This is a very rash generalization. Using your philosophy, we can just leave monetary policy in the hands of frauds who can track your every move, tell you what you should or shouldn't spend your money on and make sure that it's reported it to them properly, else they'll through you in jail.
This is your mindset. I see cash as expendable, and I'm hesitant to swipe a card knowing that I'll have to pay the bill later. Although if one has the mindset of the US government, maybe they don't mind swiping that card knowing full well they'll never pay it back.
I would think the distance from the camera A to the vehicle and camera B would not necessarily be equal, but I'd think you'd be able to calculate the difference based on the size off the license plate images. I believe I agree with you.
Have you ever had those labor laws violated, but the violations were implied so that if you did want to do something you'd have to pay a lawyer $200,000 just to get the case started?
Have you ever worked 16 hour days for 6 months straight only to be canned and have to move to San Francisco for another job only to rinse and repeat and end up back in So. Cal?
Have you ever been in a situation where if you took one of those sick days or vacation days, you'd get canned?
I have an idea that you're well beyond college age, but you need to realize that you likely haven't had the same experiences as the person you responded to so you shouldn't judge.
What about making an automobile though? The intent is not to manipulate emotions, but rather to complete a task.
Likewise for many sciences. If I do a math proof my intent is to show that it's true or false, not manipulate emotions.
Exactly. Especially if you use the wiki definition of the word.
"Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way to affect the senses or emotions."
By this definition, I can't think of a game or sport that isn't art.
The Legend of Zelda...for instance...along with about a million others. How can this guy comment on something he knows nothing about. That would be like me commenting on ballet.
People always talk about the tax code being too complex. This is non-sense. Complex implies intelligence. There is no intelligence in the tax code. It is CONVOLUTED.
Why is this not the fault of KYE factory? How come Samsung, HP, or Logitech weren't mentioned in the slashdot article? I think a certain site is a little biased.
"We are like prisoners," one worker told the NLC. "It seems like we live only to work. We do not work to live. We do not live a life, only work."
I felt this way for 10 years working in the video game industry. I never blamed it on the publisher...I blamed it on my incompetent employers. I finally left, and it was tough to get OUT!
These workers should do the same. They should quit, and find new jobs(or vice versa). If they can't find better jobs, they should acquire new skills so they can.
You missed the point of my post. My experiences have happened to even the most seasoned linux guys(Although I'm getting pretty seasoned...really against my will). They just don't know there's better out there. It's as if someone has only eaten Bologna at picnics their entire life, and all of the sudden Filet Mignon is set before them at 50 years of age. They wouldn't know what to do with it, and beg to go back to Bologna.
Every software company has won some and lost some...well not in the case of Ubuntu(You can't even beat Microsoft by giving it away) When Microsoft loses, they accept the loss and move forward having learned something from the previous defeat. They don't whine about it. I guess that's easier though when you've had a lot of wins.
Face it Linux(and anyone associated)...you lost! There are no asterisks in this life. When you guys figure out how to make a product that works, or offers something that Microsoft doesn't, maybe you can try to come play. As it stands, no normal end user wants to type sudo cp/fuckin/linux/this/directory/structure/is/unnecessarily/long/and/deep/fuckfile.txt/i/forgot/the/annoying/directory/name/again/.....or sudo vi/all/of/the/text/editors/suck/fuckfile.txt....or./configure -thisoptionisforversion431532.34.2341.4343oflinux
and see
.....
.....
.....
craploads of unreadable output with no carriage returns
.....
....
.....
I can't copy and paste from the terminal window, so I'm sparing you guys.
....
cryptic error message somewhere
....
:error 41398731234871
unnecessarilylongunreadbleusernamebecuaselinuxpeopleareagainstCamelCaps@linuxsucks.org:/you/are/royally/screwed/have/fun/using/google/to/find/cryptic/unreadable/docs
Since you're very astute, hopefully you'll join me in my quest to rid the world of this heinous repetition. It may annoy that crap out of people, but that's a price I'm willing to pay!
Our whole language is filled with tautologies. On my mission to expunge them from the English language, I'll call people out on 'tautologies' from now on and leave the stupid 'meaningless' part off. Thanks for ripping me a new one on that:P
If the threat is announced to people beyond the threatened, then he's admitted guilt if he takes action which makes the threat very stupid. If the threatened were smart, they'd know this and not take the threat seriously.
If the menace(I'd prefer 'threatenor', but it's not a word, but should be.) were serious, they might take action regardless.
We don't know what the threat was. It could have been as harmless as 'I'm not showing up in your court'...'I'll leave the country if don't cut it out'...or as serious as 'I'm gonna kill you'. If it were the latter, I'm sure the news would have reported that because that's juicy. If it were the former, they would leave that out because clearly it's quite lame.
I believe this case is a usurpation by the judge. A judge has to be able to be criticized, else he can make erroneous decisions indefinitely. In this case, if Trudeau were to act...he'd just wait for the 30 day sentence to end. What's the point? If we had a just legal system they would have to watch Trudeau. If he acted, then he should be convicted of a crime.
Furthermore, how can he be convicted of a crime for other people's actions?
Slashdot Mirror
This is a very rash generalization. Using your philosophy, we can just leave monetary policy in the hands of frauds who can track your every move, tell you what you should or shouldn't spend your money on and make sure that it's reported it to them properly, else they'll through you in jail.
This is your mindset. I see cash as expendable, and I'm hesitant to swipe a card knowing that I'll have to pay the bill later. Although if one has the mindset of the US government, maybe they don't mind swiping that card knowing full well they'll never pay it back.
Fuckin' McAfee.
Just a matter of time, and I'm sure it'll be for "our own good".
I would think the distance from the camera A to the vehicle and camera B would not necessarily be equal, but I'd think you'd be able to calculate the difference based on the size off the license plate images. I believe I agree with you.
Have you ever worked a programming job?
Have you ever had deadlines for YESTERDAY?
Have you ever had those labor laws violated, but the violations were implied so that if you did want to do something you'd have to pay a lawyer $200,000 just to get the case started?
Have you ever worked 16 hour days for 6 months straight only to be canned and have to move to San Francisco for another job only to rinse and repeat and end up back in So. Cal?
Have you ever been in a situation where if you took one of those sick days or vacation days, you'd get canned?
I have an idea that you're well beyond college age, but you need to realize that you likely haven't had the same experiences as the person you responded to so you shouldn't judge.
What about making an automobile though? The intent is not to manipulate emotions, but rather to complete a task.
Likewise for many sciences. If I do a math proof my intent is to show that it's true or false, not manipulate emotions.
The SEC will never think of it, would probably rather get their cronies to sue Microsoft, AND SHOULD BE ABOLISHED because they're incompetent.
Exactly. Especially if you use the wiki definition of the word.
"Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way to affect the senses or emotions."
By this definition, I can't think of a game or sport that isn't art.
The Legend of Zelda...for instance...along with about a million others. How can this guy comment on something he knows nothing about. That would be like me commenting on ballet.
Tautology!!!
The models, animations and textures? Also, what about the music. Does he not consider music an art?
that even shittier programmers infect the already shitty pool?
No, but a good professor would fail you for writing code that doesn't work.
That guy 'll track down the money...Why don't they tell us the amount?
People always talk about the tax code being too complex. This is non-sense. Complex implies intelligence. There is no intelligence in the tax code. It is CONVOLUTED.
Why is this not the fault of KYE factory? How come Samsung, HP, or Logitech weren't mentioned in the slashdot article? I think a certain site is a little biased.
"We are like prisoners," one worker told the NLC. "It seems like we live only to work. We do not work to live. We do not live a life, only work."
I felt this way for 10 years working in the video game industry. I never blamed it on the publisher...I blamed it on my incompetent employers. I finally left, and it was tough to get OUT!
These workers should do the same. They should quit, and find new jobs(or vice versa). If they can't find better jobs, they should acquire new skills so they can.
You missed the point of my post. My experiences have happened to even the most seasoned linux guys(Although I'm getting pretty seasoned...really against my will). They just don't know there's better out there. It's as if someone has only eaten Bologna at picnics their entire life, and all of the sudden Filet Mignon is set before them at 50 years of age. They wouldn't know what to do with it, and beg to go back to Bologna.
Every software company has won some and lost some...well not in the case of Ubuntu(You can't even beat Microsoft by giving it away) When Microsoft loses, they accept the loss and move forward having learned something from the previous defeat. They don't whine about it. I guess that's easier though when you've had a lot of wins.
Face it Linux(and anyone associated)...you lost! There are no asterisks in this life. When you guys figure out how to make a product that works, or offers something that Microsoft doesn't, maybe you can try to come play. As it stands, no normal end user wants to type sudo cp /fuckin/linux/this/directory/structure/is/unnecessarily/long/and/deep/fuckfile.txt /i/forgot/the/annoying/directory/name/again/ .....or sudo vi /all/of/the/text/editors/suck/fuckfile.txt ....or ./configure -thisoptionisforversion431532.34.2341.4343oflinux
and see
.....
.....
.....
.....
....
.....
....
....
:error 41398731234871
craploads of unreadable output with no carriage returns
I can't copy and paste from the terminal window, so I'm sparing you guys.
cryptic error message somewhere
unnecessarilylongunreadbleusernamebecuaselinuxpeopleareagainstCamelCaps@linuxsucks.org:/you/are/royally/screwed/have/fun/using/google/to/find/cryptic/unreadable/docs
Nope, didn't work :P
Since you're very astute, hopefully you'll join me in my quest to rid the world of this heinous repetition. It may annoy that crap out of people, but that's a price I'm willing to pay!
Our whole language is filled with tautologies. On my mission to expunge them from the English language, I'll call people out on 'tautologies' from now on and leave the stupid 'meaningless' part off. Thanks for ripping me a new one on that :P
"Isn't that a tautology itself?" 'itself' is unnecessary. I was referring to the 3rd definition of the word.
No, it's not evaluatable. Even if it were, mine has meaning. Your statement has a redundancy.
If the threat is announced to people beyond the threatened, then he's admitted guilt if he takes action which makes the threat very stupid. If the threatened were smart, they'd know this and not take the threat seriously.
If the menace(I'd prefer 'threatenor', but it's not a word, but should be.) were serious, they might take action regardless.
We don't know what the threat was. It could have been as harmless as 'I'm not showing up in your court'...'I'll leave the country if don't cut it out'...or as serious as 'I'm gonna kill you'. If it were the latter, I'm sure the news would have reported that because that's juicy. If it were the former, they would leave that out because clearly it's quite lame.
I believe this case is a usurpation by the judge. A judge has to be able to be criticized, else he can make erroneous decisions indefinitely. In this case, if Trudeau were to act...he'd just wait for the 30 day sentence to end. What's the point? If we had a just legal system they would have to watch Trudeau. If he acted, then he should be convicted of a crime.
Furthermore, how can he be convicted of a crime for other people's actions?