Slashdot Mirror


Genetic Research In The Heart of Amish Country

FrenchyinOntario writes "Insular, inbred communities like the Ashkenazi Jews and Indian tribes can be a bonanza of genetic information for researchers, and the Amish & Mennonite communities in the United States are proving to be fertile ground as well for scientists who want to better understand the nature of genetic diseases and how rare illnesses occur more frequently in such closed-off communities. The Amish, famous for their renunciation of a lot of technology, are embracing a lab that has been built in the centre of their community because their faith teaches them to "help their fellow man", recognizing that helping scientists better understand the genetic causes of diabetes, mental retardation, and some of the rarer diseases in their families, helps themselves as well as others. For a better understanding of the Amish and their approach to technology, Wired magazine ran an excellent story a few years back better illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes."

299 comments

  1. A question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, I really want to know this:

    Is it AY-MISH, or AH-MISH.

    1. Re:A question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. It's GNU/Amish.

    2. Re:A question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always always heard it as ah-mish, never the other way.

      Or you can just say "Pennsylvania Dutch" and be done with it... *smirk

    3. Re:A question. by cide1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've always always heard it as ah-mish, never the other way.

      Or you can just say "Pennsylvania Dutch" and be done with it... *smirk


      Not all Pennsylvania Dutch are Amish though. I come from a Pennsylvania Dutch family, and while my great grandparents spoke low-german, and were farmers, my great-grandfather also worked in a commercial dairy for an hourly wage. My great-grandparents was buried in a lutheran church, in York, PA. Amish have much stricter(simpler?) religious convictions, but on the outside, I can see how people confuse the two. My grandfather joined the Navy out of high school, and then went to college, as did most of the males from his community (WWII), and took a government job. He was a member of a lutheran church, and later an alderman of a methodist church for many years. If you met him on the street, you would have no idea, other than he is very careful about how he spends money (not cheap, but thrifty), tends to shun anything more than the basics, and values education over pretty much anything else.

      --
      -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
    4. Re:A question. by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know this might be slightly offtopic. But your reference to your grandfather's high regard for education brought this up.

      I guess valuing education very highly is a trait shared by the Brahmins of India. I come from a brahmin family and I assure you they're fanitical about education. Nothing's valued higher - not even money (although with globalisation that's changing). You could be rich as hell, but a pauper who's well educated will be respected much more than you.

      Over the years, the brahmins have been much maligned by being accused as being the sole perpetrators of the caste system. That wasn't completely true. There were three higher castes and one lower caste. The higher castes were the Brahmins, the Kshatriyas (warriors and administrators) and the Vaishyas (Merchants). The lower caste was that of the Shudras (menial labourers). While all three upper castes enjoyed the privileges of the caste system (which was not all negative - it had plenty of advantages too), it was the brahmins who have borne the brunt of the backlash post independence.

      --
      -Shaunak
    5. Re:A question. by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      is very careful about how he spends money (not cheap, but thrifty) ... and values education over pretty much anything else.

      sounds like a lot of asian families i know. i was born into an chinese family which i'd consider lower middle class. i remember in elementary school when we did projects and all the kids purchased poster boards to do theirs on, my dad would find large cardboard boxes for me to use instead. though i felt jealousy toward the other kids, i understood our economic situation and how much my father has already given up to provide for the family and to give the best possible education we can achieve.

    6. Re:A question. by Spirckle · · Score: 1

      The Amish say AH-MISH. Mish BTW in Pennsylvania Dutch means a pile of crap. As in "Ich hapt schteppa in a pile uf mish."

      -----------------
      Using the best thinking of today to create the problems of tomorrow.

      --
      Using the best knowledge of today to create the problems of tomorrow.
    7. Re:A question. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      "(not cheap, but thrifty)"

      That's what I tell my dates. They don't buy it. Maybe I should date Amish chicks?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:A question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I come from a Pennsylvania Dutch family, and while my great grandparents spoke low-german

      This may seem pedantic, but Pennsylvania Dutch isn't Low German, and the Amish aren't a Low-German-speaking group. Neither are the Hutterites or the Swiss Mennonites that have been mentioned in other postings, for that matter.

      All three of these groups speak what are most often considered varieties of High German -- that is, varieties that are most closely related the German spoken in the highlands of central Europe near the Alps. Low German, on the other hand, would be those varieties which are typical of the lowlands of the North and Baltic seas.

      Why bother making a distinction here? Linguistically, it's important in order to mark the considerable phonological differences which tend to divide Low German varieties from High German ones. Even if one disregards the linguistic arguments, however, there are still historical reasons for being more precise here: there are Low-German-speaking Anabaptist groups, perhaps most prominently the Russian Mennonites, who have a cultural and theological history distinct from that of Amish, Hutterite, and Swiss Mennonite groups. See:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_German_l anguage
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plautdietsch
    9. Re:A question. by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

      Is it AY-MISH, or AH-MISH.

      I was born in Lancaster (Lankister, not LAN-caster), grew up in Harrisburg/Hershey, and went to college in AH-MISH country. It wasn't uncommon to see/hear buggies in that town (clip-clop-clip-clop). Drunken college kids and horse-drawn buggies... That's a great combination. :)

      Now outen the light and throw papa down the stairs his hat!

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    10. Re:A question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I should date Amish chicks?

      There was an episode of Mr. Belvedere that touched on this topic.

  2. Thank goodness by gcnaddict · · Score: 0

    It's good to see that religion/culture values helping others more than abstaining (word useage?) from society.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  3. It's drumroll please... by Lullabye_Muse · · Score: 1

    AH-MISH

    1. Re:It's drumroll please... by rynthetyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou. I remember visiting my grandparents in Pennsylvania, my grandmother would get really upset with tourists who would talk about wanting to go see the AIM-ISH like they were a tourist attraction.

      More entirely on topic, I think it's a good thing that the Amish evaluate technology and its impact on community instead of chasing after every new thing without thinking. There are both negative and positive consequences to technology, but in our culture we are driven only to look at the positive. The case can be made that the Amish methods of farming are much more environmentally friendly, there's less environmental impact farming with horses than tractors, and there have been particularly rainy seasons where the Amish were able to plant their crops much earlier than farmers using tractors because horses don't sink in the mud nearly as much as a tractor. But, that doesn't mean that even in farming, they don't use technology, they're able to get much higher crop yield today than a hundred years ago because they're willing to use high tech fertilizers (the case can be made that they get the best of both worlds that way). It makes perfect sense that they'll allow genetic research, they see how diseases are affecting them, and research on understanding those diseases will benefit their communities and everyone else.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    2. Re:It's drumroll please... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case then in fact they are less "knee jerk" reactionary than the rest of the U.S. population, who hears words like "genetic" or "radiation" or "terrorist", and often react badly or irrationally. It sounds more like the Amish make an effort to actually understand the issues before making a decision whether or not to adopt something "new". Too bad more of us don't have a similar outlook.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:It's drumroll please... by njyoder · · Score: 1

      That's actually a very bad outlook, because it is exactly what has caused them to reject the aid of modern medicine in spite of their obvious genetic problems. The Amish have no education in the sciences and thus don't understand the concept of genetics at all and why their "extended inbreeding" is so bad. The Amish are now going to die off if they don't allow outsiders in (e.g. adoption).

      Not just that, but guess what happens if kids with certain genetic illnesses are born that require special needs that need constant medical intervention? That's right, you get shunned for a parent trying to treat their kids with medical science.

      Being cautious is one thing, being irrationally paranoid and causing mucho damage to your own kind is another. Being cautious also doesn't mean willful ignorance.

      I really don't think people have any idea about the genetic problems with the Amish. They have a much, much higher incidence of genetic disease for certain diseases than the general population and even have certain diseases that are almost exclusive just to the Amish.

    4. Re:It's drumroll please... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know anything about the Amish, all I'm going on is what I read here on Slashdot at the moment. That's not what you'd call a reliable source of information. But I do wish that more Americans had a better grasp of these issues and could make sounder judgments. For that matter, I wish our President did.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:It's drumroll please... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      It's a bad idea to stereotype anyone, be they Amish, or "the rest of the U.S. population."

      Everyone hates being stereotyped almost as much as machines want to be anthropomorphized.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:It's drumroll please... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Ever since the mid-sixties and the anti-tech revolution Americans have been largely unable to make rational decisions regarding technology. Stereotype that may be, but it's true. I was making an effort not to stereotype the Amish because I don't know much about them, but I've been exposed to enough of the "rest of the U.S. population" to know that the popular will in this country is often an idiot, especially regarding science and technology.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  4. Amish eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when can we slashdot the lab's server?

  5. Wired story on the top. Wired story on the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ITS A WIRED CONSPIRACY!

  6. Heart of a Magazine Readership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a better understanding of the Amish and their approach to technology, Wired magazine ran an excellent story a few years back better illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes."

    I hope Wired ran the story past their counsel at North Shore Agency first.

  7. Duh by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course they are not mindless technophobes. For one thing every member of the sect is given a period in late adolecense where they are to go forth and experience the rest of society before they join the church. This insures that they have made a choice that is at least somewhat informed. They are an interesting group of very deeply religious folk who have very good reasons for believing as they do. Hell one of my favorite vacations was one where I didn't touch an electronic device for an entire week, it was SO much more relaxing than any other vacation I have ever taken that I have to sometimes wonder if I wouldn't be more happy if I were to give it all up and live life in the simpler fashion of the amish.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Duh by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Because the Amish don't embrace the outward showy technology of the recent years, some think them backwards although I haven't heard of them rejecting useful knowledge.

      They're only backwards to us. To 99.99% of human history, they're hanging ten on the edge of the Singularity.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Duh by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Be careful out among the English, Ishmael.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they let the Amish MEN go, anyway.

    4. Re:Duh by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of them rejecting useful knowledge.

      Pneumnatic tyres, internal combustion engine, electricity...

    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got that beat

  8. Indians? by protobion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think this has been done enough. I live in India and don't know of any "in bred Indian tribes". The Indian tribes that I know of are so intermingled with the population that they are not in bred at all. I think what the author wants to talk about is "Native Americans". They are not Indians, and they only reason they were called so is because poor Columbus thought he had reached India when he reached North America. So why do some people keep calling them Indians? Celebrating Columbus' mistake?

    --
    Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    1. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why do some people keep calling them Indians?

      To give you something to complain about, perhaps?

    2. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about parking in a drive-way and driving on a park-way.

    3. Re:Indians? by Dahan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Native Americans"? I'm a native American, seeing that I was born and raised in America. However, I'm not Indian.

    4. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 0

      Changing to plurals, is different from naming cultures/people wrongly, because in the latter case, people who read such articles are misled to beleive something that is not true. "Americans", by the way, is the correct term for people from the U.S.A because they live in America, named after Amerigo Vespucci, who discovered the land.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    5. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 0

      Then you are part of the immigrant population to America...as defined from the time Amerigo christened the land.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    6. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, not like me, I'm an Indian who was born in America.

    7. Re:Indians? by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry you dislike it when people, usually citizens of the United States (notice I am being politically correct here too and not using the term Americans which one might argue includes Canadians, Mexicans, and Latin Americans), use the term "Indians" to refer to the people who were native to the land when Columbus arrived. I even agree with you that people should use the term "Native Americans" more often because it minimizes genuine confusion. If I had to speculate, the reason the term is still used is because that is what people are taught in Kindergarten and because it is much more fun to play games with Indians and Pilgrims than it is to play games with "Native Americans" and "Immigrants Predominantly Fleeing Religious Persecution in Europe" since they sure weren't actually on a pilgrimage anywhere. Sadly, this probably isn't going to change, but if you wanted to be productive you could make polite comments about the inherent confusion in using the term "Indians" to refer to Native Americans that would at worst be ignored rather than moderated -1, Offtopic but more likely at least encourage the use of the term "Native Americans" in /. submissions.

      That being said, and in hope that maybe this comment won't be moderated totally offtopic, I found both articles very interesting and I suggest that anyone who hasn't read them to do so. Research like this will help many people with rare genetic disorders and I sincerely hope it can continue for many years. Now go ahead and moderate me offtopic anyway.

    8. Re:Indians? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you got modded down automatically when you said you lived in India. You might want to keep that a secret on /.

    9. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 1

      hmm...Dan, could you tell me that means more explicity please ? Just curiosity...Slashdot got something against Indians?

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    10. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about 90% of the slashdot community is white.

    11. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmm, I never thought of Whites and Indians having any issues, except with the displeasure with outsourcing.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    12. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are African American... since everyone has ancestors in Africa.

    13. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Native Americans"? I'm a native American, seeing that I was born and raised in America. However, I'm not Indian.

      Of course not ! You would have to be born and raised in India to be an Indian. You are not Chinese or German either. Silly American !

    14. Re:Indians? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Slashdot got something against Indians?

      Yes. Look at any article mentioning "outsourcing" and the majority of the posts will be racist. Likewise, any article involving the Chinese or French gets similar treatment. Some here accuse you of "stealing" their jobs, if such a thing were possible. I wonder if they are the same ones who push the "copyright infringement is not theft" ideal, probably; hipocracy is a regular theme here.

    15. Re:Indians? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Indians and Pilgrims

      Is it not "Cowboys and Indians"? Perhaps that's just what we've called the game here in the UK, but if not and it's a change, you gotta really question the pollitical correctness of it. Cover-up the indiscresions of the white folks with a double-think name, while leaving in the incorrect name for the Native Americans? Sheeesh!! ;-)

    16. Re:Indians? by g2devi · · Score: 1

      I'm a Native American too. I was born in *South* America but I'm not an aboriginal american either.;-)

    17. Re:Indians? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      The communications barrier is a big deal. A lot of indians claim that they speak perfect english, which may be true, but quite a few are terrible at "speaking" it.

      Some people get used to it, others don't notice a difference, but it's likely that a majority of us can't understand a damn thing.

    18. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cultural labels do not refer to one's personal history. They refer to, get this, the culture that one represents. In your case, I suspect, you are not a Native American because you more than likely have no ancestors who lived in the "Americas" before the mass arrival of European colonialists roughly 500 years ago. Therefore, you are white/Caucasian/American (without the "Native" prefix)/whatever label is applied to your particular cultural heritage.

    19. Re:Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is replacing "Cowboys" with "Pilgrims" covering up the indiscresions of anyone ?

      I would say that Cowboys generally have a more positive image than those witch-burning, scarlet letter branding, Pilgrims. And in this case at least the image is closer to the historical truth -- the lower class, racially diverse and racially mixed cowboys were probably more "PC" than the pilgrims. Famous cowboys such as Goodnight and Loving were respected in the cattle industry for negiating peacefully with the Indians along the cattle trails from Texas up to the railroads and on to Wyoming and Montana, and Goodnight and Loving told the Indians that their treaties applied to any other cattle drivers who followed them, thus extending the peace even to their competitors. The sons of Pilgrims coming West in Conastogas started wars with the tribes, and over plowed the land so it dried up and blew away in the '20s.

      And yeah, I call them Indians. Except when I refer to the particular tribe, then I do try to be politically correct in using their name instead of the one others applied, Lakotah instead of Souix for example.

    20. Re:Indians? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase a North American aboriginal activist, whose name I can't remember off the top of my head: "We need to decide what to call ourselves. Then we can tell others what to call us."

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    21. Re:Indians? by Dlugar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apu: Today, I am no longer an Indian living in America. I am an Indian-American.

      Lisa: You know, in a way, all Americans are immigrants. Except, of course Native Americans.

      Homer: Yeah, Native Americans like us.

      Lisa: No, I mean American Indians.

      Apu: Like me.

      --
      Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
    22. Re:Indians? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      It's the outsourcing thing, and the fact that India is a huge country with lots of hard working, clever people. A threat to us westerners, in other words.

      Don't worry, though. You have another advantage: Your women are incredibly hot. I know a few girls who've moved here from India, and they are some of the most beautiful, graceful, sexy ones I know about. I just don't get it. How can someone be this hot, and still that smart?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    23. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 1

      The confusion that forms the basis of that joke (I saw that Simpsons episode too), is exactly the reason I would like people to use correct terminology. :)

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    24. Re:Indians? by protobion · · Score: 1

      Well, I think that may be an accent issue. To tell you the truth, I never heard an Indian speak English the way Apu does. The French have an accent, the Dutch have an accent. Hell, even the English have their own accent. But so far, honestly, I have only heard Americans claim that their's is the "correct" way to pronounce/speak English. English is generally spoken well in India because of the reason that very early on, in about the 1850s, the British colonists discovered that there are too many sub-cultures and corresponding number of languages here (75 major languages and 1430 dialects, +/- 20 depending how one defines a language or a dialect). So English has always been the official language here. Its too cumbersome to make bureacracy etc work in multiple languages.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    25. Re:Indians? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

      Like other people said, it is just the whole outsourceing thing. Nothing personal. It's more the fault of the American corporations, but Indians get blamed for it anyway.

  9. Another isolated group to study... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    Though probably known to few, may I suggest the population of South Towanda PA for such a study. Some may have heard of it, very special population, get to study genetics and a special language all in one shot.

    1. Re:Another isolated group to study... by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I would think that Dickson City wold be the prime example, *especially* for the language!

      "Hey, who closed the light? I was right in the middle of my sangwich, heyna? Where's that bah'el (bottle) of medsin? I got a sore troat! I got it when I went to Catlick church last week and I gotta go to da U (University of Scranton) for da Eetalyun (Italian) Festivahl!"

      Sadly, those outside of the coal region can't understand, but if they did they'd know that this would be +5 Accurate. :)

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:Another isolated group to study... by StudlyDego73 · · Score: 1

      oh my! that post just made my day! I know I'm a few days late reading this, but I was too busy up de eynon! As a recent grad from da U and whose family has lived here(Dunmore) since the 20s, I just want to proudly present you with the Scrantonese Dictionary http://www.brianweinberg.com/dictionary.html

  10. Evil plot? by RickPartin · · Score: 1, Funny

    Am I the only one that saw the headline and got a picture in my head of a mad scientist experimenting on the Amish? They would be the perfect target. Come to my lab, we're going to uh, cure cancer and stuff. Yup. Great fun that curing cancer is. Yep...

    1. Re:Evil plot? by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to ruin a perfectly good joke, but for whatever reason, the Amish seem pretty gung-ho for biotechnology and what not (at least in their embrace of GM crops and what not). Another reason may be the fact that the Amish also all descended from a few hundred Swiss Germans (who did and continue to marry within themselves) so they suffer from the founder effect.

      According to the wikipedia article on the Amish, there was a 60 Minutes piece some time ago about a clinic the Amish themselves set up in Ohio in order to investigate Amish-only genetic diseases (including one that caused severe mental retardation and various other maladies).

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
    2. Re:Evil plot? by magefile · · Score: 1

      The Hasidim are similar, in that they suffer from the founder effect, have been a great research population, and have set up internal systems to attempt to study and minimize inbreeding.

    3. Re:Evil plot? by espressojim · · Score: 1

      We all suffer from the founder effect. It's not enough to quote an effect, but to claim how severe it is by estimating how large the true founder population size at the maximum bottleneck was.

      After all, it was only about 10,000 people who migrated out of africa and founded the rest of the world. That's a pretty significant bottleneck, and you see that in genetic data today - african ethnicities tend to have a larger number of common variation than say, european ethnicities. That's because the bottleneck filtered diversity out of the group.

  11. Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you spent a single year living as Amish people do, then you'd want to come back here, too. They send them out with little education and little support and no friends in the outside world. Of course they are going to come back after a year. They may think they are giving people the choice, but in the end, it's adding to the indoctrination because they come back thinking that they know what it's like outside their little community.

    I'm not criticizing the Amish here. I have no doubt that they mean well by doing this, but it is not a fair way to do the comparison.

    1. Re:Somewhat informed? by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Amish (and I believe to a lesser extent, Mennonites in general) believe that you have to make a conscious and informed decision to be baptised and formally join their faith, so Rumspringa lets them have a taste of life on the outside. The majority usually decide to stay, but UPN had a reality TV show Amish in the City and for some reason, the four Amish that were featured all decided to leave the community. Probably had something to do with the fact that they put them up with a bunch of "English" in a big mansion, and got them doing various activities together.

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
    2. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm the original AC)

      Yes, I agree that this is a good thing. I saw a documentary on this once (Discovery, maybe? I no longer remember) that said that almost all return. Most who don't return have friends outside who help them, so I'm not really surprised that the four of them decided to stay given the situation.

    3. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm the original AC)

      No, I disagree that this is a good thing. I saw a documentary on this once (Discovery, maybe? I no longer remember) that said that almost all return. Most who return have foes outside who hindered them, so I'm really surprised that the four of them decided to stay given the situation.

    4. Re:Somewhat informed? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that is in part because none of them really understand the outside community?

    5. Re:Somewhat informed? by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just education and friends that are missing, either. Having grown up and been socialized in isolation from mainstream society, they possess a disctinctly different set of social skills and a different connotative vocabulary, both verbally and nonverbally.

      They lack the correctly formed tools to cope with basic aspects of the mainstream social world, things like dealing with separation and boundaries/emotional distance, the need to be assertive or to tolerate assertiveness in others, the "sixth sense" that most urban and even suburban dwellers develop about crime and dangerous situations, the expectations about what the rights/responsibilities of friendships and coupline relationships are, etc. It's not that they don't have any social tools or skills, it's just that theirs are all applicable to a very different society.

      It's rather like traveling to another country--you think it's nice to visit, but for most people, nothing feels as "comfortable" as being "home," for the very same reasons. Of course the difference is that for religious groups, visits outside the group aren't constructed as visits just to "other people" as they would be if an American visited New Zealand, but rather they are constructed as good vs. evil--you are leaving the "good" people to visit and explore the structurally opposed world of "apostates" or "heretics" or "nonbelievers," so the experience is in no way value-neutral, but rather begins with the expectation that the outside world isn't just different (and hence always at least a little uncomfortable), but that it is uncomfortable because of the presence of various kinds of evil presumed to be a property of the outside world, and conversely absent within the group.

      Thus, even for the most outgoing, life outside the community, while potentially exciting at first, ultimately seems both frightening and hollow, since nothing (including relationships and interpersonal communication) seems to respond safely in a manner that they expect, understand, or need as social beings, and they attribute this mismatch to nefarious forces.

      The problem isn't unique to the Amish, it's seen in children from nearly any intensively lived faith organized into insular communities, i.e. Mormonism, or hare krishna, etc. Even when someone decides that they want to leave the faith, life outside it can be so difficult to navigate and their methods of social interaction and personal development so dependent on its structures that it's easier just to stay inside the group as a nonbeliever.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    6. Re:Somewhat informed? by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      Even when someone decides that they want to leave the faith, life outside it can be so difficult to navigate and their methods of social interaction and personal development so dependent on its structures that it's easier just to stay inside the group as a nonbeliever.

      Which is exactly why these ascetic religious groups always deteriorate into a shallow nominal religion. It happened in the early Christian church too, despite the warnings against it in the Bible.

    7. Re:Somewhat informed? by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >They lack the correctly formed tools to cope
      >with basic aspects of the mainstream social
      >world, things like dealing with separation and
      >boundaries/emotional distance

      Right. They don't need to know about "emotional distance," because they live in a society where people from outside an immediate family group actually give a shit about each other. Strange concept, I know.

      >the need to be assertive or to tolerate >assertiveness in others,

      Yep. Again, because they have a consistent social structure, they don't need to learn how to communicate in an environment where the heirarchical position of individuals is constantly in flux, depending on context. Each individual has a consistent position in the social pecking order, which makes life much easier.

      >the "sixth sense" that most urban and even >suburban dwellers develop about crime and >dangerous situations

      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.) They don't have expensive consumer electronics as an incentive for theft, and being agriculturally based means that virtually anyone is able to get a job, regardless of lack of skill...so there is little incentive to steal.

      The bottom line is that in a vast multitude of areas, mainstream contemporary (corporate) American society is sick, degenerate, and unjustifiable. It is also primarily based in nearly every aspect on the concept of weakening and impoverishing the individual almost to the point of death, so that there is no possible chance of said individual being a threat to the homocidal parasites at the top of the heap. Sure, there's a whole heap of *talk* about the importance of individuality...but the intention behind that is actually the weakening of social cohesion...which again, leads indirectly to the weakening of the individual.

      By contrast, most non-mainstream indigenous or technologically regressive societies are based on the concept of *strengthening* both individuals and communities, and as such they form methods of achieving this over time. So yeah...anyone coming from one of those societies will experience problems...they'll need to undergo a paradigm shift...From being in a society where the emphasis is on doing things that *do* work to benefit human beings, to being in one (the mainstream one) where the specific intention is to emphasise doing things which are detrimental to human beings.

    8. Re:Somewhat informed? by rynthetyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Culturally, that part of the country is quite different whether you've grown up in the Amish community or not. My parents both come from the Lancaster/Lebanon county region in Pennsylvania, my mom's parents move to Florida when she was in highschool, leaving her older married siblings in PA. It's interesting to look at the part of the family who spent their whole life in one of those two counties as compared to the ones who moved away. The pace of life moves at a much slower tempo, the idea of buying your meat and produce at the weekly farm market is still alive and well, and in general their outlook on life hearkens back to an earlier time in American society.

      However, the Amish aren't so entirely isolated as you may think, you can't really escape the outside world, at least not anymore. They even retire to Florida like every other person in this country over a certain age does, there's a pretty large Amish community in Sarasota, Florida (not all retirees), a lot of the men work in construction jobs, which pay really well if you're a skilled craftsman. Incidentally, two of the people who went on Amish In The City had ties to Sarasota, one girl used to live there, another guy has been living there for a number of years, and given the quotes his friends gave the Sarasota paper, he definitely didn't have trouble adapting to life outside of the community (one friend was quoted as saying her first question to him when he got back was "who did you hook up with?")--that happens to be why I think the show was a joke, they pretended that the Amish on the show had never seen a city or seen the beach, but then they cast people who were living in a city right on the Gulf Coast of Florida, with beaches that people travel all the way from Europe just to visit.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    9. Re:Somewhat informed? by dvdeug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From being in a society where the emphasis is on doing things that *do* work to benefit human beings, to being in one (the mainstream one) where the specific intention is to emphasise doing things which are detrimental to human beings.

      If our society is detrimental to human beings, why do they depend on us for medical care? They get their idyllic society at the cost of being dependent on our society. They don't have to fight, because we provide the military that protects them. And anyone too disruptive can be exiled to the real world. They need us to keep their world running.

    10. Re:Somewhat informed? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

      You might have made me realize why I moved back to Nebraska after traveling the world. Thanks.

    11. Re:Somewhat informed? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

      Unless the Amish person winds up hooking up with someone like Roy Munson and goes on a bowling for dollars winning streak....

      Ishmael Boorg: Whatcha doin', Mr. Munson?
      Roy: Flossin'.
      Ishmael Boorg: Flossin? Where the hell did I get "Munson"?
      Roy: The name's Munson, what I'm doin' is flossin'.

      God I love it!

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    12. Re:Somewhat informed? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.)

      Unfortunately, not quite true. And while the perps may be idiosyncrasies, note who their customers were.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    13. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      (I'm the original AC)

      And I'm losing my mind!! Help me! I... Can't... Control... The.. Voices.....

      /rocks gently in corner

    14. Re:Somewhat informed? by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Right. They don't need to know about "emotional distance," because they live in a society where people from outside an immediate family group actually give a shit about each other. Strange concept, I know.

      The Amish, like all societies, have their problems. Gender issues, for example, are a big one. I hear that abused women face huge social stigmas if they try to seek help.

      I'm sure there's plenty of emotional distance in the Amish community.

    15. Re:Somewhat informed? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I'm just playing devil's advocate now, but to me, that sounds a lot like communism. Not in the sense that the Amish society actually could be compared to communism, that is; but your description is akin to descriptions of communism in that it sounds good on paper, but leads to real problems when actually implemented that are conveniently ignored when a more theoretical description is given.

      Take, for example, the young man mentioned in a comment above who bought a laptop, and whose bishop took him and the laptop back to the store a few days later to give it back and ask for a refund. Yes, there certainly is a *reason* for this - the bishop didn't just do it because he didn't like the young man and wanted to make him suffer. But still, that's what happened, essentially; the man *wanted* a laptop, but couldn't get one "legally", and when he simply bought one anyway, he lost it again.

      I'm sure he wasn't too happy with that, himself. Of course, I do assume here that as an adult, he is able to determine what he really wants (no matter when it's about a laptop or community life or whatever) - one might argue that he simply didn't know or didn't think about the "greater good" of society as a whole, but I think it's necessary to accept that he was aware of what he was doing and its consequences and still reached a decision.

      Where does that all put us? Certainly, society as a whole dictating certain behaviour for individuals is not all that uncommon: it's the basic idea behind democracy, after all, that the majority can make decisions, even when not *every* single individual might like them. But there's more to democracy, too - it's also about personal freedom as well as non-interference. The latter concept in particular seems to be violated here: if I do something that doesn't hurt you, then you shouldn't be able to tell me that I can't do it. I derive the basic right to do it from the fact that I have personal freedom; and from the concept of non-interference, I can conclude that if I don't interfere with *your* personal freedom, then it really is OK.

      Of course, that is in stark contrast to Amish society, which - as pointed out in the Wired article, for example - does not value individuality and individuals as much as conformity and society as a whole.

      And that's OK, too, to a certain extent - if that's what someone wants, that's certainly fine. But it is important to note that in this sense, the Amish can be compared to any other sect (like the Hare Krishna, for example). And like with any other sect, while you may not find someone who will openly *tell* you that they don't like it, there will be people like that - and the mechanics that keep these people in the cults essentially against their will are well-understood. In the case of the Amish, sending people to the outside world without information on the social structures, without friends and so on just serve to reinforce the belief that the "English" world is not for them - and that's essentially a powerful deterrent to keep people from leaving the community or even speaking up against it. If you honestly believe that it's all you have, then are you going to destroy it? Certainly not.

      And that's really the gist of the matter. It's all about *choice*: if someone genuinely chooses to live the Amish way, then that's fine, but people also must be given a fair chance to say that they don't want to do so. And contrary to what is claimed by the Amish (and maybe even believed), they don't do that.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    16. Re:Somewhat informed? by macthulhu · · Score: 1
      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.)...

      Not true. I live about 20 minutes from "Amish country". A few years ago, a very large crystal meth operation was busted... it was run by the Amish.

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    17. Re:Somewhat informed? by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      If you think that is bad, check out how they deal with child molesters.

      http://www.amishabuse.com/

      The punishment for it is that no one speaks to the offender for a month. If a victim seeks "English" justice (as in lock up the SOB and throw away the key....) they are apt to be excommunicated. Since the Amish have good PR as moral and upstanding, the courts tend to go easy on them when this sort of thing DOES wind up in court.

    18. Re:Somewhat informed? by Micah · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>> The Amish (and I believe to a lesser extent, Mennonites in general) believe that you have to make a conscious and informed decision to be baptised and formally join their faith

      Yes. I was raised Mennonite. Amish and Mennonites both come from the Anabaptist (which means they baptize again) movement. It began around 1525 or so as some people were convicted that many pracitces of the church of the day (both the Catholic and to a lesser extent later on the Protestant churches) were not lining up with what Jesus taught. One of the core values was "believer's baptism," following Jesus' example that baptism is not just a mindless thing you have done to you as a child, but a public declaration by someone who understood that they were making a lifelong commitment to follow Jesus Christ. Another core value, of course, was/is pacifism and nonresistance. These views cost them dearly in terms of persecution for a couple hundred years or so.

    19. Re:Somewhat informed? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Can you cite a source for that?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    20. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, their society doesn't include things like illegal drug use (and hence, no drug-related crime.)

      This is completely false. Some Amish communities do have serious drug problems and drug crime. Watch "Devil's Playground."

    21. Re:Somewhat informed? by fr8_liner · · Score: 1

      No drug related crime? The Amish are well known growers of pot and operators of meth labs. There was a huge scandal about 10 years ago concering Amish making "crank" for the Pagan motorcycle club in Philadelphia.

    22. Re:Somewhat informed? by dubious9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have not been "grown up and been socialized in isolation from mainstream society" as much as you might think. The world is all around them. I don't know if you've ever been to Amish country, but at least in Lancaster, PA, you can't really be isolated anymore.

      I know I alot of people that grew up there that played regularly with amish kids. The amish and mennonites would go to the local schools and participate in things like sports and other activities that were deemed acceptable. They know more than you'd think about pop culture. I know, I gotten drunk with some who were out on their own.

      None of them thought the outside world was "ultimately ... both frightening and hollow", but rather unfriendly and shallow. AFIAK, they all went back. Not because they weren't prepared for it, but because they *really* wanted to. The Amish don't pull any punches there. They want you to make a fully informed decision. They are not stupid and don't want you to come back because you were frightened. They'll ask you when you come back. They want to make sure that you're really coming back on your own accord. There's no pressure, subversion, or brainwashing. To compare them to cultish communities shows you really don't know anything about the amish.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    23. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      They don't have to fight, because we provide the military that protects them.

      The Amish and Mennonite communities don't need our military to protect them. A pacifist stance is central to their faith and if our military wasn't there, it wouldn't faze them. The Martyr's Mirror details just how strongly they clung to their pacifist views, even when they were in grave danger just for existing. It is a collection of stories from the 17th century about how the Anabaptist's remained peaceful even in the midst of terrible persecution.

      They need us to keep their world running.

      They have maintained this standard of living for a looong time. The only reason that they need our world is to "keep up" in our world. If we weren't there they wouldn't have to worry about skyrocketing land costs, obliteration of smaller farmers, and technology encroaching in every area of their lives.

    24. Re:Somewhat informed? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling you're taking a too simple view of how the Old Order Mennonites (Amish) see themselves and the rest of the world.

      A little bit of reference, I am a Mennonite myself, I'm not Old Order but I have spent a number of years in close proximity to them plus a couple months learning specifically about their beliefs and values.

      It's not about good vs evil. Yes, the rest of the world are 'the others', people who do not believe as they do but it isn't about seeing them as evil or unenlightened. It would be like feeling that the Jewish people, or the Mormons, or the Kalahari Bushmen are evil because they do not hold the same beliefs. It is sad to say people have held those beliefs, but it is far from prevailing opinion. The emphasis among the Old Order is on us. This is what WE believe, this is how WE do things, this is why WE do what we do. The rest of the world is what it is, and many Old Order that I know accept that and aren't concerned about it. The view about everyone else is simply that they exist, trade occurs, and so forth. Those other people aren't seen as evil or ignorant, they have simply made a different choice in life and the Old Order really don't much care. If you aren't part of their community, its really a non-issue.

      Most of the Mennonite faith is like that really, they believe that you cannot blindly follow. That is why Mennonites do not baptise children, because children cannot make the concious choice to accept the faith. We will teach them, and raise them as Mennonite, but they cannot become full church congregation until they are old enough to make decisions for themselves and they choose to join. If they do not choose to do so, then that is the path they take. They are not evil for doing so, although family members who leave are often seen in less favour than someone who has never been close to the community.

      That being said, I also know Old Order deacons and teachers who try to teach more to their children, give them a wider view of life and let them choose for themselves inside their communities. Although it is difficult for them as they are missing much of the experience and knowledge that we take for granted, they do try to give their children the best that they can and are sincere in the effort.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    25. Re:Somewhat informed? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice to think that, though.

      They don't depend on us for medical care, if we withdrew it, they'd go on much as they have before modern medicine was available. They pay for it too, or do you think the AMA sends out doctors to Amishland to treat people for free, because they're all a bunch of big freeloaders? That they choose not to go to medical school themselves means little, did you insist that one of your own family go? Or maybe you're pissed that they don't do any medical research (hey bonehead, this article says that they're participating, in case you didn't notice). Well, if our superior capitalist system is doing its job, the cost of that research is factored in to the care that they pay for.

      They don't have to fight, you say? I know, I know. Everyone is nervous that Iraq will invade, and the Amish, well, they'll be sitting ducks. Wouldn't suprise me if that asshole Saddam launches scuds at them filled with kurdish nerve gas.

      And what about this exile thing? You obviously don't have a clue, but it's going to be so hard to inform you against your will. They allow people to voluntarily leave. They don't force anyone. Those that are disruptive (which happens very rarely) are usually shunned as I understand it. As long as they're willing to put up with that, nothing more happens. They don't do it for 3 weeks, and if the behavior still hasn't ended, they don't form a lynch mob and storm their house at night.

      They don't need us.

    26. Re:Somewhat informed? by colmore · · Score: 1

      The military hasn't protected Americans at home since the 1940s. Our nation has interests abroad, and there's a very good case to be made for protecting them, but the Viet Kong never had plans to march into Washington.

      The contemporary situation is tougher to analyze, but remember, Bin Laden was a US operative until we enraged him by building a base in Saudi Arabia.

      As for medicine, yes, the Amish use English medicine, but I imagine if they were really forced to choose between their society and medicine, a majority would risk living without modern medicine.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    27. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's hilarious that you think one can wish away the need for a military. Even if the amish refuse to condone the actions of a military, if that military is used to protect their existence, they need that army in order to exist.

    28. Re:Somewhat informed? by macthulhu · · Score: 1

      The local paper doesn't have archives online, but it was in the Jamestown Post Journal, and on Cable 8 News, when it happened. It was just a few years ago.

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    29. Re:Somewhat informed? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I'm not really responding to the parent post, but yeah...

      Why the hell would anybody attack the Amish? The major reasons for attacking somebody are that they pissed you off or you disagree with them. I'm pretty sure the Amish don't piss anybody off. There may be disagreements with their way of society, but I don't think anybody would send million-dollar bombs to their farm just to show who's boss.

      --
      No existe.
    30. Re:Somewhat informed? by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pacifist's are always parasitical. The world is not a happy fun place where if you don't piss anyone off they will leave you alone. The reality is if you have something someone else wants and no means to protect yourself they will come and take it. You really think if we somehow placated all the people we have pissed off over the years, abolished our military, and took up pacifism the world would leave us alone? How long would it be before countries that had lower standards of living and a military saw our wealth and wanted a piece of it. And because we are pacifists, any country that could get a hold of a boat and some guns could take anything they wanted. Current "pacifists" get by only because large, powerful countries like ourselves will protect them. All it takes to bring pacifism down is one group who realizes they can have anything they desire without any work by taking it with force. Noone considers invading us because they know we could crush them with superior m,ilitary might. If we lay down our arms, (and didn't have any militarily strong allies willing to protect us) how long till aggressive countries like China, North Korea, Cuba, etc. decided to take our wealth for their own? How long until the son's and daughters of the new pacifist america are drafted into the people's army at penalty of death? Pacifism is a pathetic excuse for a philosophy. What it boils down to is "we are better then to fight and die to protect our lives and belongings, let the unbelievers waste their lives protecting us". Pacifism can never work on a large scale without 100% participation (and even pacifist communities cant manage 0 violence among themselves).

    31. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth did this get modded to +5 insightful?

      To address your specific points:

      --They don't depend on our society for medical care, they come to it only as a last resort.

      --As for military protection...who is threatening them? It isn't as if renegade Canadians are streaming in from the North to attack their famrs in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Why on earth would they join the military -- no one is threatening them, so there is no reason for them to take up arms. Your premise is entirely flawed.

      Having lived near Amish communities in Iowa and Minnesota, I understand thay they have some questionable interpretations of their own rules about technology, but on the whole, there is a great deal we as individuals, or as the American People, could learn from these people and how they live.

    32. Re:Somewhat informed? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      The reality is if you have something someone else wants and no means to protect yourself they will come and take it.

      Which the Amish avoid by not having stuff others want.

      How long would it be before countries that had lower standards of living and a military saw our wealth and wanted a piece of it.

      Armed with the weapons the Amish sold to them. No, wait, that the American Military Industrial Complex sold to them, that also sells the weapons you need to defend yourselves against all these evil people with weapons. Yeah, obviously the pacifists are the problem here, not the people making money from selling arms.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    33. Re:Somewhat informed? by geekwench · · Score: 1
      People attack Amish and, to a lesser extent, Mennonites all of the time. There aren't many solid statistics, though, because much of the crime committed by "English" goes unreported. Not only is it seen as a violation of their religion, which requires pacifism, it brings in outsiders. Even "English" who live their entire lives near Amish communities -- Lancaster County, PA being the most notable example -- don't entirely understand their "Plain" neighbors.

      In a larger view, it becomes understandble: a bully's favorite target is always the person that he knows won't fight back.

      --
      Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
    34. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there was an article fairly recently in Reader's Digest regarding the fact that there was a lot of drug crime among the Mennonites. Their communities are in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, and they are being recruited to smuggle drugs.

    35. Re:Somewhat informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure it's all as rosy as painted. There have been reports that child molestation and rape within these communities is almost never reported. Within these communities, it is taboo to discuss, and their insular nature prevents them from going to outside government agencies.

    36. Re:Somewhat informed? by villageidiot357 · · Score: 1

      Of course they are dependent on us. Ever see any Amish steel mills? Just b/c they don't use electricity does not mean that they don't need nails, plows, and other commercial goods. Amish carpenters use electric and pneumatic tools. The local Amish tack shop I know is stocked with all sorts of modern items the use medicine for horses, tools, leather treatments, nylon tack, etc. I think from my experience I would have to question the assumptions that they can't deal with we 'English.' They are pretty sharp businessmen.

    37. Re:Somewhat informed? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      They don't depend on us for medical care, if we withdrew it, they'd go on much as they have before modern medicine was available.

      Yeah, and die young and suffer horrible diseases.

      They pay for it too,

      But they don't produce medicine or medical research. Without the larger society, they never would have discovered hygine, much less penicillin and the vast variety of wonder drugs and cures. People from my society discovered that

      They don't have to fight, you say? I know, I know. Everyone is nervous that Iraq will invade, and the Amish, well, they'll be sitting ducks.

      The only reason Iraq doesn't invade is because they're in the middle of a well-armed society. If our society self-destructed, a bunch of New Yorkers would be coming over with weapons to take their food, land and women, like has been done for centuries. There's always some barbarian tribe willing to come in to take undefended spoils, like the Goths sacking Rome.

      Those that are disruptive (which happens very rarely) are usually shunned as I understand it. As long as they're willing to put up with that, nothing more happens.

      How long would you stick around here if no one responded to you? How would you respond if everyone started shunning you in real-life? Shunning, if complete, is a terribly effective punishment on a tribal creature like humans and nobody can tolerate very much of it. Our society considers it okay to lock people up in cages, but to completely isolate them without very good causes is cruel and unusual punishment.

    38. Re:Somewhat informed? by Kaboom13 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Amish have tons of stuff other people want. They make highly desirable furniture and food, have nice houses(with a little remodeling) and fertile farm land. Not to mention a large workforce of able-bodied men and women. Man of them are successfull businessmen, and since they normally deal exclusively in cash probably a good amount of money. Theres plenty of things there I would like personally, especially if I could walk in there and take it for free. If I pick up a baseball bat, walk to the nearest "pacifist" (amish or otherwise) community, and demand their women for sex, their money and belonging, and that they immediatly vacate the property, they will either restrain me with violence or the threat of violence, or call the police to do it for them. If they were truly pacifist they would have to give in to my demands or passively resist them (which means standing there while I bludgeon them to death one at a time with my baseball bat) The same would be true if we had an entire country of amish and noone willing to use force to protect them and the attacker was an invading army. The fact that they rely on others to protect them (who they look down upon as inferior) is what makes pacifists parasites. Unless you live in a (particulary damp and nasty) cave and forage for food (that noone else might eat) you have things other people, people willing to use force, want. The military industrial complex just ups the stakes. But even if we did not do military research, and develop better weapons, someone else will and they will conquer us for lacking them. Do you think Russia just wanted to play nice in the Cold War? If they had developed a signifigant technological advantage we'd all be drinking vodka. History is full of examples of civilizations conquered by others who developed better weapons and methods of war. It is only recently that the stakes of waging war have grown so high (the possible complete nuclear annihalation of everyone involved) that wars of conquest have pretty much stopped. The smaller countries of the world do not worry about military only because the superpowers will protect them. Even then when one of those countries pisses off a superpower enough, the superpower squishes them flat (witness Iraq). The reality of this world is anyone incapable of protecting themselves, or hiring someone to protect them, is just waiting for someone to come buy and take everything they have, including their life.

    39. Re:Somewhat informed? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      There's actually a pretty bad meth problem in Amish communities today.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  12. First hand knowledge by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the women who works there lives a couple doors down from me in CT. A bunch of years ago some of the Amish came over to her house to do build an addition, and they basically did it barn-raising style. Cool stuff. This has definitely been going on for 10+ years though.

    1. Re:First hand knowledge by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's VERY common around here. Many Amish barn/shed builders guarantee to have your entire structure built in a single day regardless (to a certain extent) of the size. Obviously a full-sized barn can't be done in a day, but there are many Amish builders who will guarantee that smaller barns and large sheds will be up before sundown. They're very, VERY skilled woodsmiths. Amish furniture is some of the most durable that you can purchase as well.

      No, I don't work for any Amish marketing board. Really. :) When you live 30 minutes from Lancaster, you see these things frequently.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:First hand knowledge by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I live 30 minutes from Lancaster but I have never seen any Amish around here in Blackpool.

    3. Re:First hand knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so impressed that two cities have the same names, just like thousands of others. Nobody fucking cares. I was obvious which city the guy was talking about. Who modded you interesting?

  13. Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Over in Australia we have another group of people that are highly inbred, they live on the island state of Tasmania.

    There is even rumoured to exist the infamous "two-headed" Tasmanian which were thought to have been exterminated by the early settlers though the odd unconfirmed sighting is reported now and then.

    1. Re:Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, not Tasmania.

      They the Devil!

    2. Re:Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.. No... the two-headed Tasmanians are not extinct. Its just that before they come to the mainland they normally amputate their second head.

      ~AC

    3. Re:Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they determine which one is their second?

    4. Re:Did they consider Tasmania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning, this was posted by a Victorian. Please ignore their dribbling - its probably all that shit VB they drink that does it.

  14. The Amish by petrus4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Amish are an extremely important cultural group, IMHO. I'd be lost without my computer, but aside from that I consider them a positive example to the rest of us (at least in some respects) where sustainable living is concerned. I've believed for a while now that despite having had some people laugh at them, it may well be that the Amish themselves will have the last laugh once peak oil hits. Their lifestyle also has numerous sociological benefits as well. It's fairly self-evident that the level of communal interaction is higher among less technologically oriented societies, as well as overall levels of apathy being a good deal lower. People from such communities tend to care a great deal more about their fellow man, and on a day to day basis, as well...not just when disaster hits. The rest of human society could learn a lot from them.

    1. Re:The Amish by IanCognito · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder if the Amish have well documented geneogical hierarchy like the Norwiegien communities that are paid by research groups for use of thier DNA.

    2. Re:The Amish by timmarhy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      how are these whacko's "important" what do they contribute to society? bugger all i'd wager. thus making them extremely selfish people as a group. their only saving grace is they don't whinge or expect help with their pathetic small minded lives.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:The Amish by cei · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the Amish, but I know the Mormon church keeps very detailed geneological records. It wouldn't surprise me if the Amish did the same, particularly since they're a much smaller and localized group.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    4. Re:The Amish by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've kept knowledge of how to live independently of electricity within living human memory, for one thing. It is therefore possible to study their lifestyle and (in the event that for whatever reason, large-scale generation of electricity becomes impossible) learn how the rest of humanity might be able to cope with it.

      True, the picture of a low-technology lifestyle isn't *entirely* rosy...They have a much higher birthrate on average, and as the article points out, a much smaller population compared to the average means less genetic diversity, which in turn means more genetic problems, and *possibly* somewhat lower average intelligence. It would also possibly mean lower overall literacy...but there are a very large number of people within the general American population who do not have basic literacy and numeracy skills, either. It is entirely possible that the Amish actually have a rather superior education system, since the intention behind their system would actually be to educate...whereas the aim of the mainstream education system in most countries these days is likely a lot closer to penal reform.

    5. Re:The Amish by Eskarel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I agree with some of this, but it's not really fair to base communal interaction on this sort of society because it's a very insular and homogenious society.

      Every member of the Amish community is very much like every other member, religiously, ethnically, even gentically(hence this article). Those who disagree with their way of life probably leave the society, there is little conflict, but there is little difference also.

    6. Re:The Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When's the last time an Amish person made a scientific discovery, or cured a disease?

    7. Re:The Amish by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      There's like 8 of them. Per capita, they have like 6000 more years to make a discovery or cure a disease before they fall behind.

    8. Re:The Amish by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their lifestyle also has numerous sociological benefits as well. It's fairly self-evident that the level of communal interaction is higher among less technologically oriented societies, as well as overall levels of apathy being a good deal lower. People from such communities tend to care a great deal more about their fellow man, and on a day to day basis, as well...not just when disaster hits. The rest of human society could learn a lot from them.

      A professor mine used to say that if you used things like it's self-evident and obvious before a leap of logic, anything could be justified.

      I could say that it is obvious that no matter where you put humans they always live sociologically in a smiliar way. Put any animal society anywhere else they'll do the same things - same with humans. So, maybe your whole view is just grass is greener on the other side.

    9. Re:The Amish by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Mormons have a religious reason for doing so, because they have a sort of baptizing ceremony for your late relatives. The amish have no such ideas, although since they are concerned about both tradition and genetic diseases, they probably keep some records (like most people do).

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    10. Re:The Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons also believe that the entire family will be brought together in the afterlife, and it'd sort of be embaressing to spend eternity with a bunch of people you don't know.

      No idea how the afterlife will sort out in-laws and grandparents though. Will there be some sort of visitation scheme for shared relatives?

    11. Re:The Amish by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      it'd sort of be embaressing to spend eternity with a bunch of people you don't know.

      Embarrassing? Can't you just throw a party or something and get to know each other?

      -- Terrorism may have turned the United States into a nation of fear and aggression, but it won't succeed in Europe.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    12. Re:The Amish by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      if you used things like it's self-evident and obvious before a leap of logic, anything could be justified.

      Which means that to get a valid argument you have to put the word after the leap of logic, obviously.

      -- Terrorism may have turned the United States into a nation of fear and aggression, but it won't succeed in Europe.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    13. Re:The Amish by drsquare · · Score: 1

      They've kept knowledge of how to live independently of electricity within living human memory, for one thing

      There are a lot of people in the world who live independently of electricity. Unless you thought that America = The World. I think that learning how to live without electricity is about as valuable as learning how to live without written language or indoor plumbing. Should the world be held back just in case something terrible happens?

    14. Re:The Amish by Micah · · Score: 1

      You probably haven't experienced too many "simpler" cultures. I think the grandparent is right. Modern Western society gives us far too much "stuff" to do, and spending quality time with family and neighbors has pretty much gone down the drain. How many of us actually even know more than a couple of our neighbors?

      I've been in small communities in Central America and have seen the lifestyles of people who don't have much, but have each other. IMHO they probably have far richer lives overall than most Americans! They work hard, sure, but they're not always "on the go", don't have to impress a big boss and complete a hectic project by a deadline, and don't have to plan schedules months in advance that exclude their family time.

    15. Re:The Amish by Illserve · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "People from such communities tend to care a great deal more about their fellow man, and on a day to day basis"

      While everyone is falling all over themselves to praise the amish, I'd like to bring up a relevant statistic:

      The Amish voted for Bush.

      And in record numbers.

      Their tranquil and idyllic life comes at a huge cost of ignorance of world issues. And their religious beliefs put them right in Bush's pocket, with intolerance of gays and abortion being at the top of their concern list.

      Funny, you'd think a peace loving society like the Amish would be upset about a war monger president.

      As is usually the case when outsiders look at pocket communities like this, the fantasy is better than the reality.

    16. Re:The Amish by droptone · · Score: 1
      A professor mine used to say that if you used things like it's self-evident and obvious before a leap of logic, anything could be justified.

      Basically they are flag words for a bad argument (or a faulty one). If you need to point out the obvious, then it isn't very obvious, now is it...
      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    17. Re:The Amish by njyoder · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Amish (at least some sects) do use gasoline to power motors for certain things. I know second hand that there are some that use gas engines to power milking machines for goats.

    18. Re:The Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When is the last time you did?

    19. Re:The Amish by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      Basically they are flag words for a bad argument (or a faulty one). If you need to point out the obvious, then it isn't very obvious, now is it...

      Did you mean, obviously they are flag words for a bad argument ...

      I agree with you on that if you need to point out the obvious, then it isn't very obvious, now is it

    20. Re:The Amish by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      While I'll agree they may be important as in they have something to teach us about how to value human lives and communities over profits and material goods, and give us an important lession in examining how technological innovation displaces people and can ruin peoples lives (both financially and psychologically).

      The absence of science and technology will hurt any culture when the sun runs out of fuel. It doesn't matter how sustainable you are, once the sun goes no amount of simple living will save you or your childrens lives.

      They also dont teach us much in relation about how human beings love lying to themselves and indoctrinating their children for the sake of the invisible pink unicorn. They are not pro-science, pro-truth kind of people, they are just as disgusting as outsiders, sure they may be all around good people in most respects but their whole life is based on a book of thousands of years old lies.

    21. Re:The Amish by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      While the amish represent a very nice and respectable cultural variety that we all need, technology, even as they testify to it, is not necessarily evil, as long as you can keep your priorities vs. your addictions straight. They are like the debian-stable usergroup, as a previous poster said it. Wheel is technology, hammers are technology, the plow is technology. They are just careful at examining anything new thrown at them, and wait for the dust to settle.
      Let's take for instance Africa, that's so much in the talk these days - simple lack of technology is by no means a cure-all-your-social-ills-pill, but can be quite the opposite. What kind of life you live still comes down to people and sustainable cultural values, even in Africa. Though it is true that where you used to have luscious grass and a big pond and all you have now is desert sand, when your living foundations are pulled like a rug from under you, it's hard to keep social cohesion and order in place.

  15. I am related to Amish, and need correct Slashdot. by NRAdude · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First of all, the root Amish are not part of the United States; they are seperate, having capacity in positive-law jural societies in the original estate; Patroons. When I speak of the original estate, I mean pre-Revolutionary War era. The United States existed before the "Revolutionary War", and not everyone was member after that war concluded. A prominent handful of people returned to their landing at their isolated countrymen. This is not any matter of criticism to the the People of the United States, but to assert that there are conditions on this continent that have existed long before. I am researching various forms of citizenship that predate that of the united States of America and am finding them applicable today in light of the Treaty of Paris. There are Americans, some of them are citizens of the United States, and then there are many Citizens of a local city. I've come across some people that retained their allegiance to the sovereignty of the Queen throughout all this time. The Amish are not a fringe group, but just choosing their participation with loving precision; not to participate in pursuits that give no more security than a peace-loving living will, or to impugn the efforts of others to force their will of relentless searches and seizures for an enemy of the Congress that implies it is everywhere outside of Washington city, District of Columbia.

    --
    without prejudice
  16. Amish Paradise by Ranger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes."

    As opposed to mindless kneejerk slashdot technophiles?

    Anyway time to get out Weird Al's Amish Paradise.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  17. had too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we've been spending most our lives living in an Amish Paradise,
    I kissed my cousin once or twice, living in an Amish Paradise,
    It's hard work and sacrifice, living in an Amish Paradise,
    The lab scientists are really nice, living in an Amish Paradise.

  18. The Amish also embrace porn... by speights_pride! · · Score: 1

    ...as they have figured out that a few dirty mags keeps their elders out of prison.

    1. Re:The Amish also embrace porn... by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      I didn't believe it until I did some research. But this is just disturbing.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  19. Re:Deliverance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm-hmm!

  20. Peak Oil by josh3736 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've believed for a while now that despite having had some people laugh at them, it may well be that the Amish themselves will have the last laugh once peak oil hits.
    I've read a lot (from both sides) about Peak Oil and I've come to the conclusion that while the end of oil is nigh, the end of the world and civilization is not. The thing that Peak theories fail to take into account is the fact that as the price of oil-derived energy rises, the attractiveness of alternate sources also rises. As more people switch to alternate fuel sources, there will be more incentive for companies to put resources into research and the economy of scale will take over after a while.

    So yeah, it's not a good time to buy a new car, but the gears of industry aren't exactly about to come to a screeching halt.

    Of course, depending on how rough the transition is, the Amish very well could have a lot to teach us.

    1. Re:Peak Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Petroleum is so amazingly cheap and plentiful compared to all other energy sources, that we have been able to live well beyond our means for decades. When oil becomes more scarce, and we have to turn to alternative energy sources, the price of energy will rise sharply. Since we need energy for practically everything, this will create a huge drain on our economies, because the basic necessities (like food) will become much more expensive.

      Peak oil doesn't mean the end of civilization, I agree. It does mean we're going to have to tighten our belts, turn off our air conditioners, eat less, ride bicycles, and be very stingy about turning on our TVs and computers.

      Put that way, it might not be such a bad thing after all.

    2. Re:Peak Oil by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      While I agree that Peak Oil does not have to imply the end of civilization, I think the 'market forces' answer might be wrong.

      Let's say I'm making solar cells. The materials used much energy to produce, from refining to transporting workers to making factories and mining equipment. 9 out of fifteen calories on the workers plates came from oil based fertilizer. Some of this energy came from other sources, but most came from oil.

      My point is, if oil is sitting at $300 a barrel, all these costs propagate down the chain, driving up the cost of energy from alternative sources. So when someone says "(fill in source here) is almost compatible with oil", it's probably not true, and we will not know the final costs till after the fact.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:Peak Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The thing that Peak theories fail to take into account is the fact that as the price of oil-derived energy rises, the attractiveness of alternate sources also rises."

      What you are not taking into account is the fact that the quality (unit energy out per unit energy in) and abundance of all other alternative energy sources combined is no where even close to what we currently have and have had with oil. Yes we can turn off our air-conditioners but how are we going the feed the extra billions of people world wide that the oil has allowed the population to attain? How is more than half of the U.S. population who live several miles from work and supplies going to live? Start planting seeds and hope for the best? I see massive war and chaos in out future at best.

    4. Re:Peak Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genetically engineered high-yield rapeseed (renamed "canola" in the united states of prudery) is already being trialled. Biopetroleum will become cost effective, and hey, it's a cash crop!

    5. Re:Peak Oil by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You're driving up the production cost of the solar panels but not of the solar energy itself.

      Over time even if the panels cost shitloads to make they'll pay for themselves, by producing energy at far lower running cost than the oil based alternatives (which would continue to increase in price in your doomsday scenario).

      OTOH they've been saying oil will run out for decades and they just keep finding more of it... I don't believe them this time either.

    6. Re:Peak Oil by Teun · · Score: 1
      I agree with your first paragraph though it'll be several decades for oil to realy run out.

      But I think this is a good time to buy a new car and house and regfrigarator.

      Because (especially for Americans) chances are great you can get a car with like double the mileage, that you can get a house build that needs hardly any heating and a fridge that's considerably more afficient.
      Every time I visit the southern US I am amazed if not disturbed at how badly most buildings are insulated, they'll moan about the cost of the airconditioning but that's still where the ball stops.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:Peak Oil by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      OTOH they've been saying oil will run out for decades and they just keep finding more of it... I don't believe them this time either.

      Perhaps not but watching the gas prices odometer up in a whirring blue tends to be a powerful convincer. The other thing you're missing that large so-called "second world" countries have large populations that want the big SUV too. Oil may not be about to run out but production can only be increased so much. So the supply may be fine but the demand is something else again.

    8. Re:Peak Oil by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      OTOH they've been saying oil will run out for decades and they just keep finding more of it... I don't believe them this time either.

      It's not that they are running out, just that what stocks remain are harder to extract, rasing the production costs dramatically. They went for the easy stuff first, obviously. Peak Oil is real, and WILL happen. The debate is simply when.

    9. Re:Peak Oil by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I agree. My original point was that the real cost will probably be much higher than advertised, and that the economy will look much different than todays.

      I'm not sure they are finding that much new oil. "Recoverable reserve" numbers increase regularly, but often the numbers are politically/financially fudged. This is especially clear with OPEC figures. And the core problem is not enough oil, but enough oil we can get out of the ground and to market.

      My main concern about this issue is that the US is not honestly evaluating the situation. Trusting in market forces to smoothly replace the biggest windfall of free energy we'll ever see seems a bit risky. I believe that US moves in the middle east are driven by the need to secure access to cheap oil. Note that Saudi Arabia and Iraq have the worlds lowest production costs for oil, and very large fields. Production cost measured by energy expended vs. energy returned (ROE), a number that is getting more and more important as fields dry up.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    10. Re:Peak Oil by khallow · · Score: 1
      What you are not taking into account is the fact that the quality (unit energy out per unit energy in) and abundance of all other alternative energy sources combined is no where even close to what we currently have and have had with oil.

      Wind power is already there. Solar power has steadily improved it's energy output for decades and I see no reason this progress won't continue. Both these energy sources are more abundant than oil.

      The only real problem with replacing expensive oil is transportation. Agriculture is surprisingly insensitive to oil once you ignore transportation costs. Currently, we have real problems meeting the energy density of gasoline and building a safe infrastructure around that. But the doomsayers really have a problem explaining why this problem should be insurmountable or why we cannot consider slightly more expensive substitution goods for some of the other uses of oil (eg, as chemical stock).

      IIRC the oil infrastructure is estimated around one to two trillion USD. In comparison, the US managed a several trillion decline in wealth due to the bubble in high tech stocks. While the two aren't exactly the same (after all, the transportation aspect of oil is deeply connected to all industry and commerce). But there's no obvious reason that the US (much less the global economy which is several times larger) economy can't tear out and *completely replace* the oil distribution and transportation infrastructure.

  21. Ja by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Well said, neighbor. There is only one element of your post that I hope to emphasize others against; and that is to look at neighbors as "cultures" as though genetic entropy subject to a foreign will. All citizens of the United States could learn to The Amish are verry much self-sufficient in every regard, if you consider sacrifice to be the limiting factor of your livelihood. When I mean sacrifice, I think of when the only recourse to someone stealing your horse is to just move on. Yet, even though the Amish exist outside the jurisdiction of the United States, they interact peacefully to help citizens. It was last year in Pennsylvania, in the fifth Month in the Year of Our Lord two-thousand and four, that an hundred or more Amish peacfully assembled at the supreme Court building at Pennsylvania to protest. The story is lady was hired to perform in assisting an Amish woman move a child from the womb, and resulted in the child dying from natural complications inherint in the woman that had been so blessed with such fruit. The Amish woman and man, respectively, forgave the hired-servant and were thankful despite the outcome. In returning to a post in person as a citizen of the United States, the woman began to endure a voracious prosecution for mal-practice. Thereafter, hundreds of the Amish people were arriving and encircled that Court completly in joined hands to protest the prosecution of their friend. We can all learn this from the Amish: sacrifice, forgiveness, love thy neighbor to the end. The fewer applications of the United States processes the better; yet, I don't see people rescinding their SIGN and signatures to their certifications and birth certificates/corporate soles just yet, because it seems as though people have less faith in someone without such certifications despite being qualified if an honest attempt is made in any servitude. Confounded by Google, an article pointing to the incident is dated "June 02, 2004, an old header in Google is shown as "... 2004 Last Sunday, on the 25th of July, Malteser Emergency ... Clients, even Amish, supporting midwife charged in baby's death Jun 02, 2004 -based Citizens ..." mis-alligned to a cache that is offset by an entire year. I saved a newspaper clipping from southern California, THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER, and I'll post a deranged form (averting copyright) as soon as it is found in the filing cabinet.

    --
    without prejudice
    1. Re:Ja by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, metaphorically, "they turned the other cheek to get slapped again." while yes, mis-carriages happen, if you don't pay attention to the actual cases (and admittedly, how much can the amish really know about BIRTHING TECHNOLOGY) and see somoene providing the service of helping in childbirth, but the babies don't make it, then yes, I wouldn't be sure i'd hire them, either. the amish are a backwards people who forsake progress in favor of their backwards beliefs. people extoll the virtues of them being self-sufficient, but are they, really? or are the oppressive and ignorant?

  22. Now please... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    illustrating why they are not just mindless kneejerk technophobes.

    ...seriously, tell us how you really feel.

  23. +5 Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight.

    Wired is an evil, evil group who strongarms their customers... ...But it's okay to give them hits?

    Wow, the editors must have special proxies that block all main and sub-section slashdot content, but allow posting.

    That'd explain the dupes too...hmm..

    1. Re:+5 Irony by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      And the new, special proxies that /. has recently implemented even give you the ability to respond in the wrong thread! See? Your post is proof that it works ... unless the Amish are really a wired bunch of people who send people who don't pay up for their Amish quilts to debt collectors.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    2. Re:+5 Irony by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Wow. The Amish read Wired? Huh.

    3. Re:+5 Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, watch it. You have to put in a disclaimer for mods who can't recognize that it was joke based on the previous article that slammed Wired for sending subscribers to debt collectors. I know that many mods don't have much of a sense of humor, so it's often necessary to point these things out...unless you really want that Offtopic mod that someone who hasn't has enough coffee is just itching to assign to any post possible.

  24. Don't forget the Mennonites by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    The main thing to remember about true Amish is that they're an orthodox branch of the Anabaptist church.

    The Mennonites are a non-orthodox denomination; however, to see them on the street together you'd have no idea which is the Amish and which is the Mennonite. Mennonites still hold onto the traditions except that they accept "modern" lifestyles - they own cars, TVs, computers, and so forth, but still honor the traditional dress and religious beliefs. My wife works with a Mennonite at a local grocer, and he's always in his straw hat and overalls whenever he works. It was actually a shock to see him in a "regular" suit and tie at the company Christmas party last year.

    I live about 45 minutes from Strasburg and go through that area often. There are Mennonite churches all over the place, even as far out as Carlisle and as far north as Selinsgrove (not that those names mean anything to people who are not from the area).

    Basically, if they own a buggy, they're Amish. If they own a car, they're Mennonite. :) But if they're standing side by side on a sidewalk you'd never be able to tell who is who.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Baavgai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point, but I believe it's even more broad that that.

      Within the Anabaptist groups, both Amish and Mennonite, there are a number a distinct sub groups. While the Mennonites are generally the more liberal of the two, the polar end of Amish can appear like Mennonite to an outsider.

      There are even Anabaptist groups that are much more modern than basic Mennonites, but outsiders often assume they are typical Mennonite and don't understand where the lines are. Unless you're part of the community, you'd never really know, anyway.

      Research in the "heart of Pennsylvania", that's Lancaster County. Used to be a nice quiet place were Amish and non Amish farmers lived peacefully together. Now it's a tourist trap. They bus people in, there are outlet stores and stores full of plastic crap selling authentic Pennsylvania Dutch drek. Amish are, quietly and systematically, fleeing this area in droves.

      Note, many posters assume the Amish is the base orthodoxy, with Mennonite being the relaxed offshoot. Curiously, it's slightly backwards from that. Menno Simons, an extremely early German protestant formed the group later called Mennonites. Jakob Ammann, a Mennonite, later branched off to form the Amish. He didn't think his group was being strict enough.

    2. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by barawn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mennonites still hold onto the traditions except that they accept "modern" lifestyles - they own cars, TVs, computers, and so forth, but still honor the traditional dress and religious beliefs.

      The traditional dress bits are choices, as with most things in the Mennonite church. So some Mennonites will wear traditional dress (like my grandmother) and some will not (like my aunt).

      As for technology, same thing goes - some Mennonites use cars. Others don't. It's pretty much just a very "cautious" view of technology, which is probably pretty wise, mind you, in the sense that they don't let technology change who they are.

      There are Mennonite churches all over the place, even as far out as Carlisle and as far north as Selinsgrove (not that those names mean anything to people who are not from the area).

      There are Mennonite churches all over the place. There are some areas that tend to be more concentrated. Near Eastern Mennonite University in Virginia, for one, in eastern Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, around Chicago (hours around), but they're pretty much spread all over.

      Honestly, the percentage of Mennonites that you'd confuse for Amish probably diminishes every year.

    3. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Not true.

      I live in an area of Southern Ontario that was settled initally by Mennonites from Pennsylvania.

      There is a wide spectrum of Mennonites here. From old order who use horse driven buggies, women wearing all black, and girls in flowery dresses, all the way to "regular" folks who are indistinguishable from the rest of city folk.

      In between there are those who drive cars AND wear a symbolic head bonnet, and dress.

    4. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1
      There are Mennonite churches all over the place, even as far out as Carlisle and as far north as Selinsgrove (not that those names mean anything to people who are not from the area).

      I've heard of Carlisle. It's famous for something. I'm not sure what, exactly, but I know I've heard about it often enough to remember. :-)

    5. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Johnson County Iowa. Home of the largest Amish settlement outside of Pennsylvania. also a rather large Mennonite Community (writ large) that *gasp* I am part of!
      Mennonites are not all of what we call the conservative faith. Hey I go to church with one of the WORLDS TOP heart surgeons. We call the Rural area that still Practices the traditions of Head Coverings, or Doilies, the mennonite Ghetto. Check yer Facts.

    6. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by troyer · · Score: 1

      Did you ever see that cool chart showing the geaneology of UNIX? You know the one, about 15 pages of horizontal lines and circles and arrows and a paragraph on he back...(oh wait, sorry there). Anyway, the chart of Anabaptist sects and churches looks very similar. Within the Mennonite branch, there is a wide variety of practices represented. And over time some have lost more of their outward visible distinctions more than others.

      I grew up in the Mennonite Church, one of those more outwardly modern branches. If I was standing next to one of my Amish cousins I don't think you would have much trouble figuring out which one of us was the tour buggy operator and which one of us was had root. Even though he has a nicer cell phone than I do. :)

      Around my hometown (Hesston KS) there were a number of Mennonite branches represented, and only a few still observed the outward traditions such as the women wearing coverings, and the cars having no 'extras' (radio, a/c, etc). That particular sect (the Holdeman Mennonites) even stopped going to school after the 8th grade.

      But you did need to watch out for the kid in the Magnum wih the tiny little hubcaps, he'd blow your doors off since he wasn't spending any of his money on decorations, it all went to horsepower...

      --
      dt
    7. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Darby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Basically, if they own a buggy, they're Amish. If they own a car, they're Mennonite. :) But if they're standing side by side on a sidewalk you'd never be able to tell who is who.

      Sure you can. Offer them both a free iPod.

    8. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      I noticed you said "Community."

      Are you guys kind of like Mormons in the sense of closely-knit community, but with a less insane theology?

      --

      +++ATH0
    9. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by grouchobear · · Score: 1

      A very minor point here is that Menno Simons was actually Dutch not German. He was also not the founder of the Dutch annabaptist ( re-baptizer ) movement but he was the organizer. At the end of the day it really doesn't matter where he came from I suppose, but, being Mennonite, I felt compelled to point it out.

    10. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding. I AM a Mennonite, so I can speak for all the Mennonites I know. First of all, I dress pretty much exactly like everyone I know. I hate retail store like the Gap because of their labor practices... but there is nothing external about me that would give me away as a Mennonite. My parents are even more traditional than I, but they bought me a computer in 1987 and I've been a programmer ever since. I fly to Los Angeles from Canada every few months to meet with clients. I played in a punk/alt band in college. For me, and most people I know, the term "mennonite" is simply a rough categorization of a series of beliefs, and a historical word. I believe in Christianity, and the word "mennonite" simply means I disagree with the Lutherans on a few minor points.

    11. Re:Don't forget the Mennonites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe in Christianity, and the word "mennonite" simply means I disagree with the Lutherans on a few minor points.

      In many ways that can describe just about every sect of Christianity, so what's your point?

  25. A Lancaster countian perspective... by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived in Amish country now for some 17 years. When I was younger, I wondered about their community and what the deal was with their shunning of technology. After talking to a lot of my co-workers about it (many of whom were Old Order), the local bishop showed up on a lunch hour to help 'get me straight'.

    According to the bishop, the primary reason for avoiding technology had to do with 'idle hands'. Anything that takes them away from the community or their families is considered 'not good' and there really didn't have to be a specific reason for a bishop to disallow something.

    BUT... As much as the Amish outwardly show compliance, the truth is that many of them push the boundries with things like cell phones, solar cell recharging units (some roof-sized panels used to recharge batteries for electicity at night), and even computers. Clearly the letter of the law and the spirit of it are two different things.

    In later years I worked for a small computer store in Ephrata. We catered to the Amish and Mennonite communities as they are often VERY wealthy and shrewd business people (uneducated does not mean stupid), and if the technology is considered necessary, they will not hesitate using it. In most instances, we would end up selling a computer to a farmer who used it for their milking machines or keeping track of finances, or in one instance, an egg counting machine that ran Windows NT!

    One fine day however, we had a rather nervous looking young man come by on his bike and purchased (in cash) a brand new, top of the line, Acer laptop. Upon leaving he put the laptop in the cardboard box on the back of his bike, covered it up, and rode off.

    A few days later a buggy pulls up and its this poor fellow and his bishop. The bishop appologized for his parishner's mistake and asked politely if he could get a refund. All this, and the purchaser never looked up once. Of course we gave him one - our relations with the local community demanded that, but I sure felt sorry for that kid.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:A Lancaster countian perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One fine day however, we had a rather nervous looking young man come by on his bike and purchased (in cash) a brand new, top of the line, Acer laptop. Upon leaving he put the laptop in the cardboard box on the back of his bike, covered it up, and rode off.

      A few days later a buggy pulls up and its this poor fellow and his bishop. The bishop appologized for his parishner's mistake and asked politely if he could get a refund. All this, and the purchaser never looked up once. Of course we gave him one - our relations with the local community demanded that, but I sure felt sorry for that kid.


      I'd incinerate that laptop if I were you.

  26. Inbred diseased folks... by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. The Amish have an incidence of autism that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.
    2. The Hutterites, even more inbred than the Amish, have been the highest growth rate, both population and economic, group of any Protestant heritage group -- including the Mormons.
    3. The Hutterites have a far lower rate of deliterious recessive disease expression than should be expected given their level of inbreeding. U of Chicago researchers who have been tracking their geneaologies for decades hypothesize Hutterite females must have some means of detecting when a Hutterite male has matching deliterious recessives.
    4. The Amish were forced into the cash economy when the government forbade their midwives from deliving their children. This had a traumatic effect according to friends of mine whose families have lived as neighbors to the Amish for generations.
    5. In case it slipped anyone's attention: mutations are typically recessive so if you want to see really novel evolution in action you are less likely to see it through cross breeding than through inbreeding. Yes, you'll see a lot more junk just because that's what mutations usually produce... but...
    1. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be appreciated by all if you did not call the Mormons Protestant. I will start by saying that no one considers them Protestant: Christians by and large consider them to be non-Christians (and therefore non-Protestant); they consider themselves a unique denominational class and neither Protestant, Catholic, Coptic, nor Orthodox.

      I hope you noticed that I was neutral in the above paragraph: I pulled their claim to be non-Protestant off of their own website and I'm trying to be informative and not trying to start a flamewar.

    2. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by mochan_s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... U of Chicago researchers who have been tracking their geneaologies for decades hypothesize Hutterite females must have some means of detecting when a Hutterite male has matching deliterious recessives.

      Yeah, everyone is disgusted with incest and it's built into everyone. Why would the Hutterite females need a super sense?

      Marriage and mating is the most intricate of all social practices. Maybe the Hutterite has a mate selection system that minimizes the effects of interbreeding.

      Interbreeding is just a bad idea. All of a sudden the chances of problems go through the roof.

    3. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Amish have an incidence of autism that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.

      Do we really know this is genetic? Their environment is very different from outsiders'.

    4. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amish have an incidence of autism that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.

      60-Minutes did a story recently on their developing genetic problems. Among the numbers mentioned in the link, of a hundred or so cases known worldwide of Cohen's syndrome, over a dozen are found in in the Ohio community.

    5. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, everyone is disgusted with incest and it's built into everyone.

      Incest is a common problem in some Amish communities.

      http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-Februar y-2005/feature_labi_janfeb05.msp

    6. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Inbreeding weeds out the most dangerous recessives. But the really interesting minority to study is icelanders. Those genealogical records of theirs were in part kept to prevent inbreeding, which has been a big taboo since the vikings. I believe it was the law of Magnus Lagabøter which forbade marriages between fifth cousins or closer relatives.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    7. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I think the first point proves that autism has more to do with upbringing/environment than genes. As the Wired article tells, the Amish value social relations a lot more than typical Westerners do.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by nblender · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Amish have an incidence of autism [google.com] that is less than 1/10th of the general population of the US.

      Widely believed to be a result of thimerosol (Largely Mercury) in vaccines. One Amish community studied for Autism had only 4 cases. 1 child had large exposure to mercury while really young, and the other 3 had been vaccinated when they were babies.

      http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/06/16/thimerosa l/index_np.html

    9. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by deaddrunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ is a Christian. That's what the word means and no amount of wordplay is gonna change that.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    10. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am currently the DBA for a large scale genetic study of Alzheimers disease using Amish families from Ohio (mostly Adams county). I must say it is intersting to see the pedigrees from these families. 2500 people traced back 8 generations to a single founder with as many as 20 childern from the same couple. There are also many "loops" or instances of direct family members marrying. One important factor in studying the Amish, once a family decides to participate in a study they all participate, which is extremely important in discovering causes in complex(multiple genes)genetic diseases.

    11. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realise that Jesus Christ is a major figure in Islam? Does that make Muslims christian? Mormons follow the supposed teachings of the Angel Moron (no, really, that's where the insult "moron" comes from), and Jesus is secondary. They're as christian as Muslims are.

    12. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But do Mormons and Christians believe in the same Jesus Christ?
      Their President Hinckley one stated "The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak."
      The rest of us agree that they are speaking of a false Christ. In this case they should not be called the same Christians that we are because to do so would be misleading and would suggest that we follow the same Christ. Maybe we should call them false Christians.

    13. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

      Parent poster is justified in his claims. The Mormons do not subscribe to the standard creeds of Christianity: the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasian Creed, etc. Those creeds have always been considered the benchmark that divides Christians from non-Christian cults, such as Gnosticism or Jehovah's Witnesses.

      Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, and Coptics all accept the creeds. Hence, whatever their differences, they (perhaps grudgingly) admit the name "Christian" to each other.

      The Mormons, by contrast, differ from the Creeds on several significant points, all having to do with the divinity of Christ. For example, Mormons do not believe that Jesus is divine in the same sense of God the Father.

      Hence, in the universe of Christian communities, Mormons are not accepted as Christian.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    14. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by demongp · · Score: 1

      They have a website?

    15. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      Okay, I know we're getting way off topic here, but I think you at least have to take the Athanasian creed out of that list, considering it explicitly names the Catholic faith in the first line. In fact, a quick Google of any of those names with the word "protestant" will pull up pages debating whether they are appropriate for various accepted Christian faiths.

      I think the Mormons are an interesting reminder that we can't always count on a "secret handshake" of shared literature to recognize people of a faith. It's a good start, but it rarely gets to the heart of what a person really believes. Of course, I agree that a shared literature is immensely valuable for finding out what someone thinks through discussion. Simply knowing the text, however, indicates nothing.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    16. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That fits well with my theory that the more genetically diverse a person is, the more generally attractive (and intelligent) they will be. That is, of course, ignoring the specific cultural values placed on specifically shaped attributes (large breasts, plump lips, big muscles) and instead simply having properly proportioned features and symetric sides.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    17. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Well, if you look at cases of autism and other such developmental problems, and compare the subset of 'mainstream' culture that also decides not to give their children vaccines (we didn't, for instance), you will find that there is a much lower instance of these disorders amongst those not vaccinated or innoculated. Vaccines and innoculations have some very dangerous chemicals in them that the mainstream public is not aware of. Additionally, in undeveloped countries such occurances are also significantly lower.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1

      Even further OT ... :-) The word "Catholic" in the Athanasian Creed (formulated in or before 361) simply means "universal" -- it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Roman Catholic church over against the Eastern Orthodox or Protestant churches. And in fact, starting in line 3 of the creed, it spells out precisely what this universal, or "catholic", faith consists of...

      I agree, I think, with your point that verbal assent to the creeds is not an indication of true belief. But in the case of Mormonism, verbal dissent is a pretty good indication of true unbelief.

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
    19. Re:Inbred diseased folks... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      I don't buy that. At best there is more genetic variation among us anti-inbreeding fanatics. At worst it just compensates for the small populations of Scandinavia.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  27. natural selection? by etheriel · · Score: 1

    So these societies can survive indefinitely, or will these diseases eventually snowball on them?

    Also (and i'm really not being cynical here), in dealing with such a small and admittedly inbreed population, isn't natural selection particularly important, in the long run? Will helping these people cope with genetic disorders really be good for their future generations?

    1. Re:natural selection? by simon_c_heath · · Score: 1
      A closed population (one without appreciable inwards migration) will always be inbred after a few generations by the definition of inbreeding. Note that an individual counts as being inbred if there is any known relationship between the parents, even if this relationship if very distant.

      Inbreeding in this sense is not necessarily harmful. In fact, societies with high rates of close marriages (for example first cousins) can have lower gene frequencies for mutations causing recessive diseases than outbred populations because there is more opportunities for selection to act against the mutation.

      My last point is that the aim of studies is not just to look for the genetic causes of diseass in a particular population, but to get clues for the genetic causes of diseases in the general population. Both these aims can be present of course, for example there is a large study in Iceland which is looking at almost the entire population which has the explicit aims of providing health benefits for the Icelandic population, as well as providing leads for drug development for the population in general.

    2. Re:natural selection? by mochan_s · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Inbreeding in this sense is not necessarily harmful. In fact, societies with high rates of close marriages (for example first cousins) can have lower gene frequencies for mutations causing recessive diseases than outbred populations because there is more opportunities for selection to act against the mutation.

      You're kidding me right? Have you seen what freaks come out of those kinds of families?

      First of all, they produce the ugliest of people. Second, if you have 3-4 kids in such a family, you can expect one to be a total freak.

      Like I heard about some Indian family that had a kid whose aging process is accelerated so bad that he dies at age 10 of old age. It was being used to study the genetic basis of aging.

    3. Re:natural selection? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Natural selection? There hasn't been any of that in human societies in thousands of years - that particular problem certainly is not particular to the Amish.

      The real problem is simply that you need a certain gene pool size (and thus diversity) for long-term survival; the smaller the pool is, the more likely it is that you'll see genetic defects, and if it's small enough, those defects may ultimately prove fatal (for example, some biologists believe that cheetahs will die out in the (biological) short-term future due to this).

      It's important to keep in mind that this is happening purely on a genetic level, though, and research into genetics, the diseases caused by this and how to treat (or at least relieve) them will not be able to change anything about that. If someone is suffering from a genetic disease, then helping them prevent an actual outbreak of that disease does not change their genes - so while you're helping the individual, you're not changing anything when it comes to the genetic side of things.

      In other words, *IF* the Amish gene pool is too small or if there are two little interconnections between the different localised pools, then they will suffer the same fate that cheetahs may, and research into genetics and relieving of genetic diseases will not change anything about that. The only way to accomplish that would be to increase the gene pool size and ensure diversity, and that wouldn't be possible without changes to Amish culture, too.

      But then, it's a pretty big IF. Who knows? People have lived this way in the past for a long time, and it worked for them, too (in the sense of not proving fatal), so it may well be the same for the Amish.

      In either case, what remains is the fact that research into genetic diseases can still help individual people lead a "normal" life, which I'd say is a good thing - both for the Amish and for everyone else who also benefits from it.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:natural selection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is the opposite. Europeans can be traced back to 7 women referred to as 'the seven daughters of eve.'

      http://www.oxfordancestors.com/your-maternal.html

    5. Re:natural selection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natural selection?

      Infant mortality, miscarriages, diseases.
      Incidents of sickle-cell anemia are higher in populations where resistance to malaria gives a higher survival advantage.

  28. Nice. :) by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    For those not in the know, Blackpool is in England, as is (another) Lancaster.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  29. Re:Amish Paradise by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    Ahh, thanks to that song, particularly the line "Jebediah feeds the chickens", my sister and brother (who's name is Jedidiah), found themselves having to explain to my sister's hockey teammates that no, we are not Amish. I guess the fact that we drove a car and that my sister was playing on a guy's hockey team wasn't enough proof for them.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  30. are people allowed to join? by krunk4ever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if people are allowed to leave, are people allowed to join?

    a search on google gave me this:
    http://www.800padutch.com/atafaq.shtml#join

    "Can an outsider join the Amish church/community?"

    "A local Amishman recently remarked, "You do not need to move here to adopt a lifestyle of simplicity and discipleship. You can begin wherever you are." Yes, it is possible for outsiders, through conversion and convincement, to join the Amish community, but we must quickly add that it seldom happens. First, the Amish do not evangelize and seek to add outsiders to their church. Second, outsiders would need to live among the Amish and demonstrate a genuine conversion experience and faith that results in a changed lifestyle. Third, it is extremely difficult for anyone who has not been raised without electricity, automobiles, and other modern conveniences to adjust to the austere lifestyle of the Amish. And to truly be a part of the Amish community one would need to learn the Pennsylvania Dutch dialect."

  31. Old News by dorpus · · Score: 1

    People have been doing research on the Amish for a very long time, their diseases are well characterized. The Amish play a major role in the methamphetamine trade of North America, having had shootouts with Mexican Federales and FBI agents before.

  32. Impressive workmen. by The+Tyro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was growing up, one of my relatives was a physician in eastern Ohio, and had some amish patients. He was pediatrician and a strong christian, which was something the amish greatly appreciated. As a result, many members of their community brought their children to see him.

    He mentioned in passing to one of them that he was thinking of remodeling his kitchen. The amish man immediately stated "we could do that for you."

    I was there when they came to redo the place... it was one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. Two truckloads of people, men and women, and they worked from sunup to sundown, breaking only briefly for lunch. The workmanship was incredible... everything fit perfectly. They also put in all kinds of clever little gadgets; sliding racks for table leaves, concealed hangers for towels, pivoting shelves and rack for dishes and pots... I've been in million-dollar homes that didn't have a kitchen as nice.

    Whatever criticism are leveled at the amish, there's definitely nothing wrong their work ethic.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Impressive workmen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But did he have place to plug in the microwave when they were done?

    2. Re:Impressive workmen. by flosofl · · Score: 1

      But did he have place to plug in the microwave when they were done?

      Well done! The first out-right laugh I had. I even snorted Diet Pepsi through my nose (ouch!)

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    3. Re:Impressive workmen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandfather recently had an auction in Lancaster. In return for a favor he had done and Amishman, this man brought his entire exteneded family to help that day. For no reward whatsoever, about 25-30 amishmen and women worked non stop w/o breaking for lunch or dinner. The last one left as i was pulling out at about 10:00 pm....Sure can't beat that kind of hardwork or loyalty.

  33. More on the Mennonites--to further complicate it by rynthetyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While some Mennonites drive cars, not all of them do, and not all of them are plain. When my aunt and uncle lived in Cape Coral, Florida, they went to a Mennonite church that you would have no idea was a Mennonite unless they told you it was. They all dressed like everybody else, the music was contemporary, it basically looked like the modern American megachurch. And, even with the plain Mennonites who shun cars and electricity, you can tell them apart from the Amish if you know what to look for, they drive different kinds of buggies, the women wear different prayer caps, and there are several other distinctions.

    And, to make things more complicated, you also have to factor in the various Brethren groups, which may be more or less plain (my grandmother grew up plain brethren, I think it was after she married my grandfather that she became lutheran, which is what my dad grew up). Then there was the United Brethren, which was the first American grown denomination and was started by a Mennonite preacher in my great-great-great-great-great uncle's barn in the 1767, and which much of my mom's side of the family belonged to(at least those who didn't marry Mennonites). The best I can gather, at some point in the late 1800s they split, some of them joined up with the Evangelical Brethren to become the Evangelical United Brethren, which later merged with the Methodists to create the United Methodists. And so, in a nutshell, much of American religious history can in some way tie itself back in history to the Amish by way of the Mennonites (which are of course an offshoot of the Amish).

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  34. Don't worry.. by CdBee · · Score: 1

    ... it doesn't sound like they'll be reading this, does it?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  35. Yeah right - help their fellow man by mochan_s · · Score: 1

    The Amish, famous for their renunciation of a lot of technology, are embracing a lab that has been built in the centre of their community because their faith teaches them to "help their fellow man", recognizing that helping scientists better understand the genetic causes of diabetes, mental retardation, and some of the rarer diseases in their families, helps themselves as well as others.

    From the article it says, "To the Amish, many of whom travel the few dozen miles or so from their homes by horse and buggy, the clinic has been heaven sent. It very often saves their children, who are disproportionately afflicted by rare and sometimes fatal genetic-based diseases because of 200 years of inbreeding."

    The Amish alsolutely have to rely on the outside world for their medical needs. This is just another extension of it. And they have special needs because of all the inbreeding which these genetisists are helping out to deal with.

    Face it, their gene pool is so shallow and it's getting shallower with people leaving and not joining that in a few more centuries they'll be freaks.

    1. Re:Yeah right - help their fellow man by shokk · · Score: 1

      better understand the genetic causes of diabetes


      Have SEEN how much candy and sweets these people eat? I would not be surprised if the result of this study was the finding that mass consumption of sweets was as genetically altering as smoking tobacco products. It seems that society replaces one vice with invented others.


      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Yeah right - help their fellow man by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      I would not be surprised if the result of this study was the finding that mass consumption of sweets was as genetically altering as smoking tobacco products.

      I would be really really suprised if that happened.

      Your genes cannot be altered be sweets you eat! - unless you're eating radioactive ones.

    3. Re:Yeah right - help their fellow man by shokk · · Score: 1

      But isn't that also the logical conclusion one comes to when asked if genes can be altered by smoking? What happens when you subject the body to very high levels of substances, like sugars? What continues to function properly, and what doesn't? Do things replicate to new cells like they used to, or are the bio processes immune to that?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  36. Don't forget the hutterites either by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

    When I was a child, I once visited a Hutterite colony in Manitoba. It was quite interesting to see how they live. I went with my father who is a religion professor and they basically gave us a tour of the colony. From the simple homes to the farms and domesticated animals it was quite fun. I played and ate with the Hutterite children in their mess hall (chicken and potatos). The kids were pleased when I produced some bubble gum that I had in my pocket. I'm sure Hutterite colonies are just as isolated as the Amish or Mennonites and would be good candidates for this type of research. Not exactly sure of how things have changed, or whether their view of technology differs much from the Amish or Mennonites, but they were clearly entirely self-sufficient.

    1. Re:Don't forget the hutterites either by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      A BUBBLEGUM!!
      You have introduced them to the SIN!
      You are going to burn in hell because of that bubblegum!
      <grin>

    2. Re:Don't forget the hutterites either by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      No, bubblegum is okay. The G.P. is safe unless he showed them how to play "foosball". Because, as we all know:

      "Foosball is the devil!!!"

      :^)

  37. Don't stay after dark. by Modesitt · · Score: 1

    That inbreeding mentioned isn't necessarily just among distant cousins as one would hope. This article in Legal Affairs magazine points out that some of that is from much more direct relations, such as brothers raping their sisters.

    6 weeks of the silent treatment doesn't strike me as an appropriate punishment for raping your sister or daughter.

    --
    Everyone on my foe's list is an evolution denier.
  38. who's zoomin' whom by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Christians by and large consider them to be non-Christians


    The above statement means little. Creationists of belief X usually consider Creationists of belief Y (where Y != X) to be lost sheep, damned, etc.

    A Google search for "are mormons christians" leads to some interesting reading. They seem to consider themselves to be Christians but the bigger kids on the block would rather not invite them to play.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:who's zoomin' whom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I did some reading and found a nice quote by one of their Presidents stating: "The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak." Therefore they are following a different Christ and should not be considered followers of Christ like Christians are. If they claim to be Christians, then they are denying our Christianity since they believe in a different Christ so it is logically impossible for both Mormons and traditional Christians to be Christians.

  39. Women? by OutOfMyTree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ability of people to write about a "community" without looking at women's lives is amazing (Do a count in any issue of National Geographic). Presumably half the Amish are female, but what do we learn of their experience of technology in these stories? Browsing around more widely, it certainly doesn't look like their invisibility is because they enjoy the same type of lives as the men.

    It would shed a great deal of light on the Amish if we were told what modern technology is considered acceptable for household chores, and how often men use it!

    1. Re:Women? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The women in Amish communities generally just get beaten, raped and abused, often by their own relatives. And there's nothing they can do about it because the society covers it up.

    2. Re:Women? by Spirckle · · Score: 1

      Bullshit! It been known to happen, yes. But probably a lot less than in wider society. "Generally" means the average Amish (and mennonite) woman you talk to will have been beaten and/or raped. This is just not true.

      --
      Using the best knowledge of today to create the problems of tomorrow.
    3. Re:Women? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it's a lot less? Because unlike in the real world they're not allowed to report it?

    4. Re:Women? by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

      What makes it a lot more?

      -Site an article.
      -Tell an anecdote.
      -Site a study.
      -Site a legal brief.

      You have none of this. What makes you think it is a lot more? Did Morley Safer or Ed Bradley tell you on a 20 year old episode of 60 minutes? Are you just shooting your mouth off and speculating about something which you have no knowledge? People are apt to do as such around here.

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  40. The Gentle People by whatever3003 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    After reading this article I was horrified at the new insights about these bizarre people.

    The article tells of systematic rape and abuse with no punishment, and with generations of incest producing an inbred and backwards society, condoned by the american govt. giving them the legal right to police themselves, dealing out their own justice where they see fit.

    After reading the entirety of the article, it would be hard to dismiss this as an isolated case, but if you do and still consider that they represent some noble return-to-basics society and that their rejection of technology is somehow endearing, there are other sources, and a dedicated blog that may help to change your mind.

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
    1. Re:The Gentle People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical fucking Anglo-Saxon. You just can't leave *anyone* alone to
      live their own lives, can you? After all, your own societies are
      such paragons of perfection, you can well afford to feel superior
      and pass judgement on others -- not! Attend to the beam in your
      own eye before worrying about the mote in your neighbour's.

    2. Re:The Gentle People by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Take what you read with a grain of salt and be aware of what agenda the writer is trying to push.

      No matter where you go in the world, some communities have more problems than others. I know of an Amish community near to where I lived that in that in 20 years the biggest crime that occured was one incident of spousal abuse that was dealt with by due process and resulted in excommunication and expulsion from the community of the offending individual.

      There are bad examples, and there are good examples, don't condemn a way of life because you can only see the evil in those you disagree with.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    3. Re:The Gentle People by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      That is the single craziest article link. Most people would not have guessed the armish culture is this fucked up in policing themselves. I knew they were out-of-ordinary, but rape for breakfast is ridiculous.

    4. Re:The Gentle People by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      After reading the entirety of the article, it would be hard to dismiss this as an isolated case,
      Hmm... The article discusses two cases of incest/rape - so there is no justification to assume that they represent anything other than isolated cases.
      but if you do and still consider that they represent some noble return-to-basics society and that their rejection of technology is somehow endearing, there are other sources, and a dedicated blog that may help to change your mind.
      The problem is this - these additional sources, and the dedicated blog, are all accounts of the same incident recounted in your first source. They provide no significant additional information (being largely copies of the first source) and no more justification to assume that they are reporting other than isolated incidents.

      For example - there were hundreds of news stories across thousands of news source about the London bomb attacks a few days ago, but there was only one series of attacks. The same is true in the evidence you provide - despite it's volume, they all describe one incident.

    5. Re:The Gentle People by whatever3003 · · Score: 1

      The dedicated blog discusses more than just two cases. The original article (the much longer one at legal affairs) discusses in depth the common practise of incest and rape in the closeted communities, and the insufficient punishment (if any) that inevitably leads to continuing abuse. The abc article is a followup to the original article about the sentencing of one of the perpetrators (a brother), the go article is indeed covering the same ground as the original, but is much shorter and more to the point.

      --
      "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  41. Re:Nice. :) by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article did talk a lot about the relationships between the Amish and the English.

    -- Terrorism may have turned the United States into a nation of fear and aggression, but it won't succeed in Europe.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  42. On Topic post - heart disease by spineboy · · Score: 1
    I worked at the National INstitutes of Health (NIH) in Washington, D.C. the "Meca" of medical science research in the world, in the early 90's. The lab I was in did some early stuff on the Human Genome project, and we mainly looked at inherited heart disease - specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

    HCM means - hypertrophic=increased, cardio=heart myopathy=sick muscle, so patients have a heart who's muscle becomes so thick , that it interpheres with its normal function, and the people can get conductional abnormalities , go into an arrythymia and suffer a fatal heart attack. HCM is better known as that disease that strikes down, often dead, young athletes, e.g. Hank Gathers basketball player.

    Anyway, we tended to use the Amish for our genetic work, to track down the point mutation (code error of a single DNA base) in the DNA. We used them because; 1) they were somewhat inbred, and thus the disease had a higher incidence than the gen population, and 2) THey often had LARGE! closenit families, and 3) they tended to be helpful (everyone!! in the family went and donated their blood). These three things make an ideal setting to do genetic research.

    So, yes we did find several different point mutations responsible for the heart disease, helped the families, got published alot, I got into med school and became a surgeon. So thank you Amish.

    Interesting side note - we often brought many of them into Wash D.C. to do special heart testing with ultrasound, and so it was interesting talking to them. "That was our first time on an elevator/escalator" - a whole! family told me that. Not a lot of deoderant was used by them (o.k. none.). Their little kids were somewhat shy, but the adults dealt very well at being introduced in to a chaotic looking medical lab. I wish I had spent more time talking to them,it was an interesting chance to see a different point of view on things.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  43. And who says... by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    And who says science and religion can't work together? ;-)

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  44. big problems, but easy ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    the problems you point out are big and important, but they're also not difficult to solve. seriously. they're pretty straightforward as far as societal problems are concerned. now contrast those with the advantages pointed out by the previous poster.

    "Their idyllic society" is a pretty old one, and has seen the outside world change a lot over time. Think about their dependence, and how serious it is, based on where they've been already.

  45. "That's What It Means to Be Amish" by daigu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I remember reading a story - I believe it appeared in the Plain Reader - that talked about the Amish approach to technology:

    A bus load of tourists were visiting Amish country. At some point in their journey, someone on the tour asked an Amish elder what it means to be Amish.

    The elder started explaining about Jesus Christ - but before he got too far, he was stopped. "We know all about that, but what does it mean to be Amish?" He stopped, and thought for a moment.

    He then asked everyone on the tour, "How many of you have television sets?" Every hand went up. Then, "How many of you believe that television has a negative impact on your relationships with your family, your community and with God?" Most hands went up. He then asked, "Believing that television has a negative impact on your relationships, how many of you would give up television?" No hands went up.

    "That's what it means to be Amish."

    1. Re:"That's What It Means to Be Amish" by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, I think I'm Amish!

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  46. A Debian view on the Amish by g2devi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > why do they depend on us for medical care?

    Think of it like a Debian user does.

    Debian has several repositories:
    * SID -- contains the latest and greatest, but it can be unstable and things may be
    * Testing -- contains those parts of SID that have been around a while don't seem to break anything
    * Stable -- contains those parts of Testing that have been around for a while and don't break things. Stable isn't updated that often, but receives constant security patches.

    Given this, let's describe how the Amish see it:
    * SID -- Geek enthusists who'll by anything new and shiny
    * Testing -- the rest of society who'll only use stuff that's actually useful
    * Stable -- Amish-like communities who'll only use generally available technology that is both useful and has a positive impact on their society.

    Now you might claim that the people who rely on Stable are in this privileged position because of all the people who use SID or Testing. You'd be right. But who cares? SID users are happy on the cutting edge, Testing users are happy with the less wild and wooly pace, Stable users are happy with the tried and true. Everyone wins.

    1. Re:A Debian view on the Amish by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Now you might claim that the people who rely on Stable are in this privileged position because of all the people who use SID or Testing. You'd be right. But who cares? SID users are happy on the cutting edge, Testing users are happy with the less wild and wooly pace, Stable users are happy with the tried and true. Everyone wins.

      You're right; but no one's saying that Testing and Unstable are evil and that Stable is superior and holy. People appreciate what Testing and Unstable bring to the table.

  47. Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I find the Amish the most interesting people in the US.

    The main misconception is the Amish hate technology. This is not true. They just do not want technology to control them.

    I'll give an example, if a vehicle can go faster than a horse it is banned. Why is this? Because people can then travel great distances and migrate away. Why is this a problem? Its a problem because it breaks up families. You know what, looking at my family that is precisely what happened! This is the main intention to take the rubber off the wheels of wagons ... it makes them go slower.

    The Amish do not like electricity because it comes from the grid. In other words, it makes people dependent on others. So, you can go into a store and the ceiling fan will be run from air pressure. Yep, there is a gas pump pumping air to make the fan go around. Little tubes all over the ceiling. The pump might be running vegetable oil. Or they can store fuel ... the point is they are in control.

    What is interesting is I saw some Amish using power tools. Yet, the tools were plugged into a portable generator and not the grid.

    If there is a telephone it is outside the home. Why is that? Because strangers are not allowed inside the home. You have to get permission to use the phone and go outside. You see, technology is not in control again. Having a t.v. in the house is like inviting in a child abuser...and it is!

    In the 60s, the US government tried to take over Amish schools and force their children to public schools. They fought that and won. See, more control...there was another school system in place before the feds and the 60s school take overs.

    Its very nostalgic to see a horse drawn cart harvesting a field of corn. No gas used and totally independent.

    They still have 5-6 children per family. So, in another century they will probably be a majority of the population in their state. Not dependent on immigrants to flip burgers. Again they are in control.

    What's great is $60 oil, electric grid going out, router down ... it just does not matter. They are totally independent. This flies in the face with todays elite trying to make everyone 'interdependent'. I find it fascinating.

  48. Environmentally friendly? Independent of oil? by sirra462 · · Score: 1

    I have been reading posts and I see two claims that Amish practice environmentally friendly farming methods, and that they will survive peak oil.

    Sorry, but in my personal experience (I lived next to Amish for years) some actually do more harm than good. The particular family that lived next to us operated a sawmill. They would stockpile months worth of scrap wood and light a fire to it that would rival A&M's bonfire. It was cool a few times, but they neglected the fact that this was done next to a very important and protected trout stream. It would rain and runoff from the ashes would seep into this stream causing changes to the PH level, harming the inhabitants.

    Since electricity was not acceptable to this particular church, they ran their sawmill using diesel fuel. Our well water began to smell funny, and tests confirmed that diesel fuel was in our water. The trout stream ran next to the sawmill, and apparently they would clean fuel containers in the stream. Our well water was located 500ft below this stream. They obviously were doing something more than cleaning containers to get diesel fuel into our well. The Department of Natural Resources investigated and found that the level of diesel fuel was around 2000ppm in the stream!

    I am not here to rag on the Amish, but to simply remind you that everyone is capable of damage to the environment; when profit is involved. The amish are a peaceful group of people and they live a life that seems enchanting to some of us, but corruption and greed lives everywhere.

    1. Re:Environmentally friendly? Independent of oil? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'm interested whether anyone has told them of those problems. What was their response?

      Just get their bishop involved or something. Heh.

      --
  49. Way to go.. psychoanalyst by Spirckle · · Score: 1

    Looks like some of it's on the mark but maybe a little over the top. The last bit about the kids being excited about the outside world but going back because their personal of development is dependent on that structure misses the mark, at least among the young of these religious groups.

    It's more like they've had the fear installed in them that if they are to die 'out there' enjoying the pleasures of the world that they will pretty much go to hell. So it comes down to a matter of spiritual safety. It's the discomfort of living on the edge of danger that causes them to go back.

    If an individual finds a way to logically think themselves past that fear then the situation flips. There is a distate to going back in under that kind of mental control.

    --
    Using the best knowledge of today to create the problems of tomorrow.
  50. Black Bumper Mennonites by fr8_liner · · Score: 1

    Nobody has mentioned the "Black Bumper Mennonites". At a tractor pull, they sit together in the stands wearing Blues Brothers type hats. They tend to drive black american-made cars and they spray paint over all of the chrome, especialy the bumpers, with black paint. Like most of the sects in Solanco (Southern Lancaster County), they can be very nice to us "English". As to the Amish "leaving in droves", that is because the developers are offering a lot of money for their farmland. Usually, they sell out because they have exhausted the soil anyway. They are not known as good stewards of the land. They are also criticized by many for being cruel to horses and their women.

  51. Possibly lower average intelligence? by Spirckle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say it's probably average, at least in my experience. I went to an Amish Mennonite elementary and middle school and we took the state educational evaluation tests every year. EVERYBODY in my grade placed above state average, even the *dumb* ones.

    Amish and Mennonite intelligence is applied differently maybe. And in some sense even the ones that try to assimulate into the larger culture are always on the outside looking in. Its not a bad thing. It gives great perspective.

    --
    Using the best knowledge of today to create the problems of tomorrow.
  52. Mennonites by GoClick · · Score: 1

    Just for reference not all Mennonites live in closed communities, their active members of their communities, they buy and use technology and frequently marry people from outside their church, their pretty normal and no they don't marry their cousins, atleast no more than any other group of americans.... IF you think it's weird for a woman to wear a dress she sewed, she might think it's weird that another woman paid $300 for some jeans that a poor child was paid $0.20 to make.

    1. Re:Mennonites by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      most $300 are not made by children, you're assuming the exceptional cases the media hypes are the general ones. My sister-in-law in cambodia works sewing clothes that usually wind up with made-in-thailand on them for the major labels. they do take breaks and lunch. You understand in their culture people work 7 days a week for normal jobs, whether waiter or grocer or whatever. Only bankers, engineers, and government work 5 day week. wages are low by our standards, but few dollars a day will feed a family over there. Her husband makes $350 a month as manager at another textile place, he can afford car, his & her motorcycles, and home electronics at about 1/5 what we pay. My wife started work at age 15 selling cigarettes and umbrellas going from restaurant to restaurant (lots of girls do that) for $3 a day, she loved being able to buy jewelry and makeup and clothes for herself with adult-level wages, but I'm sure american media would have thrown a fit about exploiting child.

    2. Re:Mennonites by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      " IF you think it's weird for a woman to wear a dress she sewed, "

      Definitely not. And one of the highest tech widgets at our house is a Bernina serger. Five threads, up to three needles, two loopers, and a wiper. And they all manage to miss each other.

      They sent a video tape to show how to thread the thing. Good thing too.

      Swiss technology is still with us.

    3. Re:Mennonites by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I used to live in mennonite territory. It's a scary place.

      Yes, people can leave the colonies. But when they do, they end up leaving and going to one or two close towns. This ends up basically twisting the genetics and culture of the town to be fairly like that of the surrounding colonies; while not as genetically or socially inbred as the colonies, these towns end up being horrible, trite places to live or visit. If you don't have a 'proper' last name (ie, one of several like "Tschetter" or "Hofer") and aren't from the town originally, you are an outcast even if you're "in charge". Business is hard for you, as people will preferentially avoid your business or not hire you simply because you're not "one of them". It's nepotism taken to the extreme.

      Not only that, but the social bickering in these towns is quite the ruckus. You end up having families with very, very ingrained traditions that are quite different than those of their neighbors. It's a nightmare.

      Now, granted, there are couples which will hook up cross-colony, and leave the colonies because they, as a couple, don't really fit in. I've met several of these families, and they're wonderful people (well, at least the adults are; they don't seem to know how to deal with kids that go to public school, the poor bastards).

      And don't get me wrong: the colonies are incredibly nice and obliging - at least if you're a Christian. They seem to appreciate discussing faith with outsiders (as long as there is no antagonism), and open up their houses to their business associates.

      Granted, colonies do vary quite a bit from one to another. It seems some are much more inbred than others due to age, and some cut off much more dealings with the outside world. Some will have only a dozen families, while others will have a couple hundred. Some have multi-colony conglomerates of sorts, and will even take outsiders in, and many will marry between colonies. I've been to colonies that have various shapes and sizes of people, some with very consistent body and facial shapes (even between the genders), some with very unattractive and stupid members, while others with reasonably intelligent and quite attractive members (let me tell you, that was a pleasant surprise!)

      (As a fairly attractive guy, it's kind of... interesting to arrive at a colony when you've only seen the ugly colonies to come across one where pretty much every female would be at least an 8 out of 10 "hotness" points on the outside - and that's without the assistance of makeup. It's doubly interesting when you, as a young male, walk by a group of them, and they all watch you as you go by with very hungry looks. Oy vey.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  53. Delicious irony. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    You write it as if I should hear a subtle sarcasm when you state but that it is uncomfortable because of the presence of various kinds of evil presumed to be a property of the outside world, and conversely absent within the group.... this is one paragraph below where you tell us they have no sixth sense for crime and dangerous situations.

    And this, seems both frightening and hollow. I'm an atheist, and I'd never dream of giving up technology, but anyone who hasn't thought our society is hollow at least once in his life is someone I'd likely consider to be shallow.

    What they have works, and they dont have to crack down on misfits to make it work. They allow people to leave. Tell me this, if a son decides he can't live as they do and leaves, is he still welcome to visit? I honestly don't know, but if that turns out to be the case...

  54. That doesnt mean the opposite is true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    When they piss on everything Jesus stand for? They can shove their old testament mentality up their fascistic egoistic ass.
    By the way, since they worship mammon as their first god, then cant be christians by any broad definition.

    Jesus is the true hippie, Peace, love and understanding. Jesus is NOT war, envy and hate.

    The golden calf is green, but do we all have to party in its honor.

  55. From personal experience, I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >By contrast, most non-mainstream indigenous or technologically regressive societies are based on the concept of *strengthening* both individuals and communities,

    I hate to break it to you, but having grown up in a very conservative, evangelistical religion where contact with outsiders was very much frowned on, I cannot help but find your words utterly, completely naive, and myself in complete agreement with the parent poster. Sure, such a society benefits some people, those who are happy to fit in and play the part.

    However, in any society there are always those who don't fit in, the outcasts, such as the nerd, the artist, etc. Our "individualistic" society creates a place where these people can lead normal, productive lives. It protects the right of the minority (to a greater or lesser degree.) The right to make your own informed choices, to have something called an "imagination", to create art, to think critically about situations without others telling you what you are allowed to think (or not think), to learn about the universe and the world around you, the right to be curious and ask real questions and get real answers (instead of say, creationism).

    There is a basic human need to fit in. Naturally any community can fill this need. Cults fill this need. Crazy nationalistic groups can even fill this need. When you break free from such a group, you discover that the world is not clear-cut black and white, and there are no easy answers to life's problems. And suddenly the community sees you as evil.

    You see, the "communtity" is an illusion. They were never really your friends to begin with, their friendship was _conditional_ on your going along with their beliefs.

    There is this trend nowadays to think that the low-technology of the past was some kind of panacea, forgetting that a couple centuries ago, before modern technology, how many women died at childbirt, how the average life-expectancy was half of what it is now. Truly naive. Without the dissenters, the individuals, without the scientists who broke from the strong religious communities of the past, we would still be dying from TB and the plague, and marvelling at the heavenly sphere that revolves around the earth, and fearing hellfire.

    Yes, it is not easy to live in this society. But would I ever go back to where I was before? Hell no.

  56. Our public school propaganda is doing its job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If some of these negative posts about the Amish are to be believed. Anyone or any community that stands alone is seen in a negative light. Any reasoned rejection of technology is seen as luddite. Self-sufficiency is still seen as parasitism because they don't kill in our armies. This libertarian sees sad times in our collectivized America. These Amish should just join the team and come on in for the big win. One more reason separation of school and state should be seen as progressive.

  57. Take away their morality! by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Maybe if we made an Amish mod for half-life, more kids will be lured to the path of wrongness, reducing the community!

    That, and of course porn!

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  58. The offline people by mnmn · · Score: 1

    We sure could learn alot from them, if only they had email addresses and a heavy web presence. I just couldnt find Amish blogs anywhere.

    Was also looking for online webcams of the farms and possibly Amish sitcoms. None.

    Maybe we can help by releasing an Amish language Linux distro. Yeah that'll do it.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  59. Why is peak oil fatal to our civilization? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Most of the energy that reaches Earth is through the Sun. Lucky us, the Sun reaches almost all parts of the planet.

    So the obvious forms of getting energy are solar panels, windmills and wave energy generators. And then theres also nuclear power which we're using so heavily already, while waiting for the long overdue success of the JET project.

    The only real issue we face is transportation. I suspect electric trains, expansion of subways and electric busses will fix the problem once oil becomes scarce. we'll never completely run out of oil, so less frequent uses will remain like jet aircraft. Plastics will become more expensive, and the solution will be recycling and finding more organic alternatives.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Why is peak oil fatal to our civilization? by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      "The only real issue we face is transportation."

      No. The other main issue is power storage. Solar, wind and wave only work when there is sun, wind and wave. How do you store for a calm night? Batteries are a poor solution.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    2. Re:Why is peak oil fatal to our civilization? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Massive arrays of sterling engines. Duh.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  60. In the olden days, by Neoncow · · Score: 1

    ... people attacked each other for their land and possessions. Considering the increasing scarcity of land, someone crazy enough might decide to attack a community who lacks the resources to defend themselves.

  61. Benefits? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    What are the benefits of a system with no social mobility and no room for individual brilliance?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Benefits? by hopethisnickisnottak · · Score: 1

      The rigidity crept in later. Earlier the system was quite fluid (AFAIK). However, even if you discount this, there were other benefits.

      1> There was a ready profession for every person. A child once born would have a ready profession to work towards. (S)he wouldn't have to face the problem of unemployment / lack of education leading to unemployment because the education in the trade was provided by her / his parents.

      2> Division of labour meant greater efficiency (since everyone worked for the kingdom, this was a good thing). It was a sort of specialisation of jobs.

      3> Castes were and still are the biggest support system available to most people. People of one caste looked after each other.

      As for room for individual brilliance, I don't suppose you can call the Vedas, the upanishads, Ayurveda, Indian Architecture, Mathematics (Pythagorus' theorem is described in a couple of verses in the vedas which have been dated, using the astronomical position of stars described within them to more than 8000 years BC), works like the Arthashastra by Kautilya, and other such works anything less than brilliant. Kautilya makes Machiavelli look like an amateur. These were the works of people who lived in the same caste system.

      That said, there were quite a few attrocities committed in some parts under the guise of this system. I don't mean to deny those.

      It's just worth noting that while a few non-brahmin leaders are credited with 'uplifting' the lower castes, the people who uplifted these leaders themselves were brahmins.

      --
      -Shaunak
  62. If you're done, yes, I WOULD like fries with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow...

    Sure hope your degree in "Classical Retrograde Marxist Horseshit," with a minor in "Hating the Western World While Enjoying its Benefits" has helped you get where you want in the modern world.

    Sheesh.

  63. Greetings and blessings! by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    In every society there are always some bad apples. I see it more prevailent in societies with second-class people, whereas in Amish landings it is the woman that appears second-class. Whenever there is a power granted authority to interpret scripture a certain way, it tends to bring a bias that is self-serving to settle disputes with a rigid concept. I've used the Bible to protect females declared women, with godly results. I don't know what, but a man that looks at a woman in any way it is often an application of covetousness.

    My standing is this; God created man as either male or female. A female can only be woman for a duration of time; a female with child is known as a woman, no different than a eunuch is a man that had been mutilated beyond doubt. Consider that a woman is with a child for nine months, whereas whatever the woman chooses is always afflict upon the child she bear in her womb; would it not be her husband, a man, to also have a say in the well-being of the child and the sake of the woman? Most women are accused of rash behaviour when burdened with a child in the womb; some consume unhealthy quantities of substances. The child in a womb being silent to all of this can't protest, and this is evidence that in God's law that the child is as much entitled to liberty from wicked decisions from the Host where the flesh had divided from.

    Then there are people that abuse the law...for purposes of domination. Is that not what a District Attorney attempts, just by you having a Birth Certificate, does that give anyone a right to address you and deprive your standing on your possessions? In scriptures assembled into the Holy Bible, many times have people been denied of their possessions for abusing their standing. Consider the Israelites being overcome by the Chaldeans; they were backsliding from the law, and someone of greater standing took them in their sin.

    It's the same with the Amish; if you see anyone kill, steal, adulterate, bear false witness, covet, then you are to commit an expose on their sin as you would anyone else. None are above or below the law, but equal standing. Any lack of your actions to audit another is equal as exaulting them above all that is good. God and good is same to me.

    I hope you well, friend!

    --
    without prejudice
  64. I hope the prenegotiate against patent abuse by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Ashkenazi Jews are more susceptible to a particular kind of breast cancer. There is a test for it. The test has patent protections and these people have to fork out royaltie$.

    I hope the Amish and Mennonites negotiate as a group so none of them have to pay anything more than token royalties on tests that come out of using them as test subjects. It would be a shame to tell them "thanks for letting us use you, here's your $100, now when each of your friends get tested for this killer gene $200 goes back into our pockets."

    For more info, click here , here , and here

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  65. Inbreeding != Incest by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Although you mean "inbreeding" rather than "interbreeding" (they're actually antonyms), inbreeding is simply a measure of the degree to which a population is not in a Hardy-Wienberg equilibrium with the rest of the population.

    Humans, and indeed all animals, have some natural degree of inbreeding and some natural degree of gene-flow to which they are optimally adapted. Not all populations of a species may be equally adapted to the same rates of inbreeding/gene-flow, btw. For example, there is a lot more gene-flow among Bantu Africans than most other populations. Interestingly the hunter-gatherer Bushmen have a lot higher inbreeding and lower gene-flow.

  66. No it is NOT Cowboys and Indians by Hooptie · · Score: 1

    Get with the times man. It is now called "Native American and Foreign White Oppressors"

    Hooptie

    --
    "Heavens, it appears that my weewee has been stricken with rigor mortis!" -- Stewie Griffin
  67. What in the wide, wide world of sports? by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    "Insular, inbred communities like the Ashkenazi Jews and Indian tribes

    I know I shouldn't laugh at this, but wtf?

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    1. Re:What in the wide, wide world of sports? by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1
      "Ashkenazi" means being from in the land of Ashkenaz, mentioned in Genesis 10, identified as Germany in Jewish tradition. Ashkenazi Jews are Central or Eastern European extraction.

      The second large group of Jews are the Sephardi Jews, from Spain and Portugal and resettled mostly in Islamic areas after the Spanish Expulsion of 1492.

  68. Odd Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an interesting moment the other day when i recieved a phone call from an amishman who has a telephone at the lightpost at the end of his driveway. He was just calling to say that he was gonna visit with us and some other family that saturday, but imagine my suprise when i said "Who is this" and the reply was a pause follewed by "Ike......the amishman"

  69. Slight correction by Ari1413 · · Score: 1
    Strictly speaking, refering to the Ashkenazi Jews as an "insular, inbred community" is pretty far from the mark. "Ashkenazi" simply refers to the origin of some Jews as being from eastern Europe, This is in contrast to Jews from, say, Spain, Morocco, or Middle Eastern countries (who are called Sephardic). My point is only that rather than refering to some small sect, *most* Jews in the US today are Ashkenazic, regardless of whether or not they're observant, religious, orthodox, etc. While Jews tend to marry other Jews, nobody would call that any more "inbred" than, say, Mormons who tend to marry other Mormons.

    If I'm understanding right, the reason genetisists study Ashkenazi Jews is that in the *past* they were insular (not neccessarily by choice, given prevailing attitudes in the middle ages) and inbred (due to the relatively small Jewish population in any one place in medieval Europe). While Europe probably has plenty of similar non-Jewish populations, (*any* small village in the middle ages was probably insular and relatively inbred) Ashkenazi Jews are more findable and accessable than, say, the descendants of people-who-lived-in-a-generic-small-village, and have remained more genetically homogenous through the years.

  70. Re:Amish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention, but those Amish babes are hot, Hot, HOT! I was lucky enough to have been passing through Lancaster one Friday night last year. The local grange was running a wet bonnet contest. Awesome! I only wish that I could have hung around for the "milking" event.

  71. How about Kentucky and West Virginia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no inbreeding study would be complete without these folks...

  72. Famous Memmonites: Larry Wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Larry Wall, and one of the other main perl guys, i'm sure someone will fill us in.

  73. Early adopters? by geekwench · · Score: 1
    After reading TFA, it seems to me that most of the Amish families who have agreed to participate in the study are probably the same ones who are the early adopters for the new technologies that are approved for use within the community. I think that the researchers are going to have more of a problem getting volunteers among the more conservative Old Order and Swartzentruber, because they are the subgroups that have the most bias against dealings with "English".

    Sadly, these are the same people who would probably see the most benefit from the genetic studies.

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  74. Indeed! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I suppose we'll either revert to a batch of loincloth-wearing savages, or transcend our boundaries and become gods ourselves. Y'know, one of the two.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  75. Indigineousity. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    So how long do you have to live somewhere before you become "indigenous"? The Han chinese swept out of Mongolia not too long ago---the areas where people now speak Sino-Tibetan languages used to be populated by people speaking Austronesian, who look very little like the Han. So---Han out of China! Normans out of England! Etc!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Indigineousity. by protobion · · Score: 1

      When cultures of the immigrant and native peoples amalgamate , then the new / modified culture formed could then be called indiginous.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
  76. Defensive, are we? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I haven't read the article yet, but if your system of morality forbids pointing out widespread, epidemic child abuse, no matter what your own society does, then your system of morality is fucked up.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Defensive, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I haven't read the article yet, but"

      Says it all. And it goes without saying that you didn't read my comment properly either. Return to your TV, consumer: everything is fine.

  77. Amish by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    More entirely on topic, I think it's a good thing that the Amish evaluate technology and its impact on community instead of chasing after every new thing without thinking. There are both negative and positive consequences to technology, but in our culture we are driven only to look at the positive. The case can be made that the Amish methods of farming are much more environmentally friendly, there's less environmental impact farming with horses than tractors, and there have been particularly rainy seasons where the Amish were able to plant their crops much earlier than farmers using tractors because horses don't sink in the mud nearly as much as a tractor. But, that doesn't mean that even in farming, they don't use technology, they're able to get much higher crop yield today than a hundred years ago because they're willing to use high tech fertilizers (the case can be made that they get the best of both worlds that way). It makes perfect sense that they'll allow genetic research, they see how diseases are affecting them, and research on understanding those diseases will benefit their communities and everyone else.

    That's one thing I like about the Amish, along with others such as Mennonites, these close knit groups take their tyme to evaluate technologies to see what the impact of their use will have on the community. To me that's a saner approach than using technology just because it exists.

    Falcon
  78. baptism by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    One of the core values was "believer's baptism," following Jesus' example that baptism is not just a mindless thing you have done to you as a child, but a public declaration by someone who understood that they were making a lifelong commitment to follow Jesus Christ. Another core value, of course, was/is pacifism and nonresistance. These views cost them dearly in terms of persecution for a couple hundred years or so.

    Yea, that brings up something that came up last year. My sister had a daughter in March of 2004 and she and her husband had a "Dedication Ceremony" wherein they vow to bring their daughter up in dedication to Christ. I had no idea about these ceremonies, didn't know about them, and I confronted my sister about it saying I thought that when her daughter was old enough she should be the one to decide what type of life and what her beliefs would be and not to have one force fed to her. I don't recall all she said but my sister explained that what they were doing was to try to raise her daughter knowing the values of Christians (of her type) and that her daugther would be baptized when she was old enough to decide for herself that's what she wants.

    It's kind of funny what my sister did. For years she was a Randian , a follower of Ayn Rand . Then she found out about Objectivism . Once she found this out she turned off of Ayn Rand.

    Falcon
  79. Re:Amish by ShortBeard · · Score: 0

    Being a person of Anglo-Saxon Teutonic heritage (read: German) who is American I have an intial knee-jerk reaction but then I think about it.

  80. Weedstock, the Amish, and Hemp by bmasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    9 years ago I organised Weedstock, a 3 day benefit for NORML, and "Agricultural Educational Event" in Monroe County, Wisconsin. The rural area is heavily amish, tho our host was not.

    The County authorities reluctantly acknowledged our 1st Amendment right to hold the event, but sought ways to agressively enforce the marijuana laws with "traffic' stops of those entering and leaving. They sought to use the Amish neighbors' land as staging and surveillance posts, but were refused.

    I later heard from our host that he'd met with the 80 odd year old bishop, who, on hearing of our advocacy of reintroducing hemp as a fiber crop, went on a tirade against the Federal Government's ban on this useful plant, which his people had used extensively, especially for handwoven clothing.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  81. Re:I am related to Amish, and need correct Slashdo by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that there are Amish occupied parts of North America south of Canada and North of Mexico that don't belong to the USA?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  82. Re:I am related to Amish, and need correct Slashdo by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    the USA exists in name-only. Read the constitutions for the states that are composing the united States of America, and then read the Federal "States" that compose the Confederation known as "The United States of America." If somthing is owned, then it exists either as a natural person (man) or a artificial person (corporation). Also, read the constitutions for the states; all of them forbid confederation. Technically, only the people willing to confederate their subdivision of this state to a foreign state are breaking the constitution. Also, I distinctly remember reading Continental promisory notes that read as "THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA". Also, according to the Constitution of the District of Columbia; government extends to provincial Canada. Isn't that "strange"? Yet, in general, the answer to your question is yes. Why be a citizen when you take no part in the benefits of a adhering to citizenship? According to the constitutions of every state, there were people greatful to Almighty God for separating as freemen from Almighty God into a State within a state, then there are the people that did not separate from Almighty God and remain on the original estate. This is what I hope to emphasize. I may apply the chicken-before-the-egg principal if need to ask who is principal and who is second-class (sadly). The purpose for the State of a state is that the revolution could have terminated the actual colonial charters; thus the new status would be, for example, not Citizen of Pennsylvania, but Citizen of the State of Pennsylvania. All these states under british control need sign the unanimous Declaration, yet a foreign state created by Congress or by the people without Congress would not need such a spaghetti-like structure from their post-Revolutionary War questionable citizenship. Can anyone say, (in admiralty) "Abandon citizenship and board onto the State quick, she's going under?"

    --
    without prejudice
  83. Re:I am related to Amish, and need correct Slashdo by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    You really should post a sig with every comment of yours that says "I am cuckoo, crazy, insane."

    Would save folks a lot of time.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  84. Pfft. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    If a man were to say to you, "your house is on fire!", your analogous response would be, "shut up, it's not like yours isn't smoldering too---you hate fire, that's what, and I bet you wear a tinfoil hat, too," as opposed to the more reasonable "no, it isn't".

    Oh, but feel free to call me a TV-watching consumer. I mean, without strawmen, we'd have to actually address each others' arguments and ideas, and who knows where that could lead?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  85. Re:Amish by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    What's great is $60 oil, electric grid going out, router down ... it just does not matter. They are totally independent.
    Except - they aren't. Their independence is as much as myth as their technophobia. They need steel and iron for tools, etc... Which they've bought from the English since the day they arrived. Ditto for glass (both windows and canning jars), and for ceramics.
    This flies in the face with todays elite trying to make everyone 'interdependent'. I find it fascinating.
    A claim that flies in the face of the fact that Western civilization has been interdependent since we started coming out of the Dark Ages.
  86. Okay, but China still isn't. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could say that the Normans integrated with the Anglo-Saxons, and that the Anglo-Saxons before them integrated with the Picts, but the Han? They retain nothing of the culture that was there before them. Or the Bantu-speaking peoples of most of Sub-Saharan Africa, who displaced or isolated most of the previously extant Khoisan peoples?

    So, as I was saying. Han out of China! Bantu out of South Africa!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca