Actually, there's no cutoff. They transform the standard sonogram using phase-derived data into what you see. It effectively concentrates information, lowering the entropy and clearly enhancing feature recognition. If you want to know more, read the paper (not the article -- the article is garbage).
Re:And the alternative is ... ?
on
World of Queuecraft
·
· Score: 2, Informative
You assume the problem is the server. It's not. It's the client. A world with too many people, or even just one zone with too many people in it, is sufficient to cause the client to fail.
There was a Scheme Nomic around a while back. For people who want to know more about Nomics, go search google a bit, then going Agora Nomic. We need new people.:)
I don't think that kind of thing should be your problem. It's like web hosting. Who has redundant web hosts? I don't. My provider's job is to provide a level of service.
Do you have a service level agreement? If not, you might want to look into negotiating one.
As for the scanner being bulky equipment, it is not hard to envision it shrinking very quickly if this technology becomes widespread.
I'm suspecting that the key design is such that the 6 input fibers are each placed in one of many (60?) input positions, and similarly for the output fibers. I doubt you'll just be able to do a "flooding" attack or even a "try them until you get another input" attack. However, a lockpick could use a scanner that detects the input and output fibers by the modified reflectivity, and then uses a 6-way optical switch framework to scan the 6!=720 combinations extremely quickly.
I can see ways to prevent this, but they increase the engineering complexity substantially. We are talking about car locks here. There's a limit to the cost factor.
2. What 802.11 really needs is <b>power scaling.</b> It's the big difference between cellular networks and wifi. Like the article says, the person with the highest S/N gets to talk.
I'm appalled that it apparently took a public release to get them to patch the servers. It would have been trivial for Valve to slide this into a patch and release it to everyone.
What possible rationale do they have for not fixing it in <b>3 months</b>?
This is a nice way of hosting packages when someone doesn't have the space to put up their own apt-repository. If it's searchable, that's a bonus.
It remains to be seen exactly what kinds of packages will end up here. At least it still requires a DD sponsor, so hopefully poorly-packaged/broken packages will not end up here...
I think brackup supports your particular use-case. It was originally designed for backing up to S3.
Where's the source code?
Actually, there's no cutoff. They transform the standard sonogram using phase-derived data into what you see. It effectively concentrates information, lowering the entropy and clearly enhancing feature recognition. If you want to know more, read the paper (not the article -- the article is garbage).
You assume the problem is the server. It's not. It's the client. A world with too many people, or even just one zone with too many people in it, is sufficient to cause the client to fail.
That looks a lot like the bug that 1.0.1 was supposed to fix...
I believe the article mentions that the keyboard will be used for shortcuts.
Oh, joy. Everyone'll be off a second on the damn New Year's count... again!
There was a Scheme Nomic around a while back. For people who want to know more about Nomics, go search google a bit, then going Agora Nomic. We need new people. :)
So they had contracts with two different companies for web hosting service?
That's not what I meant. I meant redundant web hosts as in having your site hosted at more than one compant.
I don't think that kind of thing should be your problem. It's like web hosting. Who has redundant web hosts? I don't. My provider's job is to provide a level of service.
Do you have a service level agreement? If not, you might want to look into negotiating one.
Tools -> Page Info -> Media. Look for the Background and save it. :)
As for the scanner being bulky equipment, it is not hard to envision it shrinking very quickly if this technology becomes widespread.
I'm suspecting that the key design is such that the 6 input fibers are each placed in one of many (60?) input positions, and similarly for the output fibers. I doubt you'll just be able to do a "flooding" attack or even a "try them until you get another input" attack. However, a lockpick could use a scanner that detects the input and output fibers by the modified reflectivity, and then uses a 6-way optical switch framework to scan the 6!=720 combinations extremely quickly.
I can see ways to prevent this, but they increase the engineering complexity substantially. We are talking about car locks here. There's a limit to the cost factor.
He doesn't want a linker, he wants something to eliminate the need for a VM, some kind of CIL compiler.
The problem isn't "out of sunshine". It's laws that are so huge and unwieldy that it's possible to hide things in them.
What federal law would that be? I've had lots of merchants impose a minimum on me...
1. Isn't this what RTS/CTS is for?
2. What 802.11 really needs is <b>power scaling.</b> It's the big difference between cellular networks and wifi. Like the article says, the person with the highest S/N gets to talk.
I'm appalled that it apparently took a public release to get them to patch the servers. It would have been trivial for Valve to slide this into a patch and release it to everyone.
What possible rationale do they have for not fixing it in <b>3 months</b>?
So for equal battles, break-even is at 5 vs. 5, whereas one extra army always gets you 50%.
But there's no link to the actual paper. Anyone?
If those are 25-21, I'm afraid to think about what might be coming up...
This is a nice way of hosting packages when someone doesn't have the space to put up their own apt-repository. If it's searchable, that's a bonus.
It remains to be seen exactly what kinds of packages will end up here. At least it still requires a DD sponsor, so hopefully poorly-packaged/broken packages will not end up here...
Is 1250 really a top 2%? There's something really disturbing about that...
(That's only about 2.5\sigma from the mean...)
That's a really good question, but you'll have to ask a lawyer.
Make sure to report back when you do!
For those who are concerned that this is a joke, check the date on the article. It's not new.
www.nearlyfreespeech.net is always a good choice -- but I'm not sure whether or not they run Red Hat.