I was working on the assumption there were three states though "no answer, yes, no" and that no answer would have a much higher success rate.
I would suspect that with frequency (based on history, not entire language) you could get pretty close, for example after prett "y" would be next, after "gue" first S then R (I just typed gue into google, I don't know the reality).
If you are working by elimination, I feel the failure mode will become very difficult to decipher, but if you can say OK, it was this letter or the 4 before it, someone could decipher it pretty easy (this is of course assuming there's a resting state that is identifiable, and it isn't always reading yes or no).
Another solution is use your method, but ask each grouping 4 times, and if it is split, ask 6, for increments of 2 (or some such nonsense), this should get the groupings pretty accurate, and allow a focus on nonsense to fill in a wildcard (like an X or some such, getting the odds even better).
As far as these results go (without RTFA, because I'm not a n00b) it seems meaningless to me. I see little evidence they can even comprehend a question well enough to answer it.
Of course, as soon as they can communicate, I suspect the desire to live would go up too.
Some basic level of curation, better community for reviews, cross PC and Android purchases, I suspect instead Steam will go away as he fails to compete in a market he created (effective online distribution games store).
Also, 70% should allow sentences to be written (frequency order the letter using a language library for next (similar to Dash), slowly show them, have the patient think YES fromnwhrb they see the one they want until "yes" is registered, and then start with the next letter.
At 70% one should be able to get close enough to desirable the results.
When I did the math it was about 20% more than staying current with the boxed copy model (upgrade prices, newest version 18 month cycle), or about 30-40% more than what the company I worked for did (every other or third version), but, it was going to take years for the increased cost to catch up.
It was very beneficial to cash flow, and as a perk, we got to be current all of the time.
We were faced with something like $3200 we didn't have in upgrades or $120/month (four licenses of upgrade for very also design suite).
$30/seat/month it was going to take 3.5 years if we stayed current, or 2.5 years if we didn't upgrade for the subscription to cost more, so it was a no brained.
I bet the low up front cost model not only has them making a little more from users, but also converted a lot of pirates to legitimate.
$50/month looks a lot more reasonable for a hobby or a part time gig than $however many thousand it used to cost (I think $2500 for acrobat, indesign, photoshop, dreamweaver, flash).
It was really smart for them all around to do, more legitimate users, more $ per user in the long run.
I'm surprised there weren't any issues with multi-line cells.
That's something I run into lrettu regularly opening excel files in libre office.
There's some minor navigation bugs I hit in libre office calc too (perhaps by design, but they seem objectively wrong to me), I wish I remembered the specific, I'd explain it.
I'd hate to format legal documents using Google Docs too.
I do believe Google Docs is approved by the bar association for all of the privacy stuff.
Also, Google Docs was always a subscription (the Google for your own domain has been pay only for many years, and subscriptions were available from pretty much the start).
I live in small to medium sized city (Wilmington, de) and the taxi service is worthless.
I've seen people wait for hours when an uber was ten minutes away, they complain about rides too close or too far (NYC is like that too, they hate gonna be passed Williamsburg in Brooklyn).
When I was in Philly it was even worse. They cried and lied when they were forced to get GPS and credit card machines (way too late for not having credit card or GPS to be a thing). Hour for pick up in city limits.
For me not only is Uber about a 20% saving Vs a cab, it also would be worth a surcharge.
I can see it, 6% of a three day trip to a medium sized city makes sense.
Figure food $150, hotel, $400, flight $300, client dinner $150, that's $1000, so $60 on uber would be 6%, that's less than the airport alone (there are of course non travel related things that get expensed though).
The more interesting thing to me is that this shows Uber is crushing taxi companies not because if price (it's expensed after all), but because of quality of service.
There's still bandwidth saving, even if it required a check in for every playback.
But it doesn't require that either. Sure, it won't get you unlimited playback everywhere forever, but it will get you two weeks of it know your region (or if you turn off location, everywhere).
It's a nice add on for flying, but it doesn't really convert it to purchased local (as it would seem some want).
It also allows me to download high res versions over Wi-Fi, and I've opted for low res no data billing on T-Mobile.
Yeah, I actually think AT&T has responded to pressure from T-mobile and is pretty competitive (especially now that T-Mobile is unlimited only).
That's why I'm concerned about the proposed Sprint buyout of T-Mobile (and the AT&T one when that was on the table).
Sprint was always garbage in my area (bad coverage, high prices), but T-Mobile has been really upping their game over the last decade, and it's starting to exert downward pressure on AT&T, which is in turn starting to affect Verizon.
It is unlimited enough for me locally (they say they'll throttle me during peak hours if I break 23 GB, but I only use 10-15) with good coverage (about 2/3 the time I am faster than 15/5mbps, and rarely under 5/1). They give me the basics I need in Toronto (slow slow slow, too slow for interactive, but I can pull a map in desperation for free).
For Verizon last I checked I'd be paying $75/month more (glancing at their page, things may have changed), with Canada being approximately all of the money.
I know that I'm justifying approx $1000/year for a few days a year traveling where I am limited to wifi calling (another great service that has saved me tons when traveling internationally).
Slashdot Mirror
I was working on the assumption there were three states though "no answer, yes, no" and that no answer would have a much higher success rate.
I would suspect that with frequency (based on history, not entire language) you could get pretty close, for example after prett "y" would be next, after "gue" first S then R (I just typed gue into google, I don't know the reality).
If you are working by elimination, I feel the failure mode will become very difficult to decipher, but if you can say OK, it was this letter or the 4 before it, someone could decipher it pretty easy (this is of course assuming there's a resting state that is identifiable, and it isn't always reading yes or no).
Another solution is use your method, but ask each grouping 4 times, and if it is split, ask 6, for increments of 2 (or some such nonsense), this should get the groupings pretty accurate, and allow a focus on nonsense to fill in a wildcard (like an X or some such, getting the odds even better).
As far as these results go (without RTFA, because I'm not a n00b) it seems meaningless to me. I see little evidence they can even comprehend a question well enough to answer it.
Of course, as soon as they can communicate, I suspect the desire to live would go up too.
I really wish they'd release steam for Android.
Some basic level of curation, better community for reviews, cross PC and Android purchases, I suspect instead Steam will go away as he fails to compete in a market he created (effective online distribution games store).
Can non locked in people use the device?
What percentage?
Also, 70% should allow sentences to be written (frequency order the letter using a language library for next (similar to Dash), slowly show them, have the patient think YES fromnwhrb they see the one they want until "yes" is registered, and then start with the next letter.
At 70% one should be able to get close enough to desirable the results.
That's about index fund rate.
S and P 500 went from 640 - 2100
The company I work for competes by not being profitable (well only a few percent).
In the US at least, only profits are taxed, and we pay employees with them where I work.
But taken orally there are no effects without an MAOI, and with one it too lasts hours (though not as long as LSD).
I'd tend to agree that using the free version would be crazy.
Also, I'd have my doubts that it (free version) meets the requirements, the pay version has a lot if extra features.
No idea, not relevant to my life.
But I'm 99% sure they meet all of the various requirements for privacy and security for legal and medical purposes.
A quick Google seems to show the American Bar approves at the very least.
http://www.americanbar.org/pub...
When I did the math it was about 20% more than staying current with the boxed copy model (upgrade prices, newest version 18 month cycle), or about 30-40% more than what the company I worked for did (every other or third version), but, it was going to take years for the increased cost to catch up.
It was very beneficial to cash flow, and as a perk, we got to be current all of the time.
We switched almost immediately and it was great.
Where I work, we switched to the subscription.
We were faced with something like $3200 we didn't have in upgrades or $120/month (four licenses of upgrade for very also design suite).
$30/seat/month it was going to take 3.5 years if we stayed current, or 2.5 years if we didn't upgrade for the subscription to cost more, so it was a no brained.
I bet the low up front cost model not only has them making a little more from users, but also converted a lot of pirates to legitimate.
$50/month looks a lot more reasonable for a hobby or a part time gig than $however many thousand it used to cost (I think $2500 for acrobat, indesign, photoshop, dreamweaver, flash).
It was really smart for them all around to do, more legitimate users, more $ per user in the long run.
I'm surprised there weren't any issues with multi-line cells.
That's something I run into lrettu regularly opening excel files in libre office.
There's some minor navigation bugs I hit in libre office calc too (perhaps by design, but they seem objectively wrong to me), I wish I remembered the specific, I'd explain it.
Of course, just like anything else, I backup things up.
I'd hate to format legal documents using Google Docs too.
I do believe Google Docs is approved by the bar association for all of the privacy stuff.
Also, Google Docs was always a subscription (the Google for your own domain has been pay only for many years, and subscriptions were available from pretty much the start).
How?
I suspect every time I use uber it's using more gasoline.
I live in small to medium sized city (Wilmington, de) and the taxi service is worthless.
I've seen people wait for hours when an uber was ten minutes away, they complain about rides too close or too far (NYC is like that too, they hate gonna be passed Williamsburg in Brooklyn).
When I was in Philly it was even worse. They cried and lied when they were forced to get GPS and credit card machines (way too late for not having credit card or GPS to be a thing). Hour for pick up in city limits.
For me not only is Uber about a 20% saving Vs a cab, it also would be worth a surcharge.
I can see it, 6% of a three day trip to a medium sized city makes sense.
Figure food $150, hotel, $400, flight $300, client dinner $150, that's $1000, so $60 on uber would be 6%, that's less than the airport alone (there are of course non travel related things that get expensed though).
The more interesting thing to me is that this shows Uber is crushing taxi companies not because if price (it's expensed after all), but because of quality of service.
You're experience with the service is very different than everyone else I know's.
Maybe you have a setting broken?
The cheap Chinese phones seem to be giving up on removable batteries too though (keeping dual sim and SD though).
I almost got a Moto z play with the camera module and an extra battery one, but in the end went cheaper.
The camera was kind of lame (it could zoom as advertised, but no HDR).
The battery wasulking relative to power too.
It seemed pretty well designed overall though.
There's still bandwidth saving, even if it required a check in for every playback.
But it doesn't require that either. Sure, it won't get you unlimited playback everywhere forever, but it will get you two weeks of it know your region (or if you turn off location, everywhere).
It's a nice add on for flying, but it doesn't really convert it to purchased local (as it would seem some want).
It also allows me to download high res versions over Wi-Fi, and I've opted for low res no data billing on T-Mobile.
I bet it has to do with android version.
Netflix runs on as far back as 4.4, maybe only 5 or 6 plus have this feature enabled.
Yeah, I actually think AT&T has responded to pressure from T-mobile and is pretty competitive (especially now that T-Mobile is unlimited only).
That's why I'm concerned about the proposed Sprint buyout of T-Mobile (and the AT&T one when that was on the table).
Sprint was always garbage in my area (bad coverage, high prices), but T-Mobile has been really upping their game over the last decade, and it's starting to exert downward pressure on AT&T, which is in turn starting to affect Verizon.
Depends where you live and travel I suppose
I have tmobile for $75/month
It is unlimited enough for me locally (they say they'll throttle me during peak hours if I break 23 GB, but I only use 10-15) with good coverage (about 2/3 the time I am faster than 15/5mbps, and rarely under 5/1). They give me the basics I need in Toronto (slow slow slow, too slow for interactive, but I can pull a map in desperation for free).
For Verizon last I checked I'd be paying $75/month more (glancing at their page, things may have changed), with Canada being approximately all of the money.
I know that I'm justifying approx $1000/year for a few days a year traveling where I am limited to wifi calling (another great service that has saved me tons when traveling internationally).
Sprint is going to by TMO first, then once it fails, there will be essentially no cellphone competition.
It's music recommendations on YouTube are terrible too.
It's not much of a substitute for a streaming service.