Slashdot Mirror


Wisdom From The Last Ninja

I Could Tell You But... writes "The AP has a story about ninjutsu master Masaaki Hatsumi, last living student of Japan's last 'fighting ninja.' He offers advice from the heart of Ninjadom, like 'always be able to kill your students,' and describes the current popular ninja image as 'pathetic.' At age 76, students are speculating on his successor, who may for the first time be non-Japanese." From the article: "As I cautiously raise the sword with a taut two-handed samurai grip, my sparring partner gingerly points to Hatsumi. I avert my eyes for a split second - and WHAM! The next thing I know, I'm staring at the rafters. Keeping your focus is just one of the lessons thumped out on the mats of the Bujinkan Dojo, a cramped school outside Tokyo that is a pilgrimage site for 100,000 worldwide followers. They revere Hatsumi as the last living master of ninjutsu - the mysterious Japanese art of war practiced by black-masked assassins of yesteryear."

539 comments

  1. Like, wow by Life700MB · · Score: 2, Funny


    Ninjas kill all the time! And don't even think about it!


    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:Like, wow by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just in case someone doesn't get it, the OP is a reference to Robert Hamburger's Real Ultimate Power meme.

    2. Re:Like, wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is clearly the best ninja site ever made!

      For example, here are some facts about ninjas:

      1. Ninjas are mammals.

      2. Ninjas fight ALL the time.

      3. The purpose of the ninja is to flip out and kill people.

    3. Re:Like, wow by JambisJubilee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why ninjas are the ultimate paradox; on the one hand they don't give a crap, but on the other hand, ninjas are very careful and precise.

    4. Re:Like, wow by carninja · · Score: 1

      Explaining that to Slashdot is like explaining how to kick ass to Chuck Norris. A wee bit redundant. Quit karma-whoring.

    5. Re:Like, wow by jessecurry · · Score: 1
      I hopE you rEalIzE that thE InformatIon you havE postEd on thIs sIght Is not only complEtEly wrong but also vEry mIslEadIng and dangErous. you obvIously havE no factual knowlEdgE of nInja,nInpo or nInjutsu but claIm to bE an authorIty on thE subjEct. god forbId somEonE actually takEs your garbagE to hEart and trIEs thIs InsanIty....your goIng to gEt soEm poor kId kIllEd....arE you rEady to accEpt that rEsponsIbIlIty.

      as for mE....Im a nInjutsu sokE...grandmastEr....In a lEgItamatE nInja ryu (famIly) wIth 25 yEars undEr my bElt In an hIstorIcaly tracEablE lInEagE.

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    6. Re:Like, wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's why ninjas are the ultimate paradox; on the one hand they don't give a crap, but on the other hand, ninjas are very careful and precise.

      oh, that's why you copied your comment from here and didn't give proper credit?

    7. Re:Like, wow by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      This one time I was eating at a dinner and someone pointed out that a ninja had plagerized and he flipped out and kill the whole town. If you don't believe me you better get a life right now.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Like, wow by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      Seems not. Some newbie low-life modded the original poster "Redundant". He obviously didn't get the reference, which is at least as relevant as the article itself.

    9. Re:Like, wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your goddamned spam in your signature where I don't have to see it, asshole.

    10. Re:Like, wow by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he did get it, and found it so obvious to be redundant.

      --
      Why not fork?
  2. Turtle Power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "They revere Hatsumi as the last living master of ninjutsu - the mysterious Japanese art of war practiced by black-masked assassins of yesteryear.""

    Oh man, the TMNT's are going to be so disappointed.

    1. Re:Turtle Power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's and irony in that back-in-the-day (15 years ago roughly) Hatsumi was *often* seen wearing a Ninja Turtle shirt.

    2. Re:Turtle Power. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was hanging out one night with some friends, talking about nothing in particular, and somehow I was on the topic of possible secret government hybrid projects. I mentioned they could create real life freak mutant turtles, four of them. One of the guys there said they wouldn't be freaks, our generation would worship them as demigods. I look back on my pop culture obsessed generation and realize, my god, we really would worship four half-man, half-mutant turtles as demigods.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    3. Re:Turtle Power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TMNT? The Palladium game or the cartoon?

  3. wow, ninjas by joe+155 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "always be able to kill you students" is brilliant advice... I know I'll be taking that one to heart when I'm lecturing... that'll show them for being late/taking phone calls/ talking over me. :)

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:wow, ninjas by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's only good advice if your students actually believe you can kill them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:wow, ninjas by dakirw · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's only good advice if your students actually believe you can kill them.

      Not if you provide an object lesson! :)
    3. Re:wow, ninjas by zanderredux · · Score: 1

      Definitely, a killer advice!

    4. Re:wow, ninjas by failure-man · · Score: 1

      That's easy to do, but it takes time to do right. The trick is to build yourself a reputation for being, basically, a stereotypical mad scientist: brilliant, somewhat nuts, and slightly reckless.

      I know that my students believe I could kill them. (Either intentionally with some sort of robot, or accidentally by having some sort of superconducting lightning-laser experiment go awry.)

    5. Re:wow, ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not really. This happened with chinese martial arts. One of the reason why the current levels of mastery are inferior to the ancient past is this whole idea of keeping an edge over your students. To be always be able to beat them means you can't teach everything -- you keep a secret in reserve to defend your life against students aspiring to take over. Those students, when all growed up and teaching, also keep a secret in reserve. Eventually the art is very diluted.

    6. Re:wow, ninjas by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      When I was in middle school there was a teacher who had sometimes made exasperating comments about killing students (he was otherwise a good teacher, and all in all there were far worse teachers in the school, so people let it slide). Anyway, he managed field day, and the day before, some students, as they were supposed to, brought him the starting gun (it doesn't have an open barrel so you don't have to worry about actually hurting someone with it). I guess a few people freaked out.

      Maybe you can learn some things from him...

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    7. Re:wow, ninjas by shadowbearer · · Score: 1
      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    8. Re:wow, ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he a ninja or a Sith Lord?

    9. Re:wow, ninjas by infomagic · · Score: 1

      you mean, "...I will defend to *your* death my right to say it"?

    10. Re:wow, ninjas by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why you should distrust the idea of tradition. After all, all those secrets were once innovations - gussying them up in the austere robes of tradition hides the fact that there was experimentation and trial-and-error in their origins. The "art" is really what happens when a "science" gets stodgy and cautious.

    11. Re:wow, ninjas by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      > always be able to kill your students...

      Heh.... A Chinese friend says that's the reason, in Chinese mythology about this stuff, that each generation of flying kung-fu masters had diminished powers. Each teacher would hold something back, then when their students became teachers, they would hold something back... eventually, all the really good stuff was lost.

    12. Re:wow, ninjas by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Not really. This happened with chinese martial arts. One of the reason why the current levels of mastery are inferior to the ancient past is this whole idea of keeping an edge over your students. To be always be able to beat them means you can't teach everything -- you keep a secret in reserve to defend your life against students aspiring to take over. Those students, when all growed up and teaching, also keep a secret in reserve. Eventually the art is very diluted.

      That, and it used to be a matter of life or death to better than any hoodlum who might attack you. Nowadays the guy with the gun wins. Consequently, the martial arts are studied as a hobby, which obviously means that a typical student is not putting in anywhere as much study time as before. And those who study them for self-defense tend to concentrate on the milder forms that have little chance of injuring or killing anyone to avoid getting into problems with law.

      In short, the current students are simply not training as intensively as those past, and they aren't learning the most effective (read: brutal) techniques, since using those techniques would get them arrested.

      Martial arts mastery used to make you a though guy, but modern firearms put an end to that. So, unless someone can figure out how to deflect or dodge bullets, the arts are likely going to keep declining, at least until they reach the level needed by modern armies for close-quarters fighting situations (Krav Maga ?).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    13. Re:wow, ninjas by Cavedragon · · Score: 1

      "always be able to kill your students" seems pretty self-defeating, to me. It implies that the master could die (eventually), knowing more than the student, who then becomse the master, and doesn't teach his student everything he knows, and so on... depending on how much knowledge there is to start with, eventually, you have an idiot teaching a half-wit ALMOST everything he knows...

      --
      Live every day as if it were your last. Someday you'll be right.
  4. Students? by daeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, he can beat his students, but what about pirates?

    1. Re:Students? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      you know, it turns out that pirates were extremely smelly and extrememly homosexual. This should be obvious if you think it over -- hundred of men confined to a small space. Anyhow, when you consider that, "piracy" is the right word for slashdotters downloading warez.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Students? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Sure, he can beat his students, but what about pirates?

      Wait a minute! That light brown plumage... - you're not pirates, you're barn owls!

    3. Re:Students? by IAstudent · · Score: 1

      Robot-Pirate-Ninja

      No exceptions

    4. Re:Students? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: Ninjas Hate Pirates

    5. Re:Students? by gnud · · Score: 1

      Try going to a black metal concert, and yell that they must all be extremely smelly and extremely homosexual, since they are confined to such a small space :)

    6. Re:Students? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No exceptions

      Except one - The Ninja-Pirate-Zombie-Robot.

    7. Re:Students? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they do wear tight pants and makeup. Hmm...

    8. Re:Students? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      According to the mother of this doctor -- who is also a ninja -- the whole ninja/pirate thing was a ninja joke at the expense of pirates.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    9. Re:Students? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows how many black metal shows you've been to-- most of the folks there are just as you've described.

    10. Re:Students? by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Nah, pirates are gay the same way prison guys were gay. You get a bitch, and do what you like with him. Then, when you're on shoreleave/parole, you rape and pillage and plunder to your hearts delight!

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    11. Re:Students? by javiercero · · Score: 1

      pfffffft. Wrong! Everyone knows ROBOTS are Ninja's real enemy. Even a second grade school girl knows that!

    12. Re:Students? by p33p3r · · Score: 1

      No exceptions


      Except one - Flying Ninja Monkey Robots

  5. Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Sir+Humphrey+Appleby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Every time some asian (or navtive american) says something whisy washy, a sizable group of people think it's wisdom. Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber.

    1. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber.

      He who does not listen, does not hear.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, assuming you are white, it is obvious that your words are motivated by greed or destroying the environment.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    3. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by daeg · · Score: 0, Troll

      You must be a Native American or an Asian.

    4. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 1

      Ah, you seek meaning. Then listen to the music, not the song.

    5. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      Not just limited to any one group:
      "Baseball is 90 percent mental. The other half is physical." - Yogi Berra
      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    6. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Ethnic Wiseass, actually.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He who does not listen, does not hear.

      Really? no shit?

    8. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber.
      I thought the article was cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by gold23 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what did you say?

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    10. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by solitas · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    11. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by einhverfr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No. they are not meaningless blabber. They are mostly obvious statements that people forget.

      Yes, anything *can* be used as a weapon (which is why we need to recognize this regarding airport security and either design sensible regulations or require that everyone fly nude ;-) ). In my (very different) form of martial art, we have that one drilled into our skull from day one. Yes, timing is the most difficult aspect of martial arts.

      But then most wisdom is obvious, if you can see it...

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    12. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really bad example. Yogi Berra said a lot of things to be funny (either that or he's seriously messed up in the head). John Madden, perhaps.

      http://www.yogiberra.com/yogi-isms.html

    13. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by MeatNoodle · · Score: 1

      Every time some asian (or navtive american) says something whisy washy, a sizable group of people think it's wisdom. Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber.

      Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean it isn't wisdom.

      P.

      --
      "That's exactly what I said, only different."
    14. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should have been modded "funny" you numbskulls. Nerds.

    15. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      Yogi Berra said a lot of things to be funny (either that or he's seriously messed up in the head).

      The Ninga == Yogi Berra, is there really a difference? =)

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    16. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by colinbrash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time some asian (or navtive american) says something whisy washy, a sizable group of people think it's wisdom. Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber. "Asian say wishwash, people hear wisdom." There, now people will listen to you.

    17. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "He who does not listen, does not hear."

      He who does not smell, does not smell.

      Check me out! I'm was Master Yoda 'n shit! Snoochie boochies!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Crizp · · Score: 1

      What do you practice, then? Krav Maga or something?

    19. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He who farts, HEY WHAT'S THAT?!

      (Lameness filter, kiss my ass.)

    20. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Native Americans are Asians. Siberians, actually.

    21. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      A form of Kenpo. That is all I will say. I have a lot of respect for the Tokugare Ninpo schools, which I believe Hatsumi founded. Different tradition. Different optimizations. But very effective in its own way.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    22. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by ajs · · Score: 2, Funny

      "anything *can* be used as a weapon (which is why we need to recognize this regarding airport security and either design sensible regulations or require that everyone fly nude"

      Won't work... remember ANYTHING can be used as a weapon....

    23. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Mark Twain put it another way: "common sense ain't so common"...

      Those of us who recognize the obviousness of broad statements of wisdom like Hatsumi's often forget that a lot of people don't understand these things -- that is, they don't live their lives based upon these simple understandings of the world. (Economics is much the same way -- it's pretty much common sense, but people try hard to refuse to believe or apply it.)

      For them, obvious wisdom bears repetition...

    24. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of respect for the Tokugare Ninpo schools

      Togakure. Just saying.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    25. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man with hand in pocket, feel cocky all day...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    26. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Understanding is a three-edged sword.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    27. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      baseball is 90% steroids and 10% fleshy mush to inject/swallow them

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    28. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I was largely joking about flying nude...

      The fact remains though that people often don't appreciate the possibilities of improised weapons. Istr that there are ninpo forms that would work very well using a blanket as a weapon.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    29. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He who is a faggot, is the parent of this post.

    30. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Oh, go balance a tack hammer on your head.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    31. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      "If you do not master your anger..."

      "'...then your anger will master you.' That's what you were going to say, isn't it? Isn't it?"

      "Not necessarily."

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    32. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as opposed to the Bible, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, or the Talmud. Those aren't wishy-washy at all, and of course they are all correct, even when they contradict each other or themselves.

      Welcome to metaphysics you idiot.

    33. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Yes, anything *can* be used as a weapon (which is why we need to recognize this regarding airport security and either design sensible regulations or require that everyone fly nude ;-) )

      On the other hand, in an enclosed space like an airplane, it would be hard for even the most accomplished martial artist to avoid being dogpiled by 20-30 desperate passengers. Sure, he/she could kill everyone who he/she could reach, but it's really hard to move (or even breath) once a couple tons of human meat is sitting on every part of your body.

      (I'm having a bad flashback to being on the wrong side of a dogpile in a undergrad Rugby game gone awry...)

    34. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Very well said Sir.

    35. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by anagama · · Score: 1

      I could see "totally sweet". I once went to the Ueno Castle, and there was a Ninja House exhibit. The Ninjas were women in Lavender Ninja outfits. I'd say totally sweet.

      http://www.iganinja.jp/english/menu.html

      You'll have to scour google for decent pictures though. Here's a start.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    36. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      On that note.... please give my sincerest apologies to your mother regarding the black eye.

    37. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese doesn't make much difference between "listen" and "hear." As a result, my students screw it up all the time. Similarly, Japanese doesn't distinguish "see," "watch," and "look." It's annoying when you have to mark papers, and they keep screwing it up.

    38. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      House without toilet is uncanny.

      Yes, we read the same sites.

    39. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time some asian (or navtive american) says something whisy washy, a sizable group of people think it's wisdom. Look at the quotes in the article, it's meaningless blabber.

      Totally agree.

    40. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      If you cannot master your rage, then rage will be your master.

    41. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man who speak with forked tongue not need chopsticks.

    42. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by Sir+Humphrey+Appleby · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, dipshit. Those books are complete nonsense, but slashdot still hasn't posted excerpts from them and called it wisdom in the headline.

    43. Re:Know what Really Pisses Me Off? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      If you were prepared for it, you would still be seriously at risk. As a said in the gun thread, even gunshot wounds are unlikely to stop the most motivated/determined attackers. If, in an airplane you are are attacked by a large number of passengers, you are likely to be in *serious* trouble.

      In these cases it is better to be on the side of the crowd rather than against it. However, in this case, knowing that you can probably throw a dining fork and hurt someone (namely a terrorist on the plane) might be a good thing :-) Also unopened pop cans might make nice projectiles... Then you have powdered cheyenne pepper, hot tea, and a million other things that can help to incapacitate a would-be terrorist.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  6. The Pirates will be pleased.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their numbers continue to rise (according to the *AA anyway)...

  7. the successor is obvious by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1
    1. Re:the successor is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool! his sucessor is and must be Chuck Norris!

    2. Re:the successor is obvious by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Lee Van Cleef http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086756/

      That is, were he alive.

      Tom Servo: "TV car chase--Theme!"

    3. Re:the successor is obvious by dwbassett42 · · Score: 1

      You can't mention Joe Armstrong (Michael Dudikoff) without also mentioning Sean Davidson (David Bradley)! They could both be contenders!

      Favorite line from American Ninja:
      Black Star Ninja: He posess great skills!

      Favorite line from American Ninja 2:
      Curtis Jackson: Ninjas. We've seen this problem before.

      Seriously though, Steven Hayes is certainly the most well-known student of Hatsumi's, although I don't know enough about Bujinkan to know who there other high-ranking disciples are, etc. It will be interesting to see what happens when he passes away. Other Japanese masters are in a similar situation, such as Taika Seiyu Oyata, who will almost certainly have an American successor.

    4. Re:the successor is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is the ask a ninja guy.
      http://www.askaninja.com/

    5. Re:the successor is obvious by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Other Japanese masters are in a similar situation, such as Taika Seiyu Oyata, who will almost certainly have an American successor.

      Soooo, what you're telling me is we're getting replacement cartoons and they're getting replacement ninja masters?

      --
      Why not fork?
  8. Haru, you are truly the Great White Ninja. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did I say ninja? I meant ninny. Haru, you are such a ninny.

  9. Really... by Spytap · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I know a pirate that could totally kick his ass...

  10. I wonder if he teaches . . . by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . about Real Ultimate Power?

    1. Re:I wonder if he teaches . . . by Penguin · · Score: 1

      Come on, there is only one Last Ninja!

      --
      - Peter Brodersen; professional nerd
    2. Re:I wonder if he teaches . . . by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      How the hell does a site like that get 17 million hits? Or did someone forget to turn off the refresh?

  11. It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the country of origin of such arts no longer has any interest in them. Why would kids play tennis instead of learning to beat the snot out of each other?

  12. Mandatory reference to all things Ninja by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1, Redundant

    http://www.realultimatepower.net/

    Just go and read. Or someone will flip out.

    --
    "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    1. Re:Mandatory reference to all things Ninja by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my fellow speech team members recently did what's called a Humorous Intepretation of this book. It was great. He editted content down to around nine minutes and then threw in all sorts of actions and transistions. It was pretty hilarious watching this kid flip-out about ninjas doing spin-kicks and various other chopping actions, claiming that he "loved ninjas with all of his body."

      I must say the greatest part was where he says something to the exent of, "The world began with the ninja and will end with the ninja with arms and legs scattered in the streets, and the ninjas will be like, 'we told you guys,' and Jesus will be like, 'you probably should have listened.'"

      I suppose it's better in person.

    2. Re:Mandatory reference to all things Ninja by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      If you find the site funny I highly recomend the book.

      The book is wet your pants hilarious and one could argue it has a deeper back story about a kid who want/needs acceptance. Well worth the read and the measely $14CAN (I assume it is cheaper in the 'states as the US dollar is still stronger than the looney).

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  13. any questions? by LiquidMind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if you're ever curious about anything relating to ninjas and you want a straight, no bs answer, you can always ask a ninja.

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:any questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering what would happen if this true ninja master ever met the joker who does Ask a Ninja (which I love), seeing as the master thinks other faux-ninja enterprises are "pathetic." Can't wait for that podcast episode...I can see the closing line now:

      "I look forward to you killing me SOON!"

  14. News for anime fags, inane koans that matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, I'll be sure to stay prepared to kill my students. Fat programmers with aspergers can never be too careful.

  15. mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    NODA, Japan - The teachings of Grand Master Masaaki Hatsumi echo through my head as he entreats me to attack a blackbelted disciple with a practice sword. "Always be able to kill your students," he says.

    Chilling words from a shockingly fit 76-year-old man who bills himself as the world's last ninja and stocks his training chamber with weapons such as throwing stars and nunchucks. Especially to a neophyte whose closest brush with martial arts was watching Bruce Lee matinees as a kid.

    As I cautiously raise the sword with a taut two-handed samurai grip, my sparring partner gingerly points to Hatsumi. I avert my eyes for a split second - and WHAM! The next thing I know, I'm staring at the rafters.

    Keeping your focus is just one of the lessons thumped out on the mats of the Bujinkan Dojo, a cramped school outside Tokyo that is a pilgrimage site for 100,000 worldwide followers. They revere Hatsumi as the last living master of ninjutsu - the mysterious Japanese art of war practiced by black-masked assassins of yesteryear.

    "He's unlimited in body, mind and spirit," says Richard VanDonk, who flew in from California to practice body throws in the dojo's warm glow of rice-paper screens and flickering votive candles. "He's a master of change."

    Hatsumi is the only living student of the last "fighting ninja," Toshitsugu Takamatsu, the so-called 33rd Grand Master who was a bodyguard to officials in Japanese-occupied Manchuria before World War II and fought - and won - 12 fights to the death. Legend says that during one battle, Takamatsu snatched an eyeball from a would-be Chinese bandit.

    Today, Hatsumi's enemies are stereotypes and flagging interest in the ancient art. He seeks to leave the task to a worthy successor as speculation mounts about his retirement.

    In many ways, the curly-haired, wide-eyed Hatsumi has been a victim of success: He has helped make ninja an international household name by training followers from Chile to South Africa. But he also has watched his legacy co-opted by goofy caricatures such as "Mutant Ninja Turtles" and schlocky Hollywood send-ups like "Beverly Hills Ninja."

    "I think it's pathetic," Hatsumi says of the ninja's modern image.

    A glance around the dojo suggests the average Japanese might agree. The vast majority of students are foreigners, often with a military background, who learned of Hatsumi overseas. That's because in Japan, ninjutsu is swept up in the wave of apathy that has sapped the ranks of traditional martial arts like sumo and judo.

    Most Japanese are exposed to martial arts in school. But the number practicing judo has been declining since the 1980s as more people turn to Western sports like golf and tennis. Sumo also has fallen on hard times, forcing the Japan Sumo Association to import stars.

    "Young kids might be more interested in other sports that are flashy or fashionable," concedes Makinori Matsuo, an associate professor of martial arts at Tokyo's International Budo University.

    "They tend to be turned off by the image of martial arts as sweaty and smelly," he said.

    Ninja is a compound word from the Japanese characters for "stealth" or "endurance" and "person," a reference to their traditional role as spies, mercenaries and assassins working for medieval warlords.

    Traditional weaponry such as swords and throwing stars feature prominently is Hatsumi's lessons, as do handclaws for climbing walls, blow darts and chili pepper dust to throw in an opponent's eyes.

    But true ninjutsu, Hatsumi says, is self-discipline and balance in the boardroom and the battlefield. It's about mastering one's weaknesses, including laziness and fear, and exploiting a riv

    1. Re:mirror by Trouvist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did anyone else see the occasional italicized letter in that? I'm a lazy bastard or else I would go find them all and whip out my own smithy code decrypting skillz.

    2. Re:mirror by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      The code is:

      drinkmoreovaltine

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:mirror by All_Star25 · · Score: 1

      They just spell "GNAA" six times. That's all.

    4. Re:mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      while (<>) { print $1 if /<em>(.+?)<\/em>/g; }

    5. Re:mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A great gift of expression these fellows have. Very trenchant."

  16. Ninja is replaced by Sniper by layer3switch · · Score: 0, Troll

    I never understood the facination of ninja. I mean, it's just an art of assassination. Give me a long range rifle and cut the smoke screen, old man.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    1. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sniper Rifles aren't much good in close quarters combat..

    2. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by layer3switch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sniper Rifles aren't much good in close quarters combat..

      Would you like to find out? Meet me at the railroad near Queens Blvd. and 74th Street intersection where street light shines down on you and make sure you wear red coat with green hat.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    3. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, you're right. Sniper rifles aren't very good in close combat unless your opponent is agreeable to the propostion of meeting you under a street light by the railroad near Queens Blvd. and 74th Street intersection, wearing a red coat with a green hat.

    4. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone can kill with a gun. % year old, to 100 year old . Plus the farther the range the more detationed from the kill.

      It takes a real man to drive a sword into somebody.

      By man, I mean psycho.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ninja is actually the art of bullshit. Seriously, the stories surrounding 'ninja' were part of the edge the ninja had. Talk up a good story, and no one will mess with you. Misdirection and cheap shots under the auspices of "quickest kill" led to its current incarnation.

      --
      "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
    6. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not always possible to have a clear shot. In such cases, a hidden knife to the throat can just be the solution.

    7. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      that's why you carry a shotgun on your other shoulder

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    8. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      I never understood the facination of ninja. I mean, it's just an art of assassination. Give me a long range rifle and cut the smoke screen, old man.


      Ninjitsu is the art of stealthly killing people. Sniping is merely carrying and firing a long range rifle.

      These are two different skill sets. While any monkey can use a firearm, it will not protect you against a trained assassin that observes your movements and launches a suprise attack.

      BTW, smoke screens are known anti-sniper tactics. Sniper rifles that are capable of looking through smoke screens are not considered common, and is considered military grade (i.e. not available to commoners).
    9. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can kill Just like a Ninja. Assuming your victim stands in a well lighted area, wearing a spicific outfit. well done.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So the Ninja can take it off your body and sell it for Saki?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by layer3switch · · Score: 4, Funny

      While any monkey can use a firearm, it will not protect you against a trained assassin that observes your movements and launches a suprise attack.

      Getting shot without knowing where the fuck it came from sounds pretty surprising to me...

      smoke screens are known anti-sniper tactics.

      So is an umbrella... Hence the birth of Smart Bomb.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    12. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by woot+account · · Score: 1

      So the Ninja can take it off your body and sell it for Saki?

      Wow. Shotguns must be very expensive in Japan if the ninja is going to buy a small peninsula with the money from it.

      (definition of "saki": (n) small peninsula from WWWJDIC)

    13. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If killing is your only goal, then yes, a sniper rifle is just as good, and requires less training. However, suppose your goal is to kill the target, and then take his briefcase full of secrets. Shooting him from 500 yards will just cause attention to swarm around the target and you'll never get those missle silo sites. There's where you need a ninja to sneak in, dispatch with the bodyguard, slit the target's throat, slice off his hand above the wrist to get rid of the handcuff connecting the target to the breifcase, and then disapear into the night.

    14. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "it's just an art of assassination."

      It's actually the art of stealth and endurance. Nin can mean concealment, sneaking in or endurance. While jutsu is technique. While much of Ninjitsu will be covered by crazy myth of ninjas leaping from trees etc. the essence of the concept still stands: It's a highly specialized form of danger avoidance in warfare for evading the enemy. Basically Ninjas are form of individual Maneuver warfare.

      The concept itself is thought to have come from the Chinese assassins in the warring states period - the Moshuh Nanren. It's also said that the concept is also based on Sun Tzu's chapter on spies. Where spies also being translated as "gap men" (k'ai ho) or those that sneak through the enemies gaps (avoiding strengths like in maneuver warfare).

      The most interesting aspects of this Asian thought is the cultural influence it has had on Asian warfighting. If you read some of the history of Japanese tactical patrolling in World War 2 you'll find some pretty deceptive patrolling techniques that were based off Ninjitsu training. A military author called H. John Poole has written about this. It's thought that the concept of stealth, assassination and danger avoidance travelled along the silk route to places like Vietnam and Indonesia. In the Vietnam war the VietCong used to train in similar ninja-like techniques in stealth walking, sensory enhancement and so on.

      The best modern example is in the Indonesian military where they have a subset of the special forces (KOPASSUS) called Gadapaksi. They are also known as the "ninjas" as they specialize in night time assassinations and abductions. If you read any of the literature on the East Timorese or even the West Papuans the Gadapaksi are mentioned as terrorizing the local populace.

      I've always thought that the whole base concept of the Ninja is brilliant. Pretty useful across a whole domain of study. Could be used from warfighting to black hat hacking.

    15. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by SquadBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes?

      And your point is?

      You *do* understand that those are all good things, right?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    16. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Informative

      While any monkey can use a firearm,

      Firearms are one of things that are easy to learn, but very difficult to master. When doing long range shooting, you don't just casually place crosshairs and pull trigger. You spend time practicing. Learning your weapon. You handload your bullets (and art in it's own right) to exacting tolerances and test out multiple powder types and charge levels to get the best grouping you can from your gun. When taking a long shot, you must have a bullet-drop table (or a good idea of it) and adjust your hold over depending on the yardage. At ranges of a few hundred yards, the slightest of movement will appear as a huge "bouncing" of the crosshairs. Most people train to exhale before aiming and not take another breath until the shot is taken (minimizes movement). Most people also practice dry firing just as much as live ammo, to notice and try to minimize "flinch", which is basically an anticipation of the recoil and an attempt to brace the rifle right before firing (it's slight, but can make a big difference).

      Yes "any monkey" can pull a trigger, but becoming an accomplished long range shooter takes a lot of time and effort.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    17. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      [quote]While any monkey can use a firearm,...[/quote]

      Right, I'd like to see you hump your rifle for days on end to your target, figure out where the best kill/escape location to shoot from would be, stay in that position moving as little as possible (including avoiding drinking water or releiving yourself) to avoid detection (which could include an enemy patrol passing as close as 5 meters from you) all to try to kill one person with one shot, and then get your ass out of there before your captured or killed.

      Being a sniper is much more than being a good shot. A sniper must make use of many simmilar tactics as a ninja, incliding camoflauge and concealment, stealthly aproaching a target, avoiding the enemy, and being able to live off the land for days or weeks. Stealth is key to a snipers survival.

      Sniper school is easily one of the hardest schools the military (any military) has to offer.

      As far as a smoke screen, I believe he was referring to the hype that ninja have, and not an actual gas grenade.

    18. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Pfft. That's what gunblade specialists are for.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    19. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      It takes a real man to drive a sword into somebody.

      By man, I mean psycho.
      Good thing the United States Armed Forces have a long history of bayonet training.

      http://mediastream.usma.army.mil/News/CFTBayonetTr aining_hi.wmv

      You can hear one of the guys saying "Kill kill" while stabbing the training dummies.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    20. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't "just an assasin". Originally, they were not assassins at all. "Freedom fighters" would be a better term for it, since they fought against the feudal system of Japan (Shoguns and such). At some point this changes and some ninja become highwaymen, but they were never just your fanatasy "assassins".

      It has been long speculated that Stephen K. Hayes, former bodyguard of the Dali Lama will succeed Hatsumi.

      Hatsumi is also famous for *not* teaching Ninjitsu, but blending in other martial arts and making a "modern" ninjitsu which features lots of gun techniques in addition to hand-to-hand fighting. Think John Woo.

      Finally, I would also like to throw out a historic footnote. Hatsumi is *not* the last Ninja Grandmaster, he's the last one to be officially recognized as such by the government of Japan. Hatsumi is Koga, and (like the movies) they are rivaled by the Iga, who never gained official recognition after WWII. These two clans were still fighting until the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and this is where your chop-saki movies get thier inspiration.

      It is said that the people who train under Iga mentors learn an even more diluted Ninjistu than under Hatsumi.

    21. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      it will not protect you against a trained assassin that observes your movements and launches a suprise attack.
      WTF do you think a sniper is?
      And untrained assassin?
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    22. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      You're greatly diminishing the skills of a trained sniper. It's not "merely carrying and firing a long range rifle" any more than ninjitsu is merely the art of wearing black clothes in a dark room and carrying smoke bombs. Snipers are trained assassins that also observe your movements--usually not even in the same room--and launch a surprise attack by killing you with one shot without you knowing someone's crosshair was on the back of your head.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    23. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... and here I thought KOPASSUS were just being murderous thugs in East Timor to support the corrupt Suharto govnerment and associated businesses. If I'd realised they were subscribing to the nobler ideals of the ninja I would have been much more at ease about the fact that they managed to kill 1/3 of the population during their 25 year occupation.

    24. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ninjitsu is the art of stealthly killing people. Sniping is merely carrying and firing a long range rifle."

      Bullshit. Why don't you try a sniper rifle sometime. The master snipers can hit you from a block away, compensating for both wind and gravity. That's right, bullets move toward the earth at long range, so you have to compensate and aim above the target based on their distance.

      As with every discipline, there is great skill and talent required. Your contentious use of "merely" to diminish sniping, all the while both misdefining ninjitsu and also not realizing that "stealthily killing people" is what a sniper does, makes you look a little ignorant on both subjects.

    25. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't the master sniper take out the bodyguard and target? I bet he could even shoot the handcuff chain. Ninja-boy's job would just to be in the room when it happens and sneak out with the briefcase.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    26. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 1
      "If I'd realised they were subscribing to the nobler ideals of the ninja I would have been much more at ease about the fact that they managed to kill 1/3 of the population during their 25 year occupation"

      It's a method of warfare. Since when is it supposed to be "noble"? The consequences of warfare are abhorrent, but that shouldn't stop us discussing the means of waging war.

    27. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Aristocrat+George · · Score: 1

      From long distance is one thing.. but a trained knifeman (or ninja i guess) is much more deadly than a trained gunman within 10 yards. I have little experience in either gunmanship or knifmanship but it is quite amazing the things someone can do with a knife.

    28. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Actually the highest trained snipers use stealth as much as any ninja, and must operate alone or in 2 man teams, as well as being crack shots.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    29. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Léon (or The Professional), when Jean Reno teaches Natalie Portman how to be a hitman, he started training her as a sniper because that gave her the most distance between your target and herself. However, as she got better, the distance slowly got shorter and shorter, until one of the scenes when Jean came out of the shadows with a knife to the neck of his target.

      I know movies don't really hold any universal truth, but there just might be something to that. When you're far away, there are a lot more factors in play due to the distance. The closer you are, the more gauranteed kill you have (if you're skilled enough).

      I mean if you're going to say gun replaced swords, might as well say rocket launchers replaced guns.

    30. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why use the sniper rifle when the BFG is just so damn destructive!

    31. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Presidents killed by ex-marine (or CIA or bigfoot) snipers = 1
      US Presidents killed by ninjas = 0

      Seems to me, the snipers have the assasination edge. If the Ninja's didn't pop Truman then I don't think they are going to pop much of anyone.

    32. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      especialy tepinyaki ;)

      flying food and knife fun

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    33. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Sniper Rifles aren't much good in close quarters combat..

      Would you like to find out? Meet me at the railroad near Queens Blvd. and 74th Street intersection where street light shines down on you and make sure you wear red coat with green hat.

      Congratulations -- you've demonstrated that a long-rifle is effective from a distance against a visible target. You've not even addressed close-quarters combat.

      I once saw a demonstration whereby someone with a holstered pistol (OK, it was a toy for the demonstration), standing 12 feet from an old-school martial artist, could NOT unholster the weapon and aim it before he got disarmed, knocked on his ass, and placed into a submission hold. It was quite scary to behold. (Yes, I'm sure if he was 25 feet away, he could have gotten the shot off -- military doctrine says kill 'em before they get close, but they still teach hand-to-hand for when that goes to shit.)

      A four (+) foot long .50 calibre rifle is NOT a close-quarters weapon.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    34. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, there were several aspects to Ninjutsu and Ninpo. THese included:

      1) Spiritual/occult training (Stephen Hayes covers this subject well in his books)
      2) Armed and unarmed combat (I am not sure a book can teach you these)
      3) Physical skills of stealth and endurance
      4) Psychological warfare

      One of the best all around looks at Ninpo today is "Pathnotes of an American Ninja Master" by Glenn Morris. Well worth the read. He talks about being beaten in a knife sparring match by Stephen Hayes' 8-month-pregnant wife (yes, *anything* can be used as a weapon), about spiritual aspects of the path, and more. Well worth the read.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    35. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All right, knock it off! Two hundred and fifty feet! He was two hundred and fifty feet away and shooting at a moving target. Oswald got off three rounds with an old Italian bolt action rifle in only six seconds and scored two hits, including a head shot! Do any of you people know where these individuals learned to shoot? Private Joker?"

    36. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by eddeye · · Score: 1
      Most people train to exhale before aiming and not take another breath until the shot is taken (minimizes movement).

      Then those people are training wrong. One of my friends went to army sniper school in the 80s. He said holding your breath when you shoot is one of the worst things you can do. Holding your breath clenches your abdominal muscles, creating a slight tremor that disrupts your hand and eye. At 300+ yards it makes a noticeable difference in your shot.

      Instead what you do is regulate your breathing into a controlled rhythm that you work into your aim (not a fixed point), then fire as you exhale. This produces more predictable results than the herky-jerky of holding your breath.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
    37. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by soupforare · · Score: 1

      layer3switch asks a ninja!

      Give me a long range rifle and cut the smoke screen, old man.

      Ah, the bravery of being out of range.
      I hope you do, one day, find a ninja in your sights. Prepare yourself, however! For before your bullet leaves its barrel, you'll be dead.

      I look forward to killing you, soon.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    38. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by king-manic · · Score: 1

      These are two different skill sets. While any monkey can use a firearm, it will not protect you against a trained assassin that observes your movements and launches a suprise attack.

      sniper > above monkey with a rifle > samarai > ninja On a well cut grass field

      Sniper > ninja > above monkey with a rifle > Samarai in a heavy brush

      Sniping is essentially a ninja with a rifle. Not any monkey can be a sniper. But a good sniper can take out any number of of the three other groups above.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    39. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      Or where you need a ninja to sneak in, slip past the bodyguard, make the target's death look like an accident, and replace the documents with fakes. They'd never know what happened.

    40. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, anyone looking for autographed 8x10 glossies of Stephen Hayes can check out his website

    41. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      I can't wait till they start handing out beam weapons. Then I might finally be able to throw away that RPG in my closet.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    42. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Which is why we have the dictum of using the right tool for the right job. If you only have a hammer, then everything starts to look like a nail.

      For your scenario above, clearly the best tool for the job is a neutron bomb, and not a ninja.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    43. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's FSCK'n useless. Then everyone will know You have the information, and countermeasures will be taken.
      And who the fuck has to steal secrets to find out where a missile silo is? Any satellite or aerial photo will tell you that. And if you were stealing security information so you can break into the silo? Since you just gave yourself away, expect all of that information to be obsolete by the time you get to the silo.
      Dream on fan boy...

    44. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      Its taught in defensive shooting tactics, a person with a knife, within 21 feet (7 yards) can consistantly deliver a fatal blow to a person with a holstered weapon.

      I know it takes me about a second and a half to draw and fire from concealment at a target with reasonable accuracy. I also know it takes me about a second for me to move 10 yards from a standstill, leaving me half a second to strike/stab/slash, and I've got no training with knife fighting.

      A knife in a gunfight is very dangerous indeed.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    45. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Very very true. You also need to learn how to read the wind. Not just the wind where you are, and not just the wind where your target is -- both of those, as well as any movement the air may be doing between the end of your barrel and what you're aiming at. Very, very difficult. At a distance of 1,000 yards, 1 MOA (that's minute of angle, that means 1/60 of a degree) is about 10.5 inches. That's right. If your aim is off by ONE SIXTIETH OF ONE DEGREE, and you're trying to shoot a person, you'll be lucky to hit their arm. Even at 500 yards, that's 5 inches. I challenge any of you chair jockies to try holding something in place and repeatedly being able to pull a trigger without deviating by a fraction of a degree. Even if you reduce your muscle tremors (and everyone shakes, slightly) to nothing at all, the blood pumping through your body will move your aim more than a few fractions of a degree. I used to shoot smallbore competetively. Was pretty good, too -- 1600, 147X was my top outdoor prone score, if that matters to anyone. In order to shoot that well, I actually had conditioned myself to be able to control my heartbeat. Through breathing and concentration I was able to pause my heartbeat and my breathing for a few seconds. I'd say I could pull off 2-3 seconds with no heartbeat.. which could have been much better, but I was around 60-70 BPM at that point. If I did more exercise and had managed to get to 40-50 BPM I probably could have pulled off 3-4 seconds with no heart beat. Chew on that the next time you're about to open your mouth and claim that serious long-range shooting is a joke, and that you could do it with only a few days practice. That's every bit as foolish as me claiming I could be a totally pr0 ninja, just give me a day or two to practice jumping around and climbing walls.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    46. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      What method does a person use to stop heartbeats like that? Also, do doctors say it is bad for you?

    47. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a lot of people fail to forget is Ninpo is a living art. We get so lost in the concept of the night warrior we forget that the Ninja was many things, including a spy in most cases. Seldom would a real ninja wear that trademarked black suit. In fact most would avoid any connection to warfare... one of the rules of ninjutsu is to be true to yourself and your famiy and their survival. The "Samurai" was essentially a slave to his master. It is when the survival of the family (long term or otherwise) that motivated the ninja into serving a particular leader. The Ninja true power was knowledge, not fighting skill. Adaptation being important as well. Indeed if one wished to be a true ninja today, he would need to be a programmer and in some cases a cracker too, not just skilled in combat. Survival in this world is no longer some power hungry leader and army (hmmm ok maybe things have not changed that much after all lol)... What seperates those today, be they warrior or cracker is the wisdom of the ninja heart and purpose of this actions. Personally I am hoping Stephen Hayes would follow Hatsumi. But it could be someone else... Unfortunately it seems Robert Bussey is no longer in the fold.

    48. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      According to you Slashdot is composed of 1337 N1nj4s,brewing their deadly perl scripts.

    49. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      I... don't rightly know, to be honest. It was just a matter of breathing control, and the fact that my heartbeat varies as I inhale/exhale normally anyway.
      Basically went like this.. the closest and easiest way to relate what was going on would be to compare it to mediatation.
      extreme calmness.. a blank mind, no-thought.. I'd lay there and shift my concentration slowly, very slowly, around my body, and make sure every single muscle was relaxed. Then, you just continue that, with slow breathing. I'd just lay there, almost as if I was falling asleep, but without the eyelid-droopy grogginess.

      I never talked to any doctors about it.. I'm sure that over such a short period of time it's fine. I didn't have to do anything to START it beating again, and people get along fine just fine with heartbeats at only 30-40 BPM normally. I never suffered any ill effects from it, nothing major or even anything minor like slightly blacking out like you can do by holding your breath for a long time. Couldn't do it by sucking in a lot of air all at once and holding your breath, as all that air and muscle strain would mean a big heartbeat -- I'd have to work myself into it for a bit beforehand, with slow, controlled breathing, working up to just a pause. Some air in the lungs, but not much at all.. not enough to cause any sort of muscle stress anywhere.

      As I said though, it's hard for me to describe without comparing it to some kind of crazy eastern meditation.

      Definately the most worthwhile thing I took away from any sport I've participated in, I'd say -- it's a great "can you do this?" card to pull, but more than that, even though I don't think I really can do it anymore, the basics are still there.. great way to calm down and keep myself even.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    50. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah?

      Well, I use a B-52 with nuclear ordnance. Let's see you snipe your way out of that one, buddy!

      Score one to me, I think!

    51. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by sharkguy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well said CHESTER COPPERPOT, ninjutsu is much more than the martial aspects focussed on by so many people. Studying this way reveals an incredible psychological grasp of humanity, all the more amazing for its age. It also has some marvelous wisdom that would seem out of harmony with anything that has so militant a reputation: 'The best way to win a fight is not to be there.'

      I would recommend reading some of the writings of Stephen K. Hayes, a student of Hatsumi's, since I found they shed some light on the deep cultural aspects of ninjutsu. The ninja culture of feudal Japan was an important counter-culture (in) to the predominantly (yo) influence of the bushi, or samurai. Of course read Master Hatsumi's own writings as well!

      Remember it was not military defeat in any single large battle that undid the historical influence of the ninja, but stability and a lack of customers (ie. lack of interest). Sadly, history repeats itself somewhat today...which is why, as mentioned in the article, so many of the students now are foreigners.

    52. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by m487396 · · Score: 1
      The best modern example is in the Indonesian military where they have a subset of the special forces (KOPASSUS) called Gadapaksi. They are also known as the "ninjas" as they specialize in night time assassinations and abductions. If you read any of the literature on the East Timorese or even the West Papuans the Gadapaksi are mentioned as terrorizing the local populace.

      Well you'd think they could do do something about Alexander Downer[1] then!

      [1] Australian Foreign Minister.

    53. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      In Léon (or The Professional), when Jean Reno teaches Natalie Portman how to be a hitman, he started training her as a sniper because that gave her the most distance between your target and herself. However, as she got better, the distance slowly got shorter and shorter, until one of the scenes when Jean came out of the shadows with a knife to the neck of his target.

      And poured hot grits down his pants?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    54. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Frenchman113 · · Score: 1

      Of course, what he probably meant is "sake", a kind of alcoholic beverage. But, you already knew that.

    55. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      All these replies you have got from all these sniper experts is amazing, but lets face it, sniping is seen as being 100% cool until you play Unreal Tournament and everybody forgets the coolness and calls them campers.

    56. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Different strokes for differnt folks. I have no sniper training, but I do competition benchrest shooting, and any breathing, rythmed or not, produces crosshair movement, making you try to pull the trigger at "just the right moment", which is not the way to make a good shot. You want to be able to calmly and slowly press the trigger moving the rifle as little as possible while doing it (which is why most benchrest shooters want the lightest trigger pull they can safely achieve. The less force you have to put in the trigger, the less you'll move the rifle).

      Also, I don't know if you noticed or intended it, but notice that you mentioned "he said holding your breath". Technically, holding your breath is inhaling and then waiting to exhale. I have indeed found this to make for a jumpy shot. What I said though, was to exhale before aiming, and not inhale again until the trigger has been pulled.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    57. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Ibix · · Score: 1
      Then I might finally be able to throw away that RPG in my closet.

      Sell it on eBay instead.

      I

    58. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by ravyne · · Score: 1

      The man in black who molested you in a child was a priest, not a ninja!

    59. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      but a trained knifeman (or ninja i guess) is much more deadly than a trained gunman within 10 yards.
      Within 10 feet, perhaps, but I'd definitely prefer a gun with a starting distance of 10 yards.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    60. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Anyone can kill with a gun. % year old, to 100 year old
      Sounds to me like you've never used a gun before.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    61. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by odourpreventer · · Score: 1
      (i.e. not available to commoners)

      But sniper rifles are? That's great, where can I get one?

    62. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by InfinityEdge · · Score: 1

      No silly, snipers work in pairs: the shooter and the spotter.

      In your situation, the shooter would shoot the case chain then take out the target and bodyguard from an apartment across the street with a supressed 300 Whisper. The spotter would be walking towards the target, then when the shooter has done his job, he would grab the case, jump on the motorcycle they had previously parked and drive off.

    63. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      Most people train to exhale before aiming and not take another breath until the shot is taken (minimizes movement).

      Then those people are training wrong.


      I agree. I was a U.S. Marine Designated Marksman, (more urban/hostage rescue oriented than Marine Scout/Sniper), and holding your breath is bad for several reasons. First, you aren't guaranteed to be holding the same amount of air in your lungs each time, which makes acheiving the proper body position difficult. (Too long to explain here...) Second, if you are holding your breath you aren't as relaxed, and muscle tension will throw off your shot. Finally, the longer you hold your breath, the more, and harder, your heart beats. (Darn thing wants to get more oxygen to your cells.) At long ranges your pulse will throw off your shot pretty badly. (I have seen my crosshairs jump entirely off a 3' target at 500 yards due to my pulse.)

      The Marines do not use the "exhale as you fire" rule since it requires exact timing to fire at the perfect spot in your breath. Instead, they teach to fire at the "natural respiratory pause" that occurs between each breath. Between each breath there is a second or two before you begin to inhale. (Check it out if you don't believe me...) If you breathe naturally, it is the same each time, so you don't have another aspect of shooting to control. It also gives you more time to apply pressure to the trigger, so you can avoid jerking the trigger and missing low.

      If everything is done properly - body position, muscle relaxation, breathing, etc., you can actually pull the trigger with your eyes closed and hit your target.

      In regards to the GP, the Marine Corps does a pretty good job of teaching how to shoot the M-16 in boot camp. If you can't hit a target at 500 yards, you aren't going to qualify with with the M-16 and you don't get to graduate from boot camp until you do. They spend 2 entire weeks on marksmanship - the first learning how to get into proper shooting positions, how to aim and spending time snapping-in (dry-firing at targets). The entire second week is spent on the range practicing, and on Friday you shoot the qualification course. Does that mean that every Marine is a dangerous sniper? No, but they are all proficient with it out to 500 yards, and can monitor the environment to determine the required windage. You also receive classes on range estimation, and practice engaging targets at unknown distances to get a feel for it. Finally, the front sight post is a good way to estimate range. Get a feel for how it looks compared to man-sized and shaped targets at known distances. Then extrapolate as needed. It isn't as good as a nice scope with mil-dots, but if you are close enough, you might miss them 2-3" high, (upper chest or neck), or low, (lower chest, solar plexus) but without a good medical team nearby, they are still dead.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    64. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by AoT · · Score: 1

      And we all know how often ninjas(ninji?) stand in well lighted area.

    65. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Toyamaryu_Shingen · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Ninjas (a.k.a. Shinobi) were spies. Plain and simple. Not great warriors or fighters but just plain old spies. I read a lot of Japanese history (in Japanese) and never are ninjas mentioned as something important or revered in martial arts or anything else for that matter. They just gathered information and sold it to the highest bidder. In fact, whenever a ninja was discovered and killed, the killiing wounds were usually found on the ninjas' back. In other words, ninjas ran away from fights rather than face opponents. Hatsumi has a descent reputation in Japan but is also known to sell his rank certificates to the highest bidder.

    66. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Is that an upper-case "5" at the start of that sentence?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    67. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by eddeye · · Score: 1
      What I said though, was to exhale before aiming, and not inhale again until the trigger has been pulled.

      Sorry, my bad, I read too much into your comment. You're right, as written it doesn't say to hold your breath.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
    68. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the holstered gun vs the ready knife at 10 yards is probably very bad for the gunman. However, the holstered knife and unholstered gun at even 10 feet swaps the advantage the other way. So is the lesson that guns suck at close quarters, or is it that having your weapon ready at close quarters is important?

    69. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ninjas(ninji?)

      It's like sheep... the plural of ninja is ninja.

    70. Re:Ninja is replaced by Sniper by SirPavlova · · Score: 1

      The people who call them campers are just sore... why don't they try doing it themselves? The sniper is ridiculously underpowered in UT2004. I dunno... I just liked the spammy version more. :(

      --
      Yar.
  17. Perhaps you should ask... A NINJA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was a young boy, I awoke every morning to the delicious smell of pancakes. My mother, and father's dojo contained within it a hot griddle perfect for making pancakes, waffles, and a multitude of other pancake-like breakfast pastries. I remember them well -- The pleasant, care-free days of my childhood in the dojo were often spent peering into the kitchen with eager anticipation as my mother prepared pancakes my family.

    As I grew older, and began my journey to spiritual enlightenment, the memories of my pancake-eating youth filled my heart and dreams with warm, fluffy goodness....Ahhh, yes..the sweet, sweet memories... The day I ate 10 pancakes... The day I placed a warm pancake between my fleshy loins and performed the forbidden dance... The day pressed a pancake to my buttocks and encouraged my dog to come eat.. Indeed, much of my childhood was spent in pure innocence -- An innocence only pancakes can provide. It was heaven. A heaven, filled with pancakes, where I sat at the throne of God, with my hand-maidens Aunt Jemimah and Mrs. Butterworth seated beside me. An indestructible triumvirate made of flour, eggs, sugar, milk, water, and love.

    By the age of 15, the path of my life became unclear and confusing. Torn between my duty my village and my love for pancakes, I foolishly left home in search of karaguchi ah-nowakadesu .. the ultimate pancake. My journey took me to the many islands of my homeland, many days away from my dojo. My hunger for pancakes became my teacher, and foolishly I let it control the path that I walked upon. My feet, sore from travel, ached as my heart and stomach did, until I came to a realization. My duty was clear. I needed to take a stand and accept my love for the art of the ninja AND my love for pancakes. It was not wrong for me to love both. I love one as a dear friend, and one as a lover. Yes--My mission was clear--I must become a ninja, a secret assassin hired by the imperial family BUT I MUST ALSO ENJOY THE OCCASIONAL PANCAKE.

    My adoration for breakfast cakes has placed me within an awkward position. Many ninja refuse to recognize me as their brother. I defend my father's land, but I am looked upon as weak and undisciplined. I tell them, "But, brothers! Listen to my plea! The pancakes do not weaken me, nor do they make me disobey the rule of my sword. They fill me with love." But alas, they do not understand...For the mind of a ninja is complex.

    My only earthly desire is to be accepted for who I am. Yes, I am a NINJA--But I also enjoy pancakes. Will you accept me? If you were approached by a ninja who requested a pancake, would you submit to his will?

    1. Re:Perhaps you should ask... A NINJA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had heard legends of the Slashdot pancake ninjas, but I never knew they were real. Now I live in fear of their awesome power, and can only hope that my fresh fluffy pancakes will appease them.

    2. Re:Perhaps you should ask... A NINJA by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      My god, why didn't you go for the karma, you anonymous coward??

    3. Re:Perhaps you should ask... A NINJA by Jetson · · Score: 1

      You don't get karma for "+1 Funny", but you lose carma for "-1 Overrated". If you just want to be funny then AC is much safer.

  18. Everything You Ever Wanted To Know by itsdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everything you ever wanted to know about ninjas

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLWGgul_mZU

    1. Re:Everything You Ever Wanted To Know by wizwormathome · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to brush up on the safety guide!

      --
      An explanation of my choices for friends
  19. That's true.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows it, and always has. But we also know we're not allowed to say it, and there are those who would like to be able to prevent us from even thinking it. So prepare to be modded -1 Troll and Flamebait.

    We all know that's inevitable too.

    1. Re:That's true.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed

  20. Inigo Montoya by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

    Inigo Montoya studied Ninja sword skills, but failed to take in the whole package. That's why he lost on the Cliffs of Insanity to a more driven opponent.

    1. Re:Inigo Montoya by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you read the book, you would know why he lost.

      I like my Rolelay Character Breakdown of that fight.
      IM, a character with a detailed background, spent lots of points in skills, and a great goal.

      TMIB: Spent all his point in Stats.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Re:So THIS is how you are going to compete with Di by s16le · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, maybe you belong on digg... with all the other idiots who end questions with periods.

  22. Feel the power! by minitual · · Score: 1, Funny

    "At age 76, students are speculating on his successor, who may for the first time be non-Japanese..."
    Chuck Norris anyone?

    1. Re:Feel the power! by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Chuck Norris is the reason there's only 1 ninja left - he killed the rest & he's saving the last one for a special occasion.

  23. I know who his successor will be: by JPriest · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have heard rumor that the Prom Ninja is going to be Masaaki Hatsumi's successor.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:I know who his successor will be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get the Sorbo-gay ninja uniform?

    2. Re:I know who his successor will be: by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I was assuming it would be Stephen Hayes but it seems he may have diverged too much in creating his own school of thought in terms of Ninjutsu for that to be appropriate. There is also Glen Morris, and a few others, or it could be someone I haven't heard of yet.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:I know who his successor will be: by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      I remember mention that Lomax was a possibility, but he's back here in Adelaide and I don't know what's the go these days (been out of the loop for waaay too long).

    4. Re:I know who his successor will be: by JPriest · · Score: 1
      or it could be someone I haven't heard of yet.

      You mean it might be somene not selling their knowledge on DVD's for $50 each? Think McDojo with an online drive through.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    5. Re:I know who his successor will be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dolt that moderated this Troll has no sense of humor.

  24. You know.. by shidarin'ou · · Score: 0

    That not only is the public perception of ninjas pathetic, but the twisted distortion of what "real" ninjas are now.

    You think you can debate if Kamakazi pilots or Ghost Dog is a samurai?

    These modern day "ninjas" have little in common with their ancestors. Shit, ninjas aren't even seperate from Samurai, a ninja is just a job for a samurai.

    *grumble*

    *drink*

    of course, there's almost zero books written about ninjas in english that is based in fact. You'll find some decent books in Japanese, and some decent prime sources if you can rid classic japanese- but other than that you're SOL at learning anything about Ninjas- and not from some washed out old man who can barely remember lessons taught to him when he was young.

    1. Re:You know.. by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 1

      "a ninja is just a job for a samurai"

      Um, what?

      The samurai class was far and above the simple ninja. In fact, they looked down on the ninja's lack of honor, class standing and inability to stand and fight.

      You might want to drink more.

      --
      "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
    2. Re:You know.. by erc · · Score: 1

      Oh, here we go again ... SVN: "Samurai vs. Ninja" - Coming soon to a theater near you!

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    3. Re:You know.. by shidarin'ou · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not true ;) Just more American and modern day myths. Enjoy them.

    4. Re:You know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone ever told you that you're a raging prick?

  25. Re:Ninja skillz by RockWolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, you lack ninja skills.

    --
    February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  26. Predicting a thread full of "Experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who think they know what they're talking about, but are actually sedentary nerds who barely understand linux.

    Oh I don't need to predict. It's the same way everyday.

  27. First off smart guy by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The plural for Ninja is Ninja.

    The Ninja started as a bunch of rebellious peasants thet refined there art. But to nothing like we presented in the media.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:First off smart guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you go about correcting someone else when you used the wrong 'there' and started a sentance with 'but?'

    2. Re:First off smart guy by sco08y · · Score: 1

      The plural for Ninja is Ninja.

      Ninja isn't a Japanese word because there are no letters "n", "i", "j" or "a" in Japanese. Also, Japanese doesn't have plurals so there is no plural form of the original.

      English, on the other hand, does. And when a word of foreign origins like "ninja" is used by an English speaker or writer it is an English word.

      When an English word ends with a vowel, the plural is formed by adding the suffix -s. So the plural of ninja is ninjas.

  28. What a load of crap by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Troll
    From Wikipedia:

    The underlying connotation of shinobi (, pronounced nin in Sino-Japanese compounds) is "to do quietly" or "to do so as not to be perceived by others" and--by extension--"to forebear," hence its association with stealth and invisibility.

    Huh. So...this guy is basking in the limelight. Wow, really staying true to the values there.

    Slow news day? I know I tagged this one "stupid".

    1. Re:What a load of crap by Quaoar · · Score: 1

      And that was the last comment ever posted by SuperBanana.

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  29. hrm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about Shô Kosugi?

  30. It is obvious to the most simple minded fool that by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chuck Norris will be chosen as successor.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Pirates? by Attrition_cp · · Score: 1

    How many pirates has he killed in his lifetime I wonder?

    And how many degrees did the global temperature rise?

    --
    Touched By His Noodley Appendage.
  32. Ninja - bah. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Give me GPS guided munitions!

    Sheesh. This is slashdot.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Ninja - bah. by tktk · · Score: 1
      Give me GPS guided munitions!

      Sheesh. This is slashdot.

      Since this is Slashdot, it should be GPS guided missle with a ninja payload.

      Why?

      Because you can.

  33. Aight, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put on my robe and wizard hat...

  34. Bah. The real ninja tests are not in the article by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Ninjas' are mammels.
    2. Ninja's fight all the time.
    3. The purpose of a ninja is to flip out and kill people

  35. Re:This is news for nerds? Stuff that matters? by RootsLINUX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly what I was thinking. While I think ninja's are totally awesome like every other mammal on the planet, I think we all agree that not all nerds are also mammals.....

    Oh, god damn it. I just had a terrible vision of RMS in skin-tight ninja gear carrying out an assasination mission in Redmond. I think my only option is to commit seppuku at this point.

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  36. Re:Mod down- article text alteration troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone can do a quick Find on the page to show that you're the only one talking about "sodomy", which means you're just a stupid troll yourself. Go back to Digg please.

  37. Quick quiz... by chill · · Score: 2, Funny

    What "...preserves the honor of the Bujinkan members, it indicates you are part of a larger whole--one whose members come together with warrior hearts to better themselves through training and friendship. It evinces the glory of warrior virtue, and embodies both loyalty and brotherly love." ?

    Why, the required membership card, of course! Don't leave dojo without it!

    http://www.bujinkan.com/guidelines.htm (#6)

      -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Quick quiz... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Cue footage of the ninja throwing their Shiruken Express card, whizzing through the card reader and becoming embedded in a tree.

    2. Re:Quick quiz... by FFON · · Score: 0

      YOU FOOL, DONT SLASHDOT THE LAST NINJAS WEBSITE

      i'm gonna go hide in my until while this whole ninja vs /. war passes

      --
      .cig
    3. Re:Quick quiz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only mocking Bujinkan because there isn't a ninja watching what you type over your shoulder... or is there?

  38. WoW by JustinKSU · · Score: 0

    How can there NOT be any World of Warcraft references posted? Need roll FTW!

  39. Proverbs by umbrellasd · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    He who spouts proverbs knows what others know but does not himself know.

    *furrows his brow and glances left and right suspiciously*

    Damnit!

    1. Re:Proverbs by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      He who questions training only trains himself at asking questions.

      If you can balance a tack hammer on your head, you will head off your foes with a balanced attack.

      Although I'm still not clear on why I'm wearing watermelon on my feet.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Proverbs by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Man who stands on toilet is high on pot.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    3. Re:Proverbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man who lay down with itchy butt wake up with smelly finger.

    4. Re:Proverbs by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Great Mystery Men reference! :)

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    5. Re:Proverbs by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      man who go to sleep with problem in hand, wake with solution on chest.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  40. Disgruntled Ninja Silently Kills 12 Co-Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
  41. be able to kill your students by atarione · · Score: 1

    fair enough /makes mental note

    checks holster snap to ensure colt45 auto is secure.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  42. Can't...resist...replying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife is Japanese, so I've visited that country many times. It's an okay place, so long as you have business there perhaps. But the people aren't secretly all Shogun, Samurai or Ninja, as many still seem to believe, and they aren't all fonts of wisdom either. In fact, some are even quite stupid! Gasp!

    And guys like this dine-out on their reps, yet I seldom see any attempts to verify their claims. Slashdot geeks love to bash IDers, for instance, while chanting "just the facts, man!"...yet they also blindly accept on faith something which sounds too cool to be untrue (or they'd love to be true), such as "He fought and won 12 battles to the death", and the like.

    Even most Japanese take such claims with a huge grain of salt, and a lot of sake.

  43. Re:This is news for nerds? Stuff that matters? by geekoid · · Score: 0

    seppuku? Talk about your open Sores!

    Thanks you! I'll be here forever!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Purple prose by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Timing is the most difficult," he adds, while casually deflecting a gleaming metal sword swung at his neck by a veteran student. After the turning the blade on the attacker, Hatsumi gives his arm a slight twist, eliciting a baleful yelp.

    I really despise prose like this in newspaper articles. I find it hard to believe that that is an exact account of what happened, so it just destroys the article's credibility and makes it seem like the writer is just trying to write a third rate action novel.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:Purple prose by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      "Casual" is a matter of style & not skill, though it often requires skill to pull it off without embarrassing yourself.

      If the guy is really that good, there's no reason he couldn't chit chat while sparring. Have you ever watched two martial artists sparring (with or without weapons)? Some people just make it look easy.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Purple prose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Agreed - who was the copy editor for this article? Take a look at this passage, copied verbatim:

      Traditional weaponry such as swords and throwing stars feature prominently is [sic] Hatsumi's lessons, as do handclaws for climbing walls, blow darts and chili pepper dust to throw in an opponent's eyes.
    3. Re:Purple prose by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a lot of mystical reverence given to ninjas in the west. I'm sure what happened was impressive but would be less god-like if we saw a video. The article makes him seem like an invincible deity or something. Ninjitsu is more down-to-earth than that, you know? A form of stealthy military and danger avoidance training. They make it seem like people go to this place to train and become mythic ninjas who are inhumanly invincible. I guess I don't like any kind of deification in the press.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:Purple prose by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Informative
      I really despise prose like this in newspaper articles. I find it hard to believe that that is an exact account of what happened, so it just destroys the article's credibility and makes it seem like the writer is just trying to write a third rate action novel.

      First of all, the guy writing the article admits he's no martial artist and is somewhat starry eyed.

      Second of all, it doesn't sound all that far fetched. If they're really training with real bladed weapons (not for the novice), that could be exactly what happened. I've seen demonstrations by some old (and old-school) martial artists which aren't that far from this.

      Some little, tiny, old asian man tells two strapping young black-belts to come at him with wooden swords -- in a shockingly short period of time, both young hearty blackbelts are staring up at the ceiling wondering how they could have done things differently.

      A friend was at a martial-arts film festival in Toronto, and they pulled him up on stage for a demonstration. A 60-year old man who had been in a bunch of films said "come at me" -- several witnesses confirm in slightly less than 1 second, my friend was spun around, *lightly* struck on the head, *gently* thumped to the floor, and placed into rather painful an arm bar -- by a man who was both amazingly fast, and very dilligent about not breaking the volunteer. He applied just enough pressure to demonstrate he could have done more, but didn't even leave him with a bump, bruise, or any lasting pain.

      I don't remember the exact set of near-beatings which were applied, but the speed was something to behold. My friend assures me he doesn't really know what the heck happened -- just that the arm-bar was enough to assure him the guy applying it could have broken his arm has he chosen -- the only thing he knows is it was all over before he was sure it was ready to begin.

      Seriously, if this guy has been doing this quite so long -- dodging a sword, taking it from you, and twisting your arm into an uncomfortable position isn't exactly a stretch to believe.

      Don't believe me? Walk into an Aikido dojo and ask for a demonstration. You might see things in a different light. A modern master is amazing -- an old school master from the last of the REAL old school masters -- something utterly amazing to behold. Especially the ones who use things with sharp edges and the like.

      As schamltzy as the reputation of martial arts is in film, and as much as you don't like the prose in the article, you should be aware of the fact that anyone who has been doing martial arts for *that* long is probably an exceedingly quick sonofabitch. And, chances are, when a bunch of young guys travel from all over the world to train with you, you're probably pretty amazing.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Purple prose by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      reminds me of a story my dad once told me.

      he was about 20 and looking to rent an apartment. he went to look at one with the landlord, and in their chit chatting the guy mentioned he had spent years as a navy seal. so theyre walking around, my dad looking at the place, and he accidentally backs into the guy, and before he can say hes sorry has his arm behind his back with his face towards a wall.

      the guy let go, apologized, and said after training for so long its just relfexive.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    6. Re:Purple prose by Serzen · · Score: 1

      How is this hard to believe? Martial artists in both the east and the west have been doing just this sort of thing for centuries. The level of skill Soke Hatsumi has achieved over the years would make ANY action he undertakes casual. Likewise, there are classically trained fencing masters walking around today who can do the same thing. Timing and distance are everything. You start off practising it slowly, then move up to combat speed over time, and, eventually, the actions are second nature. To the untrained, the master (be s/he Asian or European) quickly gets in there, his hands and arms are a blur, and then someone is lying on the ground. To one who is trained in these things, it's clear that the master has closed distance and, while the opponent is unstable due to the momentum of his attack, has applied just the necessary force to topple the already unstable adversary. It doesn't take strength, just finesse (sp?).

    7. Re:Purple prose by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the guy let go, apologized, and said after training for so long its just relfexive.

      *laugh* At that point, that's not just training, that's Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

      NOBODY is that twitchy unless they're reliving something a little too often. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Purple prose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some little, tiny, old asian man tells two strapping young black-belts to come at him with wooden swords -- in a shockingly short period of time, both young hearty blackbelts are staring up at the ceiling wondering how they could have done things differently.


      What they could have done differently was learn how to fight. They'll all tell you about the "art" in "martial art" but most of them don't really get the "martial" part.

      A friend was at a martial-arts film festival in Toronto, and they pulled him up on stage for a demonstration. A 60-year old man who had been in a bunch of films said "come at me" -- several witnesses confirm in slightly less than 1 second, my friend was spun around, *lightly* struck on the head, *gently* thumped to the floor, and placed into rather painful an arm bar -- by a man who was both amazingly fast, and very dilligent about not breaking the volunteer. He applied just enough pressure to demonstrate he could have done more, but didn't even leave him with a bump, bruise, or any lasting pain.


      Right. Come at me like an idiot and play right into my hands. I'd have to see what he used (the actor), but I'd wager it's a low probability technique that wouldn't work with a brawler that has a couple of years of full contact experience. Ditto for small joint manipulations against somebody who knows enough to stay the hell out of reach until the moment of knocking the opponent's block off.


      Don't believe me? Walk into an Aikido dojo and ask for a demonstration. You might see things in a different light. A modern master is amazing -- an old school master from the last of the REAL old school masters -- something utterly amazing to behold. Especially the ones who use things with sharp edges and the like.


      Oh bullshit. It works great on the uninitiated who overcommit and have no training, but I've seen Aikido (as well as traditional karate) attempted in MMA and it usually ends up with the aikidoist getting damaged and/or a real eye opening. I'll put a skilled Muay Thai/BJJ guy against any of the "old masters" in empty hand. As for blades you can't exactly walk around packing a katana in plain view so the nod goes to Kali/Arnis/Eskrima for pragmatism.

      My other pet pissoff are karate practitioners who whine that their techniques are "too deadly" to be used in the ring. Right. See: Fred Ettish.
    9. Re:Purple prose by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt the guy's experience and skill, I doubt the article writer's recollection of it. Yes, he might have easily dodged a sword and twisted the guy's arm, but as you said, that stuff takes a second by an extremely skilled martial artist... a lot longer than it takes to spout wisdom.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    10. Re:Purple prose by JoshNorton · · Score: 1

      Having seen videos of Hatsumi, that's NOT actually purple prose - that's a pretty straightforward description of some of his training sessions.

      --
      "Stupid! Stupid stupid stupid stupid! I touched the hot wire right there - I'm an idiot!"
    11. Re:Purple prose by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1
      Some little, tiny, old asian man tells two strapping young black-belts to come at him with wooden swords -- in a shockingly short period of time, both young hearty blackbelts are staring up at the ceiling wondering how they could have done things differently.

      Next time, remember Rule No. 1

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    12. Re:Purple prose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's a lot of mystical reverence given to ninjas in the west"

      In the west? If you think the silly ninja-worship came from the west, you haven't seen much of the *Japanese* ninja shows.

    13. Re:Purple prose by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is absolutely correct. I've never seen Haatsumi but I've seen students of his students and they're pretty darn good.

      I've also seen Dan Inosanto, who is on Haatsumi's level, and that guy is the quickest person I've ever seen anywhere. Flat out amazing.

      Something nobody talks about with regards to these guys is how durable they are. For you to do martial arts for that long, if there was anything wrong with your body physically-- in fact if you weren't a near-perfect physical specimen-- you would have washed out long ago.

      Bujinkan and ninjutsu are unfairly discredited. I do think that a lot of ninjutsu students in the US buy into the mystique quite a bit too much and it's rather annoying. There's something very cultlike about bujinkan schools and I just don't see the damn point of that. But props to them for "keepin it real" after all these years, unlike so many other arts, and through duress and great pressure to sell out.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    14. Re:Purple prose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there's Rule Nineteen. :-)

      "Remember Never to Forget Rule One"

    15. Re:Purple prose by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      That story feels a little questionable to me. Not that I'm saying you're Dad is lying. But there're a lot of people out there that get off on dropping mention that they're ex-SEALs (or whatever) into the conversation, despite the fact that they probably never even went to BUDS (basic SEAL training). It wouldn't surprise me if the landlord in question was one of these folks, and was just trying to intimidate your Dad. The "reflexive response" just doesn't ring true to me, at least based on the (real, uniformed) SEALs that I have interacted with in the past.

    16. Re:Purple prose by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


      I really despise prose like this in newspaper articles. I find it hard to believe that that is an exact account of what happened, so it just destroys the article's credibility and makes it seem like the writer is just trying to write a third rate action novel.

      As one of your commentors write:

      Seriously, if this guy has been doing this quite so long -- dodging a sword, taking it from you, and twisting your arm into an uncomfortable position isn't exactly a stretch to believe.


      Indeed! All japaneese martial arts practice how to defend yourself against an sword attack (unarmed). Even Judo does it (if you like to get a higher degree you have to practice old forms where you defend yourself against a Katana). Karate does, Aikido is completely based around the idea that everything comes from the sword.

      In fact I find the article quite good, as for a novice eye (of the author) he simply writes how his impression was! And his impresion was: attacker with sword got so fast overwhelemd that he can not explain how it happend. Nice and decriptive imho ;D

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:Purple prose by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The "reflexive response" ... is complete bullshit. I second your opinion.

      Especially pro fighters (like seals, air craft pilots etc.) learn NOT TO ACT from a reflex. Sure, they have every learnd subconsious to be able to let it lose like a reflex. But they also learn to give the start signal very consiousness. Basically you really are in the mood to only rely on reflexes when you are in a battle condition. And you dont go into the battle condition by a mere reflex.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:Purple prose by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


      I really despise prose like this in newspaper articles. I find it hard to believe that that is an exact account of what happened, so it just destroys the article's credibility and makes it seem like the writer is just trying to write a third rate action novel.


      As one of your commentors write:

      Seriously, if this guy has been doing this quite so long -- dodging a sword, taking it from you, and twisting your arm into an uncomfortable position isn't exactly a stretch to believe.


      Indeed! All japaneese martial arts practice how to defend yourself against an sword attack (unarmed). Even Judo does it (if you like to get a higher degree you have to practice old forms where you defend yourself against a Katana). Karate does, Aikido is completely based around the idea that everything comes from the sword.

      In fact I find the article quite good, as for a novice eye (of the author) he simply writes how his impression was! And his impresion was: attacker with sword got so fast overwhelemd that he can not explain how it happend. Nice and decriptive imho ;D

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:Purple prose by Jetson · · Score: 1
      you should be aware of the fact that anyone who has been doing martial arts for *that* long is probably an exceedingly quick sonofabitch

      Indeed, the Biography Channel episode for Bruce Lee mentioned that he was far quicker than most fans ever realized, and quite often they had to shoot scenes over again because Lee's actions were too fast for the 24fps film they were using.

    20. Re:Purple prose by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't exactly sound god-like if you've ever videotaped a fencing bout.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    21. Re:Purple prose by Korvar · · Score: 1

      That works just fine, assuming you never get attacked unannounced. Do the bad guys phone ahead, or just email?

      --
      Korvar the Fox!! www.korvar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
  45. To the death by Mashei · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hatsumi is the only living student of the last "fighting ninja," Toshitsugu Takamatsu, the so-called 33rd Grand Master who was a bodyguard to officials in Japanese-occupied Manchuria before World War II and fought - and won - 12 fights to the death.

    ...Rumors of Takamatsu's death still abound to this day, but scholars estimate it occurred sometime after, but before the end of, his thirteenth fight to the death.

    1. Re:To the death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Surprisingly enough Takamatsu's record in fights to the death was actually 12 wins 4 losses and 2 ties

  46. Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have studied under Hatsumi, years ago. Before a lot of the current 'purpose built' combatives were created for military and govt. use, he and his instructors would train select U.S. govt. and military personnel.

    Someone mentioned that "ninjitsu is the art of assassination". An inaccurate statement.

    Ninpo Taijitsu (a very rough translation would be ninja combat), as taught under the Bujinkan, consists of several different schools. Stealth, sword combat, locking/holding/throwing, striking, etc. are some examples of the different schools, each with their own head instructor.

    There is a famous story from the '50s (?, maybe '60s) where the Japanese National Judo Champion (at the time he was also the world champion) essentially 'called out' Hatsumi and ninpo taijitsu as a 'fraud'. Said champion was invited to face off with Hatsumi. Hatsumi proved he was no fraud, and shortly thereafter the Judo champion became one of the senior instructors at the 'judo' school of the Bujinkan.

    Hatsumi is the real deal. I've seen him run along the top of chain link fences. At one seminar, a 250+ lb. Marine spoke up and said "Ok I know you're good, but really...in combat - what are you going to do to me?". Hatsumi sqared off with the Marine, and had him on the ground and incapacitated very rapidly. No ego, no bravado - just a teacher who understands that you must be able to demonstrate that what you teach will work for real.

    Hatsumis instructor, Takamatsu, was (for lack of a better term) a real life 'ninja'. He was an agent/assassin/etc. for hire that worked for various warlords in the late 1800s.

    Do some searches on Hatsumi and Takamatsu - I believe you guys will find some very interesting reading.

    Sadly, when Hatsumi leaves us the Bujinkan will probably never be seen again in its current form, with one true Master overseeing all of the various schools that comprise Ninpo Taijitsu. It will truly be the end of an era.

    Regards,

    Former (novice) student of the Bujinkan

    1. Re:Some insight by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      Wow, an anonymous poster claims to have seen a ninja master do amazing things. I'm convinced. I'd love to see a video of someone running along the top of a chain link fence sometime.

    2. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post. Two points.
      Taijutsu is hard to translate.. my Sensei told me. I don't know japanese. But I think it's actually closer to 'body art' or 'body skills'. Given the context I suppose combat skills is a fair translation, but it should be noted that ninpo taijutsu includes more than just fighting.

      Also, regarding the modern purpose built systems, you will find a lot of ninjutsu in them. Like, the SCARS/Target Focus system is pretty much all covred, which pissed me off a little since it said it was all new and shit in the marketing.
      The diffenrence is mostly that in ninjutsu it will probably take you a few years before you get that level of overview, and you get it in a context. Sort of.

      I like to think that's a good thing though.

    3. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with this news article is the fact it leaves out the Genbukan organization. Hatsumi is not the only "grand master" of ninpo - check out www.genbukan.org , an organization that is run by Grandmaster Shoto Tanemura.

    4. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah the stories of Hatsumi abound in the Bujinkan. Problem is:

      1) They all (supposedly) happened a long time ago.
      2) There were no reliable witnesses.
      3) The opponent may not have been fighting back.
      4) People continually exagerrate them.

      I've heard the same stories told to me time and time again by various Bujinkan students. Each time the embellishment gets more and more outrageous. What you never hear are CURRENT stories about the fighting greatness of the Bujinkan leader and his senior students. When I go into a grappling school, judo school or kickboxing school you know the instructor can kick butt because he gets out there and, well, kicks butt. He doesn't just sit there and talk about what he did 30+ years ago.

      Look, fighting is hard work. Anyone who says it's not is lying. Also size and weight matter no matter what people tell you. If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose. These are just the facts. Anyone who does serious sparring against resisting opponents knows this. To think that a 76 year old man is going around throwing around guys half his age with ease is silly. They're either cooperative opponents or so incredibly untrained they may as well be cooperative.

    5. Re:Some insight by randyest · · Score: 1

      While I don't know the GP AC from Adam and he could be lying about seeing such things personally (in fact, that seems likely) but I've seen Hatsumi on video too, and he delivers what the AC claims. Buy anything here with Hatsumi or Takamatsu in the title and you can see it too. Could be faked, I guess, but I don't think so -- that would be really good special effects for back then.

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Some insight by jerald_hams · · Score: 1

      Hi,
      I've never seen Hatsumi, and maybe despite my skepticism he really is the "real deal"...BUT, your description of him mimics dozens of similar descriptions of some awe-inspiring sensei/sifu/magic-killing-wizard. Look up Dillman or Botzepe...two obvious frauds, whose students praise to the heavens.

      Do you have any videos or other evidence of him fighting/sparring with an uncooperative partner? The marine story sounds fishy to me (sorry, it's just so easy to exaggerate a 180lb teenager wearing fatigue pants into a 250lb trained marine)...did the marine have any grappling experience? What did Hatsumi do to incapacitate him?

      -Alex

    7. Re:Some insight by johnny6vasquez · · Score: 1

      The man himself at a speech (no demo unfortunately)
      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3666863159 095310372&q=Hatsumi&pl=true

      And while there isn't any chain link fence running for you, there's some wall climbing and poison dart action in this old video near the end.
      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-600287393 3808703395&q=Hatsumi&pl=true

    8. Re:Some insight by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      You realize you're probably the coolest dude to ever post on Slashdot, right?

      I can just hear Splinter's old voice narrating your post..."I trained, many years ago, under Grand Master Hatsumi..."

      Yes, I realize that makes me another dorky westerner.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    9. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Genbukan is headed by Tanemura sensei, a former student of the current soke, Hatsumi sensei. Hatsumi did not step down as grandmaster yet, so how can one of his students be a grandmaster when his teacher is still soke? He can't.... Tanemura left the Bujinkan & started his own organization, claiming to be the next grandmaster under Takamatsu but with no real credentials. He claims Takamatsu sensei visited him in a dream & made him grandmaster.... He's very skilled, but not a grandmaster by any means......

    10. Re:Some insight by Serzen · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Also size and weight matter no matter what people tell you. If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose. These are just the facts. Anyone who does serious sparring against resisting opponents knows this.

      I've two very good friends who are into the Bujinkan, a husband and wife team. He just recently was awarded the right to teach, and has opened a school where he is co-instructor with a much more senior member, one who has taken the "sword test" referred to in TFA. She, on the other hand, is a relative novice, and is lucky, on a good day, to measure in at 5'3".

      At a demonstration I sponsored in June, she was able to show quite convincingly how a very small woman is able to take down, bind and otherwise incapacitate an assailant a foot taller, and several tens of pounds heavier. The assailant in this case was a student of classical Okinawan karate with an aproximately equal skill level. Her husband did the same on a man, again, markedly out massing him, who is well trained in akido and Shindo-muso-mu (I might be spelling that wrong).

      SIZE is not the determining factor. TECHNIQUE is. Regardless of how well your opponent resists, it is, simply put, child's play to defeat an opponent, even one of equal or greater skill, if you adhere to basic principles of technique. I can say from long experience that the victory goes not to the best trained, but to the one who fails to make mistakes.

      To think that a 76 year old man is going around throwing around guys half his age with ease is silly. They're either cooperative opponents or so incredibly untrained they may as well be cooperative.

      To make such judgements without knowing the facts is silly. You talk about serious sparring, but if you're willing to make outrageous statements like this, I highly doubt that you take what you are doing that seriously.

    11. Re:Some insight by Sam+Gibson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roger that. If Bujinkan was all that good they'd BE the Judo or BJJ champs. As it is they're a bunch of LARPers and Asiaphiliacs. http://www.bullshido.net/

    12. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose."

      Equivalent skill is the key phrase there, isn't it? I mean, really, that's like the old saw about which being heavier, a ton of feathers or a ton of bricks.

      That said, have you seen any mixed martial arts competitions? May want to look into the history of its popularity here. Guy weighing half as much as the other contestants revolutionized the sport.

    13. Re:Some insight by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I'd say the original statement is rather outrageous. That doesn't mean it's untrue, but it does lead a man to question. Especially a man with experience as the grandparent poster seems to have.

      My experience with martial arts has been to respect what you see, not what you hear. A man who speaks too highly of himself is more often than not a relatively poor martial artist compared to his stories.

    14. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've two very good friends who are into the Bujinkan, a husband and wife team. He just recently was awarded the right to teach, and has opened a school where he is co-instructor with a much more senior member, one who has taken the "sword test" referred to in TFA. She, on the other hand, is a relative novice, and is lucky, on a good day, to measure in at 5'3".

      At a demonstration I sponsored in June, she was able to show quite convincingly how a very small woman is able to take down, bind and otherwise incapacitate an assailant a foot taller, and several tens of pounds heavier. The assailant in this case was a student of classical Okinawan karate with an aproximately equal skill level. Her husband did the same on a man, again, markedly out massing him, who is well trained in akido and Shindo-muso-mu (I might be spelling that wrong).


      I don't believe you. Or I should say, I don't believe he was really fighting back. I take Brazilian Jiujitsu and help train with a bunch of guys who all do cage fighting. Size matters. The idea that a small woman who is physically much weaker than a man going up and throwing him around like a ragdoll is a lie. I've been training in martial arts for 20+ years and have two black belts in two different styles as well as grappling and kickboxing experience. The Martial Arts are so full of silly demos that you can't tell what's real and what's not any more. The only way to test this stuff out is to actually test it out. That means putting on gloves and going at it full speed.

      When you actually test a lot of traditional techniques this way you'll see that they blow up under pressure. Decades of poor teaching and lack of testing has allowed a lot of very weak technique to permeate most martial arts styles. Only the competition based systems (judo, boxing, brazilian jiu jitsu, kickboxing, etc.) can perform. Everything else is just esoteric dancing.

      To make such judgements without knowing the facts is silly. You talk about serious sparring, but if you're willing to make outrageous statements like this, I highly doubt that you take what you are doing that seriously.

      I know the facts. I trained Bujinkan for years. I know a lot of guys who have also trained for years. I don't train any more because it doesn't work. Anyone who does any serious sparring knows I'm being serious in my statements. If you are fighting a 76 year old man and you are half his age and he's throwing your around like a rag doll you aren't really trying. If you are trying, you need to train in another style that shows results because a 76 year old man shouldn't be kicking your butt and I don't care who he is.

    15. Re:Some insight by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

      SIZE is not the determining factor. TECHNIQUE is. Regardless of how well your opponent resists, it is, simply put, child's play to defeat an opponent, even one of equal or greater skill, if you adhere to basic principles of technique.

      Heard it before and nearly bought the t-shirt. It's pretty easy to see you are overstating your case. "Regardless of how well your oppenent resists" How about s/he resists so well they have the ninja tied up and are hammering their head with their fists. Obviously your ninja isn't going to win there. "Defeat an opponent of greater skill is easy" except what useful measure of 'skill' is there other than by counting who wins and who loses? or did SI release a 'skill' metric when I wasn't looking. So again your ninja loses there.

      Once we strip away the retard hyperbole we just have a statement of something ambiguous (technique) being considered better than size, strength or weight.

      To make such judgements without knowing the facts is silly.

      Except that theres no reason to believe you have 'the facts' either.
      How do you know that the poster can't kick the ninjas butt? Simply put, you don't. So doesn't that make your statements outrageous? Doesn't your own logic imply that you're not taking your studies seriously?

      Anyway, your sillyness aside. I would say that unless you're artificially limiting the situation. A heavier, taller person would ceteris paribus have the advantage. To a point anyway - I'm not sure how well a 500lb person could hurt me but I'm also not that sure I could hurt him that well either.

    16. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose."

      Equivalent skill is the key phrase there, isn't it? I mean, really, that's like the old saw about which being heavier, a ton of feathers or a ton of bricks.

      That said, have you seen any mixed martial arts competitions? May want to look into the history of its popularity here. Guy weighing half as much as the other contestants revolutionized the sport.


      Equivalent skill is the key, but not the only one. If the person is much larger than you and only slightly less skilled it will be one very tough fight. I do MMA fighting in class regularly BTW. Size matters.

      What irritates me the most about martial artists that say size doesn't matter is they are lying to people who need accurate advice. A woman is never really going to outbox a man so I don't think they should spend a lot of time on kickboxing, etc. Woman (for instance) should focus a lot of time on grappling skills because more likely than not they will be knocked to the ground in a fight due to their size. They should be comfortable fighting from their back and not panic. That's a better way to approach the problem than teaching them to yell really loud while punching a guy in the face in a vain hope of knocking them out. That's simply not realistic and does a disservice to people looking for good self-defense skills.

    17. Re:Some insight by really? · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how well a 500lb person could hurt me but I'm also not that sure I could hurt him that well either.

      Given enough time, and a bit of luck you could win. Could...(Saw Remy Bonjasky kick the shit out of Akebono a couple years ago. It took a "lucky" head kick to put Akebono down. Until that kick Remy had been kicking at a "wall".)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    18. Re:Some insight by jerald_hams · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of the misinformation in this thread (such as that of the parent post) could be done away with if more people watched mixed martial arts competitions. Seriously, go on youtube.com and look up some clips from Pride or UFC tournaments. Especially watch the early UFCs where practitioners of traditional martial arts are demolished. There is no magic for defeating a larger better skilled opponent. On the street you might be able to surprise an attacker with an aikido trick, certainly not if they're trained in some form of free-fighting. Then you're screwed.

    19. Re:Some insight by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      And how is TECHNIQUE different from SKILL?

      All other things equal, the stronger one will win.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    20. Re:Some insight by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      How hard could that really be (with a bit of training)?
      Circus performers do more incredible things than runing along a fence.

    21. Re:Some insight by jafac · · Score: 1

      Well, there's more to the size advantage than just physical strength. There's also reach, and relative inaccessibility of vulnerable areas like the eyes and throat. However, it's harder for a larger (or taller) opponent to defend areas like the feet and shins, and heavier opponents are rarely quicker. All that said - reach is probably the most important advantage. Exactly how Yoda held off Count Dooku for so long, I have no idea.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    22. Re:Some insight by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've trained with Ninjutsu guys and with Mixed Martial Artists and Brazillian Juijutsu practioners. I have to agree with the grandparent poster - if a tiny guy half your size is throwing you around, you aren't much of a fighter.

      I think the stories about Hatsumi aren't complete rubbish. But there is a bit of a difference between some exceptionally skilled tiny guy surprising a 250lb Marine (who may have very little experience with any kind of serious standup grappling) and the same guy getting onto a mat or ring with a Judoka, BJJ or MMA fighter, collegiate wrestler, and so on - even a more reasonably-sized one. What's more to the point is that the exceptional skill level of someone like Hatsumi or the founder of Aikido (O-Sensei - I couldn't spell his name to save my life) might be rather moot as compared to the skill levels in the people that they can _teach_ in a reasonable amount of time.

      That is, most people I've met who had pure Ninjutsu or Aikido or any of the 'tricky' arts just really couldn't carry off their techniques against a half-decent, remotely resisting opponent. They could carry out their techniques well in the dojo against each other, but were obviously very well programmed to avoid doing the 'wrong thing' as an attacker. I think, ultimately, after 10 or 20 years these guys might be able to execute perfectly timed throws and joint-locks against attackers that aren't carrying out well-telegraphed, linear, predictable attacks, but I'm being generous here, as I've never met a practioner from those arts who could handle themselves well in this situation who didn't have extensive cross-training in some other art.

      On the other hand, I've never run into anyone who had studied Judo, BJJ, boxing, wrestling, Muay Thai, etc. for any length of time, who couldn't carry out the techniques that they knew very well against an opponent who really wasn't 'letting them hit/throw/tap them'. Obviously, many of these people have weaknesses (the boxers don't get a miraculous defense against getting taken down), and some of the techniques might be sloppy. But a wrestler who misses the double leg takedown has plenty of alternatives (and is used to using them), and the boxer who misses with the jab is pretty used to that and has another one on the way in about a quarter second, but the aikido or ninjutsu person who misses the 'graceful, deadly throw or strike' ususually winds up pretty flummoxed.

      If you're depending on brilliantly misdirecting the energy of a cloddish 250lb puncher into a graceful throw, but find that instead the cloddish 250lb puncher managed to fake a one-two or whip a foot inside your ankle during the procedure, the science tends to break down. Now you're suddenly brawling with someone twice your size - a moment in which many of these reedy little guys start to wish that they'd spent a little more time in the weight room.

      By the way, beating most traditional Karate guys is not exactly rocket science, as they tend to be very fast and strong, but exceptionally predictable, linear and quite vulnerable to grappling.

      I don't buy the whole 'UFC = reality' argument, but it's a lot more real than most of the proofs that traditionalists presented before the UFC. It's interesting to note that the traditionalists tended to make arguments that they'd totally destroy their opponents in any UFC-type fight right up to the point that they had the chance to prove it, and decided later that their art was all about

      (a) not fighting on thin mats,
      (b) deadly eye pokes and throat strikes,
      (c) surprise and/or fighting in street clothes, or
      (d) spiritual stuff after all.

    23. Re:Some insight by killjoe · · Score: 1

      One problem is that no matter what you are studying there are rules. Even in UfC there are rules. In the street there are no rules. A boxer for example could be taken down in seconds by a BJJ person because all his life the rules in the ring were that your opponent stood up and tried to punch you. Same with a kickboxer. OTOH the BJJ person has been training on a mat and may not be functional on a concrete sidewalk.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    24. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eyes and throat vulnerability is a myth. I've been hit in the throat and eyes so many times I've lost count. It's not a fight stopper. Reach is a significant advantage if he's throwing strikes at you. Also the lanky guys are tough to grapple because they can keep you under control better with their longer limbs. Also I don't know what you mean about feet and shins being vulnerable. They don't hurt any more than getting hit in other places. Martial arts that focus on deadly striking zones and one-shot fight stoppers don't work. People just aren't that fragile.

    25. Re:Some insight by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      Skill is:

      Someone knows how to box really well. They win lots of boxing matches.

      Technique is:

      The boxer faces off against a martial artist who drops to the floor, hooks their foot behind the boxer's ankle and uses their other foot to kick them in the kneecap...

      Not to spoil the ending, but the boxer's knee makes a really nasty noise and there's some screaming involved.

      I've won quite a few fights, not because of skill neccesarily, but speed and technique.

    26. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point entirely. He said two people of equal skill.

      Okinawa Karate teaches no grappling. It is extremely easy for a small Judo, Jujitsu, or Wrestling person to take them out. I could easily take out any master Karate, TKD, or Kung Fu expert that has no grappling training. Not that I am that great, it just isn't that hard.

      Size does matter. But skill matters first.

      If size didn't matter, there would be no weight classes in Judo, submission grappling, or MMA bouts.

    27. Re:Some insight by zenhkim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Someone mentioned that "ninjitsu is the art of assassination". An inaccurate statement.

      Unfortunately, ninjutsu still remains largely misunderstood and grossly misrepresented in the public's mind. Years ago I was no different: when I was a young karate student, the ninja was commonly portrayed as the "evil" shadow warrior, always using stealth, ambush, trickery, and unfair battle tactics to destroy his enemies.

      Then I discovered the writings of Stephen K. Hayes, student of Mr. Hatsumi, on the true nature and practice of the ninja arts. From the first of his books I read (Ninjutsu: The Art of The Ninja) I was deeply impressed by the depth and quality of his writing. He covered the historical background and cultural context of the ninja, explained the philosophical and spiritual foundation that ninjutsu is built upon, and stressed that a balanced approach to life was essential to studying the martial arts. ("If you constantly indulge in consuming large amounts of fattening food, inhaling clouds of nicotine-laden smoke, avoiding physical exercise or engaging in needlessly dangerous activities, there is no point in learning a martial art to defend yourself against an enemy. Your worst enemy is yourself.")

      It is indeed a travesty that so many people today still have such a distorted view of the ninja, and it will be an even greater tragedy when Mr. Hatsumi is no longer with us....

      --
      "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
    28. Re:Some insight by -noefordeg- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just so ignorant and make believe...

      Why don't we see those people fighting in Vale Tudo, Pride, UFC or similar tournaments?
      Why? Because they don't have a chance in hell of beating people -trained- to fight in an effective way. If you include weapons, well, a gun will probably beat you every time.

      I would love to see a 76 year old asian guy square it off with Tito Ortiz, Andrei Arlovski, Frank Mir, Matt Huges, Rich Franklin, Emelianenko Fedor or Wanderlei Silva.

      At a demonstration I sponsored in June, she was able to show quite convincingly how a very small woman is able to take down, bind and otherwise incapacitate an assailant a foot taller, and several tens of pounds heavier. The assailant in this case was a student of classical Okinawan karate with an aproximately equal skill level.
      -That is just so much bullshit...
      I just have to ask you: Why do you think the have weight classes in -real- fighting sports? Like in the UFC? Just think about it...
      It's because when people of EQUAL skills fight, the only thing which makes a difference is the size! And here we have you claiming otherwise. That there is some form of super secret super ultra techniques which completely invalidates what everyone else knows and experiences.
      I've trained different forms of martial arts for 6-7 years now, and also MMA! A small woman, fighting anyone heavier/bigger who's also well trained in -fighting-, will become completely obliterated. Anything else would be science fiction!

      Crap!!

    29. Re:Some insight by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      What good is technique if you don't have the skill to apply it? You aren't going to win againts a boxer because he'll knock you unconscious before you have time to "drop to the floor." Even if you do drop to the floor, he can just move out of your reach with his superior speed, footwork and reflexes (in real fights, people move around, particularly in boxing). And then you'll be lying on the floor like a retard. But since you're not in a boxing match, he might as well kick you or start grappling (he's probably stronger, tougher and more accustomed to violence than you, so you'll get beaten to death).

      You say you're going to drop to the floor and do your technique? In cardio boxing (I know what you're thinking, but I'm starting real boxing when I'm in better shape), we often have a warmup/footwork drill where we try to touch our partner's foot with our own. It's like tag. Now if I, a person of very limited skill and technique, can very easily dodge my partner's tagging attempts, what makes you think that you'll have time to drop down to the floor and do your leg technique? By the time you're down, I'll be on the other side of the room, or already on top of you.

    30. Re:Some insight by freya_bacchus · · Score: 1

      Look, fighting is hard work. Anyone who says it's not is lying. Also size and weight matter no matter what people tell you. If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose.

      I agree, but the key here is equivalent skill. You have maybe been practicing for 5 years or so, while Hatsumi have trained for 70 years.

      He learned something new yesterday, learns something new today and will learn something new tomorrow. So we are NOT talking about people at equal skill.

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity!
    31. Re:Some insight by JemalCole · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At a demonstration I sponsored in June, she was able to show quite convincingly how a very small woman is able to take down, bind and otherwise incapacitate an assailant a foot taller, and several tens of pounds heavier. The assailant in this case was a student of classical Okinawan karate with an aproximately equal skill level.

      At a demonstration sponsored by David Copperfield a few years back, he was able to show quite convincingly how a very small woman is able to turn into a tiger, and a totally-not-planted audience member (wink, wink) can be sawed in half. And put back together! Seriously, it was amazing.

      Physics doesn't stop being physics because you play-fight a lot with your friends. To quote the greatest fighting movie ever, "It's a simple question of weight ratios." Smaller fists don't hit with the same force as bigger ones. Smaller muscles don't have the same strength as bigger ones.

      SIZE is not the determining factor. TECHNIQUE is. Regardless of how well your opponent resists, it is, simply put, child's play to defeat an opponent, even one of equal or greater skill, if you adhere to basic principles of technique.

      Yeah, that's why real martial arts have all gotten rid of weight classes. Cause, you know, technique is all that matters. Oh wait, even the UFC has weight classes. Dumbass.

      Speaking of technique, do you all remember UFC 2? This "Ninja" Scott Morris ("We don't really know a lot about this guy, except that he's a ninja.") squared off against a kick-boxer, Pat Smith. Three or four elbows to the face later, the ninja is crumpling to the floor with his nose newly flattened and the kickboxer hasn't broken a sweat. Seriously, he broke this guy's orbital bone and took out some teeth. I don't know if all ninjas are frauds, but that guy was. Hey Scott, where's your shuriken now?

      I can say from long experience that the victory goes not to the best trained, but to the one who fails to make mistakes.

      Nice mumbo-jumbo, confucious, but wouldn't the one who makes the least mistakes be the one who trained the best? Go back through the fortune cookie fortunes you've glued to the mirror on your vanity and find something that makes sense.

    32. Re:Some insight by renoX · · Score: 1

      >SIZE is not the determining factor. TECHNIQUE is.

      Well, in this case why does judo use weight category?
      It's because japanese masters lost to a huge guy (from netherland I think), I doubt that his technique was as good as their was, but he was good enough that this weight/size made a difference.

      So in reality both matters very much! Same thing for 'ultimate fighting' the winners are always very huge guys..

      As an aside: demonstration of aikido have always made me laugh, usually opponents run towards the aikido master and make big movements, whereas a smart opponent against an aikido guy who go close slowly and use his knee and elbows to attack. Making it much more difficult the aikido guy to defend himself.

    33. Re:Some insight by vertinox · · Score: 1

      If you are going up against someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose.

      If you are going into a no holds bar fist fighting match... Then yes you will probably loose.

      However, if you are just fighting with no rules other than subjugate your opponent, then chances are the lighter fighter can use the other fighters weight and lesser speed to pin or get him off balance.

      The funny thing is that occasionally you'll see an Ultimate Fighter match where all the guy does is get behind his opponent and pins his arm in such a way that he has to submit.

      Else... If he didn't submit, he'd have to break his own arm to get out of the move.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    34. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some schools teach (improvised) weapons. The BJJ guy would probably have problems here.

    35. Re:Some insight by jafac · · Score: 1

      Also I don't know what you mean about feet and shins being vulnerable. They don't hurt any more than getting hit in other places.

      Not especially vulnerable, but if you take a good hit there, it can really hamper balance and mobility. It's easier for a short person to defend these areas against a tall person (as opposed to vice versa). And a laceration or contusion in the area of the eye can temporarily blind an opponent, so no, I wouldn't say that eye vulnerability is a myth.

      But the REAL vulnerable area is the nipple. One twist, stops the fight cold!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    36. Re:Some insight by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why real martial arts have all gotten rid of weight classes. Cause, you know, technique is all that matters. Oh wait, even the UFC has weight classes. Dumbass.

      Sure they do. However, I remember a UFC many years ago made up of David vs Goliath matches...and the Davids cleaned house.

    37. Re:Some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire principal of Judo is using opponents weight and movement against them!

    38. Re:Some insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Interesting


      To think that a 76 year old man is going around throwing around guys half his age with ease is silly. They're either cooperative opponents or so incredibly untrained they may as well be cooperative.


      Guy get a clue!!!

      The master in question here is 76 years old, as you write. so he likely started martial arts training with ... 16? So he has 60 years of martial arts training as background ...

      OBVIOUSLY EVERY OPPNENT HE EVER WILL HAVE is: incredibly untrained what the fuck do you think? That 20 years SEAL training (for a guy of age 40, 20 years of training is very reasonable) can compete with 40, 50 or 60 years training?

      The intersting point in this story is not that he is doing some ninjutzu (in fact there are likely over 100 different ninjutsu schools and his is only ONE of them)

      The interesting thing is that sceptic people like you believe that there is one ultimative fighting technique. You think it could be ninjutzu, but you don't find the guy impressive, so you reject this idea a second later.

      ALL FIGHTING TECHNIQUES ARE CREATED EQUAL. There is no reason some guy practicing 50 years judo can not beat easy a guy practicing 20 years karate, and vise versa. You can extend this to boxing or any "serious" martial arts you want. However in our days most martial arts focus on one aspect: Aikido only does fighting while both partners are standing (but punshing and kicking is "allowed") Brazilian Ju Jutzu only does fighting in wrestling style where both opponents are on their knees on the ground.

      As soon as a Brazilian Ju Jutzu fighter allows me to make a really hard hit, he is down. As soon as he graps me and we get into close fight, I'm down. Most Ninjutzu schols teach BOTH (and more).

      I know a guy called "Hiroshi Tada". He as well is about 75 or 76 and teaches Aikido. He is no way less impressive than Hatsumi Sensei. Albeit no one claims that Tada Sensei is running on fences for show purpose ;D

      The founder of Aikido has lots of videos of "show fights" with US forces soldiers not beliefing he can compete with them, he was age 60 then already and the US soldiers surely below 30. If you don't beleive stuff, google for it ... pretty easy.

      When you do martial arts seriously: you get BETTER EVERY YEAR. You have the climax of your "fighting" abilities just a few weeks before you die (supposing you dont get a serious illness, and supposing you dont die in such a fight ;D ).

      Ah, and: When I go into a grappling school, judo school or kickboxing school you know the instructor can kick butt because he gets out there and, well, kicks butt. No! A serious teacher has enough to do to run his school, such ppl don't run around wild and kick butt.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:Some insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only the competition based systems (judo, boxing, brazilian jiu jitsu, kickboxing, etc.) can perform. Says the one who only does,, what? fighting?

      So, you still live, otherwise you could not post....

      So, how many fights did you survive so far? I mean, all your opponents are dead, aren't they?

      Hm, what is allowed in Kickboxing? And what is not? Is it "allowed" to grap the head of your opponent? To throw him down with the aim to break his neack? To sling you legs around his neack to try to break it?

      I guess it is not, how ever Kickboxing is a serious fighting, no boy fighting, isn't it?

      OTOH, ppl practicing martial arts, never do fights Judo and Karate only does "sports" fights with very limited subset of techniques, guess what: in fights the harmless techniques are allowed, not the deadly ones. Aikido never does fights ... we only practice. Guess why? All Aikido techniques are potential deadly.

      Ofc, you could disagree, there are splinter schools of Aikido that do fights, e.g.

      However: http://www.aikidojournal.com/article.php?articleID =107 read this inteview with one of the greatest living Aikido and Sword masters .... it answers the interesting question why modern fighting schools (those that do teach fire armes, e.g. have no man versus man fights)

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    40. Re:Some insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      All other things equal, the stronger one will win.

      Yepp, and all conditions equal, the heavyer stone will fall fall faster to teh ground than the other one.

      Come on guy, first of all: there are never all other things equal.
      Second: you are wrong. Strength is complete irrelevant.
      Third: suppose both opponents ARE EQUAL, and both opponents have the first black belt, then very likely the one attacking will win. Now suppose both have the 4th black belt, very likely the one attacking will lose. Suppose they have 6th black belt, both will wait for the other to attack ...

      And in bettwen the (somewhat arbitrary) belt marks I gave, the one with more luck (or in other words experiance, but well, that belongs to the points supposely EQUAL) will win ... because the most important stuff in combat is: attitude, balance, timing. Lose one and you lose all (very likely) and only with luck you gain enough of the 3 back to win. Far more important than strength is quickness.

      angel'o'spehre

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Some insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Bujinkan was all that good they'd BE the Judo or BJJ champs

      Oki, I quit, my last post for today ;D

      So, you did read that Bujinkan is a Ninjutzu school? Yes? So, you got, that they don't do Judo and they don't do Karate either?

      So, you are well aware that they don't participate at Judo competitions? So: please tell me, how can one be Judo champion if he does not participate on Judo competitions? I mean: after all Chuck Noris easyly could do an Ushiro Mawashi Geri Kikome (Or in other words a (reverse) roundhouse kick) against every Judo champion easyly. Nevertheless he seems not willing to do so ... hm, I guess he is fraud as well?

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    42. Re:Some insight by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      So go learn a style that's designed with that lack of formality and real-world application in mind; Jeet Kune Do, Pentjak Silat, Escrima, Muay Thai, CQC, Krav Magev (think I spelled that correctly) and so on.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    43. Re:Some insight by AoT · · Score: 1

      Yepp, and all conditions equal, the heavyer stone will fall fall faster to teh ground than the other one.

      What world are you from?

    44. Re:Some insight by AoT · · Score: 1

      Actually, women should focus on kicks and grappling; they have an advantage in lowerbody strength.

    45. Re:Some insight by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Been doing martial arts for about 10 years now (2nd Dan Taekwondo, also some Judo and BJJ). As best as I can tell, every 10-20lbs you have on a guy is worth about one rank. They have weight classes in martial arts for a reason: in an even match, the heavier guy has a tendency to win. I'm 6'6", 260lbs, and have had my ass kicked by all sorts of women and short guys back in the day, so I'm not saying it can't happen, but the advantage is certainly there.

    46. Re:Some insight by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Pure BJJ guys have problems. I've done BJJ for a while, and plenty of them came into my Judo class to cross train. The reason? In a stand up fight about all they knew how to do was to grab on and fall. All of the even moderately experienced Judo guys in our class had a field day with that, even with the experienced BJJ guys. On the converse, BJJ guys would clean up Judo guys in matwork, and only the most experienced Judo guys could hold their own.

      Hence I trained in BJJ, Judo and Tangsoodo (now Taekwondo), since I didn't like having glaring problems with my fighting style.

    47. Re:Some insight by alexo · · Score: 1


      > I've heard the same stories told to me time and time again by various Bujinkan students.
      > Each time the embellishment gets more and more outrageous. What you never hear are CURRENT
      > stories about the fighting greatness of the Bujinkan leader and his senior students. When I
      > go into a grappling school, judo school or kickboxing school you know the instructor can
      > kick butt because he gets out there and, well, kicks butt.


      When I chose a martial arts instructor, I couldn't care less how well he can "kick butt".
      I am more interested how well he could *teach* me to "kick butt".

      The best practitioner is not necessarily the best teacher (and vice versa).
      A good teacher will adapt his teaching technique to maximally benefit the student and often what works for the student are quite different from what works (or worked) for the teacher.

      > Also size and weight matter no matter what people tell you. If you are going up against
      > someone 100lbs heavier than you with an equivalent skill level you will probably lose. These
      > are just the facts. Anyone who does serious sparring against resisting opponents knows this.


      All other things being equal, size and weight can be an advantage (if utilized correctly).

      However, all other things are rarely equal. Recently, Spike TV showed several fights of Royce Gracie's fights at the UFC. At about 175 pounds he submitted fighters weighing 200 to 260 that who were hardly cooperative or untrained.

    48. Re:Some insight by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1

      > Also, regarding the modern purpose built systems, you will find a lot of ninjutsu in them.

      Sambo appears to have no tie to ninjutsu, and yet is very definitely a modern, purpose-built system (and an effective one at that). Neither, it appears, does Krav Maga.

      So your claim seems unlikely, unless you mean they contain similar-but-not-derived-from-ninjutsu techniques, which is more possible.

    49. Re:Some insight by alexo · · Score: 1


      > So go learn a style that's designed with that lack of formality and real-world
      > application in mind; Jeet Kune Do, Pentjak Silat, Escrima, Muay Thai, CQC, Krav Magev (think
      > I spelled that correctly) and so on.


      It is spelled Krav Maga (Hebrew for "contact combat").

      I really do not know what is the real world effectiveness of such systems. I think it mostly depends on your definition of "real world" situations.
      Krav maga, for example, was developed for the military and as such is geared towards making the student effective against semi-trained attackers in a short training time.

      Now, in my opinion, it makes a lot of sense, as the chance of being jumped by a guy with 10 years of boxing experience plus a black belt in Jiu Jitsu is pretty small. On the other hand, the ability to effectively defend yourself against 3 knife-wielding thugs with some street brawling experience is pretty useful, especially if you acquire it after only three months of training.

      However, TANSTAAFL. An incorrect technique or lack of fundamentals may still be pretty effective in a street brawl but will break down when attempted against a more skilled opponent. There are trade offs and one must be aware of them when choosing a style.

    50. Re:Some insight by alexo · · Score: 1


      > Oh wait, even the UFC has weight classes.

      It didn't have them at the beginning.
      The UFC had to institute weight classes, along with other restrictions, to be financially viable.

      From wikipedia:
      The UFC became a hit on Pay-Per-View almost immediately due to its originality, realism and accompanying wide press coverage, although not all of it favorable. The brutal nature of the burgeoning sport quickly drew the attention of the authorities and UFC events were banned in a number of American states. After repeated criticism from Senator John McCain (R-AZ), the UFC was banned by the major cable Pay-Per-View distributor as well. To survive, the UFC redesigned its rules to remove the less palatable elements of fights, while still retaining the core elements of striking and grappling. Five minute rounds, Referee stoppages, weight classes and limitations on permissible striking areas gradually found the UFC being rebranded as a sport rather than a violent circus attraction.

    51. Re:Some insight by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You aren't going to win againts a boxer because he'll knock you unconscious before you have time to "drop to the floor."

      Are you serious? You think that a boxer will get in a knock-out blow before someone can drop to the ground? How am I supposed to believe anything you say isn't lies? Legs are longer than arms. The person going for the legs will start his drop before the boxer can reach him. The boxer isn't going to take two steps in, punch the guy on the ground, and knock him out before he is able fall to the ground. No matter who is successful, the boxer isn't going to knock anyone out whose goal is simply to drop to the ground as soon as his feet can reach the opponent.

      By the time you're down, I'll be on the other side of the room, or already on top of you.

      Ah, now you've changed your story. You'll use your expert training to be across the room by the time he's on the ground. But that isn't a move that will knock him unconscious. Getting on top of him is not a boxing technique. You will have abandoned your technique for that move, which negates the whole discussion of technique vs skill. You are so busy explaining how you will kick everyone's ass, that you forgot to answer the question asked.

    52. Re:Some insight by Das+Modell · · Score: 1
      Are you serious? You think that a boxer will get in a knock-out blow before someone can drop to the ground? How am I supposed to believe anything you say isn't lies? Legs are longer than arms. The person going for the legs will start his drop before the boxer can reach him. The boxer isn't going to take two steps in, punch the guy on the ground, and knock him out before he is able fall to the ground. No matter who is successful, the boxer isn't going to knock anyone out whose goal is simply to drop to the ground as soon as his feet can reach the opponent.

      Even if he does reach the ground, it still doesn't matter because he isn't going to win by laying on the ground.

      Ah, now you've changed your story. You'll use your expert training to be across the room by the time he's on the ground. But that isn't a move that will knock him unconscious.

      I've changed nothing. The first paragraph discussed an imaginary boxer, while the second one discusses me (not a boxer).

      Getting on top of him is not a boxing technique. You will have abandoned your technique for that move, which negates the whole discussion of technique vs skill.

      It's not supposed to be a boxing technique. Since the other fighter is using non-boxing techniques, it only stands to reason that the boxer is allowed to use other techniques.

      You are so busy explaining how you will kick everyone's ass, that you forgot to answer the question asked.

      No, I was busy explaining how I'd kick the ass of some retard who thinks he could pull off his ridiculous bullshit technique.
  47. italicized letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whipping out a quick Ruby script reveals:


    Gnaa
    gnaa
    gnaa
    gnaa
    gnaa
    gnaa


    *sigh*
    1. Re:italicized letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need a script for that: just open the DOM Inspector (ctrl+shift+I), ctrl+f for "em" tags, F3 a few times and watch the letters get highlighted one at a time. ...I have way too much free time. Please shoot me.

  48. Bill Gates by zymano · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is taking Ninja training.

  49. I'm proud of you, Slashdot by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This was modded Insightful, and not Funny.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I'm proud of you, Slashdot by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's deep!!!

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
  50. Actually by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    I think the obvious choice at the moment is probably Stephen Hayes. He is well respected among Hatsumi's students, and seems to be a strong international authority on the subject. I don't know if any of his instructional books are still in print, though.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  51. But what would really suck... by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is a ninja -with- a long range rifle. Or worse yet, a whole pirate ship full of them.

    Pirate sniper ninjas. Think about it.

    1. Re:But what would really suck... by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Pirate sniper ninjas. Think about it.

      "It wasn't really a ghost ship at all" says Velma, "It was just a ship full of pirate sniper ninjas."

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:But what would really suck... by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      Not even enough time to scream, "HAX!"...

      *shudder*

    3. Re:But what would really suck... by demongp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now add Zombies into the mix.

      Zombie pirate sniper ninjas.

      OMG I think we all are going to die!

    4. Re:But what would really suck... by arron_nz · · Score: 1

      A long-range rifle that shoots hydrogen bombs. Think about THAT.

      --
      garble
    5. Re:But what would really suck... by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Mutant Pirate Sniper Ninjas of the 28th Century

    6. Re:But what would really suck... by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 1

      Atomic zombie pirate sniper ninjas.

      This is freaking gold.

  52. Joking aside by ndogg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is sad to see an art form like this die out. It's a little like seeing a species without a purpose die out. Sure it's a dinosaur, but it's still interesting to study and learn about.

    If I were him, I, too, would probably lament the popular images of ninjas. Hollywood has definitely bastardized it, and disgraced the legend of the ninja.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Joking aside by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      The art isn't dieing. The liniage may die. The school may die. The system may die. But the art lives on, albet it lives with change. Being a martial artist myself, I believe this guy is the "last ninja" only because he wants it to be that way.

    2. Re:Joking aside by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Last ninja as in "last Working Ninja" i.e. Ninja that had a job like a bodyguard.Not that does prevent another ninjas to get security jobs,just most of them are trained for sport.

    3. Re:Joking aside by JemalCole · · Score: 1

      Sad to seen an art form like this die out? What the hell are you talking about? This guy's best stories are ripping out eyeballs, and his best "technique" is pepper spray. We're not talking about art, we're talking about assassination. And an assassin is nothing more than a deadly whore. Except that whores make people happy and ninjas kill people. So they're lower than road whores.

    4. Re:Joking aside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. They're trained killers/spies. They're like can openers, only that they don't open cans. What is there to disgrace?

    5. Re:Joking aside by merikari · · Score: 1

      Who is this "we" that is talking about assassination? Someone is confusing the popular image of "ninjas" with Bujinkan Budo Taijutsu. That is what is really sad, and that is what Hatsumi is talking about.

      Hatsumi's Taijutsu is not about assassination or killing people. You should really read some of his thoughts on martial arts. It is the art of survival, not confrontation. He teaches his students to avoid conflicts. If you fight, you always risk your survival.

      I don't practise the art but I know it is one of the few "traditional" martial arts that is capable of change without splitting into several styles. Well, almost at least. Hatsumi's achievement has been in enabling the art to evolve.

      --
      My other SIG is a Sauer.
    6. Re:Joking aside by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Japanese society and culture is decidedly decadent and depraved, a result of oppressive American occupation policies.

      America succeeded in killing the spirit of the Japanese and Germans, but the ideals of a discplined, militaristic society surely live on. With the likely escalated competition for scarce natural resources on this planet, the importance of military tactics and militaristic societal organization will again become apparent.

      The art is dead in Japan because it has no relevance to the world. What need is there for an art of war when your people disavow war itself?

      A new nation, stronger and untained by the pathetic pacifistic ideals of internationalists, will rise again.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    7. Re:Joking aside by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Japanese society and culture is decidedly decadent and depraved, a result of oppressive American occupation policies.

      Oh, please. I'm going to put aside how offended Tanaka-san on the street would be at the suggestion that his nation is decadent and depraved and suppose, for the sake of argument, that it is.

      That oppressive American occupation was a direct consequence of Japan's inhuman wartime conduct.

      But suppose, again for the sake of argument, that we occupied Japan for the hell of it. I want you to explain, in terms that someone who isn't a liberal intellectual can understand, why it is that the moment another culture interacts with America that it is so thoroughly despoiled and loses control of itself. I thought other people were pretty much like us and when bad things happened they would, individually and collectively, take control of their lives.

      Why do you think this hasn't happened in Japan? How are they *so* pathetic, such an inferior culture, that they haven't gotten over an occupation that happened a generation ago?

    8. Re:Joking aside by JemalCole · · Score: 1

      How cute: Hatsumi wants to have it both ways. On the one hand, he says he teaches an art about avoiding confrontation and self-defense, on the other, he obtains his authority as a teacher from the fact that he's the apprentice of the last "fighting ninja" who was a bodyguard and assassin. Let's all meditate on that, shall we?

      Sounds to me like Hatsumi is the one who lost the spirit of Ninjitsu.

    9. Re:Joking aside by merikari · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he has lost the spirit of ninjutsu. Whatever that is. But it also the writer of the article who gets more publicity for his article by writing about "last ninja's" and flashing steel. I would rather base my opinions on Hatsumi's own writing, not some cheesy article.

      --
      My other SIG is a Sauer.
    10. Re:Joking aside by benzapp · · Score: 1


      That oppressive American occupation was a direct consequence of Japan's inhuman wartime conduct.

      Ahh, so its justified. Well then, why waste my time with the rest of your jabber?

      Why do you think this hasn't happened in Japan? How are they *so* pathetic, such an inferior culture, that they haven't gotten over an occupation that happened a generation ago?

      The occupation has never ended. There are 100,000 US soldiers, incredible amounts of ordinance, nuclear weapons, and many other fun weapons of war to keep the Japanese in line. The American bases in Japan are despised by MANY people there. The Americans will not leave.

      I won't even respond to the rest of your post, since the crucial issue here is apparently unknown to you. Make no mistake, the army we keep in Japan is not there to protect the Japanese, but to control them.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  53. Doubt it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sneaky? Yes.
    Backstabbing? Yes.
    Smoke screen? Yes.

    But Balmer's the one throwing stuff.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Studied for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I studied Ninjutsu/Taijutsu for years and achived a Nidan (2nd Black Belt). Hatsumi is overrated. The Bujinkan does no real sparring and the techniques are rarely applied against a resisting opponent. A good kickboxer or grappler would tear apart a senior Bujinkan instructor.

    I can't stand the mysticism that people wrap around martial arts. Nobody is throwing chi balls of fire around the room. It comes down to human movement, physical training and hard sparring to test your techniques. Unfortunately Bujinkan schools are often filled with out of shape instructors, compliant partners and a complete disregard for sparring against fully resisting people. This article is a nice fluff piece, but Hatsumi has made Ninjutsu what it is all by himself. It's one thing to say the current image is "Pathetic" when he's publishing books like "Ninjutsu History and Tradition" and "Secrets of the Ninja Grandmaster". All of his books show black-clad Walter Mitty wannabes holding exotic weapons, etc. What did he expect people to think when he does this and gives advice like "Always be able to kill your students"?

    Hatsumi runs a cult of personality and that's it. If you're thinking of training in Ninjutsu I suggest you take up a good combat handgun course instead or join the military. If you want to learn hand-to-hand combat take up boxing/kickboxing/grappling where you actually apply your skills against unwilling opponents. Anything else is just deceiving yourself.

    1. Re:Studied for years... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Obviously I don't know if you're genuine and what you say about Hamitsu is true, but amen to the call for getting rid of mystical reverence for this stuff. If anything, your post shows that there is always another viewpoint when it comes to press pieces on martial arts declaring someone to be the best of something. I doubt Hamitsu is some unbeatable foe just because his teacher was "the last fighting ninja."

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Studied for years... by PenGun · · Score: 1

      The real thing is easily found at UFC Fighting, anyone want to put some money on this clown against say Matt Hughes. I'm up for your finacial lesson ;).

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  55. The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, Ninjas are cool, Ninjas are mysterious, but face it: They're outdated. As outdated as the record industry, but they have a worse lobby.

    While fighting as a sport, or for close combat, will continue to exist and has its right to exist, the art of sneaky assassination is no longer a business. If you want someone dead, hire a hitman. Easier to train, more numerous, thus cheaper.

    It's simply a matter of technology. It's really no longer feasible to have a person get close to your target and have him strike there. Surveillance equipment makes it virtually impossible to get him close enough. Sneaky and stealthy or not, it's hard to beat a good surveillance system. Whatever you do, a heat or movement sensor will catch you.

    Getting close enough to your target is also no longer as possible as it was. Bodyguards are well equipped. Communication is by far superior than it was 100 years ago. And to get into a bulletproof car, you also need more than just a can opener.

    It's over. Killing is no longer really an artform. Everyone can do it. Just pull the trigger.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always have thought that the most ingenious method of killing a person was replacing the innards of a mailbox with a bomb which used shaped explosives to send a 150 pound slab of steel into the armored car the target was riding in.

      You can make a car bullet proof and concussion proof, but not tank-shell-equivalent-proof.

    2. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ninjas are cool, Ninjas are mysterious, but face it: They're outdated. As outdated as the record industry, but they have a worse lobby.

      Indeed, ninjas are out. Pirates are the future!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Everyone can do it. Just pull the trigger.

      *cough*

      "Guns do not kill. Bullets do not kill. It is a hard heart that kills."

      "Untutored courage is useless in the face of educated bullets."

      This isn't bullshit. They don't spend millions of dollars training soldiers to within an inch of their lives for nothing, you know. And the 90% failure rate in the SEAL training program effectively make up this "Everyone" of which you speak.

      I have every confidence that modern technology would still be no match for a master ninja like Masaaki Hatsumi. Infrared detectors can be fooled. Motion detectors can be defeated. Guards can be distracted.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    4. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      You're making 2 major assumptions:

      Your first assumption is that only the rich / famous are assassinated. The fact is that pretty much anyone could be the target of a hitman. You piss off the wrong people? Do somthing you shouldn't have? If that person can't involve the police they may hire an assassin. I don't know about anyone else, but I ceartanly don't have infrared scanners around my house.

      Your second assumption is that it's always easy. Sure, you can hire some drug addict for $50 to pop a cap in somone's ass... But think of assumption #1 above. Stealth is still often required. The guy who paid for a hit doesn't want anything that will trace back to him. By being subtle and extremely careful, there is a much lower probability of getting caught. A good hitman won't be recognized, won't leave fingerprints, clothes, shells, tracable footprints, or witnesses... And the target won't know they are about to be hit until it happens.

      This all comes from a book I've forgotten the name of. The methods have changed, but stealthy assassination is still common enough.

    5. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Tom · · Score: 1

      While fighting as a sport, or for close combat, will continue to exist and has its right to exist, the art of sneaky assassination is no longer a business. If you want someone dead, hire a hitman. Easier to train, more numerous, thus cheaper.

      Errr... I think you got something mixed up there. The Ninjas were the hitmen of their time (and culture). The hitman you hire has to come from somewhere, you know?

      And killing someone silently hasn't changed one bit as preferably over shooting him with a sniper rifle (which you can not silence, no matter what Hollywood tries to tell you).

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by dalutong · · Score: 1

      feasibility has nothing to do with value. it is cheaper to make and watch movies than to watch plays, should we get rid of plays? In our ADD society no one bothers to really master any sort of art; should we just let everyone be content with the wikipedia version of them?

      I don't know a lot about ninjas, but I don't think that just because studying it is not practical that we shouldn't have programs to promote it.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    7. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      It's over. Killing is no longer really an artform. Everyone can do it. Just pull the trigger.

      Actually it's just the ticket to the University.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    8. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by PeterBrett · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And killing someone silently hasn't changed one bit as preferably over shooting him with a sniper rifle (which you can not silence, no matter what Hollywood tries to tell you).

      Depends on the calibre. You can kill someone very effectively with subsonic .22 rimfire ammunition, if you can get a good shot. And .22 hunting rifles are fairly inexpensive, and quite easy to get hold of. I've fired one -- it came with a suppressor as standard, and the only noise it made was a 'ping' as the hammer struck the firing pin.

      Anyway, if you choose your spot carefully, you could easily get away with using a full-power 7.62 or even .338 calibre weapon. Don't underestimate the disorientating effect of a supersonic round passing a couple of feet away. By the time the security detail have stopped shitting themselves, you can be well on your way from your perch (anywhere within 600 yds will do, usually, and that's a hell of a lot of ground to search in anything other than a flat, barren wilderness). The problem's not the equipment, the skills or the risk of getting caught: the problem's having steely-cold will enough to look at someone's face through an optical sight, knowing that if you pull the trigger, that person's life will end.

      And you wonder why the SS are so paranoid about assassination attempts?

    9. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      All very possible. But it doesn't warrant the necessary effort.

      I think we can agree that it IS by far easier to kill with a sniper gun from the distance than getting close to your target object and kill it with your close combat weapon of choice. Yes, killing isn't easy for many, but even that works in favor of high distance killing. It IS by far easier, on the conscience, to kill from a mile away than ramming someone a knife between his ribs.

      You don't have to look into the eyes of the dying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, here you make the asumption that the druggie can be traced to me. Or that I allow him to survive to rat on me.

      When you want to kill someone, you have 2 primary goals: The death of the target object, and not being connected with it. Whether or not the one executing the plan is caught is at best a secondary objective, and only if he is somehow traceable to you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Wweeeeeellllll, I think it could be hard to get some funding from gov. or some corps for an art that allows you to waste their top execs. As much as it would be fun for the whole country, I think you'd be hard pressed to see much being spent on it. :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The most ingenious way of killing someone depends on your target. But if you want to blow away a hardened car, do it from below. Manhole covers offer themselves very well as the housing for said shaped charges. Also for the reason that even the best armored cars usually lack good protection from below. At worst, the car is killed and forces your target to exit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by pyat · · Score: 1

      Also, no matter how strong the shell, the upward acceleration can be sufficient to kill or maim. That's why armoured vehicles sometimes incorporate crumple zones under the passenger/crew seats

      http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/armoure d/timoney/
      "More recently, production is taking place of High Energy Absorbing Seats for an overseas customer. These seats, which can reduce the blast acceleration forces from 100g to a survivable 15g"

    14. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you want someone dead, hire a hitman
      If anyone ever hears you say that, and then proceeds to hire a hitman, you're guilty of conspiracy, with a potential sentence as large as the assassin's or the person's hiring him. Here, let me rephrase that for you:
      If you want someone dead, too bad. You can't get it.
      It's not the twentieth century anymore.
      p.s. I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
    15. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


          Yea,

              Tell me about it !

              Used to be you could only kill something by trapping it, getting in close, and bashing it with a really big rock.

              Then some wimps began to do it by shoving a massive mis-shapen spear into its tender parts. Really un-manly. Punk kid stuff. Anyone could do it. No art anymore, geddit ?

              But *then* some twerp started making those dinky throwing-spears. More of a nuisance than anything else, but then everybody and their kid sister was out there, trying to get in the act. How easy and artless can it get ?

            As for bow-and-arrows, well, you gotta be kidding ! Any starveling can kill from half a valley away. So there's no defense anymore. Even for Shamans. Let alone mere Chiefs.

            Like you said. All the skill, patience, training and experience required to artfully trap and bash with a really big rock are things of the past. Sad. But so they are.

            Imagine, someday any wimp will be able to kill just by fooling the prey and sort of getting it to kill itself. They may even specialize in misdirection, illusion, deceit and falsity. Gah ! I'm just joking, of course, but serves to show how far things have declined.

      ;D

    16. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by AslanTheMentat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ninjas are cool, Ninjas are mysterious, but face it: They're outdated. As outdated as the record industry, but they have a worse lobby.

      On the contrary, I should think that the concepts which rest at the core of the Bujinkan tradition would be even more applicable in today's environment of "cold" and covert war with other nation-states...

      While fighting as a sport, or for close combat, will continue to exist and has its right to exist, the art of sneaky assassination is no longer a business. If you want someone dead, hire a hitman. Easier to train, more numerous, thus cheaper.

      Ah... but to catch a thief...

      It's simply a matter of technology. It's really no longer feasible to have a person get close to your target and have him strike there. Surveillance equipment makes it virtually impossible to get him close enough. Sneaky and stealthy or not, it's hard to beat a good surveillance system. Whatever you do, a heat or movement sensor will catch you.

      I would have to agree with you here... it is a matter of technology. Surveillance equipment probably needs repair. By a repairman. Who is that repairman, and what are his intentions?

      Getting close enough to your target is also no longer as possible as it was. Bodyguards are well equipped. Communication is by far superior than it was 100 years ago. And to get into a bulletproof car, you also need more than just a can opener.

      There was a special on cable not long ago about ninjas I saw (can't recall the channel, might have been Discovery). There was a scene at the end that embodied this example the most: A "target" was kept in a house of two floors (the first of which was set with motion sensors) and several rooms, guarded by several "armed" men. These men had to periodically move from one end of the house to the other on the second floor in order to answer questions provided by an outside party (there was a dictionary/encyclopedia in the far room). This was to simulate "daily operations" of guards protecting a witness or the like, and to keep the guards from just "waiting for attack". Then two teams were set to the task of removing a hat from the head of the target. The first team was a SWAT team, the second was a single ninja.

      The SWAT team was immediately detected by the motion detectors, were engaged by the guards, and after casualties resulted on both sides, the target was inevitably taken.

      The ninja wore the garb of a service technician and entered the building with a ladder and can of spray air. He was detected immediately but then let upstairs under the guise of needing to spray off the cameras shooting the show that were being made dusty by the chemical smoke used in the hallways. After gaining trust by helping the guards answer a question without having to traverse through the house, he made his way "repairing cameras" into the room with the bathroom holding the target. He innocently looking inside while asking "Who are you?", then quickly dove and snatched the hat, defeating the guards!

      It's over. Killing is no longer really an artform. Everyone can do it. Just pull the trigger.

      Killing has become a way of life these days. From selling it to a nation of people, to using it to control world events, there is great value in not knowing who to point the finger at once the deed is done!

      -- novice student of the Bujinkan Taijutsu Dojo.

    17. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Go tell all that to a modern-day US Army Light Infantryman.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      If the drugie cocks up, he alerts the police and your target.

    19. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      What's interesting is that some studies I've found shows that martial arts is an effective treatment for ADD.

      From my own personal experience too. When I get called in to teach kids classes I run the kids into the ground. Even the two kids with ADD in the class stop acting symptomatically by the end of the class. And over time, they've gotten an incredible amount better.

    20. Re:The last of his species. For obvious reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. see common carrier. IAAL.

  56. Obvious failure... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    If this is a true tenent of the Ninja philosphy; always be able to kill your students

    It follows that your students will be less skilled than you...

    So the next generation of teachers will be less skillful, and so on.

    It will get to the point where any punk-ass with a niner can cap your ass before you know what happened.

    I wear kevlar underware for just such an occasion. Damn that itches.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Obvious failure... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      If this is a true tenent of the Ninja philosphy; always be able to kill your students. It follows that your students will be less skilled than you... So the next generation of teachers will be less skillful, and so on.

      While I agree with the gist of what you are saying (this guy is clearly talking out his arse), there is a problem in your logic. You assume that only students may learn. Generations may actually get more skillful if the teacher continues to get better as they teach. Their students will never be as good as them, but each student who becomes a teacher may be better than their teacher was when they started teaching.

    2. Re:Obvious failure... by Shipwack · · Score: 1

      Maybe once the student is skilled enough to kill you (or come close), they are truly no longer a student, but a colleague or equal. Then you can help them reach their peak...

    3. Re:Obvious failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the student kills the teacher, student becomes teacher. Boinngg....

  57. Re:anonymous coward ftw! by Mahou · · Score: 1
    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  58. Naw... by Foerstner · · Score: 1

    Chuck Norris will not be his successor. He was just the guy who preceded Chuck Norris.

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    1. Re:Naw... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris will not be his successor. He was just the guy who preceded Chuck Norris.

      Very funny. I would love to see a challenge between Chuck and one of Hatsumi's lieutenants, although it'd be a short fight.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  59. Re:It is obvious to the most simple minded fool th by slashmojo · · Score: 1

    Chuck Norris isn't chosen, he chooses. ;)

  60. Ninjas? Pirates? Meh! by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    The other month I watched this series of documentaries where a single samurai repeatedly took on dozens of ninjas at once, winning every time!

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    1. Re:Ninjas? Pirates? Meh! by Jozer99 · · Score: 0

      I know this is a joke, but Ninjas were Samurai. Samurai were a broad class of people, a kind of minor royalty in Japan, with several sub-ranks. You were not allowed to cary a weapon unless you were Samurai. Ninjas were Smaurai mercinaries trained in special schools. Other Samurai were in the armies of various kings, members of local police forces, or unemployed. Samurai were also involved in politics at various levels.

    2. Re:Ninjas? Pirates? Meh! by Nexx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh, no.

      During the Sengoku period, during which the separation of Samurai as a class happened, the Ninja were reviled as those who killed without showing their face in battle. They were most certainly not Samurai, but were a class of ashigaru, which were essentially a class below samurai. They were allowed the longsword and surnames, but as a class of footmen, they ranked below the samurai.

      Contrary to your belief, everyone was allowed a "weapon", but only the samurai were allowed the long sword. The Chonin (commoners) were only allowed the wakizashi.

      There were no kings in Japan. Only the emperor, shogun (when appropriate), and various daimyo. Also, the samurai were not of the police force; those duties were carried out by members recruited from the chonin class, supervised by a machibugyo, who is more of a "civilian" overseer than a member of the forces.

      The samurai class were definitely in politics, as they were members of the ruling class, but usually only the highest houses were politically active.

    3. Re:Ninjas? Pirates? Meh! by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Grandparent is horribly misinformed. The ninja were from a completely different culture than the samurai - more naturalist and clannish. Only later during the Warring States period did they truly intermingle with the mainstream Japanese culture.

    4. Re:Ninjas? Pirates? Meh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate ninjas.
      Go Samurai!

  61. Why is it sad? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    It is sad to see an art form like this die out.

    I really don't understand. What is sad about it?

    Things change. Everything is sad, or funny - it's just a point of view.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Why is it sad? by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it's funny?

    2. Re:Why is it sad? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      It's sad from an anthropological standpoint. It's sad from the standpoint that I think that there is a lot of potentially lost history behind Ninjitsu schools. It's sad from the perspective that we could learn a lot about human nature by studying the Ninjitsu artform.

      I don't lament change. I lament the knowledge lost to the world when such groups die. History helps us understand the nature of the human beast, and that knowledge is lost with the loss of such groups.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  62. Studying a martial art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1 - It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
    therefore,
    2 - A decent street fighter can beat most martial artists.
    however,
    3 - I personally know at least two elderly ladies who have beaten off attackers who were trying to rob them. They didn't even break a sweat, it was over before the robbers realized what had hit them.
    4 - The Japanese used to revere the way of the samurai as espoused in the Hagakure. They believed it so much they tried to take on America. Then they realized it was a crock.
    5 - Don't worry about the most effective style. Just try to find a decent teacher. Get to know lots of other martial artists. You will eventually find the style that's right for you.
    6 - 9/10 of everything you hear about martial arts is a lie. YMMV
    7 - When choosing a style, remember that you have to be able to go to work the morning after your lessons. Don't choose a style that leaves you wrecked. My brother-in-law retired from Tae Kwan Do after he permanently wrecked his leg.
    8 - The hagakure was written by a bunch of guys who had never been in battle. In that regard, it is a lot like trying to understand knights by reading Don Quixote.
    9 - The Book of Five Wrings was written by someone who was actually good at fighting. He fought many battles and lived to an old age.
    10 - Most Ninja schools may or may not be pathetic depending on your standards. Most people don't actually want to train to be killers so if you judge a school by how many killers it produces, most of them will fall somewhat short. The martial artists I most respect take the students they get and deal with them the way they are. Some styles and techniques produce mental abnormalities. A teacher who complains that his students are a bunch of lily livers and who shouts a lot is to be avoided. He or she isn't a happy person and you don't want to be like that.

    1. Re:Studying a martial art by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      6 - 9/10 of everything you hear about martial arts is a lie. YMMV

      In that case, I'm just going to disregard the other 90% of your post.

      --saint

  63. Really ? by Joebert · · Score: 1

    "I think it's pathetic," Hatsumi says of the ninja's modern image.

    Yeah, because every ninja dreams of jumping up out of the dumpster behind the fast food joint they work at & making a big "L" sign with their hand.
    http://www.realultimatepower.net/ninja/kidgarbage. jpg

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  64. RIAA, or MPAA? by tepples · · Score: 1

    How many pirates has he killed in his lifetime I wonder?

    I didn't know that the RIAA was hiring ninja. Or is it the MPAA?

  65. Wikipedia over the man himself? by everphilski · · Score: 1

    ... you are going to trust a Wikipedia article over the man, himself? I mean, if the wikipedia article is about ninjitsu, that means its about ninjas, and this man is the head ninja... you are going to complain that the head ninja isn't living up to the wikipedia article? /boggle

  66. I suspect that modern ninjas by chroma · · Score: 1

    would avoid giving interviews to the press.

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    1. Re:I suspect that modern ninjas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? This is the information age. What's to stop the ninjas from getting in on the action, also?

  67. Re:Oh, puh-leez by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow... thanks for perpetuating the sterotype that soldiers are fucking clueless. An M-16 is not a sniper rifle. Shooting people who are running around and shooting back at you is different from taking up a hidden position, killing a person with one or a few well placed shots, and getting the hell out of there before anyone locates you.

  68. Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like to expand on this a bit.

    Even handguns are next to useless in sufficiently close quarters. Yes, you can hit someone with them, but even there, their weight makes them slow. If oyu are trained for unarmed combat, the only weapons really worth a darn in close combat (less than about 8 feet) is a knife of a good club. And even the club is often not a match for a bare hand (esp if the barer is untrained).

    In any case, training in close combat is well worth what is put into it many times over.

    Note that even with all the technology available today, unarmed combat is still taught to all our soldiers, and ninja-like skills are even taught to some of our special forces. The reason is that there is nothing more important than troops on the ground.

    Finally, suppose you are in an area you are not allowed to carry weapons and need to defend yourself. Unarmed combat training is worth its weight, as is training in improvised weaponry.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  69. Re:Students? - CHUCK NORRIS by y86 · · Score: 0

    Yeah but what about Chuck Norris! NEVER

  70. Re:Ninja skillz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fukk u nigr

  71. Err You Misunderstood that by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    I will be honest I'm not familiar with Hatsumi but a master in many martial arts (especially swordplay) can only train students at the highest level by going all out. That means with the intention of striking a fatal blow, it's up to the students to prevent that fatal cut/blow as in a real life situation.

    I didn't think there were any school's left that actually did this. It's out of place anyway, this isn't feudal japan.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
    1. Re:Err You Misunderstood that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seems like the students would, at least, lose a lot of fingers during the training... thus becoming "gun shy" (so to speak) and starting a downward spiral in the quality of students and/or teachers...

      Man, that S&W sure looks sweet now! F* that sword practice, give me a few hours on the pistol range!

    2. Re:Err You Misunderstood that by Crizp · · Score: 1

      I would think that the master and his very best students would be quite capable of tagging a fatal blow by missing by an inch or a centimeter. Like in the movies, "haha! If I had the intention, you would be dead now!"

      I would think that, but I might of course be wrong. Some of the things I've seen (in international top-level Tae-Kwon Do sparring bouts) do support my claim, though.

  72. So... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    One is best just before they die.

    Cool, sounds good to me :-)

    I'm not getting older, just better.

    Point taken.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  73. Another Nail in the Ninja Coffin by version5 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's possible that popular Hollywood images of ninjas are actually more authentic than you might think. From a post on The Japan History Group Blog:

    "Movie-style ninja, BTW, have a much longer history than the movies (although the term "ninja" does not appear to have been popularized until the 20th century). Ninja shows, ninja houses (sort of like American "haunted houses" at carnivals), and ninja novels and stories were popular by the middle of the Tokugawa period. The "ninja" performers may have created the genre completely out of whole cloth, or they may have built on genuine lore derived from old spymasters. Either way, however, it's clear that much of the lore underlying both modern ninja movies and modern ninja schools has both a long history AND little basis in reality outside the theatre."

    "I used to tell students that the question of ninja was, from a historian's standpoint, still somewhat open. I think I'm going to take a much stronger line from now on, and point out that there are no historically credible claims supporting the historicity of a tradition which somehow concludes with modern schools of ninjustsu."

    Somewhat related is this post makes the argument that the supposedly ancient history of karate (and possibly other martial arts) was manufactured in the 19th century for political reasons related to the colonization of Okinawa by the Japanese.

    --

    "It's Dot Com!"

  74. It *is* sad... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    I have spent time learning a combat martial art- there are a number of them out there. I am not talking about Karate taught as a sport (though Karate can be taught as a combat art), I am talking about combat martial arts training. We never even sparred because we did not want to train ourselves to pull our punches.

    There are many things that such a martial art can teach that are hard to learn from a sport such as tennis. Sensory enhancement, more nimble reflexes, etc. are common benefits. Additionally, there is a focus benefit that is hard to describe. Combat training even if you never use it, changes how you think and how you approach the world and it is not all bad. If anything, you become less inclined to resort to violence because you deeply understand and are conscious of what you are capable of and therefore tend to be more unified in your approach to physical resistance. After studying these arts, I have used them in self defense only once, and I will not go into what happened on these forums.

    Yes, it is sad that these skills are being lost. Unarmed combat training *is* something that is valuable from a personal development standpoint more than anything else.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  75. We really need more moderation options. by Homestar+Breadmaker · · Score: 1

    Like -1 (verbal diarrhea).

  76. Re:It is obvious to the most simple minded fool th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fool! Chuck Norris is the beginning and the end.

  77. be able to kill your students? by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that suggest an ever-declining quality of ninja? Perhaps that's why he's the last, either that or pirates...

  78. News for...what? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight: martial arts is a valid topic for /. now?

    1. Re:News for...what? by Crizp · · Score: 1

      I was going to write something long but why reinvent the wheel?
      http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/physical.html
      Martial arts are also good for improving concentration and awareness skills, in addition to a more balanced self.

    2. Re:News for...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      News for nerds. Nerds like ninjas.

    3. Re:News for...what? by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      I think so. It's like lasers--you know? Ninjas and lasers: cool stuff. And force fields. What kind of a nerd are you?

  79. Re:Oh, puh-leez by yfarren · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly the people Modding the parent have never Shot an M-16. Please Mod Parent, And me, only if you know what you are talking about.

    Virtaully No-one could hit ANYTHING with an m-16 at 1000 yards. I dont even know what the drop on that is, but the difference between 1000, and 1050 yards is going to be hella Signifigant. (the Difference between 300, and 350 yards is like 3 feet). I mean, Shooting off your whole clip (not on automatic, thank you, the pull will kill any ability you have to aim) will not really help. If you have to hit ANYTHING past 300 yards, you need a different Rifle. I mean, with a Scope, MAYBE you can press to 450 (I never trained on the M-16 with a scope.) I find it hard to believe the parent, talking about ranges of 1000 yards with an M-16 EVER fired one.

  80. I wish a ninja got my old guidance counselor by beoswulf · · Score: 1

    Damn her for advising me to go into technology or law.
    She never once advised me to be a ninja.

    I was never told of all the expected opportunities in the ninja profession with so many ninjas reaching retirement age or committing hara-kari.

  81. Re:Oh, puh-leez by Wes+Janson · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few weeks of generic military rifle training will teach anyone all they need to know to use a rifle effectively. The US Army does a pretty effective job teaching rifle skills in basic training

    The mere fact that you would say that shows that you have absolutely, positively, no idea what you're talking about. Basic is going to (hopefully) teach you how to NOT shoot yourself when handed a gun. Anything more than that is going to come later in training, and only if you wind up in a specialization that requires that ability.

    Could I hit a target every time at 1000 yards? Probably not. You solve that problem by making sure you have more than one round at your disposal. You don't need to hit a target with every shot as long as you have a full clip. Three-round groups don't hurt too much either.

    Well, if the target were twenty feet wide, and conditions were right, you might be able to pull it off. Maybe. But a thousand yards is an awfully long ways out there. Most civilian ranges don't go out that far. Also, the M-16 rifle is loaded using "magazines" not "clips". Oh, and if you'd ever had any real training you'd know WHY a three-round burst would be virtually useless against a target at a thousand. Hint: it's called muzzle rise.

    Honestly, grandparent said everything that needs to be said about long-distance marksmanship. Parent is a cocky grunt that never had any real training with a precision rifle. Anyone who would brag about making Expert with an M-16 in the Army, in regards to long distance shooting, is proclaiming to the world they have no idea what they're talking about.

  82. Re:Oh, puh-leez by king-manic · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few weeks of generic military rifle training will teach anyone all they need to know to use a rifle effectively. The US Army does a pretty effective job teaching rifle skills in basic training. I had never handled anything other than a b-b gun as a kid, and by the time rifle training was done in basic, I qualified expert with the M-16.

    Could I hit a target every time at 1000 yards? Probably not. You solve that problem by making sure you have more than one round at your disposal. You don't need to hit a target with every shot as long as you have a full clip. Three-round groups don't hurt too much either.


    This is known as spray and pray. Fairly effective at about 20 m almost a lottery at 50m and hopelessly outgunned against a marksman of any calibur at 100m. The longest snipe was 2,430m by Master Corporal Arron Perry of the Canadian armed forces on a moving target (a moving target as well). At that range regaurdless of the rifle you use you will be pwned by a trained sniper and snipers aren't easily trained.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  83. Re:anonymous coward ftw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol Associated Press!

  84. Re:anonymous coward ftw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plagiarism? Umm...not so much. It's an AP wire story. It says so, clearly, in both places.

  85. Re:Oh, puh-leez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea on the 1000 yards, but 500 yards is not a problem at all for hitting a non-moving man sized target without using a scope on the m-16. 500 yards is/was a standard part of the rifle qualifications for the USMC.

  86. Jack Bauer. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Who needs ninjas when we have Jack Bauer?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  87. Re:anonymous coward ftw! by Mahou · · Score: 1

    yeh? well your a towel!

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  88. Re:Oh, puh-leez by isd_glory · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who says you cant shoot anything beyond 300 yards?

    I've shot bullseyes at 600 yards using a well-conditioned AR15/M16 and iron sights. The only thing is that you have to crank the hell out of the rear sight to account for the drop. The problem isn't the weapon's inherent accuracy, but correctly managing elevation and windage.

    The AR15/M16 is a very popular service rifle in civilian and military competition. I've never had the opportunity to do a 1000 yard match, but I know plenty of people who have. While it isn't quite as point-and-click like a scoped "sniper" weapon, the rifle is probably more accurate than you're giving it credit for.

    [Maybe I'm just biased from being on a Navy shooting team]
    [Scopes are a crutch ;) ]

  89. Re:It is obvious to the most simple minded fool th by iroll · · Score: 1

    If Chuck Norris is chosen as successor, you must kill him, because you will know that he is a false Chuck Norris. The Real Chuck Norris cannot be "successor" to an inferior legacy.

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  90. Re:Students? - CHUCK NORRIS by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chuck Norris is a hack. MacGyver could build a gun from a paperclip and shoot Chuck Norris, then build a Stargate from a toaster and hide the body on some planet with no food whatsoever for when Chuck Norris wakes up.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  91. Re:Oh, puh-leez by yfarren · · Score: 1

    Touching a man sized target, that isnt moving, that you know is at 500 yards, is VERY differentt then hitting somone, whose distance is vaguley estimated.

    How well can you estimate distance? can you really tell distance, at even medium range, to within 20%?

    Lets say you can. Lets give you the benifit of the doubt, and give you a scope (which will help you estimate range). So I will give you 10% accuracy. So you guess right, to within 50 Yards.

    So you are between 450, and 550 yards. Now, just some rough (ROUGH) numbers. Using regular bullets (not the heavier, more accurate, less common green bullets) the speed of the damn thing is ~990 yards/sec, exiting the breech. At over 100 yards, it has already slowed below 930. At 500 yards, it is reasnoble (I dont know the numbers on this) that it will be going slower than 700 yards/second.

    Average speed: roughly 850.

    So at 500 yards, it will have been in the air 5/8.5 seconds. Meaning it has fallen a total of 9.4 feet.

    (roughly)

    how far will the bullet have fallen at 450 yards?

    4.5/8.5 (not really cause the closer you are the faster the average speed)

    very roughly 8.5 feet (ok, so I was wrong with the 3 feet in myGP post. I havent done this in YEARS).

    at 550 yards? probably about 10.6 feet.

    So, with only a 10% screw up in range estmation, you are typically going to be off by about a foot (up or down). This doenst take into account the effects of wind (at 500 yards, your bullet has been in the air for most of a second, the wind WILL be affecting it).

    With the Iron Sites, (and no help and range estimation) I dobut very much that you are going to have that much accuracy.

    Look, the M-16 is a great rifle. But Past 200 yards without a site, you are asking for trouble.

    At 1000 yards?

    the bullet has been in the air almost a second and a half (by then it is moving well under 500 yards/second). Meaning you have to aim 27? feet above your target (even with a scope. I havent seen ajustable scopes on an m-16. Not saying they dont exist, just I havent seen em. Wouldnt make so much sense at any rate.). So you will have issues putting the "cross hairs" (or line up of the pin between the two bars (sorry I dont know the english terminology for the parts of an m-16)) well above your target. So you will be aiming in the air. and your target will be blocked by the barrel of your Rifle. You likely wont even be able to SEE it. How are you going to get anything close to a lateral pin on it, when you are looking above your target, in the air?

    500 yards, Where you know the range, Possible. Hard. But Possible (I never had to hit anything with an m-16 at more than 300 yards, and without a scope, THAT is a bitch).

    1000 yards? The guy hasnt fired an M-16.

  92. In Soviet Russia ... by XMilkProject · · Score: 1, Funny

    your student kills you!

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia ... by jamesshuang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Correction - In Soviet China, your students kill you...

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia ... by tiggles · · Score: 1

      Dude, chillax, I've been a teacher here for years and only one student has tried to kill me...

      And his tiny ineffectual 4 year old fists weren't that bad...

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia ... by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      >Correction - In Soviet China, your students kill you...

      actually, the most accurate version would be "In the United States of America..."

  93. The last ninja by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this guy claims to be the last ninja alive...
    Who can be 100% sure that all the other ninjas aren't just keeping a low profile as NINJAS DO....

  94. NOT SAFE FOR WORK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    that second video has female nudity (at 14:00) and is not safe for work. I wonder why google never noiced.

    1. Re:NOT SAFE FOR WORK by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      What's your job where it's safe to watch 15 minute videos?

  95. Last Living Ninjutsu Master? by menace3society · · Score: 1
  96. Carlos Hathcock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to see a modern ninja - check this guys story out as he hunted an NVA.

    http://www.grunt.com/scuttlebutt/corps-stories/her oes/carloshathcock.asp

  97. Re:Students? - CHUCK NORRIS by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    I totally laughed when I saw that. I, as a child, admired Richard Dean Anderson. Even more than K.I.T.T. (I am hoping to convert my '99 formula).

    But only on /. could I find someone with similar heroes

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  98. Re:Oh, puh-leez by yfarren · · Score: 1

    I defy you, or anyone else, to estimate you distance, get out your stupid eyeglass scredriver, ajust your back site, and get a round off.

    I dont even know if the back site ajusts to be useful at more than 600 yards.

    What Sized Target were you hitting at 500 yards? A body? A head? I mean, at 250 yards, (when you know it is 250 yards. Again. Unless you are carrying around a rangefinder, how do you know you are at 500 yards, and not 450? Because the marker on the shooting range says so? I mean, with the iron sites, it is HARD to estimate distance. Even with the scope where you can see how much between the ticks 2 peoples heads are. Its still a crapshoot) Fully happy. At 500 yards? With an M-16? Your sites are going to be so far off you wont be able to hit anything close to you.

    Again. At 500 yards, you are at apprecialbe parts of a second. M-16 are hella light, it has past that funny place where it flips, and the wind is already doing funny things to it. At that range use a friggin M-24. Bigger bullet. Spins Faster (greater Stability). Moving faster.

    Ok Ok. ON a shooting range, you can handle distance, and get good numbers for how far it is falling. I guess if you are on a ship, that is good enough.

    But if you are moving? Use the right tool, in the right place. 500 yards? I am inclined to belive you, cause who wants to call you a liar.

    1000 yards? With an m-16? Anyone who told you that is either doing their shootin in an aiplane hanger (little wind), with a range-finder, and a really accurate drop table. Or just lying. I mean, at that range, your m-16 is acting more like a Mortar. Can people shoot Mortars accurately? Sure, you Navy boys do it all the time. As Does Artillery.

    Is that what an M-16 DOES? no

  99. Lack of Japanese interest in learning ninjutsu? by TheNoxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Son, why don't you get out more... you know, like train under that ninja that's been living in the moutains... it'd be a good way to keep in shape and honor your history."

    "Ugh, DAD! that is so LAME!"

    It's official, I will never have children as pleasing them is impossible. If you can't make a 13 year old boy happy with an apprenticeship to a real ninja, nothing ever will.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
  100. Re:So THIS is how you are going to compete with Di by Ravatar · · Score: 1

    No kidding, most of the comments on this page relate to Chuck Norris, realultimatepower, pirates, or some other weak attempt at being funny. If you don't have anything insightful/intelligent/interesting to say, don't bother hitting the Submit button.

  101. The usual /. morons weighing in by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hatsumi is the real deal - the only real deal.

    The rest of you can stuff your Shang-Chi comics up your ass.

    Talking about Hatsumi like the posts I've seen here is like talking about Linus Torvalds (or any top programmer - take your pick) as if he just learned Basic and had written his first "Hello World" program.

    Not that Hatsumi himself would care - a bunch of dumb American geeks aren't going to do his reputation any harm.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  102. Comments from yet another Booj' by hkb · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm yet another person who's Bujinkan and who has studied under soke Hatsumi.

    He and ninpo taijutsu are far, far from black-clad (ok ok we're black clad) assassins of the night. Soke himself is very enlightened, cheerful, and playful. The Bujinkan has affected me a great deal spiritually boosting me and making me a better person. To see the start contrast of "ninjutsu" and actual ninpo taijutsu, try and pick up some copies of Sanmyaku, which are essentially the Bujinkan magazines full of kind and wise words.

    I've also read comments here saying that his mentor, Takamatsu, was more of a ninja assassin, which is also bollocks. He was a man of his time and engaged in much life-and-death combat, but was not some evil assassin. I can only hope that the motion pictures of Takamatsu make their way into the world and everyone has a chance to see the man in motion, not just rusty old pictures.

    You learn some pretty good combat and stealth techniques, but you also learn heart and peace and none of this is anything like the "ninja assassin" bullshit (which ironically, was why I first joined the Bujinkan, whoops).

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    1. Re:Comments from yet another Booj' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no history document about Takamatsu claim and fights in China , nothing prove that he was realy what Hatsumi told people .. I think they just fool people and make fake history scrolls. No others budo master believe in Hatsumi and Takamatsu. The invent a style to make money$. Ask Fumon Tanaka what he think about that.. why this guy have the ninja museum... this is a real budo master.

  103. Re:Oh, puh-leez by Lucractius · · Score: 1

    using a .50 cal rifle!!

    --
    XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  104. Re:This is news for nerds? Stuff that matters? by thelenm · · Score: 1

    I think my only option is to commit seppuku at this point.

    With a frisbee?

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  105. Re:This is news for nerds? Stuff that matters? by thelenm · · Score: 1

    Dang it. What I meant was, With a frisbee?

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  106. From TFA, btw... by TheNoxx · · Score: 1

    Forgot to mention that bit.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
  107. I'll say this about ninja by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    They play a mean round of golf!

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  108. Unarmed Combat by PenGun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is slightly off topic but really the legands of wonder fighters have about as much reality as Crouching Tiger etc.

      Show up in the Octagon and see who walks away. It's pretty simple. The _proven_ methods of combat are mutai, jujitsu and just plain pounding the crap out of the other guy. The Gracies with Royce Gracie as the lead dominated the early days showing Brazillian Jujitsu as the most effective combat method. As time has passed there have been advances in defense and the striker - grappler thing is much more even now.

      I would like to see Hatsumi strut his stuff but it's just a myth. There have been quite a few so called amazing martial artists humiliated in short order.

        PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    1. Re:Unarmed Combat by ne0n · · Score: 0

      You should see Kazushi Sakuraba take out Royce and the Gracie clan. It's brutal & beautiful, sherdog.com has the footage.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Unarmed Combat by adriand · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack?! The OCTOGON?! You compare real life and death fighting to the friggin OCTOGON? A true martial art is about preparing yourself against a mortal enemy (other than the spirit/lifestyle stuff of course). You think those octo-prize fighters would last a minute if there weren't any rules about crushing someones throat in a single hit and killing them? wow, you are seriously mistaken as to what a real fight is about.

    3. Re:Unarmed Combat by eluusive · · Score: 1

      Fool! Everyone knows the Solar Stance is the invincible martial art!

    4. Re:Unarmed Combat by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I did a search for "Kazushi Sakuraba" on that site and it only turned up one clip, and it wasn't with any of the Gracies.

    5. Re:Unarmed Combat by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Brazilian Jujutzu and Ninjutzu overlap widely.
      All techniques tought in BJJ are also tought in Ninjutzu (or Ju Jutzu), but Ninjutzu has even more techniques (like weapon techniques with strange weapons ;D ).

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Unarmed Combat by PenGun · · Score: 1

      Oh no. Street fighting is another thing again. My favorite weapon is the corner of a building ...

            PenGun
          Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    7. Re:Unarmed Combat by PenGun · · Score: 1

      Very boring. Nothing happens except the old man yelling from the side. I did like it though, a good example of one of the only ways to beat a Gracie's jujitsu.

            PenGun
          Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    8. Re:Unarmed Combat by PenGun · · Score: 1

      To go further there have been traditional martial artists show up to fight every once in a while, they just get pounded. The Sumo guys are so bad I don't even want to watch as it's usually very brutal.

        Go ahead try a throat strike, the center of unarmed combat, at say Tito Ortiz and see what he does to you ;). I'd guess, depending on the dynamics and your skill, a knee to the face would be the last thing you would see.

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    9. Re:Unarmed Combat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, there is more to martial arts than allowing someone to grab onto you, and engage in a struggle where they have the opportunity to overtake you.

          There's always simply taking their lunge and sending them face first into the ground, where you can then quickly pounce them and snap their neck. Much better than the "arm wrestling" approach of boxing or wrestling.

          I do believe that UFC requires a grapple method so as to have matches that have interesting consequences. Those 3 second matches would be much more frequent... and involve severe injury of broken bones if that was not so.

    10. Re:Unarmed Combat by ne0n · · Score: 0
      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    11. Re:Unarmed Combat by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Much better than the two I found with Google video.

  109. Re:Students? - CHUCK NORRIS by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Don't write off the Ninpo masters so lightly.... If it came down to it, I am absolutely certain that life-long practitioners of combat martial arts will beat those who have dulled their skills with theatrics any day.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  110. Logically a loser by rtb61 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Logically speaking, the only lesson that can be taught by someone who claims to be that last of their kind is how to be a loser.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  111. I've got the perfect replacement by Sir+Foxx · · Score: 1

    Sho Kosugi URL:http://www.acidlogic.com/im_shokosugi.htm

    --
    "I don't which is worse, that everyone has a price, or that the price is always so low"--Hobbes
  112. Cheap tricks by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1
    Misdirection and cheap shots under the auspices of "quickest kill" led to its current incarnation.

    Your mention of cheap shots reminds me of a book a friend of mine has (he is into martial arts). I think it's called "How to be Invisible," and by his description, all of the ways listed involve blinding your opponent - throw sand in his eyes, spit in his eyes, pull something over his head, etc. The last way listed in the book is, I think, just a cartoon where a guy meditates and disappears.

    But yeah, basically, the cheap shots are what do it for you.

  113. Respect by mitymidget · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest thing yall seem to be missing is that fighting techniques, which invoke skill over physical streangth, Teach Respect, honor, and humility. Somthing that is missing in most of the westernalized cultures. 1 on 1 training as a spiritual form is the best way for anyone of any age to learn respect, not just for your elders but for your peers. You also gain peace by the teachings. I was a wrestler in HS, and studied many ancient art forms for better technique and more creativity against an oponant, sense then I have been too busy and been knocked out of shape, but I still hold on to the respect I gained.

  114. Aesfixiation by methane? Those ninja's know all... by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    So is an umbrella... Hence the birth of Smart Bomb.

    That is an outstanding attack. It appears to be possible only on a rainy day; a Ninja working at a fast-food company would sneak a few Ninja Beans in a customer's food; then when the customer is done and resumes his walk into the rain, there will be a silen but deadly death as he is aesfixiated from the farts trapped under the umbrella over his head.

    I know of a few traditions in Canada that could benefit from a Ninja-like remedy as this.

    --
    without prejudice
  115. Napolean Dynamite, of course!! by fighthairloss · · Score: 1

    Who's the only one here who knows illegal ninja moves from the government?

  116. The force is strong with this one. by JakiChan · · Score: 1

    All these people talking about guns and no one has said it yet?

    "This is the weapon of a Jedi Knight. Not as clumsy or as random as a blaster, but an elegant weapon for a more civilized age." :%s/blaster/handgun :%s/Jedi Knight/Ninja

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
  117. Redneck Cyber Ninja Monkeys by BigCheese · · Score: 1
    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  118. Re:Oh, puh-leez by isd_glory · · Score: 1

    Okay, it seems we have two different conversations going on.
    1. Is the M16 accurate at 600+ yards?
    Yes. The rear sight is easily adjustable with soldier-proof knobs. With a decent range estimation and some idea of what the wind is doing, you can reliably hit a static target at some distance. A standard NRA Highpower match goes out to 600 or 1000 yards, and it includes regular service rifles.

    2. Is the M16 a practical choice for the average soldier in the field at 200+ yards?
    Probably not. As soon as you throw moving, un-ranged targets into the mix, iron-sights estimation is a crapshoot at best. Additionally, the further the bullet goes, the less damage it may do (which generally isn't an issue with paper targets). Something scoped in .308 caliber is probably a better choice.

  119. Doesn't anyone remember Ninja III The Domination? by w00master · · Score: 1
    Uhhh, doesn't anyone remember the great masterful film, "Ninja III: The Domination?" Classic line that is one of the great truths of the universe:



    "Only a Ninja can kill another Ninja."


    Chuck Norris beware!

  120. Your ... um ... thing. It's dangling. by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    He offers advice from the heart of Ninjadom, like 'always be able to kill your students,' .... At age 76, students are speculating on his successor

    At first, I thought his ninja-advice was full of powerful thought-fu. Then, I realized that it's not that hard to 'always be able to kill your students' when you ensure that they're all in their dotage.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  121. Pai Mei? by jzarling · · Score: 1

    ...Takamatsu snatched an eyeball from a would-be Chinese bandit.

    This bandit must have called him an old fool.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  122. Finally, we see the real meaning of /.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters.

    Ahem, Ninja really brings out the nerd in everyone. :)

  123. Re:Oh, puh-leez by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

    I have to call bullshit on this.. Only because i've tried, numerous times to fire the m16 at many things over 600 yds. With an M16 you're pushing it even at 300 yds far less 600 yds. Static or not, and even if you account for wind and elevation unless you're scientifically placing your shots and getting rounds off you WILL miss. I know, because I've done it. There are too many factors, too many variables and the M16 simply doesn't have a long enough barrel to be accurate with any sort of regularity. You can get pretty good at 300-400 yds if you know your weapon but that's it.

    As a practical choice for 200+ yds it's indeed a fine weapon once you account for your own weapon tendencies. You can easily drop into a forward prone and set off rounds with accuracy at 200-300 yds. If you're speaking about from the top shooting you can still be even pretty accurate with the weapon but in combat no one is stupid enough to give the other side a half mast easy kill.

    Also, all this 1000 yd talk is obviously for people who've never fired the m16. I mean, 1000 yds with a m16, if you actually hit your target it's because you were lucky. As some other poster was saying.. You can let mortars fly and they may even hit the target but how often does that happen? It's like saying you hit something with a m60.. It's used not for its accuracy as a weapon but to surpress fire while lets say snipers or other units position themselves for more accurate kills.

    And snipers in the army do not use M16's.. Some of them have an affinity for their AR-15's.. some of them use M24's.. both come equipped with scopes and for the most part you're looking for 700-800 yd range and not 1000 yds or whatever nonsense people are talking above. Someone shooting with an m16 at 1000 yds and claiming accuracy is obviously lying; not even a sniper would try that. It's just clearly lunacy.

  124. A little more info on the man by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1
    And he didn't found it, he's the 34rd generation grandmaster of the Togakure ryu, as well as eight others. He founded the Bujinkan Honbu dojo and was the first to ever accept non-Japanese as students. An-shu Stephen Hayes was among one of the first, who has now branched off to teach his "westernized" form of ninpo taijutsu he calls to-shin do, taking some of the core principles of ninpo taijutsu and updating the teaching of it using modern education methods. Controversial in many ninpo cicles and everyone has their own opinion about it.

    Hatsumi is also a chiropracter and artist as well. You can read a bit more about him here. If you'd like to see what a 73 year old ninja looks like in motion, check him out here. Even at his age, he moves much more fluidly than most, and easily throws around guys half his age.

    I'm currently a student in the Genbukan Ninpo Bugei dojo, headed by Soke Tanemura Shoto, a former student of both Hatsumi and Hatsumi's teacher, Takamatsu Toshitsugu. Another ninpo ryu is the Jinenkan ryu, although I don't know very much about that particular school.

    As much as I have a personal interest in this topic, I find it pretty odd to be appearing on Slashdot. News for nerds? Maybe, but not very tech-oriented. Still, glad to see that the real ninja are getting some recognition other than the Real Ultimate Power crap. The real history of the ninja is much more fascinating and entertaining than any drivel some goober on the internet can make up.

    If anyone is interested further in any of this, feel free to email me, I'd be happy to converse on it. :)

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    1. Re:A little more info on the man by Mprx · · Score: 1

      That video doesn't show fighting, it shows dancing. He's playing with cooperating opponents, so as a demonstration of fighting skill it's meaningless.

    2. Re:A little more info on the man by Hast · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      I've practiced martial arts which use similar techniques (nerve points and general bending your opponent into submission). I agree that what was shown in that video was not very impressive. Anyone that's trained for a few years could do the things I saw there. And a few were probably really inefficient against a real opponent. (But many that rely on bending arms can be very efficient. You need to practice them until you don't have to think about doing them though.)

      If someone tries to just jump you and beat the shit out of you flashy stuff like that tend to be less effective. However if someone grabs your arm, jacket or similar then it can be extremely effective.

    3. Re:A little more info on the man by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


      He's playing with cooperating opponents, so as a demonstration of fighting skill it's meaningless.

      I did not find a videao, so I cant comment if the impression is that bad ...

      However: if a "cooperating (studied)" demonstration is meaningless for you, it only shows how few competence you have to judge martial arts.

      Besides: you make a demonstration which is studied so that the visitors can see what is actually happening.

      If it was "free fight" which you might prefer, you only would see one dead opponent after the other (or in case of a demonstation, opponents faking death ;D)

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  125. Re:Oh, puh-leez by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

    That must of been a pretty big bullseye. So much for the Navy Shooting team, if true then I can only recommend you guys continue to stay on the ship and in your airplanes during battle and leave the more fine art of sniping and killing to us professionals in the army/marines because you got lucky.

    Again, please leave the blood bathing to people more inclined to use the right tool for the job. "Always Forward!" not "Always in the pool!"

  126. Re:Oh, puh-leez by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

    You sir are a wise man. No one even thinks along the lines of shooting a m16 at 1000 yards. It's like driving a city bus off road. It just makes no goddamn sense.

  127. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's actually a rule that police follow that they stop 20 feet away from a suspect. A fast dude (or dudette) can close up to 20 feet to stab or otherwise engage in hand-to-hand combat before the police officer gets the gun out.

  128. Snakes on a plane by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

    Snakes on a plane, Pirate sniper ninjas.

    Seriously, "Pirate sniper ninjas", if done correctly, as a movie would kick ass. Ok, so I've been drinking, but still...

  129. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    And much beyond 20 feet, and evasive opponent becomes hard to hit. 20 feet is generally a good distance if you have a gun.

    However.... Remember why the .45 was developed. A determined and trained adversary may not let a few 9mm bullets stop him.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  130. And by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    The 8 foot range is assuming the gun is already out.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  131. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to be a lot of experts with no clues, unarmed comabt is considered a joke by most professional soldiers. Even small arms like pistols only have very limited and really a specialist item in its usage, pilots emergency gear, SF backup etc.. (always hated carrying them, another kilo to carry that is of no use). Yes most army's provide some unarmed combat, bayonet drill etc... but this is more for agression training. To train people to react to fight or flight situations, so that if you ever need to you will fight. After that its all about adrenalin. And yes I have seen the effect, not in a military situation but somebody attempted to mug me. My immediate reaction was to kick him in the balls, worked a treat....a good hard kick in the balls sent him straight to the flight mode, never seen someone run so fast.

  132. Re:Oh, puh-leez by isd_glory · · Score: 1

    Whatever you say pal. Your misgivings certainly don't stop anyone from using an AR15/M16 at NRA-style highpower rifle matches. While firing a .223 bullet over 300 yards is a lob shot, that doesn't mean where it lands somehow defies the laws of physics.

    Look! These guys shoot the M16 at 600 yards too! A couple pictures here too where some guys are shooting the AR15 at 600 yards.

    Though, I'm obviously lying and making this all up, right?

  133. Good that it is securly holstered sensei by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Cause mine isn't, it is secure in my hand and aimed at your head. And so the student becomes the master.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  134. Re:Oh, puh-leez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 1100 yards I put a round into a 6" target. It was an M-60's 105 main gun and I wish it was skill. But you get lucky every once in while. For normal qualification at 1100 yards hitting a 3' target is a pass. With a well set up tank and good crew 1' is about it.

  135. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by XeroDegrees · · Score: 1

    However.... Remember why the .45 was developed

    "The .45 was developed to replace the .380" not the "9mm" which was being developed a continent away

  136. Hatsumi would like my engines by RabidTrucker · · Score: 1

    Somehow I think the Master, Hatsumi, would like my engines. I imagine he would look at my Millenial Dawn's two-sided opposing configuration as being just ONE LONG NEVERENDING, NEVER WINNING BATTLE between the Master and his best student, except neither one ever gets knocked on the floor "looking up at the rafters". Once he got a look at the dual direction generator we designed http://www.newpath4.com/VAPOR3.gif I guess that would be enough to lay him out on the floor, looking up at the rafters. Defeated by a principle of Physics, to which we know there is none superior.

  137. 133t ninj4s!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, is there any quicker way to generate a huge number of martial arts responses from people who have never been in a real fight? Nearly every fucking software development / tech company I've ever been to has some runt, or some fatty with a neckbeard, who knows 100 ways to kill a man. You know who you are.

  138. Re:Oh, puh-leez by Ragnarrokk · · Score: 1

    "If you can't do it with one bullet, don't do it at all."

    ``Ragnarok

  139. And if you ever want to be a real ninja... by gijoel · · Score: 0

    ... then just contact these guys.

  140. *clips from Wikipedia* by goldcd · · Score: 1

    [Arron Perry was a Master corporal of the Canadian Armed Forces that set the record for the longest sniper kill in wartime. In Afghanistan during combat in 2002, using a .50-caliber MacMillan TAC-50 rifle, Perry shot and killed an Afghan soldier from a distance of 2,430 metres.

    The record was set during Operation Anaconda when a Canadian three-man sniper team from the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, set the new record with a shot on a Taliban fighter. Perry, as well as four other Canadian snipers, received Bronze Stars from the U.S. military for their efforts.

    Later in 2002, Perry was accused of discreditable conduct by the Canadian armed forces. He had allegedly removed a finger from an Al-Qaeda corpse, defecated on another, and had his picture taken with a third who bore a sign around his neck reading "Fuck Terrorism". No charges were ever laid in the investigation.

    In April of 2005, Perry left the Canadian armed forces to pursue his own interests.]

    Seems slightly strange you get medals for killing them - but messing with the corpses is a no-no.

  141. Toshitsugu Takamatsu / Masaaki Hatsumi Documentary by MOtisBeard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a documentary film about Toshitsugu Takamatsu, with Masaaki Hatsumi in it as well. It's a Japanese film, the title in English is "Takamatsu Toshitsugu, the Last Real Ninja". It's based upon a black-and-white movie filmed in the '60s that shows Takamatsu Sensei teaching Hatsumi Sensei in a park. Takamatsu Sensei demonstrates unarmed techniques and weapon techniques from the nine schools, with comments in Japanese (subtitled in English) by Hatsumi Sensei. A torrent for this film was uploaded to Secret Cinema http://www.secret-cinema.com/ a while back. It's dead now, but I am busily working on getting it back up again, so if you're interested check Secret Cinema for it in the next few days.

  142. American Ninja The Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America is a movie. The Ultimate Battle. Everyone Has Guns. One Day, they all go out and shoot each other. Only the best and the fittest will survive. If you don't agree with me, you're a damned Democrat and a Bush Hater and you probably think Charlton Heston is Gay.

    The scary thing is I bet FOX would buy this as reality TV. Hey! It watch FOX news already is.

    BTW Rupert Murdoch is actually an Australian pretending to be an American so he can take control of American TV. The Ultimate Sleeper.

    Yeah, Byte my gonads Tacoboy.

  143. What a coincident by erkan_o · · Score: 1

    I was reading the article and listening to Kohina Internet radio and suddenly the SID tune Last Ninja 2 by Matt Gray started playing! :-)

    --
    My homepage: www.erkan.se
  144. Re:Oh, puh-leez by vertinox · · Score: 1

    This is known as spray and pray. Fairly effective at about 20 m almost a lottery at 50m and hopelessly outgunned against a marksman of any calibur at 100m.

    Unless of course you happen to be in an armored vechicle or happen to have access to a radio which invovles you calling in an air strike.

    Then of course it really blows to be the sniper at that point...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  145. Misconceptions by Onuma · · Score: 1

    Maasaki Hatsumi is the last grand master of Ninjitsu, but that is not to say he is the last Ninja. Steven K. Hayes was one of his students, the first westerner to receive formal Ninja training, well before the whole 1980's Ninja boom.

    While there is heavy martial arts training involved, thereis an equal amount of spiritual and mental training as well. For example, Mr. White having to dodge his padded sword to attain his next rank is a test of his senses. The "attacker" focuses his intent to hit the student and the intent is what is sensed and timed to dodge the strike. If one makes no noise, then that is the only way to know without a visual sense.

    If anyone is really interested in the ways of the Ninja, check out a series by Steven K Hayes aptly named "Ninja". It is in 5 parts and explains the fundamentals of Ninjitsu. A good read for anyone casually or seriously interested.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  146. Re:Oh, puh-leez by WoodieR · · Score: 1

    that's 2.43 kilometers or 1 ½ Miles on a moving target ... that's what a Crazy Canuck can do ...

    --
    Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  147. Re:Students? - CHUCK NORRIS by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    I admit that that statement wasn't fully my doing. I overheard the "gun-from-a-paperclip" part from someone at school, and added the "Stargate-from-a-toaster" part from something an Ancient did in an SG-1 episode. But yes, Richard Dean Anderson is awesome, and at least 20 times more awesome than Chuck Norris.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  148. Something I can comment on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unusually, an article I can comment on. First of all, Hatsumi is not the last desendant of the ninja. He may be the last one that takes in students, but there is at least one other guy, not in Tokyo, who practices. (He's also a normal company employee.)

    That said, I find Hatsumi's "pathetic" comment to be a bit tongue in cheek. First of all, ninjuttsu is NOT a martial art. Ninjutsu incorporates (or incorporated) various aspects of available martial arts and intelligence collection methods as a means to be a spy, an assasin, or whatever other nefarious motives were needed on a particular day. They were comparable to the KGB, CIA, NSA, pick any you like. Often they would blend in with the "Eta" and "Hinin" (untouchables) to gather information, squash resistance, or other un-lawly operations.

    They didn't have dojo doors open to anyone. You were born in the way, or adopted into the way. You didn't choose to become a ninja. In that sense, I say Hatsumi, and probably his blood thirsty teacher, are full of it. I repeat, ninjutsu is not a traditional martial art. Those going to Dojo are getting a tip of the iceberg in lessons. So they teach you skills to kill a person with your bare hands. Big deal, there are quite a few moves in Karate that do the same, but they're not terribly popular for obvious reasons.

    As for the outfit... Ninjas were spies. They dressed in whatever they needed to in order to blend in. The stereotypical black suit with a sword on the back was a way to blend in with the black of night, and move around vigorously without dropping, hooking, or losing the sword. They didn't dress that way in the daytime. They dressed like whatever their infiltration objective dressed like. Sometimes, they would dress like the shogun himself as a decoy.

    The ninja were also knowledgable in areas of medicine, and especially readily available poisons.

    So at best they were CIA agents, or speical forces personnel. Not martial artists. Todays image abroad most likely dates back to when Bruce Lee had to act the part of some odd Japanese ninja role on US TV before he got his break in the movie business. While some Japanese TV shows portray this image, it's actually an import. The equivalent to the wild-west cowboy movies and TV shows in Japan (depicting the samurai and all) show a much more realistic (but still a bit odd) picture of the ninja.

    Just as much as the Last Samurai is a bit far fetched (although it's probably the best in its category to come out of the west), westerner's passion for ninjutsu is aimed at something that never existed.

    And yes, I'm Japanese.

  149. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by f97tosc · · Score: 1

    Note that even with all the technology available today, unarmed combat is still taught to all our soldiers, and ninja-like skills are even taught to some of our special forces. The reason is that there is nothing more important than troops on the ground.

    Unarmed combat ceased to be the most important thing in armed conflict with the invention of club and spear. By the end of medieval times warfare had come to be dominated by longbows and projectiles. Obviously unarmed combat has only diminished in importance since then. In modern combat people get killed primarily with artillery, bombs and long distance weapons (in recent wars, 80% of casualties had shrapnel wounds). In the unlikely event that you get close enough to actually see your enemy first hand you will be shooting each other with rifles and machine guns, and praying that you will get heavy fire support before they do. Some recent asymmetric conflict like Iraq are a bit different but still you will see that "insurgents" are mostly killed by heavy support weapons, and Americans mostly by remote detonated bombs. In the cases when they get closer to each other American troops tend to dominate with their superior marksmanship and training. If the insurgents can device a plan to get really close to American troops, they will set off a suicide bomb, not enter a fist fight.

    Hollywood of course tends to exaggerate hand to hand combat as it is much more exciting to have the hero and the villain fight it out with their bare teeth than having either killed by a random artillery shell.

    Tor

  150. Entirely possible. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    It's quite possible. I mean, there were fighter pilots who engaged in one-on-one duels (with very different rules and settings, but still) and the very best of them came away victorious after a dozen or more fights. So it's not impossible on the face of it.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  151. real ninjas, not idiot games by whitroth · · Score: 1

    From the little I know about *REAL* ninjas, I would most certainly agree with his view that the current idea of a ninja is pathetic.

    Time for a history lesson, boyos and grlls: this is allegedly a true story of the ultimate ninja, back in the 16th century.

    He was hired to kill a general. He hid in the general's outhouse, down in the shit and piss, breathing through a reed, until the general came in to make use of it. He killed him by impaling him with a spear up the rectum, then stayed hidden in the shit for another three days, until they gave up looking, and he could escape.

    Ready to emulate him? No? Then stop running off at the mouth about ninjas, and go play with your Legos (tm), and stop "ninja this" and "ninja that".

                mark, no, I never had an intention to be a ninja

  152. Re:Oh, puh-leez by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Informative

    The longest snipe was 2,430m by Master Corporal Arron Perry of the Canadian armed forces on a moving target (a moving target as well).

    Note that, although that's an amazing feat in and of itself, it was Perry's second shot on the target. US Marine Gunnery Sergeant Carlos N. Hathcock's 2500 yard confirmed kill with a .50 caliber Browning rifle (the previous record holder) was made on the first shot.

  153. Not "the only living student" of Takamatsu by bythescruff · · Score: 1

    The article is slightly incorrect; Shoto Tanemura Sensei (my Soke) was also a student of Takamatsu Sensei, and (as I understand it) both claim to be the recipient and keeper of the scrolls which pass to the grand master of Ninpo Bugei, with Hatsumi Sensei heading the Bujinkan organisation, and Soke heading the Genbukan Federation, of which I am a member. Both teach Ninpo Bugei, the traditional Japanese martial art of the samurai and the ninja.

    I only know of Hatsumi Sensei from his website and articles about him, but I have trained briefly with Soke, and I train with one of his students here in the UK. About thirty of us went over to Japan last October for a seminar celebrating Soke's 50th year of studying martial arts, and after dinner one evening Soke spoke about the history of Ninpo Bugei, briefly touching on the differences of opinion and approach between himself and Hatsumi Sensei which lead to them forming separate branches of the Ninpo tree. All I can say is that Ninpo is an excellent martial art, developing not just fighting abilities but strength of character and inner peace as well, resulting in (in layman's terms) a great bunch of people doing a really challenging, worthwhile, and fun activity.

    --
    Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    1. Re:Not "the only living student" of Takamatsu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Takamatsu den including Genbukan - Bujinkan - Jinenkan is vaporware because nothing can proove all the scrolls that got is real .
      Dont ask why the *kan are not Koryu.

  154. Re:Good that it is... (Obligatory reference) by Professr3 · · Score: 1

    Dodge this.

  155. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If oyu are trained for unarmed combat, the only weapons really worth a darn in close combat (less than about 8 feet) is a knife of a good club.

    Actually, the best weapon for close-quarters combat is probably a good staff - you can block almost anything with it, which you can't with a short knife or club, and you can reach your opponents legs as well as their upper body, without exposing yourself in the process. It's one of the most versatile melee weapons, and grossly underrated by most people. It's also much easier to handle than a knife, and you can legally carry them almost everywhere. Few people know how to defend themselves effectively against a skilled staff user - and they're at a severe disadvantage if they are holding a shorter weapon.

    It's not a good weapon for killing people with - you really want a blade for that. But it's a heck of a good way to defend yourself and disable your opponent.

  156. Kabuki theatre by S3D · · Score: 1

    If they are real ninja, why the hell they are wearing Kabuki theatre stage handlers black suits ? In Kabuki theatre stage handlers were considered "invisible" to audience, so the actor playing invisible ninja was wearing stage handler black suit, to show the audience that he is "invisible". This agreement would hardly help in the real life.

  157. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    You are right about the 9mm, but the fact is that the .45 was designed for a specific task-- namely to have a bullet strike an attacker hard enough to stop a charge. The problem was that a charging attacker who takes even a large number of bullets to the torso can still reach the shooter and strike him with a club or knife, even if the initial distance was substantial. If your adversary is largely immune to the shock of being shot (due to altered states, whether drug induced or otherwise), a .380 or a 9mm will not stop the charge, and thus shooting your attacker even multiple times may not be enough to save your own life.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  158. Are you a real NINJA ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    or rather a disgruntled IHOP employee?

  159. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Sidearms have some limited usefulness but you are right that aside from those who are not expected to face combat anyway, there is no real reason to carry them (and indeed every reason *not* to). If you have an assault carbine, for example, a pistol is not going to add any flexibility to your ability to handle longer range combat and may even put you at a disadvantage in close range combat (it is another bit of weight). Furthermore, for hand to hand combat, an M16 beats a pistol any day because you can use it like a short staff while a pistol is sort of like an L-shaped rock....

    Knife combat and other close combat is not a joke. Indeed, if you are not well trained in this regard, are aiming a gun at me, and are within 8 feet, I can take that gun away from you with little effort before you get a credible chance to shoot me. Also, there are plenty of cases of people on various sides of armed conflicts sustaining a *very* large amount (read lethal damage several times over) of damage only to close in and kill enemies with hand to hand combat before succuming to their wounds. Highly motivated enemies may not get stopped by gunfire. Documented examples include some American soldiers in Vietnam, as well as Phillipine Moros resisting American occupation (typically in this case, the Moro would sustain lethal gunshot wounds yet still kill the American soldier(s) with his club-- which was the exact reason the .45 was developed).

    My form of martial arts specializes in *close* combat (what some call infighting). One friend of mine has compared it to having a fist fight with someone while locked in a telephone booth (this is diametrically opposite to Ninpo which tends to favor outfighting including flanking, and it is *really* amusing to spar with Aikido types because they are entirely unprepared for this sort of approach).

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  160. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Unarmed combat ceased to be the most important thing in armed conflict with the invention of club and spear.

    I never said it was the most important thing, just that it was often underrated.

    There are many areas including surprise close in attacks from civil defense forces, black ops, etc. where unarmed combat is still extremely important.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  161. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Staves and canes are quite dangerous (and are better at killing people than you think) and they are subcategories of clubs. In particular there are Indian and Philipino martial arts forms that specialize in lethal force with clubs.

    Clubs/short staves were also a favored weapon among police forces in Japan for a long time (a skilled police man could *break* a Samurai sword with his club if necessary).

    You make a few mistakes in your appraisal however:

    1) Reach is not exceptionally important. A knife vs a good club or stave is an asymetric fight. In any case, against a good knife fighter, you can expect to get cut, perhaps badly. The analogous statement may or may not be true of those attacking with a stave or a club (getting cut does *not* depend on the velocity of the weapon). All I need to do with a knife is be able to reach your *hand* or your *arm* as you attack.

    2) While short staves can be turned into clubs, longer staves are less effective at striking at cluse ranges (i..e within a foot) so they are susceptible to infighting. Knives are not. At very short ranges they might have some (limited) defensive and leverage possibilities, but would be quite a bit less flexible than being completely.

    Staves work well against an opponent who is likely to be attempting to outfight or midfight you with or without weapons. They fail *miserably* if an opponent moves in and infights you. Knives tend to be the opposite, though they can reasonably used in midfighting and outfighting. They are more versitile, and more of a threat to me as I am trained to move in as soon as possible and fight you with my torso in contact with yours. With a club, a cane, or a staff, you have to stop me from doing this. If you don't, you are unlikely ever to get the leverage to hurt me.

    With a knife, I may still get cut.

    BTW, almost everyting you said about a staff also goes for infighting-- few people know how to deal with an opponent that close, and if you are trained, you can strike your opponent hard anywhere without exposing yourself in the process.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  162. Hatsumi is not the last ninja master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hatsumi is not the the last ninja grand master, nor is he the only living student of Takamatsu.

  163. Inner voice. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    Every single post on here where people are talking about how they studied with High Ninja Doodle-Sensei is being read, inside my head, in the voice of Dwight from The Office.

    I just can't shake it. How awful.

    --saint

  164. Movie is faked by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1

    > And while there isn't any chain link fence running for you, there's some wall
    > climbing and poison dart action in this old video near the end.

    This movie is utterly unimpressive. For a start, the "jumping up into a high tree" stunt at the end---the only potentially-amazing part---is jumping DOWN played in reverse. (Watch it a few times, you'll see this---I picked up on it immediately because it's related to my area of research.) Plus, the "bashing head bloody to prove determination" thing at the beginning is also faked - you'd be able to see blood on the guy's forehead if there was as much as the blood spot on the wall suggests.

    Other than that, it's basically all scripted demos, which are nothing more than what you'd see in any martial arts flick, and 5 seconds of climbing up a rough wall that anyone I know who does rock climbing could scale.

    Totally uninspiring. If this "ninja master" is at all associated with this movie, I find any amazing claims about him highly unlikely.

  165. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by InfinityEdge · · Score: 1

    insightful my ass.

    So someone has gotten within touching distance you're saying a handgun is useless? You have three pounds of metal in a secure two handed grip that can put everything you got into a barrel less than an inch across. That is a damn good striking weapon. That's good enough to get room to reload.

  166. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by InfinityEdge · · Score: 1

    With modern bullets (and by modern, I mean less than a decade) a .45 is only marginally better than a 9mm. With ball ammo like they used way back when (and in the military today), a .45 is much better. In suppressed situations, a .45 is much, much better.

  167. Yeah... by kikta · · Score: 1

    I'm sure your bowstaff skills come in handy when you're LARPing with your D & D buddies.

  168. Riiiight... by kikta · · Score: 1

    Could I hit a target every time at 1000 yards? Probably not.



    How about any time? No.

    1000 yards, huh? Hmmm... let's do some math:

    Max effective range M-16A2 (point target) = 550m
    Max effective range M-16A2 (area target) = 800m
    1000 yards = 914.4 meters

    So my conclusion is... let's see... add that... and... carry... the ... two... go develop some mad bowstaff skills.
  169. Let's be serious for a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be serious for a second....

        Ninjas (and all warriors, for that matter) are not typically nice. They are trained to kill people; whomever for their current employer.

        Also, don't be stupid. Those of you that think martial arts is a joke, think again. I don't know anything about this ninjutsu stuff, but I've heard and seen a few things about Aikido. It's a defensive art that is very powerful.

        It's really interesting because it involves taking an enemies attacks and using it against them. Also it supposed to focus on sword like (?) movements and some weapon based combat.

        You know how much squeezing a pressure point can hurt? Imagine a hard squeeze, mixed with your momentum and a good twist. Heh! Either you flip over or your arm does from the shoulder socket.

        I don't know aikido btw. I did take some lessons, but I was a kid and only learned how to run through a jump rope and fail to recite Japanese numbers.

        But yeah... That old guy probably means business. My teacher was an old man too. Those guys are NIMBLE, STRONG, and QUICK.

  170. Fat guys in tabi boots by eronysis · · Score: 1

    I saw a group of these "followers" following the dalai lama around(they took it upon themselves to "protect" him) when I saw him speak years ago. Not a one of them had under 35% body fat. Pretty funny watching guys in black outfits and tabi boots "sneaking" about in an auditorium under flourescent lighting.

  171. Re:Expanding on this a bit... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    Lol

    Let me guess: White Tiger Gong Fu?

    I unfortunately know too many people that think that "fighting while locked in a telephone booth" (or alternatively, a bathroom) is all they need to know. The trouble is, they not only suck when a person can step away, but also suck up close to anything beyond the limited number of short-range techniques they've seen. I just demonstrated a judo throw to one White Tiger guy (who wanted to "learn how to defeat Judo") and the guy tossed himself on the ground, he was so unused to throwing techniques.

  172. Re:Toshitsugu Takamatsu / Masaaki Hatsumi Document by MOtisBeard · · Score: 1

    The torrent is now up again, and being seeded... COME AND GET IT! http://www.secret-cinema.com/

  173. Lack of insight by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1

    > So, how many fights did you survive so far? I mean, all your opponents are dead, aren't they?

    How is this "Insightful"? This is just the old "excluded middle" fallacy---falsely claiming that nothing other than to-the-death fights are useful for training or evaluating martial arts, so all modern martial arts must be equally lacking in that regard.

    This, of course, is nonsense. Fighting is extremely useful for evaluating one's own abilities as well as the usefulness of particular techniques. Certainly, the closer the fighting is to "real" fighting the better, but it's obvious to anyone who gives it a moment's thought that few-rules fights (like most mixed martial arts competitions) will be much more valuable than pure sport-fighting (like most karate and tae kwon do schools do) which in turn will be much more valuable than the kind of scripted dance that aikido does.

    It's just like fighter pilots and on-the-ground cockpit simulations---they're not as good as the real thing, but they're a whole lot better than nothing.

    1. Re:Lack of insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,

      then visit n Aikido School with a well known Master and get yoour assumptins corrected.

      Mail me your are and I pick one for you if you want ....

      Fighting is extremely useful for evaluating one's own abilities as well as the usefulness of particular techniques. No body doubts this. But in your parent post you wrote: only those who do real fights can be good, all others must be worse.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Lack of insight by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
      > then visit n Aikido School with a well known Master and get yoour assumptins corrected.

      Which assumptions, that size and strength matter in addition to skill, attitude, and training? How, pray tell, would your supposed "demonstration" prove or disprove that?

      That more esoteric arts like Aikido have been tested in mostly-realistic conditions like MMA tournaments and found weak is relatively strong evidence that said arts are not as combat-effective as they like to believe. Indeed, the fact that martial arts built for soldiers (Sambo, Krav Maga, Combato, ...) are much more similar to the mixed martial arts found in these tournaments than to Aikido strongly suggests that those most closely involved in the "to the death fights" you insist are the only true test have found much more value in MMA than in Aikido.


      >>> Fighting is extremely useful for evaluating one's own abilities as well as the usefulness of particular techniques.
      >
      > No body doubts this. But in your parent post you wrote: only those who do real fights
      > can be good, all others must be worse.


      I've never said any such thing, and you sound foolish and sloppy for asserting otherwise.

    3. Re:Lack of insight by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry.

      I've never said any such thing, and you sound foolish and sloppy for asserting otherwise.

      Following the lists of parents back it seems you made a strange answer leading me to the conclusion you had mentioned this: No body doubts this. But in your parent post you wrote: only those who do real fights can be good, all others must be worse.. (That was what I wrote)

      But you did not. However the parent I answered to (and to which you finally answered) did. So basically I'm lost now in reading all that up again.

      My conclusion is (especially after your last post) you have your opinion and your experiance, i have mine. We both disagree. End of discussion. BTW: I practice martial arts since 19 years ... so I claim I have a grounded opinion.

      Anyway to give some ideas I elaborate some stories:

      E.g. That more esoteric arts like Aikido have been tested in mostly-realistic conditions like MMA ... since when are martial arts "objectively", "scientificly" *tested* ????

      So a dumb ass Aikidoka thought he could win a cage fight? He lost? So all Aikido is ... esoteric? Dream on ....

      MDT (Military Defense Technique) was an attempt of US forces to create a "über" self defense technique. One of the first students of this, some army officer, did a cage fight, against a japanese Ju Jutzu Master (Ju Jutzu = martial arts, subset of most Ninjutzu Schools, über set of Aikido). He lost in 3 seconds against one of the most simplest techniques. I dont know if about MDT (and similar american inventions) is talked much, but most ppl in the martial arts scene laugh about it.

      A similar story is when the grandmaster Gracie challenged the (was it Barazilian or was it Venezuela?) Judo national Master: finally the Judo master agreed to do a fight, televised. The Gracie team came into the arena with a coffin. The team shouted: "we carry you out in this" .... or something.

      The Judo Master won ...

      I once did a fight (my only fight) against a Israeli educated in the Israeli self defense technique (Krav Maga). We "played" about 30 minutes or so. He attacked me roughly 50 times. I won all 50 attacks (in japanese naming convention with Ippon). After that he asked me to attack also, as I was only "defending" .... so I grapped my wooden sword from my room. He changed his mind then, as I refused to attack him bare handed.

      Excurse ....

      Indeed, the fact that martial arts built for soldiers (Sambo, Krav Maga, Combato, ...) are much more similar to the mixed martial arts found in these tournaments than to Aikido strongly suggests that those most closely involved in the "to the death fights" ...


      This are turnaments. And they are build for Soldiers ... a Soldier is not a Warrior ... oh well, that probably leads to far into philosophic areas .... anyway: for soldiers its oly important that your soldiers kill enough of the opponents to win, it is not important how many of your soldiers survive. You simply can assume for every (cage) fight of one of your soldiers which your soldier wins, is one (hopefully) or two (oO, I hope not) or 0.5 (good) fight where one of the other party wins. After the fight you only are interested if you have won or not, and probably if you have enough forces left to proceede further. (Yes, that sounds insane, but lots of modern fights went like this. Primary goal of military combat education is aggression .... not surviving a battle) End of excurse.

      Aikido is the one attempt to keep ancient martial arts, that are battlefield aproved and sofisticated tailored to be able to be sportive practiceable alife. The same is true for the original story. That Ninjutzu School has not the i

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  174. Bruce Lee disagrees by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
    > When you do martial arts seriously: you get BETTER EVERY YEAR. You have the climax of
    > your "fighting" abilities just a few weeks before you die

    Really?

    "According to his wife Linda, he had no wish to live to a ripe old age because he could not stand the idea of losing the physical abilities he had strived so hard to achieve." (among others)


    When a person ages, they get slower---both muscularly and nerve responses---they get less flexible, they get weaker, they get less coordinated, and in general they become less and less able to fight effectively. Even the fiercely loyal BJJ guys insist their father is the best ever, not the best currently---80 years of martial arts training is, sadly, no match for 90 years of aging.

    From your posts, you sound like a very stereotypical "physical conditioning doesn't matter, only technique matters!!" martial artist---emphasis on the "art" part. While it's true that skill and technique can overcome deficits in size, strength, and physical ability, pretending that those latter qualities don't matter at all is simply self-delusion.

    1. Re:Bruce Lee disagrees by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      While it's true that skill and technique can overcome deficits in size, strength, and physical ability, pretending that those latter qualities don't matter at all is simply self-delusion.

      I did not pretend you don't lsoe quallity.

      However teh quallity loss due to aging is far less then the quallity gain due to long term practicing.

      We are not talking about some people who did sports for 15 years and used to train 8 - 10 hours a week during that period, and gave up when they where 33 because a 28 year odl was more fit. We talk about people that did 30, 40 or 50 years, or more nothing else but martial arts. Like ordinary people have a 8 hours working job, they do 8 hours or mroe training perday.

      Surely at a certain, individual age, they start to decline. No one doubts that. Nevertheless their abilities grow until that point where it starts to decline.

      When a person ages, they get slower---both muscularly and nerve responses---they get less flexible, they get weaker, they get less coordinated, and in general they become less and less able to fight effectively. How do you now that? Why do you think its "generaly" true? Surely one who is older is slower to react on somethign he never was trained for. E.g. he is about to get into a car accident but never made a safety training. OTOH, if you practice any martial art, your main skill is "anticipation", that compensates for slowness.

      Modern geriatrics suggests to old people to make more sports, e.g. weight lifting to gain strength, or joggin/marathon to gain a healthy condition. Coordination only fades if you don't do anything. If you continue to work in your proffession your coordination only degrades with the muscles or your general health, and not particular with your age.

      Anyway, as I said in a different post, I worked with enough martial arts teachers who are age 60 or older, and for me they are unbeatbale (and also where unbeatable when I was 25)

      Most of them practice dayly 4 - 8 hours, some even more. The are healthy and strong and fast until they are at age X, and X means the day where they rapidely start to age and die 1 or 2 years later. X may be 65 for some, but might be 92 for others.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  175. Sport karate vs. Street karate by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    I've had some (but not too much) martial arts training. It's been somewhat mixed, with striking, grappling, ground fighting, and some weapons training.

    Size is a very picky issue. In general, size will give one an advantage, but it won't always determine the outcome of a fight.

    I agree with a lot of the sentiment here, that most opponents aren't doing a terribly good job of resisting and thus provide very limited training. That's sport karate; it's all about the motions and looking good.

    But if you find a good school who teaches street karate, you'll learn that size isn't quite so vital. Sure, size helps being able to take a hit, and it helps being able to dish out. But everyone (EVERYONE) has weaknesses. If a big guy happens to miss a little woman's weaknesses, and the little woman happens to hit him in his, she will prevail. People can be surprised, the human body has weak points (solar plexus, eyes, ears, armpits, underneath the chin, etc). If you know how to hit, and where to hit, size doesn't matter nearly as much.

    You'll notice something common about all these stories of old people or women who "toss big guys around." The guy who gets tossed is always surprised. If you catch big people off guard you can drop them easily. But it helps a whoooole lot more if you're bigger than them.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  176. exampli gratia by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    No, the application of weight/muscle mass/brute force is a relatively small part of a real experts fighting ability. I have some experience in Judo, and excess weight can be a serious disadvantage in that field. I don't know if you saw that video going around lately about the small Japanese woman in the elevator and the bag snatcher, but I noticed a lot of comments about it at the time, a great many of which were "fake" and "setup".

    Not at all. If you look closely at her move, she gets under his centre of gravity and rolls him over her shoulder, much like he was falling off a barstool, and with approximately the same application of force. However, once he has started falling, she pushes him a bit faster, and slams him on his back. Now in Judo, you are taught a variety of breaks, that is when you hit the floor, you slam your hands to the floor just before you hit. This spreads the damage and makes sure you take a great deal less punishment from a move like this. The guy in the elevator doesn't break, and probably had his spine broken. Leverage means a lot more than weight. Judo has a lot of moves like that, which put the advantage on the smaller person, since they can get under the centre of gravity far more easily. Once there, its just a question of rolling the target one way or the other, and powering it a little bit. The weight of the body does its own damage.

    You should look up that video if you get a chance, and remember, someone can take a few slaps or kicks fairly easily, but any form of throw is going to incapacitate the target semi permanently. No magic, no David Copperfield, just physics. Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it less real.

  177. Hatsumi Soke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi all,

    Search the web and you will find heaps on Hatsumi Sensei and on the Bujinkan - the school he started to teach the martial traditions he was passed by Takamatsu sensei.

    Three of the schools are Ninjutsu schools (and in fact there is very little taught from these three schools). The others are all styles that have strange unfamiliar names - jutaijutsu, dakentaijutsu, koppojutsu, koshijutsu. The OLD arts.

    These are not sports that are all about point scoring, they are ways to survive. If you developed a technique - you tried it on the battlefield (there were lots of opportunities around the time of the origins of these arts). If you got it right you could teach it to someone else - if not you had the next life to contemplate your failure.

    To watch this old man train is a pleasure. To see the mastering of timing and distance, the exactness of placement and the creativity of movement is to see why they call this fighting an Art. If you understood the real nature of fighting you would know why, even at over 70 years of age this man can deal with several young, fit, BIG military trained guys. There is good reason why the big guys are afraid of him and he demands the respect of the martial arts community.

    Yes there are times when his training partners work with him to demonstrate a point or technique - but this is mostly so that they wont have to show the real technique - which can be quite physically damaging.

    There is as much training in have to deal with the real world as there is with traditional technique - you must learn to get on with others so there is no strict heirachy in the Bujinkan, no strict order, This too is a reason that many Japanese find it difficult to train - they thrive on order and structure.

    So talk about it all you like, or search out a Bujinkan school and see it for yourself. But be careful - Hatsumi soke has also said "you need the bad teachers, they attrack the bad students".

  178. Takamatsu is fake by Flopik · · Score: 1

    The Takamatsu den is not KORYU, so the lineage of ninjutsu school can't be proven for Togakure school . Hatsumi and Takamatsu invent all the scrolls .. no other Budo master in japan believe in Takamatsu story and Hatsumi claim. Make research and you will not see the name of Takamatsu in chinese or japanese archives about death match or something like that .. they make those $ story to increase the popularity of the style they created.

  179. Tempus fugit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Rumors of Takamatsu's death still abound to this day, but scholars estimate it occurred sometime after, but before the end of, his thirteenth fight to the death.

    April 2, 1972, from old age. No-one wins the battle against Time; they only postpone their final defeat.