Well, for one thing it shows how easy it is to pull the plug on a lot of people at once. A single service like this shouldn't have this kind of power. It illustrates the necessity of having alternate hookups that can *route around the damage*
It's far simpler to simply drop encrypted packets that can't be read. All the "official" channels, like banks and other businesses, have the built in back doors.
Prevent WhatsApp traffic from transiting phone carrier networks? Doesn't affect Wi-Fi, then....Maybe the judge has no idea, and neither do the folks who are supposed to implement it.
Neither do you if you think the wifi networks aren't connected to the internet through the phone carriers.
I would prefer he just offer a VPN service, or some other way to make blocking much more difficult. In the meantime, I would like to see the engineers develop robust ad hoc networks that don't require service from the phone carriers. The state has too much power over communications.
In fact, a simple objective review of actions by each party shows the Democrats are exceedingly fascist.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to single them out. I don't care for the republicans religious fascism either. I just think that democrat voters are hopelessly naive about the party's history and present day tokenism and faux "liberalism", while the republicans are just brutally "frank". There was that bit of role reversal in '64 that is climaxing now with Trump, a person that has me wondering why people don't go for Johnson instead. At this point the Rs and Ds work together more as a tag team than as actual opponents.
Regardless, back on topic, it's long past time for them to turn their backs on pharma/religious lobbyists and abolish prohibition. Unlike the old days with alcohol, this one is truly unconstitutional.
Actually I am aware of that. It's how derivatives work at 10 times the entire world's GDP. It's all IOUs. It is quite impossible to call in all those chips (scrips?). The only way to get anything out of this market is a transaction tax.
the CGC could mean a future where you don't have to worry about viruses or hackers attacking your computer, smartphone or your other connected devices. At a national level, this technology could help prevent large-scale attacks against things like power plants, water supplies and air-traffic infrastructure.
Um, this assumes that one side can always maintain an advantage, amiright? Otherwise it just sounds like a really fast game of cat and mouse.
I'm not sure what that adds here since I don't single anybody out in simply saying that fraud will be more difficult to spot when nobody is watching over the process.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, for one thing it shows how easy it is to pull the plug on a lot of people at once. A single service like this shouldn't have this kind of power. It illustrates the necessity of having alternate hookups that can *route around the damage*
More likely he did listen to Brzezinski.
Destabilization does have a purpose.
Nothing
Be grateful they don't play bagpipes.
Augmented reality and market capitalization are the same thing. We got another unicorn here..
It's far simpler to simply drop encrypted packets that can't be read. All the "official" channels, like banks and other businesses, have the built in back doors.
:-) That's almost pedantic.. They are businesses subject to any government whim. We need a way around them all to defeat the blockade.
The devil is always in the details.
More likely the story is obfuscated by the details, like that old lawyers trick, comply with a discovery order by drowning them in paperwork.
Everyone knows you can run your apps over wifi.
OMG!
Prevent WhatsApp traffic from transiting phone carrier networks? Doesn't affect Wi-Fi, then....Maybe the judge has no idea, and neither do the folks who are supposed to implement it.
Neither do you if you think the wifi networks aren't connected to the internet through the phone carriers.
I would prefer he just offer a VPN service, or some other way to make blocking much more difficult. In the meantime, I would like to see the engineers develop robust ad hoc networks that don't require service from the phone carriers. The state has too much power over communications.
Some cars don't have built in tracking or remote disable (like OnStar), so lets ban all cars that can't be tracked
You should maybe talk to the Germans about that... You gotta start small.
You may call it "ignorance" all you want, but is the blockade working? If so, then what is ""ignorant" about it?
Ah, so then the "announcement" was really an nvidia ad? Do they really need that much front page exposure?
When we reach photorealism at dual 4k, then we can maybe talk about peaking. We're a long, long way off from that.
That, and the petabytes of storage and RAM needed to store all that for a 30 second video
Would have been nice to see that specified in the summary.
By the way, it pretty much goes without mentioning that an nvidia card runs cooler than an AMD :-)
Sorry for the second reply:
But all of you might want to save yourselves the effort of posting here, since all comments will disappear if they delete the story.
Slashdot, please, if you must, instead of deleting it, just move it off the front page.
All over again.
What is this? An Alzheimers test?
The assets can be seized and put into the public domain. It would probably take a full on riot to make that happen though.
Good way to be there and not risk getting shot
At least you might end up with a good movie script.
In fact, a simple objective review of actions by each party shows the Democrats are exceedingly fascist.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to single them out. I don't care for the republicans religious fascism either. I just think that democrat voters are hopelessly naive about the party's history and present day tokenism and faux "liberalism", while the republicans are just brutally "frank". There was that bit of role reversal in '64 that is climaxing now with Trump, a person that has me wondering why people don't go for Johnson instead. At this point the Rs and Ds work together more as a tag team than as actual opponents.
Regardless, back on topic, it's long past time for them to turn their backs on pharma/religious lobbyists and abolish prohibition. Unlike the old days with alcohol, this one is truly unconstitutional.
Actually I am aware of that. It's how derivatives work at 10 times the entire world's GDP. It's all IOUs. It is quite impossible to call in all those chips (scrips?). The only way to get anything out of this market is a transaction tax.
the CGC could mean a future where you don't have to worry about viruses or hackers attacking your computer, smartphone or your other connected devices. At a national level, this technology could help prevent large-scale attacks against things like power plants, water supplies and air-traffic infrastructure.
Um, this assumes that one side can always maintain an advantage, amiright? Otherwise it just sounds like a really fast game of cat and mouse.
I'm not sure what that adds here since I don't single anybody out in simply saying that fraud will be more difficult to spot when nobody is watching over the process.