Slashdot Mirror


Mysterious Object Found In Seabed

iONiUM writes "Scientists have found a strange object in the seabed between Sweden and Finland. While claims are flying around that its a UFO that strangely resembles the Millennium Falcon, it is probably something more benign."

336 comments

  1. A chunk of Skylab by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Regurgitated by a giant squid...?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:A chunk of Skylab by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Regurgitated by a giant squid...?

      Nope ... it's Bat Boy's undersea sanctuary. Perhaps he should have put it in Yucca Mountain.

    2. Re:A chunk of Skylab by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      Yes...of course...it's just a 60 foot diameter piece of Skylab!

      Nothing to see here folks...move along.

    3. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like the ruins of Sealab.

    4. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Dog-Cow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yucca Mountain would be a strange location for an undersea sanctuary.

    5. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right
      http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/36270/ufo-found-on-ocean-floor/

    6. Re:A chunk of Skylab by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

      You're wrong

    7. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's the f**king daily mail - I mean pur-leeese !

    8. Re:A chunk of Skylab by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yes it would, but no one would ever think to look there for an undersea sanctuary!! Well, except for the Spanish Inquisition...

    9. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn Nazis are back!

    10. Re:A chunk of Skylab by PPH · · Score: 1

      Give it some time. A few half lives.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    11. Re:A chunk of Skylab by IICV · · Score: 1

      Yucca Mountain would be a strange location for an undersea sanctuary.

      Nobody would ever find you, they'd all be looking under the sea.

    12. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God -damned Nazis are back!

    13. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the simplest explanation is the best ---- crop circles, baby.

    14. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything goes in the Yucca Mountains.

    15. Re:A chunk of Skylab by captjc · · Score: 1

      Please, Batboy is in his early twenties, can we start calling him Batman now? As we all know, the recession is hurting everyone so Batman is just rooming with Aquaman for a little while. Something about taxes on the richest 1% going up in Gotham.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    16. Re:A chunk of Skylab by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Shh, no-one suspects yet!

  2. Aluminum Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the @#$! is an Aluminum Falcon?

    1. Re:Aluminum Falcon by NitroWolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the @#$! is an Aluminum Falcon?

      Best Line Ever.

    2. Re:Aluminum Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American spelling of Aluminium Falcon?

    3. Re:Aluminum Falcon by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A low-budget remake of "The Maltese Falcon" perhaps?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:Aluminum Falcon by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of low-budget crap, this week's episode of Switched at Birth makes references to Deafenstein, a fictitious Frankenstein by and for deaf people. There's a few shots of it towards the end... It's hilarious.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    5. Re:Aluminum Falcon by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Its a sad state of affairs on the net when I can read a post like this and truly not know if I'm reading a sarcastic joke for which I'm just not getting the punchline, or if the writer is actually being serious.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Aluminum Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the @#$! is an Aluminum Falcon?

      A spoof idea that MAD magazine came up with 30-odd years ago.

      You are either showing your age (as am I) - or proving that there truly is "nothing new under the sun".

    7. Re:Aluminum Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im British, you insensive clod!
      that should be:
      What the bloody @#$! is an Aluminium Falcon?

    8. Re:Aluminum Falcon by cprincipe · · Score: 1

      @*#&@#*&@# that wasn't even paid off yet!

      --

      bun-fhuinneog agam!

  3. lol Daily Mail by deains · · Score: 0

    Which "scientists" did they drag out to say this was a UFO?

    1. Re:lol Daily Mail by nhat11 · · Score: 2

      Did you read the article? No scientists said that, just people who read the article speculating that it might be a UFO.

    2. Re:lol Daily Mail by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Did you read the article?

      The first line is "A mysterious circle on a grainy scan, this is what scientists are claiming is finally evidence that Earth has been visited by aliens." Emphasis added.

    3. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it once flew, it's a UFO by definition, since it's unidentified.
      Maybe it was a US(wimming)O though...

    4. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... The first line of the article: "A mysterious circle on a grainy scan, this is what scientists are claiming is finally evidence that Earth has been visited by aliens..."

      Though I didn't see where they specifically tried to embarass a "scientist" by name.

    5. Re:lol Daily Mail by smelch · · Score: 1

      I like the emphasis, it should be in the original article. It really makes it sound way nuttier.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    6. Re:lol Daily Mail by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Needs some quote marks add.

    7. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am a scientist, and my speculation is that it is a giant washer. Either that or it is a ginormous viking shield accidentally dropped overboard after a raid.

    8. Re:lol Daily Mail by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Without a direct quote and the name of the scientist, these lines are best taken with a grain of sea salt.

    9. Re:lol Daily Mail by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We should start using loldailymail that as a story tag, to indicate that it just isn't good enough for idle.

    10. Re:lol Daily Mail by BeardedChimp · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm actually quite annoyed at this. I foolishly clicked the link without checking where it led (just wanted a peak at the pictures). The daily mail is a disgusting newspapers that spreads lies and promotes racist and homophobic agendas. The damage it has caused to vaccination in the UK is more than enough reason to boycott it and I am now ashamed to have provided them a hit.

    11. Re:lol Daily Mail by boristhespider · · Score: 2

      A mysterious "circle" on a grainy scan, "this" is what scientists are claiming is finally evidence that "Earth" has been "visited" by aliens.

    12. Re:lol Daily Mail by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am a scientist (B.A. in Comp Sci at a small liberal arts school) and I speculate that it is a highly improbable series of single-bit errors in their image-processing software. Either that a relic of the Grand Disc Tossing tournaments held circa 17,500 years ago by the Methane Frost Giants of Titan.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:lol Daily Mail by jfengel · · Score: 5, Informative

      I came here to gripe about the same thing. If I'd realized that this was the Daily Fail, I wouldn't have clicked.

      Here's the site of Team Ocean Explorer, who actually did the discovery:

      http://www.oceanexplorer.se/videos.html

      Those videos were posted on YouTube a month ago, so not only is this news-by-press-release, but it's OLDs-by-press-release.

    14. Re:lol Daily Mail by nschubach · · Score: 1

      USO works, but for the wrong reason. It's not really swimming... it's an Unidentified Sunken Object. To be more precise though, it's an Underwater Unidentified Formation.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    15. Re:lol Daily Mail by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I'm actually quite annoyed at this. I foolishly clicked the link without checking where it led ... and I am now ashamed to have provided them a hit.

      The first submission about this story supplied this link

    16. Re:lol Daily Mail by nschubach · · Score: 1

      If you feel so strongly about it, why not add it to your adblocker/routing/blocking table?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    17. Re:lol Daily Mail by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Daily Mail, Gizmodo, pretty much the same thing.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    18. Re:lol Daily Mail by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "..geologists have said it was naturally formed."

      Not geologist, apparently.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:lol Daily Mail by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      This might be more accurate:
        "A mysterious circle on a grainy scan, this is what scienticians are claiming is finally evidence that Earth has been visited by aliens."

      Emphasis and change added by me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:lol Daily Mail by geekoid · · Score: 1

      here is a hint:
      If it mentions finding an UFO, don't bother.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:lol Daily Mail by Jimbookis · · Score: 1

      U*F*O? The fecker ain't flying so it's just a UO, along with the gazillions of other UOs seen with sonar on the seabed..

    22. Re:lol Daily Mail by jfengel · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good rule. Still, it's an unknown object, and that's mildly curious.

      The fact that there's whinging about a "UFO" means that I'd be just as well off waiting until they go down and discover the perfectly ordinary object that's causing the signal. Some people enjoy the speculation beforehand, and that's fine.

      Just not from the Daily Fail. Pick a less nauseating and less criminal source of unfounded speculation.

    23. Re:lol Daily Mail by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      That is, if it is an Object. Otherwise it would just be a UW, Unidentified Whatever.

    24. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USO Stands for Unidentified Subsmersible Object. Any competent newspaper would know that.

    25. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Any competent newspaper would know that.

      Yeah, well name one!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    26. Re:lol Daily Mail by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

      Especially considering that the thing is underwater, hence by nature not flying as in 'Unidentified FLYING Object', unless they have reworked the acronym and it now means: Underwater Falcon-like Object.

    27. Re:lol Daily Mail by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's an article from the Daily Fail, which means a metric fuckton of salt assuming you're brain-dead enough to buy that rag in the first place. Non-Brits are forgiven for not knowing about the DM... in fact privileged would be a better word.

      Here's a rule of thumb, though: "scientists say X" in the DM should be read as "we made up X". This is science we're talking about, so name that boffin or it never happened.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    28. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, it wouldn't be Scientologists unless it were the shame of a DC3, right?

    29. Re:lol Daily Mail by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Daily Mail (a publication named by people whose typing is so bad that they hit M when they aimed for F) fails on all three counts. It has never yet displayed competence (immigrants are coming over here and stealing all of the competence, apparently). It does not report news. It is printed on something approximating paper, so I suppose you can give it half a point there. Half out of six is still greater than the accuracy of their stories (a most appropriate term for the contents of their articles).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    30. Re:lol Daily Mail by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The same ones that developed various bullshit medicines and think climate change theories are wrong, I guess :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    31. Re:lol Daily Mail by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 2

      UASC: Unexplained Appearance on a Sonar Scan

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
    32. Re:lol Daily Mail by mangu · · Score: 1

      From what can be seen in that video, it could be either the chimney in a steam ship or a gun turret in a war ship from the first half of the 20th century.

    33. Re:lol Daily Mail by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Or, more likely, evidence that the piece of land was previously above water at one time in Earth's past and got struck by a large meteorite.

      Oh, and some random hunks of rock fell on top of it since then.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    34. Re:lol Daily Mail by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      If it's any consolation, M and F are next to each other on a Linotype keyboard, which would have been popular at the time of the newspaper's founding in the 1890s.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    35. Re:lol Daily Mail by GrahamCox · · Score: 2

      Not only the Daily Mail, but the Daily Mail in August. You might as well get your news from the Beano.

    36. Re:lol Daily Mail by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      They should send it to CSI to enhance it.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    37. Re:lol Daily Mail by repvik · · Score: 1

      That is not a solution, it's a workaround.

    38. Re:lol Daily Mail by duhjim · · Score: 1

      Unidentified Fallen Object, its fallen and it can't get up.

    39. Re:lol Daily Mail by c0mpliant · · Score: 1
      Clearly the Dandy is the source for news in the Daily Mail

      Man eats whole cow pie!!

      --
      There is no -1 disagree
    40. Re:lol Daily Mail by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I am a scientist (B.A. in Comp Sci at a small liberal arts school)

      That's a pretty liberal application of the term 'scientist'.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    41. Re:lol Daily Mail by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      CSI could even use some fancy "new" voxel technology to make it even more impressive!

    42. Re:lol Daily Mail by larpon · · Score: 1

      Dude no - not just an UO - an USO (Unidentified Sunken Object) - ahem ... ehehe

    43. Re:lol Daily Mail by deroby · · Score: 1

      And when they board it and find the wrecked instruments, they can unsolder the chip with large GPS lettering on it, put it into their own TomTom unit and then check what galaxy the aliens came from !

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    44. Re:lol Daily Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't have possibly been a joke, like every fucking thing else in parent's post.

    45. Re:lol Daily Mail by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. Glad you got the joke. I have another one about how my other degree (a BFA from an arts college) counts as my "artistic license". I'm a real laugh riot at parties.

      Almost anyone can call themselves a "scientist". There's even a religious denomination that applies the title to Jesus Christ, even though I'm pretty sure he didn't conduct any double-blind experiments in his career.

      Though in all sincerity, I do consider myself a "scientist" in the sense of using the scientific method to learn about the world I live in.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  4. SPHERE?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Somebody round up Dustin Hoffman, Sharon Stone, and Samuel L. Jackson!

    1. Re:SPHERE?!? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mr. Jackson wasn't available for comment, though we did hear him shout "I have had it with these motherfucking aliens on this motherfucking planet!" as he was leaving.

    2. Re:SPHERE?!? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherfucking UFO's on this motherfucking planet!

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:SPHERE?!? by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      Reach down in that bag and get my light saber. It's the one that says 'Bad Mother Fucker'

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
  5. He should know better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "While claims are flying around that its a UFO that strangely resembles the Millennium Falcon,"

    Everyone knows when you let a Wookie fly your insurance rates go up for a reason.

    1. Re:He should know better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happens when you try to make the Kessel run in 11 parsecs.

    2. Re:He should know better by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I think it's the actual Millennium Falcon. That is, it fell off of the boat carrying the movie prop to an exhibition.

    3. Re:He should know better by chrisj_0 · · Score: 1

      Prop was not 60ft across

    4. Re:He should know better by peragrin · · Score: 1

      No the prop was built withe TARDIS tech as it's on screen size didn't match it's interior size.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:He should know better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How do -you- know? It looked big enough to me when it was being pulled into the Death Star.

      On another note, I swear that someday I'm going to buy one of those $300 Blue Wicked Lasers, mount it pointing almost straight up to a motor on a stand, then take this contraption and a car battery out into the desert about a mile east of the highway rest stop that everyone stops at to see the Marfa Lights. About 9pm, I'm going to turn the damn thing on so I can read about the alien abductions in the next day's paper.

    6. Re:He should know better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not the Millennium Falcon, its the Ebon Hawk.
              http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ebon_Hawk

    7. Re:He should know better by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      It;s always best to assume the simplest explination instead of creating some complex story.

      Thus, it's probably an alien UFO filled with replicators transported from a future where mankind is enslaved by evil robots who use them as batteries.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    8. Re:He should know better by black+soap · · Score: 1

      You'd probably want to be more south than east, and in that area the desert is pretty clear. Unless it is a dark night, you'll want to be farther than a mile out. Also, if you put on too good a show, you risk the 'alien' being abducted BY the rednecks.

    9. Re:He should know better by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is, I suggest we quarantine any samples we bring up, and any divers who get near it. I saw Alien.

  6. Kessel Run by Stealth+Dave · · Score: 1

    That ninth parsec is a bitch to navigate!

    --
    Evil is as eval("does");
  7. UFO? by rickyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An "object in the seabed between Sweden and Finland" could hardly be classified as a flying object, unidentified or otherwise.

    1. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a USO!

    2. Re:UFO? by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      What they meant to write was UFO, an unidentified flightless object.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:UFO? by impaledsunset · · Score: 1

      "Flying" could mean "able to fly", not "flying at the moment". And all objects can fly if there's a big enough explosion....

    4. Re:UFO? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      What they meant to write was UFO, an unidentified flightless object.

      Or a UFFO - unidentified formerly floating object.

    5. Re:UFO? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Un Floating Object, obviously.

    6. Re:UFO? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2

      Underwater Found Object

    7. Re:UFO? by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Funny

      And all objects can fly if there's a big enough explosion....

      Except your mom.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    8. Re:UFO? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is actually a term called USO (unidentified submerged object). There is a lot of reported sightings from navies and pilots of UFOs over water that would suddenly dive/resurface from the water at very fast speeds. The Hitler/Nostradamus/Monsters/Aliens channel (formerly known as the History Channel) has had several specials on it. They've even mentioned "theories" that there could be underwater bases for these USOs/UFOs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    9. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USO - Unidentified Submerged Object should be the correct term.

    10. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My explosion the other night sent your mom flying.

    11. Re:UFO? by Holammer · · Score: 1

      An "object in the seabed between Sweden and Finland" could hardly be classified as a flying object, unidentified or otherwise.

      USO if you have to be pedantic.

    12. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of reminds you of X-COM, doesn't it?

    13. Re:UFO? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is, it isn't real unless the fellow with the hair sticking out like the book version of Harry Potter comes on (the *cough* History Channel) claiming something outrageous. I think it would be neat if they could get his eyes to glow when he gets excited. 10pts if he links it to the Mayan Calendar and how we all get experience an ginormous moronic convergence on Dec. 22, 2012. One has the vague hope he'll slink off the tube in shame after that date but I'm sure he'll be back, there's a clause in his History Channel contract that says any weirdo program making vague supernatural claims must "interview" him as an expert in the field...any field...he's not particular.

    14. Re:UFO? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean the Greek guy with the crazy hair that looks like he stood in front of a wind tunnel? Yeah. Don't these guys realize that when they look like that, it does not help their credibility one bit? Although, what's more sad to me (as a polisci grad student) is Bueno de Mesquita as "the next Nostradamus". The guy may be a well-known political scientist, but after watching that special, I lost some respect for him.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    15. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh No You Didn't !!

    16. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hitler/et al. channel is still one of the best of a bad bunch of commercial infotainment channels. Here in Australia and New Zealand it really competes only with BBC Knowledge.

      Anyway, see XCOM Terror from the Deep, one of the best games of all time.

    17. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still grinning.

    18. Re:UFO? by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      UFO: Unidentified Freezing Object

    19. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is a lot of reported sightings from navies and pilots of UFOs over water that would suddenly dive/resurface from the water at very fast speeds."

      These are called waves.

    20. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is actually a term called USO (unidentified submerged object).

      Yeah, but every time someone mentioned that acronym, everyone else in the room started cheering for the dancing girls and Bob Hope.

    21. Re:UFO? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia claims that up to 10,000 cargo containers are lost at sea every year, not to mention all the ships that sank, aircraft that ditched and random rock formations.

      The same goes for UFOs. When you consider the amount of space junk and the number of lights on the ground that could be reflected off clouds etc. it should be obvious that there are far more likely explanations than secret visits by aliens or the USAF testing alien tech. Much as I would love for Stargate to be true.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:UFO? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Well I was going to say, looking at this picture:

      http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/08/01/article-2021174-0D41B1E600000578-124_468x286.jpg

      Fuck the round UFO, what the hell is the big white thing next to it! However, you've answered my question:

      "They've even mentioned "theories" that there could be underwater bases for these USOs/UFOs."

      Obviously this is somewhere we should send believers in alien visitors, I think they'd be in their element there, they could find the cure for AIDs, faster than light travel and so forth for us.

      Well, that's what we could tell them, and then fuck off with the boat so they're stuck there so that we don't have to listen to them scream UFO! each time some random shape is spotted somewhere, even though it always ends up being something much more boring when we take a closer look.

    23. Re:UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a stationary point and a sufficiently long rod and I will able to move his mom.

    24. Re:UFO? by gtall · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware he was Greek, but he's the only one on there (that I've seen) with the wind tunnel effect going on. The best part of his job is he doesn't have to think, just blurt out whatever ephemeral New Age Fizziness happens to occur to him at the time...hmmm...maybe he's onto something here...he is getting paid...for airy puffs of nonsense...I'm in the wrong business...

    25. Re:UFO? by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Underwater Floor-hugging Object.

  8. Did many Bothnians die... by SuperJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    To bring us this information?

    --

    Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

    1. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bothans

    2. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      What's a Bothnian? Is that like an Bothan from Glendale, CA?

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a trap!

    4. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whooosh*

    5. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its a Bothan who lives in the Gulf of Bothnia. Which is where this was found. Which is why it's doubly funny. Triply since it seems to have whooshed all of /. Despite the fact that at least 3 people have made this exact joke.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    6. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2

      I see your *whooosh* and I reverse it upon you:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glendale,_California#Armenian_population

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    7. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bothnia is the country right next the Stherbia, sthupid.

    8. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      What's a Bothnian?

      Thomeone from thomewhere in Bothnia, thuch ath Tharajevo.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    9. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know that Pierce Brosnan had family that spoke with a lisp and lived around Sweden and Finland. Learn something new every day, I guess.

      Or perhapth it ith a long lotht viking longboat from a community of thpeech-impaired people who emigrated from Bothnia who thpeak with lithpth (exthept when they thay Ithaca) that moved to Thweden?

    10. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that girlfriend you picked up in Thailand is a trap.....

    11. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misheard. They said she had the clap.

    12. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by tftp · · Score: 1

      What's a Bothnian?

      A variant of Boskonians perhaps?

    13. Re:Did many Bothnians die... by dragon-file · · Score: 0

      I've got a bad feeling about this...

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
  9. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another wonderful piece of speculative garbage from The Daily Mail - how surprising...

  10. If it's by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the Daily Mail - it must be true! Also this line was cute: "his team do not have the money or resources to examine the shape further. If it does turn out to be a UFO it will be priceless". All that's needed is an address so I can send the cheque!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:If it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical... they have the money to recover the items in the wreck, but not enough send a flipping small robot with a camera to get a closer look.... that's how they get you....

    2. Re:If it's by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      In the Daily Mail - it must be true! Also this line was cute: "his team do not have the money or resources to examine the shape further. If it does turn out to be a UFO it will be priceless". All that's needed is an address so I can send the cheque!

      The second part of that phrase was also great: ". . . but if it is just a shape, it will be worthless." That about covers it.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:If it's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it does turn out to be an Unidentifiable Flying Object, we still wont't know what the hell it is, but somehow we will have guessed it can fly ?

  11. Update by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

    After further study, scientists discovered that the object consisted almost entirely of old discarded IKEA furniture.

    1. Re:Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's actually supposed to be a couch. It wound up looking like the Millennium Falcon because, well, you try following IKEA instructions.

    2. Re:Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After further study, scientists discovered that the object consisted almost entirely of old discarded IKEA furniture.

      I feel sorry for the aliens then. Ikea Spaceships are only good for one move to another planet, then they just fall apart.

    3. Re:Update by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Theres old IKEA furniture and there's bold IKEA furniture, but there's no OLD, BOLD IKEA furniture.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next question is where do all the old non-discarded IKEA furniture end up? There is definitely something paranormal about that.

  12. Call Indiana Jones by Nanosphere · · Score: 1

    Maybe he can examine the skeletal remains of the pilot.

  13. Answer to "...found a crashed flying saucer?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    no

    1. Re:Answer to "...found a crashed flying saucer?" by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      The difference is that we can send down a submarine to verify what we see.. With a slice of toast that looks like the Virgin Mary, you can't prove that it wasn't put there by divine intervention, It's just a matter of faith. So while this may or may not be a crashed flying saucer, I could be verified. Couldn't you just lower a waterproof camera on a string, with a light on it to at least verify the claims? Seems like it would be a pretty cheap thing to do even if it turns out to be nothing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  14. Get your facts straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's not Millenium Falcon. The galaxy is too far away. But it's clearly a Dralthi, Kilrathi medium fighter.

    1. Re:Get your facts straight! by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Luckily, Mark Hamill could help you if it was either

    2. Re:Get your facts straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. I'm glad somebody else's first thought was Dralthi as well :)

    3. Re:Get your facts straight! by demonbug · · Score: 1

      That's not Millenium Falcon. The galaxy is too far away. But it's clearly a Dralthi, Kilrathi medium fighter.

      Lol, I was going to just say, "Kill....Rathi..." and see who got it; too late for that.

      (At least, I think that's what the dying Kilrathi pilot said in Ultima 7)

    4. Re:Get your facts straight! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an alien fighter that hit the water accidentally because the pilot was too busy trying to keep up with Will Smith and shooting "green shit" at him

  15. Many... by Lester67 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Bothnians died to get us this information.

    1. Re:Many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bothans, retard.

    2. Re:Many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be "Many Bothnians dived to retrieve this information" :D

  16. This just in... by Drathus · · Score: 2

    People like rushing to snap judgements; the more outrageous the better.

    1. Re:This just in... by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      People like rushing to snap judgements; the more outrageous the better.

      Sarah Palin's people have come to reclaim her!?

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    2. Re:This just in... by demonbug · · Score: 1

      People like rushing to snap judgements; the more outrageous the better.

      Sarah Palin's people have come to reclaim her!?

      What?! I thought Thrawn disowned her when she torpedoed the Tiger's Claw!

  17. Smiley face by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    I think it is alive as at the top right of the item it looks like there is a smiley face in the grainy sonar image. It must like having its picture taken.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  18. Cthulhu fhtagn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ia! Ia!

  19. What's the rule on rhetorical questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the rule on rhetorical questions in news headlines?

    The editor thinks it would be a better story if the answer were yes. But it is actually no.

  20. Xenu by need4mospd · · Score: 2

    Damn, Tom Cruise was right after all.

  21. That's a crater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It really should be called a USO (Unidentified Swimming Object) instead.. harr!
    In all seriousness, intelligent life is not the only force capable of producing circles. Nature does this all the time, in form of craters, bubbles, sinkholes, erosion (like in rivers or currents)... that could be anything. To me it looks like some sort of crater that has been naturally filled in with some sort of substance, like sand.

    1. Re:That's a crater by catmistake · · Score: 1

      riiight... and just how did all that sand get to the bottom of the ocean?

    2. Re:That's a crater by Syshak · · Score: 1

      riiight... and just how did all that sand get to the bottom of the ocean?

      By natural sedimenting of course, the seabed has sand (from land erosion) brought in by rivers and currents like these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_bothnia#Rivers

  22. U.F.O. by Saberwind · · Score: 2

    I agree it's an Underwater Found Object.

    1. Re:U.F.O. by Nanosphere · · Score: 1

      Unearthed Forensic Observation

  23. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never heard anything about this in any Swedish media what so ever, not even our crappy papers that posts every new "UFO autopsy in Russia" video they find.

    "Scientists " must be the most misused phrase ever.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I've seen absolutely no mention of this in any Swedish newspaper.

      / a Swede

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, government cover-up!

      This just keeps getting better and better.

    3. Re:Hmm... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      "Scientists " must be the most misused phrase ever.

      Back off, man.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read about this on http://aftonbladet.se/ a few weeks ago ..... Same cedebility as the Daily Mail...

  24. Lucas did it by operagost · · Score: 1

    It's a viral publicity stunt. Either that, or it's where Lucas hid the evidence that HAN SHOT FIRST!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  25. A Terrible Price by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

    "The shape was found at the bottom of the Gulf of Bothnia during a search for a sunken wreck which contained several cases of champagne."

    Many Bothnians died to bring us this information...

  26. It is NOT a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not flying hence it can't be an Unidentified Flying Object...

    It might be an USO Unidentified Sunken Object...

    It might also be a big rock... But it is not a UFO!!!

  27. Closely related to the face on Mars, no doubt. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Closely related to the face on Mars, no doubt. by vlm · · Score: 1

      Its kinda like a big round hole... Its goatse on Mars!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  28. It is obvious....... by alex_l83 · · Score: 0

    ......it obviously IS the Millennium Falcon . Lucas is ready to suit .

  29. Get down there already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Researchers have claimed the fuzzy outline is a flying saucer that ended up 300ft down on the ocean floor between Sweden and Finland."

    They found this weeks ago, how come they haven't sent a diver down to look at it yet.

    1. Re:Get down there already by glodime · · Score: 1

      How could the Daily Mail sell advertisements if they actually had information? No speculation = no revenue.

    2. Re:Get down there already by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Good news is no news. No controversy = no revenue.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  30. What can be more benign? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can be more benign than the Millenium Falcon? The MF was used to restore freedom and liberty to the galaxy.

    Unless of cou

  31. Sea Statue by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1

    Slaver in a stasis field. Don't open it. It's a trap.

    1. Re:Sea Statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK, I've got this Tnuctip here to help me...

    2. Re:Sea Statue by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Nice references.

    3. Re:Sea Statue by rlp · · Score: 1

      Nah, just a Blue Hades colony.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    4. Re:Sea Statue by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      And for fuck's sake, don't go near that field of funny looking flowers they found nearby...

    5. Re:Sea Statue by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I'm not going back, Jim!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    6. Re:Sea Statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. mod parent up

    7. Re:Sea Statue by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      I'm a doctor not UFOLOGIST, dammit! But, I'm pretty sure it's dead.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    8. Re:Sea Statue by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      It can't be a BLUE HADES colony, it's only 100m deep. It could be a ship though...

  32. Sweds searching for booze. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Apparently they were searching for a wreck that contained 'several cases' of champagne.

    Which surprises me. I'd expect they wouldn't put on a full salvage operation for less then a couple of boxes of Vodka.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Sweds searching for booze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Champagne is easier to drink underwater thanks to the pressurized bottle. //RescueDiver

    2. Re:Sweds searching for booze. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I guess you just belch while decompressing.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  33. DailyFail by MrQuacker · · Score: 1

    Why does /. still listed to this drivel?

    1. Re:DailyFail by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      It's good for a laugh. That makes it a more interesting link that 90% of the crud on /.'s main page at any given moment...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  34. It's a Stargate!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez didn't you guys see that episode?

  35. Don't Mess with It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ITS THE DRAIN PLUG!

    1. Re:Don't Mess with It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but anyone who has studied the subject knows that the exact location of the asshole of the world is Newark, New Jersey.

    2. Re:Don't Mess with It by 2names · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, Newark may not be the asshole of the world, but it's definitely in the hairy part around it.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    3. Re:Don't Mess with It by msauve · · Score: 0

      So, Newark residents are Klingons?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Don't Mess with It by AnnaZed · · Score: 2

      I thought the same thing; like the drain plug for all of the oceans of the entire world! [and then my hair stood up on end because I have scary dreams about stuff like that]

  36. Let's park it over there... by vgbndkng · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they'll find one really wet wookiee.

  37. Han Solo Diary found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    last entry:
    Dear diary, trying to make the kessel run in 11 parsecs this afternoon, will let you know how it goes.

  38. Two Theories: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) the "scientists" found the champagne they were looking for or
    2) some joker held up a beer can next to the sonar receiver (it might say "please recycle").

    By the way, did anyone else notice Nessie swimming by in one of the frames?

  39. Michael Crichton, Prophet by somaTh · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thought of Sphere? Granted, it's in the wrong body of water and shaped wrong (I think the novel described it as something like a B2), but.... you know. Underwater ship that might have previously been used for extraplanetary travel...

    Fine, I'll go back to work.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Michael Crichton, Prophet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, first thing I thought of too...

    2. Re:Michael Crichton, Prophet by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was the very first thing that crossed my mind.

  40. UIO by plaukas+pyragely · · Score: 1

    No. It's UIO - unidentified immersed object.

    1. Re:UIO by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      at least we can be reasonably sure it's not a offog. man, I really hate when we misplace one of those...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  41. Swedish Ocean Team Loses Grasp of Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple hours just to LOOK at a few hundred feet and they can't afford it, but are scouring the ocean for a few bottles of champagne? Hey there, Swedish Chef, slap on that silly tinfoil had and get your f-ing priorities in order. It's not like you'll break the bank to send down one automated sub for 20 minutes, or mix up some good gas for a diver to hit 300. Really? No money? You're fucking retarded.

  42. the Decepticons... Megatron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    underwater crop circle?

  43. I always thought... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I awlasy knew that we came from a different world, and that we were not here by nature, more like a terraforming experiment of some superior race (ourselves 20 ,000 generations from now)....i guess this could be that terraforming soucoupe...?

  44. You Are A Huge Fucking Nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject.

    Also, from the article: Gulf of Bothnia.

    1. Re:You Are A Huge Fucking Nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You owe me a new keyboard.

  45. Crop Circles of the Sea by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

    It's just the result of a few drunk Swedes and Fins with diving suits goofing off after a hard night of drinking...

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  46. Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    For you UFO researchers who know this is no mere rock formation, you can learn more about the alien civilization whose ship this is by reading up on the legendary Apophenia alien civilization. This will tell you all about who put this clearly recognizable spaceship on the sea floor.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by Manos_Of_Fate · · Score: 2

      So you're saying that we should discount any and every strange pattern or bit of data we find, simply because it's probably nothing? Probably the last 200 years of science would like to disagree with that sentiment. I, for one, would very much like to know what it is, even if it turns out to be an odd rock formation.

      --
      Isn't enough that I ruined a pony, making a gift for you?
    2. Re:Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, that wikipedia link didn't even have pictures of the aliens

      instead it insinuated that I'm a nutjob looking for things that aren't there...

      YOU ARE IN ON IT, elrous0.

      THEY ARE ALL AFTER ALL OF US, EACH OF THEM, ALL OF THEM

      BE VIGILANT

      signed,
      a coffee-laded paranoid conspiracy theorist

    3. Re:Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sonar is used for allot of things... Tell the navy that all their sonar-imaging is worthless...

      Probably some old remains when the land was above the sea.. Or a shipwreck... Or some ship that has dumped garbage...... But there is a chance that it could be proof of something, we just don't know... Telling what is is or dismissing it beforehand is just bad science, wait for someone to actually examine it...

      I do think it looks interesting, but in terms of what it is... no idea...

    4. Re:Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by Tim+C · · Score: 2

      To be fair he didn't say "don't bother checking it out", he just predicted that it'll be nothing particularly exciting.

      Let's face it, he's right.

    5. Re:Google "Apophenia" to learn about these aliens by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Great, now we're going to have to send out men in black to install a chip in your head. Do you have any idea how much that costs us?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  47. Lost cargo? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    My guess is that it's lost cargo that fell off of a ship. There are a number of Swedish and Finnish port cities along the Gulf of Bothnia. Luleå, for example, ships 7 million tons of cargo a year - much of it iron ore from mining. The object in question is probably some large piece of mining equipment.

    10,000 shipping containers are lost into the sea across the globe each year. It's not unreasonable that some poorly secured piece of cargo slid off the deck of a cargo vessel, known only to the cargo company and their insurance company.

    1. Re:Lost cargo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I came to the comments looking for some good explanations of what this might really be. Until I got to your note, I was quite disappointed.

    2. Re:Lost cargo? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The article gives no hints about the material of the object. Sometimes, sonar will indicate whether it is metallic or not. If it is metallic I would guess that it is a WWII relic: experimental aircraft, bomb, etc.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  48. Don't worry everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a weather balloon. Yep that's it, a weather balloon for collecting weather.

    Fell in the ocean.

    Nothing to see here, please move along. Just a weather balloon.

  49. balloon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, its obviously a weather ballon, duh.

  50. There it is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been wondering where that went. I looked all over my apartment for it, even under the couch! And all this time it was sitting at the bottom of the ocean. Thanks for finding it for me, guys. I'll be over to pick it up when I can.

  51. George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can George Sue for likeness rights on this one?

  52. It's a UFO by Narnie · · Score: 1

    Underwater Flooded Object

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  53. And of course by "scientists", they mean by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    And of course by "scientists", they mean a group of guys with a boat and sonar equipment.

    1. Re:And of course by "scientists", they mean by boristhespider · · Score: 2

      Doubt it. If a group of guys with a boat and sonar equipment thought it was a flying saucer down there they'd actually have gone down. The fact that they didn't bother shows that they're not the "source" for the Daily Mail's story. Who knows, perhaps we'll find the Daily Mail doesn't even have any "scientists" claiming it's a flying saucer! But no, that could never happen, surely.

  54. Sorry everybody by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    sorry, everybody, I left it there, I'll be removing it shortly.

    1. Re:Sorry everybody by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Pray that it isn't pinned to the ground by the evil forces of gubbermint oppression, lest you never get to pry it free. Perhaps it sunk because it got enslaved by the highway system? Them highways, they are everywhere, you know...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:Sorry everybody by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Your nick name serves you well.

    3. Re:Sorry everybody by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0

      Ahh, my old libertarian friend, you are getting desperate in your grasping for straws to defend your untenable pseudo-philosophy. It does not become you.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    4. Re:Sorry everybody by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      aren't you trolling, being off-topic and flamebaiting all in one?

    5. Re:Sorry everybody by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0

      Around here, we call it "truth". Shame you got no modpoints to suppress it, no?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    6. Re:Sorry everybody by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I, suppress you?!

      You are the one searching out my posts and leaving your worthless commentary, so clearly, you are the one who is interested in anything like that. I don't care for your comments, they are empty noise to me. But the moderators are showing their true colors here.

    7. Re:Sorry everybody by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I deeply appreciate your suffering. Galt gulch is a cold place at times, isn't it?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    8. Re:Sorry everybody by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      what? suffering? you appreciate? what are you talking about, empty noise?

    9. Re:Sorry everybody by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      So, when's the wedding, you two? :D

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  55. Scientists... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    "A mysterious circle on a grainy scan, this is what scientists are claiming is finally evidence that Earth has been visited by aliens."

    Anyone who makes such wild accusations on such little evidence can hardly be called a scientist.

  56. low-res images are the best! by gwslyon · · Score: 1

    How can they possibly be misinterpreted! https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Cydonia_(region_of_Mars) The human senses are the least reliable form of identification. They're programmed to see certain things, and to fit an image into their expectations when they're not.

    1. Re:low-res images are the best! by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      Are you saying we're programmed to see the Millenium Falcon?

    2. Re:low-res images are the best! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      as soon as they says it look like the millennium falcon, you're brains starts looking for that pattern.

      Which is why when you see something odd, and you want someone else's opinion, never say 'does that look like x?" Because there brain will try to fit that pattern.

      I highly recommend this book:
      http://www.paranormalitybook.com/

      read that and the nonsense people do or believe begins to make sense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:low-res images are the best! by boristhespider · · Score: 1

      don't worry, i do understand :)

  57. Trickery of the mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Usually people see faces in almost everything..

    now why is everybody here seeing spaceships in this object?

    It's clearly an old style Cylon fighter btw!

  58. The Cetans are here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google 'Cetan mega weapon' for more info.

  59. Only 300 ft deep? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Can't we send a diver down there with a specialized mixed-gas diving setup?

    1. Re:Only 300 ft deep? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Use a submersible, man. More plentiful and can stay down longer.
      Human exploration is dangerous, let a machine do it.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Only 300 ft deep? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Next time I ask for your help with a body, we're rowing out farther.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  60. Pirate Bay Colo by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    it runs linux 3.0 and has Captain America buried in there!

  61. Not The Falcon by MongooseKY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone keeps saying this looks like the Millennium Falcon, but it's clearly a Cylon Raider. Or maybe it's one of the fighter ships Will Smith shot down in Independence Day. Either way, I'm sure we could only wish it were someone as friendly as Han and his wookiee friend.

    1. Re:Not The Falcon by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      The craft from The Sphere?

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Not The Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friendly? From what I've heard he shot first.

    3. Re:Not The Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't look at the pictures in the article. It is 99.8% the Millenium Falcon. Which means it's a bogus UFO.

      Either it's a rock formation that was seen before the first Star Wars film was produced by the person who designed the Millenium Falcon for Lucas Arts, or it's a brass rubbing of a Millenium Falcon medalion or something of the sort.

    4. Re:Not The Falcon by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Cylon Raider is definitely not "more benign" than Millenium Falcon. Perhaps author meant to say "more mundane," and is hoping it turns out not to be a spacecraft of any kind.

    5. Re:Not The Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. My first thought when I saw it was "Oh, it's a Battlestar Glactica" prop".

  62. Obligatory by PPH · · Score: 1

    Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, good evening, Mrs. Trellis. How is the weather in North Wales today?

  63. Tommyknockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome... bah.

  64. Sensationalist Science by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can guarantee you, there were no (real) Scientists involved in this "UFO" hypothesis. No scientist worth his salt is going to jump to a claim like that based on evidence that looks like a sawn-off tree trunk in a flooded marsh. Until physical samples are taken from it, it's all vapor.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Sensationalist Science by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      After digging through the article, found out it's about 60 feet in diameter. That's a lot bigger than a tree.

      But I agree entirely with your sentiment. It would be nice to see an article about this that wasn't 100% about UFOs and Atlantis.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Daily Mail. The same rag that in pretty much every edition finds a piece of research that fails to disprove a link between [insert mundane object or phenomenon here] and turns it into the headline "[INSERT MUNDANE OBJECT OR PHENOMENON HERE] CAUSES CANCER!!!1eleventy-one"

    3. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first article I read on this yesterday said they were treasure hunters. Deep sea explorers. Definitely not scientists.

      First thing I wonder is how a vehicle could hit the water with enough force, survive a trip to part of the ocean too deep for these 'experts' to explore, to slide for 100's of feet without disintegrating on impact. For the team to make the claim it did slide I don't think they know what they're talking about and just want some fame.

    4. Re:Sensationalist Science by TreyGeek · · Score: 1

      A sawn-off tree trunk that is 60 feet in diameter? That's twice as big as some of California's giant redwood trees. Oh wait, I RTF. Sorry about that.

    5. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or in this case... water

    6. Re:Sensationalist Science by billcopc · · Score: 1

      They were scanning for a sunken ship carrying champagne... you know, because that's totally worth the man-years collectively wasted on this article.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    7. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? You can now give people online IQ tests and call yourself a scientist.

    8. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until physical samples are taken from it, it's all vapor.

      But how many physicists would not want a sample of vapor which is heavier than water?

    9. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a 60ft wide tree trunk?

    10. Re:Sensationalist Science by lxs · · Score: 1

      You have got to admit that if you are going to waste some time messing around on a boat, searching for sunken champagne is an awesome way to do it.

      Just think of how it looks on your CV:
      2009-2012 Scoured the high seas for lost treasure and champagne. (Found UFO, which was nice)

    11. Re:Sensationalist Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in this case, cellulose.

    12. Re:Sensationalist Science by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It's wine. Old wine. Probably tastes like ass.

      Now if a truck full of Mill St. Tankhouse beer were to sink to the bottom of the river, I'm strapping on the O2 tank!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:Sensationalist Science by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Yes, swamp gas vapor... reflected off Venus... weather balloon...

  65. Not too troubling by cHiphead · · Score: 1

    Well if it is aliens, its good to know their ships can crash just like all of ours. Helps to see that they aren't perfect, regardless of any advanced technology or 'magic' they could do.

    Or its just some asshole billionaire's life size remote control millenium falcon that he lost control of and it crashed into the sea.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Not too troubling by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Well if it is aliens, its good to know their ships can crash just like all of ours. Helps to see that they aren't perfect, regardless of any advanced technology or 'magic' they could do.

      What makes you think it crashed, and they didn't just park it there, planning on returning to it later after they've finished eating our brains?

    2. Re:Not too troubling by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe under water IS their natural habitat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Not too troubling by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      The big skid mark they left. Either that or they're too awesome to even notice us.

    4. Re:Not too troubling by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The big skid mark they left. Either that or they're too awesome to even notice us.

      Skid mark or sediment flow due to currents?

      In any case, a skid mark doesn't neccessarily mean a crash landing, sometimes it's just a way to help slow down for a normal landing:

      http://www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1886-2038

    5. Re:Not too troubling by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Maybe the aliens like to have a little fun too, what's more awesome than skid-parking?

  66. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dropped a 60ft replica of the Millennium Falcon off the ferry on my way back from the Ikea flagship store.. if anyone sees it....

  67. my theory about brontosaurs by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    it's obviously a crater from a anti-submarine depth-charge.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:my theory about brontosaurs by tautog · · Score: 1

      Stated so confidently.

      You're obviously an agent of the government. :-P

    2. Re:my theory about brontosaurs by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2

      That seemed like a good idea. From the great and wise Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_charge):

      "The killing radius of a depth charge depends on the payload of the depth charge and the size and strength of the submarine hull. A depth charge of approximately 100 kg of TNT (4 MJ) would normally have a killing radius (hull breach) of only 3-4 meters (10-13 ft) against a conventional 1,000-long-ton (1,000 t) submarine, while the disablement radius (where the submarine is not sunk but put out of commission) would be approximately 8-10 meters (26-33 ft). A higher payload only increases the radius by a few meters because the effect of an underwater explosion decreases with the distance cubed. "

      If the depth charge went all the way to the bottom and was especially large it might have made the 30-foot radius mark that is seen. Of course, I am not an expert, but I have played one on the internet.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  68. Right? by VirginMary · · Score: 2

    Your right

    What about my left?

    --
    When 1person suffers from a delusion,it is called insanity.When many people suffer from a delusion,it is called religion
    1. Re:Right? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      your left when facing me or facing away?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  69. Isn't this how... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    X-COM, Terror From the Deep started? Leave it where it is!

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    1. Re:Isn't this how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly!

  70. so thats where I left it by Sprogga · · Score: 1

    Never drink and fly. Well all these years later I can finally go home.

  71. Looks like a trawl door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks just like a trawl door

  72. location, location, location by phrostie · · Score: 1

    anyone found it on google.maps?

    1. Re:location, location, location by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      according to the ocean-explorer website, they found bottles of cognac, champagne - which aligns to the sinking of the Jönköping by U22 on 26 October 1916. The last known position was around 12 nautical miles SW of Raumo (Aland islands) which is a pinch point in the Baltic ocean between Finland and Sweden (an obvious place for a UBoat captain to wait)

      googlemaps only goes about 1 to 2km off the coast in high definition from the Aland islands; and anyway, the sea is too reflective and too deep at 300m to see anything.

  73. CRATER? by gaspar+ilom · · Score: 1

    Could it be a crater from a WW-II depth charge? ...It's only 300 feet from the surface.

  74. Von Neumann Probe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly rabbits, this is just our planets assigned Von Neumann Probe. It's been silently communicating for ages with the glass tower on the dark side of the moon. ;-)

  75. 300 ft? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    It's covered by 300 ft of water??? We'll NEVER be able to find out what it is for sure!

  76. The Daily Mail song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
    (Although the mail is much better than the mirror & sun)

  77. OMG, it's the Sphere! by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Do not think about going inside The Sphere. No just try not to think about that. It's so dangerous the people from the future tried to hide it in the past at the bottom of the ocean.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:OMG, it's the Sphere! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      And if Jerry tries to talk to you, just ignore him. He's a giant douchebag.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  78. Source URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.oceanexplorer.se/index.html

  79. I've seen this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll send a team of scientists to investigate, spend millions on an underground lab that will be destroyed and in less than a year nobody will remember this thing existed.

  80. It's not crashed ... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    It's pinin' for the fjords.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  81. Secret Nazi Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the Remains of a bunker used by the Nazi's in the early 1800's (yeah they had time travel)
    The bunkers purpose was to make human-koala hybrids. no real idea why this project failed.

    Dude its a rock. probably the same one that killed the dinosaurs and re-wrote the bible.

    Just talking out my arse, in all probability it is a scout ship sent out by an alien race hundreds of years ago, it crashed while trying to leave after building the pyramids and discovering what we call alcohol.

  82. The Thing by hmckee · · Score: 1

    The Thing came from a round saucer. The detachable section from ST:TNG was also round.

    I hope Picard is inside, but we'd better prepare for the former.

  83. Far better info at the original source... by Slyswede · · Score: 1

    No need to read the sensationalist newspaper, just go straight to the original source instead. In english, ofc...

    This is actually a quite interesting find, though far from the story described in the Daily Mail.

  84. Analyze the Costs by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    There's nothing to suggest that this couldn't be natural or human-made at this point, so that should be the null hypothesis. This chart helps explain that if a human can recreate a UFO sighting, then that's probably the case.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  85. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found the sawn off trunk of Yig!

  86. I saw that movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_%28film%29

  87. NSFW by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    The boobs on the right side of the article are a bad thing to have on your screen at work.

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boobs on the right side

      I didn't realize this topic was splitting along political lines already.

  88. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It will only empty the shallow seas, though. The big plug is to be found, yet.

  89. impact crater ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont know what everyone is on about. Looks more like an Impact crater to me.. and wouldn't this make more sense?

  90. "Scientists" by nilbog · · Score: 1

    "A mysterious circle on a grainy scan, this is what scientists are claiming is finally evidence that Earth has been visited by aliens."

    So we've set the bar pretty low to call someone a scientist, eh?

    --
    or else!
  91. Call Bob Howard. by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    We better not be violating the second Benthic treaty, that's all I have to say...

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  92. just a few thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1). It has no geometric uniformity whatsoever. It happens to be 'roundish' on one side...big deal. 2.) The people saying it may be a UFO are citing the 598 ft. 'path' of disturbed seabed trailing behind the object......but......think about it. If supposed UFO came screaming in to the atmosphere and hit the surface of the water, what would it do then (assuming it didn't disintegrate)? It would go subsurface at an angle, and then quickly just start dropping vertically. And IF it were under some sort of propulsion, even after it went under, you'd see a pile up of debris in front of the object....which you don't. So...I say it's just a natural rock formation.

  93. *Checks calendar* by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Nope, not April 1.

  94. Novgorod? by ChucktheMan · · Score: 1

    I am surprised that no one has mentioned the Russian monitor Novgorod, which is about the right size. Scrapped in 1912, I am not sure where, but a lot of old boats did final duty as targets for weapon testing.

  95. Don't put it in a stasis box, whatever you do! by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Ptavvs
    "A reflective statue is found at the bottom of one of Earth's oceans, having lain there for 1.5 billion years. ..."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  96. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How on earth has nobody referenced Sphere yet? Star Wars is really the best reference we can come up with when we find what looks like a space ship under the ocean? Pathetic!

  97. Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The galaxy may not be that far finally.

  98. Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You keep on using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means.

  99. There is a possiblity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Except your mom.

    That you could be wrong.

  100. 15 mod points by trawg · · Score: 1

    ...and I can't use any of them to downmod this stupid story.

  101. Gamera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody tell Kenny, we've found his turtle.

  102. Dr. UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finaly they found it, this is my spaceship, Ive lost it 2 million years ago, before the Return of Jedi. Damn Wookies, they should never be let alone flying your favorite vehicle.

    Bets regards to all
    Han Solo.

  103. Clearly by Trevorm7 · · Score: 1

    Clearly it's just a weather balloon.

  104. Looks like a Cylon Raider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from the 1978 movie/television program. Egads!!! Don't tell me Battlestar Galactica 1980 was right?!?

  105. I just found a mysterious object too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in my toilet!

  106. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  107. Fastest in the quadrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It once made Stockholm-Helsinki in under 5 parsecs.

  108. Subtle clue in video by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    [i]Ocean Explorer [b]off course[/b][/i] (sic)...

  109. Oh [SIGH] not another one ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    It'll probably be Lord Lucan's airship, crashed on the way to visit the ice-bears of Svalbard.

    [READS TFA] Oh noes! It's in the Daily Fail! We's alls gonnas dies!

    OK, got that out of the way. Reading further ... 60ft (about 18m ; trust the Daily Fail to use retard-measures) in diameter ; irregular profile including a more-or-less circular outline and transverse straight lines on an incomplete orthogonal grid. Sure looks "manufactured".

    Now what, in the sea between Sweden and Finland, could make an 18m diameter mark on the seabed 86m down? I'd go for a spud can.

    ("Wossat?" I hear you say.)

    They're the structures on the feet of "jackup" style drilling rigs that reduce the penetration of the leg into the seabed. One of the world's major rig building and maintenance yards is in Finland ; there are several similarly equipped yards in Sweden ; and there is an occasional traffic in rigs being moved through the Baltic to get into the Caspian Sea. I wouldn't be surprised to find that a jackup had been stacked or load-tested here after repairs (or new construction).

    That's my wild-arsed guess. But what the fuck would I know? I rarely spend more than a couple of hours a month looking at seabed sonar scans.

    Can I find comparable images on the net? Nope, not in 5 minutes of searching.

    Well, anyway, the probability of me buying a copy of the Daily Fail when I don't have active (and extremely urgent) diarrhoea has not increased. And the urgency of this story is almost exactly zero.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  110. I like the reasoning.... by ToronadoCheese · · Score: 1

    We dont know what it is......therefore we know its a spaceship from a galaxy far far away.

  111. Object determined to both cure and cause cancer by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    This is, after all, the Daily Mail.

  112. Well one thing is certain..... by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

    That's no moon.

    --
    Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
  113. That's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should be spending money on deep sea exploration as opposed to the stupid space. There is so much that is unexplored in the Earth's oceans, and we're already trying to jump the moon. Yeah, I know, space is more strategically important from a military standpoint, shooting lasers or dropping bombs from the orbit requires no flying it up there shortly before the fact, not mentioning the huge spying and communications potential, but really, Mars?

  114. A Cold War leftover? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Maybe a sub base?

  115. Mystry object in seabead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check scan image against under side view of missing gun turrents from heavy warships - much more likely given the area than space alyans.

  116. dolphins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dolphins are intelligent which means they must not be native to earth so it's just a matter of finding where they parked their spacecraft

  117. I knew alcohol was involved somehow!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: The shape was found at the bottom of the Gulf of Bothnia during a search for a sunken wreck which contained several cases of champagne