I think Nokia is barely breaking even in a booming market, they're not quite ready for bankruptcy court even if they're becoming a more and more marginal player. But at this point, yeah I'd vote for Microsoft because what alternative is there at this point? None at all.
To toss in an anecdotal example, every single time I go to Italy I pay extra money to our hotel for the "privilege" (offered for free in even the scummiest American hotels) of having air conditioning. Every single time I leave the room for more than five minutes they let themselves in and turn the woefully undersized A/C unit off, thus ensuring it's 90+ degrees with nearly as much humidity upon my return. You'd never see an American hospitality establishment messing with the climate controls in a rented room, particularly in so obnoxious a fashion.
For what it's worth, I think every hotel I've been to where you insert the hotel card to get lights also has had the AC on a timer when you take it out, it's not like they have the staff running around locking themselves in your room to shut it off. Or if they do that's really odd. It's very common all over Europe, but I've also experienced the same in Asia and South America though most of them have a decently sized AC unit so it doesn't take forever to get comfy again. I can't really remember if I've ever been to a hotel where the AC has been always on, I've been to the US once but it was so long ago I don't remember.
Are they expecting us to all go back and live in caves?
Not caves but... well, most environmentalists don't want to raise the average to modern standards. Looking at the current estimates the average CO2 emissions in tons/capita is: World: 4.9 (2011) EU: 8.6 (2011) US:16.4 (2012)
So if everyone were to pollute as much as the US our total emissions would over triple. People like to blame China but they're "only" up to 7.1 tons/capita, they're lower than the EU they just happen to be a billion people plus. And there's huge countries like India with 1.6 tons/capita that aren't going to stay down there just to get everyone else off the hook. Of course they want the same standard of living as the rest of us. So it is this vast inequality while the environmentalists feel the current 4.9 ton/capita is already far too high. They don't want just the US down, they want China down, the EU down, hell probably India down because the world can't take it.
And you know what? The world won't take it, nobody and I mean absolutely nobody wants to back down to 4.9 tons/capita voluntarily. The EU would have to find ways to cut emissions by 43%, the US by 70%, even China would have to cut 30%. Even if we admit that there's a lot of excess consumption as well, there's a whole lot to modern living that I don't consider luxuries and that do consume power. People lived before refrigerators, freezers, washing machines, dishwashers, microwaves, TVs and computers too but I don't plan on being one of them. And cars and bikes, maybe they'll go electric or whatever but we're never giving up that freedom of personal transportation. Bicycles aren't a full substitute.
Honestly, I don't know what the f*ck Americans are doing to have almost twice as much emissions as here in Europe. But the reason you should get down to EU levels is because otherwise China is just going to point to the US and say why aren't you dealing with the bad boy in class and instead picking on us? That way maybe we could all meet somewhere under 10 tons/capita and agree that's a reasonable maximum for a modern country. Even with the world at EU levels it'd still be a 75% increase from today, but I'm more worried that if nothing happens China decides to become 1.35 billion Americans and if the whole world follows it'll be a 235% increase instead. Because if you can, so can we.
The final estimates is that it was a magnitude 9.0 earthquake, it's on the top 5 list of recorded earthquakes and the others were in Chile, Alaska, Sumatra and Kamchatka, Russia. It tops the list of property damage by earthquake by a factor of two. If this had been a "normal" 8.0 earthquake (which is an amplitude 10 times smaller and 31 times less energy) we almost certainly wouldn't be having this discussion. It's like the engineers of the WTC towers, they had simulated a small aircraft flying into the towers but not a 747. Yes, in perfect retrospect of course it was too little but I think you're being more than a little unfair.
(yes, I have jumped through hoops, but that's not the point - here someone else has jumped through those hoops for you). (...) And we can already do *that* anywhere we like.
Actually that's exactly what you can't do with a laptop, maybe this bit and that bit works great with Linux while others don't work well or at all. Been there, tried that and it had nothing to do with price or quality but simply that some companies cared to support Linux and other's didn't. Same with accessories, one printer worked brilliantly while an almost similar competitor was a paperweight but at least those you can research. And if it doesn't quite work well you've got nobody to blame but yourself, they didn't sell it with Linux and never claimed it would work.
If you value your time then the fact that they have "jumped through those hoops" for you has value. That you have a company you can actually go back to and say "You sold me a Linux laptop but such and such isn't working!" has value. They're a big OEM, that puts pressure on the manufacturers to have Linux drivers. Perhaps during their testing and validation they've found bugs that have been fixed for this exact reason. Trust me, they do care a bit more if Dell says they'd like to sell a model but their drivers are buggy than if Joe Nobody says it doesn't work for him. But please use the Ubuntu install CD and take your chances on some random hardware, as somebody must figure out how to jump those hoops.
It's from a major OEM, it runs Linux which hopefully means it has Linux-friendly hardware and good Linux drivers. That's enough to be newsworthy on slashdot, which still hopes Linux will overtake the market share of such gems as Windows Vista and Windows 8;)
The last few will probably be stubborn; but today's technology has decimated agricultural-sector employment throughout the developed world already.
The last few won't be stubborn, they'll die. I don't know how many stories I heard about how their dad or granddad was or is running the farm, but nobody wants to take over. Alternatively, that the kids are keeping the farm running until the old man dies but no longer. If you have younger people running farms then it's typically big and automated or they're aiming for a gourmet niche with self made products. They just had a documentary with two such people, both 70 years old that have worked on their small farm for 50 years. All they know and all they want to know, but there won't be a generation to follow.
I think it's more that the evolutionary pressure is not currently present, so what you're seeing is a genetic holdover from past generations. Imagine you're witnessing the evolution of the giraffe, in years of drought the tallest survive as they can reach leaves higher up on trees than others. What do you see in rainy years when there's plenty food lower down, do you expect giraffes to keep getting taller? Why not, because even though it may seem pointless and irrational in this generation maybe in three generations there'll be an extreme drought that only the tallest survive and the genes that selected for it, despite the lack of advantage and need will come out as winners in the end. In the same way this bacteria selects for greater variability because history has given it reason to and it'll keep selecting for it until there's a stronger selection pressure to the contrary.
Quoting Bob Marley, economy is the bloodline of any society. It's where the buck stops. I hope that our "patriotic"(nationalist) Orwellian ways can play a second fiddle to our economy. If not, we are paving our path to our own demise.
As long as it doesn't backfire in the public opinion, a lot of Americans might be sympathetic to exposing the extensive spying on others but when it starts hurting their own wallet is that anger going to be directed at Snowden or the NSA? I mean in the whole "Snowden - hero or traitor?" debate tanking the US economy is probably not a plus. Personally I think you'll get a lot of first-order reaction and the second-order reaction "But should we really have been spying in the first place?" will be much weaker, the reason the saying is "don't kill the messenger" is that people do have a tendency to want to kill the messenger. Doesn't matter how dirty the laundry you're airing is or how many skeletons were in your closest, it's the one who brings it out in the open who has to pay the price.
Well, nobody knows how much of a choice they have in the matter. If the NSA come rolling in with a National Security Letter, comply and keep quiet it's rather hard to refuse. It's not like they'd just make a corporate fine for leaking it, they'd be going after individuals to put them in prison. Are you ready to do a Snowden and screw your whole life for the sake of not complying with a government order of questionable constitutionality? If the government wants to put you over a barrel, they can.
maybe its time we consider going back to software (oss) based networking gear. it will be much slower than hardware based ones but we can't verify hardware designs like we can software ones.
That software has to run on hardware and if you can't trust the hardware you are screwed anyway, it's like trusting your software (oss) encryption when there's a hardware keylogger installed. Send the right magic numbers and the hardware could start doing anything it wants like mirroring traffic, dumping memory, whatever the attacker needs to completely compromise the box. The only advantage would be that it could run on more generic hardware that you hopefully could buy from a more trusted supplier.
Assuming they want slaves and they don't want to kill you just for being of the wrong religion, race or other deviancy. Particularly if they're that good at robotics, they might not want much slave labor. I think it would be rather hard to make slaves productive in a modern society yet repressed enough not to pose a threat to their masters. Then again, the robots could be used to control them with an iron fist. Still, the risks and costs might not outweigh the gains.
Except for this nagging problem that DNS, and DNSsec, is still hierarchical and thus we still have single points of extortion, with as ultimate root... the US government.
The DNS system by nature has a single root, the trust chain doesn't necessarily have that. You could for example require that all TLDs be signed with the keys of the five permanent members of the UN security council and require all of them to be present. So Canada would own the keys to the ".ca" domain and they would be signed by the US, Russia, China, UK and France. Canada gets to do whatever they want under their domain and nobody can spoof them unless they a) steal Canada's private keys or b) steal all the other five private keys. Of course the tin foil hat brigade don't trust any authority and that's fine, you can always check the fingerprint. But I don't see how it hurts your security to have the ".com" server certifying that you own "yourdomain.com" versus a totally self-signed certificate with yourself as CA. At worst it's no trust vs no trust.
As for being "blackmailed", well if they're being nasty they're already holding all your traffic hostage (except direct IP access). The base certificate "owner of yourdomain.com" should be free with the DNS service, if you want something to actually certify who you are that's different. Really it's nothing more than the service they're doing already with DNS and DNSSEC, making sure that they're pointing you to the right server.
Hell, when I think about it, using P = 0.05 goes back to my Dad's time, when he was using a slide rule while designing engine parts for the SR-71 Blackbird. That was back in the 1950s and '60s. We should have come a long way since then. But have we?
They do sure sound like great ways to drown yourself in work. 1. Blazing trails - great, but my impression is whoever starts the ball rolling is stuck with them, often to the determent of your "real" job, unless you've got your nose so far up your bosses ass you want to "work extra days necessary to install new office software". That's a direct quote. 2. Knowing who knows - that is a valid point, but there's a difference between that and small talk and unless it's really to the point those other people have other jobs of their own. But hey, managers love people find answers in their spare time. 3. Proactive self-management, seriously she took vacation time and went to a conference for her own money? Then continued to work on it on her own time? Get a life. 4. Getting the big picture - again the example is that every night - I assume that means after hours - she'd study her notebook looking for ways to improve. 5. The right kind of followership - be the boss's No 2. That's great on Star Trek but it's also a job of its own, you want to be the sparring partner to his job as well as your own? 6. Teamwork as joint ownership of a project - in short take the team leader or mediator or coordinator role even when it's not really yours, probably a great way to get ahead but again one more job in addition to your own. 7. Small-l leadership - now you're also your coworker's coach and personal development counselor. Don't forget to share the late night pizzas, even when it's not really you having the late night. 8. Street smarts - or I'd say corporate politics, why not since we're already piling it up. 9. Show and tell - why not add some presentation, salesman and PR skills to the picture. And of course you don't spend any time at all trying to wrap your work up, as opposed to getting it done.
I've met a few people like that, they're working around the clock because in addition to the job they're really supposed to be doing, they have two or three other jobs that didn't really go in their job description. Personally I'm very much a fan of "management by opportunity cost", if you want me to do an hour more of something it means that hour must be coming out of something else. And for me taking it out of my leisure time is out of the question, so it means taking it out of other work time. I can do initiatives, find answers, find new opportunities, learn new skills, spar with my boss, direct a team, take charge, manage politics or sell solutions but they're all coming out of the time that involves actually developing the software. And if the boss thinks that's a good use of my work time that's fine, but usually there's more than enough development work that needs doing.
Honestly I'd much rather be the somewhat shielded guru that have others running interference so I don't have to deal with pointless meetings or chasing requirements or corporate politics because if you just clear me a path I'll run bloody fast, avoid all the pitfalls and score the touchdown. It's not the only job on the team, but it's an important one. Once two seniors quit with a month's difference while a third knocked his head good and was on sick leave for many months, I was doing all the heavy lifting while two juniors and a senior project manager was doing everything they could to ease the load. And training them, but honestly it was more pedal to the metal and try to keep up with me because I didn't have time to be pedagogical or work on training cases instead of large complex customers. But it worked quite well and I got a lot of credit for that.
APUs won't be able to do 4K for a loooong time for anything but video.
..if a "looooong time" means as soon as AMD and Intel support DDR4, which is in 2014... sure.
I think by "anything but video" he was referring to gaming, even the 780 Ti and R9 290X struggle with 4K. What do you think DDR4 would change? As far as I know they already support the 4K resolution but it'll play like a slide show.
The Wordpress blog's conclusions at least, in reality the last problem is the same as the first problem. We use so much energy and resources because we can afford to, if "the rest of the world" had money to compete for those resources we'd have to cut back. And despite what the Greens feel like we do recycle and care about emissions and pollution but we also like our cars and huge houses and big screen TVs and air condition and holidays in exotic places. We're not going to stop until we can't afford to, anyone who thinks the first world is going to voluntarily live like the third world is seriously deluded. Next month I'm going on a long vacation flight and I really want this vacation, I can afford it and no amount of eco-babble is going to make me sorry for the CO2 burn.
Like they're pointing out, people are getting literate. People are getting educated. People are getting better health. People spend less time child-bearing. The rest of the world is trying very hard to take over the first world work and bring down the wage equality between them and us. And of course we hate it, you can see people frothing at the mouth if I mention outsourcing here. But I totally understand the employees who of course would like to undercut a westerner and make a lower, but locally still a very good salary. With the world becoming far more connected you are going to get a lot less screwed just for being born in a third world country and you are going to get much less of a free ride for being born in a first world country. The differences are still huge of course, but there's poor and there's illiterate, seven kids, bad health poor.
Or maybe it's people who've gotten sick of downloading 5 gigs worth of an e-book collection for a single book that's about 6 dollars on Amazon.
Actually I think it's the complete opposite, it's the knowledge that yes I'll easily find a torrent that has it and yes the speed will be good, so there's very little reason to hoard it just to have it available or to avoid downloading it again. With the war on piracy it seemed for a while like the good times would come to an end, napster shut down, grokster shut down, winmx shut down, suprnova shut down, grab it now while it's easy because tomorrow it might be harder. With the TPB raid and trial I'd say that was the case no more than five years ago. That and slow speeds, if you want it now then in an hour is very different from in two days. I realized it must be an insanely good movie or series for me to watch it more than twice, if you know all the dialog, the plot twists, the gags I mean some are classics I still zone out way too fast.
I had two friends so around 2001 who tried explaining it to me as they were on a ridiculously fast 100 Mbps campus connection while I had barly gotten DSL - I think less than a megabit. At that time it was rather inconcievable to me how they had no need to hoard because they could just grab whatever they wanted, any time. Today I'm almost there (90Mbit) and I totally get it. I used to have a big maxitower with disks, now I'm down to a half-full miditower and if I really wanted to I could easily live on one SSD and one big HDD. Good series, great series, am I really going to go back and watch season one again? Naaaaaah probably not... ok, delete and if I change my mind later that's no problem.
No way will this work. Bandwidth caps as they are today will prevent people from downloading 4k video.
They said the same thing about YouTube and Netflix, but when the mainstream starts using a service the caps tend to adjust. Granted I'm not in the US but in Norway however YoY bandwidth growth here is 25% and with H.265 promising the same quality at half the bandwidth the transition from 1080p to 4K is about three years of technological advance. Personally I suspect the bandwidth will arrive far ahead of TVs and content to watch, there's a massive fiber deployment and speeds are constantly upgraded as it seems most of the cost is in operating the line, not in bandwidth charges. Like my current provider, you can get a 10 Mbps line or a 90 Mbps line for 1/3rd more. I guess it's also because mostly it means my burst speeds are higher, really I already download all I want to download I only do it faster but averaged out I don't use significantly more.
People are creatures of habit, if you go to the book store and they serve your book needs why screw with what works? Just knowing that there's alternatives out there isn't usually enough to push people over the edge, but if you go to the book store and they're pushing the Kindle and eBooks maybe you figure it's time to follow the crowd. If you go to the whip & buggy store you expect them to try selling you just that, if they instead try to sell you a car on commission because that's where the market is going they're only spelling their own doom. Either you milk the market as long as it lasts or you sell your own car, but unless you're getting very well paid I don't see assisted suicide as being profit-maximizing.
While we're talking about apples-to-oranges comparisons, I don't care much about "trivial" fires that don't cause any personal harm. They're rare enough to be an annoyance for the insurance company to deal with, but not a big deal for the overall cost. For example it's much more expensive to have a small crash with a modern car that has huge, soft crumple zones than an old rigid car as much less gets bent out of place. But if you're in a solid crash you'd want to be in the modern car that diverges all that energy around you, not transferring it to your soft meatbag. I suppose it does sound bad if you're upside down in a ditch or the doors are jammed shut by the collision, but the rate of fire doesn't directly translate to the risk of being hurt by an engine fire.
I feel this is a rather underestimated aspect of deductive logic that all science is based on, nobody knows that the "laws" of nature that we know them are universally valid. Even if you're doing a high school experiment it is "new" science, maybe things are different today than they were yesterday. You don't expect them to be, but in theory they might be. Every step of the way from confirming gravity for atoms to gravity for galaxies is valuable, expanding the experimental proof of an apparently correct formula or discovery is the dull legwork of science. It's of course particularly interesting when you can extrapolate beyond what's tested before, but even interpolation has a value. You tend to assume that anything between two extremes that follow the same formula to also follow the same formula, but it is only assumption not proof.
It's a fun movie but you're not supposed to take it seriously, I don't get the people who do. It's like the people who hate on "Pacific Rim" and give it 1/10 stars because well it's essentially giants robots and monsters brawling it out in major cities with the most contrived mind meld technology and over-the-top characters you could possibly imagine. Except the whole premise is ridiculous, the monsters don't die from bullets and grenades and missiles and bombs (well except one, but spoiler) but they die from getting punched to death by a giant robot. How can you go to a movie like that and expect something else, it's like going to a horror movie and expecting deep drama. It's not going to happen and no, if you're seeing it in Starship Troopers you're imagining things.
Paint.NET also does layers and is free for both private and commercial use. Yes, you must be running Windows but for all of us that do it's a huge step up from MS Paint in functionality, GIMP in usability and Photoshop in simplicity. I've found it to cover pretty much all my needs, those thing I'd like to do that I've found hard to do haven't been any easier in GIMP.
Elop? Nokia was already in a nosedive when he started. If anything, he just guided them to a softer crash into a fluffy Microsoft pillow.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words so here. They had ten stable quarters with >6 billion in revenue and >500 million euro profit, the Windows Phone deal is announced and boom they go from a 750 million euro profit to a 200 million euro loss and their sales have been in free fall ever since. Yes they needed a revitalization in the smart phone market where Apple and Google were kicking their ass, but they had sales and profits to fix that. Until Elop issued his "burning platform" memo and announced an all-out switch to Microsoft, that is. If Microsoft hires him it's nothing but kickback for burning Nokia to the ground to promote Windows Phone.
Slashdot Mirror
I think Nokia is barely breaking even in a booming market, they're not quite ready for bankruptcy court even if they're becoming a more and more marginal player. But at this point, yeah I'd vote for Microsoft because what alternative is there at this point? None at all.
To toss in an anecdotal example, every single time I go to Italy I pay extra money to our hotel for the "privilege" (offered for free in even the scummiest American hotels) of having air conditioning. Every single time I leave the room for more than five minutes they let themselves in and turn the woefully undersized A/C unit off, thus ensuring it's 90+ degrees with nearly as much humidity upon my return. You'd never see an American hospitality establishment messing with the climate controls in a rented room, particularly in so obnoxious a fashion.
For what it's worth, I think every hotel I've been to where you insert the hotel card to get lights also has had the AC on a timer when you take it out, it's not like they have the staff running around locking themselves in your room to shut it off. Or if they do that's really odd. It's very common all over Europe, but I've also experienced the same in Asia and South America though most of them have a decently sized AC unit so it doesn't take forever to get comfy again. I can't really remember if I've ever been to a hotel where the AC has been always on, I've been to the US once but it was so long ago I don't remember.
Are they expecting us to all go back and live in caves?
Not caves but... well, most environmentalists don't want to raise the average to modern standards. Looking at the current estimates the average CO2 emissions in tons/capita is:
World: 4.9 (2011)
EU: 8.6 (2011)
US:16.4 (2012)
So if everyone were to pollute as much as the US our total emissions would over triple. People like to blame China but they're "only" up to 7.1 tons/capita, they're lower than the EU they just happen to be a billion people plus. And there's huge countries like India with 1.6 tons/capita that aren't going to stay down there just to get everyone else off the hook. Of course they want the same standard of living as the rest of us. So it is this vast inequality while the environmentalists feel the current 4.9 ton/capita is already far too high. They don't want just the US down, they want China down, the EU down, hell probably India down because the world can't take it.
And you know what? The world won't take it, nobody and I mean absolutely nobody wants to back down to 4.9 tons/capita voluntarily. The EU would have to find ways to cut emissions by 43%, the US by 70%, even China would have to cut 30%. Even if we admit that there's a lot of excess consumption as well, there's a whole lot to modern living that I don't consider luxuries and that do consume power. People lived before refrigerators, freezers, washing machines, dishwashers, microwaves, TVs and computers too but I don't plan on being one of them. And cars and bikes, maybe they'll go electric or whatever but we're never giving up that freedom of personal transportation. Bicycles aren't a full substitute.
Honestly, I don't know what the f*ck Americans are doing to have almost twice as much emissions as here in Europe. But the reason you should get down to EU levels is because otherwise China is just going to point to the US and say why aren't you dealing with the bad boy in class and instead picking on us? That way maybe we could all meet somewhere under 10 tons/capita and agree that's a reasonable maximum for a modern country. Even with the world at EU levels it'd still be a 75% increase from today, but I'm more worried that if nothing happens China decides to become 1.35 billion Americans and if the whole world follows it'll be a 235% increase instead. Because if you can, so can we.
The final estimates is that it was a magnitude 9.0 earthquake, it's on the top 5 list of recorded earthquakes and the others were in Chile, Alaska, Sumatra and Kamchatka, Russia. It tops the list of property damage by earthquake by a factor of two. If this had been a "normal" 8.0 earthquake (which is an amplitude 10 times smaller and 31 times less energy) we almost certainly wouldn't be having this discussion. It's like the engineers of the WTC towers, they had simulated a small aircraft flying into the towers but not a 747. Yes, in perfect retrospect of course it was too little but I think you're being more than a little unfair.
(yes, I have jumped through hoops, but that's not the point - here someone else has jumped through those hoops for you). (...) And we can already do *that* anywhere we like.
Actually that's exactly what you can't do with a laptop, maybe this bit and that bit works great with Linux while others don't work well or at all. Been there, tried that and it had nothing to do with price or quality but simply that some companies cared to support Linux and other's didn't. Same with accessories, one printer worked brilliantly while an almost similar competitor was a paperweight but at least those you can research. And if it doesn't quite work well you've got nobody to blame but yourself, they didn't sell it with Linux and never claimed it would work.
If you value your time then the fact that they have "jumped through those hoops" for you has value. That you have a company you can actually go back to and say "You sold me a Linux laptop but such and such isn't working!" has value. They're a big OEM, that puts pressure on the manufacturers to have Linux drivers. Perhaps during their testing and validation they've found bugs that have been fixed for this exact reason. Trust me, they do care a bit more if Dell says they'd like to sell a model but their drivers are buggy than if Joe Nobody says it doesn't work for him. But please use the Ubuntu install CD and take your chances on some random hardware, as somebody must figure out how to jump those hoops.
It's from a major OEM, it runs Linux which hopefully means it has Linux-friendly hardware and good Linux drivers. That's enough to be newsworthy on slashdot, which still hopes Linux will overtake the market share of such gems as Windows Vista and Windows 8 ;)
The last few will probably be stubborn; but today's technology has decimated agricultural-sector employment throughout the developed world already.
The last few won't be stubborn, they'll die. I don't know how many stories I heard about how their dad or granddad was or is running the farm, but nobody wants to take over. Alternatively, that the kids are keeping the farm running until the old man dies but no longer. If you have younger people running farms then it's typically big and automated or they're aiming for a gourmet niche with self made products. They just had a documentary with two such people, both 70 years old that have worked on their small farm for 50 years. All they know and all they want to know, but there won't be a generation to follow.
I think it's more that the evolutionary pressure is not currently present, so what you're seeing is a genetic holdover from past generations. Imagine you're witnessing the evolution of the giraffe, in years of drought the tallest survive as they can reach leaves higher up on trees than others. What do you see in rainy years when there's plenty food lower down, do you expect giraffes to keep getting taller? Why not, because even though it may seem pointless and irrational in this generation maybe in three generations there'll be an extreme drought that only the tallest survive and the genes that selected for it, despite the lack of advantage and need will come out as winners in the end. In the same way this bacteria selects for greater variability because history has given it reason to and it'll keep selecting for it until there's a stronger selection pressure to the contrary.
Quoting Bob Marley, economy is the bloodline of any society. It's where the buck stops. I hope that our "patriotic"(nationalist) Orwellian ways can play a second fiddle to our economy. If not, we are paving our path to our own demise.
As long as it doesn't backfire in the public opinion, a lot of Americans might be sympathetic to exposing the extensive spying on others but when it starts hurting their own wallet is that anger going to be directed at Snowden or the NSA? I mean in the whole "Snowden - hero or traitor?" debate tanking the US economy is probably not a plus. Personally I think you'll get a lot of first-order reaction and the second-order reaction "But should we really have been spying in the first place?" will be much weaker, the reason the saying is "don't kill the messenger" is that people do have a tendency to want to kill the messenger. Doesn't matter how dirty the laundry you're airing is or how many skeletons were in your closest, it's the one who brings it out in the open who has to pay the price.
Well, nobody knows how much of a choice they have in the matter. If the NSA come rolling in with a National Security Letter, comply and keep quiet it's rather hard to refuse. It's not like they'd just make a corporate fine for leaking it, they'd be going after individuals to put them in prison. Are you ready to do a Snowden and screw your whole life for the sake of not complying with a government order of questionable constitutionality? If the government wants to put you over a barrel, they can.
maybe its time we consider going back to software (oss) based networking gear. it will be much slower than hardware based ones but we can't verify hardware designs like we can software ones.
That software has to run on hardware and if you can't trust the hardware you are screwed anyway, it's like trusting your software (oss) encryption when there's a hardware keylogger installed. Send the right magic numbers and the hardware could start doing anything it wants like mirroring traffic, dumping memory, whatever the attacker needs to completely compromise the box. The only advantage would be that it could run on more generic hardware that you hopefully could buy from a more trusted supplier.
Assuming they want slaves and they don't want to kill you just for being of the wrong religion, race or other deviancy. Particularly if they're that good at robotics, they might not want much slave labor. I think it would be rather hard to make slaves productive in a modern society yet repressed enough not to pose a threat to their masters. Then again, the robots could be used to control them with an iron fist. Still, the risks and costs might not outweigh the gains.
Except for this nagging problem that DNS, and DNSsec, is still hierarchical and thus we still have single points of extortion, with as ultimate root... the US government.
The DNS system by nature has a single root, the trust chain doesn't necessarily have that. You could for example require that all TLDs be signed with the keys of the five permanent members of the UN security council and require all of them to be present. So Canada would own the keys to the ".ca" domain and they would be signed by the US, Russia, China, UK and France. Canada gets to do whatever they want under their domain and nobody can spoof them unless they a) steal Canada's private keys or b) steal all the other five private keys. Of course the tin foil hat brigade don't trust any authority and that's fine, you can always check the fingerprint. But I don't see how it hurts your security to have the ".com" server certifying that you own "yourdomain.com" versus a totally self-signed certificate with yourself as CA. At worst it's no trust vs no trust.
As for being "blackmailed", well if they're being nasty they're already holding all your traffic hostage (except direct IP access). The base certificate "owner of yourdomain.com" should be free with the DNS service, if you want something to actually certify who you are that's different. Really it's nothing more than the service they're doing already with DNS and DNSSEC, making sure that they're pointing you to the right server.
Hell, when I think about it, using P = 0.05 goes back to my Dad's time, when he was using a slide rule while designing engine parts for the SR-71 Blackbird. That was back in the 1950s and '60s. We should have come a long way since then. But have we?
In engineering? Yes. Science? Well...
They do sure sound like great ways to drown yourself in work.
1. Blazing trails - great, but my impression is whoever starts the ball rolling is stuck with them, often to the determent of your "real" job, unless you've got your nose so far up your bosses ass you want to "work extra days necessary to install new office software". That's a direct quote.
2. Knowing who knows - that is a valid point, but there's a difference between that and small talk and unless it's really to the point those other people have other jobs of their own. But hey, managers love people find answers in their spare time.
3. Proactive self-management, seriously she took vacation time and went to a conference for her own money? Then continued to work on it on her own time? Get a life.
4. Getting the big picture - again the example is that every night - I assume that means after hours - she'd study her notebook looking for ways to improve.
5. The right kind of followership - be the boss's No 2. That's great on Star Trek but it's also a job of its own, you want to be the sparring partner to his job as well as your own?
6. Teamwork as joint ownership of a project - in short take the team leader or mediator or coordinator role even when it's not really yours, probably a great way to get ahead but again one more job in addition to your own.
7. Small-l leadership - now you're also your coworker's coach and personal development counselor. Don't forget to share the late night pizzas, even when it's not really you having the late night.
8. Street smarts - or I'd say corporate politics, why not since we're already piling it up.
9. Show and tell - why not add some presentation, salesman and PR skills to the picture. And of course you don't spend any time at all trying to wrap your work up, as opposed to getting it done.
I've met a few people like that, they're working around the clock because in addition to the job they're really supposed to be doing, they have two or three other jobs that didn't really go in their job description. Personally I'm very much a fan of "management by opportunity cost", if you want me to do an hour more of something it means that hour must be coming out of something else. And for me taking it out of my leisure time is out of the question, so it means taking it out of other work time. I can do initiatives, find answers, find new opportunities, learn new skills, spar with my boss, direct a team, take charge, manage politics or sell solutions but they're all coming out of the time that involves actually developing the software. And if the boss thinks that's a good use of my work time that's fine, but usually there's more than enough development work that needs doing.
Honestly I'd much rather be the somewhat shielded guru that have others running interference so I don't have to deal with pointless meetings or chasing requirements or corporate politics because if you just clear me a path I'll run bloody fast, avoid all the pitfalls and score the touchdown. It's not the only job on the team, but it's an important one. Once two seniors quit with a month's difference while a third knocked his head good and was on sick leave for many months, I was doing all the heavy lifting while two juniors and a senior project manager was doing everything they could to ease the load. And training them, but honestly it was more pedal to the metal and try to keep up with me because I didn't have time to be pedagogical or work on training cases instead of large complex customers. But it worked quite well and I got a lot of credit for that.
APUs won't be able to do 4K for a loooong time for anything but video.
..if a "looooong time" means as soon as AMD and Intel support DDR4, which is in 2014... sure.
I think by "anything but video" he was referring to gaming, even the 780 Ti and R9 290X struggle with 4K. What do you think DDR4 would change? As far as I know they already support the 4K resolution but it'll play like a slide show.
The Wordpress blog's conclusions at least, in reality the last problem is the same as the first problem. We use so much energy and resources because we can afford to, if "the rest of the world" had money to compete for those resources we'd have to cut back. And despite what the Greens feel like we do recycle and care about emissions and pollution but we also like our cars and huge houses and big screen TVs and air condition and holidays in exotic places. We're not going to stop until we can't afford to, anyone who thinks the first world is going to voluntarily live like the third world is seriously deluded. Next month I'm going on a long vacation flight and I really want this vacation, I can afford it and no amount of eco-babble is going to make me sorry for the CO2 burn.
Like they're pointing out, people are getting literate. People are getting educated. People are getting better health. People spend less time child-bearing. The rest of the world is trying very hard to take over the first world work and bring down the wage equality between them and us. And of course we hate it, you can see people frothing at the mouth if I mention outsourcing here. But I totally understand the employees who of course would like to undercut a westerner and make a lower, but locally still a very good salary. With the world becoming far more connected you are going to get a lot less screwed just for being born in a third world country and you are going to get much less of a free ride for being born in a first world country. The differences are still huge of course, but there's poor and there's illiterate, seven kids, bad health poor.
Or maybe it's people who've gotten sick of downloading 5 gigs worth of an e-book collection for a single book that's about 6 dollars on Amazon.
Actually I think it's the complete opposite, it's the knowledge that yes I'll easily find a torrent that has it and yes the speed will be good, so there's very little reason to hoard it just to have it available or to avoid downloading it again. With the war on piracy it seemed for a while like the good times would come to an end, napster shut down, grokster shut down, winmx shut down, suprnova shut down, grab it now while it's easy because tomorrow it might be harder. With the TPB raid and trial I'd say that was the case no more than five years ago. That and slow speeds, if you want it now then in an hour is very different from in two days. I realized it must be an insanely good movie or series for me to watch it more than twice, if you know all the dialog, the plot twists, the gags I mean some are classics I still zone out way too fast.
I had two friends so around 2001 who tried explaining it to me as they were on a ridiculously fast 100 Mbps campus connection while I had barly gotten DSL - I think less than a megabit. At that time it was rather inconcievable to me how they had no need to hoard because they could just grab whatever they wanted, any time. Today I'm almost there (90Mbit) and I totally get it. I used to have a big maxitower with disks, now I'm down to a half-full miditower and if I really wanted to I could easily live on one SSD and one big HDD. Good series, great series, am I really going to go back and watch season one again? Naaaaaah probably not... ok, delete and if I change my mind later that's no problem.
No way will this work. Bandwidth caps as they are today will prevent people from downloading 4k video.
They said the same thing about YouTube and Netflix, but when the mainstream starts using a service the caps tend to adjust. Granted I'm not in the US but in Norway however YoY bandwidth growth here is 25% and with H.265 promising the same quality at half the bandwidth the transition from 1080p to 4K is about three years of technological advance. Personally I suspect the bandwidth will arrive far ahead of TVs and content to watch, there's a massive fiber deployment and speeds are constantly upgraded as it seems most of the cost is in operating the line, not in bandwidth charges. Like my current provider, you can get a 10 Mbps line or a 90 Mbps line for 1/3rd more. I guess it's also because mostly it means my burst speeds are higher, really I already download all I want to download I only do it faster but averaged out I don't use significantly more.
People are creatures of habit, if you go to the book store and they serve your book needs why screw with what works? Just knowing that there's alternatives out there isn't usually enough to push people over the edge, but if you go to the book store and they're pushing the Kindle and eBooks maybe you figure it's time to follow the crowd. If you go to the whip & buggy store you expect them to try selling you just that, if they instead try to sell you a car on commission because that's where the market is going they're only spelling their own doom. Either you milk the market as long as it lasts or you sell your own car, but unless you're getting very well paid I don't see assisted suicide as being profit-maximizing.
While we're talking about apples-to-oranges comparisons, I don't care much about "trivial" fires that don't cause any personal harm. They're rare enough to be an annoyance for the insurance company to deal with, but not a big deal for the overall cost. For example it's much more expensive to have a small crash with a modern car that has huge, soft crumple zones than an old rigid car as much less gets bent out of place. But if you're in a solid crash you'd want to be in the modern car that diverges all that energy around you, not transferring it to your soft meatbag. I suppose it does sound bad if you're upside down in a ditch or the doors are jammed shut by the collision, but the rate of fire doesn't directly translate to the risk of being hurt by an engine fire.
I feel this is a rather underestimated aspect of deductive logic that all science is based on, nobody knows that the "laws" of nature that we know them are universally valid. Even if you're doing a high school experiment it is "new" science, maybe things are different today than they were yesterday. You don't expect them to be, but in theory they might be. Every step of the way from confirming gravity for atoms to gravity for galaxies is valuable, expanding the experimental proof of an apparently correct formula or discovery is the dull legwork of science. It's of course particularly interesting when you can extrapolate beyond what's tested before, but even interpolation has a value. You tend to assume that anything between two extremes that follow the same formula to also follow the same formula, but it is only assumption not proof.
It's a fun movie but you're not supposed to take it seriously, I don't get the people who do. It's like the people who hate on "Pacific Rim" and give it 1/10 stars because well it's essentially giants robots and monsters brawling it out in major cities with the most contrived mind meld technology and over-the-top characters you could possibly imagine. Except the whole premise is ridiculous, the monsters don't die from bullets and grenades and missiles and bombs (well except one, but spoiler) but they die from getting punched to death by a giant robot. How can you go to a movie like that and expect something else, it's like going to a horror movie and expecting deep drama. It's not going to happen and no, if you're seeing it in Starship Troopers you're imagining things.
Paint.NET also does layers and is free for both private and commercial use. Yes, you must be running Windows but for all of us that do it's a huge step up from MS Paint in functionality, GIMP in usability and Photoshop in simplicity. I've found it to cover pretty much all my needs, those thing I'd like to do that I've found hard to do haven't been any easier in GIMP.
Elop? Nokia was already in a nosedive when he started. If anything, he just guided them to a softer crash into a fluffy Microsoft pillow.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words so here. They had ten stable quarters with >6 billion in revenue and >500 million euro profit, the Windows Phone deal is announced and boom they go from a 750 million euro profit to a 200 million euro loss and their sales have been in free fall ever since. Yes they needed a revitalization in the smart phone market where Apple and Google were kicking their ass, but they had sales and profits to fix that. Until Elop issued his "burning platform" memo and announced an all-out switch to Microsoft, that is. If Microsoft hires him it's nothing but kickback for burning Nokia to the ground to promote Windows Phone.