Here is the problem, you've basically described security through obscurity.
But here is what I know about ID. It has to be public info in order to verify you are who you say you are. YOU are NOT your ID.
The problem with ID, is that it assumes the person with the ID, is the person being Identified. It puts no responsibility upon the person who is trying to verify identity from ID.Here is my solution. Make ID the responsibility of the person verifying identity, not the person who is being identified.
Someone goes in to get a loan, the bank needs to make sure the person is who they say they are, and if they are not, are liable. So when ID thief comes in with my info, and says they are me, and takes out a loan as me, that I am NOT responsible for that transaction (as it is today, and why LifeLock makes a mint). I shouldn't have to repair anything when someone presents themselves fraudulently as me.
People have no idea how much of their business is at risk when it is in the cloud. Cloud works for BIG Corps, not your average Small business. The problem is, that a Big Corp has the resources to build out its own tailor made "Cloud" infrastructure, and doesn't need the cost of Azure or whatever.Unless you need the scaling on demand that the Cloud Offers, then you're likely not going to see a benefit cost wise.
Actually, the only people caught hacking the elections have been the DNC. The Russians just exposed that which many of us already believed to be true, as the truth. The problem is, that the truth is worse than even we understood.
I am not sure how anyone could be a Democrat, let alone vote for Hillary after this.
Yes. Insanity is doing the same thing expecting different results. This is different, doing something different expecting different results.
The problem is, that the results will be exactly the same as previously outlined, because the people running the country, aren't really the ones running the country. They are figureheads using elections to pretend to be in power, all to gain wealth and fame. Nobody but Politicians can take an under 200K job and milk it for hundreds of millions of dollars. If that isn't the sign of corruption, I don't know what would be.
People are upset because he basically confessed to molesting women,
I understand. Where was the outrage against Clinton for raping women? Where is the outrage against Hillary for going after the women (plural) actually accusing Bill of unwanted sexual advances.
What I don't understand is the fake outrage at Trump by all those that ignored Bill Clinton's predatory nature. Some of us are outraged at the obvious double standard (or complete lack thereof) here.
NO, this isn't support of Donald, this is more "I can't believe anyone is falling for this bullshit" and "I can't believe Gary Johnson isn't running away with this election". That being said, Character stopped being an issue with both the Clintons, so pretending it matters with Trump is simply hypocrisy of the highest level by those that are supporting Hillary.
I can go to death valley, and come back alive. Philly as well, though Chicago might be more of a gamble, but still.
Going to mars is a one way ticket, just to say "I did it first" and have some monument built back here on earth to you. Which is why egotistical maniacs like BHO and Richard Branson are prime targets to go. Let them waste their Billions.
Meanwhile, I would much rather see something like HyperLink built with the money, which would benefit more people more immediately.
CM lost all credibility when it did two things, and nobody will trust them after that.
1) Microsoft deal 2) Screwed OnePlus over
As for #1, why would anybody trust CM after making a deal with the devil, in an attempt to wrest control of Android from Google. Especially to Microsoft?
As for #2, why would any Vendor trust CM after they tossed aside one (if not their first) customer for "big market in India" (one that never really panned out no less).
Sorry, but CM did this to themselves, by burning whatever good will and street cred they had in very short order. The only shame is that they haven't died off yet. My guess is that like Nokia, MS will end up buying whats left of CM from pennies on the dollar, and kill it off like Nokia.
Its only illegal if you get caught. There is very little chance(if any at all) of getting caught. Risk is low, reward is high, game the system until it changes.
Speeding is not typically a criminal activity. It has its own classification. Because it is "other than criminal" activity, it typically does not show up on a Criminal record as a crime. Murder, is a crime and a felony. Shoplifting is a minor crime, and is more akin to something that would have made a better comparison, because stealing, even something small, many (most??) people wouldn't do, even if the reward was substantial. Unless there is a riot going on nearby.
So, to be competent you just need to claim one of the three? She has the knowledge but completely lacks the skills (proven).
Or if you're just being pedantic, I would suggest to you that it takes all three, being rough synonyms of each other. So, knowledge without skill or ability is like having someone reading a Medical Book on brain surgery, thinking they can be a brain surgeon.
She has neither necessary skill or abilty (proven) even if she has the knowledge (debatable, with all her "I don't remember" moments during depositions).
I Noticed you can't (or didn't) name three accomplishments as Secretary of State. Not that I am a supporter of Trump, but he is more qualified than a Junior Senator from Illinois was just 8 years ago. I didn't think we could have a worse candidate that BHO was 8 years ago, but somehow, we managed to pull it off with two that are absolutely worse.
Lastly, if everyone who admits that Trump and Clinton are gawd awful candidates actually voted for Johnson, he would win... in a landslide.
You call privilege a bad thing, when I am trying to extend it to people who don't have it. You'd rather the inner city blacks remain uneducated with the status quo, rather than learn something and free themselves from the plantation of the DNC.
Here is a thought. Replace it with vouchers which can be used by any accredited school.
Let the parents decide if the inner city school is serving their kids well by keeping the status quo that is sucking the life out of kids who want to learn, but can't.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in a special school for "Really Smart People" that doesn't ignore the smart kids in favor of the trouble makers and idiots.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid into a School for the Arts and Music.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in "Math and Sciences" based school.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in the school for Snowflakes, Emos and Wallflowers, Computer in a wall (https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_shows_how_kids_teach_themselves?language=en) or Green families, or Computer Nerds or.... whatever
Oh, I don't know, let the parents decide what school their kid deserves to be in. Hell you can even give vouchers worth "extra" to those with "Special needs" where they get to spend the money the way they think their kid needs.
Saying "Yeah, that's what I thought" shows dismissive answer to real problems that need addressing. Any and all protests against voucher or programs like that is that it might destroy public schools. Well, if they can't handle (compete) against better schools, then they should die. The most common answer by the anti Voucher people is "Yeah our schools suck, but you shouldn't have a choice because you might choose something I don't like for your kid"
Slashdot Mirror
Here is the problem, you've basically described security through obscurity.
But here is what I know about ID. It has to be public info in order to verify you are who you say you are. YOU are NOT your ID.
The problem with ID, is that it assumes the person with the ID, is the person being Identified. It puts no responsibility upon the person who is trying to verify identity from ID.Here is my solution. Make ID the responsibility of the person verifying identity, not the person who is being identified.
Someone goes in to get a loan, the bank needs to make sure the person is who they say they are, and if they are not, are liable. So when ID thief comes in with my info, and says they are me, and takes out a loan as me, that I am NOT responsible for that transaction (as it is today, and why LifeLock makes a mint). I shouldn't have to repair anything when someone presents themselves fraudulently as me.
Haven't you been paying attention to the Wikileaks? The press is part of the Hillary Campaign staff.
Hey, three more Clinton supporters said Trump groped them. Are you tired of Hillary and Donald yet?
Vote Gary Johnson.
The price of living in OC is huge part of why people don't live there.
People have no idea how much of their business is at risk when it is in the cloud. Cloud works for BIG Corps, not your average Small business. The problem is, that a Big Corp has the resources to build out its own tailor made "Cloud" infrastructure, and doesn't need the cost of Azure or whatever.Unless you need the scaling on demand that the Cloud Offers, then you're likely not going to see a benefit cost wise.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...
Yeah, DNC doesn't commit voter fraud. We have no proof. yada yada yada.
And I am not voting for Trump. Here is a very good reason why you shouldn't either. And it has nothing to do with Hillary or Trump ;)
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g...
Actually, the only people caught hacking the elections have been the DNC. The Russians just exposed that which many of us already believed to be true, as the truth. The problem is, that the truth is worse than even we understood.
I am not sure how anyone could be a Democrat, let alone vote for Hillary after this.
(NO, I am NOT voting for Trump)
Yes. Insanity is doing the same thing expecting different results. This is different, doing something different expecting different results.
The problem is, that the results will be exactly the same as previously outlined, because the people running the country, aren't really the ones running the country. They are figureheads using elections to pretend to be in power, all to gain wealth and fame. Nobody but Politicians can take an under 200K job and milk it for hundreds of millions of dollars. If that isn't the sign of corruption, I don't know what would be.
It isn't moral equivalency I am talking about. It is immoral equivalency,
You support Clinton's Immorality more than you support Trumps. I get it. ;)
People are upset because he basically confessed to molesting women,
I understand. Where was the outrage against Clinton for raping women? Where is the outrage against Hillary for going after the women (plural) actually accusing Bill of unwanted sexual advances.
What I don't understand is the fake outrage at Trump by all those that ignored Bill Clinton's predatory nature. Some of us are outraged at the obvious double standard (or complete lack thereof) here.
NO, this isn't support of Donald, this is more "I can't believe anyone is falling for this bullshit" and "I can't believe Gary Johnson isn't running away with this election". That being said, Character stopped being an issue with both the Clintons, so pretending it matters with Trump is simply hypocrisy of the highest level by those that are supporting Hillary.
That's a dumb name for a spaceship to Mars. Lame
Like the sex scandals destroyed Clinton?
Meanwhile words will destroy Trump.
I can go to death valley, and come back alive. Philly as well, though Chicago might be more of a gamble, but still.
Going to mars is a one way ticket, just to say "I did it first" and have some monument built back here on earth to you. Which is why egotistical maniacs like BHO and Richard Branson are prime targets to go. Let them waste their Billions.
Meanwhile, I would much rather see something like HyperLink built with the money, which would benefit more people more immediately.
CM lost all credibility when it did two things, and nobody will trust them after that.
1) Microsoft deal
2) Screwed OnePlus over
As for #1, why would anybody trust CM after making a deal with the devil, in an attempt to wrest control of Android from Google. Especially to Microsoft?
As for #2, why would any Vendor trust CM after they tossed aside one (if not their first) customer for "big market in India" (one that never really panned out no less).
Sorry, but CM did this to themselves, by burning whatever good will and street cred they had in very short order. The only shame is that they haven't died off yet. My guess is that like Nokia, MS will end up buying whats left of CM from pennies on the dollar, and kill it off like Nokia.
Its only illegal if you get caught. There is very little chance(if any at all) of getting caught. Risk is low, reward is high, game the system until it changes.
Have you watched the Clintons? "I can't recall" would be the best answer, but check with them first.
Speeding is not typically a criminal activity. It has its own classification. Because it is "other than criminal" activity, it typically does not show up on a Criminal record as a crime. Murder, is a crime and a felony. Shoplifting is a minor crime, and is more akin to something that would have made a better comparison, because stealing, even something small, many (most??) people wouldn't do, even if the reward was substantial. Unless there is a riot going on nearby.
ethics review boards
Lawyers have ethics? Well color me surprised!
If you want to talk about "white privilege" .. Chelsea is the poster child.
Yeah, Clinton's Scandals are approaching 30 years long now, and everyone knows she is a corrupt politician who will say anything to get elected.
Scandal for Trump = "saying things" Exciting and titillating
Scandal for Clintons = "doing things' Really Boring shit.
That, and the MSM has been bankrolling the Clinton campaign for over a year.
So, to be competent you just need to claim one of the three? She has the knowledge but completely lacks the skills (proven).
Or if you're just being pedantic, I would suggest to you that it takes all three, being rough synonyms of each other. So, knowledge without skill or ability is like having someone reading a Medical Book on brain surgery, thinking they can be a brain surgeon.
She has neither necessary skill or abilty (proven) even if she has the knowledge (debatable, with all her "I don't remember" moments during depositions).
I Noticed you can't (or didn't) name three accomplishments as Secretary of State. Not that I am a supporter of Trump, but he is more qualified than a Junior Senator from Illinois was just 8 years ago. I didn't think we could have a worse candidate that BHO was 8 years ago, but somehow, we managed to pull it off with two that are absolutely worse.
Lastly, if everyone who admits that Trump and Clinton are gawd awful candidates actually voted for Johnson, he would win ... in a landslide.
Name her top three successes she has had as Senator or Secretary of State. Don't look them up, just name the first three off the top of your head?
I won't hold my breath. I really don't think "Competent" is the word you're looking for. She lacks ability and skill. Knowledge isn't enough.
You call privilege a bad thing, when I am trying to extend it to people who don't have it. You'd rather the inner city blacks remain uneducated with the status quo, rather than learn something and free themselves from the plantation of the DNC.
You have no idea how ignorant you really sound.
Here is a thought. Replace it with vouchers which can be used by any accredited school.
Let the parents decide if the inner city school is serving their kids well by keeping the status quo that is sucking the life out of kids who want to learn, but can't.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in a special school for "Really Smart People" that doesn't ignore the smart kids in favor of the trouble makers and idiots.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid into a School for the Arts and Music.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in "Math and Sciences" based school.
Let the parents decide if they want to put their kid in the school for Snowflakes, Emos and Wallflowers, Computer in a wall (https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_shows_how_kids_teach_themselves?language=en) or Green families, or Computer Nerds or .... whatever
Oh, I don't know, let the parents decide what school their kid deserves to be in. Hell you can even give vouchers worth "extra" to those with "Special needs" where they get to spend the money the way they think their kid needs.
Saying "Yeah, that's what I thought" shows dismissive answer to real problems that need addressing. Any and all protests against voucher or programs like that is that it might destroy public schools. Well, if they can't handle (compete) against better schools, then they should die. The most common answer by the anti Voucher people is "Yeah our schools suck, but you shouldn't have a choice because you might choose something I don't like for your kid"
Or runs an email server in her basement with all sorts of classified material on it, so secure that not even congress can see whats in some of it.
it makes him badly equipped to comment thoughtfully on the real world
This is the same "real world" that presents us two completely deplorable choices for President.