there's something troubling about government agencies, on taxpayer funds, driving private firms out of business.
What private firms have been driven out of business here? The ones that have been given $45M of taxpayer money? I don't see anything in the article about companies going out of business. Sorry if i missed it.
Golf clap for a master job the GOP did getting people to vote against their own best interests. Bravo, my friends.
Credit would be due if it were somehow 'hard' to fool people. As Mark Twain (allegedly) said, "It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled."
Of course, once you know what generation someone is from, you're pretty much done and you don't need to know anything else about them. Because people from a particular generation are all the same. Solid thinking there bud.
Riiiiiiight, and those shows are written, filmed and edited right before they go on the air. No up-front work has to be done with writing scipts, since those pretty much write themselves, huh?
Considering how I finally had to stop watching TWD this season, it sometimes sure seems like it.
It's the same argument that governments use to break into your computer: "think of the children! Maybe that computer we break into has child porn! Would you disagree that we need to stop child porn?" Breaking into computers and stealing e-mail is illegal. People who do that should be arrested. Nobody is murdering babies; saying "but what if they murder babies?" is not an excuse.
The US government should be constrained by US law. The Russian government is not.
Russian law is whatever Putin wants it to be. They are perfectly constrained by this.
There was plenty of circumstantial evidence, and that's what nailed Nixon to the wall. It wasn't merely that he tried to coverup the Administration's involvement in the break-in, it's that there was enough *indirect* evidence, including the tape erasure (and the ridiculous explanation for how it happened) to point a finger pretty firmly at Nixon being at the heart of the whole affair. The kind of weasel language Nixon defenders always bring up was getting pretty old even by the time of his resignation. Certainly no one in Congress actually believed any of it.
He was just unfortunate not to have a volunteer propaganda apparatus on the internet. He'd be fine nowadays. They'd just call the whole affair 'fake news' and move on.
Yeah this usage of 'if not' should have two adjectives that are the same but different in degree (it was cold, if not freezing). These mean totally different things (smart and faulty?!). Bad communication.
Slashdot Mirror
That's your 'refutation'? They made it up? lol. They have credibility, you don't, enjoy your frustrated irrelevance. DM almost certainly exists.
It also means that there's still wiggle room for those who are certain that it doesn't exist.
There appears to be a whole anti-DM subculture. Strong on here. Pretty fucking weird to be honest.
Are you really going to ignore this the next time your representatives run for re-election?
And the answer will be: ignore what?
To be fair, if he did, it would have been quite bizarre to say the least.
You realise you're basically announcing yourself as a closeted homosexual right?
there's something troubling about government agencies, on taxpayer funds, driving private firms out of business.
What private firms have been driven out of business here? The ones that have been given $45M of taxpayer money? I don't see anything in the article about companies going out of business. Sorry if i missed it.
You should have pasted a link or something, because you seem to be the only one saying that.
Golf clap for a master job the GOP did getting people to vote against their own best interests. Bravo, my friends.
Credit would be due if it were somehow 'hard' to fool people. As Mark Twain (allegedly) said, "It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled."
Yes, I use actual examples to form my opinion of the world.
In my experience, fire is always hot, water is always wet, criminals are always criminals.
--XYZZY--
So you're incapable of nuanced thought. Well done you.
Somehow I not excited when I then see show how they get a free education to then work in the computer industry and yet I had to pay for mine.
Sounds like you should seek a refund.
Of course, once you know what generation someone is from, you're pretty much done and you don't need to know anything else about them. Because people from a particular generation are all the same. Solid thinking there bud.
Yeah. It's not quite up there with announcing you're vegan but it sure does seem to be a point of pride for people. Well done them.
Riiiiiiight, and those shows are written, filmed and edited right before they go on the air. No up-front work has to be done with writing scipts, since those pretty much write themselves, huh?
Considering how I finally had to stop watching TWD this season, it sometimes sure seems like it.
Most/All new Netflix, Amazon and Hulu programs are produced under WGA;
I cannot for the life of me figure out what the World Canadian Bureau have to do with all this.
Do the writers want more munneh? Maybe some of that internet munneh?
You made the statement, so it must be true right?
That deception just so happen to not work out in the primary election.
lol, all the pollsters are part of the conspiracy too? Jesus Christ, if that rabbit hole goes any deeper you're coming out in fucking Australia.
Trump still doesn't have anything up on whitehouse.gov about these issues from what I can tell.
This is slashdot. Climate change is an evil hippy/chinese conspiracy etc.
Every liberal stood up and told us that this was completely impossible.
lol. Bush stole the election in 2000. Go ahead and link 'every liberal'. Dumb fuck.
It's the same argument that governments use to break into your computer: "think of the children! Maybe that computer we break into has child porn! Would you disagree that we need to stop child porn?" Breaking into computers and stealing e-mail is illegal. People who do that should be arrested. Nobody is murdering babies; saying "but what if they murder babies?" is not an excuse.
The US government should be constrained by US law. The Russian government is not.
Russian law is whatever Putin wants it to be. They are perfectly constrained by this.
The Globalist agenda marches on.
That's a dog whistle for Jews, right?
And you have any proof that this was Assad's making?
Evidence? Ample amounts. Evidence that you would accept? None, of course. No such evidence exists even in principle.
And he has yet to return Alaska back to Russia, which was illegally sold by the Emperer Alexander II against the will of the Russian people.
There is nowhere on Earth that was illegally acquired that is going back to its original owners.
There was plenty of circumstantial evidence, and that's what nailed Nixon to the wall. It wasn't merely that he tried to coverup the Administration's involvement in the break-in, it's that there was enough *indirect* evidence, including the tape erasure (and the ridiculous explanation for how it happened) to point a finger pretty firmly at Nixon being at the heart of the whole affair. The kind of weasel language Nixon defenders always bring up was getting pretty old even by the time of his resignation. Certainly no one in Congress actually believed any of it.
He was just unfortunate not to have a volunteer propaganda apparatus on the internet. He'd be fine nowadays. They'd just call the whole affair 'fake news' and move on.
...should of...would of...
You are a moron and your opinion is invalid. Figures you're WITH HER.
You appear to be suggesting that Trump supporters have better spelling and grammar than non-Trump supporters.
LOL.
Yeah this usage of 'if not' should have two adjectives that are the same but different in degree (it was cold, if not freezing). These mean totally different things (smart and faulty?!). Bad communication.