(I spent about two hours preparing all this text for you. It is self explanatory and can be peiced together to abate any bad faith in the conduct of a bank to render credit where credit is due, on your behalf, as well as emphasizing the role of a bank in misplaced credit.)
I vaguely remember many of the abatements in considering the deniability of a Money Order, specifically those issued in likeness of UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. One trait is the FRANKLIN watermark, the second is that none are issued greater than USD 750.00. Regardless, those instruments issued by USPS are actually fraud from the inception, because they are non-negotiable outside of UNITED STATES. By banking laws, a USPS Money Order is fraud, so I find it verry questionable jurisdiction when someone is charged with forging a forgery. Isn't that silly?
So for those of you that don't know and would like a more casual participation in the fraud, DO NOT ACCEPT A USPS MONEY ORDER GREATER THAN USD 750.00, unless you know how to abate its issue. There are those of us that know how to open a Postal Savings Account, or a Postal Chequing Account, and are afronted by these titles everyday. Consider some of these summary judgments and definitions espoused in subjects of Negotiable Instruments Law:
First, for those of you that don't know what "good faith" means when applied to commerce...
Ordinary Holder; A holder is a person who is in possession of an instrument drawn, issued or indorsed to him or to his order or bearer or in blank.Holder in Due Course; A holder in due course is a holder who takes the instrument (a) For value; and (b)In good faith; and (c)Without notice that it is overdue or has been dishonored or of any defense against or claim to it on the part of any person." (See Bank of Costa Mesa v. Losack (1977)). Good faith means nothing more than "honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned." (U.C.C 1201(19); cf. U.C.C. 2103(1)(b) [good faith in the case of a merchant under Division 2 means "honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade"].)
Payment of Forged Check. The relation of banker and depositor gives rise to an implied contract that the bank will pay out the depositor's money only upon his order. If it pays it out on a forged check, it must bear the loss and cannot debit the depositor's account. This liability of the bank for payment on a forged check is absolute, and has nothing to do with the bank's negligence. No matter how great its exercise of care, it pays a forged check at its peril (Janin v. London & San Francisco Bank (1891) 92 C. 14, 22, 27 P. 1100; see 1955 A.S. 388; Brady (Bailey) (5th ed.) clause 22.3; Clark (Rev. ed.), 6.2; 10 Am.Jur.2d, Banks clause 603.)
Paymentt on Forged Indorsement (General Rule) The drawee bank is also liable if it pays on a forged indorsement. This is because it is bound to pay only in accordance with the depositor's order. As in the case of a forged signature, a forged indorsement is no indorsement at all, and, when the bank pays on it, it is paying in violantion of the depositor's order. (See U.C.C 3401(1), 4401(1); Los Angeles Inv. Co. v. Home Savings Bank (1919) 180 C. 601, 604, 182, P. 293 [decided under former statute]; 1949 A.S. 548; 1951 A.S. 450; 1952 A.S. 355; 7 Hastings L. J. 42; 4 Stanf. L. Rev. 24 [pointing out that short (1-year) statute of limitations often defeats the depositor's recovery]; and see generally Brady (Bailey) (5th ed.) clause 23.2; Clark (Rev. ed.), 6.4; 10 Am.Jur.2d, Banks clauses 622, 623; on forgery as a real defense, see U.C.C. 3404, supra, clause 87; on effect of negligence, see infra, clauses 170, 171; on rights of drawee bank against holder, see infra, clause 177.) Payment on a forged indorsement constitutes conversion (U.C.C. 3410(1)(c)). The measure of damages is presumed to be the face amount of the unstrument (U.C.C. 3419(2)),
If it was called How To Boot Your Walkman With Emacs, now that would be a hack.
touche.
I believe you meant to say: boot eMacs with your Walkman. Haven't you noticed that the first Walkman was just a DC motor that rolled magnetic tape? Today, a Walkman is a computer capable of enforcing time-limits and other (sarcastic truth) anti-DRM (/sarcastic truth) technologies on whomever is in possession of audible tones that they conferred consideration for the value.
Does anyone know about those neat 386-based computer systems that install into your motherboard's unused DIMM sockets? Has anyone seen the Sun or Apple alternative x86 solution whereas a complete computer is assembled into a PCI adaptor form-factor and installed into a PCI slot to give access to a x86 nativity?
We need more of these solutions. Just for the utility of it, I want a computer for general purpose use; consider a Transmeta solution, and then have a Pentium M co-processor that I can enable or disable when I need it to boost an application, or even better a Hitachi SuperH 128bit solution for quicker and greater math precision. I'm waiting for the days to return when computers were modular, separate FPUs from the die core for example, like back in the late 80's when the manufacturer gave you the manual that has all the BIOS function calls and circuit schematic in such an open manner.
All I see today is a bunch of unnecessary IC bloat, taking advantage of increasing transistor efficieny to use more transistors and obtusely dissipate more heat with a design that is bigger than the previous. Is progress to obsolete computers or give what is needed? I would settle for a fab-shrunk 8-way computer based on the earlier technology because it worked. Where are all those great designs going to, or is it just a fighting statistic? How about a 386 PDA? Anyone seen one yet?
When a computer's BIOS becomes flashable by interacting with a TCA integrated circuit authenticated by a software key, any expectable virus would target the Trusted Computing Architecture to gain pre-eminence in execution of code before the operating system loads. In fact, I could imagine a Virtual Machine virus, that itself loads the operating system that it can unrestrictedly surveilance the RAM and directly modulate on the communications hardware un-detected by software firewalls that rely on Internet Protocol. I only look at an operating system as a fish-bowl, and given the tendencies of modern computing equipment to feature more schizzophrenic code translation and execution layers on the die, it would be expectant that a viral code would strive much better here than in the vast reciprocal expanse of anti-code software that can only exist with the help of the operating system.
<speculative_fear> What if this already happened; would it be known as a FPGA? </speculative_fear>
Point of Sale systems sure don't need much processing to authenticate account information for dispensing non-negotiable notes (Federal Reserve Notes).
Internet browsing kiosks or dummy terminals don't need much processing to allow a well-optimized web browser to make internetworked requests for information.
All those computer screens in an aeroplane and covered-wagon bussing terminals, that output simple 2D text visuals for departure and arrival scheduling, don't need anything more than stability.
Can you say Nethack eXXXXxtreeeeme multiplayer!!!(?)
I've been studying this phenomena and find it more applicable in so-called "law enforcement" employees and related agents of a corporate STATE. Examples are; id - sometimes pronounce incorrectly as eye-dee, is defined as the unconcious impulses that seek satisfaction with the pleasure principle, or simply defined as declaring the cause of actions. Anyone asking for "id" is actually asking for self-incrimination. I-dentification - pronounced with a strong EYE, phonetically in this way it assembles the elements of facial imagery, yet the bias for the purposes of such assembly is construed from statute to statute. I-dentify - pronounced with a strong EYE, dimorphically opposed to Identication, as to compel or command the assembly of the elements of facial imagery (action with the suffixed "y"). identification - phonetically pronounced with a short and near-silent EYE, but id, prefixed or interjected with other words, to express or satisfy an request for unknown action, and set it apart or in duplicate. In the Uniform Commercial Code, is references that such "identification" is for purposes of curing a form or Title unto goods to sell those goods. Similar, but dimorphic to identify, where this declaration is free-form and eminent (domain?) unto a subjected property; not voluntary, but coerced; varies from statute to statute for purposes of incrimation as well. resident - defined as a thing(res) known(id) out of(ent) a claim or dispute etc.. On court casefile headers, it tends to be those things in dispute, such as GUN vs SWORD, et al. It appears that a "resident" supposes that people in a dispute are things subject to jurisdiction of superiors; that is a misconception, because a matter of intellect, whereas the names are fixtures in the dispute to be settled as prize or endorsement to whomever prevails from the action. Consider such disputes where seizure of property by United States is the action being tried; those such cases exist in admiralty proceedings from a district court. I distinctly remember one or two cases on the face of a court docket as UNITED STATES vs. ONE 1954 PICKUP TRUCK (or this, and this), and UNITED STATES vs. 4 BARRELS OF LIQUID PURPOTING TO BE WHISKY, or UNITED STATES vs. FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS -- "UNITED STATES" is a thing disputing other things. In this regard, for fraud it seems, because it is misprison to challeng a property (organized theft) instead of whomever owns that property, but the world never seems to operate the way it was thought or intended...
Many more words I have found to be misplaced or misapplied. Arrest is one of them, notice is another; all abused to commit fraud on others.
The openGL drivers in the Direct Rendering Infrastructure for ATI hardware is quite mature for R250 (Radeon 8500, 9000, 9100) graphics accelerators. Of'course, the driver development was by Tungsten Graphics (makers of PDAs) for a huge graphics rendering system used by The Weather Channel. The drivers are GPL, and they are the best support next to Matrox graphics accelerators. If you want a stable graphics solution, then that is a better choice. If you want all the unnecessary framerate beyond 30 in Doom3, then that is what bleeding-edge hardware is built to accomplish with closed-source drivers. I only try to support all hardware companies that opensource their technical specifications, drivers, protocols, hardware, and intellectual property. XGI is beginning to opensource its information to be a better contender in this arena I described, and their hardware is affordable. There is more than just ATI and nVidia though. My next hardware may be from XGI, and they build closed-source DRI drivers (IIRC).
the USA exists in name-only. Read the constitutions for the states that are composing the united States of America, and then read the Federal "States" that compose the Confederation known as "The United States of America." If somthing is owned, then it exists either as a natural person (man) or a artificial person (corporation).
Also, read the constitutions for the states; all of them forbid confederation. Technically, only the people willing to confederate their subdivision of this state to a foreign state are breaking the constitution.
Also, I distinctly remember reading Continental promisory notes that read as "THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA". Also, according to the Constitution of the District of Columbia; government extends to provincial Canada. Isn't that "strange"?
Yet, in general, the answer to your question is yes. Why be a citizen when you take no part in the benefits of a adhering to citizenship? According to the constitutions of every state, there were people greatful to Almighty God for separating as freemen from Almighty God into a State within a state, then there are the people that did not separate from Almighty God and remain on the original estate. This is what I hope to emphasize. I may apply the chicken-before-the-egg principal if need to ask who is principal and who is second-class (sadly).
The purpose for the State of a state is that the revolution could have terminated the actual colonial charters; thus the new status would be, for example, not Citizen of Pennsylvania, but Citizen of the State of Pennsylvania. All these states under british control need sign the unanimous Declaration, yet a foreign state created by Congress or by the people without Congress would not need such a spaghetti-like structure from their post-Revolutionary War questionable citizenship. Can anyone say, (in admiralty) "Abandon citizenship and board onto the State quick, she's going under?"
I think it odd that anyone can be accused to squatting on a name. I squat on GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT via a "Birth Certificate", and this is a separate instance to any pre-existing people squatting on GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT. The ICANN should attempt this feat: allow people to claim domain names based on time. This would allow people to visit the true google.com founded on a certain Year, Month, and Day, and apply its respective matter. I know of people that apply their autograph to the Holy Bible and thereafter to the first Magna Carta, state Constitution, and then a Declaration of Indepence of that state.
The fraud committed by NAF and Google is trying to say that legitimate registration is tresspass to another registry. By there actions, that central database has been used for fraud. Of'course, this is applicable to any registry that is centralized. Whoever is charged to minister the law onto that database has obviously been funded to commit fraud on others. The only way to prevent this is file a trademark for the same to be entered.
What really angers me is the coercion to add unto a domain name by the registry. There is supposed to be more than one domain directory service, and registrants accessed thereof, and not this ardent and unqualified application of ".com", ".org", ".biz", ".net", ".mil", ".gov" to the registrant. It's all commerce, and it is good to emphasize that "United States" (USC Title 28, Section 3002, 15(a), "United States" is "a Federal corporation" of the United States) is implying with these extensions a form of prejudice against an internation presence of competing governments by disallowing others the use of these despite there having no relevance as it is all commerce and not government itself.
(I don't have time to proofread, gotta post and run someone at this moment.)
In every society there are always some bad apples. I see it more prevailent in societies with second-class people, whereas in Amish landings it is the woman that appears second-class. Whenever there is a power granted authority to interpret scripture a certain way, it tends to bring a bias that is self-serving to settle disputes with a rigid concept. I've used the Bible to protect females declared women, with godly results. I don't know what, but a man that looks at a woman in any way it is often an application of covetousness.
My standing is this; God created man as either male or female. A female can only be woman for a duration of time; a female with child is known as a woman, no different than a eunuch is a man that had been mutilated beyond doubt. Consider that a woman is with a child for nine months, whereas whatever the woman chooses is always afflict upon the child she bear in her womb; would it not be her husband, a man, to also have a say in the well-being of the child and the sake of the woman? Most women are accused of rash behaviour when burdened with a child in the womb; some consume unhealthy quantities of substances. The child in a womb being silent to all of this can't protest, and this is evidence that in God's law that the child is as much entitled to liberty from wicked decisions from the Host where the flesh had divided from.
Then there are people that abuse the law...for purposes of domination. Is that not what a District Attorney attempts, just by you having a Birth Certificate, does that give anyone a right to address you and deprive your standing on your possessions? In scriptures assembled into the Holy Bible, many times have people been denied of their possessions for abusing their standing. Consider the Israelites being overcome by the Chaldeans; they were backsliding from the law, and someone of greater standing took them in their sin.
It's the same with the Amish; if you see anyone kill, steal, adulterate, bear false witness, covet, then you are to commit an expose on their sin as you would anyone else. None are above or below the law, but equal standing. Any lack of your actions to audit another is equal as exaulting them above all that is good. God and good is same to me.
Well said, neighbor. There is only one element of your post that I hope to emphasize others against; and that is to look at neighbors as "cultures" as though genetic entropy subject to a foreign will. All citizens of the United States could learn to
The Amish are verry much self-sufficient in every regard, if you consider sacrifice to be the limiting factor of your livelihood. When I mean sacrifice, I think of when the only recourse to someone stealing your horse is to just move on. Yet, even though the Amish exist outside the jurisdiction of the United States, they interact peacefully to help citizens. It was last year in Pennsylvania, in the fifth Month in the Year of Our Lord two-thousand and four, that an hundred or more Amish peacfully assembled at the supreme Court building at Pennsylvania to protest. The story is lady was hired to perform in assisting an Amish woman move a child from the womb, and resulted in the child dying from natural complications inherint in the woman that had been so blessed with such fruit. The Amish woman and man, respectively, forgave the hired-servant and were thankful despite the outcome. In returning to a post in person as a citizen of the United States, the woman began to endure a voracious prosecution for mal-practice. Thereafter, hundreds of the Amish people were arriving and encircled that Court completly in joined hands to protest the prosecution of their friend.
We can all learn this from the Amish: sacrifice, forgiveness, love thy neighbor to the end. The fewer applications of the United States processes the better; yet, I don't see people rescinding their SIGN and signatures to their certifications and birth certificates/corporate soles just yet, because it seems as though people have less faith in someone without such certifications despite being qualified if an honest attempt is made in any servitude.
Confounded by Google, an article pointing to the incident is dated "June 02, 2004, an old header in Google is shown as "... 2004 Last Sunday, on the 25th of July, Malteser Emergency... Clients, even Amish, supporting midwife charged in baby's death Jun 02, 2004 -based Citizens..." mis-alligned to a cache that is offset by an entire year.
I saved a newspaper clipping from southern California, THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER, and I'll post a deranged form (averting copyright) as soon as it is found in the filing cabinet.
First of all, the root Amish are not part of the United States; they are seperate, having capacity in positive-law jural societies in the original estate; Patroons. When I speak of the original estate, I mean pre-Revolutionary War era. The United States existed before the "Revolutionary War", and not everyone was member after that war concluded. A prominent handful of people returned to their landing at their isolated countrymen. This is not any matter of criticism to the the People of the United States, but to assert that there are conditions on this continent that have existed long before. I am researching various forms of citizenship that predate that of the united States of America and am finding them applicable today in light of the Treaty of Paris. There are Americans, some of them are citizens of the United States, and then there are many Citizens of a local city. I've come across some people that retained their allegiance to the sovereignty of the Queen throughout all this time.
The Amish are not a fringe group, but just choosing their participation with loving precision; not to participate in pursuits that give no more security than a peace-loving living will, or to impugn the efforts of others to force their will of relentless searches and seizures for an enemy of the Congress that implies it is everywhere outside of Washington city, District of Columbia.
Sell the stocks for food telnet into root wheel is here again CEOs smoking crack
Hey - He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Don't know what it means, when I say:
He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He can sue some more - NASDAQ is his whore Heil the trademark tune - Novell pwns teh root
He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song That he likes to bundle along And he likes to claim his own But he knows not what it means Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
Knows not what it means [x2] Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
When the judge abandons neutrality and controlls the process of the court, then there is bias.
Yet, technically there exists no plaintiff and no defendant because there is no filed claim of damages; just because the court case says "PLAINTIFF" and "DEFENDANT" doesn't mean it is settled to that. At the moment, there is an unverified COMPLAINANT known as SCO.
The judges act more like executive administrators more and more every day... And to think they always demand to presume them "HONORABLE". Not to fuss over the most miniscule of details, but I don't walk around demanding people think I am impeached of all honor unless someone refers to me as Honorable Gregory. Surely, I prefer and presume among people the greatest of respect as a brother while no less a neighbor.:D Police officers don't show joy in me calling them brothers and sisters, and that's a self-evident fact when I'm approached for their re-venue attempts.
I thought its been a part of Photoshop since version 6, IIRC? Here is just a quote from a SAM's PHOTOSHOP guide on the Sumi-e filter. There is also a filter in GIMP. My camcorder also had a Sumi-e filter built into it, but it tends to smear the image too much resulting in loss of texture quality and improved image compression storage.
Greetings friend! This post may be a little offtopic, but it was just to abate the matter of Newton being an alleged "Christian Fundamentalist". Moderators, please have mercy...
I'll express all that I hope would solve the Satanic riddle. This pseudonym known as "Christian fundamentalist", intent on supplanting scripture is somewhat odd. If a man bears false witness of himself declaring such as "Christian," but by his actions is not Christian is he called a "Christian fundamentalist"? If there is any applicable fundamentalism, then it would rest on the compounded summary of the ten commandments and I show forth:
Matthew 22:35-50; "[35]Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, [36]Master, which is the great commandment in the law?[37]Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.[38]This is the first and great commandment.[39]And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.[40]On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Jesus advocated the ten commandments, and with God-like precision he compounded the ten with two.
That Pope is not in the original estate, but as a "Viccar" (imitation). Comparing the Pope to Jesus is like comparing Tofu to milk. I hope you don't forget that Adolph Hitler was in the blessings of the Pope of his day. Any words and actions that are not in scope and premise of the ten commandments, even as compounded by Jesus the Christ, surely you have authority by God to divide the truth from the lies. It's no different when people are confronted for doing this by so-called "Christian fundamentalists"; they're full of pride, hiding behind a goodly name, and don't realize they are the Synagogue of Satan. Yet, none who claim someon is Satanic doesn't actually know what Satan is but by comprehending the opposite of scripture. I suppose that any Bible can be Host also to those in opposition to it, such as Landover Baptist..
Alchemy is the transmutation resulting from the equal exchange of two distinct and separate matters. You can see it used today in the statutes of a state; it gives attention by its founding jurisdiction. Anything that is defined on paper is an application to the jurisdiction inherint in the courts established by that state or of the court superceding it. You'll never find an activating statute or "enabling clause" because statutes aren't law but serve to direct alien pursuits by a declaration at the verry encounter. They aren't alchemy until you volunteer to be converted and processed as a person. By the way, "person" originated in 14th century old french as a "mask worn from time to time". Are you a person (mask), a thing? There is your alchemy! Currently(!), the mechanism used by agents of the United States use confession and voluntary incrimination by use of a pen in order to presume this form of alchemy. IRS, US Treasury, Trust, Fund, all commit this same alchemy. I'll be composing a website on this feat soon, precept to a treatise on Redemption. Watch my journal for an update and direction to en.WikiPedia.org.
I'm happy to say that Alchemy is not an agreeable form of involuntary process because in past days it was looked upon as an interpreted curse of witchcraft. Ask someone who they are and they'll confuse their time-clocked mask (person) with the religion in statutes, codes, treatise, and revenue police(y). It all appears justified, until the vigors of application are intent on your asphyxiation. Alchemy is equally applicable in representing the character of judicial proceedings, no less as electricity in the movement of societal energy.
Not many people realize the alchemy in their daily life. Count for one the relative assignment of "I am" and how many people unconciously re-define themselves. "I am" this and "am I" that, but truth stands unchanged: just a man, standing on land, seeking-out living water; so saith Jesus. The structure of language flows as orders from a judge in an eternal courtroom: declarations, motions, quest(s/ions); and in person it is the movement of societal energy, or out of person it is the face of God moving across living water(!). Some construe societal structures radiating energy as being commerce; whereas even the (re)sister in their family is a key component in the huge scheme of things. I prefer to bipass the circuited courtship and move to remedy the affections directly in the supreme; call me biased if you want, but these 7th amendment "supplanted" inferior courts of limited jurisdiction only serve corporate interests in bipassing the Constitution with their orders of operation by one component per clocked cycle until all have been inducted into the corporate welfare state. Most people don't realize that it is not man, but a thing of man that serves as a component in circuit with others. In marriages: the combination of flesh, but in combining words and recorded to the movement of life from one branch(!) to another is an acceptable marriage (or merger), but is not the true marriage whence a child is born.
In conveying the matter in a court of law, every aspect is as though an orchestra performing to describe the motion of SHIPS(citizen/battle/friend); whereas canons(!) are anointed with ink onto the respective wad of papers; brutish intruments to furl the matter composed of notes, transmitted(!) under the eyes of a conductor(!), and a neutral audience sitting to hear the motions with an amusing biase(!) for good and bad form. To me, it sounds like someone listening to a radio on a hot day. For each motion to discern between the man operating the vessel and its on-board transmitting utility as referenced in the Uniform Commercial Code, there is foundation. This is the alchemy hidden in the laws of man. The only people able to compete with
Suppose that the way you got a new automobile was by having it mailed to you in 50 pound packages. It is probably possible to get cars this way, but the cars would be very different from the cars we have now --- heavier, slower, less fuel efficient, leaving a rather larger trail of (packaging) debris, and a few specialized tools, that would be useful for nothing else. Such cars would probably have no welds for assembly, and manufacturing techniques which required hazardous chemicals or heat processing would simply not be available. The lesser performance would arise from the "design for assembly" which is rather different from "design for manufacturability." (If the 50 pound limit was enforced, there would be no monolithic engine blocks; this would probably imply the existence of many small engines coupled together with a complex, heavier, transmission.)
How do you suppose they receive all the parts to assemble at a factory?:D Also, I can say that a local bicycle shop receives its parts complete in 10-pound packages, with one large box for the bicycle frame, and a round box for the rims, tires, spokes, and axles. It depends how complete you expect the asssembly to be. I've assembled two cars in my lifetime; one was a Ford Continental and the other was a homebrew no-brand American that I welded together. There realy isn't much to cars. All of the difficult and heavy parts are for comfort and trend. I've yet to see a truly efficient car outside of the consumer factor. Best example is an open-cab wagon, or a Jeep brand car.
The easier, more exotic, load delivery mechanisms can be used only if the load is little. I thought no less than someone spreading all their value over many small successive launches than risk one heavy/expensive launch. It also appears that the cost of launching heavier objects into space will increase exponentially by weight! There is much development on laser-launch systems. I was looking for the earlier Slashdot article on laser technology, yet this webpage is just an independent collection of information regarding alternatives and does show some URLs for laser content.I don't see any shark stickers, so its troll safe.
I think they're wasting their time trying to move weighty tools into space. Should concentrate on smaller devices. I can imagine a robot same size as a Radio Shaft "Zip Sap" moving quickly to space and being more maneuverable on the planet subrate with long-legged tentacle action like in the movie "War of the Worlds" NASA always complains it couldn't fit all of its test equipment in such a small rover, and demand millions of ($) to launch such a tool. I think they should minimize such large launches with hundreds of smaller launches of smaller equipment; and learn to assemble them in a vaccum or in-route. This makes better redundancy. It would be a shame to lose a ten billion ($) project in one launch, then lose a thousand ($) part of hundreds of other parts in a micro-lauch.
I wouldn't think their use were limited to DVDs. I've assumed and often been abandoned dead or old CD-ROM drives whereof the previous owners have wanted DVD capability upgrades. It's a great episode of salvage rights! I took an old servo from a CD-ROM drive and made a centrifuge out of it. With another servo from a CD-ROM drive, I've been trying to build a turn-table so I can use a diamond blade on a submerses pane of glass to grind it to a convex lens for a telescope project, with poor success thus far. In many other projects, I used the CD-ROM drive housing for breadboard enclosures. Also, I don't need to buy variable potentiometers and LEDs anymore, but that's about all you can pull from them. I save plastic inside them to melt it down with a injection moulder i am slowly learning to build.
No such thing as a $12 million loss, only gain.
on
A $251 Million Typo
·
· Score: 0
They bought the stock regardless. I would doubt anything but error, in the clearing house, would warrant refund. Considering that all the stock houses are interlinked and international, there is no forgiveness for an error. The bigger question is WHAT they were buying that the executives think is worth holding to mature. Is this purchase advertised as an error to conceal a market trend? It is known fact that companies violate copyrights, patents, trademarks, generally any intellectual property when they want to transfer funds.
All the attacks are from compromised systems in the same domain that are portscanning and sniffing for activity. Back in the Year 1997, I was port-scanning with some of my homebrew scripts looking for fileshares. When I found a fileshare that was writable, or find someone's entire WINDOWS directory shared, I tried to pry through enough information to uncover contact information of the owner and send them an eMail warning them. The world has changed since then. Firewalls report most of my scripts as being malicious intrusions, and find it disheartening that it has come to this: software companies slandering the good purpose of software as a delivery mechanism for malicious use and not practical use.
I have found fewer fileshares on the Verizon domain. In part, it is best to firewall MS Windows systems because they are such bloody-hell for any purpose other than pussy-foot workstations. I was using RedHat 5.2, BTW.
There is a proverb in the Holy Bible that hints a theory on reletivity.
Proverbs 29:27 (KJVAV 1611) "[27]An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked."
Theory of relativity originates from observation and application; socially related to two treatise I know as "Alchemy of Transfiguration" and "Mathematics of Id-entity"; both these treatise vary from persons of men to person depending on the approach and landing.
Slashdot Mirror
I vaguely remember many of the abatements in considering the deniability of a Money Order, specifically those issued in likeness of UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. One trait is the FRANKLIN watermark, the second is that none are issued greater than USD 750.00. Regardless, those instruments issued by USPS are actually fraud from the inception, because they are non-negotiable outside of UNITED STATES. By banking laws, a USPS Money Order is fraud, so I find it verry questionable jurisdiction when someone is charged with forging a forgery. Isn't that silly?
So for those of you that don't know and would like a more casual participation in the fraud, DO NOT ACCEPT A USPS MONEY ORDER GREATER THAN USD 750.00, unless you know how to abate its issue. There are those of us that know how to open a Postal Savings Account, or a Postal Chequing Account, and are afronted by these titles everyday. Consider some of these summary judgments and definitions espoused in subjects of Negotiable Instruments Law:
If it was called How To Boot Your Walkman With Emacs, now that would be a hack.
touche.
I believe you meant to say: boot eMacs with your Walkman. Haven't you noticed that the first Walkman was just a DC motor that rolled magnetic tape? Today, a Walkman is a computer capable of enforcing time-limits and other (sarcastic truth) anti-DRM (/sarcastic truth) technologies on whomever is in possession of audible tones that they conferred consideration for the value.
My printer, under the influence of mother-pucking TNN, said "Your mom has socks that smell!" while ejecting that green minty wusabi sauce.
Does anyone know about those neat 386-based computer systems that install into your motherboard's unused DIMM sockets? Has anyone seen the Sun or Apple alternative x86 solution whereas a complete computer is assembled into a PCI adaptor form-factor and installed into a PCI slot to give access to a x86 nativity?
We need more of these solutions. Just for the utility of it, I want a computer for general purpose use; consider a Transmeta solution, and then have a Pentium M co-processor that I can enable or disable when I need it to boost an application, or even better a Hitachi SuperH 128bit solution for quicker and greater math precision. I'm waiting for the days to return when computers were modular, separate FPUs from the die core for example, like back in the late 80's when the manufacturer gave you the manual that has all the BIOS function calls and circuit schematic in such an open manner.
All I see today is a bunch of unnecessary IC bloat, taking advantage of increasing transistor efficieny to use more transistors and obtusely dissipate more heat with a design that is bigger than the previous. Is progress to obsolete computers or give what is needed? I would settle for a fab-shrunk 8-way computer based on the earlier technology because it worked. Where are all those great designs going to, or is it just a fighting statistic? How about a 386 PDA? Anyone seen one yet?
When a computer's BIOS becomes flashable by interacting with a TCA integrated circuit authenticated by a software key, any expectable virus would target the Trusted Computing Architecture to gain pre-eminence in execution of code before the operating system loads. In fact, I could imagine a Virtual Machine virus, that itself loads the operating system that it can unrestrictedly surveilance the RAM and directly modulate on the communications hardware un-detected by software firewalls that rely on Internet Protocol. I only look at an operating system as a fish-bowl, and given the tendencies of modern computing equipment to feature more schizzophrenic code translation and execution layers on the die, it would be expectant that a viral code would strive much better here than in the vast reciprocal expanse of anti-code software that can only exist with the help of the operating system.
<speculative_fear>
What if this already happened; would it be known as a FPGA?
</speculative_fear>
Point of Sale systems sure don't need much processing to authenticate account information for dispensing non-negotiable notes (Federal Reserve Notes).
Internet browsing kiosks or dummy terminals don't need much processing to allow a well-optimized web browser to make internetworked requests for information.
All those computer screens in an aeroplane and covered-wagon bussing terminals, that output simple 2D text visuals for departure and arrival scheduling, don't need anything more than stability.
Can you say Nethack eXXXXxtreeeeme multiplayer!!!(?)
I've been studying this phenomena and find it more applicable in so-called "law enforcement" employees and related agents of a corporate STATE. Examples are;
id - sometimes pronounce incorrectly as eye-dee, is defined as the unconcious impulses that seek satisfaction with the pleasure principle, or simply defined as declaring the cause of actions. Anyone asking for "id" is actually asking for self-incrimination.
I-dentification - pronounced with a strong EYE, phonetically in this way it assembles the elements of facial imagery, yet the bias for the purposes of such assembly is construed from statute to statute.
I-dentify - pronounced with a strong EYE, dimorphically opposed to Identication, as to compel or command the assembly of the elements of facial imagery (action with the suffixed "y").
identification - phonetically pronounced with a short and near-silent EYE, but id, prefixed or interjected with other words, to express or satisfy an request for unknown action, and set it apart or in duplicate. In the Uniform Commercial Code, is references that such "identification" is for purposes of curing a form or Title unto goods to sell those goods. Similar, but dimorphic to identify, where this declaration is free-form and eminent (domain?) unto a subjected property; not voluntary, but coerced; varies from statute to statute for purposes of incrimation as well.
resident - defined as a thing(res) known(id) out of(ent) a claim or dispute etc.. On court casefile headers, it tends to be those things in dispute, such as GUN vs SWORD, et al. It appears that a "resident" supposes that people in a dispute are things subject to jurisdiction of superiors; that is a misconception, because a matter of intellect, whereas the names are fixtures in the dispute to be settled as prize or endorsement to whomever prevails from the action. Consider such disputes where seizure of property by United States is the action being tried; those such cases exist in admiralty proceedings from a district court. I distinctly remember one or two cases on the face of a court docket as UNITED STATES vs. ONE 1954 PICKUP TRUCK (or this, and this), and UNITED STATES vs. 4 BARRELS OF LIQUID PURPOTING TO BE WHISKY, or UNITED STATES vs. FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY DOLLARS -- "UNITED STATES" is a thing disputing other things. In this regard, for fraud it seems, because it is misprison to challeng a property (organized theft) instead of whomever owns that property, but the world never seems to operate the way it was thought or intended...
Many more words I have found to be misplaced or misapplied. Arrest is one of them, notice is another; all abused to commit fraud on others.
The openGL drivers in the Direct Rendering Infrastructure for ATI hardware is quite mature for R250 (Radeon 8500, 9000, 9100) graphics accelerators. Of'course, the driver development was by Tungsten Graphics (makers of PDAs) for a huge graphics rendering system used by The Weather Channel. The drivers are GPL, and they are the best support next to Matrox graphics accelerators. If you want a stable graphics solution, then that is a better choice. If you want all the unnecessary framerate beyond 30 in Doom3, then that is what bleeding-edge hardware is built to accomplish with closed-source drivers. I only try to support all hardware companies that opensource their technical specifications, drivers, protocols, hardware, and intellectual property. XGI is beginning to opensource its information to be a better contender in this arena I described, and their hardware is affordable. There is more than just ATI and nVidia though. My next hardware may be from XGI, and they build closed-source DRI drivers (IIRC).
the USA exists in name-only. Read the constitutions for the states that are composing the united States of America, and then read the Federal "States" that compose the Confederation known as "The United States of America." If somthing is owned, then it exists either as a natural person (man) or a artificial person (corporation). Also, read the constitutions for the states; all of them forbid confederation. Technically, only the people willing to confederate their subdivision of this state to a foreign state are breaking the constitution. Also, I distinctly remember reading Continental promisory notes that read as "THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA". Also, according to the Constitution of the District of Columbia; government extends to provincial Canada. Isn't that "strange"? Yet, in general, the answer to your question is yes. Why be a citizen when you take no part in the benefits of a adhering to citizenship? According to the constitutions of every state, there were people greatful to Almighty God for separating as freemen from Almighty God into a State within a state, then there are the people that did not separate from Almighty God and remain on the original estate. This is what I hope to emphasize. I may apply the chicken-before-the-egg principal if need to ask who is principal and who is second-class (sadly). The purpose for the State of a state is that the revolution could have terminated the actual colonial charters; thus the new status would be, for example, not Citizen of Pennsylvania, but Citizen of the State of Pennsylvania. All these states under british control need sign the unanimous Declaration, yet a foreign state created by Congress or by the people without Congress would not need such a spaghetti-like structure from their post-Revolutionary War questionable citizenship. Can anyone say, (in admiralty) "Abandon citizenship and board onto the State quick, she's going under?"
I think it odd that anyone can be accused to squatting on a name. I squat on GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT via a "Birth Certificate", and this is a separate instance to any pre-existing people squatting on GREGORY THOMAS MUNDT. The ICANN should attempt this feat: allow people to claim domain names based on time. This would allow people to visit the true google.com founded on a certain Year, Month, and Day, and apply its respective matter. I know of people that apply their autograph to the Holy Bible and thereafter to the first Magna Carta, state Constitution, and then a Declaration of Indepence of that state.
The fraud committed by NAF and Google is trying to say that legitimate registration is tresspass to another registry. By there actions, that central database has been used for fraud. Of'course, this is applicable to any registry that is centralized. Whoever is charged to minister the law onto that database has obviously been funded to commit fraud on others. The only way to prevent this is file a trademark for the same to be entered.
What really angers me is the coercion to add unto a domain name by the registry. There is supposed to be more than one domain directory service, and registrants accessed thereof, and not this ardent and unqualified application of ".com", ".org", ".biz", ".net", ".mil", ".gov" to the registrant. It's all commerce, and it is good to emphasize that "United States" (USC Title 28, Section 3002, 15(a), "United States" is "a Federal corporation" of the United States) is implying with these extensions a form of prejudice against an internation presence of competing governments by disallowing others the use of these despite there having no relevance as it is all commerce and not government itself.
(I don't have time to proofread, gotta post and run someone at this moment.)
In every society there are always some bad apples. I see it more prevailent in societies with second-class people, whereas in Amish landings it is the woman that appears second-class. Whenever there is a power granted authority to interpret scripture a certain way, it tends to bring a bias that is self-serving to settle disputes with a rigid concept. I've used the Bible to protect females declared women, with godly results. I don't know what, but a man that looks at a woman in any way it is often an application of covetousness.
My standing is this; God created man as either male or female. A female can only be woman for a duration of time; a female with child is known as a woman, no different than a eunuch is a man that had been mutilated beyond doubt. Consider that a woman is with a child for nine months, whereas whatever the woman chooses is always afflict upon the child she bear in her womb; would it not be her husband, a man, to also have a say in the well-being of the child and the sake of the woman? Most women are accused of rash behaviour when burdened with a child in the womb; some consume unhealthy quantities of substances. The child in a womb being silent to all of this can't protest, and this is evidence that in God's law that the child is as much entitled to liberty from wicked decisions from the Host where the flesh had divided from.
Then there are people that abuse the law...for purposes of domination. Is that not what a District Attorney attempts, just by you having a Birth Certificate, does that give anyone a right to address you and deprive your standing on your possessions? In scriptures assembled into the Holy Bible, many times have people been denied of their possessions for abusing their standing. Consider the Israelites being overcome by the Chaldeans; they were backsliding from the law, and someone of greater standing took them in their sin.
It's the same with the Amish; if you see anyone kill, steal, adulterate, bear false witness, covet, then you are to commit an expose on their sin as you would anyone else. None are above or below the law, but equal standing. Any lack of your actions to audit another is equal as exaulting them above all that is good. God and good is same to me.
I hope you well, friend!
Well said, neighbor. There is only one element of your post that I hope to emphasize others against; and that is to look at neighbors as "cultures" as though genetic entropy subject to a foreign will. All citizens of the United States could learn to The Amish are verry much self-sufficient in every regard, if you consider sacrifice to be the limiting factor of your livelihood. When I mean sacrifice, I think of when the only recourse to someone stealing your horse is to just move on. Yet, even though the Amish exist outside the jurisdiction of the United States, they interact peacefully to help citizens. It was last year in Pennsylvania, in the fifth Month in the Year of Our Lord two-thousand and four, that an hundred or more Amish peacfully assembled at the supreme Court building at Pennsylvania to protest. The story is lady was hired to perform in assisting an Amish woman move a child from the womb, and resulted in the child dying from natural complications inherint in the woman that had been so blessed with such fruit. The Amish woman and man, respectively, forgave the hired-servant and were thankful despite the outcome. In returning to a post in person as a citizen of the United States, the woman began to endure a voracious prosecution for mal-practice. Thereafter, hundreds of the Amish people were arriving and encircled that Court completly in joined hands to protest the prosecution of their friend. We can all learn this from the Amish: sacrifice, forgiveness, love thy neighbor to the end. The fewer applications of the United States processes the better; yet, I don't see people rescinding their SIGN and signatures to their certifications and birth certificates/corporate soles just yet, because it seems as though people have less faith in someone without such certifications despite being qualified if an honest attempt is made in any servitude. Confounded by Google, an article pointing to the incident is dated "June 02, 2004, an old header in Google is shown as "... 2004 Last Sunday, on the 25th of July, Malteser Emergency ... Clients, even Amish, supporting midwife charged in baby's death Jun 02, 2004 -based Citizens ..." mis-alligned to a cache that is offset by an entire year.
I saved a newspaper clipping from southern California, THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER, and I'll post a deranged form (averting copyright) as soon as it is found in the filing cabinet.
First of all, the root Amish are not part of the United States; they are seperate, having capacity in positive-law jural societies in the original estate; Patroons. When I speak of the original estate, I mean pre-Revolutionary War era. The United States existed before the "Revolutionary War", and not everyone was member after that war concluded. A prominent handful of people returned to their landing at their isolated countrymen. This is not any matter of criticism to the the People of the United States, but to assert that there are conditions on this continent that have existed long before. I am researching various forms of citizenship that predate that of the united States of America and am finding them applicable today in light of the Treaty of Paris. There are Americans, some of them are citizens of the United States, and then there are many Citizens of a local city. I've come across some people that retained their allegiance to the sovereignty of the Queen throughout all this time. The Amish are not a fringe group, but just choosing their participation with loving precision; not to participate in pursuits that give no more security than a peace-loving living will, or to impugn the efforts of others to force their will of relentless searches and seizures for an enemy of the Congress that implies it is everywhere outside of Washington city, District of Columbia.
Sell the stocks for food
telnet into root
wheel is here again
CEOs smoking crack
Hey - He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Don't know what it means, when I say:
He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He can sue some more - NASDAQ is his whore
Heil the trademark tune - Novell pwns teh root
He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
He's the one
Who wants to... sing-the-free-software song
That he likes to bundle along
And he likes to claim his own
But he knows not what it means
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
Knows not what it means [x2]
Knows not what it means when I say GNU(h)...
When the judge abandons neutrality and controlls the process of the court, then there is bias.
:D Police officers don't show joy in me calling them brothers and sisters, and that's a self-evident fact when I'm approached for their re-venue attempts.
Yet, technically there exists no plaintiff and no defendant because there is no filed claim of damages; just because the court case says "PLAINTIFF" and "DEFENDANT" doesn't mean it is settled to that. At the moment, there is an unverified COMPLAINANT known as SCO.
The judges act more like executive administrators more and more every day... And to think they always demand to presume them "HONORABLE". Not to fuss over the most miniscule of details, but I don't walk around demanding people think I am impeached of all honor unless someone refers to me as Honorable Gregory. Surely, I prefer and presume among people the greatest of respect as a brother while no less a neighbor.
I thought its been a part of Photoshop since version 6, IIRC? Here is just a quote from a SAM's PHOTOSHOP guide on the Sumi-e filter. There is also a filter in GIMP. My camcorder also had a Sumi-e filter built into it, but it tends to smear the image too much resulting in loss of texture quality and improved image compression storage.
Greetings friend! This post may be a little offtopic, but it was just to abate the matter of Newton being an alleged "Christian Fundamentalist". Moderators, please have mercy...
I'll express all that I hope would solve the Satanic riddle. This pseudonym known as "Christian fundamentalist", intent on supplanting scripture is somewhat odd. If a man bears false witness of himself declaring such as "Christian," but by his actions is not Christian is he called a "Christian fundamentalist"? If there is any applicable fundamentalism, then it would rest on the compounded summary of the ten commandments and I show forth:
Matthew 22:35-50;
"[35]Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, [36]Master, which is the great commandment in the law?[37]Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.[38]This is the first and great commandment.[39]And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.[40]On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Jesus advocated the ten commandments, and with God-like precision he compounded the ten with two.
That Pope is not in the original estate, but as a "Viccar" (imitation). Comparing the Pope to Jesus is like comparing Tofu to milk. I hope you don't forget that Adolph Hitler was in the blessings of the Pope of his day. Any words and actions that are not in scope and premise of the ten commandments, even as compounded by Jesus the Christ, surely you have authority by God to divide the truth from the lies. It's no different when people are confronted for doing this by so-called "Christian fundamentalists"; they're full of pride, hiding behind a goodly name, and don't realize they are the Synagogue of Satan. Yet, none who claim someon is Satanic doesn't actually know what Satan is but by comprehending the opposite of scripture. I suppose that any Bible can be Host also to those in opposition to it, such as Landover Baptist..
Alchemy is the transmutation resulting from the equal exchange of two distinct and separate matters. You can see it used today in the statutes of a state; it gives attention by its founding jurisdiction. Anything that is defined on paper is an application to the jurisdiction inherint in the courts established by that state or of the court superceding it. You'll never find an activating statute or "enabling clause" because statutes aren't law but serve to direct alien pursuits by a declaration at the verry encounter. They aren't alchemy until you volunteer to be converted and processed as a person. By the way, "person" originated in 14th century old french as a "mask worn from time to time". Are you a person (mask), a thing? There is your alchemy! Currently(!), the mechanism used by agents of the United States use confession and voluntary incrimination by use of a pen in order to presume this form of alchemy. IRS, US Treasury, Trust, Fund, all commit this same alchemy. I'll be composing a website on this feat soon, precept to a treatise on Redemption. Watch my journal for an update and direction to en.WikiPedia.org. I'm happy to say that Alchemy is not an agreeable form of involuntary process because in past days it was looked upon as an interpreted curse of witchcraft. Ask someone who they are and they'll confuse their time-clocked mask (person) with the religion in statutes, codes, treatise, and revenue police(y). It all appears justified, until the vigors of application are intent on your asphyxiation. Alchemy is equally applicable in representing the character of judicial proceedings, no less as electricity in the movement of societal energy. Not many people realize the alchemy in their daily life. Count for one the relative assignment of "I am" and how many people unconciously re-define themselves. "I am" this and "am I" that, but truth stands unchanged: just a man, standing on land, seeking-out living water; so saith Jesus. The structure of language flows as orders from a judge in an eternal courtroom: declarations, motions, quest(s/ions); and in person it is the movement of societal energy, or out of person it is the face of God moving across living water(!). Some construe societal structures radiating energy as being commerce; whereas even the (re)sister in their family is a key component in the huge scheme of things. I prefer to bipass the circuited courtship and move to remedy the affections directly in the supreme; call me biased if you want, but these 7th amendment "supplanted" inferior courts of limited jurisdiction only serve corporate interests in bipassing the Constitution with their orders of operation by one component per clocked cycle until all have been inducted into the corporate welfare state. Most people don't realize that it is not man, but a thing of man that serves as a component in circuit with others. In marriages: the combination of flesh, but in combining words and recorded to the movement of life from one branch(!) to another is an acceptable marriage (or merger), but is not the true marriage whence a child is born. In conveying the matter in a court of law, every aspect is as though an orchestra performing to describe the motion of SHIPS(citizen/battle/friend); whereas canons(!) are anointed with ink onto the respective wad of papers; brutish intruments to furl the matter composed of notes, transmitted(!) under the eyes of a conductor(!), and a neutral audience sitting to hear the motions with an amusing biase(!) for good and bad form. To me, it sounds like someone listening to a radio on a hot day. For each motion to discern between the man operating the vessel and its on-board transmitting utility as referenced in the Uniform Commercial Code, there is foundation. This is the alchemy hidden in the laws of man. The only people able to compete with
The easier, more exotic, load delivery mechanisms can be used only if the load is little. I thought no less than someone spreading all their value over many small successive launches than risk one heavy/expensive launch. It also appears that the cost of launching heavier objects into space will increase exponentially by weight! There is much development on laser-launch systems. I was looking for the earlier Slashdot article on laser technology, yet this webpage is just an independent collection of information regarding alternatives and does show some URLs for laser content.I don't see any shark stickers, so its troll safe.
Lightcraft Technologies, Inc. is a commercial venture.
Adrew V. Pakhomov appears to profess on the subject, and a host of a symposium.
I think they're wasting their time trying to move weighty tools into space. Should concentrate on smaller devices. I can imagine a robot same size as a Radio Shaft "Zip Sap" moving quickly to space and being more maneuverable on the planet subrate with long-legged tentacle action like in the movie "War of the Worlds" NASA always complains it couldn't fit all of its test equipment in such a small rover, and demand millions of ($) to launch such a tool. I think they should minimize such large launches with hundreds of smaller launches of smaller equipment; and learn to assemble them in a vaccum or in-route. This makes better redundancy. It would be a shame to lose a ten billion ($) project in one launch, then lose a thousand ($) part of hundreds of other parts in a micro-lauch.
I wouldn't think their use were limited to DVDs. I've assumed and often been abandoned dead or old CD-ROM drives whereof the previous owners have wanted DVD capability upgrades. It's a great episode of salvage rights! I took an old servo from a CD-ROM drive and made a centrifuge out of it. With another servo from a CD-ROM drive, I've been trying to build a turn-table so I can use a diamond blade on a submerses pane of glass to grind it to a convex lens for a telescope project, with poor success thus far. In many other projects, I used the CD-ROM drive housing for breadboard enclosures. Also, I don't need to buy variable potentiometers and LEDs anymore, but that's about all you can pull from them. I save plastic inside them to melt it down with a injection moulder i am slowly learning to build.
They bought the stock regardless. I would doubt anything but error, in the clearing house, would warrant refund. Considering that all the stock houses are interlinked and international, there is no forgiveness for an error. The bigger question is WHAT they were buying that the executives think is worth holding to mature. Is this purchase advertised as an error to conceal a market trend? It is known fact that companies violate copyrights, patents, trademarks, generally any intellectual property when they want to transfer funds.
All the attacks are from compromised systems in the same domain that are portscanning and sniffing for activity. Back in the Year 1997, I was port-scanning with some of my homebrew scripts looking for fileshares. When I found a fileshare that was writable, or find someone's entire WINDOWS directory shared, I tried to pry through enough information to uncover contact information of the owner and send them an eMail warning them. The world has changed since then. Firewalls report most of my scripts as being malicious intrusions, and find it disheartening that it has come to this: software companies slandering the good purpose of software as a delivery mechanism for malicious use and not practical use.
I have found fewer fileshares on the Verizon domain. In part, it is best to firewall MS Windows systems because they are such bloody-hell for any purpose other than pussy-foot workstations. I was using RedHat 5.2, BTW.
There is a proverb in the Holy Bible that hints a theory on reletivity.
Proverbs 29:27 (KJVAV 1611)
"[27]An unjust man is an abomination to the just: and he that is upright in the way is abomination to the wicked."
Theory of relativity originates from observation and application; socially related to two treatise I know as "Alchemy of Transfiguration" and "Mathematics of Id-entity"; both these treatise vary from persons of men to person depending on the approach and landing.