Slashdot Mirror


Sharp Mebius Subnotebook Review

Tong writes "PDA Buyer's Guide has published a hands-on review of the Sharp Mebius CV50. "The smallest notebook we've seen in years. This Japanese Import is available translated into English from Dynamism, and is smaller than a hardback book. It weights just under two pounds, has a 1 GHz Efficeon processor, a wide screen 7.2" display and absolutely stunning looks and style." Read the full review."

195 comments

  1. Wow by postgrep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally a laptop that isn't a brick! my back will be saved!

    1. Re:Wow by bobbis.u · · Score: 3, Funny

      Screen Size Diag: 7.2 ", Resolution: 1280 x 768
      But not your eyes!

    2. Re:Wow by Orange+Apple · · Score: 0

      My laptop weighs more then a brick! Do not insult the bricks.

      --
      Eat My Bad Karma...
    3. Re:Wow by postgrep · · Score: 1

      At least its an lcd. My eyes burn with a 17inch crt :(

    4. Re:Wow by blixel · · Score: 1

      if I had a dollar for every windows box that crashed....

      What good would 1 dollar do you every time a windows machine crashed? I've probably had at least a dollar every time my windows machine crashed.

    5. Re:Wow by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Screen Size Diag: 7.2 ", Resolution: 1280 x 768 But not your eyes!

      Indeed. Years ago Sony VAIO had something tiny like this and I opted for 505-TX (or whatever it was) with a larger screen. Still, screen wasn't the problem as much as trying to accomodate typing on such a miniscule, flat keyboard with size XL (glove size) hands.

      I use a laptop as my desktop at work, but have opted for a fullsize keyboard. (Still make mistakes, just not as many and with far less frustration.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:Wow by ejamie · · Score: 1

      I just don't know about all these subnotebook models.

      They sure look attractive. But, how functional can this be?

      I lose alot of productivity when I have to type directly on my full-sized compaq evo laptop instead of using external keyboard/mouse. This just takes it to more of an extreme...

      I'm sure it's very cool for frequent flyers (who I wager are mostly not power users, but want to answer email/play solitaire). But, this has got to be a niche audience for one of these.

      --
      Hey! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!! Stop copying my sig!!!
    7. Re:Wow by dchamp · · Score: 1

      If you look at the pictures, there's a lot of bezel around the screen. Looks like they could theoretically fit a much larger screen on it without increasing the overall dimensions.
      I have a Dell i8500, 1920x1200 uxga 15.4" screen. People often comment that the text is way too small on that screen. I imagine the text on this little sucker would be even harder to read, and I'm sure it's probably not as bright as the i8500's.

    8. Re:Wow by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Really? My laptop screen is pretty nice but my brother's 19" viewsonic p95f crt is beautiful to look at. I would much rather look at that screen all day long then stare into an LCD with only one resolution.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on DPI, you're right. The Dell display has a resolution of about 146 dpi, while the Sharp is at 206 dpi. Heck, there used to be laser printers with resolutions close to that.

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are setting you can change to increase system font sizes.

    11. Re:Wow by Bloater · · Score: 1

      The smaller the pixels the better, you just have your vector icons and text all display at the same physical size as normal.

      What Windows XP can't do that? Damn, I suppose I'll have to install a Linux desktop then. Pity.

    12. Re:Wow by zulux · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I had a dollar for every windows box that crashed... .... you'd be as rich as Bill Gates.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    13. Re:Wow by CrazyMalaysian · · Score: 1

      You dont have to run at 1280x768 you know.....

    14. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, um, doesn't that elimiate the advantage of higher resolution. I run 1600x1200 so that I can squeeze more AutoCAD icons on the screen without loosing precious drafting real estate. If I scaled my icons up, it'd elimate the whole reason for running at hi-res.

    15. Re:Wow by raodin · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's this handy setting in Windows called "Display DPI," and an equivalent setting in Xfree. Use the tools provided to you, and and you'll have lovely proper sized text.

    16. Re:Wow by pmjordan · · Score: 1

      Windows does have font sets for screens with different pixel sizes, the problem are the applications that become illegible or otherwise unusable because of widgets overlapping each other or being too small. Yep folks, that's what happens when you define absolute (pixel) widget dimensions. This applies to the vast majority of applications, from what I remember from my Windows days.

      ~phil

    17. Re:Wow by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      They sure look attractive. But, how functional can this be?

      A good deal more functional than a PDA that's not much smaller, considering you can install ALL your favorite apps on it.

      That said, I tote my Zaurus around with me and, together with a Pockettop keyboard and large SD card, can do pretty much everything I can do on my laptop, save for DVDs (although I can rip to Mpeg4 and watched with TkcVideo - but that's a rather long process).

    18. Re:Wow by stocke2 · · Score: 1

      if I want a sub notebook in this class it will be the sharp actius mm20, it has the 1ghz efficion processor and a 10.5" screen, plus it comes with a docking station so you can mouht its harddrive from another computer over usb.

      --
      A Smith & Wesson beats four aces -- Murphy's Law of Poker
    19. Re:Wow by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      I bet your refresh rate is set to 60Hz. It always amazes me how many CRTs are set to that rate, when they can go higher.

    20. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      resulution? test?

    21. Re:Wow by darc · · Score: 1

      > Finally a laptop that isn't a brick! my back will be saved!

      From the article:

      It has an ALi M5229 PCI Bust Master IDE controller by Acer Labs and a Ricoh controller for the CF slot.

      Not to mention your uh... gut...?

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    22. Re:Wow by Bloater · · Score: 1

      If your task requires good eyesight, then so be it. But my point was that it is irrelevant to the quality of the device.

  2. Languages by mmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    This Japanese Import is available translated into English from Dynamism

    I never realised that "Dynamism" was a language...

    1. Re:Languages by Jakhel · · Score: 1

      yes, and it's

      DY

      NO

      MITE!!

      I couldn't resist...
      I'll be going back to my box now. =|

  3. The big Question: by stretch0611 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will it play Net Hack?

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    1. Re:The big Question: by mengel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to say "Does it run Linux Yet?", but of course, NetHack is the real priority :-).

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    2. Re:The big Question: by superbondbond · · Score: 2, Informative
      With the Obligitory "Does it run Linux" question in mind, look at the Spec sheet from dynamism

      http://www.dynamism.com/cv50/specs.shtml/

      I would hope that with Sharp's past support of Linux (Zaurus), that this would be able to run Linux with little trouble.

    3. Re:The big Question: by killjoe · · Score: 1

      You know it's roughly the same dimentions as a 12" powerbook. It probably costs about the same too.

      Something to think about.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  4. One letter off by tritone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darn. If Sharp had only made a Mobius Subnotebook, it even taken up even less space since it would have had only one side.

    1. Re:One letter off by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      So whatever happened to that little joined-together "oe" letter, like in 'encyclopoedia' and 'amoeba'?

      I thought it was actually a mOEbius strip?

      Sorry to nitpick, but if you are gonna correct others' spelling, you should look it up first...

    2. Re:One letter off by dosius · · Score: 1

      I can be sure that "Möbius" is written "mebiusu" in Katakana (watched enough Seramyu lol). XD

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    3. Re:One letter off by Wocko · · Score: 1

      I think you mean encyclopædia...

    4. Re:One letter off by kahei · · Score: 1

      encyclopoedia

      Sorry to nitpick, but if you are gonna correct others' spelling, you should look it up first...

      Mm.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    5. Re:One letter off by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      This greek letters (ae is another one) have been slowly disappearing: how often do you see Encycolpaedia spelt that way anymore?

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    6. Re:One letter off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how often do you see Encycolpaedia spelt that way anymore?

      Quite a lot really. Also paedophile, foetus, faeces, mediaeval and so on...

    7. Re:One letter off by juhaz · · Score: 1

      greek letters (ae is another one) have been slowly disappearing

      Æ and OE are not greek letters, but latin ones, just like all the rest we use.

    8. Re:One letter off by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Bugger, how could I have f#cked that up? Oh the irony.

      I mean, yeah, that's it, I was trying to be ironic and I *meant* to mis-spell it...

      Peace.

  5. interesting but... by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought that the review of the Sharp Mobius was a little one-sided.

    --
    No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:interesting but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God no, it's just my sig. And I bet that Taco doesn't have enough hard drives to store that flamewar.

    2. Re:interesting but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe you shouldn't put inflammatory messages in your sig ;)

  6. Brush up on my Japanese by MikeMacK · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't worry, the Mebius is available in the US and other countries from Dynamism, who converts it to English and ships it with Windows XP. The thick owner's manual is in Japanese, so you'll need to use your general knowledge of notebooks and the pictorial illustrations for guidance when needed.

    So, they still ship the manual to you in Japanese? Domo ori gato

    1. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by offpath3 · · Score: 1

      Not to be picky, but it's arigato, and it's one word.

    2. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like I said, I need to brush up on my Japanese. Thanks.

    3. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      (yes, I am being picky) Wrong. It's arigatou, and I won't accept any excuses about (wrong and inaccurate) romanization!

    4. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by offpath3 · · Score: 1

      Given that the OP didn't write "doumo" in the first place, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming he was using a romanization with the vowel elogations dropped, and I followed suit.

    5. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by aminorex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ari gatou is a Greek cake in France.
      Ori gato is Jewish cat in Spain.
      Domo arigato is what you say to Mr. Roboto.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    6. Re:Brush up on my Japanese by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      in French, a cake is a "gateau" (with a '^' circumflex accent on the "a"), which is pronounced gah-tow.

      gatou (ga-too?) doesn't have any meaning, literal, imagined, spelled or phonetic, that I can think of.

  7. a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by joggle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on, can't anyone make a $400-$500 sub-laptop with a 7" screen? Anybody?

    1. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's my problem with subnotebooks. Hella expensive. I mean, when you're talking $2k or so, that would buy a killer notebook or a top of the line desktop.

    2. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by jarich · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Agreed... for 2 grand I'm going to have a nice big screen with a 64 bit AMD chip in the laptop! Actually, those are going for $1,500 these days...

      Does anyone actually need a small laptop enough to pay that much of a premium for it?

    3. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is, the price comes from SHRINKING the components down to make it work at a smaller size. That is why laptops are more expensive than desktops.

    4. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and for that matter, why are Lamborghinis so darned expensive? I would buy at least two if they were, say, $9.99 each.

    5. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Does anyone actually need a small laptop enough to pay that much of a premium for it?
      No, and that's why they only sell it in Japan!

      What people will justify buying here if they need a small laptop is something like an Apple 12" iBook or Powerbook, Dell Latitude 200X (or newer model), Sharp Actius MM-20, small Thinkpad, etc. None of these are quite as small as the expensive stuff Dynamism sells, which is why they can be justified selling them here.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by joggle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know, but it seems that something with an iPod hard drive, a 7" color LCD, a cheap CPU (just enough to do terminals and x-windows) and an integrated wireless card or ethernet card shouldn't cost $2k. Not that the product in the article meets these specs (it would be overkill of course), I'm just wondering why, AFAIK, such a product doesn't exist yet.

    7. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by jubei · · Score: 1

      The closest I have found are old Handheld PC's like the NEC Mobilepro 780.

      Too bad that the form factor has largely disappeared from the market. I would love to get one that has USB host support, a hard drive, and wifi built in.

    8. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Elias+Serge · · Score: 1

      I do. I take my laptop/subnotebook to all of my college classes. Its a sony c1vp picturebook, with the 2st-gen crusoe proc. it weighs about 2 pounds, and is not much larger than this notebook. If it wieghed any more, I wouldn't get around to taking it to classes. But since I don't even notice when it is in my backpack, I've taken it to just about every class in the past 3 years, to great benefit.

    9. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by tftp · · Score: 1
      Its a sony c1vp picturebook, with the 2st-gen crusoe proc.

      You'd better check what CPU you got :-)

    10. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Hell just put a 486 and dos on it. I have lots of great dos programs I could run on a small PC including some of my favorite games.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    11. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just did some digging again and found a component based solution which does some of this stuff, unfortunately its *even more* expensive:
      http://www.antelopetech.com/en/index.a spx?view=i-o rdering_OnlineOrdering.htm

      thats based around a 3" x 5" x 3/4" "modular computing core" ... this was an IBM invention around the time of the OQO's original debut, if you recall; Antelope licensed it. The trouble is, even as components, the core (CPU, HD) is $1.5k and the handheld shell (battery, screen) is another $1.5k. Eek.

    12. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah buddy!

      I love my little sony laptop. The crusoe is not all that powerful, but it lets me do word processing, web browsing, and some simple games. And random people stop and ask 'Is that actually a whole computer? It's so small!'

      It kicks ass.

    13. Re:a $1900 sub-laptop, read all about it by Elias+Serge · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, you're right. For some reason I was under the impression the the 5600/5400 series came after the 5500/5800-probably b/c 55005600. Its not as though there is a huge performance difference between the 5x00 series stuff anyway (not compared to the jump between crusoe and efficeon.

  8. They could have done without the screen bezel by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a computer is going to be this small, they should have made the effort to minimise the screen bezel to maximise screen size while maintaining the same dimensions of the unit. That's a poor design flaw, making the screen that small in relation to the unit. The unit is small enough that legibility or screen space would be difficult enough anyway, and this makes it even worse.

    1. Re:They could have done without the screen bezel by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Well, in their defence (?), the thing *does* cost $1900 already. Can you imagine what a screen with a three-inch larger diagonal would have bumped the price up to?

      (Yes, I think this is too expensive.)

      p

    2. Re:They could have done without the screen bezel by getnate · · Score: 1

      Agreed, that screen bezel makes the laptop look like the 386 laptops, I dont like it at all.

    3. Re:They could have done without the screen bezel by Scud · · Score: 0

      Actually, I would have perferred a smaller case instead of a bigger screen. I'd like to see it fit in my back pocket rather than having to carry a "life support" bag around with it.

      To each their own I suppose :)

      John

      --
      I dream in binary.
    4. Re:They could have done without the screen bezel by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, in their defence (?), the thing *does* cost $1900 already.

      I think the reason it cost more was because of it's miniaturisation rather than the screen size. A slightly larger screen with the same horizontal and vertical resolution (not dpi) shouldn't cost much more. In fact, it probably may cost less, because pixel density may cost more. They should have made the monitor lid thicker to put whatever electronics are in the bezel behind the screen.
  9. Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by the+pickle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Great. A laptop that only a two-year-old can type on. Those of us with normal-sized hands can look forward to cramping, RSI, and other fun medical issues.

    Why not do something semi-revolutionary and incorporate a keyboard like the FrodPad into it instead of trying to shoehorn an entire QWERTY layout in there?

    p

    1. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by justforaday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i clicked on that link for the frogpad and i can't get over their little motto in the corner: "one-handed, wireless productivity." makes you wonder who their target market is... : p

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh get over it! You might have normal-sized hands but obviously not normal-sized brain-power. The way to use these small keyboards is obvious to anybody who's graduated beyond kindergarten: grab one or two pens in each hand and tap on the keys with the pens just like you were typing with one or two fingers. It works for me everytime. It works for a lot of people. OK you won't break any speed records but who cares. Stop whining and start being resourceful for... oh why do I even try!

    3. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You know what the funny thing is? Sharp also makes the Actius MM-20, which also weighs 2lbs, and also has a 1GHz (I think) Efficeon, but has a ~10" and a more normal-sized keyboard. Maybe you should get one of those instead!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by huchida · · Score: 1

      Great. A laptop that only a two-year-old can type on. Those of us with normal-sized hands can look forward to cramping, RSI, and other fun medical issues. Well, considering you won't be buying this, what's the problem? It's a Japanese product, remember.

    5. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by macshit · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the stupidity of using a touch pad on something this small!

      Touch pads require space to work well.... and the tiny little touchpad they ended up with looks like it's either going to be horribly hard to use (requiring great precision of movement by the user) or horribly annoying (constantly having to reposition your finger for even small mouse movements).

      Most manufs. seem to end up using an eraser-head interface on their smallest models for exactly this reason, but I guess sharp was too damn to cheap to do it.

      Since the whole design looks just sort of "blah", I'm guessing this thing wasn't designed by their most talented team...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    6. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fingers you have used to type, are too fat. Please obtain a typing wand by mashing the keyboard with your hand."

    7. Re:Tiny Laptop, Tiny Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really wanted to keep the keyboard small, they could have tried to use a normal numeric keypad and T9 :)

  10. Guess they've never seen the Sony X505ZP by skitz0 · · Score: 0

    Smaller, ligher, faster.

    http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfini ty /eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_BrowseCatalog-Start;sid=rWP WSgCJrvzWcUG6CG3cQU-GpFSw0rMTNgc=?CategoryName=cpu _VAIONotebookComputers_X505_Series&Dept=cpu_VAIONo tebookComputers

    1. Re:Guess they've never seen the Sony X505ZP by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 4, Informative

      i am a karma whore...

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    2. Re:Guess they've never seen the Sony X505ZP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to agree. While the Sony is I believe almost $1k more its a whole lot more usefull.

    3. Re:Guess they've never seen the Sony X505ZP by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative
      Smaller, ligher, faster.

      Fewer display pixels, almost twice as expensive.

      Schwab

    4. Re:Guess they've never seen the Sony X505ZP by foobsr · · Score: 1

      The more constrained budget might look here.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  11. The real reason this on slashdot... by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1

    ...is because it will probably run linux with very few problems. The notebook itself is actually pretty ordinary compared to the ones offered by Sony. The only catches are the price and pretty poor linux compatibility. I used to have an "old" Sony U101 which was only 2.4lbs and had a waaay mor epowerful processor. It could also run for 13 hrs on a single battery. Oh yeah, getting linux to run on it was real pain in the ass, though!

    1. Re:The real reason this on slashdot... by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      I had one of these (PC-MM10) for a while. I was actually running the Linux-Laptops site for it, until my DSL went down. *grunt*

      Linux ran on it pretty well. No real problems, except you had to use a certain version of the ALSA sound drivers (or your screen would explode into lots of pretty colours and hang your machine), and something else I don't quite remember. I think that ACPI support in Linux was pretty crappy when I had it or something.

      Then I got drunk and stepped on it. Oh, well.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:The real reason this on slashdot... by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Oh yeah, the reason I thought it would be more compatible:

      Sharp produces a product that actually IS a PDA which runs linux quite well.

    3. Re:The real reason this on slashdot... by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      No way dude. The U101 had a 600MHz Mobile Celeron.

      The 1GHz Efficeon will easily outpace that old thing. If there were a 1GHz Pentium-M, it would also give it a good run for performance.

    4. Re:The real reason this on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U101 had a Celeron M, never called that because it wasn't in the USA. The 600mhz Celeron had the Banias core, so it was probably more like a 900mhz Celeron in the desktop... taking comparisons from the Pentium M and desktop systems.

      The 1ghz efficeon is probably as fast as a 600mhz desktop Pentium.. so the two are probably very similiar in performace..

  12. Sounds useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is an Efficeon processor? Is it Intel, Intel compatible? More importantly, does Linux work on it?

  13. So whats this cost? by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not the notebook, but running an add like this on Slashdot?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So whats this cost? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everytime there's an article about a new product that the slashdot community would have an obvious intrest in, someone has to make a comment that its an ad?
      I'm sure a large number of slashdotters agree that we like seeing this types of times on slashdot. We don't always hear about them ourselves, and its always nice to get input of a few (hundred) similar minded folk.

    2. Re:So whats this cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lay off it already. Slashdot has been posting articles about news gadgets since the begin. Then they post a few that you personally don't care about, and suddenly the editors must be posting them for ulterior motives.

      I sure am glad I am not an editor for the site. Y'all can be some of the biggest asses I have ever met in my life.

    3. Re:So whats this cost? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      No kidding. "Absolutely stunning looks and style"? According to who? this thing looks like a plaything. Losing the 3 foot bezel would be a good start...

    4. Re:So whats this cost? by Otter · · Score: 1

      1) Is PDA Buyer's Guide related to Dynamism or Sharp? If not, I don't see what there is to complain about.

      2) Anyway, who cares? Either stories are interesting or they're not -- if they are, I don't care whether they're submitted by the product's maker, the review's author, that Roland Piquepaille guy or just some random reader. Worrying about the source makes as little sense to me as getting upset because someone picked up some karma by posting the text of an unreachable link.

    5. Re:So whats this cost? by interiot · · Score: 1
      • [It has] a wide screen 7.2" display and absolutely stunning looks and style.

      1. 7.2 inches is wide? In what universe?? The article blurb ends with gushing praise.

      2. Geeks worldwide can instantly recognize this as marketing speak, and it makes them shiver. Our fearless leaders Rob Malda and friends put themselves forward as being geeks, and used to have the ability to instantly recognize such junk and keep it off the front page.

      3. It's entirely feasible that Rob Malda and friends want to make more money. Especially if they think they can do it at our expense without us recognizing the funny business.

    6. Re:So whats this cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, but I hear subtracts go for around $50.

      LOL!!!! I AM TEH FUNNYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!111111111111

    7. Re:So whats this cost? by BeBoxer · · Score: 2

      1. 7.2 inches is wide? In what universe?? The article blurb ends with gushing praise.

      The resolution is 1280x768, making it a "wide screen" format. Had they said 'It has a wide 7.2" screen' you would have been spot on though.

    8. Re:So whats this cost? by logic+hack · · Score: 1

      I'm stunned by then mentality met with every product review or cool gadget headsup that is given to slashdot readers now. A descriptive article on what I see as a slim and compact peice of well made hardware is hardly an infomercial trying to persuade every slashdotter to go out an buy one.

      Some of us _enjoy_ being told what's new in the world of consumer electronics. If the slashdot article summary can give us some clear facts on the item as far as features and appeal, then I personally clump it into the "Stuff that matters." category.

      Mod me flaimbait; but just because a reader isn't interested in the product; doesn't give them the right to brush it aside and accuse the mod's for letting ads corrupt slashdot. It's a stylish looking computer from Japan for cripes sakes, how closer to "News for Nerds" can it get.

    9. Re:So whats this cost? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      It's entirely feasible that Rob Malda and friends want to make more money. Especially if they think they can do it at our expense without us recognizing the funny business.

      You have a point, but keep in mind that it is their site to do with as they please. Also, consider that you are reading slashdot at *their* expense, so is it really wrong for them to recoup their bandwidth, server, and other overhead costs while you're busy hitting reload on the front page?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:So whats this cost? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      but why are they always products available from dynamism? You can always buy them elsewhere, but why is it that the more expensive dynamism is always mentionnned?

  14. Biggest stumbling block by spidereyes · · Score: 1

    Con: You need good eyes for the small display and patience when typing on the miniaturized keyboard. I don't know about you, but I have these huge nubby fingers and typing on little keyboards in painful. Plus I have the patience of a four year old. The only thing worse is squinting to see a small lcd. However, the portability is what will sell this item, because those nice big powerful notebooks with the 15 inch display always seem to be a little bulky for the on-the-go person.

    --

    I say we just grow up, be adults and die.
    1. Re:Biggest stumbling block by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      The Mebius isn't just another pretty face--.
      You can say that again. It is one ugly-assed piece of hardware.

    2. Re:Biggest stumbling block by glass_window · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you're also not Japanese, are you? Notice Sharp didn't actually release this in the US.

    3. Re:Biggest stumbling block by Steffan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Dynamism is marketing the product to English speakers, presumably in the U.S...

    4. Re:Biggest stumbling block by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      You not use huge nubby fingers you western barbarian, you use chopsticks !

      Patience is the virtue of the mountain that is enligtened when the sparrow poops on its tip.

      Clearly you are not zen enough. :)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  15. 7.2" not quite enough by SlashCrunchPop · · Score: 1
    This Japanese Import is available translated into English from Dynamism, and is smaller than a hardback book. It weights just under two pounds, has a 1 GHz Efficeon processor, a wide screen 7.2" display and absolutely stunning looks and style.

    7.2" for a display is just too small, IMHO most people want either a regular sized laptop or a palmtop, these variations inbetween are just too weird to be really useful as a replacement for either.

    1. Re:7.2" not quite enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can get a 7.2" screen to display 1280x768, but I can't seem to find a 30" or 32" display at, say, 2048x1536. That'd be much more useful to me (though, admittedly, not in a laptop ;-)

  16. Not a good bang for the buck by ciurana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have purchased several items from Dynamism. While I've been happy for the most part, I believe that this machine is overpriced in relation to what you get out of it. With a $1,900 USD tag, you might as well get a 12" PowerBook that will do a similar or better job, have a better screen, and include built-in wireless, Bluetooth, Ethernet, modem, etc. with about the same footprint. You'd get OS X. You can run Office:Mac if you must, at about the same price as MS-Office or cheaper. You'll have access to better quality software (i.e. OmniGraffle vs. Visio) if you must pay for it, or tons of OSS stuff that just compiles and runs, or installs with a button click.

    Besides, chicks dig the PowerBooks. They look cool, not geeky.

    Cheers,

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    1. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by dieman · · Score: 1

      Uh. Better screen, with less screen real-estate.

      If you dont want one of these, get a Fujitsu P7000 series. I've got a P2046 and the form factor rocks *and* the screen beats out a powerbook's anemic 1024x768 any day.

      Plus, you get compact flash/sd slots that the powerbook doesn't have.

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    2. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by ciurana · · Score: 1

      dieman wrote:



      If you dont want one of these, get a Fujitsu P7000 series. I've got a P2046 and the form factor rocks *and* the screen beats out a powerbook's anemic 1024x768 any day.



      The Fujitsu P7000 series doesn't have enough memory at the same price, runs Windows XP (yuck) and it's fugly to look at. Chicks won't dig it...



      Plus, you get compact flash/sd slots that the powerbook doesn't have.



      The PowerBook doesn't need those slots. That's what Firewire is for.




      Cheers,



      E
      --
      http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    3. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Besides, chicks dig the PowerBooks. They look cool, not geeky.


      So you buy your computer to impress the ladies? Do you also buy the right car and clothing to impress them? What about your furniture, etc? Is it all done to impress women? I find that all hard to believe since the very fact that you are talking favourably about an Apple product means that you are probably a member of the gay persuasion.

      Wow... That would be a good name for a really angry grindcore death metal punk rawk band. The Gay Persuasion. They could sound kind of like Anal Cunt or Napalm Death. Their album cover would have a picture of a dirty cum and shit stained glory hole in a public restroom. Their first album could be called "Painful Discharge."

    4. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by chill · · Score: 1

      I was traveling via coach class on an airplane, happily typing away on my Sony Picturebook, when the couple next to me insisted on showing me the error of my computing ways.

      They both tried to show me their brand new Apple PowerBooks and explain how much better they were.

      I say "tried" because both opened their machines at once. Even one was larger than the poor little airline tray. It was impossible to type on and the poor guy almost had his smashed when the person in the seat in front of him leaned it all the way back.

      I've always considered PowerBooks -- and all those large PC notebooks -- more of a transportable than a true use-it-in-the-field laptop. Take it from the office to home, or to a client site, but you better have plenty of space to use it on the road.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You know there's a difference between a 12" Powerbook and a 15" or 17" Powerbook, right?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No kiddin' I love my Sharp Zaurus but when it comes to something like a laptop that would be used for hours every day I can't imagine using anything but a powerbook.

      If this sharp was $1000 and came with linux I'd be all over it but it's just not worth it, and the style is bad (what's with the huge bezel, no latch to hold it closed, stupid advertising stickers on the palm rest I have to remove [problem with most Windows laptops].......it ain't no powerbook).

    7. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've always considered PowerBooks -- and all those large PC notebooks -- more of a transportable than a true use-it-in-the-field laptop. Take it from the office to home, or to a client site, but you better have plenty of space to use it on the road.


      WTF?! I use my 17" Powerbook in coach at least every other week! I sometimes even use the sides as a drink / snack holder (during in-flight DVDs), since it does completely hide the pitiful little tray table. Often, I don't fold down the pitiful tray table, since it is usually so flimsy anyway. My 17" Powerbook is a laptop, after all, so I sometimes use it in my lap! By the way, it is BY FAR the best computer for traveling that I have ever owned. I can use it under a wide variety of lighting on planes (great battery by the way) and in terminals, and often pick up 802.11 (free in Pittsburgh's airport!) and I can also use it in place of a TV and stereo in my hotel rooms. It totally blows away any other laptop, yet it fits in the briefcase I already had and is light enough that I carry it at least 40 minutes each day (walking to and from work).
    8. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could pick up a sharp mm-20 for $1350 with a 10.5" screen, weighs less than 2.5 pounds, and less than 1" thick

    9. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      I've used a clamshell iBook in coach on an American Airlines MD-80 with no problem.

      --
      End of Line.
    10. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      I've also got a P2046, and while I like it in many ways, I'm not sure I'd buy another Fujitsu.

      - The key labels have worn off half the keys. I'm a touch-typist so it doesn't bug me too much, but sometimes I'm typing one handed, and then it's a PITA.

      - the spring loaded clip that holds in the removable drive/battery fell out long ago. Friction has been enough, but I make sure I carry the laptop right-way up.

      - The drive-bay battery was obscenely expensive ($400, if I remember correctly), and it's getting close to time for a new one.

      - It has a stupid VGA dongle. Why not a real port? There's room...

      - Crusoe is slow.

      - The mouse pointer needs too much pressure, even at the most sensitive setting.

      - It's got three useless Windows keys in the bottom row, but the Insert and Delete keys are way off in right field.

      - The video driver can't do OpenGL properly.

      Other than those things, I really love it :-) I wish someone else would manufacture this form factor.

    11. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by chill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, *I* do. But, the people intent on giving me the demonstration seemingly didn't.

      I have nothing against Apple. An iBook would have done better in that situation. However, America West's seats are a bit tight in back.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem other than the fact that the MD-80 is the most uncomfortable POS ever built for human flight, you mean?

      God I hate those things. I'd rather take a F'in prop.

    13. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by atheken · · Score: 1

      asside from the comment the OP makes "stunning" - yeah, it's a shocker - thing makes me sick - the bevel on the screen is an inch in every direction! It's powerbook 12" or nothing for me, for good!

    14. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      ibooks are slightly bigger than powerbooks, actually.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    15. Re:Not a good bang for the buck by nacturation · · Score: 1

      "Plus, you get compact flash/sd slots that the powerbook doesn't have."

      The PowerBook doesn't need those slots. That's what Firewire is for.


      What if you want to offload your digital images from a CF card into iPhoto and you didn't want to lug the camera around for the task? Yeah, I guess you could connect a CF reader via Firewire...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  17. Did anyone else read the title as... by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
    "Sharp Moebius Subnotebook Review"

    I now have a vision of a one-sided PDA in the shape of a Moebius strip, with screens/buttons all over the one 'side'.

    1. Re:Did anyone else read the title as... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      No. And your sig makes no sense. That should be Karmacy, not Karmaceutical.

  18. Keyboard is trouble by usefool · · Score: 1

    I think everyone's trying to find that sweet spot in portable devices, from PDA to SmartPhone, then Tablet, then HandTop, then Subnotebook etc.

    Personally, I need a workable screen, maybe 10"-15", and I want it light, so it shouldn't have a keyboard, just like a Tablet (with touch screen), but I need a keyboard so that this device is workable, so we need a Virtual Keyboard.

    Anyway, I think a lighter Tablet (screen section only) with a Virtual Keyboard will be light enough to carry around, and you can use your fingers and stylus in awkward situation, but when you have a desk, you can start up the VKeyboard for proper typing.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
  19. More bang: More memory too! by ciurana · · Score: 2, Informative

    I forgot: For $1,900 your PowerBook will also have around 768 MB RAM, maybe even 1 GB, vs. the 256 MB offered by the Moebius.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  20. Concidentally the Sharp Mebius PC-RD3D... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... was renamd the " Sharp Actius RD3D " for the US market. The Mebius PC-RD3D was the first autostereo display notebook ever made, released around a month or two later, under a different name for the US market. Maybe if this new Mebius CV50 comes to the US, it will be renamed the Actius CV50 ?

    1. Re:Concidentally the Sharp Mebius PC-RD3D... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Also, back when I bought my Actius 150, the Japanese lineup was called "Möbius" -- had the one-sided loop as the wallpaper and everything. Can we assume that "Mebius" is a translation error?

    2. Re:Concidentally the Sharp Mebius PC-RD3D... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Also, back when I bought my Actius 150, the Japanese lineup was called "Möbius" -- had the one-sided loop as the wallpaper and everything. Can we assume that "Mebius" is a translation error?

      Googling for "sharp mebius" got about 35,200 results, while "sharp mobius" got only 15 results, and "sharp möbius" didn't get any. Maybe it was a trademark dispute and they changed the name to get by it. The actual name they would be using for the Japanese market would be in Japanese, anyway. Perhaps the Japanese name actually means "Möbius" and they intentionally mistranslate it into "Mebius" to avoid trademark disputes. And maybe that's why they renamed it for the US market as well.

      Aha! I just found out something- this is the homepage of the Mebius. When you translate the Japanese webpage title in Sherlock (Mac OS X) from Japanese to English, the result is "Mobius: Sharp". They do intentionally mistranslate it!

    3. Re:Concidentally the Sharp Mebius PC-RD3D... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      For fun, if anyone's got the old multimedia encyclopedia that came with the Sound Blaster Pro and/or creative CD drive, play the reading of "Möbius".

  21. VGA dongle sold seperately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no optical drive.I'll keep my cheaper Fujitsu P2120 Thank You

    1. Re:VGA dongle sold seperately by andfarm · · Score: 1

      RTFA: "Obviously, there's no way to cram an internal optical drive into the tiny Mebius..." A CD is 12 cm wide, and the Mebius is 15 cm wide. An optical drive would be nearly as large as the entire computer!

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    2. Re:VGA dongle sold seperately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mebius is somewhat wider than 15cm 15.75cm
      10.2 inches by 6,2 inches 2.54 cms to an inch
      larger than the optical drive in my diminutive Fujitsu which also features a 10.4" diagonal widescreen.
      I read the specs not the whole article.

  22. Cute, but M_e_bius? by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't suppose they got the spelling mixed up for m_o_bius, like that other famous gaffe s-o-n-y.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Cute, but M_e_bius? by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 1

      could you elaborate?

      my curiousity will soon erupt into a murderous rage misdirected at felines...

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    2. Re:Cute, but M_e_bius? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      could you elaborate?

      'Sony' was meant to be Sonny, as in Sonny Boy, a homey sort of name. The founder got the spelling wrong, though the name stuck. A fun site to check for stuff like this.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Cute, but M_e_bius? by kahei · · Score: 1

      It is 'mebius', not 'mobius' in Japanese. You will recall that the original is Moebius, which is difficult to type, so people tend to pick either the o or the e.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  23. Libretto Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about the Toshiba Libretto. Ala 1996, same size as a VHS tape, Pentium 133 processor, about 2 lbs. I have the Libretto 100CT, and since it runs Win95 it can do almost everything a big system can do. A little slow, but I use it for class lectures with a wireless card, I can take notes notes and surf all class long. Only problem is that the keybord is really tiny and hard to type on. But a real attention getter.

    1. Re:Libretto Anyone? by fewnorms · · Score: 1

      I got a Libretto 75CT here, lovely machine. Together with the extender for vga/serial it makes a very nice console terminal for servers. And yes, mine runs Debian (wireless too ;)

      --
      Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    2. Re:Libretto Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still love my libretto. I keep thinking I may try and get linux running on it. It is still the best machine I ever had as far as taking it with me daily in my one bag so that it was always with me when something came up. (I don't need to use one often, but when I do, I really need it.) I used to end up leaving my my bigger machine home on days when I fugured I would not be needing it, and would often be wrong and hung out to dry.

      These days, I have a bigger machine always in my bag, but my arm and back does not like the deal. Give me a two poung linux box with good battery life, wifi, ethernet, usb, serial, pcmcia, and perhaps parallel. These days I could probably pass on the parallel.

      A Nony Mouse

    3. Re:Libretto Anyone? by GrpA · · Score: 1

      I too have a libretto. ( A 60 - real early stuff). I use it to play GO on the train ride into work. And sometimes for a console. It has 802.11 connectivity and it's quite convenient to take around with me - in fact, it goes wherever I do.

      Sadly, the Libretto is exactly the reason why this won't work. Sure it will take off in other markets, but in places like the US (and Australia where I am for that matter) it's never been popular... Instead I see people with HUGE laptops which take up as much space as a LCD panel and keyboard.

      Few people can appreciate the functionality of a truly small PC - Too many people just want a portable desktop box.

      And from the comments many people have posted about the small keys and the smaller size LCD (resolution notwithstanding) it seems that as with the Libretto, most people still just don't get it... You're not supposed to use these things to replace a desktop.... They are a high-powered PDA for people who need more than to just keep appointments and take notes

      GrpA.
      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    4. Re:Libretto Anyone? by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

      I have 110CT.. running debian aswell.. I for the life of me can't get it to recognize my wireless card. however, kismet has no problem with the wireless card

      --
      God is real unless declared as int
  24. Bah that's crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Fujitsu P1000 is just as small, lighter and 500$ cheaper.

    http://webshop.fujitsupc.com/fpc/Ecommerce/build se riesbean.do?series=P1

    1. Re:Bah that's crap by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      While good for its time, the P1000 is way too long in the tooth. The 800MHz Crusoe is much slower than a 1GHz Efficeon.
      We have a bunch of those P1000 type machines...

  25. Efficeon? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it.

  26. Efficeon = Transmeta by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a Transmeta processor...I think it was the last one Linus Torvalds worked on the x86 code morphing code for before moving on.

    Does Linux work on it? I suspect so, in this case. It seemed like the Crusoe was very happy under Linux. I have friends who have had Crusoe-based laptops running under Linux.

    The only thing that might cause trouble would be the wireless networking. And that has nothing to do with the CPU.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  27. I want a notebook with a HP 200LX Keyboard by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    I think the problem with these smaller computers is that the designers think people want a keyboard that feels like a desktop computer but really, if the keyboard is smaller it's too easy to push the other keys. I had a HP 200lx for a while in the mid 90s. The thing was pocket size and had a great chiclet keyboard that is similar to the calculators. Because the keys were so hard to push down it was easy to type accurately on it even though my fingers were bunched together on it. I took notes at about 60WPM in college as the professor was speaking and got excellent notes that made studying easy. I can type normally at about 80wpm. I had to work at it to get to 60 wpm but with the 200lx keyboard you could do fast six finger typing by place your finger in between keys and and leaning your fingers to the right or left to push keys. If there were a mini laptop out there with a keyboard like this I would definitely by it.

  28. Microsoft tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blech, it ships in the US with Windows XP.

    1. Re:Microsoft tax by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering that Dynamism puts that on themselves, if you asked nicely they might leave it bare for you.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Microsoft tax by chadjg · · Score: 1

      Didn't Japan's equivalent of the Federal Trade Commission put the beat down on Microsoft for demanding that all OEMs that use WinXP for any of their machines include it on all machines? I may be way the heck off, but it would make it easier for them to do what you're thinking about.

      I'm not sure, I may have my news reports mixed up again.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    3. Re:Microsoft tax by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, here's how it works: Dynamism buys Japanese-market laptops, which have the Japanese version of Windows on them. They import them to the US, and replace the Japanese Windows with English Windows. I don't think you can just go using a different language version of Windows without changing the license, so it probably costs Dynamism money to do that. It would cost them less to just give it to you with Linux on it. Of course, the "Japanese FTC" issue you're talking about would be great for Dynamism, because all those Japanese copies of Windows are useless to them.

      However, remember that I've never bought anything from them though, so I could be completely wrong.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  29. been there... by mralphabet · · Score: 1

    I still have a small notebook like this made by Mitsubishi, pentium 166 with the max of 96 megs of ram. Runs Win95 like a champ and I can play tons of older games in it.

  30. practical in some markets by MinusBlindfold · · Score: 1

    This is not a toy for everyone. The steep price will keep it in a mostly commerical market... salesmen, travelling scientists, comic book guy (maybe). As neat/compact as it is, for most people i think it would become a novelty after a while.

  31. Sorry, Fujitsu P-1000 series was out much earlier by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK. Someone tell me how this is better than the P-1000 series from Fujitsu?

    Although it weighs 0.1 pounds less and has a (slightly) faster processor, it also is 1 inch wider (though its screen - non-touch pad, BTW - is an inch narrower), it's battery life is shorter, and it doesn't have a built-in modem and cabled ethernet socket. All-in-all, I don't see a lot of difference and what is different seems to be worse. Oh yeah, the P-1000 is also less expensive at $1200 and doesn't need a third party to retrofit for English use.

    So again, why is this news?

    --
    That is all.
  32. sharp, english, palmtop, stylish, but ugh, Windows by Speare · · Score: 1

    I want something a little bit larger than the Zaurus clamshells, a little more capable, and has zero Microsoft infection involved. Sell this same palmtop at a reasonable price running Linux, and you'll get me to buy it.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  33. Plymouth Prowler of Laptops? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1
    Has anyone found a laptop this small actually useful . . . or is it mainly for WoW factor? Personally, I find smaller laptops that aren't even this small have keyboards that are too small to seriously use and sometimes with screens too difficult to read.

    Perhaps this is useful as a laptop for a casual user that uses it in a very limited way, or for someone with serious space constraints (e.g. someone touring on a motorcycle, or backpacking), but does anyone really expect laptops this small to actually become mainstream?

    Then again, perhaps laptops like these are the Plymouth Prowlers of the laptop industry. A PR and marketing stunt for branding and to get people into shops, without an expectation that one would actually sell a lot of these, but they might help sway people into buying more conventional laptops of the same brand . . .

  34. I hate to bitch, but... by accelleron · · Score: 0

    would it be so hard for them to remove the bezel on the edges of the lid so that they could put a 9" LCD for those of us that don't carry a magnifying glass?

    --
    Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  35. Re:Sorry, Fujitsu P-1000 series was out much earli by Bloater · · Score: 1

    You know this could almost be classed as useful if only you'd provided a damned link. Why do the interesting posts that really get you going never provide a link. And to make it worse, it'll still be modded up.

  36. Could Have Larger Screen! by Omega1045 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It always bugs me when I see a design like this. There is a good 3 cm to 4 cm all the way around the LCD on this thing. The flip top looks like a big picture frame. This is space that could have been used for a larger screen. With the 10.2" X 6.2" dimensions, you could fit a 11.5" screen onto that little thing with some space to spare. They only fit a 7.2" into the space. I cannot think that this would add a lot of weight, and power consumption would not be much more considering it is an LCD monitor.

    Perhaps they could have spent a little less time trying to make it look just like an iBook and a little more time making the notebook that much more useful.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  37. PowerBooks are VERY heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Compare mm20 to a 12 inch powerbook
    MM20 is only 1.99 pounds while a 12 inch powerbook weighs 4.6 pounds. Besides,12 inch powerbooks have a BIG defect: NO PC CARD SLOT (MM20 has a PC Card slot, 2 High Speed USB slots, audio and video out slots)

    I like to read books while traveling; for this reason I need to be able to hold a laptop in a single hand for hours. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO THIS with a PowerBook; no problem with MM20

    Another defect of the powerbooks: the trackpad drivers under linux are not good ; whathever driver I use, the mouse is very jumpy. In contrast mm20 runs without problems under linux, everything works perfectly, including the wireless card; no jumpy mouse under linux.

    1. Re:PowerBooks are VERY heavy by ciurana · · Score: 1

      I agree that the PowerBooks are heavier than the mm20 -- even without having seen one of the latter.

      Now, about the PCMCIA slots -- PowerBooks don't need them. You have Firewire and almost everything else you might desire is built-in.

      As to running Linux on a PowerBook... why? GNU tools are available in there, it runs *NIX, and it has a hell of a nice GUI. Running Linux/KDE on a PowerBook is like hauling hay in a Ferrari. It just doesn't make sense. Linux does a lot of good stuff in PC hardware, but OS X/Darwin works much better under Macs for obvious reasons.

      Cheers,

      E

      --
      http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    2. Re:PowerBooks are VERY heavy by derF024 · · Score: 1

      As to running Linux on a PowerBook... why? GNU tools are available in there, it runs *NIX, and it has a hell of a nice GUI.

      Yea, because what works for you, works for everyone, right? OS X isn't for everyone. I own a mac and can't stand the thing; I use my thinkpad running debian every day while the mac collects dust.

    3. Re:PowerBooks are VERY heavy by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting. Mac users are the scientologists of the internet world. It's "obvious" that their way is the One True Way.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:PowerBooks are VERY heavy by ciurana · · Score: 1

      defF024 wrote:

      Yea, because what works for you, works for everyone, right? OS X isn't for everyone. I own a mac and can't stand the thing; I use my thinkpad running debian every day while the mac collects dust.

      I also own three Linux/RH enterprise servers, a Sun 420R with Solaris, a notebook running Mandrake 10, a Power Mac G5, and a workstation that runs Windows XP Pro.

      The right tool for the right job. I use Macs now almost exclusively for end-user/programming, Linux/Solaris for servers, and XP when someone wants me to do something for Windows. On a Mac, I prefer OS X/Cocoa. On Intel hardware I prefer Linux, usually RH of some sort.

      Cheers

      E
      --
      http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  38. Where are the stunning looks? by iammaxus · · Score: 1

    It looks just like a very small average laptop. Nothing stunning about it.

  39. So - when will we see Linux on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or OpenBSD?

    It would be a shame to waste something like this on WinBlows...

  40. P1120=TERRIBLE speakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P1120 Advantages: The hard disk is user upgradable; it comes wirh a 30GB 2.5 ich drive-you can put an 80GB drive inside. The weight is 2 lbs, the screen is bigger, 8.9'.It has a PC card slod Le laptop is extremely sturdy, linux luns without problems

    Disadvantages: the model is 1.5 years old, slow CPU TM5800 800MHZ, only 256 MB RAM , USB 1.1(of these 16 MB are used for code morphing) Terrible Speakers

    Big disatvantage of ultralight Centrino laptops: they all come with INTEL VIdeo, which I HATE. Crusoe and Efficeon laptop may be slow, but at least come with ATI graphics

  41. Experiences with Sharp & Dynamism by Scud · · Score: 0

    I bought my C860 Zaurus from Dynamism and other than the price being a bit steep, I was throughly impressed with the service.

    As for Sharp, this is my second Z (the other was a 5500) and both of them have proven to be extermly durable (I dropped the 5500 the first day that I had it, and the 860 shortly after getting it. Clumsy I guess).

    As for the CV50, it seems to be neither big enough for a laptop nor small enough for a PDA.

    John

    --
    I dream in binary.
    1. Re:Experiences with Sharp & Dynamism by T0t0r0_fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm getting more and more disappointed that I bought 5500 instead of waiting a little and buying a C760... ;( (SL5600 and C700 looked suspicious at the time because of the buggy CPU)

      Myself i can't understand this hunt for a "sub-notebook", either - a laptop like the one in the review, as nice as it is(even running Linux) can't really be put in a pocket and carried around, you'll still have to think of some sort of special bag just for it - so, are 200 or so additional grams going to pull of your arms, in exchange for a few hundred $? I don't think and extra half-centimetre will make a huge difference on your lap/desk, either. So really, why bother?

      Am I missing some killer advantages a sub-notebook going to offer over a somewhat smaller than average laptop(or even a (very) good PDA, then - you aren't going to play many games on it, are you)?

    2. Re:Experiences with Sharp & Dynamism by J3r3miah · · Score: 1

      I bought a actius 1800 not sometime ago. I have no idea what kind of material the casing is.. but it seems like plastic.. thing is.. that its cracking up and I have to use super glue to keep the cracks from growing. I love it as a laptop, light & powerful.. just wish it was a bit more sturdy.

      --
      God is real unless declared as int
  42. Actually... by mrspecialhead · · Score: 0, Informative

    "Mebius" is the Japanese rendition of mobius. So they did.

  43. Stunning looks? by Uninen · · Score: 1

    absolutely stunning looks and style

    Never seen PowerBook or iBook, have you?-)

    1. Re:Stunning looks? by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      Specially considering that their explanation for the good looks are the 'beautiful' gloss-white bezel and the chrome latch-thing...
      These Mebius are truly ugly if you ask me...

  44. If you want a small but full function subnotebook by stevarooski · · Score: 4, Informative

    . . . Ignore this guy and check out Fujitsu's Lifebook P Series.. Very small form factor, but included CD burner/DVD player. Also, I would bet its a lot zippier than this Sharp.

    I first owned one of the P Series right after they came out and were equipped with transmetas. The performance was a shade up on terrible, and the battery life merely ok. Since then, they've shifted to Intel chips. My brother bought one recently, and the machine is easily capable of running multiple adobe applications, and he is able to get design work done anywhere with his pressure-sensitive drawing pad attached.

    This new machine is smaller, yes, but are the sacrifices in functionality worth shedding the extra pound?

    --

    - - - - - - - -
    Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
  45. I was going to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think PC world stocked this for about £900, but I just looked and its gone...
    Run Linux on it? Hell no DRDOS and GEM for me!

  46. Save money by I7D · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saved a ton of money and bought a M-M-M-Mebius off of Ebay!

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  47. A better sub-notebook is coming (a tablet, too) by galtenberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    None of the sub-notebooks introduced since Sony released the C1 series has given us a reason to upgrade. My C1XS (PII 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM, 30gig HD) is 5 years old and is still thinner and smaller (9.81"x5.99"x1.14", 2.21lb) than its later lookalikes.

    Only one model is even up for consideration, in my mind (no, not even the Sony U50/70 - you -gotta- have a real keyboard attached). The Flybook is gonna have _everything_, including GPRS, and it's a tablet, too. Exactly what I've been waiting for. Would the rest of you Far East-whipped toy companies wake up and get us computers like these?

    1. Re:A better sub-notebook is coming (a tablet, too) by kahei · · Score: 1


      I agree -- the C1 form factor was superb, allowing effective typing and reading on a computer that could still be kept in a (large) jacket pocket, and the general layout and construction of the series was great.

      Except for the HD. Those seem to break easily. And the customer support, which is typical Sony...

      So, er, do you know where I can get a HD for a C1?

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    2. Re:A better sub-notebook is coming (a tablet, too) by galtenberg · · Score: 1

      You're 100% right on the crappy factory HDs. Mine started to go bad after just a year, so I had to have it swapped out.

      I'm pretty sure that the HD is just a standard 2.5" - I can investigate further if you need me to.

      I bought the 30-giger on EBay back in '00, but FedEx'd my C1XS to the Seller, as the auction included transfer service (in retrospect, I can't believe I had the guts to do that, but it worked out fine :) The guy's email address is da_icq_man@hotmail.com - I talked to him by phone, he's for real, and he did a top notch job. And he can probably just hook you up with a HD, if that's all you need.

      Cheers,
      c.m.g
      www.galtenberg.net

  48. As Bill Gates told his wife... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Nobody will ever need more than 7.2 inches."

  49. What about this one? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Sony VAIO VGN-S1VP It's got a 10.4 inch display, and only weighs 822 grams (or 1.8 pounds). It also looks a lot cooler, and has a keyboard that looks a lot more comfortable.

  50. Re:If you want a small but full function subnotebo by yppiz · · Score: 1
    I can vouch for the Fujitsu P5020D. It's similar to the Sony TR2/TR3 - a 1GHz Centrino (roughly equivalent to a 1.3-1.5GHz Pentium IV). It has an internal CD-RW, and you can swap that out for a second battery. On two batteries, it runs for 8+ hrs with real use (constant wireless, lots of HD access, full brightness).

    The keyboard is good, the wireless sensitivity is excellent, and I can run Openoffice, Mozilla 1.7 (web and email), ssh, and even Battlefield 1942 without problems.

    Highly recommended. It's so portable, I use it instead of my desktop.

    Fujitu's new model is the P7000. It is slightly more powerful than the P5000 series. Newegg and Laptopsinc carry these Fujitsu subnotebooks:

    LeoG's Fujitsu notebook forum
    LaptopsInc (a great Fujitsu dealer)
    P7010 with 512M

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  51. Re:Sorry, Fujitsu P-1000 series was out much earli by lombre · · Score: 1
  52. Re:Sorry, Fujitsu P-1000 series was out much earli by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

    Because check Fujitsu's web site:
    http://webshop.fujitsupc.com/fpc/Ecommerce/ buildse riesbean.do?series=P1

    It only runs an 800MHz Crusoe, which is much, much slower than a 1GHz Efficeon.
    (Much more so than the 200MHz speed difference in clocks).

    I know because our company has a bunch of the P1000 type machines.

  53. My ideal [sub]notebook by fossa · · Score: 1

    Why can't someone make a subnotebook (or any notebook for that matter) with a real keyboard? Take something like a Happy Hacking keyboard, which doesn't try to squeeze Insert, Home, PgUp, PgDn, etc. on the right hand side (i.e. it's no wider than shift key to shift key), and doesn't have an extra row of function keys. The Happy Hacking keyboard is the best keyboard I've ever used (I love the feel), and is only about 2 inches wider than the keyboard on a Fujitsu P series I have sitting next to me (which happens to put the up arrow key on the left half of the right shift key... how many times have I suddenly started editing my previous line in bash?).

    Personally, I'd absolutely love a thick but otherwise small laptop that had a real keyboard. I suppose with a lot of work, one could custom build such a computer, but aren't even the VIA Mini-ITX motherboards quite a bit larger than laptop boards? Then there's power adapter problems, no PC cards, etc. Also, I wouldn't know where to look for a suitable LCD screen, but imagine one could be found?

    *sigh* Once again I find myself in what appears to be a niche market.

  54. Sony X505 is a superior design but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would anyone hazard a guess as to how a Linux install would work out? The PictureBooks have been a nitemare to set up but perhaps this is because of items such as the camera.

    Note: the X505 comes with an external DVD/CD drive, powered by Firewire.

    If the process was relatively straightforward I'd consider getting one. Otherwise, being stuck with Windoze XP on such an excellent piece of industrial design would be simply schizo...

  55. How about the Sony Vaio VGN-X505VP? by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    It's slightly longer, but thinner (only 1.1cm in the thinnest end!) and it has an internal DVD-+RW burner (no integrated Wi-Fi, but a PCMCIA card is included). Certainly it's expensive, but IMHO very, very sexy. El Reg has a review here.

  56. Better Linux ultraportables by Phaid · · Score: 1

    For the money, I think the Sharp Actius MM20 is a better machine. Same 1GHZ Efficeon processor, but 512mb of RAM, built in ethernet, wifi, pc card slot, and 2 usb ports, and the screen is 10.1" instead of the tiny 7". It still only weighs 2 lbs, and costs quite a bit less. By itself it's $1500; there's an optional external USB DVD/CDRW drive for $99, and for an addtional $200 you get a long run battery which gives up to 9 hours of runtime.

    Best of all, everything works in Linux -- Emperor Linux sells this as the Meteor, although IMO they tack on too much of a premium. But you can find do it yourself Linux install instructions for several distros at Linux on Laptops.

  57. HELLO? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    in the pc world, we can actually *upgrade memory* you see. and we don't tend to base our purchasing on chicks digging it.

  58. screen won't fit by lingqi · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw this when walking through tokyo the other day.

    the screen *cannot* be any bigger because of the rounded shape of the top cover. the cover portion is not like a slate, but rather the edges start from a blade edge and only reaches full thickness about 2cm in, where the actual LCD is embedded. check out the side-view - that's why the screen is so "small".

    Now, why whould they want to design their system wich such rounded edges, that's another mystery that you can only ask their design department.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  59. that's 2k sterling pounds, pal (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (nt) -> no text

  60. is everyone on crack? by tr33limbz · · Score: 1

    "absolutely stunning looks and style" and "Absolutely gorgeous" ?? jeez, some people are falling all over themselves. other than size, what makes this so "perty"? it looks rather plain and small to me. and expensive.

    --
    -end of post.