Why are you writing Checks for services not bonded and oathed?
All the borders and its personell are commercial avenues for the transport of cargo and passengers by hired persons. A man can't be coerced to contract their services. Accordingly to tort, a man can walk wherever he may except when hindered by the land-owners exercising their claim on the land without tresspass to uninterested people. There is a difference between drug-trafickers dodging the search and seizure at a commercial port, as opposed to honest people striding through the desert paths to redeem their claim of bank-notes or title to services checked to their favor. If anyone is in posession to currency of the United States -- they have the right to enter the United States to satisfy their monetary claims to property and services. All this "illegal alien" non-sense is misplaced trust and bad faith likely advertised by debtors beligerant to the claims of the people approaching the United States as a last resort. If anyone didn't want another man or person to enter the United States (by currency), then do not contract them. No law may be passed to void a claim or counterfeit securities (fractional reserve banking) from the claimant.
I'ld like to hear a protester answer to their claim on any of the several states to the united States of America. A suitor or claimant would not be protesting. A claim as to "pregnancy", "concussion", or "disease" has nothing to do with the state and offices of public trust within; that's why there is a corporation counterfeiting legislation and squatting so-aptly nom'd "STATE OF CALIFORNIA." If I had a concussion, I would be asked as to trust a person in that state to hold the property on my behalf until I could exercise that capacity -- but all the offices are vacant when there is no oath and bond, and all that sits is the body-corporate side of the Law of Nations.
Why human rights instead of man rights? The more I study to find the etymological foundation of "human", the more evidence is shown that a "human" is a: slave, sailor, sea monster, et al.
1. Belonging to man or mankind; pertaining or relating to the race of man; as a human voice; human shape; human nature; human knowledge; human life.
2. Having the qualities of a man.
3. Profane; not sacred or divine; as a human author. [Not in use.]
For me to refer to a man as a "human", by it is bearing false-witness that their ways are not regenerate, is ill will on the declarent. Etymologically, "human" is the root of "hue" or of colorable element in the diffraction of one's character; and by "man" would mean the marriage of male and female of a creature as supposed in one of those "Bible" things. Evidence in this is how the plural form to "human" is cononcted; some say "humen", while others say "humans". As well, can there be a woman/women apply for human rights? None want to admit that "human" is a derogatory form being applied by colorable consent and protesting. A cow is qualified as a human more than a man.
I put the NES and controllers high-up on a shelf, and left a note saying;
"Anyone wanting to play with this NES and its controllers may do so whenever they like, but will be impaled if they try to steal it."
They just played and didn't think anything of it. Instead of taking the NES Castlevania cartridge without permission, someone did took the golden Zelda-1 NES cartridge. When it was returned, it had been jarred in such a way to cause a peice of plastic to unfix inside the cartridge and rattle. I have still not caught-up with them, given they moved to another town before I could impale them.
The Book is published by No Starch Press, and is available from them for USD ~39 or one can be purchased at the bargain bin for USD ~5 or from eBay for USD 0.99. Covers all topics from modern Video and Sound and Network libraries in application development, and applied to entertainment purposes (which we all know is just a bend from business programming).
The author died recently (9th Month of 2005), and his page is still heldhttp://overcode.yak.net/. To summarize his death, a new and unusual Mole formed on his shoulder and within a Year it spread cancer throughout his body and lymphnodes. He was dead in a Year! He was a great man that I participated with in the forums at LINUXGAMES.COM. His book is a good reference, but is since depricated by the slowling changing APIs. John is an ex-employee of when LOKI was in business.
Those doctors made his last Year of life a living hell with all the medication they gave him. Remember folks: Vitamin-C suffocates cancer; therefore, avoid the consumption foods and drinks known to deplete Vitam-C such as Alcohol-tainted water and animal-flesh and most medication (like Aspirin).
My/our brother is an active tank "driver". He's already made a few "hits" to his credit, and is recently waiting in Kuwait. What makes you think someone will waste their ammunition at a tank? In times of struggle, ammunition is the cornerstone of survival that is to be preserved more than anything else. It's the most important of the 3-B's; among Beans and Band-aids. A Mine is the measurable remedy to cause the most damage in the smallest area; such precision to cause a tank to de-tract its gear and tread. An anti-tank Mine is nothing like an ant-personell Mine. As well, a steep pit is just as effective as a Mine. I'm thinking of our brother all the time, but I'm also thinking of the brothers I've not yet met. There is no war declared, and it's not about oil because there is evidence as to an abunance of oil in Alask at Gull Island. To the merit of oil, I think it was a psy-ops rumor began by the CIA to give the perception of Oil; when in fact it isn't the Oil that is inflating in value, but the United States dollar/federal is losing value.
You haven't referenced your participation in an armed resolution over the mis-management of your property or effects coerced into another ministry, so I find no value in your claim that a gun is useless. Revolutions aren't limited to one tool: so get out your toolbox and sift through the applications of free energy, wit, love, charity, diligence, and non-dependance.
In my point of view, the moment deception is utilized then I find no merit in anyone. How can you trust someone constantly using deception to non-deceptively declare peace? George Washington had been the first example of someone that held the American people under the war powers of the United States to fatigue the claim of displaced Brittains not loyal to the Crown and the United States.
You confused Al-Quaeda (a CIA-created artificial-entity of paranoia and deception) to the Taliban. Don't accuse someone of knowing verry little, when the same amount of words can reference evidence to support your determination. I know for a fact that CIA had agents that were trained in the dark arts of espionage and torture, and that "Al-Quaida" was nothing more than a code-word for their CIA operation. The Taliban is de jure -- they are supported by the people in Afghanistan, not Al-Quaeda. None have found or seen any rogue agents (known as Al-Quaeda), and have used that ghost imagery only to move about with military force to unjustly seize and search private property in foreign countries that are at peace. Securities fraud! All your, other than the above emphasis, am I witness to its fact with the exception of knowing that there are three entities in force -- the united States (plural in the 1776 Declaration), from the United States of America (in the Articles of Confederation), not the United states evinced as body corporate in the 1871 Abraham Linoln re-organizations, to "United States" a 1933 corporation of District of Columbia bankrupted in 1933 (Title 27, section 3002 15b, where 'United States' means a federal corporation); all these capacities are fluid within Admiralty jurisdiction and Equity, yet there is lack of the de jure presence in the common law...so its all de facto to this day. Foreign Agents. They can't write your name, so they create an alter-ego corporate Trust to perpresture the illusion of jurisdiction and venue, and none comprehend that the fiction was created by the first birth-certificate/bank-note issued at the County and inducted to the corporate State's draft of a "Certificate of Live Birth" to the upper-case STRAWMAN. Who am I from a You?
You must be young, an idealist, or both...The military never overthrows a government, even if the commands given it might be illegal or immoral (the rule usually is: obey or be shot). Just go read a history book on that one.
Indeed, you should pick up a book, too. Obviously enough, it is young idealist army officers who usually instigate a coup.
Look at Turkey -- the military has overthrown the government at least 3 times in the last 50 years, always to restore the ideals the current nation was founded on. Anytime the government comes too directly under the sway of religious zealots, the military steps in and restores secular democracy, to widespread popular support. The Army is in fact the most trusted arm of government, and as such it attracts many of the best and brightest idealists who are proud of their responsibility.
What is particularly amusing is that you chastize the original poster for being such a silly young idealist, then go on to declare governments are filled only with conniving assholes, but nowhere do you seem to recognize that it is only by pointlessly shitting on idealism and hope that people become conniving assholes. Physician, heal thyself.
You both are liars. The Government is voluntary in its inception, and the remedy is en-forced by people that took an oath and are bonded to apply that governance to the trusted matter that was volunteered for its minister. To vote is rebellious activity, reserved to all male rebels in the pseudo-13th amendment asserted by Abraham Linoln. That's why all "Crime" is derived from Contracts that are devoid of Law; Crime is under the trustee instituted by government, a public trust. There is another government, construed as "Government", is a private trust established by VOTE. Why do you suppose that "State of California" competes with that "California Republic" to hold offices of public trust in California? Perform a checksum on those entities with the state known as California, and you'll discover two feuding nations; the "United States" feuds with the Republic having the birth-right. By defenition, the people are reserved where to grant persons and properties to be governed. What do you do when 3/4 of the people want democracy within a republic that by-defenition allows that to occur by preservation of the republic?
The Army isn't a trust of government; it's an unlawful band of men that assume among their powers the attraction to a foreign foe. Army is to be used only when the Authority has been exausted, not because they dislike the asshole of the century. In America, the people are the militia and they don't accept benefit (with attachment to disability) of funding other than donations. Army is in the criminal/military jurisdiction, with Bank One and Citibank.
I *know* that a small serving of an organically-grown red onion, ginger root, and a half-cup of non-alcoholic red wine is the natural remedy to deter blood clotts. There is also another supplement, but the file eludes me to this day on the archive. While travelling on a high-passenger land or air bus, the reality of Tuberculosis spreading throughout the plane is much higher danger than a blood clot. It's in likeness of asking if someone wants to live a tortured life(tuberculosis) or not at all (blood clott). I'm one of "those men" that would rather be thrown from the car, other than wear a seatbelt and live after being mutilated by a flying four-wheeled "accordion."
Aspirin, like alcoholic drinks and animal meat, causes the body to lose its Vitamin-C content; thereby the immune system is to a lower bar of microbiological sickness that challenges it. Yet, it depends on what variation of sickness one needs to avoid in the environment, because a high blood-alcohol content prevents most bacterial and fungal diseases from living on the host. On the other hand, allowing the body to have a high Vitamin-C content prevents a virus-function of injecting DNA-matter into a cell (for commandeering the cell to replicate the virus matter). We're somwhat at a junction to what we want to avoid, when in densly populated areas where the people interact. To fortifty against Virus, or Microbial?
I've been a ham for 35 years now. (Damn, I'm an old fart.) I'm still active, and am looking seriously at the Icom D-Star networked digital radio technology as the next big thing.
Get the ticket. There's a lot out there....de K5ZC
Greetings holder of Jay Maynard.
What say you on the FCC using threat and duress and coercion to compel the people into a contract for their copyright SIGN and private patent of Codified Regulations?
Channel 21, until you fatass pig-eating hams get your corporate thighs back into District of Columbia where you all belong./s/ MUNDT
The old analog Cell Phones were able to be hacked to use as a low-power two-way duplex tranceiver that didn't use the cell tower. Near the band (at that time) was the Amateur Radio jockeys.
The modern Cell Phones are all digitall and encrypted, so perhaps we'll see a revival of two-way line of sight communication that also features some encryption of a sort. All the news today is about some people getting pre-paid phone service, and then discovering that the pre-paid metre is logged locally on the Cell Phone with proven success to demurr that count.
I've used Water Electrolysis for a a couple years
on
Bacteria As Fuel Cells?
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
Organic fuel is not complex life-forms. Why use all those other heavier elements and compounds, when the laws of physics can compensate a higher yield of energy at the zero-point between Hydrogen and Oxygen? Prior implementation of Hydrogen and Oxygen combustion would use incorrect principles to derive from the electrolysis process on water. Even so, there are good results of applying electrolysis on any octane Gasoline fuel from the corporate Pump. My experiments and implementation was found that a large value of high-voltage electrolysis in a verry small amount of amerage (current) would yield more hydrogen and oxygen than the junk experimenters. The efficiency is quite good, and the hydrogen once injected and discharged in an Internal Combustion Engine would yield excellent mass that would then return to water once exposed to the atmosphere; from this, there is more energy given from the process and the combustion causing the process, and it naturally returns back to water whereby it is re-cycled to a separate reservoir waiting to switch from the prior pressurized cannister. I've run this in an Briggs Stratton "edger" motor, and have a greater assembly where implements to convert enough energy to provide good power to a Washing Machine Motor on a Drag-Trike that I run.
The only example of the process that I can disclose, is available at Google Video (a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-333 3992194168790800&q=Water+Car+Inventor">here) of an Inventor that was murdered way back when he too perfected his patents on this technology. There is prior art that the concept can't be patented, because it is natural to occurr on side-walks and hot roof-tops. The first industrialized nation that is known to try electrolysis on its fuels is the Nazi's german Army; they was mixing the cleaner-burning lighter-gases with their refined fuel, and eventualy started using less of their fuels entirely. A recent example of an incomplete process would be how "truckers" are installing hydrogen-kits on their Diesel trucks, to find that it increases the efficiency by an average of 30%. No matter the efficiency, farmers still can't afford to plant crop or raise cattle at such high cost of fuel, and there is a planned strike in the Year of Our Lord 2007 that will be a food shortage.
Also of note, Gasoline is still 35-cents per gallon where I live -- It's just measured in 35-cents lawful money (big-D "Dollars") of the United States as gold or silver, not the inflated UNITED STATES dollars (little-d "dollars") of fiat currency (debt notes) manufactured by a corporation named FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. When the prices at the pump appear to be too expensive, the truth is the fiat currency has simply lost its value because that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM has recently injected 2-trillion of its idollars and has an agreement with its sister-corporation DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY to not report the M3 money-supply (circulation).
FSF should have arrived, with supporters, all dressed as Microsoft exhibitors. The more knowledgable they are about Microsoft technology, would be the more untrollish their arguments could be. Just by arriving at an event to protest is an absolute example of what will be avoided. After all, the people that attent such events are there because their minds were already convinced and the expensive preparations were completed for their appearance.
The recent deploy of IMPROVEEVERYWHERE was at Best Buy (woof).
So, you went on vacation in Florida and saw a reef once, did you?
federal law requires swimmers to wear flotation jackets when nearby to avoid contact.
That applies only with the Nation Park reef. The federal law exists only in time of war, and then its agencies are not allowed to appear outside District of Columbia. District of Columbia is in perpetual war; hence their agencies use misleading postal-trademarks, where the private code (letter Improvement/Zone Improvement Plan) evidences their jurisdiction extende with using their embassy in the nearest Station for USPS to make their transmittals. Also, National Parks are corporate; ask any Floridian and they'll say the reef is local.
It takes 30,000 years to grow 1 cubic inch of coral
That is utter rubbish. Reefs can grow anywhere from a few millimeters to several centimeters(or inches) per year! It depends on light, temperature, species, environmental pressures and more. But, it's a hell of a lot faster than you think. There you go. Most people forget that all reefs are the event of jelly-fish constantly budding/reproducing and taking root. Among the lesser matter is various structure forme by "worm" and "molusk" among them, but is pale in comparison to jelly-fish activity. Calcium deposits...
mistreatment of the reefs around Florida (1960s dynamite fishing, jewelry harvesting, etc.) has made it so that the reef off of the Florida Keys is the last living coral reef in the region.
Where else do you think they would be? Where else in North America have they existed in modern times? Take a look at the lattitude of the United States and of Florida. Coorelate the lattitude with the water temperatures. Where else in the U.S. do you think coral might be able to grow but, doesn't? Ever been in the Caribbean where it's warmer than the Florida Keys?
Don't be dissing dynamite fishing either! You've never tried it and since you don;t have any of the other facts right, I don't think your qualified to judge on the matter. I heard that the recent annoyance among the reafs is drifting trash. The trash will drift into in the gulf streams, congregate, and form huge flotsam islands; the islands will eventullly become so deep and wide that they exit the gulf streams and collide into the reefs. The popular trash that doesn't decompose quickly are latex, hence there are many islands of gloves and condoms out there...congregating...and migrating. Can dynamite do that? I think naught!
Isn't is a bit disturbing that the government files patents to prevent us from using stuff that we paid them to invent?
We don't need to ask misleading questions when it has already been defined; the difference between a body politic from a body corporate is evinced in the Law of Nations. Where we begin is the first book, which clearly details that "A NATION or a state is, as has been said at the beginning of this work, a body politic, or a society of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by their combined strength." If anyone could comprehend that the people are inducted into a state known as "California", where is prohibited a state within a state yet a foreign CONGRESS libel the people/state "California" to be nothing more than territory in its records -- and CONGRESS creates a state simply called "State" within the verry territory that it libeled. "State" of California is the feud of CONGRESS, whereas California is a state, yet "The State of California" is a corporation. Doesn't that sound fishy? In the "Bill of Rights" at the 10th Ammendment, it determined a federal State that allowed the people/organic-state to induct into the federal State; insofar as acknowledging the several states/people are "respectively" preeminent to the federal State.
"Department of Energy" is a corporation chartered from Washington's District of Columbia. It is corporate, not politic; meaning its agents are idolaters trying to coerce politic into their private trust.
Government is a "public trust", not a private trust as evinced by that DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.
When an agent of a corporation conducts negotiation, it presumes a corporation with the same name to subject the politic, but the politic is layed dormant by its name being inducted for that verry name of the corporation. Securities necessary for inducting the trust between the politic and the government "public trust" are secured by credit as a bank note titled "Certificate of Birth" and the private trust is secured by debt as a bank note titled "Certificate of Live Birth" with the entity in all-upper-case letters "JOHN QUINCY DOE" Show a colorable Name for a person that isn't to a aaman (politic: human, woman, german, roman, etc), and by that truth is it proved nothing more than a corporation.
...that you post this in a discussion on mental illness...
Lyme disease causes a moment of mental illness, though competancy returns when the host is cleansed or subsides dormant for its cycle in the host.
Also of note, Plum Island (where both Labs 257 and the other are situated) is in the direct path of where tropical storms and hurricanes have move upon. Plum Island was improperly abandoned no less than in 5 hurricanes, causing untreated weapons-grade bacteria and virus to spread into the entire area as far as Pennsylvania to Nova Scotia.
In America, Lyme disease is spreading at a quicker rate and with greater infection than Tuberculosis and AIDS/HIV. There is more warning to AIDS/HIV and Killer Bees than there is of Lyme disease.
A visit to a hospital is no different than entering a museum.
I read Lab 257, and having prior knowledge of the origin of Lyme disease, discovered it is more dangerous and is spreading quicker than HIV/AIDS. The Nazi scientists were the ones that caused and founded a symbiotic relationship between the bacterian and Ticks(blood-sucking insects). The Nazi's controlled the German Army, and directed their airplanes to fly above their enemies on enemy-controlled areas to spray infect-ticks all over the troops and their horses. As the war went, on an average of two weeks of an infected host, the disease would cause at-least damaging of the joints to bones and nausea, then would clear for a month or two, then return.
The book "Lab 257" documents how that UNITED STATES was lenient to the Nazi Scientists if they brought their research and moved (with family) to America. They setup shop on a "Plum Island", a few miles near Long Island in New York. The Nazi Scients were cloaked under "Project Paperclip", and continued the same experiments in germ warfare as were done in Germany and Austria. The experiments were open-air on the island, on mostly cows and pigs and sheep, where hundres were "experimented" upon in such vile ways; the sewage from animal waste was treated and "pumped" into the open ocean in the channel, and corpses were disposed by an incinerator. Many times were there power-outage on the island, causing the sewage to overflow into the ocean as raw untreated matter; this was the cause of the Lobster-farms and many more commercially-raised and wild fish to die off.
Going back to the open-air experiments; it was sad to disclose that hundreds of species of migratory birds visited that island in their migration pattern. Following back to the experiments, the island was abandoned and returned to operation many times over 50 years between the Department of Agriculture and the US Army. The infected ticks were exposed and allowed to enter the wild premise unhindered, and following the migration pattern of the Canadian Geese would expose the actual path of Lyme moving throuout the entire area. It is also relevant that the Scientists were the cause of the Texas tick to spread beyond Texas (by bird). Lab 257 wasn't limited to just infecting ticks...there was another (sister) lab, "Lab 241" if I remember correctly. Between the two labs, there was Anthrax enrichment and many more experiments to form symbiotic relationships and delivery methods on Mosquitoes with you-know-what.
The significance of Lab 257 and its fellow lab was that it was the first installment of a closed-air circulation system, and the first example of the Pride of unrepentant men to screw everything up in the name of germ warfare. Just because the Department of Agriculture took control of the island for its side of experiments on animals doesn't prevail they weren't just hiding the same experiments under the name of Agriculture. So many times were there outbreaks of unknown illness in New York City, New York, and throughout the whole damn area -- and it was not disclosed because it was perhaps all part of the experiments.
If you hold that attitude, you'll grow a little older every day; opposed to growing up, and having vigilant youth in the law.
There was nothing wrong with my surrounding Sites. Code is not authority; authority is inducted into the code by a body politic. Within context of the counterfeit reality, or "virtual land", then would avail a landing derived without law; hence the different use between Site and a site, Cite from a cite. To buy "virtual land" as advertised, would be to accept a fiction derived of a code (fiction). And same, the corporation that was conferred the code by an Authority, is not politic to move about and Grant from specification that were neither a charter for it to grant and neither an office inherint but by the politic that chartered the corporation. Corporations are to provide no other service, but what it holds in deed on behalf of a party vested with a security interest (usually known as a Secured Party, or Creditor) and for limited liability.
Compare Site (as I intended) with Cite (as you intended); further, when the Law in the united States of America was parallel with the modern American english dictionary at the time, then it is standard to apply English Common Law known and evinced in the private patent "Uniform Commercial Code"; therefore, quote Webster's 1828 Dictionary because it is not private, and good standing in public domain...
Site, n. [L. silus];
1. Situation; local position; as the site of a city or of a house.
2. A seat or ground-plot; as a mill-site. But we usually say, mill-seat, by which we understand the place where a mill stands, or a place convenient for a mill.
3. The posture of a thing with respect of itself. The semblance of a lover fix'd in melancholy site. [This is improper.]
Cite, v.t.;
1. To call upon officially, or authoritatively; to summon; to give legal or official notice, as to a defendant to appear in court, to answer or defend.
2. To enjoin; to direct; to summon; to order or urge.
3. To quote; to name or repeat, as a passage or the words of another, either from a book or from verbal communication; as, to cite a passage from scripture, or to cite the very words a man utters.
4. To call or name, in support, proof or confirmation; as, to cite an authority to prove a point in law.
Not true, a lawyer will represent your claims, as long as he can ethically do so. The arguement can atleast be made ethically that wrong "COULD" have been done. The lawyer would not deny to take a case of this sort base on ethical grounds atleast. Money would be the major factor, but as long as you are willing to pony up cash upfront, many lawyers will take the case.
I am a lawyer, but this isn't legal advice.
In this case, there pretty clearly isn't a contract with offer and acceptance. The offer is made when the land is actually put up for auction *by the seller*.
The case is a clear enough loser (and a good example of the "fool for a client" principle) that the only way that a lawyer *could* take it would be in a "good faith effort to *change* the law."
hawk, esq.
The advice you gave is legal device, not lawful advice. You are an active attorney, and have not referenced a prior contract or Writ by which someone has accepted your offer to hold a tournament for a counterfeit reality and counterfeit currency. Your reservation in this forum, to the conflict in your interests with His, is the titular reservation of "esquire" to your Slashdot person.
Sites for a foreign court deciding matters without assignment of the owner of the Intellectual Property:
"Either buyer or seller may..."with the consent of the other sue for the benefit of whom it may concern." U.C.C. 2722(c).
Absent agreement, suit may be brought by the party who has title to, or a security interest, a special property or an insurable interest in the goods. If the goods have been destroyed or converted "a right of action is also in the party who either bore the risk of loss under the contract for sale or has since the injury assumed that risk as against the other." U.C.C. 2722(a).
The presumed Contractual agreement, often mis-titled as a "license", only confers Images and Private codified Law of Intellectual Property onto an owner; the interaction between that owner and a counterfeit and artificial person inducting of Him is a matter to be remedied by a psychiatrist.
Site:
"A person taking goods by any form of purchase aquires all title that his transferor had or had power to tansfer." U.C.C. 2403(1).
Nothing for sale, and is rented. Even Slashdot is for rent, and is disputable for anyone reserving their rights to allow Slashdot to retain Intellectual Property (even false Intelect).
Site:
"'purchase' includes any voluntary transaction creating a property interest, such as taking by sale, discount, negotiation, mortgage, pledge, lien, issue or reissue, or gift." U.C.C. 1201(32)
We both know that such craft is constructed on the premise of War; there is not one voluntary transaction in the entire theatre; all the artificial persons involved have pre-arrainged story and script that is devoid of law other than the verry substrate of semiconductor used to present the illusion of reality.
As the title of this post provides, there is no document of title or title itself conferred in a non-existant Bill of Lading; neither is there is an interested system of accounts, neither is their a presentable lien of the origin of said IP to move the IP to a steward with fee simple rights. It's all stuck in a sandbox, commercial speach and transmitting utilities, and for any man-made Court to hear such in such person as the artifice inquired then would evince that Court is artifice itself and I humbly present the signature of Gregory Thomas(tm) as to dba.
Your concern to genetically-modified (and patented) varieties of crop is a legitimate concern -- intellectual property can travel by wind and "taint" a neighbors substrate, causing a tournament for the forced subjection to a foreign private law. Recently as of February of 2006, CONGRESS was receiving a Bill from that HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES as H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act." Despite the misleading title of the Bill, among the content was that whomever bought any food were not allowed to know of certain ingredients or qualities on its nature.
How this all sets is, as of recently, it is a known fact that "Aspartame" causes cancer; its an artificial sweetener in many beverages, mostly in them branded as diet drinks. Another recent discovery is at microwave-popcorn factories, where everyone working among the "artificial butter flavoring" had all caught severe allergies and atrocious lung cancers. It was such a dangerous cancer that the remedy for one worker was a lung transplant! The chemical that caused the damage is "Diacetyl" and also is used in various brew of beer and who knows what else.
That Bill would allow those corporations to simply use any ingredient, method, or application of artifice to provide an incomplete and misleading report to the Contents of all packages lading the product assembled of them. It's no different than postal fraud, when someone intentionally mis-presents the contents of a parcel, where harm can be incurred by the worker that moves said parcel (even from grocery store to their domicile and house). I don't drink diet beverages, but I know some people that do. Nearby me is a box of microwave-popcorn, where on the Contents is no list for the ingredients of the artificial "light butter"; there is information on oiled popcorn kernels, but nothing on the butte flavoring -- into the trash it will all go.
If there ever was false advertising for a product, the above Bill would only try to seal someone's prior and future effort at fraud; brought from the end of genetically-engineered and patent crap and into the lives of people.
oh no! I found this PrionPlanet.com article, therefore there shouldn't be anything to worry about this Bill or aritificial butter flavouring. Keep grazing the grocery aisles, and take your monthly shots (money-pill/vaccine shots)
If the people could comprehend the difference between a man and a person, then all the privacy problems would be solved.
First, trademark the name. Second, respond only in matters of interest -- by contract, not to adhere to codes and related private law patented subject matter. Third, the law of trust.
Every server today wants a "name" to a trusted "resident." As defined in law dictionaries, a "resident" is a "thing known" and by subject matter that "thing known" is in dispute by a prior contract to discharge of its account. In terms of services that have no cost for registration, it would prevail that the people move their person to contribute intellectual property that may discharge the want of funding. Such is the inherint case with SLASHDOT, whereby most people contribute good information and bring such a good content that registration is acknowledge to discharge by good contribution; or show a quo-warranto where the matter does stray from a journalist bringing "news" and dialogue to trade.
As well, it would seem that a "person" is defined in the 14th century french (its first occurrence) as "a mask worn from time to time." Thereby, "isometrick" is as much a person as "nradude." Even so, there is a person shared as "Anonymous Coward." In terms of protecting one's privacy, it is acknowledged that a certain name is capable of copyright by determination of trade value. For distinguishing among others of similar patent, it is advisable that a trademark known to an account of a certain day of a month of a year would prevail that there are many of similar name and trademark but each is an separate and independent interest.
Consider that there should be allowed many accounts to a single person on Slashdot, as distinguished by port and time of entry by landing rights. If there were an infinite number of Gregory Thomas(tm) born April 20, then they would surely be not the same instance of 420 but precisely different measurement of time. Why would not the time of registration of a Slashdot account be any different? Slashdot records the personable name to the account, the account number is deed and unique by its own, yet Slashdot doesn't allow same name?
"Anonymous Coward" is just the example, yet it appears there is one public without and one private reserved within. If everything was a correct world, then it would not be difficult to determine (by accounting) the CowboyNeal from fellow CowboyNeal.
Also, on the driver license or related applicatiosn that demand a SIGNATURE (only signature, not "sign"), it is good to "DBA" the name and acknowledge the true name as the trademark. As in my examples above, "Gregory Thomas" is a trademark of the Mundt family; contracts are meeting of the minds, not meetings of the flesh (think bacteria, or fungus, or virus reasoning with cell structure);
In matters of law, most trusts are derived from the tradename of a child, and the trusts are assumed and therefore coerced because their nature is unlawfully negotiated without a sound mind or "unconcionable contract." For those, just dissolve the trust at signature as would determine on the Face of the private trust matter (advertisements on behalf of the trademarked name):
(at a private intstitution, such as that DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES) with Power of Attorney over "Gregory Thomas Mundt"; Gregory Thomas dba GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT
Notice how the above only abates the 14th amendment origin from the trademark; government is a public trust, not a private matter. Any registration is to lay dormant one's property, wherever derived from their legislative and judicial and executive ability, and be endowed with benefits from another. Administrators of Slashdot are no different than executives, but they are voluntarily in this respect and verry much honourable.
Who modded that up? I can barely break +1 on the moderation scale, and someone modded that up without confirming facts.
There are available pictures of the PS3 development kit on HOME.BTCONNECT.COM. There is an article with a strategic view of the PS3 development kit on WWW.TECHEBLOG.COM. Yet, there has been no price shown. For under USD 2000, one could just buy some Dell PC's and cluster them for a better solution to anything Sony could pull out of its proprietary mind. Why stop at USD 16000000? I say the development kit could be as much as Sony is worth. I'm impressed Sony is advertising PS3 as a Linux solution bending to an 100% open-source environment, yet at the same time BOUGHT its solution from Microsoft--nope, not surprised. If I'm uptodate on my studies in gray-area politics and economics, two competitors can build their products for eachothers benefit to prevent use of their IP (think Blu-Ray) while competing like dogs in a market.
For conclusion to the matter above; The PS3 Development kit WIKIPEDIA article yiels that Sony purchased technology from Microsoft that would provide access to GNU development tools on the Playstation 3! (I kid you naught!) And within that article, the Playstation 3 is not limited to a game console but a complete multimedia entertainment center -- this would propose it not to be a shabby little game device like the competing Nintendo Wiivolution and Microsoft XBOX.
The sad truth is, that I and many others may only buy a controller of a certain gaming system, and just theme the desktop chassis of our computer and theme the visual presentation through an X or DirectFB solution to "have it better than the real thing" while we run an emulator.
Sony and Microsoft have been turds since they ever started competing, no exceptions. Nintendo appears to be an honest venture, having evinced to not choose any intellectual properties that conflict with their customers' and stockholders' interests and securities.
Anyone asking me for a suggestion; I recommend they choose the lesser of two Wiivels...
Slashdot Mirror
Why are you writing Checks for services not bonded and oathed?
All the borders and its personell are commercial avenues for the transport of cargo and passengers by hired persons. A man can't be coerced to contract their services. Accordingly to tort, a man can walk wherever he may except when hindered by the land-owners exercising their claim on the land without tresspass to uninterested people. There is a difference between drug-trafickers dodging the search and seizure at a commercial port, as opposed to honest people striding through the desert paths to redeem their claim of bank-notes or title to services checked to their favor. If anyone is in posession to currency of the United States -- they have the right to enter the United States to satisfy their monetary claims to property and services. All this "illegal alien" non-sense is misplaced trust and bad faith likely advertised by debtors beligerant to the claims of the people approaching the United States as a last resort. If anyone didn't want another man or person to enter the United States (by currency), then do not contract them. No law may be passed to void a claim or counterfeit securities (fractional reserve banking) from the claimant.
I'ld like to hear a protester answer to their claim on any of the several states to the united States of America. A suitor or claimant would not be protesting. A claim as to "pregnancy", "concussion", or "disease" has nothing to do with the state and offices of public trust within; that's why there is a corporation counterfeiting legislation and squatting so-aptly nom'd "STATE OF CALIFORNIA." If I had a concussion, I would be asked as to trust a person in that state to hold the property on my behalf until I could exercise that capacity -- but all the offices are vacant when there is no oath and bond, and all that sits is the body-corporate side of the Law of Nations.
HU'MAN, a. [L. humanus; Heb. form, species.]
For me to refer to a man as a "human", by it is bearing false-witness that their ways are not regenerate, is ill will on the declarent. Etymologically, "human" is the root of "hue" or of colorable element in the diffraction of one's character; and by "man" would mean the marriage of male and female of a creature as supposed in one of those "Bible" things. Evidence in this is how the plural form to "human" is cononcted; some say "humen", while others say "humans". As well, can there be a woman/women apply for human rights? None want to admit that "human" is a derogatory form being applied by colorable consent and protesting. A cow is qualified as a human more than a man.
I put the NES and controllers high-up on a shelf, and left a note saying;
"Anyone wanting to play with this NES and its controllers may do so whenever they like, but will be impaled if they try to steal it."
They just played and didn't think anything of it. Instead of taking the NES Castlevania cartridge without permission, someone did took the golden Zelda-1 NES cartridge. When it was returned, it had been jarred in such a way to cause a peice of plastic to unfix inside the cartridge and rattle. I have still not caught-up with them, given they moved to another town before I could impale them.
The video is here.
Favorite lines are...
Fighter1: I came for a new life.
Fighter2: I make and sell soap.
Fighter1: Thanks - my life has meaning now.
I found the video scene on this Google cache.
The Book is published by No Starch Press, and is available from them for USD ~39 or one can be purchased at the bargain bin for USD ~5 or from eBay for USD 0.99. Covers all topics from modern Video and Sound and Network libraries in application development, and applied to entertainment purposes (which we all know is just a bend from business programming).
The author died recently (9th Month of 2005), and his page is still heldhttp://overcode.yak.net/. To summarize his death, a new and unusual Mole formed on his shoulder and within a Year it spread cancer throughout his body and lymphnodes. He was dead in a Year! He was a great man that I participated with in the forums at LINUXGAMES.COM. His book is a good reference, but is since depricated by the slowling changing APIs. John is an ex-employee of when LOKI was in business.
Those doctors made his last Year of life a living hell with all the medication they gave him. Remember folks: Vitamin-C suffocates cancer; therefore, avoid the consumption foods and drinks known to deplete Vitam-C such as Alcohol-tainted water and animal-flesh and most medication (like Aspirin).
...that simply held its soil over time.
My/our brother is an active tank "driver". He's already made a few "hits" to his credit, and is recently waiting in Kuwait. What makes you think someone will waste their ammunition at a tank? In times of struggle, ammunition is the cornerstone of survival that is to be preserved more than anything else. It's the most important of the 3-B's; among Beans and Band-aids. A Mine is the measurable remedy to cause the most damage in the smallest area; such precision to cause a tank to de-tract its gear and tread. An anti-tank Mine is nothing like an ant-personell Mine. As well, a steep pit is just as effective as a Mine. I'm thinking of our brother all the time, but I'm also thinking of the brothers I've not yet met. There is no war declared, and it's not about oil because there is evidence as to an abunance of oil in Alask at Gull Island. To the merit of oil, I think it was a psy-ops rumor began by the CIA to give the perception of Oil; when in fact it isn't the Oil that is inflating in value, but the United States dollar/federal is losing value.
You haven't referenced your participation in an armed resolution over the mis-management of your property or effects coerced into another ministry, so I find no value in your claim that a gun is useless. Revolutions aren't limited to one tool: so get out your toolbox and sift through the applications of free energy, wit, love, charity, diligence, and non-dependance.
In my point of view, the moment deception is utilized then I find no merit in anyone. How can you trust someone constantly using deception to non-deceptively declare peace? George Washington had been the first example of someone that held the American people under the war powers of the United States to fatigue the claim of displaced Brittains not loyal to the Crown and the United States.
You confused Al-Quaeda (a CIA-created artificial-entity of paranoia and deception) to the Taliban. Don't accuse someone of knowing verry little, when the same amount of words can reference evidence to support your determination. I know for a fact that CIA had agents that were trained in the dark arts of espionage and torture, and that "Al-Quaida" was nothing more than a code-word for their CIA operation. The Taliban is de jure -- they are supported by the people in Afghanistan, not Al-Quaeda. None have found or seen any rogue agents (known as Al-Quaeda), and have used that ghost imagery only to move about with military force to unjustly seize and search private property in foreign countries that are at peace. Securities fraud! All your, other than the above emphasis, am I witness to its fact with the exception of knowing that there are three entities in force -- the united States (plural in the 1776 Declaration), from the United States of America (in the Articles of Confederation), not the United states evinced as body corporate in the 1871 Abraham Linoln re-organizations, to "United States" a 1933 corporation of District of Columbia bankrupted in 1933 (Title 27, section 3002 15b, where 'United States' means a federal corporation); all these capacities are fluid within Admiralty jurisdiction and Equity, yet there is lack of the de jure presence in the common law...so its all de facto to this day. Foreign Agents. They can't write your name, so they create an alter-ego corporate Trust to perpresture the illusion of jurisdiction and venue, and none comprehend that the fiction was created by the first birth-certificate/bank-note issued at the County and inducted to the corporate State's draft of a "Certificate of Live Birth" to the upper-case STRAWMAN. Who am I from a You?
Indeed, you should pick up a book, too. Obviously enough, it is young idealist army officers who usually instigate a coup.
Look at Turkey -- the military has overthrown the government at least 3 times in the last 50 years, always to restore the ideals the current nation was founded on. Anytime the government comes too directly under the sway of religious zealots, the military steps in and restores secular democracy, to widespread popular support. The Army is in fact the most trusted arm of government, and as such it attracts many of the best and brightest idealists who are proud of their responsibility.
What is particularly amusing is that you chastize the original poster for being such a silly young idealist, then go on to declare governments are filled only with conniving assholes, but nowhere do you seem to recognize that it is only by pointlessly shitting on idealism and hope that people become conniving assholes. Physician, heal thyself.
You both are liars. The Government is voluntary in its inception, and the remedy is en-forced by people that took an oath and are bonded to apply that governance to the trusted matter that was volunteered for its minister. To vote is rebellious activity, reserved to all male rebels in the pseudo-13th amendment asserted by Abraham Linoln. That's why all "Crime" is derived from Contracts that are devoid of Law; Crime is under the trustee instituted by government, a public trust. There is another government, construed as "Government", is a private trust established by VOTE. Why do you suppose that "State of California" competes with that "California Republic" to hold offices of public trust in California? Perform a checksum on those entities with the state known as California, and you'll discover two feuding nations; the "United States" feuds with the Republic having the birth-right. By defenition, the people are reserved where to grant persons and properties to be governed. What do you do when 3/4 of the people want democracy within a republic that by-defenition allows that to occur by preservation of the republic?
The Army isn't a trust of government; it's an unlawful band of men that assume among their powers the attraction to a foreign foe. Army is to be used only when the Authority has been exausted, not because they dislike the asshole of the century. In America, the people are the militia and they don't accept benefit (with attachment to disability) of funding other than donations. Army is in the criminal/military jurisdiction, with Bank One and Citibank.
I *know* that a small serving of an organically-grown red onion, ginger root, and a half-cup of non-alcoholic red wine is the natural remedy to deter blood clotts. There is also another supplement, but the file eludes me to this day on the archive. While travelling on a high-passenger land or air bus, the reality of Tuberculosis spreading throughout the plane is much higher danger than a blood clot. It's in likeness of asking if someone wants to live a tortured life(tuberculosis) or not at all (blood clott). I'm one of "those men" that would rather be thrown from the car, other than wear a seatbelt and live after being mutilated by a flying four-wheeled "accordion."
Aspirin, like alcoholic drinks and animal meat, causes the body to lose its Vitamin-C content; thereby the immune system is to a lower bar of microbiological sickness that challenges it. Yet, it depends on what variation of sickness one needs to avoid in the environment, because a high blood-alcohol content prevents most bacterial and fungal diseases from living on the host. On the other hand, allowing the body to have a high Vitamin-C content prevents a virus-function of injecting DNA-matter into a cell (for commandeering the cell to replicate the virus matter). We're somwhat at a junction to what we want to avoid, when in densly populated areas where the people interact. To fortifty against Virus, or Microbial?
I've been a ham for 35 years now. (Damn, I'm an old fart.) I'm still active, and am looking seriously at the Icom D-Star networked digital radio technology as the next big thing.
...de K5ZC
/s/ MUNDT
Get the ticket. There's a lot out there.
Greetings holder of Jay Maynard.
What say you on the FCC using threat and duress and coercion to compel the people into a contract for their copyright SIGN and private patent of Codified Regulations?
Channel 21, until you fatass pig-eating hams get your corporate thighs back into District of Columbia where you all belong.
The old analog Cell Phones were able to be hacked to use as a low-power two-way duplex tranceiver that didn't use the cell tower. Near the band (at that time) was the Amateur Radio jockeys.
The modern Cell Phones are all digitall and encrypted, so perhaps we'll see a revival of two-way line of sight communication that also features some encryption of a sort. All the news today is about some people getting pre-paid phone service, and then discovering that the pre-paid metre is logged locally on the Cell Phone with proven success to demurr that count.
I can post a URL too: White Castle!
One hamburgher to rule them, one mole of transfatty acid to bind them, and one teaspon of secret sauce to make their stomach churn!
PS: Would you believe that smelly restaurant is accepting "comments" at their phone number "1800THECRAVE"? (heh)
Escherichia Coli are humble, trustworthy bacteria that eat my shit and make somthing of it.
A corporate-Politician today; they'd eat so-much shit long enough just to die after the moment to see where it was coming from.
I didn't use a close-html commane "/a", and still the Slashdot Code split the string enough to cause a maligned URL.
9 4168790800&q=Water+Car+Inventor
Here is the correct and complete URL http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-33339921
Organic fuel is not complex life-forms. Why use all those other heavier elements and compounds, when the laws of physics can compensate a higher yield of energy at the zero-point between Hydrogen and Oxygen? Prior implementation of Hydrogen and Oxygen combustion would use incorrect principles to derive from the electrolysis process on water. Even so, there are good results of applying electrolysis on any octane Gasoline fuel from the corporate Pump. My experiments and implementation was found that a large value of high-voltage electrolysis in a verry small amount of amerage (current) would yield more hydrogen and oxygen than the junk experimenters. The efficiency is quite good, and the hydrogen once injected and discharged in an Internal Combustion Engine would yield excellent mass that would then return to water once exposed to the atmosphere; from this, there is more energy given from the process and the combustion causing the process, and it naturally returns back to water whereby it is re-cycled to a separate reservoir waiting to switch from the prior pressurized cannister. I've run this in an Briggs Stratton "edger" motor, and have a greater assembly where implements to convert enough energy to provide good power to a Washing Machine Motor on a Drag-Trike that I run.
The only example of the process that I can disclose, is available at Google Video (a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-33
Also of note, Gasoline is still 35-cents per gallon where I live -- It's just measured in 35-cents lawful money (big-D "Dollars") of the United States as gold or silver, not the inflated UNITED STATES dollars (little-d "dollars") of fiat currency (debt notes) manufactured by a corporation named FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. When the prices at the pump appear to be too expensive, the truth is the fiat currency has simply lost its value because that FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM has recently injected 2-trillion of its idollars and has an agreement with its sister-corporation DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY to not report the M3 money-supply (circulation).
FSF should have arrived, with supporters, all dressed as Microsoft exhibitors. The more knowledgable they are about Microsoft technology, would be the more untrollish their arguments could be. Just by arriving at an event to protest is an absolute example of what will be avoided. After all, the people that attent such events are there because their minds were already convinced and the expensive preparations were completed for their appearance.
The recent deploy of IMPROVEEVERYWHERE was at Best Buy (woof).
So, you went on vacation in Florida and saw a reef once, did you?
That applies only with the Nation Park reef.
The federal law exists only in time of war, and then its agencies are not allowed to appear outside District of Columbia. District of Columbia is in perpetual war; hence their agencies use misleading postal-trademarks, where the private code (letter Improvement/Zone Improvement Plan) evidences their jurisdiction extende with using their embassy in the nearest Station for USPS to make their transmittals. Also, National Parks are corporate; ask any Floridian and they'll say the reef is local.
That is utter rubbish. Reefs can grow anywhere from a few millimeters to several centimeters(or inches) per year! It depends on light, temperature, species, environmental pressures and more. But, it's a hell of a lot faster than you think.
There you go. Most people forget that all reefs are the event of jelly-fish constantly budding/reproducing and taking root. Among the lesser matter is various structure forme by "worm" and "molusk" among them, but is pale in comparison to jelly-fish activity. Calcium deposits...
Where else do you think they would be? Where else in North America have they existed in modern times? Take a look at the lattitude of the United States and of Florida. Coorelate the lattitude with the water temperatures. Where else in the U.S. do you think coral might be able to grow but, doesn't? Ever been in the Caribbean where it's warmer than the Florida Keys?
Don't be dissing dynamite fishing either! You've never tried it and since you don;t have any of the other facts right, I don't think your qualified to judge on the matter.
I heard that the recent annoyance among the reafs is drifting trash. The trash will drift into in the gulf streams, congregate, and form huge flotsam islands; the islands will eventullly become so deep and wide that they exit the gulf streams and collide into the reefs. The popular trash that doesn't decompose quickly are latex, hence there are many islands of gloves and condoms out there...congregating...and migrating. Can dynamite do that? I think naught!
We don't need to ask misleading questions when it has already been defined; the difference between a body politic from a body corporate is evinced in the Law of Nations. Where we begin is the first book, which clearly details that "A NATION or a state is, as has been said at the beginning of this work, a body politic, or a society of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by their combined strength." If anyone could comprehend that the people are inducted into a state known as "California", where is prohibited a state within a state yet a foreign CONGRESS libel the people/state "California" to be nothing more than territory in its records -- and CONGRESS creates a state simply called "State" within the verry territory that it libeled. "State" of California is the feud of CONGRESS, whereas California is a state, yet "The State of California" is a corporation. Doesn't that sound fishy? In the "Bill of Rights" at the 10th Ammendment, it determined a federal State that allowed the people/organic-state to induct into the federal State; insofar as acknowledging the several states/people are "respectively" preeminent to the federal State.
"Department of Energy" is a corporation chartered from Washington's District of Columbia. It is corporate, not politic; meaning its agents are idolaters trying to coerce politic into their private trust.
Government is a "public trust", not a private trust as evinced by that DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.
[See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286(e)] lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived form the corporate charter.
When an agent of a corporation conducts negotiation, it presumes a corporation with the same name to subject the politic, but the politic is layed dormant by its name being inducted for that verry name of the corporation. Securities necessary for inducting the trust between the politic and the government "public trust" are secured by credit as a bank note titled "Certificate of Birth" and the private trust is secured by debt as a bank note titled "Certificate of Live Birth" with the entity in all-upper-case letters "JOHN QUINCY DOE"
Show a colorable Name for a person that isn't to a aaman (politic: human, woman, german, roman, etc), and by that truth is it proved nothing more than a corporation.
Lyme disease causes a moment of mental illness, though competancy returns when the host is cleansed or subsides dormant for its cycle in the host.
Also of note, Plum Island (where both Labs 257 and the other are situated) is in the direct path of where tropical storms and hurricanes have move upon. Plum Island was improperly abandoned no less than in 5 hurricanes, causing untreated weapons-grade bacteria and virus to spread into the entire area as far as Pennsylvania to Nova Scotia.
In America, Lyme disease is spreading at a quicker rate and with greater infection than Tuberculosis and AIDS/HIV. There is more warning to AIDS/HIV and Killer Bees than there is of Lyme disease.
A visit to a hospital is no different than entering a museum.
I read Lab 257, and having prior knowledge of the origin of Lyme disease, discovered it is more dangerous and is spreading quicker than HIV/AIDS. The Nazi scientists were the ones that caused and founded a symbiotic relationship between the bacterian and Ticks(blood-sucking insects). The Nazi's controlled the German Army, and directed their airplanes to fly above their enemies on enemy-controlled areas to spray infect-ticks all over the troops and their horses. As the war went, on an average of two weeks of an infected host, the disease would cause at-least damaging of the joints to bones and nausea, then would clear for a month or two, then return.
The book "Lab 257" documents how that UNITED STATES was lenient to the Nazi Scientists if they brought their research and moved (with family) to America. They setup shop on a "Plum Island", a few miles near Long Island in New York. The Nazi Scients were cloaked under "Project Paperclip", and continued the same experiments in germ warfare as were done in Germany and Austria. The experiments were open-air on the island, on mostly cows and pigs and sheep, where hundres were "experimented" upon in such vile ways; the sewage from animal waste was treated and "pumped" into the open ocean in the channel, and corpses were disposed by an incinerator. Many times were there power-outage on the island, causing the sewage to overflow into the ocean as raw untreated matter; this was the cause of the Lobster-farms and many more commercially-raised and wild fish to die off.
Going back to the open-air experiments; it was sad to disclose that hundreds of species of migratory birds visited that island in their migration pattern. Following back to the experiments, the island was abandoned and returned to operation many times over 50 years between the Department of Agriculture and the US Army. The infected ticks were exposed and allowed to enter the wild premise unhindered, and following the migration pattern of the Canadian Geese would expose the actual path of Lyme moving throuout the entire area. It is also relevant that the Scientists were the cause of the Texas tick to spread beyond Texas (by bird). Lab 257 wasn't limited to just infecting ticks...there was another (sister) lab, "Lab 241" if I remember correctly. Between the two labs, there was Anthrax enrichment and many more experiments to form symbiotic relationships and delivery methods on Mosquitoes with you-know-what.
The significance of Lab 257 and its fellow lab was that it was the first installment of a closed-air circulation system, and the first example of the Pride of unrepentant men to screw everything up in the name of germ warfare. Just because the Department of Agriculture took control of the island for its side of experiments on animals doesn't prevail they weren't just hiding the same experiments under the name of Agriculture. So many times were there outbreaks of unknown illness in New York City, New York, and throughout the whole damn area -- and it was not disclosed because it was perhaps all part of the experiments.
If you hold that attitude, you'll grow a little older every day; opposed to growing up, and having vigilant youth in the law.
There was nothing wrong with my surrounding Sites. Code is not authority; authority is inducted into the code by a body politic. Within context of the counterfeit reality, or "virtual land", then would avail a landing derived without law; hence the different use between Site and a site, Cite from a cite. To buy "virtual land" as advertised, would be to accept a fiction derived of a code (fiction). And same, the corporation that was conferred the code by an Authority, is not politic to move about and Grant from specification that were neither a charter for it to grant and neither an office inherint but by the politic that chartered the corporation. Corporations are to provide no other service, but what it holds in deed on behalf of a party vested with a security interest (usually known as a Secured Party, or Creditor) and for limited liability.
Compare Site (as I intended) with Cite (as you intended); further, when the Law in the united States of America was parallel with the modern American english dictionary at the time, then it is standard to apply English Common Law known and evinced in the private patent "Uniform Commercial Code"; therefore, quote Webster's 1828 Dictionary because it is not private, and good standing in public domain...
Site, n. [L. silus];
Cite, v.t.;
The advice you gave is legal device, not lawful advice. You are an active attorney, and have not referenced a prior contract or Writ by which someone has accepted your offer to hold a tournament for a counterfeit reality and counterfeit currency. Your reservation in this forum, to the conflict in your interests with His, is the titular reservation of "esquire" to your Slashdot person.
Sites for a foreign court deciding matters without assignment of the owner of the Intellectual Property:
The presumed Contractual agreement, often mis-titled as a "license", only confers Images and Private codified Law of Intellectual Property onto an owner; the interaction between that owner and a counterfeit and artificial person inducting of Him is a matter to be remedied by a psychiatrist.
Site:
Nothing for sale, and is rented. Even Slashdot is for rent, and is disputable for anyone reserving their rights to allow Slashdot to retain Intellectual Property (even false Intelect).
Site:
We both know that such craft is constructed on the premise of War; there is not one voluntary transaction in the entire theatre; all the artificial persons involved have pre-arrainged story and script that is devoid of law other than the verry substrate of semiconductor used to present the illusion of reality.
As the title of this post provides, there is no document of title or title itself conferred in a non-existant Bill of Lading; neither is there is an interested system of accounts, neither is their a presentable lien of the origin of said IP to move the IP to a steward with fee simple rights. It's all stuck in a sandbox, commercial speach and transmitting utilities, and for any man-made Court to hear such in such person as the artifice inquired then would evince that Court is artifice itself and I humbly present the signature of Gregory Thomas(tm) as to dba.
Next SLASHDOT dumpster!
without prejudice,
Just as the subject is written, do you?
Your concern to genetically-modified (and patented) varieties of crop is a legitimate concern -- intellectual property can travel by wind and "taint" a neighbors substrate, causing a tournament for the forced subjection to a foreign private law. Recently as of February of 2006, CONGRESS was receiving a Bill from that HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES as H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act." Despite the misleading title of the Bill, among the content was that whomever bought any food were not allowed to know of certain ingredients or qualities on its nature.
How this all sets is, as of recently, it is a known fact that "Aspartame" causes cancer; its an artificial sweetener in many beverages, mostly in them branded as diet drinks. Another recent discovery is at microwave-popcorn factories, where everyone working among the "artificial butter flavoring" had all caught severe allergies and atrocious lung cancers. It was such a dangerous cancer that the remedy for one worker was a lung transplant! The chemical that caused the damage is "Diacetyl" and also is used in various brew of beer and who knows what else.
That Bill would allow those corporations to simply use any ingredient, method, or application of artifice to provide an incomplete and misleading report to the Contents of all packages lading the product assembled of them. It's no different than postal fraud, when someone intentionally mis-presents the contents of a parcel, where harm can be incurred by the worker that moves said parcel (even from grocery store to their domicile and house). I don't drink diet beverages, but I know some people that do. Nearby me is a box of microwave-popcorn, where on the Contents is no list for the ingredients of the artificial "light butter"; there is information on oiled popcorn kernels, but nothing on the butte flavoring -- into the trash it will all go.
If there ever was false advertising for a product, the above Bill would only try to seal someone's prior and future effort at fraud; brought from the end of genetically-engineered and patent crap and into the lives of people.
References are...
thomas.log.gov (Four versions of 4167 to this hour)
MSDS for butanedione
DRAYMANS.COM on Diacetyl
Ambulance-chasing lawyers
RENSE.COM on the Bill(a conspiracy theorist/fact never hurt anyone to prove)
oh no! I found this PrionPlanet.com article, therefore there shouldn't be anything to worry about this Bill or aritificial butter flavouring. Keep grazing the grocery aisles, and take your monthly shots (money-pill/vaccine shots)
If the people could comprehend the difference between a man and a person, then all the privacy problems would be solved.
First, trademark the name. Second, respond only in matters of interest -- by contract, not to adhere to codes and related private law patented subject matter. Third, the law of trust.
Every server today wants a "name" to a trusted "resident." As defined in law dictionaries, a "resident" is a "thing known" and by subject matter that "thing known" is in dispute by a prior contract to discharge of its account. In terms of services that have no cost for registration, it would prevail that the people move their person to contribute intellectual property that may discharge the want of funding. Such is the inherint case with SLASHDOT, whereby most people contribute good information and bring such a good content that registration is acknowledge to discharge by good contribution; or show a quo-warranto where the matter does stray from a journalist bringing "news" and dialogue to trade.
As well, it would seem that a "person" is defined in the 14th century french (its first occurrence) as "a mask worn from time to time." Thereby, "isometrick" is as much a person as "nradude." Even so, there is a person shared as "Anonymous Coward." In terms of protecting one's privacy, it is acknowledged that a certain name is capable of copyright by determination of trade value. For distinguishing among others of similar patent, it is advisable that a trademark known to an account of a certain day of a month of a year would prevail that there are many of similar name and trademark but each is an separate and independent interest.
Consider that there should be allowed many accounts to a single person on Slashdot, as distinguished by port and time of entry by landing rights. If there were an infinite number of Gregory Thomas(tm) born April 20, then they would surely be not the same instance of 420 but precisely different measurement of time. Why would not the time of registration of a Slashdot account be any different? Slashdot records the personable name to the account, the account number is deed and unique by its own, yet Slashdot doesn't allow same name?
"Anonymous Coward" is just the example, yet it appears there is one public without and one private reserved within. If everything was a correct world, then it would not be difficult to determine (by accounting) the CowboyNeal from fellow CowboyNeal.
Also, on the driver license or related applicatiosn that demand a SIGNATURE (only signature, not "sign"), it is good to "DBA" the name and acknowledge the true name as the trademark. As in my examples above, "Gregory Thomas" is a trademark of the Mundt family; contracts are meeting of the minds, not meetings of the flesh (think bacteria, or fungus, or virus reasoning with cell structure);
In matters of law, most trusts are derived from the tradename of a child, and the trusts are assumed and therefore coerced because their nature is unlawfully negotiated without a sound mind or "unconcionable contract." For those, just dissolve the trust at signature as would determine on the Face of the private trust matter (advertisements on behalf of the trademarked name):
(at a private intstitution, such as that DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES)
with Power of Attorney over "Gregory Thomas Mundt";
Gregory Thomas dba GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT
Notice how the above only abates the 14th amendment origin from the trademark; government is a public trust, not a private matter. Any registration is to lay dormant one's property, wherever derived from their legislative and judicial and executive ability, and be endowed with benefits from another. Administrators of Slashdot are no different than executives, but they are voluntarily in this respect and verry much honourable.
Who modded that up? I can barely break +1 on the moderation scale, and someone modded that up without confirming facts.
There are available pictures of the PS3 development kit on HOME.BTCONNECT.COM. There is an article with a strategic view of the PS3 development kit on WWW.TECHEBLOG.COM. Yet, there has been no price shown. For under USD 2000, one could just buy some Dell PC's and cluster them for a better solution to anything Sony could pull out of its proprietary mind. Why stop at USD 16000000? I say the development kit could be as much as Sony is worth. I'm impressed Sony is advertising PS3 as a Linux solution bending to an 100% open-source environment, yet at the same time BOUGHT its solution from Microsoft--nope, not surprised. If I'm uptodate on my studies in gray-area politics and economics, two competitors can build their products for eachothers benefit to prevent use of their IP (think Blu-Ray) while competing like dogs in a market.
For conclusion to the matter above; The PS3 Development kit WIKIPEDIA article yiels that Sony purchased technology from Microsoft that would provide access to GNU development tools on the Playstation 3! (I kid you naught!) And within that article, the Playstation 3 is not limited to a game console but a complete multimedia entertainment center -- this would propose it not to be a shabby little game device like the competing Nintendo Wiivolution and Microsoft XBOX.
The sad truth is, that I and many others may only buy a controller of a certain gaming system, and just theme the desktop chassis of our computer and theme the visual presentation through an X or DirectFB solution to "have it better than the real thing" while we run an emulator.
Sony and Microsoft have been turds since they ever started competing, no exceptions. Nintendo appears to be an honest venture, having evinced to not choose any intellectual properties that conflict with their customers' and stockholders' interests and securities.
Anyone asking me for a suggestion; I recommend they choose the lesser of two Wiivels...