Slashdot Mirror


Using Sling Shot Power to Hurl Into Orbit

the_2nd_coming writes "space.com has an article about a new application of a very old technology. NASA is putting money into Momentum-eXchange/Electrodynamic Reboost tether technology -- MXER for short -- an innovative concept that if implemented would station miles and miles of cart-wheeling cable in orbit around the Earth. Then, rotating like a giant sling, the cable would swoop down and pick up spacecraft in low orbits, then hurl them to higher orbits or even lob them onward to other planets."

310 comments

  1. the bad boys of science. by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The key scientists behind this project are Dr. Bartholemew J. Simpson and Dr. Dennis "The Menace" Mitchell.

    Mike

    1. Re:the bad boys of science. by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      i second that, but any reference to the simpsons is given +funny automagically

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    2. Re:the bad boys of science. by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      i wonder how much the insurance is gonna cost for this...

    3. Re:the bad boys of science. by MouseR · · Score: 2, Funny

      any reference to the simpsons is given +funny automagically

      I didn't do it.

    4. Re:the bad boys of science. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

  2. A waste of time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already been proven that any cable of that length made using any currently-known material would snap under the tension of whirling an object of even the mass of a tennis ball. They're probably talking about meters and not miles.

    1. Re:A waste of time? by alexre1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wasn't this the subject of an Aurthur C. Clarke SCI-FI novel? Apparently they found methods to create a super strong material that allowed them to make an elevator to space? It was a very interesting read, especially to us nerds. The book dabbled in some interesting physics, the methods required to create such an elevator (given that a strong enough material exists), etc. Anyone remember the title of this book? I vaguely remember 'paradise' as one of the words. Alex

    2. Re:A waste of time? by calyxa · · Score: 2, Informative

      _The Fountains of Paradise_

      I guess since /. is making me wait 20 seconds, I can go get the book and find other useful info, such as ISBN and date of publication...

      ah, good thing, too, as I'd forgotten the "The" in the title.

      copyright 1978, ISBN 0-345-25356-6

      -calyxa

      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
    3. Re:A waste of time? by Tmack · · Score: 4, Informative
      Maybe this stuff will be strong enough to overcome the limit. Its definately a step in the right direction. Im too lazy to run through the material engineering aspects of it all right now and actually figure the needed strength/weight ratio needed. Im sure its something insanely strong.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    4. Re:A waste of time? by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, another poster already pushed the title but I believe it was a mono-molecular carbon fiber cable that they finally developed to support a "space elevator" application. Someday maybe :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    5. Re:A waste of time? by foolish · · Score: 1

      Well the nice thing about the tethers they are talking about is that the don't require the strength to mass ratio that a space elevator does, since the systems are mostly out of any appreciable atmosphere by that point.

    6. Re:A waste of time? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      And more to the point, because they're in orbit they don't need to support their own weight.

  3. Hmmmm by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dennis the Mennis apparently grew up and got a job at NASA!

    1. Re:Hmmmm by firehzd1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He got the idea one day when he was looking at his trusty old slingshot he used to keep in his back pocket!

    2. Re:Hmmmm by sig+cop · · Score: 0

      Me too!!! Me Too!!!

    3. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Captain Obvious!

    4. Re:Hmmmm by 680x0 · · Score: 1

      I'm suprised no-one seems to have pointed out the difference between a sling (payload at end of inelastic tether orbiting around central stationary point... much like this proposal).. and a slingshot (payload at one end of elastic band which is attached to stationary point). Two different ideas which just happen to have similar names.

    5. Re:Hmmmm by firehzd1 · · Score: 1

      You cut me. You cut me deep Shrek....

    6. Re:Hmmmm by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... not sure but i seem to recal Dennis' dad working for some space/aerospace industry. At least in the cartoon..... Maybe i'm just crazy

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  4. Or perhaps by 1984 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Swoop down and clobber spacecraft in lower orbits, smashing them into tiny pieces that could go one to clobber other spacecraft. Or perhaps larger pieces that re enter in fiery displays of wasted millions.

    Or it might work. That'd be something.

    1. Re:Or perhaps by jelle · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a good chance that spacetethers can make the re-entry speed of spacecraft lower and also can reduce the required speed for takeoff. And lower speed means lower forces and less fuel, means less risk.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:Or perhaps by FauxReal · · Score: 0

      Well maybe they can incorporate this into the Star-Wars Defense System... you could smack those missiles into bits before they hit thier targets. I hope they put some blinking red lights on this thing thoug... Imagine the anger of an advanced alien race when we inadvertantly dent one of thier starships?

  5. hm... interesting possibilities... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I once used sling shot power to hurl little rocks at my neighbor's cat. Used the middle finger from a rubber kitchen glove, a cut-apart 2-liter soda bottle, and a pipe clamp.

    If they built one of those in space, they'd be able to scare the shit out of my neighbor's cat.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:hm... interesting possibilities... by solarlux · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Shhh!! Don't give the DoD any ideas -- they'd use this to liberate a couple more countries!

    2. Re:hm... interesting possibilities... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I once [made a] sling shot....Used the middle finger from a rubber kitchen glove

      Bet your mom was pissed that dish soap ruined her commute-finger.

    3. Re:hm... interesting possibilities... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      I sewed it back on when I was done. She was none the wiser.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    4. Re:hm... interesting possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your mom's so stupid that she didn't notice that the latex finger now leaked and that there were stitches in it.

  6. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FOOD FIGHT...

    (forget missiles)

    1. Re:Two words by alan6101 · · Score: 0

      Now I feel like I'm going to hurl (into Orbit?)

      --


      This space for rent.
  7. Been there, done that by NetDanzr · · Score: 3, Informative
    From the top of my head, I can remember two identical proposals in sci-fi works:
    • The Fountains of Paradise by Atrhur C. Clarke
    • Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson
    I'm sure there are more.
    1. Re:Been there, done that by podperson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those both were space elevators -- a different technology NASA is also exploring.

    2. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you've had sex in those imaginary worlds too.

    3. Re:Been there, done that by ckessel · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Robert L. Forward had one of these in his book as well (I think he also had space elevators in other books).

    4. Re:Been there, done that by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The elevators AND this "slingshot" have the same problem. Tension ripping the cable. This has the added fun of the acceleration mashing you into the rear wall...i hope they don't sling the craft TOO hard!

    5. Re:Been there, done that by crmartin · · Score: 4, Informative

      And, in fact, Tethers Unlimited, the company proposing this beast, was founded by scientist, engineer and science fiction writer Dr Robert L Forward. Sadly, Dr Forward died last September.

    6. Re:Been there, done that by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      For some reason this idea kind of reminds me of the thing they've got running in Bubblegum Crisis (2040 version) that picks up cargo and passengers and takes it into orbit. Probably not what I would call an identical proposal but the mental picture is close.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Been there, done that by LordofWinterfell · · Score: 1

      The Moon is a Harsh Mistress...nuff' said. Weapon of Mass Destruction.

      --
      Winter is Coming.
    8. Re:Been there, done that by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

      gregory benford tides of light has these as genetically modified trees. Neat series of books. Starts off about now, and continues following the same caharactes for like 50-100,000 years, theyre still around due to time dilation.

      --
      All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    9. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>And, in fact, Tethers Unlimited, the company proposing this beast,

      Damn. I read that at Titties Unlimited, the company proposing the breast,

      I really, really need to get some lovin. Soon.

    10. Re:Been there, done that by Khasmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Charles Sheffield's Web Between the Worlds deals with not only Elevators, but Slings as well.

    11. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But unlike the sci-fi, there is real money going into making this technology happen.

    12. Re:Been there, done that by sharlskdy · · Score: 1

      What about space junk, too... Something floating around in low orbit severing one of the cables would be a bad thing. It can "withstand many years of bombardment by orbital debris." If a cable was severed, would it burn up on reentry?

    13. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Clarke in Fountains of Paradise, the idea of space elevators originated with two Russians,
      one of them called Artsutanov IIRC.Clarke also, IIRC, quoted Tziolkovski on the subject.

      In another vein, I can't believe people will put money in space elevators or tethers.
      Maybe those will be very common after the singularity, but for now, they are
      very very difficult technologies to play with.

    14. Re:Been there, done that by dasunt · · Score: 1

      For a real slingshot (not space elevators), I recall (off the top of my head):

      • Timemaster by Robert L Forward.

      Not one of his better books though...

    15. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a cable was severed, would it burn up on reentry?

      No, it would completely avoid the forces that affect every other material, and drop to Earth to start a chain of fashion stores.

    16. Re:Been there, done that by MouseR · · Score: 1

      This has the added fun of the acceleration mashing you into the rear wall

      Actually, no.

      The inertia of catapulting a heavy object like a satellite into orbit keeps the payload from suffering too much G forces at launch, as it gradually accelerates.

      If you doubt this, then you need to read up on Dr. Gerry Bull's work. And interesting first read is here for conventional cannons, and here about his space mission.

      His canons, the biggest of the sort, were meant as a mean to launch satellites into orbit. The great length of the canon, mounted on shock absorbing mounts like most canons today, means the projectile could reach orbit with a gentle-enough push so that even electronic equipment could be fired into space, directly at controlled orbits.

      Having lost funding from the Canadian gvmt, Bull turned to the states which, after a few promising test shots, decided to pursue other means shooting at things. Bull very much wanted to finish his project and be the first to sent something in space at 1/10000th the cost of traditional rockets. So he turned to Irak for funding, and he sold them a few of those canons, including a huge one that was aimes at Israel, as it was found during the Gulf war (1991/2) and quickly dismantled.

      Israel, though the USA, had bought a couple of Bull's canons, and was none too pleased to learn that friendly neighbour Irak has a bigger one. To this day, it's still a closely guarded secret, but it's been said in documentaries that those who gun shot Bull in his Brussel appt., were actually Israeli Mossad agents.

    17. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was called a Lofstrom Loop in the Gateway series by Fredrik Phol.

    18. Re:Been there, done that by jovlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He has lots of other cool ideas, such as using magnetic propulsion to levitate satelites by having them capture slugs fired from the ground, reverse their course, and fire them downwards again (== upwards momentum on both halves of the equation). I'd draw ascii-art, but your loving slashdot team have deemed that "lame" so you get none.

      Satelites that levitate above the poles by tacking with solar sails against gravity (higher the "orbit", smaller the sail needed).

      His book "indistinguishable from magic" is basically the worlds best anti-patent protection. more power (postumously) to him.

    19. Re:Been there, done that by monkeyboy87 · · Score: 1

      Damn. I read that at Titties Unlimited, the company proposing the breast,

      I really, really need to get some lovin. Soon.

      Posting on slashdot is directly proportional to the probability of getting some soon...

    20. Re:Been there, done that by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I understand that, But think about this, the "slingshot" is ALWAYS swinging at a constat velocity. Your ship gets in position at it's nice SLOW pace, the "hook" comes along and grabs your ship, no that hook is going REALLY fast compared to your velocity, for the next few min you get rapidly accelerated! The point wasn't about the initial takeoff, it's about when you actually use the booster sling!

    21. Re:Been there, done that by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Posting on slashdot is directly proportional to the probability of getting some soon...

      I believe you were looking for "inversely proportional"

  8. Obligitory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In SOVIET RUSSIA, the slingshots fire you.

    1. Re:Obligitory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the sling shot IS firing you in this case.

    2. Re:Obligitory... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      cool! now i can change my name to Boris....

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Obligitory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on what your definition of IS is.

  9. and then ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look Ma, no hands !!

  10. Another good idea, like space elevator by Saganaga · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see NASA looking at alternatives to rockets. This project, as well as the Space elevator are good ideas that if implemented could revolutionize space travel.

    1. Re:Another good idea, like space elevator by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that I think about it, Highlift Systems, from my understanding, was a precursor to a new company called LiftPort, so that's probably a better link.

  11. SciFi does it again by PaulK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that the greatest two motivators of technology are SciFi authors, and sales people.

    This approach was used by Robert Heinlein in several books; it is a pleasure to see his vision honored.

    As for sales people, I can't count the number of times that I have had to create what they have sold.

    1. Re:SciFi does it again by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      You forgot generals - just wait until an international conflict results in a satellite getting disabled. That could get real ugly.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:SciFi does it again by foolish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Robert Forward was one of the principals at TUI [www.tethers.com] and was a contemporary of RAH, Clarke and Sheffield.

      So he actually figured out how to make the damn things work, and spent about a decade trying to pitch it to NASA... but the failure of a single stranded Tether experiment made them really 'gun shy' of the technology, even though the Hoyt/Forward tether is multi-stranded.

    3. Re:SciFi does it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, some people have great imaginations (authors, artists). They sometimes have brilliant ideas no one could have thought of.

      Other people are good at making things work and implementing ideas (engineers, scientists). These people are much more practical but not nearly as effective without some inspirational help.

      I'm in the latter, I enjoy listening to other people's ideas and thinking about how I could make it work.

      Heh, ok, where's my point you may ask? Well, here it is: I find it shameful that often as much as the 2 groups need one another, they rarely respect one another. The SlashDot crowd is a good example of engineers/scientists often badmouthing artists or other non-technically literate people.

      Btw, I'm aware that some engineers have great ideas and some artists are good with computers, I'm just generalizing.

    4. Re:SciFi does it again by mr_zorg · · Score: 1
      It seems that the greatest two motivators of technology are SciFi authors, and sales people.
      This is very true. SciFi definately has an impact on technology. A good SciFi writer will try to write things that would be cool and useful, but often have no known way of implementing it (aka, the Star Trek replicator/transporter). What better to build than the impossibly cool things you read about?
    5. Re:SciFi does it again by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 1

      They are the same group, really. Some of the best sci-fi writers I've ever met are salespeople.

      "You need this software to prove string theory, walk your dog, kill Schroedinger's cat and be done by next Thursday? Absolutely!"

      Sci-fi indeed.

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    6. Re:SciFi does it again by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that one of Heinlein's books is titled "The Man Who Sold the Moon," i think he saw both sides of the issue. However i'm not sure if sales people as motivators of technology was more of a "vision," or just a concession to reality.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    7. Re:SciFi does it again by afreniere · · Score: 1
      debug g=C800:5

      Dude!!! Tell me you didn't ALSO have to use the firmware in your 11Mb full-height MFM drive to perform a low-level format to get your first computer working when you were 10 years old...!

      -Ansel.

      This signature is no longer unique:

      --
      G=C800:5
    8. Re:SciFi does it again by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As for sales people, I can't count the number of times that I have had to create what they have sold.

      Well, it keeps you in a job.

      You can create all the software you want, but without the sales people to sell it, it doesn't put food on the table.

      /me imagines geek on street with "Will Code for Food" sign...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    9. Re:SciFi does it again by PaulK · · Score: 1

      Actually, my first computer used a cassette tape as storage. By the time mfm/rll was released, I was doing it for a living.
      This is when you actually needed an oscilloscope, frequency counter, signal generator, and a box full of spare belts for seagate full height floppy drives.
      Now, I have techs wanting a job, who come in waving paper around, but don't know "righty-tighty, lefty loosy".

  12. Great, just great... by loucura! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alien species put up huge fences to keep us outside of their garden, and now we're going to be shooting stuff at them...

    [Dennis the Menace]

    Hey Mr. Freeeblgwaaxx!1

    [/Dennis]

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
    1. Re:Great, just great... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0
      "Alien species put up huge fences to keep us outside of their garden, and now we're going to be shooting stuff at them..."

      But they need to be Liberated.....

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  13. Are they serious? by curtlewis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A bunch of whirling cables in space? I wonder how many satellites will happen to stray close enough to those cables to get the crap beat out of them.

    The Japanese have failed recently with using the slingshot for space purposes, although in a different application. They tried to use the Earth's gravity to slingshot a probe to Mars but screwed it up the first time causing a 5 year delay. It's coming around for it's last try now, but it's damaged and not very maneuverable and will likely wind up being a total loss.

    I'm trying to picture these windmill like cables floating around in orbit and all I get is an image of something from a Bug's Bunny cartoon.

    If they do go for it, I hope they put alot of research into making sure it works and isn't prone to failure and unexpected consequences.

    1. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you are implying that using gravity as a sling is not practical, but I would mention its been used for both the moon missions and the Voyager satellite successfully by the USA, undoubtedly other missions as well.

    2. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he didn't imply that at all. Read it again. He says the Japanese failed the first time they tried it. The spacecraft has to come by the Earth at just the right trajectory to work.

    3. Re:Are they serious? by Servo · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but cables in space tend to gain an electrical charge. Get to close to a satelite, and that's some serious static shock.

      The other issue with cables lighting up electrically is that they heat up and snap.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    4. Re:Are they serious? by foolish · · Score: 1

      errr, only if they're conductive. Spectra fibre is one of the candidates, as is Kevlar.

    5. Re:Are they serious? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      if your satalite is 'straying' that far, it is alread broken.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Are they serious? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Gravity assist slingshotting has been around for years, and usually works very well. The ill-fated Apollo 13 mission used it to rescue the astronauts, as there was no way that the rocket had enough onboard fuel to allow the capsule to return to earth. Since then, it's been used countless times, as it is much cheaper than using chemical means to send a rocket into deep space. The mars incident is a rare failure in a pretty useful and ingeneous technique.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    7. Re:Are they serious? by barakn · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least part of the cable has to be conductive. That's the Electrodynamic Reboost mentioned in insufficient detail in the article. They run a current through the cable, and the Earth's magnetic field then exerts a force on the cable that pushes it up into a higher orbit. Each cable will have multiple layers.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    8. Re:Are they serious? by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I wonder how many satellites will happen to stray close enough to those cables to get the crap beat out of them."

      The chances of that happening are vanishingly small. I'd be more worried about orbital debris damaging the cable - but it seems they've already thought of that (multistranded). If the cable did get damaged, the worst that would happen is the satellite (if already "picked up") would get shot off in an unstable orbit.

      A plus with this would be you could use the power generated by a conductive wire thru the cable to power ion thrusters or similar to keep the cable rotating (air friction at the pickup would require some boost occasionally). Less need for solar cells :-)

      Like others have mentioned, gravity slingshots are a whole nother beast.

      I remember reading about this idea many many years ago - and I consider it something that will happen well before a space elevator will.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The problem with conductors is they are almost always very unstable as solids at very high temperatures (their electons abondon ship), so scrap the conducting cables.

    10. Re:Are they serious? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      That's true, but I don't see where it matters here. There are conductors that are stable at any temp you're likely to find in orbit (meaning sunside temperatures); and if the conducting wire is weaved into the internal parts of the cable, it'd have some protection from those temps.

      Remember, not ALL of the cable needs to be conducting, just PART of it.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  14. Similar to the Squids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm too busy to RTFA...
    I'm picturing this working in a similar fashion to the way the 'squids' in Matrix:Reloaded would throw the bombs. Cool.

  15. DOS? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "the ultimate dos-Ã-dos swing machine."

    I know the caption says it uses old technology- but I'm not trusting my space flight to something that runs on DOS.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:DOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd rather trust Windows?

  16. Fishnets!!! by petronivs · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's sort-of like a one-hundred kilometer long fish-net stocking in space, only it's incredibly strong, and it can withstand many years of bombardment by orbital debris," Hoyt said



    Say, if they make these smaller, maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!

    --
    This is the real signature
    (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
    1. Re:Fishnets!!! by overshoot · · Score: 5, Funny
      Say, if they make these smaller, maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!

      They last longer if you take them off first.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:Fishnets!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of an old joke.

      A young couple was in the backseat of the car. The boy says, "If I'd known you were a virgin, I'd have taken more time." To which she replies, "If I'd known you had more time, I'd have taken my pantyhose off!"

    3. Re:Fishnets!!! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      No. Here is a hint. When her legs keep going up when you're with her- she's still got them on.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:Fishnets!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Say, if they make these smaller, maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!"

      That might wash with the salesperson at the store, but we see through you as if you were the plate glass frontage of a lingerie store...

      "I'll take these for my girlfriend".

      You try and appear casual, glancing around at the displays, the till, anywhere but at the item you're now buying. Then you start to think you're looking too casual - like an inexperienced shoplifter - but at last the damn till-jockey has rung up the sale and it's time to hand over the money. You hand over the correct change and realise that too is uncommon behaviour - not enough to elicit comment, but still... odd. Better to have handed over a five. At least you're given a bag without having to be ask, a quick "Thanks", and you're on your way towards the exit, the first prickings of excitement starting before you're even in the parking lot. Out the door and into the bright sunlight, grinning just slightly, feeling like you just stole a diamond as big as the Ritz, and got away with it. Grinning even more at the absurdity of this feeling and in anticipation of the pleasure, the excitement and the satisfaction that this evening will bring.

    5. Re:Fishnets!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>if they make these smaller

      Her thighs are only 'smaller' than a spacecraft? That is scary. You don't want to add a modifier on the front of that ... like MUCH smaller?

    6. Re:Fishnets!!! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone get what is wrong with this post?

      Yup, the girlfriend.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:Fishnets!!! by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Bull! /. readers don't have girlfriends!

    8. Re:Fishnets!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say who his girlfriend is.

    9. Re:Fishnets!!! by WomensHealth · · Score: 1

      Dude, you shouldn't be buying pantyhose for your girlfriend. The only thing more emasculating than that, is buying her tampax or whatever.

    10. Re:Fishnets!!! by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "maybe I won't have to keep buying pantyhose for my girlfriend!"

      "Girlfriend?" That may be what you tell the cashier, but we know better.

    11. Re:Fishnets!!! by petronivs · · Score: 1

      Dude, you shouldn't be buying pantyhose for your girlfriend. The only thing more emasculating than that, is buying her tampax or whatever.



      Ummm...


      (Sheepish look)

      --
      This is the real signature
      (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
    12. Re:Fishnets!!! by overshoot · · Score: 1

      Where do you think I got the idea for the comment?

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    13. Re:Fishnets!!! by Placido · · Score: 1

      >> Anyone get what is wrong with this post? Yup, the girlfriend.

      Actually I thought it was that he seems to be bomarding his girlfriend with orbital debris.

      >> and it can withstand many years of bombardment by orbital debris

      I know I haven't had any for a while but I'm pretty sure I can't get my debris into orbit.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    14. Re:Fishnets!!! by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

      (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)

      Hey, Hey, Hey, I'm still trying to wash the paint off my hand! ;o)

  17. Inertia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would this not knock your socks off, literally? or would it simply travel at the same speed (or close to) as the shuttle? 'splain it to me pls k thx

  18. Damn NASA wasting money on garbage projects.. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Seems that the Chinese would have started a sort of the space race when the annnounced to go to the Moon.

    Instead, we're looking into slingshots.

    I want a moonbase as fast, or faster than China can get one up.

    --
    1. Re:Damn NASA wasting money on garbage projects.. by jason0000042 · · Score: 1

      I don't care who does it, I'm going. If I have to have a little red book in my pocket the whole time, so be it.

      I would also be interested in trying to eat pot stickers through a straw.

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    2. Re:Damn NASA wasting money on garbage projects.. by NialScorva · · Score: 1

      China will win. They're more willing to sacrifice life than we are right now.

    3. Re:Damn NASA wasting money on garbage projects.. by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you talking about, we're WAY more willing to sacrafice life then them.... Oh wait, you ment our lives. Never mind.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  19. Not while I'm aboard... by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I would enjoy getting smacked upside the spacecraft by a cable going 25,000 MPH faster than me.

    Can anyone say whiplash?

    1. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean "ropeburn"

    2. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by JackMonkey · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they could attach closer to the center where the tangential velocity is lower and then slide their way out to the end via centrifugal force?

      That would be a hell of a carnival ride. :-)

    3. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can one get whiplash in zero G? I know that you'll probably get smacked into the side of ship and turned into a grease stain when the accerlation changes drastically, but whiplash? i don't think so

    4. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A retractable lanyard might work, just hook the sling thing onto the lanyard type device which would reel out quickly at first and then slowly apply braking to the reel to accelerate the spacecraft. Then when you are ready to slingshot out, cut the lanyard.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by sprekken · · Score: 1
      I don't think I would enjoy getting smacked upside the spacecraft by a cable going 25,000 MPH faster than me.

      Actually, if you look at the designs on the website it seems that the tether would not be moving very fast at all. It would be spinning in the opposite direction while traveling in the same direction at a much higher speed. I would imagine that the astronauts inside the spacecraft would probably just see a big ass cable slowly coming down out of space towards them which would give them time to attach the tether somehow.

      I suspect that the real "whiplash" would come when the rotation of the tether is on its way back up, and the tension between the spacecraft and whatever it is attached to becomes taught -- that's going to generate some serious G forces!

    6. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Um... yes. Whiplash is merely the result your head being thrust back too quickly whilst your body is held stationery, causing damage to your neck. It has nothing to do with gravity at all.

    7. Re:Not while I'm aboard... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Actually I think the idea is that there wouldn't ever be any slack in the cable. Also the cable would be made of a non elastic material so you wouldn't get any "bounce".

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  20. OOOPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sucks on us if they caught the moon and give it a fling

  21. idea... by MrPotatoeHead · · Score: 1

    hey we could fling all our refuse and waste into the sun!

    course if we miss it'll come back and endanger the planet a thousand years from now...
    (c'mon who knows where that's from)

    1. Re:idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      futurama you taffer

    2. Re:idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously tho,

      flying our garbage into space or into the sun is a dumb idea to me.

      all those wasted resources. metal, plastic, and all that other stuff. i say bury it untill we find a way to use it

      *cough* nano *cough*

      taking what little resources our planet has and giving them to another planet is prob not a good idea as we might need our garbage someday.

      blue tiger

  22. April 1 already? by ab0mb88 · · Score: 1

    A huge slingshot for space shuttles called a MiXER, this can not be a real story. In other news space.com has began hiring former reporters from the the NY Times.

  23. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When probes from outer space attack the earth, we can use the slingshot to go back in time to retrieve the exact species of whale they're trying to contact!

    1. Re:Also by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the 1950's they thought that we would have nuclear and ionic space ship engines by now. Imagine their expression when someone from the 50's wakes up from a cryogenic sleep to instead see a giant slingshot aimed into space.

      "Damn! I told that egghead to set it to 2005, not 1905."

    2. Re:Also by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for a star trek reference to say
      ...

      KHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNN!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  24. With support of ACME Inc.? by OrangeGoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slingshots never worked out very well for the Coyote. Doesn't anyone pay attention to the great value of cartoons? Sheesh... how many boulders must fall on the heads of coyotes before someone gets it?

    On the other hand, rockets never worked for the Coyote either... maybe NASA is on to something! Is it possible... could cartoons be... unrealistic? Noooooo!

    1. Re:With support of ACME Inc.? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I ordered an ACME slingshot once and used it on my face. Boy did it hurt! Fortunately, my sister shouted, "It is ACME, not ACNE you dumbass dweeb!"

    2. Re:With support of ACME Inc.? by jonman_d · · Score: 1

      NASA is exempt from the ACME laws of Physics. Didn't you see Armegeddon? A sling system worked wonders for NASA in that mission!

    3. Re:With support of ACME Inc.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Slingshots never worked out very well for the Coyote. Doesn't anyone pay attention to the great value of cartoons? Sheesh... how many boulders must fall on the heads of coyotes before someone gets it?

      On the other hand, rockets never worked for the Coyote either... maybe NASA is on to something! Is it possible... could cartoons be... unrealistic? Noooooo!


      I've always said that two rockets and a big fuel tank strapped to another rocket was a design that could have only come from a cartoon coyote.

  25. not a sling shot by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A sling shot is not the same as a sling.

    A sling shot uses a rubber band to propel its payload.

    A sling uses the sudden stop of centripedal force.

    Sling shot = Dennis the Menace.
    Sling = David killing Goliath

    Slings are good for hunting small animals, apparently.

    1. Re:not a sling shot by OrangeGoo · · Score: 1

      Except for the bit where Goliath was rather large and not an animal? ;)

    2. Re:not a sling shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone else already knew that, but honestly didn't give a rip about it. We're not so obsessed with demonstrating our knowledge of minor common facts.

    3. Re:not a sling shot by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chill out man, I'm just trying to make some karma same as everybody else.

    4. Re:not a sling shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are not animals? Damn, now they are gonna have to rewrite ALL of those biology textbooks!

    5. Re:not a sling shot by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      A sling shot is not the same as a sling....A sling uses the sudden stop of centripedal force.


      Shut up! You are ruining our jokes, Bastard!

    6. Re:not a sling shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grief! I thought a slingshot was old technology, but a sling...!? That's really going back to basics.

      I was under the impression that a slingshot was like a high speed sling or possibly just a full speed sling, and now you're saying they're actually totally different?

      Can we sort out our naming conventions please!

    7. Re:not a sling shot by RevMike · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sling:

      1. Start with roughly 8 feet of sinew
      2. Add a small leather basket in the middle.
      3. Place a small stone in the basket.
      4. Hold one end of the sinew in the palm of your hand and the other between your thumb and forefinger. Adjust the length so that the basket is in the exact middle.
      5. Whirl it around your head. Release the sinew between your thumb and forefinger at exactly the right moment to cause the stone to fly off and hit your target.
      As you might imagine, doing this accurately is quite difficult. The only people that typically use the sling are shepherds, since they have the three or four hours a day to spend practicing. As a comparison, a bowman only needs about 30 minutes of daily practice to be highly skilled.

      Damn, I watch too much History Channel.

    8. Re:not a sling shot by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sling = David killing Goliath

      Hmmm. According to the Philistine bible, Goliath won.

    9. Re:not a sling shot by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I made and learned to use one for Eagle Scouts (a lot) of years ago. They're not too hard to learn - it's just a matter of timing. Took me maybe 3-4 hours to be able to put a marble into a target about 100 ft away, a few more hours to do so consistently.

      They can be devastatingly powerful. I put a small round stone about the size of a marble thru a pickup truck door once :-) Ooops. It didn't penetrate the vinyl interior but left a nice hole in the door metal, and we had to take the truck door apart to get the rock out. My friends' folks were understandably pissed.

      What works best for cord is something non-stretchable - makes you aim better - and small diameter, to cut air resistance. As I remember I used carpenters string (used for leveling, strong stuff) and a plastic shot pocket from a wristrocket.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:not a sling shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      j00 4r3 l4m3

    11. Re:not a sling shot by Peyna · · Score: 1

      A research study showed that very people actually know that humans are animals. It's because we're always taught that we're so much better than the other animals, that we forget we're animals too.

      --
      What?
  26. Degrading Orbit by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I noticed on one of the diagrams that the orbit of the slingshot itself degrades after each launch pick-up. Maybe the decrease in orbit isn't very significant, but would this system require self-adjustment? How would the system stay in service over the long term?

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    1. Re:Degrading Orbit by foolish · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The tether system (more at www.tethers.com) decreases its potential energy after propelling the payload. Which is why they suggest a mix of tether technologies, one for the payload transport, and another electro-dyanamic propulsion. Brin wrote a story about the latter.

      What is kind of sad is that Dr. Robert Forward was one of the originators of the technology but he never got to see his work in space.

      Again, tethers.com explains it all much better than I can.

      --foolish

    2. Re:Degrading Orbit by overshoot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The orbit degrades (loss of angular momentum) on each "toss up" and recovers on each "snatch." One of the cheap sources of angular momentum would be a mass driver on the Moon (think "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress") tossing rock or whatever down the chain. The stations on the chain snatch the falling rocks and recover both energy and angular momentum.

      Rockets would also work, but would be much more wasteful. Solar sails might work too, but I suspect you'd need some honkers to get adequate results.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    3. Re:Degrading Orbit by jason0000042 · · Score: 1

      Damn conservation of momentum. Who passed that stupid law anyway. Conflarnit. -NASA MXER Project Director

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    4. Re:Degrading Orbit by heli0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Easy. Launch another sling above it...

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    5. Re:Degrading Orbit by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 1


      Haha! So we have turtles all the way down and slings all the way up, eh? I like it.

      --
      True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    6. Re:Degrading Orbit by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      They have to use some way to increase the momentum. For example, some fuel can be transferred to the tether to raise its orbit (perigee) between catches.

      This could be done with an ion drive (which needs hardly any fuel) or conventional rocketry.

      However, ion drives have very low thrust and hence can take many weeks to recover the altitude.

      Alternatively, with conventional rocketry not having to launch the tethers rocket engine with each launch is a win- and the rocket engine on the tether can be much smaller anyway, since it doesn't have to directly fight gravity to reach orbit (it already is in orbit); and can thrust for much longer, with lower thrust. However rocket engines don't weigh very much (they often have thrust to weight ratios of ~100:1), so the win is not as large as you might hope.

      Getting fuel or mass from the moon helps- dropping rocks from the moon to the earth actually gains energy- all the rocks on the moon are in a high potential energy state, and this can be used to gain altitude.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    7. Re:Degrading Orbit by Ugmo · · Score: 1

      I guess that's what the big solar panels are for?

      To convert solar energy into some kind of propulsion to boost the orbit when not in slingshot mode.

    8. Re:Degrading Orbit by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1
      This page describes it in more detail.

      • Electrodynamic Reboost In order for the tether facility to boost multiple payloads, it must have the capability to restore its orbital energy and momentum after each payload transfer operation. If the tether facility has a power supply, and a portion of the tether contains conducting wire, then the power supply can drive current along the tether so as to generate thrust through electro-dynamic interactions with the Earth's magnetic field. By properly controlling the tether current during an orbit, the tether facility can reboost itself to its original orbit, as illustrated in Figure 1. The tether facility essentially serves as a large "orbital energy battery," allowing solar energy to be converted to orbital energy gradually over a long period of time and then rapidly transferred to the payload. [Learn more about ED Tethers]
      --


      --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
    9. Re:Degrading Orbit by foolish · · Score: 1

      That is one possibility, depending on wether or not the electro-dynamic concepts actually work... it is a safer bet than the electrical tether, but TUI has done a LOT of writing about dragging a conductive tether through the magnetosphere to help provide juice for the ion drives that might be attached to such a system... the kicker though is that they got the inspiration from the other major NASA tether experiment which was a momentum exchanger, but 'shorted'/arced current and snapped the tether.

    10. Re:Degrading Orbit by spun · · Score: 2, Informative
      What is kind of sad is that Dr. Robert Forward was one of the originators of the technology but he never got to see his work in space.

      Oh, man, I read your post and thought "Robert Forward is dead? I hope he's mistaken about that." Unfortunately, he died last year, and I for one will miss him for his unique style of hard science-fiction and his innovations in physics and space travel. He did a lot of work on tether propulsion systems. Unlike Arthur Clarke, he patented a lot of his inventions. I wonder if the company he set up will see any money from their use, or if he was just a little too far ahead of his time?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Degrading Orbit by Fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

      This thing is definitely cool. The other posters were right in pointing out that it regains the energy via converting solar energy into momentum by applying a current to the Earth's Magnetic field. I just wanted to point out the purpose of the devices name:

      Momentum-eXchange: this refers to how the tether adds momentum to the spacecraft

      Electrodynamic Reboost: this refers to the mechanism that recharges the orbit

      The one poster is right about the momentum-exchange working both ways in that spacecraft coming back could tether down and reboost the device. However, in most cases the craft will be leaving a payload up there (such as a satillite, or even just burned fuel/oxygen) so it would never regain as much momentum as it lost. The electrodynamic reboost ensure it keeps flying.

      --
      -no broken link
    12. Re:Degrading Orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the orbit of the tether is degraded after a launch. There are practical applications to this. For example, a space shuttle type of vehicle could use the tether to in reverse i.e. go from a high energy orbit to a sub-orbital velocity. The slower you can get a spacecraft prior to re-entry, the less thermal protection you need. In exchange, the tether moves to a higher orbit. It's a win-win situation.

    13. Re:Degrading Orbit by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      "and I for one will miss him for his unique style of hard science-fiction and his innovations in physics and space travel."

      Perhaps you would want to donate to the fund set up to organize and store his papers, which were donated to the University of Alabama at Huntsville. He had more good ideas than he could work on and it is important that they be kept available to inspire other researchers.
      http://www.robertforward.com/index.h tm

      "I wonder if the company he set up will see any money from their use"

      They have already. They aren't selling space tether systems (yet), but they have gotten many research grants to develop the technologies and do studies.

  27. Cable Strength by crispy1083 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this something that can be done with conventional materials, or is this another carbon nanotube based idea that might never come to pass?

    1. Re:Cable Strength by foolish · · Score: 4, Informative

      The people making the tethers, TUI (www.tethers.com) are making it out of Spectra fibres. You can check out their website for the full gist, but they have fabrication down pat.

      So, yes, this is the real deal, not something 'down the road 5 years'.

      --foolish

    2. Re:Cable Strength by Tmack · · Score: 1
      Carbon Nanotubes are getting more realistic.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    3. Re:Cable Strength by Khomar · · Score: 1

      Um... not really. As in the article:

      "Realistically, I believe it will take about 7-10 years of hard work to get a MXER flight demonstration into orbit," Hoyt told SPACE.com. Under the new In-Space Propulsion contracts, research teams will be busy over the next couple of years using simulations and ground tests to show that the technical challenges of MXER tethers can be solved, he said. "If those efforts are successful, I expect that it would take about 5 years to get a flight program off the ground," Hoyt senses.

      However, this does sound like it is quite feasible. We just have to realize that all projects, even ones for which we have the technology, take time to implement.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:Cable Strength by foolish · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I realized that once I posted... However, they have already constructed actual tethers, which is what I mean, instead of the 'we'll "Somehow" get carbon nantubes to work right" (though that's also looking promising).

  28. Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase by drgroove · · Score: 2, Funny

    "you've got your ass in a sling now!"

  29. too many joke possibilites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brain getting ready to explode...

  30. Weapon? by Piranhaa · · Score: 0

    New type of weapon to fire at our enemies?? :)

  31. Preview by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Steve Job's shat in his pants when he saw this at a NASA preview...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  32. Borrowed from good sci-fi... by praedor · · Score: 4, Informative

    By Gregory Benford. In either "Great Sky River" or "Tides of Light" Benford (physicist and astronomer at UC, Irvine), can't recall which, there is an organism that does this...only its ends actually come much farther down into the atmosphere than NASA's proposal. This organism was even used by the main character in the story to hitch a ride into space.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Borrowed from good sci-fi... by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure it wasn't "Beyond the Fall of Night"?

    2. Re:Borrowed from good sci-fi... by wardomon · · Score: 1

      Benford, yes. Sling, no. They were trees. The seeds of which were used as entry capsules.

      --

      - - - If the sun is a star, why can't I see it at night?
    3. Re:Borrowed from good sci-fi... by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      I'm a graduate student at UCI in physics. In talking with Benford, I can tell you that these aren't only ideas in books. This sling idea is very common right now in space science, and Benford orignially planned on using this sling idea to launch his solar sails all over the place. (They've been covered extensivly in the media and here, especially when they failed to launch... too lazy to post a link)

      So, you could say, it's good science that led to good sci-fi which in turn led to more good science.

  33. A pinwheel? by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, a similar-sounding device (known as the Pinwheel) appeared in "Beyond the Fall of Night", by Gregory Benford. This book was a sequel to the Arthur C. Clarke short story "Against the Fall of Night", which Clarke later re-wrote as the full-blown novel "The City and the Stars". All three tales are well worth a read!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  34. Tether Snatch! by overshoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The proposal has been around in science fiction circles for decades. The engineering is nontrivial, but carbon filiament cable makes it possible. You also need an energy source at the waystations to make up for the transfer (think nuke here, solar ain't enough).

    In some ways the neatest thing about it is that it does away with the need for reaction mass, which is is nothing else an environmental improvement.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  35. Rotational Momentum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Won't using the earth's rotational momentum like that take energy from the earth to give to the spaceship? Hell, after a couple hundred thousand launches our days might be an hour longer. THIS IS PREPOSTEROUS!

    1. Re:Rotational Momentum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you were trying to be funny, but I just thought i'd point out that it would be more like a couple hundred billion launches to make our day a minute longer.

  36. We should be careful with this technology... by greenhide · · Score: 1

    Isn't this how Commander John Crichton got sucked into that wormhole? He didn't use cables, but he did use the earth's gravitational field to slingshot him through space.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  37. jackass? by edrugtrader · · Score: 0, Troll

    i think i saw this on jackass... but in the end i don't think they even got over the ramp into the lake.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  38. What I don't get... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This thing is going to transfer momentum to the space craft it is boosting, right? Where is it getting it from? Something has to get that cable spinning, and I don't see how to get the tether started/respun after it has be put in orbit/used to boost without using just as much energy as you have saved by using it.

    I am sure I am missing something, but I don't know what, could someone fill me in?

    P.S. I did RTFA, doesn't explain it...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:What I don't get... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      unlike on earth, there is no atmosphere in space. Once you give something a little momentum, it keeps spinning until a counter force. Now all you need is very short/small burst of power to get it started. And using the centrifugal force, the outside spins faster than the center.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:What I don't get... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it is about the amount of power needed not he amount of energy needed.

      power is damn expensive, so the less power you need to get that smae work done the cheaper it will be...to maintain the orbit of this thing and keep it spining will cost a hell of a lot less than it would be to keep launching chemical rockets which get the same work done but in a shorter time/distance. plus you have to carry all the energy with you withthe rocket but with a spining sling you have all that energy saved in the sling so you need less energy with you in order to rondevue with the sling.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:What I don't get... by Koushiro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, looking at this image, it looks like once the tether's orbit has begun to deteriorate, it will just keep falling until it burns up/hits Australia. Rather an odd form for a disposable propulsion system, though...

      --
      Karma: Oldschool
    4. Re:What I don't get... by madboson · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is true, but every time the teather enters the atmosphere, it will be hitting alot of resistance.

      --
      Mo00o
    5. Re:What I don't get... by foolish · · Score: 1

      That's because the graphic for that is for the Terminator tether, which is used to deorbit space junk/ second stages.

    6. Re:What I don't get... by Durindana · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and I'm not sure the other replies understood your point.

      As I see it, the other end of the cable is hooked to a bigass weight - at least, that's what the massive, spacecraft-size block looks like in the schematics. Where does that block come from, and how do you boost it even to LEO? Do you mine a passing comet for all that metal?

      Spinning the cable I don't think would be the problem - get a weight (spacecraft) attached to the other end and the whole mess will rotate, with the cable ballast dropping its orbit level while the craft is boosted.

      Of course, then you have to push the bigass weight back where it was, using probably as much propulsion/fuel/whatever means you used to get it up there in the first place.

      Don't see the savings - perhaps the article's at fault or I'm a waterhead. I still like the space elevator better.

    7. Re:What I don't get... by bgspence · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two ways to get energy to restore orbital momentum to the sling system. One is mentioned in the MXER tether discussion at tethers.com. You can use solar power and the earth's magnetic field to move the system like an electric motor in space.

      Another that doesn't seem to be mentioned is slinging things back to earth. You could toss the payload up and the expended payload vehicle down in separate tosses.

    8. Re:What I don't get... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      This thing is going to transfer momentum to the space craft it is boosting, right? Where is it getting it from? Something has to get that cable spinning,

      A giant U-shaped magnet from ACME, of course.

    9. Re:What I don't get... by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      This thing is going to transfer momentum to the space craft it is boosting, right? Where is it getting it from? Something has to get that cable spinning, and I don't see how to get the tether started/respun after it has be put in orbit/used to boost without using just as much energy as you have saved by using it.

      The momentum is collected slowly but efficiently by the tether system. This essentially lifts the system up slowly, which is the same as collecting momentum in a rotary system.

      The whole point of the exercise is that you replace inefficient rockets with efficient new propulsion drives. And these drives can lift the tether craft slowly (because it is already in orbit), they don't have to do it explosively.

      Tor

    10. Re:What I don't get... by foolish · · Score: 1

      The propulsion for 'counterbalance' can come from chemical rockets, ion propulsion, solar sails or soemthing like the M2P2 plama sail.

      Since the erm, 'craft' is in space, most of the propulsive methods can use engines with really good expansion ratios.

      David Brin's shortstory on his website explains the eletric dynamic method, as does the www.tethers.com site.

      While they aren't as 'no cost' as the elevator is, they also don't have the complication of trying to convince the world gov'ts or atmospheric drag.

      generally the steps talked about for tethers are:

      Cheap Access to Space (launching the 'ballast')
      Momentum Exchange Tethers with reboost capability
      Momentum Exchange Tethers that catch incoming as well as outgoing
      THEN the Space Elevator

    11. Re:What I don't get... by Richard_J_N · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the electrodynamic bit. The conducting tether cuts magnetic field lines. This induces a voltage and causes a current to flow along it. (You emit ions at both ends to complete the circuit). Normally, that causes electromagnetic damping (like a dynamo). But, if you use solar cells to drive the current the opposite way, you can get a propulsion force... See here for more.

    12. Re:What I don't get... by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      This is actually an interesting problem, I answered without thinking myself. Here is a new hypothesis.

      1 The thether is rotating all the time.
      2 An approaching space craft accelerates to the same speed as the arm of the tether, in the lower position
      3 They attach. Since they had the same speed - no energy lost or orbital momentum lost.
      4 When the tether rotates, we note that
      -The ends have the same speed as before
      -The center of gravity has shifted
      5 At the other extreme position, the space craft is released.
      - Because it was traveling at the same speed as the thether the rotational speed of the tether remains unchanged
      - However, because the tether craft was rotating around a different point than before its center of gravity is now lower than it used to be
      6 The tehter craft uses inventive new drives to slowly lift its center of gravity again, while keeping the same spin

      Tor

    13. Re:What I don't get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not rocket scientist, but I think this thing is intended to be in a high enough in orbit that it doesn't decay very fast and can rely on slow continuous power (solar? RTG?).

    14. Re:What I don't get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt... Wrong!

      With the cable fully extended, you wouldn't be able to push on the end to get it started. It would have to be spun when the cable was all wound up. After that the cable would be let out, but the rotational speed would slow down as more mass is moved away from the center.

      The problem here is, that it needs a LOT more than a "little push". You don't get energy for free. It would take a LOT of energy to spin up the satellite fast enough to give those satellites a needed boost into a higher orbit.

      Think of it like this: Sit on a bar stool (the kind that spins). Spin yourself up with your arms close to your body. Then stick your arms straight out. You'll notice that you'll slow down because your moment of intertia is now farther out. You haven't lost energy (except for friction).

    15. Re:What I don't get... by Fjord · · Score: 1

      essentially, it's a momentum capacitor.

      --
      -no broken link
    16. Re:What I don't get... by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      I don't think this is a rocket where propulsion is a result of the ejection of mass; rather a transfer of energy to the payload so it doesn't matter where the payload goes, the orbit decays because the tether has less forward speed and so drops towards the centre of the earth to conserve umm one of the many things that it must conserve to obey the laws of physics. Is it angular something.

      Its 4.30pm here and I'm going home for a beer soon so I'm starting to forget all those things I drink to forget. Weird how this is one of them seeing as I'm an Accountant.

  39. This might not be as easy as it seems by jj_johny · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From an earlier experiment it is clear that there are forces that will wreak havoc on most equipment. Travelling that fast through even the thinnest atmosphere or magnetic field will do some serious stress on things.

  40. Will there be a concert on the moon afterwards? by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, Doctor Tsukumo will sue for patent infringement.

    (Idly curious whether or not anyone at all will get the reference...)

  41. Hurl into orbit? by Columbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gives new meaning to "Projectile Vomiting".

    Heh. Alright, I'll go away now.

  42. My results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experiments in ground-based hurling involved the horrible Yukon Jack liquor as a liquid oxidizer and resulted in a Nasal launch that slingshotted an entire package of pre-digested ramen, nearly parking it in one of the LaGrange points.

  43. news flash: King George II is DEAD by Jubedgy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry, you must be confused. King George II lived in Germany and died on 25 Oct 1760 from a burst blood vessel. You should get current...I can understand being a few days behind the times, but 243 years?

    --Jubedgy

    --
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
  44. MXER? by Alexis+Brooke · · Score: 1

    Â Â ÂNot to pick nits, but shouldn't this be called MEER?

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
    1. Re:MXER? by d_lesage · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I read the writeup. When did it become "cool" in scientific circles to use "X*" for anything spelled "Ex*" ?? Xtreme Astronomy ?

      On the other hand, I guess they did not want this project confused with "Mir".

      --

      Ich werde nie wieder denken
    2. Re:MXER? by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      (Set to the tune of The Rain In Spain):
      "To steer on Mir, you clearly need a beer."

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  45. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hilarious!

  46. Re:KICK ASS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    redundant? WHAT IN BLOODY HELL!? I had the FP, nothing I say is redundant!!!

  47. Important differences by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the works you site they build an elevator all the way from surface to space; in other words it is extremely long.

    In this case, the craft is much shorter and already in space. Rather than lifting something all the way along a cable, you accelerate it by swinging a shorter cable and throw it off.

    From an energy perspective, you exchange rockets working inefficiently for a short time for solar-powered engines working efficiently but slowly for a long time. In the space elevators you mention, you rather use more conventional engines like in an electric train.

    Tor

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Pedantic note ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... "sling" != "slingshot". They're two completely different things. Conflating the two is kind of like calling a canvas-sided trailer with some rusty tanks and piping a "weapon of mass destruction."

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Pedantic note ... by hansroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Conflating the two is kind of like calling a canvas-sided trailer with some rusty tanks and piping a "weapon of mass destruction."

      Worked for Bush

  50. Obligatory... by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Meep meep.

    --
    IAALS.
  51. The Jules Verne Gun by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One similar device is the Jules Verne Gun -- essentially it is a huge cannon that fires things into space, at about 1000 g's. The idea originated from Jules Verne's book From The Earth To The Moon. Popular Mechanics had a write-up about it a few years back (check out the pictures on page 2!) -- apparently some guy at Lawrence Livermore National Labs is trying to build one that actually works. :^)

    1. Re:The Jules Verne Gun by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The JVG is cool, but not at all similar to what they are attempting to do here with the slingshot tether.

      What Hunter is trying to do isn't all that similar either - he's using a long gun tube with multiple gas injectors rather than a bazillion bags of gunpowder. Hunter is onto something, tho...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:The Jules Verne Gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean this guy http://world.std.com/~jlr/doom/bull.htm ??

      He tried to build a gun to send stuff into orbit but nobody would fund him, so he went and built a gun for Iraq so they could shoot it at Israel. Then somebody (nobody seems quite sure who) killed him.

  52. Anime/Sci-Fi becoming reality by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    if I'm not too much mistaken they did something like that in the Bubblegum Crisis: Tokyo 2040 series.

    Even if it never pans out, it's nice to see them trying to make fiction into fact...if only in well grounded theories

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  53. Another fine product... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This thing doesn't happen to say 'ACME' on the side, does it?

    1. Re:Another fine product... by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      Unbeknownst to many, there is another scientist involved in this venture...

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

  54. Hmm... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can rig one big enough to throw out the International Space Station.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  55. Aldrin not mentioned? by sparkhead · · Score: 1

    Aldrin has been talking about this for years for a Mars transit system.

    No mention of him at all?

  56. so why is this less expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really just seems to add another layer to already complex and dangerouse rocketry. Think about it first you have to get the thing in orbit. then it has to catch the ship/satalight/explorer then afterwards it looses its higher orbit and then must be refueled, presumbly by another spaceship so it can reach the higher orbit to do it again. How would this be cheaper then the old way. God this just seems stupid. I mean you have to use multiple launches to the the work of what normaly is one launch.

    hook

  57. This smells like an idea ripped off from... by set · · Score: 1
    1. Re:This smells like an idea ripped off from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      euhm next thing that will be posted here on /. is some one who is going to use prunes carbonated soda and antacid tablets.

      i hear rumors about coca cola and pepsi fighting over the deal
      and the bush administration levvingy heavy taxes on prune imports

  58. Seems kinda silly to me... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A sling that "falls" each time you use it is kinda wacky to me. Why not just build gigantic railgun instead and magnetically accellerate the spaceship (once in low orbit) instead?

    1. Re:Seems kinda silly to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A sling that "falls" each time you use it is kinda wacky to me. Why not just build gigantic railgun instead and magnetically accellerate the spaceship (once in low orbit) instead?

      A rail gun would have the same problem. Each time you fired it it would decend to a lower orbit. Both ideas seem wacked to me.

    2. Re:Seems kinda silly to me... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Railguns can't reach orbital velocity (about 4.5km/s is the best that has been achieved) and have enormous problems with atmospheric drag of the projectile. Additionally railguns suffer from rail erosion with each launch.

      Further, guns of all kinds can't directly go into stable orbit around the earth- orbits necessarily go through the last point where a force was applied to the vehicle. This means that the vehicle intersects the ground unless a circularisation rocket engine or similar is employed.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Seems kinda silly to me... by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      With something like this, you could use highly efficient ion propulsion to boost it back up, rather than needing to launch extra rocket engines and tons of fuel to lift satelites to higher orbits.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    4. Re:Seems kinda silly to me... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      The amount of energy it takes to launch a given mass into orbit is basically a constant.

      A railgun would need to exert that energy over an extremely short time period, which has two implications:
      1) you'd squash anyone/anthing in the vehicle due to G forces
      2) you'd have to store and release MASSIVE amounts of energy in an EXTREMELY short period... think "nuclear" here

      As for a sling, you're using energy stored in the momentum of the sling. Sure, the sling falls a bit each time you use it, but you can restore that energy over a LONG period, a little at a time. If it takes a month to move the sling back to full orbit after use, no big deal.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  59. Next Up -- Patented Childhood Memories by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heat things with a giant magnifying lens until the object smokes or pops. Nope

    Shoot bb guns at stop signs (not lights). Nope

    Slingshots...that's taken.

    Blow darts with straws and paper...hmmm, yes, giant air pressure pipe to launch space capsules into orbit.

    Anyone know a good modernized implementation of pouring salt on snails?

    1. Re:Next Up -- Patented Childhood Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone know a good modernized implementation of pouring salt on snails?

      Lunch!

    2. Re:Next Up -- Patented Childhood Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...pouring salt on snails?"

      How about pouring salt on SCO management?

    3. Re:Next Up -- Patented Childhood Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM'ing a snail so that it rols it self in to the salt??

  60. It only gets you halfway. by KFury · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're trying to use a tether system to transfer from a low orbit to a high orbit, a tether will only get you halfway there. The transfer from a low orbit to high involves one thrust event to change your orbit from circular to elliptical, with the perigee (closest point) staying the same, but the apogee (farthest point) higher up. The second thrust event happens when the satellite hits apogee, accelerating it so that the orbit becomes circular again.

    You can hurl rocks up high all you want, but you'll need another force to make sure they stay there.

    Note that this doesn't apply to the moon shots or interplanetary boosts. I'm only talking about parabolic and circular orbits, not hyperbolic or complex orbits. I'm sure this would be cool for those cases.

    1. Re:It only gets you halfway. by joggle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, for the typical orbit boost, a Homan transfer, you need both a boost to get you into an eliptical orbit to get to the higher orbit and another boost at apogee to make your orbit circular. However, that boost to get you into the eliptical orbit is huge compared to the boost needed to circularize the orbit at apogee, usually requiring an upper stage just for that purpose.

      If these tethers work as claimed, they could significantly reduce the cost of getting satellites into geosynch orbits and high earth orbits, not to mention interplanetary travel as you mention.

  61. Speed and the weight problem by cshark · · Score: 1

    Something like this would certainly solve the speed vs. weight problem faced by the current set up. The only problem I could see is space. Unless you have a hell of a lot of space, or some super powerful mechisms for building such a thing, it could be impractical.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

    1. Re:Speed and the weight problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      space!!! thats the one thing they will have plenty of, the thing will BE in space! why do you think they call it space?

    2. Re:Speed and the weight problem by uncoveror · · Score: 0

      Considering that the launcher has to already be in space to fling a satellite or probe deeper into space, this idea is just impractical. They should stick to an earthbound system such as the X-4000 Launch Aparatus.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  62. DON'T DO IT! by Xzzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't these guys know anything about thermodynamics?!

    By launching a ship in this fashion, they will be STEALING momentum from the earth's rotation, degrading the planet's equilibrium and ultimately destroying the orbit and sending us to a firey death in the sun!

    This is obviously a "plan B" coming from those same wackos who want to send the moon crashing into earth by harnessing the energy in the tides.

    1. Re:DON'T DO IT! by njchick · · Score: 1

      It's not stealing. It's fair use.

    2. Re:DON'T DO IT! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      they will be STEALING momentum from the earth's rotation

      With any luck, SCO has the patents on momentum all sewn up, and can stop this heineous crime with a skillfully applied IP lawsuit.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:DON'T DO IT! by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahh, but the question is, are they stealing momentum from the earth as it orbits the sun, or from the earth's rotation? One would spiral us into the sun. The other would lock one face of the earth towards the sun. (Wasn't there a SciFi novel with that theme? The beings lived in the twilight ring between the scorching desert hemisphere and the frozen dark hemisphere). Not sure either is a good deal. /frank

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    4. Re:DON'T DO IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "The other would lock one face of the earth towards the sun."

      Tidal forces will eventually do that anyway, in the same way that they locked the moon to always face earth.

      Except that tidal forces from the moon are greater than from the sun, one side of the earth will end up facing the moon, not the sun.

  63. Uh oh! by coopaq · · Score: 1
    What if Saturn in lying in wait for a mate
    like the Horny French Skunk?

    Ooo... bahby... I like your stripes!

  64. Too late - the Elbonians have already tried it. by tdelaney · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'd give a link to the correct Dilbert strip, but don't have time to find it before I go to work.

  65. Once again NASA does something half-assed. by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    Experts have been talking about the space elevator for a few years. Someone at NASA comes up with the ! brilliant idea "what if we make it shorter to save money?" This is a Rube Goldberg solution to a problem that demands greater simplicity.

    A space elevator can (theoretically) last a relatively long time with with little maintenance, and is fairly easy to keep operational once we get it constructed. It experiences atmospheric drag, but not at supersonic speeds, and an aborted launch most likely means a stuck elevator car. The elevator can be easily copied simply by weaving new cables along side it. After we make the first one, constructing duplicate systems becomes easier, and requires MUCH less energy, allowing for new elevators to be quickly created for other terrestrial, lunar, and even Martian sites.

    I suspect Nasa's idea of a short spinning tether is another boondoggle. It will constantly need to be boosted to a higher orbit (boosted by what system?). It will suffer from material degradation due to heating during the scooping maneuver. It must be manufactured entirely on the ground and must be lofted into orbit. It can only be replaced by launching an entirely new one. It still relies on rockets to get the payload to scooping altitude. In short, it's an energy hog that never gets any easier to maintain.

    Safety is not a concern -- regarding catastrophic failures, this is not much of an issue for either system. Both systems can be designed to fragment safely into smaller segments that do little harm on reentry.

    I suspect Nasa's going for the quick cheap fix with this one. I ask, what makes a small projectile fueled by explosives any less likely to go kaboom than a big projectile? As long as rockets are a part of the launch solution, the risks to payloads will remain high. If Nasa goes with this solution the U.S. is looking at another twenty to thirty years of being beholden to a complex, short-sighted, fiscally-wreckless, and bureaucratically-expedient non-solution.

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  66. Can it be used with Sub-orbital delivery vehicles? by Ugmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you think this could boost payloads delivered from small non-NASA suborbitals like Rutan's:

    SpaceShipOne?

    It would be great if you could just fly up to the edge of space, chuck your payload up, have a tether catch it and then land. Very cheap compared to rockets.

    Also I wonder if the tether guys are working with: Carbon Fiber 60% stonger than steel

  67. woot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A giant space trebuchet.

    Let the siege of Mars begin!

  68. There have been others. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    Relatively unknown but quite funny webcomic.

    Be sure to keep going. It's got a lot more to the story than just the slingshot.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  69. Tethers... [grumble]Stupid Slashdot![/grumble] by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1

    This morning I was typing in a long post on my /. journal (which I use as a blog) about the Hoytether article at space.com. It had lots of great stuff, with links to physicist and Hard Science Fiction writer Dr. Robert L. Forward (who introducted me to the tether concept) and to Tether's Unlimited (the company that Robert Hoyt and Robert Forward started to commercialize it).

    Hell I even wrote about listening to Bob Forward (Dr. Forward to you, heh heh) tell me the story of how he found a kilt-making company in Scotland that still had old-fashioned weaving machines which could be modified to create the tethers. In fact I went so far as to link to a eulogy I wrote about Bob when he died. It was a great post! It had everything!

    But then /. ate it when I clicked 'Preview' and the back-button gave me an empty form. It was time to go to work so I said screw it; I can write it again when I come home. Yeah right. Like I would still want to post it after somebody else gets a dumber version on the /. front page!

    It's like I was never meant to blog it...

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    1. Re:Tethers... [grumble]Stupid Slashdot![/grumble] by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      HA HA!!!

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  70. Whoa anyone think of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if something messes up and it releases
    to early or late and comes back to earth? Talk
    about a backfire. Or the cables break too early.
    Nothing like going in the wrong direction for a
    while.

  71. Re:Can it be used with Sub-orbital delivery vehicl by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    perhaps, but I think the acceleration would cause a break up of the ship with all that friction in sub orbital altitudes.

    a better solution would be a geosync type tether than simply wenched up a ship from sub orbit....if we can get the construction materials needed we could actualy have it at ground level.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  72. Swing Low... by Mu*puppy · · Score: 3, Funny


    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars;
    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    I looked over low orbit,
    And WHAT did I see,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars,
    A band of "Hoytether" comin' after me,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars;
    Swing low, sweet NASA slingshot,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    If you get there before I do,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars,
    Tell all my friends I'm being slung too,
    Comin' for to launch me to Mars.

    --
    There's no wrong way, to eat a Rhesus...
    1. Re:Swing Low... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      That was beautifully funny. Thank you :-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  73. Runs in the family by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goliath's future relative in Houston walks outside to pick up the morning paper, and SWWWOOOOCK!!!

  74. Acme + Coyote = Space Propulsion by bastion · · Score: 2, Funny

    WOW!

    Wasn't this theory widely in use by a certain coyote?

    If memory serves (which it usually does just for someone else) he used the rubber bands first and rockets second, we seem to be at odds with the Acme Lab theories on propulsion.

    Everything you need to know you learned from Looney Toons (even that crossdressing habit you try to hide)

  75. Laugh.... I get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... nice reference to the USB 1.1 2.0 crap... ha ha ha... made me laugh.

  76. what? by perrin5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the question is still where do you get that force from. The point here is storing and transferring power in and from these 'rubber bands' to use to slingshot stuff. Fine, your answer tells me that I can get a strand moving with very little difficulty in space. This is not really true, since we are talking about centrifugal force, the force is similar to what we would have to apply at sea level. Yes it will stay longer, but you still have to apply the force.

    Where does that force come from?

    --
    hmmmm?
    1. Re:what? by Placido · · Score: 1

      Rocket to start it spinning.
      Electromagnetic force to recharge after momentum exchange.

      Actually I've missed the point cause you could not possibly be asking such a simple question on slashdot.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  77. Continuous repair of the tether by rossjudson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Making the tether out of a mesh is a pretty cool idea, but all you've done is extend the lifetime by some factor. What you really want to do is find a way to repair the damage relatively easily.

    Picture two mesh tethers between the endpoints. Each tether is made of a series of lines. The lines come out of the tether and are _unwoven_ from the mesh weave. They are then looped back around and _reweaved_ into the tether going back in the other direction. Each line within a tether is actually participating in a complete loop, there are back again. Each line is an unbroken circle.

    The tether is then _moved_ through the continuous loop, unweaving and weaving at each end. In this way the tether acts like a belt.

    If a break occurs, then movement of the belt/tether will eventually bring the break to one of the terminals, where it can be repaired. The weave localizes the damage and ensures that the line will not simply fly off into space. The repaired line is then rewoven into the loop.

    A belt-like tether like this can last indefinitely.

  78. WTF this is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent is wrong!

    Don't mod it up unless you understand!

  79. Wile Coyote by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    Don't believe that propaganda about Wile getting beat all the time, that's just feel good stuff.

    Remember... it wasn't the same Road Runner each time.

    --

    -pyrrho

  80. Blargh...! by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    I'd definitely hurl if they tried to slingshot me into orbit. :)

  81. Heh by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Okay Mr. Armstrong. nice and steady. use this ladder to climb up into the slingshot. Workteam: Push! *distinct hnnngh from the workteam*. Okay. here we go.. Workteam: Release! *desperate scream as Mr. Armstrong flies across the horizon to never be seen again*

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  82. it can sustain itself by chillax137 · · Score: 1

    if there are some coils in this huge wire then it'll be travelling around a huge magnetic field (the Earth). From physics class we all know that this creates some electricity. While the energy produced may be small, it should be able to get itself into the spinning motion and keep itself if power is an issue.

    --
    chillax137
  83. Are YOU serious? by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    The Japanese have failed recently with using the slingshot for space purposes, although in a different application.
    ... in other words, you have no idea what you are talking about.

    The Japanese probe was using a "gravity assist". If you would just RTFA, you'd know that the scheme being talked about here involves an actual sling (a tension member with masses at both ends) not dissimilar from the one in the legend of David vs. Goliath. The only similarities between the two are that:

    1. Energy and momentum are exchanged between two masses, and
    2. Ignorant people see the word "sling" in popular descriptions and think they're the same.
    Try to learn something before posting.
  84. Sadly, Dr Forward died last September,... by Dharma's+Dad · · Score: 1

    ...flung into space in a botched experiment designed by his newly contracted consultant/assistant, W.E. Coyote of Looney,Tuney,Roades&Runner, LLP.

    On an upnote, Dr. Forward will have fulfilled a lifelong goal of visiting all 9 planets as he rockets past Pluto in October of 2013.

    (hope this guy had a sense of humor =)

  85. Solar sails don't work there by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    Solar sails might work too, but I suspect you'd need some honkers to get adequate results.
    Below a certain altitude (which depends on the solar cycle) solar sails are worse than useless. The atmosphere is tenuous at those altitudes, but until you get high enough that the drag against your sail is smaller than the thrust you get from light pressure you'll just drag yourself down faster.

    This is why electrodynamic propulsion is so attractive for this purpose. The same soup of ions which drags against a sail forms a current-return path for a conductor. Pump some current through your tether, and you can push against Earth's magnetic field; the lower you are the denser the ions, the stronger the field, and the better it works.

  86. Use something that's going up anyway by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    As I see it, the other end of the cable is hooked to a bigass weight - at least, that's what the massive, spacecraft-size block looks like in the schematics. Where does that block come from, and how do you boost it even to LEO?
    One obvious possibility is to buy a spent Shuttle external tank (ET) or five (pay NASA to take it all the way to orbit for you), and launch something like a giant robotic tin snip with the first one. You slice the tank into pieces and stuff them into a Kevlar bag (or just cram pellets of the hydrogen tank into the much-smaller oxygen tank). One ET is about 60,000 pounds of mass, so not a bad start.
  87. Wandaba Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh. Add 4 bimbos and you get Wandaba Style.
    (yes, it sucks - I have no life, therefore, anime)

  88. evil vs. evil by Baric · · Score: 1

    This is great because it pits the money of the Hollywood media syndicate against the money of the Religious Right, which is big into editing 'filth' out of movies. Someone needs to eventually put this legal battle on DVD and serve me a bowl of popcorn!

    1. Re:evil vs. evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  89. Gee, NASA by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

    ...let's get that reentry thing down first, huh? Seriously, shouldn't every last brain cell that NASA has be committed to finding out why 7 of the world's finest citizens were killed? And they're playing with slingshots? GEEZUS.

  90. As usual... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    NASA will study this, and probably shelve it due to its excessive simplicity.

  91. Ouch! by ellem · · Score: 1

    Man when that rubberband finally snaps... that shit is gonna hurt!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  92. Re:Can it be used with Sub-orbital delivery vehicl by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    Do you think this could boost payloads delivered from small non-NASA suborbitals like Rutan's[?]
    In a word, yes. That is exactly the kind of thing it's intended for, and if I could find the web page where I stashed my Hohmann orbit transfer formulae I'd be able to give you numbers on what you could achieve. (My calculations would be simplified by treating the two-body system as a point mass for gravitational energy considerations, but I doubt that would affect the answer significantly.)

    Scratching numbers on my calculator watch, it looks like a 60-ton tether sat coming in at 9 km/sec could grab a 5-ton suborbital craft moving at 1 km/sec and be slowed to 8.38 km/sec (still above circular-orbit speed). If we assume that the tether itself is massless, the center of mass of the combined craft would be 12/13 of the way toward the counterweight. If the tether length was 100 kilometers, the angular speed would be (8km/sec/100km)=0.08/sec, and the acceleration on the smaller craft would be (omega^2*r)=0.0064*(1e5*12/13)=591m/sec^2, or about 60 G. That's too much for people, but it shouldn't be any difficulty to design unmanned spacecraft to handle it.

    Now imagine something which could boost a 5-ton payload from suborbital-hop speed to LEO, GTO or even further out... once a week.

  93. Are you serious? by barakn · · Score: 1

    The Japanese probe you refer to used a slingshot technique several times, but it had absolutely nothing to do with a cable. As pointed out before, a sling is not a slingshot.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  94. yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  95. Re:Obligitory...failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, so does this one. Ineptly done.

  96. Two great tastes that don't go great together by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...when orbital mechanics go awry...

    "You plastered your Teather System across my Space Elevator!"

    "You got your Space Elevator caught in my Teather System!"

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  97. I have a better idea... by laddhebert · · Score: 1

    WOw, maybe they will build elevators to the moon next! Then perhaps escalators to each planet! Then a "Restaurant at the End of the Universe" wouldn't be completely out of the question :)

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
  98. ...But we might not mind :) by LiberalApplication · · Score: 1
    It's true, the stresses involved with sudden acceleration and high-speed travel through a non-negligible medium may be immense, but what if we didn't really care about the cargo?

    What if we used this thing to fling all of our garbage towards the sun? Not the best idea, but it could be interesting. We could have a way of permanently ridding our planet of old TV-guides, chicken bones, watermelon rinds, E.T. Atari cartridges, Windows 98 CDs, rapists, spammers, and irreparably soiled panties.

  99. Heard about this ride... by Danse · · Score: 1

    The man said, "Keep your head, and arms, inside the MXER at all times." But Bill Jr., he was a DAAAREDEVIL, just like his old man. He was leaning out saying "Hey everybody, Look at me! Look at me!" Pow! He was decapitated! They found his head over by the snow cone concession!
    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  100. Space Elevator Gets A Little Closer by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    This is slightly off topic but Science News has an article on a significant improvement in carbon nanotube strand fabrication.

    They've figured out how to make strands of nanotube fibers that are as thick as a human hair and more importantly, 120-200 meters long. The article focuses on the use of the fibers in textiles but to me, they make fabricating a space elevator cable more feasible than before. Carbon nanotube fabrication still constrain the cost issues but at least we now know how to make useable length fibers.

    If we can figure out to make carbon tubes in bulk quantities it'll be time to start seriously looking at building a space elevator and we can forget about the tether altogether.

  101. You shouldn't hurl in orbit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's enough space junk out there already.

  102. Expert on subject in the house by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am a rocket scientist. In fact I've worked both on space tethers and giant space guns
    professionally.

    Electromagnetic tethers work on the same principle as an electric motor - put a current
    through a wire in a magnetic field and you get a force. In earth orbit, you can make electrical
    contact with the ionosphere so that you have a
    one-way current in your wire, and thus a net force. The wire will accelerate one way, and the
    ionospheric plasma accelerates the other way, but there is plasma all around the earth, so you
    don't run out.

    The force you get is IL x B, where I is current
    L is the length of the wire, and B is the magnetic field. Since the strength of the
    Earth's magnetic field is a given, you can only
    play with the current in the wire and the length of the wire to get more force.

    The only consumable you have is a bit of gas
    that is ionized and squirted out to make your electrical contact with the ionosphere. It turns out you only need about 2% as much gas as a normal rocket would use for the same push, and only 1/8 as much as an ion thruster, so it is very mass-efficient. It can be powered by solar panels.

    The downside is it only works well up to about 600 miles. Above that the ionosphere gets too thin to be of much use. That's where the momentum exchange tether comes in.

    Vertical cables, or tethers, can be built in a wide range of lengths and spin rates. Any long vertical object in orbit tends to want to remain vertical because the Earth's gravity changes with the inverse square of the distance from the center of the planet.

    So the bottom of the object, being closer to the Earth's center is tugged by gravity more than the middle, and the top is tugged less. This is the same effect that causes tides.

    Left to itself, then, a vertical cable will stay vertical. The entire thing takes the same amount of time to orbit the earth. So the bottom end, which is moving in a smaller orbit, is moving slower, and the top end is moving faster.

    A free object in a lower orbit actually moves
    faster, thus if you let go at the bottom of
    the cable, you will find yourself at a suborbital speed and re-enter. Similarly, if you let go at the top end, you were moving faster than the local orbital speed, and are thus flung into a higher orbit.

    So if you are heading to, say, the Moon, you could ride up in a suborbital rocket that gets you to a landing platform at the bottom of the tether, ride an elevator to the top, then let go and get flung outwards.

    While you were riding up the elevator, the rest of the tether is moving down due to Newton's law. Thus the electrodynamic motor, which is typically 10 km long and attached to the much longer momentum tether, is used to make up the altitude lost.

    If the momentum exchange tether is short, i.e.
    hundreds of km long, the difference in gravity
    between the top and bottom isn't too great and
    you can build it out of ordinary strong materials. When it gets sizeable in relation
    to the Earth's radius, then you need materials
    somewhat stronger than what we have available
    in quantity.

    Because the Earth's orbit has both natural and
    manmade objects flying around, you need to be
    able to tolerate damage to the tether. At a
    minimum you need something like 6 cables, spaced
    far enough apart that no single object can
    take out more than 2 at a time (you can always
    get 2 if you are aimed just right), and you need a way to replace damaged sections and transfer the tension around the damaged area in the mean time. The Tethers Unlimited design uses a fine mesh of many strands.

    In the limit of a very long tether, you can get the bottom end to be stationary relative to the ground, and you get the space elevator. But it turns out that one that large, even using insanely strong nanotubes, weighs so much it would never make sense economically. A practical one would be in the 100s to a few 1000 km long.

    Daniel

  103. Yeah I just saw this on TV by neophenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe this is the same thing that Wyle E Coyote tried to catch the roadrunner. Hopefully NASA will get better contractors than ACME

  104. *fwooooooosh* by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    That's the sound of the B2 Stealth Joke Plane flying miles overhead, safely out of range.

    - q.x.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  105. Tempur-Pedic by mabu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nasa is back to working on space stuff? I thought they gave it up to focus their energy on mattresses?

  106. cosmic trebuchet by technoCon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has Ron Toms at Trebuchet.com been awarded a NASA contract?

  107. sling it up, slingy by abe_is_fun · · Score: 1

    I would slingshot a groundhog with monkey pox into outerspace to be an ambassador for all mankind.

    I would call the groundhog V-GER and if you waited for hundreds of years I bet earth would be attacked by a giant three-toed space-sloth with an even worse type of pox, like ELEPHANT POX!
    Don't worry, because Leonard Nimoy's great great grandson would team up with Will Weaton's cryogenically frozen head and save the day.

    If airlines increased the fees for their Sky-Phones and used that money wisely, it could fund this NASA initiative.

    --
    I don't want to be here.
  108. Oh, man... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    The image this story creates is amusing, to say the least. I find myself wanting to get about a gross of Superballs caught in this contraption, and see where they all end up...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  109. Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have been seeing Arte !
    lol

  110. Farscape by Krizzzopolis · · Score: 1

    we're getting closer and closer to a Farscape project

  111. Truly an american icon [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said no text!

  112. Quite an accomplishment by _Spirit · · Score: 1

    More than a few people have problems hurling into a toilet, which is generally just about right in front of them.

    --

    beauty is only a light switch away

  113. Electric charges. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I seem to recall that NASA ran an experiment a dozen years or so ago testing the theory that if you trailed a few hundred meters of wire behind the shuttle, an electric charge would build up. The idea was that a shuttle could supplement its power reserves through such a source, if it panned out. I can't recall if the theory was that electricity would be derived from static friction, or the Earth's magnetic properties, or if it had something to do with solar wind, but anyway. . .

    A very large charge built up rather more quickly than the experiment designers had imagined and the wire melted and broke.

    Anybody remember this?


    -FL

    1. Re:Electric charges. . . by foolish · · Score: 1

      Yeah... they hadn't made the current line just one part of the entire tether, so the puppy generated a load of current, arced and snap-fused the tether.

  114. Using Sling Shot Power to Hurl Into Orbit by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one to think "Frat Boy Drinking Game!"?

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  115. Oooh, fireworks pretty.... by peekitty · · Score: 1

    At least the wreckage will fall where it won't do much damage.

  116. Bing and Bong already do it. by xjosh · · Score: 1

    This is an old application. Bing and Bong of Tiny Planets are already using this technology to travel to other planets on their couch.

  117. Hope the software's perfect by casmithva · · Score: 1

    Given the few but monumental failures in the software that has controlled various space missions in recent years, I sure hope this thing's perfect. I could just see the thing getting confused and launching something straight down. "Oops..."

  118. Pinky and the Brain by ggambett · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Pinky and the Brain are behind this!

  119. Electrostatic Tethers by pavon · · Score: 1

    Check out this link, from the same guys: High-Voltage Orbiting Long Tether (HiVOLT): A System for Remediation of the Van Allen Radiation Belts

    This sounds like an interesting idea, but what other concequences would there be to getting rid of the Van Allen Belts? There plans involve just remediating (dispersing particles from) the inner belt, but still... Since most of the particles in the van allen belts are created primarily by interactions in the upper atmosphere, would dispersing the particles in the belt closest to the atmosphere also mean that particles in the outer belts would not be replenished?

    I don't know what the effects would be becasue IANAP, and there is no info on their site about it. Would anyone out there more informed about this subject than me care to share their thoughts?

  120. Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was anybody else reminded of the black wire from Larry Niven's Ringworld. . The wire that holds the shadow squares together, that is. The application, especially the one at tethers.com about satellites in tight formation is very similar to this, right?

  121. And what about the Lofstrom Launching Loop? by LandGator · · Score: 1

    http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SPBI116.HTM
    ht tp://www.launchloop.com

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA