Cause I never would maybe want to run SSH/SFTP and be able to get to it from the inside or from a trusted LAN to my DMZ and not allow anyone from the cloud to get to it. Or I might never want to run a webserver and let a client look at it but not anybody else from the net. And of course all cloud facing servers should have internet legal addresses as opposed to giving them a RFC 1918 address hiding them behind your firewall and then if by chance you sys admin makes a mistake and opens a port that she shouldn't by accident you are still safe till she can fix it. Cause yeah defense in depth is stupid.
So yes ports that you don't want people talking on should be closed but in the real world that is just not possible and/or you want different groups of people to be able to talk to a given box on different ports. And oh yeah in a building of 300+ nodes you tell me how you are going to be sure that every box is locked down.
Linkage? Because what you are saying doesn't jive with what I remember. And no the most converative of people would really like to figure out a way for little boys to have children without having to see any of the "evil parts".
BIOS updates right now basically say that if they burn your house down it sucks to be you. In fact *all* software says this. How would this be different and why would anyone view it as anything other than another piece of software?
The correct comparison is not to Larry Flynt and this is why teh First Amendement argument doesn't really hold water.
The difference is really simple. Larry and the spammers/spimmers should both have the right to publish whatever they want to. But Larry has no way to, *force* me to view what he publishes. I have to get out of my chair, go to the store and exchange money to get it. OTOH spammers/spimmers both shove it down my throat. Thanks to fine tools like SapmAssassin and a very aggresive.procmailrc I manage to avoid most spam sent my way. I'm guessing it's slightly harder on a phone and of course most people don't know how to use those tools. The correct comparison is a salesdroid knocking on your door and if you don't answer trying to yell his "message" through the closed door. And that is not and should not be protected.
In short the problem is not that the spimmers are saying the things they are saying. It is that they are forcing you to listen. Which is a bad thing.
If I want to install something how do I get rpm to grab it and all it's depends for me?
Granted as a package format rpms and debs are pretty much equal and depend as much on the packager as the format for quality. But, from what I've seen, as a package management app rpm can't hold a candle to apt.
Then you are not the target audience. Yes most if not all of the stuff is online. But many of us still enjoy sitting down with a dead tree copy. To me it is one of lifes great pleasures. And oh yeah. I can read this on the train. Those 2 or 3 hours of being more entertained than I would have been otherwise seem like a good deal to me.
I count 8 ads. At least one of which is for a *very* cool company. There are also links for places to buy the stuff you need for the project in the articles themselves. But I consider that info rather than ads. It is worth every penny.
Now if only he could grow a sense of humour and continue to take his work seriously while taking himself much less seriously he would be a likable genius.
When a BSD box is booting the shit has well and truly hit the fan. Odds are people will be focused on things other than boot images. Most likely admins screaming "FUCK" at the top of their lungs and putting their fists through things.
Sourcefire. Martin Roesch's company. It gives you, the admin, the goodness of Snort and OSS tools and gives your bosses a contract to feel all warm and fuzzy about. Pretty much a win-win. I love my Sourcefire boxen and they cost less than the other commercial IDSes.
Re:books beat electronic documents?
on
Firefox In Print
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
ORA releases more free content than any other vendor you can name and stuff on Safari has basically no copy protection and no DRM whatsoever. To accuse Tim O'Reilly of being profit hungry scum is just plain wrong. The simple fact of the matter is that while there is a demand for dead tree books he will happily fill it and that he has been making a tidy profit off of a very non-evil ebook system for years now.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah right.
Cause I never would maybe want to run SSH/SFTP and be able to get to it from the inside or from a trusted LAN to my DMZ and not allow anyone from the cloud to get to it. Or I might never want to run a webserver and let a client look at it but not anybody else from the net. And of course all cloud facing servers should have internet legal addresses as opposed to giving them a RFC 1918 address hiding them behind your firewall and then if by chance you sys admin makes a mistake and opens a port that she shouldn't by accident you are still safe till she can fix it. Cause yeah defense in depth is stupid.
So yes ports that you don't want people talking on should be closed but in the real world that is just not possible and/or you want different groups of people to be able to talk to a given box on different ports. And oh yeah in a building of 300+ nodes you tell me how you are going to be sure that every box is locked down.
Yeah. Cause single points of failure and non-human readable configs are such a very good idea.
What drivers do you have?
Linkage? Because what you are saying doesn't jive with what I remember. And no the most converative of people would really like to figure out a way for little boys to have children without having to see any of the "evil parts".
Yeah. That was mostly just me and my etherkillers. You take that out of the scene and the gamer numbers go down to 2%.
A 12" Lodge by prefrence.
BIOS updates right now basically say that if they burn your house down it sucks to be you. In fact *all* software says this. How would this be different and why would anyone view it as anything other than another piece of software?
Very true. In order to make my free speech argument I was giving the spammers the benefit of the doubt but you are, of course, correct.
The correct comparison is not to Larry Flynt and this is why teh First Amendement argument doesn't really hold water.
.procmailrc I manage to avoid most spam sent my way. I'm guessing it's slightly harder on a phone and of course most people don't know how to use those tools. The correct comparison is a salesdroid knocking on your door and if you don't answer trying to yell his "message" through the closed door. And that is not and should not be protected.
The difference is really simple. Larry and the spammers/spimmers should both have the right to publish whatever they want to. But Larry has no way to, *force* me to view what he publishes. I have to get out of my chair, go to the store and exchange money to get it. OTOH spammers/spimmers both shove it down my throat. Thanks to fine tools like SapmAssassin and a very aggresive
In short the problem is not that the spimmers are saying the things they are saying. It is that they are forcing you to listen. Which is a bad thing.
If I want to install something how do I get rpm to grab it and all it's depends for me?
Granted as a package format rpms and debs are pretty much equal and depend as much on the packager as the format for quality. But, from what I've seen, as a package management app rpm can't hold a candle to apt.
Do what I do. Use this script with vim and them paste into /.
c ri pt_id=465
http://vim.sourceforge.net/scripts/script.php?s
In what Universe is Pine a "Linux only" client?
But they did include Pine. Which is why the question makes perfect sense.
Nice. Now I know where to get copies for overseas friends. Will they be on the website?
Somedays I *hate* living in Albany.
I got mine on Monday Feb. 14th. But I'm on the West Coast.
Then you are not the target audience. Yes most if not all of the stuff is online. But many of us still enjoy sitting down with a dead tree copy. To me it is one of lifes great pleasures.
And oh yeah. I can read this on the train. Those 2 or 3 hours of being more entertained than I would have been otherwise seem like a good deal to me.
Spider Robinson fans?
If not they should be.
/me looks at his copy.
I count 8 ads. At least one of which is for a *very* cool company. There are also links for places to buy the stuff you need for the project in the articles themselves. But I consider that info rather than ads. It is worth every penny.
Now if only he could grow a sense of humour and continue to take his work seriously while taking himself much less seriously he would be a likable genius.
http://battellemedia.com/images/googlekeys.jpg
Yes. Many peeople do.
/ de bian/local/FAQ.xhtml#debianplans
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/trunk
And now you know also.
The answer for me would be neither. Openbox is teh win.
I think you misunderstand.
When a BSD box is booting the shit has well and truly hit the fan. Odds are people will be focused on things other than boot images. Most likely admins screaming "FUCK" at the top of their lungs and putting their fists through things.
Sourcefire. Martin Roesch's company. It gives you, the admin, the goodness of Snort and OSS tools and gives your bosses a contract to feel all warm and fuzzy about. Pretty much a win-win. I love my Sourcefire boxen and they cost less than the other commercial IDSes.
ORA releases more free content than any other vendor you can name and stuff on Safari has basically no copy protection and no DRM whatsoever. To accuse Tim O'Reilly of being profit hungry scum is just plain wrong. The simple fact of the matter is that while there is a demand for dead tree books he will happily fill it and that he has been making a tidy profit off of a very non-evil ebook system for years now.
So just what *was* your point?