Which means, they have their transponders on, and ATC knows what they are up to.
My problem with this, is our government seems to think it is free to do what it wants. It does not.
My bigger problem with this, is that the people more or less believe that we don't have a choice in our government's activities. We live in a defacto surveilence state, mainly because we accept it as "normal". We are in a tyranny of security, because we are not longer the land of the free, home of the brave. Especially when the presence of chalk is cause for panic among the snowflakes attending college.
The difference between a "joint checking" and separated accounts is merely a formality and not one of any real significance. Pretending it is enough separation is functionally idiotic.
None of her emails were "MARKED" classified. Markings of themselves does not make the emails classified or not. But hey, keep parroting irrelevant information as that always works.
Classifications are well established, and Clinton was informed on her duty (as in responsibility) to maintain secrecy. You should actually read the NDA Clinton actually signed, which is fairly clear on what her responsibilities and duties were. She has breached that NDA by all reasonable measures. Of course, partisan democrats will support her all the way to conviction, and probably beyond.
Markings are irrelevant. Some information was "classified" on creation. You keep repeating this line as if it matters, it does not.
Her server was not a "government server" which means it had LESS protection, not more. Again, relevant to the story because it was also likely compromised. We don't know if it was, because it was destroyed, in a clear attempt to avoid transparency. But hey, if you're okay with it it must be okay!
Unfortunately you've been bitten by the progressive non-scientific but called Gender Neutrality which views both genders as being the same in all areas, and blaming of culture for corrupting them into gender stereotypes. Here is some scientific articles that you won't read that explain why you are not correct.
The problem is, that we tend to take the outlier as the rule, when trying to break norms. We should accept that norms are those for a reason, while not excluding those that are outside those norms. There will be girls who like trucks, and boys that like dolls. Blaming stereotypes solves nothing and doesn't actually progress understanding.
Yeah, because discussing the nature of Hilary's insecure email with a shit-tonne of classified and beyond emails is partisan. But Bernie has decreed it, "enough" and that isn't partisan. Got it.
Wow. The ONLY person I see advocating gassing of Mexicans is you. I realize that you're trying to make some sort of snarky comment on Trump, but how would you feel if I said "Kill all the babies" in response to Hillary's Abortion stance?
Yeah the difference is that Hillary has said she supports killing unborn babies (as she calls them), while Trump hasn't said anything close to "Gas the Mexicans".
Pick on Trump all you want, but make sure it is something real, not imaginary.
Indeed I am. Research suggests it is mostly due to negative stereotypes and only somewhat unfounded fears of being suspected of paedophilia.
We call that Male Privileged. Nobody cares about that side of things, even you.
Indeed I am. I haven't had much time to look into this
Mutually exclusive statement, rendering the excuse false. If you were interested, you would have ALREADY looked into it. You haven't, so I can presume that you're not that interested.
Indeed I am. I'd say this one is less about employment and more about the portrayal of women in fashion and advertisin
I'd say you don't have a clue what you're talking about so you're winging the answer based upon your own biases.
Incorrect. It's more of an institutional problem.... it's just a legacy of millennia of history.
Actually, it isn't an institutional problem. It is a Gender difference problem. It is why girls tend to prefer dolls to trucks, and boys tend to prefer trucks to dolls. It doesn't have to do with social norms and other bullshit ideas. The fact is, boys/men are different from girls/women. While there are exceptions to gender preferences, we see those show up in these stats, girls/women don't prefer STEM courses, and boys/men do not prefer teaching kindergarten, but there are some who do.
The great thing about America, which the SJW can't seem to wrap their heads around, is that we are Free to choose, rather be imposed upon by SJW ideals. At least for now. The fact is, "Norms" are that way for a reason, something that obviously offends SJWs to no end.
When "Trump 2016" = Hate Speech, that label has lost all meaning.
No, I am not voting for him, he is a douchebag. But when Precious Snowflakes can't handle a few chalk marks without running off to the Campus President, and he caves (of sorts) I weep for our country!
The articles also miss the other point, which is so many other inventions were just "toys" and never really amounted to anything at all. We tend to forget Failures, discarding them along the way.
I would disagree with Newton. It was an idea ahead of its time, regardless of implementation. We are using the Great Grandson of Newton today, they are called iPads.
The technology wasn't ready for what Newton promised at that time.
They aren't moving to Mexico, because Mexico has very strong anti-immigration policy (and a wall on its southern border). Foreign nationals cannot really own much property either. And for those that think VZ, ATT, TMO and Sprint are bad, they should see the Mexican Telecom system.
First, Bernie is acting like, money belongs to the state, who allows you to keep some of it. Everything after that assumption is irrelevant.
Second, Capital Gains are only ONE of the many Tax increases Bernie has suggested, to the tune of 18 TRILLION dollars. Yes, Bernie is a socialist/communist disguised as a Democrat, see point #1
Taxes, all of them, are regressive. The rich can and will avoid them, the poor and middle classes cannot.
Notice, nobody is protesting Bernies 18 Trillion in proposed new taxes. Because people are more afraid of imaginary issues with Trump than real issues with Bernie.
I am an asshole, because I don't value peoples feelings as much as I do their actions. When people say "you hurt that person's feelings" I say "Yeah, but not hurting their feelings would hurt my feelings", making sure they know that being an asshole is really easy.
Slashdot Mirror
Which means, they have their transponders on, and ATC knows what they are up to.
My problem with this, is our government seems to think it is free to do what it wants. It does not.
My bigger problem with this, is that the people more or less believe that we don't have a choice in our government's activities. We live in a defacto surveilence state, mainly because we accept it as "normal". We are in a tyranny of security, because we are not longer the land of the free, home of the brave. Especially when the presence of chalk is cause for panic among the snowflakes attending college.
The difference between a "joint checking" and separated accounts is merely a formality and not one of any real significance. Pretending it is enough separation is functionally idiotic.
None of her emails were "MARKED" classified. Markings of themselves does not make the emails classified or not. But hey, keep parroting irrelevant information as that always works.
Classifications are well established, and Clinton was informed on her duty (as in responsibility) to maintain secrecy. You should actually read the NDA Clinton actually signed, which is fairly clear on what her responsibilities and duties were. She has breached that NDA by all reasonable measures. Of course, partisan democrats will support her all the way to conviction, and probably beyond.
Markings are irrelevant. Some information was "classified" on creation. You keep repeating this line as if it matters, it does not.
Her server was not a "government server" which means it had LESS protection, not more. Again, relevant to the story because it was also likely compromised. We don't know if it was, because it was destroyed, in a clear attempt to avoid transparency. But hey, if you're okay with it it must be okay!
Unfortunately you've been bitten by the progressive non-scientific but called Gender Neutrality which views both genders as being the same in all areas, and blaming of culture for corrupting them into gender stereotypes. Here is some scientific articles that you won't read that explain why you are not correct.
http://www.livescience.com/226...
http://www.bustle.com/articles...
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5879647...
The problem is, that we tend to take the outlier as the rule, when trying to break norms. We should accept that norms are those for a reason, while not excluding those that are outside those norms. There will be girls who like trucks, and boys that like dolls. Blaming stereotypes solves nothing and doesn't actually progress understanding.
Yeah, because discussing the nature of Hilary's insecure email with a shit-tonne of classified and beyond emails is partisan. But Bernie has decreed it, "enough" and that isn't partisan. Got it.
Or as Bernie says "The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails"
The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails
Wow. The ONLY person I see advocating gassing of Mexicans is you. I realize that you're trying to make some sort of snarky comment on Trump, but how would you feel if I said "Kill all the babies" in response to Hillary's Abortion stance?
Yeah the difference is that Hillary has said she supports killing unborn babies (as she calls them), while Trump hasn't said anything close to "Gas the Mexicans".
Pick on Trump all you want, but make sure it is something real, not imaginary.
How about a higher pitched "cow bell" ??
Indeed I am. Research suggests it is mostly due to negative stereotypes and only somewhat unfounded fears of being suspected of paedophilia.
We call that Male Privileged. Nobody cares about that side of things, even you.
Indeed I am. I haven't had much time to look into this
Mutually exclusive statement, rendering the excuse false. If you were interested, you would have ALREADY looked into it. You haven't, so I can presume that you're not that interested.
Indeed I am. I'd say this one is less about employment and more about the portrayal of women in fashion and advertisin
I'd say you don't have a clue what you're talking about so you're winging the answer based upon your own biases.
Incorrect. It's more of an institutional problem. ... it's just a legacy of millennia of history.
Actually, it isn't an institutional problem. It is a Gender difference problem. It is why girls tend to prefer dolls to trucks, and boys tend to prefer trucks to dolls. It doesn't have to do with social norms and other bullshit ideas. The fact is, boys/men are different from girls/women. While there are exceptions to gender preferences, we see those show up in these stats, girls/women don't prefer STEM courses, and boys/men do not prefer teaching kindergarten, but there are some who do.
The great thing about America, which the SJW can't seem to wrap their heads around, is that we are Free to choose, rather be imposed upon by SJW ideals. At least for now. The fact is, "Norms" are that way for a reason, something that obviously offends SJWs to no end.
What we need, is a new standard that standardizes all the other standards ...
https://xkcd.com/927/
When "Trump 2016" = Hate Speech, that label has lost all meaning.
No, I am not voting for him, he is a douchebag. But when Precious Snowflakes can't handle a few chalk marks without running off to the Campus President, and he caves (of sorts) I weep for our country!
Because ... statistics.
And this is the reason why people go broke, because they think everything is flat, when it is linear (or worse, log).
The articles also miss the other point, which is so many other inventions were just "toys" and never really amounted to anything at all. We tend to forget Failures, discarding them along the way.
I would disagree with Newton. It was an idea ahead of its time, regardless of implementation. We are using the Great Grandson of Newton today, they are called iPads.
The technology wasn't ready for what Newton promised at that time.
What is the option?
Vote for Bernie, because "bread lines are good" ? (yes, he said that)
Vote for Clinton, because "we didn't lose a single person in Libya" ?
The American people are just plain stupid. I blame public "education"
They aren't moving to Mexico, because Mexico has very strong anti-immigration policy (and a wall on its southern border). Foreign nationals cannot really own much property either. And for those that think VZ, ATT, TMO and Sprint are bad, they should see the Mexican Telecom system.
First, Bernie is acting like, money belongs to the state, who allows you to keep some of it. Everything after that assumption is irrelevant.
Second, Capital Gains are only ONE of the many Tax increases Bernie has suggested, to the tune of 18 TRILLION dollars. Yes, Bernie is a socialist/communist disguised as a Democrat, see point #1
Taxes, all of them, are regressive. The rich can and will avoid them, the poor and middle classes cannot.
Another meaningless "protest".
Notice, nobody is protesting Bernies 18 Trillion in proposed new taxes. Because people are more afraid of imaginary issues with Trump than real issues with Bernie.
Red Headed (Red Start)
Blonde (white star)
Brunette (Blackhole)
MAC addresses are now world wide routable, using IPV6. Its actually part of the Spec.
There are ways around this, that are also built into the spec, but just wanted people to know.
Enough about that damn email server already!
3) Culture is under assault. There are a shit ton of people out there who eschew culture as being some sort of "ist"
Thank you! I'm a gold star Asshole. Best result so far. Shooting for Platinum and then Onyx, but those are really hard to get.
I am an asshole, because I don't value peoples feelings as much as I do their actions. When people say "you hurt that person's feelings" I say "Yeah, but not hurting their feelings would hurt my feelings", making sure they know that being an asshole is really easy.
Non-assholes won't get it.