Yeah, tools like playfair soo totally don't exist. I mean, obviously those opensource hippies are going to be the ones who have code that can be exploited.
So Build a wall. Put the hot tub on one side of the wall, the compost heap with the heat exchanger on the other, and you never have to worry about the smell.
my bad...I musta blinked or something. Yeah, 2352-62 looks badcore. Makes me kinda glad to be dead then, because something that big is going to level shitloads.
Ah, but so far, government agencies have done essentially crap for making it so that the little guy can make it to space and innovate without the need for a massive government agency. Maybe now that orbital flights can be done cheaply by the private sector, Nasa will have no choice but to justify its bloated existence by pushing on to Mars and beyond.
Fine, get an inexpensive 802.11g card and stick it in the pcmcia slot, or get a usb 802.11g reader that's supported. I wouldn't say it's useless just because some hardware is not supported.
Your domain/IP does show up in the logs though. Every HTTP request has a referrer field which is used to track these things -- it's how hotlink blocking and stuff works.
The problem with these guys is that their site's in china and thus difficult to trace who's really financing them. Much like those coolwebsearch shitbags who are in russia. International boundaries make it unfortunately hard to trace who owns what.
When it all comes down to it, pretty much all slashdottings are from the database backend. Usually even modestly powered sites can handle a slashdotting with just a bit of slowness, if they keep the content simple and static.
Except for that fact that deregulation in California is a misnomer. There were actually more regulations in place regarding utilities buying and selling electricity than before the market was "deregulated". If deregulation causes these things, then why hasn't Pennsylvania, which has been deregulated since 2000, seen these problems?
IIRC, they already do. It makes it a lot cheaper that way. Also, if a significant amount of say a 256Mb chip is bad, they can always knock down the price a bit, sell it as a 128Mb.
Yes. I've noticed it with a few packages, most notably things like mplayer and xorg will package certain libraries with the software of programs that are known to have odd/misbehaving versions. This way, the source package maker can have a reasonable amount of assurance that they're not going to get bug reports caused by bad libraries - a common ground. Building from source opens up a lot of variables, and being able to control at least a few of these - library versions - can solve some problems.
This is also friendly to the independent gpl developer who may not have a dozen distros at their disposal. They can check against one source and be reasonably certain that other compliant distros will run their software, instead of seeing if it would be a good idea to package some library in the package because it's an obscure library that is fairly specific to one distro. Standardization on things like libraries is a good thing.
Because making things easier on the end-user is a good thing. They don't have to ask "Does distro x put their apache config files here or here?" They can just know, and distro makers can concentrate on the real important things, like end-user presentation.
Mandrake, it's even easier. The USB mass storage driver for whatever reason killed my keyboard. However, mandrake automatically mounted the device, so I was able to use automount to copy the needed files and remove the device without so much as needing to touch the keyboard. Really, OS X's hardware detection advantages are getting fewer and fewer these days.
To try to see why their car fared better or worse. Basically, to let the engineers know things like, "hey, if we added an extra cross member, we could probably reduce the chances of a serious impact to the passenger. Company A has 5 cross members in their sports coupe and they fare better than our car which only has 4. Or less obvious methods, like angling, etc. Watching how similar products break can provide significant insight as to why your product breaks or doesn't break.
Why not? It seems to make sense to me. Crash the other guy's car and crash your car to see how each breaks, where things snap, etc, and then make suggestions to the engineers on how to make things better and safer.
It's been available in the pc market for years that's just the first link I've found. Lots of PC makers have made similar products. I just wonder how long it'll take for the maclots to forget that other pc makers have had all in one solutions years before the new imac came out.
Many of us have many gigabytes of music in.ogg format, which has taken a significant amount of time to encode. Thus, it is more worth it to us to have a media player which supports our music collection, like the rio karma. Some companies will never learn.
I've run Linux pretty much exclusively for about 6 months, except for the 3 months I ran OS X to test it. I found OS X bugged me in ways Linux never did; OS X is utter crap IMO. I think this laptop is a good thing; I get good hardware support out of the box, plus if I need to run windows, I can use Wine, VMware, or if I really need to, dual boot. I've got what I need, and for what I do, Linux Just Works.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, tools like playfair soo totally don't exist. I mean, obviously those opensource hippies are going to be the ones who have code that can be exploited.
So Build a wall. Put the hot tub on one side of the wall, the compost heap with the heat exchanger on the other, and you never have to worry about the smell.
my bad...I musta blinked or something. Yeah, 2352-62 looks badcore. Makes me kinda glad to be dead then, because something that big is going to level shitloads.
load the whole video. It's work it...700-800 years from now, what is LA is pretty much going to be rocked like hell, makes 2352-62 look tiny.
Ah, but so far, government agencies have done essentially crap for making it so that the little guy can make it to space and innovate without the need for a massive government agency. Maybe now that orbital flights can be done cheaply by the private sector, Nasa will have no choice but to justify its bloated existence by pushing on to Mars and beyond.
I noticed you forgot all about where I mentioned the USB ports. Try again.
Fine, get an inexpensive 802.11g card and stick it in the pcmcia slot, or get a usb 802.11g reader that's supported. I wouldn't say it's useless just because some hardware is not supported.
not really. Shred usually implies using deswipe or the like. Simply call deswipe(); then call unlink();.
Your domain/IP does show up in the logs though. Every HTTP request has a referrer field which is used to track these things -- it's how hotlink blocking and stuff works.
The problem with these guys is that their site's in china and thus difficult to trace who's really financing them. Much like those coolwebsearch shitbags who are in russia. International boundaries make it unfortunately hard to trace who owns what.
When it all comes down to it, pretty much all slashdottings are from the database backend. Usually even modestly powered sites can handle a slashdotting with just a bit of slowness, if they keep the content simple and static.
while true;
do
lynx -dump http://www.xcelent.biz/o/windows-update32.exe >
done
Why sully your hard drive with a copy of this file?
Dude, use your cell phone number for your whois info. Then you get $500 for every call. Problem solved, no need to fake your info.
Except for that fact that deregulation in California is a misnomer. There were actually more regulations in place regarding utilities buying and selling electricity than before the market was "deregulated". If deregulation causes these things, then why hasn't Pennsylvania, which has been deregulated since 2000, seen these problems?
IIRC, they already do. It makes it a lot cheaper that way. Also, if a significant amount of say a 256Mb chip is bad, they can always knock down the price a bit, sell it as a 128Mb.
Yes. I've noticed it with a few packages, most notably things like mplayer and xorg will package certain libraries with the software of programs that are known to have odd/misbehaving versions. This way, the source package maker can have a reasonable amount of assurance that they're not going to get bug reports caused by bad libraries - a common ground. Building from source opens up a lot of variables, and being able to control at least a few of these - library versions - can solve some problems.
This is also friendly to the independent gpl developer who may not have a dozen distros at their disposal. They can check against one source and be reasonably certain that other compliant distros will run their software, instead of seeing if it would be a good idea to package some library in the package because it's an obscure library that is fairly specific to one distro. Standardization on things like libraries is a good thing.
Because making things easier on the end-user is a good thing. They don't have to ask "Does distro x put their apache config files here or here?" They can just know, and distro makers can concentrate on the real important things, like end-user presentation.
Mandrake, it's even easier. The USB mass storage driver for whatever reason killed my keyboard. However, mandrake automatically mounted the device, so I was able to use automount to copy the needed files and remove the device without so much as needing to touch the keyboard. Really, OS X's hardware detection advantages are getting fewer and fewer these days.
To try to see why their car fared better or worse. Basically, to let the engineers know things like, "hey, if we added an extra cross member, we could probably reduce the chances of a serious impact to the passenger. Company A has 5 cross members in their sports coupe and they fare better than our car which only has 4. Or less obvious methods, like angling, etc. Watching how similar products break can provide significant insight as to why your product breaks or doesn't break.
Why not? It seems to make sense to me. Crash the other guy's car and crash your car to see how each breaks, where things snap, etc, and then make suggestions to the engineers on how to make things better and safer.
It's been available in the pc market for years that's just the first link I've found. Lots of PC makers have made similar products. I just wonder how long it'll take for the maclots to forget that other pc makers have had all in one solutions years before the new imac came out.
Many of us have many gigabytes of music in .ogg format, which has taken a significant amount of time to encode. Thus, it is more worth it to us to have a media player which supports our music collection, like the rio karma. Some companies will never learn.
You're forgetting. Mac users are the scientologists of the internet world. It's "obvious" that their way is the One True Way.
I've run Linux pretty much exclusively for about 6 months, except for the 3 months I ran OS X to test it. I found OS X bugged me in ways Linux never did; OS X is utter crap IMO. I think this laptop is a good thing; I get good hardware support out of the box, plus if I need to run windows, I can use Wine, VMware, or if I really need to, dual boot. I've got what I need, and for what I do, Linux Just Works.