Yes, they can, if they get a secondary CA cert from the primary CA. They could make the cert anything they wanted, just see what comes from the origin server, then build the same cert with a different CA.
And Nintendo got burned for it with the cracks in the DS Lite. If it's the 0.02% claimed, we would've won the lottery several times in a row on those odds.
So doesn't that apply to any EULA that includes "we may modify this at any time"? EULA's are generally take it or leave it, and if they can change it at any time, doesn't that make things hidden?
Correct, although major parts of it (the message loop, the GDI) were 16 bits and there was a global lock for running 16 bit code. Because of this, it was still way too easy for runaway apps to lock the machine.
MS kept saying everything consumer would be true 32 bit RSN after the release of 95. It took until XP.
And Windows 95 was the last 16/32 hybrid Oh no, Windows 98 will *really* be it. Whoops, Windows 98SE will be it! Windows ME will, we really mean it this time!
So add the price of the DVR, the need to find the proper one, setup, subscription (if not MythTV), etc. And DVR doesn't get rid of the ads that are starting to pop up, such as the image getting pushed over or up for the ad. Still too expensive in my book.
It's outselling "significantly", yet numbers of less than a thousand are enough to get on the top 10 sales chart. It may be doing better, but it still sucks in the grand scheme.
Slashdot Mirror
20% or so less than market is "very well"?
No, he's right.
How long was the double free in zlib?
How long was the password hard coded in Interbase?
I thought Nemesis was an awesome game. Not a Zork, IMHO, but a good game none the less.
Grand Inquisitor, now that was a graphical Zork.
Yes, they can, if they get a secondary CA cert from the primary CA. They could make the cert anything they wanted, just see what comes from the origin server, then build the same cert with a different CA.
Why? There is no X rating, and hasn't been for decades. NC-17 replaced X because X wasn't trademarked and became widely used by unrated movies.
M = R
AO = NC-17
T = PG-13
E-10 = PG
E = G
And Nintendo got burned for it with the cracks in the DS Lite. If it's the 0.02% claimed, we would've won the lottery several times in a row on those odds.
And how do you know it works if you haven't created a version?
They've already convinced the courts.
Hence the charge is "copyright infringement" and not "theft"
Fracture isn't in the SW Universe. Neither is Indy (although that is another movie property)
I guess it is true. Never...and I mean NEVER buy anything from Micro$oft that is version 1.0.
Remove "from Microsoft" from that sentence. It rarely matters who it is, there will be problems.
So doesn't that apply to any EULA that includes "we may modify this at any time"? EULA's are generally take it or leave it, and if they can change it at any time, doesn't that make things hidden?
The instances were evenly split, but since Apache is more common that IIS, you should see more Apache.
Increase reliability
Drop Price (optional, reliability is more important to me right now)
WTF are you talking about? It's trivial to branch and merge in SVN.
Correct, although major parts of it (the message loop, the GDI) were 16 bits and there was a global lock for running 16 bit code. Because of this, it was still way too easy for runaway apps to lock the machine.
MS kept saying everything consumer would be true 32 bit RSN after the release of 95. It took until XP.
And Windows 95 was the last 16/32 hybrid
Oh no, Windows 98 will *really* be it.
Whoops, Windows 98SE will be it!
Windows ME will, we really mean it this time!
Because the USPTO is pretty much paid per patent so there's no incentive to actually check things?
So add the price of the DVR, the need to find the proper one, setup, subscription (if not MythTV), etc. And DVR doesn't get rid of the ads that are starting to pop up, such as the image getting pushed over or up for the ad. Still too expensive in my book.
You forgot to factor in ads, which is primarily what I was counting in the time cost.
If the first mistake was to destroy the company's reputation or do something take down every server, damn straight I'd expect an employee to be fired.
It's only free if your time costs nothing.
The problem isn't application (or shouldn't be). The problem is testing custom business critical apps, or other third party apps that may break.
And they have the right to take fair use and space shifting?
It's outselling "significantly", yet numbers of less than a thousand are enough to get on the top 10 sales chart. It may be doing better, but it still sucks in the grand scheme.