Slashdot Mirror


HP Linux Laptop Is A Winner

minus_273 writes "MSNBC is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Linux laptops. In a story titled 'H-P's first Linux laptop a winner', the article provides a brief look at the accomplishments and some of the shortcomings of the nx5000; a new inexpensive HP business laptop that comes with SUSE installed. The author seems extremely happy about how everything just works out of the box and mentions the significance of the product. Could HP+SUSE go the way of Apple+BSD and become an option for those that want friendly non-windows laptop? Releasing an easy to use Linux system is a good first step." We mentioned this laptop a few weeks ago.

412 comments

  1. First Post by Trigun · · Score: 4, Funny

    From my Suse/HP Laptop!

    YESS! Now to hibernate!

    1. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      "YESS! Now to hibernate!"

      * Trigun closes laptop lid and waits for hibernation

      * Trigun keeps waiting

      * Trigun is still waiting

      * Trigun reopens lid and looks at the configuration

      * Trigun screams in frustration as he searches for the auto-hibernate settings

      * Trigun throws the laptop out the window and gets a Mac

      ;-)

    2. Re:First Post by Trigun · · Score: 1

      I'm so glad that somebody got that.

      That particualr quirk is the only thing keeping MS on my laptop. If they could get that working, my Averatec'd get a facelift and an upgrade immediately!

    3. Re:First Post by valkraider · · Score: 0

      It'll hibernate. Just take out the battery. Presto - hibernation.

      What do you mean you want your *data* too?

    4. Re:First Post by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Interesting
      not as much fun as I had the other day with XP on my laptop... I closed the lid while the machine was booting up in XP... I then re-opened the lid some twenty minutes later and the damned thing crashed with "Windows has encounter an unexpected error" message... it couldn't survive having the lid closed during the boot sequence...

      Mind you, I have never yet managed to get acpi working for Linux on that laptop (Packard bell iGo 4450, really a rebadged NEC Versa E400), but maybe that's because I'm scared of having to recompile my kernel... when the heck will the major distro vendors supply their distros with a precompiled laptop kernel??? or is this just too difficult an option

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:First Post by Trelane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Software Suspend 2 should work, since it doesn't involve the brain-damaged Windows-Only hardware. For instance, I've been using kernel 2.6.7 + software-suspend2 2.0.100 on my Dell Inspiron 8600 to suspend-to-disk for a while now. While it's not 100% yet, it's mostly there (I can generally get a good number of suspend-resume cycles before it stops).

      Look for it soon in a kernel near you. :)

      FWIW, if you really want Linux to work on your hardware, you need to be pestering your hardware vendors. "Gee, I'd love to upgrade, but, you see, you don't support Linux...." Bring up the specific issues if you're familiar with them. Sure, your one voice may not change much in a large company, but if many voices speak up, they will be heard. Same reason I vote in an election.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    6. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bug your software vendors as well. This is now the second major vendor that had InterVideo's windvd working (IBM ThinkPads pre-installed with Linux were the first); but they still don't sell to non-OEMs. As the parent mentioned - one email to support@intervideo.com won't get them to support it for anyone other than IBM and HP; but if as many people ask for Linux as ask for Windows-ME or Win95, they might.

    7. Re:First Post by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've got a PB iGO4450 too!! :-D

      I have SuSE 8.2 Pro installed on it, and I thought the same thing about have to recompile (I think one of the messages implies this). You don't have to. My notes (for SuSE linux btw) are:

      "After installing SuSE 8.2 on the PB iGo 4450, ACPI is not enabled. To enable it, simply to into YaST2-->System-->Runlevel Editor-->Runlevel Properties and enable ACPI and check the runlevel 5 box. AFAIK the battery monitor is the only service currently working-- the suspend functions have not been implemented yet."

      HTH!

      ps. I've also got the modem working... say if you want the notes on how to do this.

    8. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Trigun throws the laptop out the window and gets a Mac

      * Trigun feels guilty about buying over-priced, out of date hardware, and quickly installs Yellow Dog on it while a little of his sanity still remains.

    9. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Touchy, aren't we? FYI, Mac laptops hibernate better than ANY other model of laptop in existence. Close the lid, and you'll see the pulsing light in ~2.5 seconds. Open the lid and the screen will come on in about 3 seconds. Because of this, most Mac users don't even know that there's a "shutdown" option in the menu.

    10. Re:First Post by name773 · · Score: 2, Informative

      maybe that's because I'm scared of having to recompile my kernel...
      don't be. just put both kernels (your old one and the new one) into your bootloader. if the new one fails, just use the old one and retry :)

    11. Re:First Post by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but man its hard bending the iMacs goose neck down low enough to activate it.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    12. Re:First Post by Trelane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I'd pay $10-$30 or so for a special add-on CD for SuSE or Red Hat or Gentoo or whatever that had licensed codec add-on software (e.g. Microsoft, Apple, Frauenhofer codec plugins to mplayer or xine).

      There may be a market for this....

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    13. Re:First Post by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      yes.. I've got the battery monitor working on mine with Mandrake 10... whoopee... what I call acpi is suspend, hibernate and speed throttle... getting the battery monitor working just doesn't do it for me.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    14. Re:First Post by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      have you got the SIS graphics working properly in 3D yet or are you, like me, still stuck in VESA 1024x768 mode???

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    15. Re:First Post by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      VESA I think! :(

    16. Re:First Post by tornado2258 · · Score: 1

      Speed throttle definitely works under SUSE 9.1, I just tried the suspend and hibernate options and get a message saying they have been disabled by the admin. So they probably don't work.

    17. Re:First Post by timmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course I never understood why using "Start -- Suut down -- turn off the computer" and then closing the lid would cause windows XP to hibernate, and when I powered up again later, it booted, finished shutting down and turned off.

    18. Re:First Post by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er; that's sleep mode, not hibernate. Unless there's some option I'm missing on my iBook, I don't think OS X has a way to hibernate completely like Windows laptops/desktops do. That said, the battery on my iBook, in sleep mode, lasts almost a full *week* of non-use, so it's not a big deal.

    19. Re:First Post by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      Second that.
      Software suspend 2 104 on Fujitsu Lifebook, Gentoo and stock kernel 2.6.8.1. Everything goes down and back up just fine. Software suspend guys liberated my computing environment ;-)

    20. Re:First Post by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why? On the Mplayer Download Page, they have all the codecs you will ever need. I have yet to run into an audio/video file I was not able to play in Linux with Mplayer. Just download the Mplayer coded DLL files and put them all in /usr/lib/win32, and now Xine, Totem and Mplayer will play _everything_ you throw at them.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    21. Re:First Post by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I'd just like to pay to snag a CD of software that's not of questionable legality and which installs itself easily.

      I already can play such things (well, not all as I don't care enough to download all the stuff). I just wanna be on the same legal standing as Apple and Microsoft users--until we convince our congresscritters that we Don't Likes the Software Patents. At that point, the CD would be obsolete and I will dance naked in the streets for joy. And collect money from people that don't wanna see that (i.e. everyone). Step 3 is, naturally, profit.

      Hmm. Maybe I should do the dancing bit first; convincing congresscritters is expensive.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    22. Re:First Post by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ps. I've also got the modem working... say if you want the notes on how to do this.
      Why don't you post how you got the modem working on LinModems.org so that other users can get the same modem working? This is how the Linux community works : )
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    23. Re:First Post by little_fluffy_clouds · · Score: 1


      I think you'll find that is suspend, not hibernation, but it's still good. BTW, as a data point for you, I have two laptops (a compaq amarda E500 and a toshiba satellite 1410) and they both suspend perfectly, similar to your Mac (suspend in about 2.5, working again in 3sec).

      Oh, and they both run NetBSD - the neat thing is, 2.0 has ifwatchd which will watch an interface for something to happen, and run a script if it does. Mine, for example, watches for carrier to return on the ethernet interface, deletes the route and restarts dhclient.

      Use it at work, suspend it, bring it home, keep working. Magic.

      (Note to flamers, I sure your INSERT_OS_HERE can do the same thing - this is just meant as a datapoint ;).

      --
      What were the skies like when you were young?
    24. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      they both suspend perfectly, similar to your Mac (suspend in about 2.5, working again in 3sec).

      Oh, and they both run NetBSD


      Now that is very interesting. I'd nearly given up hope of ever seeing a regular Unix system actually work correctly with a laptop's power management. Any idea if the tech has been/will be ported to FreeBSD? Or does NetBSD simply have a more suitable kernel design?

    25. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, but when its not entirely off, it still produces some heat, and storing it inside a laptop case in the trunk of my car which gets over 100 degrees can't be good for the laptop which is on, but in sleep mode (using minimal power, but still on).

    26. Re:First Post by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      onward and upwards... in little steps... currently Linux on laptops is like a toddler cruising via the furniture, unsure about letting go and striking out. Ah well, at least I now know it's worth bothering to dump mandy 10 off and stick susy 9.1 on. I had been contemplating wiping it completely of XP home edition, getting rid of that hidden restore partition and putting Gentoo on.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    27. Re:First Post by Myglaren · · Score: 1

      How come the Asimov link jumps to Amazon.com? and displays "The End Of Eternity". Why is this "Lost". I read this years ago (60's)

    28. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      It's been out of print for many, many years. It only recently has gone back into print. Thus all the older memebers remember it (and a few people who found it in the library) but it's been "lost" to the younger generation. :-)

    29. Re:First Post by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      If you are ok with trying a different media player, VideoLan will play anything that I've come across, including quicktime. Shit, I swear it would play a video clip if I loaded a text file into it.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    30. Re:First Post by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      Yup, me being a 24 year old book snob, I don't think I have ever heard of this, until I clicked your sig a coupld days ago. ps is it bad if I liked all the foundation books, and I mean aaaalll of them?

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    31. Re:First Post by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      is it bad if I liked all the foundation books, and I mean aaaalll of them?

      You're going to the third ring of hell for that one! (rolls eyes) Of course it's fine. Everyone has their own tastes. It's not like Asimov writes books with poor handling of touchy subjects like sex and violence. I was downright embarrassed to read "Friday", but none of Asimov's stuff falls in that category.

      BTW, if you're looking for a really, really good modern work of fiction, check out Eternity's End by Jeffery Carver. I got a copy from a book club and couldn't put it down. It's one of those books that you really wish wouldn't end. (Yes, it's THAT GOOD.)

    32. Re:First Post by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've read anything by Carver. I need to pick that up, and some of the Asimov I haven't read yet. I got my start in scifi with Heinlein and Arthur C Clark, got into Asimov via the foundation books, then read caves of steel/etc. I only asked if it was bad if I liked aaaaalll of them because I have heard some elite-scifi snobs who crapped all over Foundation and Earth, which I actually found to be incredibly interesting, in the way he tied things together(can't elaborate any more than that without spoiling things) with some of his other books.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    33. Re:First Post by danila · · Score: 1

      Giving feedback to companies is better than voting, because, as a rule, companies actually care about their clients (even potential ones), as opposed to politicians, who don't give a shit anyway. In many cases management simply doesn't have a good idea about what their clients might want. Actually telling them really helps a lot.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    34. Re:First Post by little_fluffy_clouds · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      I don't run FreeBSD except for where I'm forced to (currently 2 servers ;). AFAIK, FreeBSD has better ACPI support than NetBSD, which, in the upcoming 2.0 release is not complete. As far as APM support, NetBSD has had this for quite some time, and it seems rather mature to me (well, just like the rest of the OS ;). I'd wager that FreeBSD APM would be just as good, but you'd have to ask someone who actually uses it.

      --
      What were the skies like when you were young?
    35. Re:First Post by marko123 · · Score: 1

      32MB RAM doesn't consume much power ;)

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  2. What is more amazing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MSNBC is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Linux laptops. In a story titled 'H-P's first Linux laptop a winner',

    or

    LinuxJournal is currently running a story on the front page reviewing the new HP Windows laptops. In a story titled "HP Windows laptops kick ass"...

    1. Re:What is more amazing? by ForemastJack · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no. You picked the wrong statement out of the writeup. The truely amazing line is:

      "We mentioned this laptop a few weeks ago."

      Why? Because it implies that /. editors have some knowledge of what stories they've run in the recent past.

      I know that was quite a shock to me.

    2. Re:What is more amazing? by kunudo · · Score: 2, Funny

      How this isn't +5 funny, or perhaps +5 sad, is beyond me...

    3. Re:What is more amazing? by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      The real amazing thing will be seeing how long the article's author Gary Krakow keeps his job.

    4. Re:What is more amazing? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      Don't know you...

      "We mentioned this a few weeks ago."

      ... is simply boiler-plate that applies to almost anything. a) Nobody will fact-check the statement so it might prevent a few "dupe" complaints. b) it increases interest in the posting because, "Wow, this has been mentioned more than once, I'd better read it!"

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    5. Re:What is more amazing? by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      maybe my humour has no taste, but that was the funniest thing i read in quite a while...
      kudos.

  3. I am surprised.... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am amazingly surprised that an HP Linux laptop would become a sleeper hit like this. I mean, I thought it wasn't going to get much press and that it would only be purchased by people who really want pre-installed Linux.

    1. Re:I am surprised.... by Trigun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really. Getting hibernate to work on a laptop, as well as any exotic functions requires quite a bit of work/digging. The vendors have the resources and knowhow to create the software for it, since they built the hardware.

      Servers I'll install myself, Desktops I'll install myself. I control the hardware that goes into them. Laptops however, I don't have so much control.

    2. Re:I am surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Walmart notebook Mobile Athlon 1600+... $600 flat!!! Rip away Win XP home edition and you got one nice but cheap litle screamer. I hope they come up with a Linux edition though, for a few bucks less.

    3. Re:I am surprised.... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Plus it makes more sense to get it to work once, and then install it on all shipped portables, plus a lot of linux users have been craving quite long for a "native linux" portable. Knowing that all the hardare will work under linux is very reassuring.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:I am surprised.... by Bastian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would buy one, and I might even keep the pre-installed Linux if it were a distribution that I use, but even if I wanted to put something else on my machine, I would still be happy just to have a laptop where I have an assurance that all of the hardware in the machine is going to work reasonably well with Linux.

    5. Re:I am surprised.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      From the article:"When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie."

      What the hell is this guy talking about? ogle and mplayer play DVD's just fine out of the box on my boxes...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:I am surprised.... by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am amazingly surprised that an HP Linux laptop would become a sleeper hit like this. I mean, I thought it wasn't going to get much press and that it would only be purchased by people who really want pre-installed Linux.

      Ummm, maybe I'm missing something but where did the article say anything about sales numbers?

      Anyhoo, as long as I'm posting, I was puzzling over:

      For instance, software installs aren't as easy to figure out as on a Windows or Mac computer. You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do. Installs should be easy to find when completed. That's not always the case for new Linux users.

      I'll take him at his word that something about software installation was difficult to figure out, but I'm not sure what he means. The last part probably refers to menu entries being added seemingly at random to a crazily crowded KDE menu, probably. (That certainly sounds like Mandrake.) But deciding where to store software, and handle permissions? Was he installing things from source tarballs?

    7. Re:I am surprised.... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't read the article until after I posted....sorry.

      But what do you expect, this is /.

    8. Re:I am surprised.... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      That is true... however, the legality of that is under question.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    9. Re:I am surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, that's because you're a criminal. Some people have respect for the law.

      (not sure if I'm shooting for a Funny mod or a Sad mod)

      To put it in a more serious tone; it would be nice to be able to watch such DVDs legally with Linux.

    10. Re:I am surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Excellent point!!! This is the strongest statement that Linux of any flavor is supported by this hardware.

      I'd like to see this from lots of hardware vendors -- support exactly one Linux, whichever they prefer, and the community can help with the rest.

      Hardware vendors - take note - if you can't show that your hardware works with Linux like HP just did, even if I want a Windows box I won't buy it just in case I need to run Linux someday down the road after Microsoft stops supporting my OS.

    11. Re:I am surprised.... by bfields · · Score: 1
      Ummm, maybe I'm missing something but where did the article say anything about sales numbers?

      In fact, how do you actually buy these things? I checked HP's web site, and while they list the model, and claim SuSe is available for it, if I follow the "configure & buy" links, they don't list any configurations with any OS other than XP.

      --Bruce Fields

    12. Re:I am surprised.... by adam+mcmaster · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily; the article mentions some custom kernel modules for the intel wireless stuff.

    13. Re:I am surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It usually needs some research.

      The sleep on my iBook (laptop from Apple) stopped working with kernel >=2.4.20 (not sure exact version). So I had to switch to 2.6 where it is now super fast, 1-2 seconds.

      But you need to understand that people using Linux OSes have some skills or can search.

      People who wants a Unix system but are lazy. Apples sells Mac laptops with Mac OS X pre-installed.

    14. Re:I am surprised.... by Excelsior · · Score: 3, Funny

      It works similar to a mail-in rebate. You take the XP install CD, make several copies and sell them on a street corner in Beijing. Then you download Suse and voila, a Linux laptop minus the Microsoft tax.

    15. Re:I am surprised.... by tirnacopu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think J2SDK (god forbid you would want two versions of this beast simultaneously), think Netscape vs. Firefox and try to install some darned plugin/extension so that it'll work in both and for all users, and also remember that if an extension refuses to install with a cryptic error maybe you didn't hit the exact 0.x.y version or maybe you were supposed to do it as root, restart browser two times and only after that it might work (Enigmail), think about some poor shmuck that goes to yahoo.com wanting to install the messenger thingie and after clicking on the download link expecting some installer to ask for permission is greeted with a message that states "What do you want to do with this x-audio-realplayer file?"...

    16. Re:I am surprised.... by laejoh · · Score: 1
      Oh boy, it is soo easy. Pick up something a la knoppix and try it out!

      I used Gnustep Live CD to get debian on my toshiba satellite 4090 CDS and on my main machine without any problems.

      Even
      apm --suspend
      worked out of the box on the toshiba...
    17. Re:I am surprised.... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      To put it in a more serious tone; it would be nice to be able to watch such DVDs legally with Linux.

      Well, it's pretty simple matter, you just need to live in a place that does not yet totally bend over for media companies and implement DMCA style laws. Yes, I know it's not an option for most, but hey, you asked.

      Anyway... where is it told, black and white, that DeCSS in video player is as illegal as everyone on the Slashdot seems to think? After all, DMCA does allow circumvention and reverse-engineering for "interoperability" purposes, and, AFAIK, has never been invoked (successfully, at least) over DeCSS utilizing _player_, which is the one case that exception would most likely allow, only DVD ripping software. All the trade secred cases have been dropped as well, no?

      So, why exactly is everyone still considering it 100% illegal?

  4. MSNBC? Declaring this? Is the world messed up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSNBC declares Linux laptop a winner? Is Microsoft losing control of their press^H^H^H^H^Hextended marketing department or what?

    What's next, SCO declaring that Linux is great?

    1. Re:MSNBC? Declaring this? Is the world messed up? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      Umm... SCO pwns Linux, dude, why wouldn't they declare it's great?

    2. Re:MSNBC? Declaring this? Is the world messed up? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's competitors include Sony (in consoles/PC's) and Sun (workstations/servers).

      An alliance with HP, allows them to compete against both at the same time.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  5. Yes but, the real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it win the gold, or will that gold medal be taken away. /posting from a suse dell laptop at work

  6. Not a negative choice by sita · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could HP+SUSE go the way of Apple+BSD and become an option for those that want friendly non-windows laptop?

    People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine, they buy Macs because they like Macs!

    1. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey buy Macs because they like Macs

      Macs suck. Especially the big mac. But its better than Burger King. Oh wait...

    2. Re:Not a negative choice by Itsik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, on the Macs the OS is made to work with the hardware and vice versa. Does it mean that if this picks up. Manufacturers will realize the potential and make sure that their laptop's hardware is Linux friendly as well?

    3. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or people want macs but don't buy macs cos they can't afford them...

    4. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does it mean that if this picks up. Manufacturers will realize the potential and make sure that their laptop's hardware is Linux friendly as well?

      I'm not sure why you're asking us, but -- yes, if these sell well, other manufacturers will be quite eager to follow suit. Of course, that involves buying them and not just coming up with some conspiracy theory if the sales don't appear.

    5. Re:Not a negative choice by phalse+phace · · Score: 0
      "People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine..."

      Really? That's odd because when I bought my PowerBook, I bought it because I specifically *did not* want a Windows machine.

      And the same goes for my friends, and their friends,....

    6. Re:Not a negative choice by GreatDrok · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought a Mac (iBook G4 14") because I was sick of the increasingly poor quality of Intel based laptops. My last Toshiba cost me £1500 and it didn't even last 18 month before it was dead. My iBook cost me £1000 and it is already 10 months old and still in great shape having been used just as much as the Toshiba was. By this point the Toshiba case was cracked and chipped, the paint had rubbed off where my palms rest and the screen was starting to flicker. Eventually the battery died and then the screen failed.

      I never used Windows on my laptops, I always made sure they could run decently with Linux. The best bit with the Mac is it is Unix and everything works right out of the box.

      I think it is good that Intel based laptops are appearing with Linux preinstalled but I still think a Mac is better value. This is my first Mac and it definitely won't be my last.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    7. Re:Not a negative choice by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful
      People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine, they buy Macs because they like Macs!

      Not necessarily. For me, being a Mac user is a somewhat negative choice. I vote with my wallet, and therefore don't want to buy another copy of Windows. The other obvious option is a Linux or BSD type Unix-alike, but they aren't quite as effortless as I'd like, and they don't come with apps (that I've found) that quite measure up to Dreamweaver and Photoshop. A Machintosh, while not really perfect either, satisfies my needs.

      My point is, though there are people who are very devoted to Apple, many Mac users are people who understand none of these OS's or architectures are perfect, but Apple just represents the best choice we can find.

    8. Re:Not a negative choice by Txiasaeia · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Nice FUD! What about all the press lately about defective powerbooks that apple refuses to fix? problems with ipods that apple refuses to acknowledge? Apple has just as many problems as Intel-based computers does.

      For the record, I've got an IBM Thinkpad 350C that's over 10 years old that *just* stopped working, and I think it's the power cord. I'll take Big Blue and 10 years of productivity over *anything* else, regardless of os or manufacturer, anyday.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    9. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you please stop crying? He was complaining about Toshibas (which certainly suck). It's not a personal slam at your Thinkpad.

    10. Re:Not a negative choice by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Well, Photoshop will work under WINE. Haven't tested Dreamweaver myself, yet, though.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    11. Re:Not a negative choice by GreatDrok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice FUD! What about all the press lately about defective powerbooks that apple refuses to fix? problems with ipods that apple refuses to acknowledge? Apple has just as many problems as Intel-based computers does.

      For the record, I've got an IBM Thinkpad 350C that's over 10 years old that *just* stopped working, and I think it's the power cord. I'll take Big Blue and 10 years of productivity over *anything* else, regardless of os or manufacturer, anyday.

      I don't see why it is FUD. I stated clearly that it was recent Intel based laptops that were a problem. I recently retired a 10 year old Toshiba that had finally reached the end of its possible uses but it still worked. But if you want something more modern than a P75 you need to look at the current state of play. Granted a laptop from IBM today is going to be better than the Toshiba Satellite Pro 3000 I bought but it is also more expensive and that was more expensive that my iBook. Also, granted there have been some problems with Apple Powerbooks and iBooks but at the end of the day all manufacturers have problems. Also, Apple has fixed the issues although I do agree they have been slow to respond.

      It is a fact that my iBook is better made than the Toshiba I had before and it is clearly holding up to daily use better than the Toshiba. It is also a lot cheaper than an IBM. Oh, and OS X is much nicer than Linux on a laptop. That is a fact and I have been a Linux user since 1994 (before that I used SunOS).

      So, where's the FUD?

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    12. Re:Not a negative choice by kundor · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Tell that to someone who's voting for John Kerry. I spoke to one such person. As badly as he wanted Kerry to be President, the only reason he could tell me that Kerry would be a good President is that he is not Bush.

      http://www.johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhima nyway.com

    13. Re:Not a negative choice by JAD+lifter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I always scrape off all the tomatoes and lettuce and crap so that it is just meat on a bun. Then I put a bunch of french frys... Oops, I mean Freedom Frys on it, put the bun back on and smoosh it down with all of my weight until it is like 3/4 of an inch thick and then I eat it. And I also drink a coke with this.

    14. Re:Not a negative choice by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, Photoshop will work under WINE. Haven't tested Dreamweaver myself, yet, though.

      Yeah, I understand that. But I still end up asking myself, why bother with all that when there's MacOS, which does everything I need, natively.

      I'm not saying much here, remember. All I was saying is, none of these systems are perfect, and some of us find MacOS the best choice. Just the best choice for us, the ones who are choosing it. I use Linux in other places. I have my desktop at work and my FTP server running Gentoo. But for my personal computer, my laptop, I'm just looking for certain functionality with the fewest headaches, and for what I want, I chose a Powerbook, in what the OP called a "negative choice". Windows isn't what I'm looking for. Linux doesn't fit the bill. MacOS comes closest, I'll go with it for now.

    15. Re:Not a negative choice by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      it just struck me that perhaps sco is gonna have to go ape on apple since people keep saying stuff like "... the mac it is unix". there are millions of sco unix licenses they should have sold!

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    16. Re:Not a negative choice by boredMDer · · Score: 1

      The PowerBooks haven't been defective, it was a bad batch of batteries. iPod batteries die, yes, but so does every other battery, eventually.

      Learn your topic before you speak on it.

    17. Re:Not a negative choice by StarTux · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do not know why these get modded at all...Its simply someones personal experience with Apple versuses Toshiba hardware. And I know people who have had problems with their laptops from Apple.l but thats not to say Apple make bad hardware (quite on the contrary, but I have seen people switch back totheir Intel based laptop manufacturer because of it).

      StarTux

    18. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to have a laptop I've been satisfied with.
      The Fujitsu Lifebook P-2000 series disk failed in fewer than six months--the replacement failed a week later. It seems to be running well with WinXP and my Dad's using it as one of his laptops now. Don't understand because everyone said it ran well with Linux ...

      The Dell Inspiron 3500(?) is just too big. It still runs though. Only problem was when it was running MS Windows2000 it seemed to just shut off randomly and not wake up. Runs Debian fine (and is my dad's primary laptop ...).

      My IBM Thinkpad had some problems with the service people giving me the run around for a year (this was mostly on-campus support since our school has big contracts with IBM and all students have Thinkpads...). This got fixed, but then the drive died and it wouldn't boot. It's now a knoppix-based router/firewall.

      Finally, the reason I responded. My Albook, purchased last october. The powerbook that wouldn't boot after its first weekend without the operating system being reinstalled. The one that I'd bring to Apple stores and they'd keep telling me that they didn't know what was wrong and I needed to reinstall the OS.

      I finally got fed up with all that, and when I took it to a store when it failed and they wouldn't even give me disks to borrow (ok, I didn't expect them too but I figured I'd ask) I gave up with that and switched it to Linux.

      It still has stability problems--most likely due to heat (I have the fan module built in .. but not sure if there's a way to tell it to be more agressive in cooling).

      All in all ... I'm yet to be happy, even with the powerbook. If the stability issue were fixed though, this would be heaven.

    19. Re:Not a negative choice by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      It's FUD because you basically said that all x86 computers are crap and all Apple computers are used by God Almighty himself. Your experience with "recent" Intel notebooks are limited to a sample of one, with which you are assuming that every single notebook built since the Pentium days with an Intel/AMD chip is crap. You spent what, 1000 pounds on an iBook? I spent about 600 pounds ($1500 CAD; not really fair comparison, but what the heck) on a brand new IBM X31 notebook, naerly top of the line for the ultraportable class.

      The "current state of play" is that *all* notebook manufacturers, including Apple *and* IBM. Saying that you'd never buy another Intel computer because of one crappy Toshiba and encouraging others to buy Apple instead is, well, propadana-ish, don't you think? I'm simply presenting an opposing opinion that not all x86 notebooks suck.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    20. Re:Not a negative choice by nizmogtr · · Score: 1

      and some of us buy/like Macs for the UNIX underpinnings. I choose to buy a Mac because I get the UNIX goodness; having MS Word availble to me on the platform was a bonus.

    21. Re:Not a negative choice by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      "The Powerbooks haven't been defective." Wow, how completely and utterly WRONG. Links below.

      What about the huge issue with motherboards on Powerbooks, the ones which would sizzle and die? How about the LCD problem a couple of months ago? I'm not dreaming these problems; I've got no problems with people who use Apple computers, but I *do* have a problem with such users who think that there have never been any problems with the hardware.

      Read some examples here if you don't believe me. Google cache of Flaming 'Books too

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    22. Re:Not a negative choice by boredMDer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know there have been problems with the hardware.

      My iBook has had the logic board replaced three times, and four days ago Apple replaced it because the board died again.

      The boards that would 'sizzle and die'? Those were in G3 iBooks, not in PowerBooks.

      Don't even start with the PowerBook 5300. That happened ONCE, in a TEST LAB, a PREPDOCUTION MODEL, with a DEFECTIVE BATTERY. No 'flaming powerbooks' were ever released to the public.

    23. Re:Not a negative choice by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I am glad you like your Mac.

      For people who want many of the same benefits on a linux box, I suggest IBM Thinkpads. They are a little more expensive than some laptops that seem comparable "by the numbers," but I find the quality to be good. They offer a 3-year extended warranty for a reasonable price, so that says something. Linux compatibility is quite good also. (This from somebody who puts a lot of hard miles on his laptops).

    24. Re:Not a negative choice by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      I'm confused. How can I reconcile the statements "The Powerbooks haven't been defective" with "I know there have been problems with the hardware"?

      Seriously, I don't care. If people like using Apple computers, that's great; I'm not going to flame somebody because they're using different hardware, a different OS, whatever. I almost bought an ibook before I fell in love with my X31. I just wish that Apple apologists weren't so darn zealous & would recognise that the Big Apple has problems too.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    25. Re:Not a negative choice by boredMDer · · Score: 1

      There has been problems with SOME hardware. And no, the PowerBooks weren't defective, none of the consumer available ones, anyway.

      You seem to equate 'hardware' with 'PowerBooks'.

      We all know Apple has problems too.

      It's people like you who bring up crap flamebait like that 'flaming books' story that are zealous in the pursuit of bashing Mac users.

    26. Re:Not a negative choice by juuri · · Score: 1

      Do you have after market memory?

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    27. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your logic skills are quite pathetic, please shut your pie hole before you embarrass yourself any further.

    28. Re:Not a negative choice by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense.

      Why not save money and buy a Mac laptop, then, and install Linux? You get the same benefits on a Linux box, and you save money ^^;

    29. Re:Not a negative choice by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I have an eMachines laptop I've been using with Linux since February. It sounds like it's holding up better than your Toshiba did. There's a couple scratches on the chrome-colored 'e' on the cover, but besides that there's nary a blemish. However, it is an Athlon XP. Maybe that is the difference?

      The only things that don't work right are suspend to memory and suspend to disk, which I haven't gotten to work because the onboard Radeon doesn't like being put to sleep....

      But then again, it cost me $700 including an extended warranty. So cheap is sometimes the way to go.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    30. Re:Not a negative choice by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I applaud your well thought out post that has nary an attack on x86 users. I, too, don't want to buy a laptop with windows on it, but I can't afford an Apple. Oh well, stuck paying the MS tax.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    31. Re:Not a negative choice by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what: i'll just keep quoting myself until it sinks in, mmkay? "Seriously, I don't care. If people like using Apple computers, that's great; I'm not going to flame somebody because they're using different hardware, a different OS, whatever."

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    32. Re:Not a negative choice by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Why not save money and buy a Mac laptop, then, and install Linux? You get the same benefits on a Linux box, and you save money
      Well, Macs are not the best for me. I did have a TiBook. The hardware was OK, but missing some features I wanted, like a swappable drive bay, and a three-button trackpoint [ducks!]. And IMHO the Pentium-M is clearly the best mobile processor out there right now - both faster and longer run-time than the competition.

      Also, I will grudgingly admit the ability to multiboot to WinXP is a benefit to me. On my Thinkpad I can usually do that under VMware without exiting Linux. Or at worst, reboot to Windows for real and feel the burn :/

      I also tried YellowDog on the TiBook. It was good, as far as it went, but there aren't enough Linux users on the Mac to get much synergy. It seems like a lot of non-YellowDog apps had trouble. And the free-ness of Linux is something I'm really attached to. The ability to reach into the source and make those little tweaks when you need to is addictive. Perhaps equally, I love the generally Spam-free nature of OSS. I feel my computer is working only for me.

    33. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll, eh? Sorry I spoke badly of the Holy Apple. Good grief, you Mac apologists make me sick. It's HARDWARE, not a freaking god!

    34. Re:Not a negative choice by kbmccarty · · Score: 1

      It is a fact that my iBook is better made than the Toshiba I had before and it is clearly holding up to daily use better than the Toshiba.

      I love my iBook, but the hard disk on it died with a horrible grinding sound recently, after only a year and a half. Ironically enough, the hard disk was in fact made by Toshiba. Perhaps tempting fate, I replaced it (what a bitch!) with another Toshiba (upgraded from 20 to 40 Gb), although I've been making twice-weekly backups since then.

      Oh, and OS X is much nicer than Linux on a laptop. That is a fact and I have been a Linux user since 1994 (before that I used SunOS).

      Here I have to disagree :-) I'm using Debian GNU/Linux because of the utter convenience of upgrading and software installation, and the superb development environment for free software it provides. (Yes, I know about Apple's IDE, but I don't want to learn Objective C and the GUI isn't at all portable to other UNIXes.)

      Plus, Linux and the vast quantity of software packaged in Debian are free. To be able to use the latest Fink packages, OTOH, I would either have to spend forever compiling them, or upgrade OS X to 10.3, which is a not-insignificant sum of money for a grad student. I don't think I've even booted into OS X since re-installing, except from inside MOL a few times.

      --
      - Kevin B. McCarty
    35. Re:Not a negative choice by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Easy. When you spend that much on something you are apt to ignore flaws in it.

    36. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? It's a real URL....and answers the grandparent's apparent confusion as to "lesser evil" arguments.

    37. Re:Not a negative choice by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      nope. I bought my powerbook because I wanted a UNIX machine that would do power management out of the box and have supported and actively developed no-hassle gfx quality. I came from LINUX land, loved it on servers, workstations but felt the pain on an i386 laptop. Tried various lnx distros on it, FreeBSD (which, btw, I totally respect and admire) and always hated to boot into w2k to get the portable performance (that's not just desktop experience... I mean battery endurance, standby on lid close) So after trying an ASUS laptop I got access to a powermac dual G4. Hmm... cute... mainstream apps ok... oh, look a UNIX console! ssh + X11! Uhh fink! Lemme try a PB... UNIX bliss... shure, there's a little difference (and I've never had access to an IBM mf, so when I'm talking UNIX someone might scoff at Yet-Another-UNIX-Poser) but I've learned to adore my PB. It's my LINUX playground that I want with a couple of pleasing Applish extras I happened to find on my way. To sum up... I bought an Apple because I wanted the UNIX experience precisely avoiding the Windows one. I didn't know sqat about Macs and would have bought an IBM Tp had it had the same UNIX support. I couldn't care less for the Apple experience, but learnt to appreciate it and frankly, now, I wouldn't go back.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    38. Re:Not a negative choice by xx_chris · · Score: 1

      I have a 15" G4 Titanium, which of course runs OS X. It also runs Debian, and I like both. It even runs Debian which runs OS X via MOL. MOL runs Pear which can also run Debian, but this gets into a vicious circle. Debian also runs Wine but I don't. Not that I don't like Wine; I'm rather fond of a Shiraz. But I just don't like Windows.

    39. Re:Not a negative choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.
      Apple has actually replaced both DIMMs already too (2x256MB).

      The Techie I left it with said the cursory tests didn't show anything wrong with the memory, but he'd run it through a more thorough set of tests and leave notes with the guy who was going to replace him (his shift was over soon).

      I wouldn't be surprised if there was nothing wrong with the original memory and the second guy just decided to replace it (the person I spoke with wasn't the newer tech ... just a clerk. The guy I originally spoke to only had what was in the computer which was that new parts were ordered).

      If you (or anyone) have any suggestions with which to go back to the Apple techs, I'd appreciate it. They couldn't think of anything when it was running OSX, and they would rather not touch it when it's running Linux. If it meant getting the system fixed, I'd put OSX back on it (at least until any hardware things were diagnosed/fixed).

  7. MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Bill: I want his head on a stick.
    Steve: We can't do that, it'd be murder.
    Bill: Ruin his career then, have him sent to North Korea as a technology correspondent.
    Steve: Yes, Master.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Msnbc is not eweek or slashdot...

    2. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured it went more like this:

      Bill: Oh the HP Laptop running Linux sucks in comparison to the same machine running XP?
      Steve: Yeah, everyone knows HP's machines are only one step above Compaq's home machines.
      Bill: Eggcellent
      Steve: Yeah, we got those stupid Slashdotters good this time.
      Bill: Soon they will be making posts about us talking about having MSNBC on a stick!
      Steve: They already are.
      Bill: No go make some false bug reports on bugzilla.
      Steve: Yes master.

    3. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see how a slashdotter would be easily confused by such such an inexplicable display of objectivity.

    4. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by winse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      whatever....if you read the whole article it comes of as more of a troll.

      Tell that to Windows and Mac users and they'll laugh.

      etc. etc. I felt betrayed by the linux friendly title. also
      " When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie."

      does anyone know where i can BUY linux dvd viewing software? I have only used MPlayer in the past.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    5. Re:MSNBC? Said good things about Linux and HP? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      does anyone know where i can BUY linux dvd viewing software? I have only used MPlayer in the past.

      It definitely had a damn-by-faint-praise feel to it, regarding needing more intimate knowledge, etc.

      When it comes to DVD players, someone still has to buy it for the PC, if yours came with a DVD player package then it was included in the price of the system. It's hardly free and there are dozens of packages out there to buy for Windows -- which would hardly be the case if it were free and bundled.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  8. Wow, suprised MSNBC would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, suprised MSNBC would put a pro-linux title and article on the front page

  9. bad grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've happy to report that the combination is a winner." and I'm not even English and can pick it up!

  10. Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I like Linux and I think it is great that you can finally buy a Linux laptop where everything just works, but I still think it trails behind Apple. I can run Photoshop and MS Office on my iBook without any gimmicks or compromises like I would need to run them on a Linux laptop. Also, when I buy new hardware or look for a new program, there is a pretty good chance that there is support of OS X. The chance of finding mainstream items that support Linux is still very slim.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Not the same by madygoosey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah but a apple laptops cost like 9 million times more than a non-apple laptop.

    2. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry budy... you cant have your opinion saying linux sucks... you need to be marked as a trool.
      This is Free Speech Tm.

    3. Re:Not the same by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Not quite. If it's a Microsoft product, you are likely being forced to settle for second best if you are running anything short of the latest Win32 binary. Now the Macs clearly won't run this without "gimmicks" either.

      Of course that all becomes moot if you were never into the "one true interface" to begin with.

      It's a Macintosh? Why run Monopolyware applications?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Not the same by agent2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to start an argument, but most mainstream hardware devices are actually the ones that do work. It's the less-mainstream hardware that uses a not so popular chipset that you may have trouble with. For example, the Realtek chipset is a very common audio and networking chipset used by many manufacturers. nVidia I know for a fact and ATI, I believe, have created their own actual linux video drivers. So, just about any piece of hardware you get will most likely work when you plug it in. About 80% of hardware I'm guessing.

    5. Re:Not the same by Otter · · Score: 1
      If it's a Microsoft product, you are likely being forced to settle for second best if you are running anything short of the latest Win32 binary.

      Perhaps you've never used Microsoft's Mac apps? You're settling for second best if you run their Windows products. I'd trade Office XP for MacOS Office 98 (let alone Office X) in an instant. Same for Entourage vs. Outlook, Mac IE (back when it was maintained) and Windows IE of the time...

    6. Re:Not the same by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is this insightful? Why is this a comparison with OS X??? I think the big deal here is that this is a FREE OS. You are thinking "non-windows". I'm thinking "non-commercial", "non-proprietary". In that case, OS X and Windows are in the same boat. Go use Windows instead of OS X if you want the best hardware support.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    7. Re:Not the same by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      I've run Linux pretty much exclusively for about 6 months, except for the 3 months I ran OS X to test it. I found OS X bugged me in ways Linux never did; OS X is utter crap IMO. I think this laptop is a good thing; I get good hardware support out of the box, plus if I need to run windows, I can use Wine, VMware, or if I really need to, dual boot. I've got what I need, and for what I do, Linux Just Works.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    8. Re:Not the same by Jacer · · Score: 1

      Did you actually pay for photoshop?

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    9. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, because they look better in brushed metal?

    10. Re:Not the same by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except the whole point is to remain compatable.

      With the way that Microsoft programs, you run the risk of losing compatibility even if you were running a copy of msword for NT/XP alpha.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can run Photoshop and MS Office on my iBook

      Well no shit. If you are planning on using Photoshop or MS Office then of course you aren't going to buy a Linux laptop. It's like I am planning on eating taco's for lunch so when I go to a restaraunt I probably will not order a hamburger. Same thing.

    12. Re:Not the same by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Good point.
      PS actually costs more than the hardware to run it.

      Something about that just doesn't seem right.

    13. Re:Not the same by LibrePensador · · Score: 1

      These kinds of posts are so predictable.

      Here's the pattern:

      I love Linux and all, but if you want a real Unix that works, use a Mac.

      Or Linux is great and all, but if you want to stay compatible, read, locked into Microsoft's proprietary office formats, I will use a Mac.

      I don't know what sadder, that you cannot imagine a future where all file formats will be free or that you will not do your part to bring it about.

      Finally, it used to be that Linux was a toy OS, then it was a good OS because it run on "edge of the network servers", then it was great that it could run on big servers and mainframes, but where is the enterprise software for it. After that, well, yeah it makes a great server, but I mean nobody in his right mind would use it as a desktop. Now, wow, that's nice that you can get a laptop with a killer Free Software OS that just works, but it just isn't as nice as my shiny powerbook.

      Nobody gives a hoot. No matter what excuses and subterfuges you throw at the free software movement, we keep on improving the coding-testing-using-bugreporting cycle. Our current focus is usability and accessibility. If you think we are not going to do on those two fields on the desktop, what we did on the server, that is strive for and achieve excellence, then you are in for a surprise. The revolution is on schedule. :)

      And in a couple of years, nobody in his right mind will want to pay for a proprietary OS when a free one in all senses of the word does everything (s)he wants to do.

      I don't have a sig, but I wanted one, it would be:

      Meet the Irritandus Unixea specimen, made up of annoying Gentoo zealots and Mac OS X users who keep repeating the "I love Mac OS X, all the power of Unix, all the great proprietary apps that we all love". Well, we do NOT ALL LOVE THEM.

      --
      Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
    14. Re:Not the same by Querty · · Score: 1

      One of the great things of running Linux for me is that I don't *have* to run Photoshop and MS Office. There are perfectly good image editing applications on Linux already installed by default and free to boot. With the greatest respect to the Open Office / Koffice / Abiword / Gnumeric developers, I have always considered so called "Office Applications" broken by design. I use other tools, but I know that if I ever need them, they are all available by default and free...

    15. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and many of the Linux comments such as yours are all the same, they speak of the "open future". Well, honestly I think that is great but I'm interested in using my computer right now. Photoshop is an amazing program and it is the standard for digital photography work. I have used Open Office and while I liked some of its features, MS Office just feels more polished. It's not just about PS or Office either, its about using the platform as a whole. For instance I own a Canon Digital Rebel which comes with some Canon software that only works on Windows and OS X. Now I'm sure I could find OSS that provides the same function, but when I want to do ditigial photography...I want to do digital photography not hunt for software on the net. To me, that is the key difference right now. Linux is great for some applications (even on the desktop for certain users) but its not great for me. Isn't that what choice is all about? Using what works for me? Also, I think the fact that the article makes it clear how shocked the author is that everything works out of the box tells how far Linux still needs to come.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    16. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my iBook with similar specs to the test unit in the article is less expensive than the HP unit.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    17. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, no. I don't use it for anything other than a hobby so I can't really afford to buy it. Also, I get Office for free from my University.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    18. Re:Not the same by Jacer · · Score: 1

      Really? My university doesn't give out copies of office. We can buy them cheaply ($100ish) but we do get free copies of Windows XP pro.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    19. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'm guessing my school has a site liscense, so that should extend to students as well. We can also get upgrades to XP for free too.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    20. Re:Not the same by calica · · Score: 1

      Because many Linux users (including myself) switched to OS X for better laptop support. The pragmatic among us just want something that works (hibernate/battery life) and has a posix base.

      With Linux officially supported on a laptop that increases options. Comparing with Apple make sense since it is a shared market.

      Go use Windows instead of OS X if you want the best hardware support.

      The software support is what matters to me.

    21. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know.... I have a similar problem. I bought an Apple PowerBook G4 to replace my linux laptop. Love it, but I've found that there are plenty of programs I want to run that can't compile and run under Darwin......

    22. Re:Not the same by dfj225 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is supposed to be funny, but I think I should comment anyway. I don't think Linux sucks, it really is a viable alternative to Windows, it is just that I was pointing out that Linux still needs a lot of work to be done. Think about it, if people on /. and other geeks are surprised that this laptop works without any problems then imagine what the normal user's ideas about linux must be? they probably think it is a piece of garbage or that it is only something for servers. In many ways, the average user is not ready for linux (or to put it more accurately linux is not ready for them) a lot of work needs to be done if not only to the code but to the image of linux on the desktop.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    23. Re:Not the same by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      If you need something that runs on Windows or Mac, well, you need it. And betting your livelihood on Wine or crossover or VNC or vmware or whatnot is scarey if you don't do a lot of homework. Plus, you're forsaking most support. You have to know what you're doing, and have the time.

      Some people prefer the way things are in Linux/BSD. Package management, being able to do tons on the command line, tons of control. Windows doesn't have that, and I don't really feel it on Mac OS X, either, so far.

      And cost is definitely an issue. If you don't want to buy expensive hardware, you may have to run an OS where you can configure it as you need it, maybe with a more minimal install or windowing system. And if you don't want to buy the OS for $200+ and updates every year for $100+ and Photoshop for $500+ (or however much it is), and Office for $500+ (again, however much) then things like Mac OS X aren't an option.

  11. Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The author seems extremely happy about how everything just works out of the box

    Just how low is the fsking bar when a reviewer has to note that nothing was broken when he first powered on the system?
    C'mon people, raise your standards for a "good" system!
    --
    I always wanted an iPod how about you?

    1. Re:Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by khrtt · · Score: 1

      You pretty much can't raise standards for a "good" system from HP without ending up without there being no good systems from HP:-). Sorry HP. You should've stuck with oscilloscopes.

    2. Re:Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that Linux comes from a completely different (and infintely more benevolent) business model than Microsoft, I understand the reviewer's joy. There's nothing wrong with wanting Linux to succeed and being proud when it does.

      BTW, your point might be a little better taken if your sig wasn't trying to rope me into a free iPod pyramid scheme...

    3. Re:Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, have you gotten that free iPod yet so you'll shut the fuck up about it, you fucking annoying spamming prick?

    4. Re:Reviewer seems VERY easy to impress by Querty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, I have yet to see more than 50% of windows machines (desktop/laptop) work 100% out of the box. You must be one lucky guy...

  12. Out of a job? by lothar97 · · Score: 1

    How soon before Gary Krakow, the columnist, is out of a job at MSNBC for such a glowing article about Linux. Perhaps it was a coincidence, but Salon.com recommended dumping IE, and soon thereafter Microsoft announced it was selling Salon.com

    --

    1. Re:Out of a job? by idsofmarch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slate.com recommended dumping IE for Firefox: http://www.slate.com/id/2103152/ Salon also had a similar reaction, but isn't owned by Microsoft. Slate, however, may be on the block.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    2. Re:Out of a job? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      surely you mean slate.com?

    3. Re:Out of a job? by lothar97 · · Score: 1

      crap, it must be time to get another cup of coffee... i'm confusing my slate with my salon.

      --

    4. Re:Out of a job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not know this because you simply assume facts not in evidence, but if you spent any time at Channel 9, especially in the ie discussions, you'd know that most of the MSofties use Firefox. Several of the bloggers at MS have also openly said they use it as well. All cite the same reason, IE hasn't been maintained and has fallen behind. Nobody's been fired, but the IE group has been re-banded. Don't assume that because you have little good to say about MS that there is some sort of reciprocal.

  13. In a related story . . . by kelzer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft has announced it's putting its share of MSNBC up for sale.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  14. Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it quite humorous that a Microsoft entity is touting a linux product so strongly - I think someone's getting fired. Good thing it's Friday.

  15. MSNBC? by karmaflux · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I have no idea what to believe any more.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  16. Not looking good. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I didn't see any price quote from the article, but MSNBC stated the model is currently available with windows. HP sells the SuSe based notebook for the same price, or likely more expensive, and gets big money off the consumer. This could turn out well anyway, but likely they'll sabatoge (sp) their own market.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:Not looking good. by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " I didn't see any price quote from the article"

      Like this one?

      "Street prices for the nx5000 will begin at $1,140.Add extra memory, a larger hard drive, a DVD writer, a better screen plus 802.11g and the total should be a lot more."

    2. Re:Not looking good. by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
      "Street prices for the nx5000 will begin at $1,140.Add extra memory, a larger hard drive, a DVD writer, a better screen plus 802.11g and the total should be a lot more."
      --
      I do security
    3. Re:Not looking good. by valkraider · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't see any price quote from the article

      hard to see a quote from the article if you didn't even read the article...

      "Street prices for the nx5000 will begin at $1,140.Add extra memory, a larger hard drive, a DVD writer, a better screen plus 802.11g and the total should be a lot more."

      Also worth noting, is that is right in the same ballpark as the Apple iBooks in performance and features and cost...

    4. Re:Not looking good. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      at the end of TFA $1,140
      What I wish they would have had was the price with Windows installed instead, as was listed as an option.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Not looking good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the price is around $1100. I'd go with the Walmart Mobile Athlon 1600+ notebook... $600 flat!!! Rip away Win XP home edition and you got one nice but cheap litle screamer. I hope they come up with a Linux edition though, for a few bucks less.

    6. Re:Not looking good. by icars99 · · Score: 1

      I was just at the hp site.. the lowest i could configure the laptop for was 1350, and no there was no discount for having linux installed.

    7. Re:Not looking good. by JAD+lifter · · Score: 1

      Yes but having owned many laptops I can tell you that one of the most important parts of your laptop is the warranty. When a workstation breaks it is faster and easier to fix yourself, when hardware on a laptop breaks it can be a nightmare.

      Having this Linux laptop being supported by HP I might actually buy one. Buying a walmart laptop and throwing linux on it may be cheaper but I am sure that it voids the warranty and when the cheap ass thing breaks you are up shit creak.

    8. Re:Not looking good. by sloanster · · Score: 1

      HP sells the SuSe based notebook for the same price, or likely more expensive.

      Actually, you're mistaken, I went to the site to price one out and it's more expensive with ms windows.

    9. Re:Not looking good. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      So, of course the next best thing is to buy 1 that costs twice as much, and only breaks once, so you can send it back to HP for them to take 6 weeks to _NOT_ fix it. I don't think manufacturers actually fix defective notebooks, and nobody trusts refurbished PC's at all. While notebooks are hard for individuals to fix, they will be impossible for the manufacturers, at least that's the logical conclusion.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    10. Re:Not looking good. by JAD+lifter · · Score: 1

      No. I have had two IBM Thinkpads and a Toshiba and one of the Thinkpads had to go back to IBM once because the case was cracked and the Toshiba had to go back to Toshiba because the battery wouldn't charge (the problem wasn't the battery). In both cases I only had to pay shipping which I believe was like $30.00 and in both cases I got the notebooks back in less than a month.

      So I personally don't agree with what you said. My experience has been that both IBM and Toshiba were very good about honoring their warrantys in a timely manner. And both of them fixed the problems. Without the warrantys I never would have been able to fix the cracked Thinkpad, maybe put some epoxy on it but that would be ugly as hell. I also could not have fixed the Toshiba.

    11. Re:Not looking good. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      True, I don't know of many experiences with HP's, but I heard first hand of really lame service by Gateway. Someone buys a notebook in a "gateway store", and she gets home to find out the keyboard doesn't even work. Contacts gateway, 6 weeks later gets a low-end logitech add on kb/mouse. They did not service in the local area even though resources were available, and the proposed solution was ludicrus. I take chances, but generally I don't regret. For example, I'll buy shoes on ebay, for a fraction of retail. If I buy retail, I can try on for fit, and return if necessary, but the price differnce for hardcore basketball is pretty intense. I average $35-$40 (shipping included), and don't pay over $50 for shoes from ebay, all retail $100+. With only 1/2 the shoes working out, (and you can't test durability in a shoestore) I still get a better deal on ebay, with no warranty. The same thing I'm saying for computers, Odds are by the time your notebook broke, its market value was under 2/3 of original. If you had bought the cheap one to begin with, you can buy another cheap-non warranty machine, and still be better off in your wallet.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
  17. Here by dandydd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a major university. I have been trying forever to get my boss to purchase all our machines with linux on them (he kept claiming that HP required us to buy them with windowsm which was true a while back). We went to Novell brainshare and saw SUSe 9.0 in action and linux has come a long way. SUSE 9.1 "looks even better (more eye candy at least)
    It wasn't ready for my laptop about a year and a half ago but maybe now it is.

    It's for real. I normally don't go for these things but...Free ipods (click here to get yours) .

    1. Re:Here by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      As a long time person who plays with Linux but then goes back to Windows, I can confirm that Linux is getting waaaaaay better. The last linux I bought was SuSE 8.2 Pro and that was pretty good, but still had enough install/driver issues to make it sub-standard when compared with (ahem) the other OS. I've recently discovered Knoppix (3.4) and am amazed by how well that works straight out of the box (so to speak). Even my wireless PCMCIA card worked once I'd wlcardconfig'ed and pump'ed it! (I couldn't find a GUI tool to do this though... so I guess that was the only disappointment).

  18. NBC -MS by cephyn · · Score: 1

    Can the rumored MS/NBC split be far off now? Slate criticized IE, gets put on the block. We hear rumors of an ms/nbc split, and now msnbc is running positive reviews of MS' competition.

    At least this proves that there's some speech left in the media not being controlled by the coporate overlords (who, if they're reading this, I for one welcome...)

    --
    Moo.
  19. HP and Linux by brilinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    I put Gentoo on my HP ze5600, and I have been quite impressed. The winmodem works, the ATI Radeon works, the WiFi works with NDIS Wrapper, and even ACPI hibernate mode seems to work fine. I hope that companies like HP continue to support more variety in their OS options.

    1. Re:HP and Linux by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      That's the problem right there. You have to go through the trouble of stating it specifically works. It took some tweaking on my laptop to get gentoo to work but I got it to work too. I think the kernel people need to let go of trying to put all the drivers in the kernel. Even putting them as modules doesn't make it easy when you need to get something working that's not supported in the kernel. I'd hate to go back to the old days in windows of hunting for every little damn driver on CDs and websites. That's not a good solution either.

    2. Re:HP and Linux by Ever+Dubious · · Score: 1
      Then there's how the notebook handles the little things like WiFi networking: although the HP/SuSE notebook now automatically connects to my access point, it only remembers one group of settings. I have two access points at home, not to mention others to which I regularly connect. With the nx5000, you need to change the access point and WEP settings separately for each location. Tell that to Windows and Mac users and they'll laugh.
      Hahahahahahaha.
    3. Re:HP and Linux by bogie · · Score: 1

      "even ACPI hibernate mode seems to work fine."

      Your lucky. ACPI is why Linux on the laptop is a no-go for most people. The bottom line is OEM's simply don't release enough info for hackers to work with. There is no standard ACPI implementation and the chances of getting speedstep, sleep, hibernation, and fan control working like it does in Windows is slim to none for most people. All of those features are working perfectly the first time you boot up XP without any fuss. The kludges I've seen just so networking or some other devices working after sleeping are just ugly to say the least. Its why I stopped running Linux on my laptop a long time ago.

      Unfortunately I don't see the situation changing anytime soon which really sucks. For main desktop use Linux is a tough sell to many technical users because they are usually PC gamers as well. Give them a functional replacment for Windows on their laptop and you take away the "but I need games" arguement and offer something Free that works just as well for what most people need their laptops for. Ie office work, development, listening to music, surfing the web etc.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  20. Huh? by idiot900 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First, props to MSNBC for continuing to dispel the idea that they are an MS shill.

    Second, here's a quote from the article:
    For instance, software installs aren't as easy to figure out as on a Windows or Mac computer. You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do. Installs should be easy to find when completed. That's not always the case for new Linux users.

    What is the writer referring to? RPMs know where to install themselves, and what permissions to set. And does SuSE not have a menu system a la the Debian menu, which inserts itself in the various desktop environments?
    1. Re:Huh? by iMaple · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent, Yast is undoubtly better and easier to use than the Windows AddRemove Programs , its almost the whole control panel in an intuitive interface.

    2. Re:Huh? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      RPMs know where to install themselves, and what permissions to set.

      When did that start? RPMs always install themselves in weird, unworkable places with dependencies against files that don't exist...sorry, I'll take dpkg any day.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    3. Re:Huh? by anaradad · · Score: 1

      Sure, they know where to install themselves. But do they put icons in the K-menu or make the appropriate file associations? Not always. I've installed a number of RPM packages on RedHat and Fedora, and also apt packages on Debian. On every system, there have been programs that I had to hunt and poke through the file system before I could use them. Installed fine, sure. Easy to find, no.

    4. Re:Huh? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      While the RPM knows where to put itself, the user generally has no idea where it went.

      And the RPM options to display where the files for a particular package are a little less than obvious to boot.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Huh? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Would you please stop the FUD already? It's been old and baseless for, well, just about as long as it's been spouted by you whining morons.

      There's no significant difference between the two nigh-identifical packaging systems.

      If you don't want something to install itself in "weird, unworkable places with dependencies against files that don't exist", then don't install crap you find on the 'net packaged by god knows who for god knows what distro and assume it's supposed to work in *your* machine. Neither RPM nor dpkg are capable of fixing broken or incompatible packages.

      Besides, did you miss the note to move to gentoo a while ago, most of you flamers seem to be using it nowadays?

  21. Ok... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So apparantly linux is ready for the laptop, but when will it be ready for the desktop?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Ok... by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      When technology advances enough to make laptop components large enough to fit on a desk.

  22. Why not just buy a mac ? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you need Unix on a laptop, why not just buy a Mac? You can run Microsoft Word, and WMP and Explorer and not have to worry about things.
    The Mac is the fastest 64 bit computing you can buy. :)

    1. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      huh, they have G5 powerbooks now?

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    2. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      The Mac is the fastest 64 bit computing you can buy. :)

      Do be a good boy, and provide us with directions to this place where we can get Apple 64-bit laptops.

    3. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Msword is a security liability.

      So is explorer.

      I can play files targeted for WMP just fine under Linux. A number of the newer Linux media players will gladly exploit Win32 codec DLLs.

      Your bulletpoints are not compelling.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need Unix on a laptop, why not just buy a Mac? You can run Microsoft Word, and WMP and Explorer

      Word, windows media player and explorer are all like the bestest programs in their respective categorys and throw in the ultra hip cool guy mac laptop, grow a goatee and buy a new VW bug and a pair of birkenstocks and you can be as cool as all the other faggots who use macs!!

    5. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      HP nx5000... From $1200

      Apple Powerbook... From $1700

      The comment regarding the non-existing 64-Bit/G5 laptop... Priceless.

      --
      #include <sig.h>
    6. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.apple.com/store

    7. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the new VW bug?

    8. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where did he mention Powerbooks? Either compare it to an iBook (from $1099), or admit to your FUD!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Why not just buy a mac ? :) by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      So, where's the 64-bit powerbook or ibook? All I see are 32-bit G4s... (not that they aren't great computers, but "portable 64" is BS, at least in apple world)

  23. Excel on Linux by iMaple · · Score: 1

    From the article You still need to know a lot more about the inner workings of a computer to excel on a Linux machine.
    You surely do if u want M$ Excel on a Linux Machine ... I mean you could get that by drinking the good wine that comes with Suse, or you could just use OO

  24. The Sleeper Must Awaken! by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, this could be the biggest sea-change in years. Major change comes slowly but surely (see: Google) and the significance of a functioning-out-of-the-box Linux laptop install (where problematic wireless issues most often arise) cannot be overstated.

    Much can be said for how far Linux has come, but there's a long way to go, especially where finding and configuring hardware is concerned. (Don't reply with the sycophantic "Have you seen how good kxxxawsum is?"; yes, I have.) This looks like a major step.

  25. Hm say what? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Ok which one of you /.'ers sabotaged the MSNBC article. You know it really read "H-P's first Linux laptop a LO$ER"...
    Hmmm "H-P" I do not think they were talking about the HP that I am aware of.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Hm say what? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Considering there nx5000 page dosen't mention Linux, plus the fact I can't find where to change the OS choice away from XP Pro anywhere, and don't forget this juicy little nugget "
      HP recommends Microsoft®
      Windows® XP Professional" I think you maybe right.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:Hm say what? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Ack my bad, For some reason I don't get the form elements to actually customize the laptop at all. Strange. tried both Firefox and Explorer

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  26. AMD64? by MexicanMenace · · Score: 1

    Looks good, however, will HP/Compaq please release an AMD64-based laptop that can run a 64-bit Linux out of the box as well?

    Those shiny Compaq AMD64 laptops running Windows XP shore look purty. I'd just rather see a Tux sticker sitting where that "ready for future versions of Windows" sticker is now.

    1. Re:AMD64? by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 0
      Amen. Hell...an AMD64 laptop would make a decent SOHO server...integrated KVM *and* UPS too.

      I thought about going that route for my next server upgrade, but I think a dual opteron with 2 GB RAM can handle doom 3, mythtv, and apache at the same time. And that would mean one less system to manage (and one less heat producing setup in my room).

      p.s. someone help me, please! I've chipped in to the community. You should too.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:AMD64? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you've chipped in to the community"? WTF?! What you're ACTUALLY doing is polluting the Internet to feed your own greed. Ass.

    3. Re:AMD64? by tskisner · · Score: 1

      I'm writing this from a Compaq R3190US laptop (Athlon64 3400+, 1GB RAM, 80GB drive) running 64bit Debian. Not "out of the box", but it is really fast. Check here

      http://cmb.phys.cwru.edu/kisner/linux/compaq-r3000 /

      to see how it's done :-)

    4. Re:AMD64? by MexicanMenace · · Score: 1

      Ugh . . . reading . . . *sobs* Anyway you could just burn me an ISO of your HD? :D

  27. Somebody at MSNBC is gonna get soooo fired... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...once word filters up to Mr. Gates about this little article...

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Somebody at MSNBC is gonna get soooo fired... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you kidding me? Bill probably commissioned the story in the first place!
      Now he can tell the European Commission's antitrust unit how he's pro-competition!

      /me adjusting tinfoil hat


      --
      I always wanted an iPod how about you?

    2. Re:Somebody at MSNBC is gonna get soooo fired... by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      actually, you have a good point. so what if bill loses .2% of market share, if it saves him tons of legal hassles and allows him to enter new markets. you know, for all our (/.'ers) bashing of microsoft and their head honchos, they are some of the best businessme^H^H^Hpeople in the world. can you think of any other product, that pervasive, that had that market share. even when the vandy's controlled damn near every railroad in the US, it wasn't like every day, 200,000,000 people hopped on to a train. they gotta figure in a few years the OS part of their empire is gonna go away. hint, hint: web services. they also gotta figure that pretty soon they'll have to end up giving it away due to linux, market pressures, decreased demand to upgrade, etc. but that doesn't mean open sourcing it, nor does it mean they're dead. and look at ti this way, here's the copier, now buy our cartidges.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  28. In Other News.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gary Krakow has been fired from his post as Columnist at MSNBC.

  29. Good laptops? by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Great! Too bad it's not someone who actually builds a good reliable laptop. I really don't care for HP junk, linux or not. And I really don't have a problem getting linux to run on my thinkpad:-). The way I look at it, it's these third-grade hardware manufacturers that give desktop/laptop linux a bad name.

    1. Re:Good laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one of you fuckwits with that stupid ass FREE IPOD shit link in your sig. Slashcode needs to be revised so that if a person has the prase FREE IPOD located anywhere in their post they will automatically post at -1

    2. Re:Good laptops? by khrtt · · Score: 1

      It's a pyramid scheme, which means 1/5 of the participants will actually get the $300 gadget for free. Good odds, I'm playing..

  30. Inexpensive is reletive. by Forge · · Score: 1

    Bot this fits in as "Less expensive than any other laptop that has seriusly tried to pry my Eye from Dell."

    Suse 9.1 on my Inspiron 8200 is a joy to use. The Modem didn't work properly when I set it up and I havn't goten around to fixing that (No free landline.)

    Everything else is slick. To go the extra step of droping the cost, increasing the RAM and preloading my OSs of choice will make me happy. And I bet the modem on that HP works :)

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  31. giggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those mac guys are so funny :)

  32. Re:NBC -MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes this proves that are still sites doing fair reviews(not like eweek or slashdot).

  33. Interesting Pricing by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I headed over to HP to price this thing how I'd like it. The select box for the OS allows me to pick the Suse option, but only subtracts $50 USD. After some research, that's actually about right. So, where's the big money savings by going to linux?

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    1. Re:Interesting Pricing by valkraider · · Score: 1

      where's the big money savings by going to linux?

      After you turn it on.

    2. Re:Interesting Pricing by leadsling · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't forget that is just the OS. There's hundreds of $$$ worth of software included with Suse that you would have to go out and buy to be productive with a new win computer.

    3. Re:Interesting Pricing by Zemplar · · Score: 0

      It could also be the $50/year antivirus subscription you'd need on a Windows machine.

    4. Re:Interesting Pricing by kunudo · · Score: 1

      For a lot of people, in that price category, it's not about saving 50 bucks, it's about personal preference.

    5. Re:Interesting Pricing by tmbg37 · · Score: 1

      Well, aside from the free additional software you get with Suse and the arguable better qualitity of the software, I'd imagine that the cost savings come from buying things in bulk. $50 might not make much of a difference when buying an individual laptop for yourself, but it would make a difference if you're buying 1000 for your company.

      --
      This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    6. Re:Interesting Pricing by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      No there isn't "hundreds of $$$ worth of software included with Suse". There's heaps of free software supplied with Suse. A lot of this free software is also ported to Windows and if it isn't, there are other good alternative free options.

    7. Re:Interesting Pricing by leadsling · · Score: 1

      The point I'm making is that when using Suse (or your favorite distro) you don't start off with an OS. You are ready to get to work in an hour, barring any hardware glitches. With a win install, you can play solitare or get on the internet and not much else. And it still takes you an hour. ;-)

  34. MOD PARENT UP! by still_sick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's Linux so in Slashdot's eyes they instantly get 10 cool points, but come on.

    Stuff not working out of the box is noteworthy in a bad way. Everything working the way that it's supposed to is just what's supposed to happen.

    Yeah, I know for a long time it was a criticism of Linux that driver support sucked - so in a way I can understand why he'd mention it. But the fact that everything is supported on the laptop is not a good (TM) thing. It's merely the absence of a bad thing.

    It's like saying that a new Windows Laptop was the best ever because it didn't explode when powered up, and didn't cause severe burns to the user's lap. Yeah, great that that's true, but it's not something to go around advertising - that would just show that you expected otherwise.

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Laptops are not as simple to get running under Linux as, say, desktop systems. Historically people always had some issues with Linux laptops - from hardware not supported to non-working consumption management. The fact that a high profile manufacturer is releasing a Linux oriented laptop is the news here; and it should be noted that it works just as expected, unlike most of the times before.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      I know a few people who were bying IBM laptops a few years back who would have been really happpy to see an 'everything worked out of the box' review. They were seeing worse than a 25% DOA.

      That was on Windows, so I have no stats for their Linux systems, though I don't think they were selling laptops with Linux on them at the time.

      My own experience with IBM laptops has been very good, but I don't tend to by new laptops all that often.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Stuff not working out of the box is noteworthy in a bad way. Everything working the way that it's supposed to is just what's supposed to happen.


      I agree to a point. When FooCorp sells a laptop running Linux, one should expect it all to work. And there are smaller outfits that do just that - Linux laptops, fully functional (the author notes this but fails to stress the "everything works" angle at that point).

      But the reality of laptop hardware is that it is often a very hostile environment to the end user wishing to install their own OS. And since Linux is not commonly offered, most user experiences with Linux and laptops is a trial of compromises, hacks, and quasi-functionality. Linux users have become used to asking about compatibility when looking at laptop purchases.

      Incidently, Windows faces the same problems. My last discount laptop came with WinME and an option to upgrade to WinXP. I wasn't interested in either option but I had a spare copy of Win2K. Installing this on my laptop was as much a trial as installing Mandrake (both generally worked - but it required considerable effort to get both supporting all my laptop features).

      Now, I would have had an easier time installing WinXP. After all, the manufactorer offered it as an option and offers all the appropriate drivers, etc. And that's the real point of this article.

      Want Linux running well on a laptop? But one that's compatible. HP has provided one. Out of the box.
    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      It's like saying that a new Windows Laptop was the best ever because it didn't explode when powered up, and didn't cause severe burns to the user's lap. Yeah, great that that's true, but it's not something to go around advertising - that would just show that you expected otherwise.

      Nope it's like a Windows Laptop that's not p0wn3d 10min after going online for the first time and that would be rather noteworthy =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  35. Pay for DVD software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to especially commend Hewlett-Packard for including LinDVD playback software with this machine. It, too, works right out of the box. When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie.

    Is it just me or did this guy's credibility just take a hit? There hasn't been commercial DVD software for Linux for that long and I've certainly never heard of anybody using it over mplayer or xine. I guess he'll be the one linux user (other than all the folks who bought this laptop) who the MPAA won't sue when they get around to stopping us from viewing our own DVDs with our own software.

    1. Re:Pay for DVD software? by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      Well I can't see HP pre-installing DeCSS for you to use with Xine.

      The MPAA haven't left them any choice but to bundle LinDVD (with a commercial CSS license).

      Hey at least SUSE allows it's users to play MP3's...

      --
      #include <sig.h>
    2. Re:Pay for DVD software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, TurboLinux ?

    3. Re:Pay for DVD software? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Yes bundled DVD players exist. The original poster was asking about the reviewer's comment about "paying to add a DVD player to Linux". As far as I know this is totally impossible. The only options are to buy a Linux that includes a DVD player, put a free DVD player on it, or not play DVD's at all.

  36. huhuhu... by Azureflare · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Isn't this the classic chicken before the egg problem?

    Will widespread acceptance of linux occur only when dominant software makers support linux, or will widespread acceptance of linux cause dominant software makers to support linux?

    Which will come first?

    It's my opinion that widespread usage will occur first. Then software giants will realize the demand, and they will start supporting it.

    Linux deserves respect and support from vendors, and I believe it will get it soon.

    1. Re:huhuhu... by twenty-exty-six · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure they would happen simultaneously.

  37. OK, but where do I buy one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, where the hell can I buy one? I went to hp.com and I couldn't find the nx5000 anywhere on the site without Windows XP.

  38. Dont Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will come out with a so called update with a hidden feature that makes sure it doesnt work well with any Microsoft network..

  39. Yeah, but.... by Beelub · · Score: 0

    "The author seems extremely happy about how everything just works out of the box." Don't get me wrong. I think Linux can be an ideal laptop OS, but when the reviewers are shouting, "Huzzah! It works out of the box!", it's a sign of what still needs to be done. I've spent some time getting Fedora working on laptops and have had a helluva lot of fun doing it. It's doable, certainly, but my idea of fun is certainly not that of the mainstream consumer (nor is yours, if you're reading this). Linux as a consumer OS will have arrived when it's just assumed it should work out of the box.

  40. I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by gphinch · · Score: 0, Troll

    Could HP+SUSE go the way of Apple+BSD and become an option for those that want friendly non-windows laptop?

    You mean charging $3000+ for a machine will get Linux market penetration? And who said theres no money in OSS!

    --
    in bed.
    1. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Except that Apple sells all 5 of it's laptop models for less than $3000. They run from $1099 to $2799 base prices.

      I know, don't feed the trolls....

    2. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by gphinch · · Score: 1

      ok fine, but really those are pretty bare minimum computers. memory? well you get 256mb but most apps need between 512 and 1gb today, so thats an extra $300-500. warranty? what 90 days isnt enough? ok $350 extra for a real one then. dont forget that case, $150 for that because our laptops are extra wide.

      dont get me wrong, i love apple (i'm posting this from a powerbook), but i'm just saying the poster made a bad comparison, apple got its market share by catering to a specific crowd (yuppie techno-elite) while the main selling point of linux to business is cost.

      --
      in bed.
    3. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by valkraider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But don't you have to buy all those same things with other companies as well? How is Apple any different? We bought my sister a HP laptop about 3 months ago (her school provides support for their teachers and they won't support anything but Windows). We paid $1400 for the laptop, $200 for the extended warranty (it came with 90 days), it only came with 256 RAM so I upgraded it to 1GB, and we paid $100 for a basic laptop satchel. All in all it was about $1800 total cost.

      Apple actually STARTED with virtually ALL of the PC market share (Apple II years), and has been losing market share every year since then. We don't need to rehash the market share vs. installed base and related arguments. Apple does not cater to yuppie techno elite, however they *are* more popular with artist types. But I am a software developer who switched when Apple OSX hit the market because it is the nicest *nix I have ever used. And I'll tell you what - I have had many many fewer issues with the 5 Macs in my home than with the PCS that I had prior. I was constantly tinkering and fixing with my Windows/Linux PCs. I decided - I do that all day - I want to have computers that are nice to use when I come home. And now I do, thanks to my Macs and OSX.

      But the claim was that Apple only sells > $3000 computers. That is false.

    4. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by plinkyplonkypk · · Score: 0

      Apple does not cater to yuppie techno elite, however they *are* more popular with artist types.

      I think they do cater to the yuppie techno elite.

      Maybe I'm mis-understanding your definition of 'yuppie techno elite' but I would say thats one of their biggest (new) markets.. I mean... Anyone who's given themselves half a chance to try one in the last two years knows that they're the best (though not perfect) computers out there.

      Apart from myself, I know the CIO of a large multinational who uses one, and has all the brass using them too...

      But yeah they've got artistic types in there too for sure.. but I think thats an old-school image of mac users. I'm seeing more and more bidness guys with them...

      PK

      PS I feel like i've misunderstood you somehow, cause I agree with everything else you've said...

    5. Re:I dunno if Apple is the best comparison by valkraider · · Score: 1

      It could be that our definition of "yuppie techno elite" is different... I would say that "techno elite" use linux. And I would say that "yuppies" no longer exist in the way they were when the name was coined... Now there are probably more "yuppies" in the Suburbs than anywhere "urban", and "professional" has changed in the past couple decades as well. Not to mention the spread of traditionally "yuppie" things to the mainstream - like Starbucks and cell-phones...

      But I think the Unixness of OSX is attracting more non-traditional-Apple customers to Apple.

  41. Bah! by deadlysloth · · Score: 2, Informative

    They [HP] are charging the same price for the laptop loaded with MS XP (not Pro) and Suse 9.1. I was kinda hoping that it'd actually be cheaper.

    1. Re:Bah! by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      They're trying to guage the market. By pricing it the same, they can be more
      confident that people buying it are actually buying it in favor of the Windows
      machine rather than just buying the cheaper machine and installing Windows on
      it after the fact.

      That, and the price HP pays for a Windows license is probably not enough to
      lower the price significantly.

      That, and there is value in knowing that the hardware is supported by Linux.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:Bah! by llefler · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd pay the same price for a machine preloaded with Linux instead of WinXP. At least for now. HP has had to add new hardware certifications and ramp up customer support for an alternative OS. I don't see it as out of line that they recover that through the Microsoft tax.

      Once we have competition for Linux laptops the prices will adjust. Where are the Dell laptops? Or better yet, Toshiba. If they would have put this on a bargain range Compaq with the AOL dialer from Linspire a couple months ago, I would have seriously considered it for my Mom's new laptop. After all, her desktop is running OS/2 so she isn't a Windows zombie. (not one crash in 8 years, and even with the shiny new laptop, she's happily keeping the old P75)

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    3. Re:Bah! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I for one would gladly pay to support opensource software development, particularly when the option is to channel the same amount of money to Redmond.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  42. That's great, but... by updog · · Score: 0, Redundant

    does it run Linux?

  43. Be everyone goes crazy... by StarTux · · Score: 1

    Go the sit and actually can buy one with SuSE. First thing you see is, "HP recommends Microsoft®
    Windows® XP Professional"

    Then try actually finding the one with SuSE Linux already installed as an option, all I am seeing is no less than 5 options all listing Windows as the default.

    Most likely the Linux option will be under customize...

    StarTux

    1. Re:Be everyone goes crazy... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      All computer companies say that. It apparently gets them a discount on the Windows bulk pricing.

      Quite likely if Linux takes off and they want to buy it from RedHat and RedHat gave them a discount for doing so, they would print "HP recommends RedHat Linux" right next to the Microsoft ad, and look even more silly.

  44. HP is NOT gooooooood..... by milktoastman · · Score: 1

    You know why I wouldn't buy an HP. Shredded chakra-talk. Let me explain: Go drop an HP laptop from a roof (an older model, not worth much in the way of resell value, of course) and let it hit a hard surface at the moment it would naturally. Watch the debris shower. Note the fine structure of the shards. Then, come back and tell me there ain't going to be a talk/chakra issue, esp. when the dye-natured coloring fades.

    1. Re:HP is NOT gooooooood..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry pal, I don't buy laptops just to drop them from roofs. If your use of laptops requires that kind of abuse, then have fun!

    2. Re:HP is NOT gooooooood..... by valkraider · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to explain? Or did I miss something?

  45. Buying software to watch movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'd like to especially commend Hewlett-Packard for including LinDVD playback software with this machine. It, too, works right out of the box. When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie."

    What software could they have possibly bought to watch movies under linux? There hasn't ever been any commercial linux dvd player universally released.

  46. Is MS even supportive of the article? by quadra23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find this unbelievable that Microsoft (MS) would even ALLOW mention of a Linux-based laptop let alone allow comments as if it was something 'positive'. Since MSNBC is a joint effort between MS and NBC we can probably conclude that NBC won this one ^_^.

    I don't have much faith in the monopoly that is Microsoft "turning over a new leaf" -- stay tuned some backlash....or a missing article (just like when MS had leaked a method would allow Windows XP Home users to have IIS run on their machines which was soon removed). No, don't worry, if the page returns a 404 File Not Found error we all know it's not cause of massive hits to the page itself... or is it? ^_^

  47. Dell Inspiron 1100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My Dell has been working flawlessly over the last 18 months. $800 brand new from Dell. It runs 24 hours a day and no problems at all. The only thing that sucks is that it runs slow due to using shared video memory, but I have a workstation for stuff where speed is key.

    My last notebook was a hand-me-down Toshiba Satellite 2000CDS. It was only 233Mhz with a 6gig drive, but was still working flawlessly after several years of travel and (ab)use.

    I've heard a lot more complaints about defective iBooks and Apple refusing to recall known defective parts. I think I'll stick with Dell next time I'm in the market.

    1. Re:Dell Inspiron 1100 by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      My iBook recently had the logic board fail (the problem that everyone complains about iBooks and many think should be recalled). However, the experience was not bad at all.

      I called Apple Support Sweden. They had me try reset PRAM and PMU. Then we waited. When the problem returned, I called them again, and they sent me a box to ship my iBook for repair.

      When I mentioned that I had a writing deadline in a couple of weeks, they said that they would find me a loaner iBook and send it too me free of charge.

      They took a week to 2 weeks to fix the iBook, and I had a RAM maxed out iBook to write on while I waited for it to return.

      No hassles. No pain. Excellent customer service. However, I haven't heard from my editor yet about what I wrote. ;-)

  48. power management and wifi by pyros · · Score: 1

    When this model was first announced, it sounded like all the power management would be preconfigured (suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk, cpu throttling, powering down the fan and disk). Is that the case? That's the biggest thing keeping linux off my laptops right now. Also, I seem to recall that the internal wifi hardware (intel 2x00) would not be supported, can anyone comment on that?

    1. Re:power management and wifi by kunudo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was gonna say rtfa, but I won't... :)
      Wifi: Hp has added another wifi adapter that is supported ny linux. So the intel one just sits there idle.

    2. Re:power management and wifi by Fouquet · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't comment on the HP machine, but am running Suse 9.1 on my Gateway 200X. The CPU throttling, fan, and disk management worked without any fiddling. I had to turn on the suspend to disk, because Suse defaults this off. This was easy, but couldn't (as far as I know) be done from within YAST. I had to change one switch in '/etc/powersave.conf'. The suspend-to-ram is flakey, and I've heard it is not well developed yet. It will suspend just fine, and the light on the front of the case starts blinking (just like it does under a Windows standby), but nothing short of pulling the plug will allow the machine to turn back on. None of the buttons are responsive (under windows, I just hit the power button).

      As for wifi, the centrino chip now works under SuSE 9.1. You have to install the proper firmware, but this shows up when you run your first software update. Otherwise, it works fine - even WEP.

      I think what this says is not so much that hardware is becoming better, but that SuSE 9.1 is really quite good.

  49. no intel for me on linux? think again.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "For the record, Linux doesn't support Intel's wireless chip."

    So I guess I can't possibly be reading this on my Dell 600m on the couch downstairs via my Intel wireless.... it must all be a bad dream. [makes sence seeing as msnbc is praising linux and hp]

    *rolls eyes*

    http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/

  50. I'm So Conflicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does MSNBC represent the Evil Left-wing Media or the Evil Right-wing corporation?

  51. I found this quote intriguing.. by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

    I'd like to especially commend Hewlett-Packard for including LinDVD playback software with this machine. It, too, works right out of the box. When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie.

    I found that quote intriguing, as since I don't know a single commercial linux (software) DVD player that has been around for more than half a year are so.

  52. MSNBC - Linux? by acherrington · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else see this as extrodinary that MSNBC did not spin a story towards microsoft for the first time. Its a good step for them, perhaps I should start looking at their news coverage again.

    (honestly im not troll hunting here, being serious)

    --


    Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    1. Re:MSNBC - Linux? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does anyone else see this as extrodinary that MSNBC did not spin a story towards microsoft for the first time. Its a good step for them, perhaps I should start looking at their news coverage again.

      It's not the first MSNBC story to question the superiority of Microsoft:

      (Posting with IE under Gentoo, and I miss the tabs :)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  53. I hope families don't buy this stuff by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense to the /. crowd and Linux fans, but I really hope families don't get bilked into buying Linux laptops or desktops without knowing what they might be getting into.

    I personally think this ia a great step toward making Linux much more mainstream than it is now, but I fear that unsuspecting and uneducated consumers being led around by unhelpful and undertrained sales staff at Circuit City or on the HP sales line might find themselves with Linux machines they really don't like.

    I could see a family making a computer purchase and visiting some retailers that, perhaps, start selling things like Linux laptops and Linux desktops as a novelty item. They get in the store and are like, "WOW! This PC is so much cheaper than that PC over there." They might even think, in their minds, that bad viruses and things come from Windows, so they're even more enthused about the Linux machine.

    They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

    Granted, the process I outlined above has to occur to some degree in order to facilitate adoption of Linux as a mainstream PC operating system (or whatever you might call it). I just hope and pray that vendors like HP and major retailers don't jump on the bandwagon a little too eagerly in trying to sell these machines only to find that they've opened a Pandora's box worse than a MyDoom worm on Windows XP... ...instead... ...a really pissed off family that can't run little Sally's Barbie Dream Makeover software.

    A family that ends up returning the Linux machine altogether rather than having the Windows machine with a virus serviced at Best Buy and put back into the wild.

    My 2 cents.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

      It only takes a bit of education. I mean, i rememeber when i switched my mother's PC to Windows 95 from Windows 3.11, she constantly complained because of the new setup ("Icons are out of place!", "What is this taskbar thing?"). People are lazy, and PC users are the laziest of them all - i don't expect users to become software engenieers, but you can't treat you new laptop like a toaster.

      In any case, a well thought desktop distro like SuSE or Mandrake is as easy to use as Windows, if not easier. As long as people isn't expecting a "cheaper Windows" (and i think HP would be smart enough not to publicite it as such), things will work out with time.

    2. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, my own hope is that the home market for Linux is recognized as large enough to support game developers writing their games for Linux as a primary distribution route, and advising Windows users to use a bare bones Linux install to run their game under, to provide an online gaming platform that is less likely to be compromised by Windows viruses while playing online.

      Do I see this as being likely to happen? No. But I think it would be a better route.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Undercooked desktop OS may cause indigestion and aversion.

      Perhaps it will also expedite the further development of support options?

      I know net support of free software is not bad, but it's not great. Fragmentation may be the primary problem. Get three OEMs to take part of the margin they gain from selling machines with cheaper OSs, and put that toward providing better support. Just an idea.

    4. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since when do you play powerful games on a laptop?

    5. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by natrius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope families don't buy Macs then. Except for being cheaper than Windows computers, they fit right into your example.

      They get it home, and then they realize that they have to jump through hoops to play this game or open this document from work.

      If anything , they'd be surprised than they can open their work documents without having to install any extra software, as most Linux distros come with an office suite, unlike Windows. I'm sure that most people know that if they bought a Mac some of their old programs might not work. Why wouldn't they consider this with Linux? I never thought I'd ever say this, but I think you underestimate the knowledge of the general population.

    6. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People always bring up the "game" thing with Windows/Linux. I'm amazed how many people own a computer just for games. But this is a business laptop. Not a game machine. And there are plenty of us who use a computer for other things than games.

    7. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by rrittenhouse · · Score: 1

      No offense to the ... crowd and Windows fans, but I really hope families don't get bilked into buying Windows laptops or desktops without knowing what they might be getting into.

      Turnabout is fair play.

      --
      -- I may be paranoid, but I'm still alive
    8. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by six11 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree: if a non-geek were to buy a Linux laptop, thinking they'd got a great deal, they'd soon be telling everybody they know about their awful experience.

      And now for a not-completely-off-topic-anecdote:
      My freshman year of college I worked at a retail software store. There was a punk kid in our store who was telling me what a l337 haX3r he was, how he, like, TOTALLY 0WNED this one IRC channel this one time. His mom came in to pick him up just as we started discussing Linux. Mom was in a bitchy, hurry-up-son we-have-to-pick-up-your-sister-from-ballet sort of mood, so when junior pressed his mom to buy one of those Sams books with a Linux CD (Slackware, with the 1.2.13 kernel, I believe) she bought it just to placate him. I have to admit, I was sort of being sadistic, because the kid was such an arrogant juvenile.

      The next day, Mom storms into the shop, guns a-blazin'. I distinctly remember that her face reminded me of jiggly red jello. She wanted to know why I did that to her, and how I was going to fix her computer, which junior evidentally trashed. Honestly, I was so fixated on how truly HUGE her eyeballs were that I didn't pay a whole of attention to the rest of the conversation.

      Anyway, that was like 1996. And today, we're still saying "Gosh, I hope ma and pa don't accidentally get Linux" because of the backlash. We've come a long, long way. But there's a long, long way to go.

    9. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      That's a funny story. I guess he 0wned her computer. It's funny when people fuck up their computers on their own. But it's even funnier when they demand someone else fix their fuck ups.

      What if my mom stormed into home depot with a half a box of nails and said "how how the hell are you going to fix my washing machine?"

    10. Re:I hope families don't buy this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is X very good at games?

  54. Since SCO claims Linux doesn't exist... by gargonia · · Score: 0

    ... I wonder if they'll admit to the existence of this laptop?

    --

    -- Gargonia
    Never play leapfrog with a unicorn.

  55. Hmmm, HP Laptops... by jasontwarnock · · Score: 1

    If a broken implementation of ps/2 keyboard and touch pad is what makes HP laptops a winner, then all of HP's recent laptops are awsome:

    http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobil e/ 2004-June/004073.html

    http://www.plausible.org/r3000z/

    http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64 /2 004-June/001642.html

    This message brought to you by my desktop, because my laptop fails to boot any respectable OS.

    --
    :wq
  56. mac rocks :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MacOS X is the first OS to bring UNIX to the masses. Linux just doesn't cut it for typical users, and UNIX newbies as a desktop operating system. Despite years of relatively rapid advancement and increased compatibility, Linux remains difficult to learn to use.

  57. I *do* take exception: by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Talk about damning something with faint praise. From TFA:

    But overall, (and here's where staunch Linux fans will take exception) this machine is not as easy to use for most computer users as the same machine running Windows XP or (if it could) Apple's OS X. You still need to know a lot more about the inner workings of a computer to excel on a Linux machine.

    Maybe I'm missing the boat, but I think this is a given. I've never heard a Linux user claim that someone who's only familiar w/ Mac or Windows is going to fully understand (much less fall in love with) Linux the first time they use it. That kind of negativity - however slight and between-the-lines - is just pushing more people away from Linux by reinforcing the "theirs is harder to use than ours" idea.

    You must figure out on your own things like where to store the software and associated programs and how to handle permissions. These are not things most consumers want to do.

    ...and because of this we have x million Windows machines running with little or no protection, instant worm-fodder.

    Linux to me is professional-grade software - the difference between the Huffy bike you'd get when you're 10 and the 18-speed alloy frame bike you buy when you start racing. It won't always be that way; there are thousands of people out there pushing to make Linux more accessible to Mr. & Ms. Average Joe, but right now it's counterproductive to act like your average AOLer should be able to sit down with KDE and instantly feel at home.

    1. Re:I *do* take exception: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It will be a long, long time before Linux lives down the hard to use thing just like Windows can't shake the blue screen of death even though you'd be hard pressed to see it anymore.

    2. Re:I *do* take exception: by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Linux *is* hard-to-use. I might be spoiled by owning a Mac, but the poor quality of open-source GUIs consistantly amazes me. Just the other day I tried some MP3 sharing software that blew me away with crappiness.

      2) Windows has already shaken the blue screen of death everywhere except Slashdot. Then again, people on Slashdot frequently complain about Microsoft Bob a product that existed for a few months in 1995 and was soon cancelled.

    3. Re:I *do* take exception: by pmfp · · Score: 1

      That kind of negativity - however slight and between-the-lines - is just pushing more people away from Linux by reinforcing the "theirs is harder to use than ours" idea.

      And what's wrong with criticising Linux? Even though Linux may or may not be claimed to be a certain thing, if that thing is required to perform a duty and it is not there, Linux will not be an option. In the above case it'd be good knowledge.

      I also think it's complete BS that just because secure, flexible and easy to use hasn't been done before should imply that it can't be made. It takes more brains, sure, but a thoroughly thought through system is possible.

      Just my .02

      --

      "So unmerciful is life, that everything afterwards is too late."
  58. No they won't by swordboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have to make it "sound like a winner" in order to get credibility. If you read on, you'll see that they don't recommend the PC for anyone who isn't a Linux expert because You still need to know a lot more about the inner workings of a computer to excel on a Linux machine.

    So, basically, they said that its great but they don't suggest that 99 percent of the Joe Users out there buy the thing. Safe.

    But the article does have points. When the hell are we going to see some standards in Linux to sort this out? Here's my list of needs/wants:

    1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment. Gnome and KDE need to learn how to play nice. Obviously, this will involve some work at lower levels by others. We need everyone to create some STANDARDS here.

    2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it. If Linux had a standardized software installer (complete with a dedicated file extension that could be "picked up" from a browser click), we'd see a huge Linux section on download.com. Yes - I realize that there are some nice things out there but we need a STANDARD to which every desktop distro can adhere (or else they don't get that fluffy "Desktop Linux Compliant" sticker that the industry also needs to invent).

    3) Rules for software companies. Right now, there's no problems with this as there are with Windows because Linux hasn't become mainstream. What am I talking about? Software installs run amok. I hate to see Windows programs putting shortcuts *everywhere* - quick launch, desktop, taskbar, programs menu (and sometimes right even off of the top of the start menu). Some of them even install their own "tool bars". WTF? If Linux doesn't fix this NOW, before it becomes desktop mainstream, we're gonna have to live with it forever. We don't need uninstall icons right off of the program menu if there's another way to do it in the control panel. FORCE companies to put software installs in ONE LOCATION. Put it off of root? Sure, why not? Nobody's stopping me.

    Forever.

    Hell... its Friday so I'm gonna go now. I really wish there were a place to submit all these suggestions that I've got.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:No they won't by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Do you not think that by creating too many "STANDARDS" you will stifle a great deal of inovation?

      The functionality of Linux has evolved rapidly partly because of a darwinian "best code wins" approach. Standards would mean that would be developers would be limited in the functionality they developed.

      ]{

    2. Re:No they won't by wsapplegate · · Score: 4, Informative

      > 1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment. Gnome and KDE need to learn how to play nice. Obviously, this will involve some work at lower levels by others. We need everyone to create some STANDARDS here.

      You could maybe lend a hand. The source is available, you know. First problem to tackle : write configuration software that will parse *any* configuration file thrown at it. That's not so trivial. Some configuration files have very hairy syntax (*cough* Sendmail *cough*). Next, make sure your software doesn't do a big mess while writing changes, this will irk power users (I did make a clean, commented /etc/fstab, and the stupid Mandrake configuration tool wrote back a mangled thing without comments or indentation. This is not acceptable). I wish you good luck. This ain't a piece of cake, to say the least.

      Still, there are efforts in this area. One example would be the GNOME System Tools. Although I won't settle for something less than stellar, this kind of software could satisfy you. As for your demand that everything should be the same from distro to distro, I just can't understand why that would be. The very point of having more than one distro is, we get to choose which one is best suited to our working methods. And, generally, we end up settling on one preferred distro and we don't move anymore (instead, we go trolling on Web forums saying it is the best distro ;-)) For my part, I chose Debian. But I guess it wouldn't please you. That's why you'll be so happy when you'll be able to get Mandrake or SuSE (or Fedora, or Gentoo, or even Slackware, whatever).

      > 2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it. If Linux had a standardized software installer (complete with a dedicated file extension that could be "picked up" from a browser click)

      An installer... you mean, like apt-get ? You know, that tool you just tell 'install foobar', and it downloads and installs the program foobar ? Or would you like some graphical thingie like Synaptic, where you just click on the program, then on Install ? Don't tell me you're still building from source without some specific reason on a 2004 distro ? That's SO nineties ;-) Also, I gather you want the files to have specific extensions. I'm not sure why (MIME types are way better metadata to identify files), but be advised the .rpm and .deb extensions are just that. Ain't life cool ?

      > 3) Rules for software companies. Right now, there's no problems with this as there are with Windows because Linux hasn't become mainstream. What am I talking about? Software installs run amok. I hate to see Windows programs putting shortcuts *everywhere*

      Then, you'll just LOVE Linux : you see, the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard specifies very clearly where files go on a Linux distribution : binaries (executables) in /usr/bin, libraries in /usr/lib, data files in /usr/share/{programname}, and so on. The menus also have been unified between KDE and GNOME. Not to mention that package management makes it a lot easier to know what your package has really installed, and you'll be sure to find your configuration and documents in your home directory. No more nightmares finding them in C:\Program Files\Foobar\Obscure\Path\Name\You\Would\Never\Hav e\Thought\Of. Linux makes managing your software a breeze :-)

      That's it. I hope I've been helpful, and I wish you good luck in your quest for a better Linux. But remember : diversity and freedom to experiment with your own solutions is what appeals so much to Linux users. A more rigid f

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    3. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it. If Linux had a standardized software installer (complete with a dedicated file extension that could be "picked up" from a browser click), we'd see a huge Linux section on download.com.


      Hi,

      I am not sure which Linux OS you used before.

      First:
      The source tarballs are for package maintainers. They build and configure the application for the end-users for their OS. It is has difficult to build software from source on Windows and OS X. It is not because the source is available that it is for the end user.

      Second:
      A Linux OS such as Debian or Gentoo has the most standardized installer. It is the same installer for all applications! You are confused with Linux (the kernel) and an OS with a Linux kernel. It is understandle has people use the terms Linux to designate an OS with a Linux kernel and a GNU userland.

      Third:
      Why download.com when you can get all the software from the OS distributor and have the OS distributor check it?

      I found the installation system on Linux OSes such as Gentoo and Debian (don't know about the others) superior to Windows and Mac OS X. Windows/OS X cannot adopt such a system because of the commercial context.

    4. Re:No they won't by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gnome and KDE will always have some different config requirements because, well, they're different systems. There will always be some things they do differently - just like vi and emacs have different configs. However, where I agree with you is that the stuff that is common - dealing with X, with hardware config, font rendering and so on - should be configged in a similar way. Obviously there will have to be different clients (Qt and GTK+), but the backend should be the same (if that is true then the clients will probably evolve similarly anyway).

      Fortunately a lot of the work I see going on on freedesktop.org seems to be heading in this direction. It won't happen immediately, but I think in 3-4 years gnome and KDE (as well as other DEs) will be able to play very nicely together with minimal effort.

      As for the installation / deinstallation stuff you mention, there's already pretty good standards for this (LSB). Most distributions adhere quite well to it, and the installation / deinstallation is managed very well by apt or rpm or various front-ends (take your pick). Generally, people who need to know how to deal with source tgzs are experienced enough to deal with them fine; certainly, for commercial software a company would be insane not to offer it as a deb or rpm - these are the de facto standards now. You're worrying about a problem that has already been solved.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    5. Re:No they won't by RWerp · · Score: 1

      1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment.
      A KDE control panel looks (almost) the same in every distro. You can't have a similar control panel for two different pieces of software (KDE v. GNOME).

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    6. Re:No they won't by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      What is the point of innovation if it's at the expense of usability? You can make neat applications while still taking care they play nice and adhere to some expected rules of behavior (such as the installer points the original poster made)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    7. Re:No they won't by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      Here's my list of needs/wants:

      1) Standard control panel through EVERY distro & desktop environment.


      They all pretty much let you point and click with the mouse. That is standard enough for me. I understand your point and realize how this can be an issue for some people but I see the leaps and bounds which linux desktop capabilities have made and I'd prefer they keep progressing the way they are. Trying to lock down the flexibility the developers currently have could have a stifling affect. If you need to standardize then pick a distro and stick with it.

      2) An installer. n00b's don't know what the hell a freakin' tar.gz file is and once they do figure it out, they don't know to where they should extract it.

      Actually most of the distros come with package management systems and require no tar.gz unless you really are an expert and your playing with bleeding edge or fringe projects. In fact I'd say from my experience that the package management in linux systems is far superior to the Windows methods that put crap everywhere across your hard drive and desktop and then leave junk everywhere when you try to remove them.

      3) Rules for software companies. Right now, there's no problems with this as there are with Windows because Linux hasn't become mainstream.

      Again, I disagree. I do agree with your statement about how messed up software installs are on Windows system, where I disagree is how linux needs to start making rules. I believe the reason linux does not have the same issues as Windows has nothing to do with marketshare and more to do with the design of the system, the development methodologies, and foremost the competition that occurs between projects.

      burnin

    8. Re:No they won't by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Then, you'll just LOVE Linux : you see, the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard specifies very clearly where files go on a Linux distribution : binaries (executables) in /usr/bin, libraries in /usr/lib, data files in /usr/share/{programname}, and so on. The menus also have been unified between KDE and GNOME. Not to mention that package management makes it a lot easier to know what your package has really installed, and you'll be sure to find your configuration and documents in your home directory. No more nightmares finding them in C:\Program Files\Foobar\Obscure\Path\Name\You\Would\Never\Hav e\Thought\Of. Linux makes managing your software a breeze :-)

      Sadly, the grandparent is right in this aspect. What you wrote applies to GPL programs shipped with the distro only. Commercial software (Acrobat Reader, Mathematica) installs into /usr/local/$somedir and that's it. The most you can expect is some links created in /usr/local/bin. I'd like to see a Mathematic .rpm package conforming to FHS, but that's just a dream.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    9. Re:No they won't by arose · · Score: 1

      Every, EVERY modern distro has a software installer. The reviewer should have used his YaST. BTW, what has software installation to do with "inner workings" of a laptop.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    10. Re:No they won't by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Windows/OS X cannot adopt such a system because of the commercial context.
      I guess you've never heard of Fink, DarwinPorts, or Gentoo/MacOS
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:No they won't by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me you're still building from source without some specific reason on a 2004 distro ? That's SO nineties ;-)

      Is having a whole distro built from source a good enough specific reason to still build from source?

      Then again, with Gentoo, installing software is still just as easy as apt-get. Just type "emerge" instead of "apt-get".

      Hell, it's pretty up-to-date too! But hey, to each their own. Which is why I love Linux. You may love Debian, I love Gentoo...it's still Linux.

      I also wonder why people always throw out the "Linux on the desktop just isn't here yet". How "here" does it have to get? I mean, installing and configuring XP isn't a cake-walk either you know...especially when you have to download and install all the updates to it. OK, so installing Gentoo isn't totally intuitive, but it wasn't hard. Hell, if I can do it, anyone can!

      But how many people buy a computer and THEN have to install the OS on it? If more people would simply buy computers WITH Linux installed...like this Laptop from HP...then wouldn't that make it "here" for the desktop?

      Oh well, got off on a tangent there...

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    12. Re:No they won't by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Standards stifling innovation?

      Imagine if other industries simply laughed at the idea of standards...

      "I'm sorry, but this DVD is incompatible with your Sony DVD player."

      Anarchy never got anyone anywhere.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    13. Re:No they won't by wsapplegate · · Score: 1

      > What you wrote applies to GPL programs shipped with the distro only.

      Not really. More and more proprietary vendors understand that users do not want to lose time with strange non-standard installers. For instance, Opera comes in RPM and DEB flavours.

      > Commercial software (Acrobat Reader, Mathematica) installs into /usr/local/$somedir and that's it. The most you can expect is some links created in /usr/local/bin.

      Well, if they come into non-packaged form (hence with no easy uninstall procedure), I would rather have them install into a well-defined place anyway (although I would prefer /opt rather than /usr/local), so I can just rm -fr /usr/local/foobar when I don't want them lying around anymore.

      > I'd like to see a Mathematic .rpm package conforming to FHS, but that's just a dream.

      That's a sorry situation, indeed. Did you try to voice your concerns to Wolfram ? I'm not a Mathematica user, but I seem to remember it's an expensive piece of software, hence I would expect to get good support for my money, including adequate packages for the mainstream distros. And since such a sophisticated software probably has a fair number of Linux users (at least I would think so), there's probably a good chance the publisher will do something. Just a guess...

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    14. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked programs and OS's were written for people (customers) to use it NOT for the developers... I know in a perfect world both could happen and be true but at the same time if every distro looks and feels diferent how do you expect (insert elderly family member here) to use it?

    15. Re:No they won't by debest · · Score: 1

      FORCE companies to put ...

      Sorry, but right there sums up every reason why attempting any of what you suggest is going to be nearly impossible.

      See, Linux and most everything in a distro is Free software, meaning you can't force anyone to do anything. If you create a solution that proves to be wonderful for both a developer and end user, then great. But even then, there is no authority within the community to dictate the standards you suggest. To do so is counter to the point of Free software.

      The Linux world will always be more "fractured" then the Windows world, and as a result it will hold back adoption with home users. To find a way to force a change to this is impossible, and even if it were it would damage the essense of what makes Linux what it is.

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    16. Re:No they won't by wsapplegate · · Score: 1

      > Is having a whole distro built from source a good enough specific reason to still build from source?

      Yes, of course. As is the need to have different compile-time settings than the maintainer, or merging additional/different patches. I keep building two dozens Debian packages locally for exactly these reasons. But let's not fool ourselves : by the time we get there, we're no longer the ``n00bs'' the original poster was referring to. I think most novices will just take binary packages, at least for a while.

      > But hey, to each their own. Which is why I love Linux. You may love Debian, I love Gentoo...it's still Linux.

      I couldn't have said it better ! It's in my opinion a very good selling point for Linux : there is no one-size-fits-all solution that's shoehorned on you like on proprietary systems. You get to choose what's best, or even create your own custom solution. I think that's why I decided to stick with Linux in the first place.

      > I also wonder why people always throw out the "Linux on the desktop just isn't here yet". How "here" does it have to get?

      Let's face it : this will never stop. Linux (and free software in general) faces an uphill battle on all fronts. Hardware support is hindered by manufacturers not releasing drivers or even specifications, yet people will bitch and moan at Linux for not supporting their latest gizmo. Compatibility with popular software like Office is difficult to attain, primarily because Microsoft uses obscure, undocumented formats. Yet people will bitch and moan at OpenOffice.org/Gnome Office/KOffice for misaligning their twisted tables, or adding too much space (and forgetting compatibility can even be haphazard between Office releases). Educational software, encyclopedias, etc. are nearly never released on Linux (one recent exception. Warning : non-english text, you can try the Fish). Yet people will bitch and moan at Linux for not running their software, not at the publishers who don't write portable code while portable toolkits already exist.

      All these problems have solutions. WINE, for instance, can help people run their proprietary applications, but then, they just bitch about it being hard to configure. The latest versions work nearly out-of-the-box, but people will then bitch about imperfect emulation, or slow performance. There is no way to avoid that. Users just like to vent their frustration (sometimes I even do, too, although on a different kind of problems). All this is not important. We'll know when Linux is ready for the mythical desktop when we'll see lots of Linux boxes everywhere we go instead of the odd one here and there. Then, the endless bitching will be irrelevant.

      Oh, and BTW, all this applies for the personal/SOHO desktop. I very much think the corporate desktop will be attained a lot faster, especially with big names like IBM and Sun now touting FOSS openly.

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    17. Re:No they won't by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      An installer... you mean, like apt-get ? You know, that tool you just tell 'install foobar', and it downloads and installs the program foobar ? Or would you like some graphical thingie like Synaptic, where you just click on the program, then on Install ? Don't tell me you're still building from source without some specific reason on a 2004 distro ?

      The fundamental dilemma is simple.

      The only distros on which apt-get and friends actually works reliably are the least user friendly distros.

      Debian and Gentoo have serious usability problems in many areas for non-technical users. There's only one distro I'd give to my friends/family today, and that's Fedora Core. Why? Because it has a slick Gnome desktop and I don't think I should be giving non-technical users a desktop which has menu items labelled "smbUmount" and a preference in the file manager called "Minimize memory usage". Sorry. Just MHO. So that leaves Fedora or some customized install of Debian. Compiling from source is right out if only because it takes so long to upgrade the system (think security updates).

      Unfortunately Fedora doesn't have many packages, and those packages it does have are often out of date. The moment a new Fedora is released, you have to upgrade too because all the packagers are now targetting the newest release. This is a pain. Often packages are broken, out of date, missing, or only in conflicting repositories. These issues are hard-wired into the system and cannot be solved by throwing manpower at it, despite what some think.

      Grandparent is exactly right, we need decentralised packaging. That does not exclude apt type "one command installs", that can easily be layered on top once the fundamental infrastructure is in place. But you've got to get the basics right: build a binary once, install it anywhere.

      Go read the autopackage ui vision to see what end users might one day use, then check out the screenshots gallery. Try it for yourself if you like.

      Be warned though. On very recent distros (fc2, debian sid etc) the Inkscape package installs but the binaries crash very quickly. It seems some library broke ABI and didn't bump the soname.

      Hey, nobody said it'd be easy ....

    18. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I guess you've never heard of Fink [sourceforge.net], DarwinPorts [opendarwin.org], or Gentoo/MacOS [metadistribution.org]


      Yes. I'm even using them. My point, is no centralisation for everything. System + apps (no matter where they are from)

      Fink etc. are centralize system for additional OOS installed. But you still have Apple update and other companies.

      So you kind of end up with several systems...

    19. Re:No they won't by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, there's really nothing stopping Apple from adopting one of the package management systems (DarwinPorts would make the most sense, although I prefer Gentoo).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:No they won't by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      first, let me put aside some miss-information:

      Compiling from source is right out if only because it takes so long to upgrade the system (think security updates).

      On gentoo, I emerge sync daily, and emerge -u world daily (read: update my system daily). It takes 15 minutes a day, and my system is completely usable while it's happening. It would be *extremely* simple to write a graphical front end, or even a gnome applet/KDE applet to do this in the background, or even check /etc/ for config file changes when a user logs in (the only real user intervention needed when you're updating the system), and have emerge -u world happen every day, at some arbitrary time, as a cron job. The only flaw in this system is updating the kernel (like you said, security updates). That requires an expert, still, for Gentoo at least.

      I don't think I should be giving non-technical users a desktop which has menu items labelled "smbUmount" and a preference in the file manager called "Minimize memory usage".

      What? My file manager is called Nautilus. In my gnome menu, it's labeled, "Browse Filesystem", and has no preference called, "Minimize memory usage". As far as SMB goes, when installed on gentoo, with gnome-vfs-extras emerged, it works flawlessly, without configuation. It just prompts you for a username and password when you try to connect to a server.

      Unfortunately Fedora doesn't have many packages, and those packages it does have are often out of date. The moment a new Fedora is released, you have to upgrade too because all the packagers are now targetting the newest release. This is a pain. Often packages are broken, out of date, missing, or only in conflicting repositories. These issues are hard-wired into the system and cannot be solved by throwing manpower at it, despite what some think.

      emerge -u world, or the equivalent apt command is starting to look more attractive, i think. Upgrading the system simply because of package dependencies seems a lot less user-friendly than a package management system that is meant to keep the system, day-by-day, as up to date and stable as possible.

      That does not exclude apt type "one command installs", that can easily be layered on top once the fundamental infrastructure is in place.

      Here, I agree - this is what unix is. It's a collection of tools that can be easily strung together to complete complex tasks. Personally I'm completely enamoured with system like ports, portage, apt-*, and so on. The just make things so damned easy, and the gui frontends for them are really starting to mature. When it comes down to it, if i wanted to set a friend up with a good linux desktop system, I would use gentoo. I'm familar with it, it's easy to install programs, and in my opinion there's no better way to keep an up to date system. Of course...unless they actually wanted to know how linux works, I would set it up for them.

    21. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this comment, how he takes up the :do it yourself" approach. Yet, next week, he'll be asking game companies for his "Linux port of xxx"! The tools are there, Chicka, do it yourself!

    22. Re:No they won't by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Gentoo is not a distro I'd ever give to my non-technical family. Neither is Debian. The reasons should hopefully be obvious.

      With the desktop comments I was referring to KDE, explaining why I'd not go for SuSE or Mandrake which are very KDE focussed. Hence the fact that Fedora is basically the best choice right now.

      In particular while "emerge" might be easy, there are an awful lot of broken packages out there. I've had to deal with random brokenness caused by bad ebuilds a lot and I have no faith in the system whatsoever. So from my perspective, there is a serious problem. If what you have works for you though, then great!

    23. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Installing and configuring XP isn't cake walk? Bullshit. When I installed XP, it took about.. 10 clicks. Mainly chosing localization settings and enter serial number - and it's got nice pretty pictures to show you how to do it.

      Configuring XP is quite frankly miles ahead of Linux. Mainly because nearly everything is in a centralized place!. Yes, I click control panel and I can change nearly anything I have to day to day.

      I still think that the points that the OP said are very, very valid. They are the 3 points which infuriate me more than anything.

      Oh also, apt-get is useless - you need to know the repositries, and commerical software is not going to be delivered that way. Installshield/Microsoft installer does a far better job. Personally, I think OSX does the best job at this, a very, very clean installer that is web aware.However, the autopackage folks are doing a damn great job, and we need to really help projects like this, and the freedesktop initive get off the ground.

    24. Re:No they won't by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Gentoo is not a distro I'd ever give to my non-technical family. Neither is Debian. The reasons should hopefully be obvious.
      The only obvious reason I can see is that they require technical knowledge to install. That's a non-issue if it's preinstalled at the factory.

      This is a good thing for Linux; hardware vendors should be able to knock off the rough edges (a lot of which are due to incompatible peripherals) - well if they can't, who the heck can?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:No they won't by PastaLover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sadly, the grandparent is right in this aspect. What you wrote applies to GPL programs shipped with the distro only. Commercial software (Acrobat Reader, Mathematica) installs into /usr/local/$somedir and that's it. The most you can expect is some links created in /usr/local/bin. I'd like to see a Mathematic .rpm package conforming to FHS, but that's just a dream.

      Some people conform to it, others don't. The point being that there is a standard on this stuff. That some people aren't keeping to it is their customers' problem, not those who developed this standard. What's important is that these noncompliant packages at least don't easily break the system like all those windows legacy apps do.

      In any case we're going to see a lot more discussion in the future between the people that say "you should be able to configure everything with graphical apps". And those (and I'm leaning towards it) who say "learn to use a damn text editor (really when you've edited a couple of config files you quickly get the hang of it). In any case, standardizing at such a high level als the end user interface requires throwing out a whole lot of perfectly good alternatives and I don't think people would stand for it.

      In essence what the OP is saying doesn't really apply. I don't think it is exactly important that there is one "configuration panel to end them all" or something like that. That is still thinking coming from a very limited, windows-centric world. What is important is that if you should want to use graphical configuration apps in whatever is your desktop environment, they should work for your particular situation in your particular distro. I don't think the average user will keep switching from gnome to kde or something and actually notice that. Not if we're just talking about system configuration.

    26. Re:No they won't by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Bullshit....this post should be erased, modded back as flamebait...take your pick!

      I fricken installed Gentoo, it was pretty easy! Can't say the same thing about installing XP and then having to update the entire OS with the updates from hell...that is if you can get it updated before someone finds your computer and starts cutting into the exploits...as was mentioned on Slashdot a few weeks ago.

      Oh, and also there sparky, I install commercial software through "emerge" on my Gentoo installation quite a bit.

      Please, tell us another one...oh, but of course, you hid behind the Anonymous Coward post because you KNOW everyone would cry BULLSHIT and mess up your karma!

      I'll probably get modded down here for speaking my feelings about this, but I have karma to burn....

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    27. Re:No they won't by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      OH, now I know why you posted anonymously...you had mod points so you posted your silly post as anon THEN modded it as informative. What should have tipped me off is that this story was from yesterday and the people with mods are modding on the new stories...I mean, what loser goes back to old stories that no one is even going to read anymore and mod them?

      I guess a loser like me that posts replies to stories that no one is going to read....

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    28. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First problem to tackle : write configuration software that will parse *any* configuration file thrown at it.

      i'd like to see that done. start by passing the turing test and move on from there i guess.

    29. Re:No they won't by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Imagine if other industries simply laughed at the idea of standards... "I'm sorry, but this DVD is incompatible with your Sony DVD player."

      Depends on where you bouhgth you DVD and in what region you try plying it.

      Sometimes standards get in the way too.

    30. Re:No they won't by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      No, the main problem is that it's too unstable. Things break. I've had to recover a few friends Gentoo systems after an emerge update blasted gcc or whatever. It doesn't happen *often* but it does happen.

    31. Re:No they won't by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Oh, not to mention there are lots of nice config tools and integration widgets in Fedora that aren't in most other distros. Even little things like a working pam_xauth can reduce the potential tech support burden.

    32. Re:No they won't by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      One Small question...

      If linux is so cool and user-friendly now, why don't we have path names like '/User/Public' rather than '/usr/pub'? or '/User/Libraries'?

      -Nano.

    33. Re:No they won't by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Installing any OS is easy *IF YOUR HARDWARE IS SUPPORTED BY IT*
      Example here...
      I have a newish AMD64 machine, mandrake 10 installs right out of the box on it, XP doesnt.. first i had to hit F6 and load the SATA driver from floppy, then when it had finally installed i had to manually install the ethernet driver and display driver as there was no ethernet support and only a slow generic display driver... A newbie can't be expected to do all this..
      To contrast, mandrake went straight on and detected everything...
      Imagine trying to install windows when you dont have the driver CD's handy? How would i have got my ethernet working? how would i have even got the os installed without the floppy containing sata drivers? all more stuff a newbie has to know, and more media to keep track of.. if you lose it, your screwed.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    34. Re:No they won't by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I've only ever see that happen in certain cases where:
      1, you hardly ever upgrade, and then you upgrade tons of stuff at once (gentoo devs upgrade regularly so they never encounter these problems really)
      2, you turn on the beta versions "~arch keyword"
      3, you kill an install halfway through the "make install" process
      4, you manually install something that conflicts with something else installed by emerge

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    35. Re:No they won't by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I agree, I am by no means a very experienced Linux user, although I do now how to compile a kernel, add some custom module/etc.

      My point was: Most of the time if I want an application I fire up Yast, select te rpm, have it solve any dependencies, and install.
      Worked every time with the 8.0 and newer versions, most of my "under the hood" experience with Linux is from older versions (like SuSE 6, 7, kernel with 2.0, 2.2) Lately everything I needed just worked, pop in the DVD, tell Yast what I want, and presto, it's ready.

      I do think that from a ISP perspective more uniformity is needed, and API's at a higher level: I do not want a RS232 port character device, I want a modem, I want to tell it, "Use error correction, fixed baud 4800 and dial 1234567", independant of what modem is connected and how (USB, RS232, RS488, ISA, PCI, etc). (Modem's are my everyday live, and the Windows TAPI hell, but it IS available).
      The same is true I think for other peripherals.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    36. Re:No they won't by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you broke a gentoo system? Is this personal dogma built upon one encounter two years ago, or is the recent? A broken package simply won't install. It does not, by itself, break a system. I'm actually running gentoo on an amd64, and i've hand-keyworded many programs to get them to install (i.e. add ~amd64 to the arch line). The system's solid. I would not think twice about installing it on my mom's computer. However...fedora would drive her insane. Anything RPM based would drive her insane. I think there are far more broken, decentralized, home-rolled RPM builds out there that could potentially mess things up. Atleast with gentoo you have a centralized repository for programs - not quite as well tested as debian's - but quite thoroughly tested. I would say there are more broken RPMs (in a relative sense, that is, % of broken RPMs relative to the total number of RPMs available on the internet) than there are broken ebuilds (again, % broken ebuilds relative to number to ebuilds around, including those on break my gentoo - to be fair).

    37. Re:No they won't by crumley · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing, "usr" doesn't stand for "User", it stands for "Unix System Resources", which is is a little bit long for my tastes.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    38. Re:No they won't by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I don't use Gentoo, I was talking about broken apps installed by wrong ebuilds. Wine is an obvious example of a pathologically broken ebuild, despite its popularity (winehq gets >2million hits/month).

    39. Re:No they won't by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ... all of which are things that Ma & Pa Nontechnical as mentioned by IamTheRealMike aren't likely to be attempting.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  59. Does anyone see the option? by pr0vidence · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps I am a complete and utter idiot. Which is entirely possible. Does anyone see the option on the web site to include Suse in place of WinXP? I can't find it anywhere. I wanted to customize a system to see what it would cost. Possibly even consider buying one 1) because my Compaq 1800t is starting to show it's age, and 2) to help show that there IS a market out there for Linux desktops/laptops.

    When it comes to replacing my laptop, an HP would not have been my first choice, but if I can get it WITHOUT paying the MSFT tax, that's a HUGE plus for them. (for those who may point out HP/Compaq are the same, yes, but I bought my laptop shortly BEFORE the merger was announced).

    1. Re:Does anyone see the option? by pr0vidence · · Score: 1

      okok, forgive me replying to my own post.

      I found it, apparently, on the list of diffrent base configurations for the nx5000, Suse is only an option on select setups, out of the 5 or so. Please disreguard all of this.

  60. Tarballs by thephotoman · · Score: 1

    I think he's refering to tarballs...which can be daunting if you don't know what you're doing. Once you get the hang of it, it's actually kinda fun.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    1. Re:Tarballs by Querty · · Score: 1

      Try compiling a tarball on standard Windows. No really, I dare you...

      Ok, repeat after me:

      * Users install packages using their package manager.

      * Developers who like to twiddle things compile from tarball.

    2. Re:Tarballs by spitzak · · Score: 1

      No, if he was talking about tarballs he would certainly mention that you had to type commands into a terminal, not "how to handle permissions". I agree I'm not sure what he is saying or talking about here. Fact is RPM's (unless you are an expert) don't give you much choice over permissions or where to install.

  61. wireless by zogger · · Score: 1

    quote "For the record, Linux doesn't support Intel's wireless chip. H-P's WiFi modules work just fine."

    Why is this? Intels fault, or what? Driver issue, voodoo, or like my dad was fond of saying (lack of ) F.M.?, last letter means "magic"

  62. you too could be a winner by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

    Someone must of used this HP laptop to hit the monkey on that annoying web popup ad. Don't believe the hype, hitting the monkey doesn't make you a winner.

  63. Microsoft Tax by khrtt · · Score: 1

    The way I look at it, I can put my linux on my laptop myself. And I would too, 'cause I like Mandrake better than SuSE. And if I wanted Windows, I've a few licenses already, so I wouldn't want to pay for 'nother one:-). But hey: isn't this a great way to avoid paying the Microsoft Tax?! I mean, noone would sell a laptop to you with no operating system. At least if you get is with SuSE, even if you are going to replace it, you are not paying for the useless system that you will replace anyways, right>?

    1. Re:Microsoft Tax by xarak · · Score: 1, Redundant


      Probably a paying version of SuSE, so still shelling out money for the OS. Probably less though, and I for one would rather give it to SuSE than MS.

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
  64. Tadpole Talin by Jahf · · Score: 3, Informative

    There has been a good SuSE (actually in this case Java Desktop System) Linux business laptop that "just works" out for 9 months now. The Tadpole Talin 15". The also now have the 12 inch screen model available.

    Not as big a brand name as HP ... but then again HP's brandname hasn't been that great for awhile now anyway.

    The Tadpole machines may be more expensive (no way for me to know, I got my Talin 15 as a demo box and their website doesn't say) so I'm not saying you should definitely get this one over the HP box if that is a concern ... just pointing out some other alternatives.

    Things in this respect are definitely improving.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    1. Re:Tadpole Talin by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note, Tadpole has been a niche laptop maker for a looong time. I have a Tadpole SPARCbook II lying around (640x480 color screen, slow-ass 32-bit SPARC that was really cool when the laptop was new). They for the early part of their existence made exclusive SPARC architecture laptops running SunOS..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  65. hibernate by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Informative

    hibernation on my toshiba tecra 8100 with kernel 2.6.8.1 works perfectly, with latest kernel patches. I use debian so a line in /etc/apt/sources.list :

    deb http://cp.yi.org/apt/hibernate ./

    makes sure I have latest hibernate scripts.

    I just assigned 'sudo /sbin/hibernate' to "sleep" button in my session manager. I also had set up sleepd to hibernate when battery drops to 5% (which is usually 2 hours).
    And, yes - there is a glitch - if I hibernate with blender or glxgears running, then after restore the 3d acceleration gets screwed up, and sooner or later I want to restart Xserver anyway (graphic card is s3 savage).

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:hibernate by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God forbid somebody make a post like that without the obligatory "works for me!" reply that utterly misses the point.

      "Hibernate works for me! All I had to do is upgrade the kernel, change a line in my etc/apt/sources.list, assign a 'sudo' command with a session manager, set up 'sleepd' to hibernate when the battery drops and there are a couple glitches that mean I have to restart my window session, but hibernate works great! It was SO EASY!"

      Feh, Linux users.

    2. Re:hibernate by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      look, if it works for me, it means it is possible.

      if it's possible, it means that any hardware wendor if he decided to - can make it work right out of the box, with the laptop he decides to sell. just like this HP laptop.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    3. Re:hibernate by Kristoffer+Lunden · · Score: 1

      Linux users - redefining "works perfectly" since 1991.

      I'd show your parent post to my mother as an example of how easy alternative OS:es are to use... if I had a thing for seeing family members heads explode.

      (Running Gentoo exclusively since a long time back, just not being a stupid zealot about it).

    4. Re:hibernate by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Huh? Did you read the article? Let me quote some of it for you.
      All in all, Hewlett-Packard has done a good job responding to their enterprise clients who are demanding that Linux be added to a laptop - and that the whole thing be done right. SuSE 9.1, as deployed here, is a terrific operating system.
      and
      Hewlett-Packard should be proud of their first Linux laptop; it's quite an accomplishment.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:hibernate by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'm replying to the parent, not to the article.

  66. Buy software to watch a movie? by spinozaq · · Score: 1

    When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie.

    What? MPlayer and/or Ogle aren't good enough for you? What are you buying? Use MPlayer and donote to them. They were looking for a hard drive the other day I think.

    1. Re:Buy software to watch a movie? by geekschmoe · · Score: 1

      Use MPlayer and donote to them.

      Maybe someone should donate some pre-compiled binaries of MPlayer so that USErs can USE the software and leave the DEVELOPment to the DEVELOPers.

    2. Re:Buy software to watch a movie? by spinozaq · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? I've installed MPlayer via apt-get in binary form on all my machines, except my HDTV machine because I needed that little bit of extra compile time optimization. There are plenty of pre-compiled mplayer installs in various packages for nearly all linux distros.

    3. Re:Buy software to watch a movie? by geekschmoe · · Score: 1

      My bad, I was referring to stuff thats more than 2 years old (see link), and it's no longer an issue. They still don't have official packages, but at least they allow them now. Please ignore my previous post.
      http://zebra.fh-weingarten.de/~maxi/html/mp layer-d ev-eng/2002-03/msg00541.html

  67. What's he gonna say? by dameron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Usually I download DeCSS from one of the available offshore repositories. Yeah, I know it's illegal, but who reads MSNBC anyway?"

    -dameron

  68. I went to the HP site by danieljpost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Same big disappointment I found when I learned Dell was supposed to be working with Linux.

    When I click Customize, the stupid site did NOT give me the option of changing the Operating System. It's hardcoded as Windows XP (here was the first clue: it's an ASP page....

    It's possible that I may have looked in the wrong place.

    http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/ctoBases.asp?Pr od uctLineId=430&FamilyId=1776&jumpid=re_R2515_store/ smProdCat/PSG/notebooks/HP_nx5000_notebook

    Anyone else have any luck actually trying to order this thing?

    --
    We must drive a sword through any hypothesis that is not strictly necessary.
  69. seems to be a pretty laptop by stock · · Score: 1

    But, i miss the "Buy Now" button on that page :)

  70. $265 rebate for WinXP version by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    Rather evil of HP to stack it up against the WinXP version which has a $265 rebate (I wonder if that's coming from Microsoft's slush fund):

    Special offers: $265 instant savings on this nx5000. Offer ends 8/31

    http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/ctoBases.asp?Prod uctLineId=435&FamilyId=1593&jumpid=re_store/smProd Cat/PSG/promo/notebooks/nx5000/$265InstantSavings

  71. Apple+BSD ? by soliptic · · Score: 1
    "Apple+BSD" is a little disingenuous isnt it?

    Nobody is buying Apple hardware plus {Net/Open/Free}BSD, they're buying an Apple laptop running Apple's OS X. Imho this description is rather a leap from the reality of Apple using a BSD-derived core "deep down in the technicals".

  72. chill, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was a complete troll. :-)

  73. Downside by JawFunk · · Score: 1

    Here's a downside, if it really is so easy, thousands of middle-aged executives will feel rebellious and want to spite Gates by using one of these. The false appeal here is that they would be diving into a Linux laptop without knowledge of linux, bash, using source code etc. While much of that knowledge is not necessary for business applications, I think eery Linux user shoud have some scripting capabilities to make full use of their OS. From my own experience in a law firm, everyonewants a diferent setting, color, and have different needs. Well, those needs can be met with Linux diveristy, but the burden falls oon the experts to exhaustingly devote man-hours to explaining the differences and how to change things. I love *nix systems, (as I write this from office on Windows) but is the average consumer ready? After all, we now have rear-view cameras and auto parking systems for idiot drivers...

    --
    [Please sign here]
    1. Re:Downside by TaintedPastry · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The false appeal here is that they would be diving into a Linux laptop without knowledge of linux, bash, using source code etc. While much of that knowledge is not necessary for business applications, I think eery Linux user shoud have some scripting capabilities to make full use of their OS.

      Which, if true, will need to change for Linux to severely cut into the 94% market share that Windows has.

      Besides, few end-users ACTUALLY make full use of their operating system - a point missed by most of the tech community. Because they are our livelyhood, they're also are lives (most of the time.) For everyone else, it's just a computer. Many facets of the Linux/Windows/Whatever battle don't even apply to the people the results will affect: Mom, Dad, Jimmy Five year old, Missy High School Report - none of these people will, or should for the matter, need to know how to use WSH, PERL to use their computer as they want.

      Diversity, OpenSource, and Choice are great...but the tech community is taking itself far too seriously in this matter.

  74. Try reading a few paragraphs of the article first by nacs · · Score: 5, Informative
    It'd probably be too much to ask some people to read the product page for the laptop but the least you can do is read the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph:

    Hewlett-Packard is now taking orders for their nx5000 business notebook computers with Novell's SuSE Linux 9.1 installed.


    HP is intentionally targetting the enterprise market with this laptop and have stated this multiple times in the past.

    Cnet even has a video where an HP representative tells us that HP is targetting enterprises and that they're doing this more as a trial run to work out kinks and see what improvements users request before they put more resources into this segment.
    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  75. There is Big Money in Linux by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    The big money doesn't lie in the short term; it lies in the long term. With a free OS you are no longer subject to monopolized prices. Not to mention all of the free software. Openoffice is "big money" savings too. Yes, it runs on Windows, but Windows isn't (legally) free. If you can run software that is free on an OS that's free, that's great isn't it?

  76. It would be nice to know... by graveyhead · · Score: 1

    if this thing has any binary-only drivers, or if the *whole distribution* is GPLd. If there's binaries, and I can't use them in Debian, what's the point? I'd rather just check the Debian hardware compatability list and build or buy a model with full support.

    Care to comment, Bruce Perens? Do you still work for HP?

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  77. how is the keyboard? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's from the Compaq side of HP. Playing with Compaq laptops at Best Buy and/or Circuit City, I'm NOT impressed with the keyboards. Is this one better?

    I went to HP's website and configured one, and compared to a similarly configured Powerbook at Apple's site, and the HP comes out a lot cheaper, with a similar weight, and a higher resolution display, so it looks like a good choice for a non-Windows laptop, if the keyboard doesn't suck.

    So far, the only good keyboard I've found is on ThinkPads. (No Apple dealer within 30 miles of where I live, so I haven't been able to check out Powerbook keyboards yet).

    1. Re:how is the keyboard? by manly_15 · · Score: 1

      I have a 12" PB first gen, and the keyboard is very nice. Quiet, with a good touch, and a nice texture on the keys. All keys are full size, except for the arrow keys and the Esc-Fn-Eject keys, which are half size. Keep in mind that the keyboard is vastly different than an iBook keyboard, which are a lot less solid and comfortable to the touch. The HP laptops I've used have a heavier feel, the keys seem thicker than the ones on the PowerBooks. However, the spring action isn't as soft. The texture is similar to any other PC laptop. Hope this helps!

    2. Re:how is the keyboard? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      When it comes to key size and feel, the Apple keyboards aren't really any different than a standard x86 laptop keyboard to me. But unlike some x86 laptops, atleast the Apple keyboards hold up pretty well to heavy use.

  78. OK, how about support for the other models? by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

    I find this as a great news for the linux community. To have a major company take the steps required to make a laptop work with linux isn't an easy task.

    However, now that HP has taken the first step, how about supporting the other laptop models that they sell. I have gentoo linux on an HP zt3000, and while 99% of the system works (WiFi, Ati Radeon, WXGA, IrDA, etc), there's still that 1% that needs HP support, like a driver for the SD media slot (although there's some work by some people to make this work).

    I think HP is doing this as an experiment, to see how will the community react, how will customers use their laptop and how much tech-support issues will they have to solve. I wish them luck and hope they get behind this fulltime.

    --
    Signatures are supposed to be funny?
  79. great stuff by Gactaculon · · Score: 1

    Even for Linux enthusiasts who coundn't really care less about the mainstream, this OS preloading is a huge win. Talk about an incentive to open specs and write Linux drivers... imagine HP saying, "You know, Broadcom, we'd really like to use your chipset in our new model laptops, but it's cheaper for us to just buy Intersil than to try to make Linux work with your stuff." That's enough to make any hardware manufacturer reevaluate their attitudes toward Linux support.

  80. Suspend to ram by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've got gentoo on my Fujitsu Lifebook and suspend-to-ram has always worked.

    Maybe I enabled something in the kernel, but 'apm -s' always does the trick for me.

    It's also not at all flakey. On average i suspend the machine twice a day and it's never failed to come back up - except when the battery has run out. I've hit up times of a month or so, and usually break it when i need windows for something.

    1. Re:Suspend to ram by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting to know. I'm running the current suse 9.1 kernel, but perhaps there is something turned off in the kernel settings. I saw a post in the suse forums with someone having the same problem with suspend-to-ram, but the response was in german.

      Regardless, the suspend-to-disk works fine for me. It takes about 20 seconds to come back, but thats a lot faster than a cold boot.

    2. Re:Suspend to ram by bandy · · Score: 1

      And 20 seconds is a buttload faster than W98 on my old ThinkPad ever did a return from suspend to disk.

      I'm awfully spoiled by my Powerbook, though!

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  81. Just like Dell by StarTux · · Score: 1

    HP have seemingly buried the SuSE Linux option, I remember Dell doing something similar and then saying Linux never sold much.

    Well luckily a feedback Window appeared, I left them feedback all right.

    StarTux

  82. A little fishy? by Sidicas · · Score: 1

    Do you notice anything in common?

    Perhaps Microsoft is making some deals under the table to prevent Linux from getting into the laptop market.

  83. ENTHUSIASTIC ASSERTION OF PARENT POST'S VALUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Effusive encouragement for higher moderation of parent posts manipulates a greater sense of value for the topic or viewpoint as well as improves the asserter's charisma, while laying a foundation for valuing further clarification.

    'Lo! Further expository complementing the just garnered charismatic appearance rewards the child post itself with higher moderation!

    I'm here to troll using real ammo. The mods bumped up nothing but a "me too" post, higher than the parent, and all it was doing was echoing a sentiment that misses the real issue at hand (and using a ridiculously incompatible metaphor). I've shrugged off this annoying behavior before, but hadn't thought about it in detail until now. Now I realize it's a kind of gripey, ignorant karma whoring. Ugly, ugly, ugly.

    The point is that Linux has hit a fucking pivotal milestone. Get it? This hasn't happened before? It's a real change (hard to perceive for its incrementalness)? It's been long coming? It makes more concrete all the predictions of a radically different future?

    Look back in five years at the curve of Linux desktop adoption and note the inflection in late 2004. Traction, baby. Get well soon.

  84. Re:Not a negative choice -- Wait A Minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...People don't buy Macs because they don't want a Windows machine..."

    Not true. I bought a PowerBook precisely because I didn't want a to support Windblows.

  85. Wow, bad example... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I can run Photoshop and MS Office on my iBook without any gimmicks or compromises like I would need to run them on a Linux laptop.

    I wouldn't call CodeWeavers Wine a gimmick or a compromise. And at this point OS X happens to owe a lot itself to open source.

    I think the significance here is that the little guy, an operating system 'cobbled together' by enthusiasts and idealists is starting to approach a state of usefulness only believed to be accomplishable by corporations. And of course, its free and strangely idealistic. Thats why its news.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Wow, bad example... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Well, I think that using Wine would be considered a compromise. Running no native software on a laptop seems like I would sacrafice a lot of speed which is something I really don't want to do.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    2. Re:Wow, bad example... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Wine imposes virtually no speed overhead. I use Office under Wine all the time, it works great.

    3. Re:Wow, bad example... by msimm · · Score: 1

      The guy who already responded hit it. The thing with Wine is the Not an Emulator (Wine Is Not an Emulator) part is important. Wine is basically an API that works with your os directly. Performance isn't really hit, think of Windows XP running 98SE software in compatability mode, its just using another API.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  86. You're kidding! by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

    You're comparing an HP made laptop with SUSE to Apple with the WAAAY more elegant OS X?

    The day that happens is the day I switch to Linux. Get coding...

    GNOME and KDE are a bad kludge compared to Aqua, or WPS or even WindowsXP explorer desktop.

  87. Conspiracy! by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    See! Once again MSNBC (owned part by Microsoft...errr....sorry, M$) is biased against anything but Windows! Next those biased jerks will report that Gmail kicks Hotmail's rear.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  88. Hello Hell? by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Yes, what temperature is it outside now? Did you say 20 below zero degrees? OK, just checking...^_^

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  89. Why the hyphen? by xee · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone hyphenate HP? It's always been HP. There's no hyphen there! I think M$ did this for some sinister reason, like screwing up search results. Hmm, I guess HP is the photo studio that took the picture. Are they the one's preinstalling linux on H-P's laptops?

    --
    Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
  90. What about the crappy WiFi client? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    With the nx5000, you need to change the access point and WEP settings separately for each location.

    It's been a while since I've run Linux on a laptop--it was, uh, interesting--but surely they can do better than the client mentioned in the article?

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  91. yeah, try and buy it from their web site by yagu · · Score: 2, Informative

    This MAY be great news, but it feels more like a publicity stunt... I'm willing and ready to purchase one and not go through all the hoops of converting a windows box.... Just try and go to the HP site and in a straightforward way navigate to the laptop with linux. What a pain! And, at least in my case, when you finally find the model, and click through to "customize", you'll NOT find linux listed there as an option for OS anymore. Go figure.

    Of course, ymmv.... I'm sure someone will try and find linux and claim it is there and easy to find. But, I navigated, and drilled down about four or five different ways, and never really ended up with an option I was looking for. (This is about two or three times more than I normally afford a web site when looking for something -- before moving on to some easier to use business selling the same item.)

    Additional disclaimer: it may not be only "hiding" linux -- I've shopped the HP web site before and had similar frustrating experience just trying to find a normal laptop or desktop with the configuration I wanted. But, finding the linux configuration was well nigh impossible.

    1. Re:yeah, try and buy it from their web site by Sidicas · · Score: 1

      It is not available equipped with Linux for Educational Discounts. If you want it with Linux, try the small business section.

    2. Re:yeah, try and buy it from their web site by enilnomi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed; frustrating. Easy enough to the find the base model, just entered "nx5000 linux" in main page search box, and there I was. And there's SUSE, clearly listed as a option. Clicked every "shopping" link offered, but no way to order the linux.

      Worse, I wanted to leave HP a comment about this....but they only accept comments if you enter a name & email addie in the form (don't need anymore sales-mail, thank you very much). Sure, I could fake it, but the whole idea that HP demands that I identify myself just to submit site feedback is nuts, and not worth supporting.

      --
      education is no substitute for intelligence
    3. Re:yeah, try and buy it from their web site by another+blockhead · · Score: 1

      I tried this, too ... and then tried "linux nx5000". That actually seems to work -- at least, the first hit brought me to a configuration page (http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/MiddleFrame.asp? page=config&ProductLineId=430&FamilyId=1776&BaseId =11024&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID=&AirTime=Fals e that let me choose SuSE Linux (this reduces the price by US$50 relative to the default XP Pro).

      That page also cautions that the DVD+RW and the Intel PRO wireless options are not supported by SuSE Linux. You can save another US$50 by choosing "no wireless", or pay an extra $25 to get a supported wireless option (which, unlike the default 802.11b only, also supports 802.11a and g, or so they say).

      After playing around with the options a bit, it looks to me like the price range for a Linux-equipped nx5000 is US$1120 to US$3530 (of which almost half is for the second GB of RAM); a nicely configured version with the 1400x1050 display option, a 60 GB drive, 512 MB of RAM, 24X DVD/CD-RW, and 802.11a/b/g would cost US$1605.

  92. Microsoft propaganda by beej · · Score: 1
    This is just more FUD being systematically spread by corporate-owned MSNBC who quite clearly has their collective head between Bill Gates'...

    Wait--what was the headline, again?

  93. Interesting by theantix · · Score: 2, Informative

    The main complaint the article highlighted was with changing between network connections, something that both Novell and Red Hat have been working on recently. If you follow Planet Gnome at at, you'd see that both companies have just released glimpses of their upcoming programs which address this very real annoyance with Linux on laptops.

    The other complaint they had was with installing new applications, which shouldn't be a big deal with Red Carpet or Yum (especially if Red Hat/Fedora ever ships with a nice GUI front-end to that). Desktop Linux is rolling along rather nicely, good to see.

    --
    501 Not Implemented
  94. Oh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "MSNBC is currently running a story...

    Like I'm gonna be stupid enough to waste my time reading a story that is run by Microsoft. Microsoft is known to lie and deceive anyone they can, and at any time, to achieve their immoral goals.

    Give me a break. Sheesh!

  95. Wait until he tries to use a webcam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.smcc.demon.nl/webcam/

  96. additionally... by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    You guys are the first to foam at the mouth with anger whenever Microsoft does anything to ignore standards, like all of their "innovative" IE additions.

    Or am I just imagining all this noise calling for IE to comply to standards?

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  97. I’ve happy to report. . . by Fritzed · · Score: 1

    Did MSNBC get hacked?

    I ask, because quite frankly this columnist has the English skills of an average hacker. Run on sentances, general bad grammar, starting paragraphs with the words "but", or "then." While I honestly don't think it was hacked, what is going on? I'm no English major, but this article is pretty bad. Especially at the professional level. Is this just the sad state of journalism on MSNBC?

    Mod me offtopic if you feel you must. . .

    -> Fritz

    --
    Spooooon!!!!!
  98. HP compax NX5000 and wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    For the record, Linux doesn't support Intel's wireless chip. H-P's WiFi modules work just fine.

    Let's just hope nobody tells my wlan nic, otherwise I'll have to resort to fast ethernet.

    I am currently at the kde conference in Ludwigsburg, Germany and working on one of these NX5000 notebooks. Hewlett-Packard was nice enough to sell them for about 580 EUR, which is about 700 USD, to kde developers.
    However, our laptop models included the intel wireless 2200BG card, otherwise known as the dreaded centrino card. But what surprise, the driver from SourceForge works. Sometimes a bit flakey though, but it works...

    Otherwise I am quite happy with the NX5000. The thing looks quite stable, has mostly supported hardware and sports a pair of superb speakers.

    All in all, quite a nifty device for a very reasonable price.

    1. Re:HP compax NX5000 and wireless by sopuli · · Score: 1

      Great, someone who actually has used this machine. I'm very curious about the claim that all hardware works under Linux. Does this include the SD-card drive?

    2. Re:HP compax NX5000 and wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Honestly, I haven't tried the SD-slot under linux yet.
      The stock kernel, which I am still using, does not contain support for it. There is a driver for mmc cards somewhere on lkml, but I haven't compiled it yet.

      For what's it worth, here is the lspci output:

      00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Host Bridge (rev 02)
      00:00.1 System peripheral: Intel Corp. 855GM/GME GMCH Memory I/O Control Registers (rev 02)
      00:00.3 System peripheral: Intel Corp. 855GM/GME GMCH Configuration Process Registers (rev 02)
      00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
      00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02)
      00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #1 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
      00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #2 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
      00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #3 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
      00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
      00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 81) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
      00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DBM LPC Interface Controller (rev 01)
      00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
      00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)
      00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Generic])
      01:04.0 Network controller: Intel Corp. Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200BG (rev 05)
      01:06.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller
      01:06.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller
      01:06.3 Unknown mass storage controller: Texas Instruments PCI7420 Flash Media Controller
      01:0d.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB22/A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
      01:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM5705M 10/100/1000Base T (rev 02)

      everything works so far, even the dvd+rw (which was claimed not to be supported in a previous article) and wireless. USB and FireWire was a no brainer, as well as sound and video.

      Only trouble is the SD drive and the modem. The current (binary) lt_modem driver does not support this AC'97 codec.
      There is a workaround however where alsa is used to create the modem sounds. I have not tried this yet.

    3. Re:HP compax NX5000 and wireless by sopuli · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. As of 2.6.9-rc1 MMC is in the kernel. Of course a lot of controller chips are not yet supported, nor does it support SD-cards. Regarding the modem, you could give slmodem in alsa mode a try.

  99. low expectations by kenlars99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps a quote from Chris Rock is in order:

    Niggers always want credit for some shit they're supposed to do. They'll brag about stuff a normal man just does. They'll say something like, "Yeah, well I take care of my kids." You're supposed to, you dumb motherfucker. "I ain't never been to jail." Whaddya want? A cookie? You're not supposed to go to jail, you low-expectation-having motherfucker!

  100. wake me up when... by zapadoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    dell ships their first laptop with FreeBSD and Gnome preinstalled.

  101. I highly doubt they will... by glass_window · · Score: 1

    1) they give you a run-around trying to find it. They actually list quite a few laptops that run with linux but they don't currently sell any of them, and the one that is reviewed in the msnbc article isn't on the list (yet?).
    2) Unless you're looking through business computers, you don't even see the linux option.
    3) It costs $1200 and only has 1.2 ghz **Celeron**. Come on, who are they kidding?
    4) They don't even give you the option for the OS if you select "Configure and Buy" (the only way to purchase it online), they lock you in to XP. What a bunch of bogus crap. You probably have to call if you actually want it.

    Until the day comes when you can go into any big name brand computer sales website and choose your version of Linux OR Windows, you don't have to worry about just anybody buying this HP "Linux" laptop. Too much hassel. That's probably why you don't see M$ complaining.

  102. Wireless?? by Frequanaut · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what tool is used on this to configure the wireless card?

    I'm pulling my hair out trying to get my wireless working with WEP between ifplugd and waproamd.

  103. Not on HP's site... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
    Decided to look at the pricing and specs, even though the list Suse Linux as an option all the pages say "HP Reccomends Windows XP Professional/Home Edition" and you can't get to a configurator with an OS selection to even see what the price difference would be. :-(

    I think MS marketing goons h^h^h^h^h er... partners got to HP not too long after the story broke.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  104. HP+SuSE != Apple+BSD by kbahey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The comparison is flawed.

    Apple does not provide "just" BSD. They have heavily customized (in fact forked) BSD and build that wonderful GUI, installation, configuration, ...etc. on top of it. Third party ISVs know that they have to deal with only a finite set of variables on the OS. Mac OS X is not available on any other hardware architecture than what Apple makes. They have a limited set of supported peripherals, ...etc. This gives the users much fewer surprises from incompatibilities and such.

    On the other hand, HP just makes the hardware. There are endless aftermarket peripherals available for it (granted much less than a desktop). They do not have their own fork of SuSE, nor any special GUI on top of it. Hence, one can get SuSE from anywhere, and run it on any hardware, and it would not be much different from HP's offering (apart from being pre-installed, usable by the masses, and perhaps certain features configured specifically for their hardware).

    Apple is playing at a different level than HP.

    Don't get me wrong: I love Linux and has been runnig it myself for years. But this comparison is Apples to HPs.

  105. HP Notebook - seems ok to me... but by Vskye · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about getting a laptop for a few months now. Doing some research and such, and I *really* DO NOT want to *uck around getting linux installed where everything is working correctly. (almost impossible on most laptops these days) I just shot over to HP's site and my configuration would run $2020.00. I'm also not a big SuSE fan, prefering Debian.

    Note to all the bashers here, I admin various Linux servers all the time, and have a few at home, so bite me. My idea of a laptop is to kick back upstairs or down in the computer room without any wires, watch a movie, burn a dvd/cdr, listen to tunes and browser the internet, without all the configuration bs.

    So I've actually been looking into a Mac, pretty much everything I need, plus the kids and wife will be able to use it easier than the two linux boxes running debian and windowmaker. That along with the fact that the only version of Windows I have here is 98 SE, which doesn't work with a Ipod, which the kids (ok... me to) would like, and I'll be damned before I give Bill any money for XP.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  106. Sometimes MSNBC impresses me. by stealth.c · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You would think that they would be a Microsoft shill given the fact that it's *MS*NBC, but most of the time I hear the exact opposite kind of talk out of them. They seem to be frank about MS product flaws, and willing to praise praiseworthy competitors.

    Do they just happen to NOT have their heads up their asses, or is there a more cynical explanation?

  107. FHS vs. L-F-H? by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    Then, you'll just LOVE Linux : you see, the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard specifies very clearly where files go on a Linux distribution

    What about the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy as documented at tldp.org?

    Have we got dueling standards going on here?

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  108. Subtle FUD: Linux don't to non standard thingy. by twitter · · Score: 1
    His general theme is, "there's all this great stuff that free software can't do, but this HP thingy almost gets it if you can put up with this shit list:" The two big FUDs are software installation and WiFi. He also takes a swipe at Linux and free softare in general with "For the record, Linux doesn?t support Intel?s wireless chip. H-P?s WiFi modules work just fine." and that might be the worst of all. What he fails to mention or even think is that all that nasty non-standard junk won't work well on Winblows either without much software installation that can't happen with the next version. The fault, of course, lies with the the members of various consortiums that will litigate to hell anyone who makes software that works with their hardware.

    The software installation FUD is one I've seen before. The Microsoft perspective is that people will have to buy programs to do things and make them work. They spin this endless headache as a convenience by pointing to the thousands of dinky boxed programs that litter computer stores and saying, "Look at all of this." Free software that does the same thing and installs from your chosen distribution is almost always superior and takes much less effort. Talk about permissions and locations is a throwback to proprietary Unix, and non free software like movie players which are just as big a pain in Winblows.

    His swipe at wifi, by mentioning that free software has problems with WEP and other nasty add-ons to 802.11, is in the same vein. Tell me WEP does anything useful for you and I'll laugh. Of course free software does not work with that garbage. Needing to remember "locations" for "logging on" to various wifi locations is an aggravation not an advantage to winblows.

    The worst thing the author is doing here is leading people into non free addons to Linux. The user is much better off with all free drivers and software. Recommending non free junk is very clever because it invites people to point out downsides that sound much like the Winblows nighmare.

    The user is better off with Linux than Winblows on this thousand dollar laptop. Me? I'll stick to the $175 P2 thinkpad and Debian I picked up last month. The few joys I miss from not being able to play DVDs and the slight trouble of setting up sound is more than made up for by the low price of the hardware, the better use of that hardware to get what I actually want done and the much lower headache factor I'll face from not getting 0wned.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  109. So do you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can stop baching MSNBC every time they run a storey that can in some way be construed as negative towards FOSS?

    This "Believe every word when they say good and trash them when they say bad" dichodomy is getting insanely tiring.

  110. DVD's on linux-No need for proprietary software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use mplayer or xine+libdecss to play encripted dvds under Suse 9.0/9.1. They are both OK; myself I prefer xine. Kafeine uses libxine,if libdecss is installed, it also plays encripted dvds. A fourth choice is ogle. You DONT NEED proprietary software!

    You can download the source code of libdecss from many places, for example from www.videolan.org. Compile it and you are all set! Under linux you can play any dvds, it does not matter if they are for Region 1, 2, 3,4,5 they just work!

  111. DVD's? WTF? by westyvw · · Score: 1

    From the article: " I'd like to especially commend Hewlett-Packard for including LinDVD playback software with this machine. It, too, works right out of the box. When I install Linux on my personal laptops I usually have to buy software to watch a movie."

    Ok i thought he was going to say, isnt this a good thing for linux, and a necesity for the seller to include a "legal" way of playing dvds.

    But then he says he has to buy software with other linux distros. WTF?

    Does this guy really use linux???
    Apt-get install libcss.

  112. Are the guys at HP schizophrenic? by Shrinky999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am sooooo pissed after reading that HP has such a huge success with it's Linux Laptop.

    That's not because I'm a Windows nut or I don't like HP or stuff, it's because I own a HP Laptop (pavilion ze4360) that is simply not usable under Linux! And I'm not talking about any "nice to have" features like suspend-to-disk or whatever, but about 20min uptime when running on battery.

    They apparently f*cked up the ACPI implementation in the BIOS really bad, so under Linux speedstepping is unsupported. No matter what I did and tried, I had a Laptop that was running at a constant ~1800MHz. Of course I can't expect any help from HP support since the guys answering my inquiries don't quite understand the problem ("But if you use that and that setting in Windows XP your battery _does_ last longer").

    How come HP produces a wonderful Linux Laptop and at the same time makes another one completely unusable for people who want to run Linux?

    1. Re:Are the guys at HP schizophrenic? by jswalter9 · · Score: 1

      My guess would be that they're responding to your need, realizing that their current models are too Wincompatible.

      --
      Retired from software... maybe. Sort of.
  113. Putting what it is after the name by edittard · · Score: 1, Funny
    "When small companies announce they're putting Linux OS"

    Do people write Windows OS, Excel SS, Netscape WB, perl PL, Apache WS, slashdot BS?

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  114. You utterly missed the point (Feh, Insightful) by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The point of the whole article was in presenting one laptop where all the tricky configuration details, e.g. making the hibernate function work, have been taken care of by the manufacturer.


    The post you responded to mentioned another laptop where one has to manually configure the hibernate function. The post was informative, because it described in detail how to do it. Now, pay attention, here's the one point which you utterly missed:


    This is what makes Open Source Software so great


    If the hibernate or any other function isn't working correctly in a commercial, closed source, software computer, what do you do? (1) hire a consultant, (2) call 1-800-EAT-SHIT, (3) sit down in a corner and cry? With FOSS, you get other alternatives: (1) Google the error, (2) ask the right on-line forum, (3) read Slashdot. I saved the text of the post you commented to, in my tips.txt file, because even if I don't have a need to configure a hibernate function right now, that's a very informative post. I might need to use exactly those steps or some variation of them in the future.


    However, contrary to what FOSS detractor FUD preaches, normal users do not need to perform all those tricky little steps for every small configuration detail. The article itself had some subtle misinformation, giving the impression that there isn't any good package installation system in Linux.


    The truth is, installing and configuring most software in Linux is simpler and easier than in MS-Windows these days. Using synaptic to install a package or even typing "apt-get install something" in the console is much easier than navigating through a maze of windows, clicking on all those buttons, accepting license agreements, filling in all your life's details in the on-line registration form, etc, etc... Then in the end, where the fsck did the files go? Are they under C:\Program Files, or in C:\My Documents? Or maybe in C:\Windows\System? And, God forbid you having any non-English character in your file names, because then you have to configure the right Code Page! And don't forget to update your anti-virus, because your newly installed software requires the latest anti-virus system to work reliably.


    A positive example of good moderation in Slashdot, I was just browsing the story and found that post, correctly modded to +5, Informative.

    1. Re:You utterly missed the point (Feh, Insightful) by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      While I agree that installing software on a good distro is just a matter of typing one command (portage in my case) I think some other aspects aren't as nice as in windows. With windows, almost all the time the program will install the files in "C:\Program Files". With linux, it's a guess half the time. /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin/...this could go on forever. Although with portage, I never have to worry about where the files go. I can install and uninstall without having to worry about much.

  115. Don't be cheap! Be Free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, where's the big money savings by going to linux?

    Free Software (eg. GNU) has nothing to do with price. The big freedom using Linux is that you can get all the sourcecode to the OS, all the applications and drivers and fix what doesn't work yourself, or extend it to your hearts content. Then you can release it to the world, and make everybody else's Linux-experience a little better.

    Oooh, the fuzzies are what makes Linux worth it! :-)

    The argument that Windows applications are expensive is BS. You can most software for free (as in beer), but you're stuck with the bugs and features. Linux gives you more Freedom, for the Source is open.

    Btw, that $50 XP license is an OEM-license, which restricts it to only that hardware..

  116. But... by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    ... where do I buy the nx5000/Linux combination in Europe??? Not even their own website contains such a deal!

  117. Microsoft licensing codecs for Linux use.... by juhaz · · Score: 1

    ... will happen when pigs fly.

    Apple might be more open for someone bringing up the idea, though, and Fraunhofer is probably happy to license to anyone.

  118. I'm going to remove Linux from that laptop... by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    ...and install Windows on it. That'll show em! :)