Already spelled that out previously, the Brits asked them not to. In other words, extortion. Thank you for providing another perfect example why it is a waste to take you seriously.. But don't let that stop you from carrying on.
You're kinda sensitive, aren't ya? Sure it could be the Chinese, or the Romanians controlling Chinese machines, or all those Chinese routers. Don't hold out on us man. Tell us what you replaced DNS with.
Bullshit (non)-question based on false assumptions. Besides, you will just wave it off, so there's no point. I believe I spelled that out. If not, then there ya go, my brave little man... so much bombast! You trying to compensate for deficiencies in other areas?
Hence, exterminating the poor would simply re-draw the borderline. Society would then be prepared afresh for another culling. And another. And another.
*There can only be one*
But yes, the rich do need their servants to feel rich. So idea of "eliminating" poverty is pretty much out of the question.
Poverty and corruption are inextricably linked. The only way out will be the universal basic income. And the automation will basically be a replicator. Then an "income" really won't be necessary. The only other option is extermination, either through neglect or by more active measures.
No, you are merely expressing a biased opinion, in a rather long winded fashion I might add. What do they call that? Bombast, high sounding with little to no meaning. Yeah, that's it... Unfortunate for you, I don't fall for it.
Just the opposite for me. The tracking I can deal with. I prefer uncensored results. Besides, there is no way to verify they actually "respect your privacy". "We do our best..." doesn't quite cut it. It is still a centralized service. Maybe I should just use the Pi as my personal web crawler.
Being located in France would make it subject to EU rules, no? Like the "right to forget", and other mandatory filtering? These are the things we need to circumvent.
That is your opinion, apparently derived from your TV, and the dictatorships back in your homeland. There is nothing that limits it to strictly military or police. We can and do obligate our government to take proper care of its citizens, and considering our great prosperity, we need to expand it much further.
Slashdot Mirror
:-) You did it again... You truly fascinate me
A single cell phone would be way too small to be practical.
I wonder if this can be used to attack steganography...
Oh MY GoD they are watching ME!
Jaaaa
Of course they are! You're the one with the difficulty and carrying on with the absurd charade here.
:-) Keep squeezing that red nose of yours. I laugh every time it squeaks.
The ISP can sniff the packets and drop the ones it doesn't like, including the ones scrambled by an 'unauthorized' VPN. Is that really so difficult?
:-) See? You're just wasting your own time writing more gibberish. Everything you need to know has already been posted and linked...
Read this link, and you tell me. Try to put the gibberish aside if you are able..
Doesn't matter how many paragraphs you blurt out, it's still gibberish.
You've answered #2 as expected.
? Ooookay?
:-) How much time did you waste writing all that gibberish?
:-) You did it again... thanks!
:-) Yes, I always post hoping nobody will notice.
why can't the DoJ act... to prosecute...?
Already spelled that out previously, the Brits asked them not to. In other words, extortion. Thank you for providing another perfect example why it is a waste to take you seriously.. But don't let that stop you from carrying on.
You're kinda sensitive, aren't ya? Sure it could be the Chinese, or the Romanians controlling Chinese machines, or all those Chinese routers. Don't hold out on us man. Tell us what you replaced DNS with.
The Russians... It's payback for Napoleon
Or it could be Russia trying to make us think it is an NSA/GCHQ false-flag operation to pin the attacks on Russia.
But we know that they know that we know....
Why?
Bullshit (non)-question based on false assumptions. Besides, you will just wave it off, so there's no point. I believe I spelled that out. If not, then there ya go, my brave little man... so much bombast! You trying to compensate for deficiencies in other areas?
Hence, exterminating the poor would simply re-draw the borderline. Society would then be prepared afresh for another culling. And another. And another.
*There can only be one*
But yes, the rich do need their servants to feel rich. So idea of "eliminating" poverty is pretty much out of the question.
Poverty and corruption are inextricably linked. The only way out will be the universal basic income. And the automation will basically be a replicator. Then an "income" really won't be necessary. The only other option is extermination, either through neglect or by more active measures.
...generates a hockey stick...
Would you prefer a jai alai cesta?
:-) You know you're babbling, right? Sure is fun to watch though...
you're lying
No, you are merely expressing a biased opinion, in a rather long winded fashion I might add. What do they call that? Bombast, high sounding with little to no meaning. Yeah, that's it... Unfortunate for you, I don't fall for it.
Just the opposite for me. The tracking I can deal with. I prefer uncensored results. Besides, there is no way to verify they actually "respect your privacy". "We do our best..." doesn't quite cut it. It is still a centralized service. Maybe I should just use the Pi as my personal web crawler.
Being located in France would make it subject to EU rules, no? Like the "right to forget", and other mandatory filtering? These are the things we need to circumvent.
Nope, it does not.
That is your opinion, apparently derived from your TV, and the dictatorships back in your homeland. There is nothing that limits it to strictly military or police. We can and do obligate our government to take proper care of its citizens, and considering our great prosperity, we need to expand it much further.