Enron wanted to be bailed out, but they weren't. Enron wanted the Kyoto Protocol signed (they've been investing in Kyoto Protocol positive projects), but it wasn't. I hate it when people are this ignorant.
"Jacobson, in a presentation to the American Geophysical Union, said soot produced by burning diesel fuels, coal and wood had a much more severe impact on the environment relative to its mass than do greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane."
This was it. Everything would have been fine and dandy, until the submitter said, "and it's not even in the US!". There are many practical reasons why each region of the world needs its own high-speed research network. No regional defensiveness would have been felt if the person who submitted this hadn't started it.
One fewer murder was committed in Florida a few years back because of the punishment if caught. I know this because I was the person who meditated on it, and decided not to go through with it.
The whole thing with America was gold. If gold hadn't been found, it would have gone the way of the Vikings landing. Only once Spain had a definite presence did other countries become interested.
No one started an arms race in space. It was inevitable once the first satellite was launched, and military tacticians of all countries started thinking about that.
Agreed. I wish there was an option that would allow the user to: 1)not display; 2)downgrade; 3)only display or; 4)segregate in separate thread-domains posts based on what they were modded as.
Re:Includes a built-in camera?
on
New Nokia Phone
·
· Score: 1
*Accidentally* leave your cell phone at the office. Call your wife from a pay phone, or someone else's phone (choose these people wisely or at random, esp. if your wife has caller id)
The added bonus to this is that you gain an extra excuse of "going back" to the office to pick your phone up.
There is a middle ground. Whether we're following the right path on that middle ground is up for debate. I consistently test as a politcal Centrist, so I feel insulted when people form a straw man argument out of my statement.
The best solution in the software industry is more openness *to those who are interested in improving/learning from the source*. I sincerely doubt that many black hats add anything of value back to a project. (This analogy that we're on doesn't correlate well enough with what the gov is doing).
Because it takes time to do this. Making this sort of information somewhat harder to get at by loners, small groups, and some of the larger groups, might give us the extra day we need.
It is stupid to respond to specifics, when those specifics were only meant to gistify something. Respond to the idea, not just the straw men. Just because the person you're arguing against isn't brilliant, doesn't mean his general position isn't right.
Because it still exists in some government stockpile somewhere. Probably where some people know it exists. How is destroying *copies* of a report destroying the report?
Excuse me. I happen to personally know many current and former members of the US armed forces who would be the first to revolt if any of our governmental leaders tried to illegally maintain their power.
Slashdot Mirror
Enron wanted to be bailed out, but they weren't. Enron wanted the Kyoto Protocol signed (they've been investing in Kyoto Protocol positive projects), but it wasn't. I hate it when people are this ignorant.
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid /13691/story.htm
"Jacobson, in a presentation to the American Geophysical Union, said soot produced by burning diesel fuels, coal and wood had a much more severe impact on the environment relative to its mass than do greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane."
This was it. Everything would have been fine and dandy, until the submitter said, "and it's not even in the US!". There are many practical reasons why each region of the world needs its own high-speed research network. No regional defensiveness would have been felt if the person who submitted this hadn't started it.
One fewer murder was committed in Florida a few years back because of the punishment if caught. I know this because I was the person who meditated on it, and decided not to go through with it.
Once they have a "snowboard" version, I'll consider it.
The whole thing with America was gold. If gold hadn't been found, it would have gone the way of the Vikings landing. Only once Spain had a definite presence did other countries become interested.
No one started an arms race in space. It was inevitable once the first satellite was launched, and military tacticians of all countries started thinking about that.
Only ~70%?
Agreed. I wish there was an option that would allow the user to: 1)not display; 2)downgrade; 3)only display or; 4)segregate in separate thread-domains posts based on what they were modded as.
Don't you mean 'politico'?
*Accidentally* leave your cell phone at the office. Call your wife from a pay phone, or someone else's phone (choose these people wisely or at random, esp. if your wife has caller id)
The added bonus to this is that you gain an extra excuse of "going back" to the office to pick your phone up.
There is a middle ground. Whether we're following the right path on that middle ground is up for debate. I consistently test as a politcal Centrist, so I feel insulted when people form a straw man argument out of my statement.
The best solution in the software industry is more openness *to those who are interested in improving/learning from the source*. I sincerely doubt that many black hats add anything of value back to a project. (This analogy that we're on doesn't correlate well enough with what the gov is doing).
So's the road to heaven. Your point?
Most people travel the middle road.
:)
Another point. Some of the populace, I'm not sure how many, but it could be alot, might feel more safe with their freedoms abridged.
The Anthrax terror seems to be blamed on a home-grown terrorist (I'm not saying said terrorist isn't an Arab or Muslim).
Maybe the other computer/planet was built by squirrels.
Your last sentence reminds me of the Goonies.
Because it takes time to do this. Making this sort of information somewhat harder to get at by loners, small groups, and some of the larger groups, might give us the extra day we need.
But because of this, *future* information might never be made no-id-needed publicly available.
No. The effect isn't necessarily the same. The short-term, outward effect may be, but that doesn't mean the long term affect will be.
Intentions DO matter, because they directly affect what other decisions will be made in the future.
It is stupid to respond to specifics, when those specifics were only meant to gistify something. Respond to the idea, not just the straw men. Just because the person you're arguing against isn't brilliant, doesn't mean his general position isn't right.
No. Read ALOT of medieval history. Those who read only a little get their facts grossly distorted.
Because it still exists in some government stockpile somewhere. Probably where some people know it exists. How is destroying *copies* of a report destroying the report?
Excuse me. I happen to personally know many current and former members of the US armed forces who would be the first to revolt if any of our governmental leaders tried to illegally maintain their power.