The original parent post on the "for loop" topic was describing a single-execution of a "for loop." Think of all the things that could have changed in the condition of said "nuclear reactor" that couldn't be throttled while in that "for loop." He was using more of a micro-controller with application-specific processing than was an actively re-Turring computing system. Operating systems of today are designed and implemented to allow code to cyclically branch their execution so one crucial task can continue executing and not transfer to another task that is without competancy of the prior. I have encountered this in the DOS era, when my program would need to write data to a file while actively monitoring the condition of another unrelated element in real-time with the disk IO.
The problem today is everyone writes software like how they read a Holy Bible as a 1-step at a time execution plan when in-fact everything needs to be done all at once and independant of one-another with perhaps the capability to respawn processes of an unrelated process when one another fail. In short, today's Operating Systems appear to be taking on the role of INITD in the Unix world; they aren't even operating systems, but just application-layer code abstractions.
And if you posted that in duplicate, it still wouldn't conflict with the prior post made on Wednesday January 31, @06:54PM with the record #17835574.
Look at all the Intellectual Property attached to the Slashdot-chartered corporate-sole known as Anonymous.
Please be more accurate to your request; I can use more operators if you like: for justice, and logical sentence flow.
the fact that gmail.de existed prior to any Google application for a German trademark.
Looking to the Uniform Commercial Code, has anyone not considered that all transmittals through the webserver are intellectual property granted to the domain registrant? I know of a number of Public Notice directories that re-print on a webserver their bulletins and notice from suitors. Foremost, acknowledging communication with Google and cerain evidence of secured insignia and design transmitted is conclusive as prior art brought into commerce not to prejudice the claims of another.
Foremost, the claim made in Germany was filed (submit to the jurisprudence and diction of the trustee to minister on behalf) and oath and bond evinced to the judge weighting on the matter. There would need to be evidence that Google made use of its GMail to prejudice the claims of GMAIL.DE, of which I and others have not seen. Just because there are Geese(tm) and Cockroaches(tm) in America doesn't mean to prejudice Geese(tm) and Cockroaches(tm) in Germany. Though they may inter-bread, the derivative is subject to the congress that allowed the matter defacto.
Does that sound Right, or controlling Interest? What are Google's interests in GMail's GMail(tm), on issue of a Certificate of Search?
Many are over-looking the fact that trademarks and procedure, collected under an independent title for said documents, with an independently assumed trademark that is not derived or conferred from another, is fair to proceed given their unique merits. GMail is everywhere; it's in the trees, it's with Google Mail, it's with a (G)Hermanian, and it is lawful to continue the lawful use of said trademark as long as not intending to interrupt or defraud another's regular use.
In other words, that GMail collected and utilized on the 31-st Day of the first Month in the Year 2007 at 1324 and 987-miliseconds+ATOMIC_TIMESTAMP from MAIL.GOOGLE.COM does not infringe or detract from this GMail collected and utilized on the 31-st Day of the first Month in the Year 2007 at 1324 and 987-miliseconds+ATOMIC_TIMESTAMP from GMAIL.DE. The same goes for the nonsense of people forcing their IP and trademark to compel with threats/duress/coercion for a lawful man of the Hershey or (Mike)Rowe family to change their name to somthing that isn't seen as similar (yet independent) of a name adapted to a corporation.
Does anyone remember about Blizzard persuance upon anyone seen using Starcraft(tm) or similar IP, without question of independance, yet they are injunctioned at all from pursuing the trademark helled by a reacreational vessel and off-land vessel company Starcraft? This is the same agreement between ministries over subject matter, that there are many men out there given the name "Gregory Thomas" yet this one given to me is timestamped 04/20/xxxx and is lawful for use in my matter.
I am aware of 5 diverse Personae in America. They are evident even before the Treaty of Paris. A US person (debtor) is not a citizen to a state. Returning to the first Act that expose'd diversification is the Judiciary Act; consider the evidence original jurisdiction, explicitly reserved in certain actions of seizure on land, maritime leins, and the tense surmised. Further, consider the Uniform Commercial Code has enumerated conveyance by means of a private administrative remedy by a corporation proceeding as State/"this State" (de facto) as opposed to "the State" (de jure). The significance of the year 1871 is recognized that the aggression of men holding federal office would cause the States to dissolve, their member to be (United:)States disbanded, and the Navy to return by aid of the Crown to create a corporation with shares to a number of subcorporations that resembled the names of the prior politic. The corporation was granted a charter in the Washington District of Columbia where the remnant politic of the several States were camped.
It's all a matter of discerning a Word Of Art (the State) from a Mathematical Unit (State). Consider Judiciary Act, Section 11;
SEC. 11. And be it further enacted, That the circuit courts shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs, the sum or value of five hundred dollars, and
the United States are plaintiffs, or petitioners; or an alien is a party, or the suit is between a citizen of the State where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another State.
And shall have exclusive cognizance of all crimes and offences cognizable under the authority of the United States, except where this act otherwise provides, or the laws of the United States shall otherwise direct, and concurrent jurisdiction with the district courts of the crimes and offences cognizable therein. But no person shall be arrested in one district for trial in another, in any civil action before a circuit or district court. And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ, nor shall any district or circuit court have cognizance of any suit to recover the contents of any promissory note or other chose in action in favour of an assignee, unless a suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover the said contents if no assignment had been made, except in cases of foreign bills of exchange. And the circuit courts shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the district courts under the regulations and restrictions herein after provided.
There is no less than 300 years of Country prior to there ever being any united States, than everyone is so set on preserving the name of a foreign federation in the District of Columbia or a corporation appearing in 1871 in the singular "United States."
That's the cost of idolatry. A friend of mine tried to convince me of this cool Jeep automobile in his parkway, dated around early 1990, was once a favorite posession and daily-driven by John Wayne. I suppose this John Wayne was either another instance unrelated to the popular pre-1979, or an imposter attempting to presume character of the John Wayne.
It's the same play on words I'm trying to elude upon; the United States is or the United States are, as differentiated by title and application even of the Uniform Commercial Code by an administrative body "State" of the State, even if that administrative State is integrated as a private citizen known as "United States" (singular-corporation); UCC 9-307...
In reality, the security of the girlfriend system is hardware-based; it requires the presence of a specialized dongle.
Woah there, comrade. Let's back-up to red-square 1. He referred to his girl "friend" as the one ascribed to the almighty sudo for "root." So given the girlfriend is root, what makes you think she hasn't already sandboxed his environment within moments of holding that title of nobility? He thinks he's sitting in a chair and watching television, when in fact it's just an artificial reality to conceal the re-organization of his ${HOME}? Who says the girlfriend(root) just didn't tunnel the request to a process in a VM? Given how there is such a cold response after his instance of "sudo", it's evidence of an exception in an inferior process. Check those symbolic links and/proc irregularities. Hell, he wouldn't even know what hit him. He could turn off the light in the artificial world, but in the real world the light is always-on -- killing his electricity bill! Someone warn the poor sod of any plants moving about the corners of his domicile; similar to my circumstances, the alleged "ferns" could be the agents of the "girlfriend" merging into the new reality in the image of their VM. I find the cohorts will take the image of a non-living thing. I could almost swear the rocks were talking to me, like they had somthing to say. Try to over-water the plants, hurry!
Out of every ten CRX I've ever seen, there has been one with a removed seat. A CRX doesn't have much of a trunk, to my knowledge; even a friend removed the seat to a CRX, for the needed storage space in his movements with his property. A CRX is not reliable in a collission, and weighted unevenly would cause it to sway uncontrollably in unusual road and weather conditions.
Keep dancing, misseur Reiser. \(*o*)/
PS. I've seen mules at a neighbor's chattel ranch reliably cary more weight than a CRX.
Let's face the truth: a student is being parented by whomever they are around the most, for no less than 7 hours a Day at said "School."
The rest of the time is spent on those "Teachers" sending the lessons away with the student expecting them to learn on their own elsewhere from what is presumed in class. Most of this is done while the student contends with their family to a job to pay rent for where they may get 5 hours of sleep aside from keeping their domicile livable.
You all can learn from a student more than you can from a "Teacher." The reason I quote "Teacher", is because they are forced upon the student by commercial means of copyright private code procedures that are not law but to be construed in Trust to be compliant to the law without having the original charter. It's all a monopoly by the State, to tresspass on a young soul by the presumption of being not schooled or unsound mind or incompetant.
The number of young students living on their own and forced to attend "Schools" is growing. I know people 15-years old that are at this standing, and are disadvantaged from the compelled services masquerading as "education." Measured to a courtship, today's Schools are unlawful and unconstitutional. Fat bastards with job security, complaining about their $30K year salary while misleading everyone to not know they get all the perks and holidays and with only working 50% of a normal job. Send those fake "Teachers" back to college. They're the ones that don't know what they are doing. The children have adapted so far. Stop forcing them to pay your livable wage, so they can go to school to work for unlivable wages for your so-called "balanced education".
In his response to Marconni winning the Nobel Prize, he immediatly donned his robe and wizard hat, reached for his Pen of +2 Confidence and spelled;
"You are a donkey."
The greatest proponents of society have all made patient attempts of secluded study that allow society to benefit therefrom. Addiction or market demand? Dropping out of college or satisfaction by leave? Society promotes an attitude that has good report, and no lawful society would defame or coerce anyone to any satisfaction of bias by application of a terminal statement of fact to defame one's reputation by attendance to an employee's study. "dropping out of school" is the same anti-social comment as I would expect of someone that would coerce all to strip their modesty for a search of idiom or property that is itself justified by the lack of a complaint and witness.
All neighborhoods are destined to fall. They should be walking around without the hood, rather than spread their blindness. They have nothing to hide, as they're "you need ID" rhetoric goes.
Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh are the parents to all that receive their transmittals. The adulterous children of those transmitting utilities would unconditionally agree and unconditionally accept the non-negotiable solicitations and treatise with a satisfaction without empirical evidence: rather than study the 1st-edition Black's Law Dictionary, the 1st-edition Bouvier's Law Dictionary, the 1st Webster's and American Heritage Dictionaries, the Holy Bible, the 1st Magna Charta, the original unanimous Declaration and Constitution for their state (as originally writ in German by popular necessity at the time), all in such a manner that is mindlessly inconsistent even with a shadow of Robert's Rules Of Order (Court hygiene/principles).
We don't have much to expect from chattel (personal property). If one causes a libel, then pull them into district Court. If one limits motion or testimony or evidence, then acknowledge their inferior Court and refuse for cause the matter by upholind copyright and trademark to disuade their commercial speach.
Consider one foreign DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, its officer emit the mission statement is to limit the teaching of knowledge for the preparation of children to be educated in all matter of factory labor allthewhile the factories are moved to foreign countries. I'm not to say there is a vacancy of a million minds, because they are to say the same of me; I only intend to be not dependent on any one, respectably.
What I don't like is that not being social means you must be a "antisocial misfit". I held a full-day presentation today for about a dozen people, that's hardly introvert. I do get along just fine when I'm out socializing. At the same time, I'm perfectly happy in my own company. There's a certain group of people I would call social addicts, which can't seem to go any significant time without social interaction, which leads them to believe that those that go without are simply misfits who are unable to.
Part of being social is to seclude into the confines of one's quarters to prepare one's thoughts for benefice towards the society. Those that don't study and ponder on one's orientation tend to be quite aggressive to no end of tresspass. Long hours of emulation at a computer console are quite beneficial for the well-being of fellow socialists.
Just be aware that all murderers and thieves are quite social; How else to prepare a respectable place for them, than good providence and diligent in one's faith to carry the Day?
He presses the transmit button. (although most people have 104 of those).
He claims to be Christian, of which all in Christ do not bear self-witness that they are Christian, yet he does. Stemming from this claim, He claims to uphold the Law of Moses, but has not the mind to move any remedy that exists in the Law; whereas most transmittals of his person eventually retourn to their revolution of "kill them" (violation of Law) and "{I am the host, this is my show, I will make inferior/limit/interrupt motions and admittance of evidence.}"
He looks sincere, because he's not young and has kept his ol' aging self in attractive mannerisms as blinking the eyes and fragrant discussion (at the end of the show)of five or so Selected electronic mail messages (out of hundreds of thousands), et al.
He is quick witted, perhaps from his training as a disc-jockey at a prior station.
He also looks at you that way, you know... like someone that wants to be your master or trustee -- like Rosey O'Donnel, George Bush senior, Fred Savage/Winnie Cooper, Al-CIAeda, Hillary Clinton, Charlton Heston, John Ridge, Tracy Lords, Ted Kennedy, Sun Yung Moon/Jerry Fallwell/John Haggee, Ron Jeremy.
Reality is of relativity, the kind that is inferior to the supreme by being centered to evends as scrutinzed as important and not someone-else's. When more than one reality blends together, then the people muster enough chaggrin to draw the supreme by the mode of their superiority in number to agree on behalf and with respectful Tresspass to a reality that neighbours. The product of today's marketers is selling a Copy of their title to Reality; complete with script for the actor presuming his disability and accompanied by the euphoria that draws from the deep that drains time into the performance.
When reality is in question, the lawful (not legal) procedure is to ascertain if anyone is interested and whether that is a controlling interest or done on their behalf with or without Authority.
Bill O'Reilly is a non-negotiable transmitting utility, already decided and scripted to be echoed in a theatre of feigned discussion. Bill O'Reilly, like every sociopath, is determined to steer someone from one evidence and motion to another; this process is known as religion (to turn one subject to pledge loyalty to another). Without evidence, most transmissions succeed as nothing more than the acceptance of commercial speach. As with all intentions, it is a libel that would lawfully be brought into a district Court but doesn't qualify because it is commercial at the beginning.
Bill O'Reilly is just as much a parent to adulteries as is anyone else. Commerce is that level of reality that cloaks the children. A boat for sale is obedient to its master that holds the wind.
It's/etc that is dirty with material that should've been sored in either/usr/etc or/usr/local/etc. And worse, sometimes I find horrendous growths materializing in/opt with their own/opt/bin!
Don't let one of the Blue-Shirts look at it though... (*cough*BestBuySucks.com*cough*)
It was supposed to be funny. If you make his corrections the sentance would read: There's a Hell: Michigan.
Wait. There's still some dust on this sentance. It should be corrected to read as:
It was supposed to be funny. If you make his corrections the sentance would read; There's a Hell: Michigan.
Remember the rule, children: A semicolon always precedes a colon. You can't have two colons, unless you're some sort of mutant/irradiated Slashdot Troll that somehow grew-up in that harsh environment consuming mouthfulls of vile slime called "News for Nerds."
I didn't watch enough Star Trek "The Next Generation." Did the Borg ever try to assimilate another by letting itself be assimilated into them first? I suppose this is like submitting an empty bag of "integrity" just so they could get their bag full of someone else's integrity.
Metaphorically speaking: Did Micros^Hx6 the Borg give any forks with the cake, or did they decide to walk away with the forks?
What people try to criticize Microsoft Internet Explorer as having poor HTML standard adherence, is actually not HTML but their own in-house standard independent to that of another. Don't forget that just because there is a Board of said standard to confer it upon a company, doesn't mean they can't just grow their own similarities independent and unique down to the verry grain. If intellect moved independently, then isolated forms of untracable intellectual inductance are the cause of reprove.
The manual that accompanies a Cell Phone, usually not including that actual Service Contract, is required a clause or statement near the end or Directory Listing that default dis-claims with prejudice of the FCC that of all the possible harm that is self-same disclosed to whomever makes use of the Cell Phone will not hold liable medical costs or recompense to damage from the FCC or the Manufacturer or related owners of said patents and copyrights ensigned upon the property.
In other words, their rate of disclosure of all the ill-health nigh experimental communications errata cause, is met with "harmless" improper amendments to the verry contract limiting the sale of said property. It's as though they are psycopathic lawyers performing surgery on your ears, and expecting you to have hearing for matters of damage they had evidence and knowledge before disclosure but decided naught to disclose in fear of no Consideration and no Satisfaction to enter the same Cell Phone use and Service.
If there were a nuclear-powered Oven used to cook food, would they sell per contract to "cook food quicker" to the satisfaction of the owner and then modify their reservations in the contract to the incompetance of the owner to deflect or refuse said alleged "amendments" that do more to change the intent than to ammend (correct)?
A bullet isn't even advertised to kill, because it is the people that determine the intent of the bullet. Yet, a Cell Phone is poorly designed to communicate, while causing all kinds of collateral damage that are known but not disclosed in the original contract and note, and assumed to accept all alleged corrections (amendments). Entering a restaraunt is to be satisfied to eat food at a restaraunt, whereas this is no different than forced to accept and agree to a contract before leaving the restraunt with the assimilated food.
I hope the people return to extend the abilities of Citizens Band radio, for moderate-distance local chat procedures of a terminal, relay of communications in the form of free and independent postal stations, and other capabilities.
This is same as confusing the people to think that Fluoride in the water is healthy, when in fact Fluoride itself is poisonous while Calcium Fluoride is the original intent scrapped in order to secure the medical services to treat whomever is involed with the pains hidden by Fluoride itself.
I know for a fact that Internet 2 is being administered to prevent "activist" groups from participating in the new availability of bandwidth. Prison Planet editors complained of all the biased surveilance being put on Internet 2. Terror Storm is #2 on Google Video yesterday, and would've been #1 months ago if not for Google Video being tipped-off by *someone* to freaze the download/view Counter.
If the people think Internet 2 will be so good, then take an example of all the crap the MPAA and RIAA are fronting on everyone that participated in Internet 1. This Opera "feature" is just that of Internet 2 malware entering now. The only thing secure is information moved through the first ring of a Secure Shell in a secure environment. I notice the history of system and network administration preventatives just keeps re-turring itself on all the hyped "secure" technologies advertised to prevent malicious useage. In the end, a bullet in the head is just as good as an unplugged network Switch.
The difference between this article and the studies of Raymond Royal Rife is those are researches that are discussing their speculation on being able to detect cancer cells, while the Raymond Royal Rife produced actual equipment that disrupts and unmaterialized foreign matter by a unique resonant frequency of energy.
I heartily thank Roland Piquepaille for inducing the post of that article, because I have posted similar subject matter and consistently denied it appearing. Look into an effect discovered by a scientist known as Raymond Rife; he is prominantly known as the first man to view a virus under a microscope, and his mode of that microscope is known to have credited him as the inventor of the first electron microscope.
The truth of the matter is all matter has a resonant frequency. The experimentation and invention of Raymond Royal Rife was concluded that the contagen of invading foreign matter in the flesh of a man can be reduced by finding the resonant frequency and causing the matter to violently materialize until it no longer functions. The same effect also can be used to "train" the Immune System of a host.
Much of the independent radio networks, primarily accessible on internet service streaming, are actively advertising these and related inventions. Try a stream from FIRSTAMENDMENTRADIO.COM or NFOWARS.NET, and one will eventually occur at least every hour.
"Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses."
-Statute Of Liberty
Abraham Lincoln on DESPOTISM "When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic]." --From the August 24, 1855 Letter to Joshua Speed"
Sad to say this; Of course everyone likes to move to the United States; they were abused to the mind of equals as slaves to their prior government, and are entertained to be ruled by the administration of that US GOVERNMENT for having no knowledge to react to conditions of slavery that are one-straw less of their prior oppression; they are not submit in the tense of their Bible: they are nieve. They are heartily welcomed to dilute the ancestry of the continent, instrumental to spread the suppression of the freemen that are not submit to that US GOVERNMENT because of a higher-standing of parity and exception preserved or reserved or actively exercised. Government is not for the lawful, it is for the lawless and incompetant.
Here is somthing to ponder: there are three entities apparent to "United States", as provided in the case of Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945). Consider a Google Search or otherwise for "Hooven Allison Evatt three United States", and we find:
The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. [Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)]
Hooven and Allison Co vs Evatt is stare decisis, yet the original meaning of the three United States is discernable in the The Judiciary Act, September 24, 1789; only by someone that has developed their English grammar beyond the comprehension and discernment accessible in modern High Schrools and Colleges. Grade-School is a great start:-). Looking into the text, we can see the shadow of a non-appearance by a "United States" by comprehension of it making claims and suing and being sued. Before quoting, please take this notice that codes are encrypted and copyright private law and intellectual property that is not the Law itself but to be compliant with the Law without direct use and reference of the Law; also, Statutes are for aliens in admiralty known as a corporation: adhering to regulation of a statute is evidence of counterfeit surety or securities fraud held by a foreigner, wherefore the purpose of this is to show that one of the foreigners in another "United States" that is moving from admiralty venue into an Exchequer and Equity to demand performance or draw compensation for contracts that benefit a neighboring person.
The Judiciary Act, September 24, 1789
SEC . 9. And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at common law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts, exclusive of costs, to the sum or value of one hundred dollars. And shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several States, of all suits against consuls or vice-consuls, except for offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in fact, in the district courts, in all causes except civ
What people don't comprehend is who the goverment is authorized to collect from. A foreign state can already collect the tax, whereas another foreign state is hindered from collecting said tax for whatever governing has already been rendered. The people can't be taxed twice, because government is applied to reprove the security and efficiency of a process. A government that collects a tax and renders no improvement, is not government; it lays down its sovereignty and becomes that of a private citizen, able to sue and be sued, own property and compete with fellow offers of the common good.
Going to the books, it would be trivial to find the loophole if the information is considered to be "the light" emit through the fiber-optic lines. The company could just as easily switch that the dark is the binary-closed/1 and the light is the binary-open/0. Then they could just as well reason on whether the information is derived or carries its Endian order of data, just for bringing the intellectual-property of a State through the process to prevent anyone from trying to attach any government to intellectual property that has already been governed. Wherever there is benefit, there is a right for a Body to govern that benefit. Given that most mail matter is tainted with commercial suggestions from worldly intellectual-property organized by trustees in a corporation known as WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION, it would seem that most governing is a suggestion enticed by the presumption to attain said services by not Refusing For Cause an Invitation or Offer from said foreign state.
Surely, everyone on Slashdot knows how to fill their Bench and move the Court; without politic, it's mindless limited liability offers from a corporation.
Most people would buy it because Tesco is their implicitly appointed Market. I profess, my main market would be that of a bi-weekly attraction to a "flee market" in the parking-lot of a School; be the cause, I know the things I am buying or trusted to hold. The Article text alludes that one of eight units of currency in that country fall into the hands of Tesco. Almost the same can be said about Homo Depot and Walwart in UNITED STATES. With research in hand, it is to know that they are nothing more than a monopoly Clearing House that opens space for products they sell on behalf of whomever has patent on that property. Looking to the numbers, most of the products are manufactured in foreign countries. Wouldn't you know it, the private industry is decimated by these markets not giving handicap to the struggling entrepreneurs that are not able to compete with slave labours that brought the foreign domesticated products into the Store.
I expect Tesco Office and Tesco Anti-Virus to have the same strength and Sound protection as a Homo Depot "door" (empty) or the same Genuine(tm) guaruntee of a Walwart "greeter" (feigned).
It means somthing better is to do. Imagine...
on
Caller ID Watches
·
· Score: 0
It would make sense for a watch as this to be PROGRAMMABLE to receive the state of a remote process. Think of a watch with a simple Quarts timestamp on the front for local awareness, yet the face is covered with no less than 20 small buttons as would a calculator watch; a USB port is on the side, from where there is software that you can RSYNC configuration data so the internals will assign a ceratain button to a task that will query a process or/proc on a remote server. That process depends on the preference of whomever holds The Watch.
Who needs to be killed just to get a watch that let me query the count of mail in the.mailbox, disk-usage via looking to/proc, server processing stress, network bandwidth usage, the percentile of completion for a database re-organization or massive file-system check, system environment temperature, or KITCO price for an asset. Better yet, just have a LCD Watch with a scroll wheel on the side that has a little Rolodex-style directory listing so I can use a standard button to choose the profile or character of data to syncronize onto and then the wheel to scroll through the data fields being updated.
BlueTooth? Why only BlueTooth? We're not Gillete! I expect 802.11G, with a hookup for an external antennae.:-)
Besides all this, we're long over-due for a 386 PDA. I'm waiting-out for a VAX fab-shrunk down to a PDA. There is no excuse why technologists should boast on technology that tries to undermine the already-consistent capabilities of yester-years expensive UNIX equipment, and thereby ignore their prestige by inventing architecture after architecture that does nothing more than create structure and debris to clutter the intelect base that was meant to be pledged for useful information. There is more worldly matter of computer architecture implementation than there is on knowledge that was meant to be stored by said computer technology. That just isn't right!
Slashdot Mirror
The original parent post on the "for loop" topic was describing a single-execution of a "for loop." Think of all the things that could have changed in the condition of said "nuclear reactor" that couldn't be throttled while in that "for loop." He was using more of a micro-controller with application-specific processing than was an actively re-Turring computing system. Operating systems of today are designed and implemented to allow code to cyclically branch their execution so one crucial task can continue executing and not transfer to another task that is without competancy of the prior. I have encountered this in the DOS era, when my program would need to write data to a file while actively monitoring the condition of another unrelated element in real-time with the disk IO.
The problem today is everyone writes software like how they read a Holy Bible as a 1-step at a time execution plan when in-fact everything needs to be done all at once and independant of one-another with perhaps the capability to respawn processes of an unrelated process when one another fail. In short, today's Operating Systems appear to be taking on the role of INITD in the Unix world; they aren't even operating systems, but just application-layer code abstractions.
And if you posted that in duplicate, it still wouldn't conflict with the prior post made on Wednesday January 31, @06:54PM with the record #17835574. Look at all the Intellectual Property attached to the Slashdot-chartered corporate-sole known as Anonymous. Please be more accurate to your request; I can use more operators if you like: for justice, and logical sentence flow.
the fact that gmail.de existed prior to any Google application for a German trademark.
Looking to the Uniform Commercial Code, has anyone not considered that all transmittals through the webserver are intellectual property granted to the domain registrant? I know of a number of Public Notice directories that re-print on a webserver their bulletins and notice from suitors. Foremost, acknowledging communication with Google and cerain evidence of secured insignia and design transmitted is conclusive as prior art brought into commerce not to prejudice the claims of another.
Foremost, the claim made in Germany was filed (submit to the jurisprudence and diction of the trustee to minister on behalf) and oath and bond evinced to the judge weighting on the matter. There would need to be evidence that Google made use of its GMail to prejudice the claims of GMAIL.DE, of which I and others have not seen. Just because there are Geese(tm) and Cockroaches(tm) in America doesn't mean to prejudice Geese(tm) and Cockroaches(tm) in Germany. Though they may inter-bread, the derivative is subject to the congress that allowed the matter defacto.
Does that sound Right, or controlling Interest? What are Google's interests in GMail's GMail(tm), on issue of a Certificate of Search?
Many are over-looking the fact that trademarks and procedure, collected under an independent title for said documents, with an independently assumed trademark that is not derived or conferred from another, is fair to proceed given their unique merits. GMail is everywhere; it's in the trees, it's with Google Mail, it's with a (G)Hermanian, and it is lawful to continue the lawful use of said trademark as long as not intending to interrupt or defraud another's regular use.
In other words, that GMail collected and utilized on the 31-st Day of the first Month in the Year 2007 at 1324 and 987-miliseconds+ATOMIC_TIMESTAMP from MAIL.GOOGLE.COM does not infringe or detract from this GMail collected and utilized on the 31-st Day of the first Month in the Year 2007 at 1324 and 987-miliseconds+ATOMIC_TIMESTAMP from GMAIL.DE. The same goes for the nonsense of people forcing their IP and trademark to compel with threats/duress/coercion for a lawful man of the Hershey or (Mike)Rowe family to change their name to somthing that isn't seen as similar (yet independent) of a name adapted to a corporation.
Does anyone remember about Blizzard persuance upon anyone seen using Starcraft(tm) or similar IP, without question of independance, yet they are injunctioned at all from pursuing the trademark helled by a reacreational vessel and off-land vessel company Starcraft? This is the same agreement between ministries over subject matter, that there are many men out there given the name "Gregory Thomas" yet this one given to me is timestamped 04/20/xxxx and is lawful for use in my matter.
It's all a matter of discerning a Word Of Art (the State) from a Mathematical Unit (State). Consider Judiciary Act, Section 11;
There is no less than 300 years of Country prior to there ever being any united States, than everyone is so set on preserving the name of a foreign federation in the District of Columbia or a corporation appearing in 1871 in the singular "United States."
That's the cost of idolatry. A friend of mine tried to convince me of this cool Jeep automobile in his parkway, dated around early 1990, was once a favorite posession and daily-driven by John Wayne. I suppose this John Wayne was either another instance unrelated to the popular pre-1979, or an imposter attempting to presume character of the John Wayne.
It's the same play on words I'm trying to elude upon; the United States is or the United States are, as differentiated by title and application even of the Uniform Commercial Code by an administrative body "State" of the State, even if that administrative State is integrated as a private citizen known as "United States" (singular-corporation); UCC 9-307...
In reality, the security of the girlfriend system is hardware-based; it requires the presence of a specialized dongle.
/proc irregularities. Hell, he wouldn't even know what hit him. He could turn off the light in the artificial world, but in the real world the light is always-on -- killing his electricity bill! Someone warn the poor sod of any plants moving about the corners of his domicile; similar to my circumstances, the alleged "ferns" could be the agents of the "girlfriend" merging into the new reality in the image of their VM. I find the cohorts will take the image of a non-living thing. I could almost swear the rocks were talking to me, like they had somthing to say. Try to over-water the plants, hurry!
Woah there, comrade. Let's back-up to red-square 1. He referred to his girl "friend" as the one ascribed to the almighty sudo for "root." So given the girlfriend is root, what makes you think she hasn't already sandboxed his environment within moments of holding that title of nobility? He thinks he's sitting in a chair and watching television, when in fact it's just an artificial reality to conceal the re-organization of his ${HOME}? Who says the girlfriend(root) just didn't tunnel the request to a process in a VM? Given how there is such a cold response after his instance of "sudo", it's evidence of an exception in an inferior process. Check those symbolic links and
Out of every ten CRX I've ever seen, there has been one with a removed seat. A CRX doesn't have much of a trunk, to my knowledge; even a friend removed the seat to a CRX, for the needed storage space in his movements with his property. A CRX is not reliable in a collission, and weighted unevenly would cause it to sway uncontrollably in unusual road and weather conditions.
Keep dancing, misseur Reiser. \(*o*)/
PS. I've seen mules at a neighbor's chattel ranch reliably cary more weight than a CRX.
Let's face the truth: a student is being parented by whomever they are around the most, for no less than 7 hours a Day at said "School."
The rest of the time is spent on those "Teachers" sending the lessons away with the student expecting them to learn on their own elsewhere from what is presumed in class. Most of this is done while the student contends with their family to a job to pay rent for where they may get 5 hours of sleep aside from keeping their domicile livable.
You all can learn from a student more than you can from a "Teacher." The reason I quote "Teacher", is because they are forced upon the student by commercial means of copyright private code procedures that are not law but to be construed in Trust to be compliant to the law without having the original charter. It's all a monopoly by the State, to tresspass on a young soul by the presumption of being not schooled or unsound mind or incompetant.
The number of young students living on their own and forced to attend "Schools" is growing. I know people 15-years old that are at this standing, and are disadvantaged from the compelled services masquerading as "education." Measured to a courtship, today's Schools are unlawful and unconstitutional. Fat bastards with job security, complaining about their $30K year salary while misleading everyone to not know they get all the perks and holidays and with only working 50% of a normal job. Send those fake "Teachers" back to college. They're the ones that don't know what they are doing. The children have adapted so far. Stop forcing them to pay your livable wage, so they can go to school to work for unlivable wages for your so-called "balanced education".
In his response to Marconni winning the Nobel Prize, he immediatly donned his robe and wizard hat, reached for his Pen of +2 Confidence and spelled; "You are a donkey."
The greatest proponents of society have all made patient attempts of secluded study that allow society to benefit therefrom. Addiction or market demand? Dropping out of college or satisfaction by leave? Society promotes an attitude that has good report, and no lawful society would defame or coerce anyone to any satisfaction of bias by application of a terminal statement of fact to defame one's reputation by attendance to an employee's study. "dropping out of school" is the same anti-social comment as I would expect of someone that would coerce all to strip their modesty for a search of idiom or property that is itself justified by the lack of a complaint and witness.
All neighborhoods are destined to fall. They should be walking around without the hood, rather than spread their blindness. They have nothing to hide, as they're "you need ID" rhetoric goes.
Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh are the parents to all that receive their transmittals. The adulterous children of those transmitting utilities would unconditionally agree and unconditionally accept the non-negotiable solicitations and treatise with a satisfaction without empirical evidence: rather than study the 1st-edition Black's Law Dictionary, the 1st-edition Bouvier's Law Dictionary, the 1st Webster's and American Heritage Dictionaries, the Holy Bible, the 1st Magna Charta, the original unanimous Declaration and Constitution for their state (as originally writ in German by popular necessity at the time), all in such a manner that is mindlessly inconsistent even with a shadow of Robert's Rules Of Order (Court hygiene/principles).
We don't have much to expect from chattel (personal property). If one causes a libel, then pull them into district Court. If one limits motion or testimony or evidence, then acknowledge their inferior Court and refuse for cause the matter by upholind copyright and trademark to disuade their commercial speach.
Consider one foreign DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, its officer emit the mission statement is to limit the teaching of knowledge for the preparation of children to be educated in all matter of factory labor allthewhile the factories are moved to foreign countries. I'm not to say there is a vacancy of a million minds, because they are to say the same of me; I only intend to be not dependent on any one, respectably.
What I don't like is that not being social means you must be a "antisocial misfit". I held a full-day presentation today for about a dozen people, that's hardly introvert. I do get along just fine when I'm out socializing. At the same time, I'm perfectly happy in my own company. There's a certain group of people I would call social addicts, which can't seem to go any significant time without social interaction, which leads them to believe that those that go without are simply misfits who are unable to.
Part of being social is to seclude into the confines of one's quarters to prepare one's thoughts for benefice towards the society. Those that don't study and ponder on one's orientation tend to be quite aggressive to no end of tresspass. Long hours of emulation at a computer console are quite beneficial for the well-being of fellow socialists.
Just be aware that all murderers and thieves are quite social; How else to prepare a respectable place for them, than good providence and diligent in one's faith to carry the Day?
He says what to do, but not as he does.
He presses the transmit button. (although most people have 104 of those).
He claims to be Christian, of which all in Christ do not bear self-witness that they are Christian, yet he does. Stemming from this claim, He claims to uphold the Law of Moses, but has not the mind to move any remedy that exists in the Law; whereas most transmittals of his person eventually retourn to their revolution of "kill them" (violation of Law) and "{I am the host, this is my show, I will make inferior/limit/interrupt motions and admittance of evidence.}"
He looks sincere, because he's not young and has kept his ol' aging self in attractive mannerisms as blinking the eyes and fragrant discussion (at the end of the show)of five or so Selected electronic mail messages (out of hundreds of thousands), et al.
He is quick witted, perhaps from his training as a disc-jockey at a prior station.
He also looks at you that way, you know... like someone that wants to be your master or trustee -- like Rosey O'Donnel, George Bush senior, Fred Savage/Winnie Cooper, Al-CIAeda, Hillary Clinton, Charlton Heston, John Ridge, Tracy Lords, Ted Kennedy, Sun Yung Moon/Jerry Fallwell/John Haggee, Ron Jeremy.
There is nothing new under the Son.
Reality is of relativity, the kind that is inferior to the supreme by being centered to evends as scrutinzed as important and not someone-else's. When more than one reality blends together, then the people muster enough chaggrin to draw the supreme by the mode of their superiority in number to agree on behalf and with respectful Tresspass to a reality that neighbours. The product of today's marketers is selling a Copy of their title to Reality; complete with script for the actor presuming his disability and accompanied by the euphoria that draws from the deep that drains time into the performance.
When reality is in question, the lawful (not legal) procedure is to ascertain if anyone is interested and whether that is a controlling interest or done on their behalf with or without Authority.
Bill O'Reilly is a non-negotiable transmitting utility, already decided and scripted to be echoed in a theatre of feigned discussion. Bill O'Reilly, like every sociopath, is determined to steer someone from one evidence and motion to another; this process is known as religion (to turn one subject to pledge loyalty to another). Without evidence, most transmissions succeed as nothing more than the acceptance of commercial speach. As with all intentions, it is a libel that would lawfully be brought into a district Court but doesn't qualify because it is commercial at the beginning.
Bill O'Reilly is just as much a parent to adulteries as is anyone else. Commerce is that level of reality that cloaks the children. A boat for sale is obedient to its master that holds the wind.
It's /etc that is dirty with material that should've been sored in either /usr/etc or /usr/local/etc. And worse, sometimes I find horrendous growths materializing in /opt with their own /opt/bin!
Don't let one of the Blue-Shirts look at it though... (*cough*BestBuySucks.com*cough*)
Wait. There's still some dust on this sentance. It should be corrected to read as:
Remember the rule, children: A semicolon always precedes a colon. You can't have two colons, unless you're some sort of mutant/irradiated Slashdot Troll that somehow grew-up in that harsh environment consuming mouthfulls of vile slime called "News for Nerds."
I didn't watch enough Star Trek "The Next Generation." Did the Borg ever try to assimilate another by letting itself be assimilated into them first? I suppose this is like submitting an empty bag of "integrity" just so they could get their bag full of someone else's integrity.
Metaphorically speaking: Did Micros^Hx6 the Borg give any forks with the cake, or did they decide to walk away with the forks?
What people try to criticize Microsoft Internet Explorer as having poor HTML standard adherence, is actually not HTML but their own in-house standard independent to that of another. Don't forget that just because there is a Board of said standard to confer it upon a company, doesn't mean they can't just grow their own similarities independent and unique down to the verry grain. If intellect moved independently, then isolated forms of untracable intellectual inductance are the cause of reprove.
The manual that accompanies a Cell Phone, usually not including that actual Service Contract, is required a clause or statement near the end or Directory Listing that default dis-claims with prejudice of the FCC that of all the possible harm that is self-same disclosed to whomever makes use of the Cell Phone will not hold liable medical costs or recompense to damage from the FCC or the Manufacturer or related owners of said patents and copyrights ensigned upon the property.
In other words, their rate of disclosure of all the ill-health nigh experimental communications errata cause, is met with "harmless" improper amendments to the verry contract limiting the sale of said property. It's as though they are psycopathic lawyers performing surgery on your ears, and expecting you to have hearing for matters of damage they had evidence and knowledge before disclosure but decided naught to disclose in fear of no Consideration and no Satisfaction to enter the same Cell Phone use and Service.
If there were a nuclear-powered Oven used to cook food, would they sell per contract to "cook food quicker" to the satisfaction of the owner and then modify their reservations in the contract to the incompetance of the owner to deflect or refuse said alleged "amendments" that do more to change the intent than to ammend (correct)?
A bullet isn't even advertised to kill, because it is the people that determine the intent of the bullet. Yet, a Cell Phone is poorly designed to communicate, while causing all kinds of collateral damage that are known but not disclosed in the original contract and note, and assumed to accept all alleged corrections (amendments). Entering a restaraunt is to be satisfied to eat food at a restaraunt, whereas this is no different than forced to accept and agree to a contract before leaving the restraunt with the assimilated food.
I hope the people return to extend the abilities of Citizens Band radio, for moderate-distance local chat procedures of a terminal, relay of communications in the form of free and independent postal stations, and other capabilities.
This is same as confusing the people to think that Fluoride in the water is healthy, when in fact Fluoride itself is poisonous while Calcium Fluoride is the original intent scrapped in order to secure the medical services to treat whomever is involed with the pains hidden by Fluoride itself.
I know for a fact that Internet 2 is being administered to prevent "activist" groups from participating in the new availability of bandwidth. Prison Planet editors complained of all the biased surveilance being put on Internet 2. Terror Storm is #2 on Google Video yesterday, and would've been #1 months ago if not for Google Video being tipped-off by *someone* to freaze the download/view Counter.
If the people think Internet 2 will be so good, then take an example of all the crap the MPAA and RIAA are fronting on everyone that participated in Internet 1. This Opera "feature" is just that of Internet 2 malware entering now. The only thing secure is information moved through the first ring of a Secure Shell in a secure environment. I notice the history of system and network administration preventatives just keeps re-turring itself on all the hyped "secure" technologies advertised to prevent malicious useage. In the end, a bullet in the head is just as good as an unplugged network Switch.
The difference between this article and the studies of Raymond Royal Rife is those are researches that are discussing their speculation on being able to detect cancer cells, while the Raymond Royal Rife produced actual equipment that disrupts and unmaterialized foreign matter by a unique resonant frequency of energy.
I heartily thank Roland Piquepaille for inducing the post of that article, because I have posted similar subject matter and consistently denied it appearing. Look into an effect discovered by a scientist known as Raymond Rife; he is prominantly known as the first man to view a virus under a microscope, and his mode of that microscope is known to have credited him as the inventor of the first electron microscope.
The truth of the matter is all matter has a resonant frequency. The experimentation and invention of Raymond Royal Rife was concluded that the contagen of invading foreign matter in the flesh of a man can be reduced by finding the resonant frequency and causing the matter to violently materialize until it no longer functions. The same effect also can be used to "train" the Immune System of a host.
Much of the independent radio networks, primarily accessible on internet service streaming, are actively advertising these and related inventions. Try a stream from FIRSTAMENDMENTRADIO.COM or NFOWARS.NET, and one will eventually occur at least every hour.
"Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses."
-Statute Of Liberty
Abraham Lincoln on DESPOTISM
"When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic]."
--From the August 24, 1855 Letter to Joshua Speed"
Sad to say this;
Of course everyone likes to move to the United States; they were abused to the mind of equals as slaves to their prior government, and are entertained to be ruled by the administration of that US GOVERNMENT for having no knowledge to react to conditions of slavery that are one-straw less of their prior oppression; they are not submit in the tense of their Bible: they are nieve. They are heartily welcomed to dilute the ancestry of the continent, instrumental to spread the suppression of the freemen that are not submit to that US GOVERNMENT because of a higher-standing of parity and exception preserved or reserved or actively exercised. Government is not for the lawful, it is for the lawless and incompetant.
Hooven and Allison Co vs Evatt is stare decisis, yet the original meaning of the three United States is discernable in the The Judiciary Act, September 24, 1789; only by someone that has developed their English grammar beyond the comprehension and discernment accessible in modern High Schrools and Colleges. Grade-School is a great start :-). Looking into the text, we can see the shadow of a non-appearance by a "United States" by comprehension of it making claims and suing and being sued. Before quoting, please take this notice that codes are encrypted and copyright private law and intellectual property that is not the Law itself but to be compliant with the Law without direct use and reference of the Law; also, Statutes are for aliens in admiralty known as a corporation: adhering to regulation of a statute is evidence of counterfeit surety or securities fraud held by a foreigner, wherefore the purpose of this is to show that one of the foreigners in another "United States" that is moving from admiralty venue into an Exchequer and Equity to demand performance or draw compensation for contracts that benefit a neighboring person.
What people don't comprehend is who the goverment is authorized to collect from. A foreign state can already collect the tax, whereas another foreign state is hindered from collecting said tax for whatever governing has already been rendered. The people can't be taxed twice, because government is applied to reprove the security and efficiency of a process. A government that collects a tax and renders no improvement, is not government; it lays down its sovereignty and becomes that of a private citizen, able to sue and be sued, own property and compete with fellow offers of the common good.
Going to the books, it would be trivial to find the loophole if the information is considered to be "the light" emit through the fiber-optic lines. The company could just as easily switch that the dark is the binary-closed/1 and the light is the binary-open/0. Then they could just as well reason on whether the information is derived or carries its Endian order of data, just for bringing the intellectual-property of a State through the process to prevent anyone from trying to attach any government to intellectual property that has already been governed. Wherever there is benefit, there is a right for a Body to govern that benefit. Given that most mail matter is tainted with commercial suggestions from worldly intellectual-property organized by trustees in a corporation known as WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION, it would seem that most governing is a suggestion enticed by the presumption to attain said services by not Refusing For Cause an Invitation or Offer from said foreign state.
Surely, everyone on Slashdot knows how to fill their Bench and move the Court; without politic, it's mindless limited liability offers from a corporation.
Most people would buy it because Tesco is their implicitly appointed Market. I profess, my main market would be that of a bi-weekly attraction to a "flee market" in the parking-lot of a School; be the cause, I know the things I am buying or trusted to hold. The Article text alludes that one of eight units of currency in that country fall into the hands of Tesco. Almost the same can be said about Homo Depot and Walwart in UNITED STATES. With research in hand, it is to know that they are nothing more than a monopoly Clearing House that opens space for products they sell on behalf of whomever has patent on that property. Looking to the numbers, most of the products are manufactured in foreign countries. Wouldn't you know it, the private industry is decimated by these markets not giving handicap to the struggling entrepreneurs that are not able to compete with slave labours that brought the foreign domesticated products into the Store.
I expect Tesco Office and Tesco Anti-Virus to have the same strength and Sound protection as a Homo Depot "door" (empty) or the same Genuine(tm) guaruntee of a Walwart "greeter" (feigned).
It would make sense for a watch as this to be PROGRAMMABLE to receive the state of a remote process. Think of a watch with a simple Quarts timestamp on the front for local awareness, yet the face is covered with no less than 20 small buttons as would a calculator watch; a USB port is on the side, from where there is software that you can RSYNC configuration data so the internals will assign a ceratain button to a task that will query a process or /proc on a remote server. That process depends on the preference of whomever holds The Watch.
.mailbox, disk-usage via looking to /proc, server processing stress, network bandwidth usage, the percentile of completion for a database re-organization or massive file-system check, system environment temperature, or KITCO price for an asset. Better yet, just have a LCD Watch with a scroll wheel on the side that has a little Rolodex-style directory listing so I can use a standard button to choose the profile or character of data to syncronize onto and then the wheel to scroll through the data fields being updated.
:-)
Who needs to be killed just to get a watch that let me query the count of mail in the
BlueTooth? Why only BlueTooth? We're not Gillete! I expect 802.11G, with a hookup for an external antennae.
Besides all this, we're long over-due for a 386 PDA. I'm waiting-out for a VAX fab-shrunk down to a PDA. There is no excuse why technologists should boast on technology that tries to undermine the already-consistent capabilities of yester-years expensive UNIX equipment, and thereby ignore their prestige by inventing architecture after architecture that does nothing more than create structure and debris to clutter the intelect base that was meant to be pledged for useful information. There is more worldly matter of computer architecture implementation than there is on knowledge that was meant to be stored by said computer technology. That just isn't right!