I remember one time way back in the day getting notice of a change with a bill and an option to leave then or to accept the new terms.
I like the way TMobile does it though, no contracts, but you can stay on legacy plans as long as you want.
I kept binge on for a long time (so I could tether and stream without affecting my data uasage), dropped it eventually to travel to Canada and not pay roaming.
That's the way I went (well I have a plane old G5), but the essential is definitely a better phone.
At $499 it's a good price, at $699 it was too much. At the price of a current high end phone I want a portrait camera at the very least.
The near zero bezel on the essential is a nice feature, and I assume the CPU etc are a generation ahead of the G5+ (I don't really know what is equivalent to what).
But the great thing about print unlock is that it makes using a super complex password a lot less difficult, as you only need to type it a few times a day at worse.
True, but if the difference is so dramatic for a "legitimate" site, it is likely not worth degrading UX in exchange for a small fraction of the revenue.
Sure, one can ad a couple percent at best (vs AdSense, darker corners of the web could up to double) to peg the users CPU and degrade the browser experience. Almost certainly not worth it.
Google is bot blocking this because they're afraid it will replace ads, they're blocking it because they're afraid sites will use it and they'll (Google) will get blamed for bad experience. Especially if it brings down every tab and makes all sites suck.
You really need something that allows someone to pay in the realm of $0.005/minute for text web with less than 50% transaction fee to even start to he competitive. Paetron (or maybe a different site, I forget) tries by having you pay a flat monthly as one transaction, then lets you click a a button on a site to kick a chunk to it, settles at the end of the month.
So if I commit say $10/month, paetron sees $9 or so, then they take a cut leaving $8 or so.
Of I click 100 buttons, that gives each click $0.08 to a site, if I click 200, it's dollar $0.04.
Since it's settled at month end, the fee to the sites or not so high, since it's larger chunks then the micropayment.
Maybe a block chain backed with money could do this? Make button click for small shards fine? I doubt it though, I assume based on lag that a Bitcoin transaction has significant cost too (when compared to the sub penny visit value of an ad we're trying to replace).
Of my math on ad value is accurate, I'm worth 10-90/month.
There's no way I'd pay $90 over the ads I deal with, but $10 in a blink.
That's what I find when I do the math on TV, me watching a show is worth more to the advertisers than I'm willing to pay in general ($1.50 or so an hour for when I did the math of revenue Canada viewers on grays anatomy, not many shows I'd pay that much to watch).
Ads are so effective for content production, because advertisers are willing to pay a bunch often.
Slashdot Mirror
Adobe typekit seems to open in it by default, that's the only time I use it.
I assume it's some kind of OS hook that requires Edge, but I'm too lazy to actually check.
I use it about 3 times a week to browse and sync fonts.
Oh cool, so they bought a lot of the low frequency spectrum to make that possible at the last big spectrum auction?
Not only is it circling the drain, they're not even trying.
They didn't buy any spectrum last auction, so they can't really build out and compete.
I suspect TMobile ends up buying them after they're reduced to about the size of Metro PCS.
I love getting out of home, but I hate being in shitty florescent light
I much prefer the local parks m
You only pay a little bit more shopping local?
Your time must be almost worthless.
But think about the passengers!
https://m.xkcd.com/1897/
I typically click on four, and there are more squares.
generally "click all that contain a sign".
A street sign would be like 2 usually and a stop sign 4, and sometimes both are there.
Giga Transfers, double version 3
If I could get everything available to Roku to cast to my Chromecast, that'd be value enough.
Amazon and Google being pissy at each other is preventing this.
Sorry, I was hoping for more details on one I can get this.
I promise I don't usually read them.
The article says around 50% less than Bristol Ridge
Yeah, but the only way to cripple Equafax would be to make it toxic to do business with them.
The real message would be class action against the banks that hand over the information to places with poorly vetted security.
Doesn't it work that way?
I remember one time way back in the day getting notice of a change with a bill and an option to leave then or to accept the new terms.
I like the way TMobile does it though, no contracts, but you can stay on legacy plans as long as you want.
I kept binge on for a long time (so I could tether and stream without affecting my data uasage), dropped it eventually to travel to Canada and not pay roaming.
This seems really improbable.
I'd be shocked if even a tenth of e-mails are even opened.
I can imagine nothing worse than NN 4.7
A terrible blast from the past.
This wasn't a joke.
I liked having a special folder to keep up with a few people and not be overwhelmed with nonsense.
I really miss Buzz
In the jury selection I've seen, it's the side that feels they are wrong that does this.
I've seen plaintiffs act this way as often as defendants, and similarly, I've seen both sides want the educated on different instances.
You can generally tell which side is right by who they object to.
You really should have been buying more RAM in 2004.
I don't think that's true on the coffee.
I spend about $1/day on coffee at home.
I've never seen it over $4 at a coffee shop, and that's for more than I drink at home (though I make mine quite strong).
That's the way I went (well I have a plane old G5), but the essential is definitely a better phone.
At $499 it's a good price, at $699 it was too much. At the price of a current high end phone I want a portrait camera at the very least.
The near zero bezel on the essential is a nice feature, and I assume the CPU etc are a generation ahead of the G5+ (I don't really know what is equivalent to what).
But the great thing about print unlock is that it makes using a super complex password a lot less difficult, as you only need to type it a few times a day at worse.
Pigs can't burn fat for warmth (according to the summary).
Because of this the only defense against cold pigs have is accumulating more fat, and small/young ones die.
This modification means they require less fat to regulate body temperature, and burn more when it's cold (which is why they are leaner).
True, but if the difference is so dramatic for a "legitimate" site, it is likely not worth degrading UX in exchange for a small fraction of the revenue.
Sure, one can ad a couple percent at best (vs AdSense, darker corners of the web could up to double) to peg the users CPU and degrade the browser experience. Almost certainly not worth it.
Google is bot blocking this because they're afraid it will replace ads, they're blocking it because they're afraid sites will use it and they'll (Google) will get blamed for bad experience. Especially if it brings down every tab and makes all sites suck.
Maybe a money backed block chain is possible?
You really need something that allows someone to pay in the realm of $0.005/minute for text web with less than 50% transaction fee to even start to he competitive. Paetron (or maybe a different site, I forget) tries by having you pay a flat monthly as one transaction, then lets you click a a button on a site to kick a chunk to it, settles at the end of the month.
So if I commit say $10/month, paetron sees $9 or so, then they take a cut leaving $8 or so.
Of I click 100 buttons, that gives each click $0.08 to a site, if I click 200, it's dollar $0.04.
Since it's settled at month end, the fee to the sites or not so high, since it's larger chunks then the micropayment.
Maybe a block chain backed with money could do this? Make button click for small shards fine? I doubt it though, I assume based on lag that a Bitcoin transaction has significant cost too (when compared to the sub penny visit value of an ad we're trying to replace).
Of my math on ad value is accurate, I'm worth 10-90/month.
There's no way I'd pay $90 over the ads I deal with, but $10 in a blink.
That's what I find when I do the math on TV, me watching a show is worth more to the advertisers than I'm willing to pay in general ($1.50 or so an hour for when I did the math of revenue Canada viewers on grays anatomy, not many shows I'd pay that much to watch).
Ads are so effective for content production, because advertisers are willing to pay a bunch often.