I don't follow your reasoning. Before you answer, remember this - SONY *MUST* approve every game that is released for PSX or PS2. Why haven't they yanked approval for PSX? They can very, very easily say "No new PSX games". These aren't open platforms like the PC.
You added a few zeros $12,500, but the same principle still applies - "free" money is still free money
And Richter is making money by mailing for others as much (or more than) anything he owns. If nobody buys, you still make money on what you charged the customer to send 'em out.
My Dad is on Linux after I determined his Win computer was infected. He has no more UI/setup problems with it than with Windows, fewer now since I can remotely administer it.
No, it makes the hacker community, which the with the marketing power of SCO and Microsoft may as well be synonomous with the OSS or FS communities, look bad. From the layman's perspective viruses aren't the fault of Windows - they are glad Microsoft is around to release patches to fix what the hackers broke.
Except that there isn't going to be a patch for this that doesn't break Windows functionality or is a primitive AV. This is simply a completely valid Win32 app that idiots run, there's no holes (except between user's ears) being taken advantage of.
"If you sue someone for patent infringment for something under Apache license, you are not allowed to use anything else patented under the Apache license"
Slashdot Mirror
Win98 is supposed to be gone, or no longer supported.
Not true. Support was extended two years.
Or an idiot developer working on a linux box happened to check in the core file with other work.
I've seen junk like that before, so it's entirely possible.
Oracle's open source? That's news to me.
So those aren't maintained. Neither is VisiCalc.
Now, point the stats that say they are in wide use.
Lesse, let's look at the stats of the ones you post there:
* Pound: No Files released, Activity 0%
* yabuse: Last file released October 26, 2003, Activity: 0%
* jxmas: Last File released November 17,2003, Activity: 0%
* modp-driver: Last files released July 31,2002, Activity: 35.9804%
* cdctl : Last files released March 26, 2000, Activity: 36.3393%
Now, those last two are the only ones you may even have a point with, given those numbers.
And possibly not then. I looked at the download stats for the past week, picked #100 (lowest one there), and it's activity is 96.124%
You are assuming that machines don't migrate from one side to another.
What about a laptop that's brought home, infected, then connected to the internal network?
Latest file release : Jan 26, 2004. The home page has a ChangeLog for Feb 3, 2004.
That's not being maintained exactly how?
If you *spend* it, then you're counterfeiting.
It all goes down to the intent, something that a printer is not going to be able to discern.
So how is printing a joke bill counterfeiting?
And buffer overflows that get data that isn't crafted are "just a crash" as well.
I don't follow your reasoning. Before you answer, remember this - SONY *MUST* approve every game that is released for PSX or PS2. Why haven't they yanked approval for PSX? They can very, very easily say "No new PSX games". These aren't open platforms like the PC.
How much game playing do you do? How many people play PSX games on a PS2?
They're still releasing PSX games (granted, not many)
Personally, I'm playing FF:Origins right now on my PS2. I never had a PSX.
BWAHAHAAHAH
They're breaking the law installing trojans that relay, and you think they're going to *label* according to law?
You added a few zeros
$12,500, but the same principle still applies - "free" money is still free money
And Richter is making money by mailing for others as much (or more than) anything he owns. If nobody buys, you still make money on what you charged the customer to send 'em out.
RTFBOFR yourself
Amendments 9 & 10 to be specific.
The money in their bank account.
You're assuming they actually make money selling the console.
So MS is breaking more standards. Lovely.
That's what SSH is for.
My Dad is on Linux after I determined his Win computer was infected. He has no more UI/setup problems with it than with Windows, fewer now since I can remotely administer it.
No, it makes the hacker community, which the with the marketing power of SCO and Microsoft may as well be synonomous with the OSS or FS communities, look bad. From the layman's perspective viruses aren't the fault of Windows - they are glad Microsoft is around to release patches to fix what the hackers broke.
Except that there isn't going to be a patch for this that doesn't break Windows functionality or is a primitive AV. This is simply a completely valid Win32 app that idiots run, there's no holes (except between user's ears) being taken advantage of.
I see it as more:
"If you sue someone for patent infringment for something under Apache license, you are not allowed to use anything else patented under the Apache license"
IANAL, so this is just my best guess.
Except ISP's aren't common carriers, and even the Bells have seperated the ISP from the phone business.
That's what he means, but what he said is accurate.
Less than 0.5% of the net is listed in SPEWS, and that's with those "draconian" policies.
There is a Do Not Fax.
If you have a fax machine, you're on it. EVERY fax number is on it.
Point to the law please.
Good luck, there isn't one. It's that you can't make full color dupes that are 76-149% the size of the real thing.
It's vaporware. Until something can be purchased by a consumer, it's vaporware.
That box was never turned on in front of press. It was supposed to be, but it never was.
And I'm sure all those 102 year old Afghanis registered with the NYTimes are a gold mine of data for the advertisers.