Slashdot Mirror


A GEANT Leap Forward In Networking For Research

An anonymous reader contributes: "A research backbone network interconnecting more than 30 countries, through which hundreds of universities can exchange traffic, with a backbone running at 10 Gbps, born on the 1st of December. Yes, it exists, and this research network is not even in the U.S.! GEANT is a european initiative which has just come online, so if you're a student in Europe, you may have noticed a significant change in your downloads speeds since last week. You can even check its weathermap! Well, obviously backbone links are still unused ... but that shouldn't last long, once people notice the sheer amount of bandwidth."

275 comments

  1. Then I just need a fiber to my home ... by Hougaard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dammn.. My ADSL is slow!

    1. Re:Then I just need a fiber to my home ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Then I just need a fiber to my home ... by waitdyahoo.com · · Score: 0

      Think they would care if we set up some P2P file sharing on this..

      I could hadle getting 1 hour TV shows in 2 or 3 min..

  2. looks like us americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have no backbone =(

    1. Re:looks like us americans by gnarly · · Score: 1
      Yup, our University network is sure behind the curve compared to this GEANT thing. Another comparison: Costa Rica gave free internet access to all citizens. US, with 100 (?) times the per capita income, is "too poor" to afford this.

      On the bright side, you can do whatever you want if your name is Bill Gates (of Borg). ++++++++++++++

      --
      :-( is a registered trademark of Despair.com
    2. Re:looks like us americans by Buck2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      WTF is your point?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    3. Re:looks like us americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His point is that he thinks he has "proof" of how horrible the US is. His point is that he is a eurotrash wannabe.

    4. Re:looks like us americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'd like to make a bumper sticker out of this post. It's dead on.

    5. Re:looks like us americans by drsquare · · Score: 1

      "Too poor"? Maybe just willing to steal the tax-payers' money to give people luxuries such as Internet connections.

      There is absolutely NO justification in stealing people's money to poor people can download porn and mp3s.

  3. Will all these end up getting joined one day? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sorry if this is a dumb question. I guess I was just wondering if it would ever turn out that all these networks would join up someday, or if we'll end up needing multiple computers to connect to all the different internets (should we want to), or if we'll have high-speed backbones connecting the backbones...

    Sorry, I'm a programmer. I don't know any more network stuff than is necessary to download pr0n on my breaks.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 1

      ummmmmmmm......that's what the internet is..the internet is made up of many diffrent networks..and if you look at the weathermap for GEANT, you can see it has links to the US

    2. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by rm-r · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Didn't you see the sign?

      Please Do Not Feed The Trolls

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    3. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know why the US1 and US2 head North West for Iceland and not for America?

    4. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by rm-r · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Maybe they're pointing 'up' in a 2-d kind of way at satellites?

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    5. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by bjtuna · · Score: 2

      They are all Internet2 peers. Check the Internet2 peering list at http://www.internet2.edu/abilene/html/peernetworks .html

    6. Re:Will all these end up getting joined one day? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Anyone know why the US1 and US2 head North West for Iceland and not for America?

      One, to keep the graphic clearer to use.
      Two, it is likely that the cables do head roughly in that direction
      as the shortest distance would be a Great Circle.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  4. Yay! by Greyfox · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Now university students will be able to download porn and MP3s even faster!

    That's cool and all, but the backbone's not the problem. The last mile's the problem.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yay! by Psiren · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not for academic institutions. Before I left my previous job, I was connected to JANET, the Joint Academic Network. I could quite regularly download at over 1 megaBYTE/s from other universites. Granted many sites in the US were still slow, but my local Debian mirror was shit hot ;-)

    2. Re:Yay! by rm-r · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I work at a British university, and just graduated from another. The last mile problem doesn't exist for us (unless you count the mile across campus, but even then fast ethernet and decent switches solve that- maybe what we should be doing at home?) Janet has just been upgraded and this uni now has a 100Mbps link, of which about 5% is used. I guess this means the upgrade will last a fair bit (in internet time at leaset) and lets us play with the newest tech- which hopefully will do my skills and cv a favour ;-)

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    3. Re:Yay! by aallan · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I work at a British university, and just graduated from another. The last mile problem doesn't exist for us...now has a 100Mbps link, of which about 5% is used.

      You've on a JANET spur then, the main JANET backbone is up to 1GB/s...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  5. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try opera.. the FASTEST browser on earth... or use telnet port 80 if you wanna be fatse rthan Opera..

    1. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W0W! j00 r 50 133t d00d!

  6. And as you can see, it's not using even... by Ieshan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    a single percent of it's total capacity right now.

    What does that mean? It's not even using up, in almost all cases, any more than a 1Gbps line would be using. Take a look at all that blue on the map. It seems to signify that this was a waste of time and money.

    Basically, I'm all for this great stuff, but until they find a use for it, it's just money wasted when it could be going to places and projects in technology that could actually benefit.

    1. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
      What does that mean? It's not even using up, in almost all cases, any more than a 1Gbps line would be using. Take a look at all that blue on the map. It seems to signify that this was a waste of time and money.

      Well the old European backbone was creaking slightly, so you can either upgrade incrementally to keep slightly ahead of demand, or oversupply now in the knowledge that in the next 5-10 years demand is going to keep going up and up.

      Sounds like they made the right choice to me.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "What does that mean? It's not even using up, in almost all cases, any more than a 1Gbps line would be using. Take a look at all that blue on the map. It seems to signify that this was a waste of time and money"

      No, what would be a waste of time and money would be if it was at 100% traffic - the whole point about building a network like this is that it will cope with researchers' increasing demands for bandwidth for years to come. Of course traffic's low to start with, because people have been living with much lower bandwidth for years and don't suddenly start sending loads more data the second a new backbone appears. The bandwidth will be used when it's required, not when it's available.

    3. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because it isnt 100% used does not mean its a waste of time and money. this is pretty important for the future, it means that europe will be ready and not have to upgrade all the damn time because they were ill prepared. good job!

    4. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by pibakic · · Score: 3, Funny
      Did you even read the story? Its been there for 10 days !

      .. and you expect it to be at capacity already!

      Pib.

      --
      "NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer" - some /.er
    5. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Basically, I'm all for this great stuff, but until they find a use for it, it's just money wasted when it could be going to places and projects in technology that could actually benefit.

      They most definately will find uses for it. I heard recently about the transfer of raw sequencing trace files (for the Human Genome Project) transfered from the UK-->USA. Turns out there wasnt enough bandwidth (these things are basically huge image files, and there are ALOT of them). Therefore they ship them over on DAT tapes.

      Furthermore, I quite regurlarly download multi-gigabyte quantaties of data for academic research.

    6. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, 640KB is enough memory for anyone.

    7. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you do know that atheist, hedonistic societies like yours have never stood up with time
      Firstly, your country is 225 years old, a little young to be boasting about your longevity. Secondly: Yes all the atheistic hedonistic societies collapsed. As did the pious well-behaved ones. Shit happens, get a helmet.

      Free sex, free booze and in some countries even free drugs
      You say these things as if they're in some way bad.
    8. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, are you ever a fucking moron. You would rather they installed 56 kB/s lines to guarantee a higher level of usage?

      Fucking luddite. Please, find the nearest angry Afghan refugee and subject yourself to a healthy beating to within an inch of your life.

    9. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by attackiko · · Score: 1

      It is not the right time in Europe IMHO. People come on the internet in the evening. Let's wait a few hours and see. (It's 17:40 CET now). Watch the students grab their dialy dose of Divx movies a few hour later.

    10. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by onion2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      I quite regurlarly download multi-gigabyte quantaties of data for academic research

      Recent into skin tone reproduction in MPEG video is it? Hehe..

    11. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a little young to be boasting about your longevity

      Oh yeah? And just how long did the Communist rule last in the Soviet Union? 40 years?

      Shit happens, get a helmet.

      I hope this wasn't one of the sick and perverted phrases used by the large homosexual crowd here. Don't bother telling me about your fecal masturbation fetishes.

    12. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh yeah? And just how long did the Communist rule last in the Soviet Union? 40 years?
      Knowledgeable little fuck aren't you. Russion Revolution - 1917: End of Soviet Union - mid 1990s, depending on how you want to define the exact moment... 75 to 80 years.

      Of course, Japan has had the same imperial line since sometime in the fourth century, and the UK is uninvaded since 1066...
    13. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't bother telling me about your fecal masturbation fetishes.

      Maybe you're not interested, but I certainly am! Please post all your (fecal) masturbation fetishes as a reply to this post! Thanks.

    14. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by tomknight · · Score: 2
      Good point. Hey, you know that 512Mb RAM you just bought? Looks like you're not using all of it, must have been a waste of money.

      Think forward planning.

      Tom.

      --
      Oh arse
    15. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by blane.bramble · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Meanwhile the U.S.A. has become the only military superpower, an industrial powerhouse and moral beacon in the world. Why?

      Vast natural resources.

    16. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. The vast natural resources the Soviet Union lacked/Russia lacks?

    17. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got 512 Mb RAM on my dual Athlon system and back when the DDR RAM was still cheap I considered upgrading to full 1 Gb.

      Then I realized that I can't think of any application that would test the limits of even the 512 Mb setup. Damn. I've got a solution looking for a problem.

    18. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Meanwhile the U.S.A. has become the only military superpower, an industrial powerhouse and moral beacon in the world. Why? "One Nation under God". That's why.
      Everything you just wrote would apply to the Holy Roman Empire. Now where is that exactly? In the dust of history. I shall now quote you some poetry:


      I met a traveller from an antique land
      Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
      Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
      Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
      And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
      Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
      Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
      The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
      And on the pedestal these words appear:
      "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
      Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
      Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
      Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
      The lone and level sands stretch far away."


      Thats your actual Shelley, that is.
    19. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And that's INSIGHTFUL?!?!? Mercy moderators, you are killing me. My abs are cramping from laughing.

      Your post was actual waste of bandwidth, whereas the network is (as far as capacity is concerned; its coverage sucks since it doesn't span to scandinavian countries) pretty useful, because:

      • In networking, latency plays important role, and above certain load level (say, 20%) latency varies way too much, thanks to burstiness of ip traffic. This leads to timeouts and resends, which means significant portion of bandwidth is wasted on overhead. Thus, higher bandwidth makes traffic more economical; less resends (less timeouts); connections much faster than just the capacity increase would indicate.
      • Network usage is (to some degree) self-controlling; with slower connections, people (and of course protocols too) tend to curb down usage too. Thus, reverse goes as well; with faster connections usage goes up somewhat too. This is nowhere near "we already have too much" situation.
      • Who cares if it's "only 1%"? If the cost of having 10x, 100x or 1000x more bandwidth is almost identical (which it may well be... depending on sweet spots of pricing of routing eq), there's absolutely no reason to be too humble and just add the absolute minimum capacity.
      • It's good to have spare capacity for peak traffic bursts (which are 100% sure well above 1% average load)
      • Traffic amounts will only increase at this point. Saturation point hasn't yet been reached, and probably won't in near future.
      • This is research network that _should_ show what can be done, even if it wasn't useful or economical.
    20. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Quixote · · Score: 1

      It's not even using up, in almost all cases, any more than a 1Gbps line would be using. Take a look at all that blue on the map. It seems to signify that this was a waste of time and money.

      People said the same thing when 4GB HDDs came out.. "Windows can't access a partition bigger than 2GB, who needs a 4GB disk?".... try to buy a 4GB today, you'll find it in an antiques store!

      This sort of excessive capacity planning is called "forethought". Thanks to all of this capacity, Europeans will be all set for a couple of years at least.

    21. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kindly shut the fuck up and stop making all americans seem ignorant fanatics. Thank you.

    22. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone with mod points please slap back this troll for me. As I read this, he's at "4 Informative" for some reason God only knows.

    23. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Alien54 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Meanwhile the U.S.A. has become the only military superpower, an industrial powerhouse and moral beacon in the world. Why? --- Vast natural resources.

      Also the fact of not having the division caused by a variety of factors such as wars, multiple languages, monetary systems, divison of resources amongst competing interests.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    24. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by polar+bear · · Score: 1

      It is almost 6pm on a Monday evening (in London). When I was in Uni, I wasn't generally working Monday evenings in December! "Pub" and "Party" spring to mind as a far more likely options...

      Polar Bear.

    25. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Wasted? I think a new network would be expected to be big enough for a few years, otherwise that would be a waste.

      The rule of thumb in a network such as this is that the bandwidth needed doubles every 9 months.

      Therefore the prediction from the rule of thumb is that this network will suffice for about 4 years and then it will be full.

      It looks sufficient to me, but it's not too much bandwidth by any means.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    26. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, stop slagging of my hard drive.

    27. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by pcb · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile the U.S.A. has become the only military superpower, an industrial powerhouse and moral beacon in the world. Why?

      Vast natural resources.


      This clearly shows you know absolutely nothing about economics. Successful economies are never limited (or created) by their access to raw materials. The availability of natural resources is probably the least important factor in a modern economy. The short answer for the reason that the US is rich: because it 'generates wealth'. The long answer is, well, very long....

      As a example of wealth (via productivity), check out the number of robots employed in manufacturing for different countries in this month Economist (you'll need to look at the print edition as it doesn't seem to be online). Think first, post later. Ignorance sucks!

      --
      'Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.' B. Pascal
    28. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Yes, perhaps he was trying to do cool "skin tone reproduction" research, or maybe he was downloading topographic maps, or weather data, or genetic stuff, or Quake I, II, and III, or perhaps something completely different.

      Maybe he was having a conference via the internet. You never know.

    29. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by monkeydo · · Score: 2
      UK is uninvaded since 1066

      Did you mean to type 10:66? Certainly you aren't claiming that the UK has not had to repel an invading force in the last 900 years. That would be a silly assertion, even if you don't consider open, armed rebellions as "invasions" there's always the Battle of Britain, and lets not forget the Falklands.

      FWIW here's a list of current territorial disputes from the CIA fact book:

      Northern Ireland issue with Ireland (historic peace agreement signed 10 April 1998); Gibraltar issue with Spain; Argentina claims Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas); Argentina claims South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Mauritius and the Seychelles claim Chagos Archipelago (UK-administered British Indian Ocean Territory); Rockall continental shelf dispute involving Denmark and Iceland; territorial claim in Antarctica (British Antarctic Territory) overlaps Argentine claim and partially overlaps Chilean claim; disputes with Iceland, Denmark, and Ireland over the Faroe Islands continental shelf boundary outside 200 NM

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    30. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I live in Europe. Where can I get all this wonderful stuff for free?

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    31. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit... we're almost as popular as the Americans ;)

    32. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      You forgot to read the part of the CIA fact book that defines the geographical boundaries of the UK. The "United Kingdom" refers specifically to England and Scotland.

      Think "United States" for a minute. Japan invaded the Phillipines, for instance, in 1941 but we don't speak of the United States as having been invaded. We speak of our colony the Phillipines as having been invaded (and occupied).

      The Battle of Britain was not an invasion, which by definition involves ground forces.

      Northern Ireland's not been invaded by a foreign power. It's a domestic dispute. The closest foreign power is Eire, and they've stayed out of it.

      The other examples you give all involve foreign possessions of Great Britain.

      And of course "territorial disputes" are not necessarily invasions by foreign powers in the first place. Most of those you mention involve nothing more than diplomatic snit-fits.

    33. Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of charlemagne lasted only his lifetime. the US has the oldest government in the world, bar non, your national borders are not even as old as ours are - euro dipshit. THE US changed them all after each of the world wars we bailed your pathetic butts out of.

      see - it always helps to know real history, not just pissing in the wind with pretend bravado - like the french and the rest of continental europe.

    34. Re: Re:And as you can see, it's not using even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      your national borders are not even as old as ours are - euro dipshit. THE US changed them all after each of the world wars we bailed your pathetic butts out of.
      You mean World War II was after Hawaii became the 50th state in the 1950s? Wow, you do know a lot of history. And when the UK's borders change in WWII, remind me of that?
  7. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try and slashdot that !

    1. Re:Ha! by mstormoen · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I've seen a number of "try and /. that" and "let's see if it can hold up to the slashdot effect"

      Well don't forget that a fast network is only part of the equation. If (by the love of a higher power) I had OC-192 laid down right up to my home webserver, my little P3-450 still wouldn't handle the /. effect (and that machine is running apache, not IIS ;)

      --
      -- "Nothing very good or very bad lasts very long."
  8. Re:GEANT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop wasting bandwidth, will you?

  9. Re:GEANT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thin-skinned shit.

  10. I see the slashdot effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those itty bitty US1 and US2 links are warming up! Who says GEANT isn't needed ;-)

  11. /.-ing GEANT by chongo · · Score: 0, Redundant
    GEANT ... with a backbone running at 10 Gbps

    But will it survive a /.? :-)

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  12. Weird by attackiko · · Score: 1

    It connects 30 countries... and is not in the USA?

  13. Pronunciation? by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gee-ahnt? Jeeant? How do you pronoune this silly, silly acronym?

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
    1. Re:Pronunciation? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Try pronouncing it in French...

    2. Re:Pronunciation? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      "Zhay-ant".

    3. Re:Pronunciation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the french actor Gérard Depardieu?

      Well, Géant is pronounced in a similar way than this guy's first name.
      Identical sounds for the 'Gé' part and then the second syllabus sounds like the 'an' part of the british "can't"

      As it obviously is a french word, there is no stress on any syllabus. It's all flat. Don't try to say [Gé'an] or [Gé-an']. Both are wrong. It is more like [Gé-an], French language oblige.

      Cheers!

      Artaxerxes

    4. Re:Pronunciation? by c0rtez · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Think homosexual insect (gay ant).

    5. Re:Pronunciation? by cymru1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well for a start it's not an acronym, it's the french word for giant. Pronunciation depends on what part of france you come from :)

  14. Not even in the US? by Spamuel · · Score: 4, Troll

    "Yes, it exists, and this research network is not even in the U.S.!"

    As if that's something hard to believe... considering the fast networks already developed and in development in Canada and Japan you'd think we could give other countries the credit they deserve. It's not like the US is the only country that knows how to string an Ethernet cable.

    1. Re:Not even in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the United States already has it's own high speed private research network anyways...

    2. Re:Not even in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have multiple research networks. I often get better throughput on ESNet than on Abilene.

  15. Oh shit! by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    What's up people? This was supposed to be a lighthearted joke. Now everyone's twatting and shitting all over the place!

    I'll leave the mop and bucket right here.

    Ugh, I'm tired.

  16. Re:GEANT? by Kvasio · · Score: 1
    Silly puny American! That's not an acronim, thats a word meaning 'Giant' in french.


    FYI: there are people in the world that think in different ways than you, and it does not mean that they are _worse_.

  17. Re:Can you imagine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Britney Spears on video giving her first blowjob !!!"
    Boring.

    "Buffy The Vampire Slayer in gangbang action !!!"
    Boring

    "Shania Twain takes it up the ass !!!"
    Might be interested.

    "Hundreds of your favorite celebs baring all in pics and vids !!!"
    Well - one of my favorite celebs is Sir Ian McKellen; not sure I'd want this option.

    "More action than you can poke your dick at !!!"
    Nope - don't want that either, have enough action right here at home.

  18. Re:GEANT? by scorcherer · · Score: 1
    Oh sure, someone will probably say it means something in another language...

    Oh yeah, something like 'giant' in French. But how would I know, we're all just ignorant /.ers and the world still revolves around America.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  19. what happend to internet 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah what ever happened to internet2, will this end up the sameway :(

  20. Re:GEANT? by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    Dude - lighten up. It's a joke.

    God forbid someone should make a joke about the French language.

    I'm tired.

  21. .nl Research by dcocos · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Great now all my downloads of adul^H^H^H^H research content from the Netherlands will get to me faster.

    I hate e-commerce t-shirt

    1. Re:.nl Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not funny, twat. Try some original humour sometime, you silly pissface.

  22. BEFORE YOU REPLY by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    Think Joke.

    Sorry, I guess the Funny Bone is turned off.

    Or you can't figure jokes out without smileys.

    1. Re:BEFORE YOU REPLY by rm-r · · Score: 1

      Think Joke which is liable to offend any European who reads it. Would you make the same joke about a Woman/Black/Muslim/Gay? Hopefully you realise that this would be hugely offensive, this isn't really very different

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    2. Re:BEFORE YOU REPLY by yomegaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Give me a break, this joke is about as offensive as the old "Those French, they've got a different word for everything" line. In other words, STFU. Thanks.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    3. Re:BEFORE YOU REPLY by gazbo · · Score: 1

      I'm European, and don't find it offensive. I make similar jokes about the Americans all the time on /. Yes, I would make the same jokes about women/blacks/Muslims/gays. I would and do make similar jokes about my race/country/culture.

      Why is this not offensive? Because not only is it lighthearted and obviously(hah!) a joke, but it is self deprecating. He is not poking fun at the French, but at his own people.

      IMHO, if I'm willing to make jokes about my own culture, but think jokes about other cultures are wrong, then I am being racist/sexist/xenophobic/homophobic, albeit in an unusual way. Unfortunately, you were implying that all of the above were wrong, so although I disagree with you, you were being consistent (damn ;-)

      In short, I don't think any group should be treated with kid gloves, and the original post was far from offensive. I in no way approve of directed, vicious racist(sexist, blah...blah) humour, though.

    4. Re:BEFORE YOU REPLY by drsquare · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh fuck off. The Europeans are there to be made fun of. Taking the piss out of frogs and krauts is almost as fun as taking the piss out of women/blacks/muslims/queers etc.

  23. Doesn't really sound like that much... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not trying to be a poseur, but really it doesn't. Let me put it into perspective another way: Right now with my measly cable modem I can download from many sites at 2Mbps+ (I get a sustained 220KB/s from Microsoft). That means that a mere 77 of me can saturate a T3, and 5,000 of me can saturate a 10Gbps. Now everyone doesn't download at the same time, but when you're talking about Europe with 100s of millions of people... BTW: I realize that this is a research network not for public consumption, but my point is moreso that it's apparently such a big deal that these 10Gbps connections exist. This naturally makes me wonder what sort of backbones exist on the North America network, because I never have a problem downloading at 220KB/second, so I presume it must be pretty extraordinary.

    1. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by cnkeller · · Score: 4, Informative
      This naturally makes me wonder what sort of backbones exist on the North America network, because I never have a problem downloading at 220KB/second, so I presume it must be pretty extraordinary.

      There is a program called pathchar which seems to do a pretty good job of characterizing pipe size. I've used this to monitor my DSL bandwidth; PacBell has a 45Mbit line heading out of it's DSLAM's (at least in my area). It was designed to be used with symmetric connections, my DSL line (1.5/128) reports like 330K, but otherwise it's a good start at measuring paths.

      From my office to microsoft's ftp servers I was easily able to determine that the slowest link is our T1 bewteen the ISP's T3 and our 10Mbps interface on our external router.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    2. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by vandenberg5 · · Score: 1

      It really isn't that much. Last week I attended a seminar on 40Gbs network technology. It looks like the 40G networks will start becoming commonplace here in the next few years. The key is that there's not just one line of fiber laid across america (or the world). I'm not sure to as the bandwidth across America.

    3. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by Manic+Miner · · Score: 1

      From the Guardian Article...:

      "Internet2 plans to offer 10 gigabit capacity by 2003," says Marine Chartois of Dante. "By that time I think we will already be looking at 40 gigabits per second. That covers a larger area, more people and a much more difficult environment."

      I think that this network is probably much faster than any backbone in the US, and by the time that the internet2 gets as fast as this the European network will be 4 times as fast.

      This network is much faster than anything currently in use in America.

      Sorry to ruin your day but America is behind on this one ;)

      --
      If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let'em go, because, man, they're gone.
    4. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by Doomdark · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, pathchar seems to be one of those invaluable cool tools that too few people know about. Used it succesfully back in '99... Too bad it was never officially 'finished' was it?

      Also, the presentation that explains how it works (which is reasonably straight-forward in theory, yet implementation seems quite sophisticated with some filtering done to remove noise from results) is worth reading. And for real "hard-core" network measurement stuff you can read the doctorate thesis Vern Paxson wrote, I think it's available from same download site... Good read if you really are interested about TCP performance analysis. The tool was (AFAIK) written for the thesis.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    5. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      This network is much faster than anything currently in use in America.
      Sorry to ruin your day but America is behind on this one ;)

      Perhaps I've given the wrong impression, but my post was not a dick size comparison between nations or continents (I'm moreso replying in that sentence to the much ruder AC post preceding yours): Indeed the fiber and hardware was made in many different countries anyways, so where it was deployed is largely irrelevant to "national pride" because everyone is involved anyways (i.e. I highly doubt that that network only uses European hardware and technology).

      Having said that, my point is moreso that we still have a LONG way to go in the internet backbones: If that humungous pipe can support a mere 5,000 cable modem users downloading at a moderate pace, then it really puts it into perspective as far as social ramifications.

    6. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...my point is moreso that it's apparently such a big deal...
      The word you want is "more", not "moreso". That is what makes you sound like a poseur. (Actually, your point about the quantity of bandwidth is exactly what I was thinking.)

      Look here.

    7. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The `word' I actually wanted was "more so": Sorry about skipping the space there, and my poseurness is made apparent by my attempts to pretend to be a touch typist.

    8. Re:Doesn't really sound like that much... by Manic+Miner · · Score: 1

      Ah.. fair enough, I must have got the wrong impression from the wording of your post.

      I would definately agree that we have a long way to go before the backbone structure can handle decent speed download to large numbers of users. Just imagine the bottle neck when people start getting 10Mbs connections to their houses! (at work I consider that a slow network connection)

      --
      If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let'em go, because, man, they're gone.
  24. What? No Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why? Why??

    1. Re:What? No Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden, Finland, Norway; they're all the same. Up there somewhere next to the Russia.

    2. Re:What? No Finland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next to Russia is also the USA.

  25. Re:Can you imagine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Might be interested.

    Great!

    Post your e-mail address here and I'll send you more information straight away. You might also want to do that to keep up to date what's happening with my site. You might be missing a huge opportunity right now because you haven't signed up for my service!

  26. Re:giants and such by Tebriel · · Score: 1, Redundant

    No, it's a giant step in attempts to thwart slashdotting.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  27. Hard work! by aurorascope · · Score: 1

    Hmm, it'd be pretty hard to slashdot geant.

    Speaking from a UK perspective, our academical network (JANET) has already rolled out something similar to this. OK, it's a fraction of 10gbps - at 622mbps. Obviously every university doesn't get that amount of bandwidth; it's usually around 155mbps going into each major city I think. However, I believe geant will pave the way for some serious warezing!

    --

    I'd rather have a bowl of coco-pops.
    1. Re:Hard work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GÉANT is basically the pan-European version of JANET. It interconnects JANET (.uk) with HEANET (.ie) with BELNET (.be) and a load of other academic networks in the EU.

      Also: the traffic over these links is the external IP traffic of universities. Therefore, as well as genome data and research papers, it will have DivX and pr0n...

    2. Re:Hard work! by grid+geek · · Score: 1

      Actually its 2.6Gb in a rough figure eight using Edinburgh, Glasgow, Manchester, Leeds, Belfast, London, Oxford and Southampton (I think these are the correct sigts, I may be out with a couple) with a double connection between the middle 4 nodes. Janet4 is in the process of being upgraded now. Anyway this is all mainly for the Grid - the undergrads aren't going to be allowed to use it and theres no way the public will get a lookin - thats what the telcos are there for.

      I thought CS problems were large until I joined Particle Physics where I've got a Petabyte of data in 6 countrys to analyse in real time - the latency is a pain however. And LHC doesn't come online until 2006 so expect a few major upgrades before then. Five years and Europe has to have a massive spurt in bandwidth, computing power and distributed software or the physicists are going to have a $3billion machine sitting there generating data and not going to be able to do anything with it.

      --------
      First to the Higgs gets the prize.

  28. Weathermap for Internet2/Abilene by tcyun · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You can check out the Internet2/Abilene weathermap at the Abilene NOC.

    Plus, the Internet2 backbone is moving to OC192 in the near term. Saturate that...

    1. Re:Weathermap for Internet2/Abilene by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      I prefer Geant's to Abilene's map:
      * png instead of gif
      * more readable and coherent color coding

    2. Re:Weathermap for Internet2/Abilene by Tower · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought the color coding on the Abilene site was far more readable... however, this happens to be on an 8-bit colormap display (grumble)... If I had all of my colors, the Geant map might look better.

      The directional arrows instead of the side column was a +, too...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:Weathermap for Internet2/Abilene by Marillion · · Score: 2

      Hmm. More trafic going to Seatle than comming from Seatle. I knew it -- Seatle does suck.

      --
      This is a boring sig
  29. Living in Luxembourg... by Dimwit · · Score: 1

    Well, I live in Luxembourg (Go Luxembourg! Woohoo!), and I seriously wonder to what they're running that line. Luxembourg (much to my chagrin) doesn't have an actual university. Makes me wonder. That, and the fact that that one line represents something like half the bandwidth running into the country...(actually, I think it's like a quarter. Either way, I'll never see any of it.:)

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:Living in Luxembourg... by 4im · · Score: 1

      Restena is connected to Belgium and France with 155Mbit lines, as you can see in GEANT's poster (PDF file).

      It's not like Restena has the only connections in Lux., there are some others that have more or less nice lines. Thinking of P&T, Cegecom, ... I guess for 400k inhabitants that's sufficient.

      Oh yes, don't forget that they want to make the Cours Universitaire into a whole university, then there's at least 3 academic research centers, the schools (lycees) etc.

  30. oh man by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 5, Funny
    You can just imagine it over at Dante right now:

    "Wow, well done guys. Our new multi-gagabyte network is now fully operational"

    "Cheers...."

    "Uh... Boss, hold on...."

    "What?"

    "Someone just posted us to slashdot!"

    *Poof* goes the bandwidth



    Seriously though, if they get slashdotted their really isnt any hope for the rest of us.

    1. Re:oh man by tomknight · · Score: 1
      ...multi-gagabyte...

      What, like McDonalds, several retches per mouthful of food?

      Tom.

      --
      Oh arse
  31. Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, it's there. But the topology map would have looked much hairier with all the nordic countries drawn there.

  32. Outside the US by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, it exists, and this research network is not even in the U.S!

    Gosh! Outside the US! In Europe!

    The Europeans really seem to be advancing don't they? A friend of mine visited Europe and told me that they've got TV, computers, mobile telephones, everything! How long before they catch up with the US?

    However, they are still really lagging in cultural things. They don't have that many great places to hang out as in the US like Starbucks or MacDonalds (just little coffee shops and resturants which are all different!) and they don't have so many TV channels (and a lot of the ones they do have are in funny languages!). And they aren't as advanced politically as the US - they don't have the personal freedoms that we have, like the feedom to carry guns and, er, the other freedoms that we have.

    (Yes, this is sarcasm).

    1. Re:Outside the US by onion2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have MacDonalds and Starbucks. But we also have enough taste not to frequent them.

    2. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and theyve got a damn wierd sense of humour. They say something thats true in a deadpan style, and everybody laughs. No idea why - no punchline or anything.
      Also, I noticed that "friends" never seem to get on. They just argue and slag each other off to each others faces. Dont know how that works. They are a strange bunch.

      I do like the way you have to "explicitly declare" sarcasm on slashdot, for fear of being moderated flamebait...

    3. Re:Outside the US by jallen02 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I know it is sarcasm, but you have to remember one thing when comparing why these cool networks are possible in europe so easily and they take more time in the states. The amount of cable and infrastructure required. In Europe everything is more dense and closely located, so sure they can lay out the networking infrastructure for something like this easily

      In the states? Not quite so easy... due to the simple fact of the size. Same reason we don't have GSM, same reason all these nifty technologies (anything wireless) take time.

      Jeremy

    4. Re:Outside the US by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 2


      I wish the French would send us their 24 hour crepe' stands.

    5. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. Every McDonald's I saw in Berlin was fucking PACKED with people, like it was edible food or something. I went to Berlin looking for schnitzel and bismarcks!

    6. Re:Outside the US by pubjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the states? Not quite so easy... due to the simple fact of the size. Same reason we don't have GSM, same reason all these nifty technologies (anything wireless) take time.

      Oh yes, that's right. Europe's easy because it's small. I'd forgotten that. Europe has a tiny land mass of 3,998,000 sq miles, whereas the USA has a massive land mass of 3,717,796 sq miles, according to Encarta. Oh, hang on, those figures can't be right, surely?

      And being lots of different locally governed countries speaking different languages and (until very recently) using differnt currencies - that's got to make things easier, hasn't it!

      The only reason that Europe is ahead of the USA in terms of DSL, GSM and advanced networks is because the USA, being a young country, speaking a single language with virtually a single culture and mindset and single government, well, everything is so much harder for the USA isn't it?

      (Yes, this is more sarcasm)

    7. Re:Outside the US by Alomex · · Score: 2
      Every McDonald's I saw in Berlin was fucking PACKED with people

      Did you notice that about 50% of the customers were also tourists like yourself?

      I have yet to run across European McDonald's away from a tourist trap. You find bars, bakeries and dinners in the off-the beaten path places but no golden arches.

      Contrast that with the US where you can find a McDonalds right smack in the middle of suburbia, a place were a tourist would never venture.

    8. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah right!

      having only ONE standard for mobile phones (GSM) around THE WORLD is so much less difficult than haveing it in the states...

      my shiny metal ass less difficult

      btw: do you know UMTS?

    9. Re:Outside the US by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dunno, the McDonald's in Thessaloniki, Greece was pretty packed, in a decidedly non-tourist area (the only reason I was there is because I have relatives in the area). There were quite a few in Belgium as well...

    10. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but that just isn't true in my experience. I spent the summer working in France far from any tourist destination. The local McDonalds' seemed pretty popular, especially with the younger generation. The consensus appears to be that although people might not like what McDonald's represents, it's convenient and cheap and therefore popular. If this is true in France, I'm sure it is elsewhere in Europe, although if you're at a tourist destination, you can of course expect to see tourists at the McDonald's.

    11. Re:Outside the US by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      UMTS, is.. the company trying to implement 3G mobile phone stuff IIRC.

      I will believe that it can achieve broadband level connection speeds to the masses when I see it in my hands..

      Jeremy

    12. Re:Outside the US by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Your quoted numbers include a huge portion of Russia, which does not have all these services you speak of, as well as the former Yugoslavia and much of eastern Europe. A more accurate figure to quote would be western Europe, whose land mass is a mere 1,400,000 sq miles.

    13. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... it seems when you want to boast about size, you include European Russia, but on the GÉANT weathermap, Russia doesn't appear at all...

    14. Re:Outside the US by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Yes, Europe is slightly larger then us. However it's population is many times that of the US, leading to a much higher population density, which is the more relavent number for the cost of deploying wireless services. As for being ahead of us in DSL, maybe a couple of countries but certainly not as a whole. In larger parts of Europe unmetered dialup is a relatively new and scarce concept....

      --
      Why?
    15. Re:Outside the US by Montecristo6 · · Score: 1

      WRONG! GSM, broadband Internet, and most of other things mentioned by the poster do indeed exist in Easter Europe, and some of them have actually propagated to Russia as well. And if progress can get there, one has to wonder even more about the USA ...

      --
      "I am just a customs officer; but I, too, wish to understand what is going on" -- Bertold Brecht
    16. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, although to be fair I suppose I should add that the Internet2 weathermap doesn't include Alaska :-) but surely you must admit, you would expect that a high capacity link between New York, Boston, Chicago and San Francisco to be a bit more expensive than a link between London, Berlin and Paris, and Stockholm.

    17. Re:Outside the US by aallan · · Score: 1

      Your quoted numbers include a huge portion of Russia, which does not have all these services you speak of, as well as the former Yugoslavia and much of eastern Europe.

      Actually having roamned over most of Eastern Europe and parts of Russian with my Orange GSM tri-band, I can quite catagorically state that you are wrong, at least for GSM.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    18. Re:Outside the US by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Being European and having lived in Germany, France, Ireland and The Netherlands for some ~30 years, I must say that you are talking absolute bollocks.

    19. Re:Outside the US by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      I expected to find at least a couple of MacDonalds in the UK (I went out of my way to avoid them for the most part) but when we broke down and went into one to get some soft drinks and a snack in Edinburgh, we didn't expect it to be quite as busy as it was. (Oh, one had to wonder what was going on in their heads with that "Silver Straw" contest...)

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    20. Re:Outside the US by prophecyvi · · Score: 1

      Can we have a poll to remove the "Troll" option from a post modded to 4 or higher? That's ridiculous.

    21. Re:Outside the US by Sique · · Score: 1

      UMTS is not a company. It is the 3G phone services standard itself. And it will be mainly implemented by a tyre and rubberboot factory and a 125 year old mechanics company.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    22. Re:Outside the US by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Yep, I guess that, in some parts of Europe at least, there will be more demand for network services per square kilometer. On the gripping hand, you do know that laying cable in densely populated urban areas is a lot more expensive than laying it in sparsely populated rural areas?

      So I guess it balances out in the end.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    23. Re:Outside the US by jbloggs · · Score: 1

      Enough people have commented on mcdonalds, so I don't need to be the only one that says europeans also go there, but in at least Birmingham, UK, I am VERY hard pressed to find a coffee shop that isn't either starbucks, café nero (brit chain) or coffee republic (brit chain). Sure people goto pubs instead for conversation, but where do you go if you just want a decent latée? Someone PLEASE correct me on this (with address, hopefully in the city centre), but until starbucks moved in the concept of café's doesn't really exist here. (i still refuse starbucks nevertheless)

    24. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you would expect that a high capacity link between New York, Boston, Chicago and San Francisco to be a bit more expensive than a link between London, Berlin and Paris, and Stockholm. "

      Er, no... For a start getting to London and Stockholm requires two underwater cables, then you have to deal with different planning, environment and land-use policies in the individual states, and the higher population density (except for Sweden) means you'll have fewer options on where you run your cables.

      Compared to this the extra distance of your US example is a minor factor. I'd be very surprised if there were any significant difference in cost between the two hypothetical networks.

    25. Re:Outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most expensive part is not the cable or the right-of-way in the US or in Europe. It is the switches.

    26. Re:Outside the US by RuleBritannia · · Score: 1

      McDonalds is pretty universally popular as fast food whilst shopping etc in UK as far as my perspective. But this is not true across all of Europe. Didn't see a single McDonalds in portugal whilst travelling, nor in Lapland come to think of it.

      SO either these people have better taste. Or McDonalds doesn't go where it can sell its particular brand of cheap food

    27. Re:Outside the US by Alomex · · Score: 2
      I dunno, the McDonald's in Thessaloniki, Greece was pretty packed, in a decidedly non-tourist area (the only reason I was there is because I have relatives in the area). There were quite a few in Belgium as well...

      Very interesting. That wasn't my experience in those cities and towns of Spain, France, Belgium, Iceland and Germany where I've visited suburbia (as you can imagine I don't visit suburbia in every town I go to).

      The sample would be about a dozen cities altogether, which admittedly is not a huge set, but I thought it would be representative enough. Seemingly it isn't.

  33. Yes, but unfortunately... by Evil+Oli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the internet is still U.S.-centric. Perhaps what you yanks don't realise is is that most well developed countries actually have decent internal networks, but since the lion's share of Internet content is hosted in America, this is irrelevant, since it is the pipe to the U.S. that matters.

    The diagram shows this - the two U.S. pipes are at around 30-50% utilisation (and are the smallest of the network), while the giant internal linkups are around 1-2%. What this says to me is that research typically doesn't use the bandwidth that they've provided for with this project. Consumer use of the internet will still get most content from America.

    But I guess there is always merit in planning for the future, and we can always benefit from making the internet less 'any-one-particular-country'-centric (despite it's origins in ARPA etc).

    1. Re:Yes, but unfortunately... by Yokaze · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Consumer use of the internet will still get most content from America
      I think your logic is a bit flawed.

      The pipes to the U.S. do not necessarily carry data originating from the U.S.

      It shows that a large amount of traffic is routed through the U.S.

      This may include data originating in the US, but also data from Europe. It may even include data originating from Europe and targeted for Europe.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:Yes, but unfortunately... by Raindeer · · Score: 1

      Yup. A thing that is even worse is that you see networks being misconfigured, so that even when you know that two companies are at a certain Internet Exchange in Europe and could therefore peer there, that data still gets exchanged on the other side of the Ocean and then gets send back.

    3. Re:Yes, but unfortunately... by Evil+Oli · · Score: 1

      >Consumer use of the internet will still get most content from America I think your logic is a bit flawed

      I stand by my statement that most Consumer use comes from access to U.S. sites. Notice I said *MOST*. I have no doubt that *some* traffic along this pipe is to be routed to other countries outside of the U.S., but if you can't see that an overwhelming proportion of consumer-content on the internet is hosted in the U.S., well, I'm sorry.

    4. Re:Yes, but unfortunately... by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2

      It's not necessarily mis-configuration - ISPs like to peer when they think both sides will get equal benefit - smaller ISPs often aren't allowed to peer with larger ones because of politics.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  34. Re:That's G�ANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you

  35. link by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was interesting article about this a few weeks ago in the gaurdian newspaper.

    Although it's pretty thin on technical details, it does provide some insight into some of the questions people are posting, such as why they need all this bandwidth, why the US arent part of the project etc.

    1. Re:link by oops · · Score: 1

      I can only assume you're being ironic by mispelling 'The Guardian' :-)

    2. Re:link by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Yeah. There was even a /. article referencing it at the time.

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didnt get that joke at first, but its actually quite funny!

  36. not all that much? by mr.ska · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Maybe I don't know enough about backbone architecture, but isn't an OC3 typical backbone stuff, running at 155Mbps?

    So what's so special about 10Mbps? Am I missing the point?

    --

    Mr. Ska

    1. Re:not all that much? by kawlyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude that 10Gbps, the G meaning Giga.

      --

      When someone yells "Stop" or goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over.
  37. Re:That's G�ANT by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Are accents written on capital letters? I got the impression they usually weren't.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  38. btw, OC192 is (essentially) 10 Gbps by tcyun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I prob should have mentioned that OC192 is essentially 10Gbps in my earlier post. This means that Internet2 will be equiv (in terms of backbone speed) to GEANT in the near term. (You can read the PR about the Internet2 upgrade if you are interested.

  39. doesn't exist by trefoil · · Score: 1

    of course the majority of the network doesn't exist in the US.. since it's a european network.. it's like saying that China doesn't exist in the US.. it doesn't, except for the embassies and the spies..

    but what were those two US connections I saw on the GEAN network (sorry I don't have that funny looking G on it.. I'm too lazy to hit my character map to copy and paste it) US1 and US2? looks like someone's leeching off of my adsl.. funny, there's a 10GB/s backbone growing out of my dsl connection!

    1. Re:doesn't exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (sorry I don't have that funny looking G on it.. I'm too lazy to hit my character map to copy and paste it)

      but you did have time to type all of that? hrm...

    2. Re:doesn't exist by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      > (sorry I don't have that funny looking G on it..
      > I'm too lazy to hit my character map to copy and
      > paste it)

      Actually, it's the E that is the funny looking character (it's accented, not really funny looking... kinda like resume is supposed to be [I'm also too lazy :) ])

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
  40. Re:That's G�ANT by rm-r · · Score: 1

    This is a word, not an acronym- it's probably being spelled in caps for same reason Unix is UNIX (cos the guys in charge like the way it looks that way) I'm not sure if accents are used on caps, but the existence within the char set suggest they are to me

    --

    J-aims
    --
    Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  41. In current replies... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I see people saying things like:
    • They're not even using 1% of capacity
    • They should invest more in the last mile
    I think that their idea might be to restructure the backbone services so that they are able to handle the imminent speed and reliability increases in the last mile.

    In future news we'll be seeing things like:
    x Telecomms corporation runs fibre in the last mile giving millions of European households the faster internet access that was made possible with the introduction of Géant's new backbone network.

    I may be wrong, but that's just my $0.02

  42. Internet2 @ Texas A&M by Milican · · Score: 1

    I remeber when I was at Texas A&M I could get really good ping times on servers at Harvard, University of Texas (gasp), and other schools on the I2 for playing quake. Its funny what a traceroute will turn up. Thank you Internet2 :)

    JOhn

  43. Re:That's G�ANT by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    There was a recent (last decade or so) ruling on this by the official guardians of the French language (not sure which group). It is now optional, whereas prior to the ruling accents were required.

  44. Re:That's G�ANT by avdp · · Score: 2

    As a french-speaking Belgian, I can tell you that I was taught in school that you don't put accents on caps. Maybe it's not a hard rule and you can go either way. I do however remember playing with my dad's typewriter when I was a kid and there was no way to put an accent on a capital letter.

  45. MacDonalds? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Geesh, apparently someone needs to receive to be sent to re-education camp.

  46. Packetloss! by zmooc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Look at the weathermap carefully and you will notice that some links change color halfway. The only explanation that I can come up with is packetloss:)

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
    1. Re:Packetloss! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather it is for the direction sending (perhaps receiving, but less likely) the traffic? The I2 maps shows arrows with two different lines so you can clearly see it... that's my guess with the color split halfway.

  47. Uninett? by Andreas(R) · · Score: 0
    So what if there is more bandwidth out to the world? My university-connection is still very limited by my 10Mbit network card :=)


    ...even though it's connected to the GÉANT's weathermap through Uninett, I can't see myself in that picture. I'm in Norway, and there is no line to Norway on the weathermap, even though there should be one because of UNINETT.

  48. Everything is relative by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    To quote a famouse obvious scientist. Sure it may be 1000X faster than a regular network but that just means we'll soon have machines putting out 1000x more data or have a 1000x more machines on a network, etc. No matter how much bandwidth there is it will always be maxed out.

  49. People seem to be missing ... by Reelworld · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With all the comments about using it for faster downloads, etc, etc, people seem to be missing the fact that it'll only really speed your downloads up if you're accessing another site on GEANT. Personally when I was a student, connecting to other academic sites was never particularly slow - but JANET (the UK academic net) doesn't have particularly good peering to transatlantic links (clearly due to the cost).

    What GEANT will help make more possible is inter-site co-operation, and apps like high bandwidth video streams. In response to the guy who said it was a waste of money - give it time?

    1. Re:People seem to be missing ... by jbloggs · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if you use the janet proxy I've gotten 600k/s from the US, and usually at least 150k/s. For an ethernet connection in on-campus housing, that's pretty good. (better than my university in the US)

  50. Slurp! by CoreDump · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You can even check its weathermap ! Well, obviously backbone links are still unused ... but that shouldn't last long, once people notice the sheer amount of bandwidth.
    You want to see some b/w suckage? Just have all the students fire up Gnutella/Morpheus and you'll hear a really loud slurping sound. :)

    Seriously though, this has ( as the US based Education networks and the like do ) the capability to further increase benefits for all of the students and researchers at the connected institutions. One of the things that Internet2 doesn't have in quite as much abundance is overwhelming raw bandwidth availability. Can't find the time to visit another school to attend a lecture? A course you want to take isn't offered at your school, but is at another one?

    Realtime video and remote tele-presence applications will easily consume this bandwidth and more ( assuming they aren't drowned out by DIVX and MP3s flying around. ).

    --

    ---
    Segmentation Fault ( core dumped )

  51. It /does/ have a purpose by roryh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I understand, the need for so much bandwidth is due to the new particle accelerator at CERN, which'll be coming on line in a few years time. When that gets run, it'll generate data in the region of gigabits/s; that's why there's all these massive data pipes pointing at Switzerland - it's to shunt off all the data around Europe to get processed!

    1. Re:It /does/ have a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What a waste.

      We must hijack those fat pipes for divx movies, mp3 trading and spam. The spice must flow...

    2. Re:It /does/ have a purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, No and Kinda - LHC doesn't come online until 2005/6 so at the moment the network is just being stress tested for something larger. However there are loads of projects at the moment in things like Broadcast quality video over IP (the Access Grid) which typically has three or more parallel connections out to multiple sites, the genetics and met. people are wanting to use it for data transfer (and at 8GB a file with a couple of hundred thousand files you see the problem).

      Yes its quiet at the moment but the unis break for xmas in the next week so the researchers and overseeing exams etc for the undergrads, if its still that quiet in mid jan I'll be amazed and when the real stuff starts happening in march it'll really be flooded.

  52. Re:Problems with networking today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least this coward's historical facts are correct...

  53. Re:typical arogant american by fishebulb · · Score: 1

    he never said that america was the best. Typical illerate response. he was stating experiences in america, and comparing americas network. he said it was extrodinary, never bashing europes or anything of the sort. Arogant america, wrong, arogant troll who needs to stop bashing america (atleast when its unfounded, fair game when it is founded)

  54. Weathermap tells all by xelph · · Score: 1

    Where is the bandwidth being used right now? Not on the intraeuropean 10 Gbps links, noooooo! It's being used on the weakest links, the ones connected to US1 and US2. Looks like the porn is much better on this side of the Atlantic. At least, that's what the eurostudents think...

  55. neat by wheel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is great! Too bad, though, it will not make much difference to me out in the sticks with my 56k dialup.

  56. Some Perspective by bjtuna · · Score: 4, Informative

    This addresses fundamental routing issues, so my apologies to most of you, however I think some of this crowd needs some clarification (albeit a simplified version):

    To all those who are posting such things as "now all I need is fiber to my home" or "I wonder if the Slashdot effect can saturate it" or "how come my ping times to it are so slow?":

    You should know that hosts on these networks are generally a mix of globally- and non-globally-accessable. Meaning, many POPs that are "hooked up" to some high-speed initiative like vBNS or Abilene also have "commodity links." Commodity links are normal T3s, etc that are hooked up to a commercial ISP. This makes the site multi-homed, and helps minimize the amount of non-research-related traffic being sent over the high-speed links, because if you want to look at www.cnn.com from, say, a vBNS-connected box, it'll go over the commodity link instead of vBNS.

    So the answer is, yes: the Slashdot effect can probably affect GEANT's web site because the Slashdot effect would flood their commodity link. On the other hand, if you were at a GEANT node... good luck trying, and enjoy the pings :)

    -Brian
    brian@internet2.edu

  57. US not involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US isn't involved at all? Are you *sure*? Is that legal?

    Well, if nothing else, I'm sure ECHELON is involved in some small way. ;)

  58. Wow! by statusbar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You know you are a geek when you look at that network bandwidth image with the blue lines and drool. It is better than pr*n!

    I wanna move to Berlin!

    --jeff

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  59. NORDUnet is on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. That link to Sweden hooks on to NORDUnet, so you have a 2.5Gb link into GÉANT.

    1. Re:NORDUnet is on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Don't worry. That link to Sweden hooks on to NORDUnet, so you have a 2.5Gb link into GÉANT.

      Actually 2 x 2.5Gb.

      http://www.nordu.net/connectivity/

  60. Re:That's G�ANT by avdp · · Score: 2

    Academie Francaise (sorry to lazy to figure out the cedille and the accent on my US keyboard :)

  61. Re:Fecal fantasies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's KW short for? I only know WW:P And K2...and ...and

  62. Re:GEANT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh sure, someone will probably say it means something in another language...

    Which means that it doesn't mean shit. The only language that matters is English, and Americanized English at that.

  63. Re:GEANT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to break the news to you, but the world DOES revolve around America, you POS eurotrash.

  64. Re:The Turd Report 12/10/2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you found ant German scat?

  65. Where's NORDUNET? by Doomdark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps their weathermap was just pruned for space... or does the network not have connections to NORDUNET (the backbone network that connects universities of nordic countries, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland... and to other backbones like NSFnet or whatever it's called now)? Seems kind of weird if that is the case; the most connected countries in Europe not connected to this one?!

    --
    I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    1. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by Caine · · Score: 1

      It's clearly connected to SUNET through Stockholm, but the map just shows the GEANT-backbone. Check out Nordunet's own maps for the connection details.

    2. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to google, type "nordunet" and click search. Pick the first link on the search page. In that page there is link "NORDUNET connected to GÉANT".

    3. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by antonsthlm · · Score: 1

      Of course it's connected to Nordunet. Nordics like speedy games, so it's a damn high priority. Btw, Géant is french for Giant according to Babelfish thingy at Altavista. I don't get it. Baseball?

      NORDUnet connected to GÉANT
      29th Oct 2001
      NORDUnet was connected to the European backbone network for research and education GÉANT on 26th October.

      NORDUnet is connected in Stockholm via two local 2.4Gbit/s circuits from NORDUnet's two PoPs to the GÉANT PoP. The GÉANT PoP is again connected to London and Frankfurt via 10 Gbit/s links, and to the R&E networks Baltic states at 34-155 Mbit/s.

      The GÉANT connection will replace NORDUnet's current 310 Mbit/s connection to TEN-155 which will terminate on 1 December 2001. The capacity to the GÉANT is roughly tenfold when compared to the current TEN-155 connection.

      With GÉANT in operation the Estonian Educational and Research Network EEnet will terminate its direct connection to NORDUnet in Helsinki, and the two networks will communicate via GÉANT in the future.

    4. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is connected to NORDUNET in Sweden.

    5. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by Doomdark · · Score: 2

      (yeah yeah, bad Karma to reply to my own post...)
      Thanks for all the replies. Glad to know it was the first option, not the second. :-)

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    6. Re:Where's NORDUNET? by elandal · · Score: 1

      Nordunet 1 and 2 PoPs were listed on the right side of the weathermap. Nordunet is connected to GEANT at Sweden, and the Nordunet nodes aren't considered GEANT nodes.

      See Nordunet's Connectivity Map for information about links. Yes, they have traffic maps, too.

  66. Some thoughts... by jd · · Score: 3, Informative
    First, why only 10Gbps? Lucent have 3 Tb long-distance optic fibre, and the primary cost of cable is in putting it into the ground, NOT the hardware.


    Second, someone complained that they're only using a tiny percent of the bandwidth. Uhhh, the idea is to have SPARE capacity on a network. The three-way hook-up between Russia, Britain and the USA, for tele-surgery becomes actually practical for more than just extreme "he's very rich, but hasn't a hope in hell" cases. We might start seeing multi-national virtual operating theatres, capable of making use of a far wider range of skills than ever before possible.


    IMHO, spending a few Euro more on slightly higher-quality fibre, and a few more frequencies of laser, is peanuts in terms of the total cost of a project like this, but offers the potential for fantastic endeavors that might actually benefit people.


    The existing Internet would be fine, for most things, if it weren't loaded down with prawn and spam. However, it is, and we have to accept that. We also need to accept that the SERIOUS work on the Internet eats bandwidth for breakfast. When you're into real-time remote operation of a nuclear particle accelerator, online surgery, high-speed train emergency braking systems, etc, you really can't afford dropped packets, let alone serious lag.


    Sure, AOLers can handle lag, just fine. What difference does an extra few minutes make, in a 2-hour download of a pirated DVD? Why the hell should they care about packet collisions or TCP retransmits?


    But there are plenty of people, for whom a single packet collision could also be the last, if it happens at just the wrong moment. When you start talking about conditions like this, you absolutely need massive bandwidth. In fact, you really need three times that*.


    (*It's a rule-of-thumb that network lag becomes significant, once you exceed one-third of the network's capacity. The odds of some form of data corruption, at that point, become too high to do even basic scientific work. You REALLY want the network to stay around the 1-5% region, for the high-end stuff.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Some thoughts... by T-Punkt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > First, why only 10Gbps? Lucent have 3 Tb long-distance optic fibre, and the primary cost of
      > cable is in putting it into the ground, NOT the hardware.

      What makes you think they put fibers in the ground that explode when more than 10Gb/s is pushed through them? The article doesn't mention what kind of connection is used between the nodes. That 10GBps is a L2 figure, not L1 or L0.
      GEANT is a logical network, not a physical one.

    2. Re:Some thoughts... by jd · · Score: 2

      Because this is the European Union we're talking
      about. Any agency that can pass laws on how bent
      a banana has to be is entirely LIKELY to put
      fibres into the ground that blow up when more than
      the designated amount is pushed through them.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Some thoughts... by warlock · · Score: 2

      Uh, they didn't lay their own fiber, they just purchased connectivity from commercial telcos.

  67. how about 1.6 Tbits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shipping products fron ciena, nortel etc can do
    1.6 Tbits over single fiber. So what is exectly so cool here?

  68. Mod parent to +10 by revscat · · Score: 1

    And to think I wasted my last moderator point on some dumbass troll, when I could have waited for your glorious post and given it the attention it deserves.

    I'd forgotten that. Europe has a tiny land mass of 3,998,000 sq miles, whereas the USA has a massive land mass of 3,717,796 sq miles...

    DAMN those facts! It's so much easier to spit off mindless hyperpole a la Rush Limbaugh than actually doing some research! Thanks, friend.

    - Rev.
    1. Re:Mod parent to +10 by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      That includes a lot of the less populated land masses. Like oh.. huge chunks of russia...

      I bet if you took the landmass of the area of GEANT and where most of these "cool" services are it would be quite a bit less than 4 Million Square miles.

      Now then, Language and culture barriers among the different countries of europe are a MUCH better argument against my parent.

      jeremy

    2. Re:Mod parent to +10 by pubjames · · Score: 2

      That includes a lot of the less populated land masses. Like oh.. huge chunks of russia...

      This is humor right? You are joking, right? I do hope so.

      Just in case you're not, here are a few facts from Encarta for you:

      In both total area and geographic extent Russia is the largest country in the world. With an area of 17,075,200 sq km (6,592,800 sq mi), Russia constitutes more than one-ninth of the world's land area and nearly twice the area of the United States or China.

      Notice that Russia is a country. It is not part of Europe.

      And for christsakes, please look at a map before posing another comment.

    3. Re:Mod parent to +10 by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I know the area the network covers and the areas where things like GSM connectivity are good are in dense areas that are no where near as spaced out as the land scape of the united states. I looked at a map of europe, even encarta. If that 4M square mile figure you quoted earlier is for the entire area of the map shown it includes quite a bit of area that is not densely populated like other parts of europe.

      It does include parts of former russia, not huge chunks, but significant portions relative to the rest of eruope.

      They have MUCH more population density which means there can be more demand for such services in a smaller area making them more profitable to the point where they can exist and make a little money.

      As far as I understand they still lag behind us in DSL capacity. I am about 30 miles from Atlanta and I have a nice 1.5M/385k DSL.

      If you roll out a service to all of the continent of North America you will be covering a huge amount of sparsely populated areas. If you roll out to most of europe where MOST of the people are you will get most of the people. Whereas the population of North America is quite a bit more spread out.

      You can quote to me every figure on the land area of coutries but my point is it is more costly to roll out these technooges into a more sparsely populated area that is spread out. (That is North America).

      Here is a nice PDF which has the land areas PER country and the total land area for Europe.

      PDF

      The land area of eruope is about 2,269,180 hectares. The land area of europe minus the "Russian Federation", which is as far as I know a part of Eruope, is a mere 569600 hectares.

      Population density and land area.

      I punched the numbers in for each little country in eruope to come up with this figure just so I could see every country individually and its land area.

      Anyways

      Jeremy

    4. Re:Mod parent to +10 by pubjames · · Score: 2

      The land area of eruope is about 2,269,180 hectares. The land area of europe minus the "Russian Federation", which is as far as I know a part of Eruope, is a mere 569600 hectares.

      Of course you are using very different figures from the ones I took from Encarta - they are from 1993, so don't take into account certain little changes since then.

      But anyway, using your table, you're right, Europe is about 570k hectares, and the USA is 957k hectares - a difference, but not a vast one.

      However, back to the original point. I consider the argument that Europe has GSM and the USA doesn't because it is 'easier' in Europe to be rubbish.

      As far as I understand they still lag behind us in DSL capacity.

      As far as you understand, or is this an assumption you have made because you assume that surely the USA must be more advanced than Europe in these things? I live between the UK and Spain and I have 2Mbps DSL connections to my homes in both places, and have had for a while now.

    5. Re:Mod parent to +10 by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      Russia is both a country and (partially) part of Europe and (partially) part of Asia. Europe is a strange continent because it's not physically separated from Asia (thus the term "Eurasia"). The bits of the ex-Soviet Union which form today's Russia's straddles both continents.

      Your either misusing or misunderstanding Encarta or you've run afoul of yet another Microsoft bug ...

    6. Re:Mod parent to +10 by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      This is humor right? You are joking, right? I do hope so.

      Just in case you're not, here are a few facts from Encarta for you:

      In both total area and geographic extent Russia is the largest country in the world. With an area of 17,075,200 sq km (6,592,800 sq mi), Russia constitutes more than one-ninth of the world's land area and nearly twice the area of the United States or China.

      Notice that Russia is a country. It is not part of Europe.

      And for christsakes, please look at a map before posing another comment.


      Um, are you sure that version of Encarta is up to date? For one thing, the old U.S.S.R. was that size, but it's fragmented into multiple nations nowadays. Second, the most Western part of Russia has generally been considered part of Europe, at least up until the Cold War...

  69. ACE did it better than TOM.... by tcc · · Score: 2

    At least he pointed where SSE2 was optimized, he did compare oranges with oranges as far as the x86 platform goes.

    Tom missed the obvious comparing Intel-heavily-optimized-SSE2-scene (skull with radiosity) with Athlon like if it was a simple 3d benchmark (he never mentionned the SSE2 optimisation in the radiosity engine that newtek boosted in 7.0b). At least Ace points it out and points out the difference in the render pipeline, which I find VERY professionnal and reliable, tom sucked big time at it, he even got nice emails telling him how to best benchmark on lightwave to make his number constant and not falling into the "specifically optimized for x or y operation" and like he does best: he didn't listen and continued with his flawed benchmarking on the LW platform.

    Kudos Ace.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  70. Re:The Turd Report 12/10/2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  71. US lines by Sideways+The+Dog · · Score: 1

    Lines to the US are the only ones being used at higher than 1%... my theory is that's the Slashdot effect of everyone on this side of the pond looking at their "weather map".

    --
    "Love is never saying you're too proud." -Tonic
  72. well I never..... by cornjones · · Score: 1

    What is this world coming to? Slashdot, usually known for it's levelheaded, facts-based postings (but only after everybody reads the articles) is having a US v. Europe thread. My god i never thought I would see that. At least it is well based in reality with little biased mudslinging being done.

    (yup, this too, is sarcasm)

    c'mon guys, how many times do we have to have the same discussion.

  73. Why so sensitive? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Some quick math shows the countries included in the GEANT project to have a combined land mass of 3,020,000 sq. km. The continental United States has a land mass of ~7,300,000 sq. km (excluding Alaska), but of course if you're talking about Europe then you might as well add Canada in there at another ~9,200,000 sq. km. Of course you are 100% correct: It is astounding how many standards Europe ratifies with the many languages, cultures, etc.

    Having said that I said in another message that this really didn't seem all that big of a pipe, which of course rose the ire of defensive Europeans, yet take a look at http://www.psi.net/news/pr/00/dec13.html (that's from a year ago), http://www.x-changemag.com/hotnews/1bh754256.html. ..hell I can find dozens of carriers that have OC-192 or better backbones all over North America.

    1. Re:Why so sensitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like AT&T with oc-192 across the continent... http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0115carrier.html

    2. Re:Why so sensitive? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I agree, like I said.. land area is not an argument, the figure of the GEANT/dense population areas is quite a bit smaller.

      However language and cultural barriers are a good argument and a fine point

      Jeremy

  74. Darn by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

    I had wondered why the link to my UK server suddenly nosedived. All the extra bandwidth is now DOSing the US transatlantic links...

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  75. You should see what dreamworks has... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need a lot of cash but they have 12 OC-3's I think. I cannot remember but I saw their billing record. So what is that? 45Gbps? lol.

  76. good, the US would slow it down withDMCA filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuckin' US Corporations squashing academia, research and science, except when it profits the company line. Keep it out of the US. Keep everything out of the US. We're policing ourselves into a cold-war era USSR. We're burning our own books. Keep every thought out of the US s that we can gradually progress into a dark age and all be slaves for the elite. Soon we'll all be immigrating back to europe. Fucking windmill.

  77. 100 Mbps soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I'm getting a 100 Mbit fiber to my house on SURFNET (= university network netherlands) in september. Thats better than the 2 Mbit I have right now.. (and only for EUR 10/month)

  78. A GEANT Leap Forward In Networking For Research by Jeff+Probst · · Score: 1, Funny

    who here groaned and thought "well, timothy can't even spell giant" until they read the post?

    1. Re:A GEANT Leap Forward In Networking For Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the above post is a joke. fucking moderators on cheap crack

  79. Didn't seem to be the case in the UK. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    While we were in Edinburgh, we went into one that was about a block off of Queen Street in Edinburgh. While the area where we were in was something that tourists would have enjoyed being, it seemed that a substantive number (definitely more than 50%) were locals with all the brogues and british accents that were present.

    While it's not a representative sample by any stretch, it does disprove your generalization.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  80. If ever an article needed to be moded as flamebait by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    This was it. Everything would have been fine and dandy, until the submitter said, "and it's not even in the US!". There are many practical reasons why each region of the world needs its own high-speed research network. No regional defensiveness would have been felt if the person who submitted this hadn't started it.

  81. Win Ver? by prophecyvi · · Score: 1

    There's a Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc... anyone know of a DOS or Windows equivalent utility?

    1. Re:Win Ver? by Sique · · Score: 1

      Just install Cygwin and compile it for your Windows NT/2000/XP.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  82. Yeah and.. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    Its fine to steal your money for corporate welfare. Your business model isn't working? Thats ok we'll just keep you alive so you can further mismanage the nations resources.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  83. Re:That's G�ANT by StuffMaster · · Score: 0

    Not having accent marks is a STRENGTH, not a weakness. Why can't you just spell it GEANT? What's the difference between that and GÉANT? It's the same word. Can't the French learn pronounciations? Accent marks are useless and unnecessarily complicating.

    Chinese has thousands of characters, look how hard they have it with keyboards, etc.

  84. Re:typical arogant american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UMM - YOU MISS the point - if a mere 5,000 cable modem users could saturate it, and America has not thousands but millions of cable modem users, just where does that put europe indeed? face it, loser, europe will always lag behind america, the die was cast long ago. America lost more money in the WTC disaster and ensuing stock market drop ( you'll have to add in the dot com shit as well) then the ECU's GDP, for christ's sake.

    At present, America's fibre optic networks are using LESS then 10% of their capacity - and just look how much less we pay for it then Euros do.

    You people are so obviously jealous of americans - we usally just sit an smile at your pathetic, child like utternaces.

  85. Re:The Turd Report 12/10/2001 by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 0

    How can you not find it? It is everywhere!

  86. THATS BECAUSE IT ISN'T VERY MUCH - SILLY EUROS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ummm, Qwest has that much alone, hehehe-

    http://www.qwest.com/largebusiness/products/esol ut ions/hosting/fiberNetwork.html

  87. moderators upgrade this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why? because it puts the 10 gig line into true perspective.

  88. Internet2 vs. current commercial backbones? by Dahan · · Score: 2
    Hmm, interesting that the current Internet2 backbone seems to be slower than current commercial backbones. For example, at least according to their website, Sprint's backbone is OC-48 (2.488Gbps); AT&T and Qwest both have OC-48 and OC-192[c] (10Gbps) on their backbones. (BTW, what's the difference between OC-192 and OC-192c?)

    I guess Internet2 is nice in that it doesn't have to share traffic with the commercial Internet, but I still would've expected an academic network to have faster connections than what the rest of us get to use :)

  89. OC192 (10Gb/s) by 2003 ? That's slow :) by airgee · · Score: 1

    According to this article :
    • "Internet2 plans to offer 10 gigabit capacity by 2003," says Marine Chartois of Dante. "By that time I think we will already be looking at 40 gigabits per second. That covers a larger area, more people and a much more difficult environment."
    Well, the problem will be "what to do with 40 Gb/s ?".
  90. Re:That's G�ANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck yourself

  91. Re:Outside the US - GSM in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In Europe everything is more dense and closely located, so sure they can lay out the networking infrastructure for something like this easily

    In the states? Not quite so easy... due to the simple fact of the size. Same reason we don't have GSM"

    What a load of bollocks. Here in Australia we have a country 80% the size of the US with c. 5% of the population. And we have GSM as the main digital mobile standard.

    The problem in the US is "when all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail". You're so fixated on applying the free market to everything that you forget that there are cases (notably in fundamental communications protocols) where it does *not* deliver an optimum solution. Like your chaotic and backward mobile phone system.

  92. European population by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yes, Europe is slightly larger then us. However it's population is many times that of the US"

    Another pig-ignorant American. Gee, this is like shooting fish in a barrel :-)

    I don't have exact figures but I'd very much doubt that European population exceeds that of the USA by more than 50%. It's certainly not "many times" the US.

    1. Re:European population by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Current UN figures put the European population at around 727 Million. I'd underestimated ours a bit, it turns out its 284 million. That puts you at a bit over two and a half times what our population is.

      --
      Why?
  93. Europe != country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Russia is a country.

    So are Ireland, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and all the other members of the European Community.

    The EC is a federation under construction and a very long-term project. It is a *colossal* achievement so far to bring together in peaceful cooperation a continent with such cultural differences and such a history of fratricidal warfare.

    It is not yet a state in its own right. In twenty years' time, when members regard their individual nations as more like states in the US or Australia, maybe.

    And who knows, maybe Russia will be a member by then!

  94. Re:If ever an article needed to be moded as flameb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if the remark hadn't been in the article, some troll would have brought it up in a comment... which would promptly have been modded down to -1, Flamebait.

  95. 10Gbps? How cute. by danFL-NERaves · · Score: 1
    Isn't OC192 kinda pokey for a brand new research network? Canada has already built a 40Gbps research network:

    CA*NET 3 - CANARIE's National Optical Internet

  96. Re:Problems with networking today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, dude...you got some major problems, don't you?

  97. Protocol? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    Please tell me they're not running IPv4 on it.

  98. RW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not get the big fuss over dvd rewritability, i own a CD-R/rw like everyone else but i have not purchased a cd-rw disk in like 4 years they were always more expensive and once i put data on a disc i usually didn't want to destroy it later anyway i can see in backup or something how it might be practical but with a disk that is only rated to be writen to 1000 times or so that does not make me comfortable. i think dvd-r is the future you can play it in most dvd drives players more then dvd+-rw can claim. as far as back up in dvd form dvd-ram kicks both the rewritable standards it can be rewritten like a 100times more than either one and the cartridge is nice protection i wish all dvds and cds had. my choice is a dvd-ram drive that writes dvd-rs and is scsi when will someone bring that out and market it correctly? rewritablity is over rated until the speeds get close to hard drives and the amount of times becomes near infinite.

  99. "A GEANT leap forward..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well whaddya know. The Slashdot Editor Spelling Bug rears it's ugly head again.

    What's that? You say it's supposed to be spelled GEANT? My mistake. Sorry.

  100. Comments on last mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Alot of the comments in this thread seem to be related to the last mile and such. One thing that should be borne in mind is that GEANT is not there to connect individual users at home. It interconnects the NRENs (National Research and Education Networks) of the partner countries. The NRENs in turn connect together all of the universities together.

    GEANT is not intended for high-speed home internet access, instead it is supposed to enable collaboration, and as a few have mentioned the distribution of data from the new CERN particle collider and GRID computing.