I'm at the junction where you claim Google Earth doesn't support Linux. Perhaps you meant that Folding@Home has no Linux client, despite there benefitting the most from such an install-base having the most security without the fatigue of corruptable data processing. Ryan "Icculus" Gordon had News posted on his ICCULUS domain, here, that he is the developer for Google Earth. On the other hand, for Folding@Home, please don't rule-out a Linux client just yet; distributed computing is the main-course meal of charity among UNIX system and network adminsitrators pledging non-used process to events, for the sake of progress and advertisement for "creditor" fragrancy among the conclusion of said-charrities progress. To think, the Breast Cancer "jogathons" wouldn't be successfull if said "participants" didn't make appearance to assume among their joys at hand the blessing they can bestow in number to complete a calculated milage or task to the event.
Great advertising space, Folding@Home is become. Same as SETI@Home.
I make my living doing nano/bio/chemical research in one of the well-known universities and read slashdot to keep up with more computer-related things. Please let me be the first to agree that Roland is uniquely unqualified to write/post the stories he does.
(yes I did research his background some time ago when I was first offended by his scientific wannabee-ness)
Roland submits fine articles and his summaries are no worse than anything else I read here. I visit his site frequently. I have a hard time believing he generates much cash from slashdot. If he does, kudos to him. I've clicked on about 5 adds total in the last 12 years.
Hey guys, what a coincidence that so-many degreed people attend this forum. Maybe it's because were much too smartest to be hired? I'm a clevel 77 Engineer in the Temple of Slashdot. I look to my feet to find some -- something near my RedWings(tm), and see an inscription in the sand that reads;
Rp#4nd 9iguepa!(e 1s a fag! P0M"T Cl1ck }-{!s articl3,
Just as I looked above, I saw a gruesome zonk. I drew my credentials from my o-pee-chee and quickly pulled the red-pen from my vest, vut it wast too laate. The zonk whipered the image in the sand, preventing its knowledge to ever be known to fellow servants in the Temple of Slashdot to learn the Article-Moderation skill that could out-cast authors of a Article before it reaches front-page. At this, zonk laughed: "heee heee he got you good and square, heeeeee" and then I thrust my pen deep into his eye. Immediatly, zonk fell as an uprouted tree whence I used my WendorWoman lasso to hoist him to the ceiling by his ankles (too empty his, uhm, pockettes). After some vigorous search, I found the Amullette of Yendor!
Would the hat be full of suggestions to replace it to the program_title "fairuse" (because websites are fairuse) and "tresspass" (because a locally-cached website is potential copyright infringment)?
I only hope the command-line was more forthcoming to default preferences of a particular account. Just typing "internet" or "internet browser" at a smart console (to replace a shell or a window-manager idle screen), should yield a preference for program use. Perhaps that preference could be to the control of symlinks having higher standing in ${PATH} and located in ${HOME}/Desktop/.Defaults or.Profiles? Nope, that would be quite a security risk if a malicious advertisement from a corporation made its way to place its crud into such an easy target. Unless...a suid for a separate group controlled that profile. That would not be favourable to hold someone "alien" files in a directory that a particular account can't overwrite or delete directly, but that's the chore of the Group maintenance that many unexperienced users just-might learn to utilize.
My qualifications on this matter is modestly constributed from experience in Demolition Derby performances. As writ in my initial post, the shell ontop the chassis of most automobiles is both more expensive than modern art to repair and unnecessarily molded in such ways as to have dual function to also delicately fold in place on collission. The FIRST modification anyone makes to fortify their automobile for anticipator collissions is modify the bumper; albeit, most bumpers are raised, while some are stuffed (unsportingly) with more steel or reinforcements. My thoughts on the matter would not be aestheitcally pleasing to the motorist whose helmsman is directing the movement of their craft or vessel. Consider a Bumper hydrollically elevated perhaps 12 inches from the bodily chassis and thenceforth certain mechanism developed to provide re-direction for the force of any collissions.
In itself, the interior of an automobile should be remeniscent of a technologically-upgraded victorian-age insanity capsule; well-padded with quality materials, necessary to assume that the focus of all interior aesthetics is certain to the science of preventing chicken or ostritch egg from fracturing at any sudden changes of intertia. My crumple zone is built off a steel oval-rim going about the length of my small-craft, of which there is a constructed mechanical mesh that distributes the imposed force. It's not aesthetically pleasing, however in comparison to a boat then one would think it better (that is, the portion of a boat exposed on the surface, not the portion of a boat that is smoothly-submerged).
Trust me, the solution would be detrimental to the carriage body repair industry and rightly so; automobiles should be as structurally-resilient as the immune-system of the horses they were meant to replace. In this fassion, I have not once bought any carriage or automobile simply to the distrust of their security systems in place of unsound structure. I just don't trust them, and the matter of 'air-bag' placement is a less a science and more a study toddlers enjoyed when experimenting with the cussions of a sofa and couch when they topple them against one-another. I build my own automobile, and treat the common Ways as no less than an expectant demolition arena given the misbehaviours of un-oathed police/COPS/security officers maliciously using their admiralty emergency hailing-signals to court non-emergency matters having caused no tort or malfeasance.
At any rate, the alleged reasons for abandoning sound-structure was to use the vessel itself as the bumper; engauging compression as a means of absorbing shock and inertia. The advertised symptom is improved fuel efficiency, despite advances of Water Electrolysis (HHO gas) and the Joe Cell, which I have found to be efficient down to an ounce of water providing enough HOO gas for combustibles to move a '77 Ford Lincoln (weighty and well-constructed carriage) no less than 100 English miles.
The liberty from another's office tends to bring one in harmony with the limited knowledge of one's burden to study their matter of fact, as is "homebrew" mediums; the free market that thought it was, is all it should be, and found to be restrictive of any profittable gain of laziness. Why burden a perspective automobile purchase with a ratio of cost of Safety Certification that is unbalanced to the value of the chassis and body? Do all cardboard boxes and tin cans rate for a "crush test" that increases their cost of purchase or value 25% as does an automobile or 250% as does the material?
After reading your posts in this thread I have found you to be a retard.:)
You have rightly judged me to your undisclosed law. And upon this truth I shall build your church, and know you as father of it; because a father that chooses to know whomever is retarded is the father of the retards for same-sake of idle pleasure. Hallow are thy words; scratched from off the pecker of a Hen at the crack of the morning corn. Thy will be done on your Slashdot post as is in your House: For you are the Father of it.
This is just another case of one assuming that people don't know what they are doing because one has failed to investigate what they actually are doing...
I don't appreciate your assumption that my opinion is based on an assumption. You should appeal my opinion when your data and theory and statistic have disqualified Murphy's Law. I thrive on ruling over the minority incidents that so-happen to be the majority of all catastrophe. Who has not profitted from the Safety Certification corporations, and show me one that is not a conflict of interest?
Just because there is a standard, doesn't mean it is adhered after private sale to the craft. Once it leaves the door, all those certificatinos are empty promises when tried through the fire; maybe if someone survives, they can address them as they are on a tort claim: commercial speach that ended at the dealer. How many lowered or raised vessels have you seen, and thereby the bumpers are mis-alligned? All the wrecks I've ever encountered and witnessed thereafter have all been the victim of those "crumple zones" buckling in the wrong way to cause one to raise above the next, and even without all the hope in standards there is always somthing unusual occurring.
I've researched the technical specifications and have found them to be nothing more than the propaganda of a Safety-Certification corporations profitting from advertising and increasin the value of a vessel for participating in their "tests."
An old man always remenisced of the age when he was younger and owned such a car that had bumper technology as nothing more than primitive affordable steel-plating bolted on the front and rear of the body. Any car that had a similarly equipped bumber would be symetrically obstructed from causing any damage to the already-thick steel chassis and shell. The "bumper-car" known at fair exposition grounds should be heeded. All automobiles should be constructed with a bumper standard; giving heed to the verry low-riding "pleasure craft" to have a more symettrical bumpter-height, and medium-sized automobiles to have two symetrical bumpers for those lower-riding as well as their class, and the larger craft to scale downwards.
It is shameful the shell that covers the motorist and his guests or passengers/property is worth more than most modern artisanry. Let's just try to prevent colliding automobiles at a popular damage site at the bumper, not at the caboose or seats of the helmsman or operator/driver.
If a man gets caught using or 'booby-trapping" a device powered by either of these power sources for malicious purposes, in one series he could be charged with Assault while in another he would just be "battery."
I do not Trust that FCC with my precious voice above my head and within reach of my yodling or echo of word about me.
The matter is not about fighting "the Man." The matter is about fighting a portrait drawn by the Man depicting his five-horned tentacle-monster grasping onto anime-style radio waves to move above unsuspecting people. I'm not going to rub you maliciously on this, but consider that the verry nature of words uttered from a creature or the mouth of a Man; they are the living radio propogation emitted, and discernable from our ears. The FCC is unlawfully moving its officers outside of a foreign state known as Columbia and actively regulating the matters of neighboring States that have no benefit from said services.
What none comprehend is that the Man is being blessed by his fellows, while the corporation inks curse after curse onto a man by assistance of its brain-washed pastafarian followers that have accepted its Oath and concealed Bond. The FCC is profitting from the sale of radio-wave bandwidth or spectrum to corporations, and is profitting after having no improvement other than the benefit of being regulated and the Code conferred upon the assets of the corporations particular as of Certifications welcoming customers for the mere suggestion of honor. It's not the radio-waves that should be regulated, but the movement of information determined a more dynamic course. Radio-waves are nothing more than noise or sound polution that we can't hear, but effects us in subtle ways; consider that every particle in our body has a resonant frequency and can be disrupted by the harmonious transmittal of a neighboring Horn or antennae: it's the same result of a vocalist that can shatter glass when the same resonant frequency is tuned.
Federal Communication Commision is neithe federal and is neither commisioned by anyone. Who agreed to pledge their radio spectrum above them and their property to an agent/corporation of a foreign principality in a far-off country? I don't mean to rub it in still, but if a Californian has any allegiance to an entity in Columbia then he is not an American; he is a USian, as per the 14th Amendment instituted by a corporation known as (singular) "United States."
The Man is idolatrous. Corporations are created by the work of a man to paper, and the corporations exist only on paper; they are combustible. Burn it, but there will always be those strangers wanting to enforced their opinions on their neighbors, by use of mass rule (fascism, by defenition) and not love. Most of America is empty, because everyone's got their Head cut-off and stuffed deep in a baskette in Washington District of Columbia, while the trade-off is to lose everyone's Head of State in exchange for the knowledge and reasoning of that mythical 5-horned (transmitting) tentacle monster.
Did you not read the Constitution of the District of Columbia, to know that is claimed all radio wave propogation and speach and transmittals above and within Columbia, without said FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISION? Get a grip on realty, to know the different between a territory and a state, an officer from a magistrate and justice.
t's a nasty habit we picked up from the British. Myself I like to read people like Chaucer, Shakespeare, Kipling, Carroll and Milne. You wouldn't believe the crap they pull on a perfectly good language.
They've been a terrible influence on me.
That's the joy of claiming the rites to such an inflection, because the owner may decide how people may pronounce the mark or what they may think it to mean. That's why many of the national corporations at the localities in America deceiving the People that they are found in the original charters, so much of COURT(inc) writes incorrect English as to have the copyright on said commercial speach while in the Court among inferiors/courts jousting their attorney about another's.
The source controlls the meaning, and when one source appears as similar to another then the dispute is whether they are independent of one-another by conscience or conciously unaware of one-another. Of course, that's somthing I talk about on various research that can show the difference between this "kfg" from that "kfg", and how they enter forum in agreement to bear witness of the kfg as heralded KFG. In that modus, most intellectual property rules can be overturned by the law.
I was teaching some children the other-day on negotiable instruments and how they are adapted to school "assignments." I thought it quite hillarious how children could dispute what they swear as true on their assignments (answer) or renegotiating the intent of a "scansheet" or otherwise that presents copyright information and trademarks as a lesson. My previous post was tried to set you up with a few entries to jest at my expense, but I didn't find any wit in your response. Perhaps I should have given you permission to the meaning of my non-errors in spelling words indifferently.
By the way, did you find any correlation in the stretched words found in your favourite subjective text in the titles revealed to me above?
> We've made the decision to comp repairs for consoles manufactured before January 1,
"comp" is a verb? Since when? Perhaps it's a Microsoft patented word, like IsNot?
"comp" is a verb?
Yep.
"Comp: Complimentary or free items and or services casinos give gamblers in gratitude for their business."
Some jokes you can't write because they just drop into your lap.
KFG
Please perform a checksum on "comp" and "complimentary", and perhaps you'll find they are comp-letely different. Thereby, none is comprehended as brevity when confusing butchery to a word with a word that only exists in the mind of USians. The only moments a non-word are used in the form of a sentance is when conferring the said intellectual property and patent on that trademark word, for use in negotiation. USians are constontantly trying to renegotiate the English language to everyone's despair.
And in response to the parent post, yea "iSNot" is a trademark of Apple. I think this is the proverbial drip into the lap that our pal "kfg" could be referring to. I suppose I should buy one of those Apple iBox products that I've been seeing advertised on CARTOON NETWORK. They only thing is they only talk about how great the iBox truly is at gaming, without opening the iBox or interfacing it to any activity other than to stare at the iBox. I wouldn't be surprised if they payed a couple hundred dollars more than was the Nintendeo GameCube, only for the few non-poseurs to mod a slit in their iBox to modify it; and they'll probably find there are either tissues for the iSnot or maybe there is a trademarked non-SGI Brick inside.
Is Steve Jobs french, does any one know? I'm seeing a lot of redundancy with Apple recently, as well as Nintendo. It was just months ago that I saw a Wii stuffed in their GameCube. What could be hiding in the legendary iBox, I wonder? And what about the "iSNot" as well?
Sincerily not Apple,
M. Gregory Thomas for
our Network Redundancy Administration
Do you not forget what DEC, among Sun and SCO, had done to the cost of a Unix solution? The license costs were thousands of US doolars, durring a time when inflation was 1/9th what is was today and Microsoft came along with a cheap solution available with the then cheaper x86 IBM-clone Personal Computers. Today, Microsoft is still slaying everyone with such an inexpensive offer, and the majority of productivity in Unix went underground to return the favor to Microsoft with an even cheaper solution that today just isn't supposed to be with all the inflation. I suppose the low-cost today is all about collecting service costs, rather than making a 1-point sale to a customer with a known working product and guaruntee. Instead, we have buggy software that doesn't even reach market on a fully tested field, and the main profit is expected to be from the service and support costs. Is it not unusual to see so many applications go the way of web CGI, just so the application is guarunteed only by a timely subscription fee? I don't see that in the localhost text wordprocessors of the old guard, but how about hiding the bloat behind a web CGI and share that could cause the entire customer base and server to be one stationary target to receive the most damage from a software bug or exploit from a malicious intrusion.
Computer Software is dying, and Microsoft is just as much to blame as are the nerdy Unix companies from before. The People aren't getting what they payed to buy, and that is further skewed and the rape continued by an unlawful enforcement of Intellectual Property rights trying to cloak an equal exchange by wording an implied contract to conceal an interest in property and right to said Intellect as nothing more than a tenant has rights to vapor above the soil (aka state).
[sarcasm] The USians are still vulnerable from events President William J. Clinton failed to mend. He didn't have a solution because he was distracted by Monica Lewinsky. [/sarcasm]
The web URL may be misleading by being written as "youtube_en.php", but you can change the source bias to any of perhaps 30 different proprietary media accessories, including YouTube and GoogleVideo. The media format to download is nothing more than what the author pre-programmed to detect what is available on that website. Most Google Videos I download are available in WMV, MPEG4, and FLV. It seems some I've downloaded only let me use the default FLV. From what I've downloaded on YouTube, I have yet to find a format other than FLV for some reason.
Of'course, once the file is complete it can be converted to a more needful format than FLV by using Transcode with a good front-end or perhaps MediaCoder.
I administer a few websites configured for dynamic content to be held on a free POP3 eMail account. A cgi to a NNTP and SMTP service is also integrated. All this runs on a modified Fujitsu aDSL SpeedPort modem. These modems today are usually tossed into the trash, although can be purchased on Yahoo Auctions or eBay for less than USD 5. Locally, the Fujitsu aDSL modem runs netBSD (as original from the designers for manufacturer), thereby slightly modified to host custom application that I wrote to receive requests and return content based on a rough Draft script that determines how to interpret content received to the Inbox. All interaction with the webserver simply categorizes and hashes the subjective form data from the client, and induces a post by SMTP to the free POP3 eMail account (cough *Google* cough).
The end-result is somthing that is less-remeniscent of Slashdot, but more useful than Myspace and YouTube and GeoCities rolled together. One of these days, I hope to do an integration with Freenet to cause the content to be more redundant in its purpose; such as in a discussion forum that people may subscribe onto, whereby the content is accessed through whomever is interested/contributed to the discussion, and cached by whomever wants to continue the discussion. This leads to a much more life-long Courtship, such are many living documents held localy in RAID can now be retained as though a distributed Network-Accessed-Storage.
Slashdot may not need so many duplicate stories to post, and Slashdot's overall importance may be found if it implements a similar idea. Who would save a Slashdot Article in compressed form to assist in the Slashdot Search function? I think Slashdot would then be returned to the 7-day attention span that its average user appears to have, maybe even less (given how there are even duplicate front-page news articles on-average within 2 days).
It was 1925. Afte it was given of California for that "State of California" to have licensing for "the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation," then all neighboring States of the several states decided to follow. First that "State of New York" followed after that "State of California" for its actors to enact licensure. All followed after, and now it is history. All that is necessary to discern is the premise for the licensure. The beginning of that STATUTE is as follows and is preserved for its limited and certain purpose not to tresspass on a man to go about his way to move his own property (without hire and without compensation)...
STATUTES OF CALIFORNIA
Passed At The
REGULAR SESSION OF THE
FORTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE
1925
CHAPTER 412, pages 833-834
An act to impose a license fee for the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation upon public streets, roadways and highways in the State of California by motor vehicle; to provide for certain exemptions; to provide for the enforcement of the provisions thereof and for the disposition of the amounts collected on account of such licenses; to make an appropriation for the purpose of this act; and to repeal all acts or parts of acts in conflict herewith.
If you agree with licensing those "illegal aliens" everyone is so afraid of, then you are no different than the wacky Californians (or more specifically, the wacky States of California).
I did not isSue any tort claim to Ford, General Motors, et al.
I ride a bicycle at the most, and walk at the least.
Unless... does that lawsuit imply that Californians (nationals, not California itself) have overlooked a trustee in "State of California" to sue on behalf of Californians?
In any event, pull the employees of that corporation/STATE OF CALIFORNIA into the District Court for lack of a trust to sue on behalf, or at least for their not having a controlling interest or so.
Of'course, that commonly issued CERTIFICATE of TITLE is not the senior claim to the property: one needs the Manufacturer's Statement/Certificate of Origin (aka MSO or MCO) to have senior claim/controlling interest and own/trust (ones behalf) to minister property by right of way on the common ways as a not-for-hire and non-commercial and private helmsman.
This is about getting to know who in the State of California is to SUE on one's behalf. Consider a Disappointment from their Office of Trust. Consider the qualifications from which the presumption of trust to that State of California is known by admiralty/corporation venue STATUTES:
STATUTES OF CALIFORNIA
Passed At The
REGULAR SESSION OF THE
FORTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE
1925
CHAPTER 412, pages 833-834
An act to impose a license fee for the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation upon public streets, roadways and highways in the State of California by motor vehicle; to provide for certain exemptions; to provide for the enforcement of the provisions thereof and for the disposition of the amounts collected on account of such licenses; to make an appropriation for the purpose of this act; and to repeal all acts or parts of acts in conflict herewith.
[ Approved by the Governor May 28, 1925. ]
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 1. The words and phrases used in this act shall for the purposes of this act, unless the same be contrary to or inconsistent with the context, be construed as follows:
(a) The phrase "railroad commission certificate" shall be construed to mean a certificate of public convenience and necessity granted or issued by the railroad commission of the State of California, authorizing a common carrier by motor vehicle to operate under the conditions prescribed by said commission, and shall include all amendments to or changes in such certificate which may be made by said commission.
(b) The word "operator" shall include all persons, firms, associations and corporations who operate motor vehicles upon any public highway in this state and thereby engage in the transportation of persons or property for hire or compensation, but shall not include any person, firm, association or corporation who solely transports by motor vehicle persons to and from or to or from attendance upon any public school or who solely transports his or its own property, or employees, or both, and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation, but all persons operating freight carrying so exempted shall be required to obtain from the state board of equalization and to display exempt emblems in the manner herein provided.
(c) The term "registration certificate" shall include any and all certificates of registration of a motor vehicle issued by the division of motor vehicles of the department of finance of the State of California, or by any governmental body within said state under which the laws of the said state may have power or authority to register and certify to the registration of a motor vehicle for operation within said state.
(d) The word "motor vehicle" shall mean and include all vehicles, automobiles, trucks or trailers operated upon or over public highways of this state whether the same be propelled or operated by steam or electricity, or propelled or operated by combustion of gasoline, distillate or other volatile and inflammable fuels.
It would be useful to have one of those cool early supercomputers fab-shrunk down to the size of a wrist-watch. The database performance in all those systems was well-implemented, if not for the computer cabinette stretching across the complete height of the server-room wall.
I have to wonder; where are those "collecters" of outdated computer intellectual properties, and how they could strategize to have a contractor re-fabricate those old systems onto generic house-hold appliances instead of re-inventing the "wheel" as does eCos or TRON? It's about time that I had a 386 PDA or 386 wristwatch (without the frickin' phone/Blackberry). Can you all imagine the awesome scope of technology that could cover a complete handheld 2-way tranceiver with good software to integrate a PDA with it? All daily chat function would immediatly obsolete upon arrival of a non-commercial private not-for-hire 2-meter or Marine or CB tranceiver with an artistic re-implementation of protocol to transverse between them or integrate to a RS232 or USB of a computer to use as a modem for direct CSLIP or multi-band PLIP to another hosting Station out there. That's where my studies are pointed at this moment.
It's not about whether I should, but whether I can accomplish the task. Redundancy is god; look at the watchmakers and jewelers: bankers.
In the Articles of Confederation, it was written that none may confederate.
If you say to "federate" means for the people to join together to dictate unto another politic (be that other politic greater or lesser), and the standing purpose of the United States in Law is written that the people may not join together; then it would be a crime to federate. Do you not remember that alleged "amendment"? (original defenition of "correction" is "amendment", like a-mend a damaged/torn/ripped fabric, as opposed to alleged "amendment" to cause a lawful act to become unlawful). That alleged amendment was in that criminal jurisdiction (military?) known as the federal government (US CODE Title 27, Section 3002, 15(b) "United States" means a federal corporation). That alleged amendment was written along the scope that slavery (like economic slavery common to debtor nations) was allowed for punnishment of a crime.
Perhaps the reason why Americans are controlled by the United States (plural/federal/criminal politic, not singular "United States" aka corporation) is because they are all implicitly-declared criminals for federating whereas their crime that holds them as slaves to that criminal jurisdiction is to federate.
I don't see why anyone would want to federate as it is now. The several states are California, Nevada, Oregen, Washington, Arizona, and perhaps 47 more. If the people were to federate on land, then that federation would be known as the United States of America; and it would confuse many non-federal state/Citizens to be incorporated and enfranchized with the federal States known as CALIFORNIA, NEVADA, OREGON, WASHINGTON, ARIZONA, and who knows what else. Then by confusion of the misleading jurisdiction obvious by the verry spelling and use of Zone-Improve-Plan (ZIP) Codes in the Post Office commercial mail-matter, would evince as receiving a Benefit to imrprove the rate of mail matter from that criminal jurisdiction. That's not even half of it. Further on, ther people would be confused by a federal corporation in the United States (plural) of America known as "United States" from where that corporation would be trustee for the charter of corporate States of the United States as evinced in certain codes and regulations. The corporate States themselves would reserve their postal trademark in their Post Office(tm); CALIFORNIA as CA, NEVADA as NV, OREGON as OR, WASHINGTON as WA, ARIZONA as AZ, and who knows what else for the 47 others.
All I need to remember for the original charter; by the Law of Nations is the state is the politic/people. All I need to remember for the original charter;
The Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789 at Secion 9:
And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, c
When the actual "landing" on the moon occurred, all the news corporations (ABC, If I remember incorrectly), had no "link" to the video feed other than NASA allowing the cameramen to direct their video-cameras at the large NASA wall-screen. As we all know, any monitor that is video-recorded with an external camera will show syncronization errata.
For $200 billion USD in 1969, it's too bad they didn't think of the press wanting the live/3-second-delay video to be directly route to their equipment. It also wasn't verry satisfying that the astronaughts held a single press conference that would never repeat ever again and they couldn't recite or remember any of the magnificent luminescence of the stars until a number of years later when they each wrote their own excellently-detailed accounts into their Books for market. I suppose they started taking their Ginko Biloba in their older-years, to remember the things they couldn't remember in their younger years.
I didn't care for anyone challenging them to be mocked as someone just using the errata for a "book deal", when every challenge for the astronaughts to remember was done at each of their Moon conferences and book-signing conventions.
All I can say is $200 billion USD in 1969 is perhaps $3 trillion USD in 2006. If the "mission" was important, then they could have a single peon making copies of the evidence to send them around the world for archival redundancy and exhibitions. Instead, it was quiet and non-descript answers or "I don't...re-call."
Thanks for nothing, NASA. I hope Armadillo Aerospace replaces your asses. At-least if they lie, we'll see zombies that will at-least be re-used in the recent re-implementation of Doom.
Network Redundancy Administration, dude! M. Gregory Thomas
Be careful with what you communicate with your eyes, too though: I know someone who got beat up and nearly died because he looked at someone funny (I am dead serious on that one, although it happened in Hawaii not Costa Rica).
Only a few people on this planet have enough courage to flip-out like that. You never know when the ninja will strike, so hide in a dumpster -- or better yet, take Oscar the Grouch's advice by living in a trashcan-armoured battle-ready suit. I remember of History lessons of this one country that practically everyone important lived (eat/shit/screw/die) in a vested trashcan. Oh, now I remember, it was Europe!
The Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789 at Secion 9:
And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or upon the high seas;
where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted;
and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have
exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land
, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States.
And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may be,
of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at common law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts, exclusive of costs, to the sum or value of one hundred dollars. And shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several States, of all suits against consuls or vice-consuls, except for offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in fact, in the district courts, in all causes except civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, shall be by jury.
America has nothing to do with it. America was lost in 1871, and since then all offices have been moved into the admiralty venue and court-martial by a federal corporation. Evidence is in the USCODE Title 27, Section 3002, 15(b); "United States" means a federal corporation. Sure, the police never have a true and complete and correct and not-misleading claim to seizure from the district court. According to SUPPLEMENTAL RULES FOR CERTAIN ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS: "all seizures on land" and "wage garnishments" go through a District Court. Good reference.
Do you remember how the constitution said the declaration of the united States of America was founding for their charters, whereby in every Constitution they bore not to be church States in themselves but at the minimum "We the People, greatful to Almighty God for our freedom, do establish this Constitution..."? That's because the original church-states (read that, not church States) "dried-up" and returned to the site of where Columbus arrived on North America: Columbia. The church-states merged with the admiralty venue as evinced by Rule B:
In Personam Actions: Attachment and Garnishment
(1) When Available; Complaint, Affidavit, Judicial Authorization, and Process. In an in personam action:
(a) If a defendant is not found within the district, a verified complaint may contain a prayer for process to attach the defendant's tangible or intangible personal property--up to the amount sued for--in the hands of garnishees named in the process.
As originally intended from their common-law States, The People could restrictively enter the admiralty/church-states to defend their claim, by use of Rule E.
Actions in Rem and Quasi in Rem: General Provisions... (7) Security on Counterclaim.
(a) When a person who has given security for damages in the original action asserts a counterclaim that arises from the transaction or occurrence that is the subject of the original action, a plaintiff for whose benefit the security has been given must give security for damages demanded in the counterclaim unless the court, for cause shown, directs otherwise. Proceedings on the original claim must be stayed until this security is given, unless the court directs otherwise.
(b) The plaintiff is required to give security under Rule E(7)(a) when the United States or its corporate instrumentality
counterclaims
and would have been required to give security to respond in damages if a private party but is relieved by law from giving security.
(8) Restricted Appearance. An appearance to defend against an admiralty and maritime claim with respect to which there has issued process in rem, or process of attachment and garnishment, may be expressly restricted to the defense of such claim, and in that event is not an appearance for the purposes of any other claim with respect to which such process is not available or has not been served.
In Rule E(8), lack of disclosure, otherwise known as having "no bill of particulars" or not being "allowed" to confront and cross-examine witnesses and evidence, voids attachment by when "inducting" the personage into the corporate COURT (or lack thereof) with a restrictive appearance (which is a ghost, realy). Notice the corporate instrumentality known as "United States" can claims and is not the same as the United States (plural). Notice that "corporate instrumentalty" clause and how it is prima facie evidence of that federa corporation referenced by USCODE Title 27 Section 3002 15(b). That "United States" is singular/corporation, not plural American States united. That "United States" is known otherwise as "trust 72" whereby it secures incompetant/convalescant people (usualy stands as moloch/king to wa
Royal Raymond Rife was the first man to construct an electron microscope, and also was the first man to view a virus (using his electron microscope). In his studies, he found that everything at the aromic particle level, be it living or dead, had a harmonic/resonant frequency that could be manipulated by bombarding that particle with the same. Outside the above two claims, he was labeled a crackpot when he constructed that verry instrument that he claimed could "rupture" those certain foreign particles from your body. It was remeniscent of shock-therapy, but more accurate to the frequency of whatever particle it was tuned to rupture. The equipment appearance was a box with two electrodes, and was used to destroy virus matter using same-frequency sound in the same manner as a singer would rupture a glass cup with a high-pitch yell. There are some great documentaries on this process, and available schematics to construct the machine. In his life, Royal Raymond Rife was dominated with one nuisance-complaint from the Medical Association every day for most of his life; having to enter court every day to defend his use of the machine. The documentary shown that the event just to publicly use the machine aggrivated the Medical Association verry badly.
Anyways, I've read as much as I could on both Rife and Tesla, and would do it again if I had the time. I have just about everything, from schematics to documentaries, conspiracy facts and theories. Most of it liens on the various Institutions using their brute force to force someone out of business just because their remedy is dangerously inexpensive. You can even buy an alleged "Rife machine" and many claim it works. All it does is train the immune system, and the worse it could do is focus energy on a certain range of tissue and disrupt it (even though if corrected, should heal).
Signing-up "suspects" to a list is a quiet act of a malevolent trustee. Disqualify them, and don't accept any perceived and alleged benefit from their actions, don't officiate any thing as property or any Body for their administration. A WATCH LIST is the least of all our problems. Go look-up the Jewish Mafia and how they terrorize North America through their banking policies. Lookup the Mexican Mafia, them having a President and Secretary and Officers in plane site; see all the terrorism they accomplish in Santa Ana California and surrounding south-western several states (not the fscking United States/corporation). Those tyrants make the CIA-created and defected Al'Quaeda look pale in comparison. No need to mention the Taliban, because they are a chosen and elect positive-law jural society whether Bush or Rice like it or not. They travel the military internationally with accusations of terror, spread resources all over the world while ignoring the bullshit that hurts Americans throughout the borders of Mexico caused by the Mexican Mafia.
Those ha ha Shtatanists are hosting another mock child-sacrifice in Bohemian Grove in middle-northern California, so look for a recent coverage of the event. The videos are available from Alex Jones, where him and his buds upload one a week for non-subscribers that can't afford to be PRISONPLANET.COM members.
The offices are not in the United States (plural) any more, the federal corporation simple known as 'United States' (singular), of the United States (plural) has folded into the hands of bankers and banking policy. And what's worse, there will be no more America given every foreign state/State in the world has a claim to a peice by use of a federal lien (Federal Reserve Certificate, not the bull-shit FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE we're conditioned to think is money).
The Prime Minister of Canada, President of the United States, and President of Mexico; have all committed treason by assigning every person/trust into the Pan-American Union by way of the Security And Prosperity Partnership (SPP, http://spp.gov). This commercial venture is advertised to of'course improve Security and Prosperity, but all prior ventuers of the same nature under different or mis-leading title have been tresspass and theft.
Go read SUIJURIS.NET and ECCLESIA.ORG so you are learned to enter the corporate/COURT only upon issue of the District Court via CONGRESSIONAL SUPPLEMENTS TO CERTAIN ADMIRALTY AND MARITEIM CLAIMS wherein is directed that all wage garnishments/seizures on land go through a district court.
Study to be particularly a court of competent jurisdiction, foreign State.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm at the junction where you claim Google Earth doesn't support Linux. Perhaps you meant that Folding@Home has no Linux client, despite there benefitting the most from such an install-base having the most security without the fatigue of corruptable data processing. Ryan "Icculus" Gordon had News posted on his ICCULUS domain, here, that he is the developer for Google Earth. On the other hand, for Folding@Home, please don't rule-out a Linux client just yet; distributed computing is the main-course meal of charity among UNIX system and network adminsitrators pledging non-used process to events, for the sake of progress and advertisement for "creditor" fragrancy among the conclusion of said-charrities progress. To think, the Breast Cancer "jogathons" wouldn't be successfull if said "participants" didn't make appearance to assume among their joys at hand the blessing they can bestow in number to complete a calculated milage or task to the event.
Great advertising space, Folding@Home is become. Same as SETI@Home.
Hey guys, what a coincidence that so-many degreed people attend this forum. Maybe it's because were much too smartest to be hired?
I'm a clevel 77 Engineer in the Temple of Slashdot.
I look to my feet to find some -- something near my RedWings(tm), and see an inscription in the sand that reads;
Rp#4nd 9iguepa!(e 1s a fag! P0M"T Cl1ck }-{!s articl3,
Just as I looked above, I saw a gruesome zonk. I drew my credentials from my o-pee-chee and quickly pulled the red-pen from my vest, vut it wast too laate. The zonk whipered the image in the sand, preventing its knowledge to ever be known to fellow servants in the Temple of Slashdot to learn the Article-Moderation skill that could out-cast authors of a Article before it reaches front-page. At this, zonk laughed: "heee heee he got you good and square, heeeeee" and then I thrust my pen deep into his eye. Immediatly, zonk fell as an uprouted tree whence I used my WendorWoman lasso to hoist him to the ceiling by his ankles (too empty his, uhm, pockettes). After some vigorous search, I found the Amullette of Yendor!
The end.
Now get back TO WORK!
Would the hat be full of suggestions to replace it to the program_title
.Profiles? Nope, that would be quite a security risk if a malicious advertisement from a corporation made its way to place its crud into such an easy target. Unless...a suid for a separate group controlled that profile. That would not be favourable to hold someone "alien" files in a directory that a particular account can't overwrite or delete directly, but that's the chore of the Group maintenance that many unexperienced users just-might learn to utilize.
"fairuse" (because websites are fairuse) and "tresspass" (because a locally-cached website is potential copyright infringment)?
I only hope the command-line was more forthcoming to default preferences of a particular account. Just typing "internet" or "internet browser" at a smart console (to replace a shell or a window-manager idle screen), should yield a preference for program use. Perhaps that preference could be to the control of symlinks having higher standing in ${PATH} and located in ${HOME}/Desktop/.Defaults or
God-bless the group!
Greetings and blessings!
My qualifications on this matter is modestly constributed from experience in Demolition Derby performances. As writ in my initial post, the shell ontop the chassis of most automobiles is both more expensive than modern art to repair and unnecessarily molded in such ways as to have dual function to also delicately fold in place on collission. The FIRST modification anyone makes to fortify their automobile for anticipator collissions is modify the bumper; albeit, most bumpers are raised, while some are stuffed (unsportingly) with more steel or reinforcements. My thoughts on the matter would not be aestheitcally pleasing to the motorist whose helmsman is directing the movement of their craft or vessel. Consider a Bumper hydrollically elevated perhaps 12 inches from the bodily chassis and thenceforth certain mechanism developed to provide re-direction for the force of any collissions.
In itself, the interior of an automobile should be remeniscent of a technologically-upgraded victorian-age insanity capsule; well-padded with quality materials, necessary to assume that the focus of all interior aesthetics is certain to the science of preventing chicken or ostritch egg from fracturing at any sudden changes of intertia. My crumple zone is built off a steel oval-rim going about the length of my small-craft, of which there is a constructed mechanical mesh that distributes the imposed force. It's not aesthetically pleasing, however in comparison to a boat then one would think it better (that is, the portion of a boat exposed on the surface, not the portion of a boat that is smoothly-submerged).
Trust me, the solution would be detrimental to the carriage body repair industry and rightly so; automobiles should be as structurally-resilient as the immune-system of the horses they were meant to replace. In this fassion, I have not once bought any carriage or automobile simply to the distrust of their security systems in place of unsound structure. I just don't trust them, and the matter of 'air-bag' placement is a less a science and more a study toddlers enjoyed when experimenting with the cussions of a sofa and couch when they topple them against one-another. I build my own automobile, and treat the common Ways as no less than an expectant demolition arena given the misbehaviours of un-oathed police/COPS/security officers maliciously using their admiralty emergency hailing-signals to court non-emergency matters having caused no tort or malfeasance.
At any rate, the alleged reasons for abandoning sound-structure was to use the vessel itself as the bumper; engauging compression as a means of absorbing shock and inertia. The advertised symptom is improved fuel efficiency, despite advances of Water Electrolysis (HHO gas) and the Joe Cell, which I have found to be efficient down to an ounce of water providing enough HOO gas for combustibles to move a '77 Ford Lincoln (weighty and well-constructed carriage) no less than 100 English miles.
The liberty from another's office tends to bring one in harmony with the limited knowledge of one's burden to study their matter of fact, as is "homebrew" mediums; the free market that thought it was, is all it should be, and found to be restrictive of any profittable gain of laziness. Why burden a perspective automobile purchase with a ratio of cost of Safety Certification that is unbalanced to the value of the chassis and body? Do all cardboard boxes and tin cans rate for a "crush test" that increases their cost of purchase or value 25% as does an automobile or 250% as does the material?
After reading your posts in this thread I have found you to be a retard. :)
You have rightly judged me to your undisclosed law. And upon this truth I shall build your church, and know you as father of it; because a father that chooses to know whomever is retarded is the father of the retards for same-sake of idle pleasure. Hallow are thy words; scratched from off the pecker of a Hen at the crack of the morning corn. Thy will be done on your Slashdot post as is in your House: For you are the Father of it.
This is just another case of one assuming that people don't know what they are doing because one has failed to investigate what they actually are doing...
I don't appreciate your assumption that my opinion is based on an assumption. You should appeal my opinion when your data and theory and statistic have disqualified Murphy's Law. I thrive on ruling over the minority incidents that so-happen to be the majority of all catastrophe. Who has not profitted from the Safety Certification corporations, and show me one that is not a conflict of interest?
Just because there is a standard, doesn't mean it is adhered after private sale to the craft. Once it leaves the door, all those certificatinos are empty promises when tried through the fire; maybe if someone survives, they can address them as they are on a tort claim: commercial speach that ended at the dealer. How many lowered or raised vessels have you seen, and thereby the bumpers are mis-alligned? All the wrecks I've ever encountered and witnessed thereafter have all been the victim of those "crumple zones" buckling in the wrong way to cause one to raise above the next, and even without all the hope in standards there is always somthing unusual occurring.
I've researched the technical specifications and have found them to be nothing more than the propaganda of a Safety-Certification corporations profitting from advertising and increasin the value of a vessel for participating in their "tests."
An old man always remenisced of the age when he was younger and owned such a car that had bumper technology as nothing more than primitive affordable steel-plating bolted on the front and rear of the body. Any car that had a similarly equipped bumber would be symetrically obstructed from causing any damage to the already-thick steel chassis and shell. The "bumper-car" known at fair exposition grounds should be heeded. All automobiles should be constructed with a bumper standard; giving heed to the verry low-riding "pleasure craft" to have a more symettrical bumpter-height, and medium-sized automobiles to have two symetrical bumpers for those lower-riding as well as their class, and the larger craft to scale downwards.
It is shameful the shell that covers the motorist and his guests or passengers/property is worth more than most modern artisanry. Let's just try to prevent colliding automobiles at a popular damage site at the bumper, not at the caboose or seats of the helmsman or operator/driver.
If a man gets caught using or 'booby-trapping" a device powered by either of these power sources for malicious purposes, in one series he could be charged with Assault while in another he would just be "battery."
I do not Trust that FCC with my precious voice above my head and within reach of my yodling or echo of word about me.
The matter is not about fighting "the Man." The matter is about fighting a portrait drawn by the Man depicting his five-horned tentacle-monster grasping onto anime-style radio waves to move above unsuspecting people. I'm not going to rub you maliciously on this, but consider that the verry nature of words uttered from a creature or the mouth of a Man; they are the living radio propogation emitted, and discernable from our ears. The FCC is unlawfully moving its officers outside of a foreign state known as Columbia and actively regulating the matters of neighboring States that have no benefit from said services.
What none comprehend is that the Man is being blessed by his fellows, while the corporation inks curse after curse onto a man by assistance of its brain-washed pastafarian followers that have accepted its Oath and concealed Bond. The FCC is profitting from the sale of radio-wave bandwidth or spectrum to corporations, and is profitting after having no improvement other than the benefit of being regulated and the Code conferred upon the assets of the corporations particular as of Certifications welcoming customers for the mere suggestion of honor. It's not the radio-waves that should be regulated, but the movement of information determined a more dynamic course. Radio-waves are nothing more than noise or sound polution that we can't hear, but effects us in subtle ways; consider that every particle in our body has a resonant frequency and can be disrupted by the harmonious transmittal of a neighboring Horn or antennae: it's the same result of a vocalist that can shatter glass when the same resonant frequency is tuned.
Federal Communication Commision is neithe federal and is neither commisioned by anyone. Who agreed to pledge their radio spectrum above them and their property to an agent/corporation of a foreign principality in a far-off country? I don't mean to rub it in still, but if a Californian has any allegiance to an entity in Columbia then he is not an American; he is a USian, as per the 14th Amendment instituted by a corporation known as (singular) "United States."
The Man is idolatrous. Corporations are created by the work of a man to paper, and the corporations exist only on paper; they are combustible. Burn it, but there will always be those strangers wanting to enforced their opinions on their neighbors, by use of mass rule (fascism, by defenition) and not love. Most of America is empty, because everyone's got their Head cut-off and stuffed deep in a baskette in Washington District of Columbia, while the trade-off is to lose everyone's Head of State in exchange for the knowledge and reasoning of that mythical 5-horned (transmitting) tentacle monster.
Did you not read the Constitution of the District of Columbia, to know that is claimed all radio wave propogation and speach and transmittals above and within Columbia, without said FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISION? Get a grip on realty, to know the different between a territory and a state, an officer from a magistrate and justice.
t's a nasty habit we picked up from the British. Myself I like to read people like Chaucer, Shakespeare, Kipling, Carroll and Milne. You wouldn't believe the crap they pull on a perfectly good language.
They've been a terrible influence on me.
That's the joy of claiming the rites to such an inflection, because the owner may decide how people may pronounce the mark or what they may think it to mean. That's why many of the national corporations at the localities in America deceiving the People that they are found in the original charters, so much of COURT(inc) writes incorrect English as to have the copyright on said commercial speach while in the Court among inferiors/courts jousting their attorney about another's.
The source controlls the meaning, and when one source appears as similar to another then the dispute is whether they are independent of one-another by conscience or conciously unaware of one-another. Of course, that's somthing I talk about on various research that can show the difference between this "kfg" from that "kfg", and how they enter forum in agreement to bear witness of the kfg as heralded KFG. In that modus, most intellectual property rules can be overturned by the law.
I was teaching some children the other-day on negotiable instruments and how they are adapted to school "assignments." I thought it quite hillarious how children could dispute what they swear as true on their assignments (answer) or renegotiating the intent of a "scansheet" or otherwise that presents copyright information and trademarks as a lesson. My previous post was tried to set you up with a few entries to jest at my expense, but I didn't find any wit in your response. Perhaps I should have given you permission to the meaning of my non-errors in spelling words indifferently.
By the way, did you find any correlation in the stretched words found in your favourite subjective text in the titles revealed to me above?
Please perform a checksum on "comp" and "complimentary", and perhaps you'll find they are comp-letely different. Thereby, none is comprehended as brevity when confusing butchery to a word with a word that only exists in the mind of USians. The only moments a non-word are used in the form of a sentance is when conferring the said intellectual property and patent on that trademark word, for use in negotiation. USians are constontantly trying to renegotiate the English language to everyone's despair.
And in response to the parent post, yea "iSNot" is a trademark of Apple. I think this is the proverbial drip into the lap that our pal "kfg" could be referring to. I suppose I should buy one of those Apple iBox products that I've been seeing advertised on CARTOON NETWORK. They only thing is they only talk about how great the iBox truly is at gaming, without opening the iBox or interfacing it to any activity other than to stare at the iBox. I wouldn't be surprised if they payed a couple hundred dollars more than was the Nintendeo GameCube, only for the few non-poseurs to mod a slit in their iBox to modify it; and they'll probably find there are either tissues for the iSnot or maybe there is a trademarked non-SGI Brick inside.
Is Steve Jobs french, does any one know? I'm seeing a lot of redundancy with Apple recently, as well as Nintendo. It was just months ago that I saw a Wii stuffed in their GameCube. What could be hiding in the legendary iBox, I wonder? And what about the "iSNot" as well?
Sincerily not Apple,
M. Gregory Thomas for
our Network Redundancy Administration
Do you not forget what DEC, among Sun and SCO, had done to the cost of a Unix solution? The license costs were thousands of US doolars, durring a time when inflation was 1/9th what is was today and Microsoft came along with a cheap solution available with the then cheaper x86 IBM-clone Personal Computers. Today, Microsoft is still slaying everyone with such an inexpensive offer, and the majority of productivity in Unix went underground to return the favor to Microsoft with an even cheaper solution that today just isn't supposed to be with all the inflation. I suppose the low-cost today is all about collecting service costs, rather than making a 1-point sale to a customer with a known working product and guaruntee. Instead, we have buggy software that doesn't even reach market on a fully tested field, and the main profit is expected to be from the service and support costs. Is it not unusual to see so many applications go the way of web CGI, just so the application is guarunteed only by a timely subscription fee? I don't see that in the localhost text wordprocessors of the old guard, but how about hiding the bloat behind a web CGI and share that could cause the entire customer base and server to be one stationary target to receive the most damage from a software bug or exploit from a malicious intrusion.
Computer Software is dying, and Microsoft is just as much to blame as are the nerdy Unix companies from before. The People aren't getting what they payed to buy, and that is further skewed and the rape continued by an unlawful enforcement of Intellectual Property rights trying to cloak an equal exchange by wording an implied contract to conceal an interest in property and right to said Intellect as nothing more than a tenant has rights to vapor above the soil (aka state).
[sarcasm]
The USians are still vulnerable from events President William J. Clinton failed to mend. He didn't have a solution because he was distracted by Monica Lewinsky.
[/sarcasm]
For the perspective, consider Circular Reasoning, and all the evidence Democrats are the cause.
http://javimoya.com/blog/youtube_en.php
The web URL may be misleading by being written as "youtube_en.php", but you can change the source bias to any of perhaps 30 different proprietary media accessories, including YouTube and GoogleVideo. The media format to download is nothing more than what the author pre-programmed to detect what is available on that website. Most Google Videos I download are available in WMV, MPEG4, and FLV. It seems some I've downloaded only let me use the default FLV. From what I've downloaded on YouTube, I have yet to find a format other than FLV for some reason.
Of'course, once the file is complete it can be converted to a more needful format than FLV by using Transcode with a good front-end or perhaps MediaCoder.
Anyone have anything better?
I administer a few websites configured for dynamic content to be held on a free POP3 eMail account. A cgi to a NNTP and SMTP service is also integrated. All this runs on a modified Fujitsu aDSL SpeedPort modem. These modems today are usually tossed into the trash, although can be purchased on Yahoo Auctions or eBay for less than USD 5. Locally, the Fujitsu aDSL modem runs netBSD (as original from the designers for manufacturer), thereby slightly modified to host custom application that I wrote to receive requests and return content based on a rough Draft script that determines how to interpret content received to the Inbox. All interaction with the webserver simply categorizes and hashes the subjective form data from the client, and induces a post by SMTP to the free POP3 eMail account (cough *Google* cough).
The end-result is somthing that is less-remeniscent of Slashdot, but more useful than Myspace and YouTube and GeoCities rolled together. One of these days, I hope to do an integration with Freenet to cause the content to be more redundant in its purpose; such as in a discussion forum that people may subscribe onto, whereby the content is accessed through whomever is interested/contributed to the discussion, and cached by whomever wants to continue the discussion. This leads to a much more life-long Courtship, such are many living documents held localy in RAID can now be retained as though a distributed Network-Accessed-Storage.
Slashdot may not need so many duplicate stories to post, and Slashdot's overall importance may be found if it implements a similar idea. Who would save a Slashdot Article in compressed form to assist in the Slashdot Search function? I think Slashdot would then be returned to the 7-day attention span that its average user appears to have, maybe even less (given how there are even duplicate front-page news articles on-average within 2 days).
If you agree with licensing those "illegal aliens" everyone is so afraid of, then you are no different than the wacky Californians (or more specifically, the wacky States of California).
It is unlawful to create a state within a state.
I did not isSue any tort claim to Ford, General Motors, et al.
I ride a bicycle at the most, and walk at the least.
Unless... does that lawsuit imply that Californians (nationals, not California itself) have overlooked a trustee in "State of California" to sue on behalf of Californians?
In any event, pull the employees of that corporation/STATE OF CALIFORNIA into the District Court for lack of a trust to sue on behalf, or at least for their not having a controlling interest or so.
Of'course, that commonly issued CERTIFICATE of TITLE is not the senior claim to the property: one needs the Manufacturer's Statement/Certificate of Origin (aka MSO or MCO) to have senior claim/controlling interest and own/trust (ones behalf) to minister property by right of way on the common ways as a not-for-hire and non-commercial and private helmsman.
This is about getting to know who in the State of California is to SUE on one's behalf. Consider a Disappointment from their Office of Trust. Consider the qualifications from which the presumption of trust to that State of California is known by admiralty/corporation venue STATUTES:
It would be useful to have one of those cool early supercomputers fab-shrunk down to the size of a wrist-watch. The database performance in all those systems was well-implemented, if not for the computer cabinette stretching across the complete height of the server-room wall.
I have to wonder; where are those "collecters" of outdated computer intellectual properties, and how they could strategize to have a contractor re-fabricate those old systems onto generic house-hold appliances instead of re-inventing the "wheel" as does eCos or TRON? It's about time that I had a 386 PDA or 386 wristwatch (without the frickin' phone/Blackberry). Can you all imagine the awesome scope of technology that could cover a complete handheld 2-way tranceiver with good software to integrate a PDA with it? All daily chat function would immediatly obsolete upon arrival of a non-commercial private not-for-hire 2-meter or Marine or CB tranceiver with an artistic re-implementation of protocol to transverse between them or integrate to a RS232 or USB of a computer to use as a modem for direct CSLIP or multi-band PLIP to another hosting Station out there. That's where my studies are pointed at this moment.
It's not about whether I should, but whether I can accomplish the task. Redundancy is god; look at the watchmakers and jewelers: bankers.
If you say to "federate" means for the people to join together to dictate unto another politic (be that other politic greater or lesser), and the standing purpose of the United States in Law is written that the people may not join together; then it would be a crime to federate. Do you not remember that alleged "amendment"? (original defenition of "correction" is "amendment", like a-mend a damaged/torn/ripped fabric, as opposed to alleged "amendment" to cause a lawful act to become unlawful). That alleged amendment was in that criminal jurisdiction (military?) known as the federal government (US CODE Title 27, Section 3002, 15(b) "United States" means a federal corporation). That alleged amendment was written along the scope that slavery (like economic slavery common to debtor nations) was allowed for punnishment of a crime.
Perhaps the reason why Americans are controlled by the United States (plural/federal/criminal politic, not singular "United States" aka corporation) is because they are all implicitly-declared criminals for federating whereas their crime that holds them as slaves to that criminal jurisdiction is to federate.
I don't see why anyone would want to federate as it is now. The several states are California, Nevada, Oregen, Washington, Arizona, and perhaps 47 more. If the people were to federate on land, then that federation would be known as the United States of America; and it would confuse many non-federal state/Citizens to be incorporated and enfranchized with the federal States known as CALIFORNIA, NEVADA, OREGON, WASHINGTON, ARIZONA, and who knows what else. Then by confusion of the misleading jurisdiction obvious by the verry spelling and use of Zone-Improve-Plan (ZIP) Codes in the Post Office commercial mail-matter, would evince as receiving a Benefit to imrprove the rate of mail matter from that criminal jurisdiction. That's not even half of it. Further on, ther people would be confused by a federal corporation in the United States (plural) of America known as "United States" from where that corporation would be trustee for the charter of corporate States of the United States as evinced in certain codes and regulations. The corporate States themselves would reserve their postal trademark in their Post Office(tm); CALIFORNIA as CA, NEVADA as NV, OREGON as OR, WASHINGTON as WA, ARIZONA as AZ, and who knows what else for the 47 others.
All I need to remember for the original charter; by the Law of Nations is the state is the politic/people. All I need to remember for the original charter;
When the actual "landing" on the moon occurred, all the news corporations (ABC, If I remember incorrectly), had no "link" to the video feed other than NASA allowing the cameramen to direct their video-cameras at the large NASA wall-screen. As we all know, any monitor that is video-recorded with an external camera will show syncronization errata.
For $200 billion USD in 1969, it's too bad they didn't think of the press wanting the live/3-second-delay video to be directly route to their equipment. It also wasn't verry satisfying that the astronaughts held a single press conference that would never repeat ever again and they couldn't recite or remember any of the magnificent luminescence of the stars until a number of years later when they each wrote their own excellently-detailed accounts into their Books for market. I suppose they started taking their Ginko Biloba in their older-years, to remember the things they couldn't remember in their younger years.
I didn't care for anyone challenging them to be mocked as someone just using the errata for a "book deal", when every challenge for the astronaughts to remember was done at each of their Moon conferences and book-signing conventions.
All I can say is $200 billion USD in 1969 is perhaps $3 trillion USD in 2006. If the "mission" was important, then they could have a single peon making copies of the evidence to send them around the world for archival redundancy and exhibitions. Instead, it was quiet and non-descript answers or "I don't...re-call."
Thanks for nothing, NASA. I hope Armadillo Aerospace replaces your asses. At-least if they lie, we'll see zombies that will at-least be re-used in the recent re-implementation of Doom.
Network Redundancy Administration, dude!
M. Gregory Thomas
Be careful with what you communicate with your eyes, too though: I know someone who got beat up and nearly died because he looked at someone funny (I am dead serious on that one, although it happened in Hawaii not Costa Rica).
Only a few people on this planet have enough courage to flip-out like that. You never know when the ninja will strike, so hide in a dumpster -- or better yet, take Oscar the Grouch's advice by living in a trashcan-armoured battle-ready suit. I remember of History lessons of this one country that practically everyone important lived (eat/shit/screw/die) in a vested trashcan. Oh, now I remember, it was Europe!
Do you remember how the constitution said the declaration of the united States of America was founding for their charters, whereby in every Constitution they bore not to be church States in themselves but at the minimum "We the People, greatful to Almighty God for our freedom, do establish this Constitution..."? That's because the original church-states (read that, not church States) "dried-up" and returned to the site of where Columbus arrived on North America: Columbia. The church-states merged with the admiralty venue as evinced by Rule B:
As originally intended from their common-law States, The People could restrictively enter the admiralty/church-states to defend their claim, by use of Rule E.
In Rule E(8), lack of disclosure, otherwise known as having "no bill of particulars" or not being "allowed" to confront and cross-examine witnesses and evidence, voids attachment by when "inducting" the personage into the corporate COURT (or lack thereof) with a restrictive appearance (which is a ghost, realy). Notice the corporate instrumentality known as "United States" can claims and is not the same as the United States (plural). Notice that "corporate instrumentalty" clause and how it is prima facie evidence of that federa corporation referenced by USCODE Title 27 Section 3002 15(b). That "United States" is singular/corporation, not plural American States united. That "United States" is known otherwise as "trust 72" whereby it secures incompetant/convalescant people (usualy stands as moloch/king to wa
Royal Raymond Rife was the first man to construct an electron microscope, and also was the first man to view a virus (using his electron microscope). In his studies, he found that everything at the aromic particle level, be it living or dead, had a harmonic/resonant frequency that could be manipulated by bombarding that particle with the same. Outside the above two claims, he was labeled a crackpot when he constructed that verry instrument that he claimed could "rupture" those certain foreign particles from your body. It was remeniscent of shock-therapy, but more accurate to the frequency of whatever particle it was tuned to rupture. The equipment appearance was a box with two electrodes, and was used to destroy virus matter using same-frequency sound in the same manner as a singer would rupture a glass cup with a high-pitch yell. There are some great documentaries on this process, and available schematics to construct the machine. In his life, Royal Raymond Rife was dominated with one nuisance-complaint from the Medical Association every day for most of his life; having to enter court every day to defend his use of the machine. The documentary shown that the event just to publicly use the machine aggrivated the Medical Association verry badly.
Anyways, I've read as much as I could on both Rife and Tesla, and would do it again if I had the time. I have just about everything, from schematics to documentaries, conspiracy facts and theories. Most of it liens on the various Institutions using their brute force to force someone out of business just because their remedy is dangerously inexpensive. You can even buy an alleged "Rife machine" and many claim it works. All it does is train the immune system, and the worse it could do is focus energy on a certain range of tissue and disrupt it (even though if corrected, should heal).
Signing-up "suspects" to a list is a quiet act of a malevolent trustee. Disqualify them, and don't accept any perceived and alleged benefit from their actions, don't officiate any thing as property or any Body for their administration. A WATCH LIST is the least of all our problems. Go look-up the Jewish Mafia and how they terrorize North America through their banking policies. Lookup the Mexican Mafia, them having a President and Secretary and Officers in plane site; see all the terrorism they accomplish in Santa Ana California and surrounding south-western several states (not the fscking United States/corporation). Those tyrants make the CIA-created and defected Al'Quaeda look pale in comparison. No need to mention the Taliban, because they are a chosen and elect positive-law jural society whether Bush or Rice like it or not. They travel the military internationally with accusations of terror, spread resources all over the world while ignoring the bullshit that hurts Americans throughout the borders of Mexico caused by the Mexican Mafia.
Those ha ha Shtatanists are hosting another mock child-sacrifice in Bohemian Grove in middle-northern California, so look for a recent coverage of the event. The videos are available from Alex Jones, where him and his buds upload one a week for non-subscribers that can't afford to be PRISONPLANET.COM members.
The offices are not in the United States (plural) any more, the federal corporation simple known as 'United States' (singular), of the United States (plural) has folded into the hands of bankers and banking policy. And what's worse, there will be no more America given every foreign state/State in the world has a claim to a peice by use of a federal lien (Federal Reserve Certificate, not the bull-shit FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE we're conditioned to think is money).
The Prime Minister of Canada, President of the United States, and President of Mexico; have all committed treason by assigning every person/trust into the Pan-American Union by way of the Security And Prosperity Partnership (SPP, http://spp.gov). This commercial venture is advertised to of'course improve Security and Prosperity, but all prior ventuers of the same nature under different or mis-leading title have been tresspass and theft.
Go read SUIJURIS.NET and ECCLESIA.ORG so you are learned to enter the corporate/COURT only upon issue of the District Court via CONGRESSIONAL SUPPLEMENTS TO CERTAIN ADMIRALTY AND MARITEIM CLAIMS wherein is directed that all wage garnishments/seizures on land go through a district court.
Study to be particularly a court of competent jurisdiction, foreign State.
Good luck, it's a long death.