Were this from the US, here's some wonderful perspective;
"The Lacey Act provides that it is unlawful for any person to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law whether in interstate or foreign commerce..."Damn
Odds are good it wouldn't matter what you did or didn't say. We've elected reasons to find a way around your rights... or at least some hard working folks who... well, spend their time doing something.
I'm still torn in regards to Wikileaks. On the one hand, transparency can be a phenomenal thing. On the other, it can't help but bleed interpretation, which in and of itself can lead to misgivings and the perversion of a "truth". Granted, there are concurrently 4 million different truths all bubbling away. Ew, interpretation just reared its ugly head. Does the right hand always want to know what the left is doing? In a perfect world, yes. In this one? I just don't know.
Yep, still torn. I contributed absolutely nothing. Flog me.
From a purely ethical standpoint, he wasn't very. As for a four year sentence given the nature of the crime, personally I think that's incredibly absurd and yet equally indicative of the judicial system in the US.
Nomadic Goat Herder here. I don't bother tweeting. Well, unless I'm covered in warm butter with the soothing sounds of Richard Marx floating through my personal space, but that's for neither here nor there.
Those are the kind best though materials of.
Perhaps they'll find one really wet wookiee.
Here come the Hadals.
Now the next time I'm in Mos Eisley I can take care of that Guido problem.
Everyone knows that's why the Mayan calendar stops there. Windows 8 comes out. The world ends. Apocalypse explained.
Typical Microsoft.
Were this from the US, here's some wonderful perspective;
"The Lacey Act provides that it is unlawful for any person to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law whether in interstate or foreign commerce..." Damn
Odds are good it wouldn't matter what you did or didn't say. We've elected reasons to find a way around your rights... or at least some hard working folks who... well, spend their time doing something.
Ignore me. I'm a silly little citizen.
Damn... I feel Old.
I'm still torn in regards to Wikileaks. On the one hand, transparency can be a phenomenal thing. On the other, it can't help but bleed interpretation, which in and of itself can lead to misgivings and the perversion of a "truth". Granted, there are concurrently 4 million different truths all bubbling away. Ew, interpretation just reared its ugly head. Does the right hand always want to know what the left is doing? In a perfect world, yes. In this one? I just don't know. Yep, still torn. I contributed absolutely nothing. Flog me.
From a purely ethical standpoint, he wasn't very. As for a four year sentence given the nature of the crime, personally I think that's incredibly absurd and yet equally indicative of the judicial system in the US.
Oh my God the possibilities are endless.
I've been trying to figure out why everything I do online ends up in Mandarin. And to think I blamed my breakfast fruit of choice.
Left turn, Clyde.
Nomadic Goat Herder here. I don't bother tweeting. Well, unless I'm covered in warm butter with the soothing sounds of Richard Marx floating through my personal space, but that's for neither here nor there.
Tethering to your partner. A little WiFi. A virtual hotspot. Endless.