You can't demand someone not say something because exercising their free speech creates a burden on you. Such an idea is incompatible with freedom of speech.
Um, that is kind of incompatible with libel and slander laws. It isn't free speech to tell a false story about someone else. Also, if the stories are true, but the tellers can't prove it, they can still be prosecuted for libel (in this case).
Notice I am not a lawyer, and neither are you, this is not legal advice.
FYI, non aviation GPS are disabled over a set altitude to prevent use as a cheap missile guidance solution. I believe the altitude is 10kft, but I could be wrong.
I used to repair GPS equipment when I was in college as a side job, it was a pretty well known thing back then, but they may have undone it since then, along with selective availability. Last time I tried to use my phone in an airplane, the GPS gave no fix despite enough satellites in view and reporting.
You use your cell phone all the time? You don't use a desktop computer when at work?
Cell phone and residential internet connections are a greater proportion of the IPv6 users, so when the majority of people are at work, less traffic goes over IPv6.
I stayed at the same job for 7 years, when jumping away from there, I got a huge raise as my salary was depressed. I was faithful and was screwed by management for staying with them.
The second amendment has always meant current military level arms. It even covers tanks and fighter jets if you can afford the stamp and the item.
FYI, most of the weapons used in the revolutionary war were privately owned. Most of the cannon used were owned by private citizens, not the government.
Also, the militia portion of the second amendment is A reason for the right to bear arms, not the only reason as you try to assert.
If you want to change the second amendment, create an amendment and get the states to approve it, until you do so, the second amendment protects everyone's rights to own a firearm, even former felons and the mentally ill.
The minimum speed limit in the US is 25 mph (40 KMph), if a speed bump needs to be slowed more than that to go over, it is a danger to traffic and should not exist. Forcing people to go 5 mph to negotiate a speed bump on a 25 mph road is poor design. There are better traffic slowing measures that don't ruin car's suspension/tires.
And before you respond personally about my driving, I will inform you that I own a large truck, I assure you, it can negotiate a speed bump at the legal speed limit without the slightest damage, but not all cars are designed like my truck. Also, as I drive a large vehichle, I frequently drive under the speed limit in residential areas, but that doesn't stop the complainers...
Here is an example of a better traffic calming method:
I read a book about this once, there was always this single yard you could cut through at top speed and cut 15 minutes off your trip. It came in quite handy for this pizza delivery driver until he used the wrong yard in a hurry and impacted an empty pool. Luckily a cheeky skateboard courier was able to complete the pizza delivery for him.
Last I checked, most people use GPS navigation nowadays. Are you going to claim that there has been a significant uptick in accidents since GPS for cars was invented?
You should sue all the car companies that sell GPS units with their cars, they are increasing accidents according to you!
You just don't get it, no one thinks you are winning an argument, only you delusionally posting as some imaginary third party. You have never made an understandable argument that hasn't been completely trashed, but you will keep posting your garbage and claiming you won!
I will win again, can you even score a point this time?
The first time I opened it, there was no picture, the second time however, the video showed, and it indeed is a vacuum tube being manufactured by "hand".
I was pointing out that contrary to what macs4all (a Apple troll) posted, Apple didn't invent Thunderbolt, Intel did. Apple modified Lightpeak to run electrically, not exactly a difficult thing, and literally it is a repackaging of an existing technology. This is true, do you deny that Lightpeak was an Intel invention? Or are you another Apple troll that feels that Apple invented everything?
macs4all claimed that Apple doesn't just repackage other people's ideas by claiming that Apple invented Thunderbolt. Apple invented a VERY minor portion of Thunderbolt, the connector.
I see there that the Hmong (whoever that is...never heard of them) need way more help than the Black people. Now, there are many problems in this country, but there are exactly 0 people alive today who were enslaved by the people of the US. Those people who are coming out of modern day slavery excepted, and they need all the help we can offer as a society.
What if the tables were reversed and that $40 printer burned down your house? Is it unreasonable to allow court to assess damages that are related to the actual damages?
As I know very little about this case since I wasn't in the courtroom, I can't say if the damages were related to anything actually real, but in the case it was, would you rather the damaged party was limited to the cost of the printer?
Slashdot Mirror
You can't demand someone not say something because exercising their free speech creates a burden on you. Such an idea is incompatible with freedom of speech.
Um, that is kind of incompatible with libel and slander laws. It isn't free speech to tell a false story about someone else. Also, if the stories are true, but the tellers can't prove it, they can still be prosecuted for libel (in this case).
Notice I am not a lawyer, and neither are you, this is not legal advice.
How slanderous of you!
Look, there was a reason for becoming a lich, and it was to avoid punk kids like you.
FYI, non aviation GPS are disabled over a set altitude to prevent use as a cheap missile guidance solution. I believe the altitude is 10kft, but I could be wrong.
I used to repair GPS equipment when I was in college as a side job, it was a pretty well known thing back then, but they may have undone it since then, along with selective availability. Last time I tried to use my phone in an airplane, the GPS gave no fix despite enough satellites in view and reporting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Looking it up, it is 59kft, so unlikely to cause you problems on your aircraft as you were speaking of 20kft.
According to Google, it is.
You use your cell phone all the time? You don't use a desktop computer when at work?
Cell phone and residential internet connections are a greater proportion of the IPv6 users, so when the majority of people are at work, less traffic goes over IPv6.
I stayed at the same job for 7 years, when jumping away from there, I got a huge raise as my salary was depressed. I was faithful and was screwed by management for staying with them.
Clearly the ball. You don't slow down for flying object entering the street?
The complaint is about the amount of traffic, not the speed of the traffic.
By the definition used, the regular citizens has better technology weapons than the government!
The government handed out muskets, private citizens provided rifles and cannon.
Bullshit.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/su...
The second amendment has always meant current military level arms. It even covers tanks and fighter jets if you can afford the stamp and the item.
FYI, most of the weapons used in the revolutionary war were privately owned. Most of the cannon used were owned by private citizens, not the government.
Also, the militia portion of the second amendment is A reason for the right to bear arms, not the only reason as you try to assert.
If you want to change the second amendment, create an amendment and get the states to approve it, until you do so, the second amendment protects everyone's rights to own a firearm, even former felons and the mentally ill.
The minimum speed limit in the US is 25 mph (40 KMph), if a speed bump needs to be slowed more than that to go over, it is a danger to traffic and should not exist. Forcing people to go 5 mph to negotiate a speed bump on a 25 mph road is poor design. There are better traffic slowing measures that don't ruin car's suspension/tires.
And before you respond personally about my driving, I will inform you that I own a large truck, I assure you, it can negotiate a speed bump at the legal speed limit without the slightest damage, but not all cars are designed like my truck. Also, as I drive a large vehichle, I frequently drive under the speed limit in residential areas, but that doesn't stop the complainers...
Here is an example of a better traffic calming method:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I read a book about this once, there was always this single yard you could cut through at top speed and cut 15 minutes off your trip. It came in quite handy for this pizza delivery driver until he used the wrong yard in a hurry and impacted an empty pool. Luckily a cheeky skateboard courier was able to complete the pizza delivery for him.
Last I checked, most people use GPS navigation nowadays. Are you going to claim that there has been a significant uptick in accidents since GPS for cars was invented?
You should sue all the car companies that sell GPS units with their cars, they are increasing accidents according to you!
That's 3.
You really suck at this game don't you?
You just don't get it, no one thinks you are winning an argument, only you delusionally posting as some imaginary third party. You have never made an understandable argument that hasn't been completely trashed, but you will keep posting your garbage and claiming you won!
I will win again, can you even score a point this time?
https://slashdot.org/comments....
That's 2.
I'm gonna win again, I see it already.
https://slashdot.org/comments....
That's 1.
https://slashdot.org/comments....
Bob, get back to work, we don't pay you to post on Slashdot!
-your boss
My last job hop was almost a 60% raise...I suppose that is what you get for being faithful to a company for 7 years.
The first time I opened it, there was no picture, the second time however, the video showed, and it indeed is a vacuum tube being manufactured by "hand".
Hmm, talking behind your back? Wouldn't that be private messaging?
Posting on a public forum that you are known to read is not, and never could be described as talking behind your back. Are you delusional APK?
https://slashdot.org/comments....
Yay! I win. Wanna play again?
I was pointing out that contrary to what macs4all (a Apple troll) posted, Apple didn't invent Thunderbolt, Intel did. Apple modified Lightpeak to run electrically, not exactly a difficult thing, and literally it is a repackaging of an existing technology. This is true, do you deny that Lightpeak was an Intel invention? Or are you another Apple troll that feels that Apple invented everything?
macs4all claimed that Apple doesn't just repackage other people's ideas by claiming that Apple invented Thunderbolt. Apple invented a VERY minor portion of Thunderbolt, the connector.
Yay, I win. It looks like you lose the argument by an actual measurable amount.
Thank you for finally admitting that you are wrong, and I am right.
I see there that the Hmong (whoever that is...never heard of them) need way more help than the Black people. Now, there are many problems in this country, but there are exactly 0 people alive today who were enslaved by the people of the US. Those people who are coming out of modern day slavery excepted, and they need all the help we can offer as a society.
What if the tables were reversed and that $40 printer burned down your house? Is it unreasonable to allow court to assess damages that are related to the actual damages?
As I know very little about this case since I wasn't in the courtroom, I can't say if the damages were related to anything actually real, but in the case it was, would you rather the damaged party was limited to the cost of the printer?
So, a lawsuit over $30,000 in damages would go to small claims court?