3 weeks should not lead to any meaningful atrophy unless you are completely inactive, in studies atrophy have been seen after 2-3 weeks for patients that are confined to bed 24x7. What you are experiencing is most likely your Central Nervous System having to slightly relearn the most efficient muscle motor pattern for bicycling. To get your CNS to learn the most effective way to perform a certain movement (part of the Repeated Bout Effect) is e.g why strength athletes have to train more often (to train the movement more) than a body builder that just wants to trigger hypertrophy. It's not unusual for BB:s to train one muscle group once per week while say Power-lifers train twice per day 7 days per week.
Other than that I fully agree with what you wrote and you are completely correct in that muscles that are not used will eventually atrophy and if you do not exercise while losing weight a larger part of the weight loss will be muscles (usually 50/50 between fat and muscle) as compared with if you exercise (usually around 70/30 to 80/20 fat/muscle in the studies that I have seen), just that it will not happen as quick as in 3 weeks unless you are completely inactive.
To give some context here one have to also understand that this was the local Left party in Södermanland, in the recent election they gathered a total of 11113 votes and it was a motion filed (and supported by) only 4 people. And naturally the motion was denied.
What's wrong with religious people, I mean wtf? I just saw an episode of "Everything for Sweden" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and when told that less than 4% of Swedes attend church several of the Americans started to cry...
Exercise and cardio is vital for your health in may ways but if you are overweight and you loose weight then all the markers that exist today for an unhealthy live decreases. So I'm not saying that exercise is bad, it's just that being overweight is really really bad for you.
The increase in BMR by added muscle mass is minuscule. 1kg fat mass needs aprox 4.5 kcal per day in maintenance while 1kg of pure muscle mass needs aprox 13kcal per day in maintenance. So while "muscle burns almost 3 times as many calories as fat from just being there on your body" sounds good the actual numbers are so small that they almost doesn't matter.
And I have never heard of cardio increasing your BMR, in every piece of litterateur that I have seen BMR depends on your age, weight (and of course body composition as I described above), sex and your genetics.
Note that I specifically wrote "mostly" and not "only". That you can obtain a caloric deficit far more easily with diet restrictions than exercise is far from false, that it's "easier" is kind of the whole point. You will not get the lazy slobs off the couch by telling them lies that diet makes no change and they should exercise instead either, for the problem is that they don't eat a proper diet either (or they would not still be fat slobs on the couch).
That exercise will shift the ratio of fat/muscle that you loose should be common knowledge and something that I didn't adress since we only talked about weight loss and not quality weight loss.
Deficiency problems however is not something that happens if you are overweight (and you supplement with vitamins and minerals if you really cut your food intake down to zero). There was several studies of people in the 70:ies that performed weight loss by cutting their food intake to absolutely zero for 365+ days and back when I myself lost 225lbs some years ago I only consumed around 700kcal a day (VLCD).
I also significantly reduced my calorie intake by cutting junkfood mostly.
Not that it's not great that you exercise but the real answer to you feeling better is what you did here. Weight loss (which mostly comes from calorie restriction and not exercise, however exercise is great for many other things) is THE major indicator for improving health vitals in all studies.
How is that close enough? AC wrote "21st in area" when it would be 2:d, and "5th or 6th in population" when the real number is 23th! It's completely backwards;)
If we look at actual population numbers then Finland would be the 23th in population after Minnesota but before South Carolina. And 2:d in area after Alaska but before Texas.
I know, it' not like that event went unnoticed here in Sweden... However she was murdered way before this extradition thing was exposed so we have no idea today if the powers at be simply used her as a scapegoat since she obviously could not defend her self at that point.
There have been exactly one such case involving two Egyptians. None of which where killed but tortured. They where detained unlawfully because the US managed to convince the then foreign minister (Anna Lind) that these two where terrorists and that the US had evidence that they where plotting to do terrorist acts in Sweden.
It was also all done in secret and once it was discovered it was a major political incident and no one involved holds any office today.
No he wasn't. If he was then the first prosecutor would not have let Assange leave the country and travel to the UK in the first place. If the US really wanted him they would have picked him off the streets in the middle of the night as they have done with the other gitmo residents.
This is not to pay the fines, this is to compensate for the loss of revenue that Google believes that they will suffer from phone makers that installs just the Google Play store and not the other Google apps.
You can begin by reading RFC 2616 and then perhaps you might understand what will happen when you issue a GET request on a server and in which direction the data will flow.
Well it's not strange that they wanted the rack space for free since they #1 provided the cache servers to the ISP:s for free and #2 having a local cache helps the ISP massively since the no longer have to peer all that traffic.
Depends on if the hardware manufacturers did break any copyrights held by IBM when they made their clones. Software patents wasn't really a thing back then and copyright only covers so much.
Still, which was the starting point behind this whole thread, will Brexit somehow fix copyright in the UK. I don't say that everything with EU smells like roses but I would not be surprised if that particular law wouldn't have been turned down anyway with regards to some trade agreement that requires compensation to rightsholders. Tape tax was one such thing that didn't need EU to get a wide hold in all the western countries for example.
Looking into that particular matter and it seams that the High Court judge actually decided to not make a reference to CJEU since the High Court ruled that "the exception had been introduced unlawfully". https://www.twobirds.com/en/ne....
However regardless of if this particular law was shut down due to EU or not there is nothing that guarantees that such an exception would be possible after a full Brexit. Or that the copyright holders does not lobby full time against the British Government as well.
My stance on the matter is that this is not a EU or no-EU thing but something that must be fought (the copyright lobby) on every front both local and globally.
Before you rethink your position you should check how your British MP:s voted on these two articles. Chances are high that this proposal are supported by the British government as well which means that they would apply this EU or no EU. The problem here is not EU but that copyright lobby groups have been successful in convincing European politicians from all countries that this law is needed and that all opposition is simply paid Google and Facebook shills.
Slashdot Mirror
However ugly gconf is it's at least not a big binary blob of a database like the Windows registry.
The 3D fad died
3 weeks should not lead to any meaningful atrophy unless you are completely inactive, in studies atrophy have been seen after 2-3 weeks for patients that are confined to bed 24x7. What you are experiencing is most likely your Central Nervous System having to slightly relearn the most efficient muscle motor pattern for bicycling. To get your CNS to learn the most effective way to perform a certain movement (part of the Repeated Bout Effect) is e.g why strength athletes have to train more often (to train the movement more) than a body builder that just wants to trigger hypertrophy. It's not unusual for BB:s to train one muscle group once per week while say Power-lifers train twice per day 7 days per week.
Other than that I fully agree with what you wrote and you are completely correct in that muscles that are not used will eventually atrophy and if you do not exercise while losing weight a larger part of the weight loss will be muscles (usually 50/50 between fat and muscle) as compared with if you exercise (usually around 70/30 to 80/20 fat/muscle in the studies that I have seen), just that it will not happen as quick as in 3 weeks unless you are completely inactive.
To give some context here one have to also understand that this was the local Left party in Södermanland, in the recent election they gathered a total of 11113 votes and it was a motion filed (and supported by) only 4 people. And naturally the motion was denied.
What's wrong with religious people, I mean wtf? I just saw an episode of "Everything for Sweden" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and when told that less than 4% of Swedes attend church several of the Americans started to cry...
The problem is that I wrote "vitals" when I meant "markers".
yeah you are correct, I see now that I mixed up square miles and square kilometres when I compared the two.
Exercise and cardio is vital for your health in may ways but if you are overweight and you loose weight then all the markers that exist today for an unhealthy live decreases. So I'm not saying that exercise is bad, it's just that being overweight is really really bad for you.
The increase in BMR by added muscle mass is minuscule. 1kg fat mass needs aprox 4.5 kcal per day in maintenance while 1kg of pure muscle mass needs aprox 13kcal per day in maintenance. So while "muscle burns almost 3 times as many calories as fat from just being there on your body" sounds good the actual numbers are so small that they almost doesn't matter.
And I have never heard of cardio increasing your BMR, in every piece of litterateur that I have seen BMR depends on your age, weight (and of course body composition as I described above), sex and your genetics.
Note that I specifically wrote "mostly" and not "only". That you can obtain a caloric deficit far more easily with diet restrictions than exercise is far from false, that it's "easier" is kind of the whole point. You will not get the lazy slobs off the couch by telling them lies that diet makes no change and they should exercise instead either, for the problem is that they don't eat a proper diet either (or they would not still be fat slobs on the couch).
That exercise will shift the ratio of fat/muscle that you loose should be common knowledge and something that I didn't adress since we only talked about weight loss and not quality weight loss.
Deficiency problems however is not something that happens if you are overweight (and you supplement with vitamins and minerals if you really cut your food intake down to zero). There was several studies of people in the 70:ies that performed weight loss by cutting their food intake to absolutely zero for 365+ days and back when I myself lost 225lbs some years ago I only consumed around 700kcal a day (VLCD).
I also significantly reduced my calorie intake by cutting junkfood mostly.
Not that it's not great that you exercise but the real answer to you feeling better is what you did here. Weight loss (which mostly comes from calorie restriction and not exercise, however exercise is great for many other things) is THE major indicator for improving health vitals in all studies.
How is that close enough? AC wrote "21st in area" when it would be 2:d, and "5th or 6th in population" when the real number is 23th! It's completely backwards ;)
If we look at actual population numbers then Finland would be the 23th in population after Minnesota but before South Carolina. And 2:d in area after Alaska but before Texas.
I know, it' not like that event went unnoticed here in Sweden... However she was murdered way before this extradition thing was exposed so we have no idea today if the powers at be simply used her as a scapegoat since she obviously could not defend her self at that point.
There have been exactly one such case involving two Egyptians. None of which where killed but tortured. They where detained unlawfully because the US managed to convince the then foreign minister (Anna Lind) that these two where terrorists and that the US had evidence that they where plotting to do terrorist acts in Sweden.
It was also all done in secret and once it was discovered it was a major political incident and no one involved holds any office today.
No he wasn't. If he was then the first prosecutor would not have let Assange leave the country and travel to the UK in the first place. If the US really wanted him they would have picked him off the streets in the middle of the night as they have done with the other gitmo residents.
This is not to pay the fines, this is to compensate for the loss of revenue that Google believes that they will suffer from phone makers that installs just the Google Play store and not the other Google apps.
And badly dubbed over with Pizza Hut over here in Europe :), Demolition Man.
So are you saying that it's not people that are downloading the data from Netflix to their computers/televisions?
You can begin by reading RFC 2616 and then perhaps you might understand what will happen when you issue a GET request on a server and in which direction the data will flow.
Well it's not strange that they wanted the rack space for free since they #1 provided the cache servers to the ISP:s for free and #2 having a local cache helps the ISP massively since the no longer have to peer all that traffic.
Depends on if the hardware manufacturers did break any copyrights held by IBM when they made their clones. Software patents wasn't really a thing back then and copyright only covers so much.
Still, which was the starting point behind this whole thread, will Brexit somehow fix copyright in the UK. I don't say that everything with EU smells like roses but I would not be surprised if that particular law wouldn't have been turned down anyway with regards to some trade agreement that requires compensation to rightsholders. Tape tax was one such thing that didn't need EU to get a wide hold in all the western countries for example.
Looking into that particular matter and it seams that the High Court judge actually decided to not make a reference to CJEU since the High Court ruled that "the exception had been introduced unlawfully". https://www.twobirds.com/en/ne....
However regardless of if this particular law was shut down due to EU or not there is nothing that guarantees that such an exception would be possible after a full Brexit. Or that the copyright holders does not lobby full time against the British Government as well.
My stance on the matter is that this is not a EU or no-EU thing but something that must be fought (the copyright lobby) on every front both local and globally.
Before you rethink your position you should check how your British MP:s voted on these two articles. Chances are high that this proposal are supported by the British government as well which means that they would apply this EU or no EU. The problem here is not EU but that copyright lobby groups have been successful in convincing European politicians from all countries that this law is needed and that all opposition is simply paid Google and Facebook shills.