as a fellow 15 year old/.'er with nothing to contribute, I too can copy sections of incredibly boring legalese and paste into a text window and proffer some random explanation thereof with the twofold hope of 1) exhausting my considerable supply of $5 words, and 2) bludgeoning my readers with hopes of making some very mundane point. But I'll spare you all of that. Lord knows you don't need it.
I do think the guy who replied to you had Rumsfeld disease, though. Maybe Rumsfeld, you, and the guy who replied to you can all get cured one day. Good luck with that.
According to a foreign corporation known as FOOD AND DRUG ADMINSITRATION, a "cure" is defined as "any substance advertised to cure a disease." Therefore, under that FDA, there is no applicability to cure Rumsfeld's disease. Would it be someone else's intent to make Rumsfeld's disease more situated on the host, as would cement is cured to a stable medium? There is only an imbalance, where one may freely admit to be easy about an herbal or natural remedy to return one's good health.
I just use an American Heritage Dictionary, of an early Year in the 1800's, a Holy Bible, and then there's the commoners emphasis on Bouvier's work. Most people don't know that there hasn't been any law since 1842, a state of emergency since implemented by George Washington's first treasons, and there has been a verry rigid code implemented since 1871 by the dishonourable Union States rebellion.
Oh well, people would rather mortgage their houses, and sell their name, rather than work for a day to get a share of stock used to insulate their wages and speculations.
I'm just a man on the Land, trying to figure everything out in common words without being a lawyer. They don't like me in the corporate County, so...
blockquoth {
You may be a legal student or a lawyer with enough time to post on Slashdot. You invoked many legal tenents (idem sonans, etc) and managed to write some of the densest prose I have ever lain eyes upon. You have to understand, though, that your attemps to elucidate your point did little to that effect. I have no idea what you are saying. I'd say you have a bright future writing very very very very long legal documents for an HMO or a Mortgage Banker. I was simply, in a lighthearted manner, point out that your post almost looked like a troll. Either that or you need to find a nice site for Law enthusiasts. No offense, just...wow...if you understand this stuff great, but not all of us care enough to decipher the UCC. I'll just hire you if I ever need to. That is, assuming you are not some 15 year old dweeb with too many pimples and way too much time on your hands. Unless you wanna cut my grass.
} blockquoth
My point is that for the purposes of modern Airline services, any that challenges and coerces the use of an SSN or supposed "Driver License", such as making an offer of service based on a prior debilitating contract of an unrelated matter. Then, to the effect of Sign or Signature, is again violating the public trust by moving in a manner far from the politic. Looking through the law of nations, where it defines there to be body politic alongside a body corporate; there is a presumption that the people are layed dormant for the appearance of a corporation to act in a mode not acceptable by the people; and just like any sign on a road it is an act of commercial speech, not protected by law, and is a mere suggestion like pants or a-dress. Are the people for sale, or is the purpose of Airline travel to trademark all our luggage as a sale-able item in case someone decides to buy while in transit?
It is only honest to proceed in an Airline service no different than a Bus or a Parcel service, yet it is been gandered proprietarily and monopolized to an unethical extent. To get out of the loop to sell the legislatively-created artificial person (think legal name), then consider the difference between the true name and the shared name; a legal name is defined as a religious/true name and a surname/sirname appended onto. This brings to effect that any accusation made to JOHN QUINCY DOE would evidence a corporation with an artificial person (transmitting utility is the legislated/John Quincy Doe) only if not bound down to defer it as John Quincy dba JOHN QUINCY DOE; correctly done, then the accusation would need to be made in the character of John Quincy. As we all know, that would comply with the fact that such unrelated account and membership numbers are owned by the institution that created them.
To mispresent anyone's name in any character than correct English grammar, would be libel and immediatly needs to be moved back into the district Court (Admiralty jurisdiction).
Looking at the "Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims" (here), as provided by Congress, would reveal that all seizures and wage garnishments on Land (think compelled and de-facto legislative forms) are to be filed in the district Court! Any alleged "notice of levy" or advertized seizures not filed in Admiralty/district Court, are implied an equity Court dispute (issue a Quo Warranto, and if no contract is exhibited then there is fraud).
My intent of the post is to show that there is no such act as "theft" while in commerce, because everyone knows who is carrying someone else's property (that was sold by incrimination) and the buyer simply forgot to pay or get a proper receipt. Commerce is the medium many insurgents in the District of Columbia use
If he can easily gain access to computers not intended to him, then his remedy would be to enter commerce on an account of him trying to improve the situation.
If a man stole a cow, is he not expected to return that cow and include the value the original owner was deprived of; cow, milk, life-span, labor, etc?
I don't want his blood, that didn't offen me; It's his mind that offended, and thendirected his hand to commit an offense. I'm not here to put a mark or record on his hand or mind, but let him repent and restore the property and value deprived -- let him try. If the damaged or deprived property is exponential in comparison to the effort at his issue, then he is owing to improve and reprove the property he tresspassed.
I wonder what Operating System gave him proper authentication...he same that de-facto Government of a government wanted irregular bipass of security for its own measures?
All the remedy for certain tresspass and alleged "crime" is being slowly shadowed by a foreign legislature and its attempts to surrender rights in favor of surrendering the already-existing more clever and effective punnishments.
As your trademark incentive to solve rape by surrendering blood and all rights to that blood, there is more rape. Prison and jail is being mis-used; they are originally intended to house the people that are under threat from the avenger of blood. According to your merit, giving information of one's flesh satisfies the unconcionable tresspass and crime sought by the one's heart and mind. Bullpie!
Historically, pederasts have been hanged; rapists have been castrated or completely gutted of their genitals; thieves have been recorded to the purchase of the goods they took or will eventually pay for its reimbursement of value greater to the owner's deprivation, and killing has been awarded a lifetime of repentance in pledge to church service in God; liars lose fingers they enjoy to pledge in trust (think fingerprint).
I am not amused to any transient authentication that can neither determine one's future or one's health in any matter not yet caused. I'll continue to keeping the young ways from growing to your old ways.
Of course, you don't even know that CALIFORNIA is a federal State unlike the de-jure state known as California (libeled by that foreign Congress to be a Territory). You don't know where you stand. I have no patent on that private legislation/code; I speak plain English, common, public.
Collateral, such as pledging one's physique for the performance of someone else's debt. For example, in trust law...
A boy was born from his true parents, and among the family to honor him was Quincy; so the boy, John, was given the name "John Quincy" of a Doe family; after born, the hospital physician and an executive administrator engauged the surprise and exaustion of the joyful event to utilize an erroneous conviction that the manner of a child being born is that of an admiralty pursuit...somthing about "living water" was spilled on the hospital-room floor. As the boy was born, his feet were immediatly directed as a STAMP onto a pre-tendered peice of paper held by a nurse, claiming the boy made an appearance for "John Quincy Doe." Thereby, that paper was certified with witness from a physician and executive administrator to Certify as being BIRTHED.
Birth is not the same as being born; one is the landing or expulsion of cargo or passengers, while the other is a physical use of force to carve by some motion or letters pat-ent. Considering this fact of a boy being born as opposed to birth; that Certificate now could claim him to be chattel to a person in an artificial world. This process is known as induction, and has destroyed more countries than you can believe imaginable. The boy made foot-tresspass on another world's paper/person, the appearance cured the implications of intent, and thereby he can be deprived of his right to life for using colorable money of that fictitious world and rather than imbursing in lawful money of the United States (as exhibited in the Constitution as gold or silver coin). Comprehend the most common form of bearing children are to be born head-first; thereby to force the child's feet as to be born in a foreign country by contract is a criminal act, and the superstitions of the deceived true parents is compounded by threat and duress and coercion of the false witness of their servants.
Who are the true parents to not argue against their servants threatening them, to pledge their child as collateral for the national debt? That Certificate is worth no less than $600 thousand US dollars (not US Dollars lawful, silver or gold). That first birth certificate is taken by libel to the contract de-facto State of a state/de-dejure, and enfranchised and incorporated as JOHN QUINCY DOE to be used as a receivership for the earlier transmitting utility: misnomer in commerce.
There are two ways to rebut these instruments of that foreign legislatures FIRST MIDDLE LAST form of Name; that is by standing in judiciary as a court of competent jurisdiction, true name to invalidate the legislated/artificial person a foreigner created to induct one's lawful standing dormant.
All "signatures", including SSN and Driver's License would abate the nature of the cause as
with power of attorny over John Quincy Doe, John Quincy dba JOHN QUINCY DOE
All "sign", in any pursuit, would abate the matter of interest as trademark or reladed product of Doe in commerce;
twenty-five pounds of carrots
20 silver Dollars
John Quincy ^ Doe
Someone accused with Identity theft needs to prove a number of qualities related;
The below regulating code on all contracts that include them, is Uniform Commercial Code; Article 2, Part V, 2-501
PART 5. PERFORMANCE
2-501. Insurable Interest in Goods; Manner of Identification of Goods.
(1) The buyer obtains a special property and an insurable interest in goods by identification of existing goods as goods to which the contract refers even though the goods so identified are non-conforming and he has an option to return or reject them. Such identification can be made at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by the parties. In the absence of explicit agreement identification occurs
(a) when the contract is made if it is for the sale of goods already existing and identified;
(b) if the contract is for the sale of future goods other than those described in paragraph (c), when goods are shipped, marked or otherwise designated by the seller as goods to which the contract refers;
(c) when the crops are planted or otherwise become growing crops or the young are conceived if the contract is for the sale of unborn young to be born within twelve months after contracting or for the sale of crops to be harvested within twelve months or the next normal harvest reason after contracting whichever is longer.
(2) The seller retains an insurable interest in goods so long as title to or any security interest in the goods remains in him and where the identification is by the seller alone he may until default or insolvency or notification to the buyer that the identification is final substitute other goods for those identified.
(3) Nothing in this section impairs any insurable interest recognized under any other statute or rule of law.
Airline services are misleadingly designated as to trasnport passengers and cargo, and the "passenger" clause in the manner of contract for the alleged "passenger" becomes a breach of contract when the alleged "passenger" enters among the crew or is asked for assistance by the crew! Otherwise, a passenger is secured as a person for the performance of the contract to sit idle among the cargo as though goods subject to casual tennancy as to prevent them from expiring; ie, Airline services only see the passengers (people re-declared as passengers) as nothing more than living-stock with attached cargo (baggage). Even if the verry instrument, such as a receipt, were tendered as Identification then it would be as though that paperwork was the applicable party to the contract while the man (having sold his trademark name as collateral for a dodgy mid-air pleasure-service) is at risk of lien for any dishonor or accessories accepted and agreed by the creature whose ear is attached to that collateral Identification of his name. Another way to look at the process would be to think of the tendered Identification as a private trust to a private service, to incorporate and administer the value (man) while the shipment is in-route. There is evidence of this same administered service in "general delivery" services from postal agencies qualified for a street address (street is internationaly defines as "an in-land waterway attached to a port of entry") such are enumerated parcels and properties (most of everything that isn't patent through the general post or an general post-office).
There looks to have avered from answering for what a man colluded to offer, for what he was not trusted to administer or convey as collateral, such as Identification in the form of a trade-able name; yet there is no theft because the services rendered are simply recalibrated to acknowledge that a lien is placed on the nameless true-part with interest regardless whether he tenders as FRANKLIN or GRANT or JACKSON or HAMILTON or LINCOLN or WASHINGTON or "John Q. Doe"...
Such are the Scope of a Rule, in "any unauthorized signature is wholly inoperative as that of the person w
Considering Conmen and the ACTORS in the movie that misleadingly portrayed a conman...
First, relating experience with cheques as opposed to a bank draft; Here is my reasoning: a Cheque is a demand, same meaning of language as in the age-old strategy game. If the instrument say "Pay to", then it is a Cheque. If it says "Pay to the order of" then it is a draft subject to certain conditions for its redemption. A cheque is a verry scarry instrument: their emphasis is used in societies where gold and silver (hard currencies) are the dominating form of lawful money. Cheque means NOW! If it is advertised on the face as a "CHECK", but says "Pay to the order of..." in controlling words, then it is just a typical ignorance and deception of the institution that cafted such dishonorable intrument.
Second, Silver and gold are still their own value, while US dollar (read that distinction, not Dollar but dollar), there is thought that US Currency is debased from its original lawful money and moved into the realm of speculation; only the people controlling the measurements will control the market. A Dollar is still gold or silver, they just attract speculation of US DOLLARS counterfeit-origin in COLUMBIA. Studying history, one act of terrorism to fear of war has caused currencies debased to speculative credit and confidence-building schemes have caused more tragic loss and abandonment than any other event under war. The conman represented in the movie "Catch me if you can" wasn't arrested on cheque fraud, because all his instruments were drafts being advertised as cheques--if anything, he was arrested for impersonating an office of trust and securities fraud.
Looking at that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Inc, the money-supply has been discontinued from being reported by their own libel to claim that the M3 reports had no effect on controlling inflation.
That thief in the movie is nothing compared to the pain and suffering caused by that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM; it being neither a Federal Reserve, and neither a bank -- it's a corporation, and the original charter was quieted. The original Federal Reserve issued Federal Reserve Certificates, not those FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES. A FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE is a non-promisory non-redeamable note drawn on a private bank, administered in admiralty jurisdiction as a claim against the United States. The way the Constitution is subverted is by moving foreign currency into the realm, averting from the activation of the original of a public trust.
A quick question that most people could barely comprehend... How do you suppose there ever became a distinction between a US State and an American state? Money determines the lineage an office is chartered to. Every office since about 1871 has been UNITED STATES everything, and America is layed dormant.
Alabama Student: "My education is substandard" blcamp: "Maybe you'd prefer the Mississippi schools"
Partygoer: "Keystone! This beer sucks." blcamp: "Perhaps Stroh's would be more to your liking."
Patient: "Leeches! Isn't bleeding discredited as a medical treatment for high fever?" blcamp: "You should consider yourself lucky we're not burning people like you at the stake anymore!"
Did anyone comprehend the prevailing attitude for someone disassociating with ill behavior? Someone that questions the effectiveness of competancy of an idea or product, is referred immediatly to a solution that is outside the domain where the dispute occurred. As the earlier Post exhibited, his recommendation for a competant and independent way of life is to a vile country far away where such character is detrimental to whomever want to pool or consolidate their good nature with equal fellowship.
Whoever fake American would offer such insult, is using unequal weights and measures by not heeding their own advice. If there is no dissolving the trust and mandate abused by the misplaced government, then it all just revolved to an energy crisis of eminent domain to construct enormous damns and artificial neighborhoods of government housing.
Judge: Wait a minute, I can't take this one-he's still connected through Xlib. RIAA: Oh he'll disconnect all-right. BearShare: I'm still shareing! Judge: He Said he's still active. BearShare: I'm not disconnected yet! RIAA: Oh be quiet, you ol' peer, you'll have neither X Server connection, files, or firewall grace by the next morning. Judge: I can't take him like that. BearShare: I feel like taking a walk. RIAA: Is there anything you can do to hurry is shutdown procedure? BearShare: I feel happy! Happy! root@127.0.0.1:/root# killall -KILL bearshare BearShare: Hap#$*&^ RIAA: Ah thankyou. Judge: don't mention it. RIAA: When will you be back in our pre-payed courthouse? Judge: Thursday, and I'll have another stack of surver logs for you to prosecute. RIAA: yea? The Sheeple will never suspect you are joined to the prosecution, by suboena evidence in for either party; thereby disqualifying as to be a judge, and more an executive administrator to a trust.
As this post shall evince, M. Gregory Thomas(tm) does declare this first post on behalf of the Special Trust confided to me from the royalty in His bench; to acknowledge and reserve and assert claim on subject matter for participants in any event of conversation, where information submitted is audit by a presentable graphic for advertised goods and servies as to discern or regulate the acceptance of automated transponse to encumber a politic in its daily discourse and business; where that advertised goods or services shall be adapted to satisfy a query of verifiable information from an image, to satisfy the cause of authentication as a postal vessel to move evidence into the forum as does from a competent and sound Record.
Done on this sixth Day of the fifth Month, in the Year of Our Lord 2006, to be held in trust by him at the town of Westminster, California republic./s/ Gregory Thomas
To proceed to Slashdot and satisfy a metric of competancy, adapt the following image to text;
Linux Support, USD 10!
[Mundt Network Redundancy Adminsitration]
[Gregory Thomas]
[Anyone trying to implement the above as claimed, will be Slashdotted. So rests duplicate of the original letter patent from His mind.]
That alleged "Security Officer" was acting in misplaced trust, and without disclosure of his actions thereby he was being equally as dishonest as the alleged arrest. The moment his character tresspass with his office, or the violation of trust from his oath to act lawfully on behalf of whoever appointed him, then there is NO Officer -- because he is acting on his own. In the republic, the people conversing about their way is known as court; on the corporate side of things, inferior to the politic, is the second court/accusation (which is banned by the Constitution -- that is why there is such a push to have politic carry ID that belongs to a corporation; corporations are quite criminal, and the people thought associated with a corporation would need to be held to answer for what corporation is called by presentment. That's why all alleged "Officers" are in their corporate mode to seize people until they have presentable corporate character (ALL UPPERCASE NAME id) and are governed under a code. As people should know, politic are governed by the laws of physics in the universe, etc. The alleged "Security Officer" was just being polite to sit the King down on his bench, and wait for him to be comfortable to any distractions that may cause him to mis-manage his person (aka corporate-sole). That's not a seizure, because politic isn't an issue--because politic is incorporated to be an organelle in the corporation. They organelle only seizes when Ordered.
According to Uniform Commercial Code, there is no such thing as theft...because in commerce, anyone that causes damage or walks away with posession of somone else's property - simply forgot to pay for it. Title is still with the one that holds a security interest to the property, and the possessor is to be reminded to pay Rent for the depletion of value for every moment its retail aspect is diminished by their occupation. The property isn't stolen when it's whereabouts is known. Everything is for sale, if it isn't held in fee simple absolute.
The recent mis-application of Commercial Code is at the mal-application of emminent domain procedure; where recently there has been perfectly owned private property literaly stolen and displaced to another non-interested privateer, or public property to a privateer where is deadicated to a ffalse-public use.
I've seen that thing dressed-up in Walmart uniform; Only, when he does somthing bad, they all just laugh at him.
I bet it's all a deception to give everyone the idea that Walmart is a communist's store. When someone realy enters to change the price-targs before buying, there'll be some Senior Citizens from Seizure World Retirement Center or such saying...
He's changing the prices!
Quick, form a Line Dance, and make like Pat Benatar: shake our pimped shoulders at hime 'till he leaves!
There is a customer after the goods and services are payed, and until payment in full. Just holding a guaruntee/limited-liability in the form a receipt/claim would construe there to be a customer even after exiting BEST BUY and until the full discharge of association with any agents of Best Buy. As far as private-property is concerned, there are express and implied invitation on the front door (open/closed--banking hours) AND advertised commercial speach why one should enter BEST BUY.
The manager was acting in such conveyance that could impugn the value of BEST BUY stocks and bonds; the misplaced manager's actions were regulating who can enter the retail market on prejudice of clothing-color and origin, without a cause of tort or theft. One of the greatest intimidations is to walk into a store that happens to sell the same goods that is being worn by the patron; from which, there can be an accusation of theft after someone sees a non-buyer walking out of the dressing room wearing the clothes they owned upon land and entry to the store. The same can be said for product conventions, sheeps-bladders, coconuts, and little rocks that can float.
Think of a store as a pool of marketing space, a small storage building tended by stewards on behalf of the owners and manufacturers of the products for sell; BEST BUY doesn't own the products, BEST BUY is under contract to sell on behalf of the owner of the products on display, BEST BUY is held accountable for misplaced and stolen property they are stewards over, agents of BEST BUY admit that they aren't competing with the products on display with a "house brand", and agents of BEST BUY are in misplaced trust by odd characters to press for monopoly holdings to compete with non-customers and possible buyers willing to exchange a security interest or fee for a product.
In other words, they are all just a bunch of lousy people that can sweep, wash windows, dust, unlock a door in the dawn, lock a door at dusk, and complain to someone else about their lack of qualifications for a ministerial position that avails them to ploy all the idiocy of minions to echo their psychopathicly ordered-disorder.
"Sir, I'm the store manager and you need to leave right now, please walk this way." If they refuse, then they're trespassing. The only times they *asked* (note the word ASKED) someone to leave and he sought to clarify, it was made 100% clear that he was NOT being TOLD to leave, only asked.
Is this the condition of reasoning in that United States; to assert that requests of incomplete information are to be construed as commands? I've heard this before...
_ "Sir, do you know why I stopped you?" _ "Sir, it isn't about tort; it's about policy and code 123xyz." _ "Sir, no, You are not under arrest." _ "Sir, just because you aren't under arrest doesn't mean you can leave." X "Sir, can you please step out of the vehicle?" _ "Sir, if you don't step out of the vehicle, I will arrest you." _ "Sir, Yes we have your name but your need to sign it here." _ "Sir, if you don't voluntarily sign this contract(ticket/confession), I will arrest you." _ "Sir, you may not sign this voluntary ticket as 'under threat durress coercion'" _ "Sir, thankyou for subscribing to our non-official side of services, enjoy the Day we sold to you."
Dark coffee is sealed into a size-13 boot-shaped can, that reads on serving requirements: "a kick in the mouth, best served cold -- do not shake or stir, ever."
I'v always thought that defamation of one's character is self-evident in anyone holding a driver license. The question answered long ago, by implications, is: what crime or tresspass has a man committed by his order, to be indebted to hold and present a license to qualify to be offered a ticket for a service? And foremost, why all the regulation only applies to a trust/person in that license, and not the man; none is done to recognize a man is even partaking on a service, except by the qualified admittions coaxing one to board such Craft. Why does a aeroplane-ticket require a driver license to move about on the common ways? Is it the driver license that is flying on the plane, or the man flying on the plane, or are they both flying on the plane in confederation but only one is verifiable/STRAWMAN?
Consider the fact that legislature created the form of name as First Middle Last, and then a State of the United States charters a corporation to incorporate the artificial person into FIRST MIDDLE LAST. The movement of words on paper, from prior art, is evidence that there are alter-ego involved in licensure.
When someone says they ways to fly somewhere, the truth is: man can't fly...only the plane can fly. When someone says they want to drive, the truth is: man can't drive...only the drivetrain under the car can drive. What can a man do, that the legislatures has already monopolized silent with their Acts?
Managing records on information of customers is a slow and steady collection.
What was it with that CENSUS BUREAUGH, to only count the population density, yet now there is a one of ten "lottery" that a chosen "unit" will be given a 100-page pamphlet asking information beyond income? Perhaps, when was the Year that CENSUS BUREAUGH began asking about income?
Consider ZABBASEARCH.COM, a somewhat free service that simply reports on queries for background search -- that's right, they don't disclose information other than NAME and AGE and TOWN/CITY and STATE, and only updates its record when SOMEONE is background-checked. Their service offers disclosure of BIRTHDAY and SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DRIVER LICENSE and PHONE NUMBER and ADDRESS, but that is the "subscription" model.
Take Albertons Inc application for members... they deliberatly tease the applicant on their form... I have the form available, and it asks just for a Trust-fund (middle-initialed) name for a person to attach to an address, and then the address and phone number, and nothing els. This gets an applicant a card with a BAR CODE on it, not even a picture or a name on the card -- only a BAR code. The form advertises to the applicant "Share some information about your self...so we can SERVE you", and "We honor your privacy, except when compelled by law". That membership system isn't a matter of exposing the name and address of the person becoming a member to Albertsons Inc, but it's a matter of recognizing that all the store prices are inflated and it is only competitive to give members a price deduction in return for letting Agents and trusted associates (read Police/FBI/CIA) of Albertsons Inc to know the shopping list in return for lowering the price back to an affordable level (known as the "REWARDS PROGRAM" in Albertsons-speak).
Collecting customer information is no different than the schemes in the Insurance business... Whatever they want to manipulate, they'll plan next-year of insurance to raise, and then offer the Insurance at the prior level only if a certain behaviour or regulation from that moment onward is agreed unto. And I don't mean people wearing seatbelts, using mudflaps on the rear wheels, or removing all the miniature mirrors a driver is alleged to be distracted to their facial improvements. Perhaps an example of the largest Insurance encroachment is to compel the people to use a Driver License, in return for affordable or possible insurance. Let me explain... The first federal-area of the country to have licensure for a DRIVER is the State of California (not to be confused with California/state or the California Republic). That State of California legislature is the first to legislate DRIVER LICENSE for their corporate soles and fellow artificial persons. Looking at that first Act that inspired through the States, was the fact that "Driving" is defined as "usinga Motor Vehicle to move property or passengers, for Hire." In that same Act, a "Motor Vehicle" is defined as any vessel deadicated to "Commercial Use". There you have it. The truth at last -- there implies the reservation of private and non-commercial/not-for-hire freedom of movement upon the common ways and postal roads and postal routes (yes, if you accept a speeding ticket/derived from DRIVER LICENSURE, then you are acting in capacity as a postman for yourself -- don't accept mail not AddREsEd tO YOU).
The truth never sees the light of Day...it is its own light, and if it isn't burning hot enough then it will be snuffed out by those that hate it.
The article isn't strictly saying which MPLAYER developers are being intervied: the MPLAYERC from GulliverWIKI tools or the ones from the *nix origin "mplayer". MPLAYERC was a brilliant project that APpeArEd to be the pre-7 version of Microsoft Windows MediaPlayer, but it isn't; it's smaller, faster, offers more controlls, and is just a classic media environment more than the Windows MediaPlayer from MS Windows 3 days and MS Windows XP days. It's limited only be the available librarires, it appears.
The other one appears to be what the interview is about: mplayer
Considering project integrity discussion on the fact, that to actually get IMMEDIATE industry-wide availability for the majority of media formats, someone had to secretly slip outside of the Project tree to modify de jure win32 libraries and then anonymously post a news bit that support for those win32 libraries is supported and specifically NOW PART OF THE MPLAYER project. Despite this, that same package is what has kept mplayer from surviving all this time and allowing it to co-exist and compete to media players of all platforms; "win32codecs-full" and "win32codecs-essential", in addition to the RealPlayer support "rp7" and "rp8", and then there is the Quicktime 6 and 7 support packages. The mplayer Project was nearly closed-down by a cease and desist for hosting thos packages, if I remember correctly. If the DMCA or RIAA wanted to close down MPLAYER, then all they had to do was assassinate everyone hosting those packages, then any Joe User without a clue would abandon the quasi-native mplayer for a solution within Wine and GulliverWIKI's MPLAYERC.
But, this has not happened to the fine developers presiding over "mplayer". There is none of this in the interview, and mainly discusses adding DVD Menu suppport, developing a great GUI (trivial crap), and their ardent associations with only "FFmpeg". Despite all the slithering: Way to go, craftsment of guerilla video!
My motto for working with someone (yes, I actually work with people that ask me for work) is to have an introductory week of typical work to let them calibrate their application to the schedule and environment, pay them for what it was worth to the customer, then decide if they could stay or come back later when they don't want to be a poseur.
It seems whenever someone asks for a job from an alleged "respected" company, and they have experience (I don't mean that street-corner Hooker kind), they just get the hypnosis response in likeness of that Movie (Truman Show)...
"Everyone needs to be XXX-certified because it promotes complacency and equality in a diverse work environment, satisfaction, and builds a good career profile for someone to present to a respective employer on their known achievements."
Wife(TM): "Honey, would you like to try a cup of some fresh mountain-country Mocha Mix(?) -- It's made from the finest extracts from the mountains of Nicaragua and fortified with all the necessary vitamins and minerals naturally found in the region(?) -- Nicaragua mountain Mocha Mix is not like all the other brands, and I trust it more than any else." Truman(R): "Who -- what are you talking to? There's no-one else here but me! Do you want to slice me, dice me, or peel me too? There are so many choices!" Wife(TM):/shaking nife at Truman/ "Truman, you are really scaring me!" Truman(R): "You are scaring me too!"/This comment brought to you by AOL, connecting people on the second or third try(C)./
psykocrime, did you write your post all by yourself or did you learn to write it by the inspiration from a Certification? This is a litmus test for people that are Domestic or Non-Domestic -- USA vs US. I wonder if a baby will eventually take off his diaper to crap on the ground, because his growing mind discerns the comfort of uncrapped pants and not some dummy-education taught by a psychopathic anti-Society troll working for "Huggies".
I hope this post was funny, not sarcastic/flamebait.:-)
Schooling begins for a young one, him either male or female; Is usually happy to attend, when curiousity is prevails a choice to learn with similar youth. Every aspect of study is about developing English(default language), Writing(good form), Arithmetic, and Bible (grace, law, etiquete, manners, respect, honor, charity, and good chastity). Up to the 6th-year of study, the young student is a qualified man(Bible says a man is "male and female"). Every manner of comprehension taught after the 6th-year has typically been for moving those three Pillars into Life for blessing and burden to neighbors; most students will have good mechanical knowledge for general work, while others could have chosen a study at a benefice among associates speculating on improvements beyond market demand. Keep in mind that none has become "career" until the coerced "education" begins after the 6th year. By the 8th year of study, there is speculation on a "High School" that is nothing more than a trade guild coerced upon children to develop a "cereer" to an opinion of a private market analysis indoctrinated by the State. The fun ends at 6th grade, where enters a blurry line of coerced education and school spit-shine for one's indoctrination to speak on one's own Will to wit.
Today, Career has become less than a specialty training and more to advance an initial trend and service to compete with the intended competancy of a student, to the suppression of a free mind to make decisions on need and charity. Career is excess, and you can take that to "telemarketers", "credit-card" offers, and related communisms.
I hope you read that title, became angry, and want to be in the know... The United States allows controversy to dominate the News, so they have an opportunity to commit other more violent actions or silence important grievances newsworthy of the RE-public at the States. I posted a Story to Slashdot, and it was REJECTED with certain prejudice. If only we could assert this to pretended unsolicited electronic mail, even though we realy can do this. I'll post my Story I submit to Slashdot, at the end of my de jure comment:
Mail that is sent to a post office, post station, or a mail box can be Returned to Sender for "no such name/wrong name". This is the case for eMail sent to an account that does not ackowledge a prior Trust with the origin of that message of the eMail. The problem with eMail is not the fact that the electronic Mail has a strong separation of Client and Server in the trusted transfer to the local Client (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) through the trusted delivery (Post Office Protocol or POP3), but the fact that the verry movement of mail can't be retro-marked at the server to not ACCEPT the mail without the Client. In other words, the verry electronic Mail system is built upon Trust that the mail server always is in Acceptance of every peice of Mail on behalf of the account holder. In standard Administrative court procedure, all mail matter is as much a contract or claim; there needs to be a electronic Mail procedure to recognize that acceptance of the Mail surely does not constitute an Agreement with the mail.
Now to get to the point: when an electronic Mail account does not exist, the message is acknowledged by the receiving Trusted Server along the subject matter of "Not Accepted" or "No Such Account/Not Deliverable" or "Account Full/Not Deliverable." I find this is the true and correct response to all Mail (electronic or letters patent) for the response to an Offer (Commercial) to Negotiate a service (contract) or Commercial Speach (ADVERTISEMENT, ALL-UPPER-CASE-NONSENSE GRAMMAR for saile). If there was a parallel protocol to negotiate the disclosure and cause a Mail account to be receptive to mail directed to it and having no association or appointment or assignment, then that is where these things stand to allow an Owner to direct an Mail Client to give preference to the Server (think postmaster's utility) to not give admittance and correspondance to the Mail Client's Trusted account reservoir on a Server.
The preference on the Server could be a simple "Not Deliverable" if a server flag hasn't confirmed "By Prior Appointment" with a secure cryption in GPG or PGP key, or "Ignore all Mail" with preference to a private list accessed in real-time to the Client's addressbook or an Online Addressbook in relation to an Career or Job-related Addressbook on a specialty or general website (think of Yahoo Auctions, eBay auctions, and independent and particular venues corresponding to private matter or club). In other words, SPAM is a problem with a Trusted Server accepting Mail from a transient client having its non-automated process manipulated by the piracy of an automated agent of an unidentified tresspasser.
NOW follows is the Story submitted and REJECTED by SLASHDOT.ORG, of Unisys Corp (the same that wreaked havoc with its anti-Unix patents of Unix) pushing Biometrics at the 15th World Congress on Information Technology at Austin, TX.
World Congress on IT @Texas, Unisys for Biometrics
The Philadelphia Inquirer presses within the new week (first week of the fifth Month of 2006), that there will be a 15th World Congress on Information Technology to convene at the town of Austin, conversing among the Republic of Texas. Among the pre-tendered exhibits is one specific scruteny of the agents of that Unisys Corp. According to The Philidelphia Inquirer article,, there concluded and wil
So is an umbrella... Hence the birth of Smart Bomb.
That is an outstanding attack. It appears to be possible only on a rainy day; a Ninja working at a fast-food company would sneak a few Ninja Beans in a customer's food; then when the customer is done and resumes his walk into the rain, there will be a silen but deadly death as he is aesfixiated from the farts trapped under the umbrella over his head.
I know of a few traditions in Canada that could benefit from a Ninja-like remedy as this.
No need to fake according to Federal Reserve-10hrs
on
Faking a Company
·
· Score: 0
According to Federal Reserve, they measure unemployment on the US population that if anyone is in business for at-least "TEN HOURS PER WEEK" then a "person" is considered em-ployed.
I find this a verry misleading concept on what is a "ploy" and whatnot. Especially misleading is the unemployment statistic being used as a measurement of productive work; By that FEDERAL RESERVE code, anyone that awakes for the Day, apply grooming and hygiene principles, prepares their own meal, washes their clothes, have already attained qualification to the 10-hour FEDERAL RESERVE code that they are an employee/employed. Given this fact, I think it is possible that more fearful truth is not being told; what does the economy truthfully appear? It could be worse than Mexico, but none knows because FEDERAL RESERVE only has lawful jurisdiction within that District of Columbia and wherever its DEBT NOTES move, not the neighboring Washington's District of Columbia.
I can't show where the quote came from: I'm not at my filing cabinette, not at my main console with SCSI RAID HDD array that holds the file that quotes their Code. (I'm posting to SLASHDOT at a mere wireless network location with an embedded mini-computer)
The Code isn't appearing on Google and Yahoo, not like we can trust them with reliable search anymore though. Can someone bring this forth?
Google showed a similar quote from some idiots at TEDNUGENT.COM, but that's just dross IMHO.
Network Redundancy Administration, M. Gregory Thomas(tm)
Slashdot Mirror
According to a foreign corporation known as FOOD AND DRUG ADMINSITRATION, a "cure" is defined as "any substance advertised to cure a disease." Therefore, under that FDA, there is no applicability to cure Rumsfeld's disease. Would it be someone else's intent to make Rumsfeld's disease more situated on the host, as would cement is cured to a stable medium? There is only an imbalance, where one may freely admit to be easy about an herbal or natural remedy to return one's good health.
I just use an American Heritage Dictionary, of an early Year in the 1800's, a Holy Bible, and then there's the commoners emphasis on Bouvier's work. Most people don't know that there hasn't been any law since 1842, a state of emergency since implemented by George Washington's first treasons, and there has been a verry rigid code implemented since 1871 by the dishonourable Union States rebellion.
Oh well, people would rather mortgage their houses, and sell their name, rather than work for a day to get a share of stock used to insulate their wages and speculations.
I'm just a man on the Land, trying to figure everything out in common words without being a lawyer. They don't like me in the corporate County, so...
blockquoth {
} blockquoth
My point is that for the purposes of modern Airline services, any that challenges and coerces the use of an SSN or supposed "Driver License", such as making an offer of service based on a prior debilitating contract of an unrelated matter. Then, to the effect of Sign or Signature, is again violating the public trust by moving in a manner far from the politic. Looking through the law of nations, where it defines there to be body politic alongside a body corporate; there is a presumption that the people are layed dormant for the appearance of a corporation to act in a mode not acceptable by the people; and just like any sign on a road it is an act of commercial speech, not protected by law, and is a mere suggestion like pants or a-dress. Are the people for sale, or is the purpose of Airline travel to trademark all our luggage as a sale-able item in case someone decides to buy while in transit?
It is only honest to proceed in an Airline service no different than a Bus or a Parcel service, yet it is been gandered proprietarily and monopolized to an unethical extent. To get out of the loop to sell the legislatively-created artificial person (think legal name), then consider the difference between the true name and the shared name; a legal name is defined as a religious/true name and a surname/sirname appended onto. This brings to effect that any accusation made to JOHN QUINCY DOE would evidence a corporation with an artificial person (transmitting utility is the legislated/John Quincy Doe) only if not bound down to defer it as John Quincy dba JOHN QUINCY DOE; correctly done, then the accusation would need to be made in the character of John Quincy. As we all know, that would comply with the fact that such unrelated account and membership numbers are owned by the institution that created them.
To mispresent anyone's name in any character than correct English grammar, would be libel and immediatly needs to be moved back into the district Court (Admiralty jurisdiction).
Looking at the "Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims" (here), as provided by Congress, would reveal that all seizures and wage garnishments on Land (think compelled and de-facto legislative forms) are to be filed in the district Court! Any alleged "notice of levy" or advertized seizures not filed in Admiralty/district Court, are implied an equity Court dispute (issue a Quo Warranto, and if no contract is exhibited then there is fraud).
My intent of the post is to show that there is no such act as "theft" while in commerce, because everyone knows who is carrying someone else's property (that was sold by incrimination) and the buyer simply forgot to pay or get a proper receipt. Commerce is the medium many insurgents in the District of Columbia use
Must be great to be a free man, even if that freedom is confined to 10 cubic feet.
If he can easily gain access to computers not intended to him, then his remedy would be to enter commerce on an account of him trying to improve the situation.
If a man stole a cow, is he not expected to return that cow and include the value the original owner was deprived of; cow, milk, life-span, labor, etc?
I don't want his blood, that didn't offen me; It's his mind that offended, and thendirected his hand to commit an offense. I'm not here to put a mark or record on his hand or mind, but let him repent and restore the property and value deprived -- let him try. If the damaged or deprived property is exponential in comparison to the effort at his issue, then he is owing to improve and reprove the property he tresspassed.
I wonder what Operating System gave him proper authentication...he same that de-facto Government of a government wanted irregular bipass of security for its own measures?
All the remedy for certain tresspass and alleged "crime" is being slowly shadowed by a foreign legislature and its attempts to surrender rights in favor of surrendering the already-existing more clever and effective punnishments.
As your trademark incentive to solve rape by surrendering blood and all rights to that blood, there is more rape. Prison and jail is being mis-used; they are originally intended to house the people that are under threat from the avenger of blood. According to your merit, giving information of one's flesh satisfies the unconcionable tresspass and crime sought by the one's heart and mind. Bullpie!
Historically, pederasts have been hanged; rapists have been castrated or completely gutted of their genitals; thieves have been recorded to the purchase of the goods they took or will eventually pay for its reimbursement of value greater to the owner's deprivation, and killing has been awarded a lifetime of repentance in pledge to church service in God; liars lose fingers they enjoy to pledge in trust (think fingerprint).
I am not amused to any transient authentication that can neither determine one's future or one's health in any matter not yet caused. I'll continue to keeping the young ways from growing to your old ways.
Of course, you don't even know that CALIFORNIA is a federal State unlike the de-jure state known as California (libeled by that foreign Congress to be a Territory). You don't know where you stand. I have no patent on that private legislation/code; I speak plain English, common, public.
A boy was born from his true parents, and among the family to honor him was Quincy; so the boy, John, was given the name "John Quincy" of a Doe family; after born, the hospital physician and an executive administrator engauged the surprise and exaustion of the joyful event to utilize an erroneous conviction that the manner of a child being born is that of an admiralty pursuit...somthing about "living water" was spilled on the hospital-room floor. As the boy was born, his feet were immediatly directed as a STAMP onto a pre-tendered peice of paper held by a nurse, claiming the boy made an appearance for "John Quincy Doe." Thereby, that paper was certified with witness from a physician and executive administrator to Certify as being BIRTHED.
Birth is not the same as being born; one is the landing or expulsion of cargo or passengers, while the other is a physical use of force to carve by some motion or letters pat-ent. Considering this fact of a boy being born as opposed to birth; that Certificate now could claim him to be chattel to a person in an artificial world. This process is known as induction, and has destroyed more countries than you can believe imaginable. The boy made foot-tresspass on another world's paper/person, the appearance cured the implications of intent, and thereby he can be deprived of his right to life for using colorable money of that fictitious world and rather than imbursing in lawful money of the United States (as exhibited in the Constitution as gold or silver coin). Comprehend the most common form of bearing children are to be born head-first; thereby to force the child's feet as to be born in a foreign country by contract is a criminal act, and the superstitions of the deceived true parents is compounded by threat and duress and coercion of the false witness of their servants.
Who are the true parents to not argue against their servants threatening them, to pledge their child as collateral for the national debt? That Certificate is worth no less than $600 thousand US dollars (not US Dollars lawful, silver or gold). That first birth certificate is taken by libel to the contract de-facto State of a state/de-dejure, and enfranchised and incorporated as JOHN QUINCY DOE to be used as a receivership for the earlier transmitting utility: misnomer in commerce.
There are two ways to rebut these instruments of that foreign legislatures FIRST MIDDLE LAST form of Name; that is by standing in judiciary as a court of competent jurisdiction, true name to invalidate the legislated/artificial person a foreigner created to induct one's lawful standing dormant.
All "signatures", including SSN and Driver's License would abate the nature of the cause as
All "sign", in any pursuit, would abate the matter of interest as trademark or reladed product of Doe in commerce;
The below regulating code on all contracts that include them, is Uniform Commercial Code; Article 2, Part V, 2-501
Airline services are misleadingly designated as to trasnport passengers and cargo, and the "passenger" clause in the manner of contract for the alleged "passenger" becomes a breach of contract when the alleged "passenger" enters among the crew or is asked for assistance by the crew! Otherwise, a passenger is secured as a person for the performance of the contract to sit idle among the cargo as though goods subject to casual tennancy as to prevent them from expiring; ie, Airline services only see the passengers (people re-declared as passengers) as nothing more than living-stock with attached cargo (baggage). Even if the verry instrument, such as a receipt, were tendered as Identification then it would be as though that paperwork was the applicable party to the contract while the man (having sold his trademark name as collateral for a dodgy mid-air pleasure-service) is at risk of lien for any dishonor or accessories accepted and agreed by the creature whose ear is attached to that collateral Identification of his name. Another way to look at the process would be to think of the tendered Identification as a private trust to a private service, to incorporate and administer the value (man) while the shipment is in-route. There is evidence of this same administered service in "general delivery" services from postal agencies qualified for a street address (street is internationaly defines as "an in-land waterway attached to a port of entry") such are enumerated parcels and properties (most of everything that isn't patent through the general post or an general post-office).
There looks to have avered from answering for what a man colluded to offer, for what he was not trusted to administer or convey as collateral, such as Identification in the form of a trade-able name; yet there is no theft because the services rendered are simply recalibrated to acknowledge that a lien is placed on the nameless true-part with interest regardless whether he tenders as FRANKLIN or GRANT or JACKSON or HAMILTON or LINCOLN or WASHINGTON or "John Q. Doe"...
Such are the Scope of a Rule, in "any unauthorized signature is wholly inoperative as that of the person w
Considering Conmen and the ACTORS in the movie that misleadingly portrayed a conman...
First, relating experience with cheques as opposed to a bank draft;
Here is my reasoning: a Cheque is a demand, same meaning of language as in the age-old strategy game. If the instrument say "Pay to", then it is a Cheque. If it says "Pay to the order of" then it is a draft subject to certain conditions for its redemption. A cheque is a verry scarry instrument: their emphasis is used in societies where gold and silver (hard currencies) are the dominating form of lawful money. Cheque means NOW! If it is advertised on the face as a "CHECK", but says "Pay to the order of..." in controlling words, then it is just a typical ignorance and deception of the institution that cafted such dishonorable intrument.
Second,
Silver and gold are still their own value, while US dollar (read that distinction, not Dollar but dollar), there is thought that US Currency is debased from its original lawful money and moved into the realm of speculation; only the people controlling the measurements will control the market. A Dollar is still gold or silver, they just attract speculation of US DOLLARS counterfeit-origin in COLUMBIA. Studying history, one act of terrorism to fear of war has caused currencies debased to speculative credit and confidence-building schemes have caused more tragic loss and abandonment than any other event under war. The conman represented in the movie "Catch me if you can" wasn't arrested on cheque fraud, because all his instruments were drafts being advertised as cheques--if anything, he was arrested for impersonating an office of trust and securities fraud.
Looking at that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Inc, the money-supply has been discontinued from being reported by their own libel to claim that the M3 reports had no effect on controlling inflation.
That thief in the movie is nothing compared to the pain and suffering caused by that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM; it being neither a Federal Reserve, and neither a bank -- it's a corporation, and the original charter was quieted. The original Federal Reserve issued Federal Reserve Certificates, not those FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES. A FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE is a non-promisory non-redeamable note drawn on a private bank, administered in admiralty jurisdiction as a claim against the United States. The way the Constitution is subverted is by moving foreign currency into the realm, averting from the activation of the original of a public trust.
A quick question that most people could barely comprehend... How do you suppose there ever became a distinction between a US State and an American state? Money determines the lineage an office is chartered to. Every office since about 1871 has been UNITED STATES everything, and America is layed dormant.
Did anyone comprehend the prevailing attitude for someone disassociating with ill behavior? Someone that questions the effectiveness of competancy of an idea or product, is referred immediatly to a solution that is outside the domain where the dispute occurred. As the earlier Post exhibited, his recommendation for a competant and independent way of life is to a vile country far away where such character is detrimental to whomever want to pool or consolidate their good nature with equal fellowship.
Whoever fake American would offer such insult, is using unequal weights and measures by not heeding their own advice. If there is no dissolving the trust and mandate abused by the misplaced government, then it all just revolved to an energy crisis of eminent domain to construct enormous damns and artificial neighborhoods of government housing.
Bring out your Peers! Bring out your Peers!
Judge: Wait a minute, I can't take this one-he's still connected through Xlib.
RIAA: Oh he'll disconnect all-right.
BearShare: I'm still shareing!
Judge: He Said he's still active.
BearShare: I'm not disconnected yet!
RIAA: Oh be quiet, you ol' peer, you'll have neither X Server connection, files, or firewall grace by the next morning.
Judge: I can't take him like that.
BearShare: I feel like taking a walk.
RIAA: Is there anything you can do to hurry is shutdown procedure?
BearShare: I feel happy! Happy!
root@127.0.0.1:/root# killall -KILL bearshare
BearShare: Hap#$*&^
RIAA: Ah thankyou.
Judge: don't mention it.
RIAA: When will you be back in our pre-payed courthouse?
Judge: Thursday, and I'll have another stack of surver logs for you to prosecute.
RIAA: yea? The Sheeple will never suspect you are joined to the prosecution, by suboena evidence in for either party; thereby disqualifying as to be a judge, and more an executive administrator to a trust.
[Smoke (art)]
/s/ Gregory Thomas
[Eat At Moe's (9.99 Hamburger)]
Subject: Competent Authentication
As this post shall evince, M. Gregory Thomas(tm) does declare this first post on behalf of the Special Trust confided to me from the royalty in His bench; to acknowledge and reserve and assert claim on subject matter for participants in any event of conversation, where information submitted is audit by a presentable graphic for advertised goods and servies as to discern or regulate the acceptance of automated transponse to encumber a politic in its daily discourse and business; where that advertised goods or services shall be adapted to satisfy a query of verifiable information from an image, to satisfy the cause of authentication as a postal vessel to move evidence into the forum as does from a competent and sound Record.
Done on this sixth Day of the fifth Month, in the Year of Our Lord 2006, to be held in trust by him at the town of Westminster, California republic.
To proceed to Slashdot and satisfy a metric of competancy, adapt the following image to text;
Linux Support, USD 10!
[Mundt Network Redundancy Adminsitration]
[Gregory Thomas]
[Anyone trying to implement the above as claimed, will be Slashdotted. So rests duplicate of the original letter patent from His mind.]
That alleged "Security Officer" was acting in misplaced trust, and without disclosure of his actions thereby he was being equally as dishonest as the alleged arrest. The moment his character tresspass with his office, or the violation of trust from his oath to act lawfully on behalf of whoever appointed him, then there is NO Officer -- because he is acting on his own. In the republic, the people conversing about their way is known as court; on the corporate side of things, inferior to the politic, is the second court/accusation (which is banned by the Constitution -- that is why there is such a push to have politic carry ID that belongs to a corporation; corporations are quite criminal, and the people thought associated with a corporation would need to be held to answer for what corporation is called by presentment. That's why all alleged "Officers" are in their corporate mode to seize people until they have presentable corporate character (ALL UPPERCASE NAME id) and are governed under a code. As people should know, politic are governed by the laws of physics in the universe, etc. The alleged "Security Officer" was just being polite to sit the King down on his bench, and wait for him to be comfortable to any distractions that may cause him to mis-manage his person (aka corporate-sole). That's not a seizure, because politic isn't an issue--because politic is incorporated to be an organelle in the corporation. They organelle only seizes when Ordered.
According to Uniform Commercial Code, there is no such thing as theft...because in commerce, anyone that causes damage or walks away with posession of somone else's property - simply forgot to pay for it. Title is still with the one that holds a security interest to the property, and the possessor is to be reminded to pay Rent for the depletion of value for every moment its retail aspect is diminished by their occupation. The property isn't stolen when it's whereabouts is known. Everything is for sale, if it isn't held in fee simple absolute.
The recent mis-application of Commercial Code is at the mal-application of emminent domain procedure; where recently there has been perfectly owned private property literaly stolen and displaced to another non-interested privateer, or public property to a privateer where is deadicated to a ffalse-public use.
I bet it's all a deception to give everyone the idea that Walmart is a communist's store. When someone realy enters to change the price-targs before buying, there'll be some Senior Citizens from Seizure World Retirement Center or such saying...
There is a customer after the goods and services are payed, and until payment in full. Just holding a guaruntee/limited-liability in the form a receipt/claim would construe there to be a customer even after exiting BEST BUY and until the full discharge of association with any agents of Best Buy. As far as private-property is concerned, there are express and implied invitation on the front door (open/closed--banking hours) AND advertised commercial speach why one should enter BEST BUY.
The manager was acting in such conveyance that could impugn the value of BEST BUY stocks and bonds; the misplaced manager's actions were regulating who can enter the retail market on prejudice of clothing-color and origin, without a cause of tort or theft. One of the greatest intimidations is to walk into a store that happens to sell the same goods that is being worn by the patron; from which, there can be an accusation of theft after someone sees a non-buyer walking out of the dressing room wearing the clothes they owned upon land and entry to the store. The same can be said for product conventions, sheeps-bladders, coconuts, and little rocks that can float.
Think of a store as a pool of marketing space, a small storage building tended by stewards on behalf of the owners and manufacturers of the products for sell; BEST BUY doesn't own the products, BEST BUY is under contract to sell on behalf of the owner of the products on display, BEST BUY is held accountable for misplaced and stolen property they are stewards over, agents of BEST BUY admit that they aren't competing with the products on display with a "house brand", and agents of BEST BUY are in misplaced trust by odd characters to press for monopoly holdings to compete with non-customers and possible buyers willing to exchange a security interest or fee for a product.
In other words, they are all just a bunch of lousy people that can sweep, wash windows, dust, unlock a door in the dawn, lock a door at dusk, and complain to someone else about their lack of qualifications for a ministerial position that avails them to ploy all the idiocy of minions to echo their psychopathicly ordered-disorder.
"Sir, I'm the store manager and you need to leave right now, please walk this way." If they refuse, then they're trespassing. The only times they *asked* (note the word ASKED) someone to leave and he sought to clarify, it was made 100% clear that he was NOT being TOLD to leave, only asked.
Is this the condition of reasoning in that United States; to assert that requests of incomplete information are to be construed as commands? I've heard this before...
_ "Sir, do you know why I stopped you?"
_ "Sir, it isn't about tort; it's about policy and code 123xyz."
_ "Sir, no, You are not under arrest."
_ "Sir, just because you aren't under arrest doesn't mean you can leave."
X "Sir, can you please step out of the vehicle?"
_ "Sir, if you don't step out of the vehicle, I will arrest you."
_ "Sir, Yes we have your name but your need to sign it here."
_ "Sir, if you don't voluntarily sign this contract(ticket/confession), I will arrest you."
_ "Sir, you may not sign this voluntary ticket as 'under threat durress coercion'"
_ "Sir, thankyou for subscribing to our non-official side of services, enjoy the Day we sold to you."
...as long as they've been thoroughly kicked by H/bim.
Don't accept cheap imitations, like those Herring-weilding esquires in the sandbox.
Dark coffee is sealed into a size-13 boot-shaped can, that reads on serving requirements: "a kick in the mouth, best served cold -- do not shake or stir, ever."
Greetings and blessings, holder of "JimBobJoe"!
I'v always thought that defamation of one's character is self-evident in anyone holding a driver license. The question answered long ago, by implications, is: what crime or tresspass has a man committed by his order, to be indebted to hold and present a license to qualify to be offered a ticket for a service? And foremost, why all the regulation only applies to a trust/person in that license, and not the man; none is done to recognize a man is even partaking on a service, except by the qualified admittions coaxing one to board such Craft. Why does a aeroplane-ticket require a driver license to move about on the common ways? Is it the driver license that is flying on the plane, or the man flying on the plane, or are they both flying on the plane in confederation but only one is verifiable/STRAWMAN?
Consider the fact that legislature created the form of name as First Middle Last, and then a State of the United States charters a corporation to incorporate the artificial person into FIRST MIDDLE LAST. The movement of words on paper, from prior art, is evidence that there are alter-ego involved in licensure.
When someone says they ways to fly somewhere, the truth is: man can't fly...only the plane can fly. When someone says they want to drive, the truth is: man can't drive...only the drivetrain under the car can drive. What can a man do, that the legislatures has already monopolized silent with their Acts?
Managing records on information of customers is a slow and steady collection.
What was it with that CENSUS BUREAUGH, to only count the population density, yet now there is a one of ten "lottery" that a chosen "unit" will be given a 100-page pamphlet asking information beyond income? Perhaps, when was the Year that CENSUS BUREAUGH began asking about income?
Consider ZABBASEARCH.COM, a somewhat free service that simply reports on queries for background search -- that's right, they don't disclose information other than NAME and AGE and TOWN/CITY and STATE, and only updates its record when SOMEONE is background-checked. Their service offers disclosure of BIRTHDAY and SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DRIVER LICENSE and PHONE NUMBER and ADDRESS, but that is the "subscription" model.
Take Albertons Inc application for members... they deliberatly tease the applicant on their form... I have the form available, and it asks just for a Trust-fund (middle-initialed) name for a person to attach to an address, and then the address and phone number, and nothing els. This gets an applicant a card with a BAR CODE on it, not even a picture or a name on the card -- only a BAR code. The form advertises to the applicant "Share some information about your self...so we can SERVE you", and "We honor your privacy, except when compelled by law". That membership system isn't a matter of exposing the name and address of the person becoming a member to Albertsons Inc, but it's a matter of recognizing that all the store prices are inflated and it is only competitive to give members a price deduction in return for letting Agents and trusted associates (read Police/FBI/CIA) of Albertsons Inc to know the shopping list in return for lowering the price back to an affordable level (known as the "REWARDS PROGRAM" in Albertsons-speak).
Collecting customer information is no different than the schemes in the Insurance business... Whatever they want to manipulate, they'll plan next-year of insurance to raise, and then offer the Insurance at the prior level only if a certain behaviour or regulation from that moment onward is agreed unto. And I don't mean people wearing seatbelts, using mudflaps on the rear wheels, or removing all the miniature mirrors a driver is alleged to be distracted to their facial improvements. Perhaps an example of the largest Insurance encroachment is to compel the people to use a Driver License, in return for affordable or possible insurance. Let me explain... The first federal-area of the country to have licensure for a DRIVER is the State of California (not to be confused with California/state or the California Republic). That State of California legislature is the first to legislate DRIVER LICENSE for their corporate soles and fellow artificial persons. Looking at that first Act that inspired through the States, was the fact that "Driving" is defined as "usinga Motor Vehicle to move property or passengers, for Hire." In that same Act, a "Motor Vehicle" is defined as any vessel deadicated to "Commercial Use". There you have it. The truth at last -- there implies the reservation of private and non-commercial/not-for-hire freedom of movement upon the common ways and postal roads and postal routes (yes, if you accept a speeding ticket/derived from DRIVER LICENSURE, then you are acting in capacity as a postman for yourself -- don't accept mail not AddREsEd tO YOU).
The truth never sees the light of Day...it is its own light, and if it isn't burning hot enough then it will be snuffed out by those that hate it.
with love,
Gregory-Thomas
The article isn't strictly saying which MPLAYER developers are being intervied: the MPLAYERC from GulliverWIKI tools or the ones from the *nix origin "mplayer". MPLAYERC was a brilliant project that APpeArEd to be the pre-7 version of Microsoft Windows MediaPlayer, but it isn't; it's smaller, faster, offers more controlls, and is just a classic media environment more than the Windows MediaPlayer from MS Windows 3 days and MS Windows XP days. It's limited only be the available librarires, it appears.
The other one appears to be what the interview is about: mplayer
Considering project integrity discussion on the fact, that to actually get IMMEDIATE industry-wide availability for the majority of media formats, someone had to secretly slip outside of the Project tree to modify de jure win32 libraries and then anonymously post a news bit that support for those win32 libraries is supported and specifically NOW PART OF THE MPLAYER project. Despite this, that same package is what has kept mplayer from surviving all this time and allowing it to co-exist and compete to media players of all platforms; "win32codecs-full" and "win32codecs-essential", in addition to the RealPlayer support "rp7" and "rp8", and then there is the Quicktime 6 and 7 support packages. The mplayer Project was nearly closed-down by a cease and desist for hosting thos packages, if I remember correctly. If the DMCA or RIAA wanted to close down MPLAYER, then all they had to do was assassinate everyone hosting those packages, then any Joe User without a clue would abandon the quasi-native mplayer for a solution within Wine and GulliverWIKI's MPLAYERC.
But, this has not happened to the fine developers presiding over "mplayer". There is none of this in the interview, and mainly discusses adding DVD Menu suppport, developing a great GUI (trivial crap), and their ardent associations with only "FFmpeg". Despite all the slithering: Way to go, craftsment of guerilla video!
My motto for working with someone (yes, I actually work with people that ask me for work) is to have an introductory week of typical work to let them calibrate their application to the schedule and environment, pay them for what it was worth to the customer, then decide if they could stay or come back later when they don't want to be a poseur.
/shaking nife at Truman/ "Truman, you are really scaring me!" /This comment brought to you by AOL, connecting people on the second or third try(C)./
:-)
It seems whenever someone asks for a job from an alleged "respected" company, and they have experience (I don't mean that street-corner Hooker kind), they just get the hypnosis response in likeness of that Movie (Truman Show)...
"Everyone needs to be XXX-certified because it promotes complacency and equality in a diverse work environment, satisfaction, and builds a good career profile for someone to present to a respective employer on their known achievements."
Wife(TM): "Honey, would you like to try a cup of some fresh mountain-country Mocha Mix(?) -- It's made from the finest extracts from the mountains of Nicaragua and fortified with all the necessary vitamins and minerals naturally found in the region(?) -- Nicaragua mountain Mocha Mix is not like all the other brands, and I trust it more than any else."
Truman(R): "Who -- what are you talking to? There's no-one else here but me! Do you want to slice me, dice me, or peel me too? There are so many choices!"
Wife(TM):
Truman(R): "You are scaring me too!"
psykocrime, did you write your post all by yourself or did you learn to write it by the inspiration from a Certification? This is a litmus test for people that are Domestic or Non-Domestic -- USA vs US. I wonder if a baby will eventually take off his diaper to crap on the ground, because his growing mind discerns the comfort of uncrapped pants and not some dummy-education taught by a psychopathic anti-Society troll working for "Huggies".
I hope this post was funny, not sarcastic/flamebait.
Let's talk about that "higher education system" and how its career-based charter ussurps children by its scheme adapted through coercion...
Has anyone tried their Will at an ol' 8th-grade graduation test?
Schooling begins for a young one, him either male or female; Is usually happy to attend, when curiousity is prevails a choice to learn with similar youth. Every aspect of study is about developing English(default language), Writing(good form), Arithmetic, and Bible (grace, law, etiquete, manners, respect, honor, charity, and good chastity). Up to the 6th-year of study, the young student is a qualified man(Bible says a man is "male and female").
Every manner of comprehension taught after the 6th-year has typically been for moving those three Pillars into Life for blessing and burden to neighbors; most students will have good mechanical knowledge for general work, while others could have chosen a study at a benefice among associates speculating on improvements beyond market demand. Keep in mind that none has become "career" until the coerced "education" begins after the 6th year. By the 8th year of study, there is speculation on a "High School" that is nothing more than a trade guild coerced upon children to develop a "cereer" to an opinion of a private market analysis indoctrinated by the State. The fun ends at 6th grade, where enters a blurry line of coerced education and school spit-shine for one's indoctrination to speak on one's own Will to wit.
Today, Career has become less than a specialty training and more to advance an initial trend and service to compete with the intended competancy of a student, to the suppression of a free mind to make decisions on need and charity. Career is excess, and you can take that to "telemarketers", "credit-card" offers, and related communisms.
Mail that is sent to a post office, post station, or a mail box can be Returned to Sender for "no such name/wrong name". This is the case for eMail sent to an account that does not ackowledge a prior Trust with the origin of that message of the eMail. The problem with eMail is not the fact that the electronic Mail has a strong separation of Client and Server in the trusted transfer to the local Client (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) through the trusted delivery (Post Office Protocol or POP3), but the fact that the verry movement of mail can't be retro-marked at the server to not ACCEPT the mail without the Client. In other words, the verry electronic Mail system is built upon Trust that the mail server always is in Acceptance of every peice of Mail on behalf of the account holder. In standard Administrative court procedure, all mail matter is as much a contract or claim; there needs to be a electronic Mail procedure to recognize that acceptance of the Mail surely does not constitute an Agreement with the mail.
Now to get to the point: when an electronic Mail account does not exist, the message is acknowledged by the receiving Trusted Server along the subject matter of "Not Accepted" or "No Such Account/Not Deliverable" or "Account Full/Not Deliverable." I find this is the true and correct response to all Mail (electronic or letters patent) for the response to an Offer (Commercial) to Negotiate a service (contract) or Commercial Speach (ADVERTISEMENT, ALL-UPPER-CASE-NONSENSE GRAMMAR for saile). If there was a parallel protocol to negotiate the disclosure and cause a Mail account to be receptive to mail directed to it and having no association or appointment or assignment, then that is where these things stand to allow an Owner to direct an Mail Client to give preference to the Server (think postmaster's utility) to not give admittance and correspondance to the Mail Client's Trusted account reservoir on a Server.
The preference on the Server could be a simple "Not Deliverable" if a server flag hasn't confirmed "By Prior Appointment" with a secure cryption in GPG or PGP key, or "Ignore all Mail" with preference to a private list accessed in real-time to the Client's addressbook or an Online Addressbook in relation to an Career or Job-related Addressbook on a specialty or general website (think of Yahoo Auctions, eBay auctions, and independent and particular venues corresponding to private matter or club). In other words, SPAM is a problem with a Trusted Server accepting Mail from a transient client having its non-automated process manipulated by the piracy of an automated agent of an unidentified tresspasser.
NOW follows is the Story submitted and REJECTED by SLASHDOT.ORG, of Unisys Corp (the same that wreaked havoc with its anti-Unix patents of Unix) pushing Biometrics at the 15th World Congress on Information Technology at Austin, TX.
So is an umbrella... Hence the birth of Smart Bomb.
That is an outstanding attack. It appears to be possible only on a rainy day; a Ninja working at a fast-food company would sneak a few Ninja Beans in a customer's food; then when the customer is done and resumes his walk into the rain, there will be a silen but deadly death as he is aesfixiated from the farts trapped under the umbrella over his head.
I know of a few traditions in Canada that could benefit from a Ninja-like remedy as this.
According to Federal Reserve, they measure unemployment on the US population that if anyone is in business for at-least "TEN HOURS PER WEEK" then a "person" is considered em-ployed.
I find this a verry misleading concept on what is a "ploy" and whatnot. Especially misleading is the unemployment statistic being used as a measurement of productive work; By that FEDERAL RESERVE code, anyone that awakes for the Day, apply grooming and hygiene principles, prepares their own meal, washes their clothes, have already attained qualification to the 10-hour FEDERAL RESERVE code that they are an employee/employed. Given this fact, I think it is possible that more fearful truth is not being told; what does the economy truthfully appear? It could be worse than Mexico, but none knows because FEDERAL RESERVE only has lawful jurisdiction within that District of Columbia and wherever its DEBT NOTES move, not the neighboring Washington's District of Columbia.
I can't show where the quote came from: I'm not at my filing cabinette, not at my main console with SCSI RAID HDD array that holds the file that quotes their Code. (I'm posting to SLASHDOT at a mere wireless network location with an embedded mini-computer)
The Code isn't appearing on Google and Yahoo, not like we can trust them with reliable search anymore though. Can someone bring this forth?
Google showed a similar quote from some idiots at TEDNUGENT.COM, but that's just dross IMHO.
Network Redundancy Administration,
M. Gregory Thomas(tm)