Slashdot Mirror


Where the Highest Paying Tech Jobs Are

prostoalex writes "Where would you look for a high-paying tech job? If your answer is Silicon Valley or Research Triangle, Forbes magazine suggests some other destinations. When you take the cost of living and consider the net pay adjusted for that cost, places like Montgomery, Ala., Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Fort Smith, Ark. suddenly seem quite attractive."

574 comments

  1. What about... by flooey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...after factoring in the personal cost of having to live in Alabama or Idaho?

    1. Re:What about... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some might see Silicon Valley and Research Triangle as carrying the personal cost.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually...what about the worst places to work in IT? i would rather that

    3. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      they can rent someone's basement to feel "at home".

    4. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 9 months of terrible weather each year makes Idaho Falls really worth it.

    5. Re:What about... by jridley · · Score: 1

      That's a plus, compared to living in the high density locations. I'm not even sure I could be paid enough to take my family there.

    6. Re:What about... by AuMatar · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. These would be rednecks, people who wish to marry their own cousin, and the insane. Noone else *wants* to live in Alabama.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    7. Re:What about... by xLittleP · · Score: 0, Troll

      The only reason I can see anyone moving to Alabama is if they like College Football. I know this is slashdot, but some of us went to schools with good football teams. On the other hand, if you're not a big fan of professional sports, the closest teams you have to hear about are in Atlanta.

      --
      When is Slashdot going to add a -1 moderation option for people who actually RTFA?
    8. Re:What about... by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, Seattle falls under the same category. I live and work near Redmond, and it's typical that TFA doesn't mention the greater Seattle area at all. Most people seem to forget we're here, which is fine w/me.

      --
      Sigs cause cancer.
    9. Re:What about... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I'd rather look on Kobol.... and get BOOMIN'!

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:What about... by tylernt · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...after factoring in the personal cost of having to live in Alabama or Idaho?
      Yup, that's right. Stay right where you're at. We Idahoans don't want any more Californians here anyway, thank you very much... our quiet state is rapidly turning into Little California.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    11. Re:What about... by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 1

      There has already been enough influx of californicators and other nere do wells.

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    12. Re:What about... by gwhenning · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a Californian who moved to Idaho, I would agree. Housing in my area has shot up about 50% in the three years since we've moved here and they're still building hundreds of new homes each year catering to the waves of immigrants into the state.

      That being said, I enjoy the ~$80/mo home utility bills (That's all total water, sewage, electric and gas.), ~$2.75/gal gasoline, 5% sales tax, skiing (water in the summer, snow in the winter although since I took out 3 of 4 ligaments in my leg last season I like that one less.), hiking, and boating.




      If only they would raise the takes to fund a fence to keep the rest of you out. :)

    13. Re:What about... by op00to · · Score: 1

      If only they would raise the takes to fund a fence to keep the rest of you out. :) ... and that is the only way your particular situation will be sustainable. Without appropriate planning (which I can assure you is NOT going on in most places in the US) the amenities you describe will disappear. And even if you could freeze time, a lot of the percieved prosperity is based on increases in growth -- these are not sustainable in the long run. So yes, traffic may not be so bad, and the taxes reasonable -- today. But what happens when an extra 100k move into your town?

      I'd rather live in an established community where housing prices may be higher, but there won't be the same growing pains 10 or 15 years down the road.

    14. Re:What about... by mantar · · Score: 2, Informative

      :-) Agreed. I was born in Twin Falls and last time I was back home I couldn't believe the cost of housing. It's the same way here in Reno, too.

      --
      # man tar
    15. Re:What about... by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

      I live in Indiana and there was just today an article in the newspaper about "forensic computer science."

      Basically, their job is to scout around computers and look for illicit content. They usually do jobs for either a police department, or they can be contracted out to companies that suspect their employees of wrongdoings.

      And get this: Their starting salary... $80,000 - $100,000.

    16. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is a great study but there is soo much more that goes in to cost of living. How about paying off student loan debts? Its easier to do with 75k in a more expensive area than 40k in a cheap area. The payments are the same but are a smaller percentage of your budget with a higher income. Also, a car costs the same almost anywhere. Electronics are the same way. A 35k difference is not going to be made up exclusively on cheaper utilities and rent.

    17. Re:What about... by 70Bang · · Score: 1


      Author! Author!

      Wiki Indianapolis (IN), Carmel (IN), Fishers, (IN); the final one is where I'm at -- and it's still a town, so we have a town council, not a mayor. We bought our house eighteen years ago with a population of 7'500 people. Fishers is growing so fast it paid for a special census in 2003 and is having another one this fall (estimated count: 60'000-63'000). The '03 one ended up with the state paying another $2M/year. I could go on & on about the resources available regarding sports, etc., but all should be worth finding in a few minutes vis Wiki or Google. I wonder why Final Four tournaments (for both genders) are held here if we're a backwater location? The same goes for pre-Olympic trials for track & field and water sports. the Indy 500, a F1 race, the Brickyard 400 NASCAR this weekend. You can walk the streets at night in Indy. Conventions produce a heavy use for the convention center and the new dome will be done within the next 2-2.5 years, then a new convention center will replace both existing buildings. You can walk in Fishers or Carmel. There's also something known as the "Monon" which is likely to be 25-30 miles long by now, running from the south of Indy all of the way to the regions of Fishers|Carmel and about 20-25 feet wide and paved. They've had to slow people down a bit because the usage volume has grown so high. You'd be surprised to see how many contraptions people have found to use the Monon to get exercise.

      My mom teaches 3rd grade 2 hours north of hear and said the teachers up there think the suburbs are reputed to be a bunch of rich kids. "Would you rather teach at inner-city schools?" "No." Her students come from farming communities. I could write a ton, but it either oversells those convinced or will fall on deaf ears. Oh, generally for all directions of a clock, there's an interstate road passing through Indy.
      The question isn't "what can we do?" but "what can't we do?" (say, what is there for families?) You'll burn out trying to do everything.

      We do have all four seasons. And it's obvious which season is in effect.

      The only thing we don't have is downhill skiing. But good places to do that aren't that far away.

    18. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shhh... we've worked long and hard on that stealth technology - hiding an entire metroplex in plain sight. Stupid grunge bands and Starbucks nearly wrecked the plan, but we're back on track. Now we just need another volcanic eruption or small earthquake, and the newbies will run back to California. *Then* maybe I can find a parking place on Queen Anne...

    19. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try your local McDonalds... ;-)

    20. Re:What about... by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      I dunno... Idaho has a nice stretch of the Rockies. If you like the outdoors, Idaho beats more congested regions hands down.

    21. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No such word as "noone" exists. It's "no one".

    22. Re:What about... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      The same thing has happened here in Colorado. Will someone please explain why you'd move to a new state ebcause you like it better than your old one, then immediately turn around and make the new state just like the old one? And blame the idiot Supreme Court which decided that state senators cannot be chosen like federal senators--thus in Colorado what Denver wants, Denver gets, and screw the rest of the state.

      We'd never have had the state smoking ban without Californians; we'd never have screwed with TABOR; we'd never have half the idiot boondoggles without 'em. I miss my state!

    23. Re:What about... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Last I read, Seattle and Portland are the only places left in the U.S. where real estate is still going up sharply - so I think people know we're here and are coming in droves.

      When I lived in Redmond 2 years ago, I saw a sign down the street that said "New Townhome-style condos - starting in the low 800's!". Yikes.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    24. Re:What about... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'm in Fisher's myself. It's getting too expensive so I'm being forced over to Noblesville. Don't get me started on that boondoggle of stadium/convention center, or Daylight Savings.

    25. Re:What about... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I'm in Colorado too. I think many of them moved here because the cost of living was so much lower, and they fully intended to make it just like home. It's creepy to visit California and see identical cookie-cutter houses in identical layouts. Weird deja-vu.

      My brother moved to San Diego and they paid 500k for a shitty condo. I can understand wanting out of that.

      It's sad to see Colorado fade to homogeneity. I liked the no-helmet law, smoke em if you got em, rip-roaring, no seatbelt law Colorado. And don't get me started on the drivers!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    26. Re:What about... by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      As a Californian who moved to Idaho, I would agree. Housing in my area has shot up about 50% in the three years since we've moved here and they're still building hundreds of new homes each year catering to the waves of immigrants into the state. ...
      If only they would raise the takes to fund a fence to keep the rest of you out. :)


      Wow, you moved there and three years later you're a crank who doesn't want anyone else to move there?

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    27. Re:What about... by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      And if you're living in NW Indiana (close to Chicago) that's peanuts. The adjusted rate for a forensic computer examiner in the Chicago area should be closer to 125k. If you're down near Indy, it might be about right. If that job was offered in anywhere in the middle, take it and run to the bank.

    28. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We Idahoans don't want any more Californians here anyway, thank you very much...

      So, does that mean we Californians can ship Idahoans back to where they came from, too?

    29. Re:What about... by aevans · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the outside is great in Seattle, if you only wanted to use it 3 months a year.

    30. Re:What about... by jaxent · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Silicon Valley homes have slab foundations.

      --
      "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly. I said I don't know." Mark Twain
    31. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a native Idahoan, I have to agree. It's great that Californians can sell their houses and move here to buy outright, but for those of us who live and have lived on Idaho salaries all our lives, it's rotten.

    32. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, as a lifelong Californian (born and raised in Silicon Valley), I used to say the same thing about my hometown.

      It *used* to be cheap to live here, with plenty of space and relatively unclogged freeways, until all the goddamn immigrants flooded in.

      (And I don't mean the ones from Mexico, China, and India -- I'm talking Kansas, Philly, and New Jersey here.)

      We should have built a mile-high fence across the Sierra Crest twenty years ago, and kept the rest of y'all from overrunning our little paradise here. Or at least blown up the Netscape offices before the boom of '94. Then we might have been able to maintain some semblance of a decent quality of life -- not to mention reasonable real estate prices.

    33. Re:What about... by gwhenning · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I have always had family up here, and I moved AWAY from California. :) I'm more of an Idahoan than a Californian even though I lived in CA most of my life.

  2. cost of living. by oyenstikker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Taking into account cost of living, try India.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    1. Re:cost of living. by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure you can get a bigger house and stuff, but what about the 'quality' of living. I like the restaurants in bigger cities personally. That and the fact that there are more jobs AFAIK.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!
      Does slashdot hate my posts?

    2. Re:cost of living. by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you measure it.

      Sure you can probably afford a six bedroom house with staff on a programmers salary, but you wont be able to afford a nice car or a plasma tv.

    3. Re:cost of living. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've considered India, but I'm seriously looking at Mexico and Costa Rica. I'm partial to Mexico because I love Mexican culture (and I already have many friends there), but Costa Rica is really an up and coming high tech nation.

      It's possible to have a very high standard of living for less money in these countries. And if your material needs are not great, you can live incredibly cheaply, save up a bunch of money and retire early.

      The other thing is that, depending on how you work it, you might not be taking a cut in pay at all. All many of us need is to be at the one end of a wire. These countries have internet infrastructure, at least in the bigger towns and cities. Last time I was in Mexico, I met two people that were living there and making a living this way. One was a daytrader (remember those?) and the other had a web development company he had basically started in the U.S. When he moved to Mexico, his clients hardly noticed. He's making even more money now because he's found a lot of local talented designers and coders that work for lower pay, but he's still getting paid the same. And because he pays at the upper end of the prevailing local wage, his workers love him.

      Moreover, he told me that because he lives in Mexico, he's much less likely to have to go to a day long meeting to discuss what exact shade of green should be used to maximize the branding of a particular website. Clients are less likely to fly him in to discuss trivial shit. Or they fly out to him because it's an excuse to visit Mexico.

      Anyway, if you can work at the end of a wire, seriously consider some of the developing nations. I can't guarantee that you'll prosper, but I can guarantee you'll have a very interesting time.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:cost of living. by really? · · Score: 1

      Nice cars are way overrated. Move to India and you can afford a really nice palanquin. ;)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:cost of living. by indiancowboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Taking into consideration purchasing power parity (PPP), India's GDP of $719.8 billion becomes $3.611 trillion. PPP adjusts the income approximately 5 times to the US Dollar. If the average salary in the US is $67,400, that is $13,480 in India's PPP terms. And the average salary for programmers in India is certainly above that. People need to understand its not about 'cheap labour'. Its just another feature of globalization.

    6. Re:cost of living. by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Sure you can get a bigger house and stuff, but what about the 'quality' of living. I like the restaurants in bigger cities personally.

      Not just a bigger house, but servants too. Maid, chef, gardner, driver. Having people do all the crap work for you makes life really nice.

      Plus, Indians are the only culture to have figured out how to make vegetarian food taste good, you'll eat healthier (not that you have to stick to vegetables or anything, just that blandness will no longer be a motivation to avoid the veggies).

      That and the fact that there are more jobs AFAIK.

      Yeah, finding a job that lets you hire all those people is definitely not so easy. So, make a bundle here, sell your house, and then "retire" over there.

    7. Re:cost of living. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Well, if as in infidel you don't mind bringing fidelity to Fidel, now that he's back in power, you could move to Cuba and (assuming your existence doesn't threaten the/any High Tech Czar, you could make a killin', I think...

      But, the IRS would probably want to be sure to tax the hell out of you under some new law made up to make you broker than hell...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    8. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... costa rica has a very large middle class and is not cheap. You seem to lump it in with the poorer/less educated south/central american countries. I went there last month (san jose, the suburbs, and the carribean side near panama) and it was just as expensive as the US.

      Also, if you go, be sure to speak spanish. There's a markup if people think they can take advantage of you...museums, clubs, taxis, etc. My friends who live there call it the "gringo tax". For example, a museum in san jose charged the tourists in front of us 5 dollars (2500 collones) to get in while we got charged 500 due to seeming like "locals".

    9. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A good work friend of mine came across from Mumbai, after working for investment banks there. He was very well paid for a native. Then he came to work here in Sydney and gets a good wage here as well (again investment banks). According to him, he will never, ever go back. Major downside for a western minded person living in india:

      -Corruption is HUGE. You have pay everyone off to just get basic services connected. It took him 1-2 years just to get an internet connection and when he did it was a 128k, then he had to keep rejustifying it. (A few years ago now). It took him a year just to get his licence, he got his here and hard the card before he left the premesis. His car was impounded at one point. When this happens it's a write-off, as the police strip it and sell it for parts. The general point here is that india is terribly, terribly inconvenient and frustrating. (Remember he was a complete native.)

      -Cost of living is good? Sure. Try buying PC parts. He paid premium prices for budget parts. Over here he has gone dual core, dual proc, with SLI for what he says is a similar expenditure.

      -You leave your earning behind. Ever think you could sell you Indian house, gather the proceeds and leave india? Think again. They will tie you up with paper work so it'll NEVER happen.

      Apparently the only thing he will miss is the Mango's :)

    10. Re:cost of living. by runcible · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is it with people and Costa Rica?

      If you don't do too much research, it looks good, but the truth is it's got some pretty serious problems -- they are in dire need of tax reform, they have some nice corruption issues in their executive ( couple of presidents arrested for corruption in the past five years or so ). Plus they have a big drug transshipment thing going, and domestic production is quite the cottage industry as well -- if they don't do anything effective about it, they're gonna be another Columbia.

      Plus, the high tech sector is *electronics manufacturing*, mostly microprocessors...and it's only there because chip fab is so hellishly toxic, and what the hell, it's the third world...

      Oh *and* IIRC if you want good Internet connectivity ( if you work on the wire, it's more of a need than a want ), you're pretty much stuck in San Jose -- so tack a couple of active volcanoes and a growing crack problem onto the list.

      Interesting time indeed.

      --
      remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
    11. Re:cost of living. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Corrupt Politicians . . .

      Drug transshipment points. . .

      Crack problems . . .

      Sounds just like the U.S.A.

      We should feel right at home.

      Have you actually been there for any length of time? I'm more interested in hearing reports from the ground, not secondhand or armchair information. If you have negative Costa Rica experiences, I'm all ears. Ditto for Mexico.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    12. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so tack a couple of active volcanoes and a growing crack problem onto the list
      They've got tubgirl over there too, eh?
    13. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the pollution and that everyone speaks Spanish. Sounds more and more like home by the minute!

    14. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      based on your .sig, I say move on down! There's no cheaper (or better for that matter) pussy than here in CR :-)

    15. Re:cost of living. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not totally up on the ins and outs of this, but, with a few exceptions, travel to Cuba is illegal for U.S. citizens. I know a lot of people who manage to travel there just the same, usually routing through Cancun. If anybody tries this, make sure not to have your passport stamped! You cold face a hefty fine if caught!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    16. Re:cost of living. by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My brother lived in Costa Rica (and I lived in El Salvador), and I would guess the biggest thing you are going to have to put up with are the bugs. One or two inch long cockroaches are pretty common down there, and occasionally you will see a 6 inch long cockroach or grasshopper. You might want to check out Baygon or Permethrin. Ants are crazy too, there are so many kinds of ants. But you will learn how to store your food and how to spray so they don't become a problem. There are some nice cheap houses down there, and nice rain forests. But in spite of what that AC said, the girls down there are not hot at all. At least, according to my brother.

      --
      Qxe4
    17. Re:cost of living. by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, and I would like to mention, COCKROACHES FLY!!!! I just tell you that to lessen the shock that we all feel when we see one of those monstrosities flying straight at us. They don't fly well, but the shock of seeing that the first time is something that can give you nightmares. And don't drink the water. Get bottled water from a reliable company. You might even want to test your bottled water. I am serious with this one, get bottled water. For a while I was purifying my water with chlorine, then I found out that the town water had LEAD in it, and I was drinking lead. I found out that no one in that town drank the water. So boiling water and stuff isn't good enough. Get the bottled water. Also, the two most important things that will keep you from getting mugged: learn to pay attention to your surroundings, what is going on, etc; and secondly, learn to look in someone's eyes and understand what he is feeling/thinking. Be careful with what you communicate with your eyes, too though: I know someone who got beat up and nearly died because he looked at someone funny (I am dead serious on that one, although it happened in Hawaii not Costa Rica). But if you do those two things you can avoid a lot, and react to things that do happen sooner. Also, if you like soccer, and get in a game of gringos against latinos, work as a team, and you will have a good chance of beating the latinos who will all want to show off and not work as a team.

      --
      Qxe4
    18. Re:cost of living. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      That's excellent, if not standard, advice. Along with your advice about situational awareness, it's worth pointing out that getting too drunk can severely impact ones S.A. and make one much more vulnerable prey. So don't get too boracho, sabes? =)

      So, what were you doing in El Salvador, if I might be so bold? How long were you there?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    19. Re:cost of living. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Your point is really a reductio ad absurdum: low costs of living in non-coastal ("red state") areas apply to housing and, to some lesser extent, food alone; consumer goods are the same price as elsewhere.

      One unspoken advantage to living in high-cost/high-wage regions is the ability to travel easily, both in the sense that one is likely to be living near a hub airport, and because one's greater income in absolute terms means more buying power overseas and elsewhere.

    20. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couple of presidents arrested for corruption in the past five years or so

      Wow, that's better than the US! We have yet to arrest any of our corrupt presidents.

    21. Re:cost of living. by capc75 · · Score: 1

      I think Mexico is a great place, when you don't have to live in Mexico City. I lived in Mexico City all my life until I was transferred to Florida few years ago. Mexico City is getting really expensive, polluted and if you go there you will know what traffic is, and not just rush hour like in the US.

      I lived about 10 miles from my work and the last time I went to see my family it took me 1 hour to get to old office. Yes, you could ride the public transport system, that sucks, the only good one is the subway (Metro) but you can't get to a lot of places just using the subway. Also you can't use the public system carrying around your laptop or anything that is worth more than 50 USD, it is highly probable that you will get robbed. Bicycle, forget it nobody will respect you and you will end up under a pecerp (minibus) or taxi.

      Outside Mexico City, it's quite different but there are not a lot of jobs, Mexico City is getting bigger and bigger because all the companies, all the federal government offices are there, it's not a viable city, we have to bring water from far places, produce electricity from other states that don't have electricity for their own people.

      If you are in the tech industry don't expect to find a really good job outside the three major cities, maybe you are lucky and will find something good but those are not easy to get or find.

      Nightlife is great if you like it, and if you know a lot of people, so you can go into the nice clubs without waiting 1 hour to see if they let you in.

      Great things about Mexico City, people, museums, culture, events, concerts, you can find something to do at any time any day, but you have to make good money, and then you won't like to go out because going to your friend's takes 1 hour at least.

      Mexico City, is a great place, but quality of life is going down faster than the water in a toilet. If the government does something to slow down things, moving big federal offices to other cities, like Pemex or the Marines, Hacienda, kick out Lopez Obrador so he can block the streets somewhere else, Mexico City will be a great place.

    22. Re:cost of living. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Vegetarian Indian food...yummmmm.

      Also, if you ever get the chance, try vegetarian Chinese food in a Buddhist monastery (in Asia). Some of their canteens are open to the public, and you make a "donation" after you're done eating. Good veggie food there too.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    23. Re:cost of living. by Johnny5000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But in spite of what that AC said, the girls down there are not hot at all. At least, according to my brother.

      I've been to Costa Rica, and your brother is full of crap.
      Or else he just wants to keep you away and keep the girls to himself.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    24. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I'm seriously looking at Mexico and Costa Rica. I'm partial to Mexico because I love Mexican culture "

      I got a Mexican culture last time I was down there. Spent a couple of days on the crapper.

    25. Re:cost of living. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I did this. I lived in Mexico for the last 10 years for personal reasons and 95% of my business was back in the U.S. Had my U.S. business number forwarding down to me in Mexico. Very few people even realized I wasn't in the U.S. It worked just fine. That said, I recently moved back to the U.S. and I've seen my income increase 300% so I'm not sure that living offshore is really a wash. Of course, I was living fine in Mexico but I certainly can't claim there was no financial impact.


      It also depends where you live in Mexico and what you spend money on. Labor costs are lower and some food costs are lower. But cars, electronics, appliances, and just about anything that isn't labor-intensive is more expensive. Which is why so many Mexicans drive up to the U.S. to buy stuff. I'm really enjoying that when I want to buy some obscure electronic thing, I just drive a few miles and pick it up or order it online and it appears at my door in a day or two. That just doesn't happen in Mexico--especially if you live in the "cheap" parts. Where I lived in Mexico, rents and houses were actually more expensive than where I now live in the U.S. (Colorado). So with costs generally being about the same where I lived in Mexico and where I live now, and with the 300% increase in income I've seen, moving back definitely was a good financial decision.

    26. Re:cost of living. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I was in El Salvador for two years working as a missionary. I loved it because I got to live all over the country, and see what life was like for the average person. For a while I even worked in a place without running water or electricity. I would love to get a job that would let me live in any random country and just move to a different country every couple of years.

      --
      Qxe4
    27. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and that's where all the jobs are!

    28. Re:cost of living. by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Only the Super rich in India can afford to buy a new house. There is simply no land in cities for a new house. The money you would spend on a OLD house in Bombay/Bangalore/Delhi etc would be easily above the average US house cost. Theres land you can buy away from the cities but those places wouldnt have the jobs, electricity etc. And dont forget, the quality/construction of a house in India is NOWHERE near that in the US.

      Almost EVERYONE lives in an apartment, unless you were lucky enough to inherit an ancestral home. Even the prices of some dingy old Apts in some areas could be more than a few hundred thousand K $. But your salary would be a lot less than the US. So the apartment you do end up buying would be ummm pathetic.

      Only the super rich in India can have a BMW or a Merc. Even with a high Indian salary you'd end up with a Corolla/Sonata . You cant even buy a Subaru, Saab, Infiniti, (and many others) as they do not have a presence in India.

      I realise I'm talking about material things only... but some material things are important. Like power. Bombay(Mumbai) is the ONLY city in India where there is power 365 days a year. In a large city like Pune with many IT companies, there are frequent power cuts EVERYDAY. The more rural you go, the worse it gets. The roads are so horribly maintained and crowded, even if you had a BMW you'd never take it out. Nobody on the road makes way for the Fire truck or the Ambulance .. not because Indians are inhuman .. theres no fucking place to move! Theres no such thing as a fire lane. Entire neighbourhoods do not have a fire hydrant...which is a good move to save money, as they wouldnt have water anyways.

      There is no broadband internet. So called 256kbps and above lines always under deliver and are more expensive than a 1.5mbps line in the US. No ISP has Usenet servers. (Try calling them and ask about it) Computer hardware is more expenive than the US.(In absolute $ value as well, not just due to lower salary)

      Personally I left India as I couldnt stand the corruption and RUDENESS of corrupt people. People in the US like to complain how rich people and politicians control everything. Live in India for month and you'll see how much worse that is over there.

      Corruption does help you if you're rich enough. With enough money, you can get caught with pot/cocaine, run over your SUV over homeless people, shoot hot chicks who reject you(or rape them), grab land from farmers, and NO one .. NO one can touch you.

      There are TONS of things wrong in India compared to a developed comutry. Its not all bad (food is good and cheap for eg.), and India has enough people to make you think that the worst is unlikely to happen to you. I will probably go back to take care of my parents when they get old.

    29. Re:cost of living. by davidsyes · · Score: 2

      It's shameful that the US makes it hard for people here with money to do business over there. I don't know that ALL Cubans are destitute, but if legal cashflow (hopefully Castro's regime won't TAKE it or TAKE it ALL) from the US could improve living conditions there. It's not as if Castro or Cuba could incite an insurrection in the US, but it is or seems all too regularly an agenda for the US to hold Cuba up as an evil regime, a rogue state, and backwards.

      Well, we've got homophobia here; drug addictions fueled by those who want, transport, or allow them to get them here; we've got BAZILLIONS of dollars to spend making and fighting enemies that needn't exist, just to give those with power a pretext to kick ass or behave imperiously; we've got millions of homeless, 10's of millions of uninsured (I'm one of them, been uninsured since March 2001 when I lost the job that was paying my salary so I could pay my mortgage on a home the likes of which I'll NEVER, EVER be able to afford... while I was just a line item to the CEO's mandate...); we've got buildings and construction going on left and right, yet... well...

      It's stupid, vengeful, idiotic and childish for economically (for now) militarily (for now), but morally and pilitically vapid presidencies (both parties are Hydras, so I won't vote until the assholes are revamped and augmented by up to 4 or 5 other power-sharing parties), most weak-willed (can't feed it's poor and clean up the streets for all the money we have... just walk around Tenderloin, SF... shit-smeared streets, homeless.. yet DHLS & other government employees and officials get new patrol SUVs, shiny equipment... office building upgrades) nation has to make it illegal to travel to Cuba. MAYYYYBE I could see SOME other countries, but what has Cuba got that is dangerous the US?

      Hmmm. Oh, yeh: "DEFIANCE!". The ONE thing they have that is courageous and in short supply in OTHER countries: D-E-F-I-A-N-C-E (Say it like R-O-L-A-I-D-S). One day the arrogance to quash defiant, small countries will come back with an even BIGGER bite...

      Anyway, what ELSE has Cuba got? A president who has outlived many of his US polit-level counterparts. Cigars so good the HAVE to be banned for the public, but smugglable by diplomats mules....

      Meantime, anyone with a fat check and who loves ANY (but particularly THIS) administration will be quick to pounce me with flamebait, I am fair certain.

      Just to be different, I hope Castro outlives the next TWO SEE-Lek-tehd US presidents. He needn't remain in power. Just outlive them. Must be something in the genes... staying power, longevity, hardiness, even at his age. OTOH, he might have a stroke in 6 months....

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    30. Re:cost of living. by notoriousE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with Costa Rican women is that they are hot until about 27 and then start turning into some of the ugliest human beings ever.

      --


      And then there was E
    31. Re:cost of living. by azav · · Score: 1

      In Silicon Valley and in SF there is a famine of hot chicks.

      That and rents through the roof kinda make it a whole lot less fun to live there.

      Really, you've got to make a quarter of a million a tear to afford a decent house there. That alone rules many cool people out of the equation.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    32. Re:cost of living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Note the hot babes tend to congregate around tourism sites where thay might either be directly rewarded (cash payments from the hotels to draw tourists) or indirectly (tourists with cash to burn buying stuff for local hotties).

    33. Re:cost of living. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      That's okay, there are new girls turning 21 every year.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    34. Re:cost of living. by Federico2 · · Score: 1

      That's good news!

      In USA you will fly. You will touch the sky with you po^H^Hfingers. Even if you are a cockroach.

  3. Not attractive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Living in Montgomery AL and installing Office on every PC in the air force does NOT sound attractive, thanks.

    1. Re:Not attractive by DeltaHat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a stint in that hellhole. Montgomery Alabama is hell on earth. Period. The only reason the adjusted income for tech jobs there is so high is due to the incredibly depressed state of the city. Also, the Air Force is the only real consumer of tech there, so you have almost no choice but to work for the military. Take that for what its worth to you. The government bureaucracy is hip deep and most systems are antiquated at best. Avoid it like the plague.

  4. See how many correspond with 'Best places to live' by mergy · · Score: 4, Informative

    'Best Places to Live' according to Money Mag/Rag

    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/200 6/top100/index.html

    1 Fort Collins, CO 128,000
    2 Naperville, IL 141,600
    3 Sugar Land, TX 75,800
    4 Columbia/Ellicott City, MD 159,200
    5 Cary, NC 106,400
    6 Overland Park, KS 164,800
    7 Scottsdale, AZ 226,000
    8 Boise, ID 193,200
    9 Fairfield, CT 57,800
    10 Eden Prairie, MN 60,600
    11 Plano, TX 250,100
    12 Eagan, MN 63,700
    13 Olathe, KS 112,100
    14 West Bloomfield , MI 65,000
    15 Richardson, TX 99,200
    16 Gilbert, AZ 178,100
    17 Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ 51,600
    18 Santa Clarita, CA 172,500
    19 Carrollton, TX 124,700
    20 Henderson, NV 232,100
    21 Bellevue, WA 117,100
    22 Newton, MA 83,200
    23 Sandy, UT 89,700
    24 Westminster, CO 105,100
    25 Ann Arbor, MI 113,300

  5. Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unemployment in the Raleigh/Durham area is sub 4% (statewide is sub 5). Forget the pharm and biotech companies; we have Cisco, Symantec, Red Hat, Microsoft, GFI, and countless others. There are constantly tons of houses for sale because some many "northerners" (of which I am one, an Ohio transplant from last year) are moving down here, and cost of living is more than fair.

    There are tons of tech jobs of every kind out there, especially programming positions. My wife is a teacher and the market for her is evening better than it is for me (as a network engineer/admin type).

    I love Ohio, and I bleed scarlet and grey, but there is just no comparison between RTP and any major area in Ohio)

    And for you elitest types (I keed!), RDP is home to the second highest percentage of PHD's (per capita) outside of Silicon Valley.

    --


    Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    1. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thought "PHD" stood for "Pointy-haired Director"?

      (psst: it's Ph.D.)

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    2. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      I think you were thinking of PHB!

      My apologies to the doctors in the room; I just don't type Ph.D. much.

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    3. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My wife is a teacher and the market for her is evening better than it is for me"

      WTF does this mean?!?

    4. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Burdell · · Score: 1

      Huntsville, AL has come in high on the per-capita PhD list most years as well. ISTR Huntsville coming in at #1 some years, but I have been unable to find a definative source (local Chamber of Commerce stuff doesn't count). I can't find who publishes such a list; I guess my Google-fu is weak tonight.

    5. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Heh. My parents live and were from the RTP. My dad wised up and started buying as much property he can since he figures it will be the next Silicon valley.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    6. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by qsqueeq · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      dat mean us kuntry foke hear in norf carolinuh kneed mo' teechin.

      NC graduates less teachers per year than they need, and some of those graduates leave the the state to work. The population in RTP/Raleigh is expanding very rapidly and this is a contributing factor. Sam

    7. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by DreamCoder · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I would have thought Los Alamos would have them both beat by a longshot.

    8. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled Ann Arbor, MI. Not surprisingly, Cambridge, MA is first. In addition, I know a guy in Brookline (Chestnut Hill), MA who has four Nobel winners on his street.

    9. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Downfall · · Score: 1

      NC is a great place for geeks on a budget. Good pay, cheap housing (relatively speaking) and everything from skiing to surfing to mountain climbing. Did I mention it's cheap?

      I bought the house I live in now 9 years ago for $50,200. It's brick, nice neighborhood on a 1/2 acre lot in town(a small town, but in town none the less). Property in the RTP area is quite a bit more...but I like living in the country...and paying lower taxes.

    10. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      You can thank the Marshall Space Flight Center for a lot of that. Huntsville is also kind of interesting in that occasionally you'll come across a Ph.D that wears denim bib overalls and lives on a small farm. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Burdell · · Score: 1

      MSFC and the Army (Redstone Arsenal) draw a lot of PhDs, as do their contractors. Other local high tech companies have grown up as well that draw PhDs. I have known engineers (don't know if any are PhDs) that have a house in the city and a farm in the country; when they retire, they sell the city house and move to the country (and a farm that is paid for).

    12. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by metlin · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in Cincinnati -- and as far as I've seen, it seems to have a decent amount of tech jobs.

      In and around Cincinnati, there are several tech. companies; not a whole lot, but enough to have good opportunities -- GE Aviation, Cincinnati Bell, Convergys, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Fujitec etc.

      And the cost of living in Cincinnati seems quite low, too. If you decide to live in either IN/KY, your housing costs are lowered still.

      Personally, I like Cincinnati. It's not too big a city to make you feel overwhelmed and not too small to make you feel like a small park.

    13. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by metlin · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

      Used to work at LANL, it was definitely one of the better places I've lived in; lots of smart (and nice) people. However, the only problem is that there are about 5 places you can eat out at and one bar -- and of course, the one bookstore by the museum.

      And almost everybody works at the labs, so after a while, you pretty much know everybody else.

    14. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for you elitest types (I keed!), RDP is home to the second highest percentage of PHD's (per capita) outside of Silicon Valley.


      Please don't use an apostrophe to show a plural noun. Apostrophes are meant for showing possession and for contractions. Showing the plural of an acronym is not a contraction and no possession is being referenced so it only requires an s to be appended.

    15. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remedial Job Searching for Thirteen-Year-Olds 002:

      The poster is a network engineer/admin type. The poster claims that the job market for his job is great in RTP.

      The poster's wife is a teacher. The poster claims that the job market for his wife's job is even better than the job market for his. Presumably, the poster is saying that there is high demand for teachers around RTP, presenting many employment options and driving better salaries working conditions.

      If it is unclear to you why a husband would consider his wife's employment options when selecting a place to live, you need help of a kind that you cannot get on Slashdot.

      The word "evening" is an obvious error. It should have been "even".

    16. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Buckeyes!!

      (Spent 3 years in Durham. Loved the winters. Made sure to spend summers at interships far to the north. Couldn't wait to return to the land of Woody, even if unemployment here has blown past 6%.)

    17. Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangle) by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      And for you elitest types (I keed!), RDP is home to the second highest percentage of PHD's (per capita) outside of Silicon Valley.

      And sadly, because of this, the Triangle is following Charlotte and Atlanta in becoming Just Another Metropolis - it's Southern identity and charm lost forever. My sister, who lived in Durham from 1982 to 2002, said she didn't realize how bad it had gotten - till they moved to Irvine (CA.) and found the differences less than expected.
       
      Even worse - my beloved Triad (I am a native)[1] seems to be going down the same path.

      [1] NC can be a little confusing as it has both the Triangle (Raliegh/Durham/Chapel Hill) and the Triad (Winston-Salem/Greensboro/High Point).
  6. Outsourcing by owlman17 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In other third world countries where these tech jobs are being outsourced to, $USD400-$600/month is very high. I live in Manila, and the minimum wage is roughly less than $USD 6.00 daily. Those who work in outsourced tech-support call centers make $300 monthly and they're very happy about it. I had a short web-design stint making about $450 monthly and I was really really happy about it, to say the least. Single people here could live like kings on that.

    1. Re:Outsourcing by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      And to think I clear 3900 USD/mo and that's not alot for me ... hehehe (it's way more than enough, just seems you always find a way to spend your money).

      Of course I live in Canada so the cost of living is a bit higher than $6/day. Without a cell/net/tv you could survive on about 900/mo (rent+food+clothes) but your life would suck balls.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  7. My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Tink2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As someone who lived in Idaho Falls, Idaho, I strongly advise against it unless you think man-made falls are cool and love a few of the Temple at night, and like the idea of living in a city that has nothing around it for miles except scenery, where the tallest building is nine stories tall and it's a hotel.

    I lived there for a year and pretty much loathed every moment of it. Of course, I came there from Atlanta, Georgia, so ... it was a bit of culture shock for me.

    If you're going to live in Montgomery, you might as well consider Huntsville as well. Although it might be slightly harder to get a job there as everyone has some sort of technical background for the most part, it's a fairly agreeable city and not at all representative of the rest of Alabama.

    1. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I've loved a few of the Temple at night....strangely enough they seem to get excommunicated soon afterwards.

    2. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by kfg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      like the idea of living in a city that has nothing around it for miles except scenery, where the tallest building is nine stories tall and it's a hotel.

      Knock down that damned building and I'm in.

      KFG

    3. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/few/view.

    4. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I don't know where that typo came in from ... it's been a long week and since I'm in college retail it's only going to get longer for a few more weeks.

    5. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! If I had mod points today I'd mod your post up solely for your signature!

    6. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Burdell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As someone who lives in Huntsville (born and raised here) and also does some business in Montgomery, I'd have to agree. I'm not aware of a whole lot of tech jobs available in Montgomery; there's always demand in Huntsville (especially as another 7-12 thousand Army and contracter jobs come to Huntsville in the next few years). I don't know how the cost of living compares (Huntsville is a good bit lower than the Atlanta area though). The "metro" areas around Montgomery and Huntsville are about the same size IIRC, but Huntsville has a lot more "outside" influence (German rocket scientists in the 1950s and people from all over the world since).

      Huntsville can be an odd place sometimes; mixing rocket scientists and rednecks has interesting results.

    7. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The most important quality of life question for Idaho Falls:

      Can you buy booze on Sunday?

      (Personally, I'm a non-drinker, but I don't want to live in a town where people can't get drunk on Sunday if they want.)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Miles of scenery trumps miles of strip malls IMHO.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by engineerofsorts · · Score: 1

      Consider, however, that rating girls in Idaho is much simpler--none of this 1 to 10 stuff-- just Grade 1, Grade 2, or culls--it is "famous for potatoes", after all.

      --
      Life is tough. Life is even tougher when you're stupid.
    10. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      No. You can't.
      However: Idaho Falls is the one place I've ever been where you could buy cigarettes by the each instead of by the pack.

      Since I posted above, I got to thinking more about life in Idaho Falls when I was there (88-89) and how that might differ today. Seeing as how I live in a relatively isolated college town now, where we have to drive 30 mins to the next "big" town (if you count Roanoke as "big", that is), I'd have to guess it's not so much different than Blacksburg, Virginia. If I want something obscure, I get it from the 'net.

      I just hated all that snow and nothing.

    11. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by xlr8ed · · Score: 1

      I lived Idaho Falls for three years and I know what you mean. What they left out of the article is that Idaho Falls is a huge Mormon community, and if you are not Mormon will not be treated faily. I am not being a bigot, I have many Mormon friends who felt sorry for us, didn't know how many of the non-Mormons dealt with it, as some of them have to deal with not being "Mormon enough" Also in general, if you are not from the area, you are considered an outsider to everyone.

    12. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by mpaque · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, yes, the water cascading over the concrete barriers and gently splashing into the concrete-lined culvert below. I remember going to sleep to the sound of 300 car trains hauling potatoes out of town.

      Many of the software engineering jobs aren't in Idaho Falls itself, but out at 'The Site', the Idaho National Engineering (and Environmental) Laboratory. It's a convenient 75-90 minute bus ride out of town, just north of Atomic City (Quonset hut with a bar, gas station, and post office).

      INE(E)L is located so far from town so as to provide a buffer zone in case of a little mistake in one of the engineering projects. Interesting place, if you ever find out what went on in some of the widely separated facilities out there. (Hint: the original name was Reactor Testing Station...)

      http://www.idptv.state.id.us/buildingbig/buildings /ineel.html
      http://nuclear.inl.gov/52reactors.shtml

    13. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idaho is great. There is tons to do. You can always go huntin' or fishin' or campin'. Good heck, as I figure it's purtineer the most best on this here earth.

    14. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Have you ever read Maddox's Idaho Rant?

      Incidentally, I've seen single cigs for sale at little dollar tiendas and liquor stores here in Los Angeles. I live in a pretty ethnic neighborhood, though. Mostly Latino.

      Don't get me wrong about needing a huge city. If a town has enough of a cosmopolitan or cultural atmosphere, perhaps if it has one or more decent universities, I'm cool. There's a town in Mexico I really like: Guanajuato. It's got a population of around 78,000. It's also the site of a famous (famous in the Latin world) University and is the state capital. It's an old silver mining town, founded in 1554. Here's the Wikipedia article on it where I just grabbed those facts, if you care to learn anymore.

      The reason I'm especially interested in Guanajuato is because a movie studio is being built in nearby San Miguel de Allende, and I happen to work in the movie business. I say, "is being built", I should say "is being planned". The land has been purchased, investors brought onboard (including Antonio Banderas, who is sort of the figurehead of this project), but I haven't heard anything further in a while. I was there for almost two months a couple of years ago and I loved it.

      I'm also thinking about Mexico City (more commonly known as D.F. or "Day Effay"). Talk about a big city! It's bigger than New York! I've been offered work there by a guy that can get me into one of the Mexican set technicians' unions. I'm not sure if that's the way I want to go (been there, done that already).

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    15. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by jnf · · Score: 1

      oddly enough i was just contacted by a recruiter from inl, as someone who typically doesnt drive- would getting to inl daily from idaho falls require a car or is there a bus? (even if it is 75-90 minutes long). I'm a little apprehensive about it because im used to living in the city (boston, new york, la, phoenix, dallas and now vegas), but its a chance to work in one of the labs which would help me get someplace nicer like llnl or similar. Basically, i'm caught between the geek in me that wants to work for the lab and the person in me who wants to live near things.

    16. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Huntsville can be an odd place sometimes; mixing rocket scientists and rednecks has interesting results.
      Do you end up with tricked out cars that look like this?
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    17. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there's a bus. No, you won't be going out into the desert. Earlier poster was full of shit. 80% of the software jobs are either at EROB or IORC buildings. I work in one of them, and suspect it'll be IORC if you're being actively recruited (there's a cybersecurity team that needs a few DOZEN more brilliant hackers/researchers).

      I'd make some negative remark about the dearth of culture here, but you live in Vegas. Obviously, culture doesn't mean a lot to you. (/snark). Seriously, the people that enjoy living here are the ones that have outdoorsy interests or the ones that can endure the cultural vacuum because something else (kids, netflix, Marcellars Wine & Beer shop) fills the void.

    18. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High school isn't the same as work, kid.

      Of the several *hundred* engineers and programmers and net admins I know at INL, I can count on two hands the number that are Idaho natives.

      Furthermore, more than half the site staff isn't Mormon. If you'd dug a bit deeper while you were here, you'd have learned that the stereotype is:

      You are EITHER mormon OR you work at the site.

    19. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by oudzeeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a buddy who is a UK citizen, has lived in several contries, and spent his teen & college years in the US (Maine). He recently took a job in Provo, Utah and works in a small tech company with mostly Mormons. He is a big partier and drinker, so I don't know if Utah is really the place for him, but he has no complaints about how he is treated by Mormons. His company is opening up a branch in England and they asked if he'd be willing to be transfered out there and he jumped at the chance, so it worked out good for him.

    20. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Burdell · · Score: 1

      Nah, that looks like just a lousy jet engine, not a real rocket engine.

      However, one of the "sell-your-own" car lots did have an X-Wing fighter parked for sale several years ago.

    21. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by weiserfireman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Idaho native, born near Idaho Falls, have relatives in Idaho Falls. I like Idaho Falls, but most of you wouldn't. Yes, the falls are artificial. Built for recreation and to increase tourism. The town is bordered by a large desert to the north and west, farmland to the east and south. The desert to the north is home to the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Home to a lot of Nuclear Power Research. At one time, had around 200 nuclear reactors there. That is still the largest employer, and it is a 60 mile commute on two lane highway. They do have buses for commuting though. If you are into outdoor activities, hunting, fishing, camping, skiing, snowmobiling, you might really like it. If you are into nightlife, clubs, movies, bars, you will hate it. The town is over 50% LDS (mormon).

    22. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by mchulse · · Score: 1

      As someone who currently lives in Idaho Falls I would recommend against it. Not that there's anything wrong with Idaho Falls. In fact, it's perfect the way it is and I hope being on lists like this doesn't make it grow into the bigger cities that I avoid like the plague. So as the OP said, skip over this one. It's interesting that I love I.F. for the exact reasons that Tink2000 loathed it for a year. Fortunately to each his own.

    23. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Huntsville can be an odd place sometimes; mixing rocket scientists and rednecks has interesting results.

      I now can't help but imagine Von Braun after he'd been acculturated to the south...

      "Achtung! Achtung! Holden sie mein Bier und vatch dis!"

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    24. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by xlr8ed · · Score: 1

      Well, first off I am in my 30's, no not much of a kid here. Additionally, where ever I work, I also have to live, so dealing with the issue if being an outsider is there if you work at the site or not,

    25. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      As you said, to each his own. I certainly had a few things happening at the time that I'm sure translated into a rather frustrating stint there (no job, just out of highschool, transplant from a city of 4million to a town of a few thousands). I was under 21, so I didn't notice the lack of nightlife; I noticed the lack of things to do, since I'm not an outdoorsy person.

      Sure it was nice, but not for me.

    26. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Actually, it'd be "und y'all vatch dis!"

    27. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However: Idaho Falls is the one place I've ever been where you could buy cigarettes by the each instead of by the pack.
      Don't spend much time in black neighborhoods, do you? It's called a loosie. As in a loose cigarette.
    28. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Well, no I don't actually. I live in a part of Virginia that is less than 3% per capita African-American, and as I recall, I never saw a single solitary AfAm the entire time I was in Idaho Falls.

      However, I did see a lot of Latino folks, so ...

    29. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      INE(E)L is located so far from town so as to provide a buffer zone in case of a little mistake in one of the engineering projects.

      For good reason.

    30. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a huge underground partying scene there.
      Large sound proof basements where the party goes all night.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:My views on Idaho Falls and Alabama in general by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      he goes to parties with some mormons he met and all they do is eat ice cream and drink root beer

  8. "...and Fort Worth, Ark..." by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 2, Informative

    Without having RTFA I can tell you that's probably Fort Smith, Arkansas (or Fort Worth, Texas, though that seems less likely).

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    1. Re:"...and Fort Worth, Ark..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first thing that I thought of when I read this summary. So I was glad to find your post and mod it up. So hello, fellow-Arkansan. Or at least, hello knowledgeable-about-Arkansas-person!

      And yep, BTW, the TFA does say "Fort Smith, Ark."

    2. Re:"...and Fort Worth, Ark..." by kfg · · Score: 1

      Carpetbagging Stranger: Can I take this road to Fort Smith?

      Arkie Fiddler: Ain't no use.

      Carpetbagging Stranger: Why not?

      Arkie Fiddler: They already got one. Now go away before I taunt you a second time.

      KFG

    3. Re:"...and Fort Worth, Ark..." by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      the TFA does say "Fort Smith, Ark."

      And it's also printed on receipts from local ATM machines.

    4. Re:"...and Fort Worth, Ark..." by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

      I always thought Fort Smith was a great town. I was born in Walnut Ridge (ugh...) but most recently was a denizen of Russellville. (I live in Nashville now... TN that is)

      --
      sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
  9. I live in Fort Collins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the only jobs being created here are at the stores.

    I have no idea where the people here work if they can afford to shop at all the new places.

    But above all, there are only two kinds of buildings under construction here. Churches and banks.

    Where do these people work???

    1. Re:I live in Fort Collins by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Denver?

      Seriously, the problem with these communities is one of the major reasons the cost of living is so low is because the vast majority of jobs there pay very little. Sure, there might be some relatively high-paying tech jobs, but the problem is there are only 5 tech jobs in the whole city.

    2. Re:I live in Fort Collins by atomic-penguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well they must work at the bank, at the church, or they are in construction.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    3. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I have no idea where the people here work if they can afford to shop at all the new places. But above all, there are only two kinds of buildings under construction here. Churches and banks. Where do these people work???"

      I live in Ft. Collins also. Try HP, Poudre Valley Hospital, Eastman Kodak, Anheuser-Busch, Agilent, Celestica and Colorado State University for starters. Within a half-hour drive or so your will find IBM, Ball Aerospace, NOAA, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Lockheed Martin, and the University of Colorado to name a few. All this is in a town within an hour or two of some of the best skiing, hiking, camping, climbing and biking in the country and a very affordable cost of living. Oh and did I mention there are several great microbreweries right in town :)

      Seriously, the only people I hear rag on Ft. Collins are the ones that have lived there their whole lives and don't realize how good they have it.

    4. Re:I live in Fort Collins by DreamCoder · · Score: 1

      Yep, Fort Collins rocks. I'd move there if Boulder wasn't so much better ;-).

    5. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 2

      Yep Boulder is much better, if you don't mind paying twice as much for your house ;)

    6. Re:I live in Fort Collins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:I live in Fort Collins by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Informative

      HALF HOUR DRIVE FROM FT. COLINS?

      In a Testerrosa perhaps! You're right on the Wyoming border for shit's-sake!

      You're describing Jobs in Boulder and Greeley was more than an hour north of there - and Ft. Colins is another hour north of Greeley. Please stop yanking people's chains!

      I lived in Colorado off and on since 1984, and the tech jobs there were always in a state of downward flux. It only took a few companies to flood a ton of skilled workers into the marketplace - followed by a continual influx of people into the state from places in CA which would drive up the cost of living to levels akin to Seattle. Between 1994 and 1996, the same identical apartment that I rented came on the market 2 years later at 225% what I rented it for.

      Pay levels did NOT increase to meet those cost of living increases. And housing? The whole of the southern suburbs of Denver went through the ROOF in housing costs. But hey - getting Quark, Echostar (and the markers of the Dish Network wasn't a small enterprise) would only give up more than 35k if you pulled on all molars. Most of Echostar's jobs were manning the call centers anyway. Real high-dollar work there. AB? Um most of their tech work is at HQ which is 876 miles east of you in St. Louis. IBM - always downsizing, Storage Tech - on the rocks, HP - oh there's a stable one of those, Kodak - another stable one of those - NOAA - no shortage of govt jobs in the fields of science, and the application time is so short too for high-end research. Aerospace is ok now that we're killing people again, but these aren't standard IT jobs unless you're ready to check stress-dynamics on dynamic peak loads within an airframe right after you finish that firewall you're putting on that intranetwork hub.

      The biggest downfall of any midwestern tech market is that once the company runs through a round of cutbacks you're going to be hard-pressed to find someone else to pick up the slack. I know plenty of suckers hurting after Sprint ditched them in the middle of bumfuck Kansas with no other options for work elsewhere.

    8. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about "tech jobs". The parent asked where all the people that live in Ft. Collins work and I answered. Are all these companies going on huge hiring sprees? No. Are a lot of them doing some hiring? Yes. Do you have a decent chance of getting a good job if you look around? MOST DEFINITELY. Trust me buddy, there is nowhere in the country where high paying jobs are oozing out of the woodwork. It's gonna be a mixed bag wherever you go. And for a town of 130,000, FOCO has some pretty good companies.

      Secondly YOU need to quit yanking peoples chains. Look at a damn map. Downtown Boulder is 45 minutes from me on a bad day. You're trying to make it sound like it's 2 hours away, bullshit. Denver is SE of Boulder and I can get there in just over an hour. IBM is HALF AN HOUR away, period. Also, I didn't describe a single job that was in Greeley.

      And housing costs are just fine in FOCO. You're talking about Denver, I never said anything about Denver. A 2 bedroom apt in FOCO is $550 a month, try finding something that cheap anywhere in CA.

    9. Re:I live in Fort Collins by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      That high altitude is cooking your brain - the partent post was talking about Ft Colins - you were insinuating that IBM and other Boulder firms were a scant 30 minutes from Ft. Collins. Oh and Highway 36 is a disaster area - particularly after the whole of the corridor built out partuclarly around Interlocken. If you're getting there in 45 minutes - either you're on the north side of Denver (which is an industrial wasteland) or are speeding like a bat out of hell from Aurora or Littleton Englewood. I won't also mention that I-25 is far - FAR worse than anything I've delt with on the 101 freeway.

      And they're STILL fucking with the damn thing.

    10. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep mentioning Denver?? Is it that difficult for you to understand my posts? For the last time...I live in Fort Collins, I can get to downtown Boulder in 45 minutes easy. I can get to IBM in 30 minutes flat, from Ft. Collins. Do you need me to explain it to you again?

      P.S. I never said IBM and other Boulder firms were a scant 30 minutes from Ft. Collins. I said "a half hour or so". So yea, it might take 40 or 45 minutes for some places in Boulder, but it's not even close to 2 hours like you're trying to make it sound.

    11. Re:I live in Fort Collins by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Then I want a picture of that car you're driving 225 miles an hour with. Your gas costs must be hiddeous.

    12. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      Boulder is less than 50 miles from me, where I live in Ft. Collins. You do the math, thats an average of 60 miles an hour. In a state where the speed limit is 75, 60 mph is nothing. But keep exaggerating some more. I'm sure there are at least a few people that will believe the stuff you're spewing.

    13. Re:I live in Fort Collins by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Actually acording to Yahoo it's over 50 miles - but not much more. Still, I'm amazed at the time you're making. Getting out of Greeley took forever, and it was further south.

      http://maps.yahoo.com/dd_result?newaddr=&taddr=&cs z=Fort+Collins%2C+Colorado&country=us&tcsz=Boulder %2C+Colorado&tcountry=us

      Plus when did 54 become a freeway? I didn't think you could do 60plus on that road.

    14. Re:I live in Fort Collins by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      That's from the center of Ft. Collins. I live on Harmony, it's under 50 miles. I don't know where 54 is. I take I-25 and do about 80 or so, then take 119 into Boulder and you can cruise at 45 mph, you'll be at The Sink in 45 minutes. Piece of cake.

    15. Re:I live in Fort Collins by DreamCoder · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if it was *only* twice... :-/

  10. Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by osho_gg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are interesting questions here. One could go for one of these highest paying jobs in obscure locations where few companies are there. However, what is the growth potential in such locations? How many companies are there to work for in such locations that can pay high salaries for specialized skills? How many companies can pay more than 100k in places like Idaho Falls, ID? And, what happens if that company goes bust/one is laid off in such areas?

    I dislike the high cost of living, traffic, unaffordability of houses etc. in places such as Silicon Valley. But there are lot more companies where one can work for with decent salary. One's chances of finding another job with close to maximum salary in one's field are lot higher there without having to move.

    These are not just idle concerns. I have been asking many such questions to myself recently as I am not in high-tech area such as Silicon Valley. There are no easy answers to such questions. These become even more difficult once one has family, house etc. and has established roots in one place.

    Osho

    1. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Has it occurred to you that in a place with a lower cost of living than Silicon Valley that you might actually be able to live better with a less than maximum salary?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by kfg · · Score: 1

      These become even more difficult once one has family, house etc. and has established roots in one place.

      Have you thought about finding someplace you like and then growing where you plant?

      KFG

    3. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by notshannon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At 33, I am in the earlier part of my career.

      As a younger person, living in a cheap locale
      commits me to living on that economic scale for
      the rest of my life.

      My "money scale" is roughly proportional to my income.

      If my salary in Central New Jersey is double that in
      Cortland, NY, then my company contribution of 5% of my
      salary or so to retirement is, well, double in NJ.

      Ditto with the cost of a lot of things. The slosh in
      my budget is larger, too. (Unfortunately, real estate
      purchase is more than double.)

      Once I've saved my war chest, at least the bulk of
      what I'll submit to the angels of compound return,
      then I could move to a lower cost of living area
      and be ahead of the game. But the reverse direction
      is not affordable.

    4. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by bwy · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wonder if the cost of living gets too much weight sometimes in an equation. I'm a sofware engineer on Kauai, and it is pretty expensive to live here but I get paid more than I made on the mainland. I'm pretty sure that smart people can always find ways to save money wherever they live. For example, I'm convinced that if you know where to look, you can get a sit down dinner anywhere in the US for around $10 a head. Housing is another story, but how much is your housing budget in relation to your salary? Once you get to a certain salary level it isn't such a big deal.

      Quality of life- now that is what rarely gets any weight because it is so subjective. You (and your family) have got to (1) be happy, (2) be able to afford your lifestyle, and (3) tend to your career. How a person prioritizes those three items is entirely up to them.

    5. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I dislike the high cost of living, traffic, unaffordability of houses etc. in places such as Silicon Valley. But there are lot more companies where one can work for with decent salary.

      Furthermore, in a one- or two-company town, you can take the salary offered to you, start your own business, or pick up and leave. Thus, a lot more people would be willing to accept salary cuts than somewhere else where there are a lot more choices.

      -b.

    6. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by osho_gg · · Score: 1
      Has it occurred to you that in a place with a lower cost of living than Silicon Valley that you might actually be able to live better with a less than maximum salary?

      Yes, I have been doing exactly that (achieving a better standard of living by being in a place with lower cost of living *and* where one can get very good salary too) for >5 years. And, that's why I have been thinking a lot about the questions that I raised. I have been thinking about the lack of growth and availability of other opportunities all the time recently.

      Osho

    7. Re:Highest paying yes, but highest growth?? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points; insightful! Though you did consider the real estate price, you didn't mention taxes. I live in NJ, and we have the highest property taxes in the US and some of the highest income taxes. My rent for a nice fairly new one bedroom apartment is just a bit more than what property taxes would cost for a slightly larger two bedroom house in my area. I'm content with renting for now, especially in the current housing market.

  11. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

    For the non-NC types, Cary (Corral Around Relocated Yankees) is the neighbor to Raleigh, and is home to many RTPers.

    --


    Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  12. Good luck finding a job in Middle Nowhere by heroine · · Score: 1

    You might as well write an essay on how Pluto has the highest salaries because there's no competition for real estate on Pluto.

    1. Re:Good luck finding a job in Middle Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pluto has the lowest salaries due to the lack of real estate, high relocation cost and unsustainable living costs.

    2. Re:Good luck finding a job in Middle Nowhere by servognome · · Score: 1
      You might as well write an essay on how Pluto has the highest salaries because there's no competition for real estate on Pluto.

      Pluto is great, it's just the commute that kills you. For those of you who say work from home, neither Comcast nor AT&T have decided to roll out high-speed internet yet.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:Good luck finding a job in Middle Nowhere by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You can get modem-speed if you can catch the New Horizons probe due there in 2015.

  13. Collateral Damage by NoHandleBars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I once oversaw moving a firms's HQ and IT functions from Silicon Valley to San Antonio, TX because of the "math" some white collar genius put together like this Forbes nonsense. Sure, the "average" wage was one-half of what it was in Palo Alto, but because of the "quality" of local talent, we ended up hiring THREE TIMES as many staff to do the same amount of work. (For the math-challenged, that meant productivity sucked by 50%.) This wasn't just a drain on company resources, but on the few people who DID know their chops and had to hoist it in for the dullards. Those that made the move and saw the disaster had to in turn move completely out of the area to restore sanity to their careers. And the "icing on the cake" is that San Antonio is the only place I've stood hip deep in mud and had sand blow in my face. No thanky-thanky.

    --
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+ "I don't know what's wrong with you, but I'm quite sure it's hard to pronounce."
    1. Re:Collateral Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because of the "math" some white collar genius"

      So, you were blue-collar then?

      "but because of the "quality" of local talent, we ended up hiring THREE TIMES as many staff to do the same amount of work. (For the math-challenged, that meant productivity sucked by 50%.)"

      Or it could mean you didn't know how to hire in the first place or manage the project properly or estimate the scope of the project. One would think you would be able to find talent in a metro of around 2 million.

    2. Re:Collateral Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So, how goes the computer animation business ? I heard you guys dried up when the Babylon 5 contract went away.

      There are a bunch pretty damn smart people in San Antonio - hell, I'm one of 'em. You can find them in the small but growing collection of tech firms, in the DoD security establishment, and in some of the most technically talented IT shops in the country.

      But the market isn't huge, and any firm that tries to build itself up in a hurry is going to run into problems. Especially if you don't know how to hire (like the other AC said). And it will be even worse if you're trying to do it on the cheap. That talent isn't going to leave their secure job for some carpetbagger that spends all their time whining.

      Don't know where you found the sand - usually the humidty is the problem :-\

    3. Re:Collateral Damage by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Racist much? San Antonio is a minority-majority city.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Collateral Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Antonio blows. I'm hispanic and most of San Antonio is hispanic, so I'd appreciate it if you skip the racist comments. On the other hand, most of San Antonio is also fat and I'm not. Feel free to say I'm prejudiced against fat people. Carry on.

    5. Re:Collateral Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It cracks me up to read that people think that Silicon Valley has better local talent than San Antonio.

      Sure, MAYBE the cream of the crop is better (and I say Maybe), but are you going to be hiring Steve Jobs or Larry Ellison or Scott McNealey (or Bill Hewlett, RIP)?

      Stanford was a great producer of educated people, but educated people don't necessarily equate to talent on the job. And the gold rush of the late 90s brought a lot of VERY untalented people out of the woodwork and into silicon valley.

      The average silicon valley wonk is far below the talent of what you can find in middle America if you just conduct a reasonable candidate search. And the average wonk in silicon valley is paid 40% more.

      My experience? I used to interview and hire people across the country for a MAJOR silicon valley-headquartered company. Hiring in Silicon Valley was the hardest spot I had to hire in - not because there wasn't some talent there, but because there were so many wanna-bes who job hop to rack up their salary and hide their deficiencies.

    6. Re:Collateral Damage by kabocox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I once oversaw moving a firms's HQ and IT functions from Silicon Valley to San Antonio, TX because of the "math" some white collar genius put together like this Forbes nonsense. Sure, the "average" wage was one-half of what it was in Palo Alto, but because of the "quality" of local talent, we ended up hiring THREE TIMES as many staff to do the same amount of work. (For the math-challenged, that meant productivity sucked by 50%.) This wasn't just a drain on company resources, but on the few people who DID know their chops and had to hoist it in for the dullards. Those that made the move and saw the disaster had to in turn move completely out of the area to restore sanity to their careers. And the "icing on the cake" is that San Antonio is the only place I've stood hip deep in mud and had sand blow in my face. No thanky-thanky.

      This just tell's me that your firm doesn't know how to hire people. There are plenty of talented people in Texas. Heck, there are plenty of talented homegrown people in the Litte Rock, AR area. If your company can't find them, don't blame the area. I personnally believe this applies to all of the US. There are plenty of trainable college grads in most major US cities. If you think the talent/gurus are much better in a tech hot spot, then you are willing to pay a premium for equal talent not better talent. I'd think that most businesses that move to area's where the cost of living is lower end up hiring more people not to do the same amount of work. They hire more people because its cheaper and can get more done if the organization is properly run.

    7. Re:Collateral Damage by DaFallus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's odd. Southwest Research Institute is based in San Antonio and although they primarily do a lot of government funded research they have a lot of talented people working for them. There are also a large number of smaller technical companies based in San Antonio. I have a number of friends who still live there working in various tech jobs.

      San Antonio is a great place to live if you don't mind the slow pace of the city. It is one of the few cities I've lived in where you can do pretty well for yourself making around $30k. There is also a lot of cultural diversity, and I'm not just talking about the hispanic influence.

      I myself would have been happy to stay there after graduating but I just couldn't handle the slow pace that everyone lives at there. Also, the city itself is pretty poor and the roads are in horrible condition, there is a large gap between the rich all bundled away in Alamo Heights, Olmos Park, etc and the rest of the population. The crime there is also relatively high compared to what I've experienced while living in Houston and parts of Southern California. I've had my car broken into at least twice, witnessed a robbery at a gas station, and saw my friend get pistol whipped in the face and pulled out of the window of his car by would-be theives. So, if you're thinking about moving there, buy a gun and stay in well lit areas.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    8. Re:Collateral Damage by uujjj · · Score: 1
      Racist much? San Antonio is a minority-majority city.



        . . . as is San Jose.

    9. Re:Collateral Damage by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      This is the result of the typical bums on seats accounting made by most large organizations. I've found it especially common in organizations which are governed without representative coming from the "trenches" (someone who long ago started out "on the floor" as a developer and has touched most facets of the development and maintenance cycle). The bums on seats mentality is a legacy from the industrial revolution and hardly applicable to information centric companies. Unfortunately there are a lot of companies and organizations which have management teams consisting only of people which are able to equate one resource = one unit of productivity.

      Even IBM realized in the 60's that a small team selected field experts for the problem context produced magnitudes more value than a large team of mixed resources [1]. Talent tops number of resources in the information domain which is something still not obvious to a lot of organizations.

      [1] Although I've heard stories that even IBM have certain organizations suffering from the bums on seat syndrome. Perhaps they're simply too big and poor to educate all their managers the lessons learned in the 60ies.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
  14. Ummmm... no by supabeast! · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "When you take the cost of living and consider the net pay adjusted for that cost, places like Montgomery, Ala., Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Fort Worth, Ark. suddenly seem quite attractive."

    Not if you consider the costs of therapy that go along with leaving civilization to live in backwaters lik Alabama, Idaho, or Arkansas.

    1. Re:Ummmm... no by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I live in Idaho. It is a little backwards sometimes (the place I live in just got highspeed internet about 3 years ago.) but it does pay well. It's hard to find a good tech, so when people do, they are more than willing to pay for it. I started a little tech business and I have been able to survive and keep myself busy without even having a storefront (finally got one a month ago after being in business for a year.)

    2. Re:Ummmm... no by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      Some people would say the same about SanFran, NYC, Chicago, etc.....

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
    3. Re:Ummmm... no by SaDan · · Score: 1

      I moved from the Boulder, CO area to work in the suburbs of Chicago.

      I fucking miss living in rural Indiana. Cities and the morons who like to pack in like sardines, deal with all this smog and pollution, and pay the insane housing and living costs associated with "city" life can all go to hell.

      Give me cell based internet, a porch swing, and a laptop out in the middle of no where, and I'd be happy as could be.

      I would gladly take a pay cut to go back to work in a rural setting.

    4. Re:Ummmm... no by AckutarQuesinta · · Score: 1

      Sure, insult a place that you've never even been to (statistically speaking of course).

      I live in Birmingham, Al (a place in between Huntsville and Montgomery) and I find everything quite agreeable. I worked in the tech section of the fourth largest private insurance company in the nation. It was based in Birmingham with offices in Atlanta, Dallas, London, and when I left, one was opening in California. Now I work for an Advertising agency (much lower in the list of "largest in the nation") it's a wonderful place to work that pays quite well. Many other big names have Birmingham as their home.

      Housing is cheap, utilities are cheap, education is good (a school downtown recently was ranked 4th best in the nation). Sure you have to drive to get anywhere but gas is cheaper than it is most places in the country as well.

      This wasn't the most coherent post I've ever made but the point is this, Alabama is a great place to live/work. Okay, I'll amend that. The larger cities in Alabama (Birmingham, Huntsville, Montgomery, and Mobile) are great places to live/work. When you get to Elba, Arab, or Pell City, it get's a little less so. Plenty to do, plenty to see, plenty of money to spend.

      --
      I'm not trying to make people mad; I'm trying to make people think!
  15. NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    I was excited there for a minute...

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I've heard that D/FW sucks. Did I hear wrong?

      The only place in Texas that sounds livable to me (again, from the reports of others) is Austin. Plus, I think I'd like the adrenaline rush every time I walked within view of the bell tower.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DFW is a close second to Austin for tech jobs, the pay is decent, and the cost of living is cheap.

      Dunno what you were told..

    3. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by Ranger96 · · Score: 1

      Dallas pretty much sucks. The Collin County suburbs north of Dallas (where I live) are basically a less expensive version of Orange County, CA, minus the surrounding mountains, nearby ocean, and Disneyland (not that I dislike Collin County, it's just not very exciting). Fort Worth is actually a very nice, laid-back, and suprisingly sophisticated city. It has real culture, a lively urban center, and a lower cost of living than the Dallas area. I grew up in Fort Worth, and would live there again in a minute, except most of the tech jobs are in Dallas and Collin County (though it's changing).

      --
      What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.-Ecclesiastes 1:9
    4. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Hey! Thanks for the info and clearing up my misperceptions.

      I really need to check out all 50 states one of these years and clear up some of the stereotypes I hold. Either on a motorcycle or a motor home, depending on how old I am when I finally do it. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      > I really need to check out all 50 states one of these years and clear up some of the stereotypes I hold.

      Seeing for myself, has tended to reinforce many of my stereotypes.

      For one thing, I didn't recognize racism or religious intolerance around me, until I got away from it. That took most of my life to do. I refuse to go back.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:NB: Fort Smith, not Forth Worth by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
      Dallas pretty much sucks. The Collin County suburbs north of Dallas (where I live) are basically a less expensive version of Orange County, CA
      That brings back some interesting memories. I lived in California for several years, then my family moved. When I was living in Dallas for a very short time back in the '80's I kept referring to the town of "Irving" as "Irvine". (For those of you not familiar with the areas, Irving is a small town about 1/2 way between Dallas and Fort Worth; Irvine is a small town in Orange County about 25 miles from Los Angeles.)
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  16. There's a reason it's cheap to live in those place by Rix · · Score: 1

    No one *wants* to, so there's no competition.

  17. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some of the places on this list could be fairly okay for an educated, liberal, free-thinker type.
    But a lot of those places are damn scary.

    Also, it doesn't make sense that Richardson TX would draw less than half the salary of Plano TX.
    I mean seriously, these are both actually the same place for anyone who would be living in that part of the Dallas metro area, and for that matter, so is Carrollton. There may be a factor related to commuting on I-35 as opposed to Central Expressway, but come on... these are all the same damn place.

    Also, pointing out Gilbert Arizona as if it's really distinct from Phoenix is pretty stupid too.

    $226 for Scottsdale AZ (yes, it's a separate township, but snobs like to point out that it's *Scottsdale* to avoid saying they live in Phoenix)... That is a joke. Scottsdale median home price is in the $250's still, and most of the housing that a mid-career professional would be happy with are well over the $million mark.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  18. Research Triangle Park by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone assume that pay rates are great here? ("here" being relative, as I work in RTP) The cost of living here is so low compared to the northeastern cities that most of our workers immigrate from that there wouldn't be a lot of justification for high pay rates.

    The pay rates here are less than my "home" city of Philadelphia. But the cost of living is so much lower that I actually get a nice net raise out of the relocation. Still, if you are just after a big income, this is not the region to look in.

  19. The Gump? No thanks! by AubieTurtle · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about Montgomery is that two interstates intersect there, making it easier to get away. The tech jobs are mostly civilian jobs on the military base. The only culture to speak of is the Alabama Shakespeare Festival (which I will admit is surprisingly good). The nightlife is terrible. The current mayor is a hundred times better than the previous good ol' boy but it is still a bland boring place. You'll need the extra money you make to make frequent trips out of there.

  20. They forgot one by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Anywhere within 30-40 miles of Washington D.C. As long as you have lived a decently clean life and aren't showing signs of severe character flaws, the job security alone is worth it.

    1. Re:They forgot one by BobSutan · · Score: 1

      This man speaks the truth when it comes to job security. What he doesn't mention is the steep cost of living in the DC/Baltimore region. With the skyrocketing prices of homes many are finding themselves priced out of the market entirely, including those with $100K+ salaries. If you are moving here for the superior income and job security, you must consider the high cost of living that comes along with it.

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    2. Re:They forgot one by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      With the skyrocketing prices of homes many are finding themselves priced out of the market entirely, including those with $100K+ salaries

      That's for-real true. The DC 'burbs are nigh on impossible to buy into these days, unless you've got a pair of people with combined income of at least $150k. Anything less, and you're in for either a 2-hour daily commute, or living in a one-bedroom apartment for $1200/month. So, the key to the DC area is being very valuable to your employer. A clearance helps, too. A lot.

      But it's a pretty cool town, in terms of stuff to do/see. You're a not very long drive into the mountains, over to the shore, or into farmland of all sorts. But the traffic's getting worse every year, so telecommuting is the magic thing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:They forgot one by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      I've lived in the DC area for decades. The number of people moving here is amazing. Yes, it's not a long drive to the mountains (approx. 60 miles), but now there are so many people with the same idea on any nice weekend, so you're bound to get stuck on I-66 or Route 50 or 7.

      Real estate is very high, though cooling now. Half a million $ for a 3 (sometimes 2) bedroom townhouse is the norm in Alexandria/Arlington. I lucked out by selling a condo during the hottest time and buying a house close in.

      But, I'm really itching to move elsewhere, but not sure where. And this article's list is hilarious. Sandy, Utah? Riigght. Cary? My visits to RTP 8 years ago reminded me of the boom in Northern Virginia - too many cars on too few roads, the need for a car in order to get anywhere, and "anywhere" was probably a strip mall. Wonder how Portland is? Seattle probably matches DC in cost, but it'd be a change. I've finally had it with the heat + humidity here. Hazy, hot, humid, had it.

  21. Or 'Best public schools in America'? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apropros a previous poster who wanted to dis 'Bama & Idaho, how many correspond with the best public schools in America?

    1 Talented & Gifted Dallas Texas
    2 Jefferson County IBS** Irondale Ala.
    3 BASIS Charter Tucson Ariz.
    4 City Honors** Buffalo N.Y.
    5 Stanton College Prep** Jacksonville Fla.
    6 Eastside** Gainesville Fla.
    7 Suncoast Community** Riviera Beach Fla.
    8 Science/Engineering Magnet Dallas Texas
    9 International Academy* Bloomfield Hills
    10 Academic Magnet North Charleston S.C.
    11 Science Academy of South Texas Mercedes Texas
    12 North Hills School** Irving Texas
    13 H-B Woodlawn Arlington Va.
    14 Eastern Sierra Academy Bridgeport Calif.
    15 Richard Montgomery** Rockville Md.
    16 Myers Park** Charlotte N.C.
    17 Classen School of Advanced Studies** Oklahoma City Okla.
    18 Highland Park Dallas Texas
    19 Clarke County** Berryville Va.
    20 Little Rock Central Little Rock Ark.
    21 Hillsborough** Tampa Fla.
    22 San Diego High School of International Studies* San Diego Calif.
    23 John Miller-Great Neck North Great Neck N.Y.
    24 Wilson Magnet** Rochester N.Y.
    25 Atlantic Community** Delray Beach Fla.
    ETC.


    Flyover country seems to be mighty well represented on some of these lists...

    1. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by Dausha · · Score: 1

      "20 Little Rock Central Little Rock Ark."

      I call B.S. on that one. I live in Little Rock presently. I've been told by several sources that half the white students in the city attend private school to avoid Little Rock public schools. Central High is but one of several high schools in that school district. The district is plagued by legal bills going back most of my life (and I'm in my 30s), has insane bussing (I've watched small children dropped off after 6p in a rundown neighborhoos), and has one of the highest per-pupil spending (~$12k)---but student testing has white students only being average and black students well below-average. They must be using some of that "New Math" I keep hearing about.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    2. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Interesting how you separate your stats by skin color. Mind expanding on the settlement that is being paid out? Also, is that settlement included in the per-head education cost?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      While I'm not sure of their criteria as well, I do know a little about Central High. I graduated from Cabot High School in 1999. (For those that don't know, Cabot is one of the more popular exurbs of Little Rock and has one of the largest school districts in the state.) But, I did have friends who went to Central High. I was consistently impressed with the number of programs and wide variety of programs they offered there. Cabot School District is typically considered one of the better in the state, and it is a much safer school district than many or most of the districts in its class, but our high school didn't compare in the number of programs available, the variety of programs available, and the quality of programs available.

      We can look at it another way: advanced classes. I took more AP classes than anybody else I graduated with at 7 and our school only offered 6 until my junior year when they made third year Spanish and French AP classes -- for a total of 8 AP classes. I had friends at Central High who took 7 AP classes in one year.

      I can't dispute the fact that most of the Little Rock School District is crap. A lot of this has to do with the bussing policy which is one of the factors that force parents to enroll their kids in private schools, as it did my parents before we moved to Cabot. That said, I would contend that Central High School is the exception to the rule.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    4. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, these are the best public high schools. Mostly NY, NJ, Ill; then places like NC & TX where there is a large tech corp presence.

    5. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by Politburo · · Score: 1
      Lists like that are severely flawed, imo. Look how many are "charter", "magnet" or "academy" schools. Yes, they're public schools, but there is usually competition to get into these schools and if you don't make it, then you could be stuck in the broken part of the system.

      For instance, there are 3 Dallas schools on the list. Makes you think Dallas has a great system, right?
      The odds that a student entering the ninth grade in Dallas public schools will earn a regular diploma are hardly better than a coin toss. This horrific graduation rate is low even when compared to other large metro school districts. Of the 100 largest school districts in the United States, Dallas public schools rank 80th in overall graduation rate.
      Oh. (source)
    6. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The criteria for the list is flawed. Looking at the number of AP tests students take doesn't indicate the quality of education, just that kids are encouraged to take AP exams. Look at the E & E% score of the #2 school. Even though the school averaged almost 10 test taken/senior, only 50% of seniors passed a single test!

      My biggest issue is how the scoring ignores the truly best schools. From the FAQ: "The Challenge Index is designed to honor schools that have done the best job in persuading average students to take college-level courses and tests. It does not work with schools that have no, or almost no, average students."
      When I looked at the list I was surprised I didn't see my old high school on the list, then I went through the FAQ and saw schools with average SAT scores over 1300 were excluded (I thought the list was for the top schools?). Even with that I think my school would have been artificially low on the list, since many students skipped some AP exams simply because they would not receive credit (eg MIT does not give credit for AP Chem or CompSci)

      I do agree with some of the reasoning behind the list: "Studies by U.S. Department of Education senior researcher Clifford Adelman in 1999 and 2005 showed that the best predictor of college graduation was not good high-school grades or test scores but whether or not a student had an intense academic experience in high school. "; but there has to be better criteria.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    7. Re:Or 'Best public schools in America'? by Dausha · · Score: 1

      I have to say I'm surprised by your interest in my separating stats by skin color. The newspapers seem to always separate these statistics that way. Remember that Central High received some noteriety back in 1957. The settlement is not monetary, but equitable in nature---fix the system so there is not a disparate impact on blacks. This case is just like the other legion desegregation cases.

      The per-head cost is a separate issue. There is another school district, almost completely black, that sued about 20 years ago over unfair distribution of education money which resulted in some school districts (read black) being paid less per-pupil than white students. IIRC, education spending is primarily a county function, but the state was sued. The Arkansas State Supreme Court ordered a minimum per-student expenditure because our state constitution was amended to provide equal education for all---which seems to be a way of ensuring teachers always get paid fairly. I say teachers being paid fairly because the Court said education should be paid first---before any other necessary expenditure. This is because education is in the Constitution, while other programs are statutory.

      The Little Rock School District spends twice the Court mandated amount per pupil. When adjusted for cost-of-living, it is among the highest spending school districts in the U.S. Yet, Seatle, which spends less per actual dollar that we do, does a better job educating its students (regardless of racial background). I did the math a while back, but I think the LRSD spends (adjusted for COL) 3-4 times as much per pupil to accomplish less. I've interpreted this to mean that it's not how much is spent per pupil that matters.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  22. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wasn't that article called "Best Places to Live -- If You're a Bible-Thumping Redneck" ?

  23. Does that by avatar4d · · Score: 0

    take into account that there is not as much to do in those locations and hence to frivolously spend your $ on?

    --
    Confucius say: "Man who associates with smarter men than himself is smarter than the men he associates with."
    1. Re:Does that by kfg · · Score: 1

      there is not as much to do in those locations and hence to frivolously spend your $ on?

      http://www.sageflyfish.com/

      All depends on what it is you like to do, don't it?

      KFG

    2. Re:Does that by avatar4d · · Score: 0

      Oh Florida, that's what the poster wrote about, my mistake

      --
      Confucius say: "Man who associates with smarter men than himself is smarter than the men he associates with."
    3. Re:Does that by avatar4d · · Score: 0

      not to mention flyfishing and cow tipping cost how much?

      --
      Confucius say: "Man who associates with smarter men than himself is smarter than the men he associates with."
  24. Work from anywhere by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    The small company I work for is based in Florida. I live in Dallas. Other employees live in Atlanta, LA, and a few Florida cities. The modern IT company does not need to be based anywhere in particular.

  25. Yeah but... by methodic · · Score: 1

    You also need to take into the account your surroundings and environment... I'd rather pay $1500/mo for a 1 bedroom apartment in Boston, a very progressive and historic place to live, instead of Alabama or Arkansas, where civil liberties and evolution stalled out hundreds of years ago.

    1. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be one of them homo fellers

    2. Re:Yeah but... by Uttles · · Score: 1

      fuck you, you fucking fuck

      --

      ~ now you know
    3. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh.. your playing stupid... and winning..

    4. Re:Yeah but... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      very progressive [Boston] ... Alabama or Arkansas, where civil liberties and evolution stalled out hundreds of years ago

      What exactly is Boston progressing too, if that's what its residents believe? I actually find people from New England to be more elitist, more close-minded, less inclinded to get along with people they've just met, and vastly, vastly ruder and more abrasive than people from down south. You've just reinforced that observation. "Progressive" ... heh. The irony is delicious, I must say. If hope that you choke on it, but that only works if you have the intellect to detect it, which means you're safe.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Yeah but... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I'd rather pay $1500/mo for a 1 bedroom apartment in Boston, a very progressive and historic place to live, instead of Alabama or Arkansas, where civil liberties and evolution stalled out hundreds of years ago.

      Don't get me wrong. I *like* Boston. But Boston has had its own problems with civil liberties recently. The DNC. "Free speech zones." Subway searches. Cops shooting bystanders to a "riot" in the head by accident (Torie Snelgrove). Much as I like Boston for other reasons, I doubt that its record on civil liberties is better than anywhere else in the country.

      -b.

    6. Re:Yeah but... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Even with the incidents you mentioned, try to keep in mind that you're still comparing *Boston* to Alabama.
      Boston has issues, but it's got a LONG way to sink before it can be compared to Alabama.

      With all due respect to others who wouldn't consider being sent to Alabama a death sentence. (I practically would.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has lived in MA for most of my life, I can attest to your characterization. I am embarrassed to tell people where I live. And despite our "superiority" we can't even build a safe tunnel, even if you give us 6 times the budget we ask for and triple the time we asked for. And you should hear the whining around here when the Big Dig went so far over budget that the (nasty Republican) federal government said they would no longer fund the patronage-fest. People were actually indignant that the rest of the nation was no longer willing to subsidize the twenty year debacle. Then, predictably, as soon as things go bad (leaks, falling ceilings) we immediately blame the companies, many of whom got the contracts due to patronage rather than merit. Government (well, Democrats anyhow - the Feds are a big problem as long as it is Republican-controlled) is NEVER at fault around these parts - it's always "BIG BUSINESS" and "THE RICH" who are the problem. And who is "THE RICH"? Near as I can tell it's everyone who works who is also not related or friends with a politician.

      I have one minor correction to your generalization though: New Hampshire (so far, though this is sadly changing) is an island of civility and sanity, with a well-behaved government that actually acts like it believes in public service (rather than public baby-sitting). I lived there for 13 wonderful years. Highway projects get done quickly, with minimal disruption to the public, and on time. Government offices are actually open at night to accomodate people who work. The roads are meticulously cared for (the contrast in road quality when you cross over the MA-NH state line, especially in the winter, is stunning). And they manage to do this with no sales tax and no income tax.

    8. Re:Yeah but... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Subtle, aren't you?

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    9. Re:Yeah but... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I have one minor correction to your generalization though: New Hampshire (so far, though this is sadly changing) is an island of civility and sanity, with a well-behaved government that actually acts like it believes in public service (rather than public baby-sitting). I lived there for 13 wonderful years. Highway projects get done quickly, with minimal disruption to the public, and on time. Government offices are actually open at night to accomodate people who work. The roads are meticulously cared for (the contrast in road quality when you cross over the MA-NH state line, especially in the winter, is stunning). And they manage to do this with no sales tax and no income tax.

      Well then, next road-trip vacation is to NH for some scouting. Since I currently live in the People's Republic Of Maryland, your description is sounding pretty enticing. Still, I have to drive dangerously close to Kennedy family members in their cars to get there, so I don't know if the risk is worth it...

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:Yeah but... by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      Be prepared to pay tolls as you pass through the Commonwealth ;-)

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  26. How about Iraq? by Digi-John · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to a reliable friend of mine, the starting salary for IT jobs in Iraq is around $100,000 a year. He says you don't really need much training, you just need to be good with computers and willing to take risks. Of course, working in Iraq is pretty certain to end up more unpleasant than working in Idaho or Arkansas.

    --
    Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    1. Re:How about Iraq? by Trieuvan · · Score: 1

      but how much you have to pay for bodyguards ?

  27. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I'm really not sure that's a very trustworthy list. Santa Clarita is number 18 on the list. My sister and her husband live in Santa Clarita, and while they like it just fine, I can't say that I'd consider it a "Best Place to Live". Maybe "An OK Place to Live If You're Just Starting Out and Want to Buy a Home", but lets face it, it's still Los Angeles, just not the fun part. And it's freaking hot during the summer and extra cold during the winter. It's at a high enough elevation where they actually get snow during the winter. It's a considerable drive to any place other than the San Fernando Valley.

    Maybe all those other places on the list are great or maybe it's just me, but Santa Clarita is far from ideal.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  28. Telecommute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make over $150K/year telecommuting for a couple of companies who have their physical presences in more expensive areas. I'm just an intranet monkey (PHP+whatever db), so it's not like I'm a l33t Oracle DBA or something...

  29. Intriguing by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lets see: cheaper housing + cheaper food/necessities + NOTHING ELSE TO SPEND MONEY ON = lower cost of living.

    Sad as it is, the expensive places to live are often expensive for a reason - people want to live there.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Intriguing by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lets see: cheaper housing + cheaper food/necessities + NOTHING ELSE TO SPEND MONEY ON = lower cost of living.

      Oh come on... We are nerds... We buy everything online and don't need to go out to buy stuff... As long as we can get borad band we'll be fine...

      We can get broad band at these places right?

      What? We can't... Well to hell with them!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Desperate need for knowledge by DeathElk · · Score: 1

    Tuttle Oklahoma perhaps?

    1. Re:Desperate need for knowledge by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      You made me grin. I remember sending news about that incident to a bunch of friends when it first hit El Reg.

      I guess that guy got so many calls, emails, and faxes that it wasn't even funny. =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:Desperate need for knowledge by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what borders on the ridiculous is that this guy's mayor gave him a $5000 salary increase for "outstanding effort"! WTF?

    3. Re:Desperate need for knowledge by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding me. That is a part of the story that I seem to have missed.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:Desperate need for knowledge by DeathElk · · Score: 1
      From the Tuttle Wikipedia page:

      "Despite the controversy, Taylor was later given a $5000 salary increase by the city council. The Mayor said that he had done "a remarkable job"."

  32. What those places lack by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 1

    Is championship (or any?) hockey! Its the intangables that count, give me RTP.

  33. None here... by aitala · · Score: 1

    I know where the jobs aren't... State College, PA...

    E

    --
    Eric Aitala
    www.f1m.com
    1. Re:None here... by kaufmanmoore · · Score: 2, Funny

      just bide your time, football coach will have to open up eventually.

  34. Move to Idaho... and Get Stuck There by razvedchik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest factor for me is to consider the possibility that if your job goes south (project ends, company folds, you don't like your boss), then you are stuck in the middle of nowhere. If you are relocating, you need to understand that at some point you will need to move again.

    If you are used to an environment where you can lose your job today and have a new one by the end of the week, then you will be shocked when you spend 6 months unemployed.

    Now don't get me wrong, I grew up in Idaho, but you need to realize that it is a complete backwater. =)

    --
    I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
    1. Re:Move to Idaho... and Get Stuck There by blueturffan · · Score: 1
      Now don't get me wrong, I grew up in Idaho, but you need to realize that it is a complete backwater.
      I grew up in Idaho as well -- in perhaps the most backwater town in SE Idaho. However, based on your comment about spending 6 months unemployed I assume you haven't been to Boise lately. The economy here is actually quite healthy.
    2. Re:Move to Idaho... and Get Stuck There by razvedchik · · Score: 1

      If your backwater was Salmon, then I probably know you. =)

      --
      I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
    3. Re:Move to Idaho... and Get Stuck There by josh253 · · Score: 1

      Small world. I grew up in Salmon.

      And to make this on topic, I'm now making a decent living in the Boise area with no worries about finding another job should this one go away. Unemployment rate is in the 3's.

  35. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up in Fort Collins, CO, and I have no idea why it always makes the tops of these lists.

    Some fun facts about Ft Collins:

    -It is closer to Cheyenne Wyoming than Denver
    -After the Matthew Shepard incident, CSU students paraded a burning effigy of him throught the streets
    -It has one of the lowest ratios of blacks to whites in the entire nation

    Apparently Ft Collins is not a wonderful place to live for just anyone...

  36. Ph.D Per-Capita? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    So I went looking for which cities have the highest Ph.Ds per-capita, and found just about every City claiming this. Anyone got a link? (I'm in Pittsburgh, which claims the same thing.)

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Ph.D Per-Capita? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends what "PHD" stands for - Pittsburgh Hole Digger, perhaps? :-)

      OK,OK, so it stands for "Polite Hair Dresser"...

  37. Re:choose from the choices above by dcalkins · · Score: 1

    Considering I was just in Idaho Falls today, I recommend you stay away. Yea... I definately recommend you stay away from the general Idaho area (I live here and MAN am I glad I'm moving soon). Going to school up here was a DUMB idea. Choose a city that you will actually be able to be happy.

  38. Oh, really? by Keyslapper · · Score: 0, Troll

    You've obviously never been to Arkansas ...

    Yah. If I were still Catholic, I'd consider my 7 years purgatory already served.

  39. I work in Parsippany-Troy Hills by Captain+Fallout · · Score: 1

    And while I'm sure it's a great place to live on the weekends, driving in and out of there during the week is an absolute nightmare. You have 3 major highways, 80(yes, the one that goes to San Fran,) 287, and 10 all converging in town which is a major source of traffic. There are three other smaller highways(202, 46 and 53) that get jammed up as well. My friend that I work with lives 4 miles away and it can take him 40 minutes by car some days. He's more than willing to take his bike if it's not too hot or cold. I live 16 miles away and it takes me 20 minutes because I'm coming from the opposite direction of traffic.

    Maybe they are saying it's nice because Intel has a large office on Rt. 10. Or they like the Jimmy Buff's that is in the next town over. Mmmm...Italian Hot Dogs.

  40. Re:No jobs in da U.P., eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No jobs dere, eh. Just those at Mead-Wesvaco-whatevernameitisnow, and Quinnesec. That's why I live in Indiana now and work in Louisville, KY. I may live down here, but I will always be a Yooper.

    Say yah to da Yoopee, eh?

  41. Montgomery? by siwelwerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article's selection of cities seems random at best. Huntsville by far has the largest tech industry base in the state, and is roughly the same cost of living as Montgomery. Growing up here, roughly 40-50% of the kids I knew had at least one parent in some form of engineering. The defense/aerospace industry is huge here, so there are plenty of SW Engineering opportunities.

  42. Take it from some that lives in Montgomery... by jascat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This place sucks! The job market is bad and you're going to be pretty much stuck working for either the state government or the DoD if you can find someone that has the right connections to get you a job. If you don't have a secret clearance, your chances seriously go down. Tech here just ain't it. Most places in Texas have lower costs of living with larger populations and better job markets. That's why I plan to head there in 2008.

    I've GOT to get out of this redneck filled, racist, little freaking town!

  43. I missed out by r00t · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are damn fine though.

    The defective kid rate is 3%. The normal defective kid rate is 1.5%. Not good, but not hopeless either.

    You can keep property in the family this way. You already know the in-laws. There are fewer screwy traditions to deal with, since you already share some grandparents. In general, bad surprises are unlikely.

    1. Re:I missed out by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points.... this made my morning!

  44. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Hazelrah · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live in the Columbia/Ellicott City area, and I can tell you that it is not really a great place to live, so I do think the list is credible to me. The cost of living is extremely high - there are a ton of government workers and government contractors, so yes there a lot of tech jobs that pay more money than other areas of the country. I should know; I work in one. There are a lot of service based industries to serve all those people too - restaurants, strip malls, and every chain store you can imagine. But the extra salary does not begin to make up for the high cost of living - restaurants cost 10-20 more for a dinner for two, grocerries cost 20-50 me more than they did when I lived in PA. Taxes are a big pay killer - about 5% higher here than in PA for local taxes and let's not forget that my bigger salary is taxed high by the federal government too. Homes in Columbia/Ellicott City are out of reach for young professionals starting out in life. Oh and depite the rich service based industry I previously mentioned, restaurants are still packed, stores are always crowded, and the roads are clogged. The Federal government's Base Realignment and Closure will bring 20 some thousand new families to the area in the next few years, but Howard County (the county where Columbia/Ellicott City is) will not approve the necassary permits for new housing to accomdate the influx. It's a bit of a mess and it's not going to be get any better. The city may have ben hot 10 years ago, but is on the decline as far as quality of life goes. There are too many people chasing too few resources.

  45. Cost of Living... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid "cost of living" isn't a very good measure.

    First off, there are a LOT of things which aren't going to be price-adjusted, no matter where you live. Computer ports will cost the same ammount, whether you're earning $200,000 a year in California, or $50,000 a year in Alabama. Some things like car dealerships may charge you a bit less, since their employee and rent costs are cheaper, but that'll only be a few percent overall.

    And, cost of living doesn't really take into account the QUALITY of living. Where land costs more, you'll find that all the houses are better quality, since $20,000 in better designs, workmanship, and materials, is a minor detail in the $200,000 sticker price. In places where land is dirt cheap, and people don't make as much, they have to build the houses as cheaply as they can to be competitive. The point is, you can get a house cheaper than elsewhere (so cost-of-living is lower), but you'll have just that: a cheaper, junkier house.

    Though, the truth of the matter is, I'd personally be happy to take a pay-cut to get the hell away from big cities.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Cost of Living... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      "Where land costs more, you'll find that all the houses are better quality,"

      That is flat out not true. California homes are terrible quality, homes in Texas are built much better.

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    2. Re:Cost of Living... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm afraid "cost of living" isn't a very good measure"

      "And, cost of living doesn't really take into account the QUALITY of living."

      Not when the largest and probably most important puchase you will ever make is a home. $500k buys something resembling a shack in larger coastal metro areas while it will practically buy a mansion in the midwest.
      If living in a shack that costs 10x what it would in a smaller city isn't related to quality of living, I don't know what really is.

      Try saying cost of living doesn't matter when you want to retire.

    3. Re:Cost of Living... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      That is flat out not true. California homes are terrible quality, homes in Texas are built much better.

      In general, it's true. There may be specific exceptions.

      Both Texas and California are large states, with highly varying land prices. Can you be more specific?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  46. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
    Also, it doesn't make sense that Richardson TX would draw less than half the salary of Plano TX.

    The numbers in the GP posting are population, not salary.

  47. I love it in the deep south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Makes me smile seeing all these comments about how people would never move to a backwards place like Alabama. I make a great salary, own a very nice home on several acres of land (that I can easily afford), and send my kids to one of the top schools in the country. http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7723397/site/newsweek/ We shop in the same stores, eat at the same resturants and watch the same movies that you find everywhere else in this country. So go ahead and look down on us poor backward southerners and keep telling yourself the quality of living is so much better in those over-taxed, crowded, crime ridden cities up north. I will continue to enjoy the peace and quite and breath fresh air as I laugh all the way to the bank.

    1. Re:I love it in the deep south by AubieTurtle · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the anti-Alabama posts were from people who actually live there or have lived there in the past. Some people love it there but in general those who get an education, especially a science related one, end up moving elsewhere. That's not ignorance, it's choice.

    2. Re:I love it in the deep south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It seems to me that a lot of the people who revile the South are people who depend heavily on the personalities of people around them to be happy. Those with a better sense of self worth aren't as fickle.

    3. Re:I love it in the deep south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Agreed. It seems to me that a lot of the people who revile the South are people who depend heavily on the personalities of people around them to be happy."

      I grew up around those bigoted, racist asswipes, in a segregated and backwards place, and spent a large part of my life struggling to get away to someplace better. Now that I've done that, I'll be damned if I'm going back to the South, or anywhere near the bible belt. You couldn't pay me enough. Seriously. Life is too fucking short and worth too much to spend a day of it in fucking Kansas or Alabama.

    4. Re:I love it in the deep south by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      You miss a point - you say you eat at the same restaurants as the rest of us? Those who might hesitate to move down south because they fear a loss of culinary choices aren't thinking Applebys or Outback.

      How many Korean grocery stores do you have? Can I get a wider variety of cheeses other than Cheddar and Swiss? Can I get real proscuitto? These things are "quality of life" to some of us as much as your big yard and fresh air are to you. So is the ability to go do things (go to library, movie theater, music performances, shopping) without using a car.

  48. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up there to, and I'll second the parents post. I cannot understand why anyone would choose to live there. It's certianly not the worst place to live, but it's pretty far from the best. Strip malls, rednecks, box stores, a million soulless housing developments, religious nuts, and pretty much no real culture. Seriously, how does that rate?

  49. an educated, liberal, free-thinker type by r00t · · Score: 1

    You don't need to use euphemisms on Slashdot.

    I'll translate: an atheist, unamerican, queer type

    1. Re:an educated, liberal, free-thinker type by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I'll translate: an atheist, unamerican, queer type

      Would not be happy, and may well be in danger of life and limb in some of the places listed.

      Your point?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  50. Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can laugh about Alabama. I did, until I came down for a job interview. Huntsville, AL is a great place. Because of the research park, there are people from all over the country. NASA and the Army's Redstone Arsenal have need for 30K to 50K high tech jobs.
    Huntsville is a very high tech city, it has the 2nd largest research center in the US.

    Brick houses (new) for under $100 a square foot. A brand new 4 bedroom, 3 bath 2500 square foot brick rambler on 1/3 of an acre in a new neighborhood for $240K. And it's not ramshackle construction.

    Overall, AL has the lowest taxes in the US. Good schools, thanks to NASA and the rocket scientists at the Redstone Arsenal.

    Insurance is a fraction of what I used to pay. Property taxes are less than 1/2 what I used to pay in a top 10 city for a house half that size. Electricity is cheap, thanks to the Tennessee Valley Authority. Gas is about the same as anywhere else, but there's no commute! No traffic! No crime! Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church! They have morals! It's not like NY City or Chicago, where you have to have Police on every street corner to keep the peace.

    On top of all this, I'm making more than I was in the big city! It is 3 hours to Atlanta, 5 hours to the Gulf Coast. 90 minutes to Nashville, Birmingham, or Chattanooga. 3 hours to Memphis. It's 4 hours to the Smoky Mountains.
     
      Winters are really mild, summers can get hot, but aren't as bad as Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, or Florida. It's not as humid as Florida or the other neighboring states. It's not as dry, or as hot, or as polluted as Southern California or Phoenix.

    The only bad thing... no Pro sports of any type unless you like the Atlanta teams.

    1. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Going to church has nothing to do with crime. I'd bet you just about anything that several of the Enron guys were regular churchgoers. It's all a matter of need and opportunity. It sounds like you live in a relatively low population density area, in which pretty much everybody is relatively well off. Those two things are really all you need to make the crime rate plummet.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church!

      Most spanish people go to church at well, try to lose the sight of your backpack for a second in Barcelona, you'd be surprised ...

      I think it's down to the people themselves, not where they go or what absurd religion they believe in. AL has nice and smart people, the weather is too iffy for the `bad people`. They prefer Florida (godspeed and stay there...) :)

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    3. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by avasol · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...Most of these people go to church! They have morals!........"

      Damn. I knew there was some reason not to move there after all. Thanks for pointing that out.

    4. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by TommyMc · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church! They have morals! It's not like NY City or Chicago, where you have to have Police on every street corner to keep the peace.

      There is absolutely no way that the relationship between morals and church-going is causative and it is contentious whether it even has a correlative effect. Please stop propagating the myth that religion makes people better, it doesn't. This has been proved historically time and time again and continues to be proved in strongly secular countries across the world.

      --
      Stupid people think it's cool. Smart people thinks it's a joke; also cool.
    5. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Flibz · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've done it now!

      1. Find place with low crime rate (so relaxed police)
      2. Go on a crime spreee.
      3. ???
      4. Profit

      You just commpleted step 1.

    6. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've always wondered what US people mean when you mention "$50k jobs". I mean, I know this is annual salary, but $4k/month still seems a lot to me.
      Where I live (Central Europe), this is _the_ upper margin for a tech job, but the figure includes health & pensions benefits and all the taxes. So the actual figure one sees on their bank account monthly is more along $1500-$2000.

      How does all this work in the US? How much does the "$50k" translate to in terms of "this is how much I can spend for my bills/groceries/mortgage/etc, per month"?

    7. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Rhett's+Dad · · Score: 1

      Typically I've seen $5k/month gross pay end up being $3k after taxes/benefits... that was in Birmingham AL. Interpolating that down to your $4k/month question, I'd say take-home pay would be around $2400.

      --
      Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key: BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE
    8. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by WWE-TicK · · Score: 1

      I make $51k a year, and I can tell you that doesn't get me very far in Maryland, USA. I believe after taxes, my take home pay per month is a little more than $3k.

    9. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by richieb · · Score: 1
      How does all this work in the US? How much does the "$50k" translate to in terms of "this is how much I can spend for my bills/groceiries/mortgage/etc, per month"?

      I live in New Jersey and commute to work in NYC. Here are some East Coast expenses: ferry pass to NYC $500/month, real estate taxes are anywhere from $500 to $1000 per month depending on value of your home, mortgage is another $500 to $1000 per month. I pay $125/month for cable TV and fast internet access. Utilities have been going up lately - $200 to $300 per month.

      $50K/year does not do it at all. Especially if you have a wife and children and if you like to eat...:)

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    10. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by tck1000 · · Score: 1
      I agree about the churchgoer comment. Just take the BTK killer for an extreme example. He was the president of his church, and worked in law enforcement (sort of). Also, priests spend a lot of time in church, and while many of them are legitimately benevolent, there is a very vocal malevolent minority. And that's all it takes. In general, I find churchgoers to be a judgemental lot (even in spite of the bible's admonition that God will be the judge so people shouldn't), so my advice is to look elsewhere for good morals. Like to parents and teachers.

      As long as people are well off and not too crowded, I think you'll generally find a low crime rate.

    11. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Religious people have some of the weirdest morals that I have ever come across. Most are more concerned with what their priest tells them every week on how to act, than actually thinking about things for themselves.

    12. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by nelsonal · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are very wide differences between locales in the US (which was the real point of this article).

      $4k/month would be difficult to survive comfortably on in NYC or San Francisco where taxes eat a good $1250-$1500, rent starts at $1000+ (for your own place in a dive), and utilities/regular bills would take another $200-300 (again in your own place). A decent cheap lunch is $7-10 or so in Manhatten. A beer is usually starts at $5.

      $4k/month doesn't go very far in a large US city (LA, DC, Chicago) where taxes are a hair lower (say $1000-$1250 you can rent places for $750 and up (these won't be nice but they will be ok) and bills are again $250+/-50. Decent lunch is $6-10 depending on how adventurous you are. Beers in a nice place are $4-5.

      $4k/month is a kings ransom in a the rural west or south (if you can find a job). Taxes will still eat $1000 or so, but there you can rent a nice 1 bedroom for under $500, a good cheap lunch will run $5-$6 and beers top out at $3.

      $4k a month would be a very good salary for a young professional there. Asr as fun money goes you'd have more than you would making $6k in one of the bigger cities, but there won't be as many young people in the smaller areas (because they weren't smart enough to look at cost of living when they got that job offer for $5k/mo.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    13. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by teflaime · · Score: 1

      But, as was pointed out previously, you still have to live in Alabama.

    14. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by teflaime · · Score: 1

      Most of these people go to church! They have morals! Religion and morality have very little to do with each other. In fact, that which the Christian church teaches as morality is little more than a plan designed to increase the number of Christians, while eliminating the competition (you know, heathens). Study a little theology and you will see that any assertion of religion bringing morality is bunk. Low population density mixed with relative affluence reduces crime. That's what Huntsville has. But Huntsville is also surrounded by a state that still thinks lynching is an acceptable solution to the "racial problem."

    15. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Vengie · · Score: 1

      And if I'm trying to raise two kids with my life partner, I have to worry about being hatecrimed out of existence. No thanks. I'll pay the cost of living in a "blue state" for the dignity value alone. I believe in states' rights -- also because I live in a state where I have the right not to be tied to a fence and left for dead.
      Also, at 2788/week (current salary), 30-50k a year doesn't look attractive. At all.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    16. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? Why don't you move on up to Canataxistan? I make 52k$ a year and my take-home is 2600$ a month. Granted, I didn't buy into the "house is an investment" mythology, and my rent is 480$ a month... So I do have a lot of money left to myself, but I don't live like most people.

    17. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
      Overall, AL has the lowest taxes in the US

      Where do you get this info? I've been trying to research tax burden by state, because I'm sick to death of having 50% of my paycheck gone before I even see it. Next (and hopefully last) place I move to, I want it to be as financially beneficial to my family as possible. AL never even came up on my radar. I focussed on states with no income tax, though.

    18. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by dmatos · · Score: 1

      Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church!

      Ugh. I was hooked until this part.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    19. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I mean, I know this is annual salary, but $4k/month still seems a lot to me.

      Um, its not. After taxes, its $2,640 / month, and then my mortgage, taxes, and house insurance is about $1500 / month. There's over half of my salary (fortunatly, my wife also works, and fortunatly, I make more than $50k) just for the house.

      But it depends on where you live too; sounds like $50k is quite a bit in AL, but in NYC, you'd be homeless.

    20. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Most are more concerned with what their priest tells them every week on how to act, than actually thinking about things for themselves.

      Did you design & build your own car? Did you design & mix the allows to create it? Did you explore, drill for & refine the oil to make its fuel?

      If not, why do you expect people to do the same with morality or philosophy? Get a basic understanding of the field, then hire an expert to do the heavy lifting for you; know just enough to keep a sanity check on him. It's called delegation.

    21. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by mcvos · · Score: 1
      [...] in NYC or San Francisco [...] rent starts at $1000+ (for your own place in a dive),
      in a large US city (LA, DC, Chicago) [..] you can rent places for $750 and up (these won't be nice but they will be ok)
      in a the rural west or south [...] you can rent a nice 1 bedroom for under $500,

      Rent is pretty high in the US. I live in Amsterdam, the biggest city of one of the most densely populated countries in the world, and I pay only $200 rent. Now this is a rent-controlled hourse, and it really isn't very big, but my brother rents on the free market, and he pays about twice what I pay for a house that's twice as big. I've been told $600 a month will get you a mortgage for a decent 2 or 3-bedroom house.

    22. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like NY City or Chicago, where you have to have Police on every street corner to keep the peace.

      Hah. What a glorious exaggeration. Clearly you don't actually live in NYC, or haven't live in NYC since the 1980s.

    23. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church!"

      Praise the laaawrd

    24. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to church has nothing to do with crime. I'd bet you just about anything that several of the Enron guys were regular churchgoers. It's all a matter of need and opportunity.

      Bill Clinton was a regular churchgoer.

    25. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      You're totally right. I actually hired someone to live my life for me. It's working out pretty nice!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    26. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      In Amsterdam? It was my understanding that while rent might be cheap home prices were very expensive there (something to do with your a home being a better tax shelter there). A $600 mortgage would only buy a $120,000 home which sounds very low for anywhere in any major cities in North America or Western Europe.
      There are some rent controlled buildings in both NYC and San Francisco but unless you know someone, I'm not sure how easy they are to get a unit in them. They tend to attract permanant rentors who rarely leave.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    27. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Captain+Bumpsickle · · Score: 1

      As an AL resident, I have to agree with the original poster with some caveats. Many of the things that he describes about Hunstville (cheap housing, cheap insurance, etc.) are true of *most* of the rest of the state as well. However, many other items do not apply.

      Exhibit 1: Schools.
      Birmingham is known to have very good schools. I will take his word about Hunstville schools.
      Schools in the Mobile area == Crap. Schools in the rest of the state have generally been regarded the same way.

      Exhibit 2: Housing
      I live in Baldwin county, which is right on the Gulf Coast. Housing used to be very affordable here. However, somebody must have done a very good job of advertising this fact to urban-dwelling midwesterners a couple of years ago. Retirees are moving here in droves. And, they're building massive, expensive houses and making it harder for the "natives" to afford a decent place. Property taxes are very low, which is one of the reasons why the schools are not very good (see exhibit 1). But, what incentive does a retiree have for increasing property taxes to fund better schools when all of his/her kids are already out of school and he just saved a ton of many by moving from a very expensive/high-tax area to a cheaper area?

      Exhibit 3: Climate
      "Winters are really mild, summers can get hot, but aren't as bad as Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, or Florida. It's not as humid as Florida or the other neighboring states."
      Yes, all of this is probably true about Huntsville, which is on the extreme northern end of the state. Here on the extreme southern end of the state, the climate is quite different. Down here, it IS as humid as Florida and as hot as Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.
      Sure, we don't have snow and we never have a situation where it's too cold to go outside. But, we have the opposite - it's too friggin hot to go outside right now!

      There are many things I like about Alabama, but the climate and the schools are definitely nothing to brag about in my neck of the woods.

      So, what's to like down here? Shrimp. We have good seafood down here. We have boiled shrimp. Fried shrimp.......

    28. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religious people have some of the weirdest morals that I have ever come across. Most are more concerned with what their priest tells them every week on how to act, than actually thinking about things for themselves.

      Yes. Same with liberals.

    29. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work as a .NET software consultant in Phoenix, AZ, and make $50/hr, ~$130,000 a year. My wife and I rent a 2 bedroom house for $1k a month, utilities (electric, cable, internet, cellphones) run about $400 a month. We both drive newer cars (her a Scion xB, me an Toyota FJ Cruiser), running about $1k a month in payments plus $200 a month in insurance. Including other payments for back taxes, my wife's student loans, etc, our total monthly 'bills' runs about $3500.

      My Wife works for the state as an accountant, and makes just over $50k a year. So, grand total, after paying everything off we come close to having ~$10k a month left over. The sad thing, though, is that we enjoy eating out, going places, buying stuff for our son, new technology, etc... we are lucky to have $1k left in savings at the end of the month...talk about America's consumerism.

    30. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by mcvos · · Score: 1
      n Amsterdam? It was my understanding that while rent might be cheap home prices were very expensive there (something to do with your a home being a better tax shelter there). A $600 mortgage would only buy a $120,000 home which sounds very low for anywhere in any major cities in North America or Western Europe.
      Owning a home certainly gives some tax advantages (bad idea IMO; rich people in expensive homes get a double advantage), but a big shot at the bank where I'm currently working claims that $600 would get me a $200,000 home, which is quite reasonable. Not something that gets you a big house in the center, but certainly something pretty comfortable, I think.
    31. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by terjeber · · Score: 1

      I agree that Huntsville is a nice place, I have done quite a bit of work there. Very nice indeed. Personally I would not want to live there, but I might choose Huntsville over Silicon Valley. Personally I like southern California, we have no rain, no heat, no humidity, no bugs and only the odd earthquake (far fewer than tornadoes and hurricanes in the souht east). I would argue that there are very few places in the world that are nicer than Southern California. East coast Australia and parts of Mediterranean Europe are similar.

      Now, one thing I have to jump to though is the following statement:

      Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church!

      This is a patently absurd statement. Yes, there is lower crime levels, but it is not because people go to church. There is lower crime in Huntsville because it is a relatively affluent area, affluence means less crime. What impact does church attendance have on crime? Well, some studies have been done, and they are not good news for church-goers.

      In general, a society that has high church attendence also has higher rates of the following: Murder, rape, teen pregnancy, divorce, abortions and child abuse.

      Now, just to make it absolutely clear, I am not saying above that the reason for these higher numbers of "social problems" is high church attendance, I am just saying that they do show a covariance. In other words, I find it unlikely that going to church makes a person a murderer or a rapist, however the data shows that it doesn't help against that person becoming a such.

    32. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Did you design & build your own car? Did you design & mix the allows to create it? Did you explore, drill for & refine the oil to make its fuel?

      I have no aptitude for car-building, and I have not acheieved the appropriate training.

      If not, why do you expect people to do the same with morality or philosophy? Get a basic understanding of the field, then hire an expert to do the heavy lifting for you; know just enough to keep a sanity check on him. It's called delegation.

      I desperately hope you are sarcastic. Not thinking, which you advocate above, is the main cause of problems in human history. Allowing your self not to think about things makes you a mindless puppet on someone elses string. The only people who do not think are mentally ill people.

    33. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by 3nd32 · · Score: 1

      "Hi, Ms. Grotowski!"

    34. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Not thinking, which you advocate above, is the main cause of problems in human history.

      Dude, you don't think about everything; most of us don't. Did you ensure that every router between you and Slashdot works? No, of course not--you relied on experts to do that for you. And note that I'm not advocating that one not think at all--merely that one hire an expert to do the heavy lifting, and maintain enough of a grasp of the subject to spot BS.

    35. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      Having never lived in AL, I feel safe in saying that what you are describing is a rare occurrence. It's a terrible crime, and when it happens, it gets national media attention. Luckily, there are no hate crimes in big cities, so they like to keep an eye Down South to drive up viewership when they see something they can use to scare Big City types.

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    36. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Time+Ed · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up in Arkansas, the state motto was "Thank God for Alabama"....

    37. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by terjeber · · Score: 1
      Dude, you don't think about everything; most of us don't.

      This is correct, but the router between slashdot and me doesn't have any real impact on how I live my life or what decisions I make. Morals and ethics does. Leaving the heavy lifting of the basis of your thinking to other people is just plain scary. Lots of people have over the years, and every time they did, lots of poeple died. In fact, leaving the heavy lifting of thinking to someone else is the main problem in the US today, IMNSHO.

      And note that I'm not advocating that one not think at all--merely that one hire an expert to do the heavy lifting

      What heavy lifting?

    38. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Vengie · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Texas and Georgia on stints for work. I'm by no means a big city type -- I found the South generally idyllic and peaceful. Outright homophobia is still "culturally acceptable" -- whereas in the north, it is shunned in mainstream society. While not all northerners are comfortable with outright equality (c.f. the marriage issue) openly calling gays and lesbians "deviants that should be locked up" basically assures social pariah status in most northern communities.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    39. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Clod9 · · Score: 1

      I think there is a positive correlation between strong religious belief and low crime.
      Sure you can find counterexamples (you mention one) but however judgemental they may be, religious people tend not to engage in crime. Whether areligious people would enjoy living among them is a completely different issue.
      I remember being told in Singapore that its government specifically encouraged religions including Christianity, in contrast to surrounding nations, because they found that a religious population has social benefits in low crime and increased productivity. Whether you like religious people or not, I think it's a pretty obvious effect.

    40. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1
      Whoah, I saw Chicago in that list, so I'm officially offended. Many people in Chicago attend church, especially in the Pilsen neighborhood. The crime problems in Chicago are a result of the ill-advised War on Some Drugs combined with the prohibition on law-abiding citizens carrying handguns along with cramming a lot of poor people into a small area, also known as projects or "the homes". That being said, crime is _way_ down in Chicago compared to the 80's.

      Going to a Christian church doesn't make you Christian; your thoughts and deeds do. I would hazard a guess that the majority of Americans who call themselves Christians are definitely not. The fact that someone tries to prostitute their religious affiliation to win points with others (*ahem* Bush) is a sure sign that they're not a true believer.

    41. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I agree. Going to Church has nothing to do with crime. This is because going to Church has nothing to do with morals. Many people go to Church in order to fulfill a social obligation or to maintain appearances that they have strong moral fiber. You cannot make the assumption that someone who goes to Church has strong moral fiber. I would guess that it is slightly more likely that someone who goes to Church would have stronger morals than someone who doesn't, but the correlation is far from 1:1.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    42. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that the Bible speaks against letting the Priest or anyone else tell you how you are supposed to think or act. The apostle Paul commended the practise of looking through the scriptures everyday to make sure that what he said was true.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    43. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Wow, I was under the impression that real estate prices there were some of the highest in Europe (similar to London). While it could put you in a home, $600/mo for a $200,000 loan probably isn't paying down any principle (you might as well rent). Thanks for the info from street level.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    44. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      I'd bet you just about anything that several of the Enron guys were regular churchgoers.

      Kenny Boy sure was.

    45. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by aevans · · Score: 1

      Religion and morality may have little to do with each other, but we're not talking morality (def: subscription to a specific religious belief about what is right and wrong), we're talking about crime. And crime *is* statistically much lower in predominantly religious communities (with the caveat that the religion is Judaism or Christianity)

    46. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by teflaime · · Score: 1

      Oh? Los Angeles and the surrounding cities are some of the most religious communities in the United States, but they also have some of the highest crime rates. Same for San Diego. And Phoenix. As someone else pointed out, Huntsville's low crime rate is predominantly due to a relative affluence across the community, especially compared to much of the rest of the state.

    47. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... No crime! Do you know why there's no crime? Most of these people go to church! They have morals! ..."

      Well, I get so very, very afraid when I read things like this.
      I grew up in scandinavia and lived for about one year in the south US when I was in my late teens. When living there I met many nice and genuinely good people, and I had a good time. I really want to emphasize that before I start.

      But I have never in my life, before or after, met so many "nice and moral religious people with strong ethics" that were so racist, parochial, and fundamentally almost evil in their way of reasoning and acting.
      Sure, they were all out every sunday and many weekdays helping and doing nice. But mainly just for the local church. Many gave $10k to beautify the church building without a blink, but would not in their life give money to non-local charity, or employ a black or person, or someone without an american accent: "you just can't trust those people [everyone else]".
      Many people I met were very outspoken against any program aimed at social welfare: "If they [the poor] don't have a job it is because they are lazy".

      Connecting church going with crime? Come on. At least three of the heaviest church supporters were white collar criminals: Organized tax evasion, illegal pollution in two third world countries, and child labour in one third world country. Sure, they never pulled out a gun outside the shooting range, or pushed any drugs heavier than alcohol, but sure enough they were harming people to financially support their way of life.
      As for tolerance to other beliefs and cultures? Give me a break. I don't know how many times, from many different people, I heard things like: "We should send in the boys [army] to clean it up [whereever there was a problem on the news]". "I personally fought to protect the free world [america] against those animals [koreans]". "Them arabs don't deserve to live". "Those murderers over there [in California] should shot [in reference to abortion]". "Them people [still California] will go to hell and burn for their sins [sex before marriage]". "Ungodly so-called science that should be illegal [genetics]". "I wish there weren't so many of those [blacks]". "Homosexuals should be shot on sight". "They think that cows are gods [hindus], we should send missionaries".

      A girl I knew had a slight birth defect, and several people independently told me that it was a sign that she was not really a good person. And this was a very sweet girl. Some would smile to her then turn around and wisper to me. I've never seen that elsewhere in the world.

      They were very nice to you as long as you fitted into their idea of local life and how it should be. When I explained that I was born outside of marriage, about one third of my nice, moral, ethical friends stopped talking to me. Both young and adult. People I had known for several months, and who had no problems with me before.

      Most of the people were very hospitable, open, and sweet. Looked nice and clean, well educated, and pillars of the community. Had great "Christian morals and ethics". But when you had known them for more than a month you really wished you had never met them.

      Now, scandinavia is a very small sandbox. But I have lived and studied/worked in six different countries all over the world for the last fifteen years, so I do have quite a lot to compare with.

      Do not ever let anyone else do the thinking for you. Especially not by connecting some kind of cosmetics, such as "going to church", with the concept of being a nice person.

    48. Re:Cost of living in AL is CHEAP! by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Real estate in the business areas is extremely expensive. Owning your own building in the center is too, but owning or renting a decent appartment can be a lot cheaper than those US prices I saw. Ofcourse if you go for something really good in an expensive neighbourhoor, I don't doubt it can be a lot more expensive too.

      Come to think of it, perhaps I should buy a house in my current neighbourhood. There's a lot of improvement going on, so prices will probably go up.

  51. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    It's at a high enough elevation where they actually get snow during the winter.

    Hmm... I live in Edmonton Alberta, Canada: latitude: 53 degrees, elevation 2192 ft.

    Santa Clarita: latitude: 34 degrees, elevation 1200 ft.

    No offense, but you're a *huge* pussy. :)

  52. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent, thanks for that list. I think I'm going to move to Sugar Land. If it's as good as they say it is, life will be sweet!

  53. crummy lists by r00t · · Score: 1

    They throw out places with income below 90% of the state median. As long as I can do fine, low income is sort of good. Crime is counted elsewhere, so that is taken care of. Low income makes my own income do better when I want to buy services. The same goes for education, unless I'm single.

    They assume you care about public schools. Even if you do have kids, you might not use the public schools.

    A lot of stuff relates to state averages. A bad school in New Hampshire probably beats a good one in Mississippi, but they don't consider that.

    Leisure and culture is quite silly. You can't just trade a golf course for a museum.

    Weather is one to argue over. I like it 80 and overcast. They consider overcast to be a negative.

    Unbelievably, they count the money spent on vacation. I think they count it positively. Vacation is trying to escape the place!

  54. Huntsville, AL by everphilski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Huntsville is a northern city transplanted in the south.

    Read what the AC said in this post. I'd write everything he said but I'm lazy. I'm an engineer, I work on Redstone Arsenal here in Huntsville, AL. Housing is cheap. Taxes are cheap. Utilities are cheap. While I was in college (I went to UAH) I was paying $350 a month for a 1-bedroom apartment. My wife and I just purchased a brand new brick home for $80 a square foot. Other homes in town, new, brick are going for $51 by reputable builders. My utilities bill is averaging $150 a month, including getting the lawn started (lots of water) and kids. Summers are freaking hot, being from Wisconsin, but the air conditioning is good and the house is well-insulated. Get a DirecTV so you can watch "real" sports :)

    Huntsville has more PhD's per square mile than anywhere in the world, except Silcon Valley. Second biggest research park in the US, fourth in the world. Tons of R&D goes on here, both NASA and all aspects of Defense, biotech, etc. Benefits for most companies that I've seen are exceptional and educations (masters, PhD's) are admired. Most companies will put you through school if you want them.

    1. Re:Huntsville, AL by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Huntsville also has no real public transportation and requires that one use a car to get anywhere at all. Factor in the cost of petrol. I grew up in Huntsville, but I'm glad that my family moved out of there before I finished school and that I was able to discover a world where one doesn't have to pay a an arm and a leg and massively pollute just to get some milk from the store or visit the post office.

    2. Re:Huntsville, AL by fredistheking · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forgot to mention the fact that Huntsville is heavily religious, conservative and their entire engineering industry is government funded defense.

    3. Re:Huntsville, AL by toranis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you prefer massive amounts of concrete and small cramped overpriced apartment housing... nice. I'll take a nice big yard and no reliance on a dingy subway, thanks. -- moved to Huntsville for a programming job with one of the largest Steel companies in the world... not a gov't defense contractor.

    4. Re:Huntsville, AL by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had to travel to Huntsville a few times for NASA work. It got barren pretty quickly when you drove anywhere and it was brutally hot. People who lived there said it was too hot in the summer to do much of anything and the lack of any pedestrian features (like sidewalks) encouraged a lot of the waistlines I saw. One local even said he felt safer visiting Boston than being in downtown Huntsville after dark. Most of the jobs and companies down there are dependent on government $ which means that they are at the mercy of politics. The focus on the military also means there is little variety in the types of jobs available.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Huntsville, AL by 8ball629 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is off-topic and maybe a pitiful pitch but your company's website doesn't seem to be 100% functional in Firefox, seeing how I work at a software company that specializes in website development... yeah :).

    6. Re:Huntsville, AL by D4MO · · Score: 1

      Wow, I just bought an 2-bed apartment for $850 a square foot. City vs country eh?

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    7. Re:Huntsville, AL by __aatjxn8377 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most spanish people go to church at well, try to lose the sight of your backpack for a second in Barcelona, you'd be surprised ...

      Most people in Spain do *not* go to the church, even if they say they are catholic. Less in Barcelona (there are other things to do). Much less the ones taking your backpack (I don't think they go to the mosque, either).

      This does not mean that high church attendance implies less crime, only that you don't know what you are saying.

    8. Re:Huntsville, AL by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And of course mass transit is green and has zero pollution as well. I live in an averge sized town and while we don't have subways, we do have a decent bus system. Based off of the amount of smoke they spew at every intersection, I'm not sure how much better public transportation is over driving yourself in a well maintained vehicle.

      Even once you factor in the cost of vehicles, it's still cheaper where I live then in Silicon Valley. I use a tank of gas a week ($40) to get to work and errands. Insurance is $500/year. The vehicle itself is an old 97 Cavalier that I have probably $2500 in. Maintenance is $1000/year. Using a little common sense, you can combine trips so that you aren't wasting gas.

      You comment about going out and discovering a world. How exactly does one do that when they are reliant on mass transportation to do it? Last I checked, most mass transit systems don't cover more then a relatively small geographical area.

    9. Re:Huntsville, AL by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      my buddy basically offered me $60-70k to come down and work at his company as a software engineer in Huntsville. Right now I work for a non-profit research lab in Maine and make 65k, with a 4% salary adjustment due in October, and a possible promotion after that. I like Maine, but there aren't too many games in town for a software engineer, and there aren't a lot of good job opportunities for my wife either. I also have a fairly long commute (I take a bus) since 1) the lab is on an island off the coast of Maine so real estate prices are inflated compared to inland, and 2) I choose to live one of the "larger" cities in Maine (we don't have big cities here) I was tempting, but my wife isn't too excited by the idea of moving to Alabama, and honestly neither am I (I have been in Huntsville, and it isn't bad there - almost a spot of blue in a sea of red if you know what I mean)

    10. Re:Huntsville, AL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I have been in Huntsville, and it isn't bad there - almost a spot of blue in a sea of red if you know what I mean)

      I wonder if bigotry will ever end, or just keep changing sides?

    11. Re:Huntsville, AL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice reply to your own AC post.

    12. Re:Huntsville, AL by BVis · · Score: 1

      Since when is it bigotry to disagree with someone? Granted, I see what you're saying, but do we really want to compare a political position or philosopy with making someone sit at the back of the bus?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    13. Re:Huntsville, AL by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a town with no public transit. I think the real cost to factor in is buying your children cars as soon as they're of legal age to drive... else they'll have no jobs and no social life. Unless they're in somebody else's car... and then they won't have much of a choice but to go along with whatever the group is doing.

      It's hell growing up in a place like that.

    14. Re:Huntsville, AL by Burdell · · Score: 1

      Huntsville's economy is NOT entirely government funded by a long shot anymore. There are a number of local high-tech companies that don't sell much (if anything) to the government. We've got Adtran (a big telecom gear maker), Avocent (formerly Cybex, a big KVM and remote system access maker), Baron Services (one of the largest providers of TV weather systems and support), and Sanmina/SCI (one of the largest contract equipment manufacturers), just to name a few off the top of my head.

    15. Re:Huntsville, AL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You forgot to mention the fact that Huntsville is heavily religious, conservative and their entire engineering industry is government funded defense.

      I'm a software engineer living in Huntsville, and I'm an atheist. I've lived in several other places, and I haven't noticed the religious influence in Huntsville being any more overbearing here than anywhere else. We have our share of bars, strip clubs, and other fun activities for us sinners.

      You're right that most of the engineering jobs are DoD funded, but there are still others that are pure commercial. Everyone's favorite VoIP Linux application Asterisk is developed in Huntsville at Digium. I'll see Mark Spencer around town fairly often.

      If you're interested in the number of engineering companies in Huntsville, check out this link here.

      As with anything, your choice of location is going to be a compromise. Is Huntsville as cool/fun as San Francisco? No. But, my mortgage on a 2200 sq. ft. house is less than $1K a month, and I have a 12 minute commute to the office.

    16. Re:Huntsville, AL by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      So you prefer massive amounts of concrete and small cramped overpriced apartment housing... nice.

      Yes, because in those massive ammounts of concrete is anything you could want. Overpriced is a relative term; it ignores all the convience around.

      I'll take a nice big yard and no reliance on a dingy subway, thanks

      I have a house, but I'm still convienced an apartment is better. That way I have time for things I want to do, instead of fixing the house, cutting the grass, etc. etc. And a subway beats driving myself; driving is frustrating, especially with the amount of jerks out there. You have jerks in a subway, but at least their inconsiderate behavior probably won't kill you.

    17. Re:Huntsville, AL by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      There have been studies done showing that the urban environment is actually worse on pollution than a suburb, thanks to traffic congestion for those who do run cars. And of course smoke belching busses, unless converted to natural gas or other fuels, are worth about 100 cars worth of pollution. Here in the Pittsburgh area, I never see busses full, either. There are usually less than 10 people on them, which means putting them into individually-owned cars would probably save on pollution.

      When I lived in Los Angeles, I tried to get around using public transport for a while. It would take literally hours to get most places. I got a car and my ability to enjoy the city improved enormously, despite traffic congestion problems. I found, being single and not particularly inspired by my home, that it was nice to just wander around the part of the city I worked in until traffic died down. I would hunker down in the local Barnes & Noble or Borders and do some reading before going home.

      Later on, I used the ultimate strategy: I moved so I was ten minutes away from my work. I almost never encountered traffic congestion of any kind since good "edge city" services were right near where I worked.

      Public transport just takes you where the government wants you to. The car gives you freedom, and that's a great thing, no matter where you live.

      D

    18. Re:Huntsville, AL by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      I'm a software engineer living in Huntsville, and I'm an atheist. I've lived in several other places, and I haven't noticed the religious influence in Huntsville being any more overbearing here than anywhere else

      Haven't noticed? I'll take a leap here and guess that you are white and heterosexual. Ask your gay friends if they notice the religious intolerance. Ask your Jewish friends the same thing. You can bet THEY notice.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    19. Re:Huntsville, AL by sgtrock · · Score: 1
      Yes, because in those massive ammounts of concrete is anything you could want. Overpriced is a relative term; it ignores all the convience around.

      Oh? So you have deer, pheasants, foxes, hawks and other assorted wildlife for neighbors? Fishing on a lake with no one else in sight? Woods to ramble in? Hunting within walking distance? Neighborhoods where you know everyone personally, and their back door is always open for visitors?

      Don't automatically assume that what /you/ want is what everyone wants.
    20. Re:Huntsville, AL by mcvos · · Score: 1
      And of course mass transit is green and has zero pollution as well. I live in an averge sized town and while we don't have subways, we do have a decent bus system. Based off of the amount of smoke they spew at every intersection, I'm not sure how much better public transportation is over driving yourself in a well maintained vehicle.

      It helps a lot if they'd maintained those buses as well as your well-maintained vehicle.

      When there are enough people living in an area that the buses, trains and subways are actually used, they'll always be more environmentally friendly than having everybody in his own car. And you won't get so many traffic jams. There are many places where public transport just isn't worth it, though. You need a car to get around, and buses are (or would be) mostly empty. Bad for mobility for children, both because they can't take the bus, and because interesting places are farther away, and a bicycle only gets you so far.

      I live in Amsterdam: excellent public transport, and only an idiot would try to get around town in a car. And almost everywhere I want to go is within bicycle distance.

      Even once you factor in the cost of vehicles, it's still cheaper where I live then in Silicon Valley.

      As I understand it, any place is cheaper to live than Silicon Valley.

      You comment about going out and discovering a world. How exactly does one do that when they are reliant on mass transportation to do it? Last I checked, most mass transit systems don't cover more then a relatively small geographical area.

      I don't know about the US (but I'm willing to believe mass transit is really bad over there), but my mass transit system reaches to the farthest corners of Europe. Some places are easier to reach by car, though.

    21. Re:Huntsville, AL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you grow up in Huntsville, Alabama? Because I dont think Ive ever heard anyone down here say petrol.

      Yes, it is a great place to live people. I work at NASA and wouldnt want to live anywhere else. My wife moved here when she was in high school from Penn. Her father was in the Army and transfered to Redstone. She says she can remember her father telling her that they were moving to Alabama and how she was mad. She admits that she had this idea of how poeple in Alabama had no shoes, no AC, and everyone just sat on their porch drinking sweet tea. I bet everyone of you from up north to this day think the samething, admit it! Its just not true, we sit on our patio's and drink sweet tea!

      Huntsville is a unique city in the south. The high schools play ice hockey and UAH has a very good hockey team as well.

    22. Re:Huntsville, AL by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh? So you have deer, pheasants, foxes, hawks and other assorted wildlife for neighbors?

      Why would I want wild animals as neighbors? But yes we do have fox and hawks around.

      Fishing on a lake with no one else in sight?

      I find fishing an mindnumbing waste of time. But I do have a lake which I can go boating on, or a beach which I can even walk to. The larger beaches may be crowed, but the smaller ones are empty or have only a few people.

      Woods to ramble in?

      We also have trees here, believe or not. There's a wildlife preserve, so you can't go in it, but there are woods nearby, with a bike path through some. If you mean a huge forest, I had that growing up; there's only so much you can do in the woods by yourself..

      Hunting within walking distance?

      I don't hunt, so its not a big deal. Hunting seems rather pointless to me anyway; I fail to see how stalking something to shoot it is fun, especially if there's no chance of you really being in danger..

      Neighborhoods where you know everyone personally, and their back door is always open for visitors?

      Most people suck, why would I want to know them personally? Why would I want to visit them, I have everything I want in my own home. If I want to visit someone, I visit my friends, not someone that just happened to move in next to me.

      Don't automatically assume that what /you/ want is what everyone wants.

      Where did I say that I was speaking for everyone? I wasn't, and my post was trying to illistrate that yes, some people DO like living in a city.

    23. Re:Huntsville, AL by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Most people suck, why would I want to know them personally?


      Yup, I'd say you belong in the "big city" of concrete where everyone avoids eye contact with everyone else. Hey, folks, if that's the way this guy feels, don't try to convince him otherwise. Let him stay in the city. He sounds like an urban anti-social hermit. Convincing people like this to move to more attractive areas will only make those areas less attractive in the long term.


    24. Re:Huntsville, AL by toranis · · Score: 1

      You know, the last thing I'm going to concern myself with is what the gay community thinks about where I live... or the jews... or the baptists... or lady at the 7/11 who could be a gay jewish baptist. Intolerance is one extreme... being a whiney baby is another.

    25. Re:Huntsville, AL by Precion · · Score: 1

      You put everything into perspective, and I wish this article had existed about four months ago.

      I actually moved from Alabama to Wisconsin. Even with my salary increase and moving bonus it all barely covers the difference in the cost of living. Bad planning on my part there. Add this with an hour commute each way, lack of southern hospitality, and need even say NO SWEET TEA it is an all around bad combination for this sourthern boy. Right now I am looking for a foothole to get back to the south without just packing up and leaving. The best responses to my resume have been in Huntsville. Maybe I will see you around...

      Again, good post.

    26. Re:Huntsville, AL by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I'm right there with you. As the posts above clearly illustrated, there really is a city boy/country boy schism. I'm not criticizing either one, because I'm a little of both (but more city), and to each his own.

    27. Re:Huntsville, AL by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Something that's much harder to change, though, is state politics. A single high-tech, liberal, progressive community composed of intelligent people does not cancel out a state that is often at odds with that. Lawrence, Kansas, mainly due to the University of Kansas, is a rather nice, suburban, liberal community (the only county in the state that wasn't won by Bush in '04). At the same time this is the state where Brownback is still making the lot of us look like complete idiots pretty frequently. Where a referendum on a state amendment against same-sex marriage passed by a disturbingly large margin a few years back. A place that in recent years is most known politically for repeatedly having a school board that pushes creationism.

      While the city or town you live in might always be nice you have to take the state and its politics as a whole into consideration much of the time. Sometimes this is less of an issue due to living in a state with one (or more) dominant cities that tend to sway the voting, but not always.

    28. Re:Huntsville, AL by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Oh? So you have deer, pheasants, foxes, hawks and other assorted wildlife for neighbors? Fishing on a lake with no one else in sight? Woods to ramble in? Hunting within walking distance?

      Sounds like hell on earth. Boring, culture-less, and to top it all off, a bunch of people wandering around shooting.

      Neighborhoods where you know everyone personally, and their back door is always open for visitors?

      Pretty much the exact opposite of my experience in the USA. The smaller the town, the more xenophobic and standoffish the people in it. Friendliest place I ever lived in the USA was New York City. Maybe things are different if you're white and like to go around shooting animals, but for the rest of us, no thanks.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    29. Re:Huntsville, AL by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I grew up in the country, and had plenty of woods and stuff around.

      Of course so I don't burst your bubble I won't remind you of the original post which listed "being alone in the woods, alone on the lake, within walking distance of hunting (i.e. far from other people)."

      I'll give you a hint; you don't know your neighbors when you move in, so there's a good chance you may not get along with them after you have. I have plenty of friends and enjoy going out; just that most people aren't worth getting to know.

    30. Re:Huntsville, AL by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the US (but I'm willing to believe mass transit is really bad over there)

      Yeah. Frankly mass transit sucks over here. There are a large cities like New York, Boston, and Chicago with good transit, but they are the exception. I'm in San Diego right now, 8th largest city in the US, and its mass transit is pretty weak for anyone outside of downtown.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    31. Re:Huntsville, AL by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Mass transit is greener per person transported, on average.

      Buses spew visible smoke, Cars spew CO (and SOx and NOx). Particulate carbon gets out of the air quite fast, the oxides don't. The oxides are also more damaging.

      One bus carries ~ 50 people. A car carries 4, but more commonly 1. pollution caused by 1 bus vs pollution caused by 50 cars?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    32. Re:Huntsville, AL by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      As long as you are pointing out that a car more commonly carries one, you might also point out that your 50 passenger bus more commonly carries less than a dozen. From CTA statistics, I can see that an average of 50 people per HOUR is a high estimate and most of those people don't ride for anywhere near an hour. I'd bet the average number of riders on a bus is probably more like 10.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    33. Re:Huntsville, AL by aevans · · Score: 1

      You might be gay, but you've never met a black person in your urban multicultural paradise. They're all over Alabama.

    34. Re:Huntsville, AL by dodobh · · Score: 1

      That's because most of your bus users are already in cars. Around here 50 to 95% of the population uses mass transit (depending on the city). The time cars stay off the road, traffic moves *fast*. The monment cars hit the road, traffic jams galore (a 45 minute ride turns into a 3 hour one). Buses typically carry 90 to 100 people, cars 1.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    35. Re:Huntsville, AL by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Point out to me where any mention was made of black people.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  55. the highest paying IT jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talking about substantial 6 figures, are for COBOL programmers, ColdFusion/JavaScript experts, and Y2K specialists. Better get training for one of those if you want to live well.

    Oops... old data. Sorry.

  56. Title mistake by kingjames128 · · Score: 1

    I don't like being a grammer nazi but in modern American-Englsih the title should read: Where the Highest Paying Tech Jobs At

  57. Just do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just do it, take off, travel a bit, see what you like, look for a job there or create one (or two). I did it a few years ago, just got tired of major urban living. Girlfriend came home in tears and told me she couldn't get gas for her car because of all the winos and crackheads hanging around the station near our house, they were harassing her. I said fuck it, we're moving! A month later or so we had sold off most of our junk-and that is all furniture and whatnot is is junk, easily replaceable. We stuck the stuff we really wanted to keep in a storage unit, then took off camping. Within a few weeks we had found a nice rural area we liked, not terribly wilderness, no way serious urban, an in between kind of place. Two weeks after that had a full time job. I kept my (still small) net work going the whole time hitting public libraries for access. Now, we're happy. Got plenty of space, nice little cozy house, whole comfy rural scene. Walk out on the porch see hummingbirds hitting the flowers, it's *nice* Lack for nothing. Trust your instincts, "go with the flow", look until it feels "right", settle in. Camping is cheap, gas is still affordable, just take off! if you wait for it to be perfect you'll never do it. Ya, less money, but less expenses, quality of life so much higher. Now the two or three times a year I am forced to go to "the big city" I can see how absolutely termite mound dismal it was, how dirty loud and stinky major urban areas are, and kick myself for waiting so long to make the move. That crap about big cities being "better" is consumerist bullshit. About the only thing "better" about big cities is how much you have to work to feed the pigs money habit as they suck your wallet dry. A traffic jam to me now is someone stopped next to the mail carrier to talk about something for a minute, big deal.

    Make the move before millions more get the urge, the real estate bubble pop is right around the corner and all those exploiters/grifters pushing that get rich quick crap will be branching out looking for new areas to trash out with their greed. That and the morons running the foreign policy, they could screw the pooch and really bork stuff out in the middle east, better to get rural where life is more sustainable for the long haul and you can actually develop "neighbors" and local ties. Big cities can go to pure hell in one day as soon as anything gets turned off, electricty, water, food deliveries, etc. We got a well, a garden, and a generator and a firewood lot, screw it, let that other stuff back in town rot. Let them enjoy their "ambience". See if "starbucks" will support them.

    Anyway, if you needed a nudge, take this as an official big NUDGE;) Good luck!

    1. Re:Just do it by Darby · · Score: 1

      That and the morons running the foreign policy, they could screw the pooch and really bork stuff out in the middle east, better to get rural where life is more sustainable for the long haul and you can actually develop "neighbors" and local ties. Big cities can go to pure hell in one day as soon as anything gets turned off, electricty, water, food deliveries, etc. We got a well, a garden, and a generator and a firewood lot, screw it, let that other stuff back in town rot.

      You do realise that it's the ignorant douchebags in these rural areas that are the ones supporting the "morons running the foreign policy", don't you.
      So great, move there and when it all does go to hell *because* of the ignorance and cowardice of the people you've surrounded yourself with you can all sit around and blame the "evil urban dwellers" who are the ones who were paying the subsidies that allowed you to live in the middle of nowhere and maintain a modern lifestyle.
      .
      Great plan.

  58. Re:No jobs in da U.P., eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shhh!! It's part of our secret plan to keep annoying city folk away. The Canadians know the U.P. is part of Michigan and leave us alone. The rest of the U.S. can't read a map and think we're part of Canada. In any event they don't realize we're here and leave us alone too. We like to keep our paradise (and the occasional pasty) to ourselves. Pretty neat, eh!

  59. In the end, it equilbrates towards by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    every place being equal. People will move (and change housing/resource prices) until the average person is indifferent to living in any two places between which substantial barriers do not exist for moving.

    In the end, it all cancels out. Your best bet is to move to a place YOU like, taking advantage of your differences from the "average" person. Do you like eating at exotic restaurants and seeing theatre regularly? Lean towards the metropolis. Are you a meat-and-potato type who likes hiking? Go for the small town. Want to raise a family, but still be close to the big city? Move to the suburbs. This really isn't difficult.

    1. Re:In the end, it equilbrates towards by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Are you a meat-and-potato type who likes hiking? Go for the small town.

      ...or a medium-sized (~200,000 people) city that you can be out of within 1/2 hr. That way, you can have your cake and eat it too.

      Want to raise a family, but still be close to the big city? Move to the suburbs.

      Why? Plenty of people I know have been raised in a city and have turned out fine. And city public schools aren't as awful as their reputation - if your kids are smart enough, they can usually get into a magnet school for high school, and (at least in NYC), the grade schools have improved quite a bit. There's also the option of Catholic schools, which are decent and inexpensive compared to private schools. (And, no, the religious agenda isn't very strong, since there's a sizable percentage of non-Catholic students).

      -b.

  60. Montgomery jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is article is amazing in how completely inaccurate a picture it gives of the Montgomery job situation. From someone who seriously considered moving to Montgomery from Atlanta (for family reasons) and actually looked for jobs in Montgomery, I can tell you the only thing you will find are mediocre defense contractor jobs. Of all the big cities in the southeast, Montgomery is perhaps the worst city if you are looking for tech jobs. If you absolutely must move to Alabama, then Huntsville or Birmingham would be a drastically better choice.

    Someone please hit the author of this article with a clue by 4.

    1. Re:Montgomery jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if you're looking for any jobs besides mediocre defense contract jobs, Wal*Mart Greeter, or McD's Burger Flipper, move away from Alabama.

      I just wish I could.

      (I'm going anonymous, because last time I insulted Alabama DESPITE THE FACT THAT I LIVE HERE AND IT'S THE DAMN TRUTH, I got modded down. Redneck mods.)

  61. uncivilized places by r00t · · Score: 1

    If you can't lets your kids play outside unsupervized because of crime, it's rather uncivilized.

    (either that, or "civilization" isn't all it's cracked up to be)

    The same goes for angry commuters, panhandlers, not knowing the people on your street by name or even recognizing them...

    1. Re:uncivilized places by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      The same goes for angry commuters, panhandlers, not knowing the people on your street by name or even recognizing them...

      Actually, in cities, you do get to know people around you. You can't help it, since you live/work/exist close by to them. It's some rural areas that are more isolating - you drive a lot and when you walk, you don't see many people if at all. If you go shopping, it's at Wall*Mark, and the people who work there are "hillbillies" and aren't worthy of consideration to you. Rural culture in the US, apart from in some small cities and university towns, has been eviscerated by the coming of the big box corporate chain stores.

      -b.

    2. Re:uncivilized places by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      I live in the city of Chicago, and I mean actually in the city, not a suburbanite who lives in mortal terror there might be a mexican or black person nearby. Children all around my neighborhood (of various colors) play outside all the time. During the summer there are neighborhood block parties on some block almost every weekend.

      I have a house with a yard, and space between me and my neighbors. And in and around the city, there are hundreds of world-class restaraunts, theaters (and I mean live theater, though there are also places like the Landmark, Music Box, and the Gene Siskel Film Center), symphonies, opera companys, museums, two zoos, and I'm less than an hour from two major airports that can take me to just about any part of the globe. I'm not much into sports, but we seem to have a decent smattering of options for sports fans as well.

      I'm not entirely clear why I'm supposed to find this intolerable.

    3. Re:uncivilized places by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If you can't lets your kids play outside unsupervized because of crime, it's rather uncivilized.

      Yeah, but who wants to live in Detroit?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:uncivilized places by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      > I'm not entirely clear why I'm supposed to find this intolerable.

      Chicago is a nice place to live. I don't know anybody who actually hates it.
      It's a shitty place to be *poor*, but then, few places are good for that.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  62. What about Orlando? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    From Wiki regarding Orlando/Central Florida:
    "Lockheed-Martin has a large manufacturing facility for missile systems, aeronautical crafts and related high tech research due to Orlando's proximity to the NASA Kennedy Space Center. Since the 1970's and 1980's the area is also home to many computer software and hardware firms, such as IBM. Other notable engineering firms have offices or labs in the Central Florida area: KDF, General Dynamics, Harris, Westinghouse, Siemens, Veritas/Seagate, multiple USAF facilities, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), Comair Aviation Academy, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, GE, Air Force Agency for Modeling and Simulation (AFAMS), Army Simulation Training and Instrumentation Command (STRICOM), AT&T, Boeing, CAE Systems Flight & Simulation Training, HP, Institute for Simulation and Training, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Systems. The Naval Training Center until a few years ago was one of the two places where nuclear engineers were trained for the US Navy. Now the land has been converted into the Baldwin Park development.

    Nearby Maitland is the home of Tiburon, a division of the video game company Electronic Arts. Originally Tiburon Entertainment, it was acquired by EA in 1998 after years of partnership, particularly in the famous Madden NFL series and NCAA Football series of video games.

    The U.S. modeling, simulation, and training (MS&T) industry is centered around the Orlando region as well, with a particularly strong presence in the Central Florida Research Park adjacent to UCF."

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  63. Living in nowhere by bockelboy · · Score: 1

    I work and live in Lincoln, Nebraska. I agree with most of the comments here - don't move out to middle America.

    We have no crime, no overcrowding, no traffic, no city nuisances, relatively little stuck up rich people. Can you walk downtown at night with a $100 bill displayed prominently from your pocket? Last year, we had 3 homicides for - a big jump for this town of 225,000. If I want a "big town" feel, Omaha is 50 minutes away.

    I personally like being able to get a nice, quality home for around $100k.

    Nebraska. Don't move here. We don't want you to.

    1. Re:Living in nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All valid points, as long as you live in, or within a mile of Lincoln. Otherwise the house prices are all inflated beyond belief. You'll see nothing but cornfields, dirt roads, and cows. It's as bad as living in the south in most places. Who in their right mind would want to live anywhere but Lincoln in the state is beyond me. No job market to speak of, low pay, bad internet, high taxes, and very few good looking women under 80 (and no, women over 80 can't look good.)

    2. Re:Living in nowhere by swid27 · · Score: 1

      As a fellow Lincolnite, I'll second that. If you feel that you *must* move to Nebraska, at the very least, find a job in Omaha. ;-)

    3. Re:Living in nowhere by rsae718 · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% with the AC especially the no job market part. I lived here for almost 40 years and I just about have my wife talked into getting the hell out of here.

  64. Re:The Gump? No thanks! by jsupreston · · Score: 1

    As a government employee for the state, I can say that the demand for tech jobs isn't as good as some would like to believe. My understanding is that the civilian jobs on base are starting to dry up. Some state agencies IT jobs are more challenging than others, but there is a lot of red tape involved in getting a job, and there are a lot of people that have been in the system for years, thus making career growth a challenge. Pay ain't too great as a state employee. Everytime the administration changes, hirings and promotions are frozen, as well as any sort of pay raises...sometimes for more than two years. If it were not for wife's family, I'd seriously consider moving. Birmingham, Huntsville, Atlanta would be better choices. As to the parent post...what nightlife? Well, we do now have a minor league ball team, which nobody thought was a good idea, and it cost around 25 million to get them here. Attendance at the games has been better that I would've thought. However, not much else, especially considering we have several colleges/universities in town. I guess everyone goes home on the weekends. Also, most folks that I have talked with believe that things were better with the previous mayor. I don't really know myself, but I don't know of anyone happy with the current mayor.

    --
    "It's a dog eat dog world out there, and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear."- Norm (from Cheers)
  65. Fallacy. by lindseyp · · Score: 1

    You should not simply be adjusting the net salary by cost of living. If you did that then somewhere like India wins hands down, for sure. To get an idea of what the 'best paid' jobs are, you should subtract the cost of an equivalent lifestyle from the net salary, and then compare what's left because that's how much you'll be able to *save* for your kids college funds, mid-life-crisis porsche, or that carribean cruise. I can't imagine someone working in Mumbai for $5,000 per year is going to have much in the way of savings in 10 years time. Neither are they going to be able to afford vacations in Hawaii twice a year, no matter how good a lifestyle they're able to live on that salary.

    --
    j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  66. Did they have to mention that? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Article: "The average for programmers in all industries is $67,400. Not bad, especially when you think about it this way: That's six times as much as a similarly qualified programmer earns in India."

    The pay better be good, because the stability isn't. It is just like regular investments: the more volitile ones have the best average returns.

  67. I'm in Vietnam by wisebabo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good Morning Vietnam!

    Well that's the time here as I post this. Anyway, it's very interesting living in Ho Chi Min (rated the #12th best major city in the world to live in and the best in Asia)*. I've got to say that, in a country that has a per capita GDP less than a tenth that of the United States a dollar goes a long way.

    The key is how to make it. If you can make it by working for a major foreign corporation here (read: oil company) and get a Western salary, you will live like a king. Unfortunately local opportunities to make that kind of money are otherwise almost nil. Even if you can speak Vietnamese you will find that even a very high salary here (doing a job like coding) in not much relative to the U.S. Also you may find yourself thought of being overqualified; I do very high end media and some people here told me they were afraid to contact me after seeing my CV because they thought I'd charge a fortune.

    While you can make a good living here teaching English I doubt that would appeal to the skilled professionals that make up Slashdot's readers. No, the best job is one in which you can work "at the end of a wire", that is live here but work for some U.S. company via the internet. The internet infrastructure is just sufficient to do that (which is one reason why I can't live in Cambodia). Internet telephony here is good (at least from my location). If your job is portable so you don't have to physically see your clients more than once or twice a year then this might "work" for you!

    By the way, the cost of living here is not going to be one-tenth that of the U.S. unless you live like a native. Instead if you insist on all the perks of the U.S. it's probably about half the U.S. cost of living (more if you want a car!). On the other hand, wealth is relative; compared to the natives you WILL be very rich and will be treated as such. That has its own perks. ;)

    * this recent study (which, to my travelled eyes cannot possibly be true) was based on a bunch of factors including how much (or little) the average person "impacted the environment". Since Vietnamese people are still very poor they don't impact the environment very much which led to a inflated score. Still Ho Chi Minh City has its charms; zero violent crime (it's a police state), pace of life (you can actually meet people and develop friendships), scale of the city (more like one giant neighborhood than a forest of skyscrapers). But act soon, things are changing fast and in 5 years it'll be unrecognizable. In that case you'll:

    Miss Saigon.

    1. Re:I'm in Vietnam by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      But act soon, things are changing fast and in 5 years it'll be unrecognizable. In that case you'll:

      Miss Saigon.


      Arrrrgh!! Bad! Bad!

      Thank you for your excellent report on living in old Saigon. I don't speak Vietnamese, but it's one of those places I've long wished to visit. (I have a long time historical interest, especially military history.) Have you had any opportunities to travel in the countryside? How "open" is Vietnam?

      Maybe I should buy a Lonely Planet guidebook, so I can day dream. I've seen some crazy videos of rush hour traffic: thousands of bicycles, motorcycles, and scooters going in all different directions but avoiding collision. Almost like four or more schools of fish swimming through each other. Anyway, big thanks for re-whetting my curiousity about Vietnam.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:I'm in Vietnam by wisebabo · · Score: 1

      I haven't travelled (yet) into the countryside but I hopefully will soon. Vietnam is pretty open but I was told not to go around videotaping things outside of the major cities.

      Traffic is pretty insane but the first time you take a motorbike ride it is exhilarating. You'll feel like a dog sticking its head out of a car window. After that you'll want a helmet (although the number of injury accidents in the city is quite low, I've never seen one).

      If you're a military historian make sure you go to the war remnants museum. Aside from showing the war from the North Vietnamese point of view it is a pretty disturbing picture of the costs of war.

    3. Re:I'm in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made you a slashdot "friend" to better keep track of you, but I'd love to hear periodic reports of your adventures, if you'd be so willing. Here's my add*, should you want to contact me. Are you keeping any sort of blog or online record?

      *m/a*r/c*o/s*m/a*l/o*&Tgmailcom

      hopefully you can strip the garbage and figure that out.

      Ohreally_factor

    4. Re:I'm in Vietnam by wisebabo · · Score: 1

      sorry don't keep a blog (don't know how to and don't think I'd have enough to say really). not even smart enough to completely figure out how to your add* ;)

    5. Re:I'm in Vietnam by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      first: strip out the /s and *s.

      second: &T = @

      third: insert the dot before the com.

      make sense now?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:I'm in Vietnam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you fogot a couple of perks. Isn't prostitution legal there? What about recreational drugs? Plus, isn't it dirt cheap to fund your own private army?

    7. Re:I'm in Vietnam by wisebabo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Prostitution is illegal in Vietnam although I've never seen a foreigner being arrested/prosecuted. Recreational drugs is DEFINITELY not permitted, that'll get you in prison for sure. Finally private armies are ludictrous when the country is a police state, all power remains with the government (not the people, or constitution for that matter), even the local mafia/gangsters exist solely at the grace of the authorities (and they don't do much anyway, there was a bust where a bunch of them were just rounded up and summarily executed).

      No if that's what you're into, Cambodia is the place to go except I don't know if prostitution is officially sanctioned (there is an active campaign against child prostitution thank god). Singapore(!) surprisingly has legal prostitution (probably to give gum chewing addicts something to do).

    8. Re:I'm in Vietnam by triso · · Score: 1
      sorry don't keep a blog (don't know how to and don't think I'd have enough to say really). not even smart enough to completely figure out how to your add* ;)
      That detail has not stopped most bloggers.
    9. Re:I'm in Vietnam by triso · · Score: 1
      Prostitution is illegal in Vietnam although I've never seen a foreigner being arrested/prosecuted. ...

      No if that's what you're into, Cambodia is the place to go except I don't know if prostitution is officially sanctioned (there is an active campaign against child prostitution thank god). Singapore(!) surprisingly has legal prostitution (probably to give gum chewing addicts something to do).
      I think Gary Glitter would disagree with you.
  68. Or . . . by Zelbinian · · Score: 1

    . . . you could just send the US to hell in a handbasket and look overseas. Australia, for instance. They might even trade the US a Koala for you if you're an IT guy (or girl).

    --
    Putting the 33k in G33k.
  69. Check the FAQ by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    I checked the FAQ to determine how they compile this list. They chuck every town that has a population over 300,000 and under 50,000. They also eliminate all cities that have absurdly high housing costs. This list ought to be called the "top 100 cities that are too small to have any real culture, too large to feel intimate, and too uninteresting to naturally attract attention."

    1. Re:Check the FAQ by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1
      top 100 cities that are too small to have any real culture, too large to feel intimate, and too uninteresting to naturally attract attention

      I moved to Rockville, which narrowly missed the top 25, a year ago. Rockville has an active arts community (including concert band, ballet and theatre). If local arts aren't enough, DC is a short Metro ride away.

      Since moving to Rockville, I've had meaningful discussions with most of the neighbors, half of the city council, and a handful of business owners. I grew in central MN, and Rockville compares very nicely in terms of intimacy.

      Finally, the main drag has so many nice restaurants that people from all over the DC region visit Rockville. This includes an absolutely fabulous Peruvian restaurant. Rockville is also attracting the interest of many biotech companies.

      Thus, I find your cynicism misplace.

  70. They never consider 401k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cost of living comparisons like this always fail to take one crucial thing into account: retirement funds. The more you earn, the more goes tax-efficiently into your retirement fund. So given the choice between living in Metropolis and Smallville with approximately the same standard of living but with a higher absolute wage in Metropolis, I'll pick Metropolis every time while I'm still saving for retirement.

    1. Re:They never consider 401k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >Cost of living comparisons like this always fail to take one crucial thing into account: retirement funds.

      No male member of my family has ever lived much past retirement age. I am much more concerned about living well NOW, than at some age that I'm probably not going to reach.

  71. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    No doubt about it! =) Although I did brave five summers in San Francisco. =P

    I've got several places picked out. All have very mild climates year 'round, even during the rainy season. Not too hot, not too cold. It's seriously a high priority for me.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  72. Relative vs. Absolute Pay by janzen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    OK, we've heard that in Manila you can be happy with $450; in Canada with $3900. In New York or London you'd probably need lots more, etc. All relative, right? Well, not quite.

    First, there's travel. If our friend in Manila wants to go skiing in Whistler, then he's going to have to save his spare cash for a long time. On the other hand, if the Canadian guy goes diving in the Philippines, he's going to be amazed at how far his money goes.

    Then there are imported goods. If you have a taste for French wine, or Japanese electronics, or Italian furniture, the price may vary a bit due to shipping, exchange rates, import duties, etc., but there's a fixed minimum amount that you're going to have to pay, no matter how low the rest of your cost of living may be.

    Finally, you have to ask whether you're really planning to stay in the same place forever. That may be the case for a lot of people; but if you dream about living in another country one day, then you also need to consider the cost of living there. It works both ways, obviously: plenty of North American retirees move to Mexico, Singaporeans go to Malaysia, and so on, partly in order to make their savings go farther. But if you're picturing a villa on the Côte d'Azur, you won't get there by working at a relatively well-paid job in a less expensive country.

    1. Re:Relative vs. Absolute Pay by owlman17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Some things are absolute, some relative. The Canadian guy you replied to said you could live on $900/mo in Canada but your quality of life would suck. With $900/month in Manila, I could retire by age 45 or sooner.

      An iPod, or a decent MOBO, or even a mid-range graphics card would cost me half a month's wages, on that $450/mo figure. Yes, I've had to save up for those. I've also had to save up just to tour next-door countries. I personally know a lot of people from North America, Japan, Singapore, etc, who've come over here to retire. Of course, my 'wants' are somewhat different from a 1st world person's, but that's another story. Anyway, if one has (relatively) simple wants and needs, a 3rd world person having an outsourced 1st world job can live pretty well.

  73. Try Charlotte NC by alshithead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Charlotte is a great area. You have to search a little bit for jobs because the VLB's (very large banks) are outsourcing to India but I got my current gig because of that fact. The customers don't like dealing with people who don't speak English as their primary language or people who's accents are mostly indecipherable so I get to help them migrate to a new version of an application they consider very important to their business. It's a well paying contract position, which is new to me having worked 8 years for my previous employer in DC and 10 years for my employer before that. It's kind of cool being able to be focused on one main task instead of wearing way too many hats on a daily basis because of the historical knowledge I had gained over the years. The job market looks really good here for the future. Big banking isn't going to suddenly go away from Charlotte and there is starting to be signicant bleed over from the Raleigh area in other IT centric businesses. Other Charlotte benefits are good schools, real estate where you can get twice the house for half the price of the DC metro area, people who are mostly civilized (unlike the uptight pricks in the larger metro areas to the north), and almost none of the crappy winter weather of the north but still get the change of seasons. The mountains are an hour to the west and the beach is a few hours to the east. There are plenty of larger city type recreational opportunities in Charlotte while a lot of the negatives of major metro areas are absent. Crime isn't too bad and despite locals' complaints the traffic isn't nearly as bad as the DC or areas further north. You also have all of the rural type recreational activities failrly close to civilization. Life is good here. Don't screw it up for me. ;)

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  74. Doesn't always cancel out by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    Sorry it doesn't always all cancel out. As economists like to say, there may be "significant barriers to entry". For an extreme example the millions of very poor but bright Indians who can't come to America even though they'd be happy with a fraction of the going rate. Why? Because of immigration laws. Another example would be a required certification of a degree you job requires.

    Likewise another factor is the fact that infomation isn't perfect. In order to have an efficient marketplace every participant has to have "perfect" information of what the supply and demand is. I think some economist(s) won a Nobel Prize for their idea that information isn't always perfect (and were able to incorporate it into their models).

    So beat the system. Don't just go with the flow, make your information more perfect than the next guy and take advantage of something overlooked. Can you say insider information (in a good way ;). Or use the barriers to entry to your advantage; go somewhere it is easy for you but hard for others (I don't mean that just in terms of location, think about your skills).

  75. Re:There's a reason it's cheap to live in those pl by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No one *wants* to, so there's no competition.

    Like we go out a lot? (Well, maybe there are less pizza and taco joints. That could suck.)

  76. What Is "Cost Of Living"? by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Job A:
    $50,000/year, $10,000 annual rent.

    Job B:
    $100,000/year, $40,000 annual rent.

    Relative to the cost of rent, Job A is phenominal: You're making five times the cost of rent. Job B sucks: you're only earning 2.5 times rent. By this measure, job A is far and away the better option - by a factor of 2.

    The thing is, once you've paid the varying rent, where do you spend the rest of your money? The decent spec new PC will be $2,000 in Rancho Santa Fe, Manhattan or BFI. The new $25,000 car will be $25,000 wherever you buy it. The big TV is the same price wherever. And, most important of all, the internet porn subscriptions run the same wherever you are too.

    At that point, would you rather the job that's 5 times "cost of living" but only leaves you with $40,000 or the one that gives a sucky 2.5x but leaves you with $60,000 extra.

    Next, on the simple level, let's look at that cost of living. Assuming you get on, buy and pay a mortgage off, in 20 years time the place with the poor salary relative to cost of living will leave you with a $500,000-$1,000,000 home vs. the $200,000-$250,000 place in the "better" area. Now, aged 40, you can up and move to the cheap place, selling your home, buying one of the nicest places in the cheap area and having a nice large nest egg lfet over to let you get to retire early. My in-laws have just done exactly that and apparently a lot of people in Texas are getting seriously pissed at all the Californians coming in, buying huge homes after selling up smaller places in CA and pushing up the Texan cost of living for people who're still paid no more.

    And, finally, there's a reason rent and property are so expensive in some areas. Go to California and look out of the window. Rumor has it that other parts of the world have a condition called Seasonal Affective Disorder. Land is expensive in California because you never shovel snow, you rarely deal with crazy humidity, you rarely have the insane heat of Arizona, you rarely get mosquitos the size of Volkswagens and you can sit on the beach on New Year's Day. In short, supply and demand means that when there's a crazy price, there's generally a great reason for it.

    So, yes, some areas have high costs of living and lower salaries in relation to that cost. But I.T. is famous for the fact that we out earn most other professions and, once you get past earning about three times cost of average rent, everything else is gravy. Sure, you reach that point faster elsewhere - but once you do reach it (and you do in I.T.), you keep going even further when the numbers are bigger.

    I've watched a lot of friends leave California because they're in other fields and it's just too expensive to live here if you don't earn well. But once you get to the kind of salaries I.T. tends to pay, the cost of rent becomes a relatively minimal part of the total cost of living a great life.

    1. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Atario · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The thing is, once you've paid the varying rent, where do you spend the rest of your money? The decent spec new PC will be $2,000 in Rancho Santa Fe, Manhattan or BFI. The new $25,000 car will be $25,000 wherever you buy it. The big TV is the same price wherever. And, most important of all, the internet porn subscriptions run the same wherever you are too.

      At that point, would you rather the job that's 5 times "cost of living" but only leaves you with $40,000 or the one that gives a sucky 2.5x but leaves you with $60,000 extra.
      I so wish I still had that last mod point I lost overnight. That's exactly what I came in here to say.

      Then again, maybe I should hide this clear thinking from others -- leaves more for me.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    2. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      And, most important of all, the internet porn subscriptions run the same wherever you are too.
      Yes however, in your backwater redneck hillbilly rural area, the hookers are damn cheaper.
      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I hear, the anti-California sentiment is very widespread across the US right now. I live in Denver, CO, and I can definitely verify that real-estate agents here advise people moving in from California not to announce that fact to their neighbors if they want to fit in well. I've read the same thing in newspapers in various places around the country that you might think of as having a lower cost of living (St. Louis, Atlanta, Phoenix, Birmingham, not just in Houston and Dallas), but this cost has risen a bit in recent years due to real estate prices, so it's not at all an isolated phenomenon. You can do a quick Google search to find a few blog posts on the subject

    4. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Insightful, indeed, however there are still dangers in that water. I lived in SoCal and couldn't wait to get out. To many stupid people to deal with. And I grew up in DC, so that's really saying quite a lot. It was nice not to have rain, but unless you lived on the coast the weather was stifling for a good bit of the year and the air made your throat and lungs hurt in the summer months.

      If you're going to stay and ride the housing price wave, remember that prices can (and do) stagnate from time to time. Even while I was there, I saw some people's houses values stagnate, while others hit the lottery (one coworker bought a house in a neighborhood for $150k in January, and by May his development was considered "hip", and his next door neighbor sold a similar house in the low $400s). Think of it as investing in the stock market in the early 90s, and selling your portfolio and retiring in 2000. Everyone should do it because you can now live on the cash and not work again. Except, of course, that you happened to hit a nice ride, and everyone who jumped into the market in 2000 isn't quite so happy with the results. Housing prices are still speculative.

      You're point that living in a high-dollar housing place will get you a nice sale and cash-out when you leave is true - that money does add up over time. Worse, if you live in a cheap, normal growth (which is about 6%/yr* before expenses, repairs, and taxes) and have to end up moving to the big cities, you're royally hosed. Houses really do drive the cost of living, but there is a certain investment quality to them, so its not all cost. The other big one is taxes. They can vary quite a bit, and are affected by RE price. I have a cousin who pays as much or more in taxes on her 5BR house in Jersey than I pay for the entire mortgage on my house in Virginia. That's money gone forever. And it's not necessarily proportional: I paid about $.20-$.23 per $100 of actual value in a rural county in VA, vs ~$2.40/$100 in Maryland.

      Not saying that you aren't correct - your plan has merit if you can stand the atmosphere

      *Data point: $130k house ~15m north of DC beltway in 1978 sold for $700k in 2003. Super hot area, McMansions galore, very desirable (large) lot with a horse barn, stone arena, fencing all put in since the original purchase. Realtor's "market value" was $540k (average from three good local agents), but the owners decided to advertise themselves instead. Increase over that 25 years: 7% per year actual, 6% by the "Realtors' Market Value" estimate. I think the realtors would have been on target if it hadn't been for the horse barn & amenities.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by sootman · · Score: 1

      apparently a lot of people in Texas are getting seriously pissed at all the Californians coming in, buying huge homes after selling up smaller places in CA and pushing up the Texan cost of living for people who're still paid no more

      Ha! Washington and Oregon have hated California "equity refugees" for decades. Texans can call either of those two states (they both share one area code, I think; California has all the rest) for tips on how to deal.

      Funny that reading the other replies I see that many other states feel the same way. How can one state affect all the others so much? Answer: 1/8 of the country lives in CA. That's a damn lot of people.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a lot of people in Texas are getting seriously pissed at all the Californians
      > coming in, buying huge homes after selling up smaller places in CA and pushing
      > up the Texan cost of living

      Karma's a bitch, ain't it.

    7. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Steve+Baker · · Score: 1

      While you're fundamentally correct with your example jobs there, alas, the taxman will more than likely close the gap betwixt the two more than you might first imagine. Paradise tends to have higher tax rates and the federal government cares not that you live in California when it lays claim to a bigger slice of your pie than it does for Job A. And just what are property taxes like on a half million dollar house in CA anyway?

      Of course you'll get some of that back when you retire -- maybe.

    8. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by SirCodeAlot · · Score: 1

      Typical Cali repsonse. I have plenty of job opportunities here in Michigan as a coder, and I like my scenery better. Let's see what Cali does deal with...Illegals, Roving Black Outs, Crappy Housing Prices, Fires, EarthQuakes,Mud Slides, No Fresh Water Supply, Pollution, Crime, I mean come on when 15% of a countries crimes happen in 2% of its states you avoid that area. And your comparison of cost of living is way off base. What about groceries, Dining, going out to a movie? ANd for the record cars are much cheaper everywhere besides Cali because we don't have all those eco-nuts that casued you to have your own set of standards. I mean really why do you think Google is putting 1000 jobs of their 6000 member workforce over into Michigan...

    9. Re:What Is "Cost Of Living"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your argument does make some sense. Living in an expensive area does result in a higher expendable income. But there are so many other factors that I feel justify my "lower" earnings in Northern Minnesota. I do not have to fear getting shot, robbed, or hassled while walking down the block for a gallon of milk. I do not have to breath in or look at toxic chemicals found in the abundant pollution of CA. I do not have to spend nearly 2 hours a day in bumper to bumper traffic. I start my truck at 8:24 and I am at my desk by 8:30. When needed, I can get timely services from a doctor, plumber, carpenter, electrician without a 2 week delay and higher costs to boot.

      Sure I have to shovel snow, but not everyday. Sure there are mosquitoes, this summer not a one. but the lakes are fresh, cool, and CLEAN. How many beaches in CA are now unswimmable? I enjoy all of the different seasons, flying across a frozen lake on a snowmobile, waterskiing on the same lake a few months later. And you can get all of this with about a $50,000 mortgage for a nice 20 acre lot with two story house and garage.

      Do all of these claims add up to $20,000? Maybe not for everyone, but I lived in San Diego and Santa Cruz for a few years. I will take the stress free, redneck life anytime.

      sorry for anonymous, I forgot login.

      Jeff

  77. Problem with Small Cities by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with the smaller places is that they tend to be one horse towns. They usually have one big employer (like Micron in Boise) and a few much smaller companies that rarely hire and that is it. If you moved there to work for the big company and got sick of it or they had a layoff you'd basically have to sell the house and move. Your choices are just too limited in those places. Also the cost of living might be lower but so would your pay. Ok you say? But the cost of cars, plane tickets, computer toys, etc doesn't go down for you. You generally pay the same as the guy in NYC. They aren't going to sell you that cool new car at half price just because you live in East Belch MO.

    Now if I could get a job in, say, Grand Junction CO so I could hike in some incredible terrain every weekend I might be willing to make an exception.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Problem with Small Cities by blueturffan · · Score: 1
      They usually have one big employer (like Micron in Boise) and a few much smaller companies that rarely hire and that is it.
      I believe the State of Idaho is the largest employer in the Boise area, followed by Micron. However, Hewlett-Packard has a huge facility in Boise (~4000 employees, and is the "home of the LaserJet printer"), the JR Simplot company is a large employer in Boise, as is Albertsons headquarters -- at least for the time being...

      Idaho Falls may be a one horse town, but Boise is not.

  78. Supply and demand by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait a moment, what am I saying?

    The more people realize this, the more they'll be encouraged to move here, the more demand for the same supply of housing and the more I have to pay.

    Iowa is the shiznit. It's the coolest place ever. I'm in California and it's awful here. We have to walk up hill both ways and the hills are steeper here (the land's scrunched up by our daily earthquakes). And hot? Like you wouldn't believe. Don't believe that stuff about coastal areas being cooler - it's hell here. No one should ever move here because, high salaries or not, life's too expensive. Iowa's the place. Des Moines is just super awesome. Off you go!

    1. Re:Supply and demand by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what it means is you need to buy property.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  79. Texas Ain't What It Was Five Years Ago.... by Slugster · · Score: 1

    I had been wanting to relocate from the midwest to Texas for some time; I had visited on a couple trips and put out resumes/talked to people there. Mainly in non-tech jobs, but also in tech jobs that I could apply to with only an associates' degree. In 2003 I got some positive conversations but no job that was outstanding enough to get me to move called me back.

    When I went again in late-2005, the tone I got was entirely diferent. Companies were treating applications with all the reverence you normally reserve for used tissues. One HR guy said outright that I had come at just about the worst time, because this was the first time he ever remembered that they had enough good applicants that they didn't have a position currently open. The hurricane season of 2004 and 2005 pushed many people off the Gulf and east coasts. A lot of those people still wanted to live somewhere warm and fairly-near the ocean, so they went (or got sent to hotels, on FEMA's nickel) to Houston and DFW.

    Now it is true that many of those that ended up there were poor uneducated people that a degreed tech worker wouldn't be competing with jobs for anyway--but all of them weren't. And they took up a lot of the cheaper housing, they took a lot of the lower-end service sector jobs and the crime rates hiccupped as well. Many of these "transplants" aren't going anywhere--they were lower-income and renting housing in areas that got flattened by a hurricane. Even if the rental properties (and jobs) they left were rebuilt last week, these people couldn't afford the trip to move back.

    Not to say that Texas is ruined--but the last couple years weather has changed some matters a bit.
    ~

    1. Re:Texas Ain't What It Was Five Years Ago.... by jascat · · Score: 1

      Texas has always had it's share of lower-income folks coming across the border. Like any area, you just have to live in the right area. I'm planning my move for 2008, so that should give things time to settle out. If nothing else, my in-laws live there and have an extra bedroom.

    2. Re:Texas Ain't What It Was Five Years Ago.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I'm planning my move for 2008, "

      President Bush?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. Nice town, but yeah... by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    No kidding. I went to school at University Park. Trying to find anything techie over $7/hour was a real challenge. I'd imagine that's due to the fact that employers have their pick of the PHD students at rock bottom prices while they're just trying to survive grad school. It's also a small business type of place. There are some major companies around, but not many.

    Beautiful, safe town, though. If I didn't have to earn a living, I'd consider moving there again. I liked it a lot when I was in school, and $7/hour was pretty fine for pocket money.

  81. Hi-tech Deliverance? by gwayne · · Score: 1

    Squeal like a bad cooling fan, boy!

  82. Go to Alberta by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you want to know where high paying jobs are go to Alberta, Canada it's insane!

      McDonald's workers are getting $15/hour, signing bonuses and $100 extra pay if you show up for all your shifts that week.

      Housing is a bit of a problem, there's a booming business finding old homes, ripping them off their foundation and dragging them to Calgary.

      Calgary is sprawling outward at an incredible rate, it's bigger in area than NY city.

      It's all from oil, tar sands that is, Canada exports oil since we make more than we use. The US gets about 10% of its oil from Canada and that will probably increase due to the US public's of growing concern about "foreign oil".

      People are going there by the thousands every day, it's crazy!

    1. Re:Go to Alberta by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Housing is a bit of a problem, there's a booming business finding old homes, ripping them off their foundation and dragging them to Calgary.

      I'm surprised they're bothering - I imagine it's be cheaper to just use either pre-fab houses or trailers.

      It's all from oil, tar sands that is, Canada exports oil since we make more than we use. The US gets about 10% of its oil from Canada and that will probably increase due to the US public's of growing concern about "foreign oil".

      In which case, God help us all. The problem isn't "foreign" oil. It's oil. The burning of which is polluting, inefficient, and most probably contributes to climate change. We have the ability to reduce our dependence on oil except for chemical processes where it's needed like plastics manufacturing. Change patterns of living so that people's commutes aren't that long - give businesses tax breaks for locating in towns rather than in BFE. Electrify the railroads for moving freight and passengers. Encourage the use of electric vehicles - the cars could have a removable diesel generator for long trips, but most car trips are under 100 miles. Encourage efficient architecture. Insulation isn't enough. A properly-designed house can heat itself passively in winter and ventilate itself through natural circulation when it's warm (but not oppressively hot) outside. Where's the extra electricity to drive our transportation systems going to come from? Wind and solar show some promise in certain regions, as does hydro despite its environmental ramifications. Solar in space with power beamed down to floating receivers via microwaves might be another option. But, like it or now, a large part of our energy in the future will be generate via nuclear power - fission for now, fusion when it's perfected in the future. Deal with it people, if you want the lights to stay on for the next few centuries.

      -b.

    2. Re:Go to Alberta by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they're bothering - I imagine it's be cheaper to just use either pre-fab houses or trailers.

        You don't understand, they do all that already but there is nothing left! There are so many people going to work there that every shack, trailer, mobile home, tent or cardboard box is being used.

    3. Re:Go to Alberta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any oil sands are only profitable when oil prices are high. When price destruction occures, not if but when becasue it will these places will be the first to implode. Look at the TexArkana region when oil prices fell in the 80s. Back then people thought prices were going to stay up forever too. Whole cities imploded and turned into ghost towns. Infrastructure was cancelled in the midst of bilding it. Fields stopped pumping becasue it cost more to extract then companies were getting for it on the market.

      I would think twice about moving to any region so dependant on a single commodity or resource to support it.

      If you don't think price destruction will occur hwo many people will go into the apple business when apples go up 500% and profit margins are greater than any other product. Supply growth will grow much fater than demand in about 10 years.

    4. Re:Go to Alberta by Kardall · · Score: 1
      I live 45min. North of Calgary, and houses here are going for anywhere between $250k to $325k for an average sized house (1200-2200sqft.)

      Problem is, it's a commuter/farming town, so you either live here and farm, or you live here and work in Red Deer or Calgary. You cannot sell here and then move to another place in town, it's pointless cause it will cost you the same to do so, or more for moving expenses.

      The population here is only about 6,000 or something stupid like that, but the number of people who are over the age of 50 is amazing. Most of them farmers who will never retire, and they work to help teach their children and grandchildren etc. Then they all farm her, take over the farm, work till they die. It's sad, but it's the Alberta Farmers Way. :D

      I for one work in the IT industry out here. Doing networking and internet/computer support, wireless installs for local homes and/or long range wireless transmissions via antenna's. And I get paid not too bad, the cost of living here is going up, and my services are cheap because I realize that you just can't charge $200/hr. to install an antenna system + materials like you can in the big city. I still sell complete systems for around $600 installed, and it maybe takes me about 1.5 hours to do a setup. But anyway, that's the report from an Albertan :D

    5. Re:Go to Alberta by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Calgary is sprawling outward at an incredible rate, it's bigger in area than NY city.

      Is sprawl supposed to be a good thing?? If your argument held any weight, we'd all be moving to Jacksonville, Florida. The impressive thing about New York City is it's population (8.1 million), not it's land area.

  83. cost of living vs. MacBook Pro by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One problem with cost of living arguments is that many items nowadays are priced nationally, not locally. If I want a brand new MacBook Pro, for example, its going to cost the same whether I live in New York City or Frostbite Falls, Minnesota. Same for HDTV sets, and many other things that we geeks like to buy at a much higher rate than the "typical" family whose needs are used to figure cost of living.

  84. Median home prices by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1
    There's no way Silicon Valley could compete in a survey like this, when the median home price there is now $770,000 (Santa Clara County). I just moved out of Santa Clara County for just this reason. I was making a fantastic salary, but to be honest, it was probably only 20% more, at most, than I would make anywhere else. And when home prices are 300% more than anywhere else, it just doesn't make sense.

    I'm betting (literally) that the housing market out there is headed for a major crash.

    I witnessed the madness out there first hand. I shopped around for houses and found that there's just not much available below half a million dollars. I asked the real estate people how people can afford anything, and they told me "Most people take an adjustable, interest-only loan." All that means is that they're gambling that the price of their home will go up and then they can sell it before their mortgage readjusts to some horrendous amount.

    And to get an idea of just how bad the situation is, there's this (from the NYT): http://www.dailynews.com/portlet/article/html/frag ments/print_article.jsp?article=4084437.The important thing is this:
    Now, the first big wave of the mortgage boom is cresting as more than $400 billion worth of adjustable-rate mortgages, or about 5 percent of all outstanding mortgage debt, will readjust this year for the first time, according to Loan Performance, a research firm. Next year, another $1 trillion in loans will readjust.
    In other words, the number of people whose mortgages will readjust will roughly triple in 2007, resulting in over a trillion dollars in mortgages that people are desperate to get out of. I don't see how home prices can continue to go up when suddenly everyone needs to sell their homes (that they never had any intention of paying for in the first place) all at the same time. And when home prices do stop going up, now all those people (who haven't paid one cent towards the principal) are faced with selling their homes for less than they paid. Bad times. Oh well... Maybe I'll be able to buy a foreclosed home at a more reasonable price.
    1. Re:Median home prices by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      in reference to your sig, and i guess you get this a lot, wasn't there a
      COPYRIGHT (C) MICROSOFT 1977,1981
      or some such in there?

    2. Re:Median home prices by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I'm betting (literally) that the housing market out there is headed for a major crash.

      Invest in businesses that cater to renovaters, brokers, contractors, and title agencies.

      A major crash in a housing market means a huge demand for the stuff the folks do with the houses
      they buy for ten cents on the dollar.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Median home prices by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      That's a really good idea... If I had the money, I'd just buy the foreclosed homes and then re-sell them. But I don't, so instead, I'm playing the real-estate futures market. Yeah, pretty risky, I know. But it's the most direct way to speculate on the future of the real estate market.

    4. Re:Median home prices by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >If I had the money, I'd just buy the foreclosed homes and then re-sell them

      WAY too much work. And you're getting a little bit ahead of yourself there -- despite the
      doom and gloom projections, the crash keeps on not coming.

      Houses in my neighborhood continue to sell within a few days of listing, at or above asking price, which is generally pretty high by my reckoning.

      One person's crash is another person's "growth rate leveling off".

      I would not necessarily be shorting a futures market right now... Maybe it's really different in your neighborhood. I heard my market was cooked two years ago. Which, I think, means it went from 'jaw-droppingly insane' to merely, 'breathtakingly insane."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Median home prices by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      Well, everyone has their own doom and gloom projections. I used to think that the crash was coming sometime around 2009 or 2010, based solely on my observations of the ridiculous home sales. In 2005, we went to look at what we thought were some new apartments being built near us. It was a four-storey building with a pretty modest exterior. It looked like it would be something affordable, which is why we were interested. So we went into what we thought was the apartment leasing office... Wrong! It was the sales office, and these were being sold as "homes." So we decided to take a tour. The one we looked at was about 1000 square feet, two bedrooms, and below-average quality of construction. The floors were some kind of fake wood (not even as nice as Pergo) that creaked just about everywhere you walked. The "balcony" (ha ha) was about 5' by 5', just large enough for one person to stand there, and it overlooked a supermarket parking lot. And keep in mind that this unit was the model! No yard, no garage, one underground parking space...

      Anyway, we looked at this place, thinking how weird it would be to buy a "home" and have neighbors above, below, left, right, and across the hall. But we figured it would probably be cheap. Wrong again. They wanted $700K for those units. And here's the real kicker -- all but like two units (out of maybe 300) were sold!! That was when we realized that all remnants of reality were completely gone. So it might seem on the surface like a really good sign, when tiny, crappy places are selling for ridiculous prices like that.

      Well, here's the problem: When you drive by that place (it's just off Montague Expressway in San Jose), you can see in a lot of the windows. Maybe like one unit in ten actually has furniture in it. The rest are sold, but empty. And several of them have a sign hanging off the balcony with the name, phone number, and picture of a realtor. So obviously, what's happening is that these real estate speculators are buying these places and just assuming that the price will go up over the next three years or so. Well, what if it doesn't? What happens to all those empty places? Even if, as you said, the market just "levels off," those people are screwed. They now have this place that they can't sell, because there's too much competition. And they still owe 100% of the principal, because they've been paying an interest-only loan.

      That article from the NYT that I cited in my original post has the cold, hard numbers to back this up. In 2006, about $400M worth of these crazy adjustable-rate mortgages will readjust. In 2007, that number triples to over ONE TRILLION DOLLARS. In any market you can imagine, tripling the number of people trying to sell something is definitely going to drive prices down. It's not going to level off, it's going down. And that wouldn't be so terrible, but the problem is that everyone has gambled so heavily on prices continuing to go up. What the hell do you do when your mortgage is about to readjust, you owe $700K, and no one is willing to pay more than $500K? You go bankrupt and the bank forecloses on the home. When bankruptcy and foreclosures start happening on a wide scale, look out.

      And never mind all the other potential catalysts... What if interest rates go up? What if the government's disaterous foreign policy over the last few years starts to really hurt the dollar, or even the stock market? Personally, I'm predicting far worse than a "bubble burst" for the Bay Area. The really unfortunate part is that it will probably have a much wider impact than just the Bay Area.

  85. Idaho's Growing Pains by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

    Boise has already gone through a great deal of it's growing pains. In many ways, it has learned that people will come whether you build it or not. In the 90's, Boise stated to change directions in its look to the future. Although it maybe difficult to see, they're preparing the infrastructure for tomorrow. The rest of Idaho might need to learn that lesson, but there's only so many people who are going to want to move to a place that only has agricultural jobs. Y por eso, hay mas mexicanos que otras en el sur. In the northern portion of the state, they'll just shoot your smart ass.

    Recently, I moved from Boise to Idaho Falls, and I'm not sure if it is worth it. There isn't a damned thing to do, and none of the restaurants have food or service above McD's quality.

  86. Try Northern Virginia, especially if you're good by hlee · · Score: 1

    I've been somewhat involved in interviewing software engineers (from fresh grads to a couple of years experience), and have observed our local talent has been somewhat lacking. I've been part of the 2nd (and final) interview process, which typically lasts an entire day for the candidate. I think about 1/3 make it pass this gauntlet to a job offer. I spoke to a co-worker who's involved in the 1st screening stage, and he said less than 1/3 make it pass him - for the most part, he would ask textbook questions about Java programming, and basic OO concepts like inheritance. In the past year or so, we've had a lot of attrition in our team just by chance, and we're now having a heck of a time recruiting someone capable.

    I'm getting just shy of 100k as a relatively senior software engineer (6 yrs experience). Living costs do vary since some areas are ridiculously expensive, especially if they're close to Washington D.C. otherwise if you move westward they become quite affordable. Move far enough (e.g. West Virginia), and you can buy your own farm. Lots of interesting stuff in D.C. so you're unlikely to get bored. My only real gripe is that people here are pretty conservative, and don't seem very nice. They are also especially inconsiderate drivers, e.g. about 1/3 would bother to stop at a pedestrian crossing (once I even saw one almost side swipe an already crossing pedestrian). This is of course just a gross generalization, since I did meet my wife here. Big international community in the region, and lots of diversity 15 miles in any direction.

  87. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    17 Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ 51,600

    Been there, worked there. Get paid over 2x as much in NYC now... And Parsippany isn't really cheaper than the outer boroughs of NYC, so no price advantage there. Not to mention, it's boring as all-get-out and the traffic is appalling since all of the big companies have located on Rt. 10. At least in NYC, you can take the subway and it gets you there quickly 99% of the time.

    -b.

  88. As a Des Moines resident, I take offense! by aduzik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know you meant "Des Moines is just super awesome" as a jab, but it really is a great place to live. Granted, it has terrible weather just like the rest of Iowa, but if you can get past that, it's wonderful. And, I'll have you know, that as of 2004 Des Moines officially employs more people in the insurance industry than any other US city -- Hartford, CT is now the Des Moines of the east. Mind you, that only employs tens of thousands of information technology people, but no worries. Wells Fargo is moving 30,000 jobs here over the next few years. Terrible life for a programmer, I know. Sadly, each year, my salary just keeps going up and up as competition for talented IT people increases.

    Really, though, it's a great size (about 400,000 people), has fantastic restaurants for a city its size, great shopping and attracts great entertainment (the Iowa State Fair excepted) Oh, and did I mention that you can get wherever you want to go in a matter of minutes? That's right; the city is spread out enough that traffic is rarely a problem. Well, OK, traffic won't be a problem as soon as they finish the vastly new and improved Intersate 235 through town.

    And, if you're smart like me, you live in one of the bigger nearby suburbs (ahem... Ankeny) where the housing is cheap, plentiful, and largely new construction. If that's not your thing, you could live in one of the dozens of new lofts they've built in downtown Des Moines.

    It annoys me when people who live on the coasts, and have never lived anywhere else, can't imagine that life in the square states could be anything but hellish. I've got firends and family who live in California, and you couldn't pay me enough to live there. Mind you, there's nowhere else in Iowa where I'd want to live, but Des Moines is, in my estimation, the shiznit. Living in sunny California is not without its problems too. What's that you're paying for gas there? And it takes you how long to get to work? My house has an attached garage, a big yard and is twice the size of your place and you pay three times as much?

    Both of the jobs I've had while living in Des Moines have paid quite well relative to the cost of living. I've actually turned down job offers elsewhere -- you know, in the "good" part of the country -- because I simply couldn't live as well there.

    But wait! What am I saying? People are going to want to live here and increase the demand for the same supply of housing and then I'll have to pay more! California is the shiznit. Coolest place ever. I'm in Iowa and it's terrible. We have to walk uphill both ways -- in the snow, mind you -- we have blizzards every day. Even in the summer! California's the place. Los Angeles is just super awesome. Off you go!

    --
    If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    1. Re:As a Des Moines resident, I take offense! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Living in sunny California is not without its problems too. What's that you're paying for gas there? And it takes you how long to get to work? My house has an attached garage, a big yard and is twice the size of your place and you pay three times as much?

      Indeed. I live in a semi-rural area near Seattle - and my (detached) garage is larger than the house on a postage stamp lot a friend of mine owns in the Bay Area. Yet she paid almost 80% more for the privilege... (And I also have a 2900 sq ft house and a pool and a yard...) My sister own a price controlled (by the Uni my brother-in-law teaches at) house in LA, slightly smaller in square footage with no yard to speak of - and paid almost 50% more than I did.
       
      I wouldn't live in any California metro area unless my life depended on it.
    2. Re:As a Des Moines resident, I take offense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't live in any California metro area unless my life depended on it.

      I'd rather die.

    3. Re:As a Des Moines resident, I take offense! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Hartford, CT is now the Des Moines of the east

      Always was, dude, always was.

    4. Re:As a Des Moines resident, I take offense! by IrishMASMS · · Score: 1

      Question: Where is the music, arts, & culture is DSM? (And I am not asking about the state fair) Sure, the Val-Air Ballroom brings in some bands (and is an awesome venue IMHO) - but what else is there? IMHO, there is more to living & to consider about a city than traffic & cheal house prices - there is just 'existing' and then there is truly 'living'.

  89. Re:choose from the choices above by blueturffan · · Score: 1
    Going to school up here was a DUMB idea.
    Let's see. You mention being in IF today, from that I assume you're either attending BYU-Idaho or ISU (Pocatello). Having attended both of those schools myself, I would agree that going to school at ISU is indeed a very, very bad idea. Please don't judge Idaho based on Pocatello.

    On the other hand, if you're not actually able to be happy in Rexburg all I can say is your experience there is the opposite of mine...

  90. Where are the highest paying jobs? by melted · · Score: 1

    Where are the highest paying jobs? Let me guess... In the areas with highest cost of living. What's the "news that matters" here, again?

  91. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by elliott_keith · · Score: 1

    I relocated to Westminster,CO (24th) from Atlanta and love it. Westminster is almost halfway between Boulder and Denver. Many tech companies are nearby: Sun, Avaya, Ball Aerospace, & Level 3 to name a few. The weather is great. Commercial expansion is at it's highest. Nice view and close proximity to the mountains.

  92. Go away! New Residents NOT Welcome by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    Not that I hate people in general, just all the fricking people moving to Idaho. Our valley has some of the highest growth rates in the nation because of all those dam californians moving in a driving up real estate prices. Property values rose 60% in my neighborhood (15yr old neighborhood) just because of all the demand from CA investors.

    DAMMIT. GO AWAY.

    And leave those jobs to all the HP people trying to leave that sinking ship.

    jason

  93. How about the savings rate? by dinodriver · · Score: 1

    It's been my experience that salaries in competitve fields are set by cost of living, sure. But that means that after covering living expenses, at the end of the day, one has the same percentage of income "left over" for savings and investment whether he lives in say San Francisco or Alabama. Let's just say 20% as an example. Which would you rather have working for your future (or spending on fun now): 20 percent of the high San Francisco salary or 20 percent of the low Alabama salary?

  94. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Pollardito · · Score: 1
    Scottsdale AZ (yes, it's a separate township, but snobs like to point out that it's *Scottsdale* to avoid saying they live in Phoenix)
    Cary, NC is essentially Raleigh. i imagine there are a lot of those in the list, but i'm not familiar with those metro areas
  95. You got this wrong by viking2000 · · Score: 1

    Cost of living comparisons assume you spend all your money where you are.

    Truth is *you don't*

    Example:
    Assume you work in San jose for $140k. You probably also get $30 in bonuses, and $30k in stock etc if you pick a decent company.

    Maybe you have $150k after taxes or $12,500/month.

    Now pay for house and food, and you have $6k left to save.

    If you find another place where everyting is half of San jose, you may live just as well, and still save almost 50%. You are however only saving $3k
    (And you will not find such a place. Your car, your TV, your PC and all other stuff cost just the same)

    When retirement comes, you will feel the difference. Twice the money will be the difference between retiring in style or just staying put.

    You probably can retire early from your job in San Jose as well.

    1. Re:You got this wrong by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I think you're dreaming if you think $140K in San Jose leads to a surplus that you can save.
      Realistically, that's gonna clear a little over $7 grand a month -- a good salary anywhere, but,
      one paycheck is going to that $2800 mortgage payment.

      If you can manage to enter San Jose with real estate equity, you live in a different world anyway.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  96. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    I"m sorry this can be regarded as Troll - but since it shot soda out my nose into the screen - I'll take humor mods too. If only because my sinuses still sting from the Dr. Pepper. Ick.

    How was that 2 to 3 feet of snow you had the year before last? Was that part of the "great"?

    Speak of great - that doesn't scream "Sun Microsystems". Perhaps you meant Storage Tech - dang - Quark? Shoot they jobbed out all their devs to their India offices um - Sun?...

  97. Telecommute by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get the best of both worlds - telecommute from a cheap area to a job in an expensive area. Works for me, and means I might actually be able to afford to buy a house before I retire.

  98. And Seattle is the most overpriced city. by Dogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, Forbes put out an article about a year ago saying Seattle was the most overpriced city in the USA. As I had just started working when this article came out, I was mildly concerned about that statement.

    Turns out Forbes is a rag. Seattle is cheaper than any other city I have ever lived in. Rent is cheaper. Wages are about the same. Gas is just as bad here as anywhere. Fruit is decent quality and only slightly worse than california prices. There's no state income tax.

    Considering the rather 'innovative' reporting they've done on the SCO v. IBM matter as well, I really do wonder if there's a substantial difference in quality between New Scientist and Forbes.

    I'm not saying THIS article is crap, but quality of life and cost of living can be very different matters and are not easy things to sum up. I'd advise that nobody use an article like this to make a life-altering decision.

    1. Re:And Seattle is the most overpriced city. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived in the Puget Sound area all my life, and Seattle may be cheaper than New York or San Jose, but it's
      damned expensive compared to anywhere else in the Northwest. Even when I was working in Seattle I commuted from the Peninsula because 1) It's nicer here and 2) I couldn't afford anything better than a rather seedy house in King County. I'm lucky in that I finally got out of Seattle and the East Side and now work in Tacoma. It's surprising how many people commute one or two hours each way to Seattle because the quality and cost of life is so much better outside King County.

  99. Re:Go away! New Residents NOT Welcome by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    >all those dam californians moving in a driving up real estate prices.

    I can only imagine that there are Idahoans, born and raised there, playing their part in this phenomenon by selling their houses to Californians. And developers, with the full consent of the state and local government (presumably comprised of, and elected by, many natural born Idahoans) making it all possible too.

    Do you not think that Idahoans share the responsiblity with Californians?

    If high real estate prices are a problem, does that indicate that you neglected to buy a house when prices were low -- a house that I imagine you, a good honest Idahoan, would refuse to sell to a Californian at 300% appreciation?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  100. Re:choose from the choices above by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Let's see -- college town in the middle of nowhere -- with college girls who are very, very bored --
    I'm not sure that would be such a bad idea.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  101. Uh by andreyw · · Score: 1

    Sure... if you can stomach living in Bumblefuck, USA.

  102. India ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or China ?

  103. quality of life. by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The quality of life than many Americans does not require public transportation. In fact I would be a good number actually see public transportation as a sign of where NOT to live.

    Some of course will take that and run off spouting racism,bigotry, or whatnot. The simple fact is that at the end of the day many aspire to nothing more than being away from it all. Stand alone housing and visual separation from the "business world - read: minimarts/gas stations/grocery stores" is key to the happiness of many. Sure we want them to still be convienent and a short hop in the car isn't an impediment.

    I'm even moving further out simply because where I bought has changed so much in 9 years that its no longer the area I desired to live in. Lots of good people are here but the little businesses have creeped down the road to where its no longer "open".

    As for your "pay and arm and a leg to massively pollute". Yeah, whatever. Three dollar, heck even 5 dollar a gallon gas isn't going to change my behaviour and I doubt that it will change that of others who live where I do. Cars are far better today than ever and that simpleton slight of yours is just silly. If I want massive pollution I will go to the big city with its public transportation because even there in the land of so called "enlightened" thinking a great many of them seem to not use that very public transportation they deem "good for others". I can go see the trash piled in alleys and cigarette butts lining the sidewalk. Oh yeah, massively pollute. Cities have no ground to stand on.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:quality of life. by MadJeff451 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Public transportation is about energy efficiency. How much energy is required for me to drive to work, cool my car. There are ~150 other people on my floor who might drive to work as well. That's a lot of energy. Comare that to a bus, and you'd see a bit of savings - lugging more people about in a less energy-efficient vehicle results in a net gain. Comare that to a train, and ... well you get my point.

      Now about cities. Don't think of a city as a cesspool of garbage (I lived in NY for awhile, I know it can be). Think of a city as giving citizens better energy eficiency per person. For instance, when you heat your house, even if it's well insulated, heat will leak out. Multiply that by the number of people on your block and you get quite a bit of wasted heat per person. Now imagine an apartment building, which differs from a house in that when heat escapes it doesn't all go to waste, much of it will drift up into the upper levels, providing more heat to the unit above, allowing persons on upper levels to turn down their furnace.

      The amount of energy you or I waste per person may be minimal, but when you think about how all that adds up the argument that living in less populated areas is more eco-friendly becomes less plausable. We might *feel* closer to the earth with nobody else around, but we increase our impact.

    2. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The quality of life than many Americans does not require public transportation. In fact I would be a good number actually see public transportation as a sign of where NOT to live.

      Sure, but then you're put in the position of leaching off of me and the rest of the urban dwellers to pay your bills.
      I have too much integrity to live my life sponging off of others, but hey, different strokes and all right?

      Here's a simple test. Would you be willing to have every single one of your bills, phone, gas, electric, cell phone etc. etc. etc. quadrupled to live where you do?
      If so, fine, start paying your own way in the world.
      If not, then you are a leach and your existence is entirely dependent upon the welfare provided to you by me and others like me.

      How about a little respect for those who pay your bills for you?


      I'm even moving further out simply because where I bought has changed so much in 9 years that its no longer the area I desired to live in. Lots of good people are here but the little businesses have creeped down the road to where its no longer "open".


      That's fine, but if you're going to move to the middle of nowhere, then you had damn well better pay to have all of the utility lines brought out there rather than expecting *me* to pay for it for you.

    3. Re:quality of life. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      How in the world does living in the suburbs mean leaching off of you?

      Man your logic is seriously fucked up.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    4. Re:quality of life. by admiralh · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Leeching off of the city dwellers" means that the extra infrastructure costs of urban sprawl are typically shared across the entire population (in the form of income taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, higher insurance rates, and higher utility costs), rather than assigned directly to the people that choose to "get away from it all" and live out in the sprawl.

      Essentially, the "sprawlers" are subsidized by the people who stay in the cities or existing suburbs.

      The sad fact is that urban sprawl is unsustainable. Not only are we covering up prime farmland with McMansions, but the energy cost is unsustainable, especially considering the dual problems of Peak Oil and Global Warming.

      Jared Diamond's book "Collapse" would be an excellent first step in your education.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    5. Re:quality of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from the 50 years of sprawl it seems pretty sustainable...

    6. Re:quality of life. by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up.

      Miles and miles of forests need to be dug in order to allow the grandparent poster to "get away from it all", not to mention all the power lost and infrastructure cost of delivering power and utility and internet to the "getaway".

      The suburban lifestyle was an idea cooked up by the auto industry to battle the train industry in the 30's, clearly, the auto industry won. It was great as US was becoming the major auto manufacturer. However, with virtually every automobile meaning that money leaves US (if not directly with purchase of a foreign car, then indirectly with gas), it's time to rethink the idea of the suburban / rural sprawl and regrow urban centers

    7. Re:quality of life. by admiralh · · Score: 1

      In the lifetime of civilizations, 50 years is nothing.

      The Greenland colony lasted for 500 years, then was abandoned.

      Humans in general have difficulty comprehending time-scales longer than a human lifetime.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    8. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1

      How in the world does living in the suburbs mean leaching off of you?

      Man your logic is seriously fucked up.


      So you ask a question whose answer is pretty clear and simple were you at all interested in actually learning the answer and then claim that my logic is "seriously fucked up". Bravo, Sparky. You're a real prize.

      "Suburbs" are a relatively small part of the problem. The rural areas are the worst.
      How it means leaching is simple.
      If you live in a rural area, look at your phone bill. Now quadruple that amount. That's what your service costs. You only pay a quarter of it and I pay the rest. How is that not leaching?

      Then just look at the whole farming thing. Not only do the farmers get paid direct subsidies i.e. welfare, but the prices of the food they sell is artificially inflated for an entire other welfare payment.

      That is the worst kind of Socialism, and the rural areas of the country have been living under that system for a hundred years.
      Add in the fact that the people there are so dangerously delusional and out of touch with reality that they think that they're capitalists even though every thing they keep whining about ("moral decay", "gays", etc.) are the direct, inevitable result of the global hyper capitalism that they keep voting for.

      So, yes, people living in rural areas *are* leaches. They are the primary example of the culture of entitlement and utter contempt for personal responsibility.

      The fact that they keep bitching about exactly what they are while pretending that the people working their asses off to pay their bills for them are the problem is completely insane. Their militant death grip on their ignorance of such simple basic matters is the primary reason our country is rotting in the core.
      A little honesty and a little integrity on the part of these leaches would go a long way to allowing us to start fixing the problems that they have created.

      Don't bet on it though. They will continue to leach off of the productive members of society until it collapses and then blame anyone but themselves.

    9. Re:quality of life. by vinn01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said.

      Most of the spawler's leeching will be done off of future generations. Future generations will inherit McMansion subdivisions instead of rich farmlands, a road system that costs a huge amount to maintain, little low cost mass transit (like European trains), a crushing national debt , and soaring energy costs.

      To repeat the parents point: "urban sprawl is unsustainable". There will come a point to there are simply not enough tanker trucks (and petrol to fill them) to meet the energy demands of the spawlers.

      I think in the not so distant future dense suburban subdivisions will be converted to small towns by the integration of goods and services. Other subdivisions will be abandoned because of their access make it too hard to move goods/services/people to and from their location. Or the integration of goods and services is too hard because of their low density.

    10. Re:quality of life. by DrBdan · · Score: 1

      You are totally making an invalid comparison between the "massive polluting" you do by driving your car everywhere and the "massive pollution" that can be found in large cities. Living in a large city means that there is a lot of people in a small area (obviously) thus even a small amount of pollution from each person adds up to a lot in one concentrated area. On the flip side, a small number of people can pollute a lot if they are all living in suburban/rural communities and not have a great effect.

      For example, 1 million people creating 1 pound of pollution is more than 10,000 people creating 10 pounds of pollution. And those smaller communities probably seem cleaner because everything is more spread out. However if you have 10 such communities surrounding one large city, those 10 communities are now making the same amount of pollution as the big city with only 10% of the people.

      Anyway to get back to the point of people wanting to live where there isn't public transit. You say that you like to live in the open areas but what is going to happen in the next 9 years? As more people move away from the city the sprawl just continues out further and further. Instead of doing something to reduce the problems that make you want to leave you are just bringing them with you to new areas.

      Of course maybe you just want to live in the open, away from everyone else. In that case move into a shack in the wilderness and leave your car, internet connection etc. in the city. Grow your own food and do everything for yourself. You can't expect to have everything good that a city provides (stores, internet etc) without the city.

      Brendan

    11. Re:quality of life. by teknopagan · · Score: 1

      I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Actually, what I would really like to see is where you get your numbers from? I personally live in SE Wisconsin - about 40 miles from Milwaukee, and about 70 miles from Chicago. My backyard butts up to a field of feed corn, and I have to drive a little over 6 miles to the nearest convenience store - definitely full-on rural. You claim then, that the folks in Milwaukee and Chicago are subsidizing my utilities? Give me an unbiased source - not a vitriolic rant like you've just shown us, but something with real, unspun facts.

      By the way - farming subsidies? How does that factor into your argument (regarding the cost of people living away from cities) at all? Are the farmers supposed to move to the big city and grow the food in the middle of your concrete jungle? Or are we all just supposed to eat pigeons and wall mold?

      --
      The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
    12. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1

      You claim then, that the folks in Milwaukee and Chicago are subsidizing my utilities? Give me an unbiased source - not a vitriolic rant like you've just shown us, but something with real, unspun facts.You claim then, that the folks in Milwaukee and Chicago are subsidizing my utilities? Give me an unbiased source - not a vitriolic rant like you've just shown us, but something with real, unspun facts.

      Come on, Dude. These are basic simple blatantly obvious facts that a half second of thought would have enabled you to prove to yourself. It's not rocket science. It's not even unclear, difficult or anything of the sort.

      I just bought a condo in Chicago. To deliver electrical service to my place, the power company strings a wire from the line to my building (40 feet from the power line tops.) By stringing this one line they have provided service to *4* households.
      To get the next building with 2-4 households, it's another drop from the power line. Same thing all up and down the entire neighborhood.
      Now compare that to what is involved with getting power to you and the closest 3 households to you.

      Pretty freaking simple, isn't it? Substitute, Phone lines, cell phone service, etc. etc. etc. and you get the exact same qualitative results.

      If you were to pay what it costs to deliver your power, then most likely *you wouldn't even have power because you couldn't afford it*. Now, the federal government has mandated that you shall get power and phone service and it shall be paid for by taxes, which people in rural areas don't even pay since they almost always get more back in tax dollars than they put out.

      Here is that data, which isn't trivially obvious like the utility issue.


      By the way - farming subsidies? How does that factor into your argument (regarding the cost of people living away from cities) at all? Are the farmers supposed to move to the big city and grow the food in the middle of your concrete jungle? Or are we all just supposed to eat pigeons and wall mold?


      It figures in because it's the same hypocritical socialist crap. If you want to be a socialist, then stand up, be a man, and admit it. The utterly morally bankrupt folks who swill at the trough while claiming to be gung ho capitalists are creating an incredible cognitive dissonance that is largely responsible for how fucked up this country is right now.

      No, they aren't supposed to move into the city to grow food. They can grow it where they are and sell it at a fair market value which is far less than it's sold for now.

      The common argument is that this would eliminate the family farm. Too fucking bad, I say. Factory farms already receive the bulk of these "family farm subsidies" because they're the ones who bought the laws.

      Our country is going bankrupt largely due to these leaches and their completely retarded voting choices, so we can't really afford to coddle them and pretend that what they do isn't already done far more efficiently without them.

      If they still want to live in the middle of nowhere, fine, but they can live at a level they can afford without picking my pocket in order to live above their means.

      I'm not one of these radical free market rah rah rah types (Actually a lot of them tend to be the very leaches we're talking about). I think that having some sort of a safety net is good, but these types of subsidies do nothing but allow deluded people to continue living in their fantasy world of "self sufficiency" when they are nothing but welfare leaches. Let them get a taste of the real world that they created and fucked over and maybe they'll be capable of pulling their heads far enough out of their asses to get a breath of fresh air and start acting like sane decent human beings instead of the rabid faggot hating blame everybody for their problems except themselves type of whiny bitch which they have demonstrated themselves to be in recent years as the results of *their* choices are now starting to affect them.

    13. Re:quality of life. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. Public transit is less efficient. It is not significantly more fuel efficient (compared to a carpool) and it is far less time efficient. Mass transit may reduce congestion on roads, but that's it. That's why areas where mass transit is in heavy use are good areas to avoid. It tells you that traffic will be bad, and there is no real upside to it.

      Time efficiency:

      My in-car commute to work: 15-20 minutes.
      My walk to the bus stop: 10 minutes. Bus time: 45 minutes. Walk from there: 15 minutes. Total time by bus: 1 hour, 10 minutes.

      Fuel efficiency:

      Hybrid city bus (NYC Transit study): 2.65 MPG. (Standard diesel busses are quite a bit worse.) Passengers: 45. Passenger-miles per gallon: 119.25.
      Toyota Prius: 51MPG. Number of passengers: 2. Passenger-miles per gallon: 102.
      Next year's Prius (rumored): 94 MPG. Number of passengers: 2. Passenger-miles per gallon: 188.
      Toyota Sienna Hybrid (expected 2007): 40 MPG. Passengers: 7. Passenger-miles per gallon: 280.

      Still think public transit is about energy efficiency? The reason public transit sucks for fuel efficiency is precisely the same reason that it sucks for fuel efficiency. Constant stop and go driving is inefficient. Want to really reduce fuel emissions? Do two things. First, carpool. Second, Demand that your city upgrade their traffic lights to a more modern, computer-controlled design that minimizes the average number of vehicle stops.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re:quality of life. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Diesel buses are quite nasty. Anyone arguing fuel efficiency for public transit is an idiot unless they're talking about 50 years in the future, because the buses on the road today are crap. There's a few places with diesel-electric or natural gas buses, but that's the exception, not the norm. Also don't forget, most buses are NOT loaded to capacity most of the time, so their passenger miles-per-gallon numbers are generally much worse. In general, public transit is very inefficient and very polluting.

      Second, Demand that your city upgrade their traffic lights to a more modern, computer-controlled design that minimizes the average number of vehicle stops.

      This is utterly infeasible and unworkable. The problem is that cities want to maximize the number of vehicle stops at red lights, in order to frustrate drivers and make them either not drive or choose alternate routes. Google for "traffic calming". Cities aren't worried about the energy efficiency of private vehicles.

      This is similar to another tactic by cities, especially those with red-light cameras. Thousands of people die at intersections every year, but cities have found that with red-light cameras, they can increase revenues by decreasing the yellow-light times, so that more people will run red lights and get tickets. So that's what they do. Just as energy efficiency is not important to local governments, neither is safety.

    15. Re:quality of life. by bowmanje · · Score: 1

      Sounds great but I would point out that urban environments would collapse without the rural areas providing resources. You didnt think all that food was grown in the store did you? You also fail to factor in the economics of the situation. I can live BETTER (by my standards) for CHEAPER outside of the city. I can own a house and grow my wealth instead of renting from month to month (or purchasing imo a crappier house for the same money). I'm sorry you feel slighted by government regulations that force utilities costs to be distributed over the whole population, but that doesn't mean that I need to feel guilty, nor should I have to live somewhere I DON'T LIKE just because you feel that it will make the world better (which is very much debateable). And don't even get me started on the whole "productive members of society" bullshit. I have seen lazy people in cities and out, and I have seen people that bust their asses on farms, in the suburbs and in the middle of the city. These accusations are baseless and biased.

    16. Re:quality of life. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Diesel buses are quite nasty. Anyone arguing fuel efficiency for public transit is an idiot unless they're talking about 50 years in the future, because the buses on the road today are crap. There's a few places with diesel-electric or natural gas buses, but that's the exception, not the norm. Also don't forget, most buses are NOT loaded to capacity most of the time, so their passenger miles-per-gallon numbers are generally much worse. In general, public transit is very inefficient and very polluting.

      That's because in general, public transit in the USA is at a 3rd-world standard.

      Electric subways are fast and carry large numbers of people with decreased energy usage and pollution (depending on the particular power supply).

      This is utterly infeasible and unworkable. The problem is that cities want to maximize the number of vehicle stops at red lights, in order to frustrate drivers and make them either not drive or choose alternate routes. Google for "traffic calming".

      Traffic calming is used to encourage drivers to choose roads which are designed for higher capacity, yes. The idea is to ensure that traffic in residential areas with children playing and people trying to sleep is not a hazard or an annoyance. You'd have to really hate your neighbours to disagree with this.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    17. Re:quality of life. by CRWeaks23 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh yeah, massively pollute. Cities have no ground to stand on.

      Your opinions on where you want to live and how much you mind paying for gas are fine, they are your opinions. However, saying that "Cities have no ground to stand on" is somewhat ignorant. Read this when you're bored, titled "NYC is the Greenest City in America." At least read the bold line from the passage below...

      http://www.walkablestreets.com/manhattan.htm

      An Excerpt:
      Most Americans, including most New Yorkers, think of New York City as an ecological nightmare, a wasteland of concrete and garbage and diesel fumes and traffic jams, but in comparison with the rest of America it's a model of environmental responsibility. By the most significant measures, New York is the greenest community in the United States, and one of the greenest cities in the world. The most devastating damage humans have done to the environment has arisen from the heedless burning of fossil fuels, a category in which New Yorkers are practically prehistoric. The average Manhattanite consumes gasoline at a rate that the country as a whole hasn't matched since the mid-nineteen-twenties, when the most widely owned car in the United States was the Ford Model T. Eighty-two per cent of Manhattan residents travel to work by public transit, by bicycle, or on foot. That's ten times the rate for Americans in general, and eight times the rate for residents of Los Angeles County. New York City is more populous than all but eleven states; if it were granted statehood, it would rank 51st in per-capita energy use.
    18. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1


      Sounds great but I would point out that urban environments would collapse without the rural areas providing resources. You didnt think all that food was grown in the store did you?


      Of course I didn't think that as I pointed out above.
      The fact that the prices of this food is massively inflated *and* subsidized is the problem, not the fact that food isn't a magically appearing item.

      You also fail to factor in the economics of the situation. I can live BETTER (by my standards) for CHEAPER outside of the city. I can own a house and grow my wealth instead of renting from month to month (or purchasing imo a crappier house for the same money).

      I don't fail to see that at all. What you fail to see is that you are taking advantage of what you see as a benefit (living "better", scenery, whatever your reasons are) and expecting *me* to pay for you to have that benefit. That is the issue as I stated quite clearly already. Please don't pretend that I said a bunch of nonsense in order to pretend you have a point.

      I'm sorry you feel slighted by government regulations that force utilities costs to be distributed over the whole population, but that doesn't mean that I need to feel guilty, nor should I have to live somewhere I DON'T LIKE just because you feel that it will make the world better (which is very much debateable).

      Again with this ridiculous made up nonsense. I didn't say any of that and you know it.

      I'm pissed by the fact that I am forced to pay for a bunch of people to live a modern lifestyle when they aren't willing to pay for it themselves.
      Where the fuck did I say anything about it making the world better if you moved to the city?!?
      I didn't.
      When you continually have to make up shiyt and claim I said it, it's a sure sign that your argument is valueless. It's also a fair indicator that you're fairly delusional if that's where you automatically head when presented with simple facts.

      I have no problem with you living whereever the hell you want. All I expect is that you will pay for it yourself.
      You see a benefit in living where you do? Fine. Pay for it yourself.

      but that doesn't mean that I need to feel guilty,

      No, of course not. Heaven forbid you shouldn't get every dollar of *mine* to which you consider yourself entitled with no feelings of guilt for ripping it off without providing me a damn thing for it.
      That's exactly the root problem with the whole culture of entitlement of which you are clearly a card carrying member.

      And don't even get me started on the whole "productive members of society" bullshit. I have seen lazy people in cities and out, and I have seen people that bust their asses on farms, in the suburbs and in the middle of the city. These accusations are baseless and biased.

      I've seen that too, and it's irrelevant to my point which is neither biased nor is it baseless. Surely if it were either you could have come up with an actual example of how it is rather than making up shit and claiming that I said it?!?

      Just becasue somebody works hard doesn't mean that they're productive. I could work 12 hours a day digging holes in my backyard. Are you seriously saying that I'm a productive member of society and should be rewarded out of *your* paycheck for it?!?

      Yeah, I didn't think so.

    19. Re:quality of life. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Electric subways are fast and carry large numbers of people with decreased energy usage and pollution (depending on the particular power supply).

      Electric subways are only feasible in certain places, and they require an enormous amount of capital to build. It's not cheap tunneling under existing buildings and infrastructure. Most US cities aren't dense enough to support subways.

      Traffic calming is used to encourage drivers to choose roads which are designed for higher capacity, yes. The idea is to ensure that traffic in residential areas with children playing and people trying to sleep is not a hazard or an annoyance. You'd have to really hate your neighbours to disagree with this.

      Children shouldn't be playing on 3-lane (each side) boulevards then. I'm sure my neighbors would agree with me on this; boulevards and other streets aren't the same as residential streets; they're for main traffic to move between residential areas and commercial areas. Residential streets don't have traffic lights where I live.

    20. Re:quality of life. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Electric subways are only feasible in certain places, and they require an enormous amount of capital to build. It's not cheap tunneling under existing buildings and infrastructure. Most US cities aren't dense enough to support subways.

      I agree; most US "cities" do suffer in this regard. Personally, I'd rather drown myself in a vat of lye than live (or make a prolonged visit to, for more than about a week) anywhere not dense enough to support subways, so my interest in such places and their problems is fairly offhand and highly abstract.

      Once you start making people who live in the sparser areas pay their own way rather than sucking money from the cities, the factors to which you refer may change. You may find that the population starts to concentrate, and/or that populations in outlying areas decrease to the point where congestion and pollution are non-issues. Would be a treat for the die-hard ruralists, I suppose.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    21. Re:quality of life. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Sounds great but I would point out that urban environments would collapse without the rural areas providing resources. You didnt think all that food was grown in the store did you?

      I don't recall anyone advocating nuclear attacks against the countryside, or mass executions of farmers. Did I miss something, or was your quote above simply a nonsequitur?

      I can live BETTER (by my standards) for CHEAPER outside of the city.

      Of course you can, because the people in the city will be subsidising you.

      nor should I have to live somewhere I DON'T LIKE just because you feel that it will make the world better

      Nobody's telling you where to live. Live in the middle of the desert or at the bottom of the sea for all I care. Just stop getting the people from the cities and the coasts to fund your choice.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    22. Re:quality of life. by bowmanje · · Score: 1

      What you were implying was that you as an urban dweller are making it possible for me the rural dweller to live in comfort because your share of the distributed cost of utilities is higher in relation to the actual utilities you consume. I then pointed out (albeit poorly) that the only reason you can even BE an urban dweller is because of the resources generated by the rural dwellers. It is YOUR choice to live in the city and absorb the extra utility costs, so quit bitching about it. You then stated a bunch of bullshit that "people living in rural areas *are* leaches. They are the primary example of the culture of entitlement and utter contempt for personal responsibility." To which I replied that there are lazy people(read: leaches) in the urban environment too. It doesn't all come down to the utility bill when tallying someone up as a leach, and frankly I consider alot of the leaching that goes on in the city to be far worse. Furthermore the only evidence that you offer is the aforementioned utilities problem and farming subsidies, which hardly supports the whole "culture of entitlement and utter contempt for personal responsibility" claim (hardly an unbiased statement). Hence I called them baseless. And by the way "every dollar of *yours*" is a little dramatic, unless you actually spend your entire income on electricity and heating. There will always be inconsistencies in the system. If you enjoy living in the city petition to get the regulations regarding utilities changed or deal with it. Myself, I prefer not to live there.

    23. Re:quality of life. by bowmanje · · Score: 1

      raju1kabir, You make it sound as though I personally went out and lobbied to have you pay my utility bill. Honestly, subsidies for infrastructure in rural areas are the least of this countries problems. I would say the same thing to you that I said to Darby. If you don't like the current regulations, get them changed. I would love to see the government stop handing out money to people for poor reasons, but personally I think its a lost cause considering how large a portion of the national budget is devoted to its various forms (welfare, veteran benefits, subsidies, grants, etc). And thats not to say that all of those are bad ideas either, just that their implementations are often substandard. In the end, we all take it in the ass for people that don't pull their weight in society. I simply take issue with laying the blame at the feet of all rural dwellers.

    24. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1

      What you were implying was that you as an urban dweller are making it possible for me the rural dweller to live in comfort because your share of the distributed cost of utilities is higher in relation to the actual utilities you consume.

      True enough, right?

      I then pointed out (albeit poorly) that the only reason you can even BE an urban dweller is because of the resources generated by the rural dwellers.

      True to a point, but it stops short of actually dealing with the issue.

      I *pay* for my food multiple times. First in subsidies to the farmers again in the artificially jacked up prices, and again by putting my money down and walking away with the food.

      I also pay for your utilities.

      There is a very deep fundamental difference there that you are totally ignoring.

      I am not accepting charity of food donations from the people who grow it.

      It is YOUR choice to live in the city and absorb the extra utility costs, so quit bitching about it.

      Oh, I see, since you people are in power in this country I'm no longer able to even express my opinion.

      It is my choice to live in the city. That does not mean that I can't work to change some of the incredible inequities which were put in place by lobbying of the rural folk who couldn't make an honest living.
      I'll quit bitching as soon as you take responsibility for yourself and pay your own fucking bills.

      You then stated a bunch of bullshit that "people living in rural areas *are* leaches. They are the primary example of the culture of entitlement and utter contempt for personal responsibility.

      It's clearly not bullshit as you continue to demonstrate.

      If I'm not happy about paying for your lifestyle then I should just quit bitching?!? Seriously, dude WTF. You proved my point with that one.

      It doesn't all come down to the utility bill when tallying someone up as a leach, and frankly I consider alot of the leaching that goes on in the city to be far worse.

      I'm not talking about an individual case by case basis. I am talking overall and therefore generalizing.
      The fact is that the rural areas as a whole absolutely do leach off of the rural areas to a huge degree.
      This does not go the other way because you do not pay one single cent in taxes that ends up benefitting me. It goes the other way. So sorry, but there is no leaching in the cities from you.
      There is no net leaching at all in almost all urban areas. So while you're free to keep bitching about that, you have no basis for your bitching whatsoever since it's not your money being pissed away on it.

      . Furthermore the only evidence that you offer is the aforementioned utilities problem and farming subsidies, which hardly supports the whole "culture of entitlement and utter contempt for personal responsibility" claim (hardly an unbiased statement).

      Maybe you should actually read what I said instead of picking out a word here and there and pretending that you aren't ignoring the point.

      Those are several examples of the fact (which you certainly don't seem to be bothering trying to dispute) that the rural areas do not pay their own way and they do live through forced welfare from the urban areas.
      You're welcome to not like the way I put that, but you obviously can't deny that it is a fact.
      But you come back and in spite of that fact claim that I should quit bitching and that you have no guilt for sponging off of me.

      That is what makes you a card carrying member of the culture of entitlement as I clearly stated above.

      You feel that you are entitled to have me pay your bills. You offer nothing in exchange and you offer no reasoning for your feeling of entitlement to my money. That is what makes you a card carrying member of the culture of entitlement as I clearly stated above. It's not the fact that you take my money, it's the fact that you are *still* arguing that you deserve it without providing any reasoning for that.

      You couldn't be much

    25. Re:quality of life. by MadJeff451 · · Score: 1
      Hybrid cars do make a difference, compared to buses, when you consider MPG. However also consider:
      • of people who commute to work, how many also own cars?
      • how many natural resources went into building that car?
      • how many trees were ripped up to pave (and expand) the road, reducing natural c02 reclycling
      • how many square feet of parking needs to be provided for each car owned - at home, work, and other destinations such as stores and malls
      I'm no expert, but having grown up in the sun belt and moved around quite a bit you begin to realize how much time/energy/% of my take-home goes into car upkeep ... it really blows the mind. I prefer trains, personally.

      Here is my favorite (non-scientific) green-city article, posted a few weeks back on \.: http://www.walkablestreets.com/manhattan.htm I don't agree with the utopian view of NYC, but it may provide an alternative way to think about cities.

    26. Re:quality of life. by teknopagan · · Score: 1
      Come on, Dude. These are basic simple blatantly obvious facts that a half second of thought would have enabled you to prove to yourself.
      Not at all, actually. If you were to say that it costs less in infrastructure expenditure to support city-dwelling people versus country-dwelling people, I would agree with you. When you go out of your way to say it's four times more expensive, I want to see numbers.

      I just bought a condo in Chicago. To deliver electrical service to my place, the power company strings a wire from the line to my building (40 feet from the power line tops.) By stringing this one line they have provided service to *4* households...Now compare that to what is involved with getting power to you and the closest 3 households to you. Pretty freaking simple, isn't it? Substitute, Phone lines, cell phone service, etc. etc. etc. and you get the exact same qualitative results.
      Do you really think that all of the cost of delivering power lies in the cable run from the line to the house? That's what it sounds like to me. Plus, I don't think there's a whole lot of money being put into running a cable to my house for cell phone service.

      By the way, the word you were looking for there was 'quantitative'

      If you were to pay what it costs to deliver your power, then most likely *you wouldn't even have power because you couldn't afford it*. Now, the federal government has mandated that you shall get power and phone service and it shall be paid for by taxes, which people in rural areas don't even pay since they almost always get more back in tax dollars than they put out.

      I see where you're trying to go there, but your quoted source doesn't exactly support your argument. The chart supplied basically says that many states receive more than or less than their fair share of federal spending in relation to the amount of tax money they pay in. For example, the map shows that Wisconsin (my home state, very rural) only received $0.82 in spending for every dollar of tax its residents paid. On the other hand, Hawaii was nearly opposite with $1.60 received per dollar spent. Population density of these two states is 72.83/sq.km. for HI versus 38.13/sq.km. Virginia also has a lower tax burden($1.66), but higher population density(69.03/sq.km.). So, at this point, I can't say that I see causality between population density and tax burden. Sorry.

      Just so you're aware, I wasn't defending farm subsidies - just pointing out that they don't fit into your argument.

      Our country is going bankrupt largely due to these leaches and their completely retarded voting choices, so we can't really afford to coddle them and pretend that what they do isn't already done far more efficiently without them.

      Here you make the mistaken assumption that peoples' votes actually count for something today.

      To close this up, you'll find the kind of people you are complaining about, the 'rabid, self-important whiny bitches,' in both rural and urban settings. Of course, in my experience - having lived in both settings - you'll find many many more of them living in cities than out in the country. Living out in the sticks teaches you to relax and enjoy things. This is something you would probably do well to learn.
      --
      The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
    27. Re:quality of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would appear that you have succeded in proving to everone how smart you are.

      You often have the last word.

      You've got an answer for everything.

      You are still an asshole.

      Get some therapy.

    28. Re:quality of life. by bowmanje · · Score: 1

      Where to begin....

      I never said I was entitled to anything. I merely am not going to go out of my way to fix a problem that I did not facilitate in the first place. And don't make it sound as though I'm in line at the welfare counter demanding money that I didn't earn either, I pay my taxes like everyone else (and bust my ass to do so), and it gets spent on people who often times don't deserve it. I would have to look into the numbers, but it just seems like utility subsidies are not that big of an issue when compared to the bulk of the 30% or so in taxes that the government redistributes in my name.

      Obviously I didnt express it adequately in my previous posts, but I do understand where you are coming from. I just take issue with your rather broad generalizations. Not everyone in rural areas is a "leach" except by your very narrow definition of utilities infrastructure. There are many more ways that money is being pulled out of your hands and given to the less worthy and its not constrained to one simple demographic, and I simply don't feel that utilities is the most important of them. You also seem to have a misconceived notion about rural areas, but contrary to your beliefs, the majority of welfare families are in urban environments (and I'll be damned, but some of that money actually comes out of my pocket), hence my objection to singling out rural dwellers as leaches. What really astounds me about your last post though (because most of your points are at least thought out) is that you seem to know so much about me, seeing as you identified me as one of "you people", when you in fact have no clue about my experiences, political leanings, or contributions to society.

      But let me sum this up succinctly, so there are no further misunderstandings. I do not want your money. I do not need your money. I am not the one making you pay for part of the infrastructure in rural areas. I would have no problem with a doubling or tripling of my utility bill as I am fortunate enough to afford it. However, I am not going to just give money away to the utility companies, and I am certainly not going to take the time to advocate for something that does not negatively affect me. There are too many things that do that I feel warrant more immediate attention. And that is what it comes down to, utilities subsidation is just not that big of a deal in terms of the money that is taken from your pocket every day.

    29. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Not at all, actually. If you were to say that it costs less in infrastructure expenditure to support city-dwelling people versus country-dwelling people, I would agree with you. When you go out of your way to say it's four times more expensive, I want to see numbers.

      "4 times" was one of the 72% of statistics that are made up on the spot. What's your best guess, or an actual figure? Take into account the fact that there are tremendous lengths of cable required, high cost of long distance power transmission and all the rest. It's obviously much more expensive *per household*.

      Do you really think that all of the cost of delivering power lies in the cable run from the line to the house? That's what it sounds like to me. Plus, I don't think there's a whole lot of money being put into running a cable to my house for cell phone service.

      No, I don't really think that's all. There are the costs of power generation. On average, lower per household in urban areas. Smaller house on average, lower electricity, gas, etc. There is cost of transmission and loss over long distance lines. More dense population == cheaper. etc. etc.etc. It all works out the same without trying to cover every detail at which point somebody here who actually runs a power generation plant will point out twelve things I missed.

      By the way, the word you were looking for there was 'quantitative'

      When trying to be a smart ass, the first rule is "Don't be a dumb ass".
      I used the word I wanted to because the costs per user of power, phones, cell service, etc. share the same *quality* of being less in urban areas due to greater population density.
      The costs of each utility are different as, likely, are the percent differences between the areas, so while they are similar in form or quality, the quantities are unknown and largely irrelevant.

      I see where you're trying to go there, but your quoted source doesn't exactly support your argument. ...
      So, at this point, I can't say that I see causality between population density and tax burden. Sorry.

      So, apparently you didn't at all see where I was going.
      I was making a correlation.
      Yes, I know that you heard somewhare that correlation doesn't indicate causation, which is true.
      Correlations by themselves are still a correlation.
      I'm not talking about the cause.


      Just so you're aware, I wasn't defending farm subsidies - just pointing out that they don't fit into your argument.


      Just so you're aware, you missed the argument ;-)


      Here you make the mistaken assumption that peoples' votes actually count for something today.


      In large groups, they do. When you get a huge portion of the population living off of the rest and yet believing that the ones paying their bills are evil heathens and such, you create such a tremendous cognitive dissonance that you can just scream crazy shit at them and they'll buy into it. That explains the current state of our country pretty well.


      To close this up, you'll find the kind of people you are complaining about, the 'rabid, self-important whiny bitches,' in both rural and urban settings. Of course, in my experience - having lived in both settings - you'll find many many more of them living in cities than out in the country. Living out in the sticks teaches you to relax and enjoy things. This is something you would probably do well to learn.


      Well, your anecdotal evidence is pretty silly looking at reality for a second.

      It's the 'rabid, self-important whiny bitches,' in the rural areas who are currently trying to change the constitution for the first time in history for the purpose of discrimination right now. They're the ones who elected the most corrupt administration and Congress in our history.
      Try and get a little perspective.

      There's a fundamental *qualitative* difference between somebody bitching in a bar or whatever, and a group of people actively working to destroy the basis of this country in order to shove their bastardized interpretation of a religion into it. Those loons exist in the cities too, but don't pretend it isn't primarilly a rural problem.

    30. Re:quality of life. by Darby · · Score: 1


      I never said I was entitled to anything.


      No, you didn't. It was already preassumed in your previous points. That's why it's a *culture* of entitlement. Reread the places where I brought that up, and what statements you made that led to that.

      I pay my taxes like everyone else (and bust my ass to do so), and it gets spent on people who often times don't deserve it.

      As you live in Wisconsin, which is not a welfare state ( i.e. a net tax sink) there probably is some truth to that. As you live in a rural area, you do receive more than I do from federal income taxes.

      I would have to look into the numbers, but it just seems like utility subsidies are not that big of an issue when compared to the bulk of the 30% or so in taxes that the government redistributes in my name.

      Check the link I posted previously. Those are the numbers.
      Like I said, Wisconson (like Illinois where I live) is a net tax supplier to the welfare states. Utility subsidies are only part of the problem. Farm subsidies are another huge part of it.
      Pork barrel spending is most of the rest (sure there's other stuff, but take away those huge worthless drains and then there's some breathing room to address the rest).

      But once again, my issue isn't the fact of subsidies, it's the culture of entitlement that it creates.


      Obviously I didnt express it adequately in my previous posts, but I do understand where you are coming from. I just take issue with your rather broad generalizations.


      Fair enough. I was making a broad generalization. I never tried to pretend that I wasn't. The fact is that as a generalization, it is true. It's a simple matter of volume and materials cost (long range electrical transmission is tricky too, and various other complicated stuff, but even without that).

      Not everyone in rural areas is a "leach" except by your very narrow definition of utilities infrastructure.

      Well, my slightly less narrow definition is actually federal tax dollars, and that's how (I think) I consistently used the word.
      By that definition, they pretty much all are. I'm not saying it's all Cletus and Bubba hanging out, leaning up against a pole.

      You also seem to have a misconceived notion about rural areas, but contrary to your beliefs, the majority of welfare families are in urban environments (and I'll be damned, but some of that money actually comes out of my pocket), hence my objection to singling out rural dwellers as leaches

      That's only by the narrow definition of "receives General Assistance checks"
      Try it with the same definition I used above.

      Then the welfare states, in which *everybody* is on welfare, are those that receive more federal tax dollars than they send in.
      Check the link I gave earlier with the numbers. You'll find that they're pretty much all rural states. I nfact, if you look at the election map from 2000, it's pretty much the "Red states". That's pretty funny actually since they're the ones electing all the "free market rah rah rah" spouting politicians, yet they really are basically "Reds" at heart. Well... as long as there's still enough of an economy in the rest of the states to keep them afloat.

      I am not going to just give money away to the utility companies, and I am certainly not going to take the time to advocate for something that does not negatively affect me

      Fair enough, I probably wouldn't either. That's why it's so insidious.

      There are too many things that do that I feel warrant more immediate attention. And that is what it comes down to, utilities subsidation is just not that big of a deal in terms of the money that is taken from your pocket every day.

      Well, my point was bigger than just utilities subsidization. I was how the various subsidies and such create a warped world view.

      Anyhow, I don't mean to be a dick (it just comes naturally ;-)

    31. Re:quality of life. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This is utterly infeasible and unworkable. The problem is that cities want to maximize the number of vehicle stops at red lights, in order to frustrate drivers and make them either not drive or choose alternate routes. Google for "traffic calming". Cities aren't worried about the energy efficiency of private vehicles.

      This is similar to another tactic by cities, especially those with red-light cameras. Thousands of people die at intersections every year, but cities have found that with red-light cameras, they can increase revenues by decreasing the yellow-light times, so that more people will run red lights and get tickets. So that's what they do. Just as energy efficiency is not important to local governments, neither is safety.

      I'm aware of those sleazy tactics. I still believe that it is neither infeasible nor unworkable. It does, however, require someone to actually run for a mayoral position with that as a key plank in his/her campaign platform. In most parts of the country, it is infeasible, but there are places in California where I think somebody could pull it off with a bit of effort. You'd get votes not only from the people who want their drive to be more pleasant, but also from the environmental-savvy parts of the public. Barring a rigged election, I think that would be a -very- popular platform, at least in the Silicon Valley area....

      If you can get one city to do it and publish the emissions studies, that might be enough to start a ripple effect within California. Once Califonia does some major eco-reform thing, New York and New Jersey usually follow suit. Eventually, it -might- trickle down to the general public as a whole. Maybe not, of course, but if not... well, at least you improved your own local environment a little by kicking the ass of the greedy politicians who think that traffic calming on major streets is a good idea.

      Note: I'm not against traffic calming on residential streets, though I suspect it more frequently has the opposite effect.... :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    32. Re:quality of life. by bowmanje · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you got the idea that I am from Wisconsin (but then again I missed your link post, so we'll call it a wash)... While informative, the linked pdf unfortunately does not break down by population density, so it is limited to observations like california has a lot of big cities and alabama doesn't. This does not necessarily prove the relationship that you claim, and your generalization certainly doesnt hold for all states (e.g. Maryland has rather high population density, yet is right up there with the red states you mentioned as a tax sink). I can certainly see the case against some of the poorer states being sinks for federal dollars, but other demographic factors could be in play as well (e.g. west virginia is one of the worst sinks but also has the third oldest population with an average age of 40.3 years). I'm not saying that what you have observed is not true in part. Again, I simply take issue with the broad generalization and accusations against all rural dwellers. I will agree with you that it is an insiduous problem though. If you polled the majority of people in these parts, I would highly doubt if more than a token percentage was even aware that there is an imbalance in the tax burden. I played with the data at http://comparisons.choosemaryland.org/comparison/i ndex.asp which appears to decently reputable (its primary source seems to be Census Bureau data) in case you are wondering where I am grabbing the examples from.

    33. Re:quality of life. by redbaritone · · Score: 1
      It seems odd to me that most everyone posting here who lives in a big city is "green", whereas the small-towners are, well, less so. Shouldn't that be the other way around? What really pisses me off is when these self-righteous city dwellers inform us "small-towners" of how inefficient/uneducated/(fill in pompous, condescending adjective of your choice) that we are. It would appear that those who live among so many others are concerned about "efficiencies" (BTUs per square foot in an apartment, MPGs per person to work, etc.) and the rest of us aren't concerned at all about efficiency. Hell, we're just uneducated, redneck Republicans.

      Here's a possible explanation. In Alabama, we have the benefit of many rivers, which drive hydroelectric turbines, which helps to provide us with energy that costs 15% _below_ the national average http://www.southernco.com/alpower/about/about.asp. So, forgive us, if we couldn't give a flying flip about wasting a few dollars heating and cooling our oversized, inexpensive homes. Fact is, with the exception of our very hot summers, we export a fair amount of electricity throughout the year.

      Secondly, because we have open spaces, rivers, woods, etc, we don't miss it as much as, say a city person would. That might explain why there are so many tree huggers in big cities. Unfortunately, these tree huggers tend to be liberal - expecting government to make everything right. Here in the south, we're more self-reliant, and, dare I say, more practical. We're also more likely to cry foul when 14.6 billion dollars of mostly federal tax money is spent (in Boston) to put the interstates below ground in order to free up more of the downtown area for parks. What a big fat waste if ever there was one! Want more trees? Either move to the south, move to the burbs, or take more vacations. No, that wouldn't be efficient or convenient for you, would it? :-(

      On a side note, we in the south have lots of open land which is being put to waste (literally). We have more than our share of waste dumps and land fills. Ironically, they tend to house all the garbage that comes out of your big "efficient" cities. So be glad we're not quite the tree huggers that you city folk seem to be, or we might make you keep that garbage. BTW, my family recycles too. Go figure.

      -------------
      Live long, live right, and shoot the lawyer on your way out, would you?

    34. Re:quality of life. by redbaritone · · Score: 1
      I think the point that should be made here is that it's possible that you're both missing something. The fact that a state may be a net consumer or a net contributor may not at all be an indicater that its population is (as a whole) is productive or not. You cannot equate productivity with pay. Teachers, for example, are very productive, yet on the whole don't make a lot of money. Michael Jordon, on the other hand, scores points in a basketball game and made (and still makes) millions. Until we become a completely socialist society, you can rule out any notion of "fairness" in pay. And thank God for that.

      However, those who make more pay more, do they not? Perhaps there are more jobs and better paying jobs in cities? (Duh.) The states with big cities are net providers, are they not? Does that mean therefore that the population of primarily rural states are therefore lazy leaches - or that the inhabitants of large cities are all contributing members of society? Of course not. While I will agree that it's a big waste of money to subsidize farmers, I'm going to stop well short of calling them leaches. The fact that our politicians try to win our favor with pork projects is not, after all, our fault. What is our fault is that we reward them for it. But, we'd be left thinking that some other state would get that money if we didn't. So blame local, rather than national thinking. It's human nature, and an unfortunate cause of big government waste.

      Another thing, while we're at it. Big cities make politicians happy. Why? Because that's where the most voters are. And that's where their pork dollars have the greatest affect. Can you say Big Dig? (Boston) The fact is, more pork projects are in big cities than anywhere else.

      Perhaps it's waste in government spending as a whole that you two need to argue about, not total dollars spent, or which states are the biggest winners and losers.

    35. Re:quality of life. by slamb · · Score: 1
      That's because in general, public transit in the USA is at a 3rd-world standard.

      We've got a long way to go before we can match the third world's quality of public transportation. In Kenya, there are swarms of matatus (15- and 25-passenger minibuses, not much larger than a van) everywhere. (Equivalently, Tanzania has dala-dalas.) I'm not sure about their exact fuel efficiency, but I'd suspect that (when they're properly maintained) it's significantly better than a full bus. And they're always full or nearly so, so the per-passenger efficiency is good.

      In Nairobi, they are going to stop issuing new 15-passenger matatu licenses because they're causing too much congestion. Think about that for a second - there are so many of these van-sized vehicles, each with 15 people in it, that they're filling up the roads. They need more 25-passenger ones. We could not get so many people to use public transportation in the United States.

      Matatus are convenient. They have routes everywhere, and there are enough of them on the road that you can just start walking where you want to go and within five minutes one will be by to pick you up.

      Downsides: many matatu drivers are suicidal, and matatus transporting fat Americans would necessarily be lower-capacity.

    36. Re:quality of life. by genka · · Score: 1

      Come on! You compare the real test data for a bus with soem theoretic values for roumored cars! In reality, not even Prius can get 51MPH in NYC traffic. Most commuters drive to work alone, and they will be lucky to get 15-20MPH in an average car in NYC. Now compare this to a bus.

    37. Re:quality of life. by garote · · Score: 1
      Yes, that Boston situation is unfortunate, but can you really blame the "tree huggers" for wanting more open space where they are? There are just plain MORE PEOPLE living there than living where you are. The "democratic" vote count is not taken in square yardage, it's taken by head count, and if they wanna grab 14 billion bucks from everyone's pocket, well ... they outvote you, squire. :)

      Look at it this way: Since they're all packed into one place, that means more open space for us country folk!

  104. Of course by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    I was speaking within the US. Obviously, our the substantial barriers we set up to immigration are what help us maintain our wealth differential.

    Problems such as imperfect information and barriers to movement are now largely irrelevant in this market. Information and people move quite easily within the US labor market, and it generally gets better over time.

  105. I was being general by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    Do what YOU like. Take advantage of YOUR specialties. No one place is better than the other. Each place has advantages and disadvantages, and housing prices will cancel out any native net difference. Yes, San Fran has much nicer weather and more cultural opportunities than my mid-size town. It also requires 50% higher salary to put a roof over your head.

  106. cost of living by devonbowen · · Score: 1

    Adjusting for the cost of living isn't that easy. Since a large portion of the money you're earning is being put into retirement savings, that money needs to be compared to the cost of living where you plan to retire and not where you earn it. (A large portion of your money is being put into retirement savings, right?)

    Devon

  107. It's an excuse to pay people less by gelfling · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm sick of surveys like this that purport to rationalize why we should all be happy to move to west bumfuck for $9/hr. We DON'T WANT to LIVE there. Instead of sending all the jobs to Bangalore why don't tech firms pay people a good enough wage so that they can live somewhere urban or at least at the median cost of living in the US?

    What next? A column from Forbes telling us how great it is for IT workers to live in Mexico?

    1. Re:It's an excuse to pay people less by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Oh you're right my bad. Accept whatever they give you, be happy you have a job. I forgot.

  108. Question the Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living in the York-Hanover, PA area, I can tell you that the statistics are lying. The author should have dug at least slightly deeper here. If you look at the site used for the article, the "Computer Application Software Engineer" sub-category is way out of line with every other sibling under the "Computer and Math Occupations" major category http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_49620.htm#b15-0 000/. Also there are spreadsheets available that include additional data... And sure enough, when you find the data that is used in the article (listing York-Hanover Computer Application Software Engineers), there are 4 columns where data is missing. I could get on my soapbox to rant about journalism (or lack there of) today, but I will spare you all.

  109. nah by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

    Just work for your local city,schools, or town governments. I am making $50,000 a year right out of college, As long as I keep taking the test my salary will continue to increase. It also helps that I have the best health insurance in NY state, have a pension, full dental and eye insurance. High paying jobs are out there but people dont look very well.

    1. Re:nah by Dewser · · Score: 1

      Not every place is as good as where you may work. I worked for a school system right out of college and after 4 years there I wasn't making even close to 50K. Though I did have great health insurance, but the downside is out of college I want to soak in as much as I can, after 2 years there was nothing more I was able to do there. The budget would not allow for necessary upgrades and the superintendant and my boss were constantly in pissing matches about technology. Superintendant was so Mac happy she decided to upgrade 3 new schools to all Mac despite the fact that they were all PC and so was the rest of the district. We had a single platform and for a school district, or any other organization, to achieve this, it means easier support in the long wrong. In any case my boss had it, she left and I stayed on to get the new IT director up to speed, unfortunately after about a year of getting him up to speed, he still had no clue. I started looking for new work.

      Got offered a job at a local systems support consulting company and after a year I have doubled what I made at the school system! Insurance is ok, but I get a higher travel reimbursement, we have a wellness reimbursement (sign up for the gym I get some coin back) and I work with a bunch of people that all have their own field of specialization so if I don't know how to fix something, someone else does.

      Money is fine and dandy, but I took on this field to learn and have fun, if I don't have either of those, then I will burn out and start to despise my job.

      --
      Dewser - all around techy "In the immortal words of Socrates - 'I drank what?'"
  110. The primary value of Silicon Valley by Baldrson · · Score: 0
    The primary value of Silicon Valley was as a place where an engineer could buy a house and change jobs during the era when owning real estate was the primary economic behavior rewarded by government policy. During that era the cost of reproduction went up by nearly a factor of 4 unless you owned a house and did not have to relocate every few years.

    If you lived outside Silicon Valley and were an engineer, you are probably in very bad shape now unless you were able to find one of those rare "cradle to grave" jobs that were so typical of the GI generation.

    But now, the bubble may be bursting finally.

  111. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by espressojim · · Score: 1

    Holy Crap. I lived in Cary, NC for a year. I couldn't get out quick enough. Sure, good salary, and good housing. No nightlife, no good food, you had to drive 10-20 miles to get anywhere. I'm originally from NY, and that's not my idea of a 'city'. Boston suits me much better, and while 'biotech' is big in RTP, the largest research centers are in Boston/San Fan. RTP seems to have as much manufacturing as research - which makes it sound like a 'center', but there are not nearly as many PhD's in the area as you'd think.

    I'd have to wonder if any of the other areas are any better.

    Plus, I'd hate to have to mail order all my food. I love to eat, and large cities tend to have resturaunts and grocery stores for immigrant populations. I love to go to the local brazillian, or japapese, or korean, or pakistani grocery store to buy all those ingredients you can't get at a chain store.

    I think a lot of smaller cities offer good ratio of salary to housing, but what if you need more?

  112. You think California is nice? by LeoDioxide · · Score: 0

    South Carolina blows. It is too hot in the summer, too cold in the winter. We have ice storms, mosquitos, a wee bit of snow, rednecks, and nothing for miles. Looking at my region of the state (NW) from the sky shows we live in a big forest. The roads are tiny and dangerous, the schools are 2nd to last in the nation (suck it 50th!), and we ceded from the USA first during the civil war.

    And I'm not saying that because I like it...........y'all.

  113. Backup plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignoring the ethical issue of working for the defense industry, wait until the next election and there is a backlash against defense spending and the war in Iraq. You will be in the middle of hicksville trying to sell your house along with every other engineer that got canned. Skepticism is a gift. Losing my job was the best thing that ever happened to me because it forced me to factor that into my plans going forward.

  114. Not in AC by poison1701 · · Score: 0

    I can tell you quite easily that the answer to this question in Not Atlantic City, NJ.

  115. Impossible, in general by njdj · · Score: 1

    Telecommuting sounds a great plan until you analyse it.

    One: Which region sets the competitive salary for telecommuters? Obviously, the cheapest. Welcome to Bangladesh salary levels. Oh, you wanted to live in the USA? How unreasonable of you!

    Two: Even if you are willing to take a Bangladesh salary, there are about a zillion people competing with you for the 2 telecommuting jobs currently open. Most people in jobs that don't require personal contact would like to telecommute. Why wouldn't they? It beats commuting on rush-hour roads ...

    There is only one way I know of to get a telecommuting job, and that is, to get an ordinary non-telecommuting job, then after a few years, persuade your boss to let you work from home. It works until your boss wakes up to the fact that he/she is overpaying you.

    You may be wondering why, in view of the cost advantages, most firms do not let their knowledge workers telecommute. You have to remember that managers do not make decisions for the good of the stockholders; they make decisions that benefit themselves. It strokes a manager's ego to be surrounded by peons at his beck and call. Having them sit at home where he cannot see them is just not the same.

  116. Mixing rocket scientists and rednecks by ke4roh · · Score: 1

    Not quite like that, but how about a rocket bicycle. (Not that you can do much commuting on a bicycle in the area - it's just as car-ridden as the rest of the country.)

    Oh, and there's Jesus as an Eggbeater and God's Rocket (the latter offering an eggbeater pic, too).

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Mixing rocket scientists and rednecks by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Oh, and there's Jesus as an Eggbeater
      Now that is wierd. Although I do have to admire the effort that went into creating that mosaic. Much harder than painting.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  117. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

    Since you misinterpreted the data, I don't think +5 Insightful is fair. However, it would have been nice if the person who posted the data had used column headings. OTOH, he did provide a link.

    Your point is basically valid though, the D/FW metroplex is one ginormous city. No one knows where the boundaries are between all the dozens of named towns and cities. I used to live in Plano, worked in Dallas, then Richardson, then Addison. Drank in Farmer's Branch, and had friends in Carrollton. It was all the same. Horrendous traffic. And sheesh, Plano had ~50,000 pop. when I lived there in the 1980s.

    --
    Most people don't even think inside the box.
  118. Re:Wrong !!! (Re:Gotta love RTP (Research Triangl by qsqueeq · · Score: 1

    Please get the fuck out of my state. You probably keep running into all the yankees that have migrated here and thats where the bad driving comes into affect. Orlando traffic is horrible because of all the tourists, and NJ/NY and Chicago are always a cluster.

  119. Talk about whacked list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of the cities they mention in california aren't all that. Stanislaw for instance is a artificial town with very little going on in it- a mediocre schooling system. they've mentioned high pay scales for places like San Jose and San Francisco in other articles. Let me tell you their's a reason why it's not unheard of to pay 900 and up per a square foot in San Francisco. It's a awsome place to live. but it is expensive. Their local rags (Tribune The Gate and others) frequently report on how a person (other than one living in the financial district) may get have a pay rate of 10.50+ a hour. but that it's also "common" for people to need to pay 40+ for Public Transit (forget parking-it's 1.50+ per two hours or 5+ for valley). Cost of groceries (100-130 for a single white male and mabie a little more others).and fuel cost in California is a bit higher than US average as well.

  120. Not Entirely by everphilski · · Score: 1

    There is plenty of computer research ( LG, Intergraph, 3D Labs), biotech ( CAS, Dynetics, Camber), and manufacturing jobs not relatted to gov't funded defense.

    There are people of all beliefs, colors and creeds. Yes a lot of southern baptists. I'm not one of them. Who cares what your neighbors believe?

    1. Re:Not Entirely by plague3106 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares what your neighbors believe?

      It matters if you kids go to the same school, and they start trying to push ID. Or ban alcohol sales on Sunday. Or prohibit just about anything else they find 'unethical.'

    2. Re:Not Entirely by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      There are people of all beliefs, colors and creeds. Yes a lot of southern baptists. I'm not one of them. Who cares what your neighbors believe?

      I might, for one. It depends to some degree on what they believe and the proportion of the population that share their belief. If my neighbor believes that my system of beliefs and ethics is "wrong" and that the underlying principles/mandates of his faith dictate that he should try to impose his system of beliefs and ethics on me (and, more particularly, my children), then it's a problem. If the number of people who agree with him significantly outnumber the number of people who are like me, it's a bigger problem.

      Southern Baptists are a favorite denomination to trot out as being intolerant, but I have seen the same kind of attitude in Presbyterians and have read of similar things in Judaism and Islam. IMHO, the more culturally diverse an area is, the less likely one group will attempt to dominate the others.

      Anyway, you make a good case for Huntsville, but I'll stay where I am until I can move to Lincoln, Montana.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:Not Entirely by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      There are people of all beliefs, colors and creeds. Yes a lot of southern baptists. I'm not one of them. Who cares what your neighbors believe?

      I care when they're put into a position of power and start telling me what I can and can't do.
      Otherwise, they're fine.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    4. Re:Not Entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just homeschool your kids. That way, you can impart all your correct beliefs and educate them about why their neighbors' beliefs are wrong. With that level of social guidance your kids will have excellent karma on Slashdot before your neighbors' kids know fractions.

    5. Re:Not Entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or prohibit just about anything else they find 'unethical.'
      *sigh* that probably includes sodomy. Sorry, if I can't get a blowjob or bugger my girlfriend in your town, then I'm not living there!
    6. Re:Not Entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what your neighbors believe?

      It matters in a democracy. When all your neighbors believe in something stupid, and then vote to back it by law (e.g. Intelligent Design), it matters. It matters a lot.

  121. My house is cheaper than your apartment by everphilski · · Score: 1

    So I have gas money to spend. Thanks.

  122. Basic Economics?? by Yad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think a lot of people have been missing something here. If you work in I/T in Silicon Valley, your wages may be lower, but you also have a low switching cost. On the other hand, if you work in Montanta in I/T your wages may be higher, but there is also a higher switching cost. Example: If you get layed off in Montana, it will take longer to find another job in the I/T field, and if you get laid off in the Silicon Valley, it won't take you as long. This is basic economies of agglomeration. So while it may seem wages are higher/lower in one area or another, what is really happening is that firms in Montana have to pay more because of the high switching cost associated with finding a new job in the field. More than likely the person will end up having to move and/or spend some time unemployed.

    --
    The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success. -Elliot Carver
  123. IT'S NOT AFAIK!! by Vr6dub · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "That and the fact that there are more jobs AFAIK."

    At the risk of being off-topic I have to point this out because it kills me. What you just said is "That and the fact that there are more jobs And For All I Know".

    Leave the "A" off!! I also hate it when people say..."Yes, I read RTFA". Just sounds silly when you're reading it in your head. Sorry, end rant.

    1. Re:IT'S NOT AFAIK!! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Don't you know that acronyms make people even stupider than usual?

      ATM machine, PIN number, USA PATRIOT Act, etc.

      Oh, btw, nice correction there fader.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  124. What about the Silicon Forest by malachid69 · · Score: 1

    I notice that they didn't even take Oregon into account, even though the Portland-metro is on par with the Silicon Valley numbers they referenced.

    --
    http://www.google.com/profiles/malachid
  125. Great correction! by fader · · Score: 1

    Except that "AFAIK" traditionally expands to "As Far As I Know". In fact, there's no expansion to "And For All I Know" in the first page of Google results for "AFAIK". So AFAIK, you're the only person that expands it to that.

    HTH, HAND.

    --
    - fader
    1. Re:Great correction! by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I stand corrected. I need to apologize for all the people I've silently cursed. My "RTFA" gripe still stands though. ;-)

    2. Re:Great correction! by fader · · Score: 1

      Now that I can get behind. Those people need to have an ATM machine dropped on them (without the PIN number) and have the NIC cards taken out of their computers.

      ;)

      --
      - fader
  126. Cost Of Living isn't that easy by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    Often it seems like people overlook an important aspect of Cost of Living: Durable Goods are still the same price!

    To illustrate, I hail from Northern Ohio. The CoL in Chicago is twice what it is where I grew up, and the salarys are nearly twice as high, but a new Honda doesn't cost twice as much in Chicago. Either does an xBox or Airline ticket or clothing at the local JCrew. Similarly, the higher the CoL the cheaper it becomes to take vacations.

    Even though $47,000 a year in Arkansas might be better then $120,000 in San Jose but I'd still take the $120k.

    1. Re:Cost Of Living isn't that easy by couchslug · · Score: 1

      What matters most is disposable income.
      Where you have more spare cash is where you will be able to buy more toys. Another consideration can be home equity. In more rural areas, you may be able to pay off your home while you are still young, which slashes your retirement overhead. In high COL areas your home may appreciate rapidly, but if the payments gut your income you will have less to spend on goodies.
      An interesting option (that I chose) was to deliberately buy "less house" than I could afford. This allowed me to retain the appreciating property as a rental while suburbs grew around it, even though I moved a couple of hundred miles away.
      If you are interested in a rural area, use your Google-fu and research the "hybrid" maps of your area. I print screencaps of these for reference.
      If your county has a website with property mapping go there too and research your parcel number, its tax history, and sale history. Useful bargaining information that the realtor may not expect you to know.
      You can normally get a large printed map with BW photo overlay from you tax office. Get that too, as it is much bigger than your monitor. :)
      You can get a good idea of how the area where you may buy a house will grow, of the proximity of neighborhoods you DON'T want to live near, and of different potential commuting routes. If you are on a recon mission, many truck stops now have wifi.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  127. This model means never moving by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    If you make a lot of local money, and it's not a lot nationally, you will live well where you are but find your savings are not enough to allow you to MOVE. So low pay/high value locations are a trap -- not necessarily a bad one, but they make you vulnerable.

    It can be better (financially) to work in New York, make scads of money, pay 90% of it on rent, and stockpile savings. This allows you to things: savings for mobility and the ability to buy mail-order.

    'Cause remember: if you live in the cheapest place in the world, Larry's Online Computer World is going to charge you the same thing for that monitor as he charges some poor person making five times what you do in New York City.

  128. Birmingham, AL IT Guy Checking in by dmcooper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do pretty well here... housing outside of the main city is extremely affordable. For a 20+ year old with a wife and two kids and low personal debt - can't be beat.

    --
    "To work for libertarianism -- to oppose the growth of government and aid the liberation of the individual -- used to be
  129. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by servognome · · Score: 1
    No doubt about it! =) Although I did brave five summers in San Francisco.

    I live in Phoenix, guess I need to agree with the GP and say *pussy* =P
    Although I agree with you, climate is also on my list of priorities, gotta get out of hell, unfortunately I haven't found a good place to move to that has both affordability and a nice climate.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  130. re: Dallas, TX metro area by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I do have a question about the Dallas, TX area. One of my friends grew up in Dallas and had nothing but praise for the area. (He lives in St. Louis, Missouri now - and I think inserts a comparison to Dallas at least every other time I talk to him.)

    I really never got a chance to spend any time down there until I was sent to some training in Carrolton, TX one week. (This was around 1999-2000.) I tried to drive around and get as much of a "feel" for what it was like to live there as possible, as opposed to just holing up in the motel.

    My impression was, the whole area was really void of "culture". Sure, they had a big Hispanic district - but that seemed to be treated as sort of the "ghetto" part of town. Mostly, it was an expanse of highways with chunks of unused, open space between exit ramps - and packed with commercial buildings and retail chain type establishments off the exits. I saw a lot of upscale suburban subdivisions, but they looked pretty "cookie-cutter" to me. Lots of neat little lawns, all in a row, and so forth. If you wanted to do a lot of shopping, it seemed like an *awesome* place to be. There were huge shopping malls and outlets everywhere, willing to sell you anything you could think of. (I fond an amazing video rental store that looked like the size of a WalMart but was just filled with rows and rows of videos and music CDs. Everything was labeled with 2 prices - a rental price and a sale price if you wanted to buy it.) But on the other hand, I went on a quest to find a little hole-in-the-wall coffee shop and all I found was some lame place in a strip mall that looked like they just took over a 7-11.

    Was I just missing something, or does that pretty much sum up the area? I don't think I'd care to live in a place quite that "commercialized".

  131. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    *nods* I can certainly understand that. Myself, I think I'd find the same weather all year 'round incredibly boring... I'm so used to the cycle of the seasons that to live without them would be... strange. But, some people just aren't confortable with those temperature extremes, not to mention those with health problems (eg, respiratory illnesses... asthma sucks during the winter).

    On the flip side, I had my first chance to visit Hawaii last December, and I gotta say... that place is a frickin' paradise. I think I could live there for a few years and not miss the seasons too much... ;)

  132. Metro Phoenix is better than expected by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    Lots of tech jobs in metro Phoenix - Tempe, Chandler holding Intel, On Semi, Microchip, and Freescale. Gilbert, Scottsdale are in the top 10 list. Yes, it's too hot in the summer, but weather is great for 7 months and the dust is more of a problem to me ( a LOT of building). Move north or east of of Phoenix valley and temperatures drop 20F. If you like the outdoors (mountain biking, motor boating, hiking, golfing) you will be surprised - and get used to doing the above starting 6AM at the weekends in summer to catch the cool.

    Can't get enough software or hardware engineers here - I work for one of the above!

  133. For expats and non-americans by LS · · Score: 1

    When you take the cost of living and consider the net pay adjusted for that cost, places like Montgomery, Ala., Idaho Falls, Idaho, and Fort Smith, Ark.

    How about China? Cost of living is extremely low here in Beijing, but it's fun as hell, unlike some of these outback joints. Furthermore, I'm making an American salary by doing contracts remotely. My work has nothing to do with China, but I know plenty of Americans who came here to study chinese, but then got a job at Microsoft or some other local American tech company at either a Chinese or American salary, depending on the position.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  134. Don't forget income taxes by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I turned down a great job in Long Island. While the pay was attractive, it put me in a higher tax bracket and took away the ability to pay for the outrageous cost of real estate. Not to mention higher cost of insurance, auto maintenance, utilities. It all added up to higher expenses and too little money to put away for savings. And if I lost my job, unemployment would not begin to meet the cost of rent. Monster.com has a tool that lets you find the cost of living in an area where there is a job opening.

    Too many people neglect to check salary offers against income taxes - you'd be shocked how much of a bite they take out.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Don't forget income taxes by Yakman · · Score: 1

      Uhm, income tax is generally marginal tax. Sure you pay more tax when you make more, but it's never a case of being disadvantaged by going into a higher tax bracket, you get taxed more only on the dollars in that bracket. A lot of people don't seem to grasp this, and yet it's very simple.

      For example (made up numbers) tax could be 20% for under $20K, and 40% for over $20K. If you make $19,999 your tax is 20% of $19,999 = $3,999.80, if you make $20,000 your tax is (and this is the important part) 20% of $19,999 + 40% of $1 = $4,000.20 NOT 40% of $20,000 ($8,000). So for $25,000 income you pay 20% of $19,999 + 40% of $5,001.

  135. You are so not a nerd. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    A nerd would have realized that while the bus does have less stringent emissions controls, the fact that it transports MANY people as opposed to ONE person, works out to less pollution per mile traveled per person.

    There are many ways to get to an airport or trainstation which do not require a private car or a publically supported transportation infrastructure. I'll leave it up to you to figure out what those ways are.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:You are so not a nerd. by aevans · · Score: 1

      Only the ignorant *and* fooling think that those buses are always full. They're usually mostly empty.

  136. Re: Dallas, TX metro area by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    That's pretty much it: I went to school in Texas about an hour north of Dallas, and all my friends live down there--what you wrote is why I haven't moved down there. The people are extremely nice; Texans are the friendliest people on the planet. The culture down there is pretty non-existent, though. At least when I was there, Dallas had no real downtown: it had several different areas, one for live music, one for bars, one for arts and so forth. At the time public transportation was horrid, although I'm told that the new light rail has improved things a lot. You have to own a car to get just about anywhere, and people see nothing wrong with spending money on toll roads.

    The weather is absolutely horrible: miserably hot in the summer and biting cold in the winter. With icestorms. OTOH fall in Texas is splendid, much better than most places I've been.

    As you noted, Texans are big fans of big box stores and zoned areas. With cheap gas maybe it all made sense and was worth it, but I just don't see it anymore.

    I'd love to return, as I miss my college friends. But I don't think I could forsake Denver for Dallas.

  137. Are you serious? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    You lived in a shitty part of town if you had problems with crackheads and winos. What kind of job did you have, WalMart cashier?! I don't think your experiences are representative of 'major urban living'.

    As for life being more sustainable in rural areas...sure...if you can grow enough food to survive the winter. And can you afford to fuel that generator for weeks on end if Doomsday happens like you predict? How long a drive to the gas station, the grocery store?

    I'm glad you enjoy where you are now, but if the arguments presented in your post are even close to what your thought process was when leaving the city...you are retarded.

    --
    Blar.
  138. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cary NC, is a lower quality clone of Reston, VA.

  139. The advantages of overpriced housing by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    It's important to consider CoL when comparing salaries in different areas. However, there is at least one benefit of living/working in a high CoL area, specifically when it's due to real estate pricing: If you buy a house while working in a high-priced area, you're in much better shape when you eventually move somewhere else.

    If you're moving someplace "cheaper", you can buy an equivalent house and have a big chunk of money left over (or you can upgrade to a mansion). If it's another expensive area, at least you've already got equity for a straight swap to a new home. Meanwhile, people moving from low-cost areas don't have nearly enough to buy the same house in the more expensive area right away; the full (paid-off) value of their old home may barely cover the down payment on an equivalent new one.

    So if you can get a similar CoL-adjusted salary in two locations, the more expensive location is actually a better deal --if you plan to buy a house, and if you think you might eventually move again (and who doesn't these days?).

  140. Try St. Louis by pnuema · · Score: 1
    I personally think St. Louis is one of the best kept secrets in the country. In addition to having one of the lowest costs of living in the nation (my house ran $119/ sq foot, 7 miles from downtown, gas is 2.87 right now), there are good tech jobs - Boeing, Washington University (genome project), Monsanto, Anheuser-Busch, A. G. Edwards, Mastercard...

    The zoo is rated #1 in the country by Zagat (and it is FREE), symphony in the top 5, art museum in the top 5 (FREE as well)...Forest Park is bigger than Central Park in New York...if you are a baseball fan, there is simply no better place to be. Football hasn't been too bad here either in the last few years. Great place to raise a family. And drive 45 minutes in any direction and you are in the woods.

    When I was younger (I'm in my early 30s) I did complain that there wasn't anything to do, and compared to New York or LA, I was right. But I have kids now, and I have more things to do with them for very little cost than I know what to do with. May not be great for 20 somethings looking for excitement, but sure suits me.

    1. Re:Try St. Louis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, St. Louis is just the red headed step child of Chicago :)

  141. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by elliott_keith · · Score: 1

    Contrary to what you see on South Park, the Denver metro area is not snowy mess year round. Anybody who lives here can vouch that it may snow 2 feet, but disappear in 2 days. It's so arid that the snow literally evaporates, unlike many cities where it just stays on the ground all season. Thanks to Orographic lift and Chinook winds the winters are rather mild. The east side of the state normally gets hit hard. I can handle a few days of snow vs a 6 months of sweaty humidity where I used to live. 100 degrees F here is a walk in the park.

    As for work, Westminster is ~20 minutes to either Denver or Boulder with plenty of employers. It costs less to live in a suburb like Westminster compared to directly in either of those two cities. If not, Ft. Collins (#1 on the list) is an hour away.

  142. WTF's in Ft. Smith, AR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived in Ozark (~45 min east) from 79-85 and that is bigtime middle of nowhere. Ft. Smith is roughly midpoint between Tulsa (OK) and Little Rock, neither particularly cosmopolitan and ~3 hours in either direction.

    mind you, the Ozark mountains are amazing and if you're into outdoor stuff it's a great place to be but when we moved in summer 85 the "tech sector" of the region consisted of a new graphite plant that moved for cheap labor.

    just curious if anyone in that part of the world can shed some light since I have no plans to go back...

  143. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 Naperville, IL 141,600

    Crap! That's where I live right now... and I was reading this
    in hopes of finding a better place to move to.

    Fort Collins, CO it is then!

  144. There Are Reasons For High Cost Of Living by tompatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always see these comparisons of the best places to live, how to get the most value for your dollar, etc. In most places where the cost of living is very high, it's usually because a lot of people want to live there. Why? Because it's a great place to live. Places like San Diego, San Francisco and Boston are beautiful cities which offer a style of living and things to do that can't be found in Idaho or Alabama. If all you want to do is save your pennies and have a big house, then these are good places to live. But money is most definately not everything.

    1. Re:There Are Reasons For High Cost Of Living by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Then again, there are those of us who don't like the busy crowded city life. I've always wanted to live in a small rural town in the middle of nowhere. The crime is low, the people are kind, and I get to own a big house.

      I was pleasently surprised when I landed the job I've got now. I've got the best of all worlds. I don't mind travelling an hour to get to Wal-Mart on the weekend. It beats having to live in the city. Here, our doors are unlocked and most people leave their keys in the ignition of their unlocked cars. Kids run unsupervised throughout the city. It's a whole different world.

  145. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    Sugar Land, TX - I remember reading an article about this place in Newsweek or something some years back. Apparently, it's so conservative there that they drove out all the movie theaters or something like that to protest the "war-protesting" Hollywood. Funny how movie theaters are also banned in Saudi Arabia.

    Olathe, KS - been there on a business trip. Wow...you can see 360 degrees around you. Lots of aerospace jobs there, though.

    Bellevue, WA - a friend's house went from $250K to $430K in the first 6 months of this year alone. Crazy. Downtown Bellevue has at least 4 skyscraper condo developments undergoing right now. If you think traffic is bad in downtown Bellevue now, wait until it gets clobbered with 3,000 more people, each trying to get around in their BMWs.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  146. phds per square mile... by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    does anyone have a definitive source on this? i just moved from research triangle park, where cary claims to have more phd's per square mile than anywhere else...

    (alternatively, phd's per capita)

  147. Any City For An Atheist Geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please don't judge this a troll: it is a serious request.

    I live in a large southern city whose culture is immersed in religious fundamentalism. Co-workers proselytize at work, put up crucifixes, prayers, posters of Jesus, play Jesus rock music on their office radio, and hold prayer-meetings at lunch and after work. At any time in a conversation, Jesus may be introduced as a third-party referent (e.g., "Some of the things you say remind me of what Jesus said..."). And although I was raised in such an environment, I have long since abandoned those beliefs.

    I am a moral person and an atheist. Not a flaming atheist: I don't push my beliefs or seek out conflict. As a rationalist and a scientist I do my best to base my beliefs on science and logic. While the intent of my co-workers is appreciated (they truly believe that conversion would improve my life), much of my life was spent where they are and my journey is away from that place.

    Where in the USA can a rationalist atheist find a home? Note that I'm not seeking a "Sodom and Gomorrah", but a city like Huntsville, AL where there is a significant technical community but without a strong culture of religious fundamentalism. [Perhaps Huntsville is like that; but some posts here indicate otherwise.]

    If not in the USA, then where in the world is such a city?

    1. Re:Any City For An Atheist Geek? by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Seattle and Bellingham come to mind if you don't think you'll mind the stench of the hippies.

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    2. Re:Any City For An Atheist Geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago. (See my post later on titled 'I know Montgomery'). I'm an atheist and love it here.

      Cheers

  148. Re: Dallas, TX metro area by metamatic · · Score: 1

    That's about right. People in Dallas who want culture drive to Austin. Or fly to Houston, I guess.

    Nice otters in the aquarium, though.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  149. Search compensation data online by ddruid · · Score: 1

    There are also companies out there who have pretty cool web tools to check how much people are actually making in any given job. (http://www.payscale.com)

  150. dammit by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    and here i left Idaho for exactly this reason. what're you telling me, to go back to that hellhole?

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  151. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by JonLatane · · Score: 1

    Ahem. I'm from NC as well, and Cary is more often referred to around these parts as the Containment Area for Rich Yankees. :P

  152. Re:choose from the choices above by dcalkins · · Score: 1

    In the middle of nowhere is a lot different than what I am used to. Denver/SLC/Seattle. Now that's where I think the happiness lies. If you can find some happiness up in this place. Good for you. Move there for all I care. All I'm saying is that the REST of the world needs to stay away.

  153. Re: Dallas, TX metro area by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    LOL. You took a trip to Carrollton.

    The band Ten Hands has a song about that :-)

    http://www.doomsday.com/john/10hands/jazz.html#2

    You needed to go a little north, and discover Denton. Or way south, and discover Austin.

    There are parts of Dallas that are way cool, different parts depending on what you think is cool,
    but you almost have to be from there to know about them.

    It's a nice place to live, but I don't know why you'd visit there.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  154. I know Montgomery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up in in Montgomery, attended the public schools and AUM (the best local university for Math majors), and worked as a programmer for a government contractor for a year before moving on to greener pastures out of the south (I have been in Chicago for over a decade now). Montgomery is growing like crazy not just from defense but the auto plants they keep building down there. My wife and I have settled in Chicago and love it here, but Montgomery would be a great place to live if are a conservative who can take the heat and enjoy spending lots of time with family (there isn't that much else to do on a week night). Would I ever move back, unlikely (I'm a "heathen" liberal who never really fit into the culture down there), but there are a lot of people who do really love it down there.

  155. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by jjr1 · · Score: 1

    Every time I see one of these lists, I start to consider how the compilers could even imagine a way to combine all the factors that go into living in a particular area. The smaller things like that people you meet, the options for spending a free Friday night and the availability of a local coffee place and bookstore I love is so much better than moving to the middle of nowhere even if it's cheap. After all, even if you save a few thousand more a year, does it really make up for the people, options and excitement of the larger metropolitan areas? In NY, you're just a few minutes on public transport from some of the best live jazz in the world, major sports teams, museums, comedy clubs, bars, parks and dozens of other things that in most of the places listed here you just simply can't get. Of course, you can spend that free time counting the money you've saved, but I'd rather be out and trying something new. To each his own...

    --
    Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
  156. How to win friends and influence people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Talk about driving people to vote Republican.
    Or how to convince people they don't need to take the left seriously.
    Or convince people that public transit advocates are nutcases.

    Here's a formula for success - insult anyone who disagrees with you even slightly.
    Encourage people to murder others who disagree with you.
    Give them a picture of the forced relocation that would result if you came to power.
    Don't leave all the compasion to the conservatives.

    So services have to be taken out to the suburbs and beyond.
    And food has to be taken into the cities.
    You could argue that every bite you eat polutes the air becuase of the trucks that
    have to bring it in to the city.
    The world's overpopulation is largely concentrated in cities.

    Some people prefer to live in cities. Some perfer to live in the country.
    Some take their preference and turn it into a virtue.

  157. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    I have friends that work for Sun. If you don't believe me, you can always look it up.

    I personally like snow, so living in Denver is a real disappointment. We get maybe 3 big storms every decade. Most winters are warm, dry, sunny. Every so often a dusting of snow or a cold snap. It's disgusting.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  158. Re:Go away! New Residents NOT Welcome by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    If only residents were growing their households and purchasing new construction for new households, then growth would be about 4% ish. But the influx of new residents has artifically driven up prices due to scarcity of the product. The incomming residents are from states whos mean income is about 2x that of the average Idahoan. There are investment companies in CA that buy a dozen homes at a time (I have met with and talked to them in my search for a home) jsut so they can rent them out and sell them a few years later earning $50-100K in profit from the sale, and a few thousand a year in profit from the rental.

    I didn't say the state was ignorant of nor innocent of their part in this problem. The selling by Idahoans is voluntary, mostly. Some areas, by proximity to downtown only, have had their appraised property values increase by 100% in the last 7 years just because the only place to build homes is farther and farther away. Many of these areas overlook downtown Boise and are owned by 2nd generation Idahoans, mostly retired and on fixed income. The property tax alone on these sites is as much as an entire house payment so several high profile individuals have been forced to sell out and move because they cannot afford the taxes. But again, this is because the local economy has been nased solely on property taxes.

    But hey.... Don't take my post on /. as well informed and researched.... I just don't want people moving into my state from CA. Strangely, few people move here from Montana or Alabama / Mississippi or some other low income state.

    jason

  159. Re:Go away! New Residents NOT Welcome by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    "But the influx of new residents has artifically driven up prices due to scarcity of the product."

    I refuse to acknowledge the laws of supply and demand as "artificial."

    "There are investment companies in CA that buy a dozen homes at a time"

    And there are realtors in your town perfectly willing to sell to them. If you were on the supply side of this equation, I'm sure you would defend your actions.

    "The property tax alone on these sites is as much as an entire house payment so several high profile individuals have been forced to sell out and move because they cannot afford the taxes."

    The city government is a rogue instrument that operates without the consent of the people it represents, or are its officials put into office via at-large elections?

    "I just don't want people moving into my state from CA."

    In my book, that just makes you a bigot. You could just as easily replace "CA" with a race, religion, or nationality, and it would express precisely the same sentiment.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  160. Quality of Life by johnmyke · · Score: 1

    There's no place like home. http://www.paragonitpros.com/itphonehome.aspx

  161. how is no pro sports a bad thing? by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

    I mean as long as there are UIL sports and rec leagues who would miss watching overpaid, overprivildged twits on parade.

    go ahead and shave your chest and paint it in the local high school's colors, you'll feel right at home under the friday night lights

  162. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    I know Denver is a slush zone - but in regards to the I36 corridor - Broomfield got CLOBBERED with snow not too long ago. When I say clobbered - I mean roofs falling in clobbered. Yes, if it's a spring fall then it melts in no time. But - if it's an October-surprise - oh you've got good snow for months to go. Remember both in 1998 and particularly in 1986 when Pena got into hot water because the city streets were so fouled up with snow-ruts that people were losing axels?

    Yes it's rare - but at least twice a year the whole of the city is shut down for a few days (or at least if you're not telecommuting - I dare anyone to jump on the I25 from Cap-Hill and go to a Job at the Tech-Center during one of those). Not Minneapolis weather mind you - but not San Diego / SunnyVale CA either. IE - not "great".

    I haven't scraped my car in years (Phoenix and back to California), and I really like not getting body work done by people whacking my car every year in parking lots and on the street (downtown).

  163. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by elliott_keith · · Score: 1

    I haven't been living here but just a little over two years, so I can't say I've experienced any of those events. Maybe I'm due for a rude awakening, but so far it's been a pleasure.

    The places you mentioned are nice, but pros and cons to living there exist as well.

    I guess different strokes for different folks...

  164. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    I probably fudged the typo and you thought I said "scraped" as in "I junked my car" - I ment "scrape your windows". No biggie for most - until you're in a rush for work. You've never had to do this - in Denver?

    If that's the case - global warming is 100% real and we're all gonna fry.

    Can I have your stereo?

  165. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by elliott_keith · · Score: 1

    Hehe...must have been through some hell weather if you had to junk your car...

    I only have to scrape windows a few times during the season. Usually after a daytime dusting while parked at work; I have a garage at night. Maybe it's just lifestyle differences. I have a sweet job only 2.6 miles from my place. Never have to drive far or get on the highways in bad weather. No traffic.

    It has to be global warming because I never see snow on the ground longer than 3 days after a storm up in Westminster.

  166. As someone who has lived in Idaho Falls and NYC by danclaw · · Score: 1

    I grew up in Idaho Falls and have lived in New York City for a few years. Each has their attractions: NYC is very large and busy. It provides a very wide range of civic events, and a significant mix of ethnic groups. However, the only nearby outdoor opportunity is in Central Park, where there is still someone within seeing distance at almost all times.

    Idaho Falls, on the other hand, is more of a bedroom community: very conservative socially, almost completely caucasian, with a small but growing latino population. It is clean, the roads are good, traffic isn't bad, which hasn't changed much in 15 years. The civic opportunities are few and muted compared to any large city. However, what you loose in civic opportunities you can make up in outdoor activities. There is camping, offroading, hunting (I don't hunt, personally) in the vicinity, with a few excellent parks within reasonable driving distance (Island Park, Yellowstone, Forest land, etc.).

    As always with the question "which city/town is best", it depends on what you like.

    For those with more civic oriented tastes, Boise, ID may be a good destination. It has more concerts, has a bigger feel (200k people in the valley), and has a variety of tech jobs available. Yet, there are still excellent outdoor opportunities nearby.

    Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on your point of view), this richness in outdoor opportunities is not lost on Idaho's elected officials. This year, the state will have a Tax revenue surplus. The former governor (Kempthorn, now Secretary of the Interior) pledged to put about $240k into higher education... and $38 million into parks.

  167. The Theory of International Hotness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Theory of International Hotness states:

    In every country at every time (except, possibly, during major famines or crises) there are some incredibly attractive women (and men). In some cases, you may not *know* it because they are not out in public, or are covered head-to-foot in conservative clothings (e.g. Women from Iraq, Afghanistan, etc in head-to-foot black shrouds).

    If someone says that XYZ country doesn't have very good looking women, they are either looking in the wrong places, or it just reflects their own aesthetic sense.

    The Corrolary to the Theory of International Hotness states:

    In every country at every time (no excpetions) there are nearly an unlimited supply of mildly attractive and downright unnatractive women (and men), and you can find them everywhere in public.

  168. Re:Flying cockroaches by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    They've got those in the Southeastern US, too. I grew up in the Florida Panhandle, and the 4" long flying kind were the standard cockroach, also in Alabama and Houston. I didn't know about the smaller, wingless, kind until I moved to California.

  169. That must have been Ultimate Power(tm). by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Be careful with what you communicate with your eyes, too though: I know someone who got beat up and nearly died because he looked at someone funny (I am dead serious on that one, although it happened in Hawaii not Costa Rica).

    Only a few people on this planet have enough courage to flip-out like that. You never know when the ninja will strike, so hide in a dumpster -- or better yet, take Oscar the Grouch's advice by living in a trashcan-armoured battle-ready suit. I remember of History lessons of this one country that practically everyone important lived (eat/shit/screw/die) in a vested trashcan. Oh, now I remember, it was Europe!

    --
    without prejudice
  170. Re:See how many correspond with 'Best places to li by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

    Interestingly enough:

    11. Plano, TX 250,100
    15. Richardson, TX 99,200
    19. Carrollton, TX 124,700

    are all suburbs of Dallas.
    It'd be interesting if the list had more correlation.

    I grew up there (five minutes from Carrollton) and would agree that it was a nice combination of:

    -near a high population city, so there's stuff to do and good jobs
    -nice weather (brutal in the middle of summer, but everywhere is well air-conditioned, and the rest of the year is very nice)
    -low cost of living

    Yes, it's the suburbs, so yes it requires a car.

    I'm currently living in NYC, and have also lived in upstate New York (Troy/Albany) and in mid New-Jersey (Bloomfied), so it's not like I have no frame of reference.