I wish they gave the fuel savings (or miles) as a percentage, then we could compare the little bit over 10% bus reduction to the miles reduction and actually know.
It seems entirely possible that each bus drives more, but there is overall savings.
it can't really be 20% more though I'd think. doing it the old way with 10% fewer buses would be only an 11% increase in bus time, this is also a decrease in overall bus miles.
I've seen people wait over an hour for a cab when lyft / uber were minutes away.
I've had a cab in NYC slam on the gas when I they figured out I was going to bushwick
I've called and been refused service from a bar a couple times, so much for taking a cab home (slept in car instead).
It's great that where you live all of the cab companies are in an app, and are fast and reliable, that is not the case here. And good luck getting one ever if ten minutes outside of town (75k city, but decent population density suburbs for about a half hour around it).
I would love to pay a fair price (as in sustainable, which I don't think Uber is, lyft may be with tipping), but the cab companies in the greater Philadelphia area (and even Philly outside of center city) make that task nearly impossible.
They're particularly good at matching ads to viewers (which is why they were able to make so much money with text only ads when everyone else was losing money on obnoxious stuff).
By making obnoxious ads worth less money (blocked by a large percentage of viewers), they can choke the revenue from companies selling them, and increase their own value as an advertiser.
Other companies with inferior matching will no longer be able to be obnoxious to make more money, advertisers will go where the simple ads are more effective, and Google wins.
It makes their strong point (data collection and matching) the only differentiation between advertisers.
On android I think it defaults to allowing (maybe asks when installing), but any notification can be held down on to revoke that apps notification permission.
Currently, only e-mail and texting have notification privilege on my phone.
Also, with more people trying to participate in the workforce than in the past, TFAs definition probably is quite historically low.
Additionally, everyone knows the definition of unemployment, and laborforce participation (at least if they've retained highschool economics knowledge to any vague amount).
For sure, they need to justify it, my point is simply 5 million viewers that love a show may be worth more tho them than 10 million that watch, but don't love it.
Especially for original content, they can use back catalog from the networks as the "filler" stuff.
a Network on the other hand cares little for how liked a show is, as long as it's heavily watched.
It's part of why subscription services have such top notch content, even if not everyone can get into it. HBO doesn't need a show with the broad appeal of The Big Bang Theory, but it needs shows with extreme appeal to smaller groups, and not complete overlap among the small groups.
Pretty much all fonts are Open Type now. Even ones with a TTF extension.
OTF is superior to PS or TT in that it combines the features of both and has a nice single file containing everything (screen display, print, ways to scale, kerning, ligatures, etc).
It's been a while, but I believe in open type font can be postscript, it's just a far more convenient and universal file format to contain the postscript.
Slashdot Mirror
I meant to say if the efficiency was the same.
Clearly it can mean less time if the cut is do to increased efficiency.
I don't think it could be that extreme.
They cut 10% of the buses, presumably doing it at the efficiency of by hand, that's only an 11% increase in time.
I also suspect that maximum time is a constraint they had to work with.
I wish they gave the fuel savings (or miles) as a percentage, then we could compare the little bit over 10% bus reduction to the miles reduction and actually know.
It seems entirely possible that each bus drives more, but there is overall savings.
it can't really be 20% more though I'd think. doing it the old way with 10% fewer buses would be only an 11% increase in bus time, this is also a decrease in overall bus miles.
It's less well known IP, so it may not count as "comics stuff" when they do it.
By count as, I mean be perceived as comic book properties.
It's $60 for limited minutes and 5GB data.
No unlimited plan is a non starter.
I do think know if it's true or not, but perceptually, TMo is as good as AT&T around my area.
Verizon still a clear best though.
I guess competition his changed things.
I've seen people wait over an hour for a cab when lyft / uber were minutes away.
I've had a cab in NYC slam on the gas when I they figured out I was going to bushwick
I've called and been refused service from a bar a couple times, so much for taking a cab home (slept in car instead).
It's great that where you live all of the cab companies are in an app, and are fast and reliable, that is not the case here. And good luck getting one ever if ten minutes outside of town (75k city, but decent population density suburbs for about a half hour around it).
I would love to pay a fair price (as in sustainable, which I don't think Uber is, lyft may be with tipping), but the cab companies in the greater Philadelphia area (and even Philly outside of center city) make that task nearly impossible.
Because they show up when you ask.
Cabs don't really work that way around where I am (or really anywhere I've been with under 250,000 people).
My uber usage meshes with people doing second jobs, cabs can't really cover high demand without taking a bath on capital buying extra cars.
It has nothing to-do with money, and little to do with hatred of talking on the phone, it has to do with availability and quality of service.
The "high end" BLU phones are pretty decent and a great price.
I got a Studio Energy 2 for $120 or so new, and it worked fine with it's 1.5GB
I currently have a Life one X 2, and it has 4GB, and fast charge, was $180
This would actually be really smart for Google.
They're particularly good at matching ads to viewers (which is why they were able to make so much money with text only ads when everyone else was losing money on obnoxious stuff).
By making obnoxious ads worth less money (blocked by a large percentage of viewers), they can choke the revenue from companies selling them, and increase their own value as an advertiser.
Other companies with inferior matching will no longer be able to be obnoxious to make more money, advertisers will go where the simple ads are more effective, and Google wins.
It makes their strong point (data collection and matching) the only differentiation between advertisers.
I agree that's likely correct, but India does have 3-4x the population AND the US is allegedly under-supplied.
Are you saying that a larger tank of adblue is impossible?
On android I think it defaults to allowing (maybe asks when installing), but any notification can be held down on to revoke that apps notification permission.
Currently, only e-mail and texting have notification privilege on my phone.
Or earning above the poverty line with 40 or less hours of work a week.
Also, with more people trying to participate in the workforce than in the past, TFAs definition probably is quite historically low.
Additionally, everyone knows the definition of unemployment, and laborforce participation (at least if they've retained highschool economics knowledge to any vague amount).
Cheetahs both stalk and outrun antelope, which are slower, but can run at top speed longer.
The cheetah must get close enough to close the gap before slowing down.
milk (at least here) calls it sell by.
It's supposed to be good for at least a week after the date listed.
Except the plan is really expensive if you don't actively manage data usage (or would be for me at least).
It's been a while since a river caught in fire, so in that sense, I'd say regulation solved an issue.
Paypal makes it relatively easy for 13+ year olds with functional families to receive payments.
AC here.
For sure, they need to justify it, my point is simply 5 million viewers that love a show may be worth more tho them than 10 million that watch, but don't love it.
Especially for original content, they can use back catalog from the networks as the "filler" stuff.
a Network on the other hand cares little for how liked a show is, as long as it's heavily watched.
It's part of why subscription services have such top notch content, even if not everyone can get into it. HBO doesn't need a show with the broad appeal of The Big Bang Theory, but it needs shows with extreme appeal to smaller groups, and not complete overlap among the small groups.
it wasn't always $99/year
Pretty much all fonts are Open Type now. Even ones with a TTF extension.
OTF is superior to PS or TT in that it combines the features of both and has a nice single file containing everything (screen display, print, ways to scale, kerning, ligatures, etc).
It's been a while, but I believe in open type font can be postscript, it's just a far more convenient and universal file format to contain the postscript.
I think they're complaining about real time communication with the innmate for the planning.
It's probably a decent way to measure the enthusiast market though.
I would assume an over representation of AMD though, as it's a new thing, so people may have a certain level of excitement to benchmark it.