I bet you would be fun at parties too if you took your ADAH medication and were able to actually stay on a point without changing subjects or moving goalposts in a pointless anti-gubmint rant.
Do you have locks on your doors? They won't stop a thief that wants in either, but I bet you use them all the same. Locks do at least retard their entry and keeps the thieves with low initiative out so there is at least some benefit.
Of course the locks on my door don't stop hardened criminals. But I didn't put locks on my door to stop the influx of hardened criminals and drugs into my home. I mean that is the argument the orange faced dipshit is using.
Now quick build that wall so your kids don't get raped.
Am I the only person that finds it oddly predictable that, in response to a story about TLS, almost every single comment is a biased (one way or the other) comment about "the Wall" or the Donald or the Problem with America Today.
IT incompetence is not news. Being caused by a shutdown through a dysfunctional and deeply dividing government on an issue that people feel passionate about on the other hand is news.
If I park my car in a public space, would that be legally "abandoned property"?
Where I live, if it is parked without paying at the meter it is abandoned, or if it hasn't moved from a free parking spot in 3 months it is abandoned.
I know this because an arsehole in my street tried to convince the council that my car was abandoned because I parked it on the street every day. I solved this problem by parking in front of his house instead.
It doesn't get used because the "knowingly" part is virtually impossible to prove.
Surely you could claim that no paralegal would have been able to get their degree by applying this level of stupid and ignorance to their profession and therefore the only conclusion is that they did this "knowingly".:-)
They will fail in my opinion as Huawei is a major 5G patent holder.
Countries don't license patents, companies do. You'll find in the world Huawei won't be able to get on without working together with the likes of Vodafone and other telecom companies, and they will be hard pressed getting a patent agreement that says: "Products not allowed to be used in country X"
While I agree in principle it's worth remembering that those hostile features made the devices incredibly desirable in the view of customers. They may be hostile to certain customers, but for the vast majority of them for a long time they have been giving them exactly what they want: a status symbol even shinier than that last.
To be fair the Germans have a long an convoluted political process that normally results on coalition negotiations. The Australians on the other hand, man we swap prime ministers more frequently than we test our smoke detectors.
but if you need a court to protect you from Amazon dash buttons, there's really no saving you from yourself.
Temporal issues alone. Germany wards off potential issues with consumer protection laws. America just sues every fucking company for every fucking thing in what appears to be an exercise in keeping the legal industry afloat.
Germans as usual are more efficient, even at protecting people from themselves.
Otto is just one company. There are several like it in the EU also with >$1bn revenue. That's just the thing. Amazon has plenty of competitors in the EU, just the antitrust laws prevent them from becoming the anti-competitive monsters that Amazon is.
does anybody have a theory for why Europe cannot seem to come up with their own online shopping portal?
Europe has plenty, (plenty meaning plentiful and implying plurals). You just haven't heard of them because Europe has strong consumer focused antitrust laws that prevent single companies from becoming the anti-competitive behemoths that the USA allows.
The fact that the EU doesn't have a company the size of Amazon is a feature, not a flaw, and a damn good one at that.
One day I would like to hear about the outcome of a lawsuit. It's worth remembering that anyone can sue about anything. In the media we typically only hear about people doing some suing, but quite often not if they actually have been even partially successful and nearly always we don't hear about the outcome.
It does not. Several subparts to part 15 apply to broad spectrum, and unlicensed spectrum. Your post is only correct for some clauses of Part 15.
Some parts definitely do apply to narrow bands of the spectrum. But quite critically Part 15 in a general case for an non-intentional radiator (reads consumer electronics) specifically says it must accept interference without any specification to the interference's spectrum. So the idea of having the FCC regulate this the same way as they would the radio spectrum would result in no change. Cameras would still be allowed to be damaged by lasers.
That isn't the problem. The problem is this batshit stupid idea that a bill of appropriation should have anything at all to do with any topic other than to finance the government. Many other countries have systems in place to prevent government shutdowns for precisely this stupid reason. Children throwing temper tantrums (on both sides) should never lead to functioning government departments going without pay. Children with power should never be in a position to be able to hold these departments to ransom.
These problems can be fixed without changing any part of the process you just described.
So this argument about things being outside the democratic process or holding the government hostage ring hollow.
Just because there is a process in the USA doesn't mean this stupidity isn't outside the democratic process. Quite the opposite. Democracy is not whatever the USA says it is, and the process in the USA has some significant refinement to go in order to be truly democratic. No perfect democracy would allow financial hostages to be taken due to the belief of one person.
The "democratic process" involves Presidential assent to laws passed by legislature. Congress can override the veto if it can.
That isn't the problem here. The problem here is the President not signing laws having the power to completely shutdown a government due to a completely irrelevant issue.
The answer is not to remove the presidential veto, the answer is to pass laws that prevent bills of appropriation having anything at all to do with anything other than keeping the existing government departments running. Many other countries have this in their legal process precisely because the idea of a democratic leader holding a government to ransom for any reason is batshit stupid.
No that wink face is a "I'm being 100% serious while at the same time waiting to see the anti-Windows crowd's heads explode" winkface:-)
But seriously this is to their credit. VLC is available not only on a wide range of platforms but it's available in a native form for that platform.
You want an exe? You got it. You want a tarball? You got that too. dmg for your Mac? Of course. dpkg? Yep, rpm? Yep. Okay that's the easy stuff.
Android store? Yesirree Windows store? You betchya. Apple App store? You got that too.
Want it on Linux but don't want to use a package manager? oh SNAP! How about a complete sandboxed environment for your video player? DOCKER! Or maybe you just feel like a hacker, compile it from source!
Slashdot Mirror
and now we'll see...
I bet you would be fun at parties too if you took your ADAH medication and were able to actually stay on a point without changing subjects or moving goalposts in a pointless anti-gubmint rant.
Do you have locks on your doors? They won't stop a thief that wants in either, but I bet you use them all the same. Locks do at least retard their entry and keeps the thieves with low initiative out so there is at least some benefit.
Of course the locks on my door don't stop hardened criminals. But I didn't put locks on my door to stop the influx of hardened criminals and drugs into my home. I mean that is the argument the orange faced dipshit is using.
Now quick build that wall so your kids don't get raped.
Not a separate topic when 40% of accidents happen at intersections.
Yep those damn highway speedcameras causing them yellow light accidents. I think it may have fried your braincells.
Am I the only person that finds it oddly predictable that, in response to a story about TLS, almost every single comment is a biased (one way or the other) comment about "the Wall" or the Donald or the Problem with America Today.
IT incompetence is not news. Being caused by a shutdown through a dysfunctional and deeply dividing government on an issue that people feel passionate about on the other hand is news.
The shutdown is the only leverage the President has.
If your president has "leverage" you not longer have a functioning democracy.
Additional post: And this varies too. Where I used to live the car is considered abandoned if it is in a public place and the registration lapses.
If I park my car in a public space, would that be legally "abandoned property"?
Where I live, if it is parked without paying at the meter it is abandoned, or if it hasn't moved from a free parking spot in 3 months it is abandoned.
I know this because an arsehole in my street tried to convince the council that my car was abandoned because I parked it on the street every day. I solved this problem by parking in front of his house instead.
It doesn't get used because the "knowingly" part is virtually impossible to prove.
Surely you could claim that no paralegal would have been able to get their degree by applying this level of stupid and ignorance to their profession and therefore the only conclusion is that they did this "knowingly". :-)
They will fail in my opinion as Huawei is a major 5G patent holder.
Countries don't license patents, companies do. You'll find in the world Huawei won't be able to get on without working together with the likes of Vodafone and other telecom companies, and they will be hard pressed getting a patent agreement that says: "Products not allowed to be used in country X"
Can you really put a price on owning an Apple product?
If you had to ask what that price was, can you really consider yourself an Apple customer?
If you want a phone for a price buy Android. This here is an Apple, and that is all you need to know about it.
While I agree in principle it's worth remembering that those hostile features made the devices incredibly desirable in the view of customers. They may be hostile to certain customers, but for the vast majority of them for a long time they have been giving them exactly what they want: a status symbol even shinier than that last.
It better have a vibrate on demand function.
To be fair the Germans have a long an convoluted political process that normally results on coalition negotiations. The Australians on the other hand, man we swap prime ministers more frequently than we test our smoke detectors.
but if you need a court to protect you from Amazon dash buttons, there's really no saving you from yourself.
Temporal issues alone. Germany wards off potential issues with consumer protection laws. America just sues every fucking company for every fucking thing in what appears to be an exercise in keeping the legal industry afloat.
Germans as usual are more efficient, even at protecting people from themselves.
Otto is just one company. There are several like it in the EU also with >$1bn revenue. That's just the thing. Amazon has plenty of competitors in the EU, just the antitrust laws prevent them from becoming the anti-competitive monsters that Amazon is.
does anybody have a theory for why Europe cannot seem to come up with their own online shopping portal?
Europe has plenty, (plenty meaning plentiful and implying plurals). You just haven't heard of them because Europe has strong consumer focused antitrust laws that prevent single companies from becoming the anti-competitive behemoths that the USA allows.
The fact that the EU doesn't have a company the size of Amazon is a feature, not a flaw, and a damn good one at that.
One day I would like to hear about the outcome of a lawsuit. It's worth remembering that anyone can sue about anything. In the media we typically only hear about people doing some suing, but quite often not if they actually have been even partially successful and nearly always we don't hear about the outcome.
Because it's a legal requirement to collect them in most countries in the world.
How exactly will they "understand" the gender of the passenger? Check for pink hair and Tumblr stickers?
How do you do it? Or do you walk through the city taking DNA swabs of everyone to get a biological opinion?
Part 15 applies to narrow bands of the spectrum.
It does not. Several subparts to part 15 apply to broad spectrum, and unlicensed spectrum. Your post is only correct for some clauses of Part 15.
Some parts definitely do apply to narrow bands of the spectrum. But quite critically Part 15 in a general case for an non-intentional radiator (reads consumer electronics) specifically says it must accept interference without any specification to the interference's spectrum. So the idea of having the FCC regulate this the same way as they would the radio spectrum would result in no change. Cameras would still be allowed to be damaged by lasers.
That isn't the problem. The problem is this batshit stupid idea that a bill of appropriation should have anything at all to do with any topic other than to finance the government. Many other countries have systems in place to prevent government shutdowns for precisely this stupid reason. Children throwing temper tantrums (on both sides) should never lead to functioning government departments going without pay. Children with power should never be in a position to be able to hold these departments to ransom.
These problems can be fixed without changing any part of the process you just described.
So this argument about things being outside the democratic process or holding the government hostage ring hollow.
Just because there is a process in the USA doesn't mean this stupidity isn't outside the democratic process. Quite the opposite. Democracy is not whatever the USA says it is, and the process in the USA has some significant refinement to go in order to be truly democratic. No perfect democracy would allow financial hostages to be taken due to the belief of one person.
The "democratic process" involves Presidential assent to laws passed by legislature. Congress can override the veto if it can.
That isn't the problem here. The problem here is the President not signing laws having the power to completely shutdown a government due to a completely irrelevant issue.
The answer is not to remove the presidential veto, the answer is to pass laws that prevent bills of appropriation having anything at all to do with anything other than keeping the existing government departments running. Many other countries have this in their legal process precisely because the idea of a democratic leader holding a government to ransom for any reason is batshit stupid.
A camera should withstand being pointed at the sun.
a) why? It's not what they are designed for.
b) sun happily damages cameras too, it all depends on exposure.
Broadcasting light interference is no different than broadcasting radio interference (in terms of responsibility, not physics).
Which is why we have part 15 of the FCC rules. You will accept the interference and you will like it.
No that wink face is a "I'm being 100% serious while at the same time waiting to see the anti-Windows crowd's heads explode" winkface :-)
But seriously this is to their credit. VLC is available not only on a wide range of platforms but it's available in a native form for that platform.
You want an exe? You got it.
You want a tarball? You got that too.
dmg for your Mac? Of course.
dpkg? Yep, rpm? Yep. Okay that's the easy stuff.
Android store? Yesirree
Windows store? You betchya.
Apple App store? You got that too.
Want it on Linux but don't want to use a package manager? oh SNAP!
How about a complete sandboxed environment for your video player? DOCKER!
Or maybe you just feel like a hacker, compile it from source!