personal Computer, as opposed to Mainframe Computers. I have always wondered about the logic of calling it PC vs Mac, when both are PCs...
What law? Do you have a link?
There were some reports of higher than normal radioactivity as far away as Maine, it was reported that they thought this was from a radioactive release from Fukushima. Apparently, this could have been from the large Radon release instead.
Except it was quite well detailed in the SF password policy that his boss was not entitled to the password, and surely the HR director on the other end of the phone, as well as the police officers they called are not privy to the password.
I thought it was Belgium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_death
Yes, the nuttery is that bad sometimes...
Bull shit. We are in a declared war in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States
How the hell!? I wasn't aware you could counter that move in such a way, wow, just wow.
I put salt on food I eat, and I have not died any time recently from it. Perhaps I am trying to point out that toxic isn't the right word to use?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/toxic
This is why I go to the BBC for news, rather than any US news organizations.
So, if this is your rationale behind being a left wing supporter, how you you align that with the left's support of the media corporations? Left or right, they are both in support of corporations, just different ones.
Does the patent office really make a profit? Is it possible for them to lose money?
Agreed, this patent actually makes sense when you consider that it is a manufactured dog toy, not a stick. Now the method of swinging on a swing pantent is blatantly stupid however, and would serve as a much better example of abuse of the system.
What laws would this be that prevent abortion in the face of harm to baby and or mother?
0, as that is pretty much impossible.
I misunderstood the term meta-stable and later figured out the error. Not being a nuclear isotope specialist, I am not clear though on the actual dangers of the 99 isotope vs the 99m isotope, and I have to say, the Wikipedia article doesn't really go into the dangers. Please enlighten me on why this isotope is so dangerous.