Slashdot Mirror


A Buckyegg Breaks Pentagon Rules

Roland Piquepaille writes "Chemists from Virginia and California have cooked a soup of fullerenes which produced an improbable buckyegg. The egg-shaped structure of their 'buckyballs' was a complete surprise for the researchers. In fact, they wanted to trap some atoms of terbium in a buckyball "to make compounds that could be both medically useful and well-tolerated in the body." And they obtained a buckyegg which both violates some chemistry laws and the FIFA soccer laws which were used until the last World Cup. Read more for additional references and a picture of this buckyegg carrying metal molecules."

137 comments

  1. Wha? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most confusing /. story blurb evar.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Wha? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Most confusing /. story blurb evar.

      I'm sure that's not an easy thing to do given Slashdot's high standards. Usually, the confusion is often just bafflement over why it was posted in the first place.

      Also, I've ignored Roland so long that I didn't realize he's posting for ZDNet now. I lost hope for Slashdot's editorial staff, I guess I really can't count on ZD to keep the riffraff editors away from them either.

    2. Re:Wha? by b0r1s · · Score: 5, Informative

      Definitely above the average story, but should be within the grasp of many.

      I was only confused until I realized that the Pentagon in the heading was the shape, not the structure/organization. Then it all made much, much more sense.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    3. Re:Wha? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, neat story, terrible Slashdot writeup. If they had said: A Buckyegg Breaks the "Adjacent Pentagon Rule", it would have been much less confusing.

      And I couldn't figure out what the heck world cup soccer had to do with buckyballs until I read the fine article, either.

      Sometimes, I think the editors post these things just to make people so thoroughly confused that they'll click the article. Makes me wonder if they get a kickback from ads on the article page or something. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank God I'm not the only one... I thought it was that pot...

    5. Re:Wha? by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      No, it seems much more likely that the editor didn't fully understand it, so they didn't try to edit the incredibly confusing intro text.

      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    6. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it is quite awful.

    7. Re:Wha? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I was only confused until I realized that the Pentagon in the heading was the shape, not the structure/organization. Then it all made much, much more sense.
      Me too. Isn't It Great How Headings Are Capitalized in the English Language?-)
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the American language.

    9. Re:Wha? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      OMG, what a nightmarish thought! A second Potomac Puzzle Palace, adjacent the first?
      That much bureaucratic inertia could slow Earth's rotation and really tear up the weather.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    10. Re:Wha? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      No, it's about on par for pisspaille.

    11. Re:Wha? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Well, Wikipedia suggests that it's more common in the US than in Britain, but there doesn't seem to be a sharp distinction.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    12. Re:Wha? by epee1221 · · Score: 1
      Indeed, neat story, terrible Slashdot writeup. If they had said: A Buckyegg Breaks the "Adjacent Pentagon Rule", it would have been much less confusing.
      Yes. As is, I saw the headline and thought "Pentagon" meant the Dept of Defense. Nothing in the summary suggested otherwise.
      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    13. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which kinda makes you wonder why they would even bother posting in the first place, doesn't it?

      Oh wait, look at the submitter... Makes sense now. Well, actually, no it doesn't, but at least now I know why.

  2. Do not click that link at the end! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Leads to Rolands blog. He's whoring it again. Don't give him your clickthroughs.

    1. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Weird, timothy didn't post the story for him this time.

    2. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a problem with the fact that he submits links to his weblog. The problem is that he understands too litle of the sufff he writes about to create a proper summary. This way he waste the time of many people.

    3. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make my living doing nano/bio/chemical research in one of the well-known universities and read slashdot to keep up with more computer-related things. Please let me be the first to agree that Roland is uniquely unqualified to write/post the stories he does.

      (yes I did research his background some time ago when I was first offended by his scientific wannabee-ness)

    4. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that there is a photo in the first link...identical to the one that Roland advertises in the second link.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by radl33t · · Score: 0

      Roland submits fine articles and his summaries are no worse than anything else I read here. I visit his site frequently. I have a hard time believing he generates much cash from slashdot. If he does, kudos to him. I've clicked on about 5 adds total in the last 12 years.

    6. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The link text just lurks people to click on the second one

    7. Re:Do not click that link at the end! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, all /. links require bouncing through the sponsor's blog posting first.

      Sometimes two or even three of them.

      The days of linking directly to the actual source article are gone.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  3. SimCity 2000 by thisnow1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been replaying SimCity 2000 lately and that reads like one of the crazy ad-libbed thrown together random newspaper articles, but not quite as coherent.

    1. Re:SimCity 2000 by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Capitalist Running Dog Lackeys Create Buckyegg?

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:SimCity 2000 by Meneth · · Score: 1

      Naysayers say nay!

    3. Re:SimCity 2000 by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      "Naysayers Say Nay"

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  4. I feel so dump by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What field of science do I have study for how long to understand that summary?

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:I feel so dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be chemistry. I've studied it independently for maybe a year, and I understood perfectly.

    2. Re:I feel so dump by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Troll

      To dumb to spell properly too it seems.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:I feel so dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to study dumpster diving

    4. Re:I feel so dump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that the poster above is TOO dumb.

    5. Re:I feel so dump by gabriel.dain · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Chemistry, and high school is more than enough. We studied fullerenes in the first year of senior high school.Its not that hard.
      I thought hackers and nerds were reknowned for their thirst for knowledge; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerenes
      C'mon; you couldn't even be bothered to look it up in wikipedia?

    6. Re:I feel so dump by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      You might have started by paying attention in your chemistry classes at secondary school. Really, it's not that hard.

    7. Re:I feel so dump by Kawahee · · Score: 1

      Way to fuck up the grammar stakes, buddy.

      --
      I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
    8. Re:I feel so dump by unitron · · Score: 1
      "To(sic) dumb to spell properly too it seems."

      What does being mute have to do with the ability to spell?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:I feel so dump by maxume · · Score: 1

      Spalling.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:I feel so dump by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      No, no, no - you're going at it all wrong.

      All you have to do is balance the positive and negative energies in yourself so that you stop felling the need to understand the summary.

    11. Re:I feel so dump by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Well, where I currently go to school, you just need a decent memory and high school chem. Buckyballs were mentioned in my chem class last year...though very briefly.

    12. Re:I feel so dump by Nutria · · Score: 1
      You might have started by paying attention in your chemistry classes at secondary school.

      Unless you graduated University before Fullerenes were discovered.

      Jackass.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  5. Nice... by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Way to throw out a completely misleading headline there, Roland. "Pentagon Rules" makes it sound like some sort of government security issue. Add that to the barely intelligible article summary and we've got another bang-up article by the Pipsqueak blogger. At least he's back to linking his own shitty blog articles again, so we're further justified calling him out for his blatant slashvertisments. Zonk, either stop approving this shit, or give us a separate category for articles from Roland so we can remove them from our fucking front pages. Forget the stupid ajaxified comment system, I want to be able to filter articles based on submittor.

    1. Re:Nice... by fozzy1015 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fullerenes, sometimes called "buckyballs," are usually spherical molecules of carbon, named after the futurist R. Buckminster Fuller, inventor of the geodesic dome. The carbon atoms are arranged in pentagons and hexagons, so their structures can resemble a soccer ball. An important rule -- until now -- is that no two pentagons can touch, but are always surrounded by hexagons.

      More interested about their experiements to put certain metals in buckyeyes for medical scanning. So is the idea of putting radioactive metals in fullerenes to 'insulate' what would normally be dangerous metals in the body?

    2. Re:Nice... by headkase · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You know, I read the article without noticing that it was yet another Roland article. At least I didn't go to his 'blog. And now after reading your comment I don't even feel like talking about the article anymore. Yay, fun times on /. . Your +5 Insightful is a community arrived at fsck you to Zonk despite his apparent lack of caring. Oh well I'm going to go browse somewhere else for a while.
      Cheers.

      --
      Shh.
    3. Re:Nice... by God+Of+Atheism · · Score: 1

      Something like that it seems, but I understood that fullerenes are not too healthy for you either, although nothing is mentioned about that here. Still, my guess is that an egg-shaped buckyball would be less stable than a sphere-shaped one and thus more easily react with other compounds.

    4. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I feel your pain.. This may help: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/5735

    5. Re:Nice... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      And? Had you read the summary it'd be clear to you we're talking about chemistry and that the pentagon rule obviously refers to the pentagons that appear in fullerenes. Even if you've never seen a fullerene there's the reference to the old football layout.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Nice... by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have a present for you, I've written a greasemonkey script that removes Roland Piquepaille articles from Slashdot. It could probably be used as an Opera userscript, as well, if you don't use Firefox. The first block of code removes section styles, so you don't have to deal with those awful color schemes. But you can just clip that part out if it's not your style.
      // ==UserScript==
      // @name Slashdot Script
      // @namespace None
      // @description None
      // @include http://.slashdot.org/*
      // @include http://slashdot.org/*
      // ==/UserScript==
       
      if(styles=document.getElementsB yTagName('link'))
        for(i=0;i<styles.length;i++){
            attribs=styles[i].getAttribute('href');
            if(attribs.search("slashdot_")>-1)
                styles[i].parentNode.removeChild(styles[i]);
            }
       
      linkArray = document.getElementsByTagName('a');
      if(linkArray)
          for(i=0; i<linkArray.length; i++){
              if(attribs = linkArray[i].getAttribute('href'))
              if(attribs.search("primidi")>-1){
                  targetNode=linkArray[i].parentNode.parentNode.pare ntNode;
                  targetParent=linkArray[i].parentNode.parentNode.pa rentNode.parentNode;
                  targetParent.removeChild(targetNode.nextSibling.ne xtSibling);
                  targetParent.removeChild(targetNode.nextSibling);
                    targetParent.removeChild(targetNode);
                  }
              }
  6. :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Am I the only who chuckled... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    .... when coming across the name of the scientist - Mrs Beavers? The jokes are endless. :)

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    1. Re:Am I the only who chuckled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pretty much are. I think most of the rest of us are over fifteen years old.

    2. Re:Am I the only who chuckled... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      .... when coming across the name of the scientist - Mrs Beavers? The jokes are endless. :)

      Hey, leave Beavers alone, they are Canada's national animal. Though not sure what that means now? :)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  8. Pentagon rules? by SecaKitten · · Score: 1

    Don't tell the Pentagon, or those science guys will be in Guantanamo!

    1. Re:Pentagon rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > Don't tell the Pentagon, or those science guys will be in Guantanamo!

      Totally off topic, but I need to vent. I visited family last week, 3 states away. Got into a conversation with my parents' bush-supporting neighbours about the whole iraq business and got called a conspiracy theorist after mentioning Guantanamo Bay.

      Not because of anything to do with what's happening there, but the neighbours genuinely didn't believe guantanamo existed.

      Ignorance worries me. /rantoveryoumaymodmedownnow

  9. My understanding... by Toba82 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IANAOC (I am not an organic chemist), but the way I see it, previous buckyball compounds needed to have the soccer ball shape because of the number of free electrons in the molecular bond didn't allow the adjacent pentagon structure to exist. Is it possible that the shell may not have a neutral charge? The molecule within could compensate and that might allow this 'impossible' set of bonds to work.

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    1. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      using acronyms doesn't help if you have to explain what it means

    2. Re:My understanding... by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that the shell may not have a neutral charge?

      Certainly possible (IANAOC either) but I'm actually thinking this could also have implications for string theory (a horrible misnomer IMNSHO) if there is no charge as the deformation could then only be explained by the chemically uninvolved contents of the Bucky-egg.

    3. Re:My understanding... by zrobotics · · Score: 3, Informative

      I recently took college chem, and if I recall correctly, 'Buckyballs' can actually be made into tubes, which have been used in some nanotech applications. Geometrically, if you were to take a soccer ball/buckyball, cut it in half along the seams, and then add in alternating rows of hexagons and pentagons, it forms a tube with hemispherical ends. It's hard to explain, but here's a link: http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1295 (sorry, no html).

      Considering the shape of these tubes, I wonder why an egg-shaped buckyball is so odd...it seems like a very short (i.e. 1-2 rows between the ends) buckytube would approximate an egg shape fairly well. If it is truly egg-shaped, then it isn't a buckyball at all as it isn't carbon-60, but rather is another form of carbon with an entirely different bonding pattern.

    4. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to point out that the "tubes" you are referring to are what are more commonly referred to as carbon nanotubes, i.e., the material people are envisioning using for the tether of a space elevator.

    5. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grats, you are the only person in this thread who knows wtf this post is about. "Stuff that matters?"

    6. Re:My understanding... by BKX · · Score: 1

      For future reference, HTML links are easy as balls to write and remember. You just toss in an anchor tag which looks like this (write this down):

      Shit that isn't a link. <a href="http://www.whateverthefuck.com/buttfuck/your ass.html">Link Text Goes Here.</a> More shit that isn't a link.

      Which will look like this on the page (but in the normal font):

      Shit that isn't a link. Link Text Goes Here. More shit that isn't a link.

      See? Now wasn't that easy? In fact, wasn't that less extra typing than your lame apology for not using HTML? (And, yes, you got off light. This isn't 1999. You should know how to write an a tag.)

    7. Re:My understanding... by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just because you don't understand it, it doesn't mean it doesn't matter.

    8. Re:My understanding... by IainMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it's anything to do with charge. Each intersection of the picture of the molecule represents a carbon atom. Even when you break the isolated pentagon rule, each carbon atom is still only connected to 3 other carbon atoms - just like in graphite.

      It's more to do with the angles those bonds are forced to take on by the structure. Having the other elements within the cage will allow different angles to occur.

      Also, I think it's more likely that the chemists involved are inorganic. :-) Fullerenes are just a way of getting them to think about carbon again. ;-)

    9. Re:My understanding... by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      I'm totally getting that domain!

    10. Re:My understanding... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      I think the parent post is more like: "since you're into this stuff, is it real or just horseshit"

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    11. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IANAOC (I am not an organic chemist)


      If you have to explain the acronym, what's the point of using it - or does this clarification that your not an organic engineer come up really really frequently?
    12. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISIDUYA (I'm sorry, I don't understand your acronyms) can you please point me to an acronym reference site? Thanks

    13. Re:My understanding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      set your default posting pref to "Plain Old Text"

      It automagically puts in the line and paragraph breaks + linkifies html for you

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
      "Comment Post Mode" is down at the bottom

    14. Re:My understanding... by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      "Also, I think it's more likely that the chemists involved are inorganic."

      Non carbon based-chemists? linky plz!

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    15. Re:My understanding... by Alchemist253 · · Score: 1

      Yes, IAAOC (I am an organic chemist - or at least a graduate student in organic chemistry at a major research university).

      Charge is not determined merely by the number of bonds/bonded atoms but by the number of lone electrons.

      Sure, carbon typically makes four bonds (e.g. methane [CH4] and carbon dioxide [O=C=O]), but uncharged carbon species exist with fewer bonds. For example, carbon radicals, such as the STABLE triphenylmethyl radical (see, e.g., http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/295/556 1/1846 - registration may be required) exist with three bonds and no charge.

      Synthetic chemists ROUTINELY make use of carbenes, species with only two bonds and no charge. See, for example, the Simmons-Smith cyclopropanation (http://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/s immons-smith-reaction.shtm). (Okay, strictly this reaction probably proceeds by way of a zinc carbenoid intermediate, but you get the idea.)

      I can't comment on the article itself as I haven't read it (too busy to go get the original reference), but I will agree that the summary leaves some to be desired.

    16. Re:My understanding... by ChemGrrl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hi All, This is Christine Beavers... ya know the Mrs. Beavers. The molecule is overall uncharged. The terbuim atoms each carry a 3+, the nitride is a -3, and the fullerene cage itself carries a 6-. I don't endorse the blog, because it does misstate some things, and it is an opinion at the end. Not to mention the copyright infringement of stealing the JACS image, not the one I gave to UCD news.... hmmm I feel compromised... well I sure didn't ask him to write about my paper.

    17. Re:My understanding... by ChemGrrl · · Score: 1
      Ding!

      The cage carries a 6- charge.

      How would I know? see my other reply....

    18. Re:My understanding... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      It's not often we get the actual author here on Slashdot to explain the paper. We usually don't get it until it's been from the scientist to the press-release-writer to the newspaper writer/blogger to the Slashdot summary writer. The actual significance of the paper is often lost along the way (usually as some minor aspect is exaggerated so that the thing seems more earth-shaking).

      So any clarifications straight from the horse's mouth would be greatly appreciated.

    19. Re:My understanding... by ChemGrrl · · Score: 1
      Its really interesting to see that my little JACS communication has grown up. It is not the first example of the Isolated Pentagon rule(IPR) being broken. It isn't even the first crystal structure of a NonIPR fullerene- the first was done by my boss, Marilyn Olmstead, in 2003. The significance was that C84 has been studied, and characterized many times by x-ray crystallography. That a NonIPR cage structure emerged when an IPR cage was predicted was the suprise. That this isomer was made in larger quantities than the IPR isomer that was produced with it was also a suprise. Of course, this is what the paper really comes down to: when we put something into a fullerene, stability rules change. And the distribution of fullerene cages that is created from graphite rods doped with terbium is different from the distribution created from pure graphite. So the metals are influencing the formation of the cages.


      The terbium atoms are in this example stabilizing the pentalene, (the pointy end where the two pentagons are fused) through a pi-bonding interaction similar to those seen in organometallic compounds. this interaction is similar to the other NonIPR structure, which also shows metal-pentalene bonding. So do these interactions drive the formation of the fullerene or are they just an interesting outcome? Thats the question for the future.

      Thanks for listening :)
      Christine

    20. Re:My understanding... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      So do these interactions drive the formation of the fullerene or are they just an interesting outcome?

      How will you go about finding out?

    21. Re:My understanding... by ChemGrrl · · Score: 1

      hehehe, thats one thing we haven't decided on yet. We would have to watch the reaction- and that is something that may be very tricky. I also shouldn't say much, lest we get scooped. But it would involve peeking into the plasma, and seeing what is there with the metals, and what is otherwise.

      Time will tell. But thanks for the question!

  10. The title is confusing... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bob Woodward is coming out with a new book about the Bush Administration, so the Pentagon is laying rotten eggs for everyone to see? No wonder there's so much swamp gas in Washington.

  11. If you add another terbium atom by thewils · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could give it to the Kiwis to play with ;)

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  12. Munchies by yellekc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone one else hungry for the worlds smallest omelet?

  13. Finally! by ZSpade · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that the drive is well underway, how long till they finish the Heart of Gold?

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  14. Lame even for Roland the Plogger by Animats · · Score: 1

    Even for Roland the Plogger, this is lame. Does he pay Slashdot to let him through, or what?

  15. FIFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which both violates some chemistry laws and the FIFA soccer laws which were used until the last World Cup

    Parse error: just too fucking stupid.

    1. Re:FIFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed

  16. nano tubes by Blighten · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is actually a pretty interesting break-through, given that carbon nano-tubes (the discovery of bucky balls lead to the formations of them) are somewhat limited in their capabilities to form certain angles. I'm wondering how stable these 'deformations' are in accord to the whole system... as bucky balls are very stable.

  17. CGB says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst... summary... ever.

  18. Can't wait for the bucky chicken! by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 4, Funny

    But this time we know the egg definitely came first!

  19. Direct link to story by Yetihehe · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  20. The mark of Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He uses the same template for every submission. Look whose blog is the first Google hit for "additional details and references".

    Hey Roland, don't you think it's about time you came up with a new phrase to link? You're in a bit of a rut.

  21. Can we remove Zonk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just noticing I don't like this anymore. Can his stuff be filtered or removed permanantly?

  22. Am I one of the few that at least sorta understood by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, no I didn't RTFA. Oh ya, and I can't guarantee anybody will understand this (even the people that know what buckyballs are) since I'm by no means a chemist, physicist, etc, and therefore there is a good chance I haven't got a clue what I'm talking about... you have been warned...

    Am I one of the few that at least sorta understood?

    Just myself being a nerd and having one day randomly stumbled upon "Buckyballs" (Buckminsterfullerene - and this was actually before Wikipedia). If I remember right, the stuff is basically a bunch of carbon atoms arranged in hex shapes, then the edges of the hex's are stuck together and wrapped up to make a ball. Since the hex's are pretty much perfectly symetrical, the ball oughta stick together fairly evenly and make, for the most part, a perfect sphere.

    This is where the article starts to mean something, because the buckyball they produced broke that perfect sphere, so I would assume either the side(s) of some of the hex's are longer than other sides on those hex's, or some of the side's are not connected at the vertices

  23. yay Davis :D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay for UCD :D! boo for a miserable blog that never mentions why the pentagon has issiues with anything. again Cool science discovery and yay UCD :D!.

  24. Ba-a-a-a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you capitalize "administration" like that, you look like a sheep. Stop it.

    1. Re:Ba-a-a-a by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I wonder why Anonymous Cowards have this fascination with sheep? Either they can't sleep or they're thinking of their girlfriends out on the farm.

    2. Re:Ba-a-a-a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hook line & sinker

  25. Re:My understanding... (iaaoc) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i refuse to give roland any clickthroughs and thus didn't read the story but i do large molecule chemical research for a living so i have an idea what's going on here. you are on-target, any disparity in symmetry of a buckyball will cause odd strains to occur in the lattice which will surely cause a correspondingly non-symmetrical charge distribution on the molecule surface. the resulting charge separation may not qualify according to the classical definition of a 'polar molecule' but a dipole would be observed which would probably cause the molecules to mostly align at some lowered temperature similar to the molecular arrangement which occurs in an LCD display. as such, i would expect some charge separation on the surface but would not expect the molecule to maintain a non-neutral charge as a whole. Further, trapped molecules will no doubt respond to the native surface charge distribution but also note that thermal energy will also cause the trapped molecule(s) to likewise interact with the bulk carbon surface which will also affect surface charge.

  26. ain't really laws then are they? by Delusionist · · Score: 1

    If they were such great "laws" then I guess they aren't really laws if they were broken and thus been proven wrong eh? ;)
    I think they'd be better off calling them "hypothesis" or "theories" then since they obviously aren't "laws"... :P

    1. Re:ain't really laws then are they? by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.

    2. Re:ain't really laws then are they? by tenco · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's chemistry! What do you expect?

  27. Stupid title, summary, and link... by posterlogo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...Basically, the unholy trifecta which sucked the soul out of the original discovery made here. Bravo Slashdot, bravo.

    1. Re:Stupid title, summary, and link... by N.+P.+Coward · · Score: 0

      I have often in the past wondered what all the Piquepaille hubub was about. The implication that the Pentagon (U.S. Military) is governed by mere "rules" while FIFA (soccer) clearly makes immutable "Laws"? Now it's clear and and y'all were right.

  28. None, for it is all about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists have come up with a new way to celebrate Zombie-Christ Day.

    Buckyegg hunts! Coming next Easter to a college physics lab near you!

    1. Re:None, for it is all about... by Punt3r · · Score: 1

      No, no... you must study Political Science.

      "A. Buckyegg Breaks Pentagon Rules" ... I'm positive from the article title that it's a story about a rogue Pentagon insider. Of course I haven't read the article or summary yet.

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
  29. Re:Am I one of the few that at least sorta underst by bladesjester · · Score: 3, Informative

    Buckyballs are made of pentegon and hexagon formations of carbon atoms (look at a soccer ball. same basic pattern). What's different here is that two of the pentagons are touching, which scientists previously thought could not happen.

    I first learned about buckyballs in my college chem classes back in 98 or 99 so I thought this article was actually pretty interesting.

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  30. Buckyegg: by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    "Not suitable for children under the age of 3, contains small parts that can be inhaled or swallowed"

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:Buckyegg: by AllahsAvatar · · Score: 1

      Do not taunt buckyegg!!

      --
      No sig for you! Come back, one year!
  31. Unpredictable by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

    I find it funny that this unexpected and unpredicted result came from experiments attempting to find more predictable ways of making fullerenes.

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  32. article link & text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.las so?id=7891

    E-mail this story
    Printable version
    Improbable "Buckyegg" Hatched

    September 28, 2006
            graphic: purple and blue balls inside an egg-shaped structure
            Buckyegg (Christine Beavers/graphic)

    An egg-shaped fullerene, or "buckyball egg" has been made and characterized by chemists at UC Davis, Virginia Tech and Emory and Henry College, Va. The unexpected discovery opens new possibilities for structures for fullerenes, which could have a wide range of uses.

    "It was a total surprise," said Christine Beavers, a chemistry graduate student working with Professors Alan Balch and Marilyn Olmstead at UC Davis. Beavers is first author on the paper, published this month in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

    Fullerenes, sometimes called "buckyballs," are usually spherical molecules of carbon, named after the futurist R. Buckminster Fuller, inventor of the geodesic dome. The carbon atoms are arranged in pentagons and hexagons, so their structures can resemble a soccer ball. An important rule -- until now -- is that no two pentagons can touch, but are always surrounded by hexagons.

    The "buckyegg" compound was made by collaborating scientists at Virginia Tech, led by Professor Harry Dorn. They heated a mixture of carbon and other ingredients under special conditions to make a mixture of fullerenes, then shipped the products to UC Davis, where Balch's group worked on characterizing their structures.

    When Beavers started to map out the structure, she found two pentagons next to each other, making the pointy end of the egg. Initially she thought that the results were a mistake, but she showed the data to Marilyn Olmstead, an expert on X-ray crystallography, and they decided that the results were real. The egg contains a molecule of triterbium nitride inside.

    The experiment was actually part of a project to find new, more predictable ways to make fullerenes, Beavers said. The researchers were trying to make fullerenes with atoms of terbium, a metal from the lanthanide series of the periodic table, trapped inside. Metals similar to terbium are used as contrast agents for some medical scanning procedures. By putting these metals inside fullerenes, the researchers hope to make compounds that could be both medically useful and well-tolerated in the body.

    The other authors on the research paper are Tianming Zuo and Kim Harich at Virginia Tech and James Duchamp at Emory and Henry College. Funding was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

  33. How stable is this? by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like there's a lot of internal energy in such a system, especially when there is something inside. Couldn't you do some neat energy tricks with this?

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:How stable is this? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      If you trap a metallic molecule inside, maybe it'll bounce around inside the cage and generate a miniscule magnetic field?

      Aside from that, well, the point of carbon bonds is that they're stable, yeah? So it's like asking if you can do a lot of tricks with a rock laying on the ground. The answer is, "not so many."

      Unless it's a pet rock, in which case it can "stay!" pretty good.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  34. Old news? by bahco · · Score: 1

    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=48 dated 11-22-00, 10:15 PM. Just Google for 'buckyballs Breaks Pentagon Rules' ... ;-]

    Funny thing is that searching Google News for 'buckyballs Breaks Pentagon Rules' has the link http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=368 (Slashdotted?) mentioned in the article as its one and only result.

    --
    -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.8 m/s^2.
  35. Oops, WTF is that?! by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    TFA: The experiment was actually part of a project to find new, more predictable ways to make fullerenes

    ...and then this happens. Back to the drawing-board, guys!

    I guess that's the nature of science, though - it's the surprises that are most interesting.

  36. Stupid blogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A link that links to a link that links to a link, which has "DIGG THIS!!!!" in screaming letters at the top? Could this be even more pathetic? Why doesn't slashdot just link to the actual story rather than letter other people generate ad revenue?

    And, a wonderful statement "The carbon cage has a distinct egg shape due to the presence of a single pair of fused pentagons at one apex of the molecule,". Yet this picture, shows it from the side so you can't even tell what the hell they're talking about! Good job!

  37. Re:Am I one of the few that at least sorta underst by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just to let you know, I did not read your comment. Tht makes us even/

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  38. Another Accidental Discovery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you love science?
    Especially when the discovery is accidental?

    I'm sure this won't be the first one, nor will it be the last one.

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/cancer/discoveries.ht ml

  39. Nice picture. by wkitchen · · Score: 1
    > west
    You have entered the laboratory.
    > look
    There is an image of the buckyegg here.
    There is a door to the east.
    > _
  40. An appropriate response.. by Frightening · · Score: 1

    ..is hard to put in words.

    First you have a very informative title, which got me wondering what kind of assasin/agent/geek would call himself buckyballs and annoy the Pentagon.
    Then I got hit by this Jewel:

    Chemists from Virginia and California have cooked a soup of fullerenes which produced an improbable buckyegg.
    and I felt like a new man. There's a name for this kind of catch-phrase whoring, I just can't remember it right now.

    Then I realised it wasn't over yet. submitter was just getting warmed up. Fifa, eggs (get it? balls and eggs?) and plenty more to come. All you have to do is follow the link to..you guessed it! Roland's blog!

    I'm sorry, but trolling becomes mandatory in these circumstances. If we don't troll insightfully, what meaning does democracy have?
    LAME

  41. Pedantic mode on.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the egg came first. Dinosaurs were laying eggs long before there were chickens. And they weren't even the first.

  42. Sounds like Nanotech by xate · · Score: 1

    I don't want any nano molecule cages floating around in my blood stream. Cancer could only get worse with wierd stuff like this in medical use, right?

    1. Re:Sounds like Nanotech by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You're right. In fact, you should cleanse yourself of all the weird nano-cages floating around in your blood stream. Like hemoglobin, for instance.

  43. What do you think they'll be useful for? by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    No offense to PHDs involved, but wouldn't the eggs be very useful because of their inherent lack of symmetry, similarly to how water is useful because one side is very electro-negative? Depending on the properties of the contained metal, I imagine the eggs would produce very similar effects.

    1. Re:What do you think they'll be useful for? by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

      They could also be very strong, given their egg shape. That would make them great for the leading edges of certain types of probes and other-pressure/impact-prone devices.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  44. Bucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bucky! Captain Bucky O'Hare!

  45. Roland, everybody is bored of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you keep posting inane shit. Nobody cares, and everybody hates you. Hands up who likes Roland.

    1. Re:Roland, everybody is bored of you. by chawly · · Score: 1

      I, for one, have my hands in my pockets

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  46. Re:Am I one of the few that at least sorta underst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just so you know, no I didn't RTFA.

    Obviously.

    Am I one of the few that at least sorta understood?

    No you are not.

    Everybody has the right to be "stupid"...
    Some people just tend to abuse that right.

    Oh the irony!

  47. AC 16257181 and #900691, get back to work! by NRAdude · · Score: 0
    I make my living doing nano/bio/chemical research in one of the well-known universities and read slashdot to keep up with more computer-related things. Please let me be the first to agree that Roland is uniquely unqualified to write/post the stories he does.

    (yes I did research his background some time ago when I was first offended by his scientific wannabee-ness)

    Roland submits fine articles and his summaries are no worse than anything else I read here. I visit his site frequently. I have a hard time believing he generates much cash from slashdot. If he does, kudos to him. I've clicked on about 5 adds total in the last 12 years.


    Hey guys, what a coincidence that so-many degreed people attend this forum. Maybe it's because were much too smartest to be hired?
    I'm a clevel 77 Engineer in the Temple of Slashdot.
    I look to my feet to find some -- something near my RedWings(tm), and see an inscription in the sand that reads;
      Rp#4nd 9iguepa!(e 1s a fag! P0M"T Cl1ck }-{!s articl3,

    Just as I looked above, I saw a gruesome zonk. I drew my credentials from my o-pee-chee and quickly pulled the red-pen from my vest, vut it wast too laate. The zonk whipered the image in the sand, preventing its knowledge to ever be known to fellow servants in the Temple of Slashdot to learn the Article-Moderation skill that could out-cast authors of a Article before it reaches front-page. At this, zonk laughed: "heee heee he got you good and square, heeeeee" and then I thrust my pen deep into his eye. Immediatly, zonk fell as an uprouted tree whence I used my WendorWoman lasso to hoist him to the ceiling by his ankles (too empty his, uhm, pockettes). After some vigorous search, I found the Amullette of Yendor!

    The end.

    Now get back TO WORK!
    --
    without prejudice
  48. Let's review the letter "S" by boyfaceddog · · Score: 3, Informative

    "pentagon rules" are rules made by the Pentagon and miscapitalized.
    "pentagon rule" is a rule about pentagon shapes.

    "Editor" is a person who knows the difference.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  49. WTF? by dthree · · Score: 1

    What does this have to do with FIFA?

    --
    "I forgot my mantra."
    1. Re:WTF? by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      The buckyballs look very much like an official soccer ball, hence the reference to FIFA (the official body regulating soccer).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:WTF? by dthree · · Score: 1

      Oh, here I thought it was something other than a silly joke.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  50. Breaking the pentagram releases the demons! by m0llusk · · Score: 1

    Scientists should have to read the Necronomicon before they start tampering with this kind of stuff.

  51. Re:Am I one of the few that at least sorta underst by Rockin'Robert · · Score: 1

    There are several versions of 'Buckyballs' that are not spheroid - due to 'bands' of atoms that configure into other shapes. Like, say, a 'belt', on a baloon - 'elongating' what began as a sphere.

  52. Or maybe you need a dictionary by p3d0 · · Score: 1
    There are lots of definitions of the word "law", such as #12 here:
    a. A statement describing a relationship observed to be invariable between or among phenomena for all cases in which the specified conditions are met: the law of gravity.
    b. A generalization based on consistent experience or results: the law of supply and demand.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  53. They should be called 'Cluckyballs' by photomic · · Score: 1

    NT bwahahaha

  54. Usefulness by phorm · · Score: 1

    So the question I would pose is: Is this just a scientific interest, or is a buckyball/buckyegg that doesn't following the pentagonal rules more useful (easier to produce, different/useful properties, etc) in some way than the regular variety of buckyball?