Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Mice Made in Chinese Youth Sweatshops?

An anonymous reader writes "The National Labor Committee offers an in-depth look into working conditions in Chinese sweatshops producing hardware (mice, etc.) for Microsoft, complete with pictures. Apparently, so called 'work study students,' 16 and 17 years of age, work 15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week, for around 65 cents per hour. Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation.'"

481 comments

  1. More companies too by sopssa · · Score: 5, Informative

    MS is probably the most catchy one, but the factory produces and packages hardware for a lot more USA companies too:

    KYE factory in China, which manufactures computer mice and webcams for Microsoft, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Best Buy, Foxconn, Acer, Logitech, ASUS and other US companies.

    Earlier also Apple products were done by child labor at many factories.

    These companies should move their factories to US or EU. But it's cheaper there and this is one of the reasons why. As long as it's cheaper, they don't care about ethics.

    1. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ethics? What is more ethical, moving your operation to the US/EU or taking away hundreds of thousands of jobs from those Chinese people just because YOU in your soft comfy couch wouldn't want to work in those conditions.

      They are paid what the market will bear in that region, these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to. In fact it's a very good thing because it provides jobs and income to people who would otherwise have none. The USA and Britain have gone through this same period of the industrial revolution. A change in labor laws or working conditions can not be forced upon them, it must come from within China by the Chinese people themselves.

      They should probably get paid a little more, but then again you have the whole tech/geek culture which scrutinizes any product that costs more then the competition.

      Imagine if the iPad were made in the USA instead of China, people complaining about the price today would be having a shitfest if it was made here.

    2. Re:More companies too by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course that stuff is made in China; corporations care nothing about human rights, only profits. And a well paid (i.e., a living wage) workforce can't compete with sweatshop labor.

      If our politicians were more beholden to voters and workers and less beholden to multinational corporations, we'd have tarriffs protecting American workers from competing with sweatshops.

    3. Re:More companies too by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      As long as it's cheaper, they don't care about ethics.

      Agreed. If they really gave a rat's ass about the conditions in their mouse factory, they'd audit this and other suppliers regularly. But a PR guy issuing soothing statements once or twice a year from his office is a lot cheaper than a dozen investigators flying around the world, to say nothing of the actual unit price rising when workers get breaks, weekends, and overtime pay.

      That list of companies tells the real story: this is simply the way global trade is done. And if this is the way your trusted big brands do business, you can rest assured that your no-name brands are worse. Maybe someone out there is working on a niche "cruelty-neutral" computer with child-labor and heavy-metal offsets sent to Amnesty International or Doctors Without Borders...

    4. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course that stuff is made in China; corporations care nothing about human rights, only profits

      The opposite is also true, our consumerist society cares most about cost which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

    5. Re:More companies too by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ethical is paying a fair wage to your employees, and budgeting so that your suppliers can do the same.

    6. Re:More companies too by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given that the factory in question is in blatant violation of existing Chinese labor laws, the suggestion that it be smacked down is hardly couchbound western cultural imperialism...

    7. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ethical is paying a fair wage to your employees, and budgeting so that your suppliers can do the same.

      None of which matters if your products cost so much that few people buy them.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:More companies too by aliquis · · Score: 1

      MS is probably the most catchy one, but the factory produces and packages hardware for a lot more USA companies too:

      Yeah but this is Slashdot. Less about news and more about advertisement, dupes, Microsoft-bashing and old jokes.

      These companies should move their factories to US or EU.

      So why should they move again?

      And yeah, salaries are low, working conditions are bad, but since when have less industry made anything better? Or well, maybe more comfortable/peaceful and spartan if that's what you're after but then there's places to move to to live that life to.

      The thing is that people who move into the cities to work in the plants get a much better income than they would have had out in the countryside. And they can get more items and since everyone else also work so cheap and don't have more money their money lasts longer than what they would do in NY.

      And with fewer jobs and lots of poor people salaries and working conditions rather go down than up. So what are you suggesting?

      The more industry they get the more work-places there is around and hence possibilities to pick a better place based on working conditions, salaries and such.

      It won't just pop up jobs for everyone for western salaries with their instant high education levels.

      Why would any company move there if they had to pay as much as they already do?
      What benefits would they gain from not having any high-paid (relative) jobs in the cities?

    9. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If our politicians were more beholden to voters and workers and less beholden to multinational corporations, we'd have tarriffs protecting American workers from competing with sweatshops.

      1930 called. They want their protectionist economic theory back.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:More companies too by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There is a (deeply perverse) reason why MS(and the various other tech companies, it isn't just them) probably do care about the wages and conditions:

      MS wants to pay as little as possible for their mice, by squeezing the margins of their suppliers as hard as possible. If their suppliers are saying "Nope, can't do it for less than $X, labor laws require us to pay the workers $Y/hour." but they are actually only paying $y-1/hour, then the suppliers are fattening their margins by lying during pricing negotiations. MS has absolutely no reason to put up with that if they can avoid it. If they are going to pay $X per mouse, because the workers cost $Y/hour, there is No Fucking Way that they want to take the bad PR for workers earning $y-1/hour. Now, because I suspect that MS doesn't really give a fuck about a bunch of chinese 16 year olds, they would likely accept either paying less per mouse or not taking the PR hit; but paying more and taking the PR hit means that KYE is shafting them to enhance their own margins.

      That, I suspect, pisses Microsoft off.

    11. Re:More companies too by coutch · · Score: 1

      It's so easy to put all the blame on the corporations. but the consumer has to take the blinders off and look in the mirror.

      When we buy something (electronics, car, clothes, vegetables, fruits ... anything!), do we stop and ask ourselves in what type on conditions that good was produced ? unlikely ...

      Or do we only look at the bottom line and get as much as we can for the lowest cost ? sounds more like it ...

      There will always be a corporation willing to do something shady to produce something for a lot cheaper .... because there will always be a consumer willing to overlook shady practices and BUY those goods.

      It starts with the consumer. WE have to change.

    12. Re:More companies too by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Earlier also Apple products were done by child labor at many factories.

      Yes, and now we have an iPad shortage.

      They could at least have waited until after the release before they enforced their code of conduct.

    13. Re:More companies too by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this 'fair wage' is rooted where it matters. It's not fair here, no. It _might_ be fair over there (I don't know) - but comparisons using our standard and cost of living is invalid either way.

      I'm not saying the current situation is right. I'm saying that the idea of a 'fair wage' is fluid, and our viewpoint is only valid here.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:More companies too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The opposite is also true, our consumerist society cares most about cost which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      No, son. Our corporations care more about profits which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      Surprisingly, you can find companies succeeding at all sorts of industries that we have been told have "moved out of the US" such as textiles, clothing, shoes, even electronics. For the transnationals that are owned by people who have nothing to do with the business itself, succeeding and making a profit is not enough. Employing people is not enough. Getting rich is not enough. Your not "winning" unless your constantly growing, and then growing faster. The drive to show quarterly increases in profit have driven this "dive to the bottom" that is resulting in kids in China working 12-hour shifts to make your WalMart trash.

      Honestly, every Walmart could close tomorrow and people's lives would go on as before. Stores would open and sell stuff. People would make stuff. Life would go on. But predatory capitalism, where Capital precedes Labor instead of the other way around, is going to make things a lot worse for a lot of people. The best part, is they can sell it as "making life better".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:More companies too by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, Apple gets away with charging an absurd markup for basically no reason, you would think they could get away with ensuring good wages for all their suppliers employees.

    16. Re:More companies too by CharlieMurphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately workers are often "forced to" stay at work as the employers withhold salaries to ensure the workers stick around. The workers poor education and government corruption mean there is not much the workers can do about it. There was a very well done documentary about a young girl working in a jeans factory in China which showed the terrible working and living conditions, I wish I could recall the name of it.

    17. Re:More companies too by yog · · Score: 0

      TheKidWho explains the situation well. A lot of people simply don't understand basic economics and will impose their particular ideology on a situation in defiance of the very real and powerful financial incentives that actually drive business decisions.

      Probably 15-year-olds shouldn't be working 15+ hours a day 7 days a week in grim prison-like conditions for miniscule pay. On the other hand, 15-year-olds shouldn't be watching TV 6+ hours a night 7 days a week, "hanging out" on street corners to look cool and show off their latest fashions, and eating a diet largely of fats, carbs, and chemicals that will induce obesity, coronary disease and type 2 diabetes in the near future.

      Which population is going to build a great country? Not ours anymore. Back when Americans worked under those kinds of conditions, and when they didn't scramble to find some work, any work, they might well miss a few meals, at that time Americans built the world's most powerful industrial society that has dominated the globe for a century and counting.

      I think it's likely the Chinese will become the predominant power in the world because of their work ethic. While we sit in our comfy air conditioned offices and whine about every little thing--I tell you it gets tedious listening to co-workers complain that the coffee isn't free or they got "cheated" out of a sick day and so forth--there are people out there making great sacrifices to get ahead and build a stronger economy.

      Meanwhile we keep enacting unfunded entitlements for ourselves, and ask the Chinese to underwrite it on the basis of their sweatshop profits. Something's very wrong with this picture and we are in big trouble. Whenever someone writes an article about China's sweatshops, I wonder what has happened to the work ethic in the U.S. Ethics and morality aside, we should admire them for their industry and diligence.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    18. Re:More companies too by commandermonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are may be correct in stating that they choose to work in those conditions. And although the conditions may be abhorrent to a citizen of a developed western country it may be the norm in China.

      That doesn't mean I am comfortable with supporting those practices.

      When people go off about 'what the market will bear' they seem to only factor in the financial cost of producing an individual widget and not the cost of Goodwill, Public Perception etc. that also factors in.

      Look at the apartheid boycott's. Damage to companies based on their labor practices was very real and help bring about social change within a country. Even though the practice was the norm in the region.

    19. Re:More companies too by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ethics of following the law?

      The factory violates every labor law in China, with grueling, long hours at an exhausting work pace.

      I do not say that they must move country, but at least force their producers to follow the law.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:More companies too by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given that the factory in question is in blatant violation of existing Chinese labor laws

      Is it? I'm sure the well-bribed, local officials would say otherwise. And their word is really how it is determined whether law is broken or not. That's how it goes in a nation of men not of laws.

    21. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baloney. It's pure profit and lack of regulation that drives companies to China. Apple juice isn't exactly a hot market, yet most of it comes from China. It's cheaper to have someone make it in China, load it on a ship, send it to the U.S.A., load it on a truck and send it to stores. The consumer isn't benefiting, the price isn't all that cheap to us; it's the company selling it since they don't have to pay workers (healthcare, social security...) here in the U.S. and have plausible deniability when we discover that our apple juice is made in the same plant as anti-freeze.

      Offshoring anything only helps the corporations. It does little to help the average person.

    22. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      There is a (deeply perverse) reason why

      Yes, aka the Invisible hand of the market.

    23. Re:More companies too by initdeep · · Score: 1

      Then i would assume you are no longer purchasing any product made i china as you have no good way to verify such products were NOT made under similar situations, and will of course only be purchasing products made in nice clean first world country manufacturing plants.

      Better be ready to drop your standard of living by about 1/3.

      Because that's how much less money you will have available to spend after you pay the higher prices.

      You should also purge your life of any of the products you already own that might be in violation of your supposed moral compass.
      I suggest starting with most of your computer equipment, as it's a good bet, most of it was made under similar conditions. (and don't forget your mobile phone as well).

    24. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Yes - because there is a shortage of work and otherwise they'd starve.

      Which is why there is nothing imo wrong with sending work to China.

      Sure, because starvation is always an option.

      Not really, the other choice would most likely be work in farms in the countryside in the heat.

      So it's OK to exploit people, as long as you can rationalize it?

      What is your alternative? Like I said, changes in labor laws have to come from within the country. When labor conditions were rough in the USA, it wasn't Britain who came along and changed them for us, we did it ourselves. You're also ignoring the entire history behind the Industrial Revolution and the economic realities of our world.

      Fuck you, you insensitive jackass. I hope you take your fucking libertardian teabagging bullshit straight to hell.

      Thanks, I'll take a mental note of that.

    25. Re:More companies too by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Ethics? What is more ethical, moving your operation to the US/EU or taking away hundreds of thousands of jobs from those Chinese people"
      Yes.
      So my mouse may cost $15 instead of $12 and the profit margin is only 40% instead of 50%.
      China is keeping their currency artificially low so there exports and labor are cheaper than our exports and labor.

      People aka customers can choose what they see value in. Some people see value in a brand name. Or nice design. It is just as reasonable for a person to see value in products made by employees that are treated the way they would like to be treated.
      It is a choice.
      As far as the iPad example you gave.
      They are selling hand over fist. I do not know what Apple's margin is on them but I bet it is pretty big. I also bet that they could make them in the us for not a lot more than they make them in China. I would love to see Apple which talks about how important ti is to control everything to actually start making their own products.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    26. Re:More companies too by Targon · · Score: 1

      This is where you fail to understand the basics of international trade. What is a "fair wage" here in the USA would make people feel wealthy in China and other countries. Forcing people to work long hours may not be considered acceptable, but what if the workers WANT to work more hours for more money? If money is tight, you work the extra hours for the money, it is that simple. The cost of living and the acceptable wage for an area is also a key factor in what is acceptable. A mouse can be sold here for $5, so with that sort of low price, how much do you think it should cost in materials and labor for production for that mouse?

    27. Re:More companies too by lazyforker · · Score: 1

      >These companies should move their factories to US or EU. But it's cheaper there and this is one of the reasons why. As long as it's cheaper, they don't care about ethics.

      As long as customers care about the price, companies will care about their manufacturing costs. Maybe the companies could take a smaller profit margin; but then they wouldn't be as profitable, wouldn't have money to invest in R&D and wouldn't be as attractive to investors. Ethics cost money - start buying stuff made in factories/countries with labor protection laws or with a solid support of human rights.

    28. Re:More companies too by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are paid what the market will bear in that region, these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to.

      Don't kid yourself, most people have no such choices but take what is available. Not just China, but everywhere. If the Chinese sweatshop laborer had a choice, they'be be living somewhere that they could have a better life.

      They should probably get paid a little more, but then again you have the whole tech/geek culture which scrutinizes any product that costs more then the competition.

      That's not geek culture, that's Ferengi culture. Geeks don't do cost/benefit analyses, we discover, create, and modify stuff. There's no such thing as an "economics geek"; nerds are scientists, engineers, programmers, designers. If your're only interested in money, you're not a geek or nerd.

      Imagine if the iPad were made in the USA instead of China, people complaining about the price today would be having a shitfest if it was made here.

      And Apple would have lower profits while the price would be higher. The Chinese sweatshop laborer is the one paying for that less expensive iPad and more robust Apple profits.

    29. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're describing a society where men should work to live. but it's about time that we the humans actually start to work for self fulfillment and self realization, something men can't do if they has to work 10 years to repay the student loans and 30 years to repay the house loans.

      if capitalism as a system works toward a society where work is not for self realization but for basic self sustenance, then we as a society are not faring better than medieval times or ancient rome and greeks gents, with slaves and stuff - true, single people living condition are better in certain area, but I'd say that the "world system" of human society is in a very worse state than how it was during the early bc ages: remember, when you start measuring we as a "humanity as a whole" there are a lot of other area that you should include too: rural america, remote russian villages, china, mongolia and all the arabian and african block drive the medium life quality really down.

    30. Re:More companies too by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If they really gave a rat's ass about the conditions in their mouse factory, they'd audit this and other suppliers regularly.

      How do you know they don't do that? Perhaps they pay a company in China who is suppose to do it for them. I don't like Microsoft that much but i'm not about to make shit up to condemn them when the full facts aren't available.

    31. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also ignoring the entire history behind the Industrial Revolution and the economic realities of our world.

      Actually, you're the one ignoring the economic realities of our world. The world is, economically speaking, very different now than it was during the Industrial Revolution. It's a global economy. Economic influence across national borders from transnationals is not imperialism, it's merely how business is done.

      If businesses like Microsoft make ethical choices, such as refusing to do business with shops that employ children, for example, then the reality of the market will force those shops to improve conditions. They will not be taking jobs away from starving Chinese people, they will simply be shifting jobs from unethical Chinese companies to more ethical Chinese companies, thus effecting a change to Chinese working conditions.

      That's how revolutions occur in our times.

    32. Re:More companies too by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      You are may be correct in stating that they choose to work in those conditions. And although the conditions may be abhorrent to a citizen of a developed western country it may be the norm in China.

      The way I see it, China is going through a period almost identical to what the USA went through when it industrialized. There will be growing pains. It will take a couple generations. But things will improve. Hopefully China will learn from the lessons of the USA and Europe, but the more I look at various histories, the more I believe that those 'growing pains' are necessary steps.

      When people go off about 'what the market will bear' they seem to only factor in the financial cost of producing an individual widget and not the cost of Goodwill, Public Perception etc. that also factors in.

      I'd argue that Goodwill, Public Perception, and such are less important than what you seem to think. The companies are still successful, that's what matters in the end.

      Also, in an impoverished area even a factory paying 'sweatshop' wages is an improvement in the region. They pay more than what other jobs in the area would.

      I remember reading in article about shoe factories in China - many had to relocate because wages in the immediate region had climbed like 500% in the last 5 years, and the smaller factories were no longer competitive, only the larger, more automated ones were. So the small ones were relocating to a fresh area in China where the wages were still low.

      Other manufacturing was moving in due to the higher skills of the workers, availability of infrastructure and such.

      In the end, this is a good thing. Right up until all regions of the world are developed, and we have to find a new model because there's no more 'cheap' manufacturing spots left.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    33. Re:More companies too by Herkum01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is hard to consider the work environment when the average person does not have access to that information. That is one of the major problems with exploitation and outsourcing. Companies can pretend they are doing the world some good while having people in near slavery type conditions.

      Until information about how products is created, this sort of environment will continue and the consumer will not be able to adjust their purchasing habits.

    34. Re:More companies too by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

      Well, one way to encourage "change from within" is to impose sanctions on countries which have policies that allow what amounts to slave labor. You don't like to call it that, you say they "choose" to work under these conditions, but that's what it is. We imposed sanctions on South Africa because of Apartheid. Why can't we do the same thing with China because of working conditions? Is it because people would have a "shitfest," as you say, if prices went up on what are, for the most part, luxury items? Yes, prices would almost certainly go up if the US, the EU, Canada, Japan, etc. put pressure on China to reform its labor laws. For me it would be worth it if I knew it meant that children weren't working 15 hours a day 6-7 days a week just so that I could have an inexpensive mouse.

    35. Re:More companies too by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are paid what the market will bear in that region, these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to. In fact it's a very good thing because it provides jobs and income to people who would otherwise have none. The USA and Britain have gone through this same period of the industrial revolution. A change in labor laws or working conditions can not be forced upon them, it must come from within China by the Chinese people themselves.

      Having studied more than a little history, I've encountered rhetoric like this before: by slavers all through history.
       
      Seriously, "they aren't forced to work there" but "otherwise they wouldn't have jobs and income"? That's an insane justification.

    36. Re:More companies too by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      Even better, If they move those factories the employees instead of having shit conditions and crap pay will have no conditions, no pay and no food..

      So while I am "supporting" harsh conditions and low pay I am at least keeping them in a Job. The "do gooders" that are complaining and demanding a crack down are achieving nothing other than getting them all sacked.

      I wonder who they'll thank.

    37. Re:More companies too by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      They should probably get paid a little more, but then again you have the whole tech/geek culture which scrutinizes any product that costs more then the competition.

      Why do not do the same thing as for coffee, bananas, chocolate and soccer balls, and create a Fair-trade label for ethically manufactured computer mice?

      Then, the consumer could pay a couple of cents more for ethically manufactured hardware, without needing to be afraid that the extra would be pocketed by one of the many middlemen.

    38. Re:More companies too by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Child labor is against the laws in our countries, while money has different values in different areas rights have the same value everywhere (or at least that's what we wrote into our constitutions when we put all those rights in there).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    39. Re:More companies too by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      the well-bribed, local officials

      Bribed? What a dirty word! The officials are just getting some money for the hard work they are doing helping their spouses run an efficient business!

    40. Re:More companies too by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      When we buy something (electronics, car, clothes, vegetables, fruits ... anything!), do we stop and ask ourselves in what type on conditions that good was produced ? unlikely ...

      I tried it for a couple months. My simple rule was 'Nothing made in China'. Trying to find a coat not made there? Took 5 stores. Waffle machine? Still haven't found one.

      Thing is, with the way goods are made by sub-contractors today, it's not possible for me to confirm conditions. Take a simple electronic good. Were the assemblers treated by my requirements? That might be trackable. But what about those making the resisters, the chips, heck, the wire, power supply, housing, etc...? Each of which is likely either bought on the open market or contracted out to another country.

      Better to work on the Country's standards at that point. The problem with China is that China has some of the best standards in the world, including environmental. It's just that nobody pays attention to them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    41. Re:More companies too by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      How about actually reading the GP's comment without inserting your own bias about where he's from or how he feels about his homeland before having a damn aneurysm? Or at least grow some balls and don't post AC when you blow your top. Saying that Chinese commerce and politics operate a certain way does not mean you're saying another country does not operate in similar fashion, unless it is explicitly stated. Assholes like you who flip out unprovoked are ruining this site.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    42. Re:More companies too by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      How do you define 'fair'?
      I know working 15 hours 6 days a week is unfair. But, Microsoft is a capitalist company. They buy work at market's price.
      In China, an "average" 1000 euro salary makes you amazingly rich. In South America, with 1000 euros you can have a big house in the suburbs and a nice car. In Europe, I can pay the rent.
      So I would criticize the workload, because salary is too relative.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    43. Re:More companies too by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The Chinese handle corrupt officials like that by executing them. They can look the other way but now that they've got people's attention they better shape up or they'll get a third nostril in their forehead.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    44. Re:More companies too by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Absurd? Do you realize how much power does an RDF generator consume when it's online? Apple's power bill must be humongous.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    45. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to. In fact it's a very good thing because it provides jobs and income to people who would otherwise have none

      When your family's farm, the means of your income, is 'bought' for a pittance and 'sold' to an agri-business, get back to me on how voluntary the local party organiser's 'suggestion' that you start working in a factory feels.

    46. Re:More companies too by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      As long as it's cheaper, they don't care about ethics.

      As long as we don't care about ethics, they don't care about ethics.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    47. Re:More companies too by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I agree, and am really pissed off that they stopped me from allowing 4 year old kids who just want to earn an honest 15 hours a day seven day a week pay check from greasing the underside of my looms. -- ghost of a 19th century English textile mill owner.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    48. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woo... sopssa earning his Microsoft Troll bucks by coming to the rescue in defense of the evil empire!

      (And in less than a minute! You get a bonus check for that?)

    49. Re:More companies too by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      How does a first world country's labor compete with third world labor practices?

      Take flashlights - I was at the store the other day - the only flashlight on the shelf that was made in the US (in Ontario California) was a Maglight - they wanted 15$ for it. It sat next to a Chinese made plastic piece of junk for 5$. Personally I'm willing to pay 10$ extra for a device that will last the rest of my life, but most won't. The difference is - Maglight probably only made 1 or 2 dollars profit on that flashlight, but the US importer probably made 4.90$ on there flashlight.

      Point being - US companies will do whatever it takes to make an extra buck - even if it means hiring children to do their work, never mind they could actually do the same work here in the US and still make a profit - it just wouldn't be as obscenely high.

    50. Re:More companies too by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      I think it's likely the Chinese will become the predominant power in the world because of their work ethic. While we sit in our comfy air conditioned offices and whine about every little thing--I tell you it gets tedious listening to co-workers complain that the coffee isn't free or they got "cheated" out of a sick day and so forth--there are people out there making great sacrifices to get ahead and build a stronger economy.

      I second. But you would find little sympathy here.

      P.S.

      A civilization is built on what is required of men, not on that which is provided for them.
      -- Antoine De Saint-Exupery

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    51. Re:More companies too by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These are computer mice. They are useful in the production of food, shelter and other necessities of life. They are not absolutely essential to the vast mass of people. They do not need to be manufactured in the kind of quantities that require these working conditions to be profitable. You're losing site of the bigger picture, which is raising everyone's standard of living.

      The hard part is looking past the indoctrination you received in grade school. Capitalism is not always right.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    52. Re:More companies too by azgard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Better be ready to drop your standard of living by about 1/3.

      Really? I guess during 50s and 60s American people must have been really poor, while they were making all the stuff themselves.

    53. Re:More companies too by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      If they are forced to work 15x6 yes absolutely unfair. My dad is a (retired) union electrician. I remember times as a kid when he had the opportunity to work 12x7 and chose to for the extra income. Was it fair? Well he didn't have to do it so sure it was fair.

    54. Re:More companies too by ak3ldama · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'll take protectionism, and local people making things for others (relatively) nearby any day. This disconnect allowing kids to be working 15 hour shifts to make junk is unacceptable. The auditing practices have an impossible time playing catchup, and may never. I say we reintroduce tariffs and end the madness. Protectionism! The last several decades called, and want you and your loony free market back.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    55. Re:More companies too by ThePhilips · · Score: 0

      So my mouse may cost $15 instead of $12 and the profit margin is only 40% instead of 50%.

      Normally double production costs would mean double retail price. Because production costs are only fraction of the retail price. And more expensive the goods are, higher all other costs surrounding them get.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    56. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Honestly, every Walmart could close tomorrow and people's lives would go on as before

      Except those poor chinese folks who need those jobs would be unemployed.

    57. Re:More companies too by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      note that these people are in the age range where in most of the western world you have some but not all of the rights and responsibilities of an adult.

      According to http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/childlbr.htm "Minors age 16 and 17 may perform any job not declared hazardous by the Secretary, and are not subject to restrictions on hours ". So these people are old enough that if they were US citizens they could work in the US. In the UK things are similar but slightly more complex (mainly that things are defined in terms of school years rather than actual age).

      I'm not saying there aren't problems here but it's not exactly "child labour" in the conventional sense of the term.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    58. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I'll take protectionism, and local people making things for others (relatively) nearby any day. This disconnect allowing kids to be working 15 hour shifts to make junk is unacceptable.

      So in your world it would be better if they weren't working at all? BTW, that "disconnect" isn't the fault of free trade, it's the fault of the Chinese Government.

      The last several decades called, and want you and your loony free market back.

      You seriously believe that the last several decades are comparable to the Great Depression? I think you need a sense of perspective.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    59. Re:More companies too by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      Ethical is paying a fair wage to your employees,

      Fair by what standard?

    60. Re:More companies too by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but I've pretty much come to expect a decent optical mouse to cost $5, and am a bit saddened that we probably should be paying more (assuming the money actually goes towards the "right" parties).

      Marketing is very much an American invention that can hike the price of consumer goods way beyond what the market price should be. As an example, video games in Asia typically go by market prices based on their popularity and manufacturing costs like how many MB's of ROM are in the cartridge (yes, I'm dating myself here). Whereas here, a crappy game would still sell for retail price alongside a newer release.

      But anyway, look up externalities sometime... those are the sacrifices made outside of your economic transaction, like environmental damage, or a wasted youth, or a war caused by ill will towards your belligerence.

    61. Re:More companies too by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      No, son. Our corporations care more about profits which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      You know who else cares about profits? All the employees of that corporation, and the employee's family, and all the local stores and businesses those employees shop at every day, and the cities those employees live and pay taxes in and many many other people.

      Companies offer products to customers. Those products add a certain amount of value to the customer's life (except when forced by law, no one knowingly buys a product that makes their life worse!).

      If part of the value of a product is knowing that it was made by people working under fair labor conditions, then companies will offer products made under fair labor conditions. Indeed as you point out, a good number of companies do just that, both large and small.

      This "ethical value add" has not yet propagated to all markets though, but if you read the article fully, it does exist to some extent even in the PC accessory market.

      There already is a demand by consumers that the products they buy be made in factories that uphold some degree of human rights. That this factory is not doing such is why this is a news story. Corporations, such as Microsoft and HP, have human rights requirements for factories they contract work out to. This factory is going to great lengths to deceive the corporations that it does work for.

      Now it would be awesome if at least a few of the large companies just outright cancelled their contract with this factory, especially since it isn't a busy PC sales season right now (at least not to the best of my knowledge) so any temporary disruptions in product availability would likely be offset by the good press the companies would get for taking such a direct pro-human rights action.

      Your not "winning" unless your constantly growing, and then growing faster. The drive to show quarterly increases in profit have driven this "dive to the bottom" that is resulting in kids in China working 12-hour shifts to make your WalMart trash.

      I do agree that the stock market's demands for endless quarterly growth is very problematic in many ways. On one hand it is completely unrealistic. But on the other hand, any company that is sitting on its laurals just doing same old same old, is likely to be torn to shreds as soon as a competitor comes along with a great new idea.

      Heck look at Blockbuster versus Netflix. Blockbuster thought "quarterly growth" meant to keep opening more and more new stores and to up advertising to encourage customers to come in more often. To be fair they were constantly experimenting with new business models in regards to customer memberships, but unfortunatly for Blockbuster all of their business model ideas involved physical stores that people walked into. (For the record I prefer going to a store to pick out a DVD, browsing shelves is easier than browsing websites when you don't know what you want!)

      Remember there are a number of ways companies can increase profits:

      1. Increase their profit margin by cutting their costs somehow. This can only go so far before you end up in a race to the bottom. Initially though it is good because it encourages operational efficiency.
        • From stopping wasteful paper usage to putting an end to nepotism, when implemented properly, an efficient company is one that it is pleasurable to work with. No useless forms to fill out, only have to write your name down once, call up customer service and something gets done right away, stuff like that.
      2. Increase their profit margin by increasing their potential customer base. Self explanatory. From making a more affordable version of an expensive product (good for society, gives everyone the option to buy the product if they want) to expanding to new markets, be in opening a new store across town, or translating software into a new language.
      3. Sell to a larger p
    62. Re:More companies too by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Why can't we do the same thing with China because of working conditions?

      Because that would be hipocritical since it's our (Western) companies doing it.

      What we *could* do is sanction our own companies for violating our laws, even in foreign countries, as we did to Shell.

    63. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 0

      You're losing site of the bigger picture, which is raising everyone's standard of living.

      Which is exactly what free trade is doing to China, raising the standard of living.

      They do not need to be manufactured in the kind of quantities that require these working conditions to be profitable.

      Where did I claim that these working conditions were required? My response was directed at this guy, who seemed to ignore the fact that you can't pay your employees a fair wage if you price your products out of the market.

      The hard part is looking past the indoctrination you received in college. Liberalism is not always right.

      Fixed that for you. One snarky comment deserves another.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    64. Re:More companies too by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Well, if politicians, as a whole, were sane in the U.S., they wouldn't have been spending us into oblivion, *and then* chastising the majority of U.S. citizens that are protesting the run-away spending *with* the politicians then demanding that taxes be raised.

    65. Re:More companies too by t33jster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Ok, wages are a piece of the puzzle here, but for a moment, take wage out of the equation, and consider the working conditions from TFA.

      "We are like prisoners," one worker told the NLC. "It seems like we live only to work. We do not work to live. We do not live a life, only work."

      I can relate to that from time to time, but when it's gotten really bad, I've been able to spruce up my resume & find a new (often better-paying) job with the skills that I've learned while 'imprisoned.' That's not the case here:

      The workers - mostly women aged 18 to 25 - work from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m. They eat horrid meals from the factory cafeterias. They have no bathroom breaks during their shifts, and must clean the toilets as discipline, according to the NLC. They sleep in factory dormitories, 14 workers to a room. They must buy their own mattresses and bedding, or else sleep on 28-inch-wide plywood boards. They "shower" with a sponge and a bucket. And many of the workers, because they're young women, are regularly sexually harassed, the NLC alleges.

      Add in a rich industrialist who adopts one of the spunky factory workers, sprinkle in a few production numbers, and we have Annie. Seriously though, I've worked as many hours for a week or two on end, but hey, I'm salaried, and sometimes I have to suck it up.
      If they were paid whatever a reasonable wage is, then the rest of this crap wouldn't be going on. If it was a reasonable wage, then they could save up, send themselves to college & make a better life for themselves, and the factory would eventually run itself out of labor. Sweatshops don't retain employees with morale-boosting team activities or high wages. Instead employee loyalty is had by paying them just enough to maintain their state of poverty.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    66. Re:More companies too by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It should be pointed out that the National Labor Committee's standard MO is exposing the use of foreign sweatshop labor, so that there's a significant PR cost to continuing to use this sort of labor. Sometimes they're successful in embarrassing companies into doing the right thing. Sometimes they're not. Often they're more successful in embarrassing companies into appearing to do the right thing but continuing their sleazy practices behind the scenes. Or often the company that the American firm they're embarrassing gets promised "no, no, of course we don't use sweatshop labor" by the foreign contractor, who proceeds to use sweatshop labor anyways knowing that the American firm will never check on it.

      Their work is illuminating on how the push towards free trade has impacted the poorer areas of the world. It's worth thinking about when you're at Walmart, at an economics lecture, or in the voting booth.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    67. Re:More companies too by Helpadingoatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Protectionism is quite often useful. And 1930, the great depression, would not have been helped by outsourcing to Chinese children.

      --

      The baby's fine -- please stop sending business cards.

    68. Re:More companies too by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      That's an insane justification.

      Well, look into the very same history books and check how attempts to push a change from outside normally end. Wars, civil wars and puppet states are often bring more misery to the people in the long run.

      And I personally find the slavery to be a good example in the case. Because in most states slavery was ended by the force of the slaves themselves. Even civil war in US was a civil war, purely internal affair.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    69. Re:More companies too by icebraining · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't have to, and in many cases it would turn into a second job. Really, that's the whole point of regulation.

      A company from the US can be convicted for breaking US laws in other countries. That's what should happen to these companies.

    70. Re:More companies too by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      Sanest, most constructive post I have seen in the whole thread.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    71. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've never heard of the Smoot-Hawley act have you?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    72. Re:More companies too by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You have some good points here. I was only fixating on the idea of "fair wage."

      Everything else here stinks. Is it really all that hard for them to treat people like fucking people? Dammit.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    73. Re:More companies too by Helpadingoatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have. Your position that excessive protectionism is bad, therefore ALL protectionism is bad, is wrong and silly.

      --

      The baby's fine -- please stop sending business cards.

    74. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are paid what the market will bear in that region, these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to...

      Your comment make me sick. Bastard, that is why we (the rest of the world) hate USA. You deserve the hate.
      Go get your flag, your mac donald, your firecracke and shut the fuck up. Stupid bastard.

    75. Re:More companies too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A 15 hour day is evidence of a non-fair wage.

      We are essentially using them as slaves or batteries.

      They have no time to live as humans.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    76. Re:More companies too by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The politicians *are* sane, they are doing exactly what we are electing them to do. We demand that the government takes care of us, and "creates jobs" and makes our life better. There's only one way to do it: spend money they don't have. If they spent money we did have, we wouldn't need the government. At this point, the US Government is the world's largest credit card, and we all have access to it in some way.

      It may seem to you that the government is working against you, but in the end, it's providing things that you wouldn't want to give up. Some of us hate overbearing law enforcement and privacy violations, while at the same time, are perfectly happy to have the government nationalize health care, thereby collecting more data on individuals than could be imagined in the NSA's wildest dreams. Other people want to make sure that they can keep their semi-skilled blue collar job, but insist that they receive benefits that makes each and every one of them wealthy compared to just about every other blue collar worker in the world. Let's face it: we only care about Chinese workers because we know that to compete with them, we need to either make them demand the same standard of living we have, or we have to go back to the sweatshops ourselves.

      Yes, the government doesn't give you all of what you want, or even most of it, but in the end, its not just the corporations that are making it into a disaster, it's also the sense of entitlement that people have gained in the last 100 years that has made the government more oppressive, and at the same time, more relied upon than ever.

    77. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Don't put words in my mouth, I've not claimed that all protectionism is bad. All I've done is point out the historical consequences of protectionism. By contrast, you took a position on the issue (it's "quite useful") and failed to back up that position with any sort of historical or contemporary evidence.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    78. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opposite is also true, our consumerist society cares most about cost which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      No, son. Our corporations care more about profits which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      Surprisingly, you can find companies succeeding at all sorts of industries that we have been told have "moved out of the US" such as textiles, clothing, shoes, even electronics. For the transnationals that are owned by people who have nothing to do with the business itself, succeeding and making a profit is not enough. Employing people is not enough. Getting rich is not enough. Your not "winning" unless your constantly growing, and then growing faster. The drive to show quarterly increases in profit have driven this "dive to the bottom" that is resulting in kids in China working 12-hour shifts to make your WalMart trash.

      Honestly, every Walmart could close tomorrow and people's lives would go on as before. Stores would open and sell stuff. People would make stuff. Life would go on. But predatory capitalism, where Capital precedes Labor instead of the other way around, is going to make things a lot worse for a lot of people. The best part, is they can sell it as "making life better".

      You haven't countered the previous poster's point. Both are true. If there was no market for Chinese goods, there would be no profits and low exploitation of Chinese workers.

    79. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      while at the same time, are perfectly happy to have the government nationalize health care

      Umm, the last time I checked this was opposed by a majority of Americans.

      it's also the sense of entitlement that people have gained in the last 100 years that has made the government more oppressive, and at the same time, more relied upon than ever.

      Well said :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    80. Re:More companies too by oreaq · · Score: 1

      1930 called. They want their protectionist economic theory back.

      --
      American political debate in C: while (1) { printf("Left wing talking point\nRight wing talking point\n"); }

      What is irony?

    81. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the conventional sense of the term.

      Sorry, but the "conventional sense of the term" has been hijacked by the "think of the children" crowd who complain about people having sex with 17-year-old "children" and whine about 19-year-old "teen pregnancy".

    82. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I can buy many more goods and have a better lifestyle for the same hour of labour. Sure I care as long as it doesn't effect my quality of life - otherwise screw them.

      - a consumer

    83. Re:More companies too by eth1 · · Score: 1

      And the drive to show quarterly increases in profit is in turn driven by greedy stock market speculators that treat companies with stable profits as losers.

    84. Re:More companies too by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure your idea of a "nation of men" is very well thought-out.

      Here, let me attempt to cure your rabid ignorance. The following gem comes from the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It preceded the US Constitution by a few years and a number of the ideas here found their way into the US Constitution later.

      Article XXX

      In the government of this commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them: the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men.

      The idea here is that strict delineation of power provides for consistent and fairly applied law. The situation in China is such that a bureaucrat with no real accountability (unless he gets unlucky enough to do something bad and public enough to make it in the papers) effective wields power that in a country like the US, is partitioned between multiple organs of government. He decides what the laws are, whether you should be punished for violation of any laws, and what your punishment should be. Basically, all of the power and almost the level of accountability of a crime lord or African strongman.

      You can continue to whine like a little baby about how unfair it is that the US acts like total, hypocritical jerks, or you can take the good ideas where you find them and apply them to your country.

    85. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I'd hardly call opposition to protectionism a right or left wing talking point. It seems to be one of the few issues that unites large segments of the Democratic and Republican parties.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    86. Re:More companies too by dillon82 · · Score: 1

      And the reason corporate ethics is a contradiction is that the corporation exists only to make money for their shareholders and will not budget for their suppliers to pay a fair wage unless it is financially beneficial to do so.

    87. Re:More companies too by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Or, more reasonably, you would think that the kind of people who tend to buy Apple would be demanding it.

    88. Re:More companies too by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      You work FASTAAA! (smacking sound) We no pay you faw asreep!

      All so I can get a mouse at Fry's for $1.99.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    89. Re:More companies too by Schoenlepel · · Score: 1

      You apparently haven't read the article or are a complete asshole.

      The biggest problem is that those wage slaves (because that's what they are) have to endure psychological torture 24/7 until they decide to flee (survive).

      But, oh well, apparently they've got jobs and so they shouldn't whine.

      Lets see how well you fare if the only job you can get includes daily torture of those levels and you can't afford to leave.

    90. Re:More companies too by t33jster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To your point that just because $x is not enough to live on in one place doesn't mean that it's not enough anywhere - I agree. However, given the rest of the information about conditions, it's an easy conclusion to draw that the wage is, in fact, not 'fair'. Economic relativity should not be used to justify moral relativism.
      As a consumer of Chinese (and other developing nations') labor, it is on my conscience whether I support these practices by spending my fair wages on stuff assembled by people who get treated like livestock. I had no idea that it was cheaper to employ a person to stick the feet on a mouse than to have a machine do it. If the overall treatment (including wages) of employees was fair, would an automated assembly line be more cost effective?

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    91. Re:More companies too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      If a person has to work more than 10 hours a day, and more than 70 hours per week, there is something inherently wrong with the wage system. The wages aren't fair here, they aren't fair there, they aren't fair anywhere in the world. I don't care how many relativist arguments you throw in - it's WRONG!

      BTW - are you aware that most of those workers are very nearly prisoners in their job sites? They get to leave the plant for a few hours on Sundays, unless they are scheduled to work. They sleep right there, and they can't leave.

      What's right about that, I ask?

      To be fair, working all those hours, the kids aren't terribly interested in going anywhere. They're probably grateful that they can roll up in their blankets without driving across town.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    92. Re:More companies too by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1
      Not making shit up per se, but I'm deducing from TFA:

      Microsoft did not answer specific questions about operations at the KYE factory, such as whether it has quality-control monitors there or whether it regularly sends representatives there to check conditions.

      ...that they'd be unable to back up any claims of a good track record on this, or they would speak up. The article singles out Microsoft because they're an easy target, but I doubt their relationship with the mouse factory is much different from the other brands mentioned.

      The historical facts, from ancient slavery all the way to the Massey mines, clearly indicate that "exploiting" labor is a pattern that occurs naturally. Sometime this is moderated by individual or collective ethics, but that's a lot less likely when you don't have to interact with the people doing your work. This is an advantage to the corporations who are willing to use it, which is pretty much all of them. For the consumer, it's a constant rain of low-priced products and a constant sewage of last year's model. For the workers, it's the invisible middle finger of the market.

      My village blacksmith doesn't make mice, and I'm not going to start making my own. But I am a reuser/repairer/recycle/freecycle type, especially with electronics.

    93. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One tiny flaw in your reasoning: You're assuming that just paying these people more would automatically increase the cost of the product, when in reality all that should happen would be a decrease in these companies' profit margins. I mean seriously: Corporate greed is out of hand. When will people learn that enough is enough? You cannot sustain an economy where every corporation constantly needs to increase revenue and income.

    94. Re:More companies too by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      No, they won't. Either their $15 maglite will be sitting next to a $5 piece of Chinese junk and people will buy the Chinese Junk or their $10 piece of American junk will sit next to the $5 piece of Chinese Junk and people will buy the Chinese junk. The American Co will then go out of business and the Chinese Co will move in and be the major importer and seller of flashlights in the US.

    95. Re:More companies too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I speak as a lazy man. I WANT to work about 32 to 40 hours per week, and get a good paycheck. I've seldom done that, though. Those jobs that were paid by the hour, and limited to a "normal" (in the U.S.) workweek generally suck ass on payday. I've worked many jobs that required me to be "on the job" between 60 and 70 hours per week. Nice paydays, but LIFE SUCKS. A half hour commute, 12 hours on the job, another half hour commute, shower, fall into bed, get up, rinse and repeat. No life at all, dude. You forget the wife's name, you forget how many kids you have, the dog growls when you come home, and, worst of all, there's no time for TAH INTARTUBEZ!!! (A man HAS to get his priorities straight, right?)

      15 hour days are ridiculous - that is slave labor, plain and simple.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    96. Re:More companies too by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Why wait for the government to do it for you? Why trade with other people for goods and services. Build a wall around your house and trade only with your immediate family. The ultimate in protectionism and you're welcome to it.

    97. Re:More companies too by takshaka · · Score: 1

      The film is called China Blue . Definitely worth watching.

      There is also David Redmon's Mardi Gras: Made in China , which reveals the source of plastic Mardi Gras beads.

    98. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      If the overall treatment (including wages) of employees was fair, would an automated assembly line be more cost effective?

      It most likely would be cheaper in the long run, but theres your problem, it would require a large upfront investment to get the process down.

    99. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethical is paying a fair wage to your employees, and budgeting so that your suppliers can do the same.

      If you read again what the GP Said: They are paid what the market will bear in that region, these people choose to work there for a reason, they aren't forced to.

      Hmmm . . wages determine purely by supply and demand . . . sounds like a fair wage to me. The employers aren't forcing anyone into slavery and the employees aren't extorting money out of the company in the form of higher wages. It's an agreed upon wage.

      Hmmm, what a fucking brilliant concept - wages determined purely by supply and demand -sounds like a fair wage to me. Why can't you people understand that?

    100. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This country was protectionist until about 1973 and it has done just fine until we instituted free trade policies.

    101. Re:More companies too by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      How can you be implying that I was comparing to the great depression? I merely made a smug comment in retort. You mentioned the great depression, but protectionism had existed long before that - as well as this great taxation device called tariffs. Dropping tariffs (and by extension allowing free trade) removes a great source of taxation. Corporations will, obviously, find any way possible to avoid taxation. We the people do not need to let that happen. If we do then the tax burden (or lack thereof via burgeoning deficits) falls on us. The country will of course then fail, the corporation has of course left since it's non-national, and the people will have their future ruined.

      Free trade is a race for all down to the bottom and shouldn't be tolerated. We should instead help others up - by taxing imports and encouraging innovation and growth in _each_ country. With the belief that people everywhere are capable and smart enough to run all facets of their economy.

      This of course is all my opinion and viewpoint on things... Feel free to share your opinion. I will read it and think about it. But I am quickly losing faith in free trade. This global new world order stuff irritates me, countries should stand up for themselves and their identity.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    102. Re:More companies too by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Well, look into the very same history books and check how attempts to push a change from outside normally end. Wars, civil wars and puppet states are often bring more misery to the people in the long run.

      Which has roughly zip point shit to do with my point.
       

      And I personally find the slavery to be a good example in the case. Because in most states slavery was ended by the force of the slaves themselves. Even civil war in US was a civil war, purely internal affair.

      Are you insane or just on serious drugs?

    103. Re:More companies too by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      WTF? Were you transported from 1850? It's like a century and a half of labor reforms went right over your head.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    104. Re:More companies too by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point you make. We really should hold the companies responsible. Also, we've pretty much passed the point when we could put much economic pressure on China; we're too dependent on them now.

    105. Re:More companies too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Speaking of suck-asses - the wikileaks didn't show the "murder of civilians". Those "civilians" in the first portion of the video fired on American troops. The gunship was called in to neutralize the attackers. How was the gunship to know that there were CIVILIAN REPORTERS embedded in the enemy unit? Firing on the van? I can't justify that as easily. But, couch warriors doing the Monday morning quarterback routine are failures, plain and simple.

      Oh - this is where you throw in the children. Look at the video again. At no point are you able to identify a child, until the soldier comes into view carrying a child to transportation. Children weren't fired on, per se. The fact is, some lame brain Darwin Award recipients brought the children into a battle zone.

      Murder? Maybe. The people who had custody of the children might be guilty of murder, depending on the court you tried them in.

      That's beside the point. Those people have been tried already, in hell. Hope they like their sentences!!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    106. Re:More companies too by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      So you're suggesting that Americans should redirect their labor from office jobs and other services to manufacturing and generally speaking, collapse the economy to industrial revolution levels where there was no such thing as the middle-class. Seeing as we're doing that we dispatch with higher education since sewing t-shirts doesn't really require one. Besides, who could afford one anyway? Mean while in all those countries where we were once purchasing their manufacturing labor, now having no buyers they themselves collapse into agrarian tribal societies. But hey, when we put on that $200 Walmart t-shirt at least we can be proud of the fact that it has a "made in the USA" label on it.

      Then again, perhaps since China, India, and the rest of the developing economies are working hard to develop highly-skilled/well-trained labor forces using the money we once gave them for their labor they will be in a position to buy our manufactured goods! Just think of it now! The "made in the USA" label will be found in countries the world over. How proud we will feel as we work 15 hour days for $20/hr to buy our $200 t-shirts!

      You sir are an economic genius! Not only do I wish to subscribe to your newsletter but I also want to send you to political office.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    107. Re:More companies too by billcopc · · Score: 1

      People complaining about the price are irrelevant. You either want one, or you don't. If the iPad is $599 with slave labour, it might be what... $699 with non-slave labour ? Is that really going to destroy your beloved economy ?

      The people don't really "choose" to work in sweatshops. They have no other sane choice, it's either work your ass off 18 hours a day and get micropaid, or not work and not get paid at all. There is no "work a little, live a little" option because the people who own and operate the factories do not offer it. They could easily increase their fees and pass it on to their workers as sustainable wages, but they choose not to.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    108. Re:More companies too by copponex · · Score: 1

      None of which matters if your products cost so much that few people buy them.

      The dollar cost of an item has nothing to do with the true cost of it. If people had to pay the actual costs of their goods, they wouldn't throw them away after using them for a few months. My grandmother has owned the same set of pots, pans, and plates for thirty years, because she bought high quality American made equipment and didn't make up a reason to throw them away.

      People buy cheap because they aren't forced to realize the true costs of youth slavery's damage to Chinese society, damage to the Chinese environment, and a host of other costs that have been externalized through exploitation.

      It's just like buying an iPod off the street for $100. You know someone is getting screwed, but as long as you don't know them, hey, you're just obeying market forces. So much for the morality of the market.

    109. Re:More companies too by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Apple charge high prices because that's what their target market is willing to pay. That said, even if the price of an iPhone or iPad were to go up $20-40 to cover non-slave labour, I don't think it would affect sales much at all.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    110. Re:More companies too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I avoid Chinese products. I've oft repeated the tale of my sons buying cheap but sexy-looking knives. They look awesome in the display case, but Dad whips out any good quality knife and carves holes into those fancy pieces of shit. I can't think of anything that China produces, that has any quality built into it.

      When I go to the store, I'm always looking for a bargain - but the lowest price is often the worst bargain. Why buy something for 5 bucks, then watch it deteriorate and fall apart in a month or three, when you can buy a similar item for 15 bucks, and it lasts damned near forever?

      Wrenches. I use wrenches every single day. Cheap wrenches round out and break under light to medium use. My tools cost more - sometimes as much as ten times more. But, I have wrenches that are ten years old. My latest purchase were Gear Wrenches. Great tools. At Christmas time, I bought a set of SAE and a set of metric, 60 bucks total. They simply don't break. They don't round out. I abuse the hell out of them, and they just work.

      Cheapskates who buy a set of wrenches for 20 bucks replace them frequently. I've seen them come into the plant new, and be broken before the week is out.

      But, it's not MY money they are wasting, so what do I care? Stupid is as stupid does, right?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    111. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Corporations will, obviously, find any way possible to avoid taxation. We the people do not need to let that happen. If we do then the tax burden (or lack thereof via burgeoning deficits) falls on us.

      The tax burden falls on us anyway. What do you think a corporation does when it has to pay taxes? Print money or pass the costs along to it's consumers? I would be of the opinion that corporations shouldn't pay taxes at all. Corporate taxes are just a way for politicians to tax individuals without paying the political costs of doing so. "Your [favorite product] now costs more money." sounds a lot better than "Your income taxes went up."

      We should instead help others up - by taxing imports and encouraging innovation and growth in _each_ country.

      How do you help them up by taxing their exports and making it harder for them to reach your market? How do you encourage innovation if you make it hard for them to sell the results of said innovation? How do you encourage growth by placing artificial barriers in the way of commerce?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    112. Re:More companies too by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      My grandmother has owned the same set of pots, pans, and plates for thirty years, because she bought high quality American made equipment and didn't make up a reason to throw them away.

      You can still buy high quality goods and not come up with reasons to throw them away.

      People buy cheap because they aren't forced to realize the true costs of youth slavery's damage to Chinese society, damage to the Chinese environment, and a host of other costs that have been externalized through exploitation.

      How do you plan on "forcing" people to realize that? From where I stand it's going to be a moot point in a few years anyway -- the Chinese people won't tolerate this forever. As someone said earlier, the United States and Britain went through a mirror image of this process when they industrialized. As the people became better educated and the economy grew they eventually demanded and received better working condictions. It wasn't a painless process by any means but drastic societal change rarely is.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    113. Re:More companies too by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're losing site of the bigger picture,

      It's "sight" for crying out loud! *sigh*

    114. Re:More companies too by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      1930 called. They want their protectionist economic theory back.

      They can have it once we finally ship off the laissez-faire theory to 1800s where it belongs.

    115. Re:More companies too by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      The inherent flaw in your argument is that you describe the grim reality of Chinese labor, and compare it to contrived and not alltogether true perception of American youth.

    116. Re:More companies too by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      From the article you cited:

      There is not any universal agreement about the effect of the tariff.
      . . .
      For monetarist authors who consider the Great Depression an effect of the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, the Smoot-Hawley's effect on the entire U.S. economy may have been small compared to monetary policy. By 1937 the effective tariff rate was reduced to 15.6% when the reaction of 1937-1938 occurred, demonstrating no statistical correlation between this economic downturn and tariff levels.

    117. Re:More companies too by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      Don't be f***ing moron.

      So you propose for US/EU to invade the China?

      Or how otherwise a country can tell another sovereign country how to deal with its internal affairs??

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    118. Re:More companies too by sjames · · Score: 0

      At one time we understood that taking excessive advantage of a situation was unethical. Today there are far too many people that think offering someone dying of thirst a half a glass of water from your swimming pool in exchange for everything they own is "just business".

      Indentured servitude is currently illegal in the U.S. even though the servant signs the contract. This is because we understand now that the "employer" was taking excessive advantage of the servant's unfortunate situation.

      If the market for just barely better than slave labor dries up, the capitalists in China will be smart enough to offer less expensive but decent labor instead.

      If there was a market for soap made from the fat of human babies there would probably be a manufacturer somewhere in the world willing to supply it and there would be an army of apologists claiming that it's up to the babies to change their society if they don't like it. They would also seek to absolve importers who bought it because it was slightly cheaper than other sources of bath soap. They might make the argument that by paying the parents a dollar per baby (about 3 month's pay in the area) they help them to support the remainder of their family.

      Imagine if the iPad were made in the USA instead of China, people complaining about the price today would be having a shitfest if it was made here.

      Probably not. The average American salary would be higher (if it wasn't JUST the iPad made here), manufacturers would be forced to take a little less profit, and mechanization efforts would be underway to reduce the amount of unskilled labor needed to make anything. Coupled with appropriate social policy it could lead to new prosperity in the West. Seeing that, people in 3rd world countries would practically demand that western nations annex wherever they live. As long as we set an economic policy that favored a slight labor shortage (artificially if necessary) we could do just that in order to improve their lives.

      Or we can just exploit the poor for a while longer so the very wealthy can become even wealthier while the middle and lower classes slide slowly into poverty.

    119. Re:More companies too by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      ...that they'd be unable to back up any claims of a good track record on this, or they would speak up.

      Or they simply have no idea about what's going on hence why:

      1) they can't answer any specific questions
      2) they're investigating the issue

      Problem is you have some kind of issues with corporations. You find them guilty until proven innocent which gets boring to read when you have no evidence to your "claims".

    120. Re:More companies too by Kagato · · Score: 1

      You limited it just to Federal. The vast majority of states have regulations on number of hours and/or nightwork that would prohibit working a 16 or 17 year old that long.

    121. Re:More companies too by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      Or they simply have no idea about what's going on

      This is a generous interpretation, but it still leads to the same deduction. "No idea what's going on" implies they're not doing a good job of monitoring, which implies it's not a priority.

      Maybe I have an "issue with corporations," and maybe that's a problem, but it's not the sort of problem that's going to cause a lot of suffering in the world, unlike some other problems that are being discussed here.

    122. Re:More companies too by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Successful countries?

    123. Re:More companies too by Duradin · · Score: 1

      "Is it really all that hard for them to treat people like fucking people?"

      Hard? No. Expensive (compared to treating them like diseased cattle), yes. And any MBA worth their degree will tell you that expenses *must* be minimized.

    124. Re:More companies too by tmosley · · Score: 1

      You do realize that "services" don't really make anything, right? And you do realize that we need things to live, right? And you also realize that now other countries make the things we need, right? You also realize that those countries don't need our services?

      Those "Industrial revolution levels" of economics are what CREATED the middle class. If we returned to them, we would still have a growing middle class (China has those values, and their middle class is growing like crazy--it's bigger than ours now nominally). Instead, we have a "service" economy that doesn't make anything useful, and as a result we have a middle class that is going into terminal decline.

      You think productive societies collapse when they don't have anyone to give them worthless paper in exchange for their labor? I guess that means that the US collapsed after WWII was over and the Europeans weren't able to afford the goods we produced OH WAIT.

    125. Re:More companies too by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Which proves that both parties are merely separate wings of the larger Fascist Party that took over Washington with the 1-2 punch of Hoover and FDR. The rocket engine propelling our economy was shut off by those guys, and we stopped rising in the late 70's. Now we are going into our final descent, right back into the serfdom from which our forefathers escaped centuries ago.

    126. Re:More companies too by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When we buy something (electronics, car, clothes, vegetables, fruits ... anything!), do we stop and ask ourselves in what type on conditions that good was produced ?

      We have no way of knowing under what conditions it was produced. No point in asking an unanswerable question.

    127. Re:More companies too by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      "or taking away hundreds of thousands of jobs from those Chinese people"

      Because the unemployment rate in the U.S. isn't 9.7% or anything...

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    128. Re:More companies too by nacturation · · Score: 1

      They do not need to be manufactured in the kind of quantities that require these working conditions to be profitable.

      So Microsoft doubles the amount for the manufacturer's contract and says "give it to your employees". The Chinese manufacturer says "of course we will" then still hires teenage students, works them crazy hours, and pockets an even greater profit.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    129. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn i just had flashes of two minutes hate here...

      of course can expect if someone invades our country, their citizens would probably consider us evil as well and that we will all be on trial in hell... i guess what goes around eventually comes around.

    130. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think though, if we didn't buy these products what jobs would these people have?

    131. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, son.

      Maybe, dude. Your arguments are 100% correct, but there is no way you and I are blameless. We often (if not always) choose the cheaper product. I would not be surprised if an American made product, if sold for a certain percent more then one made with the type of labor conditions this story exposes, that American product would sell less and possibly disappear. I hate the corporations, too, but I hate myself a little as well.

    132. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: Samsung == Seoul

    133. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why there is nothing imo wrong with sending work to China.

      You seem to be having a problem wrapping your thick head around is that you're *NOT* "sending" work to China. You are sending slavers to China.

      What is your alternative?

      Ban trade with them, or let them come over here.

      Like I said, changes in labor laws have to come from within the country.

      So it's OK to enslave someone as long as their country says it's OK? Fuck that.

      You're rationalizing slavery, plain and simple. You're fucking scum, and people like you need to die a painful, agonizing death.

    134. Re:More companies too by nacturation · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as an "economics geek"; nerds are scientists, engineers, programmers, designers. If your're only interested in money, you're not a geek or nerd.

      I think it depends on the reason. An economics geek would be one who is fascinated by how the global financial marketplace works and loves learning about the interactions between the players in the market. If their sole motivation was money and they didn't care how things worked, I'd say you're correct that it wouldn't be a geek. I can think of people I'd consider art geeks or cooking geeks. Similarly, there are programmers who do it solely for the money and don't have any passion or particular interest in it. Those aren't geeks.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    135. Re:More companies too by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      I think that the point is.. There has to be a happy medium. Increasing profits at the expense of employees, to meet growth goals, may make for happy investors (who don't have to work long days for pennies), but it's not ethical on a human level. Not every business should be expected to have never ending growth.. I know I haven't had never ending growth in my paycheck.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    136. Re:More companies too by Varuka · · Score: 1

      I've spent some time in China studying abroad. During my time there, I made a friend who is a college graduate (Compsci major), that is working an office job earning roughly three times what these sweatshop workers do. Here's the thing about the numbers: The 65 cents they earn per hour amounts to 5RMB. 5RMB will buy you a bowl of noodles and a beer for lunch. A standard "decent job" (Starbucks, McDonalds) pays about twice that, office jobs 3-4 times more. Aside from housing and entertainment, I generally lived off about 10-20rmb a day during my time in China. The problems for these kinds of workers trying to "work their way" out of poverty extends further than just wages, though. Getting in to a college takes a lot more than just $, the exams are highly competitive. Your average dawn-to-dusk sweatshop worker doesn't have time to study, can't afford to study, and likely doesn't have much for an educational background. Some of the American students studying abroad with me in Beijing were so heartbroken by the situation that they started giving free English lessons to the sweatshop workers there. There's just simply not enough resources (schools, job training programs, etc.) available for everyone them to help themselves.

    137. Re:More companies too by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me?

      The majority were opposed to national health care. In fact, after the law passed, even more are opposed to it now!

      The government can do too much, and it has been doing so. The government and its myriad of programs are killing the overall initiative and sense of individual responsibility in this country. The government is no more "by the people", and hasn't been for a long, long time. It is government "by the special interests", to the detriment of the people, their liberties, etc.

      The bulk of our representatives, based on passage of the recent health care bill, completely violated their oaths of office to "... support and defend the Constitution...." As a result, they are not representing "the people" in fact.

    138. Re:More companies too by lp_bugman · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to be all against walmart when. Even stuff from "Brand Names" is made also in China. Do a tag check on macys or Target.

      --
      BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
    139. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reason that an increase in taxes paid by a corporation will just cause an increase in product price so as not to decrease profits, an elimination of taxes paid by that corporation would just be taken as an opportunity to increase profits by not changing the product price at all.

      Taxation isn't the problem. Greed is.

    140. Re:More companies too by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Require any imported product into the USA to pay US minimum wages anywhere in the world. Fine for failure to do so is 3 years gross profit to the company and 10 years in jail for the CEO. Watch things change overnight- either they'll stop outsourcing or they'll keep an eye on things for us.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    141. Re:More companies too by nacturation · · Score: 1

      To recap this conversation for other readers:

      DerekLyons: "The phrase 'they aren't forced to work there' is moot when they have no other place to earn money so they can eat."

      ThePhilips: "Though you didn't mention it, let me introduce the topic of civil war."

      DerekLyons: "That has nothing to do with what I said."

      ThePhilips: "I don't care that you never mentioned it because now I'm foaming at the mouth about civil wars. I'm going to presume that you're in favor of an invasion of China by the US/EU, you fucking moron? Who's your war bitch now?"

      DerekLyons: "Uh, you're crazy."

      ThePhilips: "Oh, so now you're a Satan worshipper? Why do you support killing babies with a dull can opener?"

      DerekLyons: "..."

      ThePhilips: "Too busy dumping toxic waste into the Pacific Ocean to respond? That just proves that you think babies should be soldiers in a US-led invasion of all the countries in Asia."

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    142. Re:More companies too by xero314 · · Score: 1

      The majority were opposed to national health care. In fact, after the law passed, even more are opposed to it now!

      Wait. When did we pass a law about national health care? I know recently we passed a bill on regulations of health insurance, but I have yet to see anything that even resembles national health care.

      There are plenty of polls that do not back up your assertion that US citizens oppose Universal Health Care.

      Yes US citizens opposed one half-assed attempt reform health care in a way that would pass our bipartisan legislature. That is not the same as saying that the US citizens opposed Nationalized or Universal Health care.

    143. Re:More companies too by PeolesDru · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. It's a shame that global markets and outsourcing have caused this kind of work to be sent to places where people choose it over the dawn to dusk, cradle to grave subsistence farming they would otherwise have to do. Poor people in third-world countries need to learn their place! Stay in your hut scrabbling in the dirt - it's greener, anyway.

    144. Re:More companies too by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      The tax burden falls on us anyway. What do you think a corporation does when it has to pay taxes? Print money or pass the costs along to it's consumers?

      Ahh, but in this case the increase in prices will get paid by only those buying the (imported) product. Not by those buying a product that was not imported - and not by those who don't buy it at all. Therefore, a great place to have placed that particular tax increase. It is essentially protectionism of local goods - but those of course could also be taxed, just at lower rates. This tariff therefore taxes only those who want the product - which seems entirely fair. (Of course if they believe they can do better locally then they have a little more incentive to innovate locally, and a lowered barrier to entry. Typical market forces of competitive high quality products should still remain but give a slight edge to local products which also seems entirely fair. Thus caring about your own people, instead of the profits of non-national corporations which only care about profit.)

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    145. Re:More companies too by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      You seem to be having a problem wrapping your thick head around is that you're *NOT* "sending" work to China. You are sending slavers to China.

      Riiiiight.

      Ban trade with them, or let them come over here.

      Riiiiight.

      So it's OK to enslave someone as long as their country says it's OK? Fuck that.

      Well it is the People's Republic of China afterall.

      You're rationalizing slavery, plain and simple. You're fucking scum, and people like you need to die a painful, agonizing death.

      Let me just let out one big ROFLMAO. You sound like a really nice person.

    146. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that Apple discovered their own foreign labor issues, while MS and the other KYE factory listed companies had to be provided with "claims" before they "commenced an investigation".

    147. Re:More companies too by copponex · · Score: 1

      You can still buy high quality goods and not come up with reasons to throw them away.

      Not manufactured in the United States.

      From where I stand it's going to be a moot point in a few years anyway -- the Chinese people won't tolerate this forever

      Hey, its a fantastic plan. We'll just wait until the whole world has been exploited. I can't imagine there will be any long term consequences.

      As the people became better educated and the economy grew they eventually demanded and received better working condictions. It wasn't a painless process by any means but drastic societal change rarely is.

      And then the companies found new people to exploit. So they closed up shop, turned large parts of the industrial northeast into a wasteland, and are busy with finishing off what's left of the middle class. By the time they get done with China, the rest of southeast Asia, Africa, and Central America, the companies will be "saving" their next victims in Detroit and other parts of the world where profits are always more important than people.

    148. Re:More companies too by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

      You can still buy high quality goods and not come up with reasons to throw them away.

      Not manufactured in the United States.

      There's a reason for that, and it's perceived value vs. cost. If you take two products (using a set of pots and pans, for instance), one being made in the US and one being made in China, and compare them side by side, it would be difficult for the average American consumer to tell the difference. They aren't going to recognize the differences that come with a higher quality object, in this case it might be thicker steel that makes up the pots and pans. Or even if they recognize the differences, they aren't able to discern what makes that feature an indicator of "higher quality." (i.e. why thicker steel = quality/longevity)

      So when the American consumer is faced with two more or less identical objects to them, they're going to choose the one of less cost, because that will allow them to retain more money, to spend on other things as well.

      Companies realize that Americans cannot tell the difference between these two items, so why would they manufacture high-quality items that no one will buy? They need to compete with the other lower quality items using only price as a metric, just like the American consumer. And the only way to do that is to get the much cheaper labor and the much cheaper steel, and pay more for shipping, which is just what their competition does.

      In summary, the fault of the economy "going to China" lies not in the companies selling the goods, but in the American consumer buying products based solely on the initial price of that product, rather than the actual value over a given length of time. I posit that if Americans were to begin paying more for higher quality items, companies would provide items of higher quality for Americans to buy.

      Good luck on getting that to happen.

    149. Re:More companies too by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Well, 15 hours a day 6-7 days a week, yes. My brother works for a company here in the U.S. his days are about 15 hours a day for 6 days a week, for two weeks, then he gets a week off. I'm pretty sure this isn't the case here. Also, a longer work day (12 hours of work over a 14 hour day) for three days is generally more productive than a 8x5 schedule. If you run four work cycles a week (2 shifts a day, 2 sets of 3 days of work) you will get a lot more product than 5x8 times 3, with overtime. Workers will usually be happier (more consecutive time off), and you will generally have less ramp-up/down time overall.

      It seems to me, we've been trained in this country to look at anything outside an 8x5 work week to be absurd. There's a lot that depends on the context, but if they're working >12 hours a day for >5 days a week for more than a couple weeks, for a deadline push (with slow time in between), it's not at all productive in the end.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    150. Re:More companies too by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      A lot of computer equipment is made in Taiwan, and Japan under much better working conditions than the heavy manufacturing in China. That aside, I actually do try to purchase more locally... which isn't always easy at all, at the very least I try to buy from more conscionable companies. This usually means paying more. I'm also more value oriented than most, as quality is a meaningless metric when the standards are low.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    151. Re:More companies too by n4f · · Score: 1

      The hard part is looking past the indoctrination you received in college. Liberalism is not always right.

      Fixed that for you. One snarky comment deserves another.

      The person you quoted didn't make a snarky comment, it was simply the truth. You right wingers sure are being a bunch of loudmouths lately...

      The free market is a myth. You're right, if that factory wasn't there in China the people working there wouldn't be making any money, so they should be grateful for the 60 cents an hour they do get. This is starting to sound very familiar with what's going on in the US lately (I had to take a pay cut this year, but at least I still have a job!!). The factory is exploiting the massive poverty that is found in China. The government encourages this. They love being the chief exporter of cheap crap. If employees are paid a fair wage, the costs of your precious things won't go up that much. I recently purchased some clothing made in the US, with sweatshop free labor. The cost is maybe $10 higher than what I'd pay at other stores, but the quality is noticeably higher. I think you'd find that most people would prefer to buy a more expensive quality item, than to keep buying cheap crap the breaks every other year.

    152. Re:More companies too by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Someone over the age of 15 in a country where higher education doesn't have a real world value is hardly something that should be classified as "shops that employ children"... Now forcing most of their workforce to work 15-16 hour days 6-7 days a week is ridiculous, as having 2 sets of workers cover those hours would be more productive in the end. I think people in this country should stop thinking of 18 as a magical age where you are completely ready for the world, and that under that means you aren't ready for *any* of the responsibilities of adulthood.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    153. Re:More companies too by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Oh no, they would have jobs, they would have income. Specifically, they would have worse jobs and lower income. Now I'm not defending the example given - it sounds like it is in blatant violation of Chinese law, never mind anything else - but throughout history people move to specialisation of labour because of the economic freedom it brings. And that is a history I've experienced at the sharp end.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    154. Re:More companies too by ipquickly · · Score: 1

      I often go out of my way to buy American.
      I really wish that there would be more stuff out there though.

    155. Re:More companies too by ipquickly · · Score: 1

      No, son. Our corporations care more about profits which is what drives these companies to move to places like China.

      We are the corporations!

      It's not a democracy(unless you hold voting shares) but we own the stocks and we vote with our wallets.

      We bitch about cavities hurting while we are stuffing our faces with candy.

    156. Re:More companies too by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      They can have it once we finally ship off the laissez-faire theory to 1800s where it belongs.

      Is this the "they should go back to their farm fields and rice patties (or destitute poverty)" argument?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    157. Re:More companies too by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You do realize that "services" don't really make anything, right?

      Sure they do. Unless you expect a broken combine to harvest a field or an iPod to get made without any engineering. Designing and maintaining are just as essential as assembling and shipping.

      Unless the market is broken it won't support useless activities.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    158. Re:More companies too by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Is this the "they should go back to their farm fields and rice patties (or destitute poverty)" argument?

      Who are "they"?

    159. Re:More companies too by atisss · · Score: 1

      No time - yes, but they agree on such conditions, because they want to earn most money in shortest possible time.

      Lot of people from Eastern Europe migrate to U.K. for few years - to work in farms, and guess what - they accept bad living conditions, 12 hour working days, etc in order to earn up to 10 times more than they can make here for similar job. Effectively they are working less qualified job, but earning more and saving the money or helping their families.

    160. Re:More companies too by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Well, if a few million people were still working here in the US there would be a much larger consumer pool from which to draw.

      Off shoring labor is so self-defeating it's not funny. Your country's corporations exports million of jobs, and millions of its citizens no longer have jobs. Those jobless people can no longer can purchase those "cheap" products manufactured overseas, and force down labor costs overall as they are desperate for work. Send enough jobs over seas and pretty soon the marketplace dries up for all corporations, no matter how "cheap" the offshored products are. The economy will completely tank due to lack of money circulating as consumers will have little to no disposable income due to smaller wages, and because the consumer pool has shrunk in size by several millions of individuals.

      Off shoring labor is basically cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    161. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Umm, the last time I checked this was opposed by a majority of Americans.

      In the poll where they sit there and tell you "OH MY GOD, KILLING BABIES!" and then ask a yes/no "are you in favor of this health care bill?", maybe.

      In the ones which break it down into a series of approve/disapprove questions on specific things the bill does? Those routinely came out to 65%+ approval on the low end, and 85% on the high end.

      It's a similar effect to "do you approve of congress' performance lately?" vs "do you approve of [your exact senators/representatives here]?". Especially when you take away any middle options, because then any "undecided"s automatically become "no" (consider that would make a 40 yes, 30 maybe, 30 no split into a 40 yes, 60 no). Poison the waters a little and then pick your questions carefully, and you can easily spin a poll your way.

    162. Re:More companies too by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Who are "they"?

      The people some think shouldn't be working in Chinese factories. Relativism vs. absolutism.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    163. Re:More companies too by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Stop buying their shit?
      Fine the hell out of companies that sell things produced this way?

    164. Re:More companies too by mjwx · · Score: 1

      "Minors age 16 and 17 may perform any job not declared hazardous by the Secretary, and are not subject to restrictions on hours "

      In Australia, at the age of 16 you can get an apprenticeship. This means in many cases, manual labour, long working hours and often harsh environmental conditions (heat, noise, outdoors). You get the same protections as an adult worker, but not much else. You also aren't entitled to adult awards/wages until you hit 18 and finish your apprenticeship.

      A 16yr old may also work a 40 hour week in a casual or full time job.

      That being said, I doubt this is a 40 hour a week job for A$7.00 an hour (Probably more now, it was A$6.50 when I was 16) and at least some of the workers will be under 16. I've travelled a bit in SE Asia, many of the rural poor have a choice between working all day in subsistence farming or working in a factory for 12 hours a day. It's not a nice choice but it's a choice (and you no longer should have to wonder why prostitution is such an attractive job for an attractive poor girl, she makes in one night what would take 14 days of working, with this she can buy clothes and things western girls take for granted as well as supporting her family) and Thailand has a few more protections for workers (as long as you're not Burmese). It's not child slave labour as the article has made out.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    165. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't know any sum of money that would make me work 15h a day again. Granted, there are circumstances that demand this, like being poor or saving
      up for heart surgery. I've been down the 15h work road as an illegal worker in a far away western country before. It's funny how power corrupts people.
      This experience made me re-evaluate everything I want from life and I decided that many of the material things I strived for are not worth it if I have to
      earn it this way.

    166. Re:More companies too by Xest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I couldn't fathom this either.

      In the UK you can leave school at 16, by 17 you can be deployed to Afghanistan shooting people dead if you joined the Army.

      I don't see how it's child labour, it just seems to be poor working conditions for young employees, but I suspect it's the same for all employees and so the real issue is the poor working conditions.

      The child labour spin in this case sounds like sensationalism. In Apple's case previously some workers were found to be 15 and so I can kind of buy the argument there by western standards, even though it's really quite borderline, but even that's a stretch. 16 and 17 though? That's not child labour.

      If 16/17 year olds are to be reclassified as children, then er, the UK fully allows child labour too due to the fact that 16 and 17 year olds can leave school and work full time.

    167. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! That is so typical of people in the West. Use the CIA and World Bank to install puppets in key positions or even entire governments to do their bidding and then say:
      "Oh, but those ppl can decide for themselves." :D

    168. Re:More companies too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      We are the corporations!

      No. We are not the corporations. Even the equity shareholders are not the corporations.

      Corporations are legal fictions, allowed to exist by the state, that are given certain limited benefits (limited liability, etc) in order to do business.

      In predatory capitalism, corporations are actually golems whose function, like a giant squid, are only to eat and grow, unbound by any connection or responsibility to society.

      Even the employees don't care if the corporation's profits grow as long as they're making a profit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    169. Re:More companies too by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Guess what? The market IS broken.

      The primary US export is inflation. Singapore and China are close to not wanting any more.

      The majority of the "service" economy is centered around the export of inflation. Most of the rest is government, or people who are designated to deal with government. Only about 1 in 5 or 1 in 10 workers is actually productive.

    170. Re:More companies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder, how do they know they are "worn out", instead of just taking a nap? Some company culture allows doing that. In fact, as a grad students, I've seen several Chinese students sleeping in that same position after lunch or in the afternoon. Is this a "bad PR" stunt from someone? or really people tired of doing manual work for an extensive amount of time?

      Just wondering.

  2. umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boycott

    1. Re:umm... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's going to be a bit of a problem, since most other mouse manufacturers apparently contract out to this outfit too. FTFA:

      Companies such as Hewlett-Packard, Samsung, Foxconn, Acer, Logitech and Asus also outsource production to KYE Systems.

      And it looks like that's just a sample list, not the complete set. The focus on Microsoft is because the article was in a Seattle newspaper, not due to sole complicity by Microsoft.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, i mean boycott all the mouses
      the mouses are the problem.

      iPads for everyone.

      the .cn can't get a monopoly on our fingertips.

    3. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already do - not due to ethical concerns, but because my experience with Microsoft's peripherals has been awful thus far. Their basic mouse is so anti-ergonomic, it's almost painful; the keyboard got worn out in a few months, keys got jammed, silvery coating got stained. I've been using Logitech stuff for some time now, it's much nicer.

    4. Re:umm... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing you didn't choose Logitech due to ethical concerns. Because according to TFA, they outsource production to the exact same company, KYE Systems.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  3. Not only their mice by Tukz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I believe all microsoft software is written by the exact same people. ... oh come on, they walked right into that one!

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    1. Re:Not only their mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      or there's no -1 not-funny mod.

    2. Re:Not only their mice by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to sweatshops what can adequately be explained by malice.

  4. Relevance? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Seriously, given that the Chinese are pretty much balls deep in America's backside these days, does anyone care about this anymore? What Walmart-shopping, XBox360 buying American shopper is going to do anything about it? Is the American government (thanks for giving .cn the Most Favored Nation status) going to do anything about it?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Relevance? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Consume less. Buy second hand, upgrade only when you need to, don't buy iToys, enjoy the fresh air, etc.

      The American govt doesn't have to do anything. You, OTOH, can.

    2. Re:Relevance? by Pojut · · Score: 0

      ^^^^^^^Pretty much this.

    3. Re:Relevance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea! That'll really help these poor Chinese people by... um... taking away their jobs??

    4. Re:Relevance? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And in the meantime enjoy a shittier quality of life while making no appreciable difference in the situation.

      There are a few inconvenient truths in the world:

      1. Nothing you do yourself is going to affect the world large scale. You can convince others of your ideals and act as a group, but in that case your words' affect on others, not your own actions, made any change.

      2. People typically act in their own self interest, and they benefit for it.

      3. A large group of individuals acting in their own interests will often not enact a course of actions which are in the best interests in the group as a whole. Prime example here can be seen with a large crowd in a theater. If someone yells fire (and there actually is one), then it's in my own best interest the book it. The faster I get out of that situation the better. When every individual acts in this manner though, people can be trampled to death. The overall death toll will be higher, but the odds on survival rest on those who run, not those who calmly exit. Indeed those who walk out (the best for the group if everyone did it) are the most likely to be trampled. You can TRY to take the high road and walk, but the reality is once the crowd is running you're not stopping them, and you're only hurting yourself by not running along with them.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Relevance? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing you do yourself is going to affect the world large scale.

      Shouldn't this be followed with, "So you might as well kill yourself now"?

      Recall the story of the boy who threw stranded animals from the sand into the sea. "You'll never save them all!" shouts the old cynic. "No, but I saved this one," he replies.

      Also, people are better in the long run at following by example than following the words of hypocrites. This works starting with the most basic family unit, the family.

    6. Re:Relevance? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't this be followed with, "So you might as well kill yourself now"?

      Only if you equate your continued need to exist with the improvement of the world. The whole point of my post was that people typically DON'T operate in that fashion anyways. People generally exist to help themselves, not the world. You can do all sorts of things by yourself to help yourself at an individual level, and hence that's why people typically do that (and why most have no desire to "kill themselves now"). The thing is, everybody operating in a self serving fashion will NOT benefit the group as a whole.

      The whole point is that for the most part, one should accept this and move on. Accept that and by happy living your life the best way YOU can. That's a far cry from "just kill yourself now".

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    7. Re:Relevance? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole point is that for the most part, one should accept this and move on. Accept that and by happy living your life the best way YOU can. That's a far cry from "just kill yourself now".

      "Shut up and accept how the world is, just forget about caring and enjoy yourself," is to me pretty much equivalent to, "You might as well kill yourself now". That sort of soulless existence, making me nothing more than a trained monkey, is at odds with my desire to be all the things a human has the ability to be.

      Also, if you get out of the nihilistic subculture of geeky 18-30 males, the world is full of idealistic and helpful humans working to help others' lot on a familial, urban or global scale. Your trinket-based approach to living sees the selfish as successful - and they are, if they are also clever and lucky - but it doesn't question the definition of success which leads to that conclusion. If all I have gained when I am 70 is 5 beautiful wives, two large houses, and the full range of Apple iProducts, I am no more evolved than a monkey.

      Going afk.. thanks for the responses.

  5. Come on look at the photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything looks nice and clean, they even got nice uniforms... No reason to complain.

    1. Re:Come on look at the photos by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2782/4454969320_a34f2800c8.jpg

      Photo caption
      "Exhausted workers taking a break by The National Labor Committee.
      These teenagers work for the KYE factory in China, which manufactures computer mice and webcams for Microsoft, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Best Buy, Foxconn, Acer, Logitech, and other US companies. The factory violates every labor law in China, with grueling, long hours at an exhausting work pace. KYE recruits hundreds of "work study students" 16 and 17 years of age, who work 15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week".

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    2. Re:Come on look at the photos by CALI-BANG · · Score: 1

      Caption is misleading.

      during work break, most workers, on most offices take a nap. what you are you going to do after you have taken snacks/meals? dance?

    3. Re:Come on look at the photos by hjf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A picture doesn't tell me how many hours they've worked, or how old are them. Also, we don't know if the sleeping pics were staged. Investigation? Yes. Jumping to conclusions? No.

  6. What? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

    I see pictures. I see many pictures. All contain images of smiling, happy workers, joyously engaging in their labor. What is problem?

    1. Re:What? by asdf7890 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see pictures. I see many pictures. All contain images of smiling, happy workers, joyously engaging in their labor. What is problem?

      The problem is that just out of shot is a manager who has just told them that if they don't look happy for the photos they, and anyone from their family/friends, will be sacked and never again employed by that factory or any other that the owner has connections to the owners of.

    2. Re:What? by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      "YOU! Smile and look happy or you're fired!"

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    3. Re:What? by maugle · · Score: 1

      I believe your sarcasm detector may need retuning.

    4. Re:What? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that just out of shot is a manager who has just told them that if they don't look happy for the photos they, and anyone from their family/friends, will be sacked and never again employed by that factory or any other that the owner has connections to the owners of.

      True, but that's pretty much the point I was trying to make. Google "sarcasm". Anyway, the whole thing makes me glad that I only by accessory hardware made in Mexican sweatshops.

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably a cheap Chinese one.

  7. Good work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They make damn fine mice! I use an intellimouse II that's at least 6 years old and I love it.

  8. Well natch MS is looking into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation.'

    65 cents an hour is WAY too much! What, is Microsoft made of money or something??

    1. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It would be really helpful to put this in perspective. In some parts of India, $1 will pay for cheap accommodation and food for a day. In other parts, it will just about get you a cup of tea. This works out to just under $10/day, which seems a pitiful amount compared to prices where I live, but how does it compare to prices there? Are they able to save enough to go to university after a couple of years, are they barely able to afford food, or is it somewhere in the middle?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      They did currency conversion so I would assume prices would compare to US prices for goods, otherwise the currency conversion would be pointless and a useless figure, right?

    3. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by khallow · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like the other sweatshop accusations for multinational companies (for example, Nike), they're probably making a bit more than the prevailing wage for the area. Even if the owners don't pass on the profits, they have to insure that Microsoft gets their mice on time (they probably lose considerable money, if a shipment is late or of poor quality). That means a need for a more reliable and perhaps skilled workforce and hence, a somewhat higher level of pay.

    4. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not only about pay: The factory violates every labor law in China,
      This is not about having a job you don't like with an ugly uniform and you have to say "Do you want fries with that?" This is about exploiting people by breaking the law. And I can imagine that the Chinese law is perhaps not up to the same standards as the US law, let alone th European law.

      So if you break that law it must be really, really bad.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      65 cents * 8 hours a day = 520 U.S. cents = 35.4941537 Chinese yuan

      I've been reading around that a meal will cost you around 5 yuan so it seems like they're making money like you say.

    6. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be really helpful to put this in perspective. In some parts of India, $1 will pay for cheap accommodation and food for a day. In other parts, it will just about get you a cup of tea. This works out to just under $10/day, which seems a pitiful amount compared to prices where I live, but how does it compare to prices there? Are they able to save enough to go to university after a couple of years, are they barely able to afford food, or is it somewhere in the middle?

      I think University is free (basic education, however is not). Food is cheap. Servants are cheap. But a PC's price is essentially the same as in any other country, plus or minus taxes and tarrifs. Refrigerators are more or less luxury items. Automobiles are definitely luxury items, although Tata's working on that.

    7. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a useless figure, hence people trying to figure out what the value actually is.

    8. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      No, they don't do a cost of living adjustment. No newspaper does. Because the lowball wages always look more impressive without adjustment. Not to mention the fact that you'd have to determine what part of the U.S. to compare to. The cost of living difference between New York or San Fran vs. living on the outskirts of a middling to large city in the Midwest is substantial.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    9. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Given that a small lunch in the U.S. would run you around $5 (more in large cities, but you get the idea), we could establish a cost of living conversion (as opposed to a straight currency conversion), of about $1=1 yuan. So they are making about $4.50 an hour in terms of buying power. That's below the *old* minimum wage in the U.S., and the old minimum wage in the U.S. wasn't sufficient to support yourself. Which is of course why they work 15 or 16 hour shifts 6 or 7 days a weak; they're essentially doing two jobs worth of work to get as much buying power as someone working a close to minimum wage job for 40 hours a week has in the U.S.

      So no, it's not as bad as the 65 cents/hour would have you believe. But it's still exploitative.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    10. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by mxh83 · · Score: 1

      which decade are you taking about? you don't have a fucking clue. 1$ can barely buy you food for a day, let alone accommodation.

    11. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right..

    12. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food and housing is provided at a 15 cents/hour deduction

    13. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Even without having to change currency, the cost of living in the USA alone varies by nearly an order of magnitude depending on where you're at.

      Currency exchange rates are what you can buy/sell currencies for. Consider that in the USA, you have to pay shipping and local wages that are higher than if the product is left in China.

      You can look at the 'Big Mac' price index, but Big Macs are considered a premium food product over in China - thus it's more expensive.

      Look at what you can buy the 'typical' lunch for instead. Remember to get out of the tourist areas.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    14. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by quenda · · Score: 1

      65 cents * 8 hours a day =

      Only 8 hrs? You didn't even RTFS.
      As above, $10/day can go a long way in some parts of China, but don't try it in Shanghai.
      If you are working 15 hrs/ day, you don't have any time to spend it anyway.

      Anyway, the problem is not wages, it is working hours and conditions. The laws are enough, but not enforced.

    15. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Depends where you are. The $1 figure I was given by a friend who did a project working in rural India three years ago. $1/day was more than the income of most of the people he was working with, but they grew a lot of their own food. In a big city, it would certainly buy you much less.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by jrumney · · Score: 1

      And I can imagine that the Chinese law is perhaps not up to the same standards as the US law, let alone th European law.

      I don't know specifically about China (but given the socialist background, I could imagine the labour laws there might surprise some Americans), but many developing countries do in theory have just as high standards in their Labour laws as Western countries, the real problem is enforcement, and the fact that corruption favours rich corporations over poor individuals.

    17. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You arent skeptical of the "every labor law" claim?

      Really? You arent at all skeptical?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    18. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you want to talk about exploitative, the US is borrowing money to finance its extravagant lifestyle that will have to be paid back by people yet unborn.

    19. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Of course it's a useless figure. It's useless for many different reasons. First, when it comes to them purchasing services they are not paying Americans but their own kinsmen whom also work for a fraction of an American wage. When they purchase rent, food, or in general any domestically produced commodity intended for the local market they are purchasing it at prices in balance with the household budget of their average citizen not America's.

      The comparisons are as equally ridiculous as comparing the price of American goods and services today with those of 10, 20, 50, 100 years ago. In the 1920's using your average annual salary of $1236 you could get a car for $300 but can you really compare it to a car of today? Likewise with that $1236 salary you could purchase a four room house in Wisconsin for $3000 or rent a two bedroom flat in New York for $40/month but would they even remotely compare to a modern one? Recall that the Rural electrification act wasn't going to happen for another 16 years.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    20. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      While it's nothing to write home about, these factories also provide room and board which should be factored into the compensation they are receiving.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    21. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      I'd think the sexual harassment, the "horrid" meals from the cafeterias (no offsite lunch or bring your own food option), the requirement that they buy their own mattresses and bedding, and the lack of bathroom breaks during 12+ hour shifts might counteract the marginal benefit derived from "free" access to cramped dormitories.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    22. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      To be fair, most of the borrowing isn't even financing *our* extravagant lifestyle. We've got a trade deficit of about $750 billion (which is made far worse by China's currency policies, which, not coincidentally, are also providing us with a customer for our debt). With outsourcing, some of that trade deficit is coming back to the U.S. through the corporations engaging in outsourcing; the products produced by U.S. corporations overseas and sold to buyers in other countries don't show on the trade deficit balance sheets, but we're taking a cut of every sale from a Chinese subsidiary to a Parisian shopper. Resolving the China currency issue would not eliminate the deficit, but the effects of the outsourced labor would resolve it for all intents and purposes.

      That's all our "extravagant lifestyle" accounts for. Much of the rest is spending on projects that don't directly improve our lifestyle. Our two wars cost $100 billion a year. The cost of maintaining our other overseas bases (effectively removing the burden of defense from the host country) is another cost we pay that doesn't directly benefit us. We're overpaying for health care because we're one of the only countries that doesn't impose cost controls on drugs and medical devices; because of that, we effectively subsidize every other country's health care by massively overpaying for our own. Again, we pay the cost, other countries derive the benefit.

      And of course, you're conflating government debt with private debt. As noted, government debt is largely not a product of lifestyle, private debt is. Private debt isn't hereditary, so the unborn aren't responsible. If you believe the foreign expenditures run up by the U.S. government produce worthwhile long term results (arguable, but hear me out), then the unborn are paying for benefits they receive. If you disagree, then yes, it's a waste, but it still has nothing to do with extravagant lifestyles.

      That said, U.S. lifestyles are extravagant relatively speaking, and the negative externalities (pollution, cultural "imperialism", for lack of a less inflammatory word) are hard to justify. The solution to the government debt and the extravagant lifestyles could easily be the same thing. Raise the federal gas tax (at least $1 a gallon). Raise the income tax rate at the highest brackets, or create new brackets that target those who are benefiting obscenely from the government's support (e.g. 50% of income over 5 million, 60% over 10 million, 70% over 25 million, 80% over 50 million). A hedge fund manager pulled down over four billion last year (yes, billion with a 'B'). And being primarily capital gains taxes, he likely paid about 15-20% in taxes. If we taxed that to compensate for the fact that that income was only possible due to government aid, then we'd have an extra 2 billion or so in the bank. The top 25 hedge fund managers earned an *average* of a billion dollars a piece, so from 25 people who directly profited from the government bank bailouts, we'd recover 15 billion more than we actually did. Add a moderate VAT (10%) on all goods sold. It's win-win; either the extravagant lifestyles become less extravagant, or the government gets funding to pay down its own debt. People on the low and middle end of the spectrum pay a little more, people at the high end, who benefit the most from government support (after all, even for those who didn't directly benefit from a government bailout, but earn in the multi-million range are earning enough that a society without law and order would lead to them being robbed by small armies at gunpoint).

      Tax rates like these aren't growth killers; we had worse under Eisenhower (90-91% on income over $400,000) and the 50s were boom years. And they'd easily enable us to eliminate the federal deficit (and indirectly reduce the trade deficit, since the VAT would reduce spending on frivolous purchases). Hell, if we replaced the existing health care system with a system like Britain's NHS, the reduced cost of health care in the aggregate would free up money to compensate

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    23. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      His claim holds even if they're "only" breaking a few, or one. They're still exploiting people by breaking the law. So, your try at skepticism is nitpicking.

      Virg

    24. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      So fuck honesty? Lets dramatize everything with exaggerations? Think of the children that your line of thinking will hurt.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    25. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      I wasn't the one dramatizing "everything" with exaggerations. That was the National Labor Committee, as quoted by houghi, and now you. I said that his claim that they're exploiting workers by breaking the law is valid even without his exaggeration, and therefore your calling out was nitpicking.

      Virg

    26. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Don't know if you'll read this but oh well...

      I wasn't conflating public and private debt, the "Extravagant lifestyle" was a reference to those wars, foreign bases and all sorts of other junk the government pays for which it shouldn't be. We can't afford a government this big and that's the extravagant part of it.

    27. Re:Well natch MS is looking into it by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't look to the UK either. The pound has dropped 25% against the dollar over the past couple of years and that's even with the dollar having some nasty problems itself.

  9. Fact of life... by MrCrassic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it sucks that working conditions like these exist, how else can we buy mice for $20?

    1. Re:Fact of life... by Peganthyrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Robots?

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    2. Re:Fact of life... by Virak · · Score: 1

      How about, maybe--and I know this is going to sound heretical around here, but hear me out--not having your products built in abusive sweatshops just so you can get your toys a bit cheaper without any regard for the consequences? Making life shit for other people for your own petty benefit in this manner is not an unavoidable "fact of life" by any means, though I suppose that there are people like you horrible enough to think that it's a reasonable and acceptable thing sadly is.

    3. Re:Fact of life... by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I would rather pay 5 times more and know that they are made by workers not slaves. Same goes for anything else regardless of your shrug-it-off indifference.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    4. Re:Fact of life... by mxh83 · · Score: 1

      and who's going to design the zillion permutations of robots required? there are not enough scientists for that

    5. Re:Fact of life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay 20$ for a mice that cost 2 to 3$ in china (if it is an "high end" product, 1$ if it is a "novelty" product)
      And in a sane economy you might end up paying 50$ for a really good mice that would cost 35$ to manufacture and have incredible funtionalities, durability and esthetics...

    6. Re:Fact of life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you type on your computer whose components were assembled in probably-similar conditions whose subcomponents were assembled in probably-similar conditions, sitting on your chair built with similar conditions, while wearing clothes made in similar conditions, lit by a lightbulb...

      Basically, anything with a "Made in China" (or any not-first-world country, and even then...) tag is going to be made in similarly terrible conditions. Maybe not armed-guards bad, but definitely long hours with basically minimum wage pay.

      It's a Ponzi scheme, really -- low prices are always low because someone is working a shitty job for them.

    7. Re:Fact of life... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Right now for most consumer goods manufacturing costs are the smallest part of the total cost of the good. If we were paying just the cost of manufacturing + the cost of shipping, that $20 mouse would probably be about $5, and most of that $5 would be shipping costs. The rest of that $20 goes to retailing, marketing, and profits.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    8. Re:Fact of life... by icebraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, but I don't think that his point was "screw them, I want cheap stuff". I read it as "It's obvious they get nothing, if it costs us $20".

      And it is. You don't have to do "research" to understand that any $20 mouse is due to workers getting a lousy wage.
      Any person that is surprised by this report is either lying or naive.

      The problem is, paying $50 instead of $20 doesn't guarantee the company pays they're workers more. For all we know, those $30 can be going to their profits anyway.

    9. Re:Fact of life... by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Who's going to upkeep those robots when they break down?

    10. Re:Fact of life... by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      The problem is, paying $50 instead of $20 doesn't guarantee the company pays they're workers more. For all we know, those $30 can be going to their profits anyway.

      And it usually is, considering that "premium" hardware and the like usually come off the same line anyway. What, you thought that the sweet-looking, uber-functional Logitech MX-whatever wireless gaming mouse is handmade by a Logitech hardware engineer in the US because it costs $100?

      I suppose that give some of the responses here, some folks only dress in handmade cloth, sleep with handwoven linens and work for NGOs, given that most products today are, unfortunately, the fruits of cheap and unsafe labor.

    11. Re:Fact of life... by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Robots. We shall call them "turtles".

    12. Re:Fact of life... by Dreaming+in+R'lyeh · · Score: 1

      There are all those sweatshop laborers. We could train them to design robots instead.

    13. Re:Fact of life... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      We are very close on robots.

      They got down picking random objects out of a bin last year.

      So now think about how this plays out.

      Say a robot that can do a particular arbitrary job (stocking grocery shelves, assembling a mouse) gets down to $25k and lasts 4 years.

      Heaven or Hell because how is anyone going to get any money to buy anything when 70% of the jobs can be done by robots?

      And the republicans are talking about cutting off unemployment because $1100 a month is supposedly keeping people from taking $30,000 a year jobs. It's been a talking point for several months now on conservative talk radio and now it looks like they are convincing enough democrats to make it happen. After giving a trillion dollars to wall street they are going to stiff americans out of 7-8 billion dollars in unemployment benefits.

      I think we are getting close to having civil unrest, increased crime, general bad things.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Fact of life... by Virak · · Score: 1

      I never said "let's just give them more money and hope they decide to be nicer", I said "let's have them ensure they don't completely disregard ethics in an attempt to get an edge with regard to price even though it will cost us more money". Big difference.

    15. Re:Fact of life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robots?

      I for one welcome our overworked robotic over... Ahh, screw it. What threat are a bunch of tin cans that are too weak to lift a ... %%#$%#$%#$% NO CARRIER

    16. Re:Fact of life... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "While it sucks that working conditions like these exist, how else can we buy mice for $20?"

      Many mice are much more then $20 so these companies are making extreme margins.

      MX518

      http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Performance-Optical-Gaming-Mouse/dp/B0007Z1M50/

      Razor deathadder

      http://www.amazon.com/Razer-Deathadder-Precision-Infrared-Gaming/dp/B002Q4U5DK/

    17. Re:Fact of life... by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need to reassess our expectations of everyone having a "job", then.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    18. Re:Fact of life... by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Ironically... Robots are too expensive. Humans are cheaper for unskilled work. This is why automated manufacture hasn't already replaced all the menial jobs.

    19. Re:Fact of life... by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Robots?

      Obviously, you've never dealt with their unions. The expenses for hookers and blackjack quickly gets out of hand.

    20. Re:Fact of life... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      If they put together 3 mice per person, per hour, then at minimum wage in the U.S., the increase in price would only be a couple dollars.

      If they move it to the U.S., that would be assuming they don't save anything on shipping costs/tariffs.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    21. Re:Fact of life... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      That's Logitech and Razor, not Microsoft.

      Quick look at newegg:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105039&cm_re=microsoft_mous-_-26-105-039-_-Product
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105072&cm_re=microsoft_mous-_-26-105-072-_-Product
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105098&cm_re=microsoft_mous-_-26-105-098-_-Product
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105213&cm_re=microsoft_mous-_-26-105-213-_-Product
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105046&cm_re=microsoft_mous-_-26-105-046-_-Product

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    22. Re:Fact of life... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      While it sucks that working conditions like these exist, how else can we buy mice for $20?

      The last Microsoft mouse I bought was $11 free shipping.

      Shortly before that during the boxing week sale I saw a Microsoft Keyboard + Mouse combo going for $9.99 + S&H

    23. Re:Fact of life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use one good mouse for 5-10 years?

      Planned obsolescence is a major part of the evil.

  10. It is simply not profitable for them to care. by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful


    "The National Labor Committee offers an in-depth look into working conditions in Chinese sweatshops producing hardware (mice, etc.) for Microsoft, complete with pictures. Apparently, so called 'work study students,' 16 and 17 years of age, work 15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week

    It's simply not profitable to have people who aren't afraid of their job and/or their life. Third World countries deliver both fears handily.


    Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation.'"

    Said investigation will be focused on how they can prevent such things from coming to light in the future. People will be bribed, families will go in/out of favor, etc. No real change will be made outside of moving it to another equally bad of a country/location.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  11. 66 cent compared to what? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my opinion saying they "only" make 66 cent an hour means nothing without a reference. How much can you buy with 66 cent in China?

    1. Re:66 cent compared to what? by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

      Eventually a lot more than the countries that buy those mice who produce none of their own.

    2. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 66 cents in North Carolina buys you the same amount of gasoline as in Virginia? Now apply that to countries on opposite sides of the world. Geography and tax laws affect price levels.

    3. Re:66 cent compared to what? by HopefulIntern · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think we can be pretty sure that 66 cents gets you a lot more in China than it does in the US.

      To make a comparison, you might make $30k a year, which is respectable in most areas of the US. But trying coming on holiday to Norway, your money is worth very little. You will shell out $16 for a .5l beer in Oslo.

    4. Re:66 cent compared to what? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nonsense. Purchasing power varies massively across the world. Even in international chains like Starbucks charge a lot more for the same thing in different countries. When you're talking about locally produced food and goods it's a much bigger difference. The cost of food is closely related to the amount the people farming are paid, which is a lot lower in most of Africa or China than it is in the EU or USA, for example. And that's ignoring the fact that the Chinese government intentionally keeps the Yuan devalued against the US Dollar to promote exports, meaning that the purchasing power of the Yuan in China is higher than the exchange rate would lead you to believe.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:66 cent compared to what? by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      In China you can eat a good meal for $0.50
      In America you can barely afford a Candy Bar for $0.50

    6. Re:66 cent compared to what? by dskzero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not necesarily. A chocolate bar here in Venezuela can cost 3 BsF, which is around 50c. (Of course, there is this whole deal with the exchange control, but that's another thing altogether). And packs of cigarrete cost15 BsF, which is slightly more than two dollars. 66c an hour is around 5 BsF: more or less minimum wage in Venezuela. That could mean that the whole enchilada isn't really all that alarming. Not good, but hardly different than most other companies.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    7. Re:66 cent compared to what? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      How much can you buy with 66 cent in China?

      For 33 cents you can hire someone to do your work for you.

      33 cents profit for you . . . per hour!

      . . . and the 33 cent guy hires someone for 16.5 cents . . .

      You can see now why China's economy is booming!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Blue+Warlord · · Score: 1

      Easy, use the BigMac index: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Mac_Index According to wikipedia, one Big Mac in February 2009 costs $1.83, in the People's Republic of China. Hence, does 66 cents would give you roughly 1/3 of a burger per hour .... In other words, not a lot.

    9. Re:66 cent compared to what? by billius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not an economist, but according to Wolfram Alpha the GDP per capita for China is 3290 USD. Figuring 15 hours a day * $.065 per hour* 6 days a week * 52 weeks in a year = $3042 a year, so about 92% of the GDP per capita. Like any big country, I'm sure the cost of living varies quite a bit from region to region (for example a Big Mac in China costs about $1.83, meaning it takes about 3 hours to have enough to buy one) and working 15 hours a day definitely sucks, but at least on the surface the pay doesn't seem that bad. Anyone with more knowledge of economics have an opinion on the matter?

    10. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Targon · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work since a Big Mac isn't considered the "normal" food over there. Then again, the price over here has gone up by so much that there isn't much point to going to McDonalds when you can get better food for less.

    11. Re:66 cent compared to what? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I was thinking already "then they are making a really good salary". And that I mean serious. Really. When it comes to money, if that amount is true, they have nothing to complain about.

      You should not just look at "what can you buy in China for this amount" (in China your money lasts maybe 3-5 times longer than in western Europe when it comes to basic expenses such as food, public transport, clothing, etc - I find it really hard to guess). You also have to look at what the typical salaries are in a country. For example a self-cooked meal costs you maybe 1 Euro while a similar meal costs 1.5 Euro in a restaurant in China. In Europe that same self-cooked meal may cost you a bit more at 2 Euro, but a similar meal in a restaurant easily sets you back 12 Euro. Much bigger difference. Driving a car in China may even be more expensive than in Europe: the purchase price of a new car is way higher in China due to the high luxury taxes. Gas on the other hand is way cheaper. Trains and buses are also pretty cheap. As you see lifestyle matters when it comes to comparing expenditure.

      Back to the salary mentioned here. This number indicates 4.50 RMB per hour, or (15 hours a day, 30 days a week) 2025 RMB per month.

      Your run-of-the-mill factory worker is happy with half that. Common salaries (and they are still going up fast) are about 800-1000 RMB per month for unskilled factory work. And that is up from some 600 RMB per month just a few years ago (so we're talking about a 50% salary increase in a few years time!), and set to continue to rise, particularly in the Pearl River Delta area. A textile worker in the Yangtze River Delta area could make some 300 RMB per month, that is now also up to around 500-600 RMB.

      If that salary number is true, then it is hardly "sweatshop work". It contradicts what I expect from the combination of "sweatshop", "15-hour working days" and "16-17 year olds".

      Oh and for more comparison: a university graduate can expect a similar income. Not working 15-hour shifts of course, but with a diploma under their belt, while these mice builders presumably have no more than basic secondary education.

      And then the photos of sleeping Chinese... they do not have to be exhausted to sleep. Chinese sleep everywhere and anywhere. Really interesting behaviour.

    12. Re:66 cent compared to what? by bashibazouk · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Last time I was in Beijing I could get a good multi course meal for about $15 to $20 per person. Cheap but much more than the 50 cents you allege.
      there is almost always a 2 for a dollar candy bar deal at my local supermarket...

    13. Re:66 cent compared to what? by ekgringo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the relevance of Big Mac pricing in different countries. I spent some time in Saudi Arabia back before the first Gulf War. You could eat a full, satisfying meal for the equivalent of under $1 if you ate "local" food, but go to a restaurant that serves pizza or hamburgers and you would pay easily 5-10 times that for the same amount of food.

    14. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't compare the money, compare the conditions. A large portion of the worker's pay goes to the company for food (3 meals a day). They work from 8am to 10pm. They can only go out of the "compound" at approved times.

    15. Re:66 cent compared to what? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That comment was indeed insightful. When I was in Thailand in 1974 in the USAF, the average wage there was about $1,000 per year, but you could rent a bungalow for thirty bucks a month (woman included), feed four people in a fairly nice restaraunt for a dollar and get change back, and take a bus anywhere for a bhat ($.05).

      That's what westerners are competing against.

    16. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Does Venezuela have native chocolate producers?

      Your cigarettes cost like 30% of what they would in the USA, it's more like $6-8 for a pack here.(disclaimer: I don't smoke).

      Let's look at a few other prices:
      1 Gallon Milk
      1 Loaf of Bread
      1 Gallon Gasoline
      5 pounds of rice
      A 'fryer' chicken (or cost per pound for breasts)
      Average cost of a 1 bedroom apartment
      Average cost of a 2-3 bedroom house
      How much for your average mobile phone contract, per month?
      How much for your typical 'eat out' dinner?

      Some costs are highly variable, but this should give you a better idea of the cost of living than chocolate.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    17. Re:66 cent compared to what? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Beijing is an exception; it's a tourist capital and the center of power, where wages and prices vastly exceed the rest of the country.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    18. Re:66 cent compared to what? by srobert · · Score: 1

      "How much can you buy with 66 cent in China?"
        That's easy. You can buy the labor of a Chinese teenager for one hour.

    19. Re:66 cent compared to what? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      The coastline of China is much more developed then the rest of the nation and has a higher standard of living.

    20. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      You said it yourself: Beijing. That's as if you were basing the cost of housing in the USA off the cost of housing in Silicon Valley.

    21. Re:66 cent compared to what? by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      In a large city (the one I'm sitting in) I spend 6 Yuan on my main meal of the day each day, for which I get as much as I can comfortably eat in one sitting, and I'm a big heavy-eating guy).

      6 yuan is almost exactly 0.6 Euros, so about $300 these days...

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    22. Re:66 cent compared to what? by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Except that eating in McDonalds here in China is a luxury treat for most folks. It's perfectly possible to eat for a whole week on the cost of one standard McMeal combo.

      The Big Mac Index is not a valid measure in countries that do not subscribe to the American super-cheap-fast-food "culture".

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    23. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China you can eat a good meal for $0.50

      No you can't. You might be able to get a bowl of rice for $.50, but not a good meal. But I guess believing that everything is dirt cheap elsewhere makes it a bit easier to stomach that someone is working 10 hours a day and getting a $7.

    24. Re:66 cent compared to what? by ChinaLumberjack · · Score: 0

      1 text message: $0.03 Bottled water: $0.14 Instant noodle: $0.29 Low-end restaurant meal: $0.80 - $2.40 Middle-class restaurant meal: $5.00

    25. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there was me thinking that education was improving...

    26. Re:66 cent compared to what? by dskzero · · Score: 1

      The problem with your logic (not that it is wrong at all, i was just randomly poiting out two items), espcially regarding gasoline, is that the prices are wrong. A liter of gasoline is around .2 BsF (off guess). With a dollar at 7 BsF, you can't really put that comparison, since fuel is subsided by the government.

      (Whether it's good for the oil industry is a different thing)

      Other prices I can't really compare since I'm not up to date with prices in USA *prices in BsF, 7 BsF = $1) Cost of a 1 bedroom apartment is around 200K Cost of a 2-3 bedroom house is around 500K 1 loaf of bread 1.5 Average mobile phone contract is highly variable, but generally, 50 Typical eat out for two persons in a rather nice place is around 200. Burguer King, on a whopper bar, was around 110, for a comparison. (Of course, here, people consider BK a nice place to eat, so go figure)

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    27. Re:66 cent compared to what? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      $0.50 for a bowl of rice???!!! Where I am in SE Asia, the average income for factory workers is about double what it is in China, judging by the rest of the comments here, and I can get a pretty good meal for about $0.80. A bowl of rice from our staff cafeteria is a little under $0.20.

    28. Re:66 cent compared to what? by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Wew, i typed something pretty long, but i didn't published it. A summary: prices in BsF (BsF 7 = $1) Gasoline: .2 per liter. Bread: 1.5 1 room apartment: 200K 3 room house: 500K Phone contract: highly variable, around 50 Dinner: Nice place: 200, BK: 110, really nice around 600. And yes, we do produce chocolate. And Fuel is subsided by the government.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    29. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      Gasoline: .2 BsF/liter = .11 cents/gallon. I know you mentioned subsidization, but that much? Even if the decimal was off, that's still 1/3rd the price of US gasoline at ~$1.10/gallon. We're at ~$3/gallon here.
      Bread: 1.5 BsF is around what I pay for a loaf of bread here in the USA in dollars. 21 cents/loaf is around 1/7th US cost.
      1 Room Apartment: $200k = $28.6k USD I was actually thinking monthly rent, but oh well.
      3 Room House: $71.4k, around half that of US homes. I live in a relative hole.
      Cell Contract: ~$7/month. You can't even get a plan in most areas for less than $30. Again, I seem to pay around the same in USD as you would in BsF.
      Dinner: $28.57 US equivalent. One thing I forgot to specify, would this be for a single person, two, or a family of 4? This seems to be about the same cost as in the USA as for a couple. At least what I'd consider 'nice', IE a sit down, non-fast food place. I generally end up spending around $15-20 for myself.

      In summary: Gas, insanely cheap. Bread, 1/7th cost, Homes, 1/2, Phone, 1/7th, chocolate at par, nothing ID'd as being more expensive.

      Cost of living conclusion: Probably costs 1/3rd as much to live there in 'equivalent style'. Results not scientificially generated. An actual study would include hundreds of products, actual average cost studies, weighting, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    30. Re:66 cent compared to what? by sam0737 · · Score: 1

      In my opinion saying they "only" make 66 cent an hour means nothing without a reference. How much can you buy with 66 cent in China?

      A lunch - a bowl of noodle and a bun. (I live in Shanghai)

    31. Re:66 cent compared to what? by BoppreH · · Score: 1

      Big macs are fancy food at most third world countries. You can eat a good meal at a good restaurant for the same price.

    32. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In shanghai (more or less , in little restaurants)
      fried rice/simple noodles / dumplings around 5 rmb = 0,73 usd
      bus ticket 1yuan= 0,15 usd
      train tiket to beijing from 88 yuan= 13 usd
      ice-cream 3,5 yuan= 0,5 usd
      glasses(oculistic) 200 yuan= 29 usd
      vorpal longsword +3 not allowed by the party.

      Shanghai is considered to be somewhere expensive in china (after hong kong) and it is FAR more expensive than rural areas .

      Considered the buyng power obtained per hour is just a little more than my friends in italy used to be paid to work part time in a swiming pool at the same age.

    33. Re:66 cent compared to what? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I am not an economist, but I can tell you from personal experience that using the cost of a Big Mac is not a good way to measure standard of living in developing countries. In China, you can actually buy a whole meal in a restaurant for a little more than a dollar; if you cook yourself, you can feed a family for a meal. In places like that, McDonald's tends to be higher end food (not that it's better necessarily, but it's stylish). When I was living in a developing country, I only ate at an American chain restaurant once a month or so, because it really messed up my food budget. In general I wouldn't cook any meal that cost more than 50 cents USD.

      --
      Qxe4
    34. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Last time I was in Beijing I could get a good multi course meal for about $15 to $20 per person. Cheap but much more than the 50 cents you allege."

      That's Beijing. As others have said prices vary across China, try not to apply tunnel vision to your claims.

    35. Re:66 cent compared to what? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the employees are forced to put up with living in a dorm and working 15 hour days, it is most certainly NOT decent pay.

    36. Re:66 cent compared to what? by tmosley · · Score: 1

      And we used to win, before we drove up the costs for our manufacturers to the point that they all fled the country. Now the capital that used to be here, adding multipliers to US worker efforts are in China and other countries, making them more productive. Their salaries are rising because of it (they've doubled since the 90's, IIRC). They are becoming a rich nation, while we devolve into a glorified banana republic. It's not their fault, it's ours.

    37. Re:66 cent compared to what? by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Right. A meal in a fine French restaurant in Manhattan costs the same as a po-boy from a fast food joint in Louisiana, so that's how it should be in China too.

    38. Re:66 cent compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, per your numbers wouldn't a Big Mac take almost 30 hours to purchase, not 3?

      You said it's $.065 per hour (6.5 cents), $1.83 takes a little over 28.15 hours to come-up with at 6.5 cents per hour.

      On with the show...

    39. Re:66 cent compared to what? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And we used to win, before we drove up the costs for our manufacturers to the point that they all fled the country.

      But what we did that "drove up costs for the manufacturer" is costs that they should have borne all along that foreign manufacturing should as well. OSHA? Good regs; had OSHA been in effect in 1959 my grandfather wouldn't have gone down that elevator shaft. EPA? Good regs; the air at the Monsanto plant no longer burns your lungs. Minimum wage? Ours is poor compared to most industrialized natione (by "poor" I mean "lower"), and wages drive up costs as well. These are things that SHOULD be done, and if corporations had morals or ethics, these regs would not be needed.

      Manufacturing is cheap in countries who don't value clean air, clean water, or human life any more than corporations do.

    40. Re:66 cent compared to what? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Now toss in a fifteen hour work day so you don't have time to cook. Toss in no access to cooking facilities so you don't have ability if you had the time or money. Toss in cafeteria food described as "horrid". Toss in a lack of any other choice because you're forbidden to leave your job site. Toss in having to buy your own bedding. Toss in a lack of bathroom breaks for twelve hour shifts. Toss in widespread sexual harassment if you happen to be female.

      How's that $3,042 a year looking now? I don't need to be an economist to see what's wrong with this picture.

      Virg

    41. Re:66 cent compared to what? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I'm not an economist, but according to Wolfram Alpha the GDP per capita for China is 3290 USD. Figuring 15 hours a day * $.065 per hour* 6 days a week * 52 weeks in a year = $3042 a year, so about 92% of the GDP per capita.

      You're comparing GDP per capita to what a factory worker working overtime earns. You do realize that per capita takes into account all women and children and everyone who doesn't even have a job. US income per capita for 2009 was $39,138, so this would be like making $36,006.96 for working 15 hours a day, 6 days a week.

      Actually, the workers are only paid $0.52 an hour after company provided food is taken out of their salary. This means their real wage is $2433.60, which is only 80% of GDP. Which means their US equivalent wage is only $31,205.57, or $6.67/hr.

      So basically, working 15 hour days, with unpaid bathroom breaks for 10 min. every 4 hours, forced to buy company food and pay for company rent, for the equivalent to less than minimum wage "doesn't seem that bad?"

      Seriously, fuck you. This is slave labor, no two ways about it.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    42. Re:66 cent compared to what? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Holy crap dude, of course all that stuff sounds bad, but that wasn't the topic at hand. We were specifically discussing whether the pay by itself was bad or good. Context man, context!!

      --
      Qxe4
    43. Re:66 cent compared to what? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What are you calling a good meal?

      A bowl of rice with 3 shrimp and a side of cabbage is not a good meal.

    44. Re:66 cent compared to what? by billius · · Score: 1

      You make some very good points. I do realize that per capita takes into account people who don't work and was merely trying to use it as a crude means of figuring out about how much money would be a decent amount for a person to live on, given that the original poster was wondering what $0.65 can buy you in China. It's of course very important that workers have the ability to make things better for themselves through collective bargaining, etc so that conditions improve. I've just become rather cautious in recent years about sweatshop allegations because in many cases the alternatives (eg subsistence agriculture, prostitution, etc) are even worse and very well-meaning people end up campaigning for something with dubious benefits at best.

      I am, however, puzzled by the "fuck you" you decided to tack on. I was just doing some rough estimating given my limited knowledge and solicited people with a firmer grasp of economics to share their opinions. I conceded that the working conditions were really bad and I don't appreciate you taking me completely out of context on this matter. I was merely attempting to give context to the hourly wage.

    45. Re:66 cent compared to what? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      It's the very context that makes it so awful. If they paid astronomical wages for working in such hellish conditions, then I'd find it more reasonable. After all, there are a lot of awful jobs, and by paying really well they get takers. But the pay these workers are getting doesn't match up to the conditions, which is what defines it as a sweatshop. Stated in your context, the pay is horrendous considering the job and conditions.

      Virg

    46. Re:66 cent compared to what? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      We weren't talking about pay with regards to work conditions, we were talking about pay with regards to living standards outside of work. You should have been able to figure this out.

      --
      Qxe4
  12. at the age of 16... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

    ...I'd love to have earnt 65 cents an hour, scaled up to what the CoL is in my country, in an intense job to earn me quick money when I'm not studying. For me, working 15 hours a day is pretty standard, and I'll do it often providing (i) I enjoy the work; or (ii) it's for a limited amount of time.

    1. Re:at the age of 16... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      translated to american gdp, 65 cents is still below the minimum wage
      according to the numbers 75 to 80 cents would be what a chinese employer would have to pay compared to US percentages.
      they are still assholes even with the buying power arguments

    2. Re:at the age of 16... by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      The UK's had min wage for under 15 years, with more lax rules for teens and young adults. Before then, and still now for young people, many were paid below the current main adult min wage.

      Of course, it's a horrible wage to live on. But China's 13/15 of min wage is not far behind the civilised opportunities we like to think we offer in the West.

  13. Quote was missing the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation into how they are being paid such an extraordianry amount, when clearly they would accept 40 cents or even lower.'

  14. Knock-offs by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I GUARANTEE you those are not MS-brand mice. They also make Louis Vitton purses and Chanel sunglasses in the same factory.

    The Asians LOVE America but do not want to pay for the over-priced stuff when they can copy and make it themselves. There's a huge market over there for knock-offs. Do a Google search for Chinese fake products.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Knock-offs by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Um, Microsoft contracts out manufacturing to them. The second link in the summary has pictures of the boxes and mice. Even if you don't RTFA can you at least LATFPictures?

    2. Re:Knock-offs by sheph · · Score: 1

      There's a huge market here in the U.S. for the knockoffs as well. Go to Ebay and search for darn near anything and you'll find someone in China selling it for about 1/3 of what you'd pay here for it.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    3. Re:Knock-offs by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There's a huge market here in the U.S. for the knockoffs as well. Go to Ebay and search for darn near anything and you'll find someone in China selling it for about 1/3 of what you'd pay here for it.

      And it'll last 1/6 as long as the real product would have.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Knock-offs by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      Both statements are true (except about the 1/3 part...it's much less). There's no shortage of women here who can't wait for the next "Purse Party" so they can get their $75 Coach purse that would normally cost them $600 (if you're paying 1/3 the cost then you're getting ripped off). And the women who sell this shit are making a KILLING. Then again, get caught and it's federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison time.

      --
      Loading...
  15. Business practise by TDyl · · Score: 1

    I find it so hard to believe that all these entities "will investigate" when these claims are made; are they so oblivious of the facts of employment in the areas in hich they choose to have their products made, or are they just downright lying scum, trying to reduce cost margins and increase sales?

    Yes, call me naive, but I cannot believe the bastards when profits, share-holders and bottom-lines get in the way of ethics. We in the technology sector have such a powerful presence that we can force change and improve the lives of hundreds of millions around the planet - we should be doing that as a matter of first instance, not retro-actively.

    --
    Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
  16. Investigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've probably ``commenced an investigation'' on how to migrate the rest of their business to these sweatshops as well.

  17. I know this is bad. by Higaran · · Score: 1

    Now I kind of feel ripped off that I paid $80 for a MS gameing mouse last year. I do however still think that MS makes the best keyboard and mice out there, their the only ones I use. I understand that they are makeing nothing compared to us here in the us, but how does thier wages compare to other factories in china, I highly doubt that anyone would be working there if it was really that bad for the area.

    1. Re:I know this is bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering your level of English proficiency, I wonder if you're one of those labourers.

    2. Re:I know this is bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he appears to be just an average American gamer, stupid to the core.

    3. Re:I know this is bad. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Sorry buddy, Logitech all the way, sure they are pricey but damn you cant get another mouse that is half as good as the MX series anywhere.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    4. Re:I know this is bad. by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Is awesome how the two replies insulting Higaran are posted by AC. Way to go!

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    5. Re:I know this is bad. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Wow... I don't know where to start here. I know, I'll make a list!

      1. You complain about the price of your mouse despite the fact the article was trying to make the OPPOSITE point... prices are LOW and it is because of this cheap labor MS and other companies use! Using proper working conditions and treating workers like human beings would raise the cost of products.
      2. You claim MS makes the best keyboard and mice, and in the same breath admit you have no way to know that because you don't use other brands, at least it seems not recently.
      3. The article doesn't really mention this but AFAIK this is a pretty common situation in Asian factories. The currency conversion to US money though is meant to show how the wages line up... imagine yourself living on their wages.
      4. "Really that bad" is a relative term. Compared to western nations, the working conditions are horrible, inexcusable, and illegal. Over there it may very well be common and even inescapable. The poorer you are the worse jobs you HAVE to keep, since you have no savings or other people with good jobs or savings to fall back on.
    6. Re:I know this is bad. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      You claim MS makes the best keyboard and mice, and in the same breath

      ...he demonstrates they wire all the keys up wrong!

  18. Child labour by western standards, perhaps by Mouldy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But they don't consider 15-17 year olds children in China (I don't pretend to know about Chinese law - just putting the idea out there). Also, if $0.65/hour is just enough to live on - so be it. Factory workers here (UK) are paid 'just enough to live on' too. $0.65 isn't a lot by western standards, but if it can shelter, feed and clothe them over there, it's enough for them. Considering that factory has employees - it's most likely the best work those people can get in that area. If Microsoft & others decided to pack up and stop 'exploiting' - where would all those workers go? Probably to some other factory that pays even less.

    1. Re:Child labour by western standards, perhaps by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Factory workers here (UK) are paid 'just enough to live on' too.

      Note that in the UK, minimum wage for people aged 16-18 is only £3.57, as opposed to £5.80 for people aged 22 or over. A lot more than $0.65, but not necessarily when you factor in the cost of living difference.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Child labour by western standards, perhaps by Tapewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reading the article, the main thrust of it doesn't seem to be the fact that they're using 16-year-olds, though there is a part about 14-15 year-olds as well. The problem is mostly the way the factory is being run.

      The workers – mostly women aged 18 to 25 – work from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m. They eat horrid meals from the factory cafeterias. They have no bathroom breaks during their shifts, and must clean the toilets as discipline, according to the NLC.

      They sleep in factory dormitories, 14 workers to a room. They must buy their own mattresses and bedding, or else sleep on 28-inch-wide plywood boards. They "shower" with a sponge and a bucket. And many of the workers, because they're young women, are regularly sexually harassed, the NLC alleges.

    3. Re:Child labour by western standards, perhaps by mswhippingboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The workers – mostly women aged 18 to 25 – work from 7:45 a.m. to 10:55 p.m. They eat horrid meals from the factory cafeterias. They have no bathroom breaks during their shifts, and must clean the toilets as discipline, according to the NLC.

      They sleep in factory dormitories, 14 workers to a room. They must buy their own mattresses and bedding, or else sleep on 28-inch-wide plywood boards. They "shower" with a sponge and a bucket. And many of the workers, because they're young women, are regularly sexually harassed, the NLC alleges.

      So how is this different from the typical startup?

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
  19. It's a way of life, not a temporary arrangement by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    It's not what they're being paid, it's how it's being done. They have laws that mandate paid overtime, but it'd be suicidal to ask for it. At least in the US, you'll survive long enough to make it to court and make your case to an impartial judge.

    Unlike the US, China (and many other Third World countries) make it a point to instill a certain fear in the worker's life. That's how they make the hardware so cheaply. That's also why it's not a temporary arrangement, but a permanent way of life.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:It's a way of life, not a temporary arrangement by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Yes, the lack of worker movement leading to unions/tribunals/etc in China (irony...) is a problem. As is the fact that a teen worries about the cost of marriage and supporting his parents' farm. Although there are many jobs which youths have to do in the West which come with poor live-in conditions, and tower blocks of state housing in Europe resemble such dormitories in their liveability.

  20. Solution by Alarindris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take away their pay and call them 'interns'.

    1. Re:Solution by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      In the UK, even interns get paid. It's damn near minimum wage, but it's still pay :P

    2. Re:Solution by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Internship is not quite slave work, but comes very close in many cases.

    3. Re:Solution by thijsh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't they have thousands of 'interns' like that building the luxureous Dubai for instance?
      Contrary to what most people believe the worldwide total of exploited people you can categorize under the label 'slave' is more than before the abolition of slavery... Slavery and human trade is booming business and an order or magnitude more widespread than in 'slavery times'.

    4. Re:Solution by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Right, it's indentured servitude.

    5. Re:Solution by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a slashdot article about US companies getting in trouble with labor laws for not paying interns? It seems horribly unethical to create and perpetuate a system where young people trying to get into a certain industry think that it's necessary and okay to work without pay, or with incredibly small pay. You might say that the interns are okay with it, because they are pursuing their dreams or something. But I bet that they would be even more okay with it if they got paid.

      Incidentally, I am an engineer. All of my engineering and software development friends, like me, were reasonably well-paid in our internships, at a minimum of about 1.5x minimum wage, up to about 3x.

    6. Re:Solution by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Not really. Indentured servitude involves a debt that won't be paid unless the work is performed.

      Interns can quit any time and owe the employer nothing.

      Internship is more like a barter transaction. The intern barters work and the employer barters experience and education.

      The actual value of both is debatable.

  21. Not a surprise by Akido37 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time news like this comes out, the Western companies act all shocked. OF COURSE they're working in crappy conditions for low pay - how else do they make products so cheaply?

    In summary: "I'm SHOCKED to find gambling going on in this casino!!"

    1. Re:Not a surprise by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I think that as well, those companies are not stupid they do everything they can get away with, once things like that become public they play the shocked ones...
      Nothing new here, worked since the outsourcing of manufacturing has started.

    2. Re:Not a surprise by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Problem is for certain commodity items you cannot even avoid such things, show me one mouse manufacturer who does not outsource production or does not go to the cheapest bidder. Hell Logitech for instance was one of the last to outsource from Europe to Asia, but in the end they were forced to do so as well.
      The same goes for almost all computer parts :-(
      With food you at least can buy organic or fair trade, with computer parts there is almost no chance.

    3. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the single most insightful comment on this article.

      "Cheap oil is a human right!"

      Only two things are infinite, the space and human greed.

  22. Scary timing... by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

    I clicked onto this article from my RSS feed after "window shopping" mice at ebuyer. I was even looking at a Microsoft one; looking at the prices you wouldn't think they were made in sweatshops.

  23. what are you going to do to change it? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    Surprise people, but this is what's behind the "Made in China" sticker on all that crap you buy. Think about it next time you throw out your old cellphone, upgrade your comp, or buy an iPad. If there wasn't a demand, there wouldn't be a market.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:what are you going to do to change it? by Iyonesco · · Score: 1

      Most people in the west would probably be happy to pay a few extra dollars for their products. The best solution then would be to increase their hourly rate and cut their working hours, which would have a hugely beneficial impact on their lives while only causing a very small decrease in our spending power.

      From your post it seems you have no interest in improving their conditions and just want to put them out of the job. Yes, let's stop buying "all that crap" because I'm sure the KYE workers would much rather be unemployed and starving on the streets.

      I think you should tell everyone where you work so we can all help improve your conditions by not buying any products from that company. Would you like it if you lost your job because helpful people put your employer out of business?

  24. Sweatshop? Only by your standard by jsse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not here to pro-Microsoft, but....

    65 cents x 15 hours x 24 days (people work 6 days a week there) = US$234 ~= RMB1,614.00

    The wage is much more than the average of the workers there. The starting salary of a factory worker is no more than US$100/mth, an experienced worker (>2 yrs exp) might not be able to ask for more than US$200/mth.

    Also, from what I've seen in the article, the working environment is MUCH better than any other factories I've ever seen in China.

    Still, I agree that the working hours are too long, but I'm sure the workers there are more than willing to work more than you'd ask for, given high-paid.

    1. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In China (and everywhere else I believe), it is not illegal on its own to arrange 15-hour shifts. However, this can be carried out only in the presence of the employees' consent, and the "extra hours" (ones beyond the usual 8 hr) must be paid with extra wages (at least 2x on weekdays and 3x on holidays).

      I can tell you that those girls and boys are more than willing to work the extra hours, but they're usually poorly educated and don't know their rights.

      Also, in China it's not illegal to employ a 16- or 17-yr old if it can be proved that it is absolutely necessary for supporting the employee's family, AND the job does not involve risky operations e.g. ones w/ toxic matter, radiation, or working high above the ground.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      How do you figure that a 15 hour work day and 6 days are work is just average? The minimum wage, which is followed very closely is RMB 800 a month.

      Lets not pretend that these children are being paid well for a 90 hour work week because it is twice the minimum wage.

    3. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just read TFA, before commented already on the salaries, and now I realise the numbers given do not add up.

      The wage yes it looks very good. But according to TFA there is a base wage of RMB 770, plus overtime for longer working. TFA also talks about 12 hour shifts (sounds more reasonable) several times. There may be people that push on to 15 hours but that is rare. Quality falls rapidly with those hours and factory managers are not that stupid either.

      By the way you are talking about migrant workers here, they tend to work seven hours a day, mainly because they do not have anything better to do, and are only there for the money in the first place.

      OK then the strange bits: almost all workers are females of 17-25 years old, complaining that the base wage is "not enough to support a family". Women do not support a whole family in general, that's the man's task. And that age is a bit young for having your own family.

      Salary and working hours as quoted add up to over 2000 RMB per month (15 hours a day, 4.5 RMB per hour, 30 days per month). Triple the base wage. That's a bit much for overtime.

      During work hours, 1,000 workers could be crammed into one 105-foot by 105-foot room.

      That is interesting. 11 sq.ft. (1 sq.m.) per worker? Including the conveyor belt, other equipment, space to work, aisles for the supervisor to walk through? Now Chinese ain't that big people, this is too tight to be believable. The photos do not back up so little space either.

      While parts may be true (yes factory workers work very long hours in often poor conditions, though in the Pearl River Delta even double the minimum wage and airco on the factory floor is not enough any more these days!), it is also a bit sensationalist.

    4. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by YesDinosaursDidExist · · Score: 1

      Very true. When I visited China we visited both Chinese and American factories, and the conditions in the pictures were much better than some of what I saw. I only got a chance to visit Beijing and Shanghai, and one would think that the factories there would have better conditions...however, I did not see that to be true. Taking into account the wage, and the location (presumabily the interior of China) of the factory - I would say the conditions are good. Prices in the interior are lower, and this wage will let workers save money in the long run, either for university or their families. Egocentric viewpoints are a thing of the past. Try and remember The Prime Directive - Jean Luc would be proud.

      --
      Individuals must choose, decide their "essential" nature rather than having it given from some transcendent source.
    5. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      You're the problem. If you've spent time in Chinese sweatshops with conditions "MUCH" worse than 6/hr for 15 hr shifts then you must work for a company that has no regard for human rights. How do you really get much worse than the conditions described? Either you're lying, you used "seen" in the sense that you read about it or saw pictures (which is close to lying because you state it like a first hand experience), or you're an asshole that contracts out manufacturing to factories you know to abuse their workers. Regardless, you're an asshole.

      How do you really rationalize the treatment of humans like domesticated animals? If these factory workers were your family members would you still be so quick to disregard their plight? Most Americans would commit suicide before they worked 15 hrs per day for six days a week to barely earn enough to feed themselves. Just because these workers are willing to drudge through the abuses of these factory owners doesn't make it right. It's not about Microsoft, it's about outsourcing as a whole. It doesn't matter whether some sweatshops are worse or slightly better than this one, they're all unethical and paid for by American and European consumers. When we make the claim that it's not that bad we lie to ourselves because we don't want to feel guilty about how we obtained our possessions. We don't want to think of ourselves as accomplices to extortion, slavery, and abuse.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    6. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the money probably stays within their economy. There is a similar situation in Alaska. The seafood industry hires workers for minimum wage. Those employees work 16 hours a day, 7 days a week for four months straight. The majority of these employees are from the Philippines, Ethiopia, Somalia, and the Ukraine. They are charged for room and board and airfare. The majority of the money they make goes back with them. They work through the most brutal aches and pains while ankle deep in fish guts with no heat because the money is worth it to them. They all go home for a month, most blow all their money and come back broke - year after year. In another light, a deck hand on a fishing vessel averages 0.018 cents a pound for salmon (due to different types of salmon and assuming a standard 10% share of the catch). The cannery sells it for around $3.85 a pound and they process 10,000 pounds or greater per hour. Now, how that turns into around $12.00 a pound at the grocery store is insane since transportation and frozen storage only count for a fraction of that price. It's like a big slap in the face - especially to the deck hand who takes the greatest risks and works for 18 hours a day. Anyway, that's the closest thing to a sweat shop I've seen in the U.S.. I'm interested to know more about the worst working conditions that you've seen in China - things like that don't seem to make it into the news. As for the main article, it seems like the author tried to jab China and Microsoft in a single blow. I am no fan of Microsoft either, but I am grateful for your contribution of clarity.

    7. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

      Read my reply under this and think about it when eating salmon caught, processed and sold right here in the U.S., (Trident Seafoods, Peter Pan Seafoods, Icicle, Unisea to name a few), and exploitation hits home.

    8. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Americans would commit suicide before they worked 15 hrs per day for six days a week to barely earn enough to feed themselves.

      [citation needed]

    9. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Most of the factory workers are migrant workers from more rural parts of China. They have no connections in the cities they work in outside of the people they work with, and no reason to want to do anything other than make more money quicker so they can spend less of their life working in factories before they take their savings back to their villages for a better quality of life.

    10. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      In China (and everywhere else I believe), it is not illegal on its own to arrange 15-hour shifts. However, this can be carried out only in the presence of the employees' consent, and the "extra hours" (ones beyond the usual 8 hr) must be paid with extra wages (at least 2x on weekdays and 3x on holidays).

      I can tell you that those girls and boys are more than willing to work the extra hours, but they're usually poorly educated and don't know their rights.

      Also, in China it's not illegal to employ a 16- or 17-yr old if it can be proved that it is absolutely necessary for supporting the employee's family, AND the job does not involve risky operations e.g. ones w/ toxic matter, radiation, or working high above the ground.

      If the other family members were paid a living wadge, its wouldn't be necessary to employ underage workers.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    11. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK then the strange bits: almost all workers are females of 17-25 years old, complaining that the base wage is "not enough to support a family". Women do not support a whole family in general, that's the man's task. And that age is a bit young for having your own family.

      What man? You're only allowed one child per family. And the parents are in the rural area, doing farming, making even less money.

    12. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      There are 200 million unemployed in China, according to the Prime Minister, Wen Jiabao. Most of them were paid exactly nothing.

      From the perspective of those teenagers working in the electronics shop it is not only necessary for them selves, but also necessary for their unemployed parents.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    13. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mainly because the pearl river delta in the summer feels like somebody slapped you with a hot towel.
      southerners aren't lazy, the weather is just unbearable for four hours a day.
      even the alligators don't want to move very much. (I live in jackson)

    14. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by tmosley · · Score: 1

      This can only be accomplished with the application of capital to make those workers more efficient, thus allowing for higher wages. Government mandate is not enough, nor has it ever been, despite what the Unionists would like you to think.

    15. Re:Sweatshop? Only by your standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Women do not support a whole family in general, that's the man's task. "

      Now that's completely wrong. There are now many sectors (service sectors) and even factories (especially for precision-ish stuff like textile or small assembly) that either prefer women or even Only hire women. I've been to factories where only women workers are added. Here in Beijing, some Chinese people tell me: "Now the woman is considered the useful one, men are useless." The women from rural areas can go to big cities and be employed as maids in stable jobs or be in service sectors (servers, massage etc.) where women are preferred. The husband's left looking for short-term construction boss (not always, of course, but it's easier to find a job in many places if you're a girl).

      Heck, it gets worse. Chinese girls are picky now, the husband must have a decent income, a car and a house, so it's up to the guy's family to provide all of it for him so that he can get married at a decent age. The son is now often a massive liability, and most of them were so spoiled that they have no sense of duty to their parents. "I think it's better to have a girl, girls take care of the parents, the son just leaves." That's also something I've been hearing often over here. It's a massive social shift, and it's real, but one that's very observable to anyone living here.

      Another thing: often, in Chinese factories, the company provides the housing and food. It's not strange at all for the young ones to be supporting the family, because factory earnings are Still many times that of rural areas. What's pocket money to the workers can represent a year of income to their families back home.

  25. God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by NevarMore · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we just please let this one slide and go pick on Apple?

    I like my Microsoft mice and keyboards. They're actually pretty decent, don't make me hate them too.

    1. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can we just please let this one slide and go pick on Apple?

      No, but Apple is also evil.

      I like my Microsoft mice and keyboards. They're actually pretty decent, don't make me hate them too.

      I find that they suck fucking ass. The wireless ones have inferior range to the Logitech products, and they do not have the MTBF, either. Microsoft's gamepads are the quickest to get sloppy; the analog sticks get twitchy and drifty LONG before Sony's, for example. Microsoft knows jack about hardware design. The shape of the mice is probably the most inexplicable thing. Make it fit my hand like a glove, so I have to move my whole arm to use it? This is stupid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by dskzero · · Score: 1

      You must have some sort of weird anatomy. I find that their keyboards and mice are top of the line. (Dunno about wireless, i don't like them)

      I'm particulary impressed by their keyboards. They are extremely comfortable and silent.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    3. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by thijsh · · Score: 1

      Buy Logitech instead... exact same crap built in the exact same factory by the exact same Chinese workers... But as long as there are no photo's them being 'exploited' yet you're doubleplusfeelgood.

    4. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, your beloved Logitech mice / keyboards are made in the same factory, and I would be willing to bet that they are made from many of the same parts.

    5. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it but me too! Microsoft makes the only (in my opinion) decent ergonomic keyboard out there and I love mine. It really does keep my hands from hurting at the end of the day.

    6. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your beloved Logitech mice / keyboards are made in the same factory, and I would be willing to bet that they are made from many of the same parts.

      A Nissan and a Subaru are both made out of pretty much the same parts, but the experience of driving them, or even working on them, is vastly different. I know first-hand, having owned and worked quite a bit on a 1989 240SX and a 1993 Impreza (so of similar years etc.) apple and asus both use foxconn. etc etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly you're mistaken. This fellow has taken the time to find engineering/electrical design flaws in Logitech products, mainly focusing on mice, confirming the hardware inside of competitors mice (read: Microsoft) is quite a bit different.

      http://jdc.parodius.com/logitech/

      Apparently this problem with Logitech mice still exists today, and he can't bring it to Logitech's attention because of a shithead manager who was more concerned about his name being publicized (by his own Support staff) than actually working with the guy to fix the problem.

      If the parts were the same, they should be interchangeable, which is not the case.

    8. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Well, people are different. A lot of factors actually go into the feel of a mouse. Most importantly how you hold it. The most common are people who use the wrist vs. people who use the arm. Wrist users (like myself) clutch the mouse between the thumb and pinky (or in my case, ring finger) and the palm of the hand never touches the mouse because the wrist rests on the table/mousepad and this is where the movement is. Arm users tuck the whole mouse into the palm, leaving the fingers free to wander, and receives the movement from the arm itself, keeping the wrist straight (probably a healthier option, maybe, IANAD). A mouse that is not generic (normal oval shape) can be designed to fit either, but will not really be comfortable for the opposite intent; a mouse designed for an arm user will not be comfortable for a wrist user and vice versa.

      Other factors like hand size come into play too. If you have big, chunky hands/fingers (like me) you like a big mouse and not lots of little buttons clustered together (you end up hitting buttons by accident, as well as hitting several at a time when trying for just one). In the same way, people with small hands don't like big mice because they often have trouble reaching buttons that are placed far away.

    9. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What you said. Today, I use a Logitech Trackman Wheel, but I prefer the original Trackman Marble. Finding a working one under $100 is a bit of a bitch though, since they stopped making 'em. They were a little less 'ergonomic' and thus more 'one size fits all' which was an advantage because I am a larger than man sized creature.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IntelliMouse was designed by the Gods then copied by Microsoft. And thank Microsoft for that, because it's the best mouse human hands can use.

      NewEgg sells the classic old wired optical IntelliMouse in 3 and 5-packs.

    11. Re:God damn it Slashdot, I *like* MS hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but Apple is also evil

      From the article you linked to:

      Apple took the report seriously enough to launch its own investigation and to enforce certain changes in labor practices at Foxconn's factory.

      From TFA:

      Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation.'

      Seems weird to find myself defending both Apple and Microsoft in a single post but I'm guessing that Microsoft will "enforce certain changes in labor practices" as well. They may be evil, but I don't think they will condone virtual slavery either.

  26. The Result of Maximizing Profits by SplicerNYC · · Score: 1

    Not just Microsoft but every American company that ships manufacturing jobs overseas precisely because they know that people making slave wages put more money in the pockets of stockholders, board members and the CEO. The drive towards maximization of profits is a threat to the future of corporations because it replaces planning with obsession about the "now".

    1. Re:The Result of Maximizing Profits by Targon · · Score: 1

      With the way the dollar has been losing value, it won't be much longer before our wages here seem so low that we will be seen that way.

    2. Re:The Result of Maximizing Profits by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It is up to the consumer.
      It is super cheap to make a crappy car that is unsafe and pollutes.
      Enough people care about reliability and safety that they a. passed regulations and b. check on the reliability of the cars they buy.
      That is why Honda sells so many cars.
      Maybe it is time that people put value into items not made in these conditions. Maybe we should stop buying the cheapest of everything and start caring about "quality" again.
      Frankly I have found when I pay a little bit extra for things like tools, and jeans they last a lot longer than the cheap ones. They actually end up being cheaper over the long haul.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  27. Nothing we haven't seen before - it's not that bad by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    Occasionally stories like this come out, and most of the "sweatshops" look very similar to this. The conditions don't look that bad. They're not working in dirty factories with dangerous equipment. They get paid what is probably a low, but livable, salary. Most of them probably come from the countryside and have no other option for work, unless they want to stay on the farm. Remember the photos from an iPhone that came with some pictures the cute factory girls took of themselves? The factory was maybe a little bit nicer, but it looked extremely similar.

    Compared to us in the west, this looks bad. However, a lot of people in the west would take these jobs with no problem if the pay is adjusted to the cost of living... because the conditions are really not that bad!

    It's clearly not sustainable to keep these low-paying factory/assembly jobs in China, but for now, it's working out pretty well. We can buy computer peripherals for rather low prices, and in the process pay a little bit of money to poor Chinese kids who don't have the option to keep going to school or get a better job at the moment.

  28. and...? by Targon · · Score: 1

    With the cost of living and such over there, that may very well be like getting paid $100/day here. For someone 16-17 years old without any work experience, that isn't all that bad. Of course, I don't know the true cost of living there, but people need to stop using the exchange rates in the wrong way. If the average daily pay for an adult is $1/day but that lets someone live an average standard of living for that country, that isn't really horrible. On the flip side, if the standard of living were to go up, that would be better as well. But still, someone putting together mice and keyboards should NOT make so much that they are considered very wealthy for where they live either. I don't agree with the 15 hour work day stuff, but if the level of pay is acceptable to the people doing the work, then the only thing we can really say is that the working CONDITIONS are what we should be looking at, where there should be good airflow and it should not be too hot or cold.

    Even here in the USA, some people would be happy to work for $10/hour, while for other people, they would require much more than that. Just because a wage is too low for YOU does not mean that it is too low for everyone. The cost of living is a big part of that.

  29. Am I the only one... by bbbaldie · · Score: 1

    ...who misses the days when China was Red China, and we weren't doing business with them?

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by axl917 · · Score: 1

      Kissinger and Nixon can be thanked for that, as they worked to thaw relations to leverage against the Soviets.

  30. fuddles is greed/fear/ego based, (in)human? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he keeps trying (to outshrewd the rest of the corepirate nazi illuminati), but in the end, as with everyone else, he's just one of us, & will be 'rewarde(a)d' as such, as the randoidian mindset turns to boiling mush. we all have those 'features'.

    earlier today:
    http://www.aos.wisc.edu/fireball/2010_04_14_fireball_loop_1024x768_long.gif

    just look all around you including up towards the sky.

    never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators.....

  31. Fact of living a decent life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um.... this is why you should not.

    1. Re:Fact of living a decent life by icebraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, you should buy a $40 mouse, with the difference of $20 going to the companies' profits.

    2. Re:Fact of living a decent life by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unless and until we make slave ownership by proxy just as illegal as direct ownership, you are correct. The same unethical corporations that happily benefit from near slave labor will create a dizzying mesh of ownership and under the table deals to sell you a supposed "fair-labor mouse" made by the very same slaves but costing $40 instead of $20. There may be honest companies actually making $40 mice with fair labor, but they will be drowned in the noise and killed off by other unfair business practices.

      That's why it's well past time for governments to clamp down on the lying unethical weasels. That should start with actual enforcement of much stronger truth in advertising laws.

  32. Robotics... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    It is still cheaper to use manual labor then robotics to manufacture products like this. I thought robotics were supposed to make products cheaper to manufacture. Ah, it may be the cost of replacement parts. ;)

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  33. ?!??? Are you serious? WTF? by aussersterne · · Score: 2, Informative

    You do a currency conversion when you travel, too. Ever been to South America? Eastern Europe? The average American can live like a king. In some places on the globe you can get a hotel room and three meals a day for less than $5. Seriously, what are you smoking? Even within the U.S. prices vary wildly. I rent in New York for $1,250. My sister pays $400 for a place of similar size in Utah. Are you suggesting that if I just do the appropriate "currency conversion," i can save $850 a month?

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:?!??? Are you serious? WTF? by value_added · · Score: 1

      You do a currency conversion when you travel, too. Ever been to South America? Eastern Europe? The average American can live like a king. In some places on the globe you can get a hotel room and three meals a day for less than $5.

      Going off on a tangent here .. I'm aware that living in other countries can be dramatically cheap by comparison, but where exactly can you get a hotel room with three meals a day for less than $5?

    2. Re:?!??? Are you serious? WTF? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      but where exactly can you get a hotel room with three meals a day for less than $5?

      Probably most of Asia and Africa, and maybe parts of South America. For some definition of hotel room, which admittedly may not be somewhere where you personally would choose to stay.

    3. Re:?!??? Are you serious? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but where exactly can you get a hotel room with three meals a day for less than $5?

      Probably most of Asia and Africa, and maybe parts of South America. For some definition of hotel room, which admittedly may not be somewhere where you personally would choose to stay.

      When I read "hotel room and three meals a day for $5" my first thought was I could have accommodations of a similar or better quality here in the U.S. by sleeping in a cardboard box and finding my meals in a dumpster and I'd have $5 left over to boot.

  34. Oh, joy! by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    No wonder mice are the only useful thing with a Microsoft branding!

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  35. true dat by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    Here's a short article about federal prison time for selling counterfeit purses and the like.

    Seth

  36. Seriously, this is a bunch of sensationalist by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    nonsense. The working hours are long, but it's hardly a "sweatshop." It's a decent living wage in China under (judging by the photos) very reasonable conditions in comparison to alternatives.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  37. Oh brother by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Get over it. We decided during the Tienanmen Square debacle that China can pretty much do what they want. Stop bitching because no one, absolutely NO one is going to call China on it with any kind of success. Any "compliance" on their part would simply be a diplomatic bone tossed to the world while they continued to do business as usual.

    1. Re:Oh brother by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

      Amen Brother!
      I mean how is this any different than what Wal-Mart does on a daily basis when doing business in China! Wal-Mart factory workers in China make about the same wages making all kinds of cheap Wal-Mart brand stuff and you don't see anyone blowing up about that! Chinese workers are just harder workers than American workers hands down! I hate saying that but it is true! I am a Software Engineer and I work along side of some Chinese workers. Even when given a choice they always work longer hours! I can't pronounce or spell the one guy in particular but we all call him by his initials because his name is hard to say. He is always at work before anyone and leaves most of the time after everyone is gone. I stay late but most of the time he is there even after me. So, everyone needs to just get over it!
      That is my 2 cents

  38. People, esp. the "currency conversion" crowd, by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    if you adjust for GDP per capita nationally (i.e. equalize the prices of goods, services, and labor to a reductive but nominal extent), these Chinese workers are making the equivalent of about $9.00 per hour. This is not slave labor wages for a Chinese citizen. It's not investment banker territory, but there are a lot of U.S. workers that would like to make $9.00 per hour and that probably wouldn't object to working 15 hours at that rate in a clean, relatively risk-free environment.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:People, esp. the "currency conversion" crowd, by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      It's not the pay, it's the conditions.

      Just because it's the only choice doesn't make it any better.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:People, esp. the "currency conversion" crowd, by Targon · · Score: 1

      Many people willingly work in less than great conditions for pay, and you can't know if people are being forced to work long hours, or if they WANT to work the longer hours for more pay. Forcing them to work the long shifts isn't the same thing as people wanting to work long shifts.

    3. Re:People, esp. the "currency conversion" crowd, by RazorSharp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, there are a lot of U.S. workers that would like to make $9.00 per/hr. to produce goods which are sold in the U.S. but they can't because their potential job has been outsourced to the Chinese for $.60 per/hr. Not that I believe that $.60 buys you $9 worth of goods in China in the first place.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  39. How do you define a 'fair wage'? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    But how do you define a 'fair wage'?

    Do I look at what other businesses are paying? Do I look at the cost of living? Is it where I have people agree to come work for me(IE mutual agreement)?

    Is it still a fair wage if I pay my workers so much that I end up bankrupt/closing down because I can't compete?

    You can raise a family quite well in my area for $40k/year. In other sections of the country, you would have a hard time supporting a single individual on $40k. In other countries, for $40k a year you could have almost a mansion and servents to clean it.

    My house cost $15k. My parents house, which is not that much larger, cost over $150k. Makes a bit of difference.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:How do you define a 'fair wage'? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Labor costs are about 15%.

      So for your $10 mouse, giving them decent 10 hour days would cost you about an extra 50 cents.

      Hmmm. 50 cents extra for a mouse, or work children like slaves.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:How do you define a 'fair wage'? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Labor costs are about 15%.

      Source, and what for?

      Hmmm. 50 cents extra for a mouse, or work children like slaves.

      that 50 cents could be the difference between selling the mouse and not selling it, or perhaps making a profit or not. Margins are thin on electronics, after all.

      Not that I disagree with you, it's just that I believe that the best way to truly prevent worker exploitation is to make them valuable - IE 'somewhat rare/hard to get'.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:How do you define a 'fair wage'? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Source?

      I've been in many businesses in different fields (welding supplies, fast food, programming shops) over the last 30 years and that's a typical average figure for labor costs.

      Oh heck if 50 cents is going to make the difference in selling it or not, why not just go the extra mile and enslave the kids? Then we could lower the price to $9.50. They have lots of kids so if we skimped on food and took an acceptable death rate, we could probably lower costs even more.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:How do you define a 'fair wage'? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that having four sets of workers doing a 12 hours of work, over a 14 hour day for three days each would yield better results.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  40. Which would you prefer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working 15 hours in a factory, or 15 hours on a family farm? Fear not! One day Chinese laborers will unionize, and everything will be grand - for a while. Then the Chinese labor unions will climb into bed with politicians and organized crime, Chinese laborers will become lazy and entitled, and then China will have to outsource their manufacturing to the then-broke United States.

  41. LMAO by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Watch the stocks go boom....

    1. Re:LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which will benefit those who have, and want more stock. It will go up again everyone knows that.

  42. If you don't see the problem, go to a Massey mine by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...and witness roughly the same treatment and disregard. Yes, it's dangerous enough as-is(even for the more saintly of mining companies), but they're quite like China.

    It's in the US and shows how the pay isn't the problem. It shows that the problem is that it is a captive audience (their labor pool) with very few alternatives.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  43. We are all to blame, let's not act surprised. by slashsloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do we have to keep pretending to be surprised every time evidence of this sort sort of a abuse is reported or published? Isn't it a fact of life that these companies are exploiting cheap labour & couldn't care less as long as we can all have cheap crap toys for half nothing? The tech industry, the textile industry, it's all built on exploitation. There's no other way we could be getting these products at the prices we do unless the labour costs were approximately 0. On top of which, these industries & their practices are as damaging to the environment as they are to the humans involved. We are all guilty here unless we demand something be done about it & that would mean stopping our mindless consumption of cheap junk.

    --
    The ducks in the bathroom are not mine. [http://www.27bslash6.com]
    1. Re:We are all to blame, let's not act surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We are all guilty here unless we demand something be done about it & that would mean stopping our mindless consumption of cheap junk."

      No it means finding a new model for society and transforming capitalism into something else.

  44. Yeah sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People know about this, products always have origin labeling.

    People are not protesting in sufficient numbers (either demonstrating or simply buying elsewhere).

    All the stuff I am using right know says where it was made (China, Mexico, Malaysia, Sweden).

    As an aside. The mouse I am using is made in Sweden. it costed £110. Now tell me it would cost the same in any of the other places, even if all local legislation is strictly adhered to.

    People whinning about companies making profits forget that most likely a cheap job in a poor country is socially more important than a relatively poorly paid job in a rich one because it may mean to live in dignity or not. IN a rich country not having a job is not the end of the world, in a poor country it may be.

    1. Re:Yeah sure. by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      In a poor country not having a job/money is a death sentence (unless you have family members to take care of you). Family is much more important as they are your safety net. There is no welfare. There is no social security. There are no homeless shelters. There is just starvation and death.

  45. Tech Nirvana by gregulator · · Score: 1

    Well, that explains why my mouse Smells Like Teen Spirit.

  46. minimum wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To stop the exodus of jobs shouldn't there be a law that all company employees, reguardless of weather or not they are us citizens, regardless of whether or not they live in the usa, must be paid at least minimum wage in us dollars or the equivalent in gold. Those should be our kids working in those sweatshops.

  47. Re:Nothing we haven't seen before - it's not that by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

    Not that bad in the sense that you would work there or not that bad in the sense that you're okay with others doing the dirty work as long as you can lie to yourself and believe this is ethical?

    How about this. Copy Morgan Spurlock and spend 30 days working for a sweatshop that works you 15 hour shifts six times a week and live off the $.60 an hour they give you and then tell me it's "not that bad."

    I would rather be a cotton-picking slave than a factory slave-wage. At least real slaves were owned by people who had a vested interest in keeping them alive and healthy. The factories work these people until they're used up or injured and then toss them out with nothing. Yeah, that's not bad.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  48. not always by zogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That wasn't true two generations ago, and I remember it clearly, as do a lot of other folks on this board who are early boomers or older. The USA made just about everything people here bought, and they bought everything that was made, and the currency shifted around internally a lot more than it does now, acting as an economic force multiplier inside our own 50 state/nation "free trade common market", and not near as much went to imports from outside of those 50 states. And we had a robust middle class that actually owned things, instead of being in debt for everything beyond the ability to pay, and you only needed one normal blue collar level income to support a family, etc. We had ten year house notes, 12 month car loans, and medical insurance was way cheap.

    Now what has changed is Cxx salaries went from around 10-40 times what a line worker made, to now..who knows, thousands? What does Balmer or any of these other transnational CEOs-and all their legions of sub bosses- make compared to the wage of these Chinese factory line workers? I'm not going to bother to look it up, but I bet it is more than 40 times, a LOT more. We also didn't have near as much wall street mass wealth skimming going on, and the propaganda shilling to engage in global wage arbitrage or "globalism" hadn't started yet (much).

    As to people here not wanting to do the work, any time a factory announces hiring they have thousands of applications for hundreds of jobs generally speaking. As to ag work and construction etc "no one wants to do it so they have to import workers", another fairy tale. And I know I have read here *many* times that in white collar IT work they game the system to get insourced cheaper labor as well, come up with background credentials needed that are physically impossible for anyone to have achieved, then use that as "proof" they need more H1Bs and so on. Musta read hundreds of those anecdotals here over the years now.

    These fatcats goal is to break the back of the middle class, to steal their wealth, full stop, so they can have their global two class society, especially in the US where the middle class got so big and strong. They are feudalists at heart. Between outsourcing and insourcing, they are succeeding. If their schemes worked for the nation as a whole, like those liars claim, then we wouldn't have an economic "crisis" like is going on. That proves their lies completely.

      Last year, because of their corruption and takeover of government, they granted over a million green cards (that's just the legal insourcing, who knows how many million more off the books insourced people showed up to keep driving wages down), right in the middle of a mass unemployment situation with a lowballed 10% unemployment rate, and if you add in real part time workers and people finally off unemployment insurance, it is 17%, which is in the middle of "great depression" era numbers.

    Outsourcing and insourcing, the double whammy plan to marginalize and destroy the middle class here so they can have their globalist master/serf society, with one percent owning everything eventually. That's what is going on.

    1. Re:not always by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You, sir, want shadowstats.com

      The real unemployment rates exceed 20%. Low figure would be ~22%, while my own figures would be closer to 30%.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:not always by gtall · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ah, the old "it's a conspiracy" theory. The problem for the U.S. isn't the conspiracy you are so certain exists. The problem is Business School Product that make local decisions to outsource, insource, wtf-source to increase their particular bottom line. The macro effect is hollowing out the middle class in the U.S. while it is helping to create a middle class in China.

      The fatcats are not out to break the middle class, there is nothing in that attitude for them. They are breaking the middle class out of sheer stupidity and immediate gain for themselves without realizing that in the end, it will take them out too.

      The result might be the same, but you need to readjust the tin-foil a bit and learn how economies work.

    3. Re:not always by BitHive · · Score: 1

      But Ron Paul will bring back the old free market and make us all rich with gold again! Right?

    4. Re:not always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] full stop, so [...]

      FAIL

    5. Re:not always by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Agree with most of what you said except "As to ag work ... etc "no one wants to do it so they have to import workers"

      The problem with ag work is that it is seasonal work. If you wanted to do it full time, you'd need to be nomadic. The second problem is it is a low wage job. Combine temporary/seasonal with low wage and that equals not being able to live in the US due to costs.

      3 months of minimum wage isn't worth it to anyone that wants to live in the US. However, it is very much worth it to people who have a much lower cost of living, like residents of Mexico.

      This is why Alaskan crab fishing, seasonal and temporary, is very attractive to hard working Americans. Few months of very high pay and basically the rest of the year off.

      The massive numbers of harvest jobs required by the US can only be accomplished by people willing to live on 3-4 months of minimum wage. What we need are temporary worker visas, to make it legal, and to tax those workers in order to offset the cost of any services they might use while working here.

    6. Re:not always by Rancidlunchmeat · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why you were marked troll, and I wish I had some mod points to fix that. There's an old saying that goes something like 'never attribute to ill intentions what can be better explained by stupidity'. Which is exactly your point. There's no conspiracy theory needed about class warfare of the Feudalistic upper class against the downtrodden middle class. As you said, their goal isn't to crush the middle class. Their goal is to simply accumulate as much wealth as possible. The manner in which they are doing it, as you've said, is removing the middle class from NA and birthing one China. No troll about your comment as far as I can see.

    7. Re:not always by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The reason is because we had cheap energy and pushed automation. Then we quit pushing for cheaper energy (such as geo-thermal and other forms of nukes), allowed illegal aliens to replace automation, as well as shipping overseas to get rid of the risk.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:not always by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest issues, is that most of the people who want to limit the sheer amount of in-sourced/outsourced labor are also those that are anti-capitalism in general. I'm fairly pragmatic, and lean libertarian. The biggest issue all around being it isn't "bad enough" for most people to speak out, and those that do tend to have skewed, or unrealistic expectations. For the most part it isn't so bad that the typical person will organize to push back against such policies, or even be aware of what they are purchasing and/or where it is made. Remember the big "Made in the USA" campaigns in the later 80s? What happened to that? Right now, my keyboard at least is made in the U.S. (only because I like the Model-M style keyboards), and not sure about my mouse. People don't invest in those computer parts that they stick with for years, they want a fancy VCR with a keyboard they can throw away when it gets "slow". The same is true for everything. Most small appliances in general are crap that isn't made to last more than a couple years. This is far different than the over-engineered products from the 50s and 60s that were more common, but more expensive for a typical household. I tend to buy commercial products more often, because after 3-4 years they provide a better value.

      I wish more people were aware of what they are buying/doing and simple be more conscious consumers. Complain about the big corporations all you want (not parent post in particular), but the consumers made these companies giants without giving a damn how they do it. Shame on us.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    9. Re:not always by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest issues, is that most of the people who want to limit the sheer amount of in-sourced/outsourced labor are also those that are anti-capitalism in general. I'm fairly pragmatic, and lean libertarian. The biggest issue all around being it isn't "bad enough" for most people to speak out, and those that do tend to have skewed, or unrealistic expectations. For the most part it isn't so bad that the typical person will organize to push back against such policies, or even be aware of what they are purchasing and/or where it is made. Remember the big "Made in the USA" campaigns in the later 80s? What happened to that? Right now, my keyboard at least is made in the U.S. (only because I like the Model-M style keyboards), and not sure about my mouse. People don't invest in those computer parts that they stick with for years, they want a fancy VCR with a keyboard they can throw away when it gets "slow". The same is true for everything. Most small appliances in general are crap that isn't made to last more than a couple years. This is far different than the over-engineered products from the 50s and 60s that were more common, but more expensive for a typical household. I tend to buy commercial products more often, because after 3-4 years they provide a better value.

      I wish more people were aware of what they are buying/doing and simple be more conscious consumers. Complain about the big corporations all you want (not parent post in particular), but the consumers made these companies giants without giving a damn how they do it. Shame on us.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    10. Re:not always by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing and insourcing, the double whammy plan to marginalize and destroy the middle class here so they can have their globalist master/serf society, with one percent owning everything eventually. That's what is going on.

      I agree with everything you said, but I have to wonder why these CxOs, who are obviously very smart, never thought about an endgame. Are they just planning on moving to their own tropical island somewhere while the US goes up in flames? Or are they planning on living inside an armed, guarded suburban enclave (burbclave) like in so many Cyberpunk novels?

      It seems like feudalism sounds like a nice idea to a ruler, until you have thousands of angry peasants with pitchforks and torches storming the gates.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    11. Re:not always by esmrg · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to bother to look it up, but I bet it is more than 40 times, a LOT more.

      Let's see, eh.
      Ballmer's 2009 Total Compensation:
      $1,276,627 [src: forbes.com]

      Microsoft factory worker in China:
      65 cents x 15 hours x 24 days (people work 6 days a week there) = US$234/mo [from below post]
      $2,808/yr

      Ballmer makes about 454.6X a factor worker. Not really a thousand times, but getting there. Not to mention these workers have to buy their own bedding so they essentially have no benefits. None.

    12. Re:not always by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I am a full time ag worker, so I can speak on that a little,(I also live OK on less than ten grand a year) and the first rule there is you can't generalize too much, as it is such a varied "job". I've worked from subtropical citrus harvesting to sub arctic almost dairy farming, and it can be really different.

      As to some aspects being seasonal, sure, and yes, people used to travel to do them, and also, we used to have it that people who only cared or needed a part time job could do them. We used to get by OK with just domestic part time help, before wall street started raping the profits away and the farmers had to look to wherever they could to cut corners.

      And for some reason, this last generation or two...they don't seem to need part time jobs as much (very generally speaking). I hate to be a cranky old curmudgeon, but "back in the day" all kids worked part time. I am racking me pea brane here trying to think of *any* of my friends who didn't work a lot growing up, starting in young teen years or even earlier (I started at nine years old working part time, I mowed lawns and harvested fruit) For example, growing up I always worked every summer harvesting/working, then back to school in the fall, with sometimes work after school and on weekends. Off summer/fall season was leaf raking and then snow shoveling in the winter. I used to hand shovel driveways before catching the bus to school. How many kids do stuff like that now? A lot of housewives with kids at school worked with us on the farms as well sometimes, they would show up a little later, leave a little earlier, but every season, they would be back, and they were grateful for the extra cash. College kids working the summer, etc.

      It's doable, honest work, and it could pay better, with only very marginal cost increases. Here's an example, an increase at the store/retail level of only five cents per entire chicken, if the poultry farmer was to receive that, it would double our net, and get it back to being profitable, and really make it easier for the owners to pay much better wages. Just a nickle.

      About 40-50 years ago, farmers received close to 40% of the retail food products dollar, now it is 5-10%, and the high end there is rare, it is usually much lower, which has really impacted some of our "flyover" states drastically, such as Mississippi. I feel sorry for them ,it is about exactly like an example of old time colonialism, pure exploitation, with dismal wages and a perpetual bad economy, despite some of the hardest work, useful and necessary work, in the nastiest climate there is. They get exploited badly, their labor almost stolen and returned at pennies on the dollar, and people rank them because they need economic help. Blaming the victime mentality, seen it a lot too in political debates "blue states versus red states" etc. Nuts, they would be better off if they could just keep somewhat more of what they produce.

      Ag could pay, we would have to severely restrict speculators access and profits though, and skew the laws back more toward the actual producers and not the middlemen and big cartel operators. That would bring it back to being doable and desirable for a lot more people, even just part time, and we wouldn't need as many "guest" workers, and maybe they could stay home and make something of their own nation instead.

      Guest workers come here because where they come from their fatcats are even *worse*-almost unimaginable but true- and screw them over terribly. They don't come here because they really want to, it is driven by refugee/necessity aspects, they are fleeing where they are rather than jumping for joy to come here (worked with hundreds of them, so asked them about it, that is more their stance than not, get away from the local corruption and violence and severe badness)(example: worked with some Guatemalan Indians who fled their nation, because their bogus corporate fatcat army there-the technofeudalist elites' mercenaries- used them as live fire

    13. Re:not always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of not being able to see the forest for the trees? Greed does not have forthought but for its own means. The problem with this country is apathy not greed. Perhaps if we'd stop voting for the latest trend and started voting for people who aren't politicians but public servants then we might get out of all of this. I suppose the only problem with this is the fact that the only people that want to be politicians are politicians and not conscientious citizens. This is not only a shame, it's unconscionable. All of you are to blame.

  49. Why should anyone care a fuck? by mxh83 · · Score: 1

    If the chinese are stupid and ready to work for anything, have weak laws that don't protect employees, fuck around with the workers.. why should WE care- that's China's problem, and they are crying to the WRONG people. 15 hours a day- Isn't that the way software/game development is done as well? Either accept reality or quit whining.

  50. Different viewpoints. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    On your first point, I think he was trying to say that the mouse shouldn't cost $80 with labor that cheap, he probably figures there was a huge profit margin on it. Which is possible, I guess.

    On 2 - I've used many brands, I personally think MS stuff is 'average to good'. You pay a bit of a premium to have a good expectation of a product that meets your standards.

    3&4 - well, from my paying attention, the situations for Chinese workers are improving on average, but China will have to finish working it's way through the excess labor pool from subsidence farmers before conditions really start improving. IE workers will have to gain a bit of 'rarity'.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  51. Typical USian: please travel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me give you an example.

    In the UK they sale oranges by the piece, for £0.50

    In Mexico they sell oranges by the kg, 1 kg (4 or 5 good sized oranges) costs around $4 (MX peso), or £0.20.

    Nad it has nothing to do with where the stuff is produced. The UK gets them from Spain and in Mexico City tehy may come from places in the country as far or from abroad.

  52. Why is this Microsoft's fault? by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why is this not the fault of KYE factory? How come Samsung, HP, or Logitech weren't mentioned in the slashdot article? I think a certain site is a little biased.
    "We are like prisoners," one worker told the NLC. "It seems like we live only to work. We do not work to live. We do not live a life, only work."

    I felt this way for 10 years working in the video game industry. I never blamed it on the publisher...I blamed it on my incompetent employers. I finally left, and it was tough to get OUT!

    These workers should do the same. They should quit, and find new jobs(or vice versa). If they can't find better jobs, they should acquire new skills so they can.

  53. From America the Book: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Where you Aware: Despite working long hours in grueling conditions most slaves received no college credit for their unpaid labor."

  54. Degrees of separation by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Isn't a Microsoft Mouse still just a Logitech one with a different sticker?
    I don't think we can really blame or praise Microsoft either way here.

  55. oblig. by t33jster · · Score: 1
    --
    Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
  56. Work ethic by archmcd · · Score: 1

    It's a shame American kids don't have this kind of work ethic.

    --
    I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    1. Re:Work ethic by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      To have a work ethic you need two things. Jobs which are available, and some form of job stability. Job stability went poof 10-15yrs ago.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  57. Yes, and no. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Yes fair wage is fluid depending on the cost of living. No, that does not mean our viewpoint is only valid here. The former being the valid principle of economic relativity, and the latter the disgusting principle of absolute moral relativity, previously used to justify segregation, discrimination and slavery. Certain morals may be different, but to claim that they all are up for debate is dangerous.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  58. Not so simple. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    This is the result of consumers being unwilling to pay more for products. Everyone wants everything cheap which means it can't be manufactured domestically. Although, what I find really infuriating are the companies charging a huge premium for their products but still manufacturing them under these conditions, Nike, Coach and the like come to mind.

    That said, a living wage is very different in China and the developing world than it is in developed nations. And I guarantee you those workers don't necessarily have a problem with the conditions. Although, admittedly they don't have much to compare it to considering most factories in China are like this. And while foreign companies are taking advantage of the low cost these kinds of conditions afford them they're not the cause. Chinese companies would be doing this regardless of whether or not they were manufacturing foreign goods. In fact, chances are good that the conditions and pay are better at companies making foreign products. Most importantly, what would be the alternative? Most of these people, especially those outside of major cities wouldn't even have a job if it weren't for these factories. Anywhere new factories open people flock to the region for work. And as factories close down and move there are big migrations of people.

    I also find some of those claims made in the store misleading. They show photos of workers taking a nap implying that they're utterly exhausted and will take any chance they can to sleep. Having been in Asia I can assure you that employees at all levels routinely take naps at work, especially during the lunch break. This goes for factory and office workers. In some offices they'll even facilitate that by turning down the lights. As for claims of sexual harassment, I believe it happens, but it certainly isn't unique to factories by any stretch of the imagination.

    I'm not making excuses here and it does bother me immensely the extent to which American companies have outsourced. But there are a lot of factories responsible for this. It was unquestioningly gotten more expensive to run a business in the US. There are taxes, insurance and countless other expenses. Workers keep demanding more and more. Consumers are unwilling to pay more for products.

    And too many American companies haven't responded properly to the changing economy. They continue trying to compete on price which is a guaranteed road to failure because someone else can always do it more cheaply. They ruin their reputations with crap products. The nations currently manufacturing those goods are ambitious and will eventually use the expertise they've gained to make their own products. Hell, they're even outsourcing R&D nowadays. Unfortunately, it seems to be a race to the bottom. But again, ultimately, it's just as much the fault of consumers and the government as it is of the corporations.

  59. What's up with the basketball court? by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice the wierd shape of the lane on that basketball court? It's a trapezoid.

    --
    "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
  60. two words for you moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CHILD LABOUR

    1. Re:two words for you moron by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      15 year olds are not children.

  61. RE: where Capital precedes Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But predatory capitalism, where Capital precedes Labor instead of the other way around, is going to make things a lot worse for a lot of people"

    What a strange statement... Capital is needed in order to pay workers and suppliers to produce something.

    If it really WERE the other way around - some organization with no money forcing people to give them stuff and work for free to produce something, now you have slave labor and theft.

  62. Math? by kyuubiunl · · Score: 0

    These kids are making something 1.75 times the prevailing wage of china for their 15 hour a day. They make almost $10 a day, while the average Chinese citizen makes $5.54

  63. Work hours by phorm · · Score: 1

    "15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week, for around 65 cents per hour"

    That's about 4.6 Yuan per hour. Accord to wikianswers, that means you'd have to work about two hours to afford 1 quart of milk. WA also mentions the cost of bread being around $2.50, which - assuming somebody didn't use a $ to mean Yuan - is about 17 Yuan... over 2 days work?

    I'm sure this varies somewhat by region, and rice is likely more common than bread, but if anyone from China could perhaps confirm a base price?

    So how fair does that seem so far?

    If people are working 15h days constantly, and napping at work, that's probably because they need to do so to get by or try to get ahead in life. IMHO, at a fair wage they should hopefully be able to work 8-10h days, and/or have 1-2 days off instead of 0-1.

    I wonder how hard it would be to visit some of these factories (and where exactly they are). If I had the opportunity I'd love to drop in and share a little wealth with the workers. A few thousand bucks CAD or USD would probably go a decent distance.

    1. Re:Work hours by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bad examples still.
      Milk is not a commonly used foodstuff here, and bread as you're thinking of it is purchased only by foreigners living here.

      I can buy all I can eat in a restaurant for six yuan, and can eat for a week for 30.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    2. Re:Work hours by phorm · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying!

      I had tried to pick some base products that would translate over. I figured bread might be uncommon, but most of my Chinese friends drink milk so I had thought it might be comparable.

      It seems that the pay-rate isn't terrible, then, with a day's work paying for a week's food. How about rent/housing, etc?

    3. Re:Work hours by VendettaMF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expensive (by local standards) and low quality by western standards.
      Which is why most low paying jobs include basic accommodation.
      I'm paying 1500 yuan monthly for a small two room city-center apartment of high quality (by local standards). That's about $200 a month. It's a lot more than most Chinese people earn in a month, but as I said, it is city center, just off the main commercial district so my neighbors are a mix of moderately successful business owners and mistresses of even more successful rich types.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  64. After careful review... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    "15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week, for around 65 cents per hour. Microsoft said it is taking the claims seriously and has 'commenced an investigation."

    Microsoft decided to increase the work shift to 20 hour days, and lower the pay to 45 cents per hour, they said they appreciated the National Labor Committee's, bringing this to their attention and apologized for the gross oversight.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  65. Cheap labour - cheap hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else you, decadent westerners can enjoy cheap hardware?

  66. I actually think it's a good environment! by sam0737 · · Score: 1

    At least it's clean, everyone got uniform, even a cap. Mechanical transportation belt. I think it might even be air conditioned.

    0.65 (wage/hr) * 16 (hrs) * 26 (days) translates to CNY 2000 a month.

    As a matter of fact - the average undergraduate student earns only CNY 4000 in Shanghai. (Granted - ones from top tier college could earn more)

    And if you stay in the village, maybe you just earn CNY 2000 a YEAR! Still you need to work 16 hours a day. (Unlike US where China does not have agricultural subsidiary I guess)

    I would say, electronics assembling is quite a decent job - compare to farming!

  67. No, wrong. by Concern · · Score: 1

    That sounds like a rational argument based in fundamental economic principles.

    But here's where that argument breaks down.

    There is no labor market.

    The goods can cross borders. The laborers are stuck where they are. Why else do you think those teenagers are "willing" to "choose" this life?

    To make it crystal clear: it is only because men with guns will stop them from making most of the choices they would prefer.

    Imagine if those children had the same freedom to come to the US or EU that their plastic products do, instead of being essentially imprisoned. There would be massive labor shortages in areas with oppressive regimes and backwards social and economic policies.

    This is the genius of the "free trade" meme. It is no more "free" than Fox News is "fair and balanced." Manufacturers can shop the laws of the world for the most oppressive governments and the worst labor conditions imaginable. Of course they must do this, to lower their costs and be competitive. You cannot even blame Microsoft or HP for this - they are only doing what they must, based on the particular rules we have in place.

    So, the governments of the world compete in a race to the bottom. Their laborers are kept safely under control by national borders, immigration policy, and ultimately, xenophobia.

    I don't know why we have a nostalgic love of 19th century neo-feudal manufacturing economies - they were terrible for everyone, even the rich. But apparently that's the new hotness.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:No, wrong. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Like I said in my first post, the wages they receive is indicative of the local regional labor market.

      I agree that Free Trade is not free, but that's another argument.

    2. Re:No, wrong. by Concern · · Score: 1

      Thank you for replying. But I still don't know if I get your point, then or now.

      What I'm saying is, for those child laborers, the term "local/regional labor market" is an oxymoron. I realize you're being deliberate in pointing out that it's local. But that's the whole problem.

      The labor market is rigged. In this case, by former Maoist communists. Those working conditions are a product of centralized control.

      It wasn't my idea to define "free market" in global terms, but since we now do, it means we have a free market in goods, but not in labor. Labor can't pick among the world's factories. Or the world's sets of rules. These kids don't have a democracy. For practical purposes, they can't even leave.

      Thus, your statement makes no sense. Calling their choice of child-labor factories a "local regional labor market" is like calling the prison's rec room a "local regional leisure activity market."

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    3. Re:No, wrong. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen though, as those areas of China become more well developed, the jobs which provide rough working conditions tend to get pushed further inland. Personally, I believe that the labor market in China is improving at a very fast pace and will eventually be corrected by the empowered Chinese middle class.

      My point then should have been that the labor market in China might not be of the best conditions at the moment, but it is rapidly improving. In the coastal regions the market is actually very well developed and approaching Western standards.

    4. Re:No, wrong. by Concern · · Score: 1

      Then one could make the point that our tarriffs on Chinese slave-labor goods could be rapidly decreasing. :) Although I don't think trade protectionism works. So personally I would look at it differently. Perhaps a policy where you can trade freely with any nation that you also have an open door immigration policy with. Seems reasonable enough, no?

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  68. Manufacturing 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Chinese Worker .60 hr
    US worker 17.00 hr + massive govt regulations covering insurance, fines, benefits etc

    The future looks pretty darn clear to me, if you reside in the US and are in the manufacturing sector you had better start looking for a new job fast.

  69. Some numbers for everyone by poity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked in a small city in China last year (Shaoxing - a leading textile manufacturing area south of Shanghai)
    Exchange rate with USD is 6.8 at the moment.
    So 0.65USD x 6.8 x 9hr/day = about ¥40 a day. Times 6 days a week is about ¥950 per month, which is typical.

    Typical income for a local office worker is ¥1500 to ¥2000 per month, ¥800-1200 for a migrant or factory worker.
    Compare that to a relative of mine who owns an export business in the city, he makes around $20000 per month (USD and 4 zeros) after deducting office wages, expenses, and bribes -- which are partially offset by the 13% tax return he gets as subsidy for his branch of export.
    He's still a small player compared to the larger business owners in the city.

    Some numbers on the cost of living (relevant as of february of this year):
    Average apartment (the minimum quality that a city local would tolerate) - ¥1000
    Shitty apartment (the min quality that a migrant worker would tolerate - bare concrete, at least 5 to a bathroom)- ¥500
    Domestic rice - ¥4/kg bulk
    Imported oatmeal - a little under ¥30/kg packaged
    Domestic oatmeal - under ¥20/kg packaged
    Cabbage - ¥1.5 per half kilo (1.1lbs)
    Bokchoy - ¥3 per half kilo
    Tomatoes - ¥3.5 per half kilo
    Eggs - ¥3.5 per half kilo
    Pork - ¥6 to ¥18 per half kilo depending on cut
    KFC (the most popular fast food) - ¥6 per piece of fried chicken, ¥15 for sandwich combo meal with small drink and fries
    Chinese-style fast food meal (cafeteria style food that office people get during lunch) - ¥12 for a hygienic place (maybe pass inspection if in the USA), ¥6 for a place that at least wipes the tables, ¥1.50 for rice and cabbage.
    You typically have to buy your own health insurance, and even then a hospital checkup would cost ¥40 to ¥100.
    City buses are ¥1, or ¥0.8 if you buy a pass.
    Cheap cell phone plan is about ¥100/month

    As ratios of monthly income, it's apparent that comfortable wages for the average citizen have a long way to go.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  70. Work shmirk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These kids are lucky! They get to take naps during work. I wish I could do that.

  71. I smell BS, at least on some level... by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    So, they work 15hr days, 6-7 days a week? And they're 16? And they're students?

    So what, school is only about 4 hours or so, leaving them 4 hours to sleep, eat, etc? Or is the suggestion that this is school for them?

  72. Complex Issue by carp3_noct3m · · Score: 1

    For anyone truly interested in the behind the scene workings and higher level motivations for companies to do these sorts of things I highly encourage reading John Perkins second book "The Secret History of the American Empire", and maybe even his first book "Economic Hit Men". It really does a good job explaining this and how often even in places that are technically following the laws, they often use so many legal loopholes that it still amounts to slave labor, doing things like subtracting uniform costs or even everyday business costs from the laborers paychecks. To put it mildly, many of our beloved US companies (and other major allies) are raping and pillaging third world countries in every legal way they can figure out.

    --
    "It's ok, I'm completely secure as long as my iron is off"
  73. What is the solution to this problem? by mathmoi · · Score: 1

    I do agree child labor is a bad thing, especially when the working condition/pay is abusive, however I'm wondering what is the solution to this? Usually what happen is the public learns Microsoft/Wall-Mart/Nike/etc. is selling goods that have at some point been manufactured by children. The company will apologize, say it did not knew and promise it won't happen again and either change their sub-contractor or ensure no child work for them anymore. How does that help the children? They had a job where they were earning some money, probably not a lot, but still. I suppose this money was not used to pay luxury items, but to support their family in buying necessary goods like food/cloth/rent. Now, since working children is unacceptable in our westerns societies, they lost that job. And we're like : "Look we made theses kids life so much better now." I don't see how that makes their life better. That being said, what would be a good and plausible (read economically feasible) solution to the problem of child labor? (Sorry for my english, I know it's bad)

    --
    Mathieu Pagé
  74. Suddenly we care about slavery? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I thought we were capitalists... Fuck human rights...

    Put every child to work... who gives a fuck. There is massive profits to be made using slave labor.

    BTW that was the motto of every American / Multi National Corporation the past 20 years.

    Enjoy our shit economy in the US with high health insurance rates, no jobs.... and most of all, your overpriced microsoft / Logitech mice.

    The wealthy elite always wanted Slavery...

  75. Microsoft, HP, Samsung, BB Foxconn, Acer, Logitech by lp_bugman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From one of pictures in the article:
    "These teenagers work for the KYE factory in China, which manufactures computer mice and webcams for Microsoft, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Best Buy, Foxconn, Acer, Logitech, and other US companies"
    This proves what I keep saying. Now a days there is no difference, with brand you are buying. It's made by the same people (under pay kids in this case).
    Same sloppy lavor and quality standards.
    Sad..

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
  76. Internal microsoft memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copy of internal microsoft memo, issued to all shareholders:
    Our Chinese labor force work 16 hours per day, 7 days per week, for $0.65 per hour, for a total of $72.80 per week. Is there no way we can drive the cost down to either $70.00 per week, or better, $60.00 per week? Perhaps we can offer them a single disk of our software for 5 weeks work?
      Cost advantage:
    Blank DVD media $0.20
    Cost of burning pre-existing software onto it: $0.65
    unit cost, Packaging, shipping worldwide: $4.00
    Expense costs total: $4.85
    unit Retail Price: $745.00
    unit Net: $740.15
    Our Real Expense: $4.85
    Equivalent in Chinese labor (hrs) 1138.7 hours
    Real (microsoft) labor rate* $0.00426 / hr
    *anticipated special rate. Shareholders cannot expect this rate till arrangements with local officials can be made.

  77. MS Fanboy Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a Microsoft fanboy, because well, they make good software that EVERYONE in the world is able to use with minimal effort. But the more I hear about how in bed MS is with (communistic like) China, I'm going to abandon all their SW for personal use and swear it off at my employers (and future). This is ridiculous. They want to help China censor/control, an exception only to China. They use child labor sweatshops to make the HW. What's next? MS is actually 70% owned by China? F' MS and their recent (past 5 years) in choices, this is the straw that breaks the camels back.
    This isn't even to mention the "Vista"/DX choices.

  78. Microsoft isn't that oblivious by MikeV · · Score: 1

    Why is it that these companies profit wildly from the oppressive work from these sweatshops, then when they are caught red-handed profiting act all shocked and claim they're going to look into it? Greed. They've known all along. If not, then they truly are as stupid as a rock and blind as a marble.

  79. And? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is this different from pretty much everything else manufactured in Southeast Asia? Everything you buy that is made in China is made by people who are treated a little better than slaves. The companies provide rooms at the factories for their employees, with 6 people per room, communal bathroom, and no kitchen facilities. The employees are charged rent for the rooms, even if they don't stay in the rooms.

    Remember this the next time you are at Walmart, buying crap that has been made in China. It is cheap because the people who made it are being exploited.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  80. nyet by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not tinfoil hat, it is observing human nature. Once you have fatcats that are already mutil millionaires/billionaires, and they can easily buy anything they want, multiples, there's only one lust left, and that is dominance over other humans, a feudalistic outlook. That's what they want, that's how they live now, their policies support it, and it isn't accidental at all.

    And it shows in the article, only evil people who want that sort of power treat employees that way, and the same mindset goes upstream from there. And at the tippy top, there you have people who regard endless wars as just profits central. If there is no legitimate war, by golly they will manufacture one, and they don't care a whit about bloodshed and pain and suffering. How evile can you get before it is acknowledged that it is in fact evil? How is that not a plan when they go way out of their way to do such things?

    And that why all these fatcats love china and are building it up, while they try to destroy the US with our unique background of the sovereign individual with the government being subservient. They hate that, they like the older ways better with aristocrats in charge of everything and owning everything. The US middle class that got built up by the 60s was the antithesis to that, so it had to go, so they started making it go away. China is their posterboy dream society and nation, 1% corrupt controllers, and everyone else as serfs, and if you have enough money, you can do anything you want. Anything. Ya, once in awhile they might pop some minor fatcat, who possibly embarrassed them or didn't pay enough bribes upstream, etc...like in ancient times the Romans would chuck some fatcat to the lions for sport. They are evil, that's their nature. You don't get to the "top" like that without being psychopathic in some way.

    Feudalism and the aristocracy never went away, they just changed clothing and titles around a little and come up with phony "elections", but it's the same old crap, just with new shiny tech around it. That's why I have been calling this trend to this sort of world and society as "technofeudalism".

  81. All that matters is that I get my IntelliMouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd pay more for my mouse if it meant that people in China had less sucky working conditions.

    But until then I will just appreciate the work of these wonderful children. They make a great MS IntelliMouse.

  82. Why wait until it comes out? by crono_acl · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be less embarrassing if companies just gave it a check to all their chinese sweatshops when these kind of news appear? They could at least make sure that secrecy isn't compromised.

  83. Let's cut the crap... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it's popular to bash Microsoft on Slashdot, but why don't we just title this "The Walmart Effect: American products made in Chinese sweatshops because Americans have become too damn cheap to pay for quality products produced by skilled labor under good working conditions."

  84. Tired, old eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first time i read the headline, i thought said 'microsoft mice made in cheese sweatshop'

  85. I bet the quality on those things sucks by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I am typing this on a made in america IBM type M made in 1990. I bet it outlives the mice being made in that factory.

    I am not saying china always produces crap, but anyone working 15 hour days produces crap.

  86. 20 bucks, who you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was the last time you bought any Microsoft Mouse or keyboard for under $50. These things are ridiculously overpriced and if something breaks, they have a horrible warranty policy. Their keyboard stands (those pieces of plastic that prop up the keyboard) used to break on me a lot and I called up and bitched. They replied there was nothing they could do,and essentially, I was "fucked". No wonder why most of their support required a $100 refundable charge. They don't want whiners calling up. Ingenious policy but not very user friendly.

    Getting back to the keyboard, I knew I was not alone, when, buying a new M$ keyboard (yeah, you would think I would learn my lesson, but they're so nice), I now see that the stands are reinforced. Go ahead, flip your keyboard over. Notice the little extra plastic on the bottom of swively stands. That didn't used to be there, they added that in.

    Design in California By X, Created with Child Labor in China

  87. Silent majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday people are not going to stand for this anymore. It will happen.

  88. Grey market, GUARANTEE FAIL. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I GUARANTEE you those are not MS-brand mice.

    Sir I take that GUARANTEE and want my money back. MS simply buys mice from China and gets their brand put on it. In the best case scenario they get their own designs made there (I'd put good money on MS just buying a third party design, maybe USian, maybe Japanese, might even be Chinese). Now That factory would produce non branded mice as well, probably of the same design (regaurdless of ownership). Now I will explain the grey market to you. I could, if I were certifiably retarded have bought a "US only" Iphone 2G in Bangkok in October of 2007 at the MBK building, they were everywhere (they wanted 45,000 Baht for them, over A$1,500). How? Well you see when You order 10,000 Icraps from a Chinese factory, the factory makes 11,000 Icraps, fulfils your order for 10,000 Icraps and sells the rest on the open market for fun and profit. These go to markets in Hong Kong, Singapore, Bangkok and even as far as the Middle East.

    These are essentially not copies, rather they are the real thing not made under license. Same design, same internal components, same casing, even the same box and manual. This is the grey market, called grey because it isn't illegal (black) and it isn't quite legit (white). This market is permitted in most of Asia. The same thing would be happening with MS mice, I have no doubt at a market in HK I could get a "Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse" without an MS logo.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  89. somebody is getting schooled here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it's not necessarily the Chinese.

    We do own them trillions of dollars.

    Since when did the borrowers started to lecture the bankers?

    The great egalitarian experiment is in deep shit.

  90. it's very sweet of you hippies by shnull · · Score: 1

    to complain about sweatshops, but to the people working in them it's a difference between life and death. No, i'm not saying it's right, but i didn't invent the current economic system either. Blame jp morgan and edison and the old world bankers for that. If you want to close the sweatshops, what alternatives would you propose ? Forcing companies to open up factories in europe and america where they can have the same work done for ten times the cost maybe ? As if that's gonna happen. Get your heads out of your wouldbe-shouldbe asses and get real. Supply and demand is a law almost as unbreakable as gravity. If you can't fix it at that level, don't waste your energy

    --
    beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
  91. tumble weave by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    "15-hour shifts, six and seven days a week, for around 65 cents per hour. Microsoft said it" ... would follow all "the rules and laws in China." They're not like those the-new-generation, idealistic, principled hippies in Mountain View.

  92. what you said by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, if it gets ultra bad wherever they are at some time, even with their tame armed lackey protectors, official badged or private, they go to their other mansion in nation x,y or z. They are internationalists, not particularly loyal to any nation or people, they just don't care, psychopathic. Other humans to them are *prey animals", they go to where the human hunting and exploitation is the easiest, and they have the most "legal" protection, as in, the local warlord/governmental goofball/some authority figure is in their pocket, etc. And that's what helos and business jets are for, just in case they need to flee someplace else. "Laws" mostly apply to serfs and slaves after all.