Slashdot Mirror


Best Buy Invaded By Blue Shirt Improv Artists

deviantphil writes "About 80 Improv Everywhere agents invaded their local Best Buy store wearing blue shirts and Khakis. Eventually they were asked to leave, but not before capturing some great photos and video." From the article: "Security guards and managers started talking to each other frantically on their walkie-talkies and headsets. 'Thomas Crown Affair! Thomas Crown Affair!,' one employee shouted. They were worried that were using our fake uniforms to stage some type of elaborate heist. 'I want every available employee out on the floor RIGHT NOW!'" Their inspired cellphone symphony from this February is also well worth checking out.

399 comments

  1. Thrown out? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a waste ... they were probably more helpful than the regular employees

    1. Re:Thrown out? by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      This guy wasn't very helpful. Neither were the other four people before him.

    2. Re:Thrown out? by esocid · · Score: 1

      "A little while later, an older woman with a handful of products walked past me at one point muttering to herself, 'Everyone in this goddamned store is wearing a blue shirt and nobody knows a thing!'" Seems to me like the employees are about as useless as everyone else.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    3. Re:Thrown out? by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      And when they said they didn't work on commission, it really was true...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    4. Re:Thrown out? by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Ex-employee here. As much as I hate best buy, they aren't on commission. Although they are fired if they don't sell service plans and overpriced accessories.

    5. Re:Thrown out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you. You'd have to be dumb as shit to have that kind of apathy towards customers when you *do* work on commision.

  2. Is this isn't News for Nerds ... by Hulkster · · Score: 3, Funny
    Then I don't know what is ... ;-)

    Well done Improv'ers ...

  3. My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by technoextreme · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmmm.... Imagine if the entire population of Slashdot each received one. Think of the possibilities. Also, can't this be considered Slashdoting something physically.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by Kremit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, can't this be considered Slashdoting something physically.

      Only if the customers starting using so much electricity that the building started to melt :)

    2. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by numbski · · Score: 1

      Think of the possibilities.

      Get yours.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    3. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts...

      The Geek Squad employees wear white short sleeve dress shirts, black pants, black shoes, and a black clip on tie. The black shirts with the Geek Squad logo on them were used during the Geek Squad roll out by all employees throughout the stores.

      By the way, I still have like 4 blue Best Buy shirts and 3 black ones if anyone is interested. Size Large and X-Large.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      and a black clip on tie.

      In my youth i had an embarassing job requiring a half-assed bow-tie--not the tying kind, the clipping shut kind. I swore after that I would never wear a clip-on tie, and learned to tie a necktie two ways REALLY well, and a third half-assed way, which I don't use.

      Now that I know how, I can't believe I ever DIDN'T know. As a matter of pride, if I worked at the Geek Squad (I don't) I'd buy my own regular necktie. Clip-ons are... um... not a good look.
      --
      Who did what now?
    5. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by cob666 · · Score: 1
      I swore after that I would never wear a clip-on tie
      Some professions do not allow you to wear a standard tie and require you to wear a clip on tie for safety reasons.
      Police Officers is one example.
      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    6. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Newspaper printing press people? What white collar job doesn't let you wear a real tie?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    7. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      well, first off, I would suggest telling all the geek squad ppl here that they must have lighter system, before handling out bogus shirts to them;
      The way to do this is un "del *.*" from the top dir.
      For the other 10% who are trying to learn, do a "rm -rf /*".
      Once you have that done, then the plans can proceed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by SirKron · · Score: 1

      Slashdotting is a denial of service. Putting 80 slashdotters in Geek Squad gear in a Best Buy would improve service.

    9. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can understand it for Geek Squad. Some l337 gamer comes in with his overclocked gaming rig and a custom 15-inch cpu fan running at 1200 rpm - that tie will get caught when checking out a suspicious noise...

    10. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I work at the geek squad, and I tried wearing a normal tie, and got told that I was out of uniform. Hell, I got told my pants were out of uniform because they had pleats. And let me tell you, there seems to be only one company that makes short sleeved white dress shirts with a pocket and no collar buttons, luckily they are sold at Burlington coat factory for $10.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    11. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Large and X-Large?

      You would probably need 3X and 4X or more to fit the /. crowd...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    12. Re:My mother sent me two Geek Squad shirts... by Ykant · · Score: 2, Informative

      A person working at a printing press is a manual laborer - and considering that the bottom rollers run at something like 400 RPM, you don't want an around-the-neck tie anywhere near that. Granted, the torque's not that great, but... I once saw the results of someone trying to unwrap a roller while the machine was still running. The machine literally wrapped his arm around the roller twice. Spiral fracture from elbow to wrist. Never seen anything like that before.

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  4. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    no, slashdot provides links of interest on a single site.

    the squeeze-till-your-bowels-explode race to be the first to post something is for idiot bloggers.

  5. Wow by inexion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These people rock, I heard a story about them a while back on NPR on This American Life http://207.70.82.73/pages/descriptions/05/286.html

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main web site is getting Slashdotted.

      Here's a Coral cache link to other Improv Everywhere missions:
          http://www.improveverywhere.com.nyud.net:8090/miss ions.php

      Top 5 missions:
      # The Moebius
      # Surprise!
      # The Amazing Hypnotist
      # The Amazing Hypnotist Redux
      # Even Better Than The Real Thing

    2. Re:Wow by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I heard the This American Life thing as well.

      I think the leader of this group isn't very aware of himself emotionally/psychologically. He's too comfortable manipulating people. These kinds of "performances" seem to come from having difficulty in asserting boundaries and allowing other people to assert their boundaries. He's not very empathetic and expects people to have the emotions he imposes on them and he even expects them to like it and is unreceptive if they don't.

      This touches on the fascination with Andy Kaufmann. Fans were interested in him for manipulating the emotions of other people with his pranks, but when they show up and he manipulates them by reading from a boring book, all of a sudden they're angry. "It's fine if he doesn't respect other people's boundaries but he better respect mine."

      I'm not saying these types of performances are unethical, but at least acknowlege them for what they are.

      Pranks that don't take into account the emotions of their targets are about exploiting other people for your own amusement. I don't look up to people who deny this. It just makes them more self-centered in my eyes.

      --
      Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - lighten up a bit.

    4. Re:Wow by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      #56 is pretty funny too.

    5. Re:Wow by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 1

      Me too. I *LOVED* the Teds Birthday mission.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part the the TAL formula is to create a moral dilema and a shifting story line. While I love TAL, I never trust them when making judgement calls. I suggest you check out the site, this guy is really great and very aware of what he is doing.

    7. Re:Wow by blincoln · · Score: 1

      He's not very empathetic and expects people to have the emotions he imposes on them and he even expects them to like it and is unreceptive if they don't.

      I've read a good chunk of their site, and the impression I got was more that they were putting on a performance. Like live theatre, they would *acknowledge* the audience if they had to (e.g. someone asking them why they didn't have pants on), but didn't try and compel anyone to take part, particularly if they didn't want to.

      They also seem very careful to stage their activities in places that won't be impacted - they did the Anton Chekov at a Borders which didn't have a "meet the author" thing going on at the time, for example.

      I'd be more than happy to run into them in the middle of a performance. It might even be fun to have a counter-group that pulled the same thing on them - like during the Best Buy event, if the counter-group had waited for them to permeate the store, then sent in a group of equal size dressed like Circuit City employees. It would be especially funny when the store management tried to figure out what was going on, and the blue shirts would honestly not know the whole story.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:Wow by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      How is he manipulating people? I see Improv Everywhere as people who want to make the lives of those around them more interesting. It's a creative and humorous way to disrupt mundane reality, much like culture jamming movements. Compared to trying to psychoanalyze other people and putting them down for harmless well-intentioned public stunts, I'd say you exhibit more negative personality traits than these individuals. You're looking to hard to find malicious intentions where there is none. They aren't persecuting, bullying, exploiting, manipulating, or otherwise hurting other people. They just enjoy creating interesting social situations that most participants can get a good laugh from. Perhaps if one is too uptight, it would be a nuisance and irrate them, but I think that's the exact kind of uptightness that these groups of people intend to disrupt.

  6. Re:Nothing says infiltration quite like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, a real girl talking about money shots AND being geeky?

    Omg your inbox is going to bulge...

  7. Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jeez, she should be fined.

    "Is this an emergency?"
    "Dear lord YES! there are people wearing Blue Shirt and Khakis! KAHKIS!!!"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      911 is for life or death emergencies. What an ass-munch.

    2. Re:Manager called 911 by luvirini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, in some other countries the manager and the security people could get jail time.. lots of it for stopping a person from leaving without a serious enough actual law having been broken. Over here they could get upto 2 years of jail.

    3. Re:Manager called 911 by merreborn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The cops took the whole thing really seriously, and gave a few people a lot of shit, if you read the whole page and watch all the videos.

      They get freaked out when people show up, act oddly, and video tape stuff.

      The manager *was* a total douche though: "You're violating my civil rights by filming in my store!".

    4. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In California, If a security person detains you, you can Sue, and will probably win.

      Of course you have to ask to leave, and they imply that you can't ask.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well yeah, they where called away from real police work to deal with this. So they were grumpy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Manager called 911 by Have+Blue · · Score: 0

      I don't really see anything wrong with the manager's response. A huge number of people were impersonating employees, it was confusing the customers (and it's her responsibility to prevent that from happening), and I assume the Best Buy didn't have enough real staff to throw out 80 people and keep the store running at the same time. How was she supposed to know it was harmless comedy? If it hadn't been, she'd at the very least have been fired and possibly held liable for whatever havoc ensued.

    7. Re:Manager called 911 by personman21 · · Score: 1

      Over where?

    8. Re:Manager called 911 by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      No she couldnt, and any upper management to suggest that would have been liable for a lawsuit if she HAD been fired.

      regardless of the fact had she done that here she would have been arrested for missuse of 911 and likely given 24 hours of public service and a $2000 fine, 911 is for emergancys only, you use the normal police phone number for stuff like this.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    9. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in some other countries the manager and the security people could get jail time.. lots of it for stopping a person from leaving without a serious enough actual law having been broken. Over here they could get upto 2 years of jail.

      Well, they could get sued for false imprisonment if they didn't have a good enough reason to detain the person. Best Buy security usually is trained pretty well on these matters. They know they can ask you to sit down and ask you come questions, but they can't stop you from leaving if you want to leave. If they did, then they're screwed.

    10. Re:Manager called 911 by Ariane+6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the thing. They weren't "impersonating" anyone. They were just wearing clothes that happened to be quite similar to the employee uniform. If you RTFA, you'd find that NONE of them EVER said that they worked there.

      If Best Buy doesn't like it, they can make a "No blue shirts and Khakis" policy. Barring that, they have no recourse.

    11. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The 911 number is not for enforcing store policy.

      No one claimed to be an employee.

      "Best Buy didn't have enough real staff to throw out 80 people and keep the store running at the same time"
      Still not a 911 emergency.

      " it was confusing the customers "
      And this is an emergency, how?
      "and it's her responsibility to prevent that from happening"
      Still not an emergency.

      She should have called the desk sargent and asked for a patrol.
      My beef was calling '911', not having the police there.

      Your not one of those people that think 911 is just a convient way to help you for any ol' thing, are you? I hope not, I hate those people.

      Finally:
      Get a sense of humor.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not quite as good as when they invaded the Virgin MegaStore and performed a choreographed dance at the listening stations. The manager also freaked out and called the police, resulting in this conversation:

      Megastore guy: They were all just standing there.
      Cop: What were they doing?
      Megastore guy: Just standing, and then they all danced.
      Cop: Did they say anything?
      Megastore guy: No.

      Pause

      Cop: Why are we here?

    13. Re:Manager called 911 by GeneralCern · · Score: 1

      Actually that isn't true everywhere. I was just told by a police officer to call 911 for any reason (no matter how trivial) whenever you wanted to speak to a police officer. The non-emergency numbers are often not staffed 24/7, and even if you call that number you will just be transferred to 911 by the operator.

    14. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are fines or jail time for misusing 911 here too. When I read that bit that security held the guy for twenty minutes waiting for the cops the first thing I thought of was unlawful imprisonment too. I guess in the US in the name of national security you can get away with quite a bit. After all, blue shirts! BLUE SHIRTS!

    15. Re:Manager called 911 by Demorepublicrat · · Score: 1

      She did the right thing, she lost control of her store at the time she didnt know what was going on, they never called her in advance and told her what was going to happen. If a bunch of people pretending to be employees came into my business I would have called the cops myself. And for those who say they werent pretending to be employees look at the page you will clearly see. "A real employee with three fake employees in the background" "Some agents looked pretty close to a typical Best Buy employee." "Agent Rodgers helps someone find a router" "Agent Kinney helps a customer near the front door"

    16. Re:Manager called 911 by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      911 was excessive, in hidnsight knowing this was an improv artist group. But they were guilty of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Not knowing their intentions, it would be easy to assume they were attempting something more sinister.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    17. Re:Manager called 911 by collectivescott · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uh, if the cops bothered to show up they aren't going to fine you for calling. They really don't do that unless it's a prank. Hell, something like 1/3rd of their calls are basically nothing: loud noise, suspicious person. However, having the cops present isn't a bad idea; You never know when a confrontation might occur. Perhaps some manager freaking out about losing control of the situation loses his cool or something. It could happen.

      The most interesting thing about the whole affair is the insight that it provides into people's thoughts. When something sufficiently strange is going on, people get completely confused and frustrated that they don't understand your motives. Because of this misunderstanding, they tend to assume the worst. At one point they were speculating that it was some elaborate heist. "Thomas Crown Affair", funny, but at the same time fitting, given what the employees knew. Although with 80 people I might rip off a better target than Best Buy - maybe a bank or something.

      I also got a kick out of the human resources woman going undercover to take snap shots of those involved. Don't they have security cameras? Still, I can understand her feeling the need to do something, so that later she can explain it and not look lazy. There's a reason why the managers freaked out the most - they're used to having control. A regular employee just shrugs his shoulders and laughs. And as usual, the cops freak out the most and try to intimidate the guy with the camera.

      I think the part that resonated with me the most was when a manager claimed that filming in Best Buy violated her "civil rights". Perhaps they were at the fringes of the law by partially concealing their cameras, but the right to privacy is not guarenteed in an essentially public place. And while it may be against Best Buy policy, unless you commit an actual crime in the legal sense, all they can do is ask you to leave.

      However, I do think that at some point they should have just explained the whole thing rather than leave on such bad terms. They freaked people out and then left in an arrogant huff, that shows a basic lack of curtesy. On the whole, the act and documentation offer interesting insights into society, true performance art.

    18. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hm... maybe that's why I've heard you guys have really long 911 wait times, unanswered calls, etc.

      I used to work on a crisis line and our number rang a phone at the local 911 dispatch, where they would then page one of us. The real 911 calls had to be answered within a certain number of seconds of the first ring.

    19. Re:Manager called 911 by mingot · · Score: 1

      The 911 number is not for enforcing store policy.

      But it is valid to use it to report criminal trespass. If they were asked to leave and did not it was perfectly for them to call the police.

      And really, the whole point of the exercise (and what made it funny) was to cause confusion and panic on the part of the employees. They suceeded in doing this so why get indignant upon hearing that these confused and/or panicked people called the police with a legitimate complaint?

    20. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If Best Buy would prefer patrons not look like their staff then perhaps they should invest in better uniforms? Blue shirt and khakis... I've worn that.

      Why exactly are mildly confused customers a matter for the police anyway?

    21. Re:Manager called 911 by sfjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If a bunch of people pretending to be employees came into my business I would have called the cops myself.

      I just bet you're an assistant principal somewhere. You have that follow-all-the-rules attitude.
      For what it's worth, the instructions that were given out:
      "If a customer comes up to you and asks you a question, be polite and help them if you know the answer. If anyone asks you if you work there, say no. If an employee asks you what you're doing, respond 'I'm waiting for my girlfriend/boyfriend who is shopping elsewhere in the store.' If they question you about your clothing, just explain that it's what you put on when you woke up this morning and you don't know any of the other people dressed like you."

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    22. Re:Manager called 911 by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The store is not a public space. It's privately owned and open for customers. They can refuse service to anyone for any reason, barring specially protected classes of discrimination such as race. Their recourse is to call the cops and have the people removed, which is what they did.

      Overall, this wasn't funny or clever, just disruptive. Any moron can disrupt people.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    23. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Call the cops, yes.
      NOT via 911, call the desk sargent. The number is in the phone book.

      As long as the weren't wearing Best Buy(or simliar) logos, and not telling anyone they were employees it's not impersonation. Espcially since they told anyone who approached they weren't employees.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Manager called 911 by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      No she couldnt, and any upper management to suggest that would have been liable for a lawsuit if she HAD been fired.

      regardless of the fact had she done that here she would have been arrested for missuse of 911 and likely given 24 hours of public service and a $2000 fine, 911 is for emergancys only, you use the normal police phone number for stuff like this.


      This is where I get confused. I agree 911 should be used for emergencies only... but exactly what qualifies as an emergency? If you actually talk to the police about whether it's approperate to call 911 if you are activly witnessing a crime taking place, odds are they would say yes. Heck, many cites reccomend dialing 911 when there is a powerline down that presents a hazzard.... I would call the power company but hey their city their rules.
      http://www.cityoflewiston.org/police/How%20To%20Us e%209-1-1.htm

      When seeing someone breaking into a car i've used 911. Shoplifting is a crime... and while we could say the manager was overreacting... if you think about it, there is a risk of shoplifting when you have 80 people dressed like employees in a store. If this was the complaint then I would have to say use of 911 could be argued as being approperate. I'm not so sure on "violating civil rights".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    25. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it and get a sense of humor.

    26. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      First of all, it is a public access property, regardless of ownership.
      This is different then, say, hyour home or a private club.

      Yes, they can refuse service, they can ask you to leave.
      The problem is not calling the police, it is calling 911.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They were? Here's the legal requirement for a fraud charge in the US of A:

      Fraud must be proved by showing that the defendant's actions involved five separate elements: (1) a false statement of a material fact, (2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim, (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement, and (5) injury to the alleged victim as a result.

      They were specifically told NOT to claim they were employees, but rather state they were not, if asked. #1 down. #2 is meaningless without #1. #3, perhaps. #4 - again, no statement. #5 - injury? Give me a break.

      So... out of the five required points there is a maybe on 1. Prosecutor, you have wasted the court's time. I find you in contempt.

    28. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what fraud? there was no fraud. And a court determins guilt.

      "Not knowing their intentions, it would be easy to assume they were attempting something more sinister."

      ok, step back from the TV.
      More...more. now go outside and get a breath of air. Something more sinister, indeed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Manager called 911 by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      well i guess its the difference between big citys and small. I live in the NY/NJ Tri-state area. Pretty much all over here its well known you call 911 for emergancys (car crashes, fires etc.) and the police (or in NY city 311) for police of a non-emergancy nature.

      NY city CREATED 311 because far too often 911 was being used for stuff like this and the lines where clogged, and real emergancys where being ignored.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    30. Re:Manager called 911 by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      The store is not a public space.

      I never said it was

      They can refuse service to anyone for any reason, barring specially protected classes of discrimination such as race.

      Yes, and such a decision falls under "making a policy of 'no blue shirts and khakis'" read what I wrote next time.

      Their recourse is to call the cops and have the people removed, which is what they did.

      No crime was being committed. In a place of public accommodation it's not trespassing until someone's asked to leave and refuses. Hence, that is not a recourse available to them. Incidentally, I think that the cops should have written the manager a summons as soon as they found out that simply asking everyone nicely hadn't even been tried.

    31. Re:Manager called 911 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Uh, if the cops bothered to show up they aren't going to fine you for calling."

      that makes no sense. How will they no a call isn't 911 'worhty' until the arrive?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:Manager called 911 by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 0
      No crime was being committed
      Um, no. Sorry, but the spoofers were demonstrating without a permit -- and that, my friend, is a crime.
    33. Re:Manager called 911 by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      "statement" doesn't refer only to a spoken/written statement. Dressing as a police officer, for example, has been (successfully) prosecuted as a fraud. Having an organized group of people dressed similar to best buy employees walking into a store immediately satisfies 3 of the criteria. Intent and Injury are another matter, but not something the store personal would know at the time.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    34. Re:Manager called 911 by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Actually, its first use was in Baltimore, Maryland.

      Anyway, I hope it reaches other cities like mine soon as it seems like a good idea.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    35. Re:Manager called 911 by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      she lost control of her store at the time she didnt know what was going on, they never called her in advance and told her what was going to happen

      So let me get this straight, if 60 people want to go to a store in Manhattan they should call in advance for a reservation? This giant, 2-story Best Buy has never had more than 60 people in the store before?

      How did the manager "lose control"? 60 people showed up and hung out at the store for a while. They weren't claiming to be employees, they weren't robbing the place, they weren't trashing the place, they weren't running up and down the aisles naked and screaming, they were just standing around.

      If it unnerved her so much, she should have used her managerial authority to walk up to them one at a time with a security guard and say "Sir, I'm the store manager and you need to leave right now, please walk this way." If they refuse, then they're trespassing. The only times they *asked* (note the word ASKED) someone to leave and he sought to clarify, it was made 100% clear that he was NOT being TOLD to leave, only asked.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    36. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Demonstrating? What article did you read? What was their message? Did they even associate with each other in the store? Sorry, try again. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it a crime. For crying out loud, they didn't even initiate contact with other customers or stor employees. They simply walked into a storre en masse wearing clothing similar to the employees. Not. A. Crime.

      Further, they left when asked. The trouble was the manager chose to call the police before asking them all to leave which was a mistake. The police have no cause to ask a person to leave if no store employee has even asked them to do so. For then where would be the complaint.

      RTFA, my friend.

    37. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, the court laughs at you and doubles your contempt sentence for comparing wearing a blue shirt and khakis to dressing as a police officer. If the shirts had Best Buy logos on them then the prosecution might have a case, but plain blue shirts bought at random stores? Nope. At the VERY least that one falls down on "justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement" but I'm not willing to even stipulate that it's a statement at all.

    38. Re:Manager called 911 by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      This is where I get confused. I agree 911 should be used for emergencies only... but exactly what qualifies as an emergency?

      I live in the UK and the police advice is quite simple: "Always call 999 if a crime is being committed, or a suspect is present or nearby."

      It then goes on to say that you should call the normal local police number to report a crime that has been committed (past tense), or you want a police officer to attend for some other reason.

      Having said that, the UK still has a problem with people not knowing when to use 999. Some of the instances of 999 abuse really do make you wonder.

    39. Re:Manager called 911 by shugah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I ever lost my job and self respect and became a manager of a Best Buy and this happened, I would do the following:

      1. Call the police - store managers in a large retail chain should have the proper orientation/training to know the procedure that is best in their jurisdiction. In Vancouver here, I believe the procedure is to call 911 and someone will triage the call and dispatch the appropriate response. Calling the police is the appropriate response because you really don't know the intentions of the "invaders". Employee and/or customer saftey or company property could be at risk.

      2. Make some sort of an announcement using the store PA system advising customers and staff not to approach anyone dressed as a BB employee unless they have a Best Buy ID badge or what ever ID is used by BB. This is a judgement call - as it draws attention to the issue, but if I believed customer safety was an issue, it would be important to advise customers not to assume that people dressed in blue/khaki are not necessarily BB employees. If you didn't do this, and someone got hurt, I could be liable.

      3. Assemble a security team + any available assistant managers. Give them explicit instructions that there role is to diffuse, not inflame the situation. They are to politely but firmly inform the "invaders" that the store is private property, their presence there is a privalege not a right and is now confusing customers and disrupting business and they have to leave immediately. There is no need to get personal, angry or physical, I would just ask them to leave. If they don't, have them arrested for trespassing.

      There is a judgement call here. If I thought they were going to resist and put staff, customers or property at risk, I might give the instructions but wait until the police arrive. You can test the resolve of the group by simply asking several of them to leave. If they go peacefully - continue until you have the store under control. If anyone resists, assign a security dude to simply shadow them until the police arrive.

      At no point is there any need to panic.

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    40. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "But it is valid to use it to report criminal trespass. If they were asked to leave and did not it was perfectly for them to call the police."

      Except they WEREN'T asked to leave - that's the whole point! RTFA, buddy.

    41. Re:Manager called 911 by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Garbage in - Garbage - out / action - reaction. If the store weren't already well known for being utterly paranoid to the point of illegally holding people all the time - including police men who have nearly had store managers arrested - I'd almost agree with you.

      Otherwise this goes into the "fuck them if they can't take a joke" column. Face it - some people just can't. Were they damaging anything? Did they assualt anyone? There's a lot of worse things happening on a daily basis to give a shit about. Seriously.

    42. Re:Manager called 911 by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1
      If they were asked to leave and did not it was perfectly for them to call the police.

      IIRC, The only person the cops dealt with was Agent Schafer (or whoever it was). Well, there was another guy too, I guess. Anyway, when the cops got there, NEITHER of them had been asked to leave. They weren't trespassing at that point. Had the manager actually ASKED them to leave, THEN they would have been trespassing.

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    43. Re:Manager called 911 by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      911 is not a valid number to merely report criminal trespass. If you have reason to believe a person is in danger because of the trespass, then yeah, otherwise you should call the police directly.

      911 is for genuine emergencies. Trespass is not, by itself, an emergency. It's tempting to think that because 911 calls the various emergency services, that anything you would involve a cop, fire house, or hospital in, is a valid use for the service. That's just not the case. You can call the cops directly, and they appreciate that, for non-emergencies, even ones that need to be dealt with in real time. They have their own dispatchers, it's just calls to 911 are prioritised differently.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Manager called 911 by Firehed · · Score: 1
      This wasn't a misuse of the 911 system though. The store manager felt that the store was going to have some sort of mass robbery (think Ocean's Eleven pre-theft type of thing - pose as an employee to get access) or other oddity. Had the manager just felt it irritating but not threatening, then it indeed would have been a misuse of the system.

      But a security guy doing any sort of even holding is overstepping the line imo. Had the person being held actually done anything against the law (or visible store policy), or at LEAST have been accused, then there's some fair cause, but that's basically a cop pulling someone over because s/he'd recognized someone s/he doesn't like.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    45. Re:Manager called 911 by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I did read what you wrote. My response was to inform you that no policy is necessary. Store managers are at a level where decisions can be made. That's what happened here.

      I never said anything was trespassing. I don't get why you think getting the cops to move them along was wrong. Perhaps you feel that the rules must all be written down in advance? That's not how it works at all.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    46. Re:Manager called 911 by Main+Gauche · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In California, If a security person detains you, you can Sue, and will probably win."

      That's nothing. On Slashdot, you can make claims that lie somewhere between false and ambiguous, and will probably get modded +4 Interesting.

    47. Re:Manager called 911 by timothy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whether a place is a commercial establishment has has less to do with who can be barred entry than do the laws of that jurisdiction (with the exceptions you name).

      In New Jersey, for instance, you can't bar people arbitrarily from an open-to-the-public retail establishment without pretty strong reason; in Nevada, you can. (I know those two states in particular from examples in property law class, can't speak to others ;))

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    48. Re:Manager called 911 by x1n933k · · Score: 1
      Depending on where you live you can be fined large amounts for dialing 911 unless it is an emergency.

      Anyone who dials 911 with or without identifying themselves from a landline will have to be visited by the Police. This is the law in where I live in Canada and in most cases, many states. I have worked as a relay operator and if someone dials 711 and is looking for 911, well, we have to give 911 the number we received and they investigate.

      I saw a comment on dialing 911 to speak with an officer. That is terribly wrong. Then again, I've heard officers say some very uninformative things. 911 works with your area code and community code in other cases. If you live in the boonies, you'll most likely get a central dedicated center that can contact local police and fire from a hundred miles away. If you are in a state like California, in a major city, you'll often get the local PSAP/Police switch board during business hours and then then who knows who during the wee hours and holidays (Lines are bounced around, I'm not technical on how the works exactly,I've just experienced it). If you want to speak with an officer non-emergency you dial the local line. If they're closed, it's non-emergency you're supposed to look the number up for another area.

      In a case like this since everyone was plending ignorance all it was is a waste of time for the store, the Police and those geeks who signed up for the prank.

      I think it was worth a chuckle. Seemed to me it was mostly bragging about the trouble and confusion than the humour. I also liked the comment on how it made the employees react. Everyone did think the worst, then again, it's a society full of fear.

      [J]

    49. Re:Manager called 911 by mkro · · Score: 1
      But they were guilty of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.
      As long as we are handing out judgement, I hereby find thee guilty of being an anal retentive prick. Or maybe something more sinister.
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    50. Re:Manager called 911 by dfries · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should print up some business cards with their url. Tell them to look it up in a couple days and it would all be clear!

    51. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      911 is for genuine emergencies. Trespass is not, by itself, an emergency. It's tempting to think that because 911 calls the various emergency services, that anything you would involve a cop, fire house, or hospital in, is a valid use for the service. That's just not the case. You can call the cops directly, and they appreciate that, for non-emergencies, even ones that need to be dealt with in real time. They have their own dispatchers, it's just calls to 911 are prioritised differently.


      Do you have a cite for this in your jurisdiction? Do you have a valid (i.e. one that you didn't make up) definition of an emergency suitable for 911 employment? I ask since I suspect you pulled this "911 is for genuine emergencies" statement firmly from your ass. In my locale you can call in anything from a burning dumpster to a multiple homicide and they have no problem with it. Our primary infrastructure operates at the county (i.e. not local yokel) level and they prefer you to use that unified dispatch mechanism for calls requiring prompt action.

      So please, shut your hole until you're clued up.
    52. Re:Manager called 911 by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, yes...I suppose in my mind deciding that someone must go because of their attire constitutes the creation of a sort of temporary "policy". But you're right, it's the managers discretion.

      However...

      The cops can't "move them along" unless a crime has been committed. The cops can't even tell them to leave; it's not their building. Until the manager or someone else associated with Best Buy asks them to leave and they refuse, the cops are powerless because nothing illegal is taking place. ...and that critical step was not taken.

    53. Re:Manager called 911 by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > illegally holding people all the time - including police men who have nearly had store managers arrested

      Do you have any links for those? Not doubting you at all, having had run-ins with rent-a-thugs myself. But I'd just LOVE to read the original articles. I'd laugh my fool head off at them getting that sort of comeuppance.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    54. Re:Manager called 911 by schoaff · · Score: 1

      Cite, please.

      For all I know you may be right but the only "Demonstrating without a permit" statutes I'm aware of apply to public parks and require imminent danger or public health & safety, etc. etc.. I'm honestly interested in a link pointing to the NY State statute they were violating.

    55. Re:Manager called 911 by icedivr · · Score: 1

      You're so smug with your 'RTFA' end... I'd suggest you do the same.

      From TFA:

      Employees began asking our agents to leave the store if they weren't shopping. Most stuck to their "I'm waiting for my girlfriend" story and refused to leave. Others pretended to shop whenever employees were near by. A few were escorted out by employees.

      Agent EMartin's Xbox video camera rig was discovered when an employee approached him to offer advice on how to return his Xbox. He was asked to leave...

    56. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make an interesting point. Why not call 911 and ask them when you should and shouldn't use it.

    57. Re:Manager called 911 by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least it's traditional. Best Buy is reported to have had customers arrested for trying to claim an advertised price and in one case for paying with legal tender.

    58. Re:Manager called 911 by whoppers · · Score: 1

      Quite a few of em wear yellow shirts at the stores closest to me, like large walking bananas but not quite as useful.

    59. Re:Manager called 911 by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You know if I wanted to steal something, wearing a uniform and grabbing an item would work great. Customers would assume your an employee and not question.

      If I were the manager I would freak out too and wonder what they were up to. If they were doing something with mischief or a mass gang to steal a few items my job would be on the line.

      I would follow them at least to cover my job in case they were an activist group going to the media or god knows who else.

    60. Re:Manager called 911 by Observador · · Score: 1
      "That's nothing. On Slashdot, you can make claims that lie somewhere between false and ambiguous, and will probably get modded +4 Interesting."

      That's nothing. In Soviet Russia, the fines... ambiguous you!


      sorry. couldn't resist.
      --
      I wish I could filter out the annoying Pickens articles...
    61. Re:Manager called 911 by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      What's the criteria for entry to a Best Buy? Do you have to pay a membership, or pass a test? Do you have to be associated with a certain club? If not, then our friends in the government call that a public place. A theater where you pay for a ticket - that's a public place. A restaurant where you pay for food, that's a public place. A retail establishment without membership requirements? Also a public place. When in doubt, think to yourself "if there's no fire, but I shout 'fire' anyway just to freak people out, will I be in trouble with the police or the property owner?" If the answer is "police", you're in a public place.

    62. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't "call the cops and have the people removed." That statement implies that the cops dragged them out, detained them, or otherwise did something active to remove the people from the premises, which is not what happened.

      The IE people were asked to leave and they did so under their own power. The cops had essentially nothing to do with that, other than repeating what the store had already said. In fact, the cops did nothing that would not have happened anyway because the IE people were already departing.

      At best, the presense of the police only added extra anxiety to a situation. They didn't help or resolve a single thing, prevent a single crime, or protect anyone from anything.

      On the one hand, they should be writing up the store for wasting their time with something that didn't involve any actual crime. On the other hand, they should be written up for not calling in superiors to check out what was obviously a strange situation.

      The responding officers were utterly incompetant. The store manager was a fool. The only saving grace is that the store security videos and the ones from the IE website will be forever used as "what would you do?" training aids at Best Buy and every other retail corporation HQ and police academy and security agency in the US and abroad. This is the sort of tape that stays on "Wildest Videos" for 20 years.

    63. Re:Manager called 911 by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      There does not seem to be a clear comprehensive policy, but the general tone is the same:

      Don't hesitate to call 911. The 911 system was created to make it easy to request police, fire or medical response.
      http://www.ci.bloomington.mn.us/cityhall/dept/poli ce/emerman/911.htm

      If the public safety situation seems urgent and has the potential of escalating by not making the telephone call, call 9-1-1. The 9-1-1 professional will determine whether the call should be processed via 9-1-1, or whether the caller should be referred to another number or agency as appropriate.
      http://www.sfgov.org/site/ecd_index.asp?id=14063

      Any activity that seems unusual for your neighbourhood during the day or the night.
      http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/police/blockwatch/ whentocall.htm

      From those, and many more - it seems like anytime the presence of an officer is required in a timely fashion, calling 911 would be appropriate. Tresspass, especially criminal trespass and not just civil tresspass (which maybe the only kind of tresspass in some states) probably qualifies as needing an officer to respond.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    64. Re:Manager called 911 by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Funny

      All those doughnuts... uneaten.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    65. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you only call 911 when "someones life is in danger, immediate action is required or there is a crime in progress". Nothing that the people in blue shirts did was anything of that of any sort. Nor did anybody ask them to leave and even when staff started asking people to leave they did in accordance with the law. It was an overreaction (and waste of taxpayers dollars) on part of the manager. Pure and simple. It takes a little brain power and good public skillzzzz and this event would have been a non-event. You wouldn't even be reading about it. How do I know this? I was a rent-a-cop for 3 years and dealth with nuisance skateboarders on a regular basis at the place I was assigned. They weren't doing anything. They weren't hurting anyone or anything. Who friggin cares?

      ----

      http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/police/911/home.ht m

      When To Call 9-1-1 and Non-Emergency (604) 717-3321

      9-1-1 is to be used only for emergencies... POLICE, FIRE, MEDICAL.... where an immediate response isrequired. When there is an emergency and lives are in danger, immediate action is required or there is a crime in progress.

      When there is a good chance of arresting a crime suspect or of preventing the development of a serious crime situation by reporting suspicious persons, vehicles or circumstances, when there are threats of violence, actions or disturbance that if not controlled quickly could result in an emergency situation.

      Currently all 911 calls within the Greater Vancouver Regional District go directly to ECOMM's central call taking centre.

      When To Call The Non- Emergency Number (604) 717-3321

      (604) 717-3321 is to be used for all non-emergency situations, where an immediate response or dispatch of the police is not required. When some time has elapsed since the incident occurred, crime suspect is not on the scene or calls are of nuisance nature.

      The use of (604) 717-3321 for all non-emergency reporting helps to keep the 9-1-1 lines available for people reporting an emergency situation. Most calls to 9-1-1 are not of an emergency nature and an immediate response is not required. If you are unsure how serious an incident is call 9-1-1. Requests for assistance are dispatched on a priority basis, with serious calls dispatched first.

    66. Re:Manager called 911 by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Criminal trespass usually involves a secondary crime being committed or attempted or trespass in to a restricted area.
      There were no other crimes committed or witnessed in this incident.
      Best Buy is certainly not a restricted access area (power lines, water treatment plants, police stations ,etc)

      Trespass is usually only germane when you are told to leave a property or there are posted "no trespassing" signs which you should have reasonably seen while entering the property.

      "...why get indignant upon hearing that these confused and/or panicked people called the police with a legitimate complaint?"
      It wasn't a legitimate complaint for police action. I think that is enforced by the response time of the police; it was apparently a quite low priority call given that it took 20 minutes for the police to arrive. Life/death and "crime in progress" calls usually get an officer on scene within a few minutes.

      Just from a statistical point of view, the odds are almost identical that you will get 80 customers in the store wearing the same or very similar clothing as the odds that you will get any arbitrary combination.

      I guess the manager/police call went something like this:

      Police: 911, What's your emergency?
      Manager: There are about 50-80 people in my Best Buy store wearing blue shirts and khaki pants.
      Police: Are they stealing anything or making threats?
      Manager: no
      Police: Are they disrupting your customers' shopping?
      Manager: no
      Police: Are they making noise or blocking entry or exit from the store?
      Manager: no
      Police: We'll get someone over there as soon as possible.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    67. Re:Manager called 911 by mishagam · · Score: 1

      I think if 80 people came to disrupt and film business it would be fair if they are arresetd for business disruption and tresspassing and had to pay for lost business (if any).

    68. Re:Manager called 911 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      What is 711 normally for?

    69. Re:Manager called 911 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Never mind. Found it, I think (unless it's different elsewhere).

    70. Re:Manager called 911 by xpurple · · Score: 1

      I don't care what they say. It is not a public place. It is a private place with an open invitation for people to come in and spend money. They can kick anyone out for any reason. Please read my article on the matter.

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    71. Re:Manager called 911 by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      RTFA.

      . Their recourse is to call the cops and have the people removed, which is what they did.

      No, their only recourse is to ask people to leave. The cops cannot simply remove someone since they lack the power to do this (no crime was committed, etc.).They failed to ask them to leave and as such the cops were there for nothing because no crime was committed.

      The cops told this to Best Buy, and as such no one was arrested or removed by the cops.

    72. Re:Manager called 911 by jhylkema · · Score: 2, Informative

      In California, If a security person detains you, you can Sue, and will probably win.

      Of course you have to ask to leave, and they imply that you can't ask.
      /*DISCLAIMER
      This is not legal advice. You are not a client. I'm not even an attorney. If you want legal advice, contact an attorney admitted to your jurisdiction's bar. What I am saying here is probably 100% wrong and if you do anything in reliance upon it, you are a blithering idiot who deserves whatever bad shit is very likely to befall you.

      DISCLAIMER*/

      Okay, now that that's out of the way . . .

      Parent is correct. Anytime a police officer or security rental cop make someone feel as though they're not free to leave, then legally that person is detained. It's a subjective standard based upon what a reasonable person in that situation would feel. In other words, "he wasn't detained, he was free to go" when the subject was in a tiny office with three beefy guards standing in front of the door, doesn't cut it. Now, most states have merchant protection statutes which allow the detention of a person for the purpose of determining whether or not they have secreted merchandise. They only apply if the detention is done reasonably and and for a reasonable length of time. Practically speaking, if you're going that route, you damn well better be prepared to say what merchandise was taken, where it was taken from, where it's hidden, and how you know all of this. "I thought I saw him take X" won't work. Here, there was no reason to suspect that any of these people had taken anything, so no detention was warranted.

      It gets better. Detention for more than 30 minutes turns into a de facto arrest, at which point the arrestor had better be praying it turns out to be legit. If not, i.e., it turns out that said arrest was without probable cause, the arrestee can sue the cop/guard personally (and spouse if in a community property state), the guard's employer, and possibly the store on a negligent hiring/retention theory. The plaintiff will probably stand to collect a settlement big enough to interest any number of attorneys in taking the case on contingency.

      As for the ignoramus, diversity-hire store manager with the four-foot caboose (what we in the Army used to call a "Delta November" or "the NUF"), claiming her civil rights are violated by being videotaped, bullshit. It's a public place, she has no reasonable expectation of privacy. Now, the store has a right to set rules on its property against videotaping or photography, but its sole recourse is to tell the person to leave. If they refuse, that's trespass and they can be arrested for it.

      Bottom line, all they did was throw a monkey wrench in the works of the Wal-Mart of electronics stores. Nothing illegal about that.

    73. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually do have something. It's called "Loitering Laws".

      If you're not there to do business with them, you're loitering - which is a crime.

    74. Re:Manager called 911 by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      If Best Buy would prefer patrons not look like their staff then perhaps they should invest in better uniforms? Blue shirt and khakis... I've worn that.


      Nah, they should invest in worse uniforms... something no "civilian" would ever be caught wearing by choice. Then it's guaranteed that the only people wearing them will be the employees who are forced to wear them. (See the "Hot Dog on a Stick" franchise for a clear example of this strategy)


      Why exactly are mildly confused customers a matter for the police anyway?


      For the same reason that unattended luggage is a matter for the police, I suppose... the feeling is that if something unusual is going on, it's better to be safe and report it, just in case it is something sinister.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    75. Re:Manager called 911 by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Until the manager or someone else associated with Best Buy asks them to leave and they refuse, the cops are powerless because nothing illegal is taking place.

      ... and in this case, not only did Best Buy not ask the guys to leave, but they actively prevented some of them from leaving (the guy with the X-box cam). Talk about no fucking case!

    76. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is never any need to panic.

    77. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry. couldn't resist.

      Please try harder next time.

    78. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      This message was brought to you by the Best Buy PR Dept.

    79. Re:Manager called 911 by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      It probably depends on the area. I work in IT for a local government (which includes administrative services, 911 dispatch, Sherrif's, court system, etc) and most of the time our 911 operators have a lot of downtime. There might be one person on the phone, but it's generally not hectic, and they certainly wouldn't mind any call that was legitimately intended to ask for police presence.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    80. Re:Manager called 911 by wjcofkc · · Score: 1
      In Vancouver here, I believe the procedure is to call 911 and someone will triage the call and dispatch the appropriate response.

      So you're saying that in Vancouver, you have a police procedure for dealing with improv artists?

      That's harsh man.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    81. Re:Manager called 911 by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Lessie - it was a blog link with boingboing.net from a number of months ago, cross your fingers....

      Google - rocks!

      http://www.die.net/musings/bestbuy/

      and the policeman was under the comments:

      http://www.die.net/musings/bestbuy/

      It's the last one under the posted name of David H. and it reads:

      ---

      "Aaron,

      Thanks for sharing your story of Best Buy door nazis. I was also a victim
      of this today, the Best Buy security refuse to let me leave the store unless
      I showed him my receipt and PHYSICALLY BLOCKED ME FROM LEAVING. Told him I
      did not have to present a receipt and asked for a manager... showed the
      manager my police ID... and told him that the next time anyone does that,
      they'll be in handcuffs for violation of California Penal Code section 236,
      False Imprisonment. I recommend all your readers do the same. They have no
      legal right to force you to show a receipt.

      In retrospect, I should of called the police and said that I was being held
      against my will... and that I wanted the security guard to be arrested.

      I smell a class action soon...."

      --

      I'm a crappy linker when pretending to be busy at work at the final hour of a friday (hey - I'm gonna put in 2 hours this weekend to make up for it - hey - creative grooves can't be forced in the art-asset biz - stop hounding me! Quitit!)

    82. Re:Manager called 911 by pinguwin · · Score: 0

      I liked the "asked" comment. Recently I was asked to leave a store after I said a store policy was bullshit Not loudly, just matter of factly. I refused to leave as I was being asked. She asked repeatedly and I said no, but feel free to call the police, but you are asking me. "If you order me to leave, I'll go." "Please leave." and I did. A friend pointed out that 'please' is a request, so I could have said no. Heh-heh. Nope, not gonna shop at Target any more.

    83. Re:Manager called 911 by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

      but that was New York City (I think) so there would be no shortage of "Real Emergency" situations. I think 911 was misused, local law enforcement should have been called. the number is in the freaking phone book

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    84. Re:Manager called 911 by x1n933k · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's for Relay services. For contacting and assisting TDD/TTY users.

    85. Re:Manager called 911 by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

      If you can tell me exactly how/what they were demonstrating. I would be interested in your point.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
    86. Re:Manager called 911 by topham · · Score: 1

      it's for dealing with Protesters, since Vancouver seems to have 2 or 3 protests going on a DAY.

      One thing I don't miss about living in B.C.

    87. Re:Manager called 911 by admdrew · · Score: 1

      711 is relay in most (all?) states. Hearing people can call that to connect to a relay operator that in turn dials a deaf, hard of hearing, or speech disabled person on TTY. It's standard voice-to-text relay, and once connected works the same way as text-to-voice (a la MCI's IP relay, Sprint relay, etc). Since 711 is handled by state contracts, I'm not sure if *every* state has one, but there are also 800 numbers hearing people can use (for free, like 711) from anywhere to dial a TTY.

    88. Re:Manager called 911 by MellowTigger · · Score: 1

      "Your not one of those people that think 911 is just a convient way to help you for any ol' thing, are you? I hope not, I hate those people."

      Actually, you are supposed to dial 911 for lots of non-emergency issues. I didn't know that either, so I'll related to you the story that taught me this bit of information.

      About 1 month ago there was an injured duck in the road just a few blocks from where I work. The duck was very much alive, with 2 broken feet, flapping wildly trying to move. I called the local animal shelter, but they said to call the police. I called the police, but they said to call 911 so that a dispatch could be made.

      *big ignorant shrug* I called 911 and reported the duck. I felt like an idiot while doing it, but it's what the police told me to do.

    89. Re:Manager called 911 by Riturno · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that is no longer true in parts of the USA. For instance in Dallas, TX it is used for parking violations, noise complaints and other routine issues.

    90. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is Sue, and why do you can her?

    91. Re:Manager called 911 by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Although with 80 people I might rip off a better target than Best Buy - maybe a bank or something.

      Yeah, robbing banks gets you in jail. Liquor stores gets you shot. Try restaurants. Don't you kids watch Pulp Fiction?

    92. Re:Manager called 911 by sco08y · · Score: 1

      No, their only recourse is to ask people to leave. The cops cannot simply remove someone since they lack the power to do this (no crime was committed, etc.).

      If you refuse to leave when asked, you're trespassing. You don't have to wait until a crime is committed to ask the police to help with a disruptive situation.

    93. Re:Manager called 911 by falloutboy · · Score: 1

      I would say, from the manager's perspective, it was prudent to call the police and let them know what was going on. I don't think it was necessary to call 911, though. In NYC there is another number, 311, that is a general information line for all things New York. The 311 operators would have definitely connected the call to a local police station without going through an emergency line.

      Somewhat off-topic: I once called 311 because I found my previously stolen bike chained to a subway stop in front of a Chinese restaurant. They ended up connecting me to 911 anyway, but was it really an emergency? I don't think so.

    94. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that unattended luggage is a matter for the police, I suppose... the feeling is that if something unusual is going on, it's better to be safe and report it, just in case it is something sinister.

      You've just described a culture of fear. If I don't know exactly what's going on I will assume it is something I should be afraid of. Note that the creation of a paranoid culture is the goal of terrorism.

      I do like the image of Best Buy employees in Hot Dog On A Stick uniforms though. Best Buy could get the same effect just by making their logo a prominent part of the uniform though.

    95. Re:Manager called 911 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's great until you get a culture of calling 911 for anything and everything and then there's a real emergency sometime. Here the non-emergency numbers are likely to be answered by the same dispatchers as 911, but they know that if it's not a 911 call they can let it ring a few times or put the caller on hold for a real 911 call.

    96. Re:Manager called 911 by mingot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you RTFA. It says that when employees asked them to leave they refused and said they were waiting on someone.

    97. Re:Manager called 911 by Tenser234 · · Score: 1

      In California, If a security person detains you, you can Sue, and will probably win. Of course you have to ask to leave, and they imply that you can't ask. That is wrong, to an extent. As a security officer for the last year that has all of the permits excepting the handgun permit, the actual way it should be put is, "If a security guard detains you for a wrong reason, (accuses and detains for stealing when you have no items). Then you can sue and will probably win. Second, if you are caught doing something wrong, tresspassing, stealing, inciting a riot, the security officer can detain you and call the police. There can be no search of your person. The only search a security officer is allowed to do is a swift pat down for weapons. Though, if the officer suspects you of having a item that is stolen, they must know where on your person it is before retrieving it. If their suspicions are wrong, then you can sue and will probably win. California laws are really weird. If a security officer handcuffs you and hurts you, you can most likely sue and win. Most officers do not have proper handcuffing licences. Though there is no specific law that says you need to have a license to own and use handcuffs. The license is the item that will negate most lawsuits.

    98. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the rules state to lie, and commit fraud. Helping someone in the pretence of being an employee (which many of the "agents" did if you read the page) is fraud.

      I also would have had every single one of them escorted out within about 5 minutes, but not before taking photos of as many of them as possible to put up behind the Best Buy counter so they could be banned from the store.

      They were tossers plain and simple.

    99. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The store manager felt that the store was going to have some sort of mass robbery.
      > Had the manager just felt it irritating but not threatening, then it indeed would have been a misuse of the system.

      HELLO! You call 911 about crimes that have already happened or are in progress, not ones you're afraid might happen.

      I can just picture you calling 911 every other day:
      "Help! I'm afraid my car might be broken into while it's parked in this garage."
      "Help! I'm afraid I might get mugged if I go jogging tonight."
      "Help! There's a big ugly guy in the corner of the bar staring at me!"

      Please.

    100. Re:Manager called 911 by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      If you're not there to do business with them, you're loitering - which is a crime

      define 'business with them'

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
    101. Re:Manager called 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yes, the rules state to lie, and commit fraud. Helping someone in the pretence of being an employee
      > (which many of the "agents" did if you read the page) is fraud.

      Yes, they lied - but if you want to hold that against them, you have to do likewise for every actor you've ever watched pretending to be someone they're not!

      Furthermore, there is no law against dressing like an employee of any store. The participants did not wear company logos, and didn't claim to be store employees. There is no law against answering someone's question if you feel like it. You'd do well to read up on the legal definition of criminal fraud, these guys didn't try to con or cheat anybody out of anything. In other words, you're full of it!

    102. Re:Manager called 911 by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      > I don't care what they say. It is not a public place. It is a private place with an open invitation for people to come in and spend money. They can kick anyone out for any reason. Please read my article on the matter.

      I read your article, and you're wrong. A store is a public place. It is private property, but you cannot invite the general public onto your property without losing some of your rights. For what reasons the store owner can kick people out of his store depends on the laws of the state, as was said earlier. Your article on public places was a well-written, Libertarian rant, but it defined the term incorrectly.

      To understand this, assume for the moment that you hate black people. You don't want any black people on your property, so you never invite them over to your house. That's fine. Now, assume you own a store, and you put up a big sign saying "No colored persons allowed." That's not fine, and the reason it's not fine is because the store is considered a public place while your house is not.

      Since Libertarians are property rights absolutists, you probably think that, if you opened a store, putting a "No colored persons allowed" sign up would be just fine. I'm not saying that you personally would want to do that, just that you think you should have the right to do that. If the right to property were in fact an absolute right, as Libertarian philosphy dictates it should be, you could restrict who enters your store based on anything, including race, and you'd be right in stating that a store is not a public place. However, the law doesn't match Libertarian philosophy in this respect. Property is not an absolute right, and the store is considered a "public place".

      This means a number of things. For one thing, it means the property owner cannot decide to not let people in during normal business hours because of race. It also means that customers do not have an expectation of privacy, so anyone can covertly videotape them without their permission (except in the restrooms, where there is an expectation of privacy).

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    103. Re:Manager called 911 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      "They refused and said they were waiting on someone."?

      More like "They said they were waiting on someone in order to manipulate the employees into changing their mind about asking them to leave." An important distinction.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    104. Re:Manager called 911 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      It _is_ a public place. Something can be legally considered a public place without being public property. Those are two different terms in law, and you seem to be confused about this.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    105. Re:Manager called 911 by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Should they have taken it out on Improv Everywhere or the manager that called them and wasted public resources for a non-emergency?

    106. Re:Manager called 911 by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is more that most people tend to settle into a very comfortable daily routine that they simply don't like disrupted in any way. It threatens them when a new and alien situation arises and they don't know what to expect. How the employees reacted was perfectly understandable, but that's why they do these improv shows.

      People have to realize that in life there will always been situations where you aren't in complete control and things can't be predicted. The key is not to immediately panic or react with hostility when such circumstances come up. Hopefully those that participated in the event involuntarily were able to step back and have a laugh at the end of it all after realizing how paranoid they reacted to a perfectly harmless situation.

      Injecting a little unexpected humor into the lives of others can only improve our society. People need to lighten up and stop assuming the worst about each other.

    107. Re:Manager called 911 by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Yes, you have the right to be a dick, but that's what makes these improv sessions so hilarious sometimes. Some people are just too uptight and get easily annoyed by completely harmless lighthearted fun.

      Unfortunately for people like you, public places are shared by everyone--including people who like to create "disruptive" social situations in an attempt to inject humor and an element of the unexpected into the lives of people around them. Best Buy may not be public property, but it is publicly accessible nonetheless, and all members of the public are invited to frequent the stores. If you don't like it, you can open your own electronics store and bar whomever you want from entering it.

      Some people appreciate the departure from the mundane and enjoy a little spontaneity in their lives. Others, who can't handle not being in complete control of a situation, might lose their cool and react with hostility. That's just a risk that these individuals have to take, and it's something that, unfortunately, everyone else in society also has to put up with.

      So just as you have the right to act like you've got a stick up your ass, others have the right to create absurd/comedic social situations in public places to try to make life more interesting. If you don't want to be "disrupted" by unexpected situations, then stay home. Because as soon as you step foot out that door, you are no longer in control. People are free to make offhand remarks, act silly, or otherwise be as disruptive as they want without encroaching on your rights as an individual. You can either piss and moan about other people having a little harmless, or you can just learn to not be so uptight all the time.

    108. Re:Manager called 911 by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      True, I don't find distrupting people to clever, or even particularly funny. Perhaps you can go watch Tom Green reruns and get your fill of that sort of humor.

      Let me make sure I have this: I advocate being peaceful and letting people go about their lives, and you advocate disrupting them for a good laugh, and I'm the dick. Interesting perspective.

      I also like how you ascribe motivations and various psychological traits to me (quite incorrectly) and all the people involved in this situation (also very likely incorrectly). Is this the greatly increased mental power provided to you via drug use that you spoke of those many moons ago?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    109. Re:Manager called 911 by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      It was in New York City. You expect people not to panic?

    110. Re:Manager called 911 by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you were advocating peace? Gosh, I wasn't aware that Improv Everywhere was going around instigating violence and carrying out acts of aggression against others. I thought they were just "disruptive" in the sense that they planned interactive public performances that involved the audience in a direct and personal way . Thus, disrupting the mundane situations that they inject these performances into.

      I'm sorry, I totally misjudged you. Apparently you're just a peace-loving fellow who wants to put an end to the Improv Everywhere menace that has been terrorizing the community. Your disparaging remarks and condescending tone definitely do not make you come off as an asshole. Clearly you're not being too uptight about people simply wearing blue polo shirts and khaki pants in a cleverly engineer situation (the audacity of these people...). All of us who find these performances amusing must be 'morons' just as you say...

      Funny, you deny being overly uptight, but you seem to have a rudely condescending attitude towards people who simply enjoy a little benign and lighthearted fun. Is my recreational drug use (done in the privacy of my own home) too disruptive as well? Or are you simply a dick towards drug users because you just don't like people who lead a different lifestyle from yours?

      You can call anything that affects you 'disruptive'. Anything that captures your eye briefly, causes you to break a stride, throws you slightly off your usual routine, or simply makes you pause for a moment's thought can be considered disruptive. Simply seeing two guys make-out in public, which you may not be used to, can be extremely disruptive to some people. Just because it's disruptive doesn't make it wrong or necessarily bad. If seeing two guys making-out upsets you, maybe you just need to get out more and learn to be more open-minded. You can choose to be annoyed by the slightest unexpected situation, or you can choose not to.

      For instance, in college I was always very sociable towards other people, especially my freshman year since I was from out of state and didn't know anyone at my school. I said 'Hi' to everyone I met and made an effort to socialize with complete strangers. This was well-received by most people, and I immediately made a lot of friends. However, there were always one or two people who, no matter how many times I greeted, would never reply or even acknowledge my presence.

      I'm sure those individuals probably found my persistent efforts to socialize with them to be very disruptive. It may have even annoyed them (which is why I eventually gave up). But in the context of the situation, I was just trying to be friendly, and they simply weren't used to it or something.

      There will always be people like that--people who don't want to engage in smalltalk at the bus stop, people who avoid eye contact when they walk past you, or give you dirty looks when you smile at them, but that doesn't mean we should all just go through our daily routines avoiding any kind of social interactions with each other because some people might find it 'disruptive' or 'annoying'. Maybe that's what you'd call 'peaceful', but I call it 'boring'.

      Similarly, just because you choose to be annoyed by a little harmless fun doesn't mean the IE agents are in the wrong. The improv players in the video weren't approaching any customers or getting in people's way. They were just standing around in blue poloshirts and khaki pants. Most people seem to find the sessions entertaining, including the bystanders involved from all the videos I've seen. The only people getting irrate about it seem to be those with a compulsive need to keep people in line at all times--cops, for instance. So it seems like you're just too uptight about all of this.

    111. Re:Manager called 911 by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of a story I heard once about the wife of a drug dealer. She would do the following:

      1. She would go into a store with a group of her black friends dressed up very hip-hop gangstery and be very loud.

      2. She had one white friend who would go into the store seperately, looking demure and wearing a skirt with big inside pockets.

      3. While the people in the store were paying attention to the black group, the white girl would rob them blind and leave.

      Shoplifting: Life Among The Boosters

      Me, as a minimum wage employee in a store, I was taken a few times as part of a confidence game. Usually nothing as complex as the scenario described above. "Quickchange artists" attempt to confuse you about how much change you've given them. The way they do this is they come in late when everyone is tired from a long day, and they are very agressive with you and make you doubt yourself. There are other scams involving claiming that something they are holding was something they brought into the store to check the battery size. The way these work are not by fooling you, but by being agressive and insulting. It's basically the hard sell, which you may have run into in other aspects of your life.

      I remember working in a store that was victimized by a "smash and grab" in New Jersey. I almost got in trouble for it and the manager did get in trouble for it. Basically, she had tied a bunch of Street Fighter II games for the Super Nintendo onto a rack (as a display), she thought securely. Well, someone figured it out and grabbed them all while we were all distracted.

      Of course, most of the people applauding this stupid prank were probably in diapers when that happened.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    112. Re:Manager called 911 by GuloGulo2 · · Score: 1

      TFA said nothing of the kind, liar.

  8. NYUD.net Karma Whoring Link by un1xl0ser · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    1. Re:NYUD.net Karma Whoring Link by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      lol. I like that crazy bearded dude in the back. Bet he runs Hurd.

    2. Re:NYUD.net Karma Whoring Link by CamD · · Score: 1

      Any real Slashdotter would be using the Slashdotter Firefox extension which inserts a Coral Cache link after each link, rendering you whoring useless.

  9. Linus would not approve! by mctk · · Score: 3, Funny
    Also, can't this be considered Slashdoting something physically.

    Big public wanking sessions are generally looked down upon.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    1. Re:Linus would not approve! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats the hell out of looking up.

  10. Policy and Legislation by hwstar · · Score: 0, Troll

    First, Policy:

    Posted at the entrance to a store:

    Persons impersonating store employees will be prosecuted for trespassing.

    Later, Lobbyists:

    Will introduce federal legislation to make this this kind of thing a felony.

    1. Re:Policy and Legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They never impersonated employees - RTFA! They only wore blue shirts, and never once claimed to work at Best Buy. Futhermore, they each left when asked to do so, even though the manager chose to call police before even asking them to leave. As they might have said in Office Space, "She's got upper management material written all over her." Excellent, excellent interpersonal skills.

    2. Re:Policy and Legislation by Peyna · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Persons impersonating store employees will be prosecuted for trespassing.


      So, in the future I might have to bring multiple changes of clothes with me if I want to go shopping at multiple stores to make sure I don't get confused with the employees? What about those clothing stores that make their employees wear the clothes they sell in the store? Will there be a sign out front "No customer may wear Old Navy clothing inside the store."?

      Anyway, when I worked at Best Buy there was probably a few times I noticed a customer walk in wearing khakis and a blue or black or yellow polo. It seems to be a pretty common clothing ensemble.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Policy and Legislation by Namronorman · · Score: 1

      I've had several solid yellow polos of the same shade, but no solid blues like that. I have worn the yellow polos into best buy before, but never have I been asked for help while wearing them. However, I've been asked for help while wearing shirt from places like Banana Republic and what not that are not solid color.

      Oddly enough, it seems like older people and the yehaw types are the ones who ask me the most. Maybe it's just the idea a lot of people have that most people don't dress nice anymore, except while at work.

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    4. Re:Policy and Legislation by Nephilium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I think the shopping attire will eventually be mandated...

      And does this mean whenever someone asks me if I can help them I'd get in trouble?

      Although... it does remind me of my retail days... one customer asked someone who was wearing close to the same clothes as the staff where something was... when the person being asked said they didn't know, the one asking started ranting and swearing at them... for five minutes... after he stopped, the person who was asked calmly said, "I don't work here." Then turned and walked away... of course... the entire staff was in the next aisle over trying not to laugh out loud too loudly...

      Nephilium
    5. Re:Policy and Legislation by Minwee · · Score: 1
      "So, in the future I might have to bring multiple changes of clothes with me if I want to go shopping at multiple stores to make sure I don't get confused with the employees?"

      No need to go so far. Just wear a loose fitting gray coverall with the words "NOT AN EMPLOYEE" stenciled on the back. That should cut down on requests for help by at least 50%.

    6. Re:Policy and Legislation by Umuri · · Score: 1

      Umm, it already is against the law. That's why it states quite clearly if they are asked if they are employees, they responded no. Impersonating an employee or customer is illegal, not too heavy a sentence but it's still something i wouldn't want to spend.

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    7. Re:Policy and Legislation by Lectrik · · Score: 1

      OMG, I've impersonated a best buy employee before!!! I should turn myself in now

      yeah, at one point our work uniforms also consisted of blue polos and khakis. Our company logo also happened to be a very yellowy-orange, but was not the same size or shape as the BB logo.

      In the process of going in to buy a router on the way home from work, I managed to get asked where things were 5 or 6 times in the 15 minutes I was there.

      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    8. Re:Policy and Legislation by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      What state or country has laws against impersonating a store employee?

    9. Re:Policy and Legislation by nancypants · · Score: 1

      If you happen to be wearing a blue shirt and khakis, that doesn't constitute impersonation. Impersonation would be telling people you're an employee, or at the very least not informing them if they ask you something. If Best Buy were to enforce a dress code, then they might have a leg to stand on, but they can't justifiably kick you out for wearing blue. At least, not any more than they have the right to refuse service to anyone.

      Besides, how do they let you know you'll be prosecuted for trespassing if you wear blue? Will you have to agree to a goddamned EULA when you walk in the door?

      I'd love to bust out a dictionary on them if they tried to say dressing a certain way qualified as trespassing. That's ridiculous.

    10. Re:Policy and Legislation by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      The same manager also got on her walkie talkie out in the street when they left, "They're heading down 6th!" Who was she telling, the Best Buy Covert Tracking Team?

    11. Re:Policy and Legislation by zuzzabuzz · · Score: 1

      Or impersonating a customer? I tend to do that regularly...when I'm broke. Watch out World!

      --
      -buzz
    12. Re:Policy and Legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This did happen to me once. I had a royal blue shirt on, that had no logo on it. A number of people asked me questions, and I told them all that I didn't work here. Finally, I was annoyed by the time the 5th person asked me something, and I just pointed in a random direction (I was on my way out of the store).

  11. Additional info/video links by mabu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Links to more info on the Best Buy incident here.

  12. Re:news? by Anonymous+Coward+Gra · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wear a blue shirt at work and everytime I stop at Best Buy, I would get asked by numerous customers for help.

  13. same group... by cl191 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FYI, this is the same group that did the fake U2 roof top concert the day before U2 actually plays in NY.

  14. Re:welcome to last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I getting pretty tired of all these "dup!, I posted that last week! That's 10 days old, nobody cares now!" posts. Look, if you aren't posting on topic, or can't contribute in some positive way; why are you even posting?

  15. Re:news? by Daath · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're new here, aren't you? ;D

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  16. Spike by lunenburg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I _thought_ my server load was on the way down after three days of getting hammered by this story....

    1. Re:Spike by fourtyfive · · Score: 1

      If you are the server admin, you may want to try out lighttpd, or turning off keepalive for a bit. I noticed while browsing the site, as soon as you have a keepalive connection, you can download everything that failed to do so (click on pictures and click "show picture") and it pops up instantly (because you have a keepalive session until it times out), once it times out, you have to wait for another session...

    2. Re:Spike by lunenburg · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tips - it's a shared hosting box, so I'm not in a position to switch to lighttpd on short notice, but I did disable KeepAlive.

    3. Re:Spike by fourtyfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it looks like its running a _lot_ faster, is it still under the same load?

    4. Re:Spike by lunenburg · · Score: 1
  17. What a coincidence! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wear a vacant look and maintain a surly attitude every time I Stop at Best Buy, I would get asked by numerous customer for help!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:What a coincidence! by Flounder · · Score: 1

      If I'm shopping at Best Buy, it usually means something broke, I need to replace it that day, and can't wait for Newegg to ship it. So, yeah. I'm surly whenever I have to go to Best Buy.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    2. Re:What a coincidence! by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      Gave me a grin to see this as it makes the fact that BB gave my credit card number to Entertainment Weekly who promptly signed me up for a subscription, less pain. Hate them both now and won't ever entertain their entrances again, unless wearing a blue shirt of course.

  18. news?-Lifeline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wear a blue shirt at work and everytime I stop at Best Buy, I would get asked by numerous customers for help."

    "Oh please help me! You're my only hope. None of the others will talk to me, and they just run away. *grabs pants leg* Don't leave me! I have so many questions."

    1. Re:news?-Lifeline. by Minwee · · Score: 1

      "Please! Please sell me an extended warranty on my service contract!"

  19. Re:welcome to last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ok, I still appreciate the link. Think about it, is it really that important (and therefore bad for slashdot) that you know about this story? Slashdot is not mission-critical stuff. I don't have a shitload of spare time to just cruise around online, but when I need a diversion I can get it at slashdot.

    Guess what? For every article on here there are going to be people who heard of it first, heard of it 2 weeks ago, 4 months ago, whatever. Just STFU and go on to the next article. Do I give a shit about Legos? No. Do I bitch about it when a Lego article comes up? No. You are a lame bastard that needs to get a sense of reality.

  20. The Uniform by texaport · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Twenty years ago it was nearly an artform at some after-work hangouts, for ladies to guess where a guy worked:
    navy pinstripe suits indicated a bank, doublebreasted suits meant insurance, charcoal gray suits were brokerages.

    Today it is trivial for 21-25 year old women; red shirt is a computer superstore, blue shirt is big box retailer, and
    white shirts with a yellow smiley face means WalMartians...

    1. Re:The Uniform by mh101 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd think wearing a red shirt would mean don't bother dating me, I'll be dead shortly.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:The Uniform by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooh ooh, do me!

      I wear a t-shirt, khaki shorts and sandals. Sometimes with socks.

      Give up? I'm a grad student. They don't pay me enough to wear real shoes or full length pants.

    3. Re:The Uniform by wombert · · Score: 1

      It all depends on which generation you're talking about...

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    4. Re:The Uniform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What does this say about us? 20 years ago, women tried to guess what type of job you had based on what sort of business attire you wore.

      Now, anybody can guess where you work based on the color of your polo shirt.

      Tell me again how we're not engaging in a "race to the bottom" of the McJob Market...

    5. Re:The Uniform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An orange means "I just banged texaport's mom"

  21. I understand the Best Buy response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can appreciate the humor but I also understand why the Best Buy folks were freaked out by it.

    One time when I was working in the UC San Diego college bookstore back in the 1980's, a bunch of activists came in with cameras to film everybody and the inside of the store. They were eventually escorted out by Campus Security, but it really unnerved some people, because we weren't sure who they were or what they were going to do with film they shot. There was talk that the activists were going to identify us and attack us another time away from the store to get back at the "establishment" and those of us who were helping the "establishment".

    So I understand why the Best Buy folks might be a bit unnerved by this event. I suspect if I was an employee, I would have been also.

    1. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by borroff · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You have nothing to worry about - you weren't doing anything wrong (snicker). Life in Bushworld.

    2. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by Cyno · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There was talk that the activists were going to identify us and attack us another time away from the store to get back at the "establishment" and those of us who were helping the "establishment".

      Paranoid much?

      You know about 60-70% of the population will obey an order from a superior in a position of authority even if they know the order is wrong and they could be jeopardizing an innocent person's life.

      You seem to fall into the majority.

      I would suggest you spend more time questioning authority and thinking for yourself, as opposed to letting them do your thinking for you.. it means you can't trust any single source of information, and you can't trust authority. Because to do so would be foolish. But don't take my word for it.

      Google it.

      Then google some of this.

    3. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There was talk that the activists were going to identify us and attack us another time away from the store to get back at the "establishment" and those of us who were helping the "establishment".
      So.. yourself and the rest of the clueless squares in the bookstore had incredibly vague and paranoid concerns about being attacked for incoherent reasons, because a bunch of people were filming in a bookstore. And therefore you empathize with Best Buy for being freaked by anything that diverges from the standard 8-hour shift of consumer behaviour.

      I do pity you your small, scared mind.
    4. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Probably because the only time these things are publicized is when people are hurt, or they're sensationalizing the aspect of the story where everyone feared for their lives, or there's spin on it to the effect that the people could have been plotting against the store, etc. Everyone always talks about it in a negative way, but it was just a joke, and everyone seems to miss that point. I guess that's why everyone's afraid, they're always thinking about the worst. If nothing bad ever happens, or if it's extremely rare, but people always think of the worst, of course they'll always be afraid.

    5. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'You know about 60-70% of the population will obey an order from a superior in a position of authority even if they know the order is wrong and they could be jeopardizing an innocent person's life.'

      precisely the reason why you shouldnt be supporting the efforts of this group and taking videos for future storage... it would only take one of the senior ups to find support for burning the place down.

      Dont think it happens? happens all the time, your just too much of a geek to realize it.

    6. Re:I understand the Best Buy response by Cyno · · Score: 1

      more like too much of a pothead..

      good point.

  22. It's funny indeed by citking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To all of the people who complain about the stunts, the immaturity, the panic, the idiotic ideas...lighten up!

    I hate to generalize (Ok, I love it, but pretend for a second I don't) but our society today needs some humor. We hear "terrorist this" and "gas prices that" and "x troops killed today in Iraq by insurgents..." every day. We seem so drenched in sadness and tragedy sometimes we forget what we are: free!

    As long as a flash mob/stunt doesn't injure innocent bystanders and cause undue distress to officials I don't see the harm. The way that these people carry out "missions" with their "agents" is harmless. I admit that there is no screening process and no, I wouldn't want to be a manager on duty that day at Best Buy. But these stunts are things that you can look back upon 2 days, 2 weeks, 2 months, or 2 years later and grin. We need humor! I give my props to the people who have the audacity to go out there, do something very strange while surreptitiously documenting it, and post it for the rest of us to enjoy later! Way to go!

    In a world filld with bad news, depressing ideas, and bad people, it's enlightening to smile at the deeds of others without having read it on Fark or the Darwin Awards.

    I know I enjoyed the missions (the pantsless ones are priceless!) and I think that they have a great way of making people laugh. If you don't enjoy, that's fine. I don't get British humor and I hate Monty Python. Some humor isn't for everybody. But lighten up!

    --
    "This food is problematic."
    1. Re:It's funny indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Lighten up!" Is that what you tell a rape victim?

      They are disrupting people's day, causing real security issues (not perceived, but absolutely genuine), and interfering with business and the fundamental right to be left alone.

      One can scream "Lighten up!" while being physically removed or even arrested. The plea will get noted in a report somewhere, but have no other bearing whatsoever.

    2. Re:It's funny indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What pisses me off is that we don't have more video of Agent Reeves.

    3. Re:It's funny indeed by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You compare this to rape? It's not.

      What a souless mechanized sanitized society you crave.

    4. Re:It's funny indeed by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm kinda mixed on this one.

      On one hand, there should be nothing wrong bunch of people getting together in public.

      But ... it is disturbing when you are not part of the crowd/don't get it. Imagine if you held an open party at a public park and suddenly a bunch of people you don't know showed up dressed in all leather and large hats. Is that funny or unsettling? How would you feel about a bunch of people who effectively hijacked your party because they thought it would be fun?

      >As long as a flash mob/stunt doesn't injure innocent bystanders and cause undue distress to officials I don't see the harm.

      From what I can tell, it did cause undue stress on the Best Buy employees.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:It's funny indeed by mkro · · Score: 1
      Another example. Mario Blocks Cause Bomb Scare. I feel sorry for those who react with fear instead of curiousity to semi surreal events like these.

      No, people do not respond like that everywhere. Thank god.

      *considers installing Flash 8 to take a closer look at Agent Reeves*
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    6. Re:It's funny indeed by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I hate to generalize (Ok, I love it, but pretend for a second I don't) but our society today needs some humor. We hear "terrorist this" and "gas prices that" and "x troops killed today in Iraq by insurgents..." every day. We seem so drenched in sadness and tragedy sometimes we forget what we are: free!


      Sir, Please run for president because i want to vote you into office.

      This is exactly correct. I think its important that we have fun and remember we are free people. This group of 80 "agents" are a reminder that we are to enjoy life, no matter what it throws us.

      Sometimes it pays to be silly and have fun. Walk backwards down an up escalator just because you can.... Whistle while you work... or wear a silly hat while everyone looks at you like a mad man.

      The truth is.. those that dare to stand out, enjoy life. Congrats to these people. They were respectful as can be, knew the law, caused no harm, stole nothing, but instead decided to have a little fun in life, harmless, albiet perhaps confusing to the store but... harmless.

      I do think at the end of the day, one of the men should have come back to explain and thank them for their patients and hopefully everyone could enjoy the laugh.

      Cheers to those who stand up and enjoy life... cause god knows it sucks.

    7. Re:It's funny indeed by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      "As long as a flash mob/stunt doesn't injure innocent bystanders and cause undue distress to officials I don't see the harm."

      I'm not bent out of shape by this kind of thing, but let me point out "Agent Ciletti's" statement of events, in TFA. Did you get that far in TFA? Her writeup is near the bottom.

      When she was taking part in the stunt, someone asked her for help finding a USB device (or something), assuming she was an employee. She was intentionally unhelpful, and the customer started to leave. Do you think it's ok to piss off a Best Buy customer?

      I agree people need to lighten up. But there are always participants in these things that want to see how far they can push it, so they can be "cooler" than the next guy.

      I don't care how much one thinks Best Buy sucks; that part wasn't cool.

    8. Re:It's funny indeed by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Intentionally unhelpful... I'd say that's par for the course for those stores...

      Them: "Can I help you?"

      Me: Yeah, actually stock cabling!!!

      I don't know how many times I've gone there looking for some RCA or S-Video cable to find out all they have are the 6" long cables or the MONSTER diamond studded $300 an inch cables.

      It's nice that you sell 15 flavours of DVD players, but if you don't sell cables to hook them up what's the fucking point? You can reapply this with various computer gear.

      The problem is they're not an electronics store. An electronics store sells devices and their accessories. Best Buy just sells the big ticket items and the media (e.g. movies and shit).

      Makes me glad Radioshack is still around...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:It's funny indeed by mlow82 · · Score: 1
      I hate to generalize (Ok, I love it, but pretend for a second I don't) but our society today needs some humor. We hear "terrorist this" and "gas prices that" and "x troops killed today in Iraq by insurgents..." every day. We seem so drenched in sadness and tragedy sometimes we forget what we are: free!
      Remember Bowling For Columbine? For some reason, our society (in the United States) is obsessed with violence and tragedy, while some of our neighbors in Canada don't think so much about it (some of them leave their doors unlocked even after being robbed once). I agree; we as a country really need to lighten up.
    10. Re:It's funny indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We seem so drenched in sadness and tragedy

      Yeah, you poor Americans, so drenched in sadness and tragedy.

      Why don't you ask the Iraqis how fucking sad their tragic lives are right now, since you've invaded their country and killed 10s of 1000s of their civilians. Or let's ask the people of Afghanistan, who were invaded by the USA because of the Taliban dictatorship, a dicatorship that the USA had installed.

      "gas prices that"

      Oh gosh, you have "gas prices", that surely compares to the tragedy of an Iraqi father scraping his child off the ground with a shovel after an American tank ran over the child (ed: that's a true story, not hyperbole). You must weep every night because it costs an extra $100 a year to drive around your fucking truck.

      Fucking Americans. So oblivious to the rest of the world. Damn you and your fucking "sadness" you motherfucker.

    11. Re:It's funny indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember Bowling For Columbine? For some reason, our society (in the United States) is obsessed with violence and tragedy, while some of our neighbors in Canada don't think so much about it (some of them leave their doors unlocked even after being robbed once). I agree; we as a country really need to lighten up.


      Please. I live in a part of Cincinnati that has between one and five shootings every night, with an increasing number of them being fatal. Want even more fun? Try Detroit. If you're Canadian and folks are not whacking each other, that's fine.. but when people are getting killed by stray bullets in some major cities it just might be a bit more difficult to tone down the attitude. There are a number of US cities like this, and add to the mix of violent crime that a new scam comes up every minute where you're being 'tricked' out of money/property/whatever you'll have to excuse the fact that I generally keep a semiauto locked and loaded with manstoppers on my person unless I'm in a location where it is prohibited.

      And no, being nice and flowery to everybody and cranking down prison time for various felonies does not help... just in case you go there. It's hard to keep a gang banger from making 10-40k a month dealing illicit stuff by telling him that he should work at McD's for 7.00 an hour.

      Back to the topic of Best Buy: the best policy in the 21st century is not to screw with people. The cops in my neck of the woods are a bit twitchy (just watch the national news), and they'd either charge the manager of that store or more likely throw everybody into the clink on some nebulous trumped up bullshit.

      Oh, and if you leave your doors unlocked after getting robbed you're a fucking retard.
    12. Re:It's funny indeed by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Do you think it's ok to piss off a Best Buy customer?
       
      Their employees (and managers) seem to think so.

    13. Re:It's funny indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's funny, and then there's funny. See, these guys didn't really set out to have harmless fun. They went out to terrorize (and I use that term loosely) the managers. They even mention it in the page - "people acted how we expected them to." The problem with these videos is that they wouldn't have anything if the store managers and security would've been totally cool with them. Those videos are only funny because some poor manager, who has no future career path, and is probably worried about job security, got riled.

      So... tell me again, where's the funny part?

    14. Re:It's funny indeed by drmaxx · · Score: 1

      [quote:] I don't get British humor and I hate Monty Python.[/quote] ... and I always thought I am the only one out there. Welcome brother....

    15. Re:It's funny indeed by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      The parent is a great comment, insightful, and really gets to the heart of this stupid, mean prank.

      I'm surprised it hasn't been modded -1 flamebait by now.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  23. Ask them to leave... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    The worst she could legally do to them, lacking a 'no blue shirts' type policy, and probably even then, would be to tell them that they have to leave, that they're not welcome at the store anymore. If they refused to leave the store in an expedient fashion(you don't have to run, but don't linger), then she could have the police charge them with trespassing. With it being a store, permission for the public to be on the property is assumed.

    This was eventually done, at which point the people left.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Ask them to leave... by mingot · · Score: 1

      They refused when asked until the police came.

      Employees began asking our agents to leave the store if they weren't shopping. Most stuck to their "I'm waiting for my girlfriend" story and refused to leave.

    2. Re:Ask them to leave... by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the problem, the employees made it conditional. You don't make it conditional.

      "Excuse me Sir, you have to leave now" would have worked. Still, any of the 'performers' who refused could have been hauled into court for trespassing.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Ask them to leave... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is what if I just happened to be shopping at the Best Buy that day, and I was wearing a blue polo shirt with khakis? Would they have thrown me out even if I protested that I was not a member of the group, and just wanted to buy a camera?

      Of course, first I'd actually have to own a polo shirt...

    4. Re:Ask them to leave... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Of course, first I'd actually have to own a polo shirt...

      The polo shirt is the 'business casual' uniform of choice. If you don't own one, you are either a 'suit' or still in school.

      (or a dirty hippie, but let's not go there...)

    5. Re:Ask them to leave... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      The polo shirt is the 'business casual' uniform of choice. If you don't own one, you are either a 'suit' or still in school.

      I'm neither a suit nor in school. I generally just wear button-down shirts untucked, because I absolutely hate polos. Always have, always will.

    6. Re:Ask them to leave... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It's entirely possible that you would have. It's a risk Best Buy took, possibly kicking out potential paying customers. Of course, it sounds like the manager in question was A: panicked, and B: stupid/ignorant/not thinking. So it's hard to say.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  24. Thomas Crowne Affair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is absolutely outstanding. Rene and Pierce are liberal as fukall, but that was a good movie. It had subtleness to the pinnacle of any James Bond movie.

    And I'll be honest: FUCK worst buy.

    It's too bad they didn't steal trade secrets, sell them to CompUSA, then send accounting records to the New York Times and any other anti-capitalism newspaper that would review them for "discrepances".

    Up your god damn ass, Worst Buy.

    1. Re:Thomas Crowne Affair by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      The movie with Brosnan and Russo isn't the original Thomas Crowne Affair. The original is with Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway.

      This is, however, one of the few movies where I liked the newer one a lot better than the older one. The old one was a straight up late 60s action flick. The new one was a very intelligent movie (with only a passing resemblence to the original).

  25. Bust buy: Proving once again how assholes they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Droping the chance of free publicity has to be once of the worse moves in history. Calling the cops on potential costumers?, what's next.

    And don't get me started on cops wasting taxpayers dollars attending a non threatning situation just only because a BB manager freaked out, go and fight crime pigs!!!.

  26. Unreported by Zepalesque · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unreported were 5 red-shirt clad improv artists at the same event. Unfortunately they all were all killed by a freak car accident in the parking lot ;)

  27. Re:Philisophical analogy by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Ah, but you are physically attacking people.

    And by definition, clowns aren't funny.
    To quote Cmdr. Vimes:
    "If it was funny, clowns wouldn't be doing it." Cmdr. Vimes, Diskworld by Terry Prachet

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Works at the supermarket too by kbob88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try wearing khaki pants, a white button down shirt, and a tie next time you shop at the supermarket. I used to have to wear that at work, and we'd often go to the Jewel supermarket deli counter for lunch. Usually I'd get mistaken for a store manager at least once per visit.

    Eventually I stopped trying to tell little old ladies that I didn't work there. I had gotten to know the store well enough that it was easier to just tell them where their item was...

    1. Re:Works at the supermarket too by Megane · · Score: 2, Funny
      Try wearing khaki pants, a white button down shirt, and a tie next time you shop at the supermarket.

      Or at a Fry's.

      I can one-up you. More than a few times I've been in a thrift store and mistaken for someone who works there simply because of being a guy who doesn't look confused and lost. Never mind that the other employees are clearly wearing identically-colored vests with the thrift store logo on them.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Works at the supermarket too by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I was in Future Shop in an old (unfashionable) long-sleeved shirt, well-worn, and a pair of khakis that were wearing thin and hadn't been washed in a week. My hair was a mess, I felt like a wreck, and I looked like hell.... And someone still came up to me and asked if I worked there. I guess that's just how people are. Sigh.

    3. Re:Works at the supermarket too by apraetor · · Score: 1

      I work as an EMT in Massachusetts, and our summertime uniform shirt is a green polo shirt. If I stop at a Shaw's after work I am berated with questions from customers who mistake me for a store employee -- despite the huge Star of Life on my back.

  29. Re:It's a Zonk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zonk happened. Of course, before him it was michael sims, jon katz, etc. slashdot has a long history of sucking.

  30. Hmm... by sesshomaru · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is about the stupidist thing I've ever heard of. Essentially, a bunch of trust fund babies deciding to hassle the working class. I'm reminded of Bertie Wooster stealing policemens' hats. "Well, they like it, just like foxes like to be hunted." It's not coincidental that Wodehouse was popular in Soviet Russia.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    1. Re:Hmm... by PCM2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I'm reminded of Bertie Wooster stealing policemens' hats. "Well, they like it, just like foxes like to be hunted." It's not coincidental that Wodehouse was popular in Soviet Russia.
      Because, as we all know, in Soviet Russia Jeeves finds stuff on you.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  31. Re:news? by mikerm19 · · Score: 0

    It doesn't even have to be a shirt. I used to work at Home Depot. We had to wear an orange smock, but any color collar shirt.

    After I had quit, I came in to get a few things one day, and I was wearing an orange shirt. I must of gotten stopped at least a dozen times by customers wanting help. Of course, I helped them out a little bit, not wanting to go back to my Home Depot days.

  32. Re:news? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has always been a site where they link to news they find might be interesting and nerd like in nature.

    ALWAY been that way. That is their business. Don't like it? Leave.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. Dice by writermike · · Score: 1

    "Thomas Crown Affair! Thomas Crown Affair!," one employee shouted.

    Please, allow me to quote Dice Clay.

    "You fucking geek." :-)

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  34. haha by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the last thinkg a business want's is to be left alone*.
    Something yopu might want to remember if you every start a business.

    It is taky, and causes people not to listen to your point when you campare this to rape. Or anything to an absurd extreme.

    *with the exception of used book stores. Which are just a fancy way for people to show off there libraries.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I weep for the future.

  35. Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's also "disturbing the peace". Remember how thick law books are? Now you all have some idea why.

    1. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Ariane+6 · · Score: 1

      You'll be hard-pressed to find a court that will convict you of "disturbing the peace" by standing somewhere. The worst they could do is loitering, but, once again (and I really can't emphasize this enough):

      Nobody asked them to leave first

    2. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 0
      Nobody asked them to leave first
      There's no duty to warn a trespasser, even in New York State. Criminal trespass is illegal. Demonstration on private property without a license is illegal, both because of the lack of a parade permit and because of the criminal trespass statues.

      [To answer a common misconception, you don't need a message to engage in an illegal demonstration. In fact, the basic tenet of the First Amendment right to assemble means that a regulation which bans assemblies cannot have anything to do with their content, and must merely be concerned with the orderly conduct of society.]
    3. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by aloeppert · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good job! You'll be receiving your brown shirt in the mail.

    4. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no duty to warn a trespasser, even in New York State. Criminal trespass is illegal.

      This was not trespassing under any sane definition I can see, as that would lead to some down right stupid results (ex: walk into a store and get arrested without any warning). As I see it the store gives implied permission for people to enter, so unless they remove that permission from someone (and let them know) it's inane to say that person si trespassing.

    5. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's no duty to warn a trespasser, even in New York State. Criminal trespass is illegal.


      If I follow you correctly, you're saying that anybody who goes into a Best Buy is a criminal the instant Best Buy decides they don't like that person. The only difference between a law-abiding citizen and a "criminal trespasser" is Best Buy's opinion of that person.


      Do I have that right? Because that seems very strange.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It might seem shocking to you, but yes, it is the discretion of the property owner to determine who is a trespasser and who is permitted.

      Yes, you have that right when the domain in question is your property or your rented property.

    7. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      It might seem shocking to you, but yes, it is the discretion of the property owner to determine who is a trespasser and who is permitted


      I understand that they have the right to ask you to leave at any time and for any reason. What I don't understand is how they have the right to invite you in to their property, and then have you arrested because they changed their mind and you are now instantly "a trespasser". Common sense would suggest that they would need to ask you to leave, and that you would have to refuse, before you could be held criminally liable in that scenario.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Yes, you've honed the issue down to where we can agree. The store owner needed to ask them to leave. They were 'guilty of trespass' the second the owner's whim changed, though. You don't have to see the kids throwing rocks at the koi in your backyard garden pond for them to have trespassed to be there. The crime of trespassing doesn't require the property owner to tag the individual for the crime to have been committed. But in the case this whole thread is about, there is a presumption that visitors to the store are welcomed in.

    9. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Informative

      But there is an exemption to this. Trespass can only be charged when the person on the property has had ample notice that he or she isn't welcome there. Trespass can be pressed if you break in, go through or around a sign that says 'no tresspassers', into a private house, etc... When you operate a public storefront, permission is assumed for the entire public during your business hours.

      For a store to kick people out during business hours, the people have to be formally notified that they're no longer welcome, whether this be by verbal or written notice is up to the owner or his representative(the manager or employees).

      If you withdraw your permission, the person you're kicking out is still allowed to collect his or her possessions and leave in an orderly fashion (IE not running, but not lingering).

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    10. Re:Manager called 911-Unlimited laws by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Yes. In other words, they have the right to ask anyone to leave. The problem with that argument is that they chose not to exercise that right.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  36. wow that's a revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did you ever think you're comparing the attire of white collar upperclass to the requisite uniform of blue collar plebs?

  37. Rocketboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://rocketboom.com/vlog/ three days ago...

    Usually, slashdot beats them by a day or so.

  38. Re:Philisophical analogy by NMerriam · · Score: 1

    I must have missed the part where the 60 people were assaulting customers.

    But yes, if you want to go to Best Buy in a clown costume, feel free. It will certainly bring a smile to many people's face!

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  39. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once was at a best buy when something similar happened, except it was me asking if I could get some help from a best buy employee looking person this happened twice before I found what I think was a real best buy employee to help me but I guess I may never know. what if empoyees dressed as customers and pulled this same prank on customers they pretended to think were employees.

  40. Mistaken for an employee... sorta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the job I has as a senior in high school when I worked as an usher at Seattle Sonics games. Our break room was right by the visitor's locker room, and we would frequently be leaving about the same time the players were leaving to get on the team bus. A couple times I walked by the fans that were thrusting the things they wanted autographed over the barrier and signed my name on their program, jersey, or whatever. They all thought I was just one of those bench warmers that no one knew about. ;)

  41. ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    [from Agent Ace$Thugg:] And then he asked me if I had a child at home, and if I knew any children. Curious about his line of questioning, I asked him what he was getting at. He said he noticed that I was in the children's section for a long time and it was making him uncomfortable.


    Are people really that scared of single adult males, now? Because it probably wasn't to do with his appearance...

    1. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Xyrus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Didn't you get the memo?

      Every single adult male is a child molesting, sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert. But your status changes once your married though...

      In that case you're a closet child molesting, sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert.

      It's funny in a sad kind of way. If I go to the park with my son, and get involved with "kid's games" other parents get ancy. Same situation, but my wife is playing with the kids, no problems.

      Welcome to America, were all men are immediately considered to be sexual predators.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single adult male is a child molesting, sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert. But your status changes once your married though...

      In that case you're a closet child molesting, sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert.


      For the a different cultural viewpoint, see the speec of the character of Aristophanes in Plato's Symposium:

      "Men who are a section of that double nature which was once called Androgynous are lovers of women; adulterers are generally of this breed, and also adulterous women who lust after men: the women who are a section of the woman do not care for men, but have female attachments; the female companions are of this sort.

      But they who are a section of the male follow the male, and while they are young, being slices of the original man, they hang about men and embrace them, and they are themselves the best of boys and youths, because they have the most manly nature.

      Some indeed assert that they are shameless, but this is not true; for they do not act thus from any want of shame, but because they are valiant and manly, and have a manly countenance, and they embrace that which is like them. And these when they grow up become our statesmen, and these only, which is a great proof of the truth of what I am saving.

      When they reach manhood they are lovers of youth, and are not naturally inclined to marry or beget children,--if at all, they do so only in obedience to the law; but they are satisfied if they may be allowed to live with one another unwedded; and such a nature is prone to love and ready to return love, always embracing that which is akin to him."

    3. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Every single adult male is a child molesting, sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert.

      Be honest. The last two items are known to be true for all men. The first one may not be true in all men, but you'd be insane to be willing to take that chance with your kid.

    4. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Gryle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got karma to burn, so hell with it. Mod me whatever you want.
      The situation you describe is part of a larger picture. Men are being degraded. Watch your typical sitcom. I cite King of Queens, Everybody Loves Raymond, The Simpsons, King of the Hill, Family Guy as evidence. The man of the house is portrayed as dumb/passive/lazy/shifty. Contrast that to the smart, hard-working, quick-witted wife, always saving Dad from his own mistakes.

      Personally I blame modern feminists. They have preached for so long that men are evil that even men are starting to believe it. They're not after equality, they're after power.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    5. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. However, women are sex-obsessed clitty-rubbing perverts.

      I have noticed no significant difference between the sexes. That includes the "bad" things too.

    6. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, those "modern feminists." Sure.

      If you knew anything about modern feminism, you would know there is a lot about having heaps of sex, and not admonishing men. Sounds like you are talking about the feminists of the 1970s, not the modern ones, where there was some of the attitude you are referring to. But even then, it was only a vocal minority. To think that feminists are running the world is ridiculous. Furthermore, to think that the creators of shows like Family Guy are feminist are utterly absurd. They make fun of men and women. They ridicule everybody. Comedy is about laughing at yourself, not portraying yourself as some kind of perfect person. The flaws they reflect upon in those shows have a definite grain of truth, and are also based on stereotypes.

      Maybe you just need to understand comedy.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the parent is correct: there really is an obvious double-standard on television.

      A few years ago I watched an episode of Everybody Loves Raymond where his wife got pissed at him and *shoved* him backwards into a bookcase in the living room. Laughter ensued. It wasn't a playful, slapstick kind of push; she was frustrated at him over something, and basically dealt with it in a violent manner.

      Now try to imagine an episode of say King of Queens where the fat guy gets pissed off at his wife and shoves her, hard, into a wall or something. Never happen, unless it was one of those "very special" type episodes where the guy gets hauled off to jail and we all learn our special lesson about violence against women.

    8. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I know this is all way off topic for an article on a flash mob stunt in a Best Buy store, but what the hell -

      I have the exact same type of experiences when I take my 2.5 year old daughter to the park. More than once, a mom has picked up and moved her child to another part of the playground after I've waved and said hello to her kid. I've stood on the sidelines watching my little girl play on the slide with other kids, then casually glance over only to see a mom *glaring* at me with an icy "you're ruining it for me and the kids by being here" kind of look.

      Although, I guess I can kind of understand the feeling. I've been taking her to the same park every Sunday for over a year now, and in all that time I've only seen maybe a half-dozen other single dads with kids there. Every other man is with a female, and of course there are tons of women there w/o men. So maybe part of the problem is not enough men get out and spend one-on-one time with their kids.

      Hell I don't know. Being a single dad sucks. Hard.

    9. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that feminists are running the world or that dumb guys aren't funny. I'm just pointing out a trend concerning male characters in shows.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    10. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Although I agree that the pedophilophobia is out of hand, I don't think that was his intent. The question was that if he wasn't buying something for a child, what was he doing in the children's section other than causing problems?

    11. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Don't listen to that other guy. He's just a sex obsessed, cock throttling pervert!

      How the hell do you throttle a cock anyway???

      Nevermind. I don't think I really want to know.

      Anyway, yeah I agree. And it seems to me this whole "imbecile father" comedy bit got really popular in sitcoms in the late 60's, early 70's.

    12. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by dangitman · · Score: 1
      But you are hallucinating that trend. Look at how often The Family Guy makes fun of women. There is no way feminists had anything to do with that show. Just look how many jokes are made about Meg's appearance, or about lesbians, in nearly every episode. Look how these "dumb" guys have attractive wives and are very popular within the fictional world. Peter Griffin and Homer Simpson are admired for their "common man" ways.

      You also don't seem to notice the smart male characters. Could the gay newsreaders on Family Guy be considered "bumbling" or dumb? What about the nerd characters?

      I mean, really, would you want a show where men were worshipped as some kind of mythical father-heroes? That would be like "Leave it to Beaver" or something. I'm amazed at the sensitivity expressed by many men when they see a less flattering portrayal on TV. In many ways it's worse than feminist PC complaints. Shit, women are almost always used as outright sex objects, or portrayed as housewives on TV. A few jokes about men is nothing compared to the decades of objectification of women as submissive sex objects for horny men.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    13. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by dangitman · · Score: 1

      At the same time, Everybody Loves Raymond frequently makes fun of women. I can't really comment on that episode, as I have never seen it. But Family Guy has depicted men being violent towards women in a humorous context.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Anyway, yeah I agree. And it seems to me this whole "imbecile father" comedy bit got really popular in sitcoms in the late 60's, early 70's.

      Do you think that might have something to do with the preceding decades of "Leave it to Beaver" and other inane TV shows with the all-powerful father figure, and submissive housewife? Life doesn't work that way. Don't you think it's a good thing for TV to evolve beyond such ridiculous gender roles? Of course the reaction is going to be to switch those roles - because the "Father knows best" attitude was so deeply ingrained, it made those that didn't use that formula refreshing to viewers, and played off the previous stereotypes. TV does not exist in a vacuum - a lot of it is referencing the medium itself, the established protocols.

      That's exactly why The Simpsons was so popular. Do you remember that people were actually outraged at The Simpsons when it firt started, because it showed a "dysfunctional" family? How tame do those early Simpsons episodes seem now? But people actually thought it was outrageous and blasphemous. Do you want to be like those people?

      Interesting that now there are Christians embracing The Simpsons, and going to Ned Flanders look-alike conventions to take the piss out of themselves. Much more healthy, in my opinion.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I'm not hallucinating the trend. It exists. Family Guy does not define the trend, though Peter Griffin is a part of the trend. I don't watch Family Guy regularly, but you cannot deny Peter Griffin is a bumbling dumb guy. No two ways about it, regardless of how even-handed the show is in the treatment of genders. So quit getting hung up on the Family Guy bit.

      This isn't about man/woman jokes. Somewhere along the line, the good intentions of the feminists (and I do believe women's rights) became warped into an excuse for male-bashing. Degridation of either sex is wrong. Not all women are dumb, sex-object, submissive, houewives. Not all men are stupid child-molesting lazy bastards.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    16. Re:ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: by dangitman · · Score: 1
      This isn't about man/woman jokes. Somewhere along the line, the good intentions of the feminists (and I do believe women's rights) became warped into an excuse for male-bashing. Degridation of either sex is wrong. Not all women are dumb, sex-object, submissive, houewives. Not all men are stupid child-molesting lazy bastards.

      Comedy is largely about degredation. Do you think comedy should be politically correct? Sorry, I don't see the male-bashing in comedy. I certainly don't see men being portrayed as child molestors. I think perhaps you are being too sensitive. Comedy is largely about exaggeration of the real world. It mostly works when it has a grain of truth.

      Sure, not all men are lazy and selfish, but in general, they are. But then comedy makes fun of other types - people who are too serious, and work too hard, or are too greedy. I think the key point is that even the bumbling guys portrayed in such comedies are lovable bumbling guys. Although he's not human, take Bender as an example - he's lovable because he's an alcoholic, stealing rascal. And there's a definite grain of truth in the portrayal of men. I see women in general working a lot harder just to achieve the same status of men. Women of higher intelligence getting less credit than men. It's not true in all cases, but comedy is about generalization and stereotypes.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  42. Re:Philisophical analogy by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

    Of course, unless you happen to have some sort of irrational clown phobia. But that's just silly.

    --
    "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  43. Hysterical. by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tour the store and feel pretty good about landing a spot next to the vacuum cleaners. There are no employees in sight. I hover. A 50-something bearded Jewish man makes eye contact, walks toward me, my first customer.
    "Do you work here?" he asks.
    "No, I don't."
    He starts looking at vacuum cleaners, not knowing where to start.
    "What are you looking for?" I ask.
    "I need a vacuum cleaner," he says. "I have a Dirt Devil. It works really well, very powerful machine," I say.
    "A Dirt Devil. Dirt Devil, OK."
    A real employee approaches.
    "May I help you sir?" the employee asks.
    "Yes, I'd like to buy a Dirt Devil," the man responds."
    I sold my first vacuum cleaner. Damn, it feels good.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Hysterical. by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Funny
      I sold my first vacuum cleaner. Damn, it feels good.
      Many years ago, my wife and I were looking for a new car. We went into a car shop, a salesman greeted us, asked what car we were looking for and gave us a lot of guidance. Some time later, another salesman took over, and the first one left.
      "Huh, where did the other salesman go?".
      "That was not a salesman. He was just in to pick up his new Audi A8."
  44. hostage taking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    In this day and age the manager, employees and customers were supposed to know this wasn't a mass crime being committed, possibly a large hostage taking incident for some political demands..how? Psychic powers? Those "improv" idiots are lucky someone didn't draw down on them. Real DAMN lucky. Some things are funny, this one certainly wasn't. Not even close. If I had been a customer in there I would have been sorely tempted to assist the legit management in a little attitude adjustment on the moron invaders. I know my first reaction would have been to see a serious potential emergency security threat. Which would have required some very fast emergency steps taken for risk mitigation purposes.

      We live in a day and age with suicide bombers, hostage incidents, various weird groups with wild ass agendas, and who knows what, certainly not the imposter idiots, or they just might have thought of that. Perhaps they did and just didn't care. Dangerously close to swarming, happy slapping, wilding..or worse.

        You just don't *fuck* with shit like that anymore, you don't mess around. You can do any number of other things for shits and giggles, you DON'T fuck with people's security or *perception* of security.

      This is a new time, a new day, a few of the older ways to think/act/do are just GONE now. Not my fault, not your fault, but that IS reality now. I don't like it, but I live in the real world, and deal with real adults, not nintendo MTV comedy show videogame virtual reality world addicts.

        You don't stand in line at the airport and "joke" about "Hi! Jack!". You don't go to the buffet and mumble under your breath loud enough so other people can hear you about "germs in the salad, wonderful, wonderful germs, THEY'LL SEE!" even if YOU think it is funny.

      Hey, let's just throw some blow up mannequins out on the freeway and get some BIG LAUGHS as people swerve around dodging the "dead bodies". Won't that be funny? I mean, it isn't real dead bodies, so it must be cool to do that, right? And we'll VIDEOTAPE it for extra chuckles later on as we get wasted!!1!

    Nope, what they did was lame, rude, stupid and I hope they get charged, criminal trespass, terroristic threats (a large group in what could be construed as identical gang colors or political group colors meant on purpose to decieve the legitimate people in the store is in itself intimidating and could be so construed as terroristic in nature, a felony in my state BTW) and a few other assorted charges. The store manager should be commended for showing *restraint*. The idiots are lucky several of them didn't get capped.

    1. Re:hostage taking by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "In this day and age..."

      You know what age we live in? We live in an age where some pathetic mouthbreathing pantswetters are so fucking scared that they want a fascist, rigidly coontrolled police state to prevent the terrifying prospect of a bunch of people showing up wearing the same color shirt.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:hostage taking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Walking into an electronics store wearing the same color clothing as your friends equates to joking about bombs in airports? Please. That attitude is exactly why this stuff should happen more often.

    3. Re:hostage taking by CamD · · Score: 1

      Comments like these just go to show that the terrorists* have won.

      *US Government/Bush/CNN/Military

      Ironically, it was Bush who said shortly after 9/11 to live as normal--as to prevent the "terrorists" from winning.

    4. Re:hostage taking by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      We live in an age where some pathetic mouthbreathing pantswetters are so fucking scared that they want a fascist, rigidly coontrolled police state to prevent the terrifying prospect of a bunch of people showing up wearing the same color shirt.

      Everybody sing:

      It's the end of the world as we know it...
      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:hostage taking by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. If you see anyone who looks even a little bit funny, YOU TAKE THEM DOWN!! Then you'll be a hero like those guys on Flight 93. Someone looks like he's from another country? GOUGE HIS FUCKING EYES OUT! He's probably a terrorist.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:hostage taking by t35t0r · · Score: 1

      your comment has made my head explode. don't fascists and totalitarians want uniformity?

    7. Re:hostage taking by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      he was saying that he wants these people arrested and jailed. The only society that would imprison people for choosing to show up and mill about harmlessly in matching clothes is a fascist one.

      Yes, you can argue that fascists want conformity - but these people were not "conforming" by weariong matching clothes, they were doing something a bit out of the ordinary and unexpect - thereby NOT conforming... and their lack of conformity is what the parent poster felt was grounds for imprisonment.

      --
      This space available.
    8. Re:hostage taking by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      so whats the beef with mouth breathers?

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
  45. Stand alone complex by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, it could be just a stand alone complex.

  46. Dissapointed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm kind of dissapointed how the Best Buy employees handled that. They are taught to be friendly and everything, but, they sure were quick to start getting rude and ugly about it.

  47. Walmart by Davus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Related to my life.
    A few times, going into Walmart wearing my "Your Company's Computer Guy" shirt, I was asked for assistance, because of the way Walmart employees wear those vest-like things. Sure, it's a totally different shade of blue, and a different style, but that didn't stop them. ;)
    And yes, I did help them even though they realized mid-question that I don't work there.

    --
    The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    1. Re:Walmart by b4b3 · · Score: 1

      Can you help me find some bawls please?

  48. Good Job. A very well done improv. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good Job.

    Very Funny!

    Best Buy should give you all gift cards for all the free web advertising they are getting.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the original idea came from a real Best Buy employee, finding some
    'Useful fools' to create the best commercial ever.

    Notice nobody would do this at a SEARS - there are no customers in those stores to interact with.

    I like Best Buy for the smaller priced items,
    but Circuit City offers better deals on computers, laptops, and TVs.

    It is fun to think up odd (but real) questions to bug bothersome employees with.
    "Uh, What is the total number of minutes of footage in all the ST:Voyager DVDs combined?"
    And finding a reason for an odd question is even more fun!
    (I want to watch all of the DVDs over the span of 9 days, so I need to know how much to watch each day.)

    Note that their answer will be an under-value, because the 'Easter Egg video files' found on all ST DVDs are not included in the total minute count printed on the outside of the box.

  49. too funny! by geekylinuxkid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    this is awesome. i wish someone would do something like that around here.

  50. ok, this is a bit of sad commentary: "/." Predator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Welcome to America, were all men are immediately considered to be sexual predators."

    Reading slashdot will clear that right up.

  51. Re:hostage taking (MOD PARENT DOWN) by Mewtwo · · Score: 1

    WOW. This is insane.

    People SHOULD be able to get away with stuff like this without criminal charges.

    It's a sad country when two kids get into a fight, one says "I'm gonna kill you!" in the heat of the fight, and that kid gets expelled, where the other gets a 5-day suspension (or nothing at all, and then sues the other kid he was fighting.) It's sad when every single thing that can be tried as possible terrorism is tried as terrorism.

    I'm going to go to the other side of the extreme here. It shouldn't be illegal unless the terrorist act is actually committed. "Attempted" crimes PERIOD are bullshit. Attempted murder, attempted burglary, etc, etc. Don't charge 'em unless they actuall get in and the person's dead or the stuff's stolen.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 SU CK IT MP AA
  52. Not Everywhere by oostevo · · Score: 1
    "Uh, if the cops bothered to show up they aren't going to fine you for calling. They really don't do that unless it's a prank."

    This is false, at least in some jurisdictions. I've personally seen it happen at least twice (in Virginia).

    --
    In soviet russia, You ask not what country do for you, but what you do for country!
    Oh wait...
    1. Re:Not Everywhere by collectivescott · · Score: 1

      I guess I stand corrected then. I just can't imagine it happening though - emergency is such a subjective label. Maybe it's because I live in a big city, but that would never fly here. Here in Philadelphia, we have trouble with people who are too scared to speak with police. Its becoming a real problem, here's one example: http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/137 90386.htm Every time I see a "Stop Snitching" shirt it makes me sick.

    2. Re:Not Everywhere by Qacker · · Score: 0

      I think the Stop Snitching shirts look stupid but I still support the idea. For non crimes such as illegal buying and selling of things(tobbaco, guns, drugs ext) snitches are the lowest of the low and should be warned that their behaivor will not be acceptable by the community. For violent crimes snitching is OK however.

      --
      Learn lisp today!
  53. helpful employees by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had some great help from employees at Best Buy, and some really bad experiences from them. Little point in arguing with some of them, who make crazy, unfounded, unsupportable claims about the merchandise, too often speaking strictly from a wrong orifice.

    However, even without a blue polo shirt, for some reason people ask me a lot of questions of the "Will this router work with Comcast?" and "Does this one take movies with sound?" -- I try to be helpful, but as I'm not an employee I find this sort of amusing.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:helpful employees by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I'll do at that at a local Staples. I'll even ask people if they need help, saying that I don't work there, but I pretty much know where everything is (I walk around there a lot).

    2. Re:helpful employees by (Cheesyhackerhandle) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hehe...I work there...and what's even funnier...Is that I work on the geek squad, and I am the biggest noob in this forum :) Wanna know why some of the employees aren't helpful? Best Buy is a shit place to work. Pay is crap, the rules that we have to abide by: crap. And the customers? Well I assume that most people in this forum would be some of the better customers, seeing as how your all tech-savvy, but you try explaining to a stay-at-home mom with 8 kids why you can't back up her HDD b/c it is fried. The ignorant people ruin it for the rest. There is no energy or desire to be helpful after you get yelled at for an hour b/c someone screwed up their own computer and we were unable to fix it. And as for the guys in the blue shirts... well usually those same push, ignorant people reach them before they even reach us... with that being said, I personally am never impolite, and I always try to help people because I've shopped there before I worked there, and I know how frustrating it can be. So I apoligze to all of you who had bad experiences there, but it isn't going to change until the corporation changes. Unfortunately...we can't do anyting about the ignorant.

      --
      (Random quote from some sci-fi movie or TV show)
    3. Re:helpful employees by Ganniterix · · Score: 1

      I don't live in the US, I don't shop from Best Buy, I have no clue to how it works. But I do shop. So, all I can say, if you salespeople knew more about the stuff they were talking, they wouldn't be there selling stuff. :) I, wouldn't be able to be a salesperson, probably would get fired first day for insulting customers! I'm pretty sure no easy job, but it would help if salespeople don't try to talk about items they have no clue about!

    4. Re:helpful employees by Doubting+Maxwell · · Score: 1

      It seems that being young often has a lot to do with it, too.

      I'm in my early twenties, and several times while browsing Best Buy I have been accosted by older folks asking questions--and I wore neither blue nor black nor khaki.

      I actually asked one of the gentlemen (very polite, nice guy--was happy to share knowledge) why he asked me, and he said that it was because I looked young--he figured I must know about computer stuff.

      Which I do. I've been working with computers professionally (general technician...yay..) for over five years now. I pretend I know stuff for a living! ;)

    5. Re:helpful employees by (Cheesyhackerhandle) · · Score: 1

      Well this is all well and good, but you must understand that bestbuy hires college and high-school students. It isn't exactly easy to fill a store with 50+ people, all of whom know about what they need to be selling. Besides that, their rate of pay and their ridiculous scheduling techniques turn off many people to working there. It's easier (not to mention cheaper) for them to just grab students who need jobs, whether or not they know about what they are doing.

      --
      (Random quote from some sci-fi movie or TV show)
    6. Re:helpful employees by timothy · · Score: 1

      Yes; I'm something like a decade older than you, but look young enough to fall in the same category ;) You're right about age being a big factor in such queries. On the other hand, I believe (could just be the obvious problem of a limited sample) that I'm asked for directions on the street, in stores, etc, more than average. In a way I like that (it's surely an ego boost to appear knowledgeable), but sometimes it's just awkward. People have worse problems, though ;)

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  54. Re:Nothing says infiltration quite like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you talking about?

  55. New Dress code policy by Net_fiend · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, if you read enough of the site and comments you'll see some one speculating that there IS going to be a new policy of some sort of crazy ass dress code of what you can't wear into their stores now. Seems f'd up if you ask me.

    I fail to see how a store can dictate what you can and cannot wear while shopping. Its funny how people can assume so quickly that a bunch of people are conspiring just because they happen to where the same type of clothing. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Now I'm not saying impersonating is a good thing. I'm not even saying that is what happened here. If you read the statements from the people involved as well as watch the videos you can clearly tell they did not say they were employees. They may have helped out a fellow citizen find an item or help make a choice on an item. But that is not impersonation. And since when did just browsing a store become an offense? I can browse all the hell I want without purchasing an item. That is all I do half the time anyways. I go from BB, to CC, then to Target and just look. Finding the best deal is important to me because I like my hard earned cash.

    This shows how much a pole is stuck up Big Buisness' ass. It also shows you the compentancy of our law enforcement officers also known as 'Peace Officers' or 'Keeper's of the Peace'. From what I could tell the only people making a big stink and upsetting the peace were the managers.

    So what is to happen now if a regular joe citizen is to walk into a Best Buy with a pair of kahkis and nice blue shirt and also just happens to wear black shoes as well? I'd say Best Buy would be taking a nice stroll to the local court.

    All in all. I found it funny, but at the same time distrubing that both our law enforcement officers would act in such a way as well as company who is SUPPOSED to be at your beck seeing as they NEED your money to stay in business. Just my 0.02

    --
    "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
    1. Re:New Dress code policy by iphayd · · Score: 1

      The next group to do this will be 80 people walking into a Best Buy wearing Red shirts an khakis. It will get around their silly dress code, and be just as disconcerting.

    2. Re:New Dress code policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is they were not shopping. They were being jerks. You may have the right to be a creep but this does not make you Nobel. It makes you a bore. I am sorry but it is not funny to disrupt an innocent business because you think it is funny. As to those who think it was a neat experiment. It is unethical to experiment on people without their permission. Yet again, it makes you a creep!

    3. Re:New Dress code policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I fail to see how a store can dictate what you can and cannot wear while shopping.

      Easy. It's private property. They can refuse to serve anyone, and even kick them out, for any reason. You don't have a right to enter any private buisiness.

      >And since when did just browsing a store become an offense?

      It didn't. There were a bunch of people in uniforms that were not Best Buy empolyees and the manager felt threatened.

      >I'd say Best Buy would be taking a nice stroll to the local court.

      Why? Because they chose not to admit someone based on their dress? Though, given the litigious climate of this country, you are probably right. But Best Buy would be able to win, even with "Lawyers" who only have a high school diploma.

      >as company who is SUPPOSED to be at your beck

      Why are they supposed to be at your beck? Are you paying them to serve your every need? No? You're just paying them for some simple help and warehousing of product you may buy. You are not paying them to wait on you.

    4. Re:New Dress code policy by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I read about people with tickets being turned away from venues because their t-shirts had logos from competing sponsors.

      At the 2000 Gay Pride in Atlanta, officials were hassling people who had any kind beer company advertising other than Coors. That was in supposedly public Piedmont park.

    5. Re:New Dress code policy by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      The next group should dress as Muslims all with backpacks and line up to take the white house tour (or don't the scaredy cats have thattour anymore?).

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
    6. Re:New Dress code policy by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      It is unethical to experiment on people without their permission. Yet again, it makes you a creep!

      OMG here's my chance for some political posturing

      From a document called 'The Virus Cancer Program - June 1978'

      "..various live, attenuated adenovirus vaccines were administered to selected human populations as a control measure for debilitating respiratory tract infection. A further complication was introduced when it was discovered that the oncogenic papovavirus SV40, acquired from the simian cells used for propagation of the adenoviruses, was present as a major contaminant in these vaccine preparations. Since hybrid viruses with a spectrum of biological functions have been isolated from mixed adenovirus-SV40 populations, these adenovirus vaccines undoubtedly contained such recombinant viruses. Thus more than one million people(all US citizens) were inoculated with representative members of two groups of DNA viruses with known oncogenic properties."

      There are things in the US for which you should be very frightened. A group of improv entertainers isn't one of them. Your government and the way they treat you as consumers and not citizens should scare you silly.

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
  56. We need MORE of these stunts... not fewer by Mr_Trebuchet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow... this poster is the perfect example of why we need more stunts like this, not less. Anything out of the ordenary happens and chicken-littles like this decide the sky is falling. "We can only fight terrorists by maintaining a constant state of alert!" they cry... in fact we can only defeat terrorists by refusing to be afraid.

  57. Re:hostage taking (MOD PARENT DOWN) by Yaksha42 · · Score: 0

    How about attempted-suicide?

    It's the only crime where the 'attempted' has a harsher judicial punishment than actually doing the deed.

  58. Queer Eye for the Geek Guy by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1
    Hulkster wrote:
    If this isn't news for nerds then I don't know what is ... ;-)
    Well done Improv'ers ...
    I agree heartily, but beyond the humor aspects I'm a geek who has a hard time with fashion. This mission has solidified in my mind exactly what I'll wear whenever I have to go into a #@%*ing Best Buy store in the future.
  59. Reminds me of... by redpop350 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Cement Teddy Bears" http://www.cultdeadcow.com/cDc_files/cDc-0368.php My favorite Christmas story of all time!

  60. happens to me at Target by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I have a couple red shirts. Maybe I like to dress like Tiger Woods or something.

    Anyway, if I wear one to Target, I often get questions from customers, sometimes even if I'm wearing jeans.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  61. Bravo! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Funny

    I loved it! Fantastic idea.

      It's too bad they didn't really clown around a bit, act like cockroaches, walk into walls, curl up on the floor and go to sleep, do a little dance; perhaps The Robot etc..

  62. Flash 8 Videos? Brilliant. by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone do mpeg or QT anymore so the rest of us can view it?

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  63. You are absolutely correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, we Americans are entirely wrong to think we have a monopoly on tragedy when things are much worse in Iraq.

    To underline your point, I suggest 80 of us dress up as the prophet Mohammed, and wander around Baghdad for a day, to, you know, lighten things up a bit.

    Thank you for pointing this out. Why should we have all the lightening up here, when lightening can strike much more powerfully abroad?

  64. And this was for..... by mikesd81 · · Score: 0, Troll

    What reason? To cause havoc @ Best Buy and have them lose customers because of what looks like incompetent workers? Seems wrong to me.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  65. Lighten up, idiot by Krazy+Nemesis · · Score: 1

    Was that Best Buy in Iraq? Shit I read that entire article and I thought it was in New York, USA! Wow... I need to get my eyes checked. How on earth does this event, his comments or anything else in here relate to how bad things are in a country outside of the US? He was speaking in relative terms... related to our country several years ago. Not every country on the planet. If you'd bother to grow up a bit and understand more than one point of view, you'd have relize that. But you choose the popular, foriegn (again, in case you didn't notice, relative to the US) path... "hate all Americans!" BTW... attacking us repeatedly with the "stupid Americans, you don't know anything about the outside world" thing doesn't exactly motivate anybody to quickly pick up an international newspaper and start reading. If you keep that attitude you'll get the general, western, response of: Go fuck yourself!

  66. Re:Flash 8 Videos? Brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, at least MPEG. I couldn't view this at work because I can't install Flash 8

  67. Re:welcome to last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    moldy old. slashdot appears to be quite adept at recycling 2-week old news lately.

    You must be new here.

  68. You have no commanding words. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    "Sir, I'm the store manager and you need to leave right now, please walk this way." If they refuse, then they're trespassing. The only times they *asked* (note the word ASKED) someone to leave and he sought to clarify, it was made 100% clear that he was NOT being TOLD to leave, only asked.

    Is this the condition of reasoning in that United States; to assert that requests of incomplete information are to be construed as commands? I've heard this before...

    _ "Sir, do you know why I stopped you?"
    _ "Sir, it isn't about tort; it's about policy and code 123xyz."
    _ "Sir, no, You are not under arrest."
    _ "Sir, just because you aren't under arrest doesn't mean you can leave."
    X "Sir, can you please step out of the vehicle?"
    _ "Sir, if you don't step out of the vehicle, I will arrest you."
    _ "Sir, Yes we have your name but your need to sign it here."
    _ "Sir, if you don't voluntarily sign this contract(ticket/confession), I will arrest you."
    _ "Sir, you may not sign this voluntary ticket as 'under threat durress coercion'"
    _ "Sir, thankyou for subscribing to our non-official side of services, enjoy the Day we sold to you."

    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:You have no commanding words. by Skreems · · Score: 1

      While most of those examples are indeed utter BS, "can you please step out of the vehicle?" is a pretty straightforward request.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  69. True performance art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny as hell. I love the managing staff and security losing it while the rest of the employees just shrug it off. They really should try and pull something like this at a few different stores. Preferably at the same time.

    Some slashdotters need to get a serious humor injection though. They didn't scare anyone but a few overly paranoid security folks and managers. I doubt that any of the regular employees cared one way or the other and the customers weren't overly concerned either. Just because some manager got a stick up her ass and jumped the gun on calling the police is no reason to go all negative on these folks. I'll admit that the cops didn't seem all that amused but cops are always pissy when they're on duty and abnormal shit is happening (never mind that these were New York cops, not known for being real understandinf, and things were being filmed). Doesn't matter; still funny. Hell that makes it even funnier.

  70. If it's only for customers, then none can enter. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    There is a customer after the goods and services are payed, and until payment in full. Just holding a guaruntee/limited-liability in the form a receipt/claim would construe there to be a customer even after exiting BEST BUY and until the full discharge of association with any agents of Best Buy. As far as private-property is concerned, there are express and implied invitation on the front door (open/closed--banking hours) AND advertised commercial speach why one should enter BEST BUY.

    The manager was acting in such conveyance that could impugn the value of BEST BUY stocks and bonds; the misplaced manager's actions were regulating who can enter the retail market on prejudice of clothing-color and origin, without a cause of tort or theft. One of the greatest intimidations is to walk into a store that happens to sell the same goods that is being worn by the patron; from which, there can be an accusation of theft after someone sees a non-buyer walking out of the dressing room wearing the clothes they owned upon land and entry to the store. The same can be said for product conventions, sheeps-bladders, coconuts, and little rocks that can float.

    Think of a store as a pool of marketing space, a small storage building tended by stewards on behalf of the owners and manufacturers of the products for sell; BEST BUY doesn't own the products, BEST BUY is under contract to sell on behalf of the owner of the products on display, BEST BUY is held accountable for misplaced and stolen property they are stewards over, agents of BEST BUY admit that they aren't competing with the products on display with a "house brand", and agents of BEST BUY are in misplaced trust by odd characters to press for monopoly holdings to compete with non-customers and possible buyers willing to exchange a security interest or fee for a product.

    In other words, they are all just a bunch of lousy people that can sweep, wash windows, dust, unlock a door in the dawn, lock a door at dusk, and complain to someone else about their lack of qualifications for a ministerial position that avails them to ploy all the idiocy of minions to echo their psychopathicly ordered-disorder.

    --
    without prejudice
  71. On Dialing 911 by raquor · · Score: 1

    A lot of folks seem to have an issue with the Manager calling 911. And while I agree that it certainly doesn't seem like an emergency it may not be that ridiculous. I was in a situation with overly obnoxious and rude neighbors in my apartment building that loved playing their rap music late into the night at ridiculous volumes. I called the police station on two separate occasions and both times I was told to call back on 911. Both times I stated that it was NOT an emergency I just wanted an officer to stop by and tell them to turn it down since multiple times of myself going over and requesting this same thing got no response.

    All in all, just because it isn't a case of life and death apparantly doesnt mean it isnt a 911 situation I guess. And to those wondering I don't live in some podunk little town. I live about 20 miles west of Chicago. So it's not like the station only has 911 and no other number or dispatch.

    1. Re:On Dialing 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you call the police next time it's happening, tell them they have 20 minutes to to show up and talk to your neighbor or you are going to turn off their stereo yourself.

      Police will arrive shortly.

    2. Re:On Dialing 911 by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I once wanted to point out an illegally parked car. I wouldn't normally go to such lengths, but this was a really dumb parking job that was making it particularily dangerous to cyclists.

      I went into a school nearby to borrow their phonebook, to look up the police station number. When I called, they said the'd transfer me to "Traffic". The person who picked up said "911, what is the nature of your emergency?"

      And when I was interviewing for a 911 position, they said 2/3s of their calls were wacky things, but didn't mention that 911 was 'the' general incoming number. As for the job- I wasn't ready to commit to that job long term.

  72. You mean like that Yellow Walmart demon? by NRAdude · · Score: 0
    I've seen that thing dressed-up in Walmart uniform; Only, when he does somthing bad, they all just laugh at him.

    I bet it's all a deception to give everyone the idea that Walmart is a communist's store. When someone realy enters to change the price-targs before buying, there'll be some Senior Citizens from Seizure World Retirement Center or such saying...

    He's changing the prices!

    Quick, form a Line Dance, and make like Pat Benatar: shake our pimped shoulders at hime 'till he leaves!


    --
    without prejudice
  73. Comply with Commerce Code; theft is impossible by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    That alleged "Security Officer" was acting in misplaced trust, and without disclosure of his actions thereby he was being equally as dishonest as the alleged arrest. The moment his character tresspass with his office, or the violation of trust from his oath to act lawfully on behalf of whoever appointed him, then there is NO Officer -- because he is acting on his own. In the republic, the people conversing about their way is known as court; on the corporate side of things, inferior to the politic, is the second court/accusation (which is banned by the Constitution -- that is why there is such a push to have politic carry ID that belongs to a corporation; corporations are quite criminal, and the people thought associated with a corporation would need to be held to answer for what corporation is called by presentment. That's why all alleged "Officers" are in their corporate mode to seize people until they have presentable corporate character (ALL UPPERCASE NAME id) and are governed under a code. As people should know, politic are governed by the laws of physics in the universe, etc. The alleged "Security Officer" was just being polite to sit the King down on his bench, and wait for him to be comfortable to any distractions that may cause him to mis-manage his person (aka corporate-sole). That's not a seizure, because politic isn't an issue--because politic is incorporated to be an organelle in the corporation. They organelle only seizes when Ordered.

    According to Uniform Commercial Code, there is no such thing as theft...because in commerce, anyone that causes damage or walks away with posession of somone else's property - simply forgot to pay for it. Title is still with the one that holds a security interest to the property, and the possessor is to be reminded to pay Rent for the depletion of value for every moment its retail aspect is diminished by their occupation. The property isn't stolen when it's whereabouts is known. Everything is for sale, if it isn't held in fee simple absolute.

    The recent mis-application of Commercial Code is at the mal-application of emminent domain procedure; where recently there has been perfectly owned private property literaly stolen and displaced to another non-interested privateer, or public property to a privateer where is deadicated to a ffalse-public use.

    --
    without prejudice
  74. "People in uniform" attitude by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just a special case of a general phenomenon -- people in a uniform, even if it's just a shirt color, tend to become defensive about that uniform.

    I once had a temp job at a hospital loading dock. Horrible, crummy job, but it was a job. So all the people on the loading dock wore brown polyester pants, white shirts, and black shoes. So, my second day, I wore brown polyester pants, a white shirt, and black shoes. I was reprimanded for "wearing a dock uniform", paid for a half day, and asked not to return.

    A different situation: There was a Greek Festival, where all the food service people were wearing black pants or skirts, white shirts and a black hat. My girlfriend and I happened to both be wearing black pants, white shirts, and we each had a black hat, all coincidentally (we didn't even know about the festival, just chanced upon it), and so we just sort of hung out for a while and all the workers treated us like we were hosts not patrons. We ate and drank for free and hung out while everybody partied after the festival was over.

    Anyway, if you wear a blue shirt to Best Buy I'm sure they can throw you out if the laws of your state allow it, "for any reason", but not just because you wore a blue shirt, unless they eject *everyone* wearing a blue shirt (not just you.)

    The band of pranksters could test this by being not just a bunch of clowns, but some organization whose uniform is *also* well-established as blue shirts and khakis, go in the store with legitimate business, and get kicked out for no reason other than their attire, they might be able to force the store manager to explain to a judge why he considered a shirt and khakis to be inappropriate attire, or whatever was his bais calling the police was.

    But in this case, it is clear that the group was intentionally creating a disturbance, and that it was not terribly difficult to get a police officer to agree. If a reasonable person believes your intent is to disturb the peace (which it clearly was) then I hope it was enough fun to be worth the potential legal hassle.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  75. Works in general too by Atario · · Score: 1

    I used to have a job that required the shirt and tie too. (Why should a programmer wear a tie?? Whatever.) Anytime I went to any kind of retail establishment on the way home, I would get around one customer question every ten minutes.

    Definitely, if you want to cause havoc like this, it's far easier (and more plausibly deniable) to go for the shirt-and-tie route.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  76. Now send them to Office Max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same uniform...

  77. Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shop at Target quite a lot, and I also work in a call center. We don't have a uniform as such, but typical attire for men is khakis and a polo or button-down. Now, I happen to like red shirts. Anytime I go to Target after work, wearing a red shirt, I get asked at least once if I work at Target. I always say no, but I know the store well and usually point the person in the right direction... but now maybe I'll avoid Target altogether. I've already been hassled by security for browsing too long, picking up items and putting them back, putting hands in pockets too many times, all the "classic" loss-prevention warnings of a thief, et cetera; now, they'll probably be aware of this incident and be prepared to throw me out on the grounds that I am not only a "potential shoplifter" but impersonating a Target employee as well. Yet another reason to shop online!

  78. You don't become a Best Buy Manager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Without being a total Douch Bag.

  79. Hilarious by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    That's really hilarious. What a marvellous idea! I wish they did something like that around here. I could think of a few places where a stunt like that would work very well. Keep on rocking, guys!

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  80. Have you BEEN to a Best Buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go and try to ask a basic question on something you already know about.

  81. typical programmer by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    Your not one of those people that think 911 is just a convient way to help you for any ol' thing, are you? I hope not, I hate those people.

    No, perish the thought that people who are in need of the police and feel threatened (rightly or wrongly) should call the one number they remember.

    You're a typical programmer: when your system can deal with user expectations, you blame the user and add an obscure rule.

    In fact, a better thing to do would be for 911 services to invest in a little intelligence. Maybe a phone system that says "please press 1 or stay on the line to report an emergency in which lives are at stake, otherwise please press 2 now".

    1. Re:typical programmer by smcallah · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's real smart. After teaching your kids to dial 911 in an emergency...

      "Oh, BTW, don't forget to press 1 after it answers!!!"

      911 is for emergencies, plain and simple.

  82. Probably not amnymore by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If she starts screaming about her civil rights because of a camera, do you think that upper managment will want her? NOT A CHANCE. it shows that she does not play well with the little kiddies let alone the big boys.

    Other than that, I thought that she was heading straight for CEO material.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  83. Re:hostage taking (MOD PARENT DOWN) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are threre really still jurisdictions where suicide in one's private home is a crime?

  84. Next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring an ipod. Throw it away.

    Join an immigration march. Smile and wave as you march.

    Secretly take pictures and comment on how clever you are.

  85. Brings back memories of Fry's... by vmxeo · · Score: 2

    Reminds of me of a prank me and my coworkers use to play in Fry's Electronics. For those of you who have never had the experience of visiting Fry's Electronics, their customer service is arguably much worse than Best Buy. The store dress code is much less inspired- white shirt, dark slacks, dark tie. Pretty much the same dress code of our VAR company at the time(remember those?). We'd often frequent Fry's for miscellaneous hardware, as it was cheap, and close to our offices. Of course, since we were dressed like every other employee there, we'd get asked for help from clueless customers all the time. We got so sick of being asked we finally started giving out random answers, telling them the item they wanted was in the back of the store through the double doors (the stock room), or pointing them to ther customers in the store ("you want to talk to the old beared guy in suspenders standing over there. He can help you with that.") I really miss those days.
    Recently I visited Fry's Electronics in thier new store several months ago (well, new for me. I live in NYC now, and hadn't yet been to the store on Auto Mall parkway in Fremont). A customer approached and actually asked "I know you don't work here, but can you tell me if this will work in my computer?"

    Yeah, I miss those days...

    1. Re:Brings back memories of Fry's... by proudhawk · · Score: 1

      I still get that fairly often when I shop at fry's here in Phoenix.
      still, one has to wonder how clueless these "customers" are when
      they ask a BLIND PERSON where something is or if something will
      do somthing or other...

      Granted, I am a bit more knowledgable than the "customer circus"
      guys that are the store employees. but still, asking a clearly
      blind person for help when there are a half dozen employees
      loitering nearby? whats the sense in that?

      --
      Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  86. traumatised victims of the pranks by Cosmo+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    Some of the people who were the targets of the improv were really traumatised by it. I listened to the ThisLife segment and thought it was really funny but I wouldn't want to be the target of one of these.

    1. Re:traumatised victims of the pranks by Derkec · · Score: 1

      I have mixed feelings. I think that the birthday party bit went too far. But the cell phone symphony and the mobius stunts were pretty cool. One or two people got stressed out, a bunch others were confused, but many found it funny and everyone went home with a story they could tell at parties.

    2. Re:traumatised victims of the pranks by Cosmo+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I agree the great majority of their events were great and fun and no one with hurt feelings. Maybe they'd do things differently on a couple like the birthday thing and the band thing.

  87. I fail to see the humor in this by joto · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are lots of things you can do that frustrate other people. Having a crowd dress in the same clothes as shop employees only frustrate shop employees/managers/security is one alternative. But I really fail to see why you think it's so funny.

    Yes, you aren't exactly doing something "illegal", but your intention is obviously to make life harder for other people, which in my book counts as "immoral" (at least as long as these "other people" haven't done anything wrong towards you!)

    I find the whole episode comparable to someone who have gotten hold of some disappearing ink, spray it on random peoples shirts, and then write a web-page about it where they talk about how angry some people became because of this, even though it was just an innocent gag.

    I'm sorry, but if some random person sprayed my shirt with disappearing ink, I would not find it funny. And if some random crowd of people had agreed to enter my store with clothes similar to the uniform of my employees, I wouldn't find it funny either. Now, had the random person in either case, been someone I knew and trusted, I might have reacted otherwise, but this depends a bit more upon the situation. When doing practical jokes, it's a fine line between what's funny and what's just cruel.

    Oh, by the way, I killed your dog just to see how you'd react. But don't worry, here's a new one...

    1. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It's funny for two reasons.

      Firstly, because it's somewhat surreal, providing people with the experience of reality suddenly warping unexpectedly.

      Secondly, because of the reaction of humorless drones and people who overreact, like you.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh, did you even read the article and watch the videos? If you don't find that funny or see how someone else would find it funny, my friend, you have problems.

    3. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by joto · · Score: 1
      Firstly, because it's somewhat surreal, providing people with the experience of reality suddenly warping unexpectedly.

      If this is all you want to do, you can certainly do it without having to single out a "victim".

      Secondly, because of the reaction of humorless drones and people who overreact, like you.

      I'm only humorless as long it's my store you invade, my shirt you spray with ink, or my dog you kill. But I might laugh healthily when your nose is bleeding as a result of your failed attempt at humor.

    4. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're throwing an elaborate temper tantrum disguised as a crappy argument there, big baby.

    5. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their improv was strictly mental play. humor and art exploit the gaps between perception and reality.

      your examples cross the "physical" line, which suggests more about you than your lack of a sense of humor.

    6. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, he proves himself as an unreasonable asshole the moment he suggests that assaulting someone is somehow okay, but wearing a blue shirt isn't.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    7. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by xymog · · Score: 1

      These people were not interfering with store operations; in fact, they went out of their way *not* to interfere. The only people interfering with store operations were the managers overreacting. The best overreactions are the manager protesting her violation of her "civil rights" and the manager surreptitiously attempting to photograph the improv artists. Bureacracies are built for mockery because they take themselves so seriously. By the way, I like how you equate "different" with "dangerous." That speaks volumes about your outlook on life.

    8. Re:I fail to see the humor in this by joto · · Score: 1
      These people were not interfering with store operations; in fact, they went out of their way *not* to interfere.

      If you believe that arranging it so that lots of people with clothes similar to the shop-employees suddenly appear in a shop at the same time, is "going out of their way *not* to interfere", you have a different definition of "not" then me.

      The only people interfering with store operations were the managers overreacting.

      Those people are supposed to interfere with store operations, that's why they're there! It's their job!

      The best overreactions are the manager protesting her violation of her "civil rights" and the manager surreptitiously attempting to photograph the improv artists.

      Sure, they overreacted. But please tell me how they were supposed to know that without the benefit of hindsight. It's not exactly the situation you are most likely to encounter as a manager of a store. And it's a pretty damn frustrating one to be in.

      There was absolutely no way the managers could have known the intent of the invaders. Just because they acted friendly at the time, doesn't mean that they would the next moment. Obviously the invaders *were* part of some sort of planned attack, and at the time, there was no way the managers could know their real intent.

      Bureacracies are built for mockery because they take themselves so seriously.

      I'm sorry. Everyone take themselves seriously. Bureaucracies are no different in this regard.

      By the way, I like how you equate "different" with "dangerous." That speaks volumes about your outlook on life.

      I have no idea what you are talking about. Please explain what you are referring to, or are you simply trying to put words in my mouth?

  88. My Idea by Starvingboy · · Score: 1

    I always wanted to go through the airport with a shirt that said "Smuggler" and paint "Contraband" on my luggage. It would probably qualify me for "Special Glove" treatment.

  89. If I were the BB manager.. by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    So I skimmed over the article pictures and didn't read every bit so I don't know if this was done by the store manager or not, but this is what I would have done:

    1) Announce the following on the Best Buy intercom (if there is no store wide intercom, they should really invest in one):

    "Dear Best Buy customers and employees, there seems to be an elaborate social engineering prank occurring in the store. It's not a coincidence that there are many people in the store wearing blue polo shirts without best buy tags and khaki pants. If they do not have a best buy tag do not ask them questions about products or store policies." ..simply repeat every hour or so, until they seem to be mostly gone.

    1. Re:If I were the BB manager.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the fact that the manager thought her "civil liberties" were being violated by people filming inside the store, I highly doubt she has any clue what "social engineering" means.

  90. Hot Topic by metamatic · · Score: 1
    Well, if you read enough of the site and comments you'll see some one speculating that there IS going to be a new policy of some sort of crazy ass dress code of what you can't wear into their stores now.

    Imagine if Hot Topic did that.

    (If you go to Hot Topic you'll find that staff and customers are almost indistinguishable. Yet they don't seem to have any kind of problem with it.)

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  91. Well, I'm inspired by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

    These non-employees seem to be more helpful and easier to find than regular employees of retail outlets. I think that the next time I go shopping, I'm just going to ask the other shoppers questions, rather than the employees.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  92. Direct link to QT by imaginate · · Score: 1

    You can download it in quicktime on the site. Or just go here

  93. Re:Flash 8 Videos? Brilliant. by springbox · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about Flash 8, but what I used to do is use Ethereal to look at the HTTP traffic when the video player first initiates the connection. You can get a direct link to the FLV that contains the video this way and use FFMPEG to convert the FLV to some other format. Of course, you need to have Flash installed for this to work.

  94. are we living in a police state? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    it seems to me that we are in a situation where the police
    are getting called for every little problem. :(

    are we, as a society, that afraid that we are demanding
    a police state to exist?

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  95. Re:welcome to last month by get+quad · · Score: 0

    nice to see all the anonymous cowards come out of the woodwork in order to give me the proverbial slap on the wrists. lol.

    --
    "To err is human, to mod Funny divine."
  96. Re:hostage taking (MOD PARENT DOWN) by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1

    "Attempted" crimes PERIOD are bullshit. Attempted murder, attempted burglary, etc, etc. Don't charge 'em unless they actuall get in and the person's dead or the stuff's stolen.

    So you welcome a burglary or robbery attempt against you and would not want the criminal to get arrested and charged for trying to steal from you? Perhaps you would you prefer to be the victim of an attempted rape or attempted murder instead.

    I am glad that works for you, but I'll stick with defending my person and property.

    That said, I have to agree with you that the parent post was a moronic troll. Identically dressed people behaving politely in a store is not a threat of any type.

  97. These People Suck by dna2go · · Score: 1

    I have heard of these people and what they do is not art or fun or acting or improv its called being jackasses. Their "improv" creates a public disturbance, annoys people and they laugh about it and find it cute.

  98. Re:The reason the manager said her civil rights... by wk633 · · Score: 1

    If you want to get all semantic about it, racisism doesn't exist because there is only one race when it comes to humans. The differences between 'white', 'black', 'Asian' etc do not constitute 'race' biologically speaking.

    I like to ask people what they think of the Washington Redskins or Atlanta Braves. And what would they think of the Washington Blackskins or Atlanta Zulus (with corrasponding 'war whoop' and foam spears).

  99. OT: curtesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean "courtesy" (but maybe you're thinking of "curtsy", like what a woman might do in the 50's as a greeting?). That was funny, anyway.

  100. Re:The reason the manager said her civil rights... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

    Given the image most sports teams want to project, "Zulus" would be an excellent name for one. "Blackskins" not so much, since in this country's history that equates to being on the losing side more often than not.

    In conclusion, what's your point? (addendum: the foam spears would be awesome)

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  101. Argument against city life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth of why we are so violent and fearful, which nobody wants to address, is that we're living like rats in large cities when we're not adapted to them. Biologically and psychologically, we're ideally suited to living in communities of 40-200 people.

    Get rid of the cities! With modern communication and transportation technologies, we don't need to live this way anymore!

  102. Re:The reason the manager said her civil rights... by wk633 · · Score: 1

    I guess my point is that there's a lot of discrimination out there- be it anti-black, anti-gay, anti-women, anti-American, anti-this-or-that-religion. I ask about sports teams, because nobody seems to see any problem with them. If you ask questions about other forms of racism, you usually get PC responses.

  103. naked and screaming? by phyy-nx · · Score: 1

    i don't know about screaming, but they've already at least done pantless 5 times on a new york subway.

  104. It makes you wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who would have been called if 50 arab-looking guys walked in in the Best Buy outfit... I imagine that the Feds would have been around in about 3 minutes... And those same 50 guys (within a couple of hours) would have been visiting that lovely holiday camp they have done in Cuba these days...

  105. MOD AC UP FUNNY by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

    Nice one.

  106. you are correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was stupid, immature, not funny and potentially dangerous. Don't worry about the moderations, it all averages out. Some people just have a warped sense of humor and think vandalism is funny. This was an example of group vandalism, and by their sheer numbers, was meant to shock and scare people, that was supposed to be the "funny" part, to throw something very close to terrorism at people just to see how they would react. It wasn't performance art, it was gang-like activity, just a step aways from happy slapping or wilding, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of the members partake in those other activities when they aren't deluding themselves they are artists. It reminds me of what the "young people" thought was funny sport in a clockwork orange..

  107. My time at Best Buy ... by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Most of my time at Best Buy is spent trying to avoid the blue shirts. That is ... except the cute ones.

    I estimate that 95% of the people working at Best Buy/Circuit City/CompUSA haven't the foggiest clue of what they're talking about. They are just parroting something some sales rep told them.

    What is absoluetly the worst is when someone asks me to go with them to the store and I end up getting into an argument with the sales reps. The stuff that comes out of their mouth is absoluetly amazingly, collosally ignorant.

    And no, you do NOT need the service plan.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:My time at Best Buy ... by (Cheesyhackerhandle) · · Score: 1

      I agree. So very few of us who work there actually at least TRY to learn stuff about what we're selling. And the service plan depends on what you're buying. If your buying a laptop (especially toshiba), you should almost always get the service plan. The amount of times that the HDD craps out on those things is...ridiculous...plus if your an eTard and know nothing about computer maintinence or repair, then you probably should get the PSP. Or else your gonna be paying alot for support. But as for a comp-savy consumer such as yourself, no, don't buy the PSP.

      --
      (Random quote from some sci-fi movie or TV show)
    2. Re:My time at Best Buy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for laptops, I'd buy online from a reputable company with a known good tech support department and get the 3 year warrantee if I plan on travelling and using the laptop a lot. You don't want to cheap out too much on laptops intended for heavy use. Wear and tear will just catch up too soon.

      My experience with laptop support has been quite positive with 3 companies, but we bought the corporate models, not the really cheap consumer models. YMMV.

      If you buy a cheap laptop, you will need to use it more carefully. Laptops are Fragile. Some people forget that. Again, YMMV. I've had hand me down laptops and new laptops that have lasted me several years. I don't throw them around. Unless you have a Panasonic ToughBook, you should be more careful.

      My experience with supporting other people with laptops is that most of the problems with laptops comes from abuse or excessive wear and tear. They toss it on the table, put stuff on it, bang the keyboards, spill coffee, close the screen on a hard object, etc... Desktops don't directly suffer from abuse the same way. The keyboard and monitors are separate. The desktops can stay hidden, unmoving and safe from direct abuse, while keyboards and mice are damaged quite frequently.

  108. What a rube ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    a) You'll never see a good thief or gang of thieves. They dress incognito for obvious reasons. Dressing in fake uniforms (no Best Buy logo) made these people immediately conspicuous and hence the subject of scrutiny by the door checker.

    b) The bit in the Thomas Crown Affair was about RETURNING a stolen item.

    c) If you were going to steal something in faux uniform, you'd show up dressed like a cop.

    d) If you want to steal, you need to cause a diversion like a fight (just like in Ocean's Eleven) that will draw the security people away from their posts. That or a really attractive person of the opposite sex (or perhaps same?!?!?!?) to divert the attention of the door checker.

    e) An alternative strategy would be to get some item tags that are still activated and have lots of people go through the security checker with these things on. After so many "false alarms" they'll turn the thing off for the sake of keeping the business open.

    So you see the manager was a dufus and got played by reacting to the prank. If he had ignored the pranksters as people with too much time on their hands, he would have spoiled their fun.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  109. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waah waah waah.

    I have no sense of humor.

    You're probably the manager of a Best Buy some place. That would explain a lot.

  110. Thought Crimes by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I think that he's more likely talking about prosecuting "intent to commit a crime," something which has always seemed really shakey to me. Sure, he's got floorplans of the bank. Yes, he rented Bonnie and Clyde from Blockbuster 13 times in a row. Still, unless he's actually stated that he's robbing a bank, or has made an attempt at it, you shouldn't be able to bring charges against him. Suspicion of intent is a valid reason to bring someone in or to do an impromptu search of a person or property, but only under certain rules and the officer is required to justify themselves if asked.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  111. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most stupid comment

    Ever

  112. Liers with Logos by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Yes, they lied - but if you want to hold that against them, you have to do likewise for every actor you've ever watched pretending to be someone they're not!

    If lying were a crime they'd have to clear out the Best Buy sales staff as well. Or is a cable modem broadband router really faster and more secure than a switch so that's why Best Buy doesn't sell switches? Hmmm?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  113. Santa Claus story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My husband, child and I were waiting in a 3 hour line to see Santa. It was tremendously boring so I decided to go grab a cup of coffee from an overpriced mall coffee vendor. Of course, child wanted to go with me because mommy is better, so I took her and left poor husband in line to wait for Santa. He called me and made me bring child back because he was getting too many dirty looks from either people walking by or in line. -I was pissed, I wanted coffee.

    No, husband does not have a Santa Claus fettish.

  114. GuloGulo gets an F for Reading Comp. ...again. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    If an employee asks you what you're doing, respond 'I'm waiting for my girlfriend/boyfriend who is shopping elsewhere in the store.'

    Another [employee] came up to me and said, "Let me guess, you're waiting on your friend? Good answer." I guess at that point he had heard that answer more than a few times.

    Employees began asking our agents to leave the store if they weren't shopping. Most stuck to their "I'm waiting for my girlfriend" story and refused to leave.

    Al first approached me within 30 seconds and asked if I needed any help. I asked him where the bathrooms were (I was actually needing to go), but he told me they were out of order. I said, "Alright, I'll just wait for my girlfriend then. She's looking for the bathroom. I guess I might be here awhile."

    When an employee approached and asked (of course) if I needed any help. I said no, I was just waiting for my friend.

    A dude walked up to me and said: "Are you guys demonstrating or protesting or something?" I said: "Oh, I'm just waiting for my girlfriend, she's somewhere around here."

    Manager: "What are you doing can I help you?" [very sassy tone]
    Me: I'm just waiting for a friend.

    One manager came up to me and said, "I don't know what you and all your friends are doing here, but you need to leave." I said, "What? I'm just waiting for someone, I don't know..." and the guy goes, "Yeah, yeah, all of you are just 'waiting for someone.'"

    I said, "I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. If you mean, am I bored, it's true I'm kind of bored because I'm waiting for someone."

    "I'm waiting for my friend, just watching TV while I wait."

    "Nothing of the kind", indeed.

    Next time you might want to RTFA before you accuse someone else of lying about the article's contents...

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  115. Thomas Crown Affair by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I'm sure they were also very concerned that those folks were conspiring to steal a bunch of stuff. It would be really hard for store security to stop the shoplifter by saying, "Nab the guy in the blue shirt and kakhi pants" when there are 80 people plus the Best Buy employees all wearing the same thing.

    I can definitely understand why the managers and security got all uppity. But their response was really unprofessional and stupid. "My civil rights are violated by you bringing a video camera into an electronics store." Yeah... right...

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  116. Question: by lorcha · · Score: 1

    What, exactly, is "cock throttling"? This is a term witch which I am completely unfamiliar.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  117. Re:Philisophical analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, your bio is fucking funny. i just never knew there was a bunch of hot asian ladies on /. that were looking for a studly geek.

    anyways, i was metamoderating today, and saw that your comment was modded offtopic. i determined that was unfair. hopefully the person who unfairly modded you will get his mod privelegdes taken away.