No but your drug dealer is. You seem to be stuck on a trail of irrelevance. The ruling here is consistent in that it is directly related to the crime. Criminal finance results in assets being seized and accounts frozen at a bank, breaking the road rules and not responding to police results in license suspension.
These are all direct up the chain of providers, as is the Domain Registrar when the registered domain contains infringing content.
Now for your example one would need to say the ISP responsible for the personal home line of the person who registered the domain on a 3rd party server somewhere would be liable. That is as ridiculous as your google maps scenario.
The same reason that we don't shut the DMV when someone gets their drivers license revoked, and don't close down the Fed when some criminal's account gets frozen and assets seized.
That's because your example is an irrelevant strawman. The logic is actually quite consistent with other cases. Criminal cases in the courts where the government is unable to directly prosecute an individual due to being unresponsive often result in a secondary source of punishment for that person, e.g. seizing assets, freezing accounts, etc.
And yes you will find that if a motorist runs someone over and then doesn't respond to the police they will find their drivers license revoked.
There are laws and then there's evidence. Sure we all believe that Huawei may be spying on USA citizens on behalf of the government. But there's only one thing we know for certain: The USA based carriers and network companies definitely are and have been caught doing so.
An American and a Russian meet up for coffee and learn from each other. American: It is a shame you don't have any freedom in Russia. Russian: How so? American: I have the right and freedom to stand outside our government building and shout criticisms about Trump. Russian (confused): We have much better freedoms than that. Not only can I stand outside the Kremlin and shout criticisms about Trump, I may even get a medal for doing so.
When someone is making a point it is often best to not go out seeking inspiration or creativity in doing so. Using introductions to your paragraph such as the phrase "In conclusion" is nothing more than a literary tool. You need to know when to apply it and when not to.
You move the goalposts, but it didn't matter because the kicker seems to be blind. Significantly blind? No maybe he was doubly blind and everyone else was doubly blind? Or is it just in an area now?
Who can keep track when you keep changing your argument.
Oh and to your earlier comment on 80k people who are happy because they are smarter, you're finally getting to see the fundamental point: Smart people do something about their problems and don't end up being 67 years old with no savings, living in a city they can't afford with animals that eat all their available savings and then bitch when eventuality of their predicament sets in: They no longer have an income stream to support their lifestyle.
If consumer popularity had caught on, the "technical problems" would have been solved long ago.
How so? Consumer popularity doesn't change the fact that Linux is predominantly community driven. There are several specific distributions and projects to solve the technical problems that affect Linux on Desktop and look where they went; publicly shunned. Then there are underlying problems with the development model and ecosystem being primarily geared towards server environments and power users.
I would feel like a fraud encouraging others to use a system that I don't find adequate to use myself. But that's just me.
That kind of is the problem. You're thinking about yourself and not the user you're potentially talking to. (I don't run Linux on my on desktop for that reason, however I still advocate it depending on what someone wants or needs).
You take the stairs because people are blocking the escalators, it's the only scenario where it may be faster. You know what's faster than running up stairs? Running up an escalator.
And yet in a situation where both directions are relevant to the overall experience: video conferencing, calling, or say timely feedback of input events in reaction to a video feed, then QoS even on only one of the streams actually makes a big differences.
Sometimes marketing is just telling people about something that already makes sense.
By your reasoning, I'm not supporting her, she's supporting herself.
The UK got pulled out of the deepest of economic shits by joining the EU and now just wants no part of it.
Think of it this way. Your daughter rebelled and left home. Then when she got into financial strife after being kicked out by her boyfriend she came home for support. You put her on her feet, and then she buggered off again.
isn't good enough to have any say or special access.
Of course it's good enough, but the problem is not what's logical, it's what the two world leaders in bureaucracy defined in legal contracts at a time where no one expected someone to leave the EU.
It's not a case of "wants, or asks" it's a case of piling through a metric shitton of legal documents to see what at all is even possible.
I will bet you a dollar that within a few years the UK is back in the Galileo program as part of the post Brexit trade agreements.
It would be really interesting if two people who disagree on the likelihood of success could agree on how to measure the success of this experiment.
They could start by agreeing on the goal of the experiment. For starters don't call it an experiment of UBI if what they are testing isn't Universal, isn't Basic, and isn't Income.
Err sorry but no. All the major cities in the Netherlands have parking in the inner city district. One of your "newest" cities was built from the ground up with car transportation in mind.
Don't get me wrong The Netherlands has other great initiatives to dissuade people from driving a car. The fact that it driving to my city centre takes me 19 minutes, catching a metro takes 23minutes, and cycling takes 22minutes, and the parking in the city centre would quickly bankrupt me is a good start. But driving right into the middle of most cities is still very much an option.
No that would make it worse. Not pumping oil from the north sea would not change the consumption of oil around the world one bit. What it would do is funnel money from Norway's coffers into those of privately run oil and gas majors.
Norways is investing in green energy. Are the Koch brothers?
If I mount a filesystem, I don't expect it to start executing random files on it at all.
Who is talking about mounting filesystems?
What about a HID device that captures keystrokes or inserts its own? What about a network device that captures packets while the device is locked, or overrides your settings to send your data elsewhere?
And when we start talking about mounting filesystems then you have to remember that most attack vectors don't rely on "executing random files" as much as use existing bugs in software that would legitimately look at the mounted filesystem. Stuxnet spread via a file on the filesystem that was never "executed" and wasn't even a legitimate executable file.
And yet, there are ways to trick the USB firmware into misclassifying a device trivially.
And as a result the mass storage device won't be able to do much more than send keystrokes back and forth.
The risk and malware vector you're describing it mis-classifying a functioning device while a second loads in the background with a different classification. This would still prevent miss-classifying as an attack vector when the screen is locked.
Slashdot Mirror
If I remember correctly, it came out in June, however. It was definitely summertime.
That's just in time for the Christmas in July season.
Sitting on a rock, similarly, does not make that rock into a chair.
A chair is something with a very specific shape. Sitting on a rock however does make it a seat.
No but your drug dealer is. You seem to be stuck on a trail of irrelevance. The ruling here is consistent in that it is directly related to the crime. Criminal finance results in assets being seized and accounts frozen at a bank, breaking the road rules and not responding to police results in license suspension.
These are all direct up the chain of providers, as is the Domain Registrar when the registered domain contains infringing content.
Now for your example one would need to say the ISP responsible for the personal home line of the person who registered the domain on a 3rd party server somewhere would be liable. That is as ridiculous as your google maps scenario.
The same reason that we don't shut the DMV when someone gets their drivers license revoked, and don't close down the Fed when some criminal's account gets frozen and assets seized.
I fail to see the logic this court used.
That's because your example is an irrelevant strawman. The logic is actually quite consistent with other cases. Criminal cases in the courts where the government is unable to directly prosecute an individual due to being unresponsive often result in a secondary source of punishment for that person, e.g. seizing assets, freezing accounts, etc.
And yes you will find that if a motorist runs someone over and then doesn't respond to the police they will find their drivers license revoked.
And yet, Republicans are getting this passed. Now, if Trump doesn't sign it, then you'll have a gripe.
I think you only read the first 5 words of the GP's post and then immediately went on a completely unrelated and irrelevant defensive.
Try and read the post in its entirety, the post was well structured so as to make the post obvious by standing on its own in a separate sentence.
Source?
Quantum mechanics. The source ceases to exist when it is observed.
There are laws and then there's evidence. Sure we all believe that Huawei may be spying on USA citizens on behalf of the government. But there's only one thing we know for certain: The USA based carriers and network companies definitely are and have been caught doing so.
An American and a Russian meet up for coffee and learn from each other.
American: It is a shame you don't have any freedom in Russia.
Russian: How so?
American: I have the right and freedom to stand outside our government building and shout criticisms about Trump.
Russian (confused): We have much better freedoms than that. Not only can I stand outside the Kremlin and shout criticisms about Trump, I may even get a medal for doing so.
When someone is making a point it is often best to not go out seeking inspiration or creativity in doing so. Using introductions to your paragraph such as the phrase "In conclusion" is nothing more than a literary tool. You need to know when to apply it and when not to.
You move the goalposts, but it didn't matter because the kicker seems to be blind. Significantly blind? No maybe he was doubly blind and everyone else was doubly blind? Or is it just in an area now?
Who can keep track when you keep changing your argument.
Oh and to your earlier comment on 80k people who are happy because they are smarter, you're finally getting to see the fundamental point: Smart people do something about their problems and don't end up being 67 years old with no savings, living in a city they can't afford with animals that eat all their available savings and then bitch when eventuality of their predicament sets in: They no longer have an income stream to support their lifestyle.
If consumer popularity had caught on, the "technical problems" would have been solved long ago.
How so? Consumer popularity doesn't change the fact that Linux is predominantly community driven. There are several specific distributions and projects to solve the technical problems that affect Linux on Desktop and look where they went; publicly shunned. Then there are underlying problems with the development model and ecosystem being primarily geared towards server environments and power users.
I would feel like a fraud encouraging others to use a system that I don't find adequate to use myself. But that's just me.
That kind of is the problem. You're thinking about yourself and not the user you're potentially talking to. (I don't run Linux on my on desktop for that reason, however I still advocate it depending on what someone wants or needs).
You take the stairs because people are blocking the escalators, it's the only scenario where it may be faster. You know what's faster than running up stairs? Running up an escalator.
And yet in a situation where both directions are relevant to the overall experience: video conferencing, calling, or say timely feedback of input events in reaction to a video feed, then QoS even on only one of the streams actually makes a big differences.
Sometimes marketing is just telling people about something that already makes sense.
By your reasoning, I'm not supporting her, she's supporting herself.
The UK got pulled out of the deepest of economic shits by joining the EU and now just wants no part of it.
Think of it this way. Your daughter rebelled and left home. Then when she got into financial strife after being kicked out by her boyfriend she came home for support. You put her on her feet, and then she buggered off again.
That bitch!
isn't good enough to have any say or special access.
Of course it's good enough, but the problem is not what's logical, it's what the two world leaders in bureaucracy defined in legal contracts at a time where no one expected someone to leave the EU.
It's not a case of "wants, or asks" it's a case of piling through a metric shitton of legal documents to see what at all is even possible.
I will bet you a dollar that within a few years the UK is back in the Galileo program as part of the post Brexit trade agreements.
More satellites, more precision.
Nope, doesn't quite work like that beyond a certain (rather low) number of satellites.
It would be really interesting if two people who disagree on the likelihood of success could agree on how to measure the success of this experiment.
They could start by agreeing on the goal of the experiment. For starters don't call it an experiment of UBI if what they are testing isn't Universal, isn't Basic, and isn't Income.
There have been at least 3 recent experiments at UBI. One in Norway, one in Canada, and one in the U.S. (State, not Federal).
All three failed miserably.
And yet all three were not at all fitting the definition or the economic theory of UBI. And this new experiment doesn't either.
"Back home, if you don't want to work you just don't. You still collect a nice 'paycheck' from the government every month."
If the paycheck was "nice" it wasn't Universal Basic Income. UBI keeps people off the street, it doesn't keep people out of work.
As for the rent, only the willfully ignorant would claim there hasn't been a significant increase
And thus the goalposts move.
Gravity is not "a theory", stupid.
Oh LOL. Someone doesn't know how science works and then calls someone else stupid. Did you go to school?
Err sorry but no. All the major cities in the Netherlands have parking in the inner city district. One of your "newest" cities was built from the ground up with car transportation in mind.
Don't get me wrong The Netherlands has other great initiatives to dissuade people from driving a car. The fact that it driving to my city centre takes me 19 minutes, catching a metro takes 23minutes, and cycling takes 22minutes, and the parking in the city centre would quickly bankrupt me is a good start. But driving right into the middle of most cities is still very much an option.
Stop pumping oil and gas out of the North Sea.
No that would make it worse. Not pumping oil from the north sea would not change the consumption of oil around the world one bit. What it would do is funnel money from Norway's coffers into those of privately run oil and gas majors.
Norways is investing in green energy. Are the Koch brothers?
If I mount a filesystem, I don't expect it to start executing random files on it at all.
Who is talking about mounting filesystems?
What about a HID device that captures keystrokes or inserts its own?
What about a network device that captures packets while the device is locked, or overrides your settings to send your data elsewhere?
And when we start talking about mounting filesystems then you have to remember that most attack vectors don't rely on "executing random files" as much as use existing bugs in software that would legitimately look at the mounted filesystem. Stuxnet spread via a file on the filesystem that was never "executed" and wasn't even a legitimate executable file.
And yet, there are ways to trick the USB firmware into misclassifying a device trivially.
And as a result the mass storage device won't be able to do much more than send keystrokes back and forth.
The risk and malware vector you're describing it mis-classifying a functioning device while a second loads in the background with a different classification. This would still prevent miss-classifying as an attack vector when the screen is locked.