Slashdot Mirror


Using Electricity to Heal

ganjadude writes to tell us that while the idea of using electricity to heal wounds was first reported 150 years ago by Emil Du Bois-Reymond, modern scientists may have found a way to practically apply this idea. From the article: "The researchers grew layers of mouse cells and larger tissues, such as corneas, in the lab. After 'wounding' these tissues, they applied varying electric fields to them, and found they could accelerate or completely halt the healing process depending on the orientation and strength of the field."

200 comments

  1. 1.21 gigawatts by lecithin · · Score: 4, Funny

    After 'wounding' these tissues, they applied varying electric fields to them, and found they could accelerate or
    completely halt the healing process depending on the orientation and strength of the field.

    "Hey Marty, lets start out with 1.21 gigawatts right about... Here."

    "Interesting. It looks like that stopped the healing process."

    "Hello... McFly?"

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:1.21 gigawatts by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, in this case, it would be McMouse, not McFly. Get your animals right. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:1.21 gigawatts by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Funny

      And for those less technically oriented..that's pronouced "JIGGA-watts"

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    3. Re:1.21 gigawatts by x2A · · Score: 1

      or "jy-gga", as in "gigantic", where the term apparently came from.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    4. Re:1.21 gigawatts by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      just don't do this while in a car going 88 MPH

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:1.21 gigawatts by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      And for those less technically oriented..that's pronouced "JIGGA-watts"

      That's only what the marketing people say to fool you into thinking you are getting more watts than you really do.

      If you want to be technically correct you would use the ISO standard and say, "JEBI-watts."

    6. Re:1.21 gigawatts by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      If you're going to use Jigga-watts, you should remain consistent with the dialect and use "orientated" as well. (Erk.)

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  2. I'm shocked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shocked, I tell you!

  3. Hey guys... by plutonium83 · · Score: 1

    ... watch this!
    *sticks finger in socket*
    NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Hey guys... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Well, the good news is that if you had cancer, you've stopped it from spreading.

    2. Re:Hey guys... by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no! If you want to do the redneck thing right, the correct quote is, "Hey guys! Hold my beer a moment while I show you something cool!"

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Hey guys... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1
      jeeze man, get the vernacular right. A redneck would never say "a moment." The following would be more... appropriate:

      Hey'all! Hold mah beer, big Jim. I'm a-gunna show ya sumpin cool!

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    4. Re:Hey guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. Did he tell us he was hardcore first?

    5. Re:Hey guys... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, you're being far too verbose. The correct usage is:

      Hey y'all! Watch this!

      Should you ever hear such a statement, please be sure to run away as quickly as you can.

    6. Re:Hey guys... by binary+paladin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey y'all! Watch this!

      I have a sick feeling in my gut that those are going to be my not so famous last words.

  4. Magnets by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    Maybe those people (idots) who kept strapping magnets to themselves knew something after all. Although given the findings it seems equally likely that they were impairing the healing process. (yes, I know the article is about electricity, electro-magnetism people)

    1. Re:Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are right about electromagnetism, but only in regards to Moving Magnets.

      A stationary magnet does not create an electric field. And since everything is relative, Wearing a magnet on your wrist makes it stationary in comparison to your wrist, thus wearing magnets is pointless. QED.

    2. Re:Magnets by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blood keeps flowing though your hand, though.

    3. Re:Magnets by aditi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ... "And since everything is relative, Wearing a magnet on your wrist makes it stationary in comparison to your wrist, thus wearing magnets is pointless. QED. "

      Actually, no. While it is true that the magnet is stationary w.r.t your wrist (or whichever part of your body), it is not stationary with respect to the moving ions that make up the electric current within the cells. The presence of the magnetic field will deflect the charges according to a force F = Charge * Field x Velocity. Charges coming in from further away might get deflected away from their original destination, allegedly altering the healing process.

      So wearing magnets might not be pointless.

    4. Re:Magnets by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      I think they were just fucking with the Iron in their blood, and getting a pleceabo (sp) effect.

    5. Re:Magnets by idonthack · · Score: 1

      It's not a placebo if it actually does something.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    6. Re:Magnets by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A shade of experience might come in handy. I was researching a lot of stuff involving magnets for issues of motors etc. I had no interest in Magnetic Therapy though I had heard of it for years. I generally regarded it to be a bit silly.

      Then one day my 81 year old mother with 3 fractures in her left lower leg and diabetes who had been told she would never walk again called me because her leg was swollen about 2 times its normal size. I came over to help her as best I could. On a wild chance I placed 2 magnets on her leg. It was just to see what would happen. In about 60 seconds the swelling was gone! (That doesn't happen with the best of drugs folks!) After 1 week of exposure to the magnets, X-Rays showed a leg that had not healed at all in 3 months to have the region near where the magnet was, completely healed fracture and all. More astounding was seeing the X-Ray! It showed the calcification in her Osteoporosis (Ghost Bone)to be fully restored in that area about the size of a soft ball where the magnet was kept on her leg. After that we moved magnets to cover her other fracture locations. In 4 weeks they were healed. The neuropathy she has (Pain from nerve regrowth patterns and IDDM) is only successfully relieved by magnets. Drugs don't do it.

      I went looking hard into the physics of how this works. Here is the process. There is a derivation of the Maxwell Equations that states Force = B field squared times the Area / the universal magnetic constant. Since Area and the constant drop out under normal conditions the Force = B Squared. The Mitochondria of the Cells (Energy Power house of the cells) are small DC motors and their efficiency goes up if their magnets are stronger. Adding an external field adds to the B field and thus squares the sum as the power of the mitochondria. But it was even more. Since 1799 it has been known that transmutation (fusion for you physics types) is done in living things. Chickens in Wales were found putting out more Calcium than they were eating. This has since been validated extensively including 2 Nobel Prizes and work done by the US Army and by the French nuclear agency. The mitochondria of the cells does this transmutation. This means that they are small particle accelerators with microscopic "Wiggler" magnet sets. Adding an external field strengthens them. As such the cells can do their work more effectively this way.

      The pain relief therefore from magnets isn't like standard medical drug pain relief where we suppress a function. Rather a magnet relieves pain, and I now know it with my arthritic back, by causing damaged cells that are weak and which might cause pain by disintergration to be able to accelerate their function and recover. This in medicine is the magic pill that doesn't do wrong. It is real. I know about this healing ability personally from my mother as well as myself. I kicked a toe and injured it severely. One night with a magnet taped to it and it healed.

      Why then all the discussion if it works? It is quite simple. We didn't have good strong magnets until recently the therapy was unreliable because it diminishes by the inverse square law in distance and the old magnets had no range. The new N-50 magnets have the range. The ones I was using have a 200 gauss field at over 4 inches away. Point blank they have 14,700 gauss and are massively powerful. Also most experiments have not been sized to the test subjects.

      Now just some pure physics stuff for people out there: There is absolutely no difference between a permanent magnet and an induced one. All magnets are already resident in the media and induced ones are merely aimed in response to the external field. All magnets do represent strong electrical currents. The ones I am using for therapy would correspond to approximately 1 hp of current driving an induced magnet. The process by which a magnet works is that it is a diode in the ether. I know the Einstein types out there don't believe in the ether. They also don't know how a magnet works. They

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    7. Re:Magnets by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      A placebo can make people think that something is happening even if no actual physical changes are happening, which is most likely what these magnets do for these people that want to believe. So, if you replaced the magnents and put non-magnetic material in their places, I bet most of the people wouldn't know the difference, the people that would notices would be the ones who somehow notices that the magenets arn't doing anything to any metal they come in contact with.

    8. Re:Magnets by Secrity · · Score: 1

      All of the magnetic bracelets that I have seen are not intended to be stationary on the wrist, and unless they are too tight, they are free to move about on the wrist. The motion of the wrist is sufficient to power an automatic wristwatch and I would expect that the magnets in a magnetic bracelet, moving in relation to the wrist, could generate small electrical fields.

    9. Re:Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talk about a powerful placebo!

    10. Re:Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above post was Moderated at 70% 'Interesting' and 30% 'Funny' ...

      The question I have is were the 30% of the people moderating it as Funny modding the post or were they modding the 70% of the people that modded it as interesting?

      I guess, technically, the post could be considered Interesing in the same way that watching a magic show is interesting. Perhaps I'm out of line commenting on the lunacy of the modders.

    11. Re:Magnets by ultranova · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mitochondria of the Cells (Energy Power house of the cells) are small DC motors and their efficiency goes up if their magnets are stronger.

      You had me going up to this point. How about the rest of you ?

      And shame on the people who moderated this "Interesting", apparently not even noticing anything odd with this passage:

      . Since 1799 it has been known that transmutation (fusion for you physics types) is done in living things. Chickens in Wales were found putting out more Calcium than they were eating. This has since been validated extensively including 2 Nobel Prizes and work done by the US Army and by the French nuclear agency. The mitochondria of the cells does this transmutation. This means that they are small particle accelerators with microscopic "Wiggler" magnet sets.

      You really didn't notice anything strange with this ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:Magnets by Porktastic · · Score: 1

      Is Chi Chi there at your computer, threatening you with his putter?

    13. Re:Magnets by woztheproblem · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I know the Einstein types out there don't believe in the ether. They also don't know how a magnet works.

      Are you trying to insult people by comparing them to Einstein?

      Let me know how that strategy works...

    14. Re:Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmutating Chickens? lol! I think that was on an episode of Lost in Space.

      I love it when funny posts get moderated to interesting. And I thought he did a hell of a job making this especially ridiculous. Either that, or electricity/magnets & the human body brings out all the wackos.

    15. Re:Magnets by thePig · · Score: 1
      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    16. Re:Magnets by BOUND4DOOM · · Score: 1

      Actually despite what some of the other might say I do have to agree with you and only from my own experiences. I was also very skeptical of magnets. I also still do not believe the magnetic bracelets either as there are a lot of fake ones out there. However my experiences with it. I sprained my ankle, and very bad, a class 4 sprain. Any of you know that with a bad sprain you get a lot of swelling you have to ice it several times a day. You have to massage it. Your range of motion is shot and well it takes time to heal. Do even told me at least a month if not 2 months to get rid of most pain and swelling then a little longer to get range of motion back. 2 week after the sprain a friend of mine suggested a ankle magnet, which really looked kind of like a brace, which I could wear under my air cast and best thing he had one from an ankle injury a year prior so he lent it to me to try out. So being skeptical I said sure, what did I have to loose. Next day he brought it to me in the morning, I wore it to work then home and when I got home from work I went to do the normal ritual and get out bags of ice and ice the foot again. However when I took the sock off, the swelling was completely gone and I had very little pain. It was still stiff and range of motion was bad. So I continued to wear it some days in a rush I would leave for work and forget it, I would come home and it would be a little swollen. Put the magnet on and couple hours later all swelling was gone. So it was doing something. What I do not know. But the sprain healed faster than the doctor ever believed it could. He was quite astounded. Now, it wasn't like a miracle cure I still had to get my range of motion back through stretching exercises and so on but it did help heal it in some way. I am still skeptical and unsure about it even though it worked on me. However, I am not about to go out and sprain another ankle to test it out. But my friend only gave it to me because it worked very fast for him in what was a very bad injury as well stopping all swelling. Later I talked to someone that had more of an explanation of how the magnets worked. They work roughly the same as ultrasound, no not the type to see inside your, a pulsing energy used by physical therapist in hospitals around the world. The magnetic field increased the blood flow to the injured area bring the cells needed to repair the damage. So you can believe it if you want. I also think maybe daily use bracelets are a crackpot thing. However I do believe there may be something to helping heal serious injuries.

    17. Re:Magnets by Bahumat · · Score: 1

      I ought to be modded Redundant for this...

      But you sir, are a quack, a charlatan, and a fraud, and I explicitly accuse you of vested interests in the trade and sale of medically unapproved faux-"therapies". Additionally, you deserve a right rap on the Jack Johnson!

      --
      "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
    18. Re:Magnets by thePig · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I wasnt able to reach the link you proposed?
      Some spelling mistake ?

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  5. How fun by Alyks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when we cut our fingers building computers, we can just electocute ourselfs with the power cables!

    1. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then we could read a book on general spelling and grammar.

    2. Re:How fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you meant electrocure?

  6. Magnet_therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that Magnet therapy has a grain of truth in it?

    1. Re:Magnet_therapy? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Sounds like megnet therapy would cause more harm than good. If red blood cells have iron in them, I can imagine megnets causing them to clot. Sounds bad...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Magnet_therapy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Sounds like megnet therapy would cause more harm than good. If red blood cells have iron in them, I can imagine megnets causing them to clot. Sounds bad...

      The iron in blood is not large enough to have magnetic domains. If it were, you wouldn't just have to take off your watch when you got a MRI, you'd have to drain your blood, too. The only way wearing magnets would cause blood to clot would be if you wore spiky magnets that pokes holes in your skin, or maybe if they cut off your circulation. You have clearly watched X-Men too many times.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Magnet_therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so much. Hemoglobin in blood, when oxygenated, is diamagnetic (what anyone who isn't a physicist would call "non-magnetic," like water). When it's deoxygenated, it's slightly paramagnetic, meaning it'll weakly align with an externally applied field. Nothing dangerous. In fact, it's this phenomenon that is responsible for the usefulness of functional MRI to map areas of the brain as oxygen demand changes over time.

      A rather good thing, actually.

    4. Re:Magnet_therapy? by fmoliveira · · Score: 1

      In x-men that iron in the guard's blood was not only the iron normally found on blood. He had iron injected into him when he was unconscious.

  7. Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once doctors are using guided electric fields to assist healing, how will corporations which spill uncontrolled electric fields among people deny that their fields affect human tissue? Or will they just claim credit for the healing "they've already been offering free for generations", and start tacking a medical charge on our bills?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Power Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It figures that the bozos at New Scientist, by confusing "electric fields" with "electric currents", would prompt comments like this. EM radiation from wireless sources consists of orthogonal electric and magnetic fields which are as different from DC currents, physically speaking, as you could possibly imagine.

      This sort of journalism is exactly why I no longer subscribe to New Scientist. They don't appear to give a crap about the "science" part.

    2. Re:Power Insurance by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      What happens when such an electric field intersects a conductor?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I can possibly imagine neutron-degenerate matter near 0' Kelvin, which is more different than DC than is an electric field.

      And I know that DC is electrons moving in a conductor under the influence of an electric field.

      Maybe you should drop such aspirations as reading _New Scientist_ and instead catch up on basic electromagnetics.

      And try getting a userID when throwing around baseless insults that betray your ignorance. It makes it easier to distinguish your unique style from the others.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Power Insurance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      What happens when such an electric field intersects a conductor?

      This question does not particularly make sense. I can tell you that as a magnetic field passes through a conductor, it induces a current, if that helps any :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Power Insurance by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I had a hard time wording it in a meaningful way, but you get my point. I'm not one of those whackos that things 3 milligauss is a "safe limit" for magnetic fields, but it's hard to say that electric and magnetic fields have no potential effects (gah punny).

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Power Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a hint, Tesla: an electric field is a potential gradient, nothing more. It requires no moving charge carriers. An electric current is what you have when electrons are actually being transported across a medium or membrane.

      To be fair to New Scientist, it looks like the Nature authors made the same mistake. What can you say... we're not dealing with actual engineers in either case.

    7. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Look, Edison, the currents in the article have electric fields, as do all currents, DC included. As I noted, as I cited. I said there are fields, you said "no, just currents", which is wrong. Pack it in.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Power Insurance by Eivind · · Score: 1
      There couldn't *possibly* be a difference between having electricity sent trough your tissues (as happens if you hold on to two bare ends of live wire) and having electricity flowing trough a wire in the proxomity of your tissues, thus subjecting said tissues to an electric field.

      Now could there ?

      Fact is, we've experimentally raised mice in literally 1000 times the field you'll ever experience -- with no measurable effect whatsoever. This ain't proof that there *is* no effect. But if it was hugely harmful, you'd expect to start seeing peer-reviewed experiments showing it by now. It's not as if living close to electrical wires is all that new a phenomenon anymore.

    9. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Of course there's a difference. Current through your tissues exposes your tissues to both current and field.

      I didn't say it was "hugely harmful", you did; that's the standard "excluded middle" hyperbole people use in denial of other effects. Fact is, electrical fields have been tested experimentally to affect growing tissues subtly, like guiding the new matrix of healing bone. And people living close to electrical wires has been accompanied by all kinds of health problems. That's why I want to see the kind of peer-reviewed longitudinal study to which you allude. A much bigger factor in why we don't expect to see such a study despite the large potential risk is that the industry is so profitable and powerful. Like cellphone radiation, which has no conclusive harm studies, but has been widespread for decades.

      The fact that you've actually done an experiment, yet get the first logical part of your complaint in this post wrong, and are naive enough to dismiss the status quo as if the world worked logically, shows the lack of rigor even among the people who could do the research. FWIW, I ran a controlled experiment on a dozen mice exposed to incremental x-ray doses extending thousands of times past the legal limit. Observed 3 generations for any physical effects. Saw none. Yet the damaging effects of that radiation is well documented, dating from before the establishment of a hugely powerful industry. That doesn't mean that I am corrupt, deluded or naive. It just means that these effects are statistical and probably subtle, though real.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Power Insurance by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Yes people living close to electrical wires has been accompanied by all kinds of health problems.

      But that includes EVERY SINGLE PERSON LIVING IN AN ELCTRIFIED HOUSE.

      The current from a standard washing machine creates electrical fields FAR stronger than those from transmission wires. And they are FAR close to you.

      The health problems experienced by people living near high power electrical transmission wires have been repeatedly found to be NO different than people living in unwired shacks.

      Electricity can and does effect the body. So does heat and acid. But low levels do not have adverse effects, just like low levels of heat and acid don't have an effect. As the field strength represents loss (i.e. the more powerfull tha field created, the more it costs the electricity company to send the electricity over that distance), electrical companies transmit their power in such a way that the field strength is WAY too low to cause damage.

      There HAVE been serious studies done, but they show no health effects.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    11. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I produced a bibliographical research report in college (nominally for an aquatic ecology course for my major) on interaction between electric fields and tissue growth. The only serious research that had been performed (late 1980s) was by the Japanese nuclear power industry, on clogging cooling ducts in which power cables were also routed. They found that the fields dramatically increased growth of various species. The American and global power industries had produced no (or too few to notice) peer-revieewed research in the preceeding century on the subject, either ecologically on whole organisms or populations, or physiologically on animal tissues. Since then I have kept tabs on the research, as well as that by mobile phone companies.

      I have not seen these "serious studies [that] show no health effects" which you insist have been done. I have seen studies showing bone growth directly affected by electric fields. I have seen some studies showing human tissue damage from cell phones/towers, including some featured on Slashdot this year. I have also seen news reports, not yet studied, of severe effects on people's health from other radio deployments, like recent illness in Scandanavia immediately after deploying a WiMAX test in their small town.

      So let's see some of these conclusive studies that you insist exist. I'd love to know I'm safe as these fields are increasingly deployed, decreasingly regulated, everywhere in the world.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Power Insurance by adrenalinerush · · Score: 1

      Once doctors are using guided electric fields to assist healing, how will corporations which spill uncontrolled electric fields among people deny that their fields affect human tissue?

      Easy. They'll cite the mounds and mounds of research that has already been done on the topic and shown no effect. Just because researchers are able to produce an effect with specially crafted fields doesn't mean that all fields will have an effect.

    13. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You should read the other replies to my comment before you post your redundant one. While you're at it, try reading my replies that debunk your assertion.

      Since you have company in your redundancy, I guess I've got my answer to how corporations will deny.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Power Insurance by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Look, Edison, the currents in the article have electric fields, as do all currents, DC included. As I noted, as I cited. I said there are fields, you said "no, just currents", which is wrong. Pack it in.

      Actually, the current doesn't have an electric field. The individual charged particles who's movement the current is do (altought the fields propably end up cancelling each other out), but the fact that they're moving doesn't make the field any different than if they were staying still (but it does cause a magnetic field to appear).

      Now, the reason these particles are moving is likely that there's an electric field (potential difference) in the area they happen to be located in, and it causes a force to act on them (but it could also be a changing magnetic field - that's why moving a magnet next to a wire inducts a current in the wire, and is how generators work); but that field is the cause and not a result of the current (and in fact the current flows in such a direction as to lessen the potential difference and therefore destroy the field), so saying that the current has an electric field is misleading at the very least.

      Anonymous Edison is right and you are wrong.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    15. Re:Power Insurance by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What happens when such an electric field intersects a conductor?

      When an electromagnetic wave (which is what the parent described and I assume you meant) intersects a conducter, in induces a alternating current in it. This current corresponds to the wave, which in turn corresponds to the original electric disturbance which created it.

      This is how radio and (air-wave) television work. And mobile phones, walkie-talkies, and some remote controls (the ones with an antenna sticking out of them; the ones with a diode use infrared, which is also electromagnetic radiation but is usually generated and received somewhat differently).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    16. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, you've got it wrong. The charged particles (like electrons) move in a current because of the electric field. They don't just "happen" to be located in them - there's a causal relationship, as you state. Saying "the current has an electric field" doesn't mean the current produces the electric field, just that they're associated. I have not claimed what you are denying.

      As I've been saying so often in this thread, including in my direct dismissal of Anonymous Edison, the current's presence always means an electric field is present. AE tried to deny that, so they're wrong. You have inverted my argument, and thereby pronounced AE right. That's pretty far from the reality.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Power Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, doctors which start investigating this kind of medicine soon
      discover just how small the frequencies and currents involved are, start
      (justifiably) railing against the power companies and wireless companies, and
      then have all of their funding mysteriously disappear. Robert Becker was
      studying precisely these kinds of things up until the early 80's when his
      questioning of high-tension powerlines and the Navy's use of ELF antennas got
      his funding cut off.

      Try reading his book "Cross Currents" for more info.

    18. Re:Power Insurance by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah.

      I wasn't asking for a grade-school lesson on RF. I was making a point with a rhetorical question.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    19. Re:Power Insurance by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Informative reply.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    20. Re:Power Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look here:

      http://newton.nap.edu/books/0309054478/html/1.html

      and here

      http://infoventures.com/emf/federal/gao/health/gao ch1.html

      and read the following:

      Ahlbom, E Cardis et al: Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and health. Environ Health Perspect 109:911-933, 2001.

      KR Foster et al: Weak electromagnetic fields and cancer In the context of risk assessment. Proc IEEE 85:733-746, 1997.

      JE Moulder: Power-frequency fields and cancer. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 26:1-116, 1998.

      BE Butterworth et al: A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments. Cancer Letters 93:129-146, 1995.

      GM Williams et al: Epigenetic carcinogens: evaluation and risk assessment. Exper Toxicol Pathol 48:189-195, 1996.

      M Mevissen et al: Study on pineal function and DMBA-induced breast cancer formation in rats during exposure to a 100-mG, 50-HZ magnetic field. J Toxicol Environ Health 48:169-185, 1996.

      LB Sasser et al: Exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields does not alter clinical progression of LGL leukemia in Fischer rats. Carcinogenesis 17:2681-2687, 1996.

      JE Morris, LB Sasser et al: Clinical progression of transplanted large granular lymphocytic leukemia in Fischer 344 rats exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromag 20:48-56, 1999.

        L Devevey, C Patinot et al: Absence of the effects of 50Hz magnetic fields on the progression of acute myeloid leukaemia in rats. Int J Radiat Biol 76:853-862, 2000

      LE Anderson, JE Morris et al: Large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukemia in rats exposed to intermittent 60 Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromag 22:185-193, 2001.

      YL Zhao, PG Johnson et al: Increased DNA synthesis in INIT/10T1/2 cells after exposure to a 60 Hz magnetic field: A magnetic-field or a thermal effect? Radiat Res 151:201-208, 1999.

      I like that one the best. Both exposing to magnetic field and PRETENDING to expose to a field had the same result.

      I found most of these studies at:
      http://www.mcw.edu/gcrc/cop/powerlines-cancer-FAQ

  8. quick! by arabagast · · Score: 2, Funny

    more gadgets!

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
  9. what's all the buzz about? by herbiesdad · · Score: 1

    this is what we might call a "shocking" discovery. but seriously, try the veal...

    1. Re:what's all the buzz about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alright, I'll bite.

      Watt the hell is going on here? Here I was sipping on jolt and was shocked by this news. It did spark my curiosity though. Maybe I'll look into it later after I fix my roof...I just need to borrow my neighbor Jacob's ladder.

      Zap me a line if you find out more about this.

  10. So... by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1
    Does that mean that soon I can go to any cleric in town, ask for a cure light wounds, spend my GP and be good to go?

    Err, wrong game.

  11. How to get laid by New Age chicks by bermabloeme · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This creates electric field patterns all over the body.

    A lot of the "New Age" folks say they can see a person's aura. A lot of these "New Age" folks are really hot girls! So, this is what you do: you grab this article and tell them that you believe, now. Let her just start talking about this stuff. Then, complain about some ailment that requires her "healing" touch. Lastly, ask to try it on her.

    Let things progress: touching , kissing, clothes off, etc...

    Enjoy!

    --
    I know NOTHING, I know NOTHING
    1. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. Pretty girls don't exist in the basements of slashdotters' parents' houses.

    3. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 2

      How to get laid by New Age chicks (Score:3, Informative)

      Only on Slashdot...

    4. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of the "New Age" folks say they can see a person's aura. A lot of these "New Age" folks are really hot girls! So, this is what you do: you grab this article and tell them that you believe, now. Let her just start talking about this stuff. Then, complain about some ailment that requires her "healing" touch. Lastly, ask to try it on her. Let things progress: touching , kissing, clothes off, etc... Enjoy!

      Only on /. would this get modded "Informative" rather than "Funny".

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      A similar process occurs with respect to left-wing politics on campus. (Or at least it did when I was there. These days it might be right-wing politics. B-) )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    6. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      Except with right-wing politics you get chicks like Ann Coulter...

      (watch that Adam's Apple!)

    7. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Politics change, but one thing will always remain the same: Left wing politics will always get you the cute girls. It's related to the ideology...Empathy, compassion for your fellow man, enviromentalism, all that crap is seriously touchy feely, and lends itself well to pre-coital discussions about solving all the worlds problems.

      Right wing politics are just the opposite. Abstinence, fiscal conservatism, free market economics, the "neculur" (hehe) family. How the hell are you going to get laid talking about that stuff? Talking about the environment is foreplay, talking about the decline of modern morality is contraception!

      Seriously. Think of all the right wing pundits, and tell me those people would be just as angry and misanthropic if they'd gotten some action in college.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    8. Re:How to get laid by New Age chicks by Poltron+Inconnu · · Score: 0

      I know a lot of new age people and while there are some hot girls they "largely" tend to go the other way. My wife frequently asks me to attend new age events and I often opt out by saying I don't feel like whale watching that week. It's both true and funny to the point that she doesn't even get mad at me.

  12. Potential for abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advantages of this far outweigh the potential for abuse: deliberatly preventing a wound from healing...

  13. The problem by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only problem with this is that now we need to put surgeries on the top floor of hospitals. Then there's the problem of having to wait for a lightning storm. Let's not even get into the extra staff you need to turn the big wheel and lift the operating table through the roof.

    I suppose we'll also see extra insurance needed for the wear and tear on the surgeon's voicebox when he yells, "Liiiiiife! Liiiiiiife DO YOU HEAR ME!? GIVE MY CREATION ........... LIIIIIIIIIIFE!!"

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:The problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. How many bad jokes based on Frankenstein can you possibly include in one post?

      Don't answer that, fag.

    2. Re:The problem by Raelus · · Score: 1

      Remember, words like "noob" and "fag" only strengthen your argument.

      --
      "It is the stillest words which bring the storm. Thoughts that come with doves' footsteps guide the world."
  14. Doctor Frankenstein by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    while the idea of using electricity to heal wounds was first reported 150 years ago by Emil Du Bois-Reymond, modern scientists may have found a way to practically apply this idea.

    I hope this new method obviates the need for bolts in the neck.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  15. Old news by mnmn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget about 150 years, down in Texas they use electric chairs to fix up some really sick people.
    And psychiatric wards have been using it to fix up people who were sick in the head in the early half of the century.

    Even the police and mean old ladies use it to fix other people and pets. Them doctors are a little behind.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:Old news by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      The patent I was referring to is 5158081 and I also found 5549640, which might be relevant.
      There seem to be a quite a few related patents, so I really doubt that any treatment based on this new discovery will be patentable.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    2. Re:Old news by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but electroconvulsive therapy has gone a long way. It's now considered a reasonably safe and clinically proven treatment for certain disorders.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Old news by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine went through ECT a couple of years ago. I can't say that it helped his condition (but I can't say that it didn't either). What I will say is that it F*CKED his memory up. The entire roughly 4 month period he was getting ECT is gone--no memory at all of events that happened during that time, and his short-term memory is much, much worse than it used to be. I've heard similar stories from others.

      I have no doubt that ECT can create some positive outcomes, but the costs seems REALLY high to me.

    4. Re:Old news by tabrisnet · · Score: 1

      Just wait. Somebody will patent this procedure being performed on the INTERNET!

    5. Re:Old news by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Well, most of your examples are very heavy on the sarcasm, but the one about psychiatrists using it is spot on. And no, it's not just limited to the first half of the century (though stuff like insulin shock therapy was).

      For a variety of neurological disorders, they'll sedate you then run some current across your brain, with the goal of fixing whatever's been misfiring in your head. It's definitely a treatment of last resort, since the zapping can cause short/long term memory loss & the occassional change in personality amongst other things.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  16. Other uses for electricity... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    On second thought, there are probably minors reading this, so I won't give the URL of the B&D web site I stumbled across last week.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  17. I don't think this is new by andyring · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine (now deceased, rest his soul, he couldn't beat the cancer) had a treatment along these lines about a year ago to help heal some sort of lesions on his skin (may have been bed sores, I don't recall). It was a device that he'd put over the affected area and it applied voltage to the skin, adjustable by him. I'm not sure if it was for healing or pain control, but it worked. He showed it to me a couple times, when I put it on my hand it felt like a mild version of a 9-volt battery on the tongue.

    1. Re:I don't think this is new by theelectron · · Score: 1

      They said the idea of using electricity to heal wounds is 150 years old; so no, the general idea is indeed old. The thing is, the electricity has to be applied in a very specific way to work. You could guess and get lucky and heal yourself with the above mentioned device, but(what I read from TFA) the old idea only works if you guessed right.

      BUT, I think these guys found the mechanism by which electricity does this (which is new) and I'd also bet they actually have a way to reliably use the electricity (frequency/voltage/duration combo) to reliably cause healing.

    2. Re:I don't think this is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had electro-field treatment back in 1990 when I fractured my collar bone. Several months after the accident, the bone was still not knitting - hardly at all, anyway. Really disturbing to be able to bend my collar bone in the middle when doing things like, oh, sleeping or picking up a glass of water. Wrecked havoc on my posture, strength, and everything else in by back and nexk, too.

      I was told many things by many people as to why this happened and what to do about it (diet, immobilization impossibilities, extensive surgery, prayer, physical therapy, just live with it, etc.).

      One doctor prescribed a device to wear while I sleep. Charge a box during the day, then connect this "bendy-wire" loop to it, strap the loop around the break. It generated an electrical field, not an electrical shock to my skin (nor bone!). Just a field.

      It worked, and after about four weeks of this electro-treatment the bone became whole again, mostly (pretty bad break); at least it no longer had an additional joint in the middle, instead there's a bulge of bone mass where before there was only pieces. It's mostly as straight as it's supposed to be (one shoulder is now ~4cm lower than the other).

      It's definately not new. It's just taking some time to be accepted as real medicine.

    3. Re:I don't think this is new by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bone (Calcanous) has two differnt types of cells, osteoclasts which "eat bone" and osteoblasts which lay down new bone. The osteoclasts tend to meander, eating the one randomly, but the osteoblasts tend to follow electrical currents in the bone. The calcium salts in the bone give off electrical currents by the piezoelectric effect which causes the bone to grow in the direction that makes it the strongest for the stresses it normaly recieves.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:I don't think this is new by zxnos · · Score: 1
      the idea of using electricity to heal is potentially very old. i recall a battery being part of a ancient mid-east healers kit being mentioned on nova once.

      also, on the show 'lost' the island has a big magnetic field that appears to crash planes and heal people.

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    5. Re:I don't think this is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FRICKING SPOILER ALERT!!!!!

      Not eveyone on /. is in the US. And not all shows screen at the same time. Sheesh

    6. Re:I don't think this is new by RedOregon · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. Bad tibia/fibula break in a Harley accident; bones didn't heal due to an infection. Cleaned the mess out, bone/skin/muscle graft, and the little zapper box. The box sat on my belt, with two wires that went to sticky pads (like EKG connectors) that were situated on either side of the break.

      Healed that sucker up in about four weeks (quicker than the six weeks anticipated, if memory serves). Only had to swap out the 9v battery once a day.

      Full details of the accident at http://www.geocities.com/redoregon/crunch/. Also a link to the blog about followups, etc., at the end of the page.

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    7. Re:I don't think this is new by RedOregon · · Score: 1

      Odd. Make that http://www.geocities.com/redoregon/crunch - for whatever reason, Geocities doesn't like the standard "/" ending for a URL. Whatever!

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    8. Re:I don't think this is new by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
      Sounds to me that what you are describing is a TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Neural Sitmulation) unit. These are primarily used as pain control units, although I think their healing properties have been contested and there is a lot of interpatient variability in its effectiveness. The basic idea of it though is that the electrodes on the unit are attached to the specified area, and the unit generates pulses of electrical energy that stimulate the nerves around the area. This has the effect of blocking the pain signal (to some extent) from the affected area. Basically, the pain signals that your brain receives from the site ends up just being noise buried in the stimulation signal from the TENS unit.

      Although the premise of treatment your friend received is different from that mentioned in the TFA, he may have benefitted from some of these healing aspects that they have discovered. Essentially, the use of TENS units was/is for pain control. Some people (like your friend) may have shown healing aspects, but it was never really quantified. What this research shows I think is narrowing down of the exact form of the stimulation required for healing wounds (current density, intensity, direction, pulse length, etc), and the genes and/or cell properties that are involved.

    9. Re:I don't think this is new by uab21 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... This would then have serious consequences for raising children of growing age in null-g... no gravitational gradient -> no stress -> no growth (or random growth)... But then there is the possibility of using this type of effect to impose electrical fields on the boes to show them the right way to grow. Cool.

    10. Re:I don't think this is new by budgenator · · Score: 1

      There is no way that anyone would seriously consider living in zero-G for more than a temporary thing; on the space-station the astronauts run on treadmills strapped down with bungie cords to simulate gravity and they are only up there for 6 months. An astronaut can lose 25% of his bone mass in 6 months, anything longer than that they'd need centrifuges to generate G force.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:I don't think this is new by uab21 · · Score: 1

      Probably offtopic at this point, but if we are ever going to get off this rock, then procreation and child rearing in (space / altered gravitational conditions) will be necessary (and is currently being investigated in animals/insects). Would anyone seriously consider it *now*? Likely not, but people are considering finding out the implications and working out ways around them. Just because something is foolish and impractical now, doesn't mean that it always will be.

  18. forget that by npietraniec · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guy discovered immortality with magnets.

    http://www.alexchiu.com/

    Damn, they even interviewed him on slashdot.

    http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/0 6/07/1421238&mode=nocomment

    1. Re:forget that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been said that there is nothing so stupid that people won't believe it... but I really wonder if more than, say, one person believes that his magnets can grant immortality?

  19. Mumbo Jumbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe in that electricity to heal crap! Now, the layin of hands, there's a healin' remedy!

  20. Where's Majel R? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nurse Chapel, the anabolic protoplaser, please.

  21. not really suprising.. if.. by josepha48 · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. you have been to a physical therapist. My physical therapist used electricity on my shoulder to help it heal up some. I think she said it was supposed to stimulate something.. actually it just tingled and felt weird, but now I no longer have shoulder problems....

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

    1. Re:not really suprising.. if.. by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. When used properly, the electrical stimulation can work wonders for various muscle maladies. This is hardly a new discovery. Feels a bit weird at first, but pretty damn good afterward. It's just a way of triggering the nerves repeatedly to stretch the muscle in ways that you can't yourself. But when the electrodes are misplaced oh so slightly it feels like the muscles are being ripped from the bone.

    2. Re:not really suprising.. if.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      .. you have been to a physical therapist. My physical therapist used electricity on my shoulder to help it heal up some. I think she said it was supposed to stimulate something.. actually it just tingled and felt weird, but now I no longer have shoulder problems....

      What you had was probably a TENS treatment, or transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation. It is intended to work muscles, and can also cause them to relax if used properly. They are very common in physical therapy in situations in which muscle atrophy is an issue. The technology has also been adopted by bodybuilders who use it for spot toning and for working out in their sleep, no idea if that actually works.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:not really suprising.. if.. by nickmue · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iontophoresis/

      works good with anti-inflams too.

    4. Re:not really suprising.. if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physical therapists have been using different forms of electricity for decades. For treating inflammation and anything else. Depending on who you ask it is supposed to stimulate local blood flow or use the Gate control theory to dull the pain receptors. Fact is that, although many therapist still use it, a lot of studies have shown that it doesn't work. Some inflammation just has the nack of healing all by itself... so when your injury goes away after a couple of days being hooked up, you contribute it to the "therapy". However, I'm not surprised that a study finds that you can influence tissue with electricity. It's when an effect can be shown when that tissue is buried bellow 5cm and 7 layers of different types of tissue all diffusing and resisting to the current, that it starts to become interesting. Wake me up when this lot works in vivo, then I'll give you my astonishment.

    5. Re:not really suprising.. if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to a physical therapist for a shoulder injury (adhesive capsulitis). The therapist would put a electric pad on my shoulder that caused the muscles to twitch. No one claimed it would fix anything, it was just to get the muscles moving to stimulate blood flow.

      I never saw any benefit from the electric pad. The real benefits came from months of stretching and lifting weights to rebuild strength and flexibility in the joint.

  22. Old news by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The genes may have been identified, but there are patents out on the pulsing of DC across wounds by placing electrodes both laterally and diametrically on opposite side of the wounds and by holding one electrode steady while moving the other around.

    I analysed a patent recently that dealt with this as part of a question in a preliminary round of interviews.

    I can't remember the patent number, but basically, if they try to patent the actual therapy, they are going to have problems because the patent I am describing is something like 15 years old already.

    --
    I'm gonna need a spec.
  23. Awesome by BilZ0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's actually quite an awesome paper. It seems that when a wound is made, it makes a low resistance shunt across skin, which normally has a voltage difference across it. This stimulates wound healing activity. The current peaks at 10 microA cm-2 and persisted at 4-8 microA cm-2, with all the current vector pointing towards the wound center. This paper shows not only that that effect is easily demonstrated in vitro, but what are the molecular mediators of it, see the original article here.

    1. Re:Awesome by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      Isn't this a standard practice with really difficult to heal broken bones?

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:Awesome by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      That's in vivo :-]

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  24. Have we learned nothing ... by Culture · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... from history? If you read about Dr. Frankenstein, you will find that this medling in the unknown will lead to nothing but misery. I hope Bush veto's any work in this area.

    --
    ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    1. Re:Have we learned nothing ... by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      Naw, he'll just issue a signing statement.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    2. Re:Have we learned nothing ... by planckscale · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah you're right, we should've stuck with voodoo, amputations, and opium-based elixers. In fact, if we just let everyone die from any ailment, health insurance would be a lot cheaper.


      --
      Namaste
    3. Re:Have we learned nothing ... by Culture · · Score: 2, Funny

      See, you have scientifically proven that Bush is a great American, trying to save this county from medical bankruptcy. I can see that you, to, love america.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    4. Re:Have we learned nothing ... by TheBogBrushZone · · Score: 1

      Of course if you actually READ Mary Shelley's Frankenstein you'll unserstand that it was fear of the unknown that caused all the misery. Without ignorant, closed-minded people Frankenstein's creation would have been a very different character indeed.

      --
      And behold, a command prompt and he who sat upon it, his name was shutdown and -h 3:11 followed with him
    5. Re:Have we learned nothing ... by Culture · · Score: 1

      Read ... what is this thing? I have heard of it but am not familiar.

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  25. The Body Electric by Robert Becker by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

    Dr. Becker was crucified for expressing these "views"

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  26. Coming soon to an inbox near you... by Null+Nihils · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I am fascinated by genuine scientific research into such effects, and interested by the insights into cellular and genetic mechanics described in the article, I shiver to think of how news like this might reverberate across the large communities of pseudo-science loons and snake-oil salesmen that lurk in the dark corners of the Internet.

    " Electr1city curez, as seen |n New Scienti5t m4gazine. G3t electr|cal d3vice, cur3s all d1sease including ere
    Zap.

    1. Re:Coming soon to an inbox near you... by Null+Nihils · · Score: 1

      Darn! There was more to that post, but slashcode borked it.

      No amount of electricity will heal this wound. =(

    2. Re:Coming soon to an inbox near you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy v0ltagr@ online!

    3. Re:Coming soon to an inbox near you... by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Finally, a way to prevent people from buying things advertised in spam: breed the susceptibility out of the population.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
  27. Already out there by bobllama · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's already a company that's commercializing this - http://www.biofisica.com/. They have some pretty interesting information on their site for anyone interested in more detail. I'm not associated with them in anyway, just happened to see them present at an event once.

  28. Sick of 'science' reporting by bananaendian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No doubt this report will be hyped by the new-age weirdos that are always looking for miracles cures or reasons for paranoia. Why do these articles never EVER tell anything meaningful - like for example the strenght and orientation of the field they used with some simple data tables and statistics? Who has access to some weird specialist journal with a 1000USD subscrition to get the raw data? New Scientist no.1 Science Magazine, yeah right! - science isn't about wild speculation and hype - its about rigorous examination and critical thinking. I wouldn't be suprised ones other labs try to reproduce the effect it gets debunked.

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
    1. Re:Sick of 'science' reporting by staeiou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why do these articles never EVER tell anything meaningful - like for example the strenght and orientation of the field they used with some simple data tables and statistics? Who has access to some weird specialist journal with a 1000USD subscrition to get the raw data?

      So you think Nature (the journal TFA said it was published in) is some weird specialist journal with a 1000USD subscription? It is probably the most well known academic journal in existence, at least to the non-academic. And even if you are too poor to buy a subscription, I'm almost positive that every public library subscribes to Nature.

    2. Re:Sick of 'science' reporting by gclef · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I have a subscription to Nature, and I can assure you that:

      a) it's nowhere near $1,000 US /year. It isn't Time or Newsweek cheap (it's about $100-$200/year, depending), but...

      b) Time/Newsweek aren't going to give you articles that are hardcore reviews of the state of astrophysics (with references).

      If you're a science nut, Nature's a reasonable thing to subscribe to.

    3. Re:Sick of 'science' reporting by aersixb9 · · Score: 1

      They're mostly graduate student BS. They can't tell you how to reproduce their results in a simple way because their not doing real science, which apparently has been completely censored out of existance. The actual way to heal faster appears to be to heal more often, doing so will increase the rate of healing. Ironically, the only first aid that humans ever need to do is staunching blood flow and reattachment, both of which are very simple techniques. (fold the skin back into place and apply pressure & put the limb back where it belongs, fold the skin, and apply pressure) There is no need for this electrical treatment, it's either a scam whereupon a person is told that their bones will heal in 6 weeks, when the actual healing time for that individual is 3-5 days, then they zap the person with some electricity and tell them it's healed in 3 weeks, and charge $50k + 4.2% of their salary. (If it's not a scam, it also could be a student doing some flawed research to get a degree), hence the lack of a simple, english instruction on the actual, practical technique.

  29. That's all well and good, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how will this help John Bobbit?

  30. Gotta say it. by MrShaggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    'God-Damn-it Jim, I am a doctor not a generator'

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  31. Implementation or Understanding by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard stories about how the medical profession was so enamored with radioactive tools for healing. Xrays to look inside the body. The way radiation exposure could kill unwanted bacteria. The cool soothing greenish glow of radioactive clocks and other tools. They came up with implementations of using radiation before understanding what it was doing. Today, looking back at the lack of understanding seems crazy; we'd never do something like that again. Would we?

    Are we in fact going to do the same thing with electricity here? Are we really understanding why these mice are being cured or are we just satisfied to have a technique that appears to work? I don't mean to be cynical. Curing the impossible seems like a great thing. But will we be reading about how a quick emag arthritis treatment today resulted in the creation of Alzheimer's v2.0 tomorrow?

    IMHO, a workable implementation is great, but full understanding would be better.

    1. Re:Implementation or Understanding by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      I'd say we have a very poor understanding of 90% of the treatments out there. The reality is: if it works, it works. Theorists (like me) like to think that one day, the stuff on paper will matriculate into something tangible, but really, in the medical world at least, it's the other way around.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    2. Re:Implementation or Understanding by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      They came up with implementations of using radiation before understanding what it was doing. Today, looking back at the lack of understanding seems crazy; we'd never do something like that again. Would we? Are we in fact going to do the same thing with electricity here?
      [...] IMHO, a workable implementation is great, but full understanding would be better.

      Short answer: No.

      Medium answer: This has literally been studied for over 150 years. How much longer do you want to wait while people die?

      Long answer: We understand literally orders of magnitude (if you could reasonably measure knowledge anyway) more about electricity now than we did about X-rays when we were first fucking around with them. Meanwhile, there will probably always be something more to learn. Our understanding of physics is in constant development - just what exactly is an electron, for example? So again, how much longer do you want to wait while people die?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Implementation or Understanding by bishop186 · · Score: 1

      Looking inside the body, killing bacteria, and glows are a little different from actual, provable healing power, though, methinks. Granted, this is probably another route to cancer. It speeds up cell regeneration and growth from what I gather, which is pretty much what cancer does, isn't it? Makes cells replicate at an out of control pace, that is. On an unrelated to the parent comment note, ninjas and by extention (since all of them are closet ninjas) the Japanese have obviously known about this for years. Haven't any of these scientists read any manga? They're always throwing around magnified needles. Poison's passe, doncha know.

    4. Re:Implementation or Understanding by IanDanforth · · Score: 2, Informative
      Are we really understanding why these mice are being cured or are we just satisfied to have a technique that appears to work?

      The key thing about this article is the depth to which they understand how the effect works. Not only is a specific mechanical effect explored (i.e. how much current, in what way) but how that mechanism effects the biology right down to the level of gene expression! This kind of top-to-bottom understanding is highly unusual. In direct opposition to your example when you have detailed understanding of how things work you can apply that knowledge carefully and specifically rather than just a slap-dash "this will cure everything" approach.

      -Ian

    5. Re:Implementation or Understanding by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Are we in fact going to do the same thing with electricity here?

      I doubt it. The effects of radiation on the body 100 years ago was very poorly understood. Low voltage electrical currents by comparison are fairly benign. It's not like the use of electricity in the human body is new. Pacemakers have been around forever, there's been some trials of direct electrical stimulation of the brain to create artificial vision, and many parapalegics use direct muscle stimulation to stand up, etc (maybe even walk?).

      Also, the medical community itself has grown up. Years of animal testing is required for any kind of new treatment goes to limited human trials.

      That's not to say it's all perfect. You can't dismiss the danger that any new treatment is going to have unforseen side effects that don't show up in human trials. But I think comparing this new treatment to the early days of medicine where anything goes and there's poor understanding isn't terribly valid.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Implementation or Understanding by Mozleron · · Score: 1

      I think what you are talking about is at the core of american medicine these days. Fix the symptoms, and if they go away, it must be better. Thus, we see all these skyrocketing costs of surgeries and a booming drug trade... erm, I mean, pharmaceuticals industry.

      I wish the medical world would realize that they can't actually "heal" anything. All they are there for is to put our bodies into a state where it can heal itself. I am not saying that medical science has no place in the healing of the body, quite the contrary, doctors can do amazing things that do allow the body to heal itself. It just seems like they are more focused on the 'quick fix' rather than fixing the root of the problem.

      --
      ~Mozleron
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
    7. Re:Implementation or Understanding by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      I've heard stories about how the medical profession was so enamored with radioactive tools for healing. Xrays to look inside the body. The way radiation exposure could kill unwanted bacteria. The cool soothing greenish glow of radioactive clocks and other tools. They came up with implementations of using radiation before understanding what it was doing. Today, looking back at the lack of understanding seems crazy; we'd never do something like that again. Would we?

      Of course we would. The only other way is to have test groups that literally span multiple generations to see if any harmful effects occur. (To see if you cause Alzheimers in your children, for example.) In practice, waiting to be 100% sure with a medical treatment is completely infeasible. Sure, it's possible that a new treatment will kill some people. But, how many people will die in the next hundred years while we wait to be sure it's safe?
  32. Report Name by triso · · Score: 1

    They should have titled their report, The Reanimation of Dead Tissue just for a laugh.

  33. Dr. Becker wrote a book about this in 1985 by faster · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0688001238/

    He was widely derided as a wacko. What has changed that makes this so new and wonderful now?

    1. Re:Dr. Becker wrote a book about this in 1985 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      What has changed that makes this so new and wonderful now?

      If I had (or wanted) to venture a guess, it would be that we've sequenced the human genome, which likely helped identify the genes responsible for the process. Understanding the mechanism tends to lend you credibility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. Hey! Coincidence! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    About 30 minutes ago I looked myself up in the mathematics genealogy project and discovered I was a 'descendant' of Paul Du Bois-Reymond. I'd never heard of this guy before. And now suddenly I'm reading about his brother on Slashdot. Weird!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  35. iDot? by warith · · Score: 1

    "(idots) who kept strapping magnets to themselves"

    I am interested in this new Apple product you have mentioned, the iDot, and how it is affected by having magnets strapped to it. Where can I read more about it?

    (Worst. Typo nitpick. Ever.)

  36. 150 years of stagnation. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because selling life is not profitable.
    death is much more profitable.
    http://www.papimi.gr/early.htm

  37. Tesla said it by smartdreamer · · Score: 1
    Tesla was convinced that one could heal with only electricity. And if Tesla said it, it must be true.

    One strange thing about this is that it would not really heal cells, but the disease wouldn't be active anymore.

  38. Evidence of the wrong way.... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1
    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  39. Research abstract from Nature by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the curious, here's the research abstract from the publication in Nature:

    Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-big gamma and PTEN

    Wound healing is essential for maintaining the integrity of multicellular organisms. In every species studied, disruption of an epithelial layer instantaneously generates endogenous electric fields, which have been proposed to be important in wound healing. The identity of signalling pathways that guide both cell migration to electric cues and electric-field-induced wound healing have not been elucidated at a genetic level. Here we show that electric fields, of a strength equal to those detected endogenously, direct cell migration during wound healing as a prime directional cue. Manipulation of endogenous wound electric fields affects wound healing in vivo. Electric stimulation triggers activation of Src and inositol-phospholipid signalling, which polarizes in the direction of cell migration. Notably, genetic disruption of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-gamma (PI(3)Kgamma) decreases electric-field-induced signalling and abolishes directed movements of healing epithelium in response to electric signals. Deletion of the tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) enhances signalling and electrotactic responses. These data identify genes essential for electrical-signal-induced wound healing and show that PI(3)Kgamma and PTEN control electrotaxis.

  40. Are you healed? by p33p3r · · Score: 0

    20 volts
    ZZZZT
    Are you healed?
    I don't think so
    100 volts
    ZZZZZZT
    Are you healed?
    Hey that hurt's
    200 volts
    ZZZZZZT
    Are you healed?
    mooaaaannnn
    300 volts
    ZZZZZZZZT
    Are you healed?
    YES, YES, YES can I leave now?

  41. Sounds a lot like the Bemer 3000 by Tiger22 · · Score: 1

    The Bemer 3000 electromagnetic therapy has been around a while now and is used in a lot of therapies, particularly in sports where rapid healing from injury is needed. I've heard many good things about it and from the evidence I've seen it's not just some quack idea made into a product like many other things we're used to. Quite expensive for now, probably because of patents. Once they expire expect to see floods of cheap knock-offs come to the market.

  42. The pioneer is Robert Becker MD by Invisible+Now · · Score: 2, Informative

    He wrote "The Body Electric" decades ago. (still in print on Amazon, etc.) He did grounbreaking research at a Veterans Hospital demonstrating that very weak currents had profound practical effects on real patients. This book is fascinating... Everything from why our arms and legs develop to the same lengths (Ever wonder how?) to knitting bones that won't fuse and cancer. And the guy's not a crackpot... Real MD. Must read!

    --

    "Knowing everything doesn't help..."

    1. Re:The pioneer is Robert Becker MD by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Simply because one is a real MD does not mean that one isn't a crackpot. Ever hear of homeopathic "medicine"?

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  43. Start Trek by awggie · · Score: 1

    It may be a little cliche, but... does this remind anyone else of the Dermal Regenerator of Start Trek fame

    1. Re:Start Trek by awggie · · Score: 1

      start trek? i meant star trek... *doh*

    2. Re:Start Trek by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought. I wonder if it could be used on bone? I happen to have a broken humorous (no pun intended) bone that would have taken a hell of a lot less time to heal, with less pain (2 screws and a pin later). You have to wonder if these scientists were Trekies? Nah they had to have been. Transporters next?

  44. Comes to mind by cheese-cube · · Score: 0

    The phrase "snake-oil" comes to mind.

  45. Magneto is known to use electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to reverse the healing process, aka cause major injury.

  46. Electric eal by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    it's electric eal.

  47. It works!! by Nahor · · Score: 1
    It works. See: 100% of the testimonials are from people still alive (*). And he even has a patent. It has to be legit.

    (*) at the time of writing.

    1. Re:It works!! by thePig · · Score: 1

      Check out the patent.. To get it granted, he has not used the word immortality there

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  48. Implications of EMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let me get this straight. Electric fields exist in the human body in the form of ions seperated by cellular membranes. The shunting of these miniature batteries due to tissue damage is "recongized" by cellular healing/repair mechanisms. The big deal here is that now we know of it and the said field can be altered by us to aid (or deter) cellular repair process. What kind of an idiot would say that electro-magenetic fields the human body is subjected to has no effect on this minute electric field? Forgive me if I'm wrong but basic physics dictate that it has!

    To my understanding all studies on EM radiotaion and it's effects on human tissue was looking at the effects of the said radiation on the integrity of the genetic material within the cell and the integrity of the cell itself. They didn't consider the alteration of any electric fields and implications of this on the tissue overall. What if EM radiation interferes with the cellular repair mechanism that over time deteriorates the tissue resulting in damageed genetic components within cells?

    Besides who knows what other mechanisms this electric field is a part of.

  49. Re:How fun a whole new meaning to by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    shock therapy....

    hehhe slash word image: crotch...

    just don't get shocked there (male OR female)...

    Hmmm... now putting together Peter Gabriel's "Shock the Monkey", with an infinite number of chimpanzees, and an infinite number of typewriters, and a HUGE rheostat, you indeed MIGHT get "War and Peace", but you'll surely have some funky monkeys in the end...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  50. Oh, Boy. Surprise! by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

    150 years ago, some guy said, "Oh, electricity can heal." 2000-4000 years ago, some guys in India and China said the same thing and--voila! Yoga and Qigong. Both of which move biolectric energy through the body and can be used for healing purposes. Oldest. News. Ever.

  51. Dupe by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Until, from the midst of this darkness, a sudden light broke in upon me -- a light so brilliant and wondrous, and yet so simple! Change the poles from plus to minus and from minus to plus! I alone succeeded in discovering the cause of generation of life. Nay, even more -- I, myself became capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter!

    IT....COULD....WORK!!!!

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  52. Using magnets to manipulate biochem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, basically, this is just a way to use magnetism to manipulate biochemistry? Seems like a fairly basic idea, and simple ideas are usually best because they work. Granted, the side effects of applying live current to a living system could be debatable. What if this current wounds the surroundign area of the injury while it is drawing more healing molecules to the site of the injury? Like I said, sounds simple, but I think there could be more to this.

  53. Dupe... by theproff · · Score: 1

    I've been treating myself with my Violet Ray Machine "Violet Ray Machine" for a while now. I guess they figured out a new way to increase secretions.

  54. Some interesting points. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, micro-current DC electricity can be used to affect the way cells function in the human body; they can signal cells to start or stop normal biological processes in healing and growth and a multitude of other functions. Robert O. Becker has written extensively on his studies into this area. If you have not read his books, order one and read it. For under $5 dollars and shipping, (less than a movie and popcorn), what have you got to lose? His work is highly informed and challenges modern medicine in significant ways.

    Some notes of interest. . .

    Acupuncture works. Nobody contests this. --The theory is that by inserting a metal needle and setting it to lightly rotate, the needle cuts through the Earth's magnetic field creating a micro-current which then affects the body in a variety of different ways.

    Electromagnetic fields similarly are able to stimulate cells to react in similar ways; this is probably the basis of all concerns regarding Cell Phone radiation.

    How can EM fields affect humans? --It is understood by some that EM fields can be used to affect emotions and states of awareness. With specific application to the primary visual cortex, they can even be used to cause temporary blindness. (Read article half-way down.)

    The HAARP Array, supposedly used for research, is also suggested by some to be a means of mind-control; that is, beams of specific EM can be reflected from the sky onto terrestrial targets. The science is not contested, just the intent.

    In a world where the U.S. secret services admit to having run extensive (and fairly gruesome) mind-control experiments, where secrecy and paranoia run rampant through the government, where Israel is allowed to commit genocide in the Middle East without the media blinking an eye, and where Bush is allowed to build a police state, all to the drums of Christian-Cult Apocalypse insanity, the idea of population control through manipulation of EM fields is not so very far fetched, now is it?

    Disagree? Before responding, ask yourself in all honestly why you disagree and where the impulse stems from.


    -FL

    1. Re:Some interesting points. . . by StormySky · · Score: 1

      Acupuncture works. Nobody contests this. --The theory is that by inserting a metal needle and setting it to lightly rotate, the needle cuts through the Earth's magnetic field creating a micro-current which then affects the body in a variety of different ways.


      Nobody that believes in woo-woo contests it, you mean? Those pesky scientists with their logic and methods and critical thinking, on the other
      hand, actually do tend to be slightly skeptical about acupuncture.
      http://www.randi.org/encyclopedia/acupuncture.html

      Penn & Teller did an episode on using magnets for healing. I bet you can get free shipping on the DVD...
      --
      We can face anything... except for bunnies.
    2. Re:Some interesting points. . . by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      I call BS. And adding a condescending remark about people who disagree with you doesn't mean you are immune to criticism.

      I was about to believe you about acupuncture, until you threw-in the two key words of a nut case:
      1) "Nobody disagrees with this" -- Nobody, except the scientific community and the National Institute of Health. It does have some positive effects though, but nobody can consistently say what or why.
      2) Pseudoscience: "...the needle cuts through the Earth's magnetic field creating a micro-current..."

      Now, let's click on your user name and see if you are a known troll... YUP! You post 20 times a day and never receive a score above a 2. Phew! It's not just me who thinks you are full of it.

      I highly recommend you purchase a tin foil hat, so that you can keep out the mind control rays.

    3. Re:Some interesting points. . . by BigRare · · Score: 1
      In a world where the U.S. secret services admit to having run extensive (and fairly gruesome) mind-control experiments, where secrecy and paranoia run rampant through the government, where Israel is allowed to commit genocide in the Middle East without the media blinking an eye, and where Bush is allowed to build a police state, all to the drums of Christian-Cult Apocalypse insanity, the idea of population control through manipulation of EM fields is not so very far fetched, now is it?

      And what sources are you citing for this one?

      Define genocide, and cite your source.

      Overall your post was mostly informative with a bit of political conspiracy paranoia thrown in for effect. Way to turn it around there at the end.

      The actual ongoing genocide, however, in Africa is sad.
  55. Re:Oh, Boy. Surprise! by adri · · Score: 1

    The surprise isn't that the effect exists (well, we haven't yet figured out how to control universal constants) but that we now have an understanding of 'how'. This generally leads into an understanding of 'why' and, when we understand that, exposure to 'what other nifty stuff can we do with it.'

    So no; the effect may not be new - but our understanding of it is.

  56. Re:Oh, Boy. Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was about to post something similar.

    Its a good thing that western scientists are finally starting to achknowledge that this phenomena exists, but I wonder what it'll take for them to accept that there is a large body of highly-developed literature that has already studied this. It'll only be when the introspection-aquired eastern knowledge is combined with the external observation and experimentation techniques of western science that true progress will be made.

  57. Am I the only one.... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

    who, upon seeing the headline, thought that this was about using electricity to cauterize wounds?

  58. Not magnets, it means Royal Raymond Rife was right by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Royal Raymond Rife was the first man to construct an electron microscope, and also was the first man to view a virus (using his electron microscope). In his studies, he found that everything at the aromic particle level, be it living or dead, had a harmonic/resonant frequency that could be manipulated by bombarding that particle with the same. Outside the above two claims, he was labeled a crackpot when he constructed that verry instrument that he claimed could "rupture" those certain foreign particles from your body. It was remeniscent of shock-therapy, but more accurate to the frequency of whatever particle it was tuned to rupture. The equipment appearance was a box with two electrodes, and was used to destroy virus matter using same-frequency sound in the same manner as a singer would rupture a glass cup with a high-pitch yell. There are some great documentaries on this process, and available schematics to construct the machine. In his life, Royal Raymond Rife was dominated with one nuisance-complaint from the Medical Association every day for most of his life; having to enter court every day to defend his use of the machine. The documentary shown that the event just to publicly use the machine aggrivated the Medical Association verry badly.

    Anyways, I've read as much as I could on both Rife and Tesla, and would do it again if I had the time. I have just about everything, from schematics to documentaries, conspiracy facts and theories. Most of it liens on the various Institutions using their brute force to force someone out of business just because their remedy is dangerously inexpensive. You can even buy an alleged "Rife machine" and many claim it works. All it does is train the immune system, and the worse it could do is focus energy on a certain range of tissue and disrupt it (even though if corrected, should heal).

    --
    without prejudice
  59. Dermal regenerator? by WerewolfOfVulcan · · Score: 1

    We may get to witness the birth of the great-great-great-great-grandfather of yet another common Star Trek tool.

    Cool! }:-)

  60. Start worrying!! by bjk002 · · Score: 1

    "how news like this might reverberate across the large communities of pseudo-science loons and snake-oil salesmen that lurk in the dark corners of the Internet"

    30 million /. readers at this moment have the proverbial light bulb over head.

    --
    Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
  61. What the h@ll's a Jiggawatt? (nt) by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    "What the h@ll's a Jiggawatt??!!??"

  62. It's ALIVE!!!! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    "IT'S ALIVE!", may be words emminating from hospitals around the world. 'Ol Marry may yet spin in her grave.

  63. every new physics is "magical" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The classic example is Meserism- a combination of magnetism and suggestion. That was a fad in 19th century and got Freud started in his career. Surprisingly this technique has never faded. Magnetic healing abounds at new age health fairs today.

    Other magical new physics includes electricity, radiation, X-rays, quantum microtubes, earth magnetism (feng shui), and so on. Well-homed radiation has been useful for fighting tumors.

  64. Dr. Frankenstein was right!!!! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    And to think--we derided him, mocking his outlandish theories as so much balderdash! Nay, we even accoutered ourselves with torches and pitchforks in an effort to halt his vile experiments and unholy machinations.

    And yet only now, in this year of our Lord 2006, do we realize that HE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG!!!!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  65. Dermal Regenerator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this could be the basis for a Star Trek-like "dermal regenerator".

  66. Acupuncture by airship · · Score: 1

    I'm a science guy - I'm not particularly enamored of 'New Age' beliefs. But a few years ago, I had a huge repetitive-stress-induced ganglion cyst on my wrist, which my neurologist said could only be fixed with surgery. Since I had just recovered from a cubital tunnel operation, I reluctantly let myself be talked into trying acupuncture first. The acupuncturist not only applied long needles, he attached electrodes to them and applied a strong pulsating electric current. I was treated every two days for ten days. After a couple of treatments, the cyst began to recede. After ten days, it was gone. Let's face it, folks, we still don't know everything there is to know.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  67. Old news by Ykstort · · Score: 1

    Defibrilation, anyone ?

  68. But what about that elec tower behind my house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So where does this leave the power companies which say that people who live near power lines are perfectly safe from EMI/RFI? Is it feasible that EMI fields generated could relaly have some kind of negative impact on teh body as some claim? Hmmmmm......

  69. Capactiy to learn. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I call BS. And adding a condescending remark about people who disagree with you doesn't mean you are immune to criticism.

    Using popular phrases like, "I call BS", is indicative of somebody who falls prey to group-think, and since group-think is most often the product of media manipulation, I am not terribly surprised that your post is so contaminated with muddy logic and over-generalized rationalization.

    --Now the above comment, you should note, might more reasonably be labeled a 'condescending remark', although it is not intended as such. --And what I wrote at the end of my original post was very much not. Seriously, it is important to question where one's knee jerk reactions come from.

    1) "Nobody disagrees with this" -- Nobody, except the scientific community and the National Institute of Health. It does have some positive effects though, but nobody can consistently say what or why.

    You are saying two conflicting things here. You are saying that the scientific community doesn't believe acupuncture works, but that acupuncture has some positive effects. So which is it? --The problem is that acupuncture does work. The National Institute of Health was quoted several times in the very article you linked to as saying that they recognize that acupuncture does indeed have a measurable effect. They certainly don't like having to admit it, but so what? --It's certainly enough to make my original point.

    2) Pseudoscience: "...the needle cuts through the Earth's magnetic field creating a micro-current..."

    This is not pseudoscience. It's basic high school science which every kid in North America is supposed to learn. Conductors when they pass through a magnetic field ALWAYS create an electrical current, whether it is the Earth's or the magnets in an electric generator. Much of human technology would stop cold if this basic principal of physics didn't function as described.

    Now, let's click on your user name and see if you are a known troll... YUP! You post 20 times a day and never receive a score above a 2. Phew! It's not just me who thinks you are full of it.

    This is simply not accurate; you should look through my posting history with your eyes open. Further, I find it telling that you find relief in believing that you are nestled up tightly with the herd thinking. Guess what? You are not a cow. You are an individual with your own powers of thought and observation. Who cares what everybody else thinks? Unfortunately, there are many, many people like you who have had their egos crushed and reformed to respond with fear and anxiety should they step outside the bounds of consensus thought patterns, and since those thought patterns are usually driven by the crap the TeeVee tells them is true, many, many people are hopelessly ignorant and easily manipulated into fearing their own capacity to learn and express themselves.


    -FL

  70. If electricity can heal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then after six years in the US Navy as an Electrician's Mate, I am bulletproof.

    I got bit by:

    450V 60Hz
    120V 60Hz
    120V 400Hz (quite an interesting experience)
    270V DC (that sucked)

    One of those had to be the correct magnitude/orientation.

  71. Stage Magicians. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Nobody that believes in woo-woo contests it, you mean? Those pesky scientists with their logic and methods and critical thinking, on the other hand, actually do tend to be slightly skeptical about acupuncture.

    First of all, James Randi doesn't actually say that acupuncture doesn't work in the article you linked to. And he'd be a fool to, because even the National Institute of Health agrees that it does. --They don't know how, but that's hardly the issue. From the Wikipedia article on acupuncture. . .

    The NIH consensus statement said that, "the data in support of acupuncture are as strong as those for many accepted Western medical therapies" and added that "there is clear evidence that needle acupuncture is efficacious for adult postoperative and chemotherapy nausea and vomiting and probably for the nausea of pregnancy... There is reasonable evidence of efficacy for postoperative dental pain... reasonable studies (although sometimes only single studies) showing relief of pain with acupuncture on diverse pain conditions such as menstrual cramps, tennis elbow, and fibromyalgia..."

    It works. Simple as that. And that should be enough to raise questions. The problem is that the answers are very upsetting to the power structure of the West.


    Penn & Teller did an episode on using magnets for healing. I bet you can get free shipping on the DVD...

    Penn & Teller may have done an episode on using magnets for healing, but this is hardly relevant since I made no mention of using magnets for healing. Further, I find it curious that you quote performers as definitive sources on the state of reality. Penn & Teller, and James Randi, as clever as they are, are not scientists. They are stage magicians with tunnel vision and egos to protect.


    -FL

    1. Re:Stage Magicians. . . by StormySky · · Score: 1
      First of all, James Randi doesn't actually say that acupuncture doesn't work in the article you linked to.

      I was mistaken thinking that the location of the link, "An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural", would be a very good tipoff as to what Mr. Randi thinks about it.

      And he'd be a fool to, because even the National Institute of Health agrees that it does. --They don't know how, but that's hardly the issue.

      It's hardly the issue that something 'works' but nobody knows how? Most folks don't know how a car, or a gun, work internally, but the people making them (presumably) certainly must, for them to actually be able to ... well, work.

      From the Wikipedia article on acupuncture. . .
      From the same Wiki:

      Whether acupuncture is efficacious or a placebo is subject to scientific research. There is no scientific consensus over whether or not evidence supports efficacy

      And...

      In 1997, the following statement was adopted as policy of the American Medical Association (AMA) after a report on a number of alternative therapies including acupuncture:[37]

      "There is little evidence to confirm the safety or efficacy of most alternative therapies. Much of the information currently known about these therapies makes it clear that many have not been shown to be efficacious. Well-designed, stringently controlled research should be done to evaluate the efficacy of alternative therapies."

      Which goes back to my original post that there certainly are people who contest whether acupuncture works. Here's another link, found with the google search terms 'acupuncture' and 'fake': http://atheism.about.com/b/a/169142.htm.

      Penn & Teller may have done an episode on using magnets for healing, but this is hardly relevant since I made no mention of using magnets for healing. Further, I find it curious that you quote performers as definitive sources on the state of reality. Penn & Teller, and James Randi, as clever as they are, are not scientists. They are stage magicians with tunnel vision and egos to protect.
      Granted, you didn't mention magnets, but, since usually acupuncture and magnets go together, I thought I'd head it off at the cuff. As far as definitive sources on the state of reality, stage performers make their living with trickery. The ones I referenced happen to ADMIT that it's trickery, rather than trying to pass it off as some mystical bullshit. Please do some basic research on them before dismissing them merely as people looking to protect their egos. Whatever flaws they have as messengers doesn't negate the honesty of their respective messages.

      I think there's a bit of a difference in using directed electricty, which you can immediately observe in a laboratory environment, versus sticking pieces of metal into various places on your body and saying there's some sort of benevolent effect.

      And, again, 'working but not knowing how' could be said of prayer, as well. While you're free to believe what you will, that doesn't change those beliefs into anything resembling the actual reality that exists, despite whatever faith based approach you may have developed in perceiving it. Nor do your beliefs translate into a blanket consensus of agreement amongst everyone. This is just common sense: Even for things that ARE agreed upon by the vast majority, there still are those who'll contest them, despite the evidence. For example, the moon landing. That's why it's important to have reproducable results, and understand WHY and HOW something works, not just that 'it seems to'.

      The problem is that the answers are very upsetting to the power structure of the West.
      No, not really. Fruits making money selling acupuncture, reflexology, and sugar pills certainly do take away from the profit of large drug c

      --
      We can face anything... except for bunnies.
    2. Re:Stage Magicians. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Which goes back to my original post that there certainly are people who contest whether acupuncture works.

      Okay. I'll grant you that. I mistakenly believed that people weren't so willingly ignorant given the number of agencies and tests which purport positive results. --The AMA's quote you provide denunciating Acupuncture despite all the evidence is particularly embarrassing, though not terribly surprising as they are a union of doctors schooled in Western medicine, (20 of the 21 board members are white Americans), who are naturally going to have a massive bias against anything which threatens to upset their pool of knowledge which they each spent a significant number of years committing their lives to learning and identifying themselves with.

      No, not really. Fruits making money selling acupuncture, reflexology, and sugar pills certainly do take away from the profit of large drug companies, but if it became standard practice, some of the less scrupulous ones would just dive in as well. For a more plausible conspiracy theory dealing with the power structure of the West, see the movie "The Constant Gardener."

      You are not seeing the big picture. Here are just a few points. . .

      1. Stem Cell research is based on the idea that cells cannot de-differentiate and that you need stem cells in order to re-grow parts of the body. It has been demonstrated that normal cells can dedifferentiate, and indeed do, and that it is controlled by the body through micro DC currents. This means that most of today's cancer research and indeed, massive portions of the billion-dollar medical industry is needlessly misdirected into the pockets of many hundreds of thousands of doctors, researchers and pharmaceutical and medical equipment company employees who all want their paychecks and are more than willing to look the other way when new ideas come along which might upset the gravy train. And that's the small potatoes.

      2. If the idea that cells can be manipulated with electromagnetics is accepted as fact, then following from that is the notion that the human brain and mind can also be so manipulated. It can be and is. The idea that humans can be controled through relatively simple means is simply not talked about. People walk around believing that they are not constantly subject to mood control and behavior modification. The public, however, has been programmed to deny this with automatic knee-jerk force. Those who do the research, however, (all of which is available enough), will eventually see how the whole game works. --Just because most people don't bother to read the data does not mean that the data ceases to exist.

      3. Chi, which is linked to all of this, is indeed understood to some degree by Western science, particularly military science. Denying its existence removes it from the public tool set, and thus limits individuals in their search for their own power; keeps them locked down and easier to control.

      Granted, you didn't mention magnets, but, since usually acupuncture and magnets go together, I thought I'd head it off at the cuff. As far as definitive sources on the state of reality, stage performers make their living with trickery. The ones I referenced happen to ADMIT that it's trickery, rather than trying to pass it off as some mystical bullshit. Please do some basic research on them before dismissing them merely as people looking to protect their egos. Whatever flaws they have as messengers doesn't negate the honesty of their respective messages.

      I've actually done quite a lot of research on these people. I've studied with a professional stage magician, and I know a fair bit about the craft, and believe me, James Randi in particular is a certifiable egomaniac. Magicians have a most peculiar version of tunnel vision; because they know first-hand how easy it is to trick human perceptions, they automatically fall into the belief that ALL human perceptions are faulty with regard to any observation which falls outside the parameters o

    3. Re:Stage Magicians. . . by sjames · · Score: 1

      It is always preferred to understand the mechanism of action for any medical procedure. However, several of the more important pharmaceuticals were in use for years before a plausible mechanism of action was known. Examples include aspirin and penecillin. It would have been quite a shame if they had been shelved until a mechanism of action was known. If something can be shown to be useful, it is best to use it now and then figure out how/why it works (mostly since the expanded understanding may lead to even more useful things)

      That's not to say that every patent remedy should be on the shelves. Most can't demonstrate even marginal effectiveness for anything but lining someone's pockets, much less a mechanism of action.

      The big problem comes in when a vicious circle gets going. We can't imagine how it works so we conclude it can't be effective. Since it can't be effective, we won't waste time studying it. Anyone who does waste time on it is of questionable authority, therefore, their reports may be disregarded. We know it isn't effective because we haven't seen any credible reports to the contrary.

      The unfortunate effective result is to make some things untouchable by conventional medicine for reasons no better than why some people won't go to work on friday the 13th and find any broken mirror more horrifying than annoying.

  72. Re:Oh, Boy. Surprise! by Drakai · · Score: 1

    Wait a sec? Are you saying that a practictioner of Yoga and self heal better or that a Yogi master can heal anyone? You make it sound like these great 'healers' have been running around curing cancer and closing bullet wounds. I guess we are just to western-biased and technology-oriented to see it?

  73. Electromagnetism & Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One of his earlier works is available online in its entirety:

    Electromagetism & Life

    Pretty interesting stuff.

  74. Re:Oh, Boy. Surprise! by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    I think it is a mistake to state that it is only with the addition of Western science that progress will be made. There have been 4000 years of progress. Eastern medicine has also been driven by external observation and experimentation for thousands of years. The difference is that it has also been driven by internal observation, and Eastern medicine is past the stage of "If I don't have an explanation for this that fits my current model of the Universe, it doesn't exist," which is regrettably the stage that many Western scientists occupy. In medicine that might be related to all the money they get from the pharmaceutical companies that emphasize long-term treatment of symptoms, but that's a different discussion.

    But my point is: this is really, really old news. I didn't say it was unimportant that Western scientists finally found some information that might possibly perhaps allow them to give credence to a huge body of scientific work done under a different model that they usually reject as unscientific. And I did not say or imply anything about what can or cannot be done with bioelectric energy or energy from other sources. I posted because the context of the article and some of the discussion struck me as, "Wow, this is new!" In reality it is very old information.

    I've been practicing Qigong for about 5 years and I can tell you for a fact that damage causes an energetic potential in the area of the wound because I can feel it. The area around the wound becomes "fuzzy" somewhat like the resistance you feel when passing your hand through an area charged with static electricity. Is that scientific? Well, I think it is. It is measurable and repeatable, and if I focus on moving energy through that area in a particular way, I can tell you that it heals faster. Over the years, I've had plenty of injuries from which to obtain experimental results. People have been doing that in Qigong (though the practices go by many names in different cultures) for thousands of years. I'm not saying anything new, which is why I don't spend much time saying it to people. And most people will disagree with you without even investing the time to experience it.

    But there's a wealth of science out there about this topic already if you are interested.

  75. That Geneva convention feeling by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    And what sources are you citing for this one?

    At last count, I had just shy of 500 megabytes worth of saved websites and various documents scooped from the collective world news services since around the year 2000. I don't even know where to start. It's like asking me to find a source to prove that water is wet. Nobody says such a thing directly. You have to infer it through cross examination and through the use of your mental faculties. In this case, anybody with eyes, a brain and an hour of time each day to scan the news is capable of learning the nature of the world.

    Define genocide, and cite your source.

    Genocide: "Killing everybody who isn't a Jew who occupies the land Israel wants to take for its own."

    Yeah, they're being slow and methodical about it, but "Bulldozing Houses" just doesn't inspire that Geneva Convention feeling.

    My source, again, is the collective world news since around September 2001, when Israel stepped up its campaign against Palestine under the guise of 'combating terror'. If you honestly need sources from me to validate this, you need more help than I can personally provide.

    If you have been following, you'll also note that Israel has expanded their war recently. Hundreds of dead in Lebanon, and about a half million refugees in just over a week. Nice job!


    -FL

  76. Re:Oh, Boy. Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not disagreeing with anything you are saying. I have personal experience with using qi to heal myself as well, amoung other things. My comment was made mostly on the off chance that someone might be provoked into investigating the eastern energy arts. I was also talking about the progress of *western* science (although the eastern arts do benefit as well from the new perspective): my guess is that the mainstream (I know there are some who are forging ahead on their own) will continue fumbling around in the dark. Just look at how long it has taken acupuncture to get a measure of acceptance. Heck, there are still many who scoff at the concept, despite abundant evidence that it works.