Slashdot Mirror


User: EnVisiCrypt

EnVisiCrypt's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
217
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 217

  1. Re:Wow 110 kilometers on Use Multiple Channels for Faster Wireless Networking · · Score: 1

    I know you're joking, but assuming that a pringles can is 9.25in tall (the best figure I could find), it would take 450,082 end to end to reach that distance. :)

  2. If I had to make a recommendation... on Linux vs. Windows: Choice vs. Usability · · Score: 1

    I would definitely say that Ximian desktop would be the way forward. It installs and configures a lot of niceties like Evolution, Open Office, management tools, and a sane desktop configuration.

    I do believe the proliferation of window managers/desktop environments is a good thing. However, if business/home oriented distros could co-ordinate around 1 default desktop, things would be much more useable. It wouldn't remove any choice from the end user, the others would still be available, but the default could be "just there" for beginners to use.

    Aside from all that, if the more tech-oriented folks want a distribution that caters to them and doesn't lay a default on them, they can still check out Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, LFS, or even *gasp* one of the BSD's.

  3. Re:OS X: off to a pretty good start on Mac OS X Maximum Security · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows 98 is vulnerable to the overflow condition that Blaster exploits as well, not just 2K.

  4. Re:Uhm, right... on Microsoft Code at Fault for Half of all Windows Crashes · · Score: 1

    Ah, but the benefit to the microkernel is that a buggy *driver* is not going to kill your system.

    If it's a driver that's essential to the operation of the device, then it's the developer of the device's responsibility to write the driver themselves, OR, choose a reliable third party to provide the driver.

  5. Re:A moving target is still a target on WindowsUpdate.com Secured, Permanently · · Score: 1

    My point is that it wouldn't work anyway. If the work exploits a buffer overflow in the RPC service, that hack isn't going to work. Period. If the program is executed by a program that is allowed to run, it's not going to work.

    It's not a good idea, and there are better ways to handle it.

  6. Re:A moving target is still a target on WindowsUpdate.com Secured, Permanently · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is a bad idea. Not only does it not account for polymorphism in the name, but is also not foolproof.

    For instance, block an image name, then set your Internet Explorer home page to that image. Bam. It executes with no problems. As long as a trusted program executes it, Windows will not complain. The group policy only prevents the user from running it directly.

  7. Re:Uhm, right... on Microsoft Code at Fault for Half of all Windows Crashes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yup.

    I've done an embedded system with QNX, and it is quite the nice RTOS.

    Under QNX, the devices hang out in the device manager, which is not in the kernel space, and the drivers are handled by the process manager, also not in the kernel. Since the kernel exists just to pass messages, essentially, it is uncrashable.

  8. Re:Sad.. on One Last New Episode of Futurama · · Score: 1

    You are not nice. And an idiot, apparently, as you've called this gentleman. The show aired on the Tracey Ullman show, not Tracy Morgan.

  9. Re:Yet... on Major Flaw Found In Cisco IOS Devices · · Score: 1

    It's like she's staring right into my soul... *shivers*

  10. Re: Your sig on Messaging Over IPv6 Headers · · Score: 1

    With your circumvention device, you have cost an estimated Eleventy Billion dollars in sales for my organization. Expect to hear from my lawyers.

  11. Re: Your sig on Messaging Over IPv6 Headers · · Score: 1

    01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100001 01101011 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01000100 01001101 01000011 01000001 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101110 00100000 01001000 01100101 01111000 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101100 01100001 01101101 01100101 01110010 01110011 00101110 00100000 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 00110000 01110111 01101110 01110011 00100000 01101010 00110000 00110000 00101110

    Oh, and mods, buzz off unless you feel like converting the binary.

  12. Re:Is copyright going the way of prohibition? on Filesharing Up 10% After RIAA Threatens Users · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are lot of people who shoplift. Why hasn't that been made legal yet, anyway?

  13. Re:Simple Solution on Hormel Sues Over SpamArrest Name · · Score: 1

    This is not insightful. It is, however, funny.

  14. Re:No on (When) Will Linux Pass Apple On The Desktop? · · Score: 1
    Did you even read the parent? Parent said
    "I purchased a dual-capable 2.0Ghz xeon machine from Dell a while ago for $700"
    I was refuting that point. The kind of system that he's talking about is closer to $2,500 than $700.

    I will never claim that Apple's are cheaper up-front than an equivalent PC, because they aren't. TCO is another issue for another time.
  15. Re:Not quite.. on (When) Will Linux Pass Apple On The Desktop? · · Score: 1

    That's not the point though. Cry all you want about how good GiMP is, but Photoshop users are not willing to switch, and a large part of that is the interface, regardless of whether it is more logical. The fact that Photoshop users are not compelled to switch is particularly telling as GiMP is about $609 cheaper

  16. Re:Not quite.. on (When) Will Linux Pass Apple On The Desktop? · · Score: 1

    GiMP may match feature for feature, but it's interface is no good for too many people. It may work for some, but for most, it just doesn't work. I know it doesn't for me.

  17. Re:No on (When) Will Linux Pass Apple On The Desktop? · · Score: 2, Informative

    I call shenanigans.

    A bottom line (and I mean BOTTOM. radeon VE, onboard sound, 256 mb ram, 40gb hard drive) Xeon capable Dell, *starts* at $1,048. If you got yours refurb, it's not a fair comparison. Look at the Apple refurbs if you're going to do that.

    A truly comparable, new Dell runs $2,509, which is much less reasonable, especially given that the Xeon is a 32-bit processor.

  18. Re:It's all good science until ... on Nanotech Pinball and Miniature Engines · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to break it to the mod's, but this is not offtopic. In fact, it's quite funny.

    See, the micro-engine charges the cellphones. Combustion + ear = ear on fire. That was his joke. Even if you thought it unfunny, it was on-topic.

    Posted with a bonus in hopes that someone will see this.

  19. Re:SciFi does it again on Using Sling Shot Power to Hurl Into Orbit · · Score: 1

    They are the same group, really. Some of the best sci-fi writers I've ever met are salespeople.

    "You need this software to prove string theory, walk your dog, kill Schroedinger's cat and be done by next Thursday? Absolutely!"

    Sci-fi indeed.

  20. Re:Who needs self-destruction? on More Incompatible DVDs and CDs Coming Your Way · · Score: 1

    FOTR Plays fine in my Xbox. What kind of problems are you having?

  21. Re:Apple Needs a Little Sun To Grow on Sun's Last Stand · · Score: 1

    Java *is* an Apple supported language. Just open project builder and see.

  22. Best. Troll. Ever. on PPC 970 Powerbooks and Powermacs in Production? · · Score: 1

    I normally hate trolls, but I have to hand it to you, you did a good job with this one.

  23. Re:details have been pulled on iTunes Indie Meeting Notes · · Score: 1

    Apple already settled that suit. Apple paid $30 million to use the name Apple in association with sound recordings after they added sound to the Macintosh, AFAIK.

  24. Re:Hrm. on GameFAQs Acquired by CNET · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the site that I had, it covered about 1/8. If I had used skyscrapers, interstitials, and pop-ups, I probably could have knocked about 1/2 the site's cost.

    It was still too little, though, especially given how many users that would have driven away.

  25. Re:Hrm. on GameFAQs Acquired by CNET · · Score: 1

    Having run an "advertising supported" site, I can safely say that advertising *does not* even come close to paying the bills.

    Just ask Taco, and I'm sure he'll tell you that the ads don't even come close to paying the bandwidth costs.